PYTHIA 6.2 Tunes for Run II
|
|
- Sheila Black
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 PYTHIA 6.2 Tunes for Run II Outline of Talk Min-Bias Collisions! Min-Bias Generators Hadron Hadron! The in Hard Scattering Processes Proton Outgoing Parton PT(hard) Initial-State Radiation AntiProton Outgoing Parton Final-State Radiation Flavor Creation b-quark! Initial-State Radiation and b-bbar Correlations Proton AntiProton Initial-State Radiation b-quark Rick Field Page
2 Min-Bias &! What happens when a high energy proton and an antiproton collide? Proton AntiProton! Most of the time the proton and antiproton ooze through each other and fall apart (i.e. no hard scattering). The outgoing particles continue in roughly the same direction as initial proton and antiproton. A Min-Bias collision.! Occasionally there will be a hard parton-parton collision resulting in large transverse momentum outgoing partons. Also a Min-Bias collision.! The underlying event is everything except the two outgoing hard scattered jets. It is an unavoidable background to many collider observables. Proton Proton Soft Collision (no hard scattering) Hard Scattering Outgoing Parton Beam-Beam Remnants Final-State Radiation Outgoing Parton PT(hard) underlying event has initial-state radiation! Min-Bias AntiProton Initial-State Radiation AntiProton Beam-Beam Remnants Initial-State Radiation Rick Field Page 2
3 CDF Min-Bias Data Charged Particle Density Charged Particle Pseudo-Rapidity Distribution: dn/dη Charged Particle Density: dn/dηdφ 7 6 CDF Published CDF Published dn/dη CDF Min-Bias.8 TeV CDF Min-Bias 630 GeV all PT Pseudo-Rapidity η dn/dηdφ CDF Min-Bias 630 GeV CDF Min-Bias.8 TeV all PT Pseudo-Rapidity η <dn chg /dη> = 4.2 <dn chg /dηdφ> = 0.67! Shows CDF Min-Bias data on the number of charged particles per unit pseudo-rapidity at 630 and,800 GeV. There are about 4.2 charged particles per unit η in Min-Bias collisions at.8 TeV ( η <, all P T ).! Convert to charged particle density, dn chg /dηdφ, by dividing by 2π. There are about 0.67 charged particles per unit η-φ in Min-Bias collisions at.8 TeV ( η <, all P T ). Rick Field Page 3
4 CDF Min-Bias Data Charged Particle Density: dn/dηdφ Herwig "Soft" Min-Bias P T Dependence 4 TeV.0E+0.0E+00 Charged Particle Density CDF Preliminary Lots of hard scattering in Min-Bias! η < dn/dηdφ GeV.8 TeV Pseudo-Rapidity η all PT! Shows the energy dependence of the charged particle density, dn chg /dηdφ, for Min-Bias collisions compared with HERWIG Soft Min-Bias. Charged Density dn/dηdφdpt (/GeV/c).0E-0.0E-02.0E-03.0E-04.0E-05.0E-06 CDF Min-Bias Data at.8 TeV HW "Soft" Min-Bias at 630 GeV,.8 TeV, and 4 TeV PT (GeV/c)! Shows the P T dependence of the charged particle density, dn chg /dηdφdp T, for Min-Bias collisions at.8 TeV collisions compared with HERWIG Soft Min-Bias.! HERWIG Soft Min-Bias does not describe the Min-Bias data! The Min-Bias data contains a lot of hard parton-parton collisions which results in many more particles at large P T than are produces by any soft model. Rick Field Page 4
5 CDF Min-Bias Data P T Dependence.4.2 Charged Particle Density: dn/dηdφ Herwig "Soft" Min-Bias 4 TeV.0E+00 Charged Particle Density CDF Preliminary η < dn/dηdφ GeV TeV Pseudo-Rapidity η all PT! Shows the energy dependence of the charged particle density, dn chg /dηdφ, for Min-Bias collisions compared with HERWIG Soft Min-Bias.! Shows the P T dependence of the charged particle density, dn chg /dηdφdp T, for Min-Bias collisions at.8 TeV collisions compared with HERWIG Soft Min-Bias and MBR.! Although MBR has a harder P T distribution it is a soft model and has no hard scattering. MBR does nt describe the correlation in the min-bias data (i.e. the data have jets ) and MBR does not. Charged Density dn/dηdφdpt (/GeV/c).0E-0.0E-02.0E-03.0E-04.0E-05.0E-06 CDF Min-Bias Data at.8 TeV PT (GeV/c) MBR "Soft" Min-Bias at.8 TeV HW "Soft" Min-Bias at.8 TeV Rick Field Page 5
6 dn/dηdφ HW "Soft" Min-Bias Min-Bias: Combining Hard and Soft Collisions Charged Particle Density: dn/dηdφ Pseudo-Rapidity η HW PT(hard) > 3 GeV/c.8 TeV all PT CDF Min-Bias Data Herwig Jet3 Herwig Min-Bias! HERWIG hard QCD with P T (hard) > 3 GeV/c describes well the high P T tail but produces too many charged particles overall. Not all of the Min-Bias collisions have a hard scattering with P T (hard) > 3 GeV/c! Charged Density dn/dηdφdpt (/GeV/c).0E+0.0E+00.0E-0.0E-02.0E-03.0E-04.0E-05.0E-06 Charged Particle Density CDF Preliminary HERWIG soft Min-Bias does not fit the Min-Bias data! HW PT(hard) > 3 GeV/c PT (GeV/c) Herwig Jet3 Herwig Min-Bias CDF Min-Bias Data.8 TeV η < HW "Soft" Min-Bias! One cannot run the HERWIG hard QCD Monte-Carlo with P T (hard) < 3 GeV/c because the perturbative 2-to-2 cross-sections diverge like /P T (hard) 4? Rick Field Page 6
7 dn/dηdφ HW "Soft" Min-Bias Min-Bias: Combining Hard and Soft Collisions Charged Particle Density: dn/dηdφ Pseudo-Rapidity η HW PT(hard) > 3 GeV/c.8 TeV all PT CDF Min-Bias Data Herwig Jet3 Herwig Min-Bias! HERWIG hard QCD with P T (hard) > 3 GeV/c describes well the high P T tail but produces too many charged particles overall. Not all of the Min-Bias collisions have a hard scattering with P T (hard) > 3 GeV/c! Charged Density dn/dηdφdpt (/GeV/c).0E+0.0E+00.0E-0.0E-02.0E-03.0E-04.0E-05.0E-06 Charged Particle Density CDF Preliminary HERWIG soft Min-Bias does not fit the Min-Bias data! Hard-Scattering Cross-Section PT (GeV/c) CTEQ5L.8 TeV Herwig Jet3 Herwig Min-Bias CDF Min-Bias Data.8 TeV η < PYTHIA HERWIG 0.0 HW PT(hard) > 3 GeV/c Hard-Scattering Cut-Off PTmin HW "Soft" Min-Bias! One cannot run the HERWIG hard QCD Monte-Carlo with P T (hard) < 3 GeV/c because the perturbative 2-to-2 cross-sections diverge like /P T (hard) 4? σ HC Cross-Section (millibarns) HERWIG diverges! PYTHIA cuts off the divergence. Can run P T (hard)>0! Rick Field Page 7
8 PYTHIA Min-Bias Soft + Hard Tuned to fit the underlying event! dn/dηdφ CDF Published Charged Particle Density: dn/dηdφ Pythia Set A CDF Min-Bias.8 TeV Pseudo-Rapidity η.8 TeV all PT Charged Particle Density! PYTHIA regulates the perturbative 2-to-2.0E-05 parton-parton cross sections with cut-off CDF Preliminary parameters which allows one to run with.0e-06 Lots of hard scattering P T (hard) in > Min-Bias! 0. One can simulate both hard PT(charged) (GeV/c) and soft collisions in one program.! The relative amount of hard versus soft depends on the cut-off and can be tuned.! This PYTHIA fit predicts that 2% of all Min-Bias events are a result of a hard 2-to-2 parton-parton scattering with P T (hard) > 5 GeV/c (% with P T (hard) > 0 GeV/c)! Charged Density dn/dηdφdpt (/GeV/c).0E+00.0E-0.0E-02.0E-03.0E-04 PT(hard) > 0 GeV/c Pythia Set A CDF Min-Bias Data.8 TeV η < 2% of Min-Bias events have P T (hard) > 5 GeV/c! % of Min-Bias events have P T (hard) > 0 GeV/c! Rick Field Page 8
9 Transverse region is very sensitive to the underlying event! Charged Jet # Direction Evolution of Charged Jets Toward-Side Jet φ Charged Particle φ Correlations P T > 0.5 GeV/c η < Toward-side jet (always) Charged Jet # Direction φ Look at the charged particle density in the transverse region! 2π Away Region Transverse Region Toward Toward φ Leading Jet Transverse Away-side jet (sometimes) Away Transverse Away-Side Jet Transverse Away Transverse Perpendicular to the plane of the 2-to-2 hard scattering Toward Region Transverse Region Away Region 0 - η +! Look at charged particle correlations in the azimuthal angle φ relative to the leading charged particle jet.! Define φ φ < 60 o as Toward, 60 o < φ φ < 20 o as Transverse, and φ φ > 20 o as Away.! All three regions have the same size in η-φ space, ηx φ φ = 2x20 o = 4π/3. Rick Field Page 9
10 Charged Particle Density Transverse P T Distribution "Transverse" Charged Density Min-Bias "Transverse" Charged Particle Density: dn/dηdφ CDF Preliminary data uncorrected PT(charged jet#) (GeV/c) CDF Min-Bias data <dn chg /dηdφ> = 0.25 CDF Min-Bias CDF JET20 Factor of 2!.8 TeV η <.0 PT>0.5 GeV P T (charged jet#) > 30 GeV/c Transverse <dn chg /dηdφ> = 0.56 Charged Density dn/dηdφdpt (/GeV/c).0E+00.0E-0.0E-02.0E-03.0E-04.0E-05.0E-06 Min-Bias Charged Particle Density.8 TeV η < PT>0.5 GeV/c "Transverse" PT(chgjet#) > 5 GeV/c PT(charged) (GeV/c) CDF Preliminary data uncorrected "Transverse" PT(chgjet#) > 30 GeV/c! Compares the average transverse charge particle density with the average Min-Bias charge particle density ( η <, P T >0.5 GeV). Shows how the transverse charge particle density and the Min-Bias charge particle density is distributed in P T. Rick Field Page 0
11 HERWIG 6.4 Transverse P T Distribution "Transverse" Charged Density "Transverse" Charged Particle Density: dn/dηdφ CDF Data data uncorrected theory corrected Total "Remnants" "Hard" PT(charged jet#) (GeV/c) Herwig 6.4 CTEQ5L PT(hard) > 3 GeV/c.8 TeV η <.0 PT>0.5 GeV Charged Density dn/dηdφdpt (/GeV/c).0E+00.0E-0.0E-02.0E-03.0E-04.0E-05 "Transverse" Charged Particle Density PT(chgjet#) > 5 GeV/c CDF Data data uncorrected theory corrected.8 TeV η < PT>0.5 GeV/c PT(chgjet#) > 30 GeV/c HERWIG has the too steep of a P T dependence of the beam-beam remnant component of the underlying event! Herwig 6.4 CTEQ5L.0E PT(charged) (GeV/c)! Compares the average transverse charge particle density ( η <, P T >0.5 GeV) versus P T (charged jet#) and the P T distribution of the transverse density, dn chg /dηdφdp T with the QCD hard scattering predictions of HERWIG 6.4 (default parameters with P T (hard)>3 GeV/c. Shows how the transverse charge particle density is distributed in P T. Rick Field Page
12 Proton Parameter MSTP(8) MSTP(82) Multiple Parton Interactions Same parameter that cuts-off the hard 2-to-2 parton cross sections! Value Outgoing Parton PYTHIA: Multiple Parton Interaction Parameters Outgoing Parton PT(hard) AntiProton Description Multiple-Parton Scattering off Multiple-Parton Scattering on Multiple interactions assuming the same probability, with an abrupt cut-off P T min=parp(8) Multiple interactions assuming a varying impact parameter and a hadronic matter overlap consistent with a double Gaussian matter distribution (governed by PARP(83) and PARP(84)), with a smooth turn-off P T0 =PARP(82) Pythia uses multiple parton interactions to enhance the underlying event. Multiple interactions assuming a varying impact parameter and a hadronic matter overlap consistent with a single Gaussian matter distribution, with a smooth turnoff P T0 =PARP(82) Multiple parton interaction more likely in a hard (central) collision! Hard Core and now HERWIG! Jimmy: MPI J. M. Butterworth J. R. Forshaw M. H. Seymour Rick Field Page 2
13 Proton Parameter MSTP(8) MSTP(82) Multiple Parton Interactions Same parameter that cuts-off the hard 2-to-2 parton cross sections! Value Outgoing Parton PYTHIA: Multiple Parton Interaction Parameters Outgoing Parton PT(hard) AntiProton Note that Description since the same cut-off parameters govern both the primary hard scattering and the secondary MPI interaction, changing the amount of MPI also changes the amount of hard primary Multiple-Parton Scattering off Multiple-Parton Scattering on Multiple interactions assuming a varying impact parameter and a hadronic matter overlap consistent with a double Gaussian matter distribution (governed by PARP(83) and PARP(84)), with a smooth turn-off P T0 =PARP(82) Pythia uses multiple parton interactions to enhance the underlying event. Multiple interactions assuming the same probability, with an abrupt scattering cut-off P T min=parp(8) in PYTHIA Min-Bias events! Multiple interactions assuming a varying impact parameter and a hadronic matter overlap consistent with a single Gaussian matter distribution, with a smooth turnoff P T0 =PARP(82) Multiple parton interaction more likely in a hard (central) collision! Hard Core and now HERWIG! Jimmy: MPI J. M. Butterworth J. R. Forshaw M. H. Seymour Rick Field Page 3
14 Parameter Default PYTHIA: Multiple Parton Interaction Parameters Description PARP(83) PARP(84) PARP(85) PARP(86) PARP(89) PARP(90) PARP(67) TeV Double-Gaussian: Fraction of total hadronic matter within PARP(84) Double-Gaussian: Fraction of the overall hadron radius containing the fraction PARP(83) of the total hadronic matter. Probability that the MPI produces two gluons with color connections to the nearest neighbors. Probability that the MPI produces two gluons either as described by PARP(85) or as a closed gluon loop. The remaining fraction consists of quark-antiquark pairs. Determines the reference energy E 0. Determines the energy dependence of the cut-off P T0 as follows P T0 (E cm ) = P T0 (E cm /E 0 ) ε with ε = PARP(90) A scale factor that determines the maximum parton virtuality for space-like showers. The larger the value of PARP(67) the more initialstate radiation. Hard Core PT0 (GeV/c) Color String Multiple Parton Interaction PYTHIA Multiple Parton Interaction Color String Hard-Scattering Cut-Off PT0 Take E 0 =.8 TeV ε = 0.25 (Set A)) ε = 0.6 (default) Color String 00,000 0,000 00,000 CM Energy W (GeV) Reference point Rick Field at.8 TeV Page 4
15 PYTHIA default parameters Parameter MSTP(8) MSTP(82) PARP(8) PARP(82) PARP(89) PARP(90) PARP(67) PYTHIA Defaults MPI constant , , , "Transverse" Charged Density probability scattering "Transverse" Charged Particle Density: dn/dηdφ CDF Data data uncorrected theory corrected Pythia (default) MSTP(82)= PARP(8) =.9 GeV/c PT(charged jet#) (GeV/c).8 TeV η <.0 PT>0.5 GeV CTEQ3L CTEQ4L CTEQ5L CDF Min-Bias CDF JET20! Plot shows the Transverse charged particle density versus P T (chgjet#) compared to the QCD hard scattering predictions of PYTHIA (P T (hard) > 0) using the default parameters for multiple parton interactions and CTEQ3L, CTEQ4L, and CTEQ5L. Note Change PARP(67) = 4.0 (< 6.38) PARP(67) =.0 (> 6.38) Default parameters give very poor description of the underlying event! Rick Field Page 5
16 b-quark Production at the Tevatron Flavor Creation b-quark Flavor Excitation b-quark Parton Shower/Fragmentation Proton AntiProton Proton AntiProton Proton AntiProton b-quark Initial-State Radiation Initial-State Radiation gluon, quark, or antiquark b-quark Initial-State Radiation b-quark b-quark All three sources are important at the Tevatron!! The QCD leading-log Monte-Carlo models do a fairly good job in describing b-quark data at the Tevatron. The QCD Monte-Carlo models do a much better job fitting the b data than most people realize!! Clearly all three sources are important at the Tevatron.! Nothing is goofy (Rick Field, CDF B Group Talk, March 9, 200).! Next step is to study in detail b-bbar correlations and the compare the predictions of HERWIG, ISAJET, and PYTHIA in order to understand how reliable the estimates are.! Want to know what the leading-log QCD Monte-Carlo Models predict, how stable the estimates are, and how they compare with data. Also, if it is possible we would like to tune the Monte-Carlo models to fit the data. Rick Field Page 6
17 Inclusive b-quark b Cross Section.0E+02 Integrated b-quark Cross Section for PT > PTmin.0E+02 Integrated b-quark Cross Section for PT > PTmin.0E+0 PYTHIA CTEQ5L PARP(67)= PY (67=) Total Flavor Creation Flavor Excitation Shower/Fragmentation D0 Data CDF Data.0E+0 PYTHIA CTEQ5L PARP(67)=4 PY (67=4) Total Flavor Creation Flavor Excitation Shower/Fragmentation D0 Data CDF Data Cross Section (µb).0e+00.0e-0 Cross Section (µb).0e+00.0e-0.0e-02.8 TeV y <.0E-02.8 TeV y < Changed at version 6.38!.0E PTmin (GeV/c).0E PTmin (GeV/c)! Data on the integrated b-quark total cross section (P T > PTmin, y < ) for proton-antiproton collisions at.8 TeV compared with the QCD Monte-Carlo model predictions of PYTHIA (CTEQ5L) with PARP(67)= (new default) and PARP(67)=4 (old default). The four curves correspond to the contribution from flavor creation, flavor excitation, shower/fragmentation, and the resulting total. PARP(67) is a scale factor that governs the amount of large angle initial-state radiation. Larger values of PARP(67) results in more large angle initial-state radiation! Rick Field Page 7
18 dσ/dφ (µb/deg) Azimuthal Correlations b-quark Correlations: Azimuthal φ Distribution.8 TeV PT > 5 GeV/c PT2 > 0 GeV/c y < y2 < PYTHIA CTEQ5L PARP(67)= New PYTHIA default (less initial-state radiation) dσ/dφ (µb/deg) Old PYTHIA default (more initial-state radiation) b-quark Correlations: Azimuthal φ Distribution.8 TeV PT > 5 GeV/c PT2 > 0 GeV/c y < y2 < PYTHIA CTEQ5L PARP(67)=4 "Toward" "Away" φ (degrees) PY62 (67=) Total Flavor Creation Flavor Excitation Shower/Fragmentation "Toward" "Away" φ (degrees) PY62 (67=4) Total Flavor Creation Flavor Excitation Shower/Fragmentation! Predictions of PYTHIA (CTEQ5L) with PARP(67)= (new default) and PARP(67)=4 (old default) for the azimuthal angle, φ, between a b-quark with PT > 5 GeV/c, y < and bbar-quark with PT 2 > 0 GeV/c, y 2 < in proton-antiproton collisions at.8 TeV. The curves correspond to dσ/d φ (µb/ o ) for flavor creation, flavor excitation, shower/fragmentation, and the resulting total. b-quark direction Toward Away φ bbar-quark Rick Field Page 8
19 dσ/dφ (µb/deg) Azimuthal Correlations b-quark Correlations: Azimuthal φ Distribution.8 TeV PT > 5 GeV/c PT2 > 0 GeV/c y < y2 < "Toward" HERWIG 6.4 CTEQ5L φ (degrees) "Away" HW64 Total Flavor Creation Flavor Excitation Shower/Fragmentation Old PYTHIA default (more initial-state radiation) dσ/dφ (µb/deg) b-quark Correlations: Azimuthal φ Distribution.8 TeV PT > 5 GeV/c PT2 > 0 GeV/c y < y2 < PYTHIA PARP(67)=4 "Toward" HERWIG 6.4 "Flavor Creation" CTEQ5L φ (degrees) "Away" PYTHIA PARP(67)=! Predictions of HERWIG 6.4 (CTEQ5L) for the azimuthal angle, φ, between a b-quark with PT > 5 GeV/c, y < and bbar-quark with PT 2 > 0 GeV/c, y 2 < in proton-antiproton collisions at.8 TeV. The curves correspond to dσ/d φ (µb/ o ) for flavor creation, flavor excitation, shower/fragmentation, and the resulting total. b-quark direction Toward Away φ bbar-quark New PYTHIA default (less initial-state radiation) Flavor Creation Rick Field Page 9
20 b-quark direction φ CDF Run I Analysis Azimuthal Correlations PARP(67) = maybe too narrow? Toward Away bbar-quark PARP(67) = 4 maybe too broad?! Kevin Lannon preliminary unblessed CDF Run I analysis of the azimuthal angle, φ, between a b-quark y < and bbar-quark y 2 < in protonantiproton collisions at.8 TeV. Rick Field Page 20
21 DiPhoton Correlations /σ dσ/dpt (/GeV/c) Diphoton System Transverse Momentum PYC5 DiPhoton PARP(67)= PYC5 DiPhoton PARP(67)=4 CDF DiPhoton Data New Pythia.8 TeV PT > 2 GeV η < 0.9 Old Pythia /σ dσ/dφ (/deg) DiPhoton Correlations: Azimuthal φ Distribution PYC5 DiPhoton PARP(67)=4 PYC5 DiPhoton PARP(67)= CDF DiPhoton Data New Pythia.8 TeV PT > 2 GeV η < 0.9 Old Pythia Diphoton System PT (GeV/c) φ (degrees)! Predictions of PYTHIA 6.58 (CTEQ5L) with PARP(67)= (new default) and PARP(67)=4 (old default) for diphoton system PT and the azimuthal angle, φ, between a photon with PT > 2 GeV/c, y < 0.9 and photon with PT 2 > 2 GeV/c, y 2 < 0.9 in protonantiproton collisions at.8 TeV compared with CDF data. Photon direction Toward Away φ Photon Rick Field Page 2
22 PYTHIA CTEQ5L Parameter MSTP(8) MSTP(82) PARP(82) PARP(85) PARP(86) PARP(89) PARP(90) PARP(67) Tune D 3.6 GeV TeV Tuned PYTHIA Tune C 3.7 GeV TeV Single Gaussian "Transverse" Charged Density "Transverse" Charged Particle Density: dn/dηdφ CDF Preliminary data uncorrected theory corrected CTEQ5L PYTHIA (Set D) PARP(67)= PYTHIA (Set C) PARP(67)= PT(charged jet#) (GeV/c).8 TeV η <.0 PT>0.5 GeV! Plot shows the Transverse charged particle density versus P T (chgjet#) compared to the QCD hard scattering predictions of two tuned versions of PYTHIA (CTEQ5L, Set D (PARP(67)=) and Set C (PARP(67)=4)). New PYTHIA default (less initial-state radiation) Old PYTHIA default (more initial-state radiation) Rick Field Page 22
23 PYTHIA CTEQ5L Parameter MSTP(8) MSTP(82) PARP(82) PARP(83) PARP(84) PARP(85) PARP(86) PARP(89) PARP(90) PARP(67) Tune B TeV New PYTHIA default (less initial-state radiation) 4.9 GeV Tuned PYTHIA Tune A GeV TeV Double Gaussian "Transverse" Charged Density ! Plot shows the Transverse charged particle density versus P T (chgjet#) compared to the QCD hard scattering predictions of two tuned versions of PYTHIA (CTEQ5L, Set B (PARP(67)=) and Set A (PARP(67)=4)). Old PYTHIA default (more initial-state radiation) "Transverse" Charged Particle Density: dn/dηdφ CDF Preliminary data uncorrected theory corrected CTEQ5L PYTHIA (Set B) PARP(67)= PYTHIA (Set A) PARP(67)= PT(charged jet#) (GeV/c).8 TeV η <.0 PT>0.5 GeV Rick Field Page 23
24 Tuned PYTHIA vs HERWIG 6.4 Transverse Densities Charged Jet # Direction φ Transverse Toward Away Transverse Charged Particle Density Charged PT sum Density "Transverse" Charged Density "Transverse" Charged Particle Density: dn/dηdφ CDF Preliminary data uncorrected theory corrected CTEQ5L PYTHIA (Set B) PARP(67)= PYTHIA (Set A) PARP(67)= PT(charged jet#) (GeV/c) HERWIG TeV η <.0 PT>0.5 GeV! Plots shows CDF data on the charge particle density and the charged PT sum density in the transverse region.! The data are compared with the QCD Monte-Carlo predictions of HERWIG 6.4 (CTEQ5L, P T (hard) > 3 GeV/c) and two tuned versions of PYTHIA (P T (hard) > 0). "Transverse" PTsum Density (GeV) "Transverse" Charged PTsum Density: dptsum/dηdφ CDF Preliminary data uncorrected theory corrected CTEQ5L PYTHIA (Set A) PARP(67)=4 PYTHIA (Set B) PARP(67)= PT(charged jet#) (GeV/c) HERWIG TeV η <.0 PT>0.5 GeV Rick Field Page 24
25 Tuned PYTHIA Transverse P T Distribution "Transverse" Charged Density "Transverse" Charged Particle Density: dn/dηdφ CDF Preliminary data uncorrected theory corrected CTEQ5L PYTHIA (Set B) PARP(67)= PYTHIA (Set A) PARP(67)= PT(charged jet#) (GeV/c).8 TeV η <.0 PT>0.5 GeV Charged Density dn/dηdφdpt (/GeV/c).0E+00.0E-0.0E-02.0E-03.0E-04.0E-05 "Transverse" Charged Particle Density PT(chgjet#) > 5 GeV/c PT(chgjet#) > 30 GeV/c CDF Data data uncorrected theory corrected PYTHIA Set A PARP(67)=4 PYTHIA Set B PARP(67)= PARP(67)=4.0 (old default) is favored over PARP(67)=.0 (new default)!.8 TeV η < PT>0.5 GeV/c.0E PT(charged) (GeV/c)! Compares the average transverse charge particle density ( η <, P T >0.5 GeV) versus P T (charged jet#) and the P T distribution of the transverse density, dn chg /dηdφdp T with the QCD Monte-Carlo predictions of two tuned versions of PYTHIA (P T (hard) > 0, CTEQ5L, Set B (PARP(67)=) and Set A (PARP(67)=4)). Rick Field Page 25
26 "Transverse" Charged Density Min-Bias "Transverse" Charged Particle Density: dn/dηdφ CDF Preliminary data uncorrected theory corrected CTEQ5L Tuned PYTHIA Set A Set A Min-Bias <dn chg /dηdφ> = 0.24 PYTHIA Set A PT(charged jet#) (GeV/c).8 TeV η <.0 PT>0.5 GeV Describes the rise from Min-Bias to underlying event! Set A P T (charged jet#) > 30 GeV/c Transverse <dn chg /dηdφ> = 0.60 Charged Density dn/dηdφdpt (/GeV/c).0E+00.0E-0.0E-02.0E-03.0E-04.0E-05 CDF Min-Bias CTEQ5L Charged Particle Density PYTHIA Set A.8 TeV η < PT>0.5 GeV/c "Transverse" PT(chgjet#) > 5 GeV/c PT(charged) (GeV/c) CDF Preliminary data uncorrected theory corrected "Transverse" PT(chgjet#) > 30 GeV/c! Compares the average transverse charge particle density ( η <, P T >0.5 GeV) versus P T (charged jet#) and the P T distribution of the transverse and Min-Bias densities with the QCD Monte-Carlo predictions of a tuned version of PYTHIA (P T (hard) > 0, CTEQ5L, Set A). Describes Min-Bias collisions! Describes the underlying event! Rick Field Page 26
27 Summary Outgoing Parton Proton PT(hard) Initial-State Radiation AntiProton Min-Bias and the Outgoing Parton Final-State Radiation! PYTHIA (tune A and B ) does a good job of describing both min-bias collisions and the underlying event in hard scattering processes in the Run I data.! PYTHIA (tune A or B ) is the only min-bias generator that includes both soft and hard scattering.! Both ISAJET and HERWIG have the too steep of a P T dependence of the beam-beam remnant component of the underlying event and hence do not have enough beambeam remnants with P T > 0.5 GeV/c.! PYTHIA tune A is slightly favored over tune B, but eventually the best fit may be somewhere in between. The initial-state radiation in tune A with PARP(67) = 4 (used in all Run I simulations) looks more like HERWIG s initial-state radiation. Rick Field Page 27
28 Recommendations! I suggest the tune set A be used as the default for PYTHIA for the first round of Run II simulations.! Although PYTHIA set A does a better job on the underlying event that HERWIG I suggest that you continue to run both HERWIG and PYTHIA. Run II Monte-Carlo Simulations The underlying-event is only part of the overall event. It is very important to compare at least two Monte-carlo estimates.. In Run I the systematic error due to initial-state radiation was overestimated.! PYTHIA set B can be compared with set A to determine how sensitive a given analysis is to the initial-state radiation.! In addition to MBR one should use PYTHIA (set A or B ) to generate min-bias collisions.! As we study the Run II data I will update and improve the PYTHIA tunes.! See my tunes WEBsite at Rick Field Page 28
29 I know what tune A is doing. PARP(67) = 4 was used in Run I. Recommendations! I suggest the tune set A be used as the default for PYTHIA for the first round of Run II simulations.! Although PYTHIA set A does a better job on the underlying event that HERWIG I suggest that you continue to run both HERWIG and PYTHIA. Warning! Some of the preliminary comparisons of PYTHIA (set A ) with Run II data indicate that there is not enough! PYTHIA set B can be compared sumet in with the underlying event. set A to determine how sensitive I do not a understand this! given analysis is to the initial-state radiation.! In addition to MBR one should use PYTHIA (set A or B ) to generate min-bias collisions. Run II Monte-Carlo Simulations The underlying-event is only part of the overall event. It is very important to compare at least two Monte-carlo estimates.. In Run I the systematic error due to initial-state radiation was overestimated.! As we study the Run II data I will update and improve the PYTHIA tunes.! See my tunes WEBsite at Rick Field Page 29
Toward an Understanding of Hadron-Hadron. Collisions From Feynman-Field to the LHC
Toward an Understanding of Hadron-Hadron Collisions From Feynman-Field to the LHC Rick Field University of Florida Outline of Talk The old days of Feynman-Field Phenomenology. XXIèmes Rencontres de Blois
More informationThe LHC Physics Environment
The LHC Physics Environment Talk : What We Have Learned at the Tevatron Rick Field University of Florida Outline of Talk The old days of Feynman-Field Phenomenology. Review what we learned about minbias,
More informationTevatron Energy Scan. Energy Dependence of the Underlying Event. Rick Field Craig Group & David Wilson University of Florida
Rick Field Craig Group & David Wilson University of Florida Tevatron Energy Scan Energy Dependence of the Underlying Event Outline of Talk Wine & Cheese talk, October 4, 2002. Studying the underlying event
More information51 st Cracow School of Theoretical Physics The Soft Side of the LHC Min-Bias and the Underlying Event at the LHC Rick Field University of Florida
5 st Cracow School of Theoretical Physics The Soft Side of the LHC Min-Bias and the Underlying Event at the LHC Rick Field University of Florida Lecture : Outline Review: The CDF Tevatron underlying event
More informationThe Underlying Event in Run II ChgJets versus JetClu Jets
The Underlying Event in Run II ChgJets versus JetClu Jets Outline of Talk! The evolution of charged particle jets and the underlying event. Study the event topology relative to the leading chgjet and compare
More informationCollisions Rick s View of Hadron Collisions
st Workshop on Energy Scaling in Hadron-Hadron Collisions Rick s View of Hadron Collisions Rick Field University of Florida Fermilab 2009 Outline of Talk The early days of Feynman-Field Phenomenology.
More informationMinimum Bias at CDF and CMS
Minimum Bias at CDF and CMS Minumum Bias Collisions Proton AntiProton CDF Run 2 CMS Outline of Talk Review the CDF Run 2 minimum bias tune (i.e. PYTHIA Tune A). UE&MB@CMS Show the minimum bias predictions
More informationUniversity of Glasgow Tevatron Energy Scan: Findings & Surprises
Outline of Talk University of Glasgow Tevatron Energy Scan: Findings & Surprises Rick Field University of Florida Simulating hadron-hadron collisions: The early days of Feynman-Field Phenomenology. The
More informationMin-Bias Data: Jet Evolution and Event Shapes
Min-Bias Data: Jet Evolution and Event Shapes Rick Field and David Stuart July 1, 1999 Abstract The Min-Bias data are used to study the transition between soft and hard collisions. We study this transition
More informationHEP Seminar. Studying the Energy Dependence of the Underlying Event at the Tevatron and the LHC Rick Field University of Florida.
Studying the Energy Dependence of the Underlying Event at the Tevatron and the LHC Rick Field University of Florida HEP Seminar Outline Early studies the underlying event (UE) at CDF and PYTHIA Tune A.
More informationUsing Drell-Yan to Probe the
Using Drell-Yan to Probe the Underlying Event in Run 2 at CDF Deepak Kar University of Florida (On behalf of the CDF Collaboration) Experimental Particle Physics Seminar 30 th October 2008 Prologue: We
More informationToward an Understanding of Hadron-Hadron. Collisions From Feynman-Field to the LHC
Rick Field University of Florida Outline of Talk Ricky & Sally. Toward an Understanding of Hadron-Hadron Collisions From Feynman-Field to the LHC The Berkeley Years Rick & Jimmie. The early days of Feynman-Field
More informationLHCP QCD at the Tevatron. Rick Field University of Florida (for the CDF & D0 Collaborations) Outline of Talk. with help from Christina Mesropian
with help from Christina Mesropian QCD at the Tevatron Rick Field University of Florida (for the CDF & D0 Collaborations) Outline of Talk D0 Photon + Jet Measurements. CDF W/Z + Upsilon Search. CDF Measurements
More informationMinimum-Bias and Underlying-Event Physics
2008 CTEQ MCnet Summer School on QCD Phenomenology and Monte Carlo Event Generators 8 16 August 2008 Debrecen, Hungary Minimum-Bias and Underlying-Event Physics Torbjörn Sjöstrand Department of Theoretical
More informationQCD and jets physics at the LHC with CMS during the first year of data taking. Pavel Demin UCL/FYNU Louvain-la-Neuve
QCD and jets physics at the LHC with CMS during the first year of data taking Pavel Demin UCL/FYNU Louvain-la-Neuve February 8, 2006 Bon appétit! February 8, 2006 Pavel Demin UCL/FYNU 1 Why this seminar?
More informationMini-Bias and Underlying Event Studies at CMS
Yuan Chao Department of Physics National Taiwan University 1617 Taipei, TAIWAN 1 Introduction The Tevatron experiments provide us very good information for the quantum chromodynamics (QCD) modelings of
More informationCharged particle multiplicity in proton-proton collisions with ALICE
Charged particle multiplicity in proton-proton collisions with ALICE Introduction on the motivations for a pp physics programme with ALICE A short review on the detectors used to reconstruct charged particle
More informationQCD at CDF. Régis Lefèvre IFAE Barcelona On behalf of the CDF Collaboration
QCD at CDF Régis Lefèvre IFAE Barcelona On behalf of the CDF Collaboration Jet Inclusive Cross-Section Underlying event studies Jet Shapes Specific processes _ W+Jets, γ + γ, γ + b/c, b-jet / bb jet Diffraction
More informationSoft interactions in Herwig
Soft interactions in Herwig Stefan Gieseke Institut für Theoretische Physik KIT work with Patrick Kirchgaeßer and Frashër Loshaj MPI@LHC6 San Cristóbal de las Casas 28 Nov 2 Dec 206 Stefan Gieseke MPI@LHC
More informationQCD at Cosmic Energies - VII May 16-20, 2016 Chalkida, Greece Multiparton interactions in Herwig
QCD at Cosmic Energies - VII May 6-20, 206 Chalkida, Greece Multiparton interactions in Herwig Frashër Loshaj Table of Contents Introduction 2 MPI and the Underlying event 3 Soft interactions 4 Diffraction
More informationResponse to the Referee for Physical Review DG8044
Response to the Referee for Physical Review We would like to thank the referee for the effort he has put into his report. We agree with many of the referee s comments and we now realize that there are
More informationMinimum Bias and Underlying Event Studies at CDF
FERMILAB-CONF--531-E Minimum Bias and Underlying Event Studies at CDF INFN, Bologna E-mail: moggi@bo.infn.it Soft, non-perturbative, interactions are poorly understood from the theoretical point of view
More informationTests of Pythia8 Rescattering Model
Tests of Pythia8 Rescattering Model arxiv:5.325v [hep-ph] Nov 25 Tasnuva Chowdhury Shahjalal University of Science and Technology Sylhet, Bangladesh. Deepak Kar University of Witwatersrand Johannesburg,
More informationJet Energy Calibration. Beate Heinemann University of Liverpool
Jet Energy Calibration Beate Heinemann University of Liverpool Fermilab, August 14th 2006 1 Outline Introduction CDF and D0 calorimeters Response corrections Multiple interactions η-dependent corrections
More informationLHC MPI and underlying event results
LHC MPI and underlying event results Marianna Testa (ATLAS) for the ALICE, ATLAS, CMS & LHCb collaborations SM@LHC 2012, Copenhagen, 10-13 April 2012 The Underlying Event Everything in hadron collisions
More informationFYST17 Lecture 6 LHC Physics II
FYST17 Lecture 6 LHC Physics II 1 Today, (tomorrow) & Next week The LHC accelerator Challenges The experiments (mainly CMS and ATLAS) Important variables Preparations Soft physics minímum bias, underlying
More informationFYST17 Lecture 6 LHC Physics II
FYST17 Lecture 6 LHC Physics II 1 Today & Monday The LHC accelerator Challenges The experiments (mainly CMS and ATLAS) Important variables Preparations Soft physics EWK physics Some recent results Focus
More informationPrecision QCD at the Tevatron. Markus Wobisch, Fermilab for the CDF and DØ Collaborations
Precision QCD at the Tevatron Markus Wobisch, Fermilab for the CDF and DØ Collaborations Fermilab Tevatron - Run II Chicago Ecm: 1.8 1.96 TeV more Bunches 6 36 Bunch Crossing 3500 396ns CDF Booster Tevatron
More informationCharmonium production versus multiplicity in PYTHIA8
Hard-Soft correlations in hadronic collisions Steffen Weber Charmonium production versus multiplicity in PYTHIA8 Hard-Soft correlations in hadronic collisions Clermont-Ferrand July 23, 2018 Steffen Weber
More informationHadron Collider Physics, HCP2004, June 14-18
) " % "" ' & % % " ) " % '% &* ' ) * ' + " ' ) ( $#! ' "") ( * " ) +% % )( (. ' + -, '+ % &* ' ) ( 021 % # / ( * *' 5 4* 3 %( '' ' " + +% Hadron Collider Physics, HCP2004, June 14-18 The Run II DØ Detector
More informationTesting QCD at the LHC and the Implications of HERA DIS 2004
Testing QCD at the LHC and the Implications of HERA DIS 2004 Jon Butterworth Impact of the LHC on QCD Impact of QCD (and HERA data) at the LHC Impact of the LHC on QCD The LHC will have something to say
More informationQCD dijet analyses at DØ
QCD dijet analyses at DØ Pavel Demine for the DØ collaboration DAPNIA-SPP, CEA Saclay, France Contents: DØ detector Jet reconstruction at DØ Dijet mass spectrum Dijet azimuthal angle decorrelation XII
More informationSome studies for ALICE
Some studies for ALICE Motivations for a p-p programme in ALICE Special features of the ALICE detector Preliminary studies of Physics Performances of ALICE for the measurement of some global properties
More informationParticle spectra in Minimum Bias events at 13TeV
Particle spectra in Minimum Bias events at TeV Juan Manuel Grados Luyando on behalf of the CMS collaboration Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron, Hamburg MPI@LHC 05 Trieste, Italy Motivation Probe the different
More informationQCD Jets at the LHC. Leonard Apanasevich University of Illinois at Chicago. on behalf of the ATLAS and CMS collaborations
QCD Jets at the LHC Leonard Apanasevich University of Illinois at Chicago on behalf of the ATLAS and CMS collaborations Outline Physics at the LHC Jet Reconstruction and Performance Clustering Algorithms
More informationPhysics at Hadron Colliders Part II
Physics at Hadron Colliders Part II Marina Cobal Università di Udine 1 The structure of an event One incoming parton from each of the protons enters the hard process, where then a number of outgoing particles
More informationRecent QCD results from ATLAS
Recent QCD results from ATLAS PASCOS 2013 Vojtech Pleskot Charles University in Prague 21.11.2013 Introduction / Outline Soft QCD: Underlying event in jet events @7TeV (2010 data) Hard double parton interactions
More informationQCD at LHC in pp. Department of Theoretical Physics, Lund University
3rd Nordic LHC and Beyond Workshop 2-3 February 2009 Lund, Sweden QCD at LHC in pp Torbjörn Sjöstrand Department of Theoretical Physics, Lund University Introduction: the structure of an event Multiple
More informationResults from D0: dijet angular distributions, dijet mass cross section and dijet azimuthal decorrelations
Results from D: dijet angular distributions, dijet mass cross section and dijet azimuthal decorrelations Zdenek Hubacek Czech Technical University in Prague E-mail: zdenek.hubacek@cern.ch on behalf of
More informationJet reconstruction in W + jets events at the LHC
Jet reconstruction in W + jets events at the LHC Ulrike Schnoor Michigan State University High Energy Physics Institutsseminar IKTP TU Dresden, Nov 4, 010 Jet reconstruction in W + jets events at the LHC
More informationQCD Studies at LHC with the Atlas detector
QCD Studies at LHC with the Atlas detector Introduction Sebastian Eckweiler - University of Mainz (on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration) Examples of QCD studies Minimum bias & underlying event Jet-physics
More informationProton anti proton collisions at 1.96 TeV currently highest centre of mass energy
Tevatron & Experiments 2 Proton anti proton collisions at 1.96 TeV currently highest centre of mass energy Tevatron performing very well 6.5 fb 1 delivered (per experiment) 2 fb 1 recorded in 2008 alone
More informationIntroduction to Monte Carlo generators - II
Introduction to Monte Carlo generators - II (Fully exclusive modeling of high-energy collisions) Andrzej Siódmok CTEQ School - University of Pittsburgh, USA 18-28 July 2017 Thanks to: S. Gieseke, S.Höche,
More informationarxiv: v1 [nucl-th] 23 Jan 2019
arxiv:1901.08157v1 [nucl-th] 23 Jan 2019 Cyclotron Institute and Department of Physics and Astronomy, Texas A&M University, College Station TX 77843, USA E-mail: rjfries@comp.tamu.edu Michael Kordell Cyclotron
More informationMultiple Interactions, Saturation, and Final States in pp Collisions and DIS
Introduction Minimum bias and Underlying event ˇ Multiple Interactions, Saturation, and Final States in pp Collisions and DIS Gösta Gustafson Lund Univ. and Hamburg Univ. Epiphany 2009, Krakow 5-7 Jan.
More informationLecture 5. QCD at the LHC Joey Huston Michigan State University
Lecture 5 QCD at the LHC Joey Huston Michigan State University Tevatron data Wealth of data from the Tevatron, both Run 1 and Run 2, that allows us to test/add to our pqcd formalism with analysis procedures/
More informationNon-perturbative effects for QCD jets at hadron colliders
Non-perturbative effects for QCD jets at hadron colliders Lorenzo Magnea Università di Torino INFN, Sezione di Torino Work in collaboration with M. Dasgupta and G. Salam. Milano 03/04/08 Outline Jets at
More informationAtlas results on diffraction
Atlas results on diffraction Alessia Bruni INFN Bologna, Italy for the ATLAS collaboration Rencontres du Viet Nam 14th Workshop on Elastic and Diffractive Scattering Qui Nhon, 16/12/2011 EDS 2011 Alessia
More informationQCD at hadron colliders
QCD at hadron colliders Soushi Tsuno Okayama University Outline Introduction: Focus on current (Tevatron) and future (LHC) hadron colliders High pt pqcd phenomena & issues: PDF measurement Jet Physics
More informationAzimuthal decorrelations between jets in QCD
Azimuthal decorrelations between jets in QCD Andrea Banfi ETH Zurich q q p 1 p 1 Outline Azimuthal decorrelations in QCD hard processes Dijets in the back-to-back region Phenomenology of azimuthal decorrelations
More informationPDFs for Event Generators: Why? Stephen Mrenna CD/CMS Fermilab
PDFs for Event Generators: Why? Stephen Mrenna CD/CMS Fermilab 1 Understanding Cross Sections @ LHC: many pieces to the puzzle LO, NLO and NNLO calculations K-factors Benchmark cross sections and pdf correlations
More informationRecent Results on Jet Physics and α s
Recent Results on Jet Physics and α s XXI Physics in Collision Conference Seoul, Korea June 8, Presented by Michael Strauss The University of Oklahoma Outline Introduction and Experimental Considerations
More informationSummary of Working Group C: Hadronic Final States DIS03, St.Petersburg
Summary of Working Group C: Hadronic Final States DIS03, St.Petersburg Conveners: Jon Butterworth, Yuri Dokshitzer Event shapes & energy flows: DIS final states vs e + e -. Jets and energy flows: proton-antiproton
More informationDouble Parton Scattering in CMS. Deniz SUNAR CERCI Adiyaman University On behalf of the CMS Collaboration Low-x th June 2017 Bari, Italy
Double Parton Scattering in CMS Deniz SUNAR CERCI Adiyaman University On behalf of the CMS Collaboration Low-x 2017 17th June 2017 Bari, Italy Outline Introduction to DPS DPS measurements with CMS 2b +
More informationRecent progress from Les Houches WG. Photon isolation and fragmentation contribution
Recent progress from Les Houches WG Photon isolation and fragmentation contribution Workshop PPSHC - 30/03/2012 Nicolas Chanon - ETH Zürich In behalf of the Photon Les Houches WG N. Chanon, S. Gascon-Shotkin,
More informationPhysics at the Fermilab Tevatron Collider. Darien Wood Northeastern University
Physics at the Fermilab Tevatron Collider Darien Wood Northeastern University 1 Outline Introduction: collider experiments The Tevatron complex (review) Examples of physics studies at the Tevatron jet
More informationMeasurement of photon production cross sections also in association with jets with the ATLAS detector
Nuclear and Particle Physics Proceedings 00 (07) 6 Nuclear and Particle Physics Proceedings Measurement of photon production cross sections also in association with jets with the detector Sebastien Prince
More informationMeasurement of multi-jet cross sections in proton proton collisions at a 7 TeV center-of-mass energy
Eur. Phys. J. C (2011) 71:1763 DOI 10.1140/epjc/s10052-011-1763-6 Regular Article - Experimental Physics Measurement of multi-jet cross sections in proton proton collisions at a 7 TeV center-of-mass energy
More informationarxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 17 Aug 2016
arxiv:8.95v [hep-ex] 7 Aug Measurement of the underlying-event properties with the detector Yuri Kulchitsky, on behalf of the collaboration Institute of Physics, National Academy of ciences, Minsk, Belarus
More informationMultiple Parton-Parton Interactions: from pp to A-A
Multiple Parton-Parton Interactions: from pp to A-A Andreas Morsch CERN QCD Challenges at LHC Taxco, Mexico, Jan 18-22 (2016) Multiple Parton-Parton Interactions Phys. Lett. B 167 (1986) 476 Q i 2 Λ QCD
More informationCharged Particle Multiplicity in pp Collisions at s = 13 TeV
Charged Particle Multiplicity in pp Collisions at s = 13 TeV Khadeejah ALGhadeer PhD in Engineering, Physics The Workshop of the APS Topical Group on Hadronic Physics Charged Particle Multiplicity IN PP
More informationWhat to do with Multijet Events?
DØ note 4465 2004-06-03 What to do with Multijet Events? T. Hebbeker RWTH Aachen ABSTRACT Multijet events are frequently produced in p p collisions. Events with several jets might indicate physics beyond
More informationLecture 3 Cross Section Measurements. Ingredients to a Cross Section
Lecture 3 Cross Section Measurements Ingredients to a Cross Section Prerequisites and Reminders... Natural Units Four-Vector Kinematics Lorentz Transformation Lorentz Boost Lorentz Invariance Rapidity
More informationResults on QCD and Heavy Flavors Production at the Tevatron
Results on QCD and Heavy Flavors Production at the Tevatron Donatella Lucchesi INFN and University of Padova October 21 Padova Outline: Machine and detector description Latest results on QCD Heavy Flavor:
More informationThe LHCf data hadronic interactions and UHECR showers. Paolo Lipari LHCf meeting Catania, 6th july 2011
The LHCf data hadronic interactions and UHECR showers Paolo Lipari LHCf meeting Catania, 6th july 2011 ~50 years of UHECR Problems of determination of: Energy Mass A Hadronic interaction Modeling Measure
More informationNikos Varelas. University of Illinois at Chicago. CTEQ Collaboration Meeting Northwestern November 20, Nikos Varelas. CTEQ Meeting Nov 20, 2009
QCD Physics at CMS University of Illinois at Chicago CTEQ Collaboration Meeting Northwestern November 0, 009 1 QCD Physics at CMS University of Illinois at Chicago CTEQ Collaboration Meeting Northwestern
More informationTransverse momentum and pseudorapidity distributions with minimum bias events in CMS at the LHC
Transverse momentum and pseudorapidity distributions with minimum bias events in CMS at the LHC Christof Roland/ MIT For the CMS Collaboration Rencontres de Moriond QCD Session 14 th March, 2010 Moriond
More informationStudy of observables for measurement of MPI using Z+jets process
Study of observables for measurement of MPI using Z+jets process PANJAB University, IN Email: ramandeep.kumar@cern.ch AKAL University, IN 7th International Workshop on Multiple Parton Interactions at the
More informationQCD at hadron colliders
QCD at hadron colliders This will be a brief experimentalist s view, with a concentration on the two hadron-hadron colliders mentioned in the previous talk If you want a good reference book for graduate
More informationProperties of Proton-proton Collision and. Comparing Event Generators by Multi-jet Events
Properties of Proton-proton Collision and Comparing Event Generators by Multi-jet Events Author: W. H. TANG 1 (Department of Physics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong) Supervisors: Z. L. MARSHALL 2,
More informationExperimental review of jet physics in hadronic collisions
Eur. Phys. J. C (2009) 61: 637 647 DOI 10.1140/epjc/s10052-008-0849-2 Regular Article - Experimental Physics Experimental review of jet physics in hadronic collisions Mario Martínez a ICREA/IFAE, Institut
More informationRecent Advances in QCD Event Generators
Durham University Recent Advances in QCD Event Generators Peter Richardson IPPP, Durham University Bonn Seminar 27 th January 1 Introduction Monte Carlo event generators are essential for experimental
More informationNon-perturbative effects in transverse momentum distribution of electroweak bosons
Non-perturbative effects in transverse momentum distribution of electroweak bosons Andrzej Siódmok a,e in collaboration with M. H. Seymour b,c & S. Gieseke b,d a Jagiellonian University, b CERN, c University
More informationMeasurement of Quenched Energy Flow for Dijets in PbPb collisions with CMS
Measurement of Quenched Energy Flow for Dijets in PbPb collisions with CMS For the CMS Collaboration NPA Seminar Yale, USA 15 October, 2015 Relativistic Heavy Ion Collisions Trying to answer two important
More informationThe Heavy Quark Search at the LHC
The Heavy Quark Search at the LHC The Heavy Quark Search at the LHC Backgrounds: estimating and suppressing tt, multijets,... jet mass technique NLO effects matrix elements for extra jets initial state
More informationThe inclusive jet cross section, jet algorithms, underlying event and fragmentation corrections. J. Huston Michigan State University
The inclusive jet cross section, jet algorithms, underlying event and fragmentation corrections J. Huston Michigan State University Tevatron in Run II 36 bunches (396 ns crossing time) 2 CDF in Run II
More informationMPI in PYTHIA. 1. Brief overview 2. Color reconnection and the top mass
MPI in PYTHIA 1. Brief overview 2. Color reconnection and the top mass Torbjörn Sjöstrand Department of Astronomy and Theoretical Physics Lund University Sölvegatan 14A, SE-223 62 Lund, Sweden MPI@LHC
More informationPrecision Jet Physics At the LHC
Precision Jet Physics At the LHC Matthew Schwartz Harvard University JETS AT THE LHC An (almost) universal feature of SUSY is and Source: Atlas TDR SIGNAL VS. BACKGROUND Source: Atlas TDR Can we trust
More informationCollective flow in (anti)proton-proton collision at Tevatron and LHC
Collective flow in (anti)proton-proton collision at Tevatron and LHC Tanguy Pierog, K. Werner, Y. Karpenko, S. Porteboeuf Institut für Kernphysik, Karlsruhe, Germany XLVth Rencontres de Moriond, QCD, La
More informationJets (and photons) at the LHC. J. Huston LPC March 10, 2010
Jets (and photons) at the LHC J. Huston LPC March 10, 2010 More references Understanding cross sections at the LHC we have to understand QCD (at the LHC) PDF s, PDF luminosities and PDF uncertainties LO,
More informationHow to Measure Top Quark Mass with CMS Detector??? Ijaz Ahmed Comsats Institute of Information Technology, Islamabad
How to Measure Top Quark Mass with CMS Detector??? Ijaz Ahmed Comsats Institute of Information Technology, Islamabad Outlines o o o o o o o High Pt top basic idea Methods for jets selection Top quark mass
More informationTop production measurements using the ATLAS detector at the LHC
Top production measurements using the ATLAS detector at the LHC INFN, Sezione di Bologna and University of Bologna E-mail: romano@bo.infn.it This paper is an overview of recent results on top-quark production
More informationTransverse Energy-Energy Correlation on Hadron Collider. Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron
Transverse Energy-Energy Correlation on Hadron Collider Wei Wang ( 王伟 ) Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron Work with Ahmed Ali, Fernando Barreiro, Javier Llorente arxiv: 1205.1689, Phys.Rev. D86, 114017(2012)
More informationUnderlying Event Measurements at the LHC
14th EDS Blois Workshop Underlying Event Measurements at the LHC Michael Heinrich for the ATLAS and CMS collaborations INSTITUTE OF EXPERIMENTAL PARTICLE PHYSICS (EKP) PHYSICS FACULTY KIT University of
More informationStefano Carignano 12/2010. Phenomenology of particle production in pp collisions
Phenomenology of particle production in pp collisions Stefano Carignano 12/2010 Outline Some very basic stuff Modeling interactions in pp collisions Strings and hadronization Motivation pp collisions provide
More informationExperiences on QCD Monte Carlo simulations: a user point of view on the inclusive jet cross-section simulations
Journal of Physics: Conference Series Experiences on QCD Monte Carlo simulations: a user point of view on the inclusive jet cross-section simulations Related content - Measurement of multi-jet cross-sections
More informationQCD Studies at the Tevatron
QCD Studies at the Tevatron Results from the CDF and DØ Collaborations Markus Wobisch, Louisiana Tech University DESY Seminar, June 24, 2008 Fermilab Tevatron - Run II CDF Chicago pp at 1.96 TeV DØ 36x36
More informationMBR Monte Carlo Simulation in PYTHIA8
The Rockefeller University, 10 York Avenue, New York, NY 06, USA E-mail: robert.ciesielski@rockefeller.edu Konstantin Goulianos The Rockefeller University, 10 York Avenue, New York, NY 06, USA E-mail:
More informationMeasurement of multijets and the internal structure of jets at ATLAS
Measurement of multijets and the internal structure of jets at ALAS Bilge M. Demirköz, on behalf of the ALAS Collaboration Institut de Fisica d Altes Energies, Barcelona, SPAIN also at Middle East echnical
More informationRecent DØ results in Diffractive and Jet Physics
Recent DØ results in Diffractive and Jet Physics * Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, P.O. Box 500, Batavia, IL 60510 E-mail: odell@fnal.gov DØ measurements of the inclusive jet cross section and the
More informationMeasurement of the Inclusive Isolated Prompt Photon Cross Section at CDF
of the Inclusive Isolated Cross at IFAE Barcelona HEP Seminar University of Virginia Outline Theoretical introduction Prompt photon production The The Photon detection prediction The pqcd NLO prediction
More informationSOFT QCD AT ATLAS AND CMS
SAHAL YACOOB UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN ON BEHALF OF THE ATLAS AND CMS COLLABORATIONS SOFT QCD AT ATLAS AND CMS 28th Rencontres de Blois INTRODUCTION IN 15 MINUTES 2 Inelastic cross section ATLAS and CMS
More informationJet Photoproduction at THERA
DESY 0 03 ISSN 048 9833 hep ph/00309 March 200 Jet Photoproduction at THERA arxiv:hep-ph/00309v 9 Mar 200 M. Klasen II. Institut für Theoretische Physik, Universität Hamburg, Luruper Chaussee 49, 2276
More informationLessons from the early LHC data for MC tuning
Lessons from the early LHC data for MC tuning P. S k a n d s ( C E R N ) Multiple Partonic Interactions at LHC, November 211, Hamburg A Factorized View 1. Where is the energy going? Note: only linearized
More informationQCD at the Tevatron: The Production of Jets & Photons plus Jets
QCD at the Tevatron: The Production of Jets & Photons plus Jets Mike Strauss The University of Oklahoma The Oklahoma Center for High Energy Physics for the CDF and DØD Collaborations APS 2009 Denver, Colorado
More informationReview of LHCb results on MPI, soft QCD and diffraction
Review of LHCb results on MPI, soft QCD and diffraction Marcin Kucharczyk on behalf of LHCb collaboration HNI Krakow EDS Blois 2015, Borgo (Corse), 30.06.2015 Outline LHCb - general purpose forward experiment
More informationTwo Early Exotic searches with dijet events at ATLAS
ATL-PHYS-PROC-2011-022 01/06/2011 Two Early Exotic searches with dijet events at ATLAS University of Toronto, Department of Physics E-mail: rrezvani@physics.utoronto.ca This document summarises two exotic
More informationPhotoproduction of Events with Rapidity Gaps Between Jets with ZEUS at HERA. Michigan State HEP Seminar May 2, 2006
Photoproduction of Events with Rapidity Gaps Between Jets with ZEUS at HERA Patrick Ryan University of Wisconsin Michigan State HEP Seminar May 2, 2006 Rapidity Gaps Between Jets in PHP MSU HEP Seminar,
More informationPhotoproduction of Events with Rapidity Gaps Between Jets with ZEUS at HERA. PhD Defense May 5, Patrick Ryan, Univ.
Photoproduction of Events with Rapidity Gaps Between Jets with ZEUS at HERA Patrick Ryan University of Wisconsin PhD Defense May 5, 2006 Rapidity Gaps Between Jets in PHP PhD Defense, May. 5 2006-1 Outline
More informationStatus of diffractive models. Robert Ciesielski [The Rockefeller University]
Status of diffractive models Robert Ciesielski [The Rockefeller University] CTEQ Workshop, QCD tool for LHC Physics: From 8 to 14 TeV, what is needed and why FNAL, 14 November, 2013 1 Main processes contributing
More information