The LHC Physics Environment

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "The LHC Physics Environment"

Transcription

1 The LHC Physics Environment Talk : What We Have Learned at the Tevatron Rick Field University of Florida Outline of Talk The old days of Feynman-Field Phenomenology. Review what we learned about minbias, the underlying event, and event topologies in Run at CDF. Review the CDF Run 2 underlying event studies in high transverse momentum jet production and in Drell-Yan production. Describe the QCD Monte-Carlo models that are used to simulate hadronhadron collisions. Examine some extrapolations from the Tevatron to the LHC. CDF Run 2 CMS at the LHC University of Wisconsin, Madison June 24 th July 2 nd, 2009 Final-State Radiation PT(hard) UE&MB@CMS Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page

2 Toward and Understanding of Hadron-Hadron Collisions Feynman-Field Phenomenology st hat! Feynman and Field From 7 GeV/c π 0 s to 600 GeV/c Jets. The early days of trying to understand and simulate hadronhadron collisions. PT(hard) Final-State Radiation Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 2

3 Hadron-Hadron Collisions FF 977 What happens when two hadrons collide at high energy? Most of the time the hadrons ooze through each other and fall apart (i.e. no hard scattering). The outgoing particles continue in roughly the same direction as initial proton and antiproton. Hadron??? Hadron Parton-Parton Scattering Soft Collision (no large transverse momentum) Occasionally there will be a large transverse momentum meson. Question: Where did it come from? Hadron Hadron We assumed it came from quark-quark elastic scattering, but we did not know how to calculate it! Black-Box Model high P T meson Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 3

4 Hadron-Hadron Collisions FF 977 What happens when two hadrons collide at high energy? Hadron Feynman quote from FF??? The model we shall choose is not a popular one, Most of the time the hadrons ooze so that we will not duplicate too much of the through each other and work fall apart of others (i.e. who are similarly analyzing no hard scattering). The various outgoing models (e.g. constituent interchange particles continue in roughly model, multiperipheral the same models, etc.). We shall Parton-Parton Scattering direction as initial proton assume and that the high P T particles arise from antiproton. direct hard collisions between constituent quarks in the incoming particles, which Occasionally there will fragment be a large or cascade down Hadron into several hadrons. transverse momentum meson. Question: Where did it come from? Hadron Soft Collision (no large transverse momentum) Hadron We assumed it came from quark-quark elastic scattering, but we did not know how to calculate it! Black-Box Model high P T meson Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 4

5 Quark Distribution Functions determined from deep-inelastic lepton-hadron collisions Quark-Quark Black-Box Box Model FF 977 No gluons! Quark-Quark Cross-Section Unknown! Deteremined from hadron-hadron collisions. Quark Fragmentation Functions determined from e + e - annihilations Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 5

6 Quark Distribution Functions determined from deep-inelastic lepton-hadron collisions Quark-Quark Black-Box Box Model FF 977 Feynman quote from FF Because of the incomplete knowledge of our functions some things can be predicted with more certainty than others. Those experimental results that are not well predicted can be used up to determine these functions in greater detail to permit better predictions of further experiments. Our papers will be a bit long because we wish to discuss this interplay in detail. No gluons! Quark-Quark Cross-Section Unknown! Deteremined from hadron-hadron collisions. Quark Fragmentation Functions determined from e + e - annihilations Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 6

7 Quark-Quark Black-Box Box Model Predict particle ratios FF 977 Predict increase with increasing CM energy W The underlying event (Beam-Beam Remnants)! Predict overall event topology (FFF paper 977) 7 GeV/c π 0 s! Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 7

8 Quark-Quark Black-Box Box Model Predict particle ratios FF 977 Predict increase with increasing CM energy W When Jim Cronin s group at the University of Chicago measured these rations and we knew we were on the right track! The underlying event (Beam-Beam Remnants)! Predict overall event topology (FFF paper 977) 7 GeV/c π 0 s! Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 8

9 QCD Approach: Quarks & Gluons Quark & Gluon Fragmentation Functions Q 2 dependence predicted from QCD FFF2 978 Parton Distribution Functions Q 2 dependence predicted from QCD Quark & Gluon Cross-Sections Calculated from QCD Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 9

10 QCD Approach: Quarks & Gluons Quark & Gluon Fragmentation Functions Q 2 dependence predicted from QCD FFF2 978 Parton Distribution Functions Q 2 dependence predicted from QCD Feynman quote from FFF2 We investigate whether the present experimental behavior of mesons with large transverse momentum in hadron-hadron collisions is consistent with the theory of quantum-chromodynamics (QCD) with asymptotic freedom, at least as the theory is now partially understood. Quark & Gluon Cross-Sections Calculated from QCD Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 0

11 High P T Jets Feynman, Field, & Fox (978) CDF (2006) Predict large jet cross-section 30 GeV/c! 600 GeV/c Jets! Feynman quote from FFF At the time of this writing, there is still no sharp quantitative test of QCD. An important test will come in connection with the phenomena of high P T discussed here. Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page

12 QCD Monte-Carlo Models: High Transverse Momentum Jets Hard Scattering PT(hard) Hard Scattering Jet Jet PT(hard) Hard Scattering Component Final-State Radiation Jet Final-State Radiation Start with the perturbative 2-to-2 (or sometimes 2-to-3) parton-parton scattering and add initial and finalstate gluon radiation (in the leading log approximation or modified leading log approximation). The underlying event consists of the beam-beam remnants and from particles arising from soft or semi-soft multiple parton interactions (MPI). The underlying event is an unavoidable Of course the outgoing colored partons fragment into hadron jet and inevitably underlying event background to most collider observables observables receive contributions from initial and final-state radiation. and having good understand of it leads to more precise collider measurements! Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 2

13 QCD Monte-Carlo Models: Lepton-Pair Production High Lepton-Pair P T Z-Boson Production Anti-Lepton High PLepton-Pair T Z-Boson Production Jet Outgoing Anti-Lepton Parton Final-State Radiation Hard Scattering Component Final-State Radiation Z-boson Lepton Z-boson Lepton Start with the perturbative Drell-Yan muon pair production and add initial-state gluon radiation (in the leading log approximation or modified leading log approximation). The underlying event consists of the beam-beam remnants and from particles arising from soft or semi-soft multiple parton interactions (MPI). Of course the outgoing colored partons fragment into hadron jet and inevitably underlying event observables receive contributions from initial-state radiation. Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 3

14 Elastic Scattering - Collisions at the Tevatron Single Diffraction M The CDF Min-Bias trigger picks up most of the hard core cross-section plus a Double small Diffraction amount of single & double diffraction. M M 2 σ tot = σ EL + σ SD +σ DD +σ HC.8 TeV: 78mb = 8mb + 9mb + (4-7)mb + (47-44)mb The hard core component contains both hard and soft collisions. Inelastic Non-Diffractive Component Soft Hard Core (no hard scattering) Hard Core Beam-Beam Counters 3.2 < η < 5.9 Hard Hard Core (hard scattering) CDF Min-Bias trigger charged particle in forward BBC AND charged particle in backward BBC Final-State Radiation PT(hard) Initial-State Radiation Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 4

15 Particle Densities 2π η = 4π = 2.6 Charged Particles p T > 0.5 GeV/c η < CDF Run 2 Min-Bias CDF Run 2 Min-Bias Observable Average Average Density per unit η-φ φ 3 charged particles Nchg PTsum (GeV/c) Number of Charged Particles (p T > 0.5 GeV/c, η < ) Scalar p T sum of Charged Particles (p T > 0.5 GeV/c, η < ) 3.7 +/ / / /- 8 3 GeV/c PTsum dnchg/dηdφ = /4π 3/4π = Divide by 4π 0 - η + dptsum/dηdφ = /4π 3/4π GeV/c = GeV/c Study the charged particles (p T > 0.5 GeV/c, η < ) and form the charged particle density, dnchg/dηdφ, and the charged scalar p T sum density, dptsum/dηdφ. Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 5

16 CDF Run Min-Bias Data Charged Particle Density Charged Particle Pseudo-Rapidity Distribution: dn/dη Charged Particle Density: dn/dηdφ 7 6 CDF Published 0.8 CDF Published dn/dη CDF Min-Bias.8 TeV CDF Min-Bias 630 GeV all PT Pseudo-Rapidity η dn/dηdφ CDF Min-Bias 630 GeV CDF Min-Bias.8 TeV all PT Pseudo-Rapidity η <dn chg /dη> = 4.2 <dn chg /dηdφ> = 0.67 Shows CDF Min-Bias data on the number of charged particles per unit pseudo-rapidity at 630 and,800 GeV. There are about 4.2 charged particles per unit η in Min-Bias collisions at.8 TeV ( η <, all p T ). ηx = Convert to charged particle density, dn chg /dηdφ, by dividing by 2π. = There are about 0.67 charged particles per unit η-φ in Min-Bias 0.67 collisions at.8 TeV ( η <, all p T ). η = Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 6

17 CDF Run Min-Bias Data Charged Particle Density Charged Particle Pseudo-Rapidity Distribution: dn/dη Charged Particle Density: dn/dηdφ 7 6 CDF Published 0.8 CDF Published dn/dη CDF Min-Bias.8 TeV CDF Min-Bias 630 GeV all PT Pseudo-Rapidity η dn/dηdφ CDF Min-Bias 630 GeV CDF Min-Bias.8 TeV all PT Pseudo-Rapidity η <dn chg /dη> = 4.2 Shows CDF Min-Bias data on the number of charged particles per unit pseudo-rapidity at 630 and,800 GeV. There are about 4.2 charged particles per unit η in Min-Bias collisions at.8 TeV ( η <, all p T ). ηx = Convert to charged particle density, dn chg /dηdφ, by dividing by 2π. = There are about 0.67 charged particles per unit η-φ in Min-Bias collisions at.8 TeV ( η <, all p T ). <dn chg /dηdφ> = 0.67 There are about 0.25 charged particles per unit η-φ in Min-Bias collisions at.96 TeV ( η <, p T > 0.5 GeV/c). η = Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 7

18 Highest p T charged particle! PTmax Direction Correlations in φ CDF Run Min-Bias Associated Charged Particle Density Charged Particle Density CDF Preliminary data uncorrected Charged Particle Density: dn/dηdφ Charge Density Min-Bias PTmax (degrees) Associated Density PTmax not included Associated densities do not include PTmax! Charged Particles ( η <, PT>0.5 GeV/c) Use the maximum p T charged particle in the event, PTmax, to define a direction and look at the the associated density, dnchg/dηdφ, in min-bias collisions (p T > 0.5 GeV/c, η < ). Shows the data on the dependence of the associated charged particle density, dnchg/dηdφ, for charged particles (p T > 0.5 GeV/c, η <, not including PTmax) relative to PTmax (rotated to 80 o ) for min-bias events. Also shown is the average charged particle density, dnchg/dηdφ, for min-bias events. Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 8

19 Highest p T charged particle! PTmax Direction Correlations in φ CDF Run Min-Bias Associated Charged Particle Density Charged Particle Density CDF Preliminary data uncorrected Charged Particle Density: dn/dηdφ Charge Density Min-Bias (degrees) Use the maximum p T charged particle in the event, PTmax, to define a direction and look at the the associated It is more probable density, dnchg/dηdφ, to find a particle in min-bias collisions (p T > 0.5 GeV/c, η < ). accompanying PTmax than it is to find a particle in the central region! Shows the data on the dependence of the associated charged particle density, dnchg/dηdφ, for charged particles (p T > 0.5 GeV/c, η <, not including PTmax) relative to PTmax (rotated to 80 o ) for min-bias events. Also shown is the average charged particle density, dnchg/dηdφ, for min-bias events. PTmax Associated Density PTmax not included Associated densities do not include PTmax! Charged Particles ( η <, PT>0.5 GeV/c) Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 9

20 CDF Run Min-Bias Associated Charged Particle Density Rapid rise in the particle density in the transverse region as PTmax increases! PTmax Direction Jet # Correlations in φ Jet #2 Ave Min-Bias 0.25 per unit η-φ Associated Particle Density PTmax > 2.0 GeV/c PTmax > GeV/c PTmax > 0.5 GeV/c Associated Particle Density: dn/dηdφ Transverse Region PTmax not included Charged Particles ( η <, PT>0.5 GeV/c) PTmax (degrees) CDF Preliminary data uncorrected Transverse Region Min-Bias PTmax > 2.0 GeV/c PTmax > 0.5 GeV/c Shows the data on the dependence of the associated charged particle density, dnchg/dηdφ, for charged particles (p T > 0.5 GeV/c, η <, not including PTmax) relative to PTmax (rotated to 80 o ) for min-bias events with PTmax > 0.5,, and 2.0 GeV/c. Shows jet structure in min-bias collisions (i.e. the birth of the leading two jets!). Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 20

21 Charged Particle Density 0. Associated Charged Particle Density: dn/dηdφ RDF Preliminary py Tune A generator level PTmax > 5.0 GeV/c Min-Bias.96 TeV Region PTmax > GeV/c (degrees) Min-Bias Associated Charged Particle Density PTmax > GeV/c PTmax > 2.0 GeV/c PTmax > 0.5 GeV/c Charged Particle Density PTmax Direction Associated Charged Particle Density: dn/dηdφ RDF Preliminary Min-Bias py Tune A generator level.96 TeV "Toward" "Away" PTmax (GeV/c) "Transverse" Shows the dependence of the associated charged particle density, dnchg/dηdφ, for charged particles (p T > 0.5 GeV/c, η <, not including PTmax) relative to PTmax (rotated to 80 o ) for min-bias events at.96 TeV with PTmax > 0.5,, 2.0, 5.0, and GeV/c from PYTHIA Tune A (generator level). PTmax Direction Shows the associated charged particle density in the toward, away and transverse regions as a function of PTmax for charged particles (p T > 0.5 GeV/c, η <, not including PTmax) for min-bias events at.96 TeV from PYTHIA Tune A (generator level). Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 2

22 Charged Particle Density 0. Associated Charged Particle Density: dn/dηdφ RDF Preliminary py Tune A generator level PTmax > 5.0 GeV/c Min-Bias.96 TeV Region PTmax > GeV/c (degrees) Min-Bias Associated Charged Particle Density PTmax > GeV/c PTmax > 2.0 GeV/c PTmax > 0.5 GeV/c Charged Particle Density PTmax Direction Associated Charged Particle Density: dn/dηdφ RDF RDF Preliminary Min-Bias Preliminary Min-Bias 4 TeV.96 TeV py Tune A generator level py Tune generator level "Toward" "Toward" "Away" Charged Charged Particles Particles ( η <, ( η <, PT>0.5 PT>0.5 GeV/c) GeV/c) PTmax (GeV/c) "Away" "Transverse" "Transverse" Shows the dependence of the associated charged particle density, dnchg/dηdφ, for charged particles (p T > 0.5 GeV/c, η <, not including PTmax) relative to PTmax (rotated to 80 o ) for min-bias events at.96 TeV with PTmax > 0.5,, 2.0, 5.0, and GeV/c from PYTHIA Tune A (generator level). PTmax Direction Shows the associated charged particle density in the toward, away and transverse regions as a function of PTmax for charged particles (p T > 0.5 GeV/c, η <, not including PTmax) for min-bias events at.96 TeV from PYTHIA Tune A (generator level). Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 22

23 Charged Particle Density 0. Associated Charged Particle Density: dn/dηdφ RDF Preliminary py Tune A generator level PTmax > 5.0 GeV/c Min-Bias.96 TeV Region PTmax > GeV/c (degrees) Min-Bias Associated Charged Particle Density PTmax > GeV/c PTmax > 2.0 GeV/c PTmax > 0.5 GeV/c "Transverse" Charged Particle Charged Density PTmax Direction "Transverse" Associated Charged Particle Density: dn/dηdφ RDF Preliminary Min-Bias RDF Preliminary Min-Bias Min-Bias 4 TeV 4 TeV.96 TeV py Tune A generator level py Tune A generator level "Toward" "Toward" ~ factor of 2! "Away" "Transverse" Charged Charged Particles Particles ( η <, ( η <, PT>0.5 PT>0.5 GeV/c) GeV/c) PTmax (GeV/c) "Away".96 TeV "Transverse" Shows the dependence of the associated charged particle density, dnchg/dηdφ, for charged particles (p T > 0.5 GeV/c, η <, not including PTmax) relative to PTmax (rotated to 80 o ) for min-bias events at.96 TeV with PTmax > 0.5,, 2.0, 5.0, and GeV/c from PYTHIA Tune A (generator level). PTmax Direction Shows the associated charged particle density in the toward, away and transverse regions as a function of PTmax for charged particles (p T > 0.5 GeV/c, η <, not including PTmax) for min-bias events at.96 TeV from PYTHIA Tune A (generator level). Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 23

24 Charged Density PTmax Direction ChgJet# Direction "Transverse" Charged Density "Transverse" Charged Particle Density: dn/dηdφ RDF Preliminary py Tune A generator level PTmax ChgJet# Jet#.96 TeV 0.6 Jet# Direction PT(jet#) or PT(chgjet#) or PTmax (GeV/c) Shows the charged particle density in the transverse region for charged particles (p T > 0.5 GeV/c, η < ) at.96 TeV as defined by PTmax, PT(chgjet#), and PT(jet#) from PYTHIA Tune A at the particle level (i.e. generator level). Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 24

25 CDF Run : Evolution of Charged Jets region very sensitive to the underlying event! Charged Jet # Direction Toward-Side Jet Charged Particle Correlations P T > 0.5 GeV/c η < CDF Run Analysis Charged Jet # Direction 2π Away Region Transverse Region Look at the charged particle density in the transverse region! φ Leading Jet Toward Region Transverse Region Away-Side Jet 0 Away Region - η + Look at charged particle correlations in the azimuthal angle relative to the leading charged particle jet. Define < 60 o as, 60 o < < 20 o as, and > 20 o as. All three regions have the same size in η-φ space, ηx = 2x20 o = 4π/3. Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 25

26 Run Charged Particle Density p T Distribution "Transverse" Charged Density "Transverse" Charged Particle Density: dn/dηdφ 0 CDF Run data uncorrected CDF Min-Bias CDF JET20 Factor of 2!.8 TeV η < PT>0.5 GeV/c PT(charged jet#) (GeV/c) Charged Particle Jet # Direction Min-Bias Compares the average transverse charge particle density with the average Min-Bias charge particle density ( η <, p T >0.5 GeV). Shows how the transverse charge particle density and the Min-Bias charge particle density is distributed in p T. Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 26

27 Run Charged Particle Density p T Distribution "Transverse" Charged Density Min-Bias "Transverse" Charged Particle Density: dn/dηdφ CDF Run data uncorrected P T (charged jet#) > 30 GeV/c <dn chg /dηdφ> = 0.56 CDF Run Min-Bias data <dn chg /dηdφ> = 0.25 Factor of 2! PT(charged jet#) (GeV/c) CDF Min-Bias CDF JET20.8 TeV η < PT>0.5 GeV/c Charged Density dn/dηdφdpt (/GeV/c) E+00 E-0 E-02 E-03 E-04 E-05 E-06 Min-Bias Charged Particle Density.8 TeV η < PT>0.5 GeV/c "Transverse" PT(chgjet#) > 5 GeV/c PT(charged) (GeV/c) CDF Run data uncorrected "Transverse" PT(chgjet#) > 30 GeV/c Compares the average transverse charge particle density with the average Min-Bias charge particle density ( η <, p T >0.5 GeV). Shows how the transverse charge particle density and the Min-Bias charge particle density is distributed in p T. Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 27

28 Charged Jet # Direction Beam-Beam Remnants "Transverse" Charged Density ISAJET 7.32 Density ISAJET uses a naïve leading-log parton shower-model which does not agree with the data! "Transverse" Charged Particle Density: dn/dηdφ CDF Run Data data uncorrected theory corrected "Remnants" Isajet PT(charged jet#) (GeV/c) "Hard".8 TeV η < PT>0.5 GeV ISAJET Hard Component Plot shows average transverse charge particle density ( η <, p T >0.5 GeV) versus P T (charged jet#) compared to the QCD hard scattering predictions of ISAJET 7.32 (default parameters with P T (hard)>3 GeV/c). The predictions of ISAJET are divided into two categories: charged particles that arise from the break-up of the beam and target (beam-beam remnants); and charged particles that arise from the outgoing jet plus initial and final-state radiation (hard scattering component). Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 28

29 Charged Jet # Direction Beam-Beam Remnants "Transverse" Charged Density HERWIG uses a modified leadinglog parton shower-model which does agrees better with the data! "Transverse" Charged Particle Density: dn/dηdφ HERWIG 6.4 Density CDF Run Data data uncorrected theory corrected Total "Remnants" "Hard" PT(charged jet#) (GeV/c) Herwig 6.4 CTEQ5L PT(hard) > 3 GeV/c.8 TeV η < PT>0.5 GeV HERWIG Hard Component Plot shows average transverse charge particle density ( η <, p T >0.5 GeV) versus P T (charged jet#) compared to the QCD hard scattering predictions of HERWIG 5.9 (default parameters with P T (hard)>3 GeV/c). The predictions of HERWIG are divided into two categories: charged particles that arise from the break-up of the beam and target (beam-beam remnants); and charged particles that arise from the outgoing jet plus initial and final-state radiation (hard scattering component). Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 29

30 HERWIG 6.4 P T Distribution "Transverse" Charged Density "Transverse" Charged Particle Density: dn/dηdφ CDF Data data uncorrected theory corrected HERWIG has the too steep of a p T dependence of the beam-beam remnant component of the underlying event! Total "Remnants" "Hard" PT(charged jet#) (GeV/c) Herwig 6.4 CTEQ5L PT(hard) > 3 GeV/c.8 TeV η < PT>0.5 GeV Herwig P T (chgjet#) > 30 GeV/c <dn chg /dηdφ> = 0.5 Charged Density dn/dηdφdpt (/GeV/c) E+00 E-0 E-02 E-03 E-04 E-05 "Transverse" Charged Particle Density PT(chgjet#) > 5 GeV/c Herwig 6.4 CTEQ5L CDF Data data uncorrected theory corrected.8 TeV η < PT>0.5 GeV/c PT(chgjet#) > 30 GeV/c Herwig P T (chgjet#) > 5 GeV/c <dn chg /dηdφ> = 0 E PT(charged) (GeV/c) Compares the average transverse charge particle density ( η <, p T >0.5 GeV) versus P T (charged jet#) and the p T distribution of the transverse density, dn chg /dηdφdp T with the QCD hard scattering predictions of HERWIG 6.4 (default parameters with P T (hard)>3 GeV/c. Shows how the transverse charge particle density is distributed in p T. Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 30

31 Multiple Hard Parton Collision Interaction initial-state radiation outgoing parton outgoing parton MPI: Multiple Parton Interactions final-state radiation initial-state radiation Hard Component outgoing jet PYTHIA models the soft component of the underlying event with color string fragmentation, but in addition includes a contribution arising from multiple parton interactions (MPI) in which one interaction is hard and the other is semi-hard. color string color string The probability that a hard scattering events also contains a semi-hard multiple parton interaction can be varied but adjusting the cut-off for the MPI. One can also adjust whether the probability of a MPI depends on the P T of the hard scattering, P T (hard) (constant cross section or varying with impact parameter). One can adjust the color connections and flavor of the MPI (singlet or nearest neighbor, q-qbar or glue-glue). Also, one can adjust how the probability of a MPI depends on P T (hard) (single or double Gaussian matter distribution). + final-state radiation Semi-Hard MPI or Beam-Beam Remnants Soft Component Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 3

32 MPI, Pile-Up, and Overlap MPI: Multiple Parton Interactions PT(hard) MPI: Additional 2-to-2 parton-parton scatterings within a single protonantiproton collision. Final-State Radiation Pile-Up Pile-Up Interaction Region z Primary Pile-Up: More than one proton-antiproton collision in the beam crossing. Overlap Overlap: An experimental timing issue where a proton-antiproton collision from the next beam crossing gets included in the protonantiproton collision from the current beam crossing because the next crossing happened before the event could be read out. Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 32

33 Parameter Default Tuning PYTHIA: Multiple Parton Interaction Parameters Description PARP(83) PARP(84) PARP(85) Double-Gaussian: Fraction of total hadronic matter within PARP(84) Double-Gaussian: Fraction of the overall hadron radius containing the fraction PARP(83) of the total hadronic matter. Determines the energy Probability that the MPI produces two gluons dependence of the MPI! with color connections to the nearest neighbors. Hard Core Color String Multiple Parton Interaction Color String PARP(86) 0.66 Probability that Affects the MPI the produces amount two of gluons either as described initial-state by PARP(85) radiation! or as a closed gluon loop. The remaining fraction consists of quark-antiquark pairs. Multiple Parton Determine Interaction by comparing with 630 GeV data! Color String PARP(89) PARP(82) PARP(90) TeV.9 GeV/c 0.6 Determines the reference energy E 0. The cut-off P T0 that regulates the 2-to-2 scattering divergence /PT 4 /(PT 2 +P T0 2 ) 2 Determines the energy dependence of the cut-off P T0 as follows P T0 (E cm ) = P T0 (E cm /E 0 ) ε with ε = PARP(90) PT0 (GeV/c) PYTHIA Hard-Scattering Cut-Off PT0 Take E 0 =.8 TeV ε = 0.25 (Set A)) PARP(67) A scale factor that determines the maximum parton virtuality for space-like showers. The larger the value of PARP(67) the more initialstate radiation. ε = 0.6 (default) 00,000 0,000 00,000 Reference point at.8 TeV CM Energy W (GeV) Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 33

34 Parameter PARP(83) PARP(84) PARP(85) PARP(86) PARP(89) PARP(82) PARP(90) PARP(67) Default TeV.9 GeV/c 0.6 Tuning PYTHIA: Multiple Parton Interaction Parameters Description Double-Gaussian: Fraction of total hadronic matter within PARP(84) Double-Gaussian: Fraction of the overall hadron radius containing the fraction PARP(83) of the total hadronic matter. Determines the energy Probability that the MPI produces two gluons dependence of the MPI! with color connections to the nearest neighbors. Probability that Affects the MPI the produces amount two of gluons either as described initial-state by PARP(85) radiation! or as a closed gluon loop. The remaining fraction consists of quark-antiquark pairs. Determines the reference energy E 0. The cut-off P T0 that regulates the 2-to-2 scattering divergence /PT 4 /(PT 2 +P T0 2 ) 2 Determines the energy dependence of the cut-off P T0 as follows P T0 (E cm ) = P T0 (E cm /E 0 ) ε with ε = PARP(90) A scale factor that determines the maximum parton virtuality for space-like showers. The larger the value of PARP(67) the more initialstate radiation. Hard Core PT0 (GeV/c) Color String I will talk more about the energy dependence of MPI tomorrow morning! Multiple Parton Interaction Color String Multiple Parton Determine Interaction by comparing with 630 GeV data! PYTHIA Color String Hard-Scattering Cut-Off PT0 Take E 0 =.8 TeV ε = 0.25 (Set A)) ε = 0.6 (default) 00,000 0,000 00,000 Reference point at.8 TeV CM Energy W (GeV) Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 34

35 PYTHIA default parameters Parameter MSTP(8) MSTP(82) PARP(8) PARP(82) PARP(89) PARP(90) PARP(67) PYTHIA Defaults MPI constant probability , , , "Transverse" Charged Density scattering "Transverse" Charged Particle Density: dn/dηdφ CDF Data data uncorrected theory corrected Pythia (default) MSTP(82)= PARP(8) =.9 GeV/c PT(charged jet#) (GeV/c).8 TeV η < PT>0.5 GeV CTEQ3L CTEQ4L CTEQ5L CDF Min-Bias CDF JET20 Plot shows the charged particle density versus P T (chgjet#) compared to the QCD hard scattering predictions of PYTHIA (P T (hard) > 0) using the default parameters for multiple parton interactions and CTEQ3L, CTEQ4L, and CTEQ5L. Note Change PARP(67) = 4.0 (< 6.38) PARP(67) = (> 6.38) Default parameters give very poor description of the underlying event! Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 35

36 Parameter MSTP(8) MSTP(82) PARP(82) PARP(83) PARP(84) PARP(85) PARP(86) PARP(89) PARP(90) PARP(67) Not the default! PYTHIA CTEQ5L Tune B TeV 0.25 New PYTHIA default (less initial-state radiation) 4.9 GeV Run PYTHIA Tune A Tune A GeV TeV "Transverse" Charged Density CDF Default! "Transverse" Charged Particle Density: dn/dηdφ CDF Preliminary data uncorrected theory corrected CTEQ5L Plot shows the transverse charged particle density versus P T (chgjet#) compared to the QCD hard scattering predictions of two tuned versions of PYTHIA (CTEQ5L, Set B (PARP(67)=) and Set A (PARP(67)=4)). Old PYTHIA default (more initial-state radiation) PYTHIA (Set B) PARP(67)= PYTHIA (Set A) PARP(67)= PT(charged jet#) (GeV/c) Run Analysis.8 TeV η < PT>0.5 GeV Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 36

37 dn/dηdφ CDF Published Charged Particle Density: dn/dηdφ Pythia Set A CDF Min-Bias.8 TeV Pseudo-Rapidity η PYTHIA Tune A Min-Bias Soft + Hard.8 TeV all PT PYTHIA regulates the perturbative 2-to-2 parton-parton cross sections with cut-off parameters which allows one to run with Lots of hard scattering in P T Min-Bias (hard) > at 0. the One Tevatron! can simulate both hard and soft collisions in one program. PYTHIA Tune A CDF Run 2 Default Charged Particle Density The relative amount of hard versus soft depends on the cut-off and can be tuned. Charged Density dn/dηdφdpt (/GeV/c) E+00 E-0 E-02 E-03 E-04 E-05 E-06 CDF Preliminary PT(hard) > 0 GeV/c PT(charged) (GeV/c) Tuned to fit the CDF Run underlying event! Pythia Set A CDF Min-Bias Data.8 TeV η < 2% of Min-Bias events have P T (hard) > 5 GeV/c! % of Min-Bias events have P T (hard) > 0 GeV/c! This PYTHIA fit predicts that 2% of all Min-Bias events are a result of a hard 2-to-2 parton-parton scattering with P T (hard) > 5 GeV/c (% with P T (hard) > 0 GeV/c)! Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 37

38 PYTHIA Tune A LHC Min-Bias Predictions Charged Density dn/dηdφdpt (/GeV/c) E+00 E-0 E-02 E-03 E-04 E-05 Charged Particle Density Pythia Set A.8 TeV 630 GeV 50% 2% of Min-Bias events have P T (hard) > 0 GeV/c! η < % of Events 40% PT(hard) > 5 GeV/c PT(hard) > 0 GeV/c 30% 20% Hard-Scattering in Min-Bias Events Pythia Set A 4 TeV 0% 0% 00,000 0,000 00,000 CM Energy W (GeV) LHC? E-06 CDF Data % of Min-Bias events have P T (hard) > 0 GeV/c! PT(charged) (GeV/c) Shows the center-of-mass energy dependence of the charged particle density, dn chg /dηdφdp T, for Min-Bias collisions compared with PYTHIA Tune A with P T (hard) > 0. PYTHIA Tune A predicts that % of all Min-Bias events at.8 TeV are a result of a hard 2-to-2 parton-parton scattering with P T (hard) > 0 GeV/c which increases to 2% at 4 TeV! Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 38

39 region is very sensitive to the underlying event! Towards, Away Jet # Direction Toward-Side Jet Away, Correlations relative to the leading jet Charged particles p T > 0.5 GeV/c η < Calorimeter towers E T > 0. GeV η < Z-Boson Jet # Direction 2π Look at the charged particle density, the charged PTsum density and the ETsum density in all 3 regions! Away Region Transverse Region φ Leading Jet Away-Side Jet Toward Region Transverse Region Away Region 0 - η + Look at correlations in the azimuthal angle relative to the leading charged particle jet ( η < ) or the leading calorimeter jet ( η < 2). Define < 60 o as, 60 o < < 20 o as Transverse, and > 20 o as. Each of the three regions have area η = 2 20 o = 4π/3. Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 39

40 Event Topologies Leading Jet events correspond to the leading calorimeter jet (MidPoint R = 0.7) in the region η < 2 with no other conditions. Inclusive 2-Jet Back-to-Back events are selected to have at least two jets with Jet# and Jet#2 nearly backto-back ( 2 > 50 o ) with almost equal transverse energies (P T (jet#2)/p T (jet#) > 0.8) with no other conditions. Exclusive 2-Jet Back-to-Back events are selected to have at least two jets with Jet# and Jet#2 nearly backto-back ( 2 > 50 o ) with almost equal transverse energies (P T (jet#2)/p T (jet#) > 0.8) and P T (jet#3) < 5 GeV/c. Leading ChgJet events correspond to the leading charged particle jet (R = 0.7) in the region η < with no other conditions. Z-Boson events are Drell-Yan events with 70 < M(lepton-pair) < 0 GeV with no other conditions. Jet # Direction Jet # Direction Jet #2 Direction ChgJet # Direction Z-Boson Direction Leading Jet subset Inc2J Back-to-Back subset Exc2J Back-to-Back Charged Jet Z-Boson Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 40

41 transmax & transmin Z-Boson Jet # Direction Direction Area = 4π/6 Jet # Direction Toward-Side Jet transmin very sensitive to the beam-beam remnants! TransMAX TransMIN TransMAX TransMIN Jet #3 Away-Side Jet Define the MAX and MIN transverse regions ( transmax and transmin ) on an event-by-event basis with MAX (MIN) having the largest (smallest) density. Each of the two transverse regions have an area in η-φ space of 4π/6. The transmin region is very sensitive to the beam-beam remnant and the soft multiple parton interaction components of the underlying event. The difference, transdif ( transmax minus transmin ), is very sensitive to the hard scattering component of the underlying event (i.e. hard initial and final-state radiation). The overall transverse density is the average of the transmax and transmin densities. Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 4

42 Observables at the Particle and Detector Level Leading Jet Observable Particle Level Detector Level Jet # Direction dnchg/dηdφ Number of charged particles per unit η-φ (p T > 0.5 GeV/c, η < ) Number of good charged tracks per unit η-φ (p T > 0.5 GeV/c, η < ) dptsum/dηdφ Scalar p T sum of charged particles per unit η-φ (p T > 0.5 GeV/c, η < ) Scalar p T sum of good charged tracks per unit η-φ (p T > 0.5 GeV/c, η < ) <p T > Average p T of charged particles (p T > 0.5 GeV/c, η < ) Average p T of good charged tracks (p T > 0.5 GeV/c, η < ) Jet # Direction Jet #2 Direction PTmax detsum/dηdφ PTsum/ETsum Maximum p T charged particle (p T > 0.5 GeV/c, η < ) Require Nchg Scalar E T sum of all particles per unit η-φ (all p T, η < ) Scalar p T sum of charged particles (p T > 0.5 GeV/c, η < ) divided by the scalar E T sum of all particles (all p T, η < ) Maximum p T good charged tracks (p T > 0.5 GeV/c, η < ) Require Nchg Scalar E T sum of all calorimeter towers per unit η-φ (E T > 0. GeV, η < ) Scalar p T sum of good charged tracks (p T > 0.5 GeV/c, η < ) divided by the scalar E T sum of calorimeter towers (E T > 0. GeV, η < ) Back-to-Back Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 42

43 UE Parameters ISR Parameters Intrensic KT CDF Run P (Z) T PYTHIA 6.2 CTEQ5L Parameter MSTP(8) MSTP(82) PARP(82) PARP(83) PARP(84) PARP(85) PARP(86) PARP(89) PARP(90) PARP(62) PARP(64) PARP(67) MSTP(9) PARP(9) PARP(93) Tune A GeV TeV Tune AW GeV TeV Tune used by the CDF-EWK group! PT Distribution /N dn/dpt Z-Boson Transverse Momentum CDF Run Data PYTHIA Tune A PYTHIA Tune AW Z-Boson PT (GeV/c) CDF Run published.8 TeV Normalized to Shows the Run Z-boson p T distribution (<p T (Z)>.5 GeV/c) compared with PYTHIA Tune A (<p T (Z)> = 9.7 GeV/c), and PYTHIA Tune AW (<p T (Z)> =.7 GeV/c). Effective Q cut-off, below which space-like showers are not evolved. The Q 2 = k T2 in α s for space-like showers is scaled by PARP(64)! Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 43

44 Jet-Jet Correlations (DØ) Jet#-Jet#2 Distribution Jet#-Jet#2 MidPoint Cone Algorithm (R = 0.7, f merge = 0.5) L= 50 pb - (Phys. Rev. Lett (2005)) Data/NLO agreement good. Data/HERWIG agreement good. Data/PYTHIA agreement good provided PARP(67) = 4.0 (i.e. like Tune A, best fit 2.5). Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 44

45 CDF Run P (Z) T PYTHIA 6.2 CTEQ5L Z-Boson Transverse Momentum UE Parameters Parameter MSTP(8) MSTP(82) PARP(82) PARP(83) PARP(84) PARP(85) Tune DW 4.9 GeV 0.5 Tune AW GeV PT Distribution /N dn/dpt CDF Run Data PYTHIA Tune DW HERWIG CDF Run published.8 TeV Normalized to ISR Parameters PARP(86) PARP(89) PARP(90) PARP(62) PARP(64) PARP(67).8 TeV TeV Z-Boson PT (GeV/c) Shows the Run Z-boson p T distribution (<p T (Z)>.5 GeV/c) compared with PYTHIA Tune DW, and HERWIG. MSTP(9) PARP(9) PARP(93) Intrensic KT Tune DW uses D0 s perfered value of PARP(67)! Tune DW has a lower value of PARP(67) and slightly more MPI! Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 45

46 All use LO α s with Λ = 92 MeV! Parameter Tune AW Tune DW Tune D6 PYTHIA 6.2 Tunes PDF CTEQ5L CTEQ5L CTEQ6L UE Parameters MSTP(8) MSTP(82) PARP(82) GeV 4.9 GeV 4.8 GeV Uses CTEQ6L PARP(83) PARP(84) PARP(85) Tune A energy dependence! (not the default) ISR Parameter PARP(86) PARP(89) TeV.8 TeV.8 TeV PARP(90) PARP(62) PARP(64) PARP(67) MSTP(9) PARP(9) PARP(93) Intrinsic KT Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 46

47 All use LO α s with Λ = 92 MeV! Parameter PYTHIA 6.2 Tunes Tune DWT Tune D6T ATLAS PDF CTEQ5L CTEQ6L CTEQ5L MSTP(8) UE Parameters MSTP(82) PARP(82).9409 GeV.8387 GeV.8 GeV PARP(83) PARP(84) PARP(85) ATLAS energy dependence! (PYTHIA default) ISR Parameter PARP(86) PARP(89).96 TeV.96 TeV 0.66 TeV PARP(90) PARP(62) PARP(64) PARP(67) MSTP(9) PARP(9) PARP(93) Intrinsic KT Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 47

48 PYTHIA 6.2 Tunes All use LO α s with Λ = 92 MeV! Tune A UE Parameters ISR Parameter Tune D Intrinsic KT Parameter Tune DWT PDF CTEQ5L MSTP(8) MSTP(82) 4 PARP(82).9409 GeV PARP(83) 0.5 PARP(84) Tune AW PARP(85) PARP(86) PARP(89).96 TeV PARP(90) 0.6 PARP(62).25 PARP(64) 0.2 PARP(67) 2.5 MSTP(9) PARP(9) Tune 2. DW PARP(93) 5.0 Tune D6T CTEQ6L GeV 0.5 Tune B.96 TeV ATLAS CTEQ5L 4.8 GeV TeV 0.6 Tune D6 5.0 ATLAS energy dependence! (PYTHIA default) Tune BW Tune D6T Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 48

49 PYTHIA 6.2 Tunes All use LO α s with Λ = 92 MeV! Tune A UE Parameters ISR Parameter Tune D Intrinsic KT Parameter PDF MSTP(8) MSTP(82) PARP(82) CTEQ5L Tune D6T CTEQ6L.8387 GeV PARP(83) PARP(84) Tune B 0.5 PARP(85) 0.33 These are old PYTHIA 6.2 tunes! PARP(86) 0.66 There are new tunes by PARP(89).96 TeV.96 TeV TeV Tune AW PARP(64) PARP(67) PARP(93) Tune DWT.9409 GeV MSTP(9) PARP(9) Tune 2. DW ATLAS CTEQ5L 4.8 GeV Tune D6 5.0 ATLAS energy dependence! (PYTHIA default) Tune BW Peter Skands (Tune S320, update of S0) PARP(90) Peter Skands (Tune N324, N0CR) PARP(62) Hendrik Hoeth (Tune P329, Professor ) Tune D6T Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 49

50 JIMMY Runs with HERWIG and adds multiple parton interactions! The Energy in the Underlying Event in High P T Jet Production JIMMY: MPI J. M. Butterworth J. R. Forshaw M. H. Seymour Jet # Direction JIMMY at CDF PT(JIM)= 2.5 GeV/c. PT(JIM)= 3.25 GeV/c. "Transverse" ETsum Density (GeV) TeV "Transverse" ETsum Density: det/dηdφ JIMMY Default JM325 generator level theory PY Tune A PT(particle jet#) (GeV/c) JIMMY was tuned to fit the energy density in the transverse region for leading jet events! "Leading Jet" MidPoint R = 0.7 η(jet) < 2 All Particles ( η <) Final-State Radiation PT(hard) <Densities> vs P T (jet#) "Transverse" PTsum Density (GeV/c) TeV "Transverse" PTsum Density: dpt/dηdφ JIMMY Default generator level theory JM325 PY Tune A PT(particle jet#) (GeV/c) "Leading Jet" MidPoint R = 0.7 η(jet) < 2 Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 50

51 JIMMY Runs with HERWIG and adds multiple parton interactions! The Energy in the Underlying Event in High P T Jet Production JIMMY: MPI J. M. Butterworth J. R. Forshaw M. H. Seymour Jet # Direction Final-State Radiation <Densities> vs P T (jet#) JIMMY at CDF PT(hard) PT(JIM)= 2.5 GeV/c. PT(JIM)= 3.25 GeV/c. "Transverse" ETsum Density (GeV) "Transverse" PTsum Density: dpt/dηdφ JMRAD(9).6 =.8 JIMMY Default "Transverse" PTsum Density (GeV/c) TeV.96 TeV "Transverse" ETsum Density: det/dηdφ JIMMY Default generator level theory JM325 The Drell-Yan JIMMY Tune PTJIM = 3.6 GeV/c, JMRAD(73) =.8 generator level theory PT(particle jet#) (GeV/c) JM325 PY Tune A PY Tune A PT(particle jet#) (GeV/c) JIMMY was tuned to fit the energy density in the transverse region for leading jet events! "Leading Jet" MidPoint R = 0.7 η(jet) < 2 All Particles ( η <) "Leading Jet" MidPoint R = 0.7 η(jet) < 2 Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 5

52 Towards,, Leading Jet Jet # Direction Average Charged Density Charged Particle Density: dn/dηdφ pya generator level "Transverse" PT(jet#) (GeV/c) "Away" Factor of ~4.5 "Toward" "Leading Jet" MidPoint R=0.7 η(jet#) <2 Data at.96 TeV on the density of charged particles, dn/dηdφ, with p T > 0.5 GeV/c and η < for leading jet events as a function of the leading jet p T for the toward, away, and transverse regions. The data are corrected to the particle level (with errors that include both the statistical error and the systematic uncertainty) and are compared with PYTHIA Tune A at the particle level (i.e. generator level). Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 52

53 Towards,, Leading Jet Jet # Direction Charged Average PTsum Charged Density Density (GeV/c) Charged PTsum Particle Density: dpt/dηdφ dn/dηdφ 0 5 CDF CDF Run Run 2 Preliminary 2 Preliminary pya generator level pya generator level "Toward" "Away" "Transverse" "Away" Factor of ~6 "Toward" "Transverse" "Leading Jet" MidPoint R=0.7 η(jet#) <2 Factor of ~4.5 "Leading Jet" MidPoint R=0.7 η(jet#) < PT(jet#) (GeV/c) (GeV/c) Data at.96 TeV on the charged density of particle charged scalar particles, p dn/dηdφ, with p T > 0.5 GeV/c and η < for leading T sum density, dpt/dηdφ, with p T > 0.5 GeV/c and η < for jet leading events as jet a function events as of a the function leading of jet the p T leading for the jet toward, p away, and transverse regions. The T for the toward, away, and transverse regions. data are corrected The data are to the corrected particle to level the (with particle errors level that (with include errors both that the include statistical both error the statistical and the systematic error and the uncertainty) systematic and uncertainty) are compared and are with compared PYTHIA with Tune PYTHIA A at the Tune particle A at level the (i.e. particle generator level (i.e. level). generator level). Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 53

54 Towards,, Leading Jet Jet # Direction Charged Average ETsum PTsum Density Charged Density (GeV) Density (GeV/c) 3 Charged ETsum PTsum Particle Density: Density: det/dηdφ dpt/dηdφ dn/dηdφ 0 5 CDF CDF Run Run 2 Preliminary 2 Preliminary 4 "Toward" pya generator level pya generator level "Toward" "Away" "Away" "Away" Factor of ~3 "Toward" "Transverse" Factor of ~6 "Transverse" "Leading Jet" 2 Factor of MidPoint ~4.5 R=0.7 η(jet#) <2 "Transverse" "Leading Jet" "Leading Jet" MidPoint R=0.7 η(jet#) <2 MidPoint R=0.7 η(jet#) <2 pya generator level Charged Stable Particles Particles ( η <, ( η <, PT>0.5 all GeV/c) PT) (GeV/c) PT(jet#) (GeV/c) density of charged particles, dn/dηdφ, with p T > 0.5 GeV/c and η < for leading Data jet events at.96 as TeV a function on the particle charged of the leading scalar particle jet E scalar p T sum density, dpt/dηdφ, with p T > 0.5 GeV/c and η < T p sum T for density, the toward, det/dηdφ, away, for η and < transverse for leading regions. jet events The as a function for leading of the jet leading events jet as pa function of the leading jet p T for the toward, away, and transverse regions. data are corrected The data are to the corrected particle T for the toward, away, and transverse regions. The data are corrected to level the (with particle errors level that (with include errors both that the include statistical both error the statistical and the systematic to the particle level (with errors that include both the statistical error and the systematic uncertainty) error and and are the uncertainty) systematic and uncertainty) are compared and are with compared PYTHIA with Tune PYTHIA A at the Tune particle A at level the (i.e. particle generator level (i.e. level). compared with PYTHIA Tune A at the particle level (i.e. generator level). generator level). Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 54

55 Charged Particle Density Charged Particle Density: dn/dηdφ Charged Particle Density: dn/dηdφ Average Charged Density pyaw generator level "Drell-Yan Production" 70 < M(pair) < 0 GeV "Toward" "Away" "Transverse" Average Charged Density pya generator level "Transverse" "Away" "Toward" "Leading Jet" MidPoint R=0.7 η(jet#) < PT(Z-Boson) (GeV/c) PT(jet#) (GeV/c) Z-Boson Direction High P T Z-Boson Production Jet # Direction PT(hard) Z-boson Final-State Radiation Data at.96 TeV on the density of charged particles, dn/dηdφ, with p T > 0.5 GeV/c and η < for Z-Boson and Leading Jet events as a function of the leading jet p T or P T (Z) for the toward, away, and transverse regions. The data are corrected to the particle level (with errors that include both the statistical error and the systematic uncertainty) and are compared with PYTHIA Tune AW and Tune A, respectively, at the particle level (i.e. generator level). Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 55

56 Charged Particle Density "Transverse" Average Charged Density "Transverse" Charged Charged Particle Particle Density: Density: dn/dηdφ dn/dηdφ CDF CDF Run Run 2 2 Preliminary Preliminary generator level theory pyaw generator level "Drell-Yan Production" 70 < M(pair) < 0 GeV "Z-Boson" "Leading "Away" Jet" "Transverse" "Toward" PT(jet#) PT(Z-Boson) or PT(Z-Boson) (GeV/c) (GeV/c) Average "Away" Charged Charged Density Density "Away" Charged Charged Particle Particle Density: Density: dn/dηdφ dn/dηdφ CDF Run Run 22 Preliminary data data corrected corrected generator pya generator level level theory "Leading Jet" "Z-Boson""Transverse" "Away" PT(jet#) PT(jet#) or PT(Z-Boson) (GeV/c) (GeV/c) "Toward" "Leading Jet" MidPoint R=0.7 η(jet#) <2 Z-Boson Direction High P T Z-Boson Production Jet # Direction PT(hard) Z-boson Final-State Radiation Data at.96 TeV on the density of charged particles, dn/dηdφ, with p T > 0.5 GeV/c and η < for Z-Boson and Leading Jet events as a function of the leading jet p T or P T (Z) for the toward, away, and transverse regions. The data are corrected to the particle level (with errors that include both the statistical error and the systematic uncertainty) and are compared with PYTHIA Tune AW and Tune A, respectively, at the particle level (i.e. generator level). Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 56

57 "Transverse" Average Charged Density Charged Particle Density HERWIG + JIMMY "Transverse" Charged Charged Particle Particle Density: Density: dn/dηdφ "Away" dn/dηdφcharged Particle Density: "Away" dn/dηdφ Charged Charged Particle Particle Density: Tune Density: dn/dηdφ (PTJIM = 3.6) dn/dηdφ CDF CDF Run Run 2 2 Preliminary Preliminary generator level theory pyaw generator level "Drell-Yan Production" 70 < M(pair) < 0 GeV "Z-Boson" "Away" Charged Density 3 "Leading "Away" Jet" generator level theory 2 "Transverse" "Drell-Yan Production" 70 < M(pair) < 0 GeV pyaw Average "Away" Charged Charged Density Density "Toward" Charged Particles ( η <, PT>0.5 GeV/c) PT(jet#) PT(Z-Boson) or PT(Z-Boson) (GeV/c) (GeV/c) PT(jet#) PT(jet#) or PT(Z-Boson) (GeV/c) (GeV/c) PT(Z-Boson) (GeV/c) CDF Run Run 22 Preliminary data data corrected corrected generator pya generator level level theory JIM "Leading Jet" "Z-Boson""Transverse" "Away" "Toward" "Leading Jet" MidPoint R=0.7 η(jet#) <2 Z-Boson Direction High P T Z-Boson Production Jet # Direction PT(hard) Z-boson Final-State Radiation Data at.96 TeV on the density of charged particles, dn/dηdφ, with p T > 0.5 GeV/c and η < for Z-Boson and Leading Jet events as a function of the leading jet p T or P T (Z) for the toward, away, and transverse regions. The data are corrected to the particle level (with errors that include both the statistical error and the systematic uncertainty) and are compared with PYTHIA Tune AW and Tune A, respectively, at the particle level (i.e. generator level). Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 57

58 "Transverse" Average Charged Density Charged Particle Density HERWIG + JIMMY H. Hoeth, MPI@LHC08 "Transverse" Charged Charged Particle Particle Density: Density: dn/dηdφ "Away" dn/dηdφcharged Particle Density: "Away" dn/dηdφ Charged Charged Particle Particle Density: Tune Density: dn/dηdφ (PTJIM = 3.6) dn/dηdφ CDF CDF Run Run 2 2 Preliminary Preliminary generator level theory pyaw generator level "Drell-Yan Production" 70 < M(pair) < 0 GeV "Z-Boson" "Away" Charged Density 3 "Leading "Away" Jet" generator level theory 2 "Transverse" "Drell-Yan Production" 70 < M(pair) < 0 GeV pyaw Average "Away" Charged Charged Density Density "Toward" Charged Particles ( η <, PT>0.5 GeV/c) PT(jet#) PT(Z-Boson) or PT(Z-Boson) (GeV/c) (GeV/c) PT(jet#) PT(jet#) or PT(Z-Boson) (GeV/c) (GeV/c) PT(Z-Boson) (GeV/c) CDF Run Run 22 Preliminary data data corrected corrected generator pya generator level level theory JIM "Leading Jet" "Z-Boson""Transverse" "Away" "Toward" "Leading Jet" MidPoint R=0.7 η(jet#) <2 Z-Boson Direction High P T Z-Boson Production Jet # Direction PT(hard) Z-boson Final-State Radiation Data at.96 TeV on the density of charged particles, dn/dηdφ, with p T > 0.5 GeV/c and η < for Z-Boson and Leading Jet events as a function of the leading jet p T or P T (Z) for the toward, away, and transverse regions. The data are corrected to the particle level (with errors that include both the statistical error and the systematic uncertainty) and are compared with PYTHIA Tune AW and Tune A, respectively, at the particle level (i.e. generator level). Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 58

59 Charged PTsum Density Charged PTsum Density: dpt/dηdφ Charged PTsum Density: dpt/dηdφ Charged PTsum Density (GeV/c) 0. pyaw generator level "Drell-Yan Production" 70 < M(pair) < 0 GeV "Away" "Transverse" "Toward" PT(Z-Boson) (GeV/c) Charged PTsum Density (GeV/c) 0 0. pya generator level "Toward" "Away" "Transverse" PT(jet#) (GeV/c) "Leading Jet" MidPoint R=0.7 η(jet#) <2 Z-Boson Direction High P T Z-Boson Production Jet # Direction PT(hard) Z-boson Final-State Radiation Data at.96 TeV on the charged scalar PTsum density, dpt/dηdφ, with p T > 0.5 GeV/c and η < for Z- Boson and Leading Jet events as a function of the leading jet p T or P T (Z) for the toward, away, and transverse regions. The data are corrected to the particle level (with errors that include both the statistical error and the systematic uncertainty) and are compared with PYTHIA Tune AW and Tune A, respectively, at the particle level (i.e. generator level). Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 59

60 Charged PTsum Density "Transverse" Charged PTsum Density (GeV/c) "Transverse" Charged Charged PTsum PTsum Density: Density: dpt/dηdφ dpt/dηdφ CDF CDF Run Run 22 Preliminary data data corrected corrected pyaw generator level generator level theory "Away" "Leading Jet" "Transverse" "Toward" 0.5 "Drell-Yan Production" 70 < M(pair) < 0 GeV "Z-Boson" PT(jet#) PT(Z-Boson) or PT(Z-Boson) (GeV/c) (GeV/c) Charged "Away" PTsum Density (GeV/c) "Away" Charged Charged PTsum PTsum Density: Density: dpt/dηdφ dpt/dηdφ 0 20 CDF CDF Run Run 2 Preliminary 2 data corrected "Leading Jet" pya generator level 5 generator level theory "Toward" "Away" 0 "Z-Boson" "Transverse" 5 "Leading Jet" MidPoint R=0.7 η(jet#) < PT(jet#) PT(jet#) or PT(Z-Boson) (GeV/c) (GeV/c) Z-Boson Direction High P T Z-Boson Production Jet # Direction PT(hard) Z-boson Final-State Radiation Data at.96 TeV on the charged scalar PTsum density, dpt/dηdφ, with p T > 0.5 GeV/c and η < for Z- Boson and Leading Jet events as a function of the leading jet p T or P T (Z) for the toward, away, and transverse regions. The data are corrected to the particle level (with errors that include both the statistical error and the systematic uncertainty) and are compared with PYTHIA Tune AW and Tune A, respectively, at the particle level (i.e. generator level). Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 60

61 "Transverse" Charged PTsum Density (GeV/c) Charged PTsum Density "Transverse" Charged Charged PTsum PTsum Density: Density: dpt/dηdφ dpt/dηdφ "Away" Charged PTsum Density: "Away" dpt/dηdφ Charged Charged PTsum PTsum Density: Density: dpt/dηdφ dpt/dηdφ CDF CDF Run Run 22 Preliminary "Away" CDF CDF Run Run 2 Preliminary 2 "Leading Jet" data corrected pyaw generator level "Leading Jet" pya generator level.5 generator level theory generator level theory 5pyAW generator level theory "Toward" 8 "Drell-Yan Production" "Transverse" "Away" 70 < M(pair) < 0 GeV 0 "Z-Boson" JIM "Transverse" 4 "Toward" "Leading Jet" "Drell-Yan Production" MidPoint R=0.7 η(jet#) <2 70 < M(pair) < 0 GeV "Z-Boson" PT(jet#) PT(Z-Boson) or PT(Z-Boson) (GeV/c) (GeV/c) PT(Z-Boson) (GeV/c) PT(jet#) PT(jet#) or PT(Z-Boson) (GeV/c) (GeV/c) "Away" PTsum Density (GeV/c) Charged "Away" PTsum Density (GeV/c) Z-Boson Direction High P T Z-Boson Production Jet # Direction PT(hard) Z-boson Final-State Radiation Data at.96 TeV on the charged scalar PTsum density, dpt/dηdφ, with p T > 0.5 GeV/c and η < for Z- Boson and Leading Jet events as a function of the leading jet p T or P T (Z) for the toward, away, and transverse regions. The data are corrected to the particle level (with errors that include both the statistical error and the systematic uncertainty) and are compared with PYTHIA Tune AW and Tune A, respectively, at the particle level (i.e. generator level). Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 6

62 The TransMAX/MIN Regions "Transverse" Charged Density.6.2 "TransMAX/MIN" Charged Particle Density: dn/dηdφ generator level theory "Drell-Yan Production" 70 < M(pair) < 0 GeV 0.8 ATLAS pyaw JIM "transmax" pydw "transmin" PT(Z-Boson) (GeV/c) "Transverse" Charged Density "TransMAX/MIN" Charged Particle Density: dn/dηdφ generator level theory "transmax" "transmin" PT(jet#) (GeV/c) "Leading Jet" MidPoint R=0.7 η(jet#) <2 PY Tune A Z-Boson Direction TransMAX TransMIN High P T Z-Boson Production Jet # Direction TransMAX TransMIN PT(hard) Z-boson Final-State Radiation Data at at.96 TeVon on the the charged density of particle charged density, particles, dn/dηdφ, dn/dηdφ, with with p T > p0.5 GeV/c and η < for Z-Boson and T > 0.5 GeV/c and η < for leading Leading jet events Jet as a events function as a of function the leading of P T jet (Z) por the leading jet p T for the transmax, and transmin regions. T and for Z-Boson events as a function of P T (Z) for TransDIF = The transmax data are corrected minus transmin to the particle regions. level (with The data errors are that corrected include to both the the particle statistical level error (with and errors the that systematic include uncertainty) both the statistical and are error compared and the with systematic PYTHIA uncertainty) Tune AW and and are Tune compared A, respectively, with PYTHIA at the particle Tune A and level (i.e. generator HERWIG level). (without MPI) at the particle level (i.e. generator level). Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 62

63 The TransMAX/MIN Regions "Transverse" TransMAX - TransMIN Charged Density "TransMAX/MIN" "TransDIF" Charged Charged Particle Particle Density: Density: dn/dηdφ dn/dηdφ generator level theory "Drell-Yan Production" < < M(pair) < < 0 0 GeV GeV pyaw pyaw JIM "transmax" pydw ATLAS "transmin" PT(Z-Boson) (GeV/c) TransMAX "Transverse" - TransMIN Charged Density "TransMAX/MIN" "TransDIF" Charged Particle Density: dn/dηdφ data data corrected corrected generator generator level level theory theory "transmax" "transmin" "Leading Jet" MidPoint R=0.7 η(jet#) <2 PY Tune A PY Tune A "Leading Jet" MidPoint R=0.7 η(jet#) < PT(jet#) (GeV/c) Z-Boson Direction TransMAX TransMIN High P T Z-Boson Production Jet # Direction TransMAX TransMIN PT(hard) Z-boson Final-State Radiation Data at at.96 TeVon on the the charged density of particle charged density, particles, dn/dηdφ, dn/dηdφ, with with p T > p0.5 GeV/c and η < for Z-Boson and T > 0.5 GeV/c and η < for leading Leading jet events Jet as a events function as a of function the leading of P T jet (Z) por the leading jet p T for the transmax, and transmin regions. T and for Z-Boson events as a function of P T (Z) for TransDIF = The transmax data are corrected minus transmin to the particle regions. level (with The data errors are that corrected include to both the the particle statistical level error (with and errors the that systematic include uncertainty) both the statistical and are error compared and the with systematic PYTHIA uncertainty) Tune AW and and are Tune compared A, respectively, with PYTHIA at the particle Tune A and level (i.e. generator HERWIG level). (without MPI) at the particle level (i.e. generator level). Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 63

64 The TransMAX/MIN Regions "Transverse" TransMAX - TransMIN Charged Density "TransMAX/MIN" "TransDIF" Charged Charged Particle Particle Density: Density: dn/dηdφ dn/dηdφ generator level theory "Drell-Yan Production" "transmax" < < M(pair) < < 0 0 GeV GeV pyaw pydw pyaw JIM pydw JIM ATLAS 0.3 "transmin" ATLAS PT(Z-Boson) (GeV/c) TransMAX "Transverse" - TransMIN Charged Density "TransMAX/MIN" "TransDIF" Charged Particle Density: dn/dηdφ data data corrected corrected generator generator level level theory theory "transmax" "transmin" "Leading Jet" MidPoint R=0.7 η(jet#) <2 PY Tune A PY Tune A "Leading Jet" MidPoint R=0.7 η(jet#) < PT(jet#) (GeV/c) Z-Boson Direction TransMAX TransMIN High P T Z-Boson Production Jet # Direction TransMAX TransMIN PT(hard) Z-boson Final-State Radiation Data at at.96 TeVon on the the charged density of particle charged density, particles, dn/dηdφ, dn/dηdφ, with with p T > p0.5 GeV/c and η < for Z-Boson and T > 0.5 GeV/c and η < for leading Leading jet events Jet as a events function as a of function the leading of P T jet (Z) por the leading jet p T for the transmax, and transmin regions. T and for Z-Boson events as a function of P T (Z) for TransDIF = The transmax data are corrected minus transmin to the particle regions. level (with The data errors are that corrected include to both the the particle statistical level error (with and errors the that systematic include uncertainty) both the statistical and are error compared and the with systematic PYTHIA uncertainty) Tune AW and and are Tune compared A, respectively, with PYTHIA at the particle Tune A and level (i.e. generator HERWIG level). (without MPI) at the particle level (i.e. generator level). Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 64

65 The TransMAX/MIN Regions "Transverse" TransMAX - TransMIN Charged Density "TransMAX/MIN" "TransDIF" Charged Charged Particle Particle Density: Density: dn/dηdφ "TransDIF" dn/dηdφ Charged Particle "TransMAX/MIN" Density: "TransDIF" dn/dηdφ Charged Particle Density: dn/dηdφ generator level theory "Drell-Yan Production" < < M(pair) < < 0 0 GeV GeV.2 pyaw pydw pyaw JIM generator level theory 0.9 "transmax" "TransDIF" Charged Density 0.6 TransMAX "Transverse" - TransMIN Charged Density pydw JIM ATLAS "transmin" 0.3 "transmin" "Leading Jet" 0.3 "Z-Boson" 0.3 ATLAS MidPoint R=0.7 η(jet#) < PT(Z-Boson) (GeV/c) PT(jet#) or PT(Z-Boson) (GeV/c) PT(jet#) (GeV/c) "Leading data data corrected corrected Jet" generator generator level level theory theory "transmax" "Leading Jet" MidPoint R=0.7 η(jet#) <2 PY Tune A PY Tune A Z-Boson Direction TransMAX TransMIN High P T Z-Boson Production Jet # Direction TransMAX TransMIN PT(hard) Z-boson Final-State Radiation Data at at.96 TeVon on the the charged density of particle charged density, particles, dn/dηdφ, dn/dηdφ, with with p T > p0.5 GeV/c and η < for Z-Boson and T > 0.5 GeV/c and η < for leading Leading jet events Jet as a events function as a of function the leading of P T jet (Z) por the leading jet p T for the transmax, and transmin regions. T and for Z-Boson events as a function of P T (Z) for TransDIF = The transmax data are corrected minus transmin to the particle regions. level (with The data errors are that corrected include to both the the particle statistical level error (with and errors the that systematic include uncertainty) both the statistical and are error compared and the with systematic PYTHIA uncertainty) Tune AW and and are Tune compared A, respectively, with PYTHIA at the particle Tune A and level (i.e. generator HERWIG level). (without MPI) at the particle level (i.e. generator level). Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 65

66 The TransMAX/MIN Regions "TransMAX/MIN" Charged PTsum Density "TransMAX/MIN" Charged PTsum Density "Transverse" PTsum Density (GeV/c) generator level theory "Drell-Yan Production" 70 < M(pair) < 0 GeV "transmax" pyaw "transmin" "Transverse" PTsum Density (GeV/c) generator level theory "transmax" "transmin" PY Tune A "Leading Jet" MidPoint R=0.7 η(jet#) < PT(Z-Boson) (GeV/c) PT(jet#) (GeV/c) Z-Boson Direction TransMAX TransMIN High P T Z-Boson Production Jet # Direction TransMAX TransMIN PT(hard) Z-boson Final-State Radiation Data at at.96 TeV on the charged scalar PTsum density, dpt/dηdφ, with p Z- T > 0.5 GeV/c and η < for Boson leading and jet Leading events as Jet a function events as of the a function leading of jet P T p(z) or the leading jet p T for the transmax, and T and for Z-Boson events as a function of P T (Z) for transmin TransDIF regions. = transmax The data minus are corrected transmin to the regions. particle The level data (with are errors corrected that to include the particle both the level statistical (with errors and that the include systematic both the uncertainty) statistical and error are and compared the systematic with PYTHIA uncertainty) Tune and AW are and compared Tune A, with respectively, PYTHIA at the particle Tune A level and HERWIG (i.e. generator (without level). MPI) at the particle level (i.e. generator level). Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 66

67 The TransMAX/MIN Regions TransMAX "Transverse" - TransMIN PTsum Density (GeV/c) "TransDIF" "TransMAX/MIN" Charged Charged PTsum Density: PTsum Density dpt/dηdφ generator level theory "Drell-Yan Production" 70 < "Drell-Yan M(pair) < Production" "transmax" 0 GeV 70 < M(pair) < 0 GeV pyaw pyaw "transmin" PT(Z-Boson) (GeV/c) "Transverse" PTsum Density (GeV/c) TransMAX - TransMIN Density (GeV/c) "TransDIF" "TransMAX/MIN" Charged Charged PTsum PTsum Density: Density dpt/dηdφ CDF Run 22 Preliminary data generator level level theory PY Tune A "transmax" PY Tune A "Leading Jet" "Leading Jet" MidPoint R=0.7 η(jet#) <2 MidPoint R=0.7 η(jet#) <2 "transmin" PT(jet#) (GeV/c) Z-Boson Direction TransMAX TransMIN High P T Z-Boson Production Jet # Direction TransMAX TransMIN PT(hard) Z-boson Final-State Radiation Data at at.96 TeV on the charged scalar PTsum density, dpt/dηdφ, with p Z- T > 0.5 GeV/c and η < for Boson leading and jet Leading events as Jet a function events as of the a function leading of jet P T p(z) or the leading jet p T for the transmax, and T and for Z-Boson events as a function of P T (Z) for transmin TransDIF regions. = transmax The data minus are corrected transmin to the regions. particle The level data (with are errors corrected that to include the particle both the level statistical (with errors and that the include systematic both the uncertainty) statistical and error are and compared the systematic with PYTHIA uncertainty) Tune and AW are and compared Tune A, with respectively, PYTHIA at the particle Tune A level and HERWIG (i.e. generator (without level). MPI) at the particle level (i.e. generator level). Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 67

68 The TransMAX/MIN Regions TransMAX "Transverse" - TransMIN PTsum Density (GeV/c) "TransDIF" "TransMAX/MIN" Charged Charged PTsum Density: PTsum Density dpt/dηdφ "TransDIF" Charged PTsum Density: "TransDIF" "TransMAX/MIN" dpt/dηdφ Charged Charged PTsum PTsum Density: Density dpt/dηdφ 3.0 generator level theory generator level theory pyaw 2.0 "Drell-Yan Production" "transmax" pyaw "Z-Boson" 70 < "Drell-Yan M(pair) < Production" 0 GeV 70 < M(pair) < 0 GeV "TransDIF" PTsum Density (GeV/c) "Leading Jet" "Leading Jet" MidPoint R=0.7 η(jet#) <2 MidPoint R=0.7 η(jet#) <2 "transmin" "transmin" PT(Z-Boson) (GeV/c) "Transverse" PTsum Density (GeV/c) TransMAX - TransMIN Density (GeV/c) CDF Run 22 Preliminary data generator "Leading level level theory Jet" PY Tune A PT(jet#) or PT(Z-Boson) (GeV/c) "transmax" PY Tune A PT(jet#) (GeV/c) Z-Boson Direction TransMAX TransMIN High P T Z-Boson Production Jet # Direction TransMAX TransMIN PT(hard) Z-boson Final-State Radiation Data at at.96 TeV on the charged scalar PTsum density, dpt/dηdφ, with p Z- T > 0.5 GeV/c and η < for Boson leading and jet Leading events as Jet a function events as of the a function leading of jet P T p(z) or the leading jet p T for the transmax, and T and for Z-Boson events as a function of P T (Z) for transmin TransDIF regions. = transmax The data minus are corrected transmin to the regions. particle The level data (with are errors corrected that to include the particle both the level statistical (with errors and that the include systematic both the uncertainty) statistical and error are and compared the systematic with PYTHIA uncertainty) Tune and AW are and compared Tune A, with respectively, PYTHIA at the particle Tune A level and HERWIG (i.e. generator (without level). MPI) at the particle level (i.e. generator level). Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 68

69 Charged Particle <p< T > "Transverse" Average PT (GeV/c) generator level theory "Transverse" Average PT PY Tune A "Leading Jet" MidPoint R=0.7 η(jet#) < "Toward" <PT> (GeV/c) "Toward" Average PT Charged generator level theory pydw JIM pyaw ATLAS "Drell-Yan Production" 70 < M(pair) < 0 GeV PT(jet#) (GeV/c) PT(Z-Boson) (GeV/c) Jet # Direction Z-BosonDirection Data at.96 TeV on the charged particle average p T, with p T > 0.5 GeV/c and η < for the toward region for Z-Boson and the transverse region for Leading Jet events as a function of the leading jet p T or P T (Z). The data are corrected to the particle level (with errors that include both the statistical error and the systematic uncertainty) and are compared with PYTHIA Tune AW and Tune A, respectively, at the particle level (i.e. generator level). The Z-Boson data are also compared with PYTHIA Tune DW, the ATLAS tune, and HERWIG (without MPI) Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 69

70 Charged Particle <p< T > H. Hoeth, MPI@LHC08 "Transverse" Average PT (GeV/c) generator level theory "Transverse" Average PT PY Tune A "Leading Jet" MidPoint R=0.7 η(jet#) < "Toward" <PT> (GeV/c) "Toward" Average PT Charged generator level theory pydw JIM pyaw ATLAS "Drell-Yan Production" 70 < M(pair) < 0 GeV PT(jet#) (GeV/c) PT(Z-Boson) (GeV/c) Jet # Direction Z-BosonDirection Data at.96 TeV on the charged particle average p T, with p T > 0.5 GeV/c and η < for the toward region for Z-Boson and the transverse region for Leading Jet events as a function of the leading jet p T or P T (Z). The data are corrected to the particle level (with errors that include both the statistical error and the systematic uncertainty) and are compared with PYTHIA Tune AW and Tune A, respectively, at the particle level (i.e. generator level). The Z-Boson data are also compared with PYTHIA Tune DW, the ATLAS tune, and HERWIG (without MPI) Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 70

71 Charged Density Z-Boson: Towards,, Transverse, & TransMIN Charge Density Charged Particle Density: dn/dηdφ pyaw generator level "Transverse "Toward" "Drell-Yan Production" 70 < M(pair) < 0 GeV PT(Z-Boson) (GeV/c) Charged Density High Charged P T Z-Boson Particle Production Density: dn/dηdφ pyaw generator level "Toward" Z-boson Z-boson "transmin" "Drell-Yan Production" 70 < M(pair) < 0 GeV PT(Z-Boson) (GeV/c) Z-BosonDirection Z-Boson Direction TransMAX TransMIN Data at.96 TeV on the density of charged particles, dn/dηdφ, with p T > 0.5 GeV/c and η < for Z- Boson events as a function of P T (Z) for the toward and transverse regions. The data are corrected to the particle level (with errors that include both the statistical error and the systematic uncertainty) and are compared with PYTHIA Tune AW and HERWIG (without MPI) at the particle level (i.e. generator level). Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 7

72 "Toward" Charged Charged Density Density Z-Boson: Towards,, Transverse, & TransMIN Charge Density "Toward" Charged Charged Particle Particle Density: Density: dn/dηdφ dn/dηdφ 0.9 CDF Run Preliminary "Transverse pydw pyaw data generator correctedlevel ATLAS JIM generator level theory 0.6 "Toward" 0.3 pyaw "Drell-Yan Production" < M(pair) < 0 GeV PT(Z-Boson) (GeV/c) "TransMIN" Charged Charged Density Density "TransMIN" High Charged P T Z-Boson Charged Particle Production Particle Density: Density: dn/dηdφ dn/dηdφ generator pyaw generator level theory level JIM "Toward" Z-boson Z-boson "transmin" pyaw "Drell-Yan Production" "Drell-Yan Production" 70 M(pair) < 0 GeV 70 < M(pair) < 0 GeV ATLAS pydw PT(Z-Boson) (GeV/c) Z-BosonDirection Z-Boson Direction TransMAX TransMIN Data at.96 TeV on the density of charged particles, dn/dηdφ, with p T > 0.5 GeV/c and η < for Z- Boson events as a function of P T (Z) for the toward and transverse regions. The data are corrected to the particle level (with errors that include both the statistical error and the systematic uncertainty) and are compared with PYTHIA Tune AW and HERWIG (without MPI) at the particle level (i.e. generator level). Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 72

73 "Toward" Charged Charged Density Density Z-Boson: Towards,, Transverse, & TransMIN Charge Density "Toward" Charged Charged Particle Particle Density: Density: dn/dηdφ dn/dηdφ "TransMIN" Charged Particle Density: "TransMIN" High Charged dn/dηdφ P T Z-Boson Charged Particle Production Particle Density: Density: dn/dηdφ dn/dηdφ CDF Run Preliminary pyaw data generator correctedlevel generator level theory "Transverse ATLAS JIM 0.6 "Toward" "TransMIN" Charged Density 0.8 pydw generator level theory "TransMIN" Charged Charged Density Density generator pyaw generator level theory level "Leading Jet" JIM "Toward" "Drell-Yan Production" "Drell-Yan Production" 70 M(pair) < 0 GeV 70 < M(pair) < 0 GeV ATLAS pydw Z-boson pyaw Z-boson 0.2 "Drell-Yan Production" "transmin" < M(pair) < 0 GeV pyaw "Z-Boson" PT(Z-Boson) (GeV/c) PT(jet#) or PT(Z-Boson) (GeV/c) PT(Z-Boson) (GeV/c) Z-BosonDirection Z-Boson Direction TransMAX TransMIN Data at.96 TeV on the density of charged particles, dn/dηdφ, with p T > 0.5 GeV/c and η < for Z- Boson events as a function of P T (Z) for the toward and transverse regions. The data are corrected to the particle level (with errors that include both the statistical error and the systematic uncertainty) and are compared with PYTHIA Tune AW and HERWIG (without MPI) at the particle level (i.e. generator level). Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 73

74 "Toward" Charged Charged Density Density Z-Boson: Towards,, Transverse, & TransMIN H. Hoeth, Charge Density "Toward" Charged Charged Particle Particle Density: Density: dn/dηdφ dn/dηdφ "TransMIN" Charged Particle Density: "TransMIN" High Charged dn/dηdφ P T Z-Boson Charged Particle Production Particle Density: Density: dn/dηdφ dn/dηdφ CDF Run Preliminary pyaw data generator correctedlevel generator level theory "Transverse ATLAS JIM 0.6 "Toward" "TransMIN" Charged Density 0.8 pydw generator level theory "TransMIN" Charged Charged Density Density generator pyaw generator level theory level "Leading Jet" JIM "Toward" "Drell-Yan Production" "Drell-Yan Production" 70 M(pair) < 0 GeV 70 < M(pair) < 0 GeV ATLAS pydw Z-boson pyaw Z-boson 0.2 "Drell-Yan Production" "transmin" < M(pair) < 0 GeV pyaw "Z-Boson" PT(Z-Boson) (GeV/c) PT(jet#) or PT(Z-Boson) (GeV/c) PT(Z-Boson) (GeV/c) Z-BosonDirection Z-Boson Direction TransMAX TransMIN Data at.96 TeV on the density of charged particles, dn/dηdφ, with p T > 0.5 GeV/c and η < for Z- Boson events as a function of P T (Z) for the toward and transverse regions. The data are corrected to the particle level (with errors that include both the statistical error and the systematic uncertainty) and are compared with PYTHIA Tune AW and HERWIG (without MPI) at the particle level (i.e. generator level). Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 74

75 Charged PTsum Density (GeV/c) Z-Boson: Towards,, Transverse, & TransMIN Charge Density Charged PTsum Density: dpt/dηdφ pyaw generator level "Transverse "Toward" "Drell-Yan Production" 70 < M(pair) < 0 GeV PT(Z-Boson) (GeV/c) Charged PTsum Density (GeV/c) High Charged P T Z-Boson PTsum Production Density: dpt/dηdφ pyaw generator level "Toward" Z-boson Z-boson "transmin" PT(Z-Boson) (GeV/c) "Drell-Yan Production" 70 < M(pair) < 0 GeV Z-BosonDirection Z-Boson Direction TransMAX TransMIN Data at.96 TeV on the charged scalar PTsum density, dpt/dηdφ, with p T > 0.5 GeV/c and η < for Z-Boson events as a function of P T (Z) for the toward and transverse regions. The data are corrected to the particle level (with errors that include both the statistical error and the systematic uncertainty) and are compared with PYTHIA Tune AW and HERWIG (without MPI) at the particle level (i.e. generator level). Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 75

76 "Toward" Charged PTsum Density (GeV/c).8.2 Z-Boson: Towards,, Transverse, & TransMIN Charge Density "Toward" Charged Charged PTsum PTsum Density: Density: dpt/dηdφ dpt/dηdφ pyaw generator generator level theory level "Drell-Yan Production" 70 < M(pair) < 0 GeV ATLAS pydw "Transverse JIM 0.6 "Toward" pyaw Charged PTsum Density (GeV/c) "TransMIN" PTsum Density (GeV/c) "TransMIN" High Charged P T Z-Boson Charged PTsum Production PTsum Density: Density: dpt/dηdφ dpt/dηdφ pyaw generator generator level theory level "Drell-Yan Production" "Drell-Yan Production" 70 < M(pair) < 0 GeV 70 < M(pair) < 0 GeV JIM ATLAS "Toward" pydw Z-boson 0.2 Z-boson "transmin" pyaw PT(Z-Boson) (GeV/c) PT(Z-Boson) (GeV/c) Z-BosonDirection Z-Boson Direction TransMAX TransMIN Data at.96 TeV on the charged scalar PTsum density, dpt/dηdφ, with p T > 0.5 GeV/c and η < for Z-Boson events as a function of P T (Z) for the toward and transverse regions. The data are corrected to the particle level (with errors that include both the statistical error and the systematic uncertainty) and are compared with PYTHIA Tune AW and HERWIG (without MPI) at the particle level (i.e. generator level). Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 76

77 "Toward" Charged PTsum Density (GeV/c) Z-Boson: Towards,, Transverse, & TransMIN Charge Density "Toward" Charged Charged PTsum PTsum Density: Density: dpt/dηdφ dpt/dηdφ "TransMIN" Charged PTsum Density: "TransMIN" High Charged dpt/dηdφ P T Z-Boson Charged PTsum Production PTsum Density: Density: dpt/dηdφ dpt/dηdφ "Drell-Yan Production" "Drell-Yan Production" "Drell-Yan Production" 70 < M(pair) < 0 GeV 70 < M(pair) < 0 GeV data ATLAS corrected 70 < M(pair) < 0 GeV pyaw generator generator level theory level generator level theory "Leading pyaw generator generator Jet" level theory level pydw pydw 0.8 "Transverse "TransMIN" PTsum Density (GeV/c) Charged PTsum Density (GeV/c) "TransMIN" PTsum Density (GeV/c) ATLAS JIM "Toward" JIM 0.6 Z-boson Z-boson "Toward" pyaw "transmin" "Z-Boson" Charged Particles pyaw ( η <, PT>0.5 GeV/c) PT(Z-Boson) (GeV/c) PT(jet#) or PT(Z-Boson) (GeV/c) PT(Z-Boson) (GeV/c) Z-BosonDirection Z-Boson Direction TransMAX TransMIN Data at.96 TeV on the charged scalar PTsum density, dpt/dηdφ, with p T > 0.5 GeV/c and η < for Z-Boson events as a function of P T (Z) for the toward and transverse regions. The data are corrected to the particle level (with errors that include both the statistical error and the systematic uncertainty) and are compared with PYTHIA Tune AW and HERWIG (without MPI) at the particle level (i.e. generator level). Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 77

78 "Toward" Charged PTsum Density (GeV/c) Z-Boson: Towards,, Transverse, & TransMIN H. Hoeth, Charge Density "Toward" Charged Charged PTsum PTsum Density: Density: dpt/dηdφ dpt/dηdφ "TransMIN" Charged PTsum Density: "TransMIN" High Charged dpt/dηdφ P T Z-Boson Charged PTsum Production PTsum Density: Density: dpt/dηdφ dpt/dηdφ "Drell-Yan Production" "Drell-Yan Production" "Drell-Yan Production" 70 < M(pair) < 0 GeV 70 < M(pair) < 0 GeV data ATLAS corrected 70 < M(pair) < 0 GeV pyaw generator generator level theory level generator level theory "Leading pyaw generator generator Jet" level theory level pydw pydw 0.8 "Transverse "TransMIN" PTsum Density (GeV/c) Charged PTsum Density (GeV/c) "TransMIN" PTsum Density (GeV/c) ATLAS JIM "Toward" JIM 0.6 Z-boson Z-boson "Toward" pyaw "transmin" "Z-Boson" Charged Particles pyaw ( η <, PT>0.5 GeV/c) PT(Z-Boson) (GeV/c) PT(jet#) or PT(Z-Boson) (GeV/c) PT(Z-Boson) (GeV/c) Z-BosonDirection Z-Boson Direction TransMAX TransMIN Data at.96 TeV on the charged scalar PTsum density, dpt/dηdφ, with p T > 0.5 GeV/c and η < for Z-Boson events as a function of P T (Z) for the toward and transverse regions. The data are corrected to the particle level (with errors that include both the statistical error and the systematic uncertainty) and are compared with PYTHIA Tune AW and HERWIG (without MPI) at the particle level (i.e. generator level). Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 78

Toward an Understanding of Hadron-Hadron. Collisions From Feynman-Field to the LHC

Toward an Understanding of Hadron-Hadron. Collisions From Feynman-Field to the LHC Toward an Understanding of Hadron-Hadron Collisions From Feynman-Field to the LHC Rick Field University of Florida Outline of Talk The old days of Feynman-Field Phenomenology. XXIèmes Rencontres de Blois

More information

Collisions Rick s View of Hadron Collisions

Collisions Rick s View of Hadron Collisions st Workshop on Energy Scaling in Hadron-Hadron Collisions Rick s View of Hadron Collisions Rick Field University of Florida Fermilab 2009 Outline of Talk The early days of Feynman-Field Phenomenology.

More information

51 st Cracow School of Theoretical Physics The Soft Side of the LHC Min-Bias and the Underlying Event at the LHC Rick Field University of Florida

51 st Cracow School of Theoretical Physics The Soft Side of the LHC Min-Bias and the Underlying Event at the LHC Rick Field University of Florida 5 st Cracow School of Theoretical Physics The Soft Side of the LHC Min-Bias and the Underlying Event at the LHC Rick Field University of Florida Lecture : Outline Review: The CDF Tevatron underlying event

More information

University of Glasgow Tevatron Energy Scan: Findings & Surprises

University of Glasgow Tevatron Energy Scan: Findings & Surprises Outline of Talk University of Glasgow Tevatron Energy Scan: Findings & Surprises Rick Field University of Florida Simulating hadron-hadron collisions: The early days of Feynman-Field Phenomenology. The

More information

Tevatron Energy Scan. Energy Dependence of the Underlying Event. Rick Field Craig Group & David Wilson University of Florida

Tevatron Energy Scan. Energy Dependence of the Underlying Event. Rick Field Craig Group & David Wilson University of Florida Rick Field Craig Group & David Wilson University of Florida Tevatron Energy Scan Energy Dependence of the Underlying Event Outline of Talk Wine & Cheese talk, October 4, 2002. Studying the underlying event

More information

Minimum Bias at CDF and CMS

Minimum Bias at CDF and CMS Minimum Bias at CDF and CMS Minumum Bias Collisions Proton AntiProton CDF Run 2 CMS Outline of Talk Review the CDF Run 2 minimum bias tune (i.e. PYTHIA Tune A). UE&MB@CMS Show the minimum bias predictions

More information

PYTHIA 6.2 Tunes for Run II

PYTHIA 6.2 Tunes for Run II PYTHIA 6.2 Tunes for Run II Outline of Talk Min-Bias Collisions! Min-Bias Generators Hadron Hadron! The in Hard Scattering Processes Proton Outgoing Parton PT(hard) Initial-State Radiation AntiProton Outgoing

More information

Using Drell-Yan to Probe the

Using Drell-Yan to Probe the Using Drell-Yan to Probe the Underlying Event in Run 2 at CDF Deepak Kar University of Florida (On behalf of the CDF Collaboration) Experimental Particle Physics Seminar 30 th October 2008 Prologue: We

More information

HEP Seminar. Studying the Energy Dependence of the Underlying Event at the Tevatron and the LHC Rick Field University of Florida.

HEP Seminar. Studying the Energy Dependence of the Underlying Event at the Tevatron and the LHC Rick Field University of Florida. Studying the Energy Dependence of the Underlying Event at the Tevatron and the LHC Rick Field University of Florida HEP Seminar Outline Early studies the underlying event (UE) at CDF and PYTHIA Tune A.

More information

Min-Bias Data: Jet Evolution and Event Shapes

Min-Bias Data: Jet Evolution and Event Shapes Min-Bias Data: Jet Evolution and Event Shapes Rick Field and David Stuart July 1, 1999 Abstract The Min-Bias data are used to study the transition between soft and hard collisions. We study this transition

More information

Toward an Understanding of Hadron-Hadron. Collisions From Feynman-Field to the LHC

Toward an Understanding of Hadron-Hadron. Collisions From Feynman-Field to the LHC Rick Field University of Florida Outline of Talk Ricky & Sally. Toward an Understanding of Hadron-Hadron Collisions From Feynman-Field to the LHC The Berkeley Years Rick & Jimmie. The early days of Feynman-Field

More information

LHCP QCD at the Tevatron. Rick Field University of Florida (for the CDF & D0 Collaborations) Outline of Talk. with help from Christina Mesropian

LHCP QCD at the Tevatron. Rick Field University of Florida (for the CDF & D0 Collaborations) Outline of Talk. with help from Christina Mesropian with help from Christina Mesropian QCD at the Tevatron Rick Field University of Florida (for the CDF & D0 Collaborations) Outline of Talk D0 Photon + Jet Measurements. CDF W/Z + Upsilon Search. CDF Measurements

More information

The Underlying Event in Run II ChgJets versus JetClu Jets

The Underlying Event in Run II ChgJets versus JetClu Jets The Underlying Event in Run II ChgJets versus JetClu Jets Outline of Talk! The evolution of charged particle jets and the underlying event. Study the event topology relative to the leading chgjet and compare

More information

Mini-Bias and Underlying Event Studies at CMS

Mini-Bias and Underlying Event Studies at CMS Yuan Chao Department of Physics National Taiwan University 1617 Taipei, TAIWAN 1 Introduction The Tevatron experiments provide us very good information for the quantum chromodynamics (QCD) modelings of

More information

Minimum-Bias and Underlying-Event Physics

Minimum-Bias and Underlying-Event Physics 2008 CTEQ MCnet Summer School on QCD Phenomenology and Monte Carlo Event Generators 8 16 August 2008 Debrecen, Hungary Minimum-Bias and Underlying-Event Physics Torbjörn Sjöstrand Department of Theoretical

More information

QCD and jets physics at the LHC with CMS during the first year of data taking. Pavel Demin UCL/FYNU Louvain-la-Neuve

QCD and jets physics at the LHC with CMS during the first year of data taking. Pavel Demin UCL/FYNU Louvain-la-Neuve QCD and jets physics at the LHC with CMS during the first year of data taking Pavel Demin UCL/FYNU Louvain-la-Neuve February 8, 2006 Bon appétit! February 8, 2006 Pavel Demin UCL/FYNU 1 Why this seminar?

More information

LHC MPI and underlying event results

LHC MPI and underlying event results LHC MPI and underlying event results Marianna Testa (ATLAS) for the ALICE, ATLAS, CMS & LHCb collaborations SM@LHC 2012, Copenhagen, 10-13 April 2012 The Underlying Event Everything in hadron collisions

More information

Physics at Hadron Colliders Part II

Physics at Hadron Colliders Part II Physics at Hadron Colliders Part II Marina Cobal Università di Udine 1 The structure of an event One incoming parton from each of the protons enters the hard process, where then a number of outgoing particles

More information

Minimum Bias and Underlying Event Studies at CDF

Minimum Bias and Underlying Event Studies at CDF FERMILAB-CONF--531-E Minimum Bias and Underlying Event Studies at CDF INFN, Bologna E-mail: moggi@bo.infn.it Soft, non-perturbative, interactions are poorly understood from the theoretical point of view

More information

QCD at CDF. Régis Lefèvre IFAE Barcelona On behalf of the CDF Collaboration

QCD at CDF. Régis Lefèvre IFAE Barcelona On behalf of the CDF Collaboration QCD at CDF Régis Lefèvre IFAE Barcelona On behalf of the CDF Collaboration Jet Inclusive Cross-Section Underlying event studies Jet Shapes Specific processes _ W+Jets, γ + γ, γ + b/c, b-jet / bb jet Diffraction

More information

Tests of Pythia8 Rescattering Model

Tests of Pythia8 Rescattering Model Tests of Pythia8 Rescattering Model arxiv:5.325v [hep-ph] Nov 25 Tasnuva Chowdhury Shahjalal University of Science and Technology Sylhet, Bangladesh. Deepak Kar University of Witwatersrand Johannesburg,

More information

Charged particle multiplicity in proton-proton collisions with ALICE

Charged particle multiplicity in proton-proton collisions with ALICE Charged particle multiplicity in proton-proton collisions with ALICE Introduction on the motivations for a pp physics programme with ALICE A short review on the detectors used to reconstruct charged particle

More information

QCD Studies at LHC with the Atlas detector

QCD Studies at LHC with the Atlas detector QCD Studies at LHC with the Atlas detector Introduction Sebastian Eckweiler - University of Mainz (on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration) Examples of QCD studies Minimum bias & underlying event Jet-physics

More information

QCD Jets at the LHC. Leonard Apanasevich University of Illinois at Chicago. on behalf of the ATLAS and CMS collaborations

QCD Jets at the LHC. Leonard Apanasevich University of Illinois at Chicago. on behalf of the ATLAS and CMS collaborations QCD Jets at the LHC Leonard Apanasevich University of Illinois at Chicago on behalf of the ATLAS and CMS collaborations Outline Physics at the LHC Jet Reconstruction and Performance Clustering Algorithms

More information

Testing QCD at the LHC and the Implications of HERA DIS 2004

Testing QCD at the LHC and the Implications of HERA DIS 2004 Testing QCD at the LHC and the Implications of HERA DIS 2004 Jon Butterworth Impact of the LHC on QCD Impact of QCD (and HERA data) at the LHC Impact of the LHC on QCD The LHC will have something to say

More information

Jet Energy Calibration. Beate Heinemann University of Liverpool

Jet Energy Calibration. Beate Heinemann University of Liverpool Jet Energy Calibration Beate Heinemann University of Liverpool Fermilab, August 14th 2006 1 Outline Introduction CDF and D0 calorimeters Response corrections Multiple interactions η-dependent corrections

More information

Particle spectra in Minimum Bias events at 13TeV

Particle spectra in Minimum Bias events at 13TeV Particle spectra in Minimum Bias events at TeV Juan Manuel Grados Luyando on behalf of the CMS collaboration Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron, Hamburg MPI@LHC 05 Trieste, Italy Motivation Probe the different

More information

Underlying Event Measurements at the LHC

Underlying Event Measurements at the LHC 14th EDS Blois Workshop Underlying Event Measurements at the LHC Michael Heinrich for the ATLAS and CMS collaborations INSTITUTE OF EXPERIMENTAL PARTICLE PHYSICS (EKP) PHYSICS FACULTY KIT University of

More information

Charged Particle Multiplicity in pp Collisions at s = 13 TeV

Charged Particle Multiplicity in pp Collisions at s = 13 TeV Charged Particle Multiplicity in pp Collisions at s = 13 TeV Khadeejah ALGhadeer PhD in Engineering, Physics The Workshop of the APS Topical Group on Hadronic Physics Charged Particle Multiplicity IN PP

More information

Response to the Referee for Physical Review DG8044

Response to the Referee for Physical Review DG8044 Response to the Referee for Physical Review We would like to thank the referee for the effort he has put into his report. We agree with many of the referee s comments and we now realize that there are

More information

Recent results on soft QCD topics from ATLAS

Recent results on soft QCD topics from ATLAS Recent results on soft QCD topics from ATLAS Roman Lysák Institute of Physics, Prague on behalf of the ATLAS collaboration Bormio 2016 Overview Understanding of soft-qcd interactions has direct impact

More information

Physics at Hadron Colliders

Physics at Hadron Colliders Physics at Hadron Colliders Part 2 Standard Model Physics Test of Quantum Chromodynamics - Jet production - W/Z production - Production of Top quarks Precision measurements -W mass - Top-quark mass QCD

More information

Atlas results on diffraction

Atlas results on diffraction Atlas results on diffraction Alessia Bruni INFN Bologna, Italy for the ATLAS collaboration Rencontres du Viet Nam 14th Workshop on Elastic and Diffractive Scattering Qui Nhon, 16/12/2011 EDS 2011 Alessia

More information

Hadron Collider Physics, HCP2004, June 14-18

Hadron Collider Physics, HCP2004, June 14-18 ) " % "" ' & % % " ) " % '% &* ' ) * ' + " ' ) ( $#! ' "") ( * " ) +% % )( (. ' + -, '+ % &* ' ) ( 021 % # / ( * *' 5 4* 3 %( '' ' " + +% Hadron Collider Physics, HCP2004, June 14-18 The Run II DØ Detector

More information

SOFT QCD AT ATLAS AND CMS

SOFT QCD AT ATLAS AND CMS SAHAL YACOOB UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN ON BEHALF OF THE ATLAS AND CMS COLLABORATIONS SOFT QCD AT ATLAS AND CMS 28th Rencontres de Blois INTRODUCTION IN 15 MINUTES 2 Inelastic cross section ATLAS and CMS

More information

Some studies for ALICE

Some studies for ALICE Some studies for ALICE Motivations for a p-p programme in ALICE Special features of the ALICE detector Preliminary studies of Physics Performances of ALICE for the measurement of some global properties

More information

Jet reconstruction in W + jets events at the LHC

Jet reconstruction in W + jets events at the LHC Jet reconstruction in W + jets events at the LHC Ulrike Schnoor Michigan State University High Energy Physics Institutsseminar IKTP TU Dresden, Nov 4, 010 Jet reconstruction in W + jets events at the LHC

More information

Recent QCD results from ATLAS

Recent QCD results from ATLAS Recent QCD results from ATLAS PASCOS 2013 Vojtech Pleskot Charles University in Prague 21.11.2013 Introduction / Outline Soft QCD: Underlying event in jet events @7TeV (2010 data) Hard double parton interactions

More information

QCD at hadron colliders

QCD at hadron colliders QCD at hadron colliders Soushi Tsuno Okayama University Outline Introduction: Focus on current (Tevatron) and future (LHC) hadron colliders High pt pqcd phenomena & issues: PDF measurement Jet Physics

More information

Precision QCD at the Tevatron. Markus Wobisch, Fermilab for the CDF and DØ Collaborations

Precision QCD at the Tevatron. Markus Wobisch, Fermilab for the CDF and DØ Collaborations Precision QCD at the Tevatron Markus Wobisch, Fermilab for the CDF and DØ Collaborations Fermilab Tevatron - Run II Chicago Ecm: 1.8 1.96 TeV more Bunches 6 36 Bunch Crossing 3500 396ns CDF Booster Tevatron

More information

QCD dijet analyses at DØ

QCD dijet analyses at DØ QCD dijet analyses at DØ Pavel Demine for the DØ collaboration DAPNIA-SPP, CEA Saclay, France Contents: DØ detector Jet reconstruction at DØ Dijet mass spectrum Dijet azimuthal angle decorrelation XII

More information

Results from D0: dijet angular distributions, dijet mass cross section and dijet azimuthal decorrelations

Results from D0: dijet angular distributions, dijet mass cross section and dijet azimuthal decorrelations Results from D: dijet angular distributions, dijet mass cross section and dijet azimuthal decorrelations Zdenek Hubacek Czech Technical University in Prague E-mail: zdenek.hubacek@cern.ch on behalf of

More information

QCD at Cosmic Energies - VII May 16-20, 2016 Chalkida, Greece Multiparton interactions in Herwig

QCD at Cosmic Energies - VII May 16-20, 2016 Chalkida, Greece Multiparton interactions in Herwig QCD at Cosmic Energies - VII May 6-20, 206 Chalkida, Greece Multiparton interactions in Herwig Frashër Loshaj Table of Contents Introduction 2 MPI and the Underlying event 3 Soft interactions 4 Diffraction

More information

Soft interactions in Herwig

Soft interactions in Herwig Soft interactions in Herwig Stefan Gieseke Institut für Theoretische Physik KIT work with Patrick Kirchgaeßer and Frashër Loshaj MPI@LHC6 San Cristóbal de las Casas 28 Nov 2 Dec 206 Stefan Gieseke MPI@LHC

More information

Multiple Parton-Parton Interactions: from pp to A-A

Multiple Parton-Parton Interactions: from pp to A-A Multiple Parton-Parton Interactions: from pp to A-A Andreas Morsch CERN QCD Challenges at LHC Taxco, Mexico, Jan 18-22 (2016) Multiple Parton-Parton Interactions Phys. Lett. B 167 (1986) 476 Q i 2 Λ QCD

More information

Proton anti proton collisions at 1.96 TeV currently highest centre of mass energy

Proton anti proton collisions at 1.96 TeV currently highest centre of mass energy Tevatron & Experiments 2 Proton anti proton collisions at 1.96 TeV currently highest centre of mass energy Tevatron performing very well 6.5 fb 1 delivered (per experiment) 2 fb 1 recorded in 2008 alone

More information

Forward QCD studies and prospects at the LHC

Forward QCD studies and prospects at the LHC Forward QCD studies and prospects at the LHC Pierre.VanMechelen@ua.ac.be (*) INT Workshop on Perturbative and Non-Perturbative Aspects of QCD at Collider Energies 1 Seattle, September 13-18, 2010 (*) As

More information

The Heavy Quark Search at the LHC

The Heavy Quark Search at the LHC The Heavy Quark Search at the LHC The Heavy Quark Search at the LHC Backgrounds: estimating and suppressing tt, multijets,... jet mass technique NLO effects matrix elements for extra jets initial state

More information

Lessons from the early LHC data for MC tuning

Lessons from the early LHC data for MC tuning Lessons from the early LHC data for MC tuning P. S k a n d s ( C E R N ) Multiple Partonic Interactions at LHC, November 211, Hamburg A Factorized View 1. Where is the energy going? Note: only linearized

More information

JET FRAGMENTATION DENNIS WEISER

JET FRAGMENTATION DENNIS WEISER JET FRAGMENTATION DENNIS WEISER OUTLINE Physics introduction Introduction to jet physics Jets in heavy-ion-collisions Jet reconstruction Paper discussion The CMS experiment Data selection and track/jet

More information

QCD at hadron colliders

QCD at hadron colliders QCD at hadron colliders This will be a brief experimentalist s view, with a concentration on the two hadron-hadron colliders mentioned in the previous talk If you want a good reference book for graduate

More information

Underlying Event measurements with first LHC data

Underlying Event measurements with first LHC data Underlying Event measurements with first LHC data Holger Schulz Graduiertenkolleg Masse, Spektrum, Symmetrie Berlin, Septemer 29, 2009 Holger Schulz Underlying Event measurements with first LHC data 1

More information

arxiv:hep-ex/ v1 8 Jun 2001

arxiv:hep-ex/ v1 8 Jun 2001 Subjet Multiplicity in Quark and Gluon Jets at DØ The DØ Collaboration Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 651 (February 7, 28) Abstract arxiv:hep-ex/164v1 8 Jun 21 We measure the

More information

Double Parton Scattering in CMS. Deniz SUNAR CERCI Adiyaman University On behalf of the CMS Collaboration Low-x th June 2017 Bari, Italy

Double Parton Scattering in CMS. Deniz SUNAR CERCI Adiyaman University On behalf of the CMS Collaboration Low-x th June 2017 Bari, Italy Double Parton Scattering in CMS Deniz SUNAR CERCI Adiyaman University On behalf of the CMS Collaboration Low-x 2017 17th June 2017 Bari, Italy Outline Introduction to DPS DPS measurements with CMS 2b +

More information

PDFs for Event Generators: Why? Stephen Mrenna CD/CMS Fermilab

PDFs for Event Generators: Why? Stephen Mrenna CD/CMS Fermilab PDFs for Event Generators: Why? Stephen Mrenna CD/CMS Fermilab 1 Understanding Cross Sections @ LHC: many pieces to the puzzle LO, NLO and NNLO calculations K-factors Benchmark cross sections and pdf correlations

More information

arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 17 Aug 2016

arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 17 Aug 2016 arxiv:8.95v [hep-ex] 7 Aug Measurement of the underlying-event properties with the detector Yuri Kulchitsky, on behalf of the collaboration Institute of Physics, National Academy of ciences, Minsk, Belarus

More information

Review of LHCb results on MPI, soft QCD and diffraction

Review of LHCb results on MPI, soft QCD and diffraction Review of LHCb results on MPI, soft QCD and diffraction Marcin Kucharczyk on behalf of LHCb collaboration HNI Krakow EDS Blois 2015, Borgo (Corse), 30.06.2015 Outline LHCb - general purpose forward experiment

More information

Recent forward physics and diffraction results from CMS

Recent forward physics and diffraction results from CMS Recent forward physics and diffraction results from CMS Gabor Veres (CERN) on behalf of the CMS Collaboration ISMD 2015 Conference, Wildbad Kreuth, Germany October 5th, 2015 Outline CMS: forward instrumentation

More information

Summary of Working Group C: Hadronic Final States DIS03, St.Petersburg

Summary of Working Group C: Hadronic Final States DIS03, St.Petersburg Summary of Working Group C: Hadronic Final States DIS03, St.Petersburg Conveners: Jon Butterworth, Yuri Dokshitzer Event shapes & energy flows: DIS final states vs e + e -. Jets and energy flows: proton-antiproton

More information

Recent Results on Jet Physics and α s

Recent Results on Jet Physics and α s Recent Results on Jet Physics and α s XXI Physics in Collision Conference Seoul, Korea June 8, Presented by Michael Strauss The University of Oklahoma Outline Introduction and Experimental Considerations

More information

Lecture 5. QCD at the LHC Joey Huston Michigan State University

Lecture 5. QCD at the LHC Joey Huston Michigan State University Lecture 5 QCD at the LHC Joey Huston Michigan State University Tevatron data Wealth of data from the Tevatron, both Run 1 and Run 2, that allows us to test/add to our pqcd formalism with analysis procedures/

More information

Nikos Varelas. University of Illinois at Chicago. CTEQ Collaboration Meeting Northwestern November 20, Nikos Varelas. CTEQ Meeting Nov 20, 2009

Nikos Varelas. University of Illinois at Chicago. CTEQ Collaboration Meeting Northwestern November 20, Nikos Varelas. CTEQ Meeting Nov 20, 2009 QCD Physics at CMS University of Illinois at Chicago CTEQ Collaboration Meeting Northwestern November 0, 009 1 QCD Physics at CMS University of Illinois at Chicago CTEQ Collaboration Meeting Northwestern

More information

How to Measure Top Quark Mass with CMS Detector??? Ijaz Ahmed Comsats Institute of Information Technology, Islamabad

How to Measure Top Quark Mass with CMS Detector??? Ijaz Ahmed Comsats Institute of Information Technology, Islamabad How to Measure Top Quark Mass with CMS Detector??? Ijaz Ahmed Comsats Institute of Information Technology, Islamabad Outlines o o o o o o o High Pt top basic idea Methods for jets selection Top quark mass

More information

QCD at the Tevatron: The Production of Jets & Photons plus Jets

QCD at the Tevatron: The Production of Jets & Photons plus Jets QCD at the Tevatron: The Production of Jets & Photons plus Jets Mike Strauss The University of Oklahoma The Oklahoma Center for High Energy Physics for the CDF and DØD Collaborations APS 2009 Denver, Colorado

More information

Transverse Energy-Energy Correlation on Hadron Collider. Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron

Transverse Energy-Energy Correlation on Hadron Collider. Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron Transverse Energy-Energy Correlation on Hadron Collider Wei Wang ( 王伟 ) Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron Work with Ahmed Ali, Fernando Barreiro, Javier Llorente arxiv: 1205.1689, Phys.Rev. D86, 114017(2012)

More information

Multi-jet production and jet correlations at CMS

Multi-jet production and jet correlations at CMS Multi-jet production and jet correlations at Gábor I. Veres on behalf of the Collaboration CERN E-mail: gabor.veres@cern.ch Hadronic jet production at the LHC is an excellent testing ground for QCD. Essential

More information

What to do with Multijet Events?

What to do with Multijet Events? DØ note 4465 2004-06-03 What to do with Multijet Events? T. Hebbeker RWTH Aachen ABSTRACT Multijet events are frequently produced in p p collisions. Events with several jets might indicate physics beyond

More information

Measurement of jet production in association with a Z boson at the LHC & Jet energy correction & calibration at HLT in CMS

Measurement of jet production in association with a Z boson at the LHC & Jet energy correction & calibration at HLT in CMS Measurement of jet production in association with a Z boson at the LHC & Jet energy correction & calibration at HLT in CMS Fengwangdong Zhang Peking University (PKU) & Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB)

More information

Measurement of the associated production of direct photons and jets with the Atlas experiment at LHC. Michele Cascella

Measurement of the associated production of direct photons and jets with the Atlas experiment at LHC. Michele Cascella Measurement of the associated production of direct photons and jets with the Atlas experiment at LHC Michele Cascella Graduate Course in Physics University of Pisa The School of Graduate Studies in Basic

More information

Measurement of multi-jet cross sections in proton proton collisions at a 7 TeV center-of-mass energy

Measurement of multi-jet cross sections in proton proton collisions at a 7 TeV center-of-mass energy Eur. Phys. J. C (2011) 71:1763 DOI 10.1140/epjc/s10052-011-1763-6 Regular Article - Experimental Physics Measurement of multi-jet cross sections in proton proton collisions at a 7 TeV center-of-mass energy

More information

Properties of Proton-proton Collision and. Comparing Event Generators by Multi-jet Events

Properties of Proton-proton Collision and. Comparing Event Generators by Multi-jet Events Properties of Proton-proton Collision and Comparing Event Generators by Multi-jet Events Author: W. H. TANG 1 (Department of Physics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong) Supervisors: Z. L. MARSHALL 2,

More information

Measurement of the jet production properties at the LHC with the ATLAS Detector

Measurement of the jet production properties at the LHC with the ATLAS Detector Measurement of the jet production properties at the LHC with the ALAS Detector Stanislav okar Comenius University, Bratislava On behalf of the ALAS collaboration Different features of the jet production

More information

MPI in PYTHIA. 1. Brief overview 2. Color reconnection and the top mass

MPI in PYTHIA. 1. Brief overview 2. Color reconnection and the top mass MPI in PYTHIA 1. Brief overview 2. Color reconnection and the top mass Torbjörn Sjöstrand Department of Astronomy and Theoretical Physics Lund University Sölvegatan 14A, SE-223 62 Lund, Sweden MPI@LHC

More information

PoS(ICHEP2012)300. Electroweak boson production at LHCb

PoS(ICHEP2012)300. Electroweak boson production at LHCb Physik-Institut der Universität Zürich, Switzerland. E-mail: jonathan.anderson@cern.ch The electroweak boson production cross-sections have been measured in the forward region using s = 7 TeV proton-proton

More information

Jets (and photons) at the LHC. J. Huston LPC March 10, 2010

Jets (and photons) at the LHC. J. Huston LPC March 10, 2010 Jets (and photons) at the LHC J. Huston LPC March 10, 2010 More references Understanding cross sections at the LHC we have to understand QCD (at the LHC) PDF s, PDF luminosities and PDF uncertainties LO,

More information

The inclusive jet cross section, jet algorithms, underlying event and fragmentation corrections. J. Huston Michigan State University

The inclusive jet cross section, jet algorithms, underlying event and fragmentation corrections. J. Huston Michigan State University The inclusive jet cross section, jet algorithms, underlying event and fragmentation corrections J. Huston Michigan State University Tevatron in Run II 36 bunches (396 ns crossing time) 2 CDF in Run II

More information

Azimuthal decorrelations between jets in QCD

Azimuthal decorrelations between jets in QCD Azimuthal decorrelations between jets in QCD Andrea Banfi ETH Zurich q q p 1 p 1 Outline Azimuthal decorrelations in QCD hard processes Dijets in the back-to-back region Phenomenology of azimuthal decorrelations

More information

Measurement of multijets and the internal structure of jets at ATLAS

Measurement of multijets and the internal structure of jets at ATLAS Measurement of multijets and the internal structure of jets at ALAS Bilge M. Demirköz, on behalf of the ALAS Collaboration Institut de Fisica d Altes Energies, Barcelona, SPAIN also at Middle East echnical

More information

Results on QCD and Heavy Flavors Production at the Tevatron

Results on QCD and Heavy Flavors Production at the Tevatron Results on QCD and Heavy Flavors Production at the Tevatron Donatella Lucchesi INFN and University of Padova October 21 Padova Outline: Machine and detector description Latest results on QCD Heavy Flavor:

More information

Top production measurements using the ATLAS detector at the LHC

Top production measurements using the ATLAS detector at the LHC Top production measurements using the ATLAS detector at the LHC INFN, Sezione di Bologna and University of Bologna E-mail: romano@bo.infn.it This paper is an overview of recent results on top-quark production

More information

MC ATLAS Stephen Jiggins on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration University College London (UCL)

MC ATLAS Stephen Jiggins on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration University College London (UCL) MC Tuning @ ATLAS Stephen Jiggins on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration University College London (UCL) Contents Contents: 1) Monte Carlo models/event generation 2) Basic Tuning Methodology 3) A2 tune series

More information

MBR Monte Carlo Simulation in PYTHIA8

MBR Monte Carlo Simulation in PYTHIA8 The Rockefeller University, 10 York Avenue, New York, NY 06, USA E-mail: robert.ciesielski@rockefeller.edu Konstantin Goulianos The Rockefeller University, 10 York Avenue, New York, NY 06, USA E-mail:

More information

Photoproduction of Events with Rapidity Gaps Between Jets with ZEUS at HERA. PhD Defense May 5, Patrick Ryan, Univ.

Photoproduction of Events with Rapidity Gaps Between Jets with ZEUS at HERA. PhD Defense May 5, Patrick Ryan, Univ. Photoproduction of Events with Rapidity Gaps Between Jets with ZEUS at HERA Patrick Ryan University of Wisconsin PhD Defense May 5, 2006 Rapidity Gaps Between Jets in PHP PhD Defense, May. 5 2006-1 Outline

More information

7 Physics at Hadron Colliders

7 Physics at Hadron Colliders 7 Physics at Hadron Colliders The present and future Hadron Colliders - The Tevatron and the LHC Test of the Standard Model at Hadron Colliders Jet, W/Z, Top-quark production Physics of Beauty Quarks (T.

More information

Experimental review of jet physics in hadronic collisions

Experimental review of jet physics in hadronic collisions Eur. Phys. J. C (2009) 61: 637 647 DOI 10.1140/epjc/s10052-008-0849-2 Regular Article - Experimental Physics Experimental review of jet physics in hadronic collisions Mario Martínez a ICREA/IFAE, Institut

More information

Reconstruction in Collider Experiments (Part IX)

Reconstruction in Collider Experiments (Part IX) Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments (Part IX) Peter Loch University of Arizona Tucson,

More information

arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 9 Jan 2019

arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 9 Jan 2019 Quarkonium production as a function of charged-particle multiplicity in pp and p Pb collisions measured by ALICE at the LHC arxiv:1901.02627v1 [hep-ex] 9 Jan 2019 Discipline of Physics, School of Basic

More information

Physics at LHC. lecture one. Sven-Olaf Moch. DESY, Zeuthen. in collaboration with Martin zur Nedden

Physics at LHC. lecture one. Sven-Olaf Moch. DESY, Zeuthen. in collaboration with Martin zur Nedden Physics at LHC lecture one Sven-Olaf Moch Sven-Olaf.Moch@desy.de DESY, Zeuthen in collaboration with Martin zur Nedden Humboldt-Universität, October 22, 2007, Berlin Sven-Olaf Moch Physics at LHC p.1 LHC

More information

Physique des Particules Avancées 2

Physique des Particules Avancées 2 Physique des Particules Avancées Interactions Fortes et Interactions Faibles Leçon 6 Les collisions p p (http://dpnc.unige.ch/~bravar/ppa/l6) enseignant Alessandro Bravar Alessandro.Bravar@unige.ch tél.:

More information

Particle Physics. Lecture 11: Mesons and Baryons

Particle Physics. Lecture 11: Mesons and Baryons Particle Physics Lecture 11: Mesons and Baryons Measuring Jets Fragmentation Mesons and Baryons Isospin and hypercharge SU(3) flavour symmetry Heavy Quark states 1 From Tuesday: Summary In QCD, the coupling

More information

Exclusive Central π+π- Production in Proton Antiproton Collisions at the CDF

Exclusive Central π+π- Production in Proton Antiproton Collisions at the CDF Exclusive Central π+π- Production in Proton Antiproton Collisions at the CDF Maria Żurek Research Center Jülich University of Cologne on behalf of the CDF Collaboration XLV International Symposium on Multiparticle

More information

Studies on the definition of inelastic Non-Single Diffractive events

Studies on the definition of inelastic Non-Single Diffractive events Studies on the definition of inelastic Non-Single Diffractive events Armando Bermúdez Martínez Instituto Superior de Tecnologías y Ciencias Aplicadas (InSTEC), Havana, Cuba Supervisor: Hannes Jung September,

More information

PANIC August 28, Katharina Müller on behalf of the LHCb collaboration

PANIC August 28, Katharina Müller on behalf of the LHCb collaboration Measurements with electroweak bosons at LHCb PANIC August 28, 2014 on behalf of the LHCb collaboration Outline LHCb detector Measurements with electroweak bosons Motivation Z production Z plus jets, Z

More information

QCD Jet Physics with CMS LHC

QCD Jet Physics with CMS LHC QCD Jet Physics with CMS Detector @ LHC Y.Chao for the CMS Collaboration (National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan) QCD10 (25th annivervary) 2010/06/28-07/03 The Large Hadron Collider Four major experiments

More information

Measurement of photon production cross sections also in association with jets with the ATLAS detector

Measurement of photon production cross sections also in association with jets with the ATLAS detector Nuclear and Particle Physics Proceedings 00 (07) 6 Nuclear and Particle Physics Proceedings Measurement of photon production cross sections also in association with jets with the detector Sebastien Prince

More information

Recent DØ results in Diffractive and Jet Physics

Recent DØ results in Diffractive and Jet Physics Recent DØ results in Diffractive and Jet Physics * Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, P.O. Box 500, Batavia, IL 60510 E-mail: odell@fnal.gov DØ measurements of the inclusive jet cross section and the

More information

Hard And Soft QCD Physics In ATLAS

Hard And Soft QCD Physics In ATLAS Hard And Soft QCD Physics In ALAS Stefanie Adomeit on behalf of the ALAS collaboration International Conference on New Frontiers in Physics - Crete, June -6, QCD Measurements in ALAS at LHC every kind

More information

Jet Physics with ALICE

Jet Physics with ALICE Jet Physics with ALICE Oliver Busch for the ALICE collaboration Oliver Busch Tsukuba 2014 /03/13 1 Outline introduction results from pp jets in heavy-ion collisions results from Pb-Pb collisions jets in

More information

High p T physics at the LHC Lecture III Standard Model Physics

High p T physics at the LHC Lecture III Standard Model Physics High p T physics at the LHC Lecture III Standard Model Physics Miriam Watson, Juraj Bracinik (University of Birmingham) Warwick Week, April 2011 1. LHC machine 2. High PT experiments Atlas and CMS 3. Standard

More information

W/Z+jet results from the Tevatron

W/Z+jet results from the Tevatron W/Z+jet results from the Tevatron Dmitry Bandurin Florida State University On behalf of D0 and CDF Collaborations Moriond QCD 2012, March 15, La Thuile, Italy Precision QCD tests Photon, W, Z etc. p parton

More information