Experiments testing macroscopic quantum superpositions must be slow

Transcription

1 Experiments testing macroscopic quantum superpositions must be slow spatial (Scientic Reports (2016) - arxiv: ) Andrea Mari, Giacomo De Palma, Vittorio Giovannetti NEST - Scuola Normale Superiore and CNR-Nano, Pisa, Italy. Erice, 2016

2

3 Outline Introduction Macroscopic superpositions Main result Derivation of the main result A paradox Solution of the paradox Estimate of the minimum discrimination time Implications Consistency with QED Implications for quantum gravity

4 Macroscopic spatial quantum superpositions Photons Electrons Quantum mechanics Neutrons Atoms Molecules Legend Gravity Planck mass Opto-mechanical systems Cats Planets Experimentally observed Quantum effects observed but not yet superpositions Not observed

5 The Problem: Can we distinguish the quantum state from a classical one? Quantum spatial superposition of a mass m (or of a charge q) Quantum superposition Classical mixture

6 The Problem: Can we distinguish the quantum state from a classical one? Quantum spatial superposition of a mass m (or of a charge q) Quantum superposition Classical mixture Quantum superposition of a macroscopic mass (or charge) consistency requirement No-signaling principle (relativistic causality) The observation of macroscopic quantum superpositions requires a minimum finite time

7 Main result of this talk Quantum spatial superposition of a mass m (or of a charge q) Can we distinguish the quantum state from a classical one? Quantum superposition Classical mixture Result: The minimum duration, of EVERY experiment, discriminating from is: (superposition of a mass) e.g. age of the Universe!

8 Main result of this talk Quantum spatial superposition of a mass m (or of a charge q) Can we distinguish the quantum state from a classical one? Quantum superposition Classical mixture Result: The minimum duration, of EVERY experiment, discriminating from is: (superposition of a mass) (superposition of a charge) e.g. e.g. age of the Universe!

9 Outline Introduction Macroscopic superpositions Main result Derivation of the main result A paradox Solution of the paradox Estimate of the minimum discrimination time Implications Consistency with QED Implications for quantum gravity

10 A paradox Protocol of the thought experiment Alice prepares a quantum macroscopic superposition; Bob prepares a test mass in the ground state of a very narrow harmonic trap

11 A paradox Protocol of the thought experiment Alice prepares a quantum macroscopic superposition; Bob prepares a test mass in the ground state of a very narrow harmonic trap Bob decides if : doing noting opening the trap No entanglement is created Entanglement creates after

12 A paradox Protocol of the thought experiment Alice prepares a quantum macroscopic superposition; Bob prepares a test mass in the ground state of a very narrow harmonic trap Bob decides if : doing noting opening the trap No entanglement is created Entanglement creates after Alice performs an arbitrary experiment aiming at discriminating In this way she deduces the choice of Bob. from

13 A paradox Protocol of the thought experiment Alice prepares a quantum macroscopic superposition. Bob prepares a test mass in the ground state of a very narrow harmonic trap. Bob decides if : doing noting opening the trap No entanglement is created Entanglement creates after Alice performs an arbitrary experiment aiming at discriminating In this way she deduces the choice of Bob. from Superluminal communication paradox For sufficiently large the entanglement generation time can be arbitrarily reduced. If Bob can send a signal to Alice faster than light!

14 Solution of the paradox Alice can discriminate from, but the experiment must be slow! Causality should be satisfied: Alice discrimination time Bob measurement time Free parameters of the thought experiment: (,, width of the trap ) Let us choose them in order to get the best bound for

15 Estimate of the minimum discrimination time The two possible Hamiltonians for the free test mass in Bob's laboratory are:

16 Estimate of the minimum discrimination time The two possible Hamiltonians for the free test mass in Bob's laboratory are: Entanglement is created when the two Hamiltonians drive the test mass into orthogonal states:

17 Estimate of the minimum discrimination time The two possible Hamiltonians for the free test mass in Bob's laboratory are: Entanglement is created when the two Hamiltonians drive the test mass into orthogonal states: (Baker Campbell Hausdorff formula) displacement operator Displacement in position Displacement in momentum

18 Estimate of the minimum discrimination time (superposition of a mass) The initial state of the test mass is Gaussian and characterized by width of the trap or where

19 Estimate of the minimum discrimination time (superposition of a mass) The initial state of the test mass is Gaussian and characterized by width of the trap This condition is easier to get since the trap is very narrow. or where Maximum localization of a mass Causality inequality

20 Estimate of the minimum discrimination time (superposition of a charge) The initial state of the test mass is Gaussian and characterized by width of the trap This condition is easier to get since the trap is very narrow. or where Minimal radius of a charge Causality inequality

21 Estimate of the minimum discrimination time Summary of the results Quantum superposition Classical mixture Result: The minimum duration, of EVERY experiment, discriminating from is: (superposition of a mass) (superposition of a charge)

22 Outline Introduction Macroscopic superpositions Main result Derivation of the main result A paradox Solution of the paradox Estimate of the minimum discrimination time Implications Consistency with QED Implications for quantum gravity

23 Consistency with QED We have shown that What is the physical origin of this bound? Let us choose two specific experiments and see what happens. How can we probe a spatial superposition? 1) Interference experiment 2) Measure the momentum distribution

24 Consistency with QED We have shown that What is the physical origin of this bound? Let us choose two specific experiments and see what happens. How can we probe a spatial superposition? 1) Interference experiment 2) Measure the momentum distribution 1) Interference experiment d Apply a spin dependent force which moves to within a time interval of Perform a spin measurement discriminating between

25 Consistency with QED What happens if the experiment is too fast? If the charge is accelerated too much it will radiate photons: vacuum radiation field

26 Consistency with QED What happens if the experiment is too fast? If the charge is accelerated too much it will radiate photons: vacuum radiation field What is the minimum time such that radiation is not produced?

27 Consistency with QED What happens if the experiment is too fast? If the charge is accelerated too much it will radiate photons: vacuum radiation field What is the minimum time such that radiation is not produced? Non-trivial QED calculation

28 Implications for quantum gravity For superpositions of charged systems we have just shown: What is the physical origin of this bound? 1) Photons 2) Vacuum fluctuations For superpositions of massive systems, the analogy with QED would suggest: What is the physical origin of this bound? 1) Gravitons! 2) Metric fluctuations!

29 Conclusions No progress without a paradox Experiments testing macroscopic quantum superpositions must be slow: Fully consistent with quantum electrodynamics Indirect evidence of a quantum gravity effects: gravitons, metric fluctuations. Above a certain scale macroscopic superpositions are not observable Outlook Use linearized quantum gravity to verify the bound Other thought experiments? Thanks!!! Mari, De Palma, Giovannetti, Sci. Rep. 6, (2016)

30 Supplementary Slides

31 Consistency with QED 2) Measure the momentum distribution (second experiment) momentum distrib. Interference fringes with distance of the order of The precision required in the measurement of momentum is

32 Consistency with QED 2) Measure the momentum distribution (second experiment) momentum distrib. Interference fringes with distance of the order of The precision required in the measurement of momentum is From the minimal coupling Hamiltonian The velocity is gauge invariant and locally measurable Noise term with infinite variance!

33 Consistency with QED 2) Measure the momentum distribution (second experiment) momentum distrib. Interference fringes with distance of the order of The precision required in the measurement of momentum is From the minimal coupling Hamiltonian The velocity is gauge invariant and locally measurable Noise term with infinite variance! Slow measurement of averaged velocity Averaged noise: The same bound, again!

34 Planck units In this talk: Planck mass: Planck length: Planck charge: (~ 12 positrons) Physical operational interpretations: Quantum gravity is relevant for: Minimal universal length: Minimal radius for a charge:

35 Estimate of the minimum discrimination time (superposition of a mass) The initial state of the test mass is Gaussian and characterized by width of the trap This condition is easier to get since the trap is very narrow. or where Maximum localization of a mass Causality inequality

36 Consistency with QED What happens if the experiment is too fast? If the charge is accelerated too much it will radiate photons: vacuum radiation field What is the minimum time such that radiation is not produced? Non-trivial QED calculation bound saturated! Sketch of the calculation: Fix the trajectory of the charge to be e.g. Classical current density (coherent field)