FIGURE 2-39 LITTLE SISTER BAY AND MCRAE FARM SHIFT

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "FIGURE 2-39 LITTLE SISTER BAY AND MCRAE FARM SHIFT"

Silvia Simmons
5 years ago
Views:

1 F I I 9 I 17 FI K I V J Z V I I Z F I I Q I V V I I I I I V J J J I F FI V I V K I I I I Z cae Farm I 41 K K I I I I 6 I 7 I I I I J Q I 7 V I ecan ointe 6 apway I K KI V arolina ay K KI K F F I odified lignment riginal lignment asement I 0 egend 2,000 4,000 Feet hapter 2. evelopment of lternatives - FI 2-39 I I F IF 2-80

2 V I FI FI 7 91 K K I I F V I Ketchuptown F F I I QI ,000 Feet hapter 2. evelopment of lternatives 2,000 I odified lignment riginal lignment 0 F egend K K - K I FI 2-40 K IF 2-81

3 multitude of comments were received from individual property owners that requested shifts in the vicinity of their homes. In all cases, the suggestions were evaluated. owever, in the majority of cases the modification would simply shift the potential impacts from one property owner to another. For example, it was suggested to move the interchange at.. oute 41, near Zion, 400 feet to the north to avoid potential impacts to a property owner. he modification was not made because it would have impacted 14 additional residences. nother example was a comment received from a farmer near.. oute 22 that suggested a potential shift. he modification would have impacted an additional 3.6 acres of wetlands and would have shifted the potential impact from one property owner to another. Following the evaluation of the proposed modifications, the referred lternative was requantified and a summary of the impacts is presented in able 2.17 on page hat is the estimated cost of the referred lternative? he estimated cost to construct the referred lternative was determined in 2006 dollars, and then factored up by six percent per year to the ears 2011 and he total estimated cost for lternative 3, the referred lternative, is $964 million in In 2011 the estimated cost would be $1.290 billion and $1.726 billion in hapter 2. evelopment of lternatives 2-82

4 his page intentionally left blank hapter 2. evelopment of lternatives

able 2.17 F V I IX F F V lternative 3) I - F F I II II I ystem inkage conomic evelopment urricane vacuation ocal raffic ongestion ultimodal lanning ength iles 43.

5 able 2.17 F V I IX F F V lternative 3) I - F F I II II I ystem inkage conomic evelopment urricane vacuation ocal raffic ongestion ultimodal lanning ength iles 43.5 esign riteria eets/oes ot eet eets onstructability cale highest) 1 onstruction ost ear 2011) ear 2011 ollars illions) hreatened and ndangered pecies es #) / o o pecies of oncern es #) / o o etlands cres Fill cres ridge cres 24.2 etland Quality Value 1,510.8 treams Fill Value 1,378.9 ridge Value otal rossings # of rossings inear Feet) 22 3,860) erennial # of rossings inear Feet) 13 3,155) Intermittent # of rossings inear Feet) 9 705) ater Quality utstanding esource ater # of rossings 3 303d) Impaired # of rossings 0 abitat nique o atural pland ommunities cres Floodplains cres azardous aterial ites # 0 arks and ildlife efuges es #) / o 1 istorical tructures es #) / o 0 oise = esidential) # 13 Farmland cres 1,915 rime cres 1,186 tatewide Important cres 729 ommunity Impacts cale least impact) 2 otal elocations # 78 esidential elocations # 74 ommercial and overnment Facility elocations # 4 3, 1) nvironmental Justice es / o o irports # 0 Fire tations # 0 chools # 0 hurches # 0 emeteries # 0 = ommercial, =overnment es es es es es hapter 2. evelopment of lternatives 2-84

Capitol Region Council of Governments (CRCOG)

Capitol Region Council of Governments (CRCOG) apitol egion ouncil of Governments G elocation of - nterchange and idening of - and oute / to - artford and ast artford onnecticut tate roject o - ctober roject eam epartment of ransportation: Gregory