arxiv: v1 [nucl-th] 12 Jan 2012

Transcription

1 Renormalization grou and Fermi liquid theory for many-nucleon systems arxiv: v1 [nucl-th] 12 Jan 2012 B. Friman 1, K. Hebeler 2,3 and A. Schwenk 2,4,5 1 GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany b.friman@gsi.de 2 TRIUMF, 4004 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 2A3, Canada 3 Deartment of Physics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA hebeler.4@osu.edu 4 ExtreMe Matter Institute EMMI, GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany 5 Institut für Kernhysik, Technische Universität Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany schwenk@hysik.tu-darmstadt.de Summary. We discuss renormalization grou aroaches to strongly interacting Fermi systems, in the context of Landau s theory of Fermi liquids and functional methods, and their alication to neutron matter. 1 Introduction In these lecture notes we discuss develoments using renormalization grou (RG) methods for strongly interacting Fermi systems and their alication to neutron matter. We rely on material from the review of Shankar [1], the lecture notes by Polchinski [2], and work on the functional RG, discussed in the lectures of Gies [3] and in the recent review by Metzner et al. [4]. The lecture notes are intended to show the strengths and flexibility of the RG for nucleonic matter, and to exlain the ideas in more detail. We start these notes with an introduction to Landau s theory of normal Fermi liquids [5, 6, 7], which make the concet of a quasiarticle very clear. Since Landau s work, this concet has been successfully alied to a wide range of many-body systems. In the quasiarticle aroximation it is assumed that the relevant art of the excitation sectrum of the one-body

2 2 B. Friman, K. Hebeler and A. Schwenk roagator can be incororated as an effective degree of freedom, a quasiarticle. In Landau s theory of normal Fermi liquids this assumtion is well motivated, and the so-called background contributions to the one-body roagator are included in the low-energy coulings of the theory. In microscoic calculations and in alications of the RG to many-body systems, the quasiarticle aroximation is hysically motivated and widely used due to the great reduction of the calculational effort. 2 Fermi liquid theory 2.1 Basic ideas Much of our understanding of strongly interacting Fermi systems at low energies and temeratures goes back to the seminal work of Landau in the late fifties [5, 6, 7]. Landau was able to exress macroscoic observables in terms of microscoic roerties of the elementary excitations, the so-called quasiarticles, and their residual interactions. In order to illustrate Landau s arguments here, we consider a uniform system of non-relativistic sin-1/2 fermions at zero temerature. Landau assumed that the low-energy, elementary excitations of the interacting system can be described by effective degrees of freedom, the quasiarticles. Due to translational invariance, the states of the uniform system are eigenstates of the momentum oerator. The quasiarticles are much like single-article states in the sense that for each momentum there is a welldefined quasiarticle energy. We stress, however, that a quasiarticle state is not an energy eigenstate, but rather a resonance with a non-zero width. For quasiarticles close to the Fermi surface, the width is small and the corresonding life-time is large; hence the quasiarticle concet is useful for time scales short comared to the quasiarticle life-time. Landau assumed that there is a one-to-one corresondence between the quasiarticles and the single-article states of a free Fermi gas. For a suerfluid system, this oneto-one corresondence does not exist, and Landau s theory must be suitably modified, as discussed by Larkin and Migdal [8] and Leggett [9]. Whether the quasiarticle concet is useful for a articular system can be determined by comarison with exeriment or by microscoic calculations based on the underlying theory. The one-to-one corresondence starts from a free Fermi gas consisting of N articles, where the ground state is given by a filled Fermi shere in momentum sace, see Fig. 1. The article number density n and the groundstate energy E 0 are given by (with = c = 1) n = 1 V σ n 0 σ = k3 F 3π 2 and E 0 = σ k 2 F 2m n0 σ = 3 52m N, (1)

3 Renormalization grou and Fermi liquid theory for many-nucleon systems 3 n 0 σ 1 k F σ 0 k F Fig. 1. Zero-temerature distribution function of a free Fermi gas in the ground state (left) and with one added article (right). where k F denotes the Fermi momentum, V the volume, and n 0 σ = θ(k F ) is the Fermi-Dirac distribution function at zero temerature for articles with momentum,sin rojectionσ, andmassm.byaddingarticlesorholes,the distribution function is changed by δn σ = n σ n 0 σ, and the total energy of the system by δe = E E 0 = σ 2m δn σ. (2) When a article is added in the state σ, one has δn σ = 1 and when a article is removed (a hole is added) δn σ = 1. In the interacting system the corresonding state is one with a quasiarticle added or removed, and the change in energy is given by δe = σ ε σ δn σ, (3) where ε σ = δe/δn σ denotes the quasiarticle energy. When two or more quasiarticles are added to the system, an additional term takes into account the interaction between the quasiarticles: δe = σ ε 0 σ δn σ + 1 2V σ 1,σ 2 f 1σ 1σ 2 δn 1σ 1 δn 2σ 2. (4) Here ε 0 σ is the quasiarticle energy in the ground state. In the next section, we will show that the exansion in δn is general and does not require weak interactions. The small exansion arameter in Fermi liquid theory is the density of quasiarticles, or equivalently the excitation energy, and not the strength of the interaction. This allows a systematic treatment of strongly interacting systems at low temeratures. The second term in Eq. (4), the quasiarticle interaction f 1σ 1σ 2, has no corresondence in the non-interacting Fermi gas. In an excited state with more than one quasiarticle, the quasiarticle energy is modified according to ε σ = δe δn σ = ε 0 σ + 1 V σ 2 f σ2σ 2 δn 2σ 2, (5)

4 4 B. Friman, K. Hebeler and A. Schwenk where the changes are effectively roortional to the quasiarticle density. The quasiarticle interaction can be understood microscoically from the second variation of the energy with resect to the quasiarticle distribution, f 1σ 1σ 2 = V δ 2 E δn 1σ 1 δn 2σ 2 = V δε σ 1 δn 2σ 2. (6) As discussed in detail in Section 2.5, this variation diagrammatically corresonds to cutting one of the fermion lines in a given energy diagram and labeling the incoming and outgoing fermion by σ 1, followed by a second variation leading to σ 2. For the uniform system, the resulting contributions to f 1σ 1σ 2 are quasiarticle reducible in the article-article and in the exchange article-hole (induced interaction) channels, but irreducible in the direct article-hole (zero sound) channel. The zero-sound reducible diagrams are generated by the article-hole scattering equation. In normal Fermi systems, the quasiarticle concet makes sense only for states close to the Fermi surface, where the quasiarticle life-time τ is long. The leading term is quadratic in the momentum difference from the Fermi surface [10], 1/τ ( k F ) 2, while the deendence of the quasiarticle energy is linear, ε µ ( k F ). Thus, the condition ε µ 1 τ, (7) which is needed for the quasiarticle to be well defined, is satisfied by states close enough to the Fermi surface. Generally, quasiarticles are useful for time scales τ τ and thus for high frequencies ω τ 1. In articular, states dee in the Fermi sea, which are occuied in the ground-state distribution, do not corresond to well-defined quasiarticles. Accordingly, we refer to the interacting ground state that corresonds to a filled Fermi sea in the noninteracting system as a state with no quasiarticles. In a weakly excited state the quasiarticle distribution δn σ is generally non-zero only for states close to the Fermi surface. For low-lying excitations, the quasiarticle energy ε σ and interaction f 1σ 1σ 2 is needed only for momenta close to the Fermi momentum k F. It is then sufficient to retain the leading term in the exansion of ε σ µ around the Fermi surface, and to take the magnitude of the quasiarticle momenta in f 1σ 1σ 2 equal to the Fermi momentum. In an isotroic and sin-saturated system (N = N ), and if the interaction between free articles is invariant under SU(2) sin symmetry (so that there are no non-central contributions, such as σ to the energy), we have ε σ µ = ε µ v F ( k F )+..., (8) where v F = k F /m denotes the Fermi velocity and m is the effective mass. In addition, the quasiarticle interaction can be decomosed as

5 Renormalization grou and Fermi liquid theory for many-nucleon systems 5 f 1σ 1σ 2 = f s +f a σ 1 σ 2, (9) where f s = 1 2 ( f1 +f 1 ) and f a = 1 2 ( ) f1 f 1. (10) In nuclear hysics the notation f 1 = f s and g 1 = f a is generally used, and the quasiarticle interaction includes additional terms that take into account the isosin deendence and non-central tensor contributions [11, 12, 13]. However, for our discussion here, the sin and isosin deendence is not imortant. For the uniform system, Eq. (6) yields the quasiarticle interaction only for forward scattering (low momentum transfers). In the article-hole channel, this corresonds to the long-wavelength limit. This restriction, which is consistent with considering low excitation energies, constrains the momenta and to be close to the Fermi surface, = = k F. The quasiarticle interaction then deends only on the angle between and. It is convenient to exand this deendence on Legendre olynomials f s/a = f s/a (cosθ 1 ) = l f s/a l P l (cosθ 1 ), (11) and to define the dimensionless Landau Parameters F s/a l F s/a l by = N(0)f s/a l, (12) σ δ(ε σ µ) = m k F /π 2 denotes the quasiarticledensity where N(0) = 1 V of states at the Fermi surface. The Landau arameters can be directly related to macroscoic roerties of the system. F1 s determines the effective mass and the secific heat c V, m m = 1+ Fs 1 3, (13) c V = m k F 3 k 2 BT, (14) while the comressibility K and incomressibility κ are given by F s 0, K = 1 V κ = 9 nk = 9V n V P = 1 n 2 n µ = 1 n 2 N(0) 1+F s 0 Moreover, the sin suscetibility χ m is related to F a 0, χ m = m H, (15) P V = 9 P n = 3k2 F m (1+Fs 0). (16) = β2 N(0) 1+F a 0, (17)

6 6 B. Friman, K. Hebeler and A. Schwenk for sin-1/2 fermions with magnetic moment β = ge/(4m) and gyromagnetic ratio g. Finally, a stability analysis of the Fermi surface against small amlitude deformations leads to the Pomeranchuk criteria [14] F s/a l > (2l+1). (18) For instance F s/a 0 < 1 imlies an instability against sontaneous growth of density/sin fluctuations. Landau s theory of normal Fermi liquids is an effective low-energy theory in the modern sense [1, 2]. The effective theory incororates the symmetries of the system and the low-energy coulings can be fixed by exeriment or calculated microscoically based on the underlying theory. Fermi Liquid theory has been very successful in describing low-temerature Fermi liquids, in articular liquid 3 He. Alications to the normal hase are reviewed, for examle, in Baym and Pethick [10] and Pines and Nozières [15], while we refer to Wölfle and Vollhardt [16] for a descrition of the suerfluid hases. The first alications to nuclear systems were ioneered by Migdal [11] and first microscoic calculations for nuclei and nuclear matter by Brown et al. [12]. Recently, advances using RG methods for nuclear forces [17] have lead to the develoment of a non-erturbative RG aroach for nucleonic matter [18], to a first comlete study of the sin structure of induced interactions [13], and to new calculations of Fermi liquid arameters [19, 20]. 2.2 Three-quasiarticle interactions In Section 2.1, we introduced Fermi liquid theory as an exansion in the density of quasiarticles δn/v. In alications of Fermi liquid theory to date, even for liquid 3 He, which is a very dense and strongly interacting system, this exansion is truncated after the second-order (δn) 2 term, including only airwise interactions of quasiarticles (see Eq. (4)). However, for a strongly interacting system, there is a riori no reason that three-body (or higherbody) interactions between quasiarticles are small. In this section, we discuss the convergence of this exansion. Three-quasiarticle interactions arise from iterated two-body forces, leading to three- and higher-body clusters in the linked-cluster exansion, or through many-body forces. While three-body forces lay an imortant role in nuclear hysics [21, 22, 23], little is known about them in other Fermi liquids. Nevertheless, in strongly interacting systems, the contributions of many-body clusters can in general be significant, leading to otentially imortant (δn) 3 terms in the Fermi liquid exansion, also in the absence of three-body forces: δe = 1 ε 0 1 δn V 1,2 f (2) 1,2 δn 1δn V 2 1,2,3 f (3) 1,2,3 δn 1δn 2 δn 3. (19) Here f (n) 1,...,n denotes the n-quasiarticle interaction (the Landau interaction is f f (2) ) and we have introduced the short-hand notation n n σ n.

7 Renormalization grou and Fermi liquid theory for many-nucleon systems 7 In order to better understand the exansion, Eq. (19), around the interacting groundstate with N fermions, considerexciting oradding N q quasiarticles with N q N. The microscoic contributions from many-body clusters or from many-body forces can be groued into diagrams containing zero, one, two, three, or more quasiarticle lines. The terms with zero quasiarticle lines contribute to the interacting ground state for δn = 0, whereas the terms with one, two,andthree quasiarticlelinescontribute to ε 0 1, f (2) 1,2, and f(3) 1,2,3, resectively (these also deend on the ground-state density due to the N fermion lines). The terms with more than three quasiarticle lines would contribute to higher-quasiarticle interactions. Because a quasiarticle line relaces a line summed over N fermions when going from ε 0 1 to f (2) 1,2, and from f(2) 1,2 to f(3) 1,2,3, it is intuitively clear that the contributions due to three-quasiarticle interactions are suressed by N q /N comared to two-quasiarticle interactions, and that the Fermi liquid exansion is effectively an exansion in N q /N or n q /n [15]. Fermi liquid theory alies to normal Fermi systems at low energies and temeratures, or equivalently at low quasiarticle densities. We first consider excitations that conserve the net number of quasiarticles,δn = σ δn σ = 0, so that the number of quasiarticles equals the number of quasiholes. This corresonds to the lowest energy excitations of normal Fermi liquids. We denote their energy scale by. Excitations with one valence article or quasiarticle added start from energies of order the chemical otential µ. In the case of δn = 0, the contributions of two-quasiarticle interactions are of the same order as the first-order δn term, but three-quasiarticle interactions are suressed by /µ [24]. This is the reason that Fermi liquid theory with only two-body Landau arameters is so successful in describing even strongly interacting and dense Fermi liquids. This counting is best seen from the variation of the free energy F = E µn, δf = δ(e µn) = 1 (ε 0 1 µ)δn V 1,2 f (2) 1,2 δn 1δn V 2 1,2,3 f (3) 1,2,3 δn 1δn 2 δn 3, (20) which for δn = 0 is equivalent to δe of Eq. (19). The quasiarticle distribution is δn σ 1 within a shell around the Fermi surface ε 0 σ µ. The first-order δn term is therefore roortional to times the number of quasiarticles σ δn σ = N q N( /µ), and 1 (ε 0 1 µ)δn 1 N 2 µ. (21) Corresondingly, the contribution of two-quasiarticle interactions yields 1 f (2) 1,2 2V δn 1δn 2 1 ( ) 2 N V f(2) F (2) N 2 µ µ, (22) 1,2

8 8 B. Friman, K. Hebeler and A. Schwenk where F (2) = n f (2) /µ is an averagedimensionless couling on the order of the Landau arameters. Even in the strongly interacting, scale-invariant case f (2) 1/k F ; hence F (2) 1 and the contribution of two-quasiarticle interactions is of the same order as the first-order term. However, the threequasiarticle contribution is of order 1 6V 2 1,2,3 f (3) 1,2,3 δn 1δn 2 δn 3 n2 µ f(3) N 3 µ 2 F (3) N 3 µ 2. (23) Therefore at low excitation energies this is suressed by /µ, comared to two-quasiarticle interactions, even if the dimensionless three-quasiarticle interaction F (3) = n 2 f (3) /µ is strong (of order 1). Similarly, higher n-body interactions are suressed by ( /µ) n 2. Normal Fermi systems at low energies are weakly couled in this sense. The small arameter is the ratio of the excitation energy er article to the chemical otential. These considerations hold for all normal Fermi systems where the underlying interarticle interactions are finite range. The Fermi liquid exansion in /µ is equivalent to an exansion in N q /N /µ, the ratio of the number of quasiarticles and quasiholes N q to the number of articles N in the interacting ground state, or an exansion in the density of excited quasiarticles over the ground-state density, n q /n. For the case where N q quasiarticles or valence articles are added to a Fermi-liquid ground state, δn 0 and the first-order term is ε 0 1 δn 1 µn q µ N N, (24) µ 1 while the contribution of two-quasiarticle interactions is suressed by N q /N /µ and that of three-quasiarticle interactions by (N q /N) 2. Therefore, either for δn = 0 or δn 0, the contributions of threequasiarticle interactions to normal Fermi systems at low excitation energies are suressed by the ratio of the quasiarticle density to the ground-state density, or equivalently by the ratio of the excitation energy over the chemical otential. This holds for excitations that conserve the number of articles (excited states of the interacting ground state) as well as for excitations that add or remove articles. This suression is general and alies to strongly interacting systems even with strong, but finite-range three-body forces. However, this does not imly that the contributions from three-body forces to the interacting ground-state energy (the energy of the core nucleus in the context of shell-model calculations), to quasiarticle energies, or to two-quasiarticle interactions are small. The argument only alies to the effects of residual three-body interactions at low energies. 2.3 Microscoic foundation of Fermi liquid theory A central object in microscoic aroaches to many-body systems is the onebody (time-ordered) roagator or Green s function G defined by

9 Renormalization grou and Fermi liquid theory for many-nucleon systems 9 Im ω Im ω 2m iδ Reω 2m + iδ Re ω Fig. 2. Analytic structure of the free one-body Green s function G 0 in the comlex ω lane with simle oles for > k F (left) and < k F (right). G(1,2) = i 0 Tψ(1)ψ (2) 0, (25) where 0 denotes the ground state of the system, T is the time-ordering oerator, ψ and ψ annihilate and create a fermion, resectively, and 1, 2 are short hand for sace, time and internal degrees of freedom (such as sin and isosin). For a translationally invariant sin-saturated system that is also invariant under rotations in sin sace, the Green s function is diagonal in sin and can be written in momentum sace as G(ω,)δ σ1σ 2 = d(1 2)G(1,2)e iω(t1 t2) i (x1 x2) δ σ1σ = 2 ω 2 2m Σ(ω,), (26) where Σ(ω, ) defines the self-energy. For an introduction to many-body theory and additional details, we refer to the books by Fetter and Walecka [25], Abrikosov, Gor kov and Dzyaloshinski [26], Negele and Orland [27], and Altland and Simons [28]. Without interactions the self-energy vanishes and consequently the free Green s function G 0 reads G 0 (ω,) = 1 ω 2 2m +iδ = 1 n 0 ω 2 2m +iδ + n0, (27) ω 2 2m iδ where δ = δ sign( k F ) and δ is a ositive infinitesimal. The free Green s function has simle oles, as illustrated in Fig. 2, and the imaginary art takes the form ) ImG 0 (ω,) = π(1 2n 0 )δ (ω 2. (28) 2m The single-article sectral function ρ(ω, ) is determined by the imaginary art of the retarded roagator G R (1,2) = iθ(t 1 t 2 ) 0 { ψ(1),ψ (2) } 0, (29) ρ(ω,) = 1 π ImGR (ω,), (30)

10 10 B. Friman, K. Hebeler and A. Schwenk where {, } denotes the anticommutator. The retarded roagator is analytic in the uer comlex ω lane and fulfills Kramers-Kronig relations, which relate the real and imaginary arts. Physically this imlies that all modes are roagating forward in time and causality is fulfilled. Therefore, resonse functions are usually exressed in terms of the retarded roagator. In a non-interacting system the retarded roagator is given by G R 1 0 (ω,) =, (31) ω 2 2m +iδ ) ImG R 0 (ω,) = πδ (ω 2, (32) 2m which imlies that the free sectral function is a delta function ρ 0 (ω,) = δ(ω 2 2m ). This simle form follows from the fact that single-article lanewave states are eigenstates of the non-interacting Hamiltonian. In the interacting case the situation is more comlicated. Here the quasiarticle energy is given imlicitly by the Dyson equation ε = 2 2m +Σ(ε,). (33) At the chemical otential ω = µ, the imaginary art of the self-energy vanishes, ImΣ(µ,) = 0, (34) and the quasiarticle life-time τ for k F. 1 For ω µ, the imaginary art of the self-energy obeys ImΣ(ω,) < 0, for ω > µ, (35) ImΣ(ω,) > 0, for ω < µ. (36) The retarded self-energy, which enters the retarded Green s function is related to the time-ordered one through G R 1 (ω,) = ω 2 2m ΣR (ω,), (37) ReΣ R (ω,) = ReΣ(ω,), (38) { +ImΣ(ω,) < 0, for ω > µ, ImΣ R (ω,) = ImΣ(ω,) < 0, for ω < µ. (39) Using Eq. (30), one finds the general form of the sectral function 1 Atnon-zerotemerature, the imaginary art of theself-energy never vanishes and the quasiarticle life-time is finite. However, for T µ and ω µ, the life-time is large and the quasiarticle concet is useful.

11 Renormalization grou and Fermi liquid theory for many-nucleon systems 11 ρ(ω,) = 1 ImΣ R (ω,) [ π ω 2m ReΣR (ω,) ] 2 [ + ImΣR (ω,) ] 2. (40) In the interacting case the single-article strength is therefore, for a given momentum state, fragmented in energy, and the sectral function rovides a measure of the single-article strength in the eigenstates of the Hamiltonian, with the normalization dωρ(ω,) = 1. The sectral or Källén-Lehmann reresentation of the Green s function, G R (ω,) = dω ρ(ω,) ω ω +iδ, (41) follows from analyticity and imlies that the full roagator is comletely determined by the sectral function. Using Eq.(41) and the normalization condition, the asymtotic ( ω ) behaviorof both G R (ω,) and G(ω,) 1/ω follows. Furthermore, the singularities of the full Green s function (that corresond to eigenvalues of the Hamiltonian) are all located on the real axis and result in a cut along the real axis in the continuum limit. The quasiarticle ole, on the other hand, is located off the real axis, on an unhysical Riemann sheet, 2 with the distance to the real axis given by the quasiarticle width, quasiarticle ole ( k F ): ω q = ε iγ, quasihole ole ( k F ): ω q = ε +iγ. (44) A ole close to the real axis gives rise to a eak in the single-article strength, as illustrated in Fig. 3. Hence, microscoically a quasiarticle or quasihole is identified by a well-defined eak in the sectral function. In other words, the excitation of a quasiarticle corresonds to the coherent excitation of several eigenstates H ψ i = E i ψ i of the Hamiltonian, with similar energies E i (ω ε in Eq. (41)) sread over the quasiarticle width Γ = τ 1. A quasiarticle created at t = 0 then roagates in time as ψ q (t) = i c i e ieit ψ i. (45) 2 This is readily seen by evaluating G(z = ω ±iδ,) for a sectral function of the quasiarticle form, ρ(ω,) = 1 π Γ /2 (ω ε ) 2 +Γ 2 /4, (42) using the Källén-Lehmann reresentation for the Green s function at a comlex argument, G(z,) = dω ρ(ω,). (43) z ω One then finds that G(ω ±iδ,) = (ω ε ± iγ /2) 1. This imlies that for ω in the uer half lane the quasiarticle ole is in the lower half lane and vice versa.

12 12 B. Friman, K. Hebeler and A. Schwenk ρ(, ω) 2Γ µ ε ω Fig. 3. Sectral function ρ(ω,) for a given momentum k F as a function of frequency ω. The shaded art marks the quasiarticle eak, with quasiarticle width Γ and single-article strength z. For short times, t 1/Γ, the eigenstates remain coherent and the quasiarticle is well defined, while for t 1/Γ, the hase coherence is lost and the quasiarticle decays. Using this definition of a quasiarticle, the full roagator can be formally searated into a quasiarticle art and a smooth background φ(ω, ): G(ω,) = z ω ε +iγ +φ(ω,), (46) where the single-article strength z carried by the quasiarticle is given by [ z = 1 Σ(ω,) ] 1 ω < 1, (47) ω=ε and must be less than unity due to the normalization of the sectral function. Close to the Fermi surface the width Γ is small, Γ ( k F ) 2, and consequently quasiarticles are well defined. For rocesses with a tyical time scale τ < τ = Γ 1, the contribution of the quasiarticle remains coherent, while that of the smooth background is incoherent. Even for very small values of the single-article strength z, quasiarticles lay a leading role at sufficiently low excitation energies. 2.4 Scattering of quasiarticles Quasiarticle scattering rocesses are in general described by the Bethe- Saleter equation. The quasiarticle scattering amlitude is given by the full four-oint function Γ, which includes contributions from scattering in the channels shown in Fig. 4. For small q = (ω,q), the contribution of the direct article-hole or zero-sound (ZS) channel is singular due to a inching of the

13 Renormalization grou and Fermi liquid theory for many-nucleon systems 13 P 2 + q 2 q 2 q/2 P 2 q 2 + q 2 P 2 + q 2 q 2 P 2 q 2 + q 2 P 2 + k P 2 k P 2 + q 2 + q 2 + q/2 P 2 q 2 q 2 P 2 + q 2 + q 2 q /2 + q /2 P 2 q 2 q 2 P/2 + P/2 P 2 + k P 2 k Fig. 4. Scattering channels in a many-fermion system. The direct article-hole or zero-sound (ZS) channel (left), the exchange article-hole (ZS ) channel (middle) and the article-article/hole-hole (BCS) channel (right). The relative incoming and outgoing four-momenta k,k are related to the momentum transfers q,q by k = (q +q)/2 and k = (q q)/2. The center-of-mass momentum is denoted by P. + q 2 q 2 + q 2 q 2 + q 2 q 2 Γ Γ = Γ + + q 2 q 2 + q 2 q 2 + q 2 q 2 Γ + q 2 q 2 Fig. 5. The Bethe-Saleter equation in the ZS channel, Eq. (48). integration contour by the quasiarticle oles of the two intermediate roagators for any external momenta = (P + q )/2 and = (P q )/2, as discussed below and in detail in Ref. [26]. In contrast, for small q the exchange article-hole (ZS ) and the article-article/hole-hole (BCS) channels are smooth for almost all external momenta. 3 The Bethe-Saleter equation that sums all ZS-channel reducible diagrams is shown diagrammatically in Fig. 5 and reads Γ(, ;q) = Γ(, ;q) d 4 i (2π) Γ( 4 1,;q)G(+q/2)G( q/2)γ(, ;q), (48) where Γ denotes the ZS-channel irreducible four-oint function and we suress the sin of the fermions for simlicity. The singular art of the two intermediate roagators is obtained by using the quasiarticle reresenta- 3 The BCS singularity for back-to-back scattering, P = 0, is discussed in Section 3.

14 14 B. Friman, K. Hebeler and A. Schwenk tion of the Green s function, Eq. (46), and for q 0 one finds z +q/2 G(+q/2)G( q/2) = ε+ω/2 µ v F ( +q /2 k F )+iδ +q /2 z q/2 +φ 2 (), ε ω/2 µ v F ( q /2 k F )+iδ q /2 = 2πiz 2 k F q cosθ q ω v F q cosθ q δ(ε µ)δ( k F )+φ 2 (), (49) where = (ε, ). The first term in Eq. (49) is the quasiarticle-quasihole art, which constrains the intermediate states to the Fermi surface, and the contribution φ 2 () includes at least one owerofthe smoothbackgroundφ(). In addition, we have taken q 0 in all nonsingular terms and neglected the quasiarticle width, which is small close to the Fermi surface. We observe that the quasiarticle-quasihole art of the article-hole roagator vanishes in the limit q /ω 0. Therefore, we define Γ ω ( (, ) = lim Γ(1, ;q) ) ω 0 q =0, (50) Γ q ( (, ) = lim Γ(1, ;q) ) q 0 ω=0. (51) Using the quasiarticle-quasihole reresentation of the article-hole roagator, Eq. (49), the Bethe-Saleter equation in the ZS channel takes the form Γ(, ;q) = Γ(, ;q) i + z2 k F kf 2 (2π) 3 d 4 (2π) 4 Γ(,;q)φ 2 ()Γ(, ;q) dω Γ(1,;q) q cosθ q ω v F q cosθ q Γ(, ;q). (52) In the limit q /ω 0, we have for the quasiarticle-quasihole irreducible art of the four-oint function Γ ω, Γ ω (, ) = Γ(, ) i d 4 (2π) 4 Γ(,)φ 2 ()Γ ω (, ). (53) Using Γ ω, we can then eliminate the ZS-channel irreducible four-oint function Γ and the background term φ 2 to write the Bethe-Saleter equation in the form Γ(, ;q) = Γ ω (, )+ z2 k F k 2 F (2π) 3 In the limit ω/ q 0 one then finds Γ q (, ) = Γ ω (, ) z2 k F m k F (2π) 3 dω Γ ω q cosθ q (,) Γ(, ;q). ω v F q cosθ q (54) dω Γ ω (,)Γ q (, ), (55)

15 Renormalization grou and Fermi liquid theory for many-nucleon systems 15 which describes the scattering of quasiarticles. By identifying the quasiarticle interaction with (as justified in Section 2.5) f 1 = z 2 k F Γ ω (, ) ω1=ε 1,ω 2=ε 2, (56) and the quasiarticle scattering amlitude with a 1 = z 2 k F Γ q (, ) ω1=ε 1,ω 2=ε 2, (57) the Bethe-Saleter equation for the quasiarticle scattering amlitude reads a 1σ 1σ 2 = f 1σ 1σ 2 N(0) dω a 1σ 8π 1σf σ2σ 2, (58) where we have reintroduced sin indices. By exanding the angular deendence of the quasiarticle scattering amlitude on Legendre olynomials, a s/a = a s/a (cosθ 1 ) = l σ a s/a l P l (cosθ 1 ), (59) and using the corresonding exansion of the quasiarticle interaction, Eq. (11), the quasiarticle scattering equation, Eq.(58), can be solved analytically for each value of l, A s,a l = F s,a l 1+ Fs,a l 2l+1, (60) with A s,a l = N(0)a s,a l. This analytic solution of the quasiarticle scattering equation, Eq. (54), is in general ossible only in the limit q 0. Quasiarticles are fermionic excitations and therefore obey the Pauli rincile. This imoses nontrivial constraints on the Landau arameters, as can be seen by the following argument. The full four-oint function must be antisymmetric under exchange of two articles in the initial or final states, P 2 + k, σ 1 P 2 k, σ 2 P 2 k, σ 2 P 2 + k, σ 1 Γ = Γ, (61) P 2 + k, σ 1 P 2 k, σ 2 P 2 + k, σ 1 P 2 k, σ 2 and therefore the forward scattering amlitude, q = 0, of identical articles, q = 0 and σ 1 = σ 2, must vanish. This imlies a 1σ 1σ 1 = 0, which leads to the Pauli-rincile sum rule [7, 29] ( A s l +A a ) l = 0. (62) l The relations given in this section can be generalized to include isosin and tensor forces [12, 13, 30, 31], which lay an imortant role in nuclear systems.

16 16 B. Friman, K. Hebeler and A. Schwenk 2.5 Functional aroach Functional methods rovide a owerful tool for studying many-body systems. We start by discussing the two-article irreducible (2PI) effective action. This rovides a useful framework for an RG aroach to many-body systems. For simlicity, we first consider bosonic systems described by a scalar field φ and generalize the results later to fermions. Our discussion follows Ref. [32]. We start with the exression for the generating functional W for connected N- oint functions W[J,K] = ln [ Dφ ex is[φ] d 4 xφ(x)j(x) 1 ] d 4 xd 4 yφ(x)k(x,y)φ(y), (63) 2 where Dφ denotes a functional integral over the field φ, the action is given by S[φ] = d 4 xl(φ(x)), and J(x) and K(x,y) are external sources. In thermodynamic equilibrium, the sace-time integral is d 4 x = iβ 0 dt d 3 x, (64) with inverse temerature β = 1/T. By taking functional derivatives with resect to J and K, we obtain the exectation value of the field φ = φ and the Green s function G resectively, δw[j,k] = φ(x) = φ(x), δj(x) (65) δw[j,k] δk(x,y) = 1 ( ) φ(x)φ(y)+g(x,y). 2 (66) A double Legendre transform leads to the 2PI effective action Γ[φ,G], Γ[φ,G] = W[J,K] d 4 xφ(x)j(x) 1 2 [ ] d 4 x d 4 y φ(x)φ(y)+g(x,y) K(x,y), (67) which is stationary with resect to variations of φ and G for vanishing sources, δγ[φ,g] δφ(x) = J(x) d 4 yk(x,y)φ(y) J=K=0 = 0, (68) δγ[φ,g] δg(x,y) = 1 J=K=0 K(x,y) = 0. (69) 2

17 Renormalization grou and Fermi liquid theory for many-nucleon systems 17 An exlicit form for Γ in terms of the exectation value φ and the exact Green s function G can be constructed following Refs. [32, 33, 34]. This leads to [ ] Γ[φ,G] = is[φ]+trlng 1 +Tr (G 1 0 G 1 )G Φ[φ,G]. (70) Here the functional Φ is the sum of all 2PI skeleton diagrams (for a discussion of diagrams, see below) and the trace is a short-hand notation for iβ Tr = d 4 xtr = dt d 3 xtr, (71) where tr denotes the trace over the internal degrees of freedom, such as sin and isosin. The stationarity of the 2PI effective action in the absence of sources, Eqs.(68) and(69), leads to the ga and Dyson equations, resectively. With the exlicit form for Γ, Eq. (70), the Dyson equation is given by which imlies δγ[φ,g] δg 0 = G 1 +G δφ[φ,g] = 0, (72) δg G 1 = G 1 0 Σ, (73) with the self-consistently determined self-energy Σ defined by Σ = δφ[φ,g] δg. (74) At the stationary oint, the 2PI effective action Γ is roortional to the thermodynamic otential Ω = TΓ (in units with volume V = 1) [35]: [ ] Ω(µ,T) = d 3 xl(φ(x))+ω 0 (µ,t)+t Trln(1 G 0 Σ)+TrΣG Φ(φ,G), (75) where we have introduced the thermodynamic otential of the non-interacting Bose gas, Ω 0 (µ,t) = T TrlnG 1 0 = T tr [ d [ ( 2 )]] (2π) 3 ln 1 ex β µ, (76) 2m and the third term on the right-hand side of Eq. (75) can also be written as T TrlnG0 1 +T TrlnG 1,sothatΩ 0 (µ,t)+t Trln(1 G 0 Σ) = T TrlnG 1. Finally, one can verify that the form of the 2PI effective action given by Eq. (75), where the self-energy enters exlicitly, is stationary with resect to indeendent variations of G and Σ. Similarly one has for the thermodynamic otential of a system consisting of fermions (where the exectation value ψ vanishes in the absence of sources) [ ] Ω(µ,T) = T TrlnG 1 +TrΣG Φ[G]. (77)

18 18 B. Friman, K. Hebeler and A. Schwenk Im ω C occuied states µ unoccuied states Re ω Fig. 6. Integration contour in the comlex ω lane at T = 0. Moreover the energy of a fermionic system can be exressed at T = 0 in a form similar to Eq. (75), E = E 0 Trln(1 G 0 Σ) TrΣG+Φ[G]. (78) Here E 0 = tr d (2π) 3 2m n0 σ is the energy of the non-interacting system, and at T = 0 the trace in Eq. (78) is given by Tr = tr d 4 (2π) 4 i = tr C dω 2πi d (2π) 3, (79) where the integration contour C is shown in Fig. 6. Next, we use the functional integral aroach to relate the quasiarticle interaction to the quasiarticle-quasihole irreducible art of the four-oint function Γ ω following Ref. [36]. In the quasiarticle aroximation, the full roagator takes the form of Eq. (46), 1 G(ω,) = G 1 0 (ω,) Σ(ω,) = z +φ(ω,), (80) ω ε +iδ where we have neglected the imaginary art of the self-energy for excitations close to the Fermi surface. As shown in Section 2.3, the quasiarticle energy ε is given by the self-consistent solution to the Dyson equation, Eq. (33), ε = 2 2m +Σ(ε,), (81) and the single-article strength z by Eq. (47). When a quasiarticle with momentum is added to the system, the state is changed from unoccuied to occuied, so that δ = δ δ, with ositive infinitesimal δ > 0. Because the 2PI effective action is stationary with resect to indeendent variations of G and Σ, we only need to consider changes of E 0 and those induced by

19 Renormalization grou and Fermi liquid theory for many-nucleon systems 19 Im ω n = 0 n = 1 2m +iπ iπ ε Re ω Fig. 7. Analytic structure of ln(g 0G 1 ) in the comlex ω lane for ε > 2 2m. The uer (lower) contour is for n = 0 (n = 1) and the shaded region reresents the comlex cut on the real axis. variations of G 0 in Eq. (78). In the quasiarticle aroximation, we have for the argument of the logarithm, 1 G 0 ()Σ() = G 0 ()G 1 () = 1 ω ε +iδ z ω 2 2m +iδ + smooth arts. (82) Consider the case ε > 2 2m. Then the real art of G 0G 1 is negative for 2m < ω < ε, resulting in a cut on the real energy, as shown in Fig. 7. When a article is added to the system, the integration contour changes from above the cut to below, and ln(g 0 G 1 ) changes by 2πi for 2 2m < ω < ε. As a result, the change in the energy of the system is given by δe = δe 0 δ δn δn δn = 2 2m + ( C (ε 2 2m dω d 2πi (2π) 3 ln( G 0 ()G 1 () ) ), (83) ) = ε. (84) This variation is the quasiarticle energy, as ostulated by Landau. As discussed in Section 2.1, the quasiarticle interaction f 1 is obtained by an additional variation with resect to the occuation number n 2, f 1 = δ 2 E δn 1 δn 2 = δε δn 2. (85) Using the Dyson equation, Eq. (81), the variation of the quasiarticle energy ε 1 with resect to the occuation number n 2 yields δε 1 = δσ(ω 1, ) δn 2 δn 2 + Σ(ω 1, ) δε 1 ω1=ε 1 ω 1. (86) ω1=ε 1 δn 2 This can be exressed with the single-article strength z as

20 20 B. Friman, K. Hebeler and A. Schwenk Fig. 8. Only 2PI skeleton diagrams contribute to the self-energy Σ, as shown on the left. Non-skeleton diagrams, such as the one on the right, are not art of Σ. Therefore, the kernel Γ = δσ/δg (denoted by the shaded blob) is article-hole irreducible in the ZS channel. δε 1 δσ(ω 1, ) = z 1 δn 2. (87) ω1=ε 1 δn 2 Furthermore, it follows from the definition of Σ through the Φ functional, Σ() = δφ[g]/δg(), that the self-energy consists of skeleton diagrams. Therefore, we can write δσ(ω 1, ) δn 2 = ω1=ε 1 d 4 (2π) 4 i δσ(ω 1, ) δg() δg() δn 2. (88) ω1=ε 1 The variation of Σ with resect to G selects one of the internal lines of the diagrams contributing to the self-energy. As a result, the kernel Γ(, ) = δσ() δg( ), (89) must be article-hole irreducible in the ZS channel. Otherwise the corresonding diagram in Σ would not have been a 2PI skeleton diagram. This is illustrated in Fig. 8. Using the quasiarticle form of the full roagator, Eq. (80), there are two contributions to δg( )/δn 2 (for details, see also Ref. [36]). One for = (ω 2 = ε 2 ), which results in a shift of the quasiarticle ole across the integration contour, and one for, which corresonds to a variation of the self-energy, δg( ) δn 2 = (2π) 4 iz 2 δ( )δ(ω 1 ε 2 )+ δσ() δn 2 G 2 ( ). (90) The G 2 ( ) art in the second term is equivalent to the non-singular contribution φ 2 ( ) of Eq. (49). By inserting this exression for δg( )/δn 2 in Eq. (88), one finds the integral equation Y(, ) = 1 δσ(ω 1, ) z 2 (91) ω1=ε 1 δn 2 = Γ(, )+ d 4 (2π) 4 i Γ(,)G 2 ()Y(, ). (92)

21 Renormalization grou and Fermi liquid theory for many-nucleon systems 21 E (2) ε (2) f (2) Fig. 9. The variation of the second-order energy diagram E (2) (left) with resect to the quasiarticle distribution function yields the second-order contribution to the quasiarticle energy ε (2) given by the self-energy diagram (middle) and the corresonding two-hole one-article diagram. The second variation gives the second-order contributions to the quasiarticle interaction (right). These include the articlearticle and article-hole diagrams shown and a article-hole diagram that is obtained from the article-article one by reversing the arrow on the line (lus the diagrams obtained from the two-hole one-article self-energy contribution). A comarison with Eq. (53) leads to the identification Y(, ) = Γ ω (, ) = 1 δσ(ω 1, ) z 2. (93) ω1=ε 1 Using Eq. (87), this imlies δn 2 z2 z2 f 1 = δε δn 2 = z 1 z 2 Γ ω (, ) = Γ ω. (94) z1 z1 This rovidesamicroscoicbasis for calculatingthe quasiarticleenergyε = δe δn 1 and the quasiarticle interaction f 1 = δ2 E δn 1 δn 2 and a justification for the identification of the quasiarticle interaction as in Eq. (56). The contributions to the quasiarticle interaction can be understood by considering the variation of the second-order energy diagram, as shown in Fig. 9. The resulting diagrams in f 1 are quasiarticle-quasihole reducible in the BCS and ZS channels, but irreducible in the ZS channel (see Fig. 4 for a definition of the BCS, ZS and ZS channels). The ZS reducible diagrams, which are shown for the second-order examle in Fig. 10, are included in the scattering amlitude a 1 but not in the quasiarticle interaction. Because the ZS and ZS channels are related by exchange [37], the quasiarticle scattering amlitude is antisymmetric, but the quasiarticle interaction is not.

22 22 B. Friman, K. Hebeler and A. Schwenk Fig. 10. Second-order diagrams that are not generated by variations of the energy diagram. Γ q Γ q = Γ ω + Γ ω Fig. 11. The Bethe-Saleter equation for the quasiarticle scattering amlitude, Eq. (55), which sums diagrams reducible in the ZS channel. The intermediate-state roagators include only the quasiarticle-quasihole art. All other contributions are included in Γ ω. The quasiarticle-quasihole reducible diagrams in the ZS channel are summed by the Bethe-Saleter equation, Eq. (55), which yields the fully reducible four-oint function Γ q, given the quasiarticle-quasihole irreducible one Γ ω, as shown in Fig. 11. The fully reducible four-oint function Γ q corresonds to the quasiarticle scattering amlitude. The four-oint function can also be obtained by summing diagrams that are quasiarticle-quasihole reducible in the ZS channel. The corresonding Bethe-Saleter equation is shown in Fig. 12, where the irreducible term is the quasiarticle interaction in the ZS channel, the exchange of Γ ω denoted by Γ ω. The kinematics in the integral term on the right-hand side of Fig. 12 requiresasinut the quasiarticlescatteringamlitude Γ q andthe quasiarticle interaction Γ ω at finite q. Therefore, we can generalize Γ q on the left-hand side to finite q. If we then take the limit q /ω 0, all quasiarticle-quasihole reducible terms in the ZS channel vanish. In this limit, Γ q on the left-hand side of Fig. 12 is relaced by Γ ω, and the first term on the right hand side, Γ ω, is reduced to the driving term I, which is quasiarticle-quasihole irreducible in both ZS and ZS channels. As a result, we obtain an integral equation for Γ ω that sums quasiarticle-quasihole reducible diagrams in the ZS channel.

23 Renormalization grou and Fermi liquid theory for many-nucleon systems 23 Γ q = Γ ω + Γ ω Γ q Fig. 12. The Bethe-Saleter equation for the quasiarticle scattering amlitude in the exchange (ZS ) channel. In this channel, the solution requires as inut the quasiarticle scattering amlitude Γ q and the quasiarticle interaction Γ ω at finite q. As in Fig. 11, the intermediate-state roagators include only the quasiarticlequasihole art. Γ ω = I + Γ ω Γ q Fig. 13. Integral equation for the quasiarticle interaction Γ ω that sums quasiarticle-quasihole reducible diagrams in the ZS channel. The second term on the right hand side is the induced interaction of Babu and Brown [37]. This is shown diagrammatically in Fig. 13, where the second term on the right hand side is the induced interaction of Babu and Brown [37] (see also Ref. [19]). For =, this integral equation has the simle form, Γ ω (, ) = I(, ) P σ z 2 k F m k F (2π) 3 dω Γ ω (,)Γ q (, ). (95) The induced interaction accounts for the contributions to the quasiarticle interaction due to the olarization of the medium and is necessary for the antisymmetry of the quasiarticle scattering amlitude Γ q. σ 3 Functional RG aroach to Fermi liquid theory In this section we aly the functional RG [38] to calculate the roerties of a Fermi liquid. The basic idea is to renormalize the quasiarticle energy and the quasiarticle interaction, as one sequentially integrates out the excitations of the system. Thereby, one starts with the high-lying states and integrates down to low excitation energy. The functional RG leads to an infinite set of couled differential equations for the n-oint functions, which in ractical calculations must be truncated. We return to this question below, when we discuss alications.

24 24 B. Friman, K. Hebeler and A. Schwenk k F +Λ k F k F Λ Fig. 14. The cutoffs above and below the Fermi surface searate high- and low-lying excitations of the many-fermion system. In zero-temerature Fermi systems, the low-lying states are those near the Fermi surface. Consequently, at some intermediate ste of the calculation, the high-lying states, far above and far below the Fermi surface have been integrated out, while the states near the Fermi surface are not yet included. This is schematically illustrated in Fig. 14. However, in the first art of this section we kee the discussion more general and allow for finite temeratures. In the second art, we aly the RG aroach to a Fermi liquid at zero temerature and also secify the detailed form of the regulator adated to Fermi systems at zero temerature. The Green s function G 1 2 Λ0 (ω,) = ω 2m R Λ(), (96) with regulator R Λ () defines the free theory at a finite cutoff scale Λ. The corresonding effective action is given by (see Eq. (70) and the corresonding exression for fermions, Eq. (77)) Γ Λ (ψ,ψ,g) = is Λ (ψ,ψ) Trln( G 1 ) Tr[G 1 Λ0 G 1]+Φ(ψ,ψ,G), (97) with the action S Λ (ψ,ψ) = it d 3 ) (2π) 3 ψ (ω n,) (ω n 2 2m R Λ() ψ(ω n,), (98) n and Matsubara frequency ω n = (2n + 1)iπT. At the stationary oint, the roagator G satisfies the Dyson equation (see Eqs. (73) and (74)) G 1 Λ = G 1 Λ0 δφ(ψ,ψ,g) δg, (99) G=GΛ

25 Renormalization grou and Fermi liquid theory for many-nucleon systems 25 and therefore acquires a deendence on Λ. Due to the stationarity of the 2PI effective action with resect to variations of ψ, ψ, and G, only the exlicit Λ deendence of the bare Green s function G Λ0 contributes to the flow equation for the effective action: dγ Λ (ψ,ψ,g Λ ) dλ [ δγλ (ψ,ψ,g Λ ) = Tr δg 1 Λ0 () [ = Tr ψ dr Λ () dλ ψ 1 dgλ0 () ] dλ ] [ +Tr G Λ () dr Λ() dλ ], (100) where we have introduced the short-hand notations ψ = ψ(ω n,) and Tr = T d n (2π). The flow equation follows almost trivially from the stationarity 3 of the 2PI effective action, while within a 1PI scheme, 4 the derivation of the flow equation is somewhat more involved [38, 39]. The flow equation for the two-oint function in the 1PI scheme is obtained by varying Eq. (100) with resect to ψ and ψ. Using and Γ, Λ(2) = δ2 Γ Λ δψ = G 1 Λ (), (101) δψ δ 2 G Λ ( ) δψ = G Λ ( )Γ Λ(4),, δψ, G Λ( ) with Γ Λ(4),,, = δ2 Γ, Λ(2) δψ δψ, (102) one finds dγ, Λ(2) dλ = dr Λ() Tr dλ [ Γ Λ(4),,, G Λ( ) dr Λ( ] ) G Λ ( ) dλ. (103) Next, we briefly discuss the flow equation in the 2PI scheme and make a connection between the two schemes for the two-oint function. Here we follow the discussion of Duuis [40]. The starting oint is the observation that the 2PI functional Φ does not flow, when ψ and G are treated as free variables dφ(ψ, G) dλ = 0. (104) ψ,g As discussed in the revious section, the functional Φ(ψ, G) generates the article-hole irreducible n-oint functions through variations with resect to the Green s function (see also Ref. [34]) Φ Λ(2n) δ n Φ(ψ,G),,...,n 1,n = δg(, ) δg(n 1,n ). (105) 4 The 1PI effective action is obtained by constraining the Green s function in the 2PI effective action to the solution of the Dyson equation, Eq. (99).

26 26 B. Friman, K. Hebeler and A. Schwenk = Φ = Γ Fig. 15. Grahical reresentation of the 1PI and 2PI flow equations for the twooint function, Eqs. (103) and (107). The internal lines reresent full roagators G Λ. The filled crossed circles reresent dγλ(2) dλ and the unfilled ones dg 1 Λ0 dλ = dr Λ dλ. After the variation, the Green s functions satisfy the Dyson equation, Eq.(99). Consequently, the flow of the 2PI vertices Φ (n) results only from the Λ deendence of the Green s function: d dλ ΦΛ(2n),,...,n 1,n = Tr [ Φ Λ(2n+2),,...,n 1,n,q,q ] dg Λ (q). (106) dλ Combined with the self-energy Σ() = Φ Λ(2),, so that Γ, Λ(2) = G 1 Λ0 () ΦΛ(2), and dγλ(2), dλ = drλ() dλ dφλ(2), dλ, one finds [ dγ, Λ(2) dλ = dr Λ() +Tr dλ ],,, G Λ( ) dγλ(2), dλ G Λ( ). (107) Φ Λ(4) The flow equations for the two-oint function in the 1PI and 2PI schemes, Eqs. (103) and (107), are equivalent, as can be shown in a straightforward calculation, making use of the Bethe-Saleter equation for scattering of two articles of vanishing total momentum [41], Γ Λ(4),,, = Φ Λ(4),,, +Tr [ Φ Λ(4),,, G Λ( )G Λ ( )Γ Λ(4),,, ]. (108) The relation between the two schemes is illustrated diagrammatically in Fig. 15. The article-hole reducible diagrams can be shifted between the fouroint function and the regulator insertion on the fermion line. For more details on the relation between the RG aroaches based on 1PI and 2PI functionals the reader is referred to Ref. [40]. We are now in a osition to connect with Fermi liquid theory, by deriving a flow equation for the quasiarticle energy closely related to 1PI equation, Eq. (103). To this end, we first define the energy functional following Eq. (78) E Λ (G) = E Λ0 Trln(G Λ0 G 1 ) Tr [ (G 1 Λ0 G 1 )G ] +Φ(G), (109) which at the stationary oint equals the (zero-temerature) ground-state energy at the cutoff scale Λ. The trace Tr is defined as in Eq. (79), E Λ0 is the energy of the non-interacting system at the scale Λ,

27 Renormalization grou and Fermi liquid theory for many-nucleon systems 27 d 3 [ ] 2 E Λ0 = tr (2π) 3 2m +R Λ() n 0,Λ, (110) with n 0,Λ = θ(k F Λ ), and the free Green s function G Λ0 is given by G Λ0 (ω,) = 1 n 0,Λ ω 2 2m R Λ()+iδ + G Λ (ω,) = z [ 1 n 0,Λ ω ε +iδ + n0,λ ω 2 2m R Λ() iδ. (111) Furthermore, in the quasiarticle aroximation the one-article Green s function of the interacting system is of the form ] +φ(,ω), (112) where the quasiarticle energy ε is given by n 0,Λ ω ε iδ ε = 2 2m +Σ Λ( ε,)+r Λ (). (113) The flow equation that follows from the energy functional, Eq. (109), reads de Λ dλ = de [ Λ0 dλ Tr (G Λ0 G Λ ) dr ] [ ] Λ dr Λ = Tr G Λ. (114) dλ dλ By varying Eq. (114) with resect to the quasiarticle occuation number, we obtain a flow equation for the quasiarticle energy d ε dλ = δ de Λ δn dλ = δ ( d 4 tr δn (2π) 4 i G Λ( ) dr Λ( ) ) dλ = z dr Λ () dλ +tr d 4 (2π) 4 i 1 z f G 2 Λ ( ) dr Λ( ) dλ, (115) where we have used Eqs. (90), (93) and (94). Combined with Eq. (113), the right-hand side of the flow equation for the quasiarticle energy, Eq. (115), can be written as d ε dλ = z ( ΣΛ ( ε,) Λ + dr ) Λ() dε dλ dλ +z dr Λ () dλ, (116) where we have identified dε /dλ with z Σ Λ ( ε,)/ Λ. In the limit Λ 0, ε aroaches the solution of the Dyson equation, Eq. (81). For our urose, we use following regulator (adated from Ref. [42]) R Λ () = 2 2m [ 1 Θ ǫ ( (k F +Λ))+Θ ǫ (k F Λ ) 1 ], (117) where lim ǫ 0 Θ ǫ (x) Θ(x) at the end of the calculation. The regulator suresses low-lying single-article modes with momenta in the range k F Λ < < k F +Λ (see Fig. 14). In the limit of a shar cutoff, ǫ 0, one finds [42]