General idea. Firms can use competition between agents for. We mainly focus on incentives. 1 incentive and. 2 selection purposes 3 / 101
|
|
- Bartholomew Carson
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 3 Tournaments
2 3.1 Motivation
3 General idea Firms can use competition between agents for 1 incentive and 2 selection purposes We mainly focus on incentives 3 / 101
4 Main characteristics Agents fulll similar tasks performances are comparable The principal xes prizes before agents compete The best performing agent gets the highest prizes, the second best gets the second highest prize and so on 4 / 101
5 Examples how rms use contests Job-promotion tournaments Firms often award a promotion to the best performer in the lower-level job Potential conict between incentives and selection: e.g., in an R&D organization, the best researcher does not need to be the best manager of the research group Forced-distribution systems for performance appraisals E.g., specic percentages for each rating Helps to reduce the following problems: managers tend to give many employees the same rating; or some are lenient, while others are strict Sales contests Sharing of a xed bonus pool (e.g., in big Japanese companies) 5 / 101
6 UPS UPS has promoted from within for generations. This includes: Part-time workers moving into full-time positions Non-management employees moving into management positions Supervisors and managers moving into positions of greater responsibility Well over 58 percent of the current full-time drivers were once part-time employees More than 77 percent of the full-time managers (including most vice presidents) were once nonmanagement employees 6 / 101
7 Advantages of tournaments + performance signals do not need to be veriable + Only ordinal information needed + Filtering of common noise (risk costs may decrease) such as general working conditions or rm reputation + Principal perfectly knows wage costs ex-ante 7 / 101
8 Disadvantages of tournaments Contradicts the cooperative idea of teamwork Sabotage Horizontal collusion Cheating (breaking the rules) and inuence activities (e.g., bribing the supervisor) Incentives may be decreased by: External job oers, intermediate information, or heterogeneity 8 / 101
9 3.2 Basic model
10 Model Two risk-neutral and homogeneous agents A and B q i = e i + ε i : output (in monetary terms) of agent i = A, B e i : agent i's eort ε i : exogenous noise term ε A and ε B are independently and identically distributed (i.i.d.) with distribution function F (ε) and corresponding density function f (ε) = F (ε) q i is observable, but not veriable (and thus not contractible) There is moral hazard: Neither e i nor ε i are observable ei and ε i are therefore also not veriable and not contractible Remark: The model is due to Lazear and Rosen (1981) 10 / 101
11 Timing 1 The principal suggests a contract 2 Each agent can either accept or reject If an agent rejects, he receives the reservation utility ū If an agent accept accepts, he chooses an eort level 3 The noise terms realize, outputs are determined, and payments are made according to the contract Remarks: If not explicitly stated dierently, we suppose throughout the course that the principal always wants to make sure that the agents accept Agents' timings are parallel: i.e., if agents accept, they simultaneously choose eorts 11 / 101
12 Winning probabilities The probability that agent i wins (and not j, where i, j {A, B} and i j) is prob{q i > q j } = prob{e i + ε i > e j + ε j } = prob{ε j ε i < e i e j } = G(e i e j ) G( ): distribution function of the composed random variable ε j ε i, with corresponding density g( ) Examples: 1 ε i, ε j N ( µ, σ 2 ), then εj ε i N ( 0, 2σ 2 ) 2 ε i, ε j are uniformly distributed, then G( ) is a triangular distribution Remark: There are also models with multiplicative noise, i.e., q i = ε i e i 12 / 101
13 Exercise 3.1 Suppose ε i, ε j N (0, 1/2) and agents choose eorts e j = 1 and e i = 2 Determine the probability that agent i wins How does this probability change if ε i, ε j N (10, 1/2)? How does this probability change if ε i, ε j N (0, 2)? 13 / 101
14 Eort costs, prizes, liability c(e i ): agent i's eort costs (in monetary terms) Assumptions: c is twice continuously dierentiable, c(0) = c (0) = 0, c (e i ) > 0 for all e i > 0, lim ei c (e i ) =, c (e i ) > 0 w 1, w 2 : winner prize and loser prize, respectively In case two or more agents have the same output, their places will be determined by drawing lots If g( ) has no mass pointswhich we assume henceforththe probability that agents have the same output is zero There is unlimited liability: i.e., tournament prizes can take every value, e.g., can also be negative 14 / 101
15 First-best solution To have a benchmark, we solve for the rst-best, where eorts are contractible The Lagrangian is L (e, w) = E[q i ] w λ( w + c(e i ) + ū), where w is the xed payment to agent i Since E[q i ] = e i + E[ε i ], we can use the result from the introduction: e FB solves 1 = c ( e FB) Intuition: In the rst-best, an agent's eort is chosen such that the marginal product equals the marginal eort costs 15 / 101
16 Agents' eort choices Suppose next that eorts are not contractible, outputs are observable but not contractible, agents have accepted and thus compete for the prizes w 1 and w 2 Agents simultaneously choose their eort levels Thus, agent i takes agent j's eort as given when choosing e i Agent i's expected utility is EU i = (w 1 c(e i )) G(e i e j ) + (w 2 c(e i )) (1 G(e i e j )) = w 2 + w G(e i e j ) c(e i ), where w := w 1 w 2 denotes the prize spread Similarly, agent j's expected utility is EU j = w 2 + w (1 G(e i e j )) c(e j ) 16 / 101
17 Equilibrium Each agent maximizes his expected utility over his eort choice Assuming that a pure-strategy equilibrium exists, it is given by the rst-order conditions w g(e i e j ) = c (e i ) w g(e i e j ) = c (e j ) As both LHSs are identical, the unique and symmetric equilibrium is e i = e j = e with w g(0) = c (e) (IC) 17 / 101
18 Discussion of (IC) Equilibrium eort is increasing in The prize spread w The expression g(0) as an inverse measure of luck The atness of the cost function c( ) Since in equilibrium both agents invest the same amount of eort, the tournament winner is purely determined by luck: winning probability G(0) = / 101
19 ε i can be interpreted as individual productivity shocks (the noise is at the productivity level) or individual measurement error of the supervisor (the noise is at the measurement level) or individual talent that is unknown to everyone ex-ante (the noise is at level of the agents) In the last case: the agent with the highest (unknown) talent wins Perfect selection of agents, e.g., in a promotion tournament
20 Principal's optimal tournament contract Principal maximizes the expected net prot E [q A + q B ] w 1 w 2 subject to: the incentive constraint (IC) and the participation constraint w 1 + w 2 2 c(e) ū (PC) 20 / 101
21 Equivalence This is equivalent to the case where the principal maximizes the expected net prot per agent subject to: E [q i ] w 1 + w 2 2 the incentive constraint (IC) and the participation constraint w 1 + w 2 2 c(e) ū (PC) 21 / 101
22 Lagrangian L (e, w 1, w 2 ) = e + E[ε] w 1 + w 2 ( 2 λ 1 w ) 1 + w 2 + c(e) + ū 2 λ 2 ( (w 1 w 2 ) g(0) + c (e)) 22 / 101
23 Exercise 3.2 Solve the Lagrangian. Does the (PC) bind in equilibrium? What is the intuition? 23 / 101
24 Remarks The optimal prize spread w = c (e ) g(0) are high (i.e., g(0) is small) Exercise 3.3 What is the intuition? is large if random inuences On average, each agent is just compensated for his eort costs and his forgone outside option ū However, ex-post the winner is strictly better o than the loser This is why the tournament creates incentives 24 / 101
25 Comparison to rst-best The solution satises 1 = c (e ) Thus, e = e FB Also the principal's wage costs are equal to the rst-best level: w 1 + w 2 = 2c(e ) + 2ū The principal's expected utility thus equals the rst-best level as well That is, despite that eorts are not observable and outputs are observable, but not veriable, the optimal tournament contract leads to the rst-best solution in the basic tournament model (homogeneous, risk-neutral agents with unlimited liability) 25 / 101
26 Exercise 3.4 What is the intuition? 26 / 101
27 Credibility of contracts The principal can observe outputs q i, q j But outputs are not veriable (and thus not contractible) The principal could assign the loser prize w 2 to both agents But this in contradiction to the contract, which species that one agent receives the winner- and the other the loser-prize Agents can go to a court and force the principal to pay the prize w 1 to one of them Principal has to assign the winner prize to one agent 27 / 101
28 Alternatively, the principal could assign the winner-prize w 1 to the loser (the agent with the lower output level) and the loser-prize w 2 to the winner (the agent with the higher output level) Agents cannot go to a court, since outputs are not veriable The principal's total payment to the agents is the same when she assigns the winner-prize to the winner and the loser-prize to the loser Since the principal is indierent, we assume that she prefers to follow the latter strategy With repeated interaction, the principal benets from having a reputation to follow this strategy and this strategy is then strictly optimal
29 Bargaining power We assumed that the principal has all the bargaining power (as in the standard principal-agent model) Suppose now that the agents have all the bargaining power, i.e., can x w 1 and w 2 (plausible in a competitive labor market with zero expected prots in equilibrium) Claim: The result does not change, i.e., the rst-best eort is still implemented Hint: replace the (PC) with the nonnegative-prot condition E[q i ] w 1 + w (NPC) 29 / 101
30 Exercise 3.5 Prove the claim (exploit that in equilibrium both agents invest the same eort) 30 / 101
31 Does a pure-strategy equilibrium exist? The SOCs for the agents' eort choices are w g (e i e j ) c (e i ) < 0 and w g (e i e j ) c (e j ) < 0 for all e i, e j Thus, only if the cost function is suciently convex (meaning that the marginal eort costs increase suciently fast) and/or the density is suciently at (meaning that there is sucient noise in the tournament) are the SOCs satised 31 / 101
32 Note If a SOC or the SOCs is/are violated, then we cannot be sure that the agents optimally choose the eorts given by the FOC, i.e., the (IC) But: This does not mean that the agents choose eorts dierent from that given by the (IC) in any case Example: EU i bell-shaped in e i (EU i is not concave SOC not satised, but maximum is still given by the FOC) 32 / 101
33 Zero noise Suppose there is zero noise (i.e., ε A = ε B = constant) Exercise 3.6 Does a pure-strategy Nash equilibrium exist? Why or why not? Concentrate on the case where both agents invest the same, positive eort level 33 / 101
34 Mixed-strategy equilibrium In a mixed-strategy equilibrium each agent chooses an optimal probability distribution over the interval [0, ē] ē is implicitly given by c(ē) = w Let G j (e i ) be the probability that j exerts e i or less eort Then i's expected utility is EU i (e i ) = w 2 + w G j (e i ) c(e i ) Agent i must be indierent between choosing the lowest possible eort e i = 0, ē, and any eort between (otherwise, she would not mix over [0, ē]) 34 / 101
35 If i plays e i = 0 she loses for sure Thus EU i (0) = w 2 c(0) = w 2 Therefore, EU i = w 2, i.e., in the mixed strategy equilibrium each player's expected utility equals w 2 If i plays e i (0, ē) she may win Her utility is then EU i (e i ) = w 2 + w G j (e i ) c(e i ) By the arguments from above we must have EU i (0) = EU i (e i ) Solving yields G j (e i ) = c(e i) w
36 Common noise Let agent i's output, where i {A, B}, be q i = e i + ε i + η Then, i's winning probability is prob (e i + ε i + η > e j + ε j + η) = prob (ε j ε i < e i e j ) Hence, the common noise η is completely eliminated 36 / 101
Gender Dierences. Experimental studies suggest that. Gneezy, Nierderle, and Rustichini (2003) let subjects solve computerized mazes
3.3 Some Empirics Gender Dierences Experimental studies suggest that Men are more strongly motivated by competitive incentives than women or Men are more eective in competitive environments than women
More informationModule 8: Multi-Agent Models of Moral Hazard
Module 8: Multi-Agent Models of Moral Hazard Information Economics (Ec 515) George Georgiadis Types of models: 1. No relation among agents. an many agents make contracting easier? 2. Agents shocks are
More informationMinimum Wages and Excessive E ort Supply
Minimum Wages and Excessive E ort Supply Matthias Kräkel y Anja Schöttner z Abstract It is well-known that, in static models, minimum wages generate positive worker rents and, consequently, ine ciently
More informationEconS Microeconomic Theory II Midterm Exam #2 - Answer Key
EconS 50 - Microeconomic Theory II Midterm Exam # - Answer Key 1. Revenue comparison in two auction formats. Consider a sealed-bid auction with bidders. Every bidder i privately observes his valuation
More informationTeoria das organizações e contratos
Teoria das organizações e contratos Chapter 6: Adverse Selection with two types Mestrado Profissional em Economia 3 o trimestre 2015 EESP (FGV) Teoria das organizações e contratos 3 o trimestre 2015 1
More informationGame Theory and Economics of Contracts Lecture 5 Static Single-agent Moral Hazard Model
Game Theory and Economics of Contracts Lecture 5 Static Single-agent Moral Hazard Model Yu (Larry) Chen School of Economics, Nanjing University Fall 2015 Principal-Agent Relationship Principal-agent relationship
More informationIntroduction to Game Theory
Introduction to Game Theory Part 2. Dynamic games of complete information Chapter 2. Two-stage games of complete but imperfect information Ciclo Profissional 2 o Semestre / 2011 Graduação em Ciências Econômicas
More informationMoral Hazard. Felix Munoz-Garcia. Advanced Microeconomics II - Washington State University
Moral Hazard Felix Munoz-Garcia Advanced Microeconomics II - Washington State University Moral Hazard Reading materials: Start with Prajit Dutta, Chapter 19. MWG, Chapter 14 Macho-Stadler and Perez-Castrillo,
More informationECO421: Moral hazard. Marcin P ski. March 26, 2018
ECO421: Moral hazard Marcin P ski March 26, 2018 Plan Introduction Worker Inventor CEO Grades VP Teacher (multi-tasking) Eciency wages Introduction Moral hazard Moral hazard: two agents with misaligned
More information(a) Output only takes on two values, so the wage will also take on two values: z(0) = 0 0 z(0) 0. max s(d)z { d. n { z 1 0 (n + d) 2.
Steve Pischke/Jin Li Labor Economics II Problem Set Answers. An Agency Problem (a) Output only takes on two values, so the wage will also take on two values: z( ) z 0 z The worker s problem: z(0) 0 0 z(0)
More information1. The General Linear-Quadratic Framework
ECO 317 Economics of Uncertainty Fall Term 2009 Slides to accompany 21. Incentives for Effort - Multi-Dimensional Cases 1. The General Linear-Quadratic Framework Notation: x = (x j ), n-vector of agent
More informationCostly Expertise. Dino Gerardi and Leeat Yariv yz. Current Version: December, 2007
Costly Expertise Dino Gerardi and Leeat Yariv yz Current Version: December, 007 In many environments expertise is costly. Costs can manifest themselves in numerous ways, ranging from the time that is required
More information1 Moral Hazard: Multiple Agents 1.1 Moral Hazard in a Team
1 Moral Hazard: Multiple Agents 1.1 Moral Hazard in a Team Multiple agents (firm?) Partnership: Q jointly affected Individual q i s. (tournaments) Common shocks, cooperations, collusion, monitor- ing.
More informationMoral Hazard: Part 1. April 9, 2018
Moral Hazard: Part 1 April 9, 2018 Introduction In a standard moral hazard problem, the agent A is characterized by only one type. As with adverse selection, the principal P wants to engage in an economic
More informationMulti prizes for multi tasks: externalities and the optimal design of tournaments
Multi prizes for multi tasks: externalities and the optimal design of tournaments Xu Tang Department of Economics, Georgia State University Email: xtang4@gsu.edu Yongsheng Xu Department of Economics, Georgia
More informationModule 16: Signaling
Module 16: Signaling Information Economics (Ec 515) George Georgiadis Players with private information can take some action to signal their type. Taking this action would distinguish them from other types.
More informationMoral Hazard: Hidden Action
Moral Hazard: Hidden Action Part of these Notes were taken (almost literally) from Rasmusen, 2007 UIB Course 2013-14 (UIB) MH-Hidden Actions Course 2013-14 1 / 29 A Principal-agent Model. The Production
More informationHidden information. Principal s payoff: π (e) w,
Hidden information Section 14.C. in MWG We still consider a setting with information asymmetries between the principal and agent. However, the effort is now perfectly observable. What is unobservable?
More informationThis work is distributed as a Discussion Paper by the STANFORD INSTITUTE FOR ECONOMIC POLICY RESEARCH
This work is distributed as a Discussion Paper by the STANFORD INSTITUTE FOR ECONOMIC POLICY RESEARCH SIEPR Discussion Paper No. 02-20 Performance Evaluations over Time By Korok T. Ray Stanford University
More informationLecture 8: Incomplete Contracts
Lecture 8: Incomplete Contracts Cheng Chen School of Economics and Finance The University of Hong Kong (Cheng Chen (HKU)) Econ 6006 / 23 Introduction Motivation Development of microeconomics theory: General
More informationMoral Hazard. EC202 Lectures XV & XVI. Francesco Nava. February London School of Economics. Nava (LSE) EC202 Lectures XV & XVI Feb / 19
Moral Hazard EC202 Lectures XV & XVI Francesco Nava London School of Economics February 2011 Nava (LSE) EC202 Lectures XV & XVI Feb 2011 1 / 19 Summary Hidden Action Problem aka: 1 Moral Hazard Problem
More informationUniversity of Warwick, Department of Economics Spring Final Exam. Answer TWO questions. All questions carry equal weight. Time allowed 2 hours.
University of Warwick, Department of Economics Spring 2012 EC941: Game Theory Prof. Francesco Squintani Final Exam Answer TWO questions. All questions carry equal weight. Time allowed 2 hours. 1. Consider
More informationCOSTLY STATE VERIFICATION - DRAFT
COSTLY STTE VERIFICTION - DRFT SIMCH BRKI I am writing this note in order to explain under what circumstances debt contracts are optimal; more importantly, to explain why debt contracts are optimal. For
More informationIncentives versus Competitive Balance
Incentives versus Competitive Balance Marc Möller Department of Economics Universität Bern Abstract When players compete repeatedly, prizes won in earlier contests may improve the players abilities in
More informationScreening. Diego Moreno Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Diego Moreno () Screening 1 / 1
Screening Diego Moreno Universidad Carlos III de Madrid Diego Moreno () Screening 1 / 1 The Agency Problem with Adverse Selection A risk neutral principal wants to o er a menu of contracts to be o ered
More informationLecture 6 Games with Incomplete Information. November 14, 2008
Lecture 6 Games with Incomplete Information November 14, 2008 Bayesian Games : Osborne, ch 9 Battle of the sexes with incomplete information Player 1 would like to match player 2's action Player 1 is unsure
More informationContracts in informed-principal problems with moral hazard
Contracts in informed-principal problems with moral hazard Nicholas C Bedard January 20, 2016 Abstract In many cases, an employer has private information about the potential productivity of a worker, who
More informationMicroeconomic Theory (501b) Problem Set 10. Auctions and Moral Hazard Suggested Solution: Tibor Heumann
Dirk Bergemann Department of Economics Yale University Microeconomic Theory (50b) Problem Set 0. Auctions and Moral Hazard Suggested Solution: Tibor Heumann 4/5/4 This problem set is due on Tuesday, 4//4..
More informationBargaining, Contracts, and Theories of the Firm. Dr. Margaret Meyer Nuffield College
Bargaining, Contracts, and Theories of the Firm Dr. Margaret Meyer Nuffield College 2015 Course Overview 1. Bargaining 2. Hidden information and self-selection Optimal contracting with hidden information
More informationOptimal Incentive Contract with Costly and Flexible Monitoring
Optimal Incentive Contract with Costly and Flexible Monitoring Anqi Li 1 Ming Yang 2 1 Department of Economics, Washington University in St. Louis 2 Fuqua School of Business, Duke University May 2016 Motivation
More informationThis is designed for one 75-minute lecture using Games and Information. October 3, 2006
This is designed for one 75-minute lecture using Games and Information. October 3, 2006 1 7 Moral Hazard: Hidden Actions PRINCIPAL-AGENT MODELS The principal (or uninformed player) is the player who has
More informationAbility Matters, and Heterogeneity Can Be Good: The Effect of Heterogeneity on the Performance of Tournament Participants
Ability Matters, and Heterogeneity Can Be Good: The Effect of Heterogeneity on the Performance of Tournament Participants Rudi Stracke University of St. Gallen Uwe Sunde University of St. Gallen IZA, Bonn
More informationOrganization, Careers and Incentives
Organization, Careers and Incentives Chapter 4 Robert Gary-Bobo March 2018 1 / 31 Introduction Introduction A firm is a pyramid of opportunities (Alfred P. Sloan). Promotions can be used to create incentives.
More informationLecture 5: Labour Economics and Wage-Setting Theory
Lecture 5: Labour Economics and Wage-Setting Theory Spring 2017 Lars Calmfors Literature: Chapter 7 Cahuc-Carcillo-Zylberberg: 435-445 1 Topics Weakly efficient bargaining Strongly efficient bargaining
More informationThe Impact of Organizer Market Structure on Participant Entry Behavior in a Multi-Tournament Environment
The Impact of Organizer Market Structure on Participant Entry Behavior in a Multi-Tournament Environment Timothy Mathews and Soiliou Daw Namoro Abstract. A model of two tournaments, each with a field of
More informationEconS 501 Final Exam - December 10th, 2018
EconS 501 Final Exam - December 10th, 018 Show all your work clearly and make sure you justify all your answers. NAME 1. Consider the market for smart pencil in which only one firm (Superapiz) enjoys a
More informationMicroeconomics II Lecture 4: Incomplete Information Karl Wärneryd Stockholm School of Economics November 2016
Microeconomics II Lecture 4: Incomplete Information Karl Wärneryd Stockholm School of Economics November 2016 1 Modelling incomplete information So far, we have studied games in which information was complete,
More informationCardinal Contests. Patrick Hummel. Arpita Ghosh. Categories and Subject Descriptors ABSTRACT
Cardinal Contests Arpita Ghosh Cornell University Ithaca, NY, USA arpitaghosh@cornell.edu Patrick Hummel Google Inc. Mountain View, CA, USA phummel@google.com ABSTRACT Contests are widely used as a means
More informationFixed Term Employment Contracts. in an Equilibrium Search Model
Supplemental material for: Fixed Term Employment Contracts in an Equilibrium Search Model Fernando Alvarez University of Chicago and NBER Marcelo Veracierto Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago This document
More informationPrincipal-Agent model: Hidden Information
Principal-Agent model: Hidden Information Laont-Martimort, ch 2,3 Agent is the producer who will produce q units of the good for the principal rm-regulator or worker - employer Principal's utility is V
More informationAdvanced Microeconomics
Advanced Microeconomics ECON5200 - Fall 2012 Introduction What you have done: - consumers maximize their utility subject to budget constraints and firms maximize their profits given technology and market
More informationHybrid All-Pay and Winner-Pay Contests
Hybrid All-Pay and Winner-Pay Contests Seminar at DICE in Düsseldorf, June 5, 208 Johan N. M. Lagerlöf Dept. of Economics, U. of Copenhagen Email: johan.lagerlof@econ.ku.dk Website: www.johanlagerlof.com
More informationGame Theory, Information, Incentives
Game Theory, Information, Incentives Ronald Wendner Department of Economics Graz University, Austria Course # 320.501: Analytical Methods (part 6) The Moral Hazard Problem Moral hazard as a problem of
More informationSupplementary Material for \Collusion with Persistent Cost Shocks"
Supplementary Material for \Collusion with Persistent Cost Shocks" Susan Athey and Kyle Bagwell July 3, 2006 Abstract This document has three parts. The rst part analyzes generalizations of our model to
More informationAnswer Key for M. A. Economics Entrance Examination 2017 (Main version)
Answer Key for M. A. Economics Entrance Examination 2017 (Main version) July 4, 2017 1. Person A lexicographically prefers good x to good y, i.e., when comparing two bundles of x and y, she strictly prefers
More informationPrice Competition and Endogenous Valuation in Search Advertising
Price Competition and Endogenous Valuation in Search Advertising Lizhen Xu Jianqing Chen Andrew Whinston Web Appendix A Heterogeneous Consumer Valuation In the baseline model, we assumed that consumers
More informationWhat happens when there are many agents? Threre are two problems:
Moral Hazard in Teams What happens when there are many agents? Threre are two problems: i) If many agents produce a joint output x, how does one assign the output? There is a free rider problem here as
More informationDISCUSSION PAPER SERIES
DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES IN ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT Strategic Incentives for Managers in Contests Matthias Kräkel Discussion Paper No. 01-08 GERMAN ECONOMIC ASSOCIATION OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION - GEABA
More informationThe Firm-Growth Imperative: A Theory of Production and Personnel Management
The Firm-Growth Imperative: A Theory of Production and Personnel Management Rongzhu Ke Hong Kong Baptist University Jin Li London School of Economics Michael Powell Kellogg School of Management Management
More informationMoral Hazard: Characterization of SB
Moral Hazard: Characterization of SB Ram Singh Department of Economics March 2, 2015 Ram Singh (Delhi School of Economics) Moral Hazard March 2, 2015 1 / 19 Characterization of Second Best Contracts I
More informationECO 199 GAMES OF STRATEGY Spring Term 2004 Precepts Week 7 March Questions GAMES WITH ASYMMETRIC INFORMATION QUESTIONS
ECO 199 GAMES OF STRATEGY Spring Term 2004 Precepts Week 7 March 22-23 Questions GAMES WITH ASYMMETRIC INFORMATION QUESTIONS Question 1: In the final stages of the printing of Games of Strategy, Sue Skeath
More informationAdverse Selection, Signaling, and Screening in Markets
BGPE Intensive Course: Contracts and Asymmetric Information Adverse Selection, Signaling, and Screening in Markets Anke Kessler Anke Kessler p. 1/27 Stylized Facts: Market Failure used cars, even if they
More informationGame theory lecture 4. September 24, 2012
September 24, 2012 Finding Nash equilibrium Best-response or best-reply functions. We introduced Nash-equilibrium as a profile of actions (an action for each player) such that no player has an incentive
More informationLabor Economics, Lecture 11: Partial Equilibrium Sequential Search
Labor Economics, 14.661. Lecture 11: Partial Equilibrium Sequential Search Daron Acemoglu MIT December 6, 2011. Daron Acemoglu (MIT) Sequential Search December 6, 2011. 1 / 43 Introduction Introduction
More informationCrowdsourcing contests
December 8, 2012 Table of contents 1 Introduction 2 Related Work 3 Model: Basics 4 Model: Participants 5 Homogeneous Effort 6 Extensions Table of Contents 1 Introduction 2 Related Work 3 Model: Basics
More informationFinal Exam (Solution) Economics 501b Microeconomic Theory
Dirk Bergemann and Johannes Hoerner Department of Economics Yale Uniersity Final Exam (Solution) Economics 5b Microeconomic Theory May This is a closed-book exam. The exam lasts for 8 minutes. Please write
More informationECO421: Signaling. Marcin P ski. March 26, 2018
ECO421: Signaling Marcin P ski March 26, 2018 Plan Introduction Education Suits Signaling everywhere Conclusion Introduction Signaling games We talked about communication cheap talk veriable talk Talk
More informationIntroduction to Game Theory
Introduction to Game Theory Part 3. Dynamic games of incomplete information Chapter 3. Job Market Signaling Ciclo Profissional 2 o Semestre / 2011 Graduação em Ciências Econômicas V. Filipe Martins-da-Rocha
More informationSome Notes on Moral Hazard
Some Notes on Moral Hazard John Morgan University of California at Berkeley Preliminaries Up until this point, we have been concerned mainly with the problem of private information on the part of the agent,
More information5. Relational Contracts and Career Concerns
5. Relational Contracts and Career Concerns Klaus M. Schmidt LMU Munich Contract Theory, Summer 2010 Klaus M. Schmidt (LMU Munich) 5. Relational Contracts and Career Concerns Contract Theory, Summer 2010
More information1. Linear Incentive Schemes
ECO 317 Economics of Uncertainty Fall Term 2009 Slides to accompany 20. Incentives for Effort - One-Dimensional Cases 1. Linear Incentive Schemes Agent s effort x, principal s outcome y. Agent paid w.
More information1 Web Appendix: Equilibrium outcome under collusion (multiple types-multiple contracts)
1 Web Appendix: Equilibrium outcome under collusion (multiple types-multiple contracts) We extend our setup by allowing more than two types of agent. The agent s type is now β {β 1, β 2,..., β N }, where
More informationOptimal Insurance of Search Risk
Optimal Insurance of Search Risk Mikhail Golosov Yale University and NBER Pricila Maziero University of Pennsylvania Guido Menzio University of Pennsylvania and NBER November 2011 Introduction Search and
More informationRelative Performance Pay, Bonuses, and Job-Promotion Tournaments
Relative Performance Pay, Bonuses, and Job-Promotion Tournaments Matthias Kräkel y Anja Schöttner z Abstract Several empirical studies have challenged tournament theory by pointing out that (1) there is
More informationDoping and Cheating in Contest-Like Situations
DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES IZA DP No. 2059 Doping and Cheating in Contest-Like Situations Matthias Kräkel March 2006 Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit Institute for the Study of Labor Doping and Cheating
More informationInternal Labor Markets and Worker Rents
Internal Labor Markets and Worker Rents Matthias Kräkel y Anja Schöttner z Abstract We show that establishing an internal labor market by o ering combined contracts across hierarchy levels strictly dominates
More informationAsymmetric Information in Economic Policy. Noah Williams
Asymmetric Information in Economic Policy Noah Williams University of Wisconsin - Madison Williams Econ 899 Asymmetric Information Risk-neutral moneylender. Borrow and lend at rate R = 1/β. Strictly risk-averse
More informationDoping in Contest-Like Situations
Discussion Paper No. 46 Doping in Contest-Like Situations Matthias Kräkel* May 2005 *Matthias Kräkel, Department of Economics, BWL II, University of Bonn, Adenauerallee 24-42, D-53113 Bonn, Germany, m.kraekel@uni-bonn.de
More informationEmotions and Incentives
DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES IZA DP No 1270 Emotions and Incentives Matthias Kräkel August 2004 Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit Institute for the Study of Labor Emotions and Incentives Matthias Kräkel
More informationArea I: Contract Theory Question (Econ 206)
Theory Field Exam Summer 2011 Instructions You must complete two of the four areas (the areas being (I) contract theory, (II) game theory A, (III) game theory B, and (IV) psychology & economics). Be sure
More informationDepartment of Agricultural Economics. PhD Qualifier Examination. May 2009
Department of Agricultural Economics PhD Qualifier Examination May 009 Instructions: The exam consists of six questions. You must answer all questions. If you need an assumption to complete a question,
More informationarxiv: v1 [cs.gt] 16 Feb 2012
Implementing Optimal Outcomes in Social Computing: A Game-Theoretic Approach arxiv:1202.3480v1 [cs.gt] 16 Feb 2012 Arpita Ghosh Yahoo! Research Santa Clara, CA, USA arpita@yahoo-inc.com February 17, 2012
More informationSF2972 Game Theory Exam with Solutions March 15, 2013
SF2972 Game Theory Exam with s March 5, 203 Part A Classical Game Theory Jörgen Weibull and Mark Voorneveld. (a) What are N, S and u in the definition of a finite normal-form (or, equivalently, strategic-form)
More informationD i (w; p) := H i (w; S(w; p)): (1)
EC0 Microeconomic Principles II Outline Answers. (a) Demand for input i can be written D i (w; p) := H i (w; S(w; p)): () where H i is the conditional demand for input i and S is the supply function. From
More informationOn the Unique D1 Equilibrium in the Stackelberg Model with Asymmetric Information Janssen, M.C.W.; Maasland, E.
Tilburg University On the Unique D1 Equilibrium in the Stackelberg Model with Asymmetric Information Janssen, M.C.W.; Maasland, E. Publication date: 1997 Link to publication General rights Copyright and
More informationDesigning Dynamic Research Tournaments
Designing Dynamic Research Tournaments Jean-Michel Benkert and Igor Letina March 13, 2016 Abstract This paper considers the optimal design of dynamic research tournaments when the buyer can set time-dependent
More informationTheory Field Examination Game Theory (209A) Jan Question 1 (duopoly games with imperfect information)
Theory Field Examination Game Theory (209A) Jan 200 Good luck!!! Question (duopoly games with imperfect information) Consider a duopoly game in which the inverse demand function is linear where it is positive
More informationLayo Costs and E ciency with Asymmetric Information
Layo Costs and E ciency with Asymmetric Information Alain Delacroix (UQAM) and Etienne Wasmer (Sciences-Po) September 4, 2009 Abstract Wage determination under asymmetric information generates ine ciencies
More informationThe Revenue Equivalence Theorem 1
John Nachbar Washington University May 2, 2017 The Revenue Equivalence Theorem 1 1 Introduction. The Revenue Equivalence Theorem gives conditions under which some very different auctions generate the same
More informationA Principal-Agent Model of Sequential Testing
A Principal-Agent Model of Sequential Testing Dino Gerardi y Lucas Maestri z December 2008 Abstract This paper analyzes the optimal provision of incentives in a sequential testing context. In every period
More informationGame Theory Fall 2003
Game Theory Fall 2003 Problem Set 1 [1] In this problem (see FT Ex. 1.1) you are asked to play with arbitrary 2 2 games just to get used to the idea of equilibrium computation. Specifically, consider the
More informationOne Variable Calculus. Izmir University of Economics Econ 533: Quantitative Methods and Econometrics
Izmir University of Economics Econ 533: Quantitative Methods and Econometrics One Variable Calculus Introduction Finding the best way to do a specic task involves what is called an optimization problem.
More informationA Principal-Agent Model of Sequential Testing
A Principal-Agent Model of Sequential Testing Dino Gerardi Lucas Maestri No. 115 June 2009 www.carloalberto.org/working_papers 2009 by Dino Gerardi and Lucas Maestri. Any opinions expressed here are those
More informationRelative Performance Evaluation
Relative Performance Evaluation Ram Singh Department of Economics March, 205 Ram Singh (Delhi School of Economics) Moral Hazard March, 205 / 3 Model I Multiple Agents: Relative Performance Evaluation Relative
More informationAn adaptation of Pissarides (1990) by using random job destruction rate
MPRA Munich Personal RePEc Archive An adaptation of Pissarides (990) by using random job destruction rate Huiming Wang December 2009 Online at http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/203/ MPRA Paper No. 203, posted
More informationRice University. Fall Semester Final Examination ECON501 Advanced Microeconomic Theory. Writing Period: Three Hours
Rice University Fall Semester Final Examination 007 ECON50 Advanced Microeconomic Theory Writing Period: Three Hours Permitted Materials: English/Foreign Language Dictionaries and non-programmable calculators
More informationEconS Advanced Microeconomics II Handout on Subgame Perfect Equilibrium (SPNE)
EconS 3 - Advanced Microeconomics II Handout on Subgame Perfect Equilibrium (SPNE). Based on MWG 9.B.3 Consider the three-player nite game of perfect information depicted in gure. L R Player 3 l r a b
More informationMechanism Design: Basic Concepts
Advanced Microeconomic Theory: Economics 521b Spring 2011 Juuso Välimäki Mechanism Design: Basic Concepts The setup is similar to that of a Bayesian game. The ingredients are: 1. Set of players, i {1,
More informationOptimal contract under adverse selection in a moral hazard model with a risk averse agent
Optimal contract under adverse selection in a moral hazard model with a risk averse agent Lionel Thomas CRESE Université de Franche-Comté, IUT Besanon Vesoul, 30 avenue de l Observatoire, BP1559, 25009
More informationSupplementary Material to Monopoly Insurance and Endogenous Information
Supplementary Material to Monopoly Insurance and Endogenous Information Johan N. M. Lagerlöf Christoph Schottmüller May 27, 2016 Not intended for publication Contents 1 Introduction 2 1.1 Notation.............................................
More information1 The Basic RBC Model
IHS 2016, Macroeconomics III Michael Reiter Ch. 1: Notes on RBC Model 1 1 The Basic RBC Model 1.1 Description of Model Variables y z k L c I w r output level of technology (exogenous) capital at end of
More informationT R(y(L)) w L = 0. L so we can write this as p ] (b) Recall that with the perfectly competitive firm, demand for labor was such that
Problem Set 11: Solutions ECO 301: Intermediate Microeconomics Prof. Marek Weretka Problem 1 (Monopoly and the Labor Market) (a) We find the optimal demand for labor for a monopoly firm (in the goods market
More informationMoral hazard in teams
Division of the Humanities and Social Sciences Moral hazard in teams KC Border November 2004 These notes are based on the first part of Moral hazard in teams by Bengt Holmström [1], and fills in the gaps
More informationLecture Notes - Dynamic Moral Hazard
Lecture Notes - Dynamic Moral Hazard Simon Board and Moritz Meyer-ter-Vehn October 27, 2011 1 Marginal Cost of Providing Utility is Martingale (Rogerson 85) 1.1 Setup Two periods, no discounting Actions
More informationGeorge Mason University February 2009
Cheryl Druehl George Mason University February 2009 Open Innovation Chesborough's (2003) book Open Innovation identifies open innovation as distinct from closed innovation. Closed takes place entirely
More informationEconomics 2450A: Public Economics Section 8: Optimal Minimum Wage and Introduction to Capital Taxation
Economics 2450A: Public Economics Section 8: Optimal Minimum Wage and Introduction to Capital Taxation Matteo Paradisi November 1, 2016 In this Section we develop a theoretical analysis of optimal minimum
More informationA Structural Model of Sponsored Search Advertising Auctions
A Structural Model of Sponsored Search Advertising Auctions S. Athey and D. Nekipelov presented by Marcelo A. Fernández February 26, 2014 Remarks The search engine does not sell specic positions on the
More informationLinear Contracts. Ram Singh. February 23, Department of Economics. Ram Singh (Delhi School of Economics) Moral Hazard February 23, / 22
Ram Singh Department of Economics February 23, 2015 Ram Singh (Delhi School of Economics) Moral Hazard February 23, 2015 1 / 22 SB: Linear Contracts I Linear Contracts Assumptions: q(e, ɛ) = e + ɛ, where
More informationEC476 Contracts and Organizations, Part III: Lecture 2
EC476 Contracts and Organizations, Part III: Lecture 2 Leonardo Felli 32L.G.06 19 January 2015 Moral Hazard: Consider the contractual relationship between two agents (a principal and an agent) The principal
More informationCollective Production and Incentives
Discussion Paper No. 186 Collective Production and Incentives Alex Gershkov* Jianp Li** Paul Schwnzer*** December 2006 *Alex Gershkov, Department of Economics, University of Bonn, Lennéstraße 37, 53113
More information