Abstraction of Nondeterministic Automata Rong Su
|
|
- Alvin Rodgers
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Astrtion of Nondeterministi Automt Rong Su My 6, 2010 TU/e Mehnil Engineering, Systems Engineering Group 1
2 Outline Motivtion Automton Astrtion Relevnt Properties Conlusions My 6, 2010 TU/e Mehnil Engineering, Systems Engineering Group 2
3 Key Conepts of RW Supervisory Control Theory (SCT) Controllility Oservility Nonlokingness Cheking nonlokingness is omputtionlly intensive Let L m (S/G) = L m (G 1 ) L m (G n ) L m (S 1 ) L m (S r ) Let L(S/G) = L(G 1 ) L(G n ) L(S 1 ) L(S r ) Chek whether or not L m (S/G) = L(S/G) We hve the stte-spe explosion issue here! My 6, 2010 TU/e Mehnil Engineering, Systems Engineering Group 3
4 A Few Attempts to Del with Nonlokingness Stte-feedk Control nd Symoli Computtion, e.g. supervisory ontrol of stte tree strutures (STS) Astrtion-Bsed Synthesis, e.g. oordinted modulr supervisory ontrol (MSC) hierrhil supervisory ontrol (HSC) Synthesis sed on Struturl Deoupling, e.g. interfe-sed supervisory ontrol (IBSC) My 6, 2010 TU/e Mehnil Engineering, Systems Engineering Group 4
5 Prolems Assoited with These Attempts STS is entrlized, not suitle for very lrge systems Current hierrhil nd modulr pprohes need oservers The oserver property is too strong! G = {11,12,14,21,22,24,27} = {11,21} nd To mke P: * * n L m (G)-oserver we need = Interfes re very diffiult to design My 6, 2010 TU/e Mehnil Engineering, Systems Engineering Group 5
6 Our Gol To define n strtion over (nondeterministi) FSAs, It hs the following property similr to wht n oserver hs, nmely for ny G nd n S whose lphet is the sme s (G), GS is nonloking if (nd only if) (G)S is nonloking It hs no speil requirement on trget lphet s n oserver does My 6, 2010 TU/e Mehnil Engineering, Systems Engineering Group 6
7 Outline Motivtion Automton Astrtion Relevnt Properties Conlusions My 6, 2010 TU/e Mehnil Engineering, Systems Engineering Group 7
8 Nondeterministi Finite-Stte Automton A finite-stte utomton G=(X,,, x 0, X m ) is nondeterministi if : X 2 X i.e stte my hve more thn one trnsition with the sme event lel x x 1 x 2 From now on we ssume ll utomt re nondeterministi My 6, 2010 TU/e Mehnil Engineering, Systems Engineering Group 8
9 Automton Produt Let G i =(X i, i, i,x 0,i,X m,i )( i ) with i=1,2. The produt of G 1 nd G 2, written s G 1 G 2, is n utomton G 1 G 2 =(X 1 X 2, 1 2, 1 2, (x 0,1,x 0,2 ),X m,1 X m,2 ) where 1 2 :X 1 X 2 ( 1 2 )2 X1X2 is defined s follows, ( )(( x 1 2 1, x 2 ), ) : 1( x1, ) { x2} { x1} 2( x2, ) 1( x1, ) 2( x 2, ) if if if My 6, 2010 TU/e Mehnil Engineering, Systems Engineering Group 9
10 The Conept of Equivlene Reltion Given set X, let R e inry reltion on X, nmely R X X For ny (x,x)r, we write xrx. We sy R is n equivlene reltion on X, if R is reflexive, i.e. (xx) xrx R is symmetri, i.e. (x,yx) xry yrx R is trnsitive, i.e. (x,y,zx) xry yrz xrz Let E(X) e the olletion of ll equivlene reltions on X E(X) is omplete lttie My 6, 2010 TU/e Mehnil Engineering, Systems Engineering Group 10
11 The Conept of Mrking Wek Bisimilrity Given G=(X,,,x 0,X m ), let, R X X e n equivlene reltion. R is mrking wek isimultion reltion over X with respet to if R X m X m (X X m ) (X X m ) For ll (x,x)r nd s *, if (x,s) then there exists s * suh tht (x,s) P(s)=P(s) (y(x,s))(y(x,s)) (y,y)r where P : * * is the nturl projetion The lrgest mrking wek isimultion is mrking wek isimilrity, written s My 6, 2010 TU/e Mehnil Engineering, Systems Engineering Group 11
12 Automton Astrtion Let G=(X,,,x 0,X m ) nd For eh xx let [x] := {xx (x,x)}, nd X/ := {[x] xx}. G/ = (X,,,x 0,X m ) is n utomton strtion of G w.r.t. if X = X/, X m = {[x]x [x] X m }, x 0 = [x 0 ]X :X 2 X, where for ny [x]x nd, ([x],):={[x]x (y[x],y[x])(u,u(-) * ) y(y,uu)} My 6, 2010 TU/e Mehnil Engineering, Systems Engineering Group 12
13 Exmple , u 6 = {,,,, u} = {, } 6 G G/ My 6, 2010 TU/e Mehnil Engineering, Systems Engineering Group 13
14 Outline Motivtion Automton Astrtion Relevnt Properties Conlusions My 6, 2010 TU/e Mehnil Engineering, Systems Engineering Group 14
15 Effet of Silene Pths 2 G 0 1 G = {,} = {} = {,} = {} G/ 0 1 G/ My 6, 2010 TU/e Mehnil Engineering, Systems Engineering Group 15
16 Astrtion my rete unwnted ehviours. To void this, we introdue the onept of stndrdized utomt. My 6, 2010 TU/e Mehnil Engineering, Systems Engineering Group 16
17 The Stndrdized Automt Suppose G = (X,,,x 0,X m ). Bring in new event symol. will e treted s unontrollle nd unoservle. An utomton G = (X,{},,x 0,X m ) is stndrdized if x 0 X m (xx) (x,) x = x 0 () (x 0,)= (xx)({}) x 0 (x,) Let () e the olletion of ll stndrdized utomt over. My 6, 2010 TU/e Mehnil Engineering, Systems Engineering Group 17
18 Exmple of Stndrdized Automton d G : efore stndrdiztion G : fter stndrdiztion d My 6, 2010 TU/e Mehnil Engineering, Systems Engineering Group 18
19 Mrking Awreness G() is mrking wre with respet to, if (xx-x m )(s * ) (x,s)x m P(s) where P: * * is the nturl projetion. My 6, 2010 TU/e Mehnil Engineering, Systems Engineering Group 19
20 Automton Astrtion vs Nturl Projetion Let B(G) ={s * (x(x 0,s))(s * ) (x,s) X m = }. Let N G (x) ={s * (x,s) X m }. In prtiulr, N(G):= N G (x 0 ). Proposition 1 Let G(),, nd P: * * e the nturl projetion. Then P(B(G)) B(G/ ) nd P(N(G))=N(G/ ) i.e. utomton strtion my potentilly rete more loking ehviours If G is mrking wre with respet to ', then P(B(G))= B(G/ ) My 6, 2010 TU/e Mehnil Engineering, Systems Engineering Group 20
21 / () () / () () N N B B P * 2 * 2 P * 2 * 2 When G is mrking wre with respet to ' My 6, 2010 TU/e Mehnil Engineering, Systems Engineering Group 21
22 Nonloking Preservtion nd Equivlene Let G 1, G 2 (). G 1 is nonloking preserving w.r.t. G 2, denoted s G 1 G 2, if B(G 1 )B(G 2 ) nd N(G 1 )=N(G 2 ) For ny sn(g 1 ), nd x 1 1 (x 1,0,s), there exists x 2 2 (x 2,0,s) suh tht N G2 (x 2 ) N G1 (x 1 ) x 1 X 1,m x 2 X 2,m G 1 is nonloking equivlent to G 2, denoted s G 1 G 2, if G 1 G 2 nd G 2 G 1 My 6, 2010 TU/e Mehnil Engineering, Systems Engineering Group 22
23 Proposition 2 (Nonloking Invrine under produt) For ny, G 1,G 2 () nd G 3 (), if G 1 G 2 then G 1 G 3 G 2 G 3 if G 1 G 2 then G 1 G 3 G 2 G 3 My 6, 2010 TU/e Mehnil Engineering, Systems Engineering Group 23
24 Proposition 3 (Nonloking Invrine under strtion) For ny nd G 1,G 2 (), if G 1 G 2 then G 1 / G 2 / if G 1 G 2 then G 1 / G 2 / My 6, 2010 TU/e Mehnil Engineering, Systems Engineering Group 24
25 Proposition 4 (Chin Rule of Automton Astrtion) Suppose nd G(). Then (G/ )/ G/. My 6, 2010 TU/e Mehnil Engineering, Systems Engineering Group 25
26 Proposition 5 (Distriution of Astrtion over Produt) Let G i ( i ), where i=1,2, nd 1 2. If 1 2, then (G 1 G 2 )/ (G 1 / 1 )(G 2 / 2 ). If 1 2 nd G i (i=1,2) is mrking wre w.r.t. i, then (G 1 G 2 )/ (G 1 / 1 )(G 2 / 2 ) My 6, 2010 TU/e Mehnil Engineering, Systems Engineering Group 26
27 Exmple G 1 G 2 1 ={,,,} 2 ={,} ={,} ,2 3 G 1 G 2 (G 1 G 2 )/ My 6, 2010 TU/e Mehnil Engineering, Systems Engineering Group 27
28 Exmple 1 (ont.) G 1 G G 1 / 1 G 2 / 2 (G 1 / 1 ) (G 2 / 2 ) My 6, 2010 TU/e Mehnil Engineering, Systems Engineering Group 28
29 Exmple 1 (ont.) Clerly, (G 1 G 2 )/ (G 1 / 1 )(G 2 / 2 ) Thus, the ondition of mrking wreness is only suffiient. My 6, 2010 TU/e Mehnil Engineering, Systems Engineering Group 29
30 Exmple 2 G 1 G 2 1 ={,} 2 ={,,} ={,,} My 6, 2010 TU/e Mehnil Engineering, Systems Engineering Group 30
31 Exmple 2 (ont.) G 1 G 2 (G 1 G 2 )/ My 6, 2010 TU/e Mehnil Engineering, Systems Engineering Group 31
32 Exmple 2 (ont.) G 1 / 1 G 2 / 2 (G 1 / 1 )(G 2 / 2 ) My 6, 2010 TU/e Mehnil Engineering, Systems Engineering Group 32
33 Clerly, (G 1 G 2 )/ (G 1 / 1 )(G 2 / 2 ) My 6, 2010 TU/e Mehnil Engineering, Systems Engineering Group 33
34 Exmple 3 G 1 G 2 1 ={,,} 2 ={,} ={,} My 6, 2010 TU/e Mehnil Engineering, Systems Engineering Group 34
35 Exmple 3 (ont.) G 1 G 2 (G 1 G 2 )/ My 6, 2010 TU/e Mehnil Engineering, Systems Engineering Group 35
36 Exmple 3 (ont.) G 1 / 1 G 2 / 2 (G 1 / 1 )(G 2 / 2 ) My 6, 2010 TU/e Mehnil Engineering, Systems Engineering Group 36
37 Clerly, (G 1 G 2 )/ (G 1 / 1 )(G 2 / 2 ) But, it is not true tht (G 1 G 2 )/ (G 1 / 1 )(G 2 / 2 ) My 6, 2010 TU/e Mehnil Engineering, Systems Engineering Group 37
38 Exmple 3 (revisit) G 1 G 2 1 ={,,} 2 ={,} ={,,} My 6, 2010 TU/e Mehnil Engineering, Systems Engineering Group 38
39 Exmple 3 (ont.) G 1 G 2 (G 1 G 2 )/ My 6, 2010 TU/e Mehnil Engineering, Systems Engineering Group 39
40 Exmple 3 (ont.) G 1 / 1 G 2 / 2 (G 1 / 1 )(G 2 / 2 ) My 6, 2010 TU/e Mehnil Engineering, Systems Engineering Group 40
41 We n hek tht, (G 1 G 2 )/ (G 1 / 1 )(G 2 / 2 ) My 6, 2010 TU/e Mehnil Engineering, Systems Engineering Group 41
42 Min Result Theorem: Given nd, let G() nd S(). Then B((G/ )S)= B(GS)= G is mrking wre w.r.t. [B((G/ )S)= B(GS)=] My 6, 2010 TU/e Mehnil Engineering, Systems Engineering Group 42
43 A Computtionl Chllenge Let { i ii={1,2,,n}} e olletion of lol lphets. For ny JI, let J := jj j. Let G i ( i ) for eh ii, nd I. We wnt to ompute ( ii G i )/ effiiently. My 6, 2010 TU/e Mehnil Engineering, Systems Engineering Group 43
44 Sequentil Astrtion over Produt (SAP) For k=1,2,,n, J(k) := {1,2,,k} nd T(k) := Jk ( I-Jk ) If k=1 then W 1 :=G 1 / T(1) If k>1 then W k :=(W k-1 G k )/ T(k) Proposition 6 Suppose W n is omputed y SAP. Then ( ii G i )/ W n. My 6, 2010 TU/e Mehnil Engineering, Systems Engineering Group 44
45 Conlusions Advntges of this pproh It possesses the good spets of n oserver It does not hve the d spets of n oserver Potentil disdvntges of this pproh Astrtion retes more trnsitions, whih might omplite synthesis The mrking wreness ondition is suffiient ut not neessry My 6, 2010 TU/e Mehnil Engineering, Systems Engineering Group 45
Supervisory Control under Partial Observation
Supervisory Control under Prtil Observtion Dr Rong Su S1-B1b-59, Shool of EEE Nnyng Tehnologil University Tel: +65 6790-6042, Emil: rsu@ntu.edu.sg EE6226 Disrete Event Dynmi Systems 1 Outline Motivtion
More informationBehavior Composition in the Presence of Failure
Behvior Composition in the Presene of Filure Sestin Srdin RMIT University, Melourne, Austrli Fio Ptrizi & Giuseppe De Giomo Spienz Univ. Rom, Itly KR 08, Sept. 2008, Sydney Austrli Introdution There re
More informationDiscrete Structures, Test 2 Monday, March 28, 2016 SOLUTIONS, VERSION α
Disrete Strutures, Test 2 Mondy, Mrh 28, 2016 SOLUTIONS, VERSION α α 1. (18 pts) Short nswer. Put your nswer in the ox. No prtil redit. () Consider the reltion R on {,,, d with mtrix digrph of R.. Drw
More informationCS311 Computational Structures Regular Languages and Regular Grammars. Lecture 6
CS311 Computtionl Strutures Regulr Lnguges nd Regulr Grmmrs Leture 6 1 Wht we know so fr: RLs re losed under produt, union nd * Every RL n e written s RE, nd every RE represents RL Every RL n e reognized
More informationAutomatic Synthesis of New Behaviors from a Library of Available Behaviors
Automti Synthesis of New Behviors from Lirry of Aville Behviors Giuseppe De Giomo Università di Rom L Spienz, Rom, Itly degiomo@dis.unirom1.it Sestin Srdin RMIT University, Melourne, Austrli ssrdin@s.rmit.edu.u
More informationPetri Nets. Rebecca Albrecht. Seminar: Automata Theory Chair of Software Engeneering
Petri Nets Ree Alreht Seminr: Automt Theory Chir of Softwre Engeneering Overview 1. Motivtion: Why not just using finite utomt for everything? Wht re Petri Nets nd when do we use them? 2. Introdution:
More informationNondeterministic Automata vs Deterministic Automata
Nondeterministi Automt vs Deterministi Automt We lerned tht NFA is onvenient model for showing the reltionships mong regulr grmmrs, FA, nd regulr expressions, nd designing them. However, we know tht n
More informationChapter Five: Nondeterministic Finite Automata. Formal Language, chapter 5, slide 1
Chpter Five: Nondeterministic Finite Automt Forml Lnguge, chpter 5, slide 1 1 A DFA hs exctly one trnsition from every stte on every symol in the lphet. By relxing this requirement we get relted ut more
More information378 Relations Solutions for Chapter 16. Section 16.1 Exercises. 3. Let A = {0,1,2,3,4,5}. Write out the relation R that expresses on A.
378 Reltions 16.7 Solutions for Chpter 16 Section 16.1 Exercises 1. Let A = {0,1,2,3,4,5}. Write out the reltion R tht expresses > on A. Then illustrte it with digrm. 2 1 R = { (5,4),(5,3),(5,2),(5,1),(5,0),(4,3),(4,2),(4,1),
More informationBehavior Composition in the Presence of Failure
Behior Composition in the Presene of Filure Sestin Srdin RMIT Uniersity, Melourne, Austrli Fio Ptrizi & Giuseppe De Giomo Spienz Uni. Rom, Itly KR 08, Sept. 2008, Sydney Austrli Introdution There re t
More informationFinite State Automata and Determinisation
Finite Stte Automt nd Deterministion Tim Dworn Jnury, 2016 Lnguges fs nf re df Deterministion 2 Outline 1 Lnguges 2 Finite Stte Automt (fs) 3 Non-deterministi Finite Stte Automt (nf) 4 Regulr Expressions
More informationBisimulation, Games & Hennessy Milner logic
Bisimultion, Gmes & Hennessy Milner logi Leture 1 of Modelli Mtemtii dei Proessi Conorrenti Pweł Soboiński Univeristy of Southmpton, UK Bisimultion, Gmes & Hennessy Milner logi p.1/32 Clssil lnguge theory
More informationCompression of Palindromes and Regularity.
Compression of Plinromes n Regulrity. Kyoko Shikishim-Tsuji Center for Lierl Arts Eution n Reserh Tenri University 1 Introution In [1], property of likstrem t t view of tse is isusse n it is shown tht
More informationTransition systems (motivation)
Trnsition systems (motivtion) Course Modelling of Conurrent Systems ( Modellierung neenläufiger Systeme ) Winter Semester 2009/0 University of Duisurg-Essen Brr König Tehing ssistnt: Christoph Blume In
More informationNON-DETERMINISTIC FSA
Tw o types of non-determinism: NON-DETERMINISTIC FS () Multiple strt-sttes; strt-sttes S Q. The lnguge L(M) ={x:x tkes M from some strt-stte to some finl-stte nd ll of x is proessed}. The string x = is
More informationTechnische Universität München Winter term 2009/10 I7 Prof. J. Esparza / J. Křetínský / M. Luttenberger 11. Februar Solution
Tehnishe Universität Münhen Winter term 29/ I7 Prof. J. Esprz / J. Křetínský / M. Luttenerger. Ferur 2 Solution Automt nd Forml Lnguges Homework 2 Due 5..29. Exerise 2. Let A e the following finite utomton:
More information80 CHAPTER 2. DFA S, NFA S, REGULAR LANGUAGES. 2.6 Finite State Automata With Output: Transducers
80 CHAPTER 2. DFA S, NFA S, REGULAR LANGUAGES 2.6 Finite Stte Automt With Output: Trnsducers So fr, we hve only considered utomt tht recognize lnguges, i.e., utomt tht do not produce ny output on ny input
More informationLecture 6: Coding theory
Leture 6: Coing theory Biology 429 Crl Bergstrom Ferury 4, 2008 Soures: This leture loosely follows Cover n Thoms Chpter 5 n Yeung Chpter 3. As usul, some of the text n equtions re tken iretly from those
More informationNondeterministic Finite Automata
Nondeterministi Finite utomt The Power of Guessing Tuesdy, Otoer 4, 2 Reding: Sipser.2 (first prt); Stoughton 3.3 3.5 S235 Lnguges nd utomt eprtment of omputer Siene Wellesley ollege Finite utomton (F)
More informationKENDRIYA VIDYALAYA IIT KANPUR HOME ASSIGNMENTS FOR SUMMER VACATIONS CLASS - XII MATHEMATICS (Relations and Functions & Binary Operations)
KENDRIYA VIDYALAYA IIT KANPUR HOME ASSIGNMENTS FOR SUMMER VACATIONS 6-7 CLASS - XII MATHEMATICS (Reltions nd Funtions & Binry Opertions) For Slow Lerners: - A Reltion is sid to e Reflexive if.. every A
More informationCoalgebra, Lecture 15: Equations for Deterministic Automata
Colger, Lecture 15: Equtions for Deterministic Automt Julin Slmnc (nd Jurrin Rot) Decemer 19, 2016 In this lecture, we will study the concept of equtions for deterministic utomt. The notes re self contined
More informationChapter 2 Finite Automata
Chpter 2 Finite Automt 28 2.1 Introduction Finite utomt: first model of the notion of effective procedure. (They lso hve mny other pplictions). The concept of finite utomton cn e derived y exmining wht
More informationMinimal DFA. minimal DFA for L starting from any other
Miniml DFA Among the mny DFAs ccepting the sme regulr lnguge L, there is exctly one (up to renming of sttes) which hs the smllest possile numer of sttes. Moreover, it is possile to otin tht miniml DFA
More informationLearning Partially Observable Markov Models from First Passage Times
Lerning Prtilly Oservle Mrkov s from First Pssge s Jérôme Cllut nd Pierre Dupont Europen Conferene on Mhine Lerning (ECML) 8 Septemer 7 Outline. FPT in models nd sequenes. Prtilly Oservle Mrkov s (POMMs).
More informationOn Determinisation of History-Deterministic Automata.
On Deterministion of History-Deterministic Automt. Denis Kupererg Mich l Skrzypczk University of Wrsw YR-ICALP 2014 Copenhgen Introduction Deterministic utomt re centrl tool in utomt theory: Polynomil
More informationSynchronizing Automata with Random Inputs
Synchronizing Automt with Rndom Inputs Vldimir Gusev Url Federl University, Ekterinurg, Russi 9 August, 14 Vldimir Gusev (UrFU) Synchronizing Automt with Rndom Input 9 August, 14 1 / 13 Introduction Synchronizing
More informationHybrid Systems Modeling, Analysis and Control
Hyrid Systems Modeling, Anlysis nd Control Rdu Grosu Vienn University of Tehnology Leture 5 Finite Automt s Liner Systems Oservility, Rehility nd More Miniml DFA re Not Miniml NFA (Arnold, Diky nd Nivt
More informationProject 6: Minigoals Towards Simplifying and Rewriting Expressions
MAT 51 Wldis Projet 6: Minigols Towrds Simplifying nd Rewriting Expressions The distriutive property nd like terms You hve proly lerned in previous lsses out dding like terms ut one prolem with the wy
More informationLet's start with an example:
Finite Automt Let's strt with n exmple: Here you see leled circles tht re sttes, nd leled rrows tht re trnsitions. One of the sttes is mrked "strt". One of the sttes hs doule circle; this is terminl stte
More informationa,b a 1 a 2 a 3 a,b 1 a,b a,b 2 3 a,b a,b a 2 a,b CS Determinisitic Finite Automata 1
CS4 45- Determinisitic Finite Automt -: Genertors vs. Checkers Regulr expressions re one wy to specify forml lnguge String Genertor Genertes strings in the lnguge Deterministic Finite Automt (DFA) re nother
More informationAlpha Algorithm: Limitations
Proess Mining: Dt Siene in Ation Alph Algorithm: Limittions prof.dr.ir. Wil vn der Alst www.proessmining.org Let L e n event log over T. α(l) is defined s follows. 1. T L = { t T σ L t σ}, 2. T I = { t
More information1 Nondeterministic Finite Automata
1 Nondeterministic Finite Automt Suppose in life, whenever you hd choice, you could try oth possiilities nd live your life. At the end, you would go ck nd choose the one tht worked out the est. Then you
More informationNon-Deterministic Finite Automata. Fall 2018 Costas Busch - RPI 1
Non-Deterministic Finite Automt Fll 2018 Costs Busch - RPI 1 Nondeterministic Finite Automton (NFA) Alphbet ={} q q2 1 q 0 q 3 Fll 2018 Costs Busch - RPI 2 Nondeterministic Finite Automton (NFA) Alphbet
More information= state, a = reading and q j
4 Finite Automt CHAPTER 2 Finite Automt (FA) (i) Derterministi Finite Automt (DFA) A DFA, M Q, q,, F, Where, Q = set of sttes (finite) q Q = the strt/initil stte = input lphet (finite) (use only those
More informationState Complexity of Union and Intersection of Binary Suffix-Free Languages
Stte Complexity of Union nd Intersetion of Binry Suffix-Free Lnguges Glin Jirásková nd Pvol Olejár Slovk Ademy of Sienes nd Šfárik University, Košie 0000 1111 0000 1111 Glin Jirásková nd Pvol Olejár Binry
More informationCS 573 Automata Theory and Formal Languages
Non-determinism Automt Theory nd Forml Lnguges Professor Leslie Lnder Leture # 3 Septemer 6, 2 To hieve our gol, we need the onept of Non-deterministi Finite Automton with -moves (NFA) An NFA is tuple
More informationOn the Maximally-Permissive Range Control Problem in Partially-Observed Discrete Event Systems
On the Mximlly-Permissie Rnge Control Prolem in Prtilly-Osered Disrete Eent Systems Xing Yin nd Stéphne Lfortune EECS Deprtment, Uniersity of Mihign 55th IEEE CDC, De 2-4, 206, Ls Vegs, USA X.Yin & S.Lfortune
More informationUnfoldings of Networks of Timed Automata
Unfolings of Networks of Time Automt Frnk Cssez Thoms Chtin Clue Jr Ptrii Bouyer Serge H Pierre-Alin Reynier Rennes, Deemer 3, 2008 Unfolings [MMilln 93] First efine for Petri nets Then extene to other
More informationDesigning finite automata II
Designing finite utomt II Prolem: Design DFA A such tht L(A) consists of ll strings of nd which re of length 3n, for n = 0, 1, 2, (1) Determine wht to rememer out the input string Assign stte to ech of
More informationLogic, Set Theory and Computability [M. Coppenbarger]
14 Orer (Hnout) Definition 7-11: A reltion is qusi-orering (or preorer) if it is reflexive n trnsitive. A quisi-orering tht is symmetri is n equivlene reltion. A qusi-orering tht is nti-symmetri is n orer
More informationCS103B Handout 18 Winter 2007 February 28, 2007 Finite Automata
CS103B ndout 18 Winter 2007 Ferury 28, 2007 Finite Automt Initil text y Mggie Johnson. Introduction Severl childrens gmes fit the following description: Pieces re set up on plying ord; dice re thrown or
More informationChapter 4 State-Space Planning
Leture slides for Automted Plnning: Theory nd Prtie Chpter 4 Stte-Spe Plnning Dn S. Nu CMSC 722, AI Plnning University of Mrylnd, Spring 2008 1 Motivtion Nerly ll plnning proedures re serh proedures Different
More informationStrong Bisimulation. Overview. References. Actions Labeled transition system Transition semantics Simulation Bisimulation
Strong Bisimultion Overview Actions Lbeled trnsition system Trnsition semntics Simultion Bisimultion References Robin Milner, Communiction nd Concurrency Robin Milner, Communicting nd Mobil Systems 32
More informationPrefix-Free Regular-Expression Matching
Prefix-Free Regulr-Expression Mthing Yo-Su Hn, Yjun Wng nd Derik Wood Deprtment of Computer Siene HKUST Prefix-Free Regulr-Expression Mthing p.1/15 Pttern Mthing Given pttern P nd text T, find ll sustrings
More informationFormal Methods for XML: Algorithms & Complexity
Forml Methods for XML: Algorithms & Complexity S. Mrgherit di Pul August 2004 Thoms Shwentik Shwentik XML: Algorithms & Complexity Introdution 1 XML Exmple Doument Composer Nme Clude Debussy /Nme Vit Born
More informationThe University of Nottingham SCHOOL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE A LEVEL 2 MODULE, SPRING SEMESTER MACHINES AND THEIR LANGUAGES ANSWERS
The University of ottinghm SCHOOL OF COMPUTR SCIC A LVL 2 MODUL, SPRIG SMSTR 2015 2016 MACHIS AD THIR LAGUAGS ASWRS Time llowed TWO hours Cndidtes my omplete the front over of their nswer ook nd sign their
More informationLecture 08: Feb. 08, 2019
4CS4-6:Theory of Computtion(Closure on Reg. Lngs., regex to NDFA, DFA to regex) Prof. K.R. Chowdhry Lecture 08: Fe. 08, 2019 : Professor of CS Disclimer: These notes hve not een sujected to the usul scrutiny
More informationDeterministic Finite Automata
Finite Automt Deterministic Finite Automt H. Geuvers nd J. Rot Institute for Computing nd Informtion Sciences Version: fll 2016 J. Rot Version: fll 2016 Tlen en Automten 1 / 21 Outline Finite Automt Finite
More informationNondeterminism and Nodeterministic Automata
Nondeterminism nd Nodeterministic Automt 61 Nondeterminism nd Nondeterministic Automt The computtionl mchine models tht we lerned in the clss re deterministic in the sense tht the next move is uniquely
More informationExercises Chapter 1. Exercise 1.1. Let Σ be an alphabet. Prove wv = w + v for all strings w and v.
1 Exercises Chpter 1 Exercise 1.1. Let Σ e n lphet. Prove wv = w + v for ll strings w nd v. Prove # (wv) = # (w)+# (v) for every symol Σ nd every string w,v Σ. Exercise 1.2. Let w 1,w 2,...,w k e k strings,
More informationFormal Languages and Automata
Moile Computing nd Softwre Engineering p. 1/5 Forml Lnguges nd Automt Chpter 2 Finite Automt Chun-Ming Liu cmliu@csie.ntut.edu.tw Deprtment of Computer Science nd Informtion Engineering Ntionl Tipei University
More informationCONTROLLABILITY and observability are the central
1 Complexity of Infiml Oservle Superlnguges Tomáš Msopust Astrt The infiml prefix-losed, ontrollle nd oservle superlnguge plys n essentil role in the reltionship etween ontrollility, oservility nd o-oservility
More informationFundamentals of Computer Science
Fundmentls of Computer Science Chpter 3: NFA nd DFA equivlence Regulr expressions Henrik Björklund Umeå University Jnury 23, 2014 NFA nd DFA equivlence As we shll see, it turns out tht NFA nd DFA re equivlent,
More informationCSE : Exam 3-ANSWERS, Spring 2011 Time: 50 minutes
CSE 260-002: Exm 3-ANSWERS, Spring 20 ime: 50 minutes Nme: his exm hs 4 pges nd 0 prolems totling 00 points. his exm is closed ook nd closed notes.. Wrshll s lgorithm for trnsitive closure computtion is
More informationMyhill-Nerode Theorem
Overview Myhill-Nerode Theorem Correspondence etween DA s nd MN reltions Cnonicl DA for L Computing cnonicl DFA Myhill-Nerode Theorem Deepk D Souz Deprtment of Computer Science nd Automtion Indin Institute
More informationCS 275 Automata and Formal Language Theory
CS 275 utomt nd Forml Lnguge Theory Course Notes Prt II: The Recognition Prolem (II) Chpter II.5.: Properties of Context Free Grmmrs (14) nton Setzer (Bsed on ook drft y J. V. Tucker nd K. Stephenson)
More informationRegular expressions, Finite Automata, transition graphs are all the same!!
CSI 3104 /Winter 2011: Introduction to Forml Lnguges Chpter 7: Kleene s Theorem Chpter 7: Kleene s Theorem Regulr expressions, Finite Automt, trnsition grphs re ll the sme!! Dr. Neji Zgui CSI3104-W11 1
More informationCMPSCI 250: Introduction to Computation. Lecture #31: What DFA s Can and Can t Do David Mix Barrington 9 April 2014
CMPSCI 250: Introduction to Computtion Lecture #31: Wht DFA s Cn nd Cn t Do Dvid Mix Brrington 9 April 2014 Wht DFA s Cn nd Cn t Do Deterministic Finite Automt Forml Definition of DFA s Exmples of DFA
More informationNon Deterministic Automata. Linz: Nondeterministic Finite Accepters, page 51
Non Deterministic Automt Linz: Nondeterministic Finite Accepters, pge 51 1 Nondeterministic Finite Accepter (NFA) Alphbet ={} q 1 q2 q 0 q 3 2 Nondeterministic Finite Accepter (NFA) Alphbet ={} Two choices
More informationSpeech Recognition Lecture 2: Finite Automata and Finite-State Transducers
Speech Recognition Lecture 2: Finite Automt nd Finite-Stte Trnsducers Eugene Weinstein Google, NYU Cournt Institute eugenew@cs.nyu.edu Slide Credit: Mehryr Mohri Preliminries Finite lphet, empty string.
More informationPOSITIVE IMPLICATIVE AND ASSOCIATIVE FILTERS OF LATTICE IMPLICATION ALGEBRAS
Bull. Koren Mth. So. 35 (998), No., pp. 53 6 POSITIVE IMPLICATIVE AND ASSOCIATIVE FILTERS OF LATTICE IMPLICATION ALGEBRAS YOUNG BAE JUN*, YANG XU AND KEYUN QIN ABSTRACT. We introue the onepts of positive
More informationLecture 3: Equivalence Relations
Mthcmp Crsh Course Instructor: Pdric Brtlett Lecture 3: Equivlence Reltions Week 1 Mthcmp 2014 In our lst three tlks of this clss, we shift the focus of our tlks from proof techniques to proof concepts
More informationTypes of Finite Automata. CMSC 330: Organization of Programming Languages. Comparing DFAs and NFAs. Comparing DFAs and NFAs (cont.) Finite Automata 2
CMSC 330: Orgniztion of Progrmming Lnguges Finite Automt 2 Types of Finite Automt Deterministic Finite Automt () Exctly one sequence of steps for ech string All exmples so fr Nondeterministic Finite Automt
More informationRegular languages refresher
Regulr lnguges refresher 1 Regulr lnguges refresher Forml lnguges Alphet = finite set of letters Word = sequene of letter Lnguge = set of words Regulr lnguges defined equivlently y Regulr expressions Finite-stte
More informationCISC 4090 Theory of Computation
9/6/28 Stereotypicl computer CISC 49 Theory of Computtion Finite stte mchines & Regulr lnguges Professor Dniel Leeds dleeds@fordhm.edu JMH 332 Centrl processing unit (CPU) performs ll the instructions
More informationOutline. Theory-based Bayesian framework for property induction Causal structure induction
Outline Theory-sed Byesin frmework for property indution Cusl struture indution Constrint-sed (ottom-up) lerning Theory-sed Byesin lerning The origins of usl knowledge Question: how do people relily ome
More informationFormal Language and Automata Theory (CS21004)
Forml Lnguge nd Automt Forml Lnguge nd Automt Theory (CS21004) Khrgpur Khrgpur Khrgpur Forml Lnguge nd Automt Tle of Contents Forml Lnguge nd Automt Khrgpur 1 2 3 Khrgpur Forml Lnguge nd Automt Forml Lnguge
More informationTIME AND STATE IN DISTRIBUTED SYSTEMS
Distriuted Systems Fö 5-1 Distriuted Systems Fö 5-2 TIME ND STTE IN DISTRIUTED SYSTEMS 1. Time in Distriuted Systems Time in Distriuted Systems euse eh mhine in distriuted system hs its own lok there is
More informationFinite-State Automata: Recap
Finite-Stte Automt: Recp Deepk D Souz Deprtment of Computer Science nd Automtion Indin Institute of Science, Bnglore. 09 August 2016 Outline 1 Introduction 2 Forml Definitions nd Nottion 3 Closure under
More informationCHAPTER 1 Regular Languages. Contents
Finite Automt (FA or DFA) CHAPTE 1 egulr Lnguges Contents definitions, exmples, designing, regulr opertions Non-deterministic Finite Automt (NFA) definitions, euivlence of NFAs nd DFAs, closure under regulr
More informationinput tape head moves current state
CPS 140 - Mthemticl Foundtions of CS Dr. Susn Rodger Section: Finite Automt (Ch. 2) (lecture notes) Things to do in clss tody (Jn. 13, 2004): ffl questions on homework 1 ffl finish chpter 1 ffl Red Chpter
More informationMid-Term Examination - Spring 2014 Mathematical Programming with Applications to Economics Total Score: 45; Time: 3 hours
Mi-Term Exmintion - Spring 0 Mthemtil Progrmming with Applitions to Eonomis Totl Sore: 5; Time: hours. Let G = (N, E) e irete grph. Define the inegree of vertex i N s the numer of eges tht re oming into
More informationDescriptional Complexity of Non-Unary Self-Verifying Symmetric Difference Automata
Desriptionl Complexity of Non-Unry Self-Verifying Symmetri Differene Automt Lurette Mris 1,2 nd Lynette vn Zijl 1 1 Deprtment of Computer Siene, Stellenosh University, South Afri 2 Merk Institute, CSIR,
More informationCMSC 330: Organization of Programming Languages
CMSC 330: Orgniztion of Progrmming Lnguges Finite Automt 2 CMSC 330 1 Types of Finite Automt Deterministic Finite Automt (DFA) Exctly one sequence of steps for ech string All exmples so fr Nondeterministic
More informationMore on automata. Michael George. March 24 April 7, 2014
More on utomt Michel George Mrch 24 April 7, 2014 1 Automt constructions Now tht we hve forml model of mchine, it is useful to mke some generl constructions. 1.1 DFA Union / Product construction Suppose
More informationCS 310 (sec 20) - Winter Final Exam (solutions) SOLUTIONS
CS 310 (sec 20) - Winter 2003 - Finl Exm (solutions) SOLUTIONS 1. (Logic) Use truth tles to prove the following logicl equivlences: () p q (p p) (q q) () p q (p q) (p q) () p q p q p p q q (q q) (p p)
More informationRegular Expressions (RE) Regular Expressions (RE) Regular Expressions (RE) Regular Expressions (RE) Kleene-*
Regulr Expressions (RE) Regulr Expressions (RE) Empty set F A RE denotes the empty set Opertion Nottion Lnguge UNIX Empty string A RE denotes the set {} Alterntion R +r L(r ) L(r ) r r Symol Alterntion
More informationChapter 1, Part 1. Regular Languages. CSC527, Chapter 1, Part 1 c 2012 Mitsunori Ogihara 1
Chpter 1, Prt 1 Regulr Lnguges CSC527, Chpter 1, Prt 1 c 2012 Mitsunori Ogihr 1 Finite Automt A finite utomton is system for processing ny finite sequence of symols, where the symols re chosen from finite
More informationCS 267: Automated Verification. Lecture 8: Automata Theoretic Model Checking. Instructor: Tevfik Bultan
CS 267: Automted Verifiction Lecture 8: Automt Theoretic Model Checking Instructor: Tevfik Bultn LTL Properties Büchi utomt [Vrdi nd Wolper LICS 86] Büchi utomt: Finite stte utomt tht ccept infinite strings
More informationSpeech Recognition Lecture 2: Finite Automata and Finite-State Transducers. Mehryar Mohri Courant Institute and Google Research
Speech Recognition Lecture 2: Finite Automt nd Finite-Stte Trnsducers Mehryr Mohri Cournt Institute nd Google Reserch mohri@cims.nyu.com Preliminries Finite lphet Σ, empty string. Set of ll strings over
More informationTheory of Computation Regular Languages. (NTU EE) Regular Languages Fall / 38
Theory of Computtion Regulr Lnguges (NTU EE) Regulr Lnguges Fll 2017 1 / 38 Schemtic of Finite Automt control 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 Figure: Schemtic of Finite Automt A finite utomton hs finite set of control
More informationTypes of Finite Automata. CMSC 330: Organization of Programming Languages. Comparing DFAs and NFAs. NFA for (a b)*abb.
CMSC 330: Orgniztion of Progrmming Lnguges Finite Automt 2 Types of Finite Automt Deterministic Finite Automt () Exctly one sequence of steps for ech string All exmples so fr Nondeterministic Finite Automt
More information22: Union Find. CS 473u - Algorithms - Spring April 14, We want to maintain a collection of sets, under the operations of:
22: Union Fin CS 473u - Algorithms - Spring 2005 April 14, 2005 1 Union-Fin We wnt to mintin olletion of sets, uner the opertions of: 1. MkeSet(x) - rete set tht ontins the single element x. 2. Fin(x)
More information1. For each of the following theorems, give a two or three sentence sketch of how the proof goes or why it is not true.
York University CSE 2 Unit 3. DFA Clsses Converting etween DFA, NFA, Regulr Expressions, nd Extended Regulr Expressions Instructor: Jeff Edmonds Don t chet y looking t these nswers premturely.. For ech
More informationNFA DFA Example 3 CMSC 330: Organization of Programming Languages. Equivalence of DFAs and NFAs. Equivalence of DFAs and NFAs (cont.
NFA DFA Exmple 3 CMSC 330: Orgniztion of Progrmming Lnguges NFA {B,D,E {A,E {C,D {E Finite Automt, con't. R = { {A,E, {B,D,E, {C,D, {E 2 Equivlence of DFAs nd NFAs Any string from {A to either {D or {CD
More informationCSCI 340: Computational Models. Kleene s Theorem. Department of Computer Science
CSCI 340: Computtionl Models Kleene s Theorem Chpter 7 Deprtment of Computer Science Unifiction In 1954, Kleene presented (nd proved) theorem which (in our version) sttes tht if lnguge cn e defined y ny
More informationProportions: A ratio is the quotient of two numbers. For example, 2 3
Proportions: rtio is the quotient of two numers. For exmple, 2 3 is rtio of 2 n 3. n equlity of two rtios is proportion. For exmple, 3 7 = 15 is proportion. 45 If two sets of numers (none of whih is 0)
More informationTheory of Computation Regular Languages
Theory of Computtion Regulr Lnguges Bow-Yw Wng Acdemi Sinic Spring 2012 Bow-Yw Wng (Acdemi Sinic) Regulr Lnguges Spring 2012 1 / 38 Schemtic of Finite Automt control 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 Figure: Schemtic of
More informationSecond Lecture: Basics of model-checking for finite and timed systems
Second Lecture: Bsics of model-checking for finite nd timed systems Jen-Frnçois Rskin Université Lire de Bruxelles Belgium Artist2 Asin Summer School - Shnghi - July 28 Pln of the tlk Lelled trnsition
More informationCS375: Logic and Theory of Computing
CS375: Logic nd Theory of Computing Fuhu (Frnk) Cheng Deprtment of Computer Science University of Kentucky 1 Tle of Contents: Week 1: Preliminries (set lger, reltions, functions) (red Chpters 1-4) Weeks
More informationLecture 1 - Introduction and Basic Facts about PDEs
* 18.15 - Introdution to PDEs, Fll 004 Prof. Gigliol Stffilni Leture 1 - Introdution nd Bsi Fts bout PDEs The Content of the Course Definition of Prtil Differentil Eqution (PDE) Liner PDEs VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV
More informationThe size of subsequence automaton
Theoreticl Computer Science 4 (005) 79 84 www.elsevier.com/locte/tcs Note The size of susequence utomton Zdeněk Troníček,, Ayumi Shinohr,c Deprtment of Computer Science nd Engineering, FEE CTU in Prgue,
More informationSystem Validation (IN4387) November 2, 2012, 14:00-17:00
System Vlidtion (IN4387) Novemer 2, 2012, 14:00-17:00 Importnt Notes. The exmintion omprises 5 question in 4 pges. Give omplete explntion nd do not onfine yourself to giving the finl nswer. Good luk! Exerise
More information5. (±±) Λ = fw j w is string of even lengthg [ 00 = f11,00g 7. (11 [ 00)± Λ = fw j w egins with either 11 or 00g 8. (0 [ ffl)1 Λ = 01 Λ [ 1 Λ 9.
Regulr Expressions, Pumping Lemm, Right Liner Grmmrs Ling 106 Mrch 25, 2002 1 Regulr Expressions A regulr expression descries or genertes lnguge: it is kind of shorthnd for listing the memers of lnguge.
More informationINTEGRATION. 1 Integrals of Complex Valued functions of a REAL variable
INTEGRATION NOTE: These notes re supposed to supplement Chpter 4 of the online textbook. 1 Integrls of Complex Vlued funtions of REAL vrible If I is n intervl in R (for exmple I = [, b] or I = (, b)) nd
More informationCS415 Compilers. Lexical Analysis and. These slides are based on slides copyrighted by Keith Cooper, Ken Kennedy & Linda Torczon at Rice University
CS415 Compilers Lexicl Anlysis nd These slides re sed on slides copyrighted y Keith Cooper, Ken Kennedy & Lind Torczon t Rice University First Progrmming Project Instruction Scheduling Project hs een posted
More informationWorked out examples Finite Automata
Worked out exmples Finite Automt Exmple Design Finite Stte Automton which reds inry string nd ccepts only those tht end with. Since we re in the topic of Non Deterministic Finite Automt (NFA), we will
More informationA Symbolic Approach to Control via Approximate Bisimulations
A Symolic Approch to Control vi Approximte Bisimultions Antoine Girrd Lortoire Jen Kuntzmnn, Université Joseph Fourier Grenole, Frnce Interntionl Symposium on Innovtive Mthemticl Modelling Tokyo, Jpn,
More informationGrammar. Languages. Content 5/10/16. Automata and Languages. Regular Languages. Regular Languages
5//6 Grmmr Automt nd Lnguges Regulr Grmmr Context-free Grmmr Context-sensitive Grmmr Prof. Mohmed Hmd Softwre Engineering L. The University of Aizu Jpn Regulr Lnguges Context Free Lnguges Context Sensitive
More information1 From NFA to regular expression
Note 1: How to convert DFA/NFA to regulr expression Version: 1.0 S/EE 374, Fll 2017 Septemer 11, 2017 In this note, we show tht ny DFA cn e converted into regulr expression. Our construction would work
More information