Tevatron Energy Scan. Energy Dependence of the Underlying Event. Rick Field Craig Group & David Wilson University of Florida

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Tevatron Energy Scan. Energy Dependence of the Underlying Event. Rick Field Craig Group & David Wilson University of Florida"

Transcription

1 Rick Field Craig Group & David Wilson University of Florida Tevatron Energy Scan Energy Dependence of the Underlying Event Outline of Talk Wine & Cheese talk, October 4, Studying the underlying event (UE) at CDF. The PYTHIA UE tunes. LPCC MB&UE working group common plots. CDF MB common plots from the Tevatron Energy Scan. CDF UE common plots from the Tevatron Energy Scan. Mapping out the energy dependence of MB & UE: Tevatron to the LHC! CDF new UE observables from the Tevatron Energy Scan. Summary & Conclusions. Underlying Event Outgoing Parton CDF Run GeV,, 1.96 TeV Final-State Radiation Outgoing Parton PT(hard) Initial-State Radiation Anti Underlying Event 1 mile CMS at the LHC, 7 & 8 TeV Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 1 CDF Anti

2 2002 Wine & Cheese Talk Rick Field Wine & Cheese Talk October 4, 2002 Studying the underlying event at CDF! Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 2

3 UE Publications "Underlying Event" Publications Others RDF Number Year Publications with underlying event in the title. Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 3

4 UE Publications "Underlying Event" Publications 25 Others CDF Collaboration, RDF coming soon (I hope)! 20 Tevatron Energy Scan: Findings & Surprises, Number Year Publications with underlying event in the title. The Underlying Event in Large Transverse Momentum Charged Jet and Z boson Production at CDF, R. Field, published in the proceedings of DPF Charged Jet Evolution and the Underlying Event in -Antiproton Collisions at 1.8 TeV, CDF Collaboration, Phys. Rev. D65 (2002) Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 4

5 QCD Monte-Carlo Models: High Transverse Momentum Jets Hard Scattering Initial-State Radiation Outgoing Parton PT(hard) Hard Scattering Jet Jet Initial-State Radiation Outgoing Parton PT(hard) Hard Scattering Component Underlying Event Anti Underlying Event Outgoing Parton Final-State Radiation Outgoing Parton Jet Final-State Radiation Underlying Event Anti Underlying Event Underlying Event Start with the perturbative 2-to-2 (or sometimes 2-to-3) parton-parton scattering and add initial and finalstate gluon radiation (in the leading log approximation or modified leading log approximation). The underlying event consists of the beam-beam remnants and from particles arising from soft or semi-soft multiple parton interactions (MPI). The underlying event is an unavoidable Of course the outgoing colored partons fragment into hadron jet and inevitably underlying event background to most collider observables observables receive contributions from initial and final-state radiation. and having good understand of it leads to more precise collider measurements! Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 5

6 Occasionally one of the parton-parton collisions is hard (p T > 2 GeV/c) The Inelastic Non-Diffractive Cross-Section Majority of minbias events! Semi-hard partonparton collision (p T < 2 GeV/c) Multiple-parton interactions (MPI)! Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 6

7 The Underlying Event Select inelastic non-diffractive events that contain a hard scattering Hard parton-parton collisions is hard (p T > 2 GeV/c) The underlying-event (UE)! 1/(p T ) 4 1/(p T 2 +p T0 2 ) 2 Semi-hard partonparton collision (p T < 2 GeV/c) + Given that you have one hard scattering it is more probable to have MPI! Hence, the UE has more activity than min-bias. + + Multiple-parton Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS interactions (MPI)! Page 7

8 Allow leading hard scattering to go to zero p T with same cut-off as the MPI! Model of σnd Model of the inelastic nondiffractive cross section! 1/(p T ) 4 1/(p T 2 +p T0 2 ) 2 Semi-hard partonparton collision (p T < 2 GeV/c) Multiple-parton interactions (MPI)! Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 8

9 UE Tunes Underlying Event Allow primary hard-scattering to go to p T = 0 with same cut-off! Fit the underlying event in a hard scattering process. 1/(p T ) 4 1/(p T 2 +p T0 2 ) 2 Min-Bias (add (ND) single & double diffraction) + Predict MB (ND)! Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 9

10 UE Tunes Underlying Event Allow primary hard-scattering to go to p T = 0 with same cut-off! Fit the underlying event in a hard scattering process. 1/(p T ) 4 1/(p T 2 +p T0 2 ) 2 Min-Bias (add (ND) single & double diffraction) + Predict MB (ND)! Predict MB (IN)! + + Single Diffraction M + Double Diffraction M 2 M 1 Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 10

11 Parameter Default Tuning PYTHIA 6.2: Multiple Parton Interaction Parameters Description PARP(83) PARP(84) PARP(85) Double-Gaussian: Fraction of total hadronic matter within PARP(84) Double-Gaussian: Fraction of the overall hadron radius containing the fraction PARP(83) of the total hadronic matter. Probability that the MPI produces two gluons with color connections to the nearest neighbors. Hard Core Color String Multiple Parton Interaction Color String PARP(86) 0.66 Probability that the MPI produces two gluons either as described by PARP(85) or as a closed gluon loop. The remaining fraction consists of quark-antiquark pairs. Multiple Parton Interaction Color String PARP(89) PARP(82) PARP(90) 1 TeV 1.9 GeV/c 0.16 Determines the reference energy E 0. The cut-off P T0 that regulates the 2-to-2 scattering divergence 1/PT 4 1/(PT 2 +P T0 2 ) 2 Determines the energy dependence of the cut-off P T0 as follows P T0 (E cm ) = P T0 (E cm /E 0 ) ε with ε = PARP(90) PT0 (GeV/c) PYTHIA Hard-Scattering Cut-Off PT0 Take E 0 = 1.8 TeV ε = 0.25 (Set A)) PARP(67) A scale factor that determines the maximum parton virtuality for space-like showers. The larger the value of PARP(67) the more initialstate radiation. ε = 0.16 (default) ,000 10, ,000 Reference point at 1.8 TeV CM Energy W (GeV) Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 11

12 Parameter Default Tuning PYTHIA 6.2: Multiple Parton Interaction Parameters Description PARP(83) PARP(84) PARP(85) Double-Gaussian: Fraction of total hadronic matter within PARP(84) Double-Gaussian: Fraction of the overall hadron radius containing the fraction PARP(83) of the total hadronic matter. Determines the energy Probability that the MPI produces two gluons dependence of the MPI! with color connections to the nearest neighbors. Hard Core Color String Multiple Parton Interaction Color String PARP(86) 0.66 Probability that Affects the MPI the produces amount two of gluons either as described initial-state by PARP(85) radiation! or as a closed gluon loop. The remaining fraction consists of quark-antiquark pairs. Multiple Parton Determine Interaction by comparing with 630 GeV data! Color String PARP(89) PARP(82) PARP(90) 1 TeV 1.9 GeV/c 0.16 Determines the reference energy E 0. The cut-off P T0 that regulates the 2-to-2 scattering divergence 1/PT 4 1/(PT 2 +P T0 2 ) 2 Determines the energy dependence of the cut-off P T0 as follows P T0 (E cm ) = P T0 (E cm /E 0 ) ε with ε = PARP(90) PT0 (GeV/c) PYTHIA Hard-Scattering Cut-Off PT0 Take E 0 = 1.8 TeV ε = 0.25 (Set A)) PARP(67) A scale factor that determines the maximum parton virtuality for space-like showers. The larger the value of PARP(67) the more initialstate radiation. ε = 0.16 (default) ,000 10, ,000 Reference point at 1.8 TeV CM Energy W (GeV) Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 12

13 Parameter PARP(83) PARP(84) PARP(85) PARP(86) PARP(89) PARP(82) PARP(90) PARP(67) Default TeV 1.9 GeV/c 0.16 Tuning PYTHIA 6.2: Multiple Parton Interaction Parameters Description Double-Gaussian: Fraction of total hadronic matter within PARP(84) Double-Gaussian: Fraction of the overall hadron radius containing the fraction PARP(83) of the total hadronic matter. Determines the energy Probability that the MPI produces two gluons dependence of the MPI! with color connections to the nearest neighbors. Probability that Affects the MPI the produces amount two of gluons either as described initial-state by PARP(85) radiation! or as a closed gluon loop. The remaining fraction consists of quark-antiquark pairs. Determines the reference energy E 0. The cut-off P T0 that regulates the 2-to-2 scattering divergence 1/PT 4 1/(PT 2 +P T0 2 ) 2 Determines the energy dependence of the cut-off P T0 as follows P T0 (E cm ) = P T0 (E cm /E 0 ) ε with ε = PARP(90) A scale factor that determines the maximum parton virtuality for space-like showers. The larger the value of PARP(67) the more initialstate radiation. Hard Core Color String Remember the energy dependence of the underlying event activity depends on both the ε = PARP(90) and the PDF! 5 PT0 (GeV/c) Multiple Parton Interaction Color String Multiple Parton Determine Interaction by comparing with 630 GeV data! PYTHIA Color String Hard-Scattering Cut-Off PT0 Take E 0 = 1.8 TeV ε = 0.25 (Set A)) ε = 0.16 (default) ,000 10, ,000 Reference point at 1.8 TeV CM Energy W (GeV) Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 13

14 Traditional Approach Transverse region very sensitive to the underlying event! CDF Run 1 Analysis Charged Jet #1 Direction Toward-Side Jet φ Charged Particle φ Correlations P T > PT min η < η cut Leading Object Direction φ 2π Leading Calorimeter Jet or Leading Charged Particle Jet or Leading Charged Particle or Z-Boson Away Region Transverse Region Toward Toward φ Leading Object Transverse Transverse Transverse Transverse Toward Region Away Away Transverse Region Away-Side Jet Away Region 0 -η cut η +η cut Look at charged particle correlations in the azimuthal angle φ relative to a leading object (i.e. CaloJet#1, ChgJet#1, PTmax, Z-boson). For CDF PTmin = 0.5 GeV/c η cut = 1. Define φ φ < 60 o as Toward, 60 o < φ φ < 120 o as Transverse, and φ φ > 120 o as Away. All three regions have the same area in η-φ space, η φ φ = 2η cut 120 o = 2η cut 2π/3. Construct densities by dividing by the area in η-φ space. Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 14

15 UE Observables Transverse Charged Particle Density: Number of charged particles (p T > 0.5 GeV/c, η < η cut ) in the transverse region as defined by the leading charged particle, PTmax, divided by the area in η-φ space, 2η cut 2π/3, averaged over all events with at least one particle with p T > 0.5 GeV/c, η < η cut. Transverse Charged PTsum Density: Scalar p T sum of the charged particles (p T > 0.5 GeV/c, η < η cut ) in the transverse region as defined by the leading charged particle, PTmax, divided by the area in η-φ space, 2η cut 2π/3, averaged over all events with at least one particle with p T > 0.5 GeV/c, η < η cut. PTmax Direction Transverse Toward Away φ Transverse Transverse Charged Particle Average P T : Event-by-event <p T > = PTsum/Nchg for charged particles (p T > 0.5 GeV/c, η < η cut ) in the transverse region as defined by the leading charged particle, PTmax, averaged over all events with at least one particle in the transverse region with p T > 0.5 GeV/c, η < η cut. Zero Transverse Charged Particles: If there are no charged particles in the transverse region then Nchg and PTsum are zero and one includes these zeros in the average over all events with at least one particle with p T > 0.5 GeV/c, η < η cut. However, if there are no charged particles in the transverse region then the event is not used in constructing the transverse average p T. Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 15

16 PYTHIA Defaults MPI constant probability PYTHIA default parameters Parameter MSTP(81) 1 MSTP(82) 1 PARP(81) 1.4 PARP(82) PARP(89) 1,000 1,000 1,000 PARP(90) PARP(67) "Transverse" Charged Density scattering "Transverse" Charged Particle Density: dn/dηdφ CDF Data data uncorrected theory corrected Pythia (default) MSTP(82)=1 PARP(81) = 1.9 GeV/c PT(charged jet#1) (GeV/c) 1.8 TeV η < PT>0.5 GeV CTEQ3L CTEQ4L CTEQ5L CDF Min-Bias CDF JET20 Plot shows the Transverse charged particle density versus P T (chgjet#1) compared to the QCD hard scattering predictions of PYTHIA (P T (hard) > 0) using the default parameters for multiple parton interactions and CTEQ3L, CTEQ4L, and CTEQ5L. Note Change PARP(67) = 4.0 (< 6.138) PARP(67) = (> 6.138) Default parameters give very poor description of the underlying event! Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 16

17 Parameter MSTP(81) MSTP(82) PARP(81) PARP(82) PARP(89) PARP(90) PARP(67) PYTHIA Defaults MPI constant probability PYTHIA default parameters "Transverse" Charged Density "Transverse" Charged Particle Density: dn/dηdφ CDF Data data uncorrected theory corrected Pythia (default) MSTP(82)=1 PARP(81) = 1.9 GeV/c Remember the underlying event activity depends on both the 1,000 1, TeV η < PT>0.5 GeV 1,000 0 cut-off p T0 and the PDF! PT(charged jet#1) (GeV/c) scattering CTEQ3L CTEQ4L CTEQ5L CDF Min-Bias CDF JET20 Plot shows the Transverse charged particle density versus P T (chgjet#1) compared to the QCD hard scattering predictions of PYTHIA (P T (hard) > 0) using the default parameters for multiple parton interactions and CTEQ3L, CTEQ4L, and CTEQ5L. Note Change PARP(67) = 4.0 (< 6.138) PARP(67) = (> 6.138) Default parameters give very poor description of the underlying event! Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 17

18 Parameter MSTP(81) MSTP(82) PARP(82) PARP(83) PARP(84) PARP(85) PARP(86) PARP(89) PARP(90) PARP(67) TeV 0.25 New PYTHIA default (less initial-state radiation) Run 1 PYTHIA Tune A PYTHIA CTEQ5L Tune B GeV Tune A GeV TeV CDF Default Feburary 25, 2000! "Transverse" Charged Particle Density: dn/dηdφ "Transverse" Charged Density data uncorrected theory corrected CTEQ5L Plot shows the transverse charged particle density versus P T (chgjet#1) compared to the QCD hard scattering predictions of two tuned versions of PYTHIA (CTEQ5L, Set B (PARP(67)=1) and Set A (PARP(67)=4)). Old PYTHIA default (more initial-state radiation) PYTHIA (Set B) PARP(67)=1 PYTHIA (Set A) PARP(67)= PT(charged jet#1) (GeV/c) Run 1 Analysis 1.8 TeV η < PT>0.5 GeV Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 18

19 All use LO α s with Λ = 192 MeV! UE Parameters ISR Parameter PYTHIA 6.2 Tunes Parameter PDF MSTP(81) MSTP(82) PARP(82) PARP(83) PARP(84) PARP(85) PARP(86) PARP(89) PARP(90) PARP(62) PARP(64) PARP(67) MSTP(91) PARP(91) Tune AW CTEQ5L GeV TeV Tune DW CTEQ5L GeV TeV Tune D6 CTEQ6L GeV TeV Uses CTEQ6L Tune A energy dependence! PARP(93) Intrinsic KT Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 19

20 All use LO α s with Λ = 192 MeV! UE Parameters ISR Parameter Intrinsic KT PYTHIA 6.2 Tunes Parameter PDF MSTP(81) MSTP(82) PARP(82) PARP(83) PARP(84) PARP(85) PARP(86) PARP(89) PARP(90) PARP(62) PARP(64) PARP(67) MSTP(91) PARP(91) PARP(93) Tune DWT CTEQ5L GeV TeV Tune D6T CTEQ6L GeV TeV ATLAS CTEQ5L GeV TeV ATLAS energy dependence! Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 20

21 All use LO α s with Λ = 192 MeV! Tune A UE Parameters ISR Parameter Tune D Intrinsic KT PYTHIA 6.2 Tunes Parameter PDF MSTP(81) MSTP(82) PARP(82) PARP(83) Tune D6T CTEQ6L GeV 0.5 PARP(84) 0.5 Tune AW Tune B Tune BW PARP(85) 0.33 PARP(86) PARP(89) PARP(90) PARP(62) PARP(64) PARP(67) PARP(93) Tune DWT CTEQ5L MSTP(91) 1 PARP(91) Tune 2.1 DW GeV TeV TeV ATLAS CTEQ5L GeV TeV Tune D6 5.0 ATLAS energy dependence! Tune D6T Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 21

22 Transverse Charged Particle Density "Transverse" Charged Density RDF LHC Prediction! "Transverse" Charged Particle Density: dn/dηdφ RDF Preliminary generator level Min-Bias 1.96 TeV PY64 Tune S320 PY64 Tune P329 PY64 Tune N PY Tune A Charged Particles ( η <, PT>0.5 GeV/c) "Transverse" Charged Density "Transverse" Charged Particle Density: dn/dηdφ RDF Preliminary generator level PY ATLAS PY Tune A PY64 Tune S320 PY Tune DW Min-Bias 14 TeV Charged Particles ( η <, PT>0.5 GeV/c) PY64 Tune P329 PY Tune DWT PTmax Direction PTmax Direction φ φ Toward Toward Transverse Transverse Tevatron LHC Transverse Transverse Away Away Shows the associated charged particle density in the transverse region as a function of PTmax for charged particles (p T > 0.5 GeV/c, η < 1, not including PTmax) for min-bias events at 1.96 TeV from PYTHIA Tune A, Tune S320, Tune N324, and Tune P329 at the particle level (i.e. generator level). Extrapolations of PYTHIA Tune A, Tune DW, Tune DWT, Tune S320, Tune P329, and pyatlas to the LHC. Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 22

23 Transverse Charged Particle Density "Transverse" Charged Density RDF LHC Prediction! "Transverse" Charged Particle Density: dn/dηdφ RDF Preliminary generator level "Transverse" Charged Density "Transverse" Charged Particle Density: dn/dηdφ PY Tune A 0.8 PY64 Tune P329 PY64 Tune N324 PY Tune A PY64 Tune S320 PY64 Tune S320 PY Tune DW Min-Bias Min-Bias Charged Particles If the ( η <, LHC PT>0.5 GeV/c) data are 14 not TeV in 1.96 TeV Charged Particles ( η <, PT>0.5 GeV/c) the 14range shown 20 0here then PTmax Direction Transverse Toward Away PY64 Tune P329 φ Transverse Tevatron RDF Preliminary generator level we learn new (QCD) physics! Rick Field October 13, 2009 LHC PTmax Direction Transverse Toward Away PY ATLAS φ Transverse PY Tune DWT Shows the associated charged particle density in the transverse region as a function of PTmax for charged particles (p T > 0.5 GeV/c, η < 1, not including PTmax) for min-bias events at 1.96 TeV from PYTHIA Tune A, Tune S320, Tune N324, and Tune P329 at the particle level (i.e. generator level). Extrapolations of PYTHIA Tune A, Tune DW, Tune DWT, Tune S320, Tune P329, and pyatlas to the LHC. Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 23

24 Transverse Charged Particle Density "Transverse" Charged Density "Transverse" Charged Particle Density: dn/dηdφ RDF Preliminary py Tune DW generator level Min-Bias TeV 1.96 TeV 0.9 TeV 0.2 TeV 10 TeV 7 TeV Charged Particles ( η <, PT>0.5 GeV/c) "Transverse" Charged Density "Transverse" Charged Particle Density: dn/dηdφ RDF Preliminary py Tune DW generator level Tevatron RHIC LHC Center-of-Mass Energy (TeV) LHC10 PTmax = 5.25 GeV/c LHC14 Charged Particles ( η <, PT>0.5 GeV/c) RHIC PTmax Direction φ Toward Transverse Transverse 0.2 TeV 1.96 TeV (UE increase ~2.7 times) Tevatron PTmax Direction φ Toward Transverse Transverse 1.96 TeV 14 TeV (UE increase ~1.9 times) LHC PTmax Direction φ Toward Transverse Transverse Away Away Away Shows the associated charged particle density in the transverse region as a function of PTmax for charged particles (p T > 0.5 GeV/c, η < 1, not including PTmax) for min-bias events at 0.2 TeV, 0.9 TeV, 1.96 TeV, 7 TeV, 10 TeV, 14 TeV predicted by PYTHIA Tune DW at the Linear scale! particle level (i.e. generator level). Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 24

25 Transverse Charged Particle Density "Transverse" Charged Density "Transverse" Charged Particle Density: dn/dηdφ RDF Preliminary py Tune DW generator level Min-Bias Charged Particles ( η <, PT>0.5 GeV/c) TeV 1.96 TeV 0.9 TeV 0.2 TeV 10 TeV 7 TeV "Transverse" Charged Density "Transverse" Charged Particle Density: dn/dηdφ RDF Preliminary py Tune DW generator level RHIC Tevatron Charged Particles ( η <, PT>0.5 GeV/c) Center-of-Mass Energy (TeV) LHC14 LHC10 LHC7 PTmax = 5.25 GeV/c LHC7 PTmax Direction φ Toward Transverse Transverse Away 7 TeV 14 TeV (UE increase ~20%) Linear on a log plot! LHC14 PTmax Direction φ Toward Transverse Transverse Away Shows the associated charged particle density in the transverse region as a function of PTmax for charged particles (p T > 0.5 GeV/c, η < 1, not including PTmax) for min-bias events at 0.2 TeV, 0.9 TeV, 1.96 TeV, 7 TeV, 10 TeV, 14 TeV predicted by PYTHIA Tune DW at the Log scale! particle level (i.e. generator level). Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 25

26 Transverse Charge Density "Transverse" Charged Density "Transverse" Charged Particle Density: dn/dηdφ RDF Preliminary py Tune DW generator level Prediction! factor of 2! TeV Charged Particles ( η <2.0, PT>0.5 GeV/c) Rick Field MB&UE@CMS Workshop CERN, November 6, 2009 LHC PTmax Direction φ Toward Transverse Transverse Away 7 TeV (UE increase ~ factor of 2) ~ ~0.8 LHC 7 TeV PTmax Direction φ Toward Transverse Transverse Away Shows the charged particle density in the transverse region for charged particles (p T > 0.5 GeV/c, η < 2) at and 7 TeV as defined by PTmax from PYTHIA Tune DW and at the particle level (i.e. generator level). Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 26

27 PYTHIA Tune DW Charged Particle Density "Transverse" Charged Particle Density: dn/dηdφ CMS Preliminary data uncorrected pydw + SIM PT(chgjet#1) GeV/c "Transverse" Charged Density "Transverse" Charged Particle Density: dn/dηdφ RDF Preliminary ATLAS corrected data Tune DW generator level PTmax Direction φ 7 TeV Charged Particles ( η <2.5, PT>0.5 GeV/c) CMS preliminary data at and 7 TeV ATLAS preliminary data at and 7 on the transverse charged particle density, TeV on the transverse charged particle dn/dηdφ, as defined by the leading charged density, dn/dηdφ, as defined by the leading particle jet (chgjet#1) for charged particles charged particle (PTmax) for charged particles with p T > 0.5 GeV/c and η < 2. The data are with p T > 0.5 GeV/c and η < 2.5. The data are uncorrected and compared with PYTHIA corrected and compared with PYTHIA Tune Tune DW after detector simulation. DW at the generator level. PT(chgjet#1) Direction Charged Particles ( η <2.0, PT>0.5 GeV/c) φ 7 TeV CMS ATLAS Toward Toward Transverse Transverse Transverse Transverse Away Away Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 27

28 PYTHIA Tune DW Charged Particle Density "Transverse" Charged Particle Density: dn/dηdφ CMS Preliminary data uncorrected pydw + SIM Ratio PT(chgjet#1) GeV/c CMS preliminary data at and 7 TeV on the transverse charged particle density, dn/dηdφ, as defined by the leading charged particle jet (chgjet#1) for charged particles with p T > 0.5 GeV/c and η < 2. The data are uncorrected and compared with PYTHIA Tune DW after detector simulation. PT(chgjet#1) Direction Toward Charged Particles ( η <2.0, PT>0.5 GeV/c) φ 7 TeV CMS Ratio: 7 TeV/ "Transverse" Charged Particle Density: dn/dηdφ CMS Preliminary data uncorrected pydw + SIM 7 TeV / Charged Particles ( η <2.0, PT>0.5 GeV/c) PT(chgjet#1) (GeV/c) CMS Ratio of CMS preliminary data at and 7 TeV on the transverse charged particle density, dn/dηdφ, as defined by the leading charged particle jet (chgjet#1) for charged particles with p T > 0.5 GeV/c and η < 2. The data are uncorrected and compared with PYTHIA Tune DW after PT(chgjet#1) Direction detector simulation. Toward φ Transverse Transverse Transverse Transverse Away Away Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 28

29 PYTHIA Tune Z1 All my previous tunes (A, DW, DWT, D6, D6T, CW, X1, and X2) were PYTHIA 6.4 tunes using the old Q 2 -ordered parton showers and the old MPI model (really 6.2 tunes)! I believe that it is time to move to PYTHIA 6.4 (p T -ordered parton showers and new MPI model)! Tune Z1: I started with the parameters of ATLAS Tune AMBT1, but I changed LO* to CTEQ5L and I varied PARP(82) and PARP(90) to get a very good fit of the CMS UE data at 900 GeV and 7 TeV. The ATLAS Tune AMBT1 was designed to fit the inelastic data for Nchg 6 and to fit the PTmax UE data with PTmax > 10 GeV/c. Tune AMBT1 is primarily a min-bias tune, while Tune Z1 is a UE tune! PARP(90) Color Connections Underlying Event Outgoing Parton Final-State Radiation PARP(82) Diffraction Outgoing Parton PT(hard) UE&MB@CMS Initial-State Radiation Underlying Event Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 29

30 PYTHIA Tune Z1 Parameter Tune Z1 (R. Field CMS) Tune AMBT1 (ATLAS) Parameters not shown are the PYTHIA 6.4 defaults! Parton Distribution Function PARP(82) MPI Cut-off PARP(89) Reference energy, E0 CTEQ5L LO* PARP(90) MPI Energy Extrapolation PARP(77) CR Suppression PARP(78) CR Strength PARP(80) Probability colored parton from BBR PARP(83) Matter fraction in core PARP(84) Core of matter overlap PARP(62) ISR Cut-off PARP(93) primordial kt-max 1 1 MSTP(81) MPI, ISR, FSR, BBR model MSTP(82) Double gaussion matter distribution 4 4 MSTP(91) Gaussian primordial kt 1 1 MSTP(95) strategy for color reconnection 6 6 Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 30

31 CMS UE Data Charged Particle Density "Transverse" Charged Particle Density: dn/dηdφ CMS Preliminary data uncorrected Theory + SIM D6T PT(chgjet#1) GeV/c CMS preliminary data at and 7 TeV on the transverse charged particle density, dn/dηdφ, as defined by the leading charged particle jet (chgjet#1) for charged particles with p T > 0.5 GeV/c and η < 2.0. The data are uncorrected and compared with PYTHIA Tune DW and D6T after detector simulation (SIM). Color reconnection suppression. Color reconnection strength. DW 7 TeV CMS Tune Z1 (CTEQ5L) PARP(82) = PARP(90) = PARP(77) = 16 PARP(78) = Charged Particle Density "Transverse" Charged Particle Density: dn/dηdφ CMS Preliminary data uncorrected pyz1 + SIM Tune Z1 Charged Particles ( η <2.0, PT>0.5 GeV/c) PT(chgjet#1) GeV/c 7 TeV CMS CMS preliminary data at and 7 TeV on the transverse charged particle density, dn/dηdφ, as defined by the leading charged particle jet (chgjet#1) for charged particles with p T > 0.5 GeV/c and η < 2.0. The data are uncorrected and compared with PYTHIA Tune Z1 after detector simulation (SIM). Tune Z1 is a PYTHIA 6.4 using p T -ordered parton showers and the new MPI model! Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 31

32 PYTHIA 6.2 Tunes Parameter Tune AW Tune DW Tune D6 PDF CTEQ5L CTEQ5L CTEQ6L UE Parameters MSTP(81) MSTP(82) PARP(82) GeV GeV GeV Uses CTEQ6L PARP(83) PARP(84) PARP(85) 0.9 ISR Parameter PARP(86) PARP(89) PARP(90) PARP(62) TeV TeV TeV Reduce PARP(82) by factor of 1.8/1.9 = 0.95 Everything else the same! PARP(64) PARP(67) MSTP(91) PARP(91) Tune A energy dependence! (not the default) PARP(93) Intrinsic KT CMS: We wanted a CTEQ6L version of Tune Z1 in a hurry! Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 32

33 PYTHIA Tune Z2 My guess! Parameter Tune Z1 (R. Field CMS) Tune Z2 (R. Field CMS) Parton Distribution Function CTEQ5L CTEQ6L PARP(82) MPI Cut-off PARP(89) Reference energy, E PARP(90) MPI Energy Extrapolation PARP(77) CR Suppression PARP(78) CR Strength PARP(80) Probability colored parton from BBR Reduce PARP(82) by factor of 1.83/1.93 = 0.95 Everything else the same! PARP(83) Matter fraction in core PARP(84) Core of matter overlap PARP(62) ISR Cut-off PARP(93) primordial kt-max 1 1 MSTP(81) MPI, ISR, FSR, BBR model MSTP(82) Double gaussion matter distribution 4 4 MSTP(91) Gaussian primordial kt 1 1 MSTP(95) strategy for color reconnection 6 6 Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 33

34 PYTHIA Tune Z2 My guess! Parameter Tune Z1 (R. Field CMS) Tune Z2 (R. Field CMS) Parton Distribution Function CTEQ5L CTEQ6L PARP(82) MPI Cut-off PARP(89) Reference energy, E PARP(90) MPI Energy Extrapolation PARP(77) CR Suppression PARP(78) CR Strength PARP(80) Probability colored parton from BBR Reduce PARP(82) by factor of 1.83/1.93 = 0.95 Everything else the same! PARP(83) Matter fraction in core PARP(84) Core of matter overlap PARP(62) ISR Cut-off PARP(93) primordial kt-max PARP(90) same For Z1 and Z2! MSTP(81) MPI, ISR, FSR, BBR model MSTP(82) Double gaussion matter distribution 4 4 MSTP(91) Gaussian primordial kt 1 1 MSTP(95) strategy for color reconnection 6 6 Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 34

35 PYTHIA 6.4 Tune Z2 Charged Particle Density "Transverse" Charged Particle Density: dn/dηdφ CMS Preliminary data corrected Tune Z1 generator level PT(chgjet#1) GeV/c 7 TeV CMS Tune Z1 Charged Particles ( η <2.0, PT>0.5 GeV/c) CMS preliminary data at and 7 TeV on the transverse charged particle density, dn/dηdφ, as defined by the leading charged particle jet (chgjet#1) for charged particles with p T > 0.5 GeV/c and η < 2.0. The data are corrected and compared with PYTHIA Tune Z1 at the generator level. PTsum Density (GeV/c) "Transverse" Charged PTsum Density: dpt/dηdφ CMS Preliminary data corrected Tune Z1 generator level 7 TeV CMS Charged Particles ( η <2.0, PT>0.5 GeV/c) PT(chgjet#1) GeV/c Tune Z1 CMS preliminary data at and 7 TeV on the transverse charged PTsum density, dpt/dηdφ, as defined by the leading charged particle jet (chgjet#1) for charged particles with p T > 0.5 GeV/c and η < 2.0. The data are corrected and compared with PYTHIA Tune Z1 at the generator level. CMS corrected data! Very nice agreement! CMS corrected data! Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 35

36 PYTHIA 6.4 Tune Z2 Charged Particle Density "Transverse" Charged Particle Density: dn/dηdφ CMS Preliminary data corrected Tune Z2 generator level 7 TeV Tune Z2 Charged Particles ( η <2.0, PT>0.5 GeV/c) PTsum Density (GeV/c) "Transverse" Charged PTsum Density: dpt/dηdφ CMS Preliminary data corrected Tune Z2 generator level 7 TeV Tune Z2 Charged Particles ( η <2.0, PT>0.5 GeV/c) PT(chgjet#1) GeV/c PT(chgjet#1) GeV/c CMS preliminary data at and 7 TeV on the transverse charged particle density, dn/dηdφ, as defined by the leading charged particle jet (chgjet#1) for charged particles with p T > 0.5 GeV/c and η < 2.0. The data are corrected and compared with PYTHIA Tune Z2 at the generator level. CMS preliminary data at and 7 TeV on the transverse charged PTsum density, dpt/dηdφ, as defined by the leading charged particle jet (chgjet#1) for charged particles with p T > 0.5 GeV/c and η < 2.0. The data are corrected and compared with PYTHIA Tune Z2 at the generator level. CMS corrected data! Not good! Bad energy dependence! CMS corrected data! Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 36

37 PYTHIA Tune Z2* PARP(82) MPI Cut-off Parameter Parton Distribution Function PARP(89) Reference energy, E0 PARP(90) MPI Energy Extrapolation PARP(77) CR Suppression PARP(78) CR Strength A. Knutsson & M. Zakaria PARP(80) Probability colored parton from using BBR Rivet & the Professor 0.1 PARP(83) Matter fraction in core Tune Z1 (R. Field CMS) CTEQ5L Tune Z2 (R. Field CMS) CTEQ6L Tune Z2* (CMS) CTEQ6L PARP(84) Core of matter overlap PARP(62) ISR Cut-off PARP(93) primordial kt-max MSTP(81) MPI, ISR, FSR, BBR model MSTP(82) Double gaussion matter distribution MSTP(91) Gaussian primordial kt MSTP(95) strategy for color reconnection Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 37

38 MB&UE Working Group MB & UE Common Plots CMS The LPCC MB&UE Working Group has suggested several MB&UE Common Plots the all the LHC groups can produce and compare with each other. ATLAS Outgoing Parton PT(hard) Minimum Bias Collisions Initial-State Radiation Underlying Event Underlying Event Outgoing Parton Final-State Radiation Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 38

39 MB Common Plots 7 TeV Direct charged particles (including leptons) corrected to the particle level with no corrections for SD or DD. Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 39

40 CMS Common Plots Observable MB1: dn chg /dη N chg 1 η < 0.8 p T > 0.5 Gev/c & GeV/c MB2: dn chg /dp T N chg 1 η < 0.8 MB3: Multiplicity Distribution η < 0.8 p T > 0.5 GeV/c & GeV/c MB4: <p T > versus Nchg η < 0.8 p T > 0.5 GeV/c & GeV/c UE1: Transverse Nchg & PTsum as defined by the leading charged particle, PTmax η < 0.8 p T > 0.5 GeV/c & GeV/c Done QCD Stalled Stalled In progress (Antwerp) Done FSQ TeV Done QCD Stalled Stalled In progress (Antwerp) Done FSQ Direct charged particles (including leptons) corrected to the particle level with no corrections for SD or DD. Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 40

41 CMS Common Plots Observable MB1: dn chg /dη N chg 1 η < 0.8 p T > 0.5 Gev/c & GeV/c Done QCD TeV Done QCD MB2: dn chg /dp T N chg 1 η < 0.8 MB3: Multiplicity Distribution η < 0.8 p T > 0.5 GeV/c & GeV/c MB4: <p T > versus Nchg η < 0.8 p T > 0.5 GeV/c & GeV/c UE1: Transverse Nchg & PTsum as defined by the leading charged particle, PTmax η < 0.8 p T > 0.5 GeV/c & GeV/c Stalled Note that all the common plots require at least one charged Stalled particle with p T > 0.5 GeV/c and η < 0.8! In progress This done so that the plots are (Antwerp) less sensitive to SD and DD. Done FSQ Direct charged particles (including leptons) corrected to the particle level with no corrections for SD or DD. Stalled Stalled In progress (Antwerp) Done FSQ Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 41

42 Tevatron Energy Scan 1 mile CDF Anti 1.96 TeV Anti Just before the shutdown of the Tevatron CDF has collected more than 10M min-bias events at several center-of-mass energies! 300 GeV 12.1M MB Events 54.3M MB Events Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 42

43 Tevatron Energy Scan 1 mile CDF Anti Special thanks to Mike Albrow, Michelangelo Mangano, Rob Roser, TeV and everyone that helped make this happen! Anti Just before the shutdown of the Tevatron CDF has collected more than 10M min-bias events at several center-of-mass energies! 300 GeV 12.1M MB Events 54.3M MB Events Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 43

44 CDF Common Plots Observable 300 GeV 1.96 TeV MB1: dn chg /dη N chg 1 η < 0.8 p T > 0.5 Gev/c & GeV/c Done Done Done MB2: dn chg /dp T N chg 1 η < 0.8 In progress In progress In progress MB3: Multiplicity Distribution η < 0.8 p T > 0.5 GeV/c & GeV/c In progress In progress In progress MB4: <p T > versus Nchg η < 0.8 p T > 0.5 GeV/c & GeV/c In progress In progress In progress UE1: Transverse Nchg & PTsum as defined by the leading charged particle, PTmax η < 0.8 p T > 0.5 GeV/c & GeV/c p T > 0.5 GeV/c Done p T > 0.5 GeV/c Done p T > 0.5 GeV/c Done Direct charged particles (including leptons) corrected to the particle level with no corrections for SD or DD. R. Field, C. Group, and D. Wilson. Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 44

45 CDF Common Plots Observable 300 GeV 1.96 TeV MB1: dn chg /dη N chg 1 η < 0.8 p T > 0.5 Gev/c & GeV/c Done Done Done MB2: dn chg /dp T N chg 1 η < 0.8 MB3: Multiplicity Distribution η < 0.8 p T > 0.5 GeV/c & GeV/c MB4: <p T > versus Nchg η < 0.8 p T > 0.5 GeV/c & GeV/c UE1: Transverse Nchg & PTsum as defined by the leading charged particle, PTmax η < 0.8 p T > 0.5 GeV/c & GeV/c In progress In progress p T > 0.5 GeV/c Done In progress Special thanks In to progress Mary Convery, In progress Ray Culbertson, and Jonathan Lewis for their help with the datasets! In progress p T > 0.5 GeV/c Done Direct charged particles (including leptons) corrected to the particle level with no corrections for SD or DD. In progress In progress In progress p T > 0.5 GeV/c Done R. Field, C. Group, and D. Wilson. Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 45

46 MB Common Plots Direct charged particles (including leptons) corrected to the particle level with no corrections for SD or DD. Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 46

47 MB Common Plots Average Number RDF Preliminary CMS Pseudo-Rapidity Distribution: dn/dη ATLAS CDF ALICE Pseudo-Rapidity At least 1 charged particle Average Number RDF Preliminary CMS Pseudo-Rapidity Distribution: dn/dη ALICE CDF ATLAS At least 1 charged particle Charged Particles ( η <0.8, PT> GeV/c) Pseudo-Rapidity Direct charged particles (including leptons) corrected to the particle level with no corrections for SD or DD. Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 47

48 New CDF MB Data Pseudo-Rapidity Distribution: dn/dη TeV Average Number GeV At least 1 charged particle Pseudo-Rapidity New Corrected CDF data at 300 GeV,, and 1.96 TeV on on pseudo-rapidity distribution of charged particles, dn/dη, with p T > 0.5 GeV/c. Events are required to have at least one charged particle with η < 0.8 and p T > 0.5 GeV/c. The data are corrected to the particle level with errors that include both the statistical error and the systematic uncertainty. Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 48

49 New CDF MB Data Average Number RDF Pseudo-Rapidity Distribution: dn/dη 300 GeV 1.96 TeV CDF At least 1 charged particle CMS Pseudo-Rapidity New Corrected CDF data at 300 GeV,, and 1.96 TeV on on pseudo-rapidity distribution of charged particles, dn/dη, with p T > 0.5 GeV/c. Events are required to have at least one charged particle with η < 0.8 and p T > 0.5 GeV/c. The data are corrected to the particle level with errors that include both the statistical error and the systematic uncertainty. Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 49

50 Average Number New CDF MB Data RDF RDF Corrected Data CDF 2.0 CDF 2 CDF GeV 300 GeV CMS Pseudo-Rapidity Distribution: dn/dη 1.96 TeV Tune Z TeV CDF Pseudo-Rapidity 7 TeV At least 1 charged particle CMS New Corrected CDF data at 300 GeV,, and 1.96 TeV on on pseudo-rapidity distribution of charged particles, dn/dη, with p T > 0.5 GeV/c. Events are required to have at least one charged particle with η < 0.8 and p T > 0.5 GeV/c. The data are corrected to the particle level with errors that include both the statistical error and the systematic uncertainty. Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 50

51 New CDF MB Data Pseudo-Rapidity Distribution: dn/dη TeV Average Number 300 GeV At least 1 charged particle Charged Particles ( η <0.8, PT> GeV/c) Pseudo-Rapidity New Corrected CDF data at 300 GeV,, and 1.96 TeV on on pseudo-rapidity distribution of charged particles, dn/dη, with p T > GeV/c. Events are required to have at least one charged particle with η < 0.8 and p T > GeV/c. The data are corrected to the particle level with errors that include both the statistical error and the systematic uncertainty. Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 51

52 New CDF MB Data Average Number Pseudo-Rapidity Distribution: dn/dη RDF CDF 1.96 TeV 1.1 CMS GeV At least At 1 least charged 1 charged particle particle Charged Charged Particles Particles ( η <0.8, ( η <0.8, PT> PT> GeV/c) GeV/c) Pseudo-Rapidity New Corrected CDF data at 300 GeV,, and 1.96 TeV on on pseudo-rapidity distribution of charged particles, dn/dη, with p T > GeV/c. Events are required to have at least one charged particle with η < 0.8 and p T > GeV/c. The data are corrected to the particle level with errors that include both the statistical error and the systematic uncertainty. Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 52

53 Average Number New CDF MB Data RDF Preliminary CDF CDF Corrected Corrected Data Data Pseudo-Rapidity Distribution: dn/dη 1.96 TeV CMS CDF 1.96 TeV 0.9 CDF 300 GeV At least At 1 least 1 charged 300 GeV At least 1 charged particle particle Tune Z1 Charged Charged Particles Particles ( η <0.8, ( η <0.8, PT> PT> GeV/c) GeV/c) Pseudo-Rapidity New Corrected CDF data at 300 GeV,, and 1.96 TeV on on pseudo-rapidity distribution of charged particles, dn/dη, with p T > GeV/c. Events are required to have at least one charged particle with η < 0.8 and p T > GeV/c. The data are corrected to the particle level with errors that include both the statistical error and the systematic uncertainty. 7 TeV CMS Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 53

54 Energy Dependence dn/d /dη Pseudo-Rapidity Distribution: dn/dη(η=0) RDF Preliminary CDF black dots CMS red squares Average Number Center-of-Mass Energy (GeV) At least 1 charged particle CMS data at 7 TeV and and CDF data at 1.96 TeV,, and 300 GeV on dn/dη at η = 0 with p T > 0.5 GeV/c as a function of the center-of-mass energy. Events are required to have at least one charged particle with η < 0.8 and p T > 0.5 GeV/c. The data are corrected to the particle level with errors that include both the statistical error and the systematic uncertainty. Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 54

55 Average Number Energy Dependence dn/d /dη Pseudo-Rapidity Distribution: dn/dη(η=0) RDF Preliminary Tune Z1 CDF black dots CMS red squares Center-of-Mass Energy (GeV) At least 1 charged particle CMS data at 7 TeV and and CDF data at 1.96 TeV,, and 300 GeV on dn/dη at η = 0 with p T > 0.5 GeV/c as a function of the center-of-mass energy. Events are required to have at least one charged particle with η < 0.8 and p T > 0.5 GeV/c. The data are corrected to the particle level with errors that include both the statistical error and the systematic uncertainty. Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 55

56 Energy Dependence dn/d /dη Average Number Pseudo-Rapidity Distribution: dn/dη(η=0) RDF Preliminary Tune Z1 CDF black dots CMS red squares Center-of-Mass Energy (GeV) At least 1 charged particle Charged Particles ( η <0.8, PT> GeV/c) CMS data at 7 TeV and and CDF data at 1.96 TeV,, and 300 GeV on dn/dη at η = 0 with p T > GeV/c as a function of the center-of-mass energy. Events are required to have at least one charged particle with η < 0.8 and p T > GeV/c. The data are corrected to the particle level with errors that include both the statistical error and the systematic uncertainty. Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 56

57 Overall Charged Particle Density Pseudo-Rapidity Distribution: dn/dη Overall Charged Particle Density TeV 0.50 RDF Preliminary CMS red squares CDF blue dots Average Number GeV Charged Density At least 1 charged particle Pseudo-Rapidity At least 1 charged particle Center-of-Mass Energy (TeV) Corrected CDF data on the pseudo-rapidity Corrected CDF and CMS data overall density of distribution, dn/dη, for charged with p T > 0.5 charged particles with p T > 0.5 GeV/c and η < GeV/c and η < 0.8 for events with at least one 0.8 for events with at least one charged particle charged particle with p T > 0.5 GeV/c and η < with p T > 0.5 GeV/c and η < 0.8 plotted versus 0.8. the center-of-mass energy (log scale). The data are corrected to the particle level with errors Ecm Nchg error NchgDen error that include both the statistical error and the 300 GeV systematic uncertainty TeV N chg = dn dη dη Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 57

58 New UE Observables transmax and transmin Charged Particle Density: Number of charged particles (p T > 0.5 GeV/c, η < 0.8) in the the maximum (minimum) of the two transverse regions as defined by the leading charged particle, PTmax, divided by the area in η-φ space, 2η cut 2π/6, averaged over all events with at least one particle with p T > 0.5 GeV/c, η < η cut. PTmax Direction φ Toward TransMAX TransMIN transmax and transmin Charged PTsum Density: Scalar p T sum of charged particles (p T > 0.5 GeV/c, η < 0.8) in the the maximum (minimum) of the two transverse regions as defined by the leading charged particle, PTmax, divided by the area in η-φ space, 2η cut 2π/6, averaged over all events with at least one particle with p T > 0.5 GeV/c, η < η cut. Away Note: The overall transverse density is equal to the average of the transmax and TransMIN densities. The TransDIF Density is the transmax Density minus the transmin Density Transverse Density = transave Density = ( transmax Density + transmin Density)/2 TransDIF Density = transmax Density - transmin Density η cut = 0.8 Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 58

59 transmin & transdif The toward region contains the leading jet, while the away region, on the average, contains the away-side jet. The transverse region is perpendicular to the plane of the hard 2-to-2 scattering and is very sensitive to the underlying event. For events with large initial or final-state radiation the transmax region defined contains the third jet while both the transmax and transmin regions receive contributions from the MPI and beam-beam remnants. Thus, the transmin region is very sensitive to the multiple parton interactions (MPI) and beam-beam remnants (BBR), while the transmax minus the transmin (i.e. transdif ) is very sensitive to initial-state radiation (ISR) and final-state radiation (FSR). Jet #3 PTmax Direction TransMAX Toward Away Toward-Side Jet φ TransMIN TransMIN density more sensitive to MPI & BBR. Away-Side Jet TransDIF density more sensitive to ISR & FSR. 0 TransDIF 2 TransAVE TransDIF = TransAVE if TransMIX = 3 TransMIN Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 59

60 PTmax UE Data CDF PTmax UE Analysis: transmax, transmin, transave, and transdif charged particle and PTsum densities (p T > 0.5 GeV/c, η < 0.8) in proton-antiproton collisions at 300 GeV,, and 1.96 TeV (R. Field analysis). CMS PTmax UE Analysis: transmax, transmin, transave, and transdif charged particle and PTsum densities (p T > 0.5 GeV/c, η < 0.8) in proton-proton collisions at and 7 TeV (M. Zakaria analysis). The transmax, transmin, and transdif are not yet approved so I can only show transave which is approved. PTmax Direction φ Toward TransMAX TransMIN Away CMS UE Tunes: PYTHIA 6.4 Tune Z1 (CTEQ5L) and PYTHIA 6.4 Tune Z2* (CTEQ6L). Both were tuned to the CMS leading chgjet transave UE data at and 7 TeV. PYTHIA 8: Some comparisons with PYTHIA 8 Tune 4C (CTEQ6L), Richard Corke and Torbjörn Sjöstrand, JHEP 1103:032 (2011), arxiv: Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 60

61 UE Common Plots "Transverse" Charged Density "Transverse" Charged Particle Density: dn/dηdφ RDF Preliminary corrected data ATLAS (solid blue) ALICE (open black) 7 TeV Charged Particles ( η < 0.8, PT > 0.5 GeV/c) PTsum Density (GeV/c) "Transverse" Charged PTsum Density: dpt/dηdφ RDF Preliminary corrected data ATLAS (solid blue) ALICE (open black) 7 TeV Charged Particles ( η < 0.8, PT > 0.5 GeV/c) "Transverse" Charged Density "Transverse" Charged Particle Density: dn/dηdφ RDF Preliminary corrected data ATLAS (solid blue) ALICE (open black) Charged Particles ( η < 0.8, PT > 0.5 GeV/c) PTsum Density (GeV/c) "Transverse" Charged PTsum Density: dpt/dηdφ RDF Preliminary corrected data ATLAS (solid blue) ALICE (open black) Charged Particles ( η < 0.8, PT > 0.5 GeV/c) Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 61

62 UE Common Plots "Transverse" Charged Density "Transverse" Charged Density Density "Transverse" Charged Particle Density: dn/dηdφ RDF RDF Preliminary corrected corrected data data CMS (solid red) TeV ATLAS (solid blue) 7 TeV ATLAS (solid blue) ALICE ALICE (open (open black) black) Charged Charged Particles Particles ( η ( η < < 0.8, 0.8, PT PT > > GeV/c) GeV/c) PTmax PTmax (GeV/c) (GeV/c) "Transverse" Charged Particle Density: dn/dηdφ "Transverse" Charged Particle Density: dn/dηdφ RDF Preliminary RDF Preliminary corrected data corrected data CMS (solid red) ATLAS (solid blue) ATLAS (solid blue) ALICE (open black) Charged Particles ( η < 0.8, PT > 0.5 GeV/c) ALICE (open black) Charged Particles ( η < 0.8, PT > 0.5 GeV/c) PTsum Density (GeV/c) PTsum Density (GeV/c) PTsum Density (GeV/c) PTsum Density (GeV/c) "Transverse" Charged PTsum Density: dpt/dηdφ RDF RDF Preliminary corrected data data TeV TeV CMS (solid red) ATLAS (solid (solid blue) blue) ALICE (open black) Charged Particles ( η ( η < 0.8, < 0.8, PT PT > 0.5 > 0.5 ALICE (open black) GeV/c) "Transverse" Charged PTsum Density: dpt/dηdφ RDF RDF Preliminary corrected corrected data data CMS (solid red) ATLAS (solid blue) ATLAS (solid blue) ALICE Charged Particles ( η < 0.8, PT > 0.5 GeV/c) ALICE (open (open black) black) Charged Particles ( η < 0.8, PT > 0.5 GeV/c) PTmax (GeV/c) Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 62

63 UE Common Plots "Transverse" Charged Density "Transverse" Charged Density "Transverse" Charged Particle Density: dn/dηdφ 1.5 RDF Preliminary corrected data data Tune Z1 generator level 0.5 CMS (solid red) 7 TeV ATLAS (solid blue) ALICE (open black) Charged Particles ( η < 0.8, PT PT > GeV/c) "Transverse" Charged Particle Density: dn/dηdφ RDF RDF Preliminary corrected data corrected data Tune Z1 generator level CMS (solid red) red) ATLAS (solid blue) ( η 0.8, PT 0.5 ALICE (open black) Charged Particles ( η ( η < 0.8, 0.8, PT PT > GeV/c) PTsum Density (GeV/c) PTsum Density (GeV/c) PTsum Density (GeV/c) "Transverse" Charged PTsum Density: dpt/dηdφ RDF RDF Preliminary corrected data data Tune Z1 generator level TeV CMS (solid red) ATLAS (solid blue) ( η < 0.8, PT > 0.5 ALICE (open black) Charged Particles ( η < 0.8, PT > 0.5 GeV/c) "Transverse" Charged PTsum Density: dpt/dηdφ 0.8 RDF RDF Preliminary corrected data data Tune Z1 generator level CMS (solid red) ATLAS (solid blue) ( η PT 0.5 ALICE (open black) Charged Particles ( η < 0.8, PT > 0.5 GeV/c) Rick Field Florida/CDF/CMS Page 63

51 st Cracow School of Theoretical Physics The Soft Side of the LHC Min-Bias and the Underlying Event at the LHC Rick Field University of Florida

51 st Cracow School of Theoretical Physics The Soft Side of the LHC Min-Bias and the Underlying Event at the LHC Rick Field University of Florida 5 st Cracow School of Theoretical Physics The Soft Side of the LHC Min-Bias and the Underlying Event at the LHC Rick Field University of Florida Lecture : Outline Review: The CDF Tevatron underlying event

More information

University of Glasgow Tevatron Energy Scan: Findings & Surprises

University of Glasgow Tevatron Energy Scan: Findings & Surprises Outline of Talk University of Glasgow Tevatron Energy Scan: Findings & Surprises Rick Field University of Florida Simulating hadron-hadron collisions: The early days of Feynman-Field Phenomenology. The

More information

Toward an Understanding of Hadron-Hadron. Collisions From Feynman-Field to the LHC

Toward an Understanding of Hadron-Hadron. Collisions From Feynman-Field to the LHC Toward an Understanding of Hadron-Hadron Collisions From Feynman-Field to the LHC Rick Field University of Florida Outline of Talk The old days of Feynman-Field Phenomenology. XXIèmes Rencontres de Blois

More information

HEP Seminar. Studying the Energy Dependence of the Underlying Event at the Tevatron and the LHC Rick Field University of Florida.

HEP Seminar. Studying the Energy Dependence of the Underlying Event at the Tevatron and the LHC Rick Field University of Florida. Studying the Energy Dependence of the Underlying Event at the Tevatron and the LHC Rick Field University of Florida HEP Seminar Outline Early studies the underlying event (UE) at CDF and PYTHIA Tune A.

More information

The LHC Physics Environment

The LHC Physics Environment The LHC Physics Environment Talk : What We Have Learned at the Tevatron Rick Field University of Florida Outline of Talk The old days of Feynman-Field Phenomenology. Review what we learned about minbias,

More information

Minimum Bias at CDF and CMS

Minimum Bias at CDF and CMS Minimum Bias at CDF and CMS Minumum Bias Collisions Proton AntiProton CDF Run 2 CMS Outline of Talk Review the CDF Run 2 minimum bias tune (i.e. PYTHIA Tune A). UE&MB@CMS Show the minimum bias predictions

More information

LHCP QCD at the Tevatron. Rick Field University of Florida (for the CDF & D0 Collaborations) Outline of Talk. with help from Christina Mesropian

LHCP QCD at the Tevatron. Rick Field University of Florida (for the CDF & D0 Collaborations) Outline of Talk. with help from Christina Mesropian with help from Christina Mesropian QCD at the Tevatron Rick Field University of Florida (for the CDF & D0 Collaborations) Outline of Talk D0 Photon + Jet Measurements. CDF W/Z + Upsilon Search. CDF Measurements

More information

PYTHIA 6.2 Tunes for Run II

PYTHIA 6.2 Tunes for Run II PYTHIA 6.2 Tunes for Run II Outline of Talk Min-Bias Collisions! Min-Bias Generators Hadron Hadron! The in Hard Scattering Processes Proton Outgoing Parton PT(hard) Initial-State Radiation AntiProton Outgoing

More information

Collisions Rick s View of Hadron Collisions

Collisions Rick s View of Hadron Collisions st Workshop on Energy Scaling in Hadron-Hadron Collisions Rick s View of Hadron Collisions Rick Field University of Florida Fermilab 2009 Outline of Talk The early days of Feynman-Field Phenomenology.

More information

Using Drell-Yan to Probe the

Using Drell-Yan to Probe the Using Drell-Yan to Probe the Underlying Event in Run 2 at CDF Deepak Kar University of Florida (On behalf of the CDF Collaboration) Experimental Particle Physics Seminar 30 th October 2008 Prologue: We

More information

The Underlying Event in Run II ChgJets versus JetClu Jets

The Underlying Event in Run II ChgJets versus JetClu Jets The Underlying Event in Run II ChgJets versus JetClu Jets Outline of Talk! The evolution of charged particle jets and the underlying event. Study the event topology relative to the leading chgjet and compare

More information

Toward an Understanding of Hadron-Hadron. Collisions From Feynman-Field to the LHC

Toward an Understanding of Hadron-Hadron. Collisions From Feynman-Field to the LHC Rick Field University of Florida Outline of Talk Ricky & Sally. Toward an Understanding of Hadron-Hadron Collisions From Feynman-Field to the LHC The Berkeley Years Rick & Jimmie. The early days of Feynman-Field

More information

Min-Bias Data: Jet Evolution and Event Shapes

Min-Bias Data: Jet Evolution and Event Shapes Min-Bias Data: Jet Evolution and Event Shapes Rick Field and David Stuart July 1, 1999 Abstract The Min-Bias data are used to study the transition between soft and hard collisions. We study this transition

More information

Minimum-Bias and Underlying-Event Physics

Minimum-Bias and Underlying-Event Physics 2008 CTEQ MCnet Summer School on QCD Phenomenology and Monte Carlo Event Generators 8 16 August 2008 Debrecen, Hungary Minimum-Bias and Underlying-Event Physics Torbjörn Sjöstrand Department of Theoretical

More information

Mini-Bias and Underlying Event Studies at CMS

Mini-Bias and Underlying Event Studies at CMS Yuan Chao Department of Physics National Taiwan University 1617 Taipei, TAIWAN 1 Introduction The Tevatron experiments provide us very good information for the quantum chromodynamics (QCD) modelings of

More information

Physics at Hadron Colliders Part II

Physics at Hadron Colliders Part II Physics at Hadron Colliders Part II Marina Cobal Università di Udine 1 The structure of an event One incoming parton from each of the protons enters the hard process, where then a number of outgoing particles

More information

MPI in PYTHIA. 1. Brief overview 2. Color reconnection and the top mass

MPI in PYTHIA. 1. Brief overview 2. Color reconnection and the top mass MPI in PYTHIA 1. Brief overview 2. Color reconnection and the top mass Torbjörn Sjöstrand Department of Astronomy and Theoretical Physics Lund University Sölvegatan 14A, SE-223 62 Lund, Sweden MPI@LHC

More information

QCD Studies at LHC with the Atlas detector

QCD Studies at LHC with the Atlas detector QCD Studies at LHC with the Atlas detector Introduction Sebastian Eckweiler - University of Mainz (on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration) Examples of QCD studies Minimum bias & underlying event Jet-physics

More information

LHC MPI and underlying event results

LHC MPI and underlying event results LHC MPI and underlying event results Marianna Testa (ATLAS) for the ALICE, ATLAS, CMS & LHCb collaborations SM@LHC 2012, Copenhagen, 10-13 April 2012 The Underlying Event Everything in hadron collisions

More information

QCD at LHC in pp. Department of Theoretical Physics, Lund University

QCD at LHC in pp. Department of Theoretical Physics, Lund University 3rd Nordic LHC and Beyond Workshop 2-3 February 2009 Lund, Sweden QCD at LHC in pp Torbjörn Sjöstrand Department of Theoretical Physics, Lund University Introduction: the structure of an event Multiple

More information

Tests of Pythia8 Rescattering Model

Tests of Pythia8 Rescattering Model Tests of Pythia8 Rescattering Model arxiv:5.325v [hep-ph] Nov 25 Tasnuva Chowdhury Shahjalal University of Science and Technology Sylhet, Bangladesh. Deepak Kar University of Witwatersrand Johannesburg,

More information

Charged particle multiplicity in proton-proton collisions with ALICE

Charged particle multiplicity in proton-proton collisions with ALICE Charged particle multiplicity in proton-proton collisions with ALICE Introduction on the motivations for a pp physics programme with ALICE A short review on the detectors used to reconstruct charged particle

More information

QCD and jets physics at the LHC with CMS during the first year of data taking. Pavel Demin UCL/FYNU Louvain-la-Neuve

QCD and jets physics at the LHC with CMS during the first year of data taking. Pavel Demin UCL/FYNU Louvain-la-Neuve QCD and jets physics at the LHC with CMS during the first year of data taking Pavel Demin UCL/FYNU Louvain-la-Neuve February 8, 2006 Bon appétit! February 8, 2006 Pavel Demin UCL/FYNU 1 Why this seminar?

More information

MPI in PYTHIA 8. Richard Corke. Department of Astronomy and Theoretical Physics Lund University. September 2010

MPI in PYTHIA 8. Richard Corke. Department of Astronomy and Theoretical Physics Lund University. September 2010 MPI in PYTHIA 8 Richard Corke Department of Astronomy and Theoretical Physics Lund University September Richard Corke (Lund University) MPI@DESY September / 5 Overview MPI in PYTHIA 8 Enhanced screening

More information

Atlas results on diffraction

Atlas results on diffraction Atlas results on diffraction Alessia Bruni INFN Bologna, Italy for the ATLAS collaboration Rencontres du Viet Nam 14th Workshop on Elastic and Diffractive Scattering Qui Nhon, 16/12/2011 EDS 2011 Alessia

More information

QCD at CDF. Régis Lefèvre IFAE Barcelona On behalf of the CDF Collaboration

QCD at CDF. Régis Lefèvre IFAE Barcelona On behalf of the CDF Collaboration QCD at CDF Régis Lefèvre IFAE Barcelona On behalf of the CDF Collaboration Jet Inclusive Cross-Section Underlying event studies Jet Shapes Specific processes _ W+Jets, γ + γ, γ + b/c, b-jet / bb jet Diffraction

More information

Double Parton Scattering in CMS. Deniz SUNAR CERCI Adiyaman University On behalf of the CMS Collaboration Low-x th June 2017 Bari, Italy

Double Parton Scattering in CMS. Deniz SUNAR CERCI Adiyaman University On behalf of the CMS Collaboration Low-x th June 2017 Bari, Italy Double Parton Scattering in CMS Deniz SUNAR CERCI Adiyaman University On behalf of the CMS Collaboration Low-x 2017 17th June 2017 Bari, Italy Outline Introduction to DPS DPS measurements with CMS 2b +

More information

Particle spectra in Minimum Bias events at 13TeV

Particle spectra in Minimum Bias events at 13TeV Particle spectra in Minimum Bias events at TeV Juan Manuel Grados Luyando on behalf of the CMS collaboration Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron, Hamburg MPI@LHC 05 Trieste, Italy Motivation Probe the different

More information

Testing QCD at the LHC and the Implications of HERA DIS 2004

Testing QCD at the LHC and the Implications of HERA DIS 2004 Testing QCD at the LHC and the Implications of HERA DIS 2004 Jon Butterworth Impact of the LHC on QCD Impact of QCD (and HERA data) at the LHC Impact of the LHC on QCD The LHC will have something to say

More information

Charged Particle Multiplicity in pp Collisions at s = 13 TeV

Charged Particle Multiplicity in pp Collisions at s = 13 TeV Charged Particle Multiplicity in pp Collisions at s = 13 TeV Khadeejah ALGhadeer PhD in Engineering, Physics The Workshop of the APS Topical Group on Hadronic Physics Charged Particle Multiplicity IN PP

More information

Underlying Event Measurements at the LHC

Underlying Event Measurements at the LHC 14th EDS Blois Workshop Underlying Event Measurements at the LHC Michael Heinrich for the ATLAS and CMS collaborations INSTITUTE OF EXPERIMENTAL PARTICLE PHYSICS (EKP) PHYSICS FACULTY KIT University of

More information

Recent QCD results from ATLAS

Recent QCD results from ATLAS Recent QCD results from ATLAS PASCOS 2013 Vojtech Pleskot Charles University in Prague 21.11.2013 Introduction / Outline Soft QCD: Underlying event in jet events @7TeV (2010 data) Hard double parton interactions

More information

arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 15 Jan 2019

arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 15 Jan 2019 CMS-CR-8/37 January 7, 9 Top Quark Modelling and Tuning at CMS arxiv:9.559v [hep-ex] 5 Jan 9 Emyr Clement on behalf of the CMS Collaboration University of Bristol Recent measurements dedicated to improving

More information

Lessons from the early LHC data for MC tuning

Lessons from the early LHC data for MC tuning Lessons from the early LHC data for MC tuning P. S k a n d s ( C E R N ) Multiple Partonic Interactions at LHC, November 211, Hamburg A Factorized View 1. Where is the energy going? Note: only linearized

More information

Study of observables for measurement of MPI using Z+jets process

Study of observables for measurement of MPI using Z+jets process Study of observables for measurement of MPI using Z+jets process PANJAB University, IN Email: ramandeep.kumar@cern.ch AKAL University, IN 7th International Workshop on Multiple Parton Interactions at the

More information

Some studies for ALICE

Some studies for ALICE Some studies for ALICE Motivations for a p-p programme in ALICE Special features of the ALICE detector Preliminary studies of Physics Performances of ALICE for the measurement of some global properties

More information

MC ATLAS Stephen Jiggins on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration University College London (UCL)

MC ATLAS Stephen Jiggins on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration University College London (UCL) MC Tuning @ ATLAS Stephen Jiggins on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration University College London (UCL) Contents Contents: 1) Monte Carlo models/event generation 2) Basic Tuning Methodology 3) A2 tune series

More information

Minimum Bias and Underlying Event Studies at CDF

Minimum Bias and Underlying Event Studies at CDF FERMILAB-CONF--531-E Minimum Bias and Underlying Event Studies at CDF INFN, Bologna E-mail: moggi@bo.infn.it Soft, non-perturbative, interactions are poorly understood from the theoretical point of view

More information

Review of LHCb results on MPI, soft QCD and diffraction

Review of LHCb results on MPI, soft QCD and diffraction Review of LHCb results on MPI, soft QCD and diffraction Marcin Kucharczyk on behalf of LHCb collaboration HNI Krakow EDS Blois 2015, Borgo (Corse), 30.06.2015 Outline LHCb - general purpose forward experiment

More information

Underlying Event measurements with first LHC data

Underlying Event measurements with first LHC data Underlying Event measurements with first LHC data Holger Schulz Graduiertenkolleg Masse, Spektrum, Symmetrie Berlin, Septemer 29, 2009 Holger Schulz Underlying Event measurements with first LHC data 1

More information

QCD at Cosmic Energies - VII May 16-20, 2016 Chalkida, Greece Multiparton interactions in Herwig

QCD at Cosmic Energies - VII May 16-20, 2016 Chalkida, Greece Multiparton interactions in Herwig QCD at Cosmic Energies - VII May 6-20, 206 Chalkida, Greece Multiparton interactions in Herwig Frashër Loshaj Table of Contents Introduction 2 MPI and the Underlying event 3 Soft interactions 4 Diffraction

More information

QCD Jet Physics with CMS LHC

QCD Jet Physics with CMS LHC QCD Jet Physics with CMS Detector @ LHC Y.Chao for the CMS Collaboration (National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan) QCD10 (25th annivervary) 2010/06/28-07/03 The Large Hadron Collider Four major experiments

More information

MBR Monte Carlo Simulation in PYTHIA8

MBR Monte Carlo Simulation in PYTHIA8 The Rockefeller University, 10 York Avenue, New York, NY 06, USA E-mail: robert.ciesielski@rockefeller.edu Konstantin Goulianos The Rockefeller University, 10 York Avenue, New York, NY 06, USA E-mail:

More information

Multiple Parton-Parton Interactions: from pp to A-A

Multiple Parton-Parton Interactions: from pp to A-A Multiple Parton-Parton Interactions: from pp to A-A Andreas Morsch CERN QCD Challenges at LHC Taxco, Mexico, Jan 18-22 (2016) Multiple Parton-Parton Interactions Phys. Lett. B 167 (1986) 476 Q i 2 Λ QCD

More information

Charmonium production versus multiplicity in PYTHIA8

Charmonium production versus multiplicity in PYTHIA8 Hard-Soft correlations in hadronic collisions Steffen Weber Charmonium production versus multiplicity in PYTHIA8 Hard-Soft correlations in hadronic collisions Clermont-Ferrand July 23, 2018 Steffen Weber

More information

QCD Jets at the LHC. Leonard Apanasevich University of Illinois at Chicago. on behalf of the ATLAS and CMS collaborations

QCD Jets at the LHC. Leonard Apanasevich University of Illinois at Chicago. on behalf of the ATLAS and CMS collaborations QCD Jets at the LHC Leonard Apanasevich University of Illinois at Chicago on behalf of the ATLAS and CMS collaborations Outline Physics at the LHC Jet Reconstruction and Performance Clustering Algorithms

More information

Forward QCD studies and prospects at the LHC

Forward QCD studies and prospects at the LHC Forward QCD studies and prospects at the LHC Pierre.VanMechelen@ua.ac.be (*) INT Workshop on Perturbative and Non-Perturbative Aspects of QCD at Collider Energies 1 Seattle, September 13-18, 2010 (*) As

More information

Recent results on soft QCD topics from ATLAS

Recent results on soft QCD topics from ATLAS Recent results on soft QCD topics from ATLAS Roman Lysák Institute of Physics, Prague on behalf of the ATLAS collaboration Bormio 2016 Overview Understanding of soft-qcd interactions has direct impact

More information

Jet Energy Calibration. Beate Heinemann University of Liverpool

Jet Energy Calibration. Beate Heinemann University of Liverpool Jet Energy Calibration Beate Heinemann University of Liverpool Fermilab, August 14th 2006 1 Outline Introduction CDF and D0 calorimeters Response corrections Multiple interactions η-dependent corrections

More information

PDFs for Event Generators: Why? Stephen Mrenna CD/CMS Fermilab

PDFs for Event Generators: Why? Stephen Mrenna CD/CMS Fermilab PDFs for Event Generators: Why? Stephen Mrenna CD/CMS Fermilab 1 Understanding Cross Sections @ LHC: many pieces to the puzzle LO, NLO and NNLO calculations K-factors Benchmark cross sections and pdf correlations

More information

Recent forward physics and diffraction results from CMS

Recent forward physics and diffraction results from CMS Recent forward physics and diffraction results from CMS Gabor Veres (CERN) on behalf of the CMS Collaboration ISMD 2015 Conference, Wildbad Kreuth, Germany October 5th, 2015 Outline CMS: forward instrumentation

More information

QCD at hadron colliders

QCD at hadron colliders QCD at hadron colliders Soushi Tsuno Okayama University Outline Introduction: Focus on current (Tevatron) and future (LHC) hadron colliders High pt pqcd phenomena & issues: PDF measurement Jet Physics

More information

Transverse momentum and pseudorapidity distributions with minimum bias events in CMS at the LHC

Transverse momentum and pseudorapidity distributions with minimum bias events in CMS at the LHC Transverse momentum and pseudorapidity distributions with minimum bias events in CMS at the LHC Christof Roland/ MIT For the CMS Collaboration Rencontres de Moriond QCD Session 14 th March, 2010 Moriond

More information

Jet Results in pp and Pb-Pb Collisions at ALICE

Jet Results in pp and Pb-Pb Collisions at ALICE Jet Results in pp and Pb-Pb Collisions at ALICE Oliver Busch for the ALICE Collaboration Motivation Jet reconstruction in ALICE Jets in pp Jets in Pb-Pb Hadron triggered recoil jets Motivation Jets originate

More information

How to Measure Top Quark Mass with CMS Detector??? Ijaz Ahmed Comsats Institute of Information Technology, Islamabad

How to Measure Top Quark Mass with CMS Detector??? Ijaz Ahmed Comsats Institute of Information Technology, Islamabad How to Measure Top Quark Mass with CMS Detector??? Ijaz Ahmed Comsats Institute of Information Technology, Islamabad Outlines o o o o o o o High Pt top basic idea Methods for jets selection Top quark mass

More information

Multiple Interactions, Saturation, and Final States in pp Collisions and DIS

Multiple Interactions, Saturation, and Final States in pp Collisions and DIS Introduction Minimum bias and Underlying event ˇ Multiple Interactions, Saturation, and Final States in pp Collisions and DIS Gösta Gustafson Lund Univ. and Hamburg Univ. Epiphany 2009, Krakow 5-7 Jan.

More information

Results from D0: dijet angular distributions, dijet mass cross section and dijet azimuthal decorrelations

Results from D0: dijet angular distributions, dijet mass cross section and dijet azimuthal decorrelations Results from D: dijet angular distributions, dijet mass cross section and dijet azimuthal decorrelations Zdenek Hubacek Czech Technical University in Prague E-mail: zdenek.hubacek@cern.ch on behalf of

More information

Recent CMS results in the forward region with the CASTOR detector. Sebastian Baur for the CMS Collaboration

Recent CMS results in the forward region with the CASTOR detector. Sebastian Baur for the CMS Collaboration Recent CMS results in the forward region with the CASTOR detector Sebastian Baur for the CMS Collaboration The Forward Instrumentation of CMS 2 Overview CMS has an excellent calorimetric instrumentation

More information

Jets (and photons) at the LHC. J. Huston LPC March 10, 2010

Jets (and photons) at the LHC. J. Huston LPC March 10, 2010 Jets (and photons) at the LHC J. Huston LPC March 10, 2010 More references Understanding cross sections at the LHC we have to understand QCD (at the LHC) PDF s, PDF luminosities and PDF uncertainties LO,

More information

Experiences on QCD Monte Carlo simulations: a user point of view on the inclusive jet cross-section simulations

Experiences on QCD Monte Carlo simulations: a user point of view on the inclusive jet cross-section simulations Journal of Physics: Conference Series Experiences on QCD Monte Carlo simulations: a user point of view on the inclusive jet cross-section simulations Related content - Measurement of multi-jet cross-sections

More information

Hadron Collider Physics, HCP2004, June 14-18

Hadron Collider Physics, HCP2004, June 14-18 ) " % "" ' & % % " ) " % '% &* ' ) * ' + " ' ) ( $#! ' "") ( * " ) +% % )( (. ' + -, '+ % &* ' ) ( 021 % # / ( * *' 5 4* 3 %( '' ' " + +% Hadron Collider Physics, HCP2004, June 14-18 The Run II DØ Detector

More information

Measurement of jet production in association with a Z boson at the LHC & Jet energy correction & calibration at HLT in CMS

Measurement of jet production in association with a Z boson at the LHC & Jet energy correction & calibration at HLT in CMS Measurement of jet production in association with a Z boson at the LHC & Jet energy correction & calibration at HLT in CMS Fengwangdong Zhang Peking University (PKU) & Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB)

More information

Precision QCD at the Tevatron. Markus Wobisch, Fermilab for the CDF and DØ Collaborations

Precision QCD at the Tevatron. Markus Wobisch, Fermilab for the CDF and DØ Collaborations Precision QCD at the Tevatron Markus Wobisch, Fermilab for the CDF and DØ Collaborations Fermilab Tevatron - Run II Chicago Ecm: 1.8 1.96 TeV more Bunches 6 36 Bunch Crossing 3500 396ns CDF Booster Tevatron

More information

Nikos Varelas. University of Illinois at Chicago. CTEQ Collaboration Meeting Northwestern November 20, Nikos Varelas. CTEQ Meeting Nov 20, 2009

Nikos Varelas. University of Illinois at Chicago. CTEQ Collaboration Meeting Northwestern November 20, Nikos Varelas. CTEQ Meeting Nov 20, 2009 QCD Physics at CMS University of Illinois at Chicago CTEQ Collaboration Meeting Northwestern November 0, 009 1 QCD Physics at CMS University of Illinois at Chicago CTEQ Collaboration Meeting Northwestern

More information

Jet Physics with ALICE

Jet Physics with ALICE Jet Physics with ALICE Oliver Busch for the ALICE collaboration Oliver Busch Tsukuba 2014 /03/13 1 Outline introduction results from pp jets in heavy-ion collisions results from Pb-Pb collisions jets in

More information

LHC Heavy Ion Physics Lecture 5: Jets, W, Z, photons

LHC Heavy Ion Physics Lecture 5: Jets, W, Z, photons LHC Heavy Ion Physics Lecture 5: Jets, W, Z, photons HUGS 2015 Bolek Wyslouch Techniques to study the plasma Radiation of hadrons Azimuthal asymmetry and radial expansion Energy loss by quarks, gluons

More information

Introduction to Monte Carlo generators - II

Introduction to Monte Carlo generators - II Introduction to Monte Carlo generators - II (Fully exclusive modeling of high-energy collisions) Andrzej Siódmok CTEQ School - University of Pittsburgh, USA 18-28 July 2017 Thanks to: S. Gieseke, S.Höche,

More information

PoS(IHEP-LHC-2011)008

PoS(IHEP-LHC-2011)008 in pp collisions at the LHC Sergei Lobanov Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Russian Federation E-mail: Sergey.Lobanov@cern.ch Artem Maevskiy M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Russian

More information

Diffractive Dijets and Gap Survival Probability at HERA

Diffractive Dijets and Gap Survival Probability at HERA Diffractive Dijets and Gap Survival Probability at HERA Sebastian Schätzel (CERN) CERN EP Seminar 21 April 2008 HERA Electron-Proton Collider May 1992-June 2007, DESY Hamburg 27.5 GeV electrons on 820

More information

PANIC August 28, Katharina Müller on behalf of the LHCb collaboration

PANIC August 28, Katharina Müller on behalf of the LHCb collaboration Measurements with electroweak bosons at LHCb PANIC August 28, 2014 on behalf of the LHCb collaboration Outline LHCb detector Measurements with electroweak bosons Motivation Z production Z plus jets, Z

More information

Measurement of Quenched Energy Flow for Dijets in PbPb collisions with CMS

Measurement of Quenched Energy Flow for Dijets in PbPb collisions with CMS Measurement of Quenched Energy Flow for Dijets in PbPb collisions with CMS For the CMS Collaboration NPA Seminar Yale, USA 15 October, 2015 Relativistic Heavy Ion Collisions Trying to answer two important

More information

The Heavy Quark Search at the LHC

The Heavy Quark Search at the LHC The Heavy Quark Search at the LHC The Heavy Quark Search at the LHC Backgrounds: estimating and suppressing tt, multijets,... jet mass technique NLO effects matrix elements for extra jets initial state

More information

arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 17 Aug 2016

arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 17 Aug 2016 arxiv:8.95v [hep-ex] 7 Aug Measurement of the underlying-event properties with the detector Yuri Kulchitsky, on behalf of the collaboration Institute of Physics, National Academy of ciences, Minsk, Belarus

More information

Measurement of multi-jet cross sections in proton proton collisions at a 7 TeV center-of-mass energy

Measurement of multi-jet cross sections in proton proton collisions at a 7 TeV center-of-mass energy Eur. Phys. J. C (2011) 71:1763 DOI 10.1140/epjc/s10052-011-1763-6 Regular Article - Experimental Physics Measurement of multi-jet cross sections in proton proton collisions at a 7 TeV center-of-mass energy

More information

Jet reconstruction in W + jets events at the LHC

Jet reconstruction in W + jets events at the LHC Jet reconstruction in W + jets events at the LHC Ulrike Schnoor Michigan State University High Energy Physics Institutsseminar IKTP TU Dresden, Nov 4, 010 Jet reconstruction in W + jets events at the LHC

More information

SOFT QCD AT ATLAS AND CMS

SOFT QCD AT ATLAS AND CMS SAHAL YACOOB UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN ON BEHALF OF THE ATLAS AND CMS COLLABORATIONS SOFT QCD AT ATLAS AND CMS 28th Rencontres de Blois INTRODUCTION IN 15 MINUTES 2 Inelastic cross section ATLAS and CMS

More information

arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 9 Jan 2019

arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 9 Jan 2019 Quarkonium production as a function of charged-particle multiplicity in pp and p Pb collisions measured by ALICE at the LHC arxiv:1901.02627v1 [hep-ex] 9 Jan 2019 Discipline of Physics, School of Basic

More information

FYST17 Lecture 6 LHC Physics II

FYST17 Lecture 6 LHC Physics II FYST17 Lecture 6 LHC Physics II 1 Today & Monday The LHC accelerator Challenges The experiments (mainly CMS and ATLAS) Important variables Preparations Soft physics EWK physics Some recent results Focus

More information

Double- & multi-parton scatterings in p-a collisions at the LHC

Double- & multi-parton scatterings in p-a collisions at the LHC Double- & multi-parton scatterings in p-a collisions at the LHC Workshop on p-a collisions at the LHC ECT* Trento, 10th May 2013 David d'enterria CERN (*) Part of the results based on: Dd'E & A. Snigirev,

More information

What to do with Multijet Events?

What to do with Multijet Events? DØ note 4465 2004-06-03 What to do with Multijet Events? T. Hebbeker RWTH Aachen ABSTRACT Multijet events are frequently produced in p p collisions. Events with several jets might indicate physics beyond

More information

QCD dijet analyses at DØ

QCD dijet analyses at DØ QCD dijet analyses at DØ Pavel Demine for the DØ collaboration DAPNIA-SPP, CEA Saclay, France Contents: DØ detector Jet reconstruction at DØ Dijet mass spectrum Dijet azimuthal angle decorrelation XII

More information

Soft interactions in Herwig

Soft interactions in Herwig Soft interactions in Herwig Stefan Gieseke Institut für Theoretische Physik KIT work with Patrick Kirchgaeßer and Frashër Loshaj MPI@LHC6 San Cristóbal de las Casas 28 Nov 2 Dec 206 Stefan Gieseke MPI@LHC

More information

The Lund Model. and some extensions. Department of Astronomy and Theoretical Physics Lund University Sölvegatan 14A, SE Lund, Sweden

The Lund Model. and some extensions. Department of Astronomy and Theoretical Physics Lund University Sölvegatan 14A, SE Lund, Sweden The Lund Model and some extensions Torbjörn Sjöstrand Department of Astronomy and Theoretical Physics Lund University Sölvegatan 4A, SE-223 62 Lund, Sweden Workshop on Collective effects in small collisions

More information

Response to the Referee for Physical Review DG8044

Response to the Referee for Physical Review DG8044 Response to the Referee for Physical Review We would like to thank the referee for the effort he has put into his report. We agree with many of the referee s comments and we now realize that there are

More information

Early physics with Atlas at LHC

Early physics with Atlas at LHC Early physics with Atlas at LHC Bellisario Esposito (INFN-Frascati) On behalf of the Atlas Collaboration Outline Atlas Experiment Physics goals Next LHC run conditions Physics processes observable with

More information

Proton anti proton collisions at 1.96 TeV currently highest centre of mass energy

Proton anti proton collisions at 1.96 TeV currently highest centre of mass energy Tevatron & Experiments 2 Proton anti proton collisions at 1.96 TeV currently highest centre of mass energy Tevatron performing very well 6.5 fb 1 delivered (per experiment) 2 fb 1 recorded in 2008 alone

More information

Reconstruction in Collider Experiments (Part IX)

Reconstruction in Collider Experiments (Part IX) Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments (Part IX) Peter Loch University of Arizona Tucson,

More information

Measurement of W-boson Mass in ATLAS

Measurement of W-boson Mass in ATLAS Measurement of W-boson Mass in ATLAS Tai-Hua Lin on behalf of the ATLAS collaboration Blois 2017, France Outline Motivation for W mass measurement Measurement Strategy Method: Monte Carlo Templates Fits

More information

Status of diffractive models. Robert Ciesielski [The Rockefeller University]

Status of diffractive models. Robert Ciesielski [The Rockefeller University] Status of diffractive models Robert Ciesielski [The Rockefeller University] CTEQ Workshop, QCD tool for LHC Physics: From 8 to 14 TeV, what is needed and why FNAL, 14 November, 2013 1 Main processes contributing

More information

The ATLAS Detector at the LHC

The ATLAS Detector at the LHC The ATLAS Detector at the LHC Results from the New Energy Frontier Cristina Oropeza Barrera Experimental Particle Physics University of Glasgow Somewhere near the Swiss Alps... A Toroidal LHC ApparatuS

More information

Top production measurements using the ATLAS detector at the LHC

Top production measurements using the ATLAS detector at the LHC Top production measurements using the ATLAS detector at the LHC INFN, Sezione di Bologna and University of Bologna E-mail: romano@bo.infn.it This paper is an overview of recent results on top-quark production

More information

Azimuthal Correlations for Inclusive 2-jet, 3-jet and 4-jet events in pp collisions at s = 13 TeV with CMS

Azimuthal Correlations for Inclusive 2-jet, 3-jet and 4-jet events in pp collisions at s = 13 TeV with CMS Azimuthal Correlations for Inclusive 2-jet, 3-jet and 4-jet events in pp collisions at s = 13 TeV with CMS Paris Gianneios University of Ioannina 29 th March 2018, HEP Athens Outline 1 2 3 4 5 CMS Detector

More information

FYST17 Lecture 6 LHC Physics II

FYST17 Lecture 6 LHC Physics II FYST17 Lecture 6 LHC Physics II 1 Today, (tomorrow) & Next week The LHC accelerator Challenges The experiments (mainly CMS and ATLAS) Important variables Preparations Soft physics minímum bias, underlying

More information

Background Subtraction Methods on Recoil Jets from Proton-Proton Collisions

Background Subtraction Methods on Recoil Jets from Proton-Proton Collisions Background Subtraction Methods on Recoil Jets from Proton-Proton Collisions Colby Ostberg San Francisco State University REU student at Texas A&M Cyclotron Institute 1 Motivation At the RHIC, heavy ions

More information

MBR Monte Carlo Simulation in PYTHIA8

MBR Monte Carlo Simulation in PYTHIA8 MBR Monte Carlo Simulation in PYTHIA8 Robert Ciesielski, Konstantin Goulianos The Rockefeller University, 130 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA E-mail: robert.ciesielski@rockefeller.edu, dino@rockefeller.edu

More information

arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 5 Mar 2017

arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 5 Mar 2017 Recent CMS Results on Diffraction arxiv:703.0604v [hep-ex] 5 Mar 207 Roland Benoît on behalf of the CMS Collaboration DESY - CMS Notkestrasse 85, 22603 Hamburg Germany Abstract Recent CMS results on diffraction

More information

Jet Physics at ALICE. Oliver Busch. University of Tsukuba Heidelberg University

Jet Physics at ALICE. Oliver Busch. University of Tsukuba Heidelberg University Jet Physics at ALICE Oliver Busch University of Tsukuba Heidelberg University 1 2 Outline Introduction Results from pp collisions Identified jet fragmentation in pp Jets in heavy-ion collisions Jet shapes

More information

Summary of Working Group C: Hadronic Final States DIS03, St.Petersburg

Summary of Working Group C: Hadronic Final States DIS03, St.Petersburg Summary of Working Group C: Hadronic Final States DIS03, St.Petersburg Conveners: Jon Butterworth, Yuri Dokshitzer Event shapes & energy flows: DIS final states vs e + e -. Jets and energy flows: proton-antiproton

More information

Double parton scattering studies in CMS

Double parton scattering studies in CMS CBPF-Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Fisicas, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil E-mail: gilvan@cern.ch he double parton scattering (DPS) process in proton-proton collisions at a center-of-mass energy of 7 and 3 ev

More information

Double & multi parton scatterings in p-a collisions at the LHC

Double & multi parton scatterings in p-a collisions at the LHC Double & multi parton scatterings in p-a collisions at the LHC Workshop on MPI at the LHC Tel Aviv University, 17th Oct. 2012 David d'enterria CERN (*) Part of the results based on: Dd'E & A. Snigirev

More information