Elizabeth C. Weatherhead, PhD University of Colorado at Boulder. April, 2005 Revised October, Report to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
|
|
- Marlene Patrick
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Task (e) Report, Contract 4D-888-WTSA: Submitted for APM 227 Report on Geographic and Seasonal Variability of Solar UV Radiation Affecting Human and Ecological Health Elizabeth C. Weatherhead, PhD University of Colorado at Boulder April, 2 Revised October, 26 Report to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Task (e) Compare the UV-B flux measurements with the predictions of the National Weather Service Ozone Watch Program, together with an analysis of the differences and potential causes for the discrepancies These results have been peer-reviewed through a process supervised by EPA. Cooperative Institute for Research in the Environmental Sciences University of Colorado at Boulder 32 Broadway Boulder, CO 83 betsy.weatherhead@colorado.edu +1 (33)
2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency s Ultraviolet (UV) Monitoring Program began collecting data using Brewer instruments at various national park and urban sites in 199. This report compares UV Index forecasts released by the National Weather Service with Brewer UV measurements at each of the sites. The National Weather Service and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency forecast a UV Index value for each day for several cities and locations across the U.S. The UV Index is computed according to criteria developed by the World Meteorological Organization (WMO). The prediction provides an estimate of the daily high UV irradiance for a particular location, and is based on estimates of total column ozone and cloudiness. Of 4,474 days of Brewer measurements, over 3,811 days are identified as good for comparison to the UV index. For each location, the daytime integrated values and the NWS UV Index forecasts are compared. The results are presented both in terms of correlation coefficients and absolute differences and indicate very good agreement. For mid and high-latitude locations, the correlations between the UV index forecasts and the daily measured UV levels are extremely high, ranging from.87 to.97. This extremely high agreement is impressive given the difficulty in predicting clouds and the fact that total column ozone measurements were missing for some periods of time, requiring climatological values to be used. For the low-latitude sites at Virgin Islands, Hawaii, Everglades, and Big Bend, the correlations are roughly between.6 and.8. This good agreement is surprising given that cloud estimates are not provided for the National Weather Service predictions of UV levels at two of the locations, and that clouds are difficult to predict in most locations. The differences between UV index values and measured UV values suggest a very strong seasonal dependence, with the highest differences generally observed in the summer. The standard deviation of the differences was generally around one UV Index value. These values are summarized for each site. In a few cases, the UV index values were observed to be systematically high and the mean deviation was also high (1.49 and 2.46) compared to the measurements. This bias occurred at the two locations Virgin Islands and Hawaii where the UV index predictions did not include cloud estimates and were therefore expected to be high relative to the actual measurements. Overall, the agreement between the NWS-predicted values and the Brewer measurements was surprisingly good. The results support the usefulness of the measurements in verifying and potentially improving the NWS UV Index forecasts. The high correlations demonstrate both the skill of the UV Index forecasts and the high quality of the Brewer measurements. 2
3 3
4 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction and Background page 4 2. Description of National Weather Service UV Index page 3. Description of UV Dose Calculations page 7 4. Methods page 8 Quality Assurance page 8 Computation of NWS and Brewer UV Values page 14 Comparison of NWS forecasts and Brewer Measurements page 2. Detailed Site Analyses for All 21 Brewer Locations page Intercomparison of Results for All 21 Brewer Locations page Conclusion page 8. References page 7 4
5 1. Introduction and Background Task (e) compare the UV-B flux measurements with the predictions of the National Weather Service Ozone Watch Program, together with an analysis of the differences and discrepancies is one of several tasks defined by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to analyze measurements from the network of ultraviolet radiation instruments operated by EPA and the University of Georgia (UGA) in collaboration with the National Park Service (NPS). Other tasks address different elements of UV-B exposure and effects, and the results of those tasks are summarized in the individual task reports. The tasks defined by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency at the start of the project are as follows: (a) Determine the trends in UV-B flux at the individual Brewer sites, at groups of similar sites and/or across the network. (b) Analyze the factors affecting the observations and trends at each site (and across the network, as appropriate) including correlations with changes in the ozone column, changes in stratospheric ozone, changes in ground level ozone, changes attributable to other pollutants or atmospheric constituents, etc. (c) Analyze the major factors affecting the UV-B flux, including solar angle, latitude, elevation, cloud cover, pollution levels and composition, etc. (d) Analyze the direct versus indirect exposures to UV-B radiation and the factors affecting the ratio. (e) Compare the UV-B flux measurements with the predictions of the National Weather Service Ozone Watch Program, together with an analysis of the differences and potential causes for the discrepancies. (f) Compare the Brewer UV-B measurements with that of the Tropospheric Ultraviolet (TUV) Model, Total Ozone Mapping Spectrometer (TOMS) measurements, and provide an analysis of the differences of those measurements and the causes of those differences. (g) Compare the UV-B measurements with air pollution measurements to determine the effects of tropospheric air pollution on UV-B exposures. (h) Compare trends in UV-B flux measured by the network at mid-latitudes in the United States to United National Environmental Program (UNEP) data.
6 (i) Determine the effect of clouds/haze/aerosols on UV-B exposure. (j) Analyze the directional diffuse (cloudless) sky irradiance in the nm (UV- B and 32-4nm (UV-A) wavelength bands as a function of aerosol optical depth. (k) Analyze the directional diffuse sky irradiance in the 29-4nm (UV-B and UV- A) wavelength band as a function of cloud cover, cloud type, cloud depth. (l) Analyze the reflectance (spectral albedo) for key materials (snow, beach sand, concrete, asphalt and water) in the 29nm-4nm (UV-B and UV-A) wavelength band, as appropriate for the network measurement sites. (m) Analyze the bi-directional reflectance (forward-scattering and back-scattering) for key materials (snow, beach sand, concrete, asphalt and water) in the 29nm 4nm (UV-B and UV-A) wavelength band, as appropriate for the network. Task (e) compares the Brewer UV-B flux measurements with predictions from the National Weather Service s ozone/uv prediction program. The National Weather Service has used ozone values to produce daily forecasts of the UV Index (UVI) for major U.S. cities for the past ten years. This report will compare the UV-B flux values measured by the Brewer instruments with the archived UVI forecasts obtained by National Weather Service personnel. 2. Description of National Weather Service UV Index The National Weather Service and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency teamed up in 1994 to produce standardized UV Index forecasts for major cities across the United States. Canada had actually started producing UV Index forecasts in 1992, and similar products were being developed in many other countries. Two World Meteorological Organization Meetings of the Experts in 1994 and 1997 helped define the term UV Index (UVI) and develop standards for producing forecasts. A follow-up meeting by the World Health Organization in 21 further refined the UV Index definition in the context of health messages and exposure categories, and many countries have now switched over to this standard (WHO, 22). The U.S. adopted this new worldwide standard in 24 (Long, 23). The National Weather Service/U.S. Environmental Protection Agency UV Index forecasts are made for noontime of the following day. The archived forecast values can be compared with noontime measurements from the Brewer instruments to evaluate the accuracy of the forecasts. The UVI predictions are made for all major urban areas and 6
7 regions across the U.S., so the predictions can be compared with data collected at each of the 21 Brewer sites. The procedures for computing the UV Index are summarized by both the National Weather and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. In the U.S., the UV Index is computed using forecasted ozone levels, a computer model that relates ozone levels to UV incidence (incoming radiation level) on the ground, forecasted cloud amounts, and the elevation of the forecast cities. Other countries also incorporate ground observations into the forecast estimates. As reported in NWS and U.S. EPA documents (see, for instance, sunwise/uvcalc.html), the UV Index calculation starts with measurements of current total ozone amounts for the entire globe, obtained via two satellites operated by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). These data are used to produce a forecast of ozone levels for the next day at various points around the country. A radiative transfer model is then used to determine the amount of UV radiation reaching the ground from 29 to 4 nm in wavelength (representing the full spectrum of UV wavelengths), using the time of day (solar noon), day of year, and latitude. This resulting irradiance estimates are weighted according to how human skin responds to each wavelength. The wavelength weighting is important because people need increased protection from wavelengths that harm skin than from wavelengths that do not damage people's skin. The weighting function is called the McKinlay-Diffey erythemal action spectrum, and is the action spectrum for human response adopted by the Commission Internationale de l'eclairage (CIE) (CIE, 1998). This weighting process is described in more detail below. The weighted irradiances are then integrated over the 29 to 4 nm range resulting in a value representing the total effect a given day's UV radiation will have on skin. In producing the UV Index, the weighted irradiance estimates are then adjusted for the effects of elevation and clouds. UV at the surface increases about 6 percent per kilometer above sea level. Clear skies allow 1 percent of the incoming UV radiation from the sun to reach the surface, whereas scattered clouds transmit 89 percent, broken clouds transmit 73 percent, and overcast conditions transmit only 31 percent. Once adjusted for elevation and clouds, this value is then scaled (divided) by a conversion factor of 2 and rounded to the nearest whole number. This process results in a UV Index that usually ranges from (where there is no sun light) to the mid teens (high UV). The computation of the UV Index does not currently include the effects of variable surface reflection (e.g., sand, water, or snow), atmospheric pollutants or haze. 7
8 3. Description of UV dose calculations A comparative biologically weighted UV value can be calculated from the Brewer UV irradiance measurements. UV amounts are expressed in terms of irradiance, which denotes the energy flow per unit area reaching a surface. Irradiance can be integrated over a spectrum of interest, for instance 29 to 4 nm for UV wavelengths reaching the terrestrial environment. To compute an effective UV dose rate and a time-integrated UV dose, the UV part of the spectrum is weighted with an erythemal response spectrum. An erythemal response spectrum demonstrates the human skin-reddening sensitivity to each UV wavelength and is determined using both field and laboratory studies. For human health effects, the action spectrum most commonly used is that of McKinlay and Diffey [12], given by 1, for 2 298nm; ( ) = a { 1., where a.94 (298. ), for nm; (1) b 1., where b.1 (139. ), for328 4nm. The McKinlay-Diffey curve represents the standard erythemal action spectrum adopted by the Commission Internationale de l'eclairage (CIE) to represent the average skin response over the UV-B and UV-A regions of the spectrum (CIE, 1998). Using the McKinlay-Diffey function, the erythemal UV irradiance, or dose rate, can be written as UV erythemaldoserate 4nm 2 F( ) ( ) d, (2) where F is the spectral irradiance, is the McKinlay-Diffey action spectrum, and the product is integrated over the entire wavelength range of interest. The resulting measurement is expressed as a dose rate in units of mw m -2 (WHO, 22). Integrating these values over the length of a day provides a daytime integrated UV dose. 8
9 4. Methods Denali Quality Assurance The first step in the analysis of the spectral UV data involved a review of the available data with the scientists at UGA to determine any potential biases at particular sites. UGA personnel have put considerable effort into producing a Level 1 data product suitable for scientific use. The Level 1 data from all 21 sites were used to address several questions about the various factors influencing UV. The spectral nature of the Brewer data, as well as the large geographic coverage of the Brewer network (Figure 1), allow for an analysis of changes in UV at various wavelengths, which can provide important information about the factors affecting UV throughout the continental United States and in Alaska and Hawaii. Denali Olympic Glacier Theodore Acadia Rockymtn Boulder Sequoia Canyonlands Albuquerque Riverside Chicago Gaithersburg Shenandoah Greatsmoky Rtp Atlanta Bigbend Everglades ii Hawaii Virginislands Figure 1. The map shows the locations of instruments for the EPA Brewer UV monitoring network operated by the University of Georgia. The sites cover a large geographical area and represent a range of ecosystems. Parameters relating to UV observations and temperature characterizations at each of the Brewer sites are summarized in Table 1. Columns a through c give the latitude, longitude, elevation, and year observations were begun at each site. 9
10 Table 1. Location information for the U.S. EPA Brewer instrument network. Site (Brewer #) (a) Latitude/ Longitude (b) Elevation (c) Start Date Glacier National Park, 48.7ºN, 113.4ºW 424 m 1997 Montana (96-134) Denali National Park, 63.7ºN, 149.ºW 661 m 1997 Alaska (96-141) Olympic National Park, 48.1ºN, 123.4ºW 32 m 1997 Washington (96-147) Rocky Mountain National 4.ºN, 1.ºW 2896 m 1998 Park, Colorado (96-146) Hawaii Volcanoes National 19.42ºN,.29ºW 1243 m 1999 Park, Hawaii Boulder, CO (93-11) 4.1ºN, 1.2ºW 1689 m 1996 Gaithersburg, MD (1) 39.1ºN, 77.2ºW 43 m 1994 Acadia National Park, 44.4ºN, 68.3ºW 137 m 1998 Maine (96-138)* Everglades National Park, 2.4ºN, 8.7ºW 18 m 1997 Florida (96-13) * Chicago, IL (94-13) 41.8ºN, 87.6ºW 16 m 1999 Atlanta, GA (94-18) * 33.8ºN, 84.4ºW 91 m 1994 Research Triangle Park, 3.9ºN, 78.9ºW 14 m 199 NC (92-87) Great Smoky National 3.6ºN, 83.8ºW 64 m 1996 Park, TN (96-132) * Big Bend National Park, 29.3ºN, 13.2ºW 329 m 1997 Texas (96-13) Albuquerque, NM (94-19) 3.1ºN, 16.6ºW 161 m 1998 * Sequoia National Park, 36.ºN, 118.8ºW 49 m 1998 California (96-139) * Virgin Islands National 18.3ºN, 64.8ºW 3 m 1998 Park, U.S. Virgin Islands (96-144) Shenandoah National Park, 38.ºN, 78.4ºW 32 m 1997 VA (96-137) Canyonlands National 38.ºN, 19.8ºW 814 m 1997 Park, Utah (96-133) Riverside, CA (94-112) 34.ºN, 117.3ºW 84 m 199 Theodore Roosevelt National Park, North Dakota (96-131) * 46.9ºN, 13.4ºW 238 m 1998 *A site that has a shift or other problem Problem values in the data, including missing scans or extremely high or low points, have been flagged in the Level 1 data files released by UGA. However, examination of the data has identified suspicious values that had not been flagged. The occurrence of such 1
11 values varies from site to site, with some sites achieving extremely good collection rates as well as high data quality. The results of extensive quality screening of the data are summarized in Figure 2. The data shown in red for each day have been evaluated as being problem-free, based on set criteria. Over 3, days of data have been identified as good: each of these good days contains between 1 and UV scans. 11
12 Acadia : 1693 good days FLAGS - IDENTIFIED AS GOOD DAYS Albuquerque : 168 good days Atlanta : 184 good days Bigbend : 142 good days Boulder : 18 good days Canyonlands : 1889 good days Chicago : 131 good days Denali : 112 good days Everglades : 1664 good days Gaithersburg : 239 good days Glacier : 1981 good days Great Smoky : 1797 good days Haw aii : 114 good days Olympic : 1899 good days R.T.P : 171 good days Riverside : 2328 good days Rocky Mountain : 1674 good days Sequoia : 1626 good days Shenandoah : 227 good days T. Roosevelt : 132 good days Virgin Islands : 136 good days Weatherhead Sun Sep 26 14:43:3 UMS 24 task1.ssc Figure 2. The data presented here are as released on the University of Georgia web site and screened for quality. These data are used in this report to examine spectral UV changes over the time periods of instrument operation. 12
13 The UGA staff screened the data based on the two criteria listed in the readme file associated with the site. The two criteria suggested for screening were that the data compared reasonably well to a clear sky model and that approximately the right number of scans were taken on a given day. In addition to the screening performed by UGA as discussed above, we employed at least seven additional criteria. These additional criteria eliminated roughly 12 percent of the daily values. The checks were necessary to prevent systematic problems which could have had large impacts on the results presented. However, detailed screening of the spectral data was not possible and it is likely that some critical problems still exist in the individual spectral values. The additional quality assurance tests are summarized as follows: Test 1: The data were checked to define the time of the first scan. For the daily data to pass this test, the first scan had to have occurred within one hour of when the first scan was scheduled to occur. Test 2: The data were checked to define the time of the last scan. For the daily data to pass this test, the last scan had to have occurred within one hour of when the last scan was scheduled to occur. Test 3: The minimum solar zenith angles were checked. This test verifies whether scans were taken near solar noon. For the daily data to pass this test, the minimum solar zenith angle recorded was required be within three degrees of the expected solar zenith angle for that time of year. Test 4: The number of scans in a single day was checked. This test evaluates whether enough data were taken to provide a reasonable estimate of the daytime-integrated value. The criterion for this test is that the number of scans must not differ from the scheduled number of scans for the time of year by more than 1. Test : The data were visually evaluated for spikes. Spikes are a well-known phenomenon with the Brewer instruments, though their causes are not completely understood. Spikes result in extremely large values for single wavelength measurement in a single scan and do not represent a robust measurement of atmospheric composition. Many spikes had already been removed through UGA s screening of the data. Test 6: The data were assessed for problems with inappropriate time sequences. Occasionally, the data were written to files incorrectly, with two days of data recorded to one daily file. In these cases, the daytime-integrated UV was observed to be much higher than usual. We identified and screened these instances by looking for cases in which the order of the solar zenith angles was out of line with what would happen during a normal day. The test also looked for uneven or highly irregular sampling during a day. 13
14 Test 7: The data were checked to assure that DUV values were within range. Observed daytime-integrated UV values are rarely above 7 oules/meter 2 /day and should never be equal to zero, given the sensitivity and locations of the Brewer instruments. All reported values greater than 9 and less than or equal to zero were omitted from further evaluation. No efforts were made to determine the cause of these unusual values, however an inspection of when they occurred at each site showed no patterns consistent with an atmospheric cause of the unusual values. Data were required to pass all seven tests to be used in the analysis of the Diffeyweighted UV. The number of data points removed in the screening process represented only a small portion of the data collected (less than 1% network wide), but the screening was necessary because only a few unusual points have the ability to change the results of the analyses. 14
15 Computation of NWS and Brewer UV values Figure 3 presents a graphical view of the number of days of Brewer data from the U.S. EPA network. For each site, the color-coding represents the number of days of quality measurements for a given year, displayed on the y-axis. Deep oranges and reds correspond to years with over 3 days of measurements available, while blues and greens indicate significantly fewer days of high quality observations. Number of Days Available EPA Brewer Data Acadia Albuquerque Atlanta Bigbend Boulder Canyonlands Chicago Denali Everglades Gaithersburg Glacier Great Smoky Hawaii Olympic R.T.P Riverside Rocky Mountain Sequoia Shenandoah T. Roosevelt Virgin Islands Figure 3. The color-coding denotes the number of days of high quality measurements available for each year at each of the U.S. EPA Brewer sites. Figure 4 summarizes the number of days with available NWS UV Index data. As in the above figure, reds and oranges correspond to a majority of values being available for the year, while greens denote years in which fewer (only 1-2) values were available. 1
16 Number of Days Available UV Index Data Acadia Albuquerque Atlanta Bigbend Boulder Canyonlands Chicago Denali Everglades Gaithersburg Glacier Great Smoky Hawaii Olympic R.T.P Riverside Rocky Mountain Sequoia Shenandoah T. Roosevelt Virgin Islands Figure 4. The number of days with available UV Index data is plotted for each year for each of the Brewer sites. The total column ozone time series plotted in Figure provides information about the ozone values used to calculate the NWS UV Index. For Atlanta, Georgia, in 1997, ozone peaked in the spring months and declined through the summer and into fall. The seasonal cycle is typical for ozone at midlatitudes. 16
17 Total Column Ozone F M A M A S O N D Atlanta, 1997 Figure. Total column ozone is plotted as a function of day of year for Atlanta, Georgia. For each site, the total column ozone is used in conjunction with a radiative transfer model to estimate the amount of UV radiation reaching the surface. The resulting clear sky UV Index forecasts based on the ozone values above are plotted in Figure 6. Cloud estimates are not used in this analysis, and the values for Atlanta in 1997 reflect a clear seasonal cycle: UV Index increases through the spring and reaches a peak in the summer months. This seasonal cycle is strongly related to Sun angle and is typical for most mid-latitude sites. 17
18 Clear Sky UV Index Forecast F M A M A S O N D Atlanta, 1997 Figure 6. The UV Index values plotted here for Atlanta are computed by the National Weather Service making use of only the Sun angle and the total column ozone values. The values in Figure 7 represent the cloud amounts used in the UV Index forecasts. The values shown here correspond to cloud conditions over Atlanta, Georgia, in Cloud conditions will vary for each of the U.S. EPA Brewer sites. 18
19 Cloud Amount Used in UV Index Forecast F M A M A S O N D Atlanta, 1997 Figure 7. The predicted cloud factors plotted for Atlanta, Georgia, are produced by the National Weather Service for the UV Index. A value of implies a strong influence of clouds, while higher values indicate higher transmission. The UV Index forecasts based on both cloudiness and ozone are plotted in Figure 8 for Atlanta, Georgia. The values indicate a larger spread than was present when only ozone and Sun angle were incorporated into the calculations. These UV Index values are compared with the UV values obtained from the Brewer instruments at each of the monitoring sites. 19
20 Actual UV Index Forecast F M A M A S O N D Atlanta, 1997 Figure 8. The UV Index forecasts released to the general public are plotted for Atlanta as a function of day of year. These values include the effects of Sun angle, total column ozone, and clouds, and are the values that are compared to the Brewer UV measurements. The UV values measured by the Brewer instrument at the Atlanta, Georgia, site are plotted in Figure 9. These values are computed using the biological weighting and integration over the wavelength spectrum as described in Section 1. As expected, the data reflect a similar seasonal cycle to those in Figure 8. These data from each measurement location are compared to the corresponding NWS UV Index forecasts for each site. 2
21 UV Measured Daytime Integrated UV F M A M A S O N D Atlanta, 1997 Figure 9. Actual, measured UV from the U.S. EPA Brewer instrument at Atlanta, Georgia, are plotted as a function of day of year. These values will be compared to the forecasted NWS UV Index values. Comparison of NWS forecasts and Brewer measurements Two methods are particularly useful for comparing measured UV with the NWS UV forecast. The first is a correlation of the two sets of daily values and the second is an estimate of the difference. The correlation allows us to identify whether the variations are similar in both datasets, but ignores offsets and changing slopes from location to location. The absolute differences is difficult can show results which magnify differences in high UV regions and times of year. Together, these two comparisons allow an effective comparison of the measurements with the UV index values. In order to estimate absolute differences, we make a conversion from daytime integrated UV levels, which are in oules/m 2 /day, to UV index units. For the entire network, we make a single multiplicative transformation based on comparison of all measurements at all sites. The factor we use is 1/6 to convert oules/m 2 /day CIE weighted UV to UV Index levels. Analysis of deriving individual factors at each site showed that this relationship was reasonable and would allow for an unbiased weighting from site to site. 21
22 4. Detailed Site Analyses For All 21 Brewer Locations The following pages of plots present the results for each Brewer site. It should be kept in mind that some of the results shown might not be entirely conclusive based on the short duration of the EPA Brewer datasets. For each of the sites, the differences between the NWS-forecasted UV Index values and weighted, daytime integrated UV measurements are plotted as a function of day of year. The differences are plotted in units of equivalent UV Index, so that a standard deviation of 1 corresponds to 1 value on the UV Index scale. 22
23 Acadia National Park Latitude: 44.4ºN Longitude: 68.3ºW Elevation: 137 m Standard Deviation: F M A M A S O N D Acadia Acadia National Park is located in the northeastern United States. The northern latitude location results in a very large seasonal cycle: average UV in the summer is more than eight times the average UV in the winter. Comparing the NWS values with the EPA measurements, we find that the agreement is generally quite good, and that the largest differences occur during the summer months. These months are when both the predicted and measured values are at their highest, and are also the months when clouds can play the greatest role in attenuating UV. 23
24 Albuquerque, NM Latitude: 3.1ºN Longitude: 16.6ºW Elevation: 161 m Standard Deviation: 1 - F M A M A S O N D Albuquerque The metropolitan area of Albuquerque is known for its dry, hot climate in the summer and generally mild winters. The southern location and high elevation of the site results in extremes of UV levels. The differences between the NWS values and the Brewer measurements are largest during the spring and summer, when clouds may have a large influence on the actual, measured UV. 24
25 Atlanta, GA Latitude: 33.8ºN Longitude: 84.4ºW Elevation: 91 m Standard Deviation: F M A M A S O N D Atlanta The twenty-county Atlanta metropolitan area is an important urban monitoring site for the Brewer network. The comparisons for this site indicate that the largest differences between the NWS and measured UV values occur in the months from March through October. Little difference is observed during the winter months when UV values are generally lower. 2
26 Big Bend National Park Latitude: 29.3ºN Longitude: 13.2ºW Elevation: 329 m Standard Deviation: F M A M A S O N D Bigbend Big Bend National Park covers over 8, acres in sourthern Texas and hosts an array of ecological, paleontological, and archaelogical research. The differences between the NWS and measured UV values can be large at all times of year at this site, and are both positive and negative, suggesting that neither value is systematically over- or under-estimating the UV amount relative to the other. The largest differences are observed during the spring, when ozone and cloud effects may play a large role. 26
27 Boulder, CO Latitude: 4.1ºN Longitude: 1.2ºW Elevation: 1689 m Standard Deviation: F M A M A S O N D Boulder Boulder s UV monitoring takes place within 3 miles of the city of Denver at elevation of 1689 meters. The forecasted and measured UV values agree fairly well during the late fall and through the winter. Larger differences are observed during the spring and summer. 27
28 Canyonlands National Park Latitude: 38.ºN Longitude: 19.8ºW Elevation: 814 m Standard Deviation: F M A M A S O N D Canyonlands Canyonlands National Park is located in the Utah high desert and is studied by numerous scientists because of its unique soil and a variety of algae, lichen and bacteria which allow for a rich desert ecosystem. At Canyonlands, the agreement between NWSforecasted and Brewer-measured UV is quite good during the late fall and through the winter months. During the spring and summer, the differences become larger but do not appear to be systemically biased toward either an over- or under-estimation of measured amounts. 28
29 Chicago, IL Latitude: 41.8ºN Longitude: 87.6ºW Elevation: 16 m Standard Deviation:.97 - F M A M A S O N D Chicago The nine-county metropolitan area of Chicago is located in the heartland of the United States and is home to eight million people. The NWS-forecasted and Brewer-measured UV values agree quite well in the late fall and through the winter. The differences start to increase in the spring and are largest at around the summer solstice. The differences do not seem to biased in either the positive or negative direction, suggesting that there is no systematic bias related to the treatment of clouds or other factors. 29
30 3
31 Denali National Park Latitude: 63.7ºN Longitude: 149.ºW Elevation: 661 m Standard Deviation:.79 - F M A M A S O N D Denali Denali National Park is the farthest north site in the EPA Brewer network. The data reflect a higher seasonality than those at any other site, with the winter values being generally quite low, often below the detection limit of the instrument. The differences between the NWS-forecasted and Brewer-measured UV are quite small, particularly during the fall and winter months. Even during the summer, when the largest differences are apparent, the values agree more closely than for other sites in the network. 31
32 Everglades National Park Latitude: 2.4ºN Longitude: 8.7ºW Elevation: 18 m Standard Deviation: F M A M A S O N D Everglades Everglades National Park is one of the more southerly sites in the EPA network. The summer UV levels are higher than the winter levels by only a factor of 2. The differences between the NWS-forecasted and Brewer-measured UV values are very large, particularly during the spring and summer months when clouds may play the greatest role. The differences are biased positively, suggesting that the forecast value tends to overestimate the measured UV. This difference is not unexpected, as the Everglades UV Index forecast values do not account for the effects of clouds. 32
33 Gaithersburg, MD Latitude: 39.1ºN Longitude: 77.2ºW Elevation: 43 m Standard Deviation: F M A M A S O N D Gaithersburg Gaithersburg, Maryland is located within 3 miles of both Baltimore, Maryland, and Washington, DC. The data show a large annual cycle and generally low variability. The differences between the two values are generally minimal in the late fall and through the winter, but increase during the spring and reach a peak around the time of the summer solstice. 33
34 Glacier National Park Latitude: 48.7ºN Longitude: 113.4ºW Elevation: 424 m Standard Deviation: F M A M A S O N D Glacier Glacier National Park encompasses over a million acres of land in the northern United States. The site experiences a large variation in the seasonal cycle of UV due to both its high latitude and high elevation (424 meters). The NWS-forecasted and Brewermeasured UV show little difference during the fall or winter. The largest differences occur during the summer months when the site experiences its largest UV values. 34
35 Great Smoky Mountains National Park Latitude: 3.6ºN Longitude: 83.8ºW Elevation: 64 m Standard Deviation: F M A M A S O N D Great Smoky Great Smoky National Park encompasses over a half million acres of land in the eastern U.S. The differences between predicted and measured UV at this site are largest during the spring and summer and likely due to changes in clouds and in the treatment of clouds in the UV forecasts. Agreement at this site during the fall and winter is not as tight as it is for other sites during these seasons, however the overall differences remain small. 3
36 Hawaii Volcanoes National Park Latitude: ºN Longitude: 1.28 ºW Elevation: 1243 m Standard Deviation: F M A M A S O N D Hawaii Hawaii Volcanoes National Park covers over 3, acres at a high elevation on a Pacific island. Hawaii and Virgin Islands are the only two locations for which the National Weather Service does not incorporate cloud predictions into their UV forecast. For this reason, the measurements are generally higher than than the forecasts resulting in the differences presented here being centered around 1., rather than around zero. 36
37 Olympic National Park Latitude: 48.1ºN Longitude: 123.4ºW Elevation: 32 m Standard Deviation:.8 - F M A M A S O N D Olympic Olympic National Park encompasses over 9, acres and is one of the most northernly parks in the network. As such, it experiences a strong seasonal cycle with summer measurements that are over 12 times higher than winter measurements. The differences between predicted and measured UV values at this site are minimal during the late fall and through the winter. The differences increase into the summer months, but are still not overly large. 37
38 Research Triangle Park Latitude: 3.9ºN Longitude: 78.9ºW Elevation: 14 m Standard Deviation:.93 - F M A M A S O N D R.T.P Research Triangle Park is one of the country s premier research areas in the southeastern United States. One of the first Brewer instruments was installed near RTP and the data record provides a long time series for comparing with NWS UV forecasts. The differences between the predicted and measured valus are largest during the spring, summer, and fall. The largest differences seem to result from the forecasted value overestimating the UV amounts, though there does not seem to be a systematic bias toward an overestimation of UV. 38
39 Riverside, CA Latitude: 34.ºN Longitude: 117.3ºW Elevation: 84 m Standard Deviation: 1. - F M A M A S O N D Riverside The Riverside-San Bernardino area is near the population area of Los Angeles which includes over 9 million people. The location is known both for its air pollution and its success in cleaning its air over the last decade. The differences between forecasted and measured UV are greatest during the late spring, but can be high anytime during the period from March to October. The forecasted UV seems to overestimate the measured UV more often than the reverse behavior occurs. 39
40 Rocky Mountain National Park Latitude: 4.ºN Longitude: 1.ºW Elevation: 2896 m Standard Deviation: F M A M A S O N D Rocky Mountain Rocky Mountain National Park sits on the east end of the Rocky Mountains. Its high elevation results in a very strong seasonal cycle, while its mid-latitude location results in generally low variability. The largest differences between predicted and measured UV occur during the late spring and summer, and may be associated with changes in cloud conditions, or in the treatment of clouds in the forecast model. The differences during the fall and winter are typically not as large. 4
41 Sequoia National Park Latitude: 36.ºN Longitude: 118.8ºW Elevation: 49 m Standard Deviation: F M A M A S O N D Sequoia Sequoia and King s Canyon National Parks cover over 8, acres in the mountains of California. At this site, the differences between the NWS-forecasted UV and the Brewermeasured UV are largest during the period from March through September. The larger differences are most often positive, suggesting that they may be caused by changes in cloudiness or by limitations in the cloud predictions used to estimate the UV Index. 41
42 Shenandoah National Park Latitude: 38.ºN Longitude: 78.4ºW Elevation: 32 m Standard Deviation: F M A M A S O N D Shenandoah Shenandoah National Park covers roughly 2, acres in the eastern U.S. The UV values over time indicate generally low variability. The differences between the predicted and measured UV are largest right around the solstice, but can be fairly large at almost all times of year. The biggest differences are positive, suggesting that the discrepancies between the predicted and measured values are most often due to an overestimation of the UV Index. 42
43 Theodore Roosevelt National Park Latitude: 46.9ºN Longitude: 13.4ºW Elevation: 238 m Standard Deviation: F M A M A S O N D T. Roosevelt Theodore Roosevelt National Park covers 7, acres in North Dakota. The Brewer UV measurements have shown little change over the past five years, and exhibit generally low variability. The differences between predicted and measured UV are largest during the late spring and through the summer and smallest during the fall and the winter. The differences are both positive and negative, suggesting no systematic bias between the two values. 43
44 Virgin Islands National Park Latitude: 18.3ºN Longitude: 64.8ºW Elevation: 3 m Standard Deviation: F M A M A S O N D Virgin Islands Virgin Islands National Park is the most southern location in the EPA netowrk. The Brewer is located within the tropics and therefore exhibits an unusual seasonal cycle, at least compared to what is typically observed at mid-latitudes. Virgin Islands and Hawaii are the only two locations for which the National Weather Service does not incorporate cloud estimates into their UV forecasts. For this reason, the differences of Brewer measurements minus NWS UV forecasts hovers above zero. 44
45 . Intercomparison of Results for All 21 Brewer Locations The analyses presented in this section summarize and compare the UV measured at the individual EPA Brewer sites with the predicted UV index values at the nearest city. There are several reasons why these comparisons should not result in perfect correlations. First of all, the sites are not co-located. Clouds are extremely difficult to predict, and changes in cloud conditions have been a substantial effect on the measured UV. Finally, the comparison is between the quality-assured daytime integrated values and the predictions, which are generally for local solar noon irradiances. Nonetheless, the results show that there is an extremely good relationship between the UV predicted for local noon and the UV measured for daytime integrals at each site. The correlation coefficients between the predicted and measured UV for each of sites are plotted in Figure 1. The correlation coefficients are generally extremely high, except at the lowest latitude sites, where they are still relatively high. The relationship shows that for the four most southern locations the correlations range between.7 and.8, while all of the other 17 sites show correlation coefficients much higher between.87 and.9. This high agreement is a strong testimony to both the quality of the UV index estimates and the quality of the EPA Brewer network. The reason for the lower correlation coefficients at the lower latitudes are the lack of good cloud predictions and the fact that ozone varies little at these locations. It should be noted that the National Weather Service incorporates clouds into their UV index forecasts for all locations except the Virgin Islands and Hawaii. The fact that clouds are not incorporated contributes to the lower correlations observed at these two locations. 4
46 Correlations.9 Albuquerque Canyonlands Olympic Riverside Sequoia T. Roosevelt R.T.P Chicago Acadia Atlanta Great Boulder Gaithersburg Smoky Glacier Shenandoah Rocky Mountain Denali.8.7 Bigbend Virgin Islands Everglades.6 Hawaii Latitude Figure 1. The correlation coefficients for the comparisons of measured UV at the Brewer sites and the NWS-forecasted UV index values are plotted as a function of latitude. The measured daytime integrated CIE levels from the Brewer network are plotted in Figure 11. At each of the sites, the seasonal cycle is clearly present, along with large day-to-day variations associated mainly with changing cloud conditions. The figure only shows the quality assured data from the network. These daytime integrated doses account for UV throughout the entire day, rather than being based on the UV radiation integrated near noon as is the case for the NWS UV Indices. The values are related, however, and both have biological relevance. 46
47 Acadia Albuquerque Atlanta Bigbend Boulder Canyonlands Chicago Denali Everglades Gaithersburg Glacier Great Smoky Haw aii Olympic R.T.P Riverside Rocky Mountain Sequoia Shenandoah T. Roosevelt Virgin Islands
48 Figure 11. The measured daytime integrated CIE levels are plotted for each day of each year for the 21 EPA Brewer locations. These data are compared with the NWS predicted UV Index values. The NWS-calculated UV Index values for clear sky conditions are shown in Figure 12 for each of the Brewer sites. These values are not released to the public because they do not include the effects of clouds. For clear sky conditions only, there is very little day-to-day variability in forecasted UV. The majority of the variation is due to seasonal cycle. Any other variations are a result of changes in total column ozone. These values are presented for comparison only and are not included in the analysis for each of the sites. 48
49 Acadia Albuquerque Atlanta Bigbend Boulder Canyonlands Chicago Denali Everglades Gaithersburg Glacier Great Smoky Haw aii Olympic R.T.P Riverside Rocky Mountain Sequoia Shenandoah T. Roosevelt Virgin Islands
50 Figure 12. UV index values calculated by the National Weather Service for clear sky conditions are plotted for each Brewer site. These values are not released to the public because they do not include the effects of clouds. They are also not the final UV Index values used in the comparisons with the Brewer observations. The UV Index values used in this analysis are those that are released to the general public. These values are plotted for each Brewer site in Figure 13. At each of the sites, the seasonal cycle is clearly evident. Large variations outside of the seasonal cycle are due primarily to changes in cloudiness. To a lesser extent, the UV Index values are influenced by changes in total column ozone.
51 Acadia Albuquerque Atlanta Bigbend Boulder Canyonlands Chicago Denali Everglades Gaithersburg Glacier Great Smoky Haw aii Olympic R.T.P Riverside Rocky Mountain Sequoia Shenandoah T. Roosevelt Virgin Islands
52 Figure 13. The UV index values released to the public, incorporating clouds as well as ozone changes, are plotted for each Brewer site. The seasonal cycle is clearly evident. Large variations beyond the seasonal cycle are due primarily to variations in expected cloudiness and to a lesser extent, variations in total column ozone. The differences between the NWS-forecasted UV Index and the weighted daytime integrated UV values measured by the Brewer instruments are shown in Figure 14. The results are reported in equivalent UV Index units, and the y-axis is held the same so that the differences at the sites can be compared. In general, the largest differences occur during the summer months when the UV values are largest. For all of the sites except Hawaii and the Virgin Islands, there seems to be no systematic bias with the UV Index either overestimating or underestimating the measured UV. At Hawaii and Virgin Islands, the UV Index forecasts do not incorporate clouds, hence at these two sites, a positive bias, with UV Index often overestimating the actual UV amounts, is observed. 2
53 Acadia 1.1 Albuquerque 1 Atlanta F M A M Bigbend A S O N D 1.79 F M A M A S O N D Boulder F M A M Chicago A S O N D.97 F M A M Denali A S O N D F M A M Gaithersburg A S O N D F M A M 1.14 Glacier A S O N D F M A M Haw aii A S O N D 2.4 F M A M Olympic A S O N D F M A M.8 R.T.P F M A M Riverside A S O N D F M A M A S O N D Rocky Mountain F M A M Shenandoah A S O N D 1.39 F M A M T. Roosevelt A S O N D A S O N D 1.17 A S O N D.93 A S O N D 1.2 Virgin Islands F M A M F M A M F M A M A S O N D Sequoia 1. A S O N D Great Smoky F M A M A S O N D Everglades F M A M F M A M Canyonlands 1.18 A S O N D 1.49 F M A M 3 A S O N D F M A M A S O N D
54 Figure 14. The differences between the National Weather Service UV Index forecasts and the measured, daytime integrated UV values are plotted as a function of time of year. The differences are reported in equivalent UV Index units. The measured daytime integrated UV values for each site are compared to the corresponding NWS UV Index values in Figure 1. The correlations are very strong, which is impressive given the difficulty estimating future UV levels and the difficulty in measuring UV accurately. The high correlations demonstrate the high quality of the measurements as well as the skill of the UV index forecasts. The comparisons of the differences between measured UV and UV Index values show the strength of the measurements in verifying and potentially improving the NWS UV Index forecasts 4
55 Acadia.91 Albuquerque Atlanta Bigbend Boulder Chicago Denali Gaithersburg 1 1 Haw aii 1 1 Riverside 1 1 Olympic Shenandoah T. Roosevelt 1 1 R.T.P Sequoia Virgin Islands Rocky Mountain 1 1 Great Smoky Everglades 1 Glacier Canyonlands
56 Figure 1. The measured daytime integrated UV values are compared to the National Weather Service s predicted UV levels. The strong correlations are extremely impressive given the difficulty of estimate future UV levels and the difficulty in measuring UV accurately. 6
57 7. Conclusion The National Weather Service makes daily predictions of UV levels for a number of U.S. cities. The value, referred to as the UV Index, is computed according to the criteria developed by the World Meteorological Organization (WMO). The prediction incorporates both total column ozone and cloudiness, and provides an estimate of daily high UV irradiance for a particular location. In comparing the UV index forecasts, we isolate the quality assured daily CIE-weighted UV data. Of the 4,474 days of data, over 3,811 are identified as good for comparison to the UV index. For each location, we compare the daytime integrated values and the NWS UV Index forecasts. The results are presented both in terms of correlation coefficients and absolute differences. For the low-latitude locations, Virgin Islands, Hawaii, Everglades and Big Bend, the correlations are high, roughly between.6 and.8. This high agreement is surprising given that cloud estimates are not provided for the National Weather Service predictions of UV levels at two of the locations (Virgin Islands and Hawaii) and clouds are difficult to predict in most locations. These high correlations serve as a testimony to both the National Weather Service s skill at predicting UV amounts and the quality of the EPA Brewer data. For mid and high-latitude locations, the correlations between the UV index forecasts and the daily measured UV levels are extremely high, ranging from.87 to.97. This extremely high agreement is extremely impressive given the difficulty in predicting clouds and the fact that total column ozone measurements were missing for some brief periods of time (several months), resulting in only climatological values being used. These extremely high correlations indicate the quality of both the NWS UV index forecasts and the EPA Brewer data. In addition to correlation, differences between UV index values and measured UV values were computed and shown to have a very high seasonal dependence, with the highest differences generally observed in the summer. The standard deviation of the differences was generally around one UV index value, with the exception of Hawaii, where the typical offset was 2.. In some cases, the UV index values were observed to be systematically high compared to the measurements. This bias occurred at the two locations where the UV index predictions did not include cloud estimates and were therefore expected to be high relative to the actual measurements. The comparisons of the differences between measured UV and UV Index values show the strength of the measurements in verifying and potentially improving the NWS UV 7
Elizabeth C. Weatherhead, PhD University of Colorado at Boulder. April, 2005 Revised October, Report to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Task (c) Report, Contract 4D-5888-WTSA: Submitted for APM 227 Report on Geographic and Seasonal Variability of Solar UV Radiation Affecting Human and Ecological Health Elizabeth C. Weatherhead, PhD University
More information). It is a gas produced naturally in the stratosphere where it strongly absorbs incoming
Page 1 of 6 What Determines How Much Ultraviolet Radiation Reaches the Earth s Surface? The amount of UV radiation reaching the Earth s surface varies widely around the globe and through time. Several
More informationLecture Outlines PowerPoint. Chapter 16 Earth Science 11e Tarbuck/Lutgens
Lecture Outlines PowerPoint Chapter 16 Earth Science 11e Tarbuck/Lutgens 2006 Pearson Prentice Hall This work is protected by United States copyright laws and is provided solely for the use of instructors
More informationOZONE AND ULTRAVIOLET RADIATION
OZONE AND ULTRAVIOLET RADIATION Alfio Parisi, Michael Kimlin Imagine if the earth s protective atmosphere did not exist and the earth was subjected to the harmful ultraviolet energy from the sun. Life
More information1. The frequency of an electromagnetic wave is proportional to its wavelength. a. directly *b. inversely
CHAPTER 3 SOLAR AND TERRESTRIAL RADIATION MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTIONS 1. The frequency of an electromagnetic wave is proportional to its wavelength. a. directly *b. inversely 2. is the distance between successive
More informationWhich graph best shows the relationship between intensity of insolation and position on the Earth's surface? A) B) C) D)
1. The hottest climates on Earth are located near the Equator because this region A) is usually closest to the Sun B) reflects the greatest amount of insolation C) receives the most hours of daylight D)
More informationRecommendations from COST 713 UVB Forecasting
Recommendations from COST 713 UVB Forecasting UV observations UV observations can be used for comparison with models to get a better understanding of the processes influencing the UV levels reaching the
More informationSolutions Manual to Exercises for Weather & Climate, 8th ed. Appendix A Dimensions and Units 60 Appendix B Earth Measures 62 Appendix C GeoClock 63
Solutions Manual to Exercises for Weather & Climate, 8th ed. 1 Vertical Structure of the Atmosphere 1 2 Earth Sun Geometry 4 3 The Surface Energy Budget 8 4 The Global Energy Budget 10 5 Atmospheric Moisture
More informationSurface UV Irradiance from OMI on EOS Aura. Atmospheric Science Conference ESRIN, 8-12 May 2006 Aapo Tanskanen
Surface UV Irradiance from OMI on EOS Aura Atmospheric Science Conference ESRIN, 8-12 May 2006 Aapo Tanskanen Contents OMI Surface UV Algorithm N. Krotkov /GEST Center, University of Maryland J. Herman
More information5. In which diagram is the observer experiencing the greatest intensity of insolation? A) B)
1. Which factor has the greatest influence on the number of daylight hours that a particular Earth surface location receives? A) longitude B) latitude C) diameter of Earth D) distance from the Sun 2. In
More informationPrentice Hall EARTH SCIENCE. Tarbuck Lutgens
Prentice Hall EARTH SCIENCE Tarbuck Lutgens Chapter 17 The Atmosphere: Structure and Temperature 17.1 Atmosphere Characteristics Composition of the Atmosphere Weather is constantly changing, and it refers
More informationChapter 11 Lecture Outline. Heating the Atmosphere
Chapter 11 Lecture Outline Heating the Atmosphere They are still here! Focus on the Atmosphere Weather Occurs over a short period of time Constantly changing Climate Averaged over a long period of time
More informationTOTAL COLUMN OZONE AND SOLAR UV-B ERYTHEMAL IRRADIANCE OVER KISHINEV, MOLDOVA
Global NEST Journal, Vol 8, No 3, pp 204-209, 2006 Copyright 2006 Global NEST Printed in Greece. All rights reserved TOTAL COLUMN OZONE AND SOLAR UV-B ERYTHEMAL IRRADIANCE OVER KISHINEV, MOLDOVA A.A. ACULININ
More informationTIME. Astronomical time Time is defined by astronomical cycles. The day is the average time from noon to noon (the solar day).
ASTRONOMY READER TIME 2.1 TIME Astronomical time Time is defined by astronomical cycles. The day is the average time from noon to noon (the solar day). The month was originally based on the average time
More informationAnalysis Global and Ultraviolet Radiation in Baghdad City, Iraq
Analysis Global and Ultraviolet Radiation in Baghdad City, Iraq Ali M. Alsalihi 1 Siaf H. Abdulatif 1,2 1.Department of Atmospheric Sciences, College of science, Al-Mustansiriyah University, Baghdad, Iraq
More informationThe Atmosphere: Structure and Temperature
Chapter The Atmosphere: Structure and Temperature Geologists have uncovered evidence of when Earth was first able to support oxygenrich atmosphere similar to what we experience today and more so, take
More informationC) wavelength C) eastern horizon B) the angle of insolation is high B) increases, only D) thermosphere D) receive low-angle insolation
1. What is the basic difference between ultraviolet, visible, and infrared radiation? A) half-life B) temperature C) wavelength D) wave velocity 2. In New York State, the risk of sunburn is greatest between
More informationATMOSPHERIC ENERGY and GLOBAL TEMPERATURES. Physical Geography (Geog. 300) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College
ATMOSPHERIC ENERGY and GLOBAL TEMPERATURES Physical Geography (Geog. 300) Prof. Hugh Howard American River College RADIATION FROM the SUN SOLAR RADIATION Primarily shortwave (UV-SIR) Insolation Incoming
More informationWinter. Here s what a weak La Nina usually brings to the nation with tempseraures:
2017-2018 Winter Time again for my annual Winter Weather Outlook. Here's just a small part of the items I considered this year and how I think they will play out with our winter of 2017-2018. El Nino /
More informationEnd of Ozone Season Report
End of Ozone Season Report Central Ohio: April 1 through October 31, 2016 The Mid-Ohio Regional Planning Commission (MORPC) is part of a network of agencies across the country that issues daily air quality
More information5.6. Barrow, Alaska, USA
SECTION 5: QUALITY CONTROL SUMMARY 5.6. Barrow, Alaska, USA The Barrow installation is located on Alaska s North Slope at the edge of the Arctic Ocean in the city of Barrow. The instrument is located in
More informationScientific Challenges of UV-B Forecasting
Scientific Challenges of UV-B Forecasting Henning Staiger, German Meteorological Service (DWD) International activities and the UV Index UV Index definition and forecasting requirements Challenges in calculation
More informationCurrent Status of the Stratospheric Ozone Layer From: UNEP Environmental Effects of Ozone Depletion and Its Interaction with Climate Change
Goals Produce a data product that allows users to acquire time series of the distribution of UV-B radiation across the continental USA, based upon measurements from the UVMRP. Provide data in a format
More informationWeather and Climate Summary and Forecast Winter
Weather and Climate Summary and Forecast Winter 2016-17 Gregory V. Jones Southern Oregon University December 5, 2016 Well after an October that felt more like November, we just finished a November that
More informationWeather and Climate Summary and Forecast February 2018 Report
Weather and Climate Summary and Forecast February 2018 Report Gregory V. Jones Linfield College February 5, 2018 Summary: For the majority of the month of January the persistent ridge of high pressure
More informationMeteorology. Circle the letter that corresponds to the correct answer
Chapter 3 Worksheet 1 Meteorology Name: Circle the letter that corresponds to the correct answer 1) If the maximum temperature for a particular day is 26 C and the minimum temperature is 14 C, the daily
More informationInsolation and Temperature variation. The Sun & Insolation. The Sun (cont.) The Sun
Insolation and Temperature variation Atmosphere: blanket of air surrounding earth Without our atmosphere: cold, quiet, cratered place Dynamic: currents and circulation cells June 23, 2008 Atmosphere important
More informationA) usually less B) dark colored and rough D) light colored with a smooth surface A) transparency of the atmosphere D) rough, black surface
1. Base your answer to the following question on the diagram below which shows two identical houses, A and B, in a city in North Carolina. One house was built on the east side of a factory, and the other
More informationInvestigation 11.3 Weather Maps
Name: Date: Investigation 11.3 Weather Maps What can you identify weather patterns based on information read on a weather map? There have been some amazing technological advancements in the gathering and
More informationWeather and Climate Summary and Forecast March 2019 Report
Weather and Climate Summary and Forecast March 2019 Report Gregory V. Jones Linfield College March 2, 2019 Summary: Dramatic flip from a mild winter to a top five coldest February on record in many locations
More informationAT350 EXAM #1 September 23, 2003
AT350 EXAM #1 September 23, 2003 Name and ID: Enter your name and student ID number on the answer sheet and on this exam. Record your answers to the questions by using a No. 2 pencil to completely fill
More informationEnergy Systems, Structures and Processes Essential Standard: Analyze patterns of global climate change over time Learning Objective: Differentiate
Energy Systems, Structures and Processes Essential Standard: Analyze patterns of global climate change over time Learning Objective: Differentiate between weather and climate Global Climate Focus Question
More informationWhat is Climate? Understanding and predicting climatic changes are the basic goals of climatology.
What is Climate? Understanding and predicting climatic changes are the basic goals of climatology. Climatology is the study of Earth s climate and the factors that affect past, present, and future climatic
More information1 A 3 C 2 B 4 D. 5. During which month does the minimum duration of insolation occur in New York State? 1 February 3 September 2 July 4 December
INSOLATION REVIEW 1. The map below shows isolines of average daily insolation received in calories per square centimeter per minute at the Earth s surface. If identical solar collectors are placed at the
More informationLecture 2: Global Energy Cycle
Lecture 2: Global Energy Cycle Planetary energy balance Greenhouse Effect Vertical energy balance Solar Flux and Flux Density Solar Luminosity (L) the constant flux of energy put out by the sun L = 3.9
More informationMonthly Long Range Weather Commentary Issued: APRIL 18, 2017 Steven A. Root, CCM, Chief Analytics Officer, Sr. VP,
Monthly Long Range Weather Commentary Issued: APRIL 18, 2017 Steven A. Root, CCM, Chief Analytics Officer, Sr. VP, sroot@weatherbank.com MARCH 2017 Climate Highlights The Month in Review The average contiguous
More informationMonthly Long Range Weather Commentary Issued: APRIL 1, 2015 Steven A. Root, CCM, President/CEO
Monthly Long Range Weather Commentary Issued: APRIL 1, 2015 Steven A. Root, CCM, President/CEO sroot@weatherbank.com FEBRUARY 2015 Climate Highlights The Month in Review The February contiguous U.S. temperature
More informationOPTIMISING THE TEMPORAL AVERAGING PERIOD OF POINT SURFACE SOLAR RESOURCE MEASUREMENTS FOR CORRELATION WITH AREAL SATELLITE ESTIMATES
OPTIMISING THE TEMPORAL AVERAGING PERIOD OF POINT SURFACE SOLAR RESOURCE MEASUREMENTS FOR CORRELATION WITH AREAL SATELLITE ESTIMATES Ian Grant Anja Schubert Australian Bureau of Meteorology GPO Box 1289
More informationThe Atmosphere. Importance of our. 4 Layers of the Atmosphere. Introduction to atmosphere, weather, and climate. What makes up the atmosphere?
The Atmosphere Introduction to atmosphere, weather, and climate Where is the atmosphere? Everywhere! Completely surrounds Earth February 20, 2010 What makes up the atmosphere? Argon Inert gas 1% Variable
More informationWhat Is the Relationship Between Earth s Tilt and the Seasons?
Learning Set 2 Why Are There Differences in Temperature? Review Images and Graphics While reading about Earth s tilt and the seasons, pay particular attention to the graphics included. How do they help
More informationATMOSPHERIC CIRCULATION AND WIND
ATMOSPHERIC CIRCULATION AND WIND The source of water for precipitation is the moisture laden air masses that circulate through the atmosphere. Atmospheric circulation is affected by the location on the
More information2. Fargo, North Dakota receives more snow than Charleston, South Carolina.
2015 National Tournament Division B Meteorology Section 1: Weather versus Climate Chose the answer that best answers the question 1. The sky is partly cloudy this morning in Lincoln, Nebraska. 2. Fargo,
More informationLesson 3 Latitude is Everything
Latitude is Everything Essential Question: How does latitude affect the Amount of Solar Energy an Area Receives and that Area s Climate? Objective: Students will be able to explain how the sun s energy
More informationName Per Date Earth Science Climate & Insolation Test
Name Per Date Earth Science Climate & Insolation Test 1) Which graph best represents the general relationship between latitude and average surface temperature? 2) The diagram below shows the apparent path
More informationSEASONAL AND DAILY TEMPERATURES
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 SEASONAL AND DAILY TEMPERATURES Chapter 3 Earth revolves in elliptical path around sun every 365 days. Earth rotates counterclockwise or eastward every 24 hours. Earth closest
More informationJ8.4 TRENDS OF U.S. SNOWFALL AND SNOW COVER IN A WARMING WORLD,
J8.4 TRENDS OF U.S. SNOWFALL AND SNOW COVER IN A WARMING WORLD, 1948-2008 Richard R. Heim Jr. * NOAA National Climatic Data Center, Asheville, North Carolina 1. Introduction The Intergovernmental Panel
More informationEarth Science Unit 5- Weather Knowledge Packet
Earth Science Unit 5- Weather Knowledge Packet 2B: Describe types of energy transfer We all have a pretty good idea that the Sun is where majority of the heat comes from in Earth. That heat tends to act
More informationTopic 6: Insolation and the Seasons
Topic 6: Insolation and the Seasons Solar Radiation and Insolation Insolation: In Sol ation The Sun is the primary source of energy for the earth. The rate at which energy is radiated is called Intensity
More informationNational Wildland Significant Fire Potential Outlook
National Wildland Significant Fire Potential Outlook National Interagency Fire Center Predictive Services Issued: September, 2007 Wildland Fire Outlook September through December 2007 Significant fire
More informationSunlight and its Properties Part I. EE 446/646 Y. Baghzouz
Sunlight and its Properties Part I EE 446/646 Y. Baghzouz The Sun a Thermonuclear Furnace The sun is a hot sphere of gas whose internal temperatures reach over 20 million deg. K. Nuclear fusion reaction
More informationP1.34 MULTISEASONALVALIDATION OF GOES-BASED INSOLATION ESTIMATES. Jason A. Otkin*, Martha C. Anderson*, and John R. Mecikalski #
P1.34 MULTISEASONALVALIDATION OF GOES-BASED INSOLATION ESTIMATES Jason A. Otkin*, Martha C. Anderson*, and John R. Mecikalski # *Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies, University of
More informationWeather Systems Study Guide:
Weather Systems Study Guide: 1. Draw a diagram of Earth s water cycle and label each part. 2. Explain how the water cycle works. 3. What happens in the troposphere and stratosphere? Atmosphere Level What
More information2011 National Seasonal Assessment Workshop for the Eastern, Southern, & Southwest Geographic Areas
2011 National Seasonal Assessment Workshop for the Eastern, Southern, & Southwest Geographic Areas On January 11-13, 2011, wildland fire, weather, and climate met virtually for the ninth annual National
More informationWeather and Climate Summary and Forecast November 2017 Report
Weather and Climate Summary and Forecast November 2017 Report Gregory V. Jones Linfield College November 7, 2017 Summary: October was relatively cool and wet north, while warm and very dry south. Dry conditions
More information( 1 d 2 ) (Inverse Square law);
ATMO 336 -- Exam 3 120 total points including take-home essay Name The following equations and relationships may prove useful. F d1 =F d2 d 2 2 ( 1 d 2 ) (Inverse Square law);! MAX = 0.29 " 104 µmk (Wien's
More informationME 476 Solar Energy UNIT THREE SOLAR RADIATION
ME 476 Solar Energy UNIT THREE SOLAR RADIATION Unit Outline 2 What is the sun? Radiation from the sun Factors affecting solar radiation Atmospheric effects Solar radiation intensity Air mass Seasonal variations
More informationClimates of NYS. Definitions. Climate Regions of NYS. Storm Tracks. Climate Controls 10/13/2011. Characteristics of NYS s Climates
Definitions Climates of NYS Prof. Anthony Grande 2011 Weather and Climate Weather the state of the atmosphere at one point in time. The elements of weather are temperature, air pressure, wind and moisture.
More informationCoordinating and Integrating UV Observations in Svalbard
Coordinating and Integrating UV Observations in Svalbard Georg Hansen & Tove Svendby, NILU, Norway Boyan Petkov & Vito Vitale, ISAC-CNR, Italy Piotr Sobolwski, IGFPAS, Poland Josef Elster, University of
More informationWhy the Earth has seasons. Why the Earth has seasons 1/20/11
Chapter 3 Earth revolves in elliptical path around sun every 365 days. Earth rotates counterclockwise or eastward every 24 hours. Earth closest to Sun (147 million km) in January, farthest from Sun (152
More informationWeather and Climate Summary and Forecast March 2018 Report
Weather and Climate Summary and Forecast March 2018 Report Gregory V. Jones Linfield College March 7, 2018 Summary: The ridge pattern that brought drier and warmer conditions from December through most
More informationFinal Review Meteorology
Final Review Meteorology Multiple Choice Identify the choice that best completes the statement or answers the question. 1. Which of the following is an example of climate? a. A sudden snowstorm resulted
More informationChapter 2 Available Solar Radiation
Chapter 2 Available Solar Radiation DEFINITIONS Figure shows the primary radiation fluxes on a surface at or near the ground that are important in connection with solar thermal processes. DEFINITIONS It
More informationSurface UV Irradiance Obtained by Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) Over Peninsular Malaysia
Pertanika J. Sci. & Technol. 19 (S): 125-129 (2011) ISSN: 0128-7680 Universiti Putra Malaysia Press Surface UV Irradiance Obtained by Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) Over Peninsular Malaysia N. H. Hisamuddin
More informationARCH 1250 APPLIED ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES. CLASS TWO - CLIMATE Macroclimate and Microclimate
APPLIED ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES CLASS TWO - Macroclimate and Microclimate Part 1: Climate Overview John Seitz, RA, LEED AP Assistant Adjunct Professor Professor Paul C. King, RA, AIA, ARA Assistant Professor
More informationLAB 2: Earth Sun Relations
LAB 2: Earth Sun Relations Name School The amount of solar energy striking the Earth s atmosphere is not uniform; distances, angles and seasons play a dominant role on this distribution of radiation. Needless
More informationWeather and Climate Summary and Forecast October 2018 Report
Weather and Climate Summary and Forecast October 2018 Report Gregory V. Jones Linfield College October 4, 2018 Summary: Much of Washington, Oregon, coastal California and the Bay Area and delta region
More informationEarth is tilted (oblique) on its Axis!
MONDAY AM Radiation, Atmospheric Greenhouse Effect Earth's orbit around the Sun is slightly elliptical (not circular) Seasons & Days Why do we have seasons? Why aren't seasonal temperatures highest at
More informationWeather and Climate Summary and Forecast Fall/Winter 2016
Weather and Climate Summary and Forecast Fall/Winter 2016 Gregory V. Jones Southern Oregon University November 5, 2016 After a year where we were seemingly off by a month in terms of temperatures (March
More informationGEO1010 tirsdag
GEO1010 tirsdag 31.08.2010 Jørn Kristiansen; jornk@met.no I dag: Først litt repetisjon Stråling (kap. 4) Atmosfærens sirkulasjon (kap. 6) Latitudinal Geographic Zones Figure 1.12 jkl TØRR ATMOSFÆRE Temperature
More informationURBAN HEAT ISLAND IN SEOUL
URBAN HEAT ISLAND IN SEOUL Jong-Jin Baik *, Yeon-Hee Kim ** *Seoul National University; ** Meteorological Research Institute/KMA, Korea Abstract The spatial and temporal structure of the urban heat island
More informationChapter 2. Heating Earth's Surface & Atmosphere
Chapter 2 Heating Earth's Surface & Atmosphere Topics Earth-Sun Relationships Energy, Heat and Temperature Mechanisms of Heat Transfer What happens to Incoming Solar Radiation? Radiation Emitted by the
More informationEstimation of Seasonal and Annual Albedo of the Earth s Atmosphere over Kano, Nigeria
IOSR Journal of Applied Physics (IOSR-JAP) e-issn: 2278-4861.Volume 6, Issue 5 Ver. I (Sep.-Oct. 2014), PP 56-62 Estimation of Seasonal and Annual Albedo of the Earth s Atmosphere over Kano, Nigeria Audu,
More informationClimate Outlook through 2100 South Florida Ecological Services Office Vero Beach, FL September 9, 2014
Climate Outlook through 2100 South Florida Ecological Services Office Vero Beach, FL September 9, 2014 Short Term Drought Map: Short-term (
More informationWhich Earth latitude receives the greatest intensity of insolation when Earth is at the position shown in the diagram? A) 0 B) 23 N C) 55 N D) 90 N
1. In which list are the forms of electromagnetic energy arranged in order from longest to shortest wavelengths? A) gamma rays, x-rays, ultraviolet rays, visible light B) radio waves, infrared rays, visible
More informationFor further information, and additional background on the American Meteorological Society s Education Program, please contact:
Project ATMOSPHERE This guide is one of a series produced by Project ATMOSPHERE, an initiative of the American Meteorological Society. Project ATMOSPHERE has created and trained a network of resource agents
More informationWarming Earth and its Atmosphere The Diurnal and Seasonal Cycles
Warming Earth and its Atmosphere The Diurnal and Seasonal Cycles Or, what happens to the energy received from the sun? First We Need to Understand The Ways in Which Heat Can be Transferred in the Atmosphere
More informationERBE Geographic Scene and Monthly Snow Data
NASA Contractor Report 4773 ERBE Geographic Scene and Monthly Snow Data Lisa H. Coleman, Beth T. Flug, Shalini Gupta, Edward A. Kizer, and John L. Robbins Science Applications International Corporation
More informationIMPROVING THE CONAE SOLAR UV INDEX FOR ARGENTINA
IMPROVING THE CONAE SOLAR UV INDEX FOR ARGENTINA Salum G. M. (1,), Piacentini R. D. (1,3), Cede A. (), Luccini E. (5), Marraco H. (), Machado M.E. () (1) Instituto de Física Rosario (CONICET Universidad
More informationThe following information is provided for your use in describing climate and water supply conditions in the West as of April 1, 2003.
Natural Resources Conservation Service National Water and Climate Center 101 SW Main Street, Suite 1600 Portland, OR 97204-3224 Date: April 8, 2003 Subject: April 1, 2003 Western Snowpack Conditions and
More informationGlobal temperature record reaches one-third century
Dec. 16, 2011 Vol. 21, No. 7 For Additional Information: Dr. John Christy, (256) 961-7763 john.christy@nsstc.uah.edu Dr. Roy Spencer, (256) 961-7960 roy.spencer@nsstc.uah.edu Global temperature record
More informationAN INTERNATIONAL SOLAR IRRADIANCE DATA INGEST SYSTEM FOR FORECASTING SOLAR POWER AND AGRICULTURAL CROP YIELDS
AN INTERNATIONAL SOLAR IRRADIANCE DATA INGEST SYSTEM FOR FORECASTING SOLAR POWER AND AGRICULTURAL CROP YIELDS James Hall JHTech PO Box 877 Divide, CO 80814 Email: jameshall@jhtech.com Jeffrey Hall JHTech
More informationWeather and Climate Summary and Forecast Summer 2016
Weather and Climate Summary and Forecast Summer 2016 Gregory V. Jones Southern Oregon University June 6, 2016 May 2016 continued the warm trend for portions of the west, while providing some relief for
More informationPage 1. Name:
Name: 1) What is the primary reason New York State is warmer in July than in February? A) The altitude of the noon Sun is greater in February. B) The insolation in New York is greater in July. C) The Earth
More informationActivity 2.2: Recognizing Change (Observation vs. Inference)
Activity 2.2: Recognizing Change (Observation vs. Inference) Teacher Notes: Evidence for Climate Change PowerPoint Slide 1 Slide 2 Introduction Image 1 (Namib Desert, Namibia) The sun is on the horizon
More informationInfluence of the aerosol load on the Erythemal variation
Influence of the aerosol load on the Erythemal variation A.M. Díaz a, O.E. García a, J.P. Díaz a, F.J. Expósito a, P.A. Hernández-Leal a, A. Redondas b and S. Toru c a University of La Laguna, Avda. Astrofísico
More informationFormative Test. 4 th Grading in Science VII
Formative Test 4 th Grading in Science VII I. Latitude and Longitude 1. It is an imaginary line that divides the northern and southern hemispheres. A. Latitude B. Equator C. Longitude D. Tropic of Cancer
More informationWhat Is the Weather Like in Different Regions of the United States?
Learning Set 1 What Is Weather, and How Is It Measured and Described? 1.3 Explore What Is the Weather Like in Different Regions of the United States? trends: patterns or tendencies you can see over a broad
More informationObserved Climate Variability and Change: Evidence and Issues Related to Uncertainty
Observed Climate Variability and Change: Evidence and Issues Related to Uncertainty David R. Easterling National Climatic Data Center Asheville, North Carolina Overview Some examples of observed climate
More informationDeke Arndt, Chief, Climate Monitoring Branch, NOAA s National Climatic Data Center
Thomas R. Karl, L.H.D., Director, NOAA s National Climatic Data Center, and Chair of the Subcommittee on Global Change Research Peter Thorne, PhD, Senior Scientist, Cooperative Institute for Climate and
More informationRegional Haze Metrics Trends and HYSPLIT Trajectory Analyses. May 2017
Regional Haze Metrics Trends and HYSPLIT Trajectory Analyses May 2017 Principal Contributors: Tom Downs, CCM, ME DEP Project manager Martha Webster, ME DEP Trajectory analyses and GIS mapping Rich Greves,
More informationDEPARTMENT OF EARTH & CLIMATE SCIENCES Name SAN FRANCISCO STATE UNIVERSITY Nov 29, ERTH 360 Test #2 200 pts
DEPARTMENT OF EARTH & CLIMATE SCIENCES Name SAN FRANCISCO STATE UNIVERSITY Nov 29, 2018 ERTH 360 Test #2 200 pts Each question is worth 4 points. Indicate your BEST CHOICE for each question on the Scantron
More informationLaboratory Exercise #7 - Introduction to Atmospheric Science: The Seasons
Laboratory Exercise #7 - Introduction to Atmospheric Science: The Seasons page - 1 Section A - Introduction: This lab consists of both computer-based and noncomputer-based questions dealing with atmospheric
More informationFoundations of Earth Science, 6e Lutgens, Tarbuck, & Tasa
Foundations of Earth Science, 6e Lutgens, Tarbuck, & Tasa Weather Patterns and Severe Weather Foundations, 6e - Chapter 14 Stan Hatfield Southwestern Illinois College Air masses Characteristics Large body
More informationDefinitions Weather and Climate Climates of NYS Weather Climate 2012 Characteristics of Climate Regions of NYS NYS s Climates 1.
Definitions Climates of NYS Prof. Anthony Grande 2012 Weather and Climate Weather the state of the atmosphere at one point in time. The elements of weather are temperature, t air pressure, wind and moisture.
More informationWeather and Climate Summary and Forecast April 2018 Report
Weather and Climate Summary and Forecast April 2018 Report Gregory V. Jones Linfield College April 4, 2018 Summary: A near Miracle March played out bringing cooler and wetter conditions to the majority
More informationA Time Series of Photo-synthetically Available Radiation at the Ocean Surface from SeaWiFS and MODIS Data
A Time Series of Photo-synthetically Available Radiation at the Ocean Surface from SeaWiFS and MODIS Data Robert Frouin* a, John McPherson a, Kyozo Ueyoshi a, Bryan A. Franz b a Scripps Institution of
More informationSunlight and its Properties II. EE 446/646 Y. Baghzouz
Sunlight and its Properties II EE 446/646 Y. Baghzouz Solar Time (ST) and Civil (clock) Time (CT) There are two adjustments that need to be made in order to convert ST to CT: The first is the Longitude
More informationEarth s Heat Budget. What causes the seasons? Seasons
Earth s Heat Budget Solar energy and the global heat budget Transfer of heat drives weather and climate Ocean circulation A. Rotation of the Earth B. Distance from the Sun C. Variations of Earth s orbit
More informationGlobal Climate Change
Global Climate Change Overview: Students will learn about global climate change, what causes global warming, and scientific projections about climate change in the near future. Levels V-VI Grades 9-12
More informationChapter 4 Nadir looking UV measurement. Part-I: Theory and algorithm
Chapter 4 Nadir looking UV measurement. Part-I: Theory and algorithm -Aerosol and tropospheric ozone retrieval method using continuous UV spectra- Atmospheric composition measurements from satellites are
More information