Lecture 5: Labour Economics and Wage-Setting Theory
|
|
- Buck Fields
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Lecture 5: Labour Economics and Wage-Setting Theory Spring 2017 Lars Calmfors Literature: Chapter 7 Cahuc-Carcillo-Zylberberg:
2 1 Topics Weakly efficient bargaining Strongly efficient bargaining Wage dispersion Bargaining over working time
3 2 Efficient contracts Bargaining over the wage only and letting employers determine employment (right to manage) is not efficient. An efficient solution can be found by bargaining over both the wage and employment. Max w, L [ ] 1 ( ) [ ν( ) ν( )] γ γ γ R L wl w w L s.t. 0 L N and w w Interior solution R'( L) w γ (1 γ) + 0 (I) RL ( ) wl L L γν '( w) (1 γ) + 0 (II) RL ( ) wl ν( w) ν( w) Eliminate γ between the two equations to get w R'( L) ν( w) ν( w) ν '( w) (III)
4 3 This is the equation of a contract curve (Pareto-efficient combinations of w, L) connecting tangency points of indifference and isoprofit curves. The same equation would be obtained by maximising [ ] L ν( w) ν( w) s.t. π π Differentiation of the contract curve equation gives: dw R"( L) dl ν "( w) w R '( L) [ ] γ 0 R '( L) w according to (I) R '( L) w ν( w) ν( w) and w w according to (III) Hence the contract curve starts on the labour demand schedule at w If w R'( L) > and workers are risk averse, i.e. ν " < 0, then dw / dl > 0 for w > R '( L). w γ 0 gives the competitive level of employment L Lw ( ) With γ > 0, the union uses its bargaining power to raise both the wage and employment over the competitive levels. dw If workers are risk-neutral, then ν " 0 and. Hence the contract dl curve is vertical. Employment is at the competitive level.
5 4 Overemployment if workers are risk-averse weak efficiency as R '( L) < w due to employment being higher than L defined by R'( L ) w c c
6 5 Strongly efficient contracts Efficiency gain for union if utility of employed and unemployed are equated Incentive to bargain with firm over unemployment benefit paid by the firm Union objective Lν( w) + ( N L) ν( b + w) Firm profit π R( L) wl ( N L) b Max Lν( w) + ( N L) ν( b+ w) w, b w, b s.t. π π 0 [ ] Max Lν( w) + ( N L) ν( b+ w) + λ R( L) wl ( N L) b π 0 FOC Lν'( w) λl 0 ( N L) ν'( b + w) λ( N L) 0 ν '( w) λ ν '( b + w) λ
7 6 Hence: ν '( w) ν'( b + w) w b + w Pareto efficiency requires a wage for the employed that is equal to the income as unemployed. The firm pays a benefit b to all unemployed. It pays a wage w + b to the employed. Employment does not matter to the union, since members are insured against unemployment. The bargaining problem Max b FOC: 1 γ [ R( L*) wl* bn] [ ν( w + b) ν( w) ] [ ] ν( w + b) ν( w) γ R( L*) wl* bn ν'( w+ b) 1 γ N with w w+ b γ R'( L*) w Employment equals the competitive level Union members appropriate a share of the firm s profit without this having negative effects on employment
8 7 Diagrammatical illustration Indifference curves: ν ν 1 1 υ s dw dw dl dw dl ν( w) The indifference curves are horizontal lines. Isoprofit curve π R( L) wl bn R( L) wl N( w w) dπ 0 R'( L) dl wdl Ndw dw R '( L) w dl N Tangency points between isoprofit curves and indifference curves give a vertical contract curve (at the competitive level of employment) Bargaining over wages, employment and unemployment benefits from firms is strongly efficient.
9 8
10 9 Collective bargaining and wage dispersion Heterogeneous workers Collective bargaining reduces wage dispersion Two types of workers, indexed by i 1, 2 Revenue of the firm R(L 1, L 2 ) Type -1 workers are more productive with a higher reservation w > w wage 1 2 N i workers of type i in the firm s labour pool The union utility function 2 υ υ υ L ( w ) + ( N L ) ( w + b ) L N s i i i i i i i i i1 Strongly efficient bargaining over employment, wages and unemployment benefits Optimal contract implies w w + b i i i
11 10 Bargaining problem γ 2 2 RL (, L) ( wl bn) N { ( w b ) ( w )} ν + ν i i i i i 1 i 1 Max i i i i b, b, L, L γ s.t. 0 L N i 1, 2 i i FOCs (11) (12) RL (, L) L ν'(w + b ) w i 1 γ i i 2 γ γ 2 i1 [ ν( ) + ) ν( )] N w b w i i i i RL (, L) ( wl + bn) 1 2 i 1 i i i i Equation (11): Productive efficiency, i.e. the marginal productivity of each type of worker equals the reservation wage. This implies the competitive level of employment. Equation (12): RHS is independent of i. Hence the same wage for the two types of labour. Wage equality follows from the assumption of a utilitarian union and identical preferences.
12 11 N N N N ν( w ) + ν( w ) ν w + w N + N N + N N + N N + N Because of concavity the union is better off with a wage N N 1 2 w + N + N N + N w for everyone than with separate wages w 1 and w 2.
13 12 Two-stage bargaining over employment (Manning 1987) Stage 1: Bargaining over the wage Stage 2: Bargaining over employment Different bargaining strengths in the two negotiations Bargaining over employment (given the wage) Max L 1 [ ] [ ν ν ] γ γ γ L L L R( L) wl ( w) ( w) L s.t. 0 L N The solution gives L L( γ, w, w) L Bargaining over the wage (takes the outcome of second-stage bargaining over employment into account) Max w s.t. 1 [ ( ) ] [ ν( ) ν( )] R L wl w w L L L( γ, w, w) and w w L γ γ γ Different cases γ 0 and γ > 0 gives the right-to-manage model L γ γ gives (weakly) efficient bargain model L Otherwise solution on neither labour-demand schedule nor contract curve
14 13 Motivations Efficient bargaining is complex Wage bargaining precedes employment bargaining Wage bargaining is often at more centralised level Strongly efficient bargaining is improbable because of moral hazard problems: unemployed being fully insured will not search effectively for jobs - argument for partial insurance - individual firm (sector) offering full insurance would be swamped by labour inflow One does not find many examples of contracts with unemployment benefits paid by firms Unclear empirical results on right-to-manage model and (weakly efficient) bargaining
15 14
16 15 Bargaining over hours Real-world bargaining appears often to be about both wages and working time Ω wage income T time allocation H hours worked Ω wh Utility function of a worker is υ(ω, H) e (H) productivity of a worker L number of workers Revenue of the firm [ ( ) ] [ ( ) ] / [ 0, 1] ReHL ehl α α α e η He '( H ) / e( H ) > 0 is the elasticity of worker H productivity w.r.t. hours. eh ( )/( H ) the productivity per hour. It increases with the e number of hours if η > 1. H Bargaining about the hourly wage and hours only Union utility [ ν ] V ( Ω, T H) + (1 ) ν( w, T) Min (1, L/N) s
17 16 Firm profit π 1 α [ eh L] a ( ) ΩL (24) Right-to-manage assumption Firm determines employment from profit maximisation. w and H or equivalently Ω and H are taken as given. π Set / L 0 and solve for L: [ ] /(1 ) 1/( 1) L(, H) e( H) α α α Ω Ω (25) If L( Ω, H) < N, we can plug (25) into profit equation (24). π 1-α eh ( ) ( Ω, H ) Ω α Nash bargaining solution If no agreement: Employee gets ν( wt, ) Firm gets zero profit γ α/(1 α) L( Ω, H) Max (, ) (, ) (, ) Ω, H N γ [ ν Ω T H ν w T ] [ π Ω H ] s.t. L( Ω, H) N and H H H is legal constraint on hours (maximum hours allowed by legislation).
18 17 Interior solution Take logs and differentiate w.r.t. Ω and H. FOCs γν ( Ω, T H) α(1 γ) + γ 1 ν( Ω, T H) ν( w, T) (1 α) Ω (26) γν ( Ω, T H) α eh '( ) 2 ν( Ω, T H) ν( w, T) (1 α) e( H) (27) Divide (26) by (27): 2 [ ] ν ( Ω, T H) α(1 γ) + γ (1- α) eh ( ) 1 ν ( Ω, T H) (1 α) Ω α e'( H) [ α(1 γ) + γ] eh ( ) H H[ α(1 γ) + γ] (28) e α e'( H) H Ω Ω αη η e H He '( H ) / e( H ) H Equation (28) defines the MRS between income and leisure as a function of the e wage w Ω/H and the elasticity of employee productivity w.r.t. H, η. h
19 18 Assume Cobb-Douglas utility function: ν μ 1 μ ( Ω, ) ( Ω) ( ) μ (0, 1) Then: T H T H ν 1 μω ( T H) μ 1 1 μ ν 2 2 μ (1- μ)( T H) Ω ν μ 1 1 μ Ω ( T H) ν 1-μ 1-μ μ ( T H) Ω Assume that e(h) H, then η e H e'( H) 1 and e'( H) H / e( H) 1. (28) then simplifies to: μ ( T H) H α(1 γ) + γ Ω Ω 1 μ α H * μα (29A) [ ] (1- μ) γ + α(1 γ) + μα
20 19 Optimal number of hours is increasing in μ (the importance of income relative to leisure) is decreasing in union bargaining power γ - unions want low working time to get leisure and more workers employed - explanation of work sharing: reduction in hours to boost employment Legal maximum of hours H < H Negotiated wage is then given by (26) with H With Cobb-Douglas preferences one obtains: * H μ 1 μ γ(1 α) + α Ω ( T H) ν( w, T) (A) γ(1 μ)(1 α) + α RHS of (A) is a constant. Hence: μ 1 μ Ω ( T H) constant μ nω + (1 μ) n( T H) constant
21 20 Differentiate w.r.t. d nh μ d nω d n( T H) + (1 μ) 0 d nh d nh μ d nω d n( T H) dh + (1 μ) 0 d nh dh d nh μ d nω ( 1) + (1 μ) H 0 d nh T H d nω H(1 μ) η Ω h d nh ( T H) μ The elasticity of wage income w.r.t. hours, Hence wage income falls if hours fall. It falls more if hours are long to begin with. η Ω h, is positive.
22 21 [ ] /(1 ) 1/( 1) L(, H) e( H) α α α Ω Ω (25) Assume again eh ( ) H L H H α α α /(1 ) 1/ 1 ( Ω, ) Ω (B) We want to know what happens to employment L if binding legal maximum H is reduced. - direct effect from change in H - indirect effect from induced change in wage income Ω. Take logs of (B): α 1 nl nh + nω 1 α α 1 Differentiate w.r.t. d nh d nl d nh α α α 1 d nω d nh We use: d nω H(1 μ) d nh ( T H) μ
23 22 d nl α 1 H(1 μ) + d nh 1 α α 1 ( T H) μ d nl α 1 H(1 μ) < 0 if + < 0 d nh 1 α α 1 ( T H) μ This is equivalent to H > Hˆ Hˆ μα (1 μ) + μα T Interpretation A reduction in working time raises employment only if H > Hˆ. From (29A) we have that Ĥ is optimal hours for unions. H * γ 1 μα [ ] (1 μ) γ + α(1 γ) + μα (29A) H * μα (1 μ) + μα
24 23 A reduction in H increases employment only down to the point where H reaches the trade union optimum. Further reductions lower employment.
25 24
26 25 Insiders and outsiders Unions negotiate on behalf of insiders (the already employed those with a strong affiliation to the labour market) Unions do not negotiate on behalf of outsiders (the unemployed in general or the long-term unemployed) An insider-outsider model L O insiders The firm decides on how many insiders L I L O it wants to retain. It also decides on how many outsiders L E it wants to hire. Revenue function R(L I + L E ) The firm s profit: π R(L I + L E ) - w(l I + L E ) Employment of insiders, L I, and of outsiders, L E, is found by maximising profits s. t. L I L O and L E > 0. Define w O by R (L O ) w O. Define L as the employment level such that R (L ) w, where w is the current wage. Labour demand L L and L 0 if w w I E O L L and L L L if w w I O E O O If w w we have L L < L, so some insiders are fired. O I O
27 26 Wage bargaining V expected utility of an insider I V ν( w) + (1 ) ν( w) Min (1, L / L ) I O w the reservation wage 1 γ [ π w ] { [ ν w ν w ]} Max ( ) ( ) ( ) w with π( w) R( L ) wl Let w 1 be the solution when L / L (interior solution O with some unemployed insiders). The solution is the same as in the standard right-to-manage model but with L O N. γ ν( w ) ν( w) γ 1 L wν'( w ) γη + (1 γ) η 1 w π w (10) Solution with 1 L Set η 0 in (10); employment of insiders cannot increase w ν( w ) ν( w) γ 2 π w ν'( w ) (1 γ) η w 2 2
28 27 Different solutions B Nash bargaining product when > L, i.e. some employed outsiders 1 0 B Nash bargaining product when L < L, 2 0 i.e. some unemployed insiders L We have: B w > B w 1 2 Larger gain from wage increase if only outsiders lose their jobs than if also insiders do. Second-order conditions for a maximum 2B 1 ( B 1 / w) w2 w < 2B 2 ( B 2 / w) w2 w < 0 0
29 28 (1) Interior solution with B w B > 0 > 0 w 1 2 (2) Corner solution with w > w and L L 0 0 w w and L L 0 0 B w B > 0 < 0 w 1 2 (3) Interior solution with B w B > 0 < 0 w 1 2 w < w 0
30 29
31 30 Conclusion A fall in the number of insiders results in an unchanged wage or in an increase in the wage Explanation of the persistence of unemployment No incentive to reduce the wage as the union does not care about the unemployed Empirical research has had problems finding that a reduction in lagged employment has a positive effect on the wage.
Lecture 4: Labour Economics and Wage-Setting Theory
ecture 4: abour Economics and Wage-Setting Theory Spring 203 ars Calmfors iterature: Chapter 5 Cahuc-Zylberberg (pp 257-26) Chapter 7 Cahuc-Zylberberg (pp 369-390 and 393-397) Topics The monopsony model
More informationLecture 1: Labour Economics and Wage-Setting Theory
ecture 1: abour Economics and Wage-Setting Theory Spring 2015 ars Calmfors iterature: Chapter 1 Cahuc-Zylberberg (pp 4-19, 28-29, 35-55) 1 The choice between consumption and leisure U = U(C,) C = consumption
More informationEconomics 2450A: Public Economics Section 8: Optimal Minimum Wage and Introduction to Capital Taxation
Economics 2450A: Public Economics Section 8: Optimal Minimum Wage and Introduction to Capital Taxation Matteo Paradisi November 1, 2016 In this Section we develop a theoretical analysis of optimal minimum
More informationSELECTION EFFECTS WITH HETEROGENEOUS FIRMS: ONLINE APPENDIX
SELECTION EFFECTS WITH HETEROGENEOUS FIRMS: ONLINE APPENDIX Monika Mrázová University of Geneva and CEPR J. Peter Neary University of Oxford, CEPR and CESifo Appendix K: Selection into Worker Screening
More informationOptimal Insurance of Search Risk
Optimal Insurance of Search Risk Mikhail Golosov Yale University and NBER Pricila Maziero University of Pennsylvania Guido Menzio University of Pennsylvania and NBER November 2011 Introduction Search and
More informationEconomics th April 2011
Economics 401 8th April 2011 Instructions: Answer 7 of the following 9 questions. All questions are of equal weight. Indicate clearly on the first page which questions you want marked. 1. Answer both parts.
More informationWages, Unemployment and Inequality with Heterogeneous Firms and Workers
Wages, Unemployment and Inequality with Heterogeneous Firms and Workers Elhanan Helpman Oleg Itskhoki Stephen Redding Harvard and CIFAR Harvard LSE and CEP Penn State June 12, 2008 1 / 28 Introduction
More informationFoundations of Modern Macroeconomics B. J. Heijdra & F. van der Ploeg Chapter 9: Search in the Labour Market
Foundations of Modern Macroeconomics: Chapter 9 1 Foundations of Modern Macroeconomics B. J. Heijdra & F. van der Ploeg Chapter 9: Search in the Labour Market Foundations of Modern Macroeconomics: Chapter
More informationWorking Time Reduction, Unpaid Overtime Work and Unemployment
Working Time Reduction Unpaid Overtime Work and Unemployment Makoto Masui Department of Economics Soka University 1-236 Tangi-cho Hachiouji-city Tokyo 192-8577 Japan First Version: April 2007 Second Version:
More informationEcon 101A Problem Set 6 Solutions Due on Monday Dec. 9. No late Problem Sets accepted, sorry!
Econ 0A Problem Set 6 Solutions Due on Monday Dec. 9. No late Problem Sets accepted, sry! This Problem set tests the knowledge that you accumulated mainly in lectures 2 to 26. The problem set is focused
More informationEfficient Union Contracts in the Presence of Homogeneous Labor and Differentiated Unions
ANNALS OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE 5, 27 46 (2004) Efficient Union Contracts in the Presence of Homogeneous Labor and Differentiated Unions Ana Paula Martins * Universidade Católica Portuguesa Cam. Palma
More informationLecture Notes October 18, Reading assignment for this lecture: Syllabus, section I.
Lecture Notes October 18, 2012 Reading assignment for this lecture: Syllabus, section I. Economic General Equilibrium Partial and General Economic Equilibrium PARTIAL EQUILIBRIUM S k (p o ) = D k k (po
More informationDiamond-Mortensen-Pissarides Model
Diamond-Mortensen-Pissarides Model Dongpeng Liu Nanjing University March 2016 D. Liu (NJU) DMP 03/16 1 / 35 Introduction Motivation In the previous lecture, McCall s model was introduced McCall s model
More informationFoundations of Modern Macroeconomics Third Edition
Foundations of Modern Macroeconomics Third Edition Chapter 7: A closer look at the labour market Ben J. Heijdra Department of Economics, Econometrics & Finance University of Groningen 13 December 2016
More informationUnder-Employment and the Trickle-Down of Unemployment - Online Appendix Not for Publication
Under-Employment and the Trickle-Down of Unemployment - Online Appendix Not for Publication Regis Barnichon Yanos Zylberberg July 21, 2016 This online Appendix contains a more comprehensive description
More informationCompliance with the Institutional Wage in Dualistic Models. Ana Paula Martins. EERI Research Paper Series No 15/2011 ISSN:
EERI Economics and Econometrics Research Institute Compliance with the Institutional Wage in Dualistic Models Ana Paula Martins EERI Research Paper Series No 5/20 ISSN: 203-4892 EERI Economics and Econometrics
More informationGeneral idea. Firms can use competition between agents for. We mainly focus on incentives. 1 incentive and. 2 selection purposes 3 / 101
3 Tournaments 3.1 Motivation General idea Firms can use competition between agents for 1 incentive and 2 selection purposes We mainly focus on incentives 3 / 101 Main characteristics Agents fulll similar
More informationThe Harris-Todaro model
Yves Zenou Research Institute of Industrial Economics July 3, 2006 The Harris-Todaro model In two seminal papers, Todaro (1969) and Harris and Todaro (1970) have developed a canonical model of rural-urban
More informationModelling Czech and Slovak labour markets: A DSGE model with labour frictions
Modelling Czech and Slovak labour markets: A DSGE model with labour frictions Daniel Němec Faculty of Economics and Administrations Masaryk University Brno, Czech Republic nemecd@econ.muni.cz ESF MU (Brno)
More informationLecture Notes for January 8, 2009; part 2
Economics 200B Prof. R. Starr UCSD Winter 2009 Lecture Notes for January 8, 2009; part 2 Integrating Production and Multiple Consumption Decisions: A2 2 2 Model Competitive Equilibrium: Production and
More informationHidden information. Principal s payoff: π (e) w,
Hidden information Section 14.C. in MWG We still consider a setting with information asymmetries between the principal and agent. However, the effort is now perfectly observable. What is unobservable?
More informationTeoria das organizações e contratos
Teoria das organizações e contratos Chapter 6: Adverse Selection with two types Mestrado Profissional em Economia 3 o trimestre 2015 EESP (FGV) Teoria das organizações e contratos 3 o trimestre 2015 1
More informationAnswer Key for M. A. Economics Entrance Examination 2017 (Main version)
Answer Key for M. A. Economics Entrance Examination 2017 (Main version) July 4, 2017 1. Person A lexicographically prefers good x to good y, i.e., when comparing two bundles of x and y, she strictly prefers
More information(a) Write down the Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman (HJB) Equation in the dynamic programming
1. Government Purchases and Endogenous Growth Consider the following endogenous growth model with government purchases (G) in continuous time. Government purchases enhance production, and the production
More informationWage Inequality, Labor Market Participation and Unemployment
Wage Inequality, Labor Market Participation and Unemployment Testing the Implications of a Search-Theoretical Model with Regional Data Joachim Möller Alisher Aldashev Universität Regensburg www.wiwi.uni-regensburg.de/moeller/
More informationCompetitive Search: A Test of Direction and Efficiency
Bryan Engelhardt 1 Peter Rupert 2 1 College of the Holy Cross 2 University of California, Santa Barbara November 20, 2009 1 / 26 Introduction Search & Matching: Important framework for labor market analysis
More informationOnline Appendix to Asymmetric Information and Search Frictions: A Neutrality Result
Online Appendix to Asymmetric Information and Search Frictions: A Neutrality Result Neel Rao University at Buffalo, SUNY August 26, 2016 Abstract The online appendix extends the analysis to the case where
More information1. Linear Incentive Schemes
ECO 317 Economics of Uncertainty Fall Term 2009 Slides to accompany 20. Incentives for Effort - One-Dimensional Cases 1. Linear Incentive Schemes Agent s effort x, principal s outcome y. Agent paid w.
More information(a) Output only takes on two values, so the wage will also take on two values: z(0) = 0 0 z(0) 0. max s(d)z { d. n { z 1 0 (n + d) 2.
Steve Pischke/Jin Li Labor Economics II Problem Set Answers. An Agency Problem (a) Output only takes on two values, so the wage will also take on two values: z( ) z 0 z The worker s problem: z(0) 0 0 z(0)
More informationPh.D. Preliminary Examination MICROECONOMIC THEORY Applied Economics Graduate Program May 2012
Ph.D. Preliminary Examination MICROECONOMIC THEORY Applied Economics Graduate Program May 2012 The time limit for this exam is 4 hours. It has four sections. Each section includes two questions. You are
More informationDepartment of Agricultural Economics. PhD Qualifier Examination. May 2009
Department of Agricultural Economics PhD Qualifier Examination May 009 Instructions: The exam consists of six questions. You must answer all questions. If you need an assumption to complete a question,
More informationLabor Economics, Lecture 11: Partial Equilibrium Sequential Search
Labor Economics, 14.661. Lecture 11: Partial Equilibrium Sequential Search Daron Acemoglu MIT December 6, 2011. Daron Acemoglu (MIT) Sequential Search December 6, 2011. 1 / 43 Introduction Introduction
More informationWELFARE: THE SOCIAL- WELFARE FUNCTION
Prerequisites Almost essential Welfare: Basics Welfare: Efficiency WELFARE: THE SOCIAL- WELFARE FUNCTION MICROECONOMICS Principles and Analysis Frank Cowell July 2017 1 Social Welfare Function Limitations
More informationThis is designed for one 75-minute lecture using Games and Information. October 3, 2006
This is designed for one 75-minute lecture using Games and Information. October 3, 2006 1 7 Moral Hazard: Hidden Actions PRINCIPAL-AGENT MODELS The principal (or uninformed player) is the player who has
More informationContracts, Risk-Sharing, and Incentives
Contracts, Risk-Sharing, and Incentives Bruno Van der Linden Université catholique de Louvain January 25, 2011 (ESL-UCL) 1 / 102 Introduction The labour relationship: Generally a long-term one The labour
More informationEconS 501 Final Exam - December 10th, 2018
EconS 501 Final Exam - December 10th, 018 Show all your work clearly and make sure you justify all your answers. NAME 1. Consider the market for smart pencil in which only one firm (Superapiz) enjoys a
More informationToulouse School of Economics, M2 Macroeconomics 1 Professor Franck Portier. Exam Solution
Toulouse School of Economics, 2013-2014 M2 Macroeconomics 1 Professor Franck Portier Exam Solution This is a 3 hours exam. Class slides and any handwritten material are allowed. You must write legibly.
More informationUnder-Employment and the Trickle-Down of Unemployment Online Appendix Not for Publication
Under-Employment and the Trickle-Down of Unemployment Online Appendix Not for Publication Regis Barnichon Yanos Zylberberg March 30, 2018 Section 1 contains the proofs of Propositions 1 to 3 pertaining
More informationMonetary Economics: Solutions Problem Set 1
Monetary Economics: Solutions Problem Set 1 December 14, 2006 Exercise 1 A Households Households maximise their intertemporal utility function by optimally choosing consumption, savings, and the mix of
More informationEquilibrium in Factors Market: Properties
Equilibrium in Factors Market: Properties Ram Singh Microeconomic Theory Lecture 12 Ram Singh: (DSE) Factor Prices Lecture 12 1 / 17 Questions What is the relationship between output prices and the wage
More informationMoral Hazard. EC202 Lectures XV & XVI. Francesco Nava. February London School of Economics. Nava (LSE) EC202 Lectures XV & XVI Feb / 19
Moral Hazard EC202 Lectures XV & XVI Francesco Nava London School of Economics February 2011 Nava (LSE) EC202 Lectures XV & XVI Feb 2011 1 / 19 Summary Hidden Action Problem aka: 1 Moral Hazard Problem
More informationAsymmetric Information in Economic Policy. Noah Williams
Asymmetric Information in Economic Policy Noah Williams University of Wisconsin - Madison Williams Econ 899 Asymmetric Information Risk-neutral moneylender. Borrow and lend at rate R = 1/β. Strictly risk-averse
More informationChiang/Wainwright: Fundamental Methods of Mathematical Economics
Chiang/Wainwright: Fundamental Methods of Mathematical Economics CHAPTER 9 EXERCISE 9.. Find the stationary values of the following (check whether they are relative maima or minima or inflection points),
More informationRevisiting Nash Wages Negotiations in Matching Models
Introduction Revisiting Nash Wages Negotiations in Matching Models S. Amine 1 S. Baumann 2 P. Lages Dos Santos 2 F. Valognes 3 1 CIRANO University of Quebec en Outaouais 2 CERENE University of Le Havre
More informationOptimal Insurance of Search Risk
Optimal Insurance of Search Risk Mikhail Golosov Yale University and NBER Pricila Maziero University of Pennsylvania Guido Menzio University of Pennsylvania and NBER May 27, 2011 Introduction Search and
More informationMoral Hazard: Hidden Action
Moral Hazard: Hidden Action Part of these Notes were taken (almost literally) from Rasmusen, 2007 UIB Course 2013-14 (UIB) MH-Hidden Actions Course 2013-14 1 / 29 A Principal-agent Model. The Production
More informationG5212: Game Theory. Mark Dean. Spring 2017
G5212: Game Theory Mark Dean Spring 2017 Adverse Selection We have now completed our basic analysis of the adverse selection model This model has been applied and extended in literally thousands of ways
More informationu(c t, x t+1 ) = c α t + x α t+1
Review Questions: Overlapping Generations Econ720. Fall 2017. Prof. Lutz Hendricks 1 A Savings Function Consider the standard two-period household problem. The household receives a wage w t when young
More informationEC476 Contracts and Organizations, Part III: Lecture 2
EC476 Contracts and Organizations, Part III: Lecture 2 Leonardo Felli 32L.G.06 19 January 2015 Moral Hazard: Consider the contractual relationship between two agents (a principal and an agent) The principal
More informationMoral Hazard: Part 1. April 9, 2018
Moral Hazard: Part 1 April 9, 2018 Introduction In a standard moral hazard problem, the agent A is characterized by only one type. As with adverse selection, the principal P wants to engage in an economic
More informationAnswers to Spring 2014 Microeconomics Prelim
Answers to Spring 204 Microeconomics Prelim. To model the problem of deciding whether or not to attend college, suppose an individual, Ann, consumes in each of two periods. She is endowed with income w
More informationOn-the-Job Search with Match-Specific Amenities
On-the-Job Search with Match-Specific Amenities James Albrecht Georgetown University, CESifo, and IZA Carlos Carrillo-Tudela University of Essex, CEPR, CESifo, and IZA Susan Vroman Georgetown University,
More informationJob Search Models. Jesús Fernández-Villaverde. University of Pennsylvania. February 12, 2016
Job Search Models Jesús Fernández-Villaverde University of Pennsylvania February 12, 2016 Jesús Fernández-Villaverde (PENN) Job Search February 12, 2016 1 / 57 Motivation Introduction Trade in the labor
More informationDirected Search with Phantom Vacancies
Directed Search with Phantom Vacancies Jim Albrecht (Georgetown University) Bruno Decreuse (Aix-Marseille U, AMSE) Susan Vroman (Georgetown University) April 2016 I am currently on the job hunt and I had
More informationFirms and returns to scale -1- Firms and returns to scale
Firms and returns to scale -1- Firms and returns to scale. Increasing returns to scale and monopoly pricing 2. Constant returns to scale 19 C. The CRS economy 25 D. pplication to trade 47 E. Decreasing
More informationFoundations of Modern Macroeconomics B. J. Heijdra & F. van der Ploeg Chapter 7: A Closer Look at the Labour Market
Foundations of Modern Macroeconomics: Chapter 7 1 Foundations of Modern Macroeconomics B. J. Heijdra & F. van der Ploeg Chapter 7: A Closer Look at the Labour Market Foundations of Modern Macroeconomics:
More informationNASH BARGAINING, ON-THE-JOB SEARCH AND LABOR MARKET EQUILIBRIUM
NASH BARGAINING, ON-THE-JOB SEARCH AND LABOR MARKET EQUILIBRIUM Roberto Bonilla Department of Economics University of Newcastle Business School University of Newcastle upon Tyne Newcastle upon Tyne U.K.
More informationUncertainty Per Krusell & D. Krueger Lecture Notes Chapter 6
1 Uncertainty Per Krusell & D. Krueger Lecture Notes Chapter 6 1 A Two-Period Example Suppose the economy lasts only two periods, t =0, 1. The uncertainty arises in the income (wage) of period 1. Not that
More informationD i (w; p) := H i (w; S(w; p)): (1)
EC0 Microeconomic Principles II Outline Answers. (a) Demand for input i can be written D i (w; p) := H i (w; S(w; p)): () where H i is the conditional demand for input i and S is the supply function. From
More informationIntroductory Microeconomics
Prof. Wolfram Elsner Faculty of Business Studies and Economics iino Institute of Institutional and Innovation Economics Introductory Microeconomics The Ideal Neoclassical Market and General Equilibrium
More informationLecture 2: The Human Capital Model
Lecture 2: The Human Capital Model Fatih Guvenen University of Minnesota February 7, 2018 Fatih Guvenen (2018) Lecture 2: Ben Porath February 7, 2018 1 / 16 Why Study Wages? Labor income is 2/3 of GDP.
More informationMaster 2 Macro I. Lecture notes #9 : the Mortensen-Pissarides matching model
2012-2013 Master 2 Macro I Lecture notes #9 : the Mortensen-Pissarides matching model Franck Portier (based on Gilles Saint-Paul lecture notes) franck.portier@tse-fr.eu Toulouse School of Economics Version
More informationAsymmetric Information and Search Frictions: A Neutrality Result
Asymmetric Information and Search Frictions: A Neutrality Result Neel Rao University at Buffalo, SUNY August 26, 2016 Abstract This paper integrates asymmetric information between firms into a canonical
More informationMortenson Pissarides Model
Mortenson Pissarides Model Prof. Lutz Hendricks Econ720 November 22, 2017 1 / 47 Mortenson / Pissarides Model Search models are popular in many contexts: labor markets, monetary theory, etc. They are distinguished
More informationModels of Wage Dynamics
Models of Wage Dynamics Toshihiko Mukoyama Department of Economics Concordia University and CIREQ mukoyama@alcor.concordia.ca December 13, 2005 1 Introduction This paper introduces four different models
More informationEcon 58 Gary Smith Spring Final Exam Answers
Econ 58 Gary Smith Spring 2006 Final Exam Answers. If we substitute the equations for c, i, and g into y = c + i + g, we can solve for y: y = 300 + 0.6y + i 0 + g 0 = 300 + i 0 + g 0-0.6 a. The comparative-static
More informationINTRODUCTORY MATHEMATICS FOR ECONOMICS MSCS. LECTURE 3: MULTIVARIABLE FUNCTIONS AND CONSTRAINED OPTIMIZATION. HUW DAVID DIXON CARDIFF BUSINESS SCHOOL.
INTRODUCTORY MATHEMATICS FOR ECONOMICS MSCS. LECTURE 3: MULTIVARIABLE FUNCTIONS AND CONSTRAINED OPTIMIZATION. HUW DAVID DIXON CARDIFF BUSINESS SCHOOL. SEPTEMBER 2009. 3.1 Functions of more than one variable.
More informationT h o m a s B r e d g a a r d, P r o f e s s o r, P h. d.
Danish flexicurity and the crisis T h o m a s B r e d g a a r d, P r o f e s s o r, P h. d. Centre for Labour Market Research at Aalborg University (CARMA), Denmark What is flexicurity? C o n t r a c t
More informationEC319 Economic Theory and Its Applications, Part II: Lecture 7
EC319 Economic Theory and Its Applications, Part II: Lecture 7 Leonardo Felli NAB.2.14 27 February 2014 Signalling Games Consider the following Bayesian game: Set of players: N = {N, S, }, Nature N strategy
More informationGame Theory, Information, Incentives
Game Theory, Information, Incentives Ronald Wendner Department of Economics Graz University, Austria Course # 320.501: Analytical Methods (part 6) The Moral Hazard Problem Moral hazard as a problem of
More informationThe Real Business Cycle Model
The Real Business Cycle Model Macroeconomics II 2 The real business cycle model. Introduction This model explains the comovements in the fluctuations of aggregate economic variables around their trend.
More informationTrade policy III: Export subsidies
The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies - wiiw June 25, 2015 Overview Overview 1 1 Under perfect competition lead to welfare loss 2 Effects depending on market structures 1 Subsidies to
More informationLecture 5 Markups and Hedonics. Bronwyn H. Hall Economics 220C, UC Berkeley Spring 2005
Lecture 5 Markups and Hedonics Bronwyn H. Hall Economics 220C, UC Berkeley Spring 2005 Outline Production function with scale (dis)economies and markups Demand system overview Characteristic space Product
More informationENDOGENOUS FIRM OBJECTIVES
ENDOGENOUS FIRM OBJECTIVES THOMAS RENSTRÖM AND ERKAN YALÇIN Abstract. We analyze the behavior of a monopolistic firm in general equilibrium when the firm s decision are taken through shareholder voting.
More informationThe employment effect of reforming a public employment agency
The employment effect of reforming a public employment agency Andrey Launov and Klaus Wälde (European Economic Review, 2016) Presented by Ismael Gálvez March 15, 2017 Motivation Rich literature on the
More informationCES functions and Dixit-Stiglitz Formulation
CES functions and Dixit-Stiglitz Formulation Weijie Chen Department of Political and Economic Studies University of Helsinki September, 9 4 8 3 7 Labour 6 5 4 5 Labour 5 Capital 3 4 6 8 Capital Any suggestion
More informationImportant job creation - job destruction rate Account for labor supply and labor demand behavior to explain unemployment
Labor Economics and Employment Policies Pierre Cahuc and Sébastien Roux, 2007-2008 Lecture 5: Job creations, job destructions and unemployment: the matching model Important job creation - job destruction
More informationNBER WORKING PAPER SERIES A MACROECONOMIC THEORY OF OPTIMAL UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE. Camille Landais Pascal Michaillat Emmanuel Saez
NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES A MACROECONOMIC THEORY OF OPTIMAL UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE Camille Landais Pascal Michaillat Emmanuel Saez Working Paper 16526 http://www.nber.org/papers/w16526 NATIONAL BUREAU
More informationLecture 7. The Dynamics of Market Equilibrium. ECON 5118 Macroeconomic Theory Winter Kam Yu Department of Economics Lakehead University
Lecture 7 The Dynamics of Market Equilibrium ECON 5118 Macroeconomic Theory Winter 2013 Phillips Department of Economics Lakehead University 7.1 Outline 1 2 3 4 5 Phillips Phillips 7.2 Market Equilibrium:
More informationThe Labor Market in the New Keynesian Model: Foundations of the Sticky Wage Approach and a Critical Commentary
The Labor Market in the New Keynesian Model: Foundations of the Sticky Wage Approach and a Critical Commentary Lawrence J. Christiano March 30, 2013 Baseline developed earlier: NK model with no capital
More informationMinimum wage increases can lead to wage reductions by imperfectly competitive firms
Minimum wage increases can lead to wage reductions by imperfectly competitive firms Ken Clark a,b, *, Leo Kaas c, Paul Madden a a School of Social Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Rd, Manchester,
More informationAdvanced Microeconomic Theory. Chapter 6: Partial and General Equilibrium
Advanced Microeconomic Theory Chapter 6: Partial and General Equilibrium Outline Partial Equilibrium Analysis General Equilibrium Analysis Comparative Statics Welfare Analysis Advanced Microeconomic Theory
More information5. Externalities and Public Goods
5. Externalities and Public Goods Welfare properties of Walrasian Equilibria rely on the hidden assumption of private goods: the consumption of the good by one person has no effect on other people s utility,
More informationAdverse Selection, Signaling, and Screening in Markets
BGPE Intensive Course: Contracts and Asymmetric Information Adverse Selection, Signaling, and Screening in Markets Anke Kessler Anke Kessler p. 1/27 Stylized Facts: Market Failure used cars, even if they
More informationSharing aggregate risks under moral hazard
Sharing aggregate risks under moral hazard Gabrielle Demange 1 November 2005 Abstract This paper discusses some of the problems associated with the efficient design of insurance schemes in the presence
More informationThe Principal-Agent Problem
Andrew McLennan September 18, 2014 I. Introduction Economics 6030 Microeconomics B Second Semester Lecture 8 The Principal-Agent Problem A. In the principal-agent problem there is no asymmetric information
More informationOptimal Incentive Contract with Costly and Flexible Monitoring
Optimal Incentive Contract with Costly and Flexible Monitoring Anqi Li 1 Ming Yang 2 1 Department of Economics, Washington University in St. Louis 2 Fuqua School of Business, Duke University May 2016 Motivation
More informationMinimum Wages, Employment and. Monopsonistic Competition
Minimum Wages, Employment and Monopsonistic Competition V. Bhaskar Ted To University of Essex Bureau of Laor Statistics August 2003 Astract We set out a model of monopsonistic competition, where each employer
More informationLecture 2: Intermediate macroeconomics, autumn Lars Calmfors
Lecture 2: Intermediate macroeconomics, autumn 2009 Lars Calmfors 1 Topics Production Labour productivity and economic growth The Solow Model Endogenous growth Long-run effects of the current recession
More informationAdvanced Microeconomic Analysis, Lecture 6
Advanced Microeconomic Analysis, Lecture 6 Prof. Ronaldo CARPIO April 10, 017 Administrative Stuff Homework # is due at the end of class. I will post the solutions on the website later today. The midterm
More informationContracts in informed-principal problems with moral hazard
Contracts in informed-principal problems with moral hazard Nicholas C Bedard January 20, 2016 Abstract In many cases, an employer has private information about the potential productivity of a worker, who
More information1. Basic Model of Labor Supply
Static Labor Supply. Basic Model of Labor Supply.. Basic Model In this model, the economic unit is a family. Each faimily maximizes U (L, L 2,.., L m, C, C 2,.., C n ) s.t. V + w i ( L i ) p j C j, C j
More informationDepartment of Economics The Ohio State University Final Exam Questions and Answers Econ 8712
Prof. Peck Fall 20 Department of Economics The Ohio State University Final Exam Questions and Answers Econ 872. (0 points) The following economy has two consumers, two firms, and three goods. Good is leisure/labor.
More informationLecture 2: Firms, Jobs and Policy
Lecture 2: Firms, Jobs and Policy Economics 522 Esteban Rossi-Hansberg Princeton University Spring 2014 ERH (Princeton University ) Lecture 2: Firms, Jobs and Policy Spring 2014 1 / 34 Restuccia and Rogerson
More informationDifferentiable Welfare Theorems Existence of a Competitive Equilibrium: Preliminaries
Differentiable Welfare Theorems Existence of a Competitive Equilibrium: Preliminaries Econ 2100 Fall 2017 Lecture 19, November 7 Outline 1 Welfare Theorems in the differentiable case. 2 Aggregate excess
More informationPublic Economics Ben Heijdra Chapter 2: Taxation and the Supply of Labour
Public Economics: Chapter 2 1 Public Economics Ben Heijdra Chapter 2: Taxation and the Supply of Labour Public Economics: Chapter 2 2 Overview Theoretical insights static / dynamic models [dynamics treated
More informationI-1. The slope of the bid-price function, P{u}, is - t / H. Use Equation (35) to derive general
ECN 741, Professor Yinger Exercises Part I. Bid Functions and Density Functions I-1. The slope of the bid-price function, P{u}, is - t / H. Use Equation (35) to derive general expression for the slope
More informationOrganization, Careers and Incentives
Organization, Careers and Incentives Chapter 4 Robert Gary-Bobo March 2018 1 / 31 Introduction Introduction A firm is a pyramid of opportunities (Alfred P. Sloan). Promotions can be used to create incentives.
More informationRice University. Answer Key to Mid-Semester Examination Fall ECON 501: Advanced Microeconomic Theory. Part A
Rice University Answer Key to Mid-Semester Examination Fall 006 ECON 50: Advanced Microeconomic Theory Part A. Consider the following expenditure function. e (p ; p ; p 3 ; u) = (p + p ) u + p 3 State
More informationMacroeconomics Theory II
Macroeconomics Theory II Francesco Franco FEUNL February 2011 Francesco Franco Macroeconomics Theory II 1/34 The log-linear plain vanilla RBC and ν(σ n )= ĉ t = Y C ẑt +(1 α) Y C ˆn t + K βc ˆk t 1 + K
More information