Distribution of Bipartite Entanglement of a Random Pure State
|
|
- Gervase Randall
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Distribution of Bipartite Entanglement of a Random Pure State Satya N. Majumdar Laboratoire de Physique Théorique et Modèles Statistiques,CNRS, Université Paris-Sud, France Collaborators: C. Nadal (Oxford University, UK) M. Vergassola (Institut Pasteur, Paris, France) Refs: Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, (2010) J. Stat. Phys. 142, 403 (2011) (long version)
2 Plan Plan: Bipartite entanglement of a random pure state
3 Plan Plan: Bipartite entanglement of a random pure state Reduced density matrix random matrix theory
4 Plan Plan: Bipartite entanglement of a random pure state Reduced density matrix random matrix theory Distribution of the Renyi entropy Results Coulomb gas technique for large systems Phase transitions
5 Plan Plan: Bipartite entanglement of a random pure state Reduced density matrix random matrix theory Distribution of the Renyi entropy Results Coulomb gas technique for large systems Phase transitions Summary and Conclusions
6 Coupled Bipartite System A B N dim. M dim. i A α B Coupled Bipartite System N M Bipartite quantum system A B: Hilbert space H A H B subsystem A: dimension N (the system to study) subsystem B: dimension M N ( environment )
7 Coupled Bipartite System A B N dim. M dim. i A α B Coupled Bipartite System N M Bipartite quantum system A B: Hilbert space H A H B subsystem A: dimension N (the system to study) subsystem B: dimension M N ( environment ) Large system: limit N 1 and M 1 with M N.
8 Pure State and Reduced Density Matrix A B N dim. M dim. i A α B Coupled Bipartite System N M
9 Pure State and Reduced Density Matrix A B N dim. M dim. i A α B Coupled Bipartite System N M Any pure state of the full system: ψ >= i,α x i,α i A > α B > X = [x i,α ] (N M) rectangular Coupling matrix
10 Pure State of Bipartite System ψ >= i,α x i,α i A > α B >
11 Pure State of Bipartite System ψ >= i,α x i,α i A > α B > If x i,α = a i b α then ψ >= i a i i A > α b α α B >= Φ A > Φ B >
12 Pure State of Bipartite System ψ >= i,α x i,α i A > α B > If x i,α = a i b α then ψ >= i a i i A > α b α α B >= Φ A > Φ B > Fully separable (factorised)
13 Pure State of Bipartite System ψ >= i,α x i,α i A > α B > If x i,α = a i b α then ψ >= i a i i A > α b α α B >= Φ A > Φ B > Fully separable (factorised)
14 Pure State of Bipartite System ψ >= i,α x i,α i A > α B > If x i,α = a i b α then ψ >= i a i i A > α b α α B >= Φ A > Φ B > Fully separable (factorised) Otherwise Entangled (non-factorisable)
15 Pure State of Bipartite System ψ >= i,α x i,α i A > α B > If x i,α = a i b α then ψ >= i a i i A > α b α α B >= Φ A > Φ B > Fully separable (factorised) Otherwise Entangled (non-factorisable) Density matrix of the composite system ˆρ = ψ >< ψ with Tr[ˆρ] = 1
16 Pure State of Bipartite System ψ >= i,α x i,α i A > α B > If x i,α = a i b α then ψ >= i a i i A > α b α α B >= Φ A > Φ B > Fully separable (factorised) Otherwise Entangled (non-factorisable) Density matrix of the composite system ˆρ = ψ >< ψ with Tr[ˆρ] = 1 Pure state: ˆρ k p k ψ k >< ψ k not a Mixed state
17 Reduced Density Matrix of subsystem A: A B N dim. M dim. i A α B Coupled Bipartite System N M
18 Reduced Density Matrix of subsystem A: A B N dim. M dim. i A α B Coupled Bipartite System N M Reduced Density Matrix: ˆρ A = Tr B [ˆρ] = Tr B [ ψ ψ ] with Tr[ˆρ A ] = 1
19 Reduced Density Matrix of subsystem A: A B N dim. M dim. i A α B Coupled Bipartite System N M Reduced Density Matrix: ˆρ A = Tr B [ˆρ] = Tr B [ ψ ψ ] with Tr[ˆρ A ] = 1 Measurement ÔA = Tr[Ô ˆρ A]
20 Reduced Density Matrix of subsystem A: A B N dim. M dim. i A α B Coupled Bipartite System N M Reduced Density Matrix: ˆρ A = Tr B [ˆρ] = Tr B [ ψ ψ ] with Tr[ˆρ A ] = 1 Measurement ÔA = Tr[Ô ˆρ A] ˆρ A = Tr B [ˆρ]
21 Reduced Density Matrix of subsystem A: A B N dim. M dim. i A α B Coupled Bipartite System N M Reduced Density Matrix: ˆρ A = Tr B [ˆρ] = Tr B [ ψ ψ ] with Tr[ˆρ A ] = 1 Measurement ÔA = Tr[Ô ˆρ A] M ˆρ A = Tr B [ˆρ] = < α B ˆρ α B > α=1
22 Reduced Density Matrix of subsystem A: A B N dim. M dim. i A α B Coupled Bipartite System N M Reduced Density Matrix: ˆρ A = Tr B [ˆρ] = Tr B [ ψ ψ ] with Tr[ˆρ A ] = 1 Measurement ÔA = Tr[Ô ˆρ A] [ M N M ] ˆρ A = Tr B [ˆρ] = < α B ˆρ α B > = x i,α xj,α i A >< j A α=1 i,j=1 α=1
23 Reduced Density Matrix of subsystem A: A B N dim. M dim. i A α B Coupled Bipartite System N M Reduced Density Matrix: ˆρ A = Tr B [ˆρ] = Tr B [ ψ ψ ] with Tr[ˆρ A ] = 1 Measurement ÔA = Tr[Ô ˆρ A] [ M N M ] ˆρ A = Tr B [ˆρ] = < α B ˆρ α B > = x i,α xj,α i A >< j A α=1 = i,j=1 α=1 N W i,j i A >< j A i,j=1 where the N N matrix: W = XX
24 Eigenvalues of W: In the diagonal representation N N ˆρ A = W i,j i A >< j A λ i λ A i >< λ A i i,j=1 i=1
25 Eigenvalues of W: In the diagonal representation N N ˆρ A = W i,j i A >< j A λ i λ A i >< λ A i i,j=1 i=1 {λ 1, λ 2,..., λ N } non-negative eigenvalues of W = XX
26 Eigenvalues of W: In the diagonal representation N N ˆρ A = W i,j i A >< j A λ i λ A i >< λ A i i,j=1 i=1 {λ 1, λ 2,..., λ N } non-negative eigenvalues of W = XX Tr[ˆρ A ] = 1 N λ i = 1 0 λ i 1 i=1
27 Eigenvalues of W: In the diagonal representation N N ˆρ A = W i,j i A >< j A λ i λ A i >< λ A i i,j=1 i=1 {λ 1, λ 2,..., λ N } non-negative eigenvalues of W = XX Tr[ˆρ A ] = 1 N λ i = 1 0 λ i 1 i=1 M Similarly ˆρ B = Tr A [ˆρ] = W α,β α B >< β B α,β=1
28 Eigenvalues of W: In the diagonal representation N N ˆρ A = W i,j i A >< j A λ i λ A i >< λ A i i,j=1 i=1 {λ 1, λ 2,..., λ N } non-negative eigenvalues of W = XX Tr[ˆρ A ] = 1 N λ i = 1 0 λ i 1 i=1 M Similarly ˆρ B = Tr A [ˆρ] = W α,β α B >< β B α,β=1 W = X X (M M) matrix with M eigenvalues (recall N M)
29 Eigenvalues of W: In the diagonal representation N N ˆρ A = W i,j i A >< j A λ i λ A i >< λ A i i,j=1 i=1 {λ 1, λ 2,..., λ N } non-negative eigenvalues of W = XX Tr[ˆρ A ] = 1 N λ i = 1 0 λ i 1 i=1 Similarly ˆρ B = Tr A [ˆρ] = M α,β=1 W α,β α B >< β B W = X X (M M) matrix with M eigenvalues (recall N M) {λ 1, λ 2,..., λ N, 0, 0,..., 0}
30 Eigenvalues of W: In the diagonal representation N N ˆρ A = W i,j i A >< j A λ i λ A i >< λ A i i,j=1 i=1 {λ 1, λ 2,..., λ N } non-negative eigenvalues of W = XX Tr[ˆρ A ] = 1 N λ i = 1 0 λ i 1 i=1 Similarly ˆρ B = Tr A [ˆρ] = M α,β=1 W α,β α B >< β B W = X X (M M) matrix with M eigenvalues (recall N M) {λ 1, λ 2,..., λ N, 0, 0,..., 0} Schmidt decomposition: ψ >= N λi λ A i > λ B i > i=1
31 Entanglement N Schmidt decomposition: ψ >= λi λ A i > λ B i > N Reduced density matrix: ˆρ A = Tr B [ ψ >< ψ ] = λ i λ A i >< λ A i i=1 i=1
32 Entanglement N Schmidt decomposition: ψ >= λi λ A i > λ B i > N Reduced density matrix: ˆρ A = Tr B [ ψ >< ψ ] = λ i λ A i >< λ A i i=1 {λ 1, λ 2,..., λ N } eigenvalues of W = XX with N 0 λ i 1 and λ i = 1 i=1 i=1
33 Entanglement Schmidt decomposition: ψ >= N λi λ A i > λ B i > i=1 Reduced density matrix: ˆρ A = Tr B [ ψ >< ψ ] = {λ 1, λ 2,..., λ N } eigenvalues of W = XX with N 0 λ i 1 and λ i = 1 (i) Unentangled λ i0 = 1, λ j = 0 j i 0 ψ = λ A i 0 λ B i 0 is separable ˆρ A = λ A i 0 λ A i 0 is pure i=1 N λ i λ A i >< λ A i i=1 (ii) Maximally entangled λ j = 1/N for all j (all eigenvalues equal) ψ is a superposition of all product states ˆρ A = 1 N N i=1 λa i λ A i = 1 N 1 A is completely mixed
34 Entanglement entropy Subsystem A described by ˆρ A = N i=1 λ i λ A i λ A i Von Neuman entropy: S VN = Tr [ˆρ A ln ˆρ A ] = N i=1 λ i ln λ i
35 Entanglement entropy Subsystem A described by ˆρ A = N i=1 λ i λ A i λ A i Von Neuman entropy: S VN = Tr [ˆρ A ln ˆρ A ] = N i=1 λ i ln λ i [ Renyi entropy: S q = 1 1 q ln N ] i=1 λq i and Σ q = N i=1 λq i
36 Entanglement entropy Subsystem A described by ˆρ A = N i=1 λ i λ A i λ A i Von Neuman entropy: S VN = Tr [ˆρ A ln ˆρ A ] = N i=1 λ i ln λ i [ Renyi entropy: S q = 1 1 q ln N ] i=1 λq i and Σ q = N i=1 λq i S q 1 = S VN and S q = ln(λ max ) Σ 2 = exp[ S q=2 ] Purity
37 Entanglement entropy Subsystem A described by ˆρ A = N i=1 λ i λ A i λ A i Von Neuman entropy: S VN = Tr [ˆρ A ln ˆρ A ] = N i=1 λ i ln λ i [ Renyi entropy: S q = 1 1 q ln N ] i=1 λq i and Σ q = N i=1 λq i S q 1 = S VN and S q = ln(λ max ) Σ 2 = exp[ S q=2 ] Purity (i) Unentangled λ i0 = 1, λ j = 0 j i 0 ˆρ A = λ A i 0 λ A i 0 is pure S VN = 0 = S q is minimal (ii) Maximally entangled λ j = 1/N for all j ˆρ A = 1 N N i=1 λa i λ A i mixed S VN = ln N = S q is maximal
38 A Simple Diagram for N=3 (0,0,1) λ 3 (1/3,1/3,1/3) MOST ENTANGLED S=log(N) (0,1,0) λ 2 λ 1 (1,0,0) LEAST ENTANGLED S=0
39 A Simple Diagram for N=3 (0,0,1) λ 3 (1/3,1/3,1/3) MOST ENTANGLED S=log(N) (0,1,0) λ 2 λ 1 (1,0,0) LEAST ENTANGLED S=0
40 Random Pure State: Haar Measure ψ >= x i,α i A > α B > = i,α N λi λ A i > λ B i > i=1
41 Random Pure State: Haar Measure ψ >= i,α x i,α i A > α B > = N λi λ A i > λ B i > random pure state where X = [x i,α ] are uniformly distributed among the sets of {x i,α } satisfying i,α x i,α 2 = Trρ = 1 i=1 Haar measure
42 Random Pure State: Haar Measure ψ >= i,α x i,α i A > α B > = N λi λ A i > λ B i > random pure state where X = [x i,α ] are uniformly distributed among the sets of {x i,α } satisfying i,α x i,α 2 = Trρ = 1 i=1 Haar measure Equivalently, for the N M matrix P(X ) δ ( Tr(XX ) 1 )
43 Random Pure State: Haar Measure ψ >= i,α x i,α i A > α B > = N λi λ A i > λ B i > random pure state where X = [x i,α ] are uniformly distributed among the sets of {x i,α } satisfying i,α x i,α 2 = Trρ = 1 i=1 Haar measure Equivalently, for the N M matrix P(X ) δ ( Tr(XX ) 1 ) In the basis i A of H A : ˆρ A = W = XX Distribution of the eigenvalues λ i of ˆρ A? Distribution of the entanglement entropies S VN, S q?
44 Joint PDF of Eigenvalues the joint pdf P(λ 1, λ 2,..., λ N ) where {λ 1, λ 2,..., λ N } eigenvalues of the Wishart matrix W = XX (X N M Gaussian random matrix) with an additional constraint N λ i = 1 i=1
45 Joint PDF of Eigenvalues the joint pdf P(λ 1, λ 2,..., λ N ) where {λ 1, λ 2,..., λ N } eigenvalues of the Wishart matrix W = XX (X N M Gaussian random matrix) with an additional constraint N λ i = 1 i=1 Joint distribution of Wishart eigenvalues (James 64): [ P({λ i }) exp β N λ i] λ β 2 (1+M N) 1 i λ j λ k β 2 i=1 i j<k
46 Joint PDF of Eigenvalues the joint pdf P(λ 1, λ 2,..., λ N ) where {λ 1, λ 2,..., λ N } eigenvalues of the Wishart matrix W = XX (X N M Gaussian random matrix) with an additional constraint N λ i = 1 i=1 Joint distribution of Wishart eigenvalues (James 64): [ ( P({λ i }) exp β N λ i] λ β 2 (1+M N) 1 N ) i λ j λ k β δ λ i 1 2 i=1 i i=1 j<k (Llyod & Pagels 88, Zyczkowski & Sommers 2001)
47 Joint PDF of Eigenvalues the joint pdf P(λ 1, λ 2,..., λ N ) where {λ 1, λ 2,..., λ N } eigenvalues of the Wishart matrix W = XX (X N M Gaussian random matrix) with an additional constraint N λ i = 1 i=1 Joint distribution of Wishart eigenvalues (James 64): [ ( P({λ i }) exp β N λ i] λ β 2 (1+M N) 1 N ) i λ j λ k β δ λ i 1 2 i=1 i i=1 j<k (Llyod & Pagels 88, Zyczkowski & Sommers 2001) Given this pdf, what is the distribution of the Renyi entropy: [ S q = 1 1 q ln N ] i=1 λq i
48 Random Pure State: Well Studied Average von Neumann entropy: S VN ln N N 2M for M N 1 Near Maximal [Page ( 93), Foong and Kanno ( 94), Sánchez-Ruiz ( 95), Sen ( 96)]
49 Random Pure State: Well Studied Average von Neumann entropy: S VN ln N N 2M for M N 1 Near Maximal [Page ( 93), Foong and Kanno ( 94), Sánchez-Ruiz ( 95), Sen ( 96)] statistics of observables such as average density of eigenvalues, concurrence, purity, minimum eigenvalue λ min etc. [Lubkin ( 78), Zyczkowski & Sommers (2001, 2004), Cappellini, Sommers and Zyczkowski (2006), Giraud (2007), Znidaric (2007), S.M., Bohigas and Lakshminarayan (2008), Kubotini, Adachi and Toda (2008), Chen, Liu and Zhou (2010), Vivo (2010),...]
50 Random Pure State: Well Studied Average von Neumann entropy: S VN ln N N 2M for M N 1 Near Maximal [Page ( 93), Foong and Kanno ( 94), Sánchez-Ruiz ( 95), Sen ( 96)] statistics of observables such as average density of eigenvalues, concurrence, purity, minimum eigenvalue λ min etc. [Lubkin ( 78), Zyczkowski & Sommers (2001, 2004), Cappellini, Sommers and Zyczkowski (2006), Giraud (2007), Znidaric (2007), S.M., Bohigas and Lakshminarayan (2008), Kubotini, Adachi and Toda (2008), Chen, Liu and Zhou (2010), Vivo (2010),...] Laplace transform of the purity (q = 2) distribution for large N [Facchi et. al. (2008, 2010)]
51 Results: Entropy Distribution Scaling for large N: λ typ 1 N as N i=1 λ i = 1
52 Results: Entropy Distribution Scaling for large N: λ typ 1 N as N i=1 λ i = 1 Renyi entropy: S q = 1 1 q ln [Σ q] with Σ q = N i=1 λq i, q > 1
53 Results: Entropy Distribution Scaling for large N: λ typ 1 N as N i=1 λ i = 1 Renyi entropy: S q = 1 1 q ln [Σ q] with Σ q = N i=1 λq i, q > 1 Σ q = N 1 q s for large N S q = ln N ln s q 1
54 Results: Entropy Distribution Scaling for large N: λ typ 1 N as N i=1 λ i = 1 Renyi entropy: S q = 1 1 q ln [Σ q] with Σ q = N i=1 λq i, q > 1 Σ q = N 1 q s for large N S q = ln N ln s q 1 (i) Unentangled S q = 0 is minimal Σ q = 1 (or s ) (ii) Maximally entangled S q = ln N is maximal Σ q = N 1 q (or s = 1)
55 Results: Entropy Distribution Scaling for large N: λ typ 1 N as N i=1 λ i = 1 Renyi entropy: S q = 1 1 q ln [Σ q] with Σ q = N i=1 λq i, q > 1 Σ q = N 1 q s for large N S q = ln N ln s q 1 (i) Unentangled S q = 0 is minimal Σ q = 1 (or s ) (ii) Maximally entangled S q = ln N is maximal Σ q = N 1 q (or s = 1) Average entropy for large N: Σ q N 1 q s(q) S q ln N ln s(q) q 1 where s(q) = Γ(q+1/2) πγ(q+2) 4 q
56 Results: Entropy Distribution Scaling for large N: λ typ 1 N as N i=1 λ i = 1 Renyi entropy: S q = 1 1 q ln [Σ q] with Σ q = N i=1 λq i, q > 1 Σ q = N 1 q s for large N S q = ln N ln s q 1 (i) Unentangled S q = 0 is minimal Σ q = 1 (or s ) (ii) Maximally entangled S q = ln N is maximal Σ q = N 1 q (or s = 1) Average entropy for large N: Σ q N 1 q s(q) S q ln N ln s(q) q 1 where s(q) = Γ(q+1/2) πγ(q+2) 4 q For q = 2, Σ 2 2 N (purity); For q 1, S VN ln N 1 2
57 Results: pdf of Σ q = i λq i P ( Σ q = N 1 q s ) exp { βn 2 Φ I (s) } exp { βn 2 Φ II (s) } { exp βn 1+ 1 q } ΨIII (s) for 1 s < s 1 (q) for s 1 (q) < s < s 2 (q) for s > s 2 (q) P ( Σ q = N 1 q s ) s(q) (a) ln [ P ( Σ q = N 1 q s )] (b) I II III I II III 1 s 1 (q) s 2 (q) max. entangled unentangled s 1s 1 (q) s(q) s 2 (q) s
58 Computation of the pdf of Σ q : Coulomb gas method PDF of Σ q = i λq i ( ) ( ) P(Σ q, N) = P(λ 1,..., λ N ) δ λ q i Σ q dλ i. i i
59 Computation of the pdf of Σ q : Coulomb gas method PDF of Σ q = i λq i ( ) ( ) P(Σ q, N) = P(λ 1,..., λ N ) δ λ q i Σ q dλ i. i i The joint pdf of the eigenvalues can be interpreted as a Boltzmann weight at inverse temperature β: P(λ 1,..., λ N ) δ ( λ i 1 ) i N i=1 exp { βe [{λ i }]} λ β 2 (M N+1) 1 i λ i λ j β i<j where E [{λ i }] = γ N i=1 ln λ i i<j ln λ i λ j (with i λ i = 1) effective energy of a 2D Coulomb gas of charges
60 Charge Density and Effective Energy E{λ i } = γ N ln λ i ln λ i λ j with λ i = 1 i<j i i=1
61 Charge Density and Effective Energy E{λ i } = γ N ln λ i ln λ i λ j with λ i = 1 i<j i i=1 Continuous charge density in the large N limit (regimes I, II): {λ i } ρ(x) = 1 δ (x λ i N) N i P ( Σ q = N 1 q s, N ) D [ρ] exp { βn 2 E s [ρ] }
62 Charge Density and Effective Energy E{λ i } = γ N ln λ i ln λ i λ j with i<j i i=1 λ i = 1 Continuous charge density in the large N limit (regimes I, II): {λ i } ρ(x) = 1 δ (x λ i N) N i P ( Σ q = N 1 q s, N ) D [ρ] exp { βn 2 E s [ρ] } with effective energy E s [ρ] = 1 dx dx ρ(x)ρ(x ) ln x x ( ) +µ 0 dx ρ(x) 1 0 ( ) ( +µ 1 dx x ρ(x) 1 + µ 2 where µ 0, µ 1 and µ 2 are Lagrange multipliers 0 0 ) dx x q ρ(x) s
63 Saddle Point Solution E s [ρ]= 1 ( dxdx ρ(x)ρ(x ) ln x x + µ ( ) ( +µ 1 dx x ρ(x) 1 + µ ) dx ρ(x) 1 0 ) dx x q ρ(x) s
64 Saddle Point Solution E s [ρ]= 1 ( dxdx ρ(x)ρ(x ) ln x x + µ ( ) ( +µ 1 dx x ρ(x) 1 + µ ) dx ρ(x) 1 0 ) dx x q ρ(x) s Saddle point method for large N: P ( Σ q = N 1 q s, N ) D [ρ] exp { βn 2 E s [ρ] } exp { βn 2 E s [ρ c ] } where ρ c minimizes the energy: δe s δρ = 0 ρ=ρc
65 Saddle Point Solution E s [ρ]= 1 ( dxdx ρ(x)ρ(x ) ln x x + µ ( ) ( +µ 1 dx x ρ(x) 1 + µ ) dx ρ(x) 1 0 ) dx x q ρ(x) s Saddle point method for large N: P ( Σ q = N 1 q s, N ) D [ρ] exp { βn 2 E s [ρ] } exp { βn 2 E s [ρ c ] } where ρ c minimizes the energy: 0 δe s δρ = 0 giving ρ=ρc dx ρ c (x ) ln x x = µ 0 + µ 1 x + µ 2 x q V (x) V (x) effective potential for the charges.
66 Saddle Point Solution E s [ρ]= 1 ( dxdx ρ(x)ρ(x ) ln x x + µ ( ) ( +µ 1 dx x ρ(x) 1 + µ ) dx ρ(x) 1 0 ) dx x q ρ(x) s Saddle point method for large N: P ( Σ q = N 1 q s, N ) D [ρ] exp { βn 2 E s [ρ] } exp { βn 2 E s [ρ c ] } where ρ c minimizes the energy: 0 δe s δρ = 0 giving ρ=ρc dx ρ c (x ) ln x x = µ 0 + µ 1 x + µ 2 x q V (x) V (x) effective potential for the charges. Taking derivative with respect to x gives P 0 dx ρ c(x ) x x = µ 1 + q µ 2 x q 1 = V (x)
67 Steps for Computing the PDF of Σ q (i) find the solution ρ c (x) of the integral equation P 0 dx ρ c(x ) x x = µ 1 + q µ 2 x q 1 = V (x) Tricomi s solution: density ρ c (x) with finite support [L 1, L 2 ]: [ 1 L2 ] ρ c (x) = π dy y L1 L2 y C P V (y), x L 1 L2 x π x y where C = L 2 L 1 dx ρ c (x) is a constant L 1
68 Steps for Computing the PDF of Σ q (i) find the solution ρ c (x) of the integral equation P 0 dx ρ c(x ) x x = µ 1 + q µ 2 x q 1 = V (x) Tricomi s solution: density ρ c (x) with finite support [L 1, L 2 ]: [ 1 L2 ] ρ c (x) = π dy y L1 L2 y C P V (y), x L 1 L2 x π x y where C = L 2 L 1 dx ρ c (x) is a constant (ii) for a given s, the unknown Lagrange multipliers µ 0, µ 1 and µ 2 are fixed by the three conditions: 0 ρ c (x) dx = 1, 0 L 1 x ρ c (x) dx = 1 and 0 x q ρ c (x) dx = s
69 Steps for Computing the PDF of Σ q (i) find the solution ρ c (x) of the integral equation P 0 dx ρ c(x ) x x = µ 1 + q µ 2 x q 1 = V (x) Tricomi s solution: density ρ c (x) with finite support [L 1, L 2 ]: [ 1 L2 ] ρ c (x) = π dy y L1 L2 y C P V (y), x L 1 L2 x π x y where C = L 2 L 1 dx ρ c (x) is a constant (ii) for a given s, the unknown Lagrange multipliers µ 0, µ 1 and µ 2 are fixed by the three conditions: 0 ρ c (x) dx = 1, 0 L 1 x ρ c (x) dx = 1 and (iii) evaluate the saddle point energy E s [ρ c ] 0 x q ρ c (x) dx = s
70 Phase Transitions Regime I: 1 < s < s 1 (s 1 (q = 2) = 5/4 ) Regime II: s 1 < s < s 2 (s 2 (q = 2) = /3 N 1/3 ) V (x) V (x) V (x) Regime III: s > s 2 (weakly entangled) I II III 0 x x 0 x 0 x (a) (b) (c) ρ c (λ, N) ρ c (λ, N) ρ c (λ, N) I II III L 1 /N L 2 /N λ λ λ 0 L/N 0 ζ t
71 q = 2 : Purity Regime I: 1 < s < 5/4 ρ c (x) = L2 x x L 1 2π (s 1) P (Σ 2 = s ) N, N e βn2 Φ I (s), Φ I (s) = 1 4 ln (s 1) 1 8,
72 q = 2 : Purity Regime I: 1 < s < 5/4 ρ c (x) = L2 x x L 1 2π (s 1) P (Σ 2 = s ) N, N e βn2 Φ I (s), Φ I (s) = 1 4 ln (s 1) 1 8 Regime II: 5/4 < s < /3 N 1/3 ρ c (x) = 1 L x ( (A + B x) with L = 2 3 ) 9 4s π x P (Σ 2 = s ) N, N e βn2 Φ II (s), Φ II (s) = 1 ( ) L 2 ln L 2 5 L + 7 8,
73 q = 2 : Purity Regime I: 1 < s < 5/4 ρ c (x) = L2 x x L 1 2π (s 1) P (Σ 2 = s ) N, N e βn2 Φ I (s), Φ I (s) = 1 4 ln (s 1) 1 8 Regime II: 5/4 < s < /3 N 1/3 ρ c (x) = 1 L x ( (A + B x) with L = 2 3 ) 9 4s π x P (Σ 2 = s ) N, N e βn2 Φ II (s), Φ II (s) = 1 ( ) L 2 ln L 2 5 L + 7 8, 3-rd order phase transition at s = 5/4 d 3 Φ I (s) ds 3 s=5/4 = 32 while d 3 Φ II (s) s=5/4 ds = 16 3
74 Regime III Regime III: s > /3 Continuous density with support [0, ζ] with N 1/3 ζ 4 N and separated λ max ζ: λ max = t s 2 N P (Σ 2 = s ) N, N e βn 3 2 Ψ III (s), Ψ III (s) = s 2 2
75 Numerical simulations Monte Carlo Simulations (non-standard Metropolis algorithm): pdf of Σ 2 (purity) for N = 1000 (second phase transition) ln P (Σ 2 = s N ) βn Φ III = Ψ III N Φ II s(2) s 2 (2) s
76 Numerical Simulations (2) Jump of the maximal eigenvalue (rightmost charge) at s = s 2 for q = 2 and different values of N N t = N λ max for Σ 2 = s N N = 1000 N = N = s s 2 (N = 1000) s2 (N = 500) s
77 The limit q 1 von Neumann Entropy S VN = S q 1 = N i=1 λ i ln(λ i ) = ln(n) z
78 The limit q 1 von Neumann Entropy 0 z S VN = S q 1 = N i=1 λ i ln(λ i ) = ln(n) z exp { βn 2 φ I (z) } for 0 z < z 1 = 2 3 ln ( 3 2) = (S VN = ln(n) z) exp { βn 2 φ II (z) } for < z < z 2 = 1/2 { } exp β N2 ln(n) φ III (z) for z > z 2 = 1/2 P(S VN = ln(n) z) II III z= I maximally entangled z 1 = = 0.5 z
79 The limit q Maximal eigenvalue S q = ln (λ max )
80 The limit q Maximal eigenvalue S q = ln (λ max ) ( P λ max = t ) N exp { βn 2 χ I (t) } for 1 t < t 1 = 4 3 exp { βn 2 χ II (t) } for 4 3 < t < t 2 = 4 exp { βn χ III (t)} for t > t 2 = 4
81 The limit q Maximal eigenvalue S q = ln (λ max ) ( P λ max = t ) N exp { βn 2 χ I (t) } for 1 t < t 1 = 4 3 exp { βn 2 χ II (t) } for 4 3 < t < t 2 = 4 exp { βn χ III (t)} for t > t 2 = 4 Around its mean, λ max = 4/N, the typical fluctuations ( O(N 5/3 )) are described by the Tracy-Widom distribution λ max = 4 N + 24/3 N 5/3 Y β Y β random variable distributed via Tracy-Widom law
82 The limit q Maximal eigenvalue S q = ln (λ max ) ( P λ max = t ) N exp { βn 2 χ I (t) } for 1 t < t 1 = 4 3 exp { βn 2 χ II (t) } for 4 3 < t < t 2 = 4 exp { βn χ III (t)} for t > t 2 = 4 Around its mean, λ max = 4/N, the typical fluctuations ( O(N 5/3 )) are described by the Tracy-Widom distribution λ max = 4 N + 24/3 N 5/3 Y β Y β random variable distributed via Tracy-Widom law For finite N and M, see P. Vivo (2011)
83 Summary and Conclusions Exact distribution of the Renyi entanglement entropy S q for a random pure state in a large bipartite quantum system (M N 1)
84 Summary and Conclusions Exact distribution of the Renyi entanglement entropy S q for a random pure state in a large bipartite quantum system (M N 1) Coulomb gas method saddle point solution
85 Summary and Conclusions Exact distribution of the Renyi entanglement entropy S q for a random pure state in a large bipartite quantum system (M N 1) Coulomb gas method saddle point solution 2 critical points direct consequence of 2 phase transitions in the associated Coulomb gas
86 Summary and Conclusions Exact distribution of the Renyi entanglement entropy S q for a random pure state in a large bipartite quantum system (M N 1) Coulomb gas method saddle point solution 2 critical points direct consequence of 2 phase transitions in the associated Coulomb gas at the second critical point: λ max suddenly jumps to a value N (1 1/q) much larger than the other λ i 1/N
87 Summary and Conclusions Exact distribution of the Renyi entanglement entropy S q for a random pure state in a large bipartite quantum system (M N 1) Coulomb gas method saddle point solution 2 critical points direct consequence of 2 phase transitions in the associated Coulomb gas at the second critical point: λ max suddenly jumps to a value N (1 1/q) much larger than the other λ i 1/N While the average entropy of a random pure state is indeed close to its maximal value ln N, the probability of occurrence of the maximally entangled state (all λ i = 1/N) is actually very small.
88 Summary and Conclusions Exact distribution of the Renyi entanglement entropy S q for a random pure state in a large bipartite quantum system (M N 1) Coulomb gas method saddle point solution 2 critical points direct consequence of 2 phase transitions in the associated Coulomb gas at the second critical point: λ max suddenly jumps to a value N (1 1/q) much larger than the other λ i 1/N While the average entropy of a random pure state is indeed close to its maximal value ln N, the probability of occurrence of the maximally entangled state (all λ i = 1/N) is actually very small. Work in progress (C. Nadal, S.M with C. Pineda and T. Seligman) Distribution of entropy for N finite but M N (large environment)?
89 References On the large N distribution of the Renyi entropy: C. Nadal, S.M. and M. Vergassola, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, (2010) long version: J. Stat. Phys. 142, 403 (2011) On the distribution of the minimum Schmidt number λ min : S.M., O. Bohigas and A. Lakshminarayan, J. Stat. Phys. 131, 33 (2008) see also S.M. in Handbook of Random Matrix Theory (ed. by G. Akemann, J. Baik and P. Di Francesco and forwarded by F.J. Dyson) (Oxford Univ. Press, 2011) (arxiv: )
Large deviations of the top eigenvalue of random matrices and applications in statistical physics
Large deviations of the top eigenvalue of random matrices and applications in statistical physics Grégory Schehr LPTMS, CNRS-Université Paris-Sud XI Journées de Physique Statistique Paris, January 29-30,
More informationMP 472 Quantum Information and Computation
MP 472 Quantum Information and Computation http://www.thphys.may.ie/staff/jvala/mp472.htm Outline Open quantum systems The density operator ensemble of quantum states general properties the reduced density
More informationValerio Cappellini. References
CETER FOR THEORETICAL PHYSICS OF THE POLISH ACADEMY OF SCIECES WARSAW, POLAD RADOM DESITY MATRICES AD THEIR DETERMIATS 4 30 SEPTEMBER 5 TH SFB TR 1 MEETIG OF 006 I PRZEGORZAłY KRAKÓW Valerio Cappellini
More informationUncertainty Relations, Unbiased bases and Quantification of Quantum Entanglement
Uncertainty Relations, Unbiased bases and Quantification of Quantum Entanglement Karol Życzkowski in collaboration with Lukasz Rudnicki (Warsaw) Pawe l Horodecki (Gdańsk) Jagiellonian University, Cracow,
More informationEnsembles and incomplete information
p. 1/32 Ensembles and incomplete information So far in this course, we have described quantum systems by states that are normalized vectors in a complex Hilbert space. This works so long as (a) the system
More informationEntropic Uncertainty Relations, Unbiased bases and Quantification of Quantum Entanglement
Entropic Uncertainty Relations, Unbiased bases and Quantification of Quantum Entanglement Karol Życzkowski in collaboration with Lukasz Rudnicki (Warsaw) Pawe l Horodecki (Gdańsk) Phys. Rev. Lett. 107,
More information1 More on the Bloch Sphere (10 points)
Ph15c Spring 017 Prof. Sean Carroll seancarroll@gmail.com Homework - 1 Solutions Assigned TA: Ashmeet Singh ashmeet@caltech.edu 1 More on the Bloch Sphere 10 points a. The state Ψ is parametrized on the
More informationTop eigenvalue of a random matrix: Large deviations
Top eigenvalue of a random matrix: Large deviations Satya N. Majumdar Laboratoire de Physique Théorique et Modèles Statistiques,CNRS, Université Paris-Sud, France First Appearence of Random Matrices Covariance
More informationEntanglement Measures and Monotones Pt. 2
Entanglement Measures and Monotones Pt. 2 PHYS 500 - Southern Illinois University April 8, 2017 PHYS 500 - Southern Illinois University Entanglement Measures and Monotones Pt. 2 April 8, 2017 1 / 13 Entanglement
More informationTOP EIGENVALUE OF CAUCHY RANDOM MATRICES
TOP EIGENVALUE OF CAUCHY RANDOM MATRICES with Satya N. Majumdar, Gregory Schehr and Dario Villamaina Pierpaolo Vivo (LPTMS - CNRS - Paris XI) Gaussian Ensembles N = 5 Semicircle Law LARGEST EIGENVALUE
More informationConcentration of Measure Effects in Quantum Information. Patrick Hayden (McGill University)
Concentration of Measure Effects in Quantum Information Patrick Hayden (McGill University) Overview Superdense coding Random states and random subspaces Superdense coding of quantum states Quantum mechanical
More informationQuantum Chaos and Nonunitary Dynamics
Quantum Chaos and Nonunitary Dynamics Karol Życzkowski in collaboration with W. Bruzda, V. Cappellini, H.-J. Sommers, M. Smaczyński Phys. Lett. A 373, 320 (2009) Institute of Physics, Jagiellonian University,
More informationAlgebraic Theory of Entanglement
Algebraic Theory of (arxiv: 1205.2882) 1 (in collaboration with T.R. Govindarajan, A. Queiroz and A.F. Reyes-Lega) 1 Physics Department, Syracuse University, Syracuse, N.Y. and The Institute of Mathematical
More informationarxiv:quant-ph/ v1 7 Mar 2007
Statistical bounds on the dynamical production of entanglement Rômulo F. Abreu and Raúl O. Vallejos Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Físicas (CBPF), Rua Dr. Xavier Sigaud 150, 22290-180 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
More informationEigenstate entanglement between quantum chaotic subsystems: universal transitions and power laws in the entanglement spectrum
Eigenstate entanglement between quantum chaotic subsystems: universal transitions and power laws in the entanglement spectrum Steven Tomsovic,,, 3 Arul Lakshminarayan,, 4 Shashi C. L. Srivastava,, 5, 6
More informationThe Principles of Quantum Mechanics: Pt. 1
The Principles of Quantum Mechanics: Pt. 1 PHYS 476Q - Southern Illinois University February 15, 2018 PHYS 476Q - Southern Illinois University The Principles of Quantum Mechanics: Pt. 1 February 15, 2018
More informationarxiv: v4 [cond-mat.stat-mech] 28 May 2015
arxiv:1311.0580v4 [cond-mat.stat-mech] 28 May 2015 Top eigenvalue of a random matrix: large deviations and third order phase transition Satya N. Majumdar Université Paris-Sud, LPTMS, CNRS (UMR 8626), 91405
More informationNON-GAUSSIANITY AND PURITY IN FINITE DIMENSION
International Journal of Quantum Information Vol. 7, Supplement (9) 97 13 c World Scientific Publishing Company NON-GAUSSIANITY AND PURITY IN FINITE DIMENSION MARCO G. GENONI, and MATTEO G. A. PARIS,,
More informationStatistical Inference and Random Matrices
Statistical Inference and Random Matrices N.S. Witte Institute of Fundamental Sciences Massey University New Zealand 5-12-2017 Joint work with Peter Forrester 6 th Wellington Workshop in Probability and
More informationIs the world more classical or more quantum?
Is the world more classical or more quantum? A. Lovas, A. Andai BUTE, Department of Analysis XXVI International Fall Workshop on Geometry and Physics Braga, 4-7 September 2017 A. Lovas, A. Andai Is the
More informationarxiv: v2 [quant-ph] 18 Mar 2011
Generating random density matrices arxiv:1010.3570v2 [quant-ph] 18 Mar 2011 Karol Życzkowski 1,2, Karol A. Penson 3, Ion Nechita 4,5 and Benoît Collins 4,6 1 Institute of Physics, Jagiellonian University,
More informationIntroduction to Quantum Information Hermann Kampermann
Introduction to Quantum Information Hermann Kampermann Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf Theoretische Physik III Summer school Bleubeuren July 014 Contents 1 Quantum Mechanics...........................
More informationQuantum Entanglement- Fundamental Aspects
Quantum Entanglement- Fundamental Aspects Debasis Sarkar Department of Applied Mathematics, University of Calcutta, 92, A.P.C. Road, Kolkata- 700009, India Abstract Entanglement is one of the most useful
More information2.1 Definition and general properties
Chapter 2 Gaussian states Gaussian states are at the heart of quantum information processing with continuous variables. The basic reason is that the vacuum state of quantum electrodynamics is itself a
More informationMultipartite Monogamy of the Entanglement of Formation. Abstract
Multipartite Monogamy of the Entanglement of Formation Xian Shi Institute of Mathematics, Academy of Mathematics and Systems Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China University of Chinese
More informationEntropy in Classical and Quantum Information Theory
Entropy in Classical and Quantum Information Theory William Fedus Physics Department, University of California, San Diego. Entropy is a central concept in both classical and quantum information theory,
More informationModification of the Porter-Thomas distribution by rank-one interaction. Eugene Bogomolny
Modification of the Porter-Thomas distribution by rank-one interaction Eugene Bogomolny University Paris-Sud, CNRS Laboratoire de Physique Théorique et Modèles Statistiques, Orsay France XII Brunel-Bielefeld
More informationFRACTAL DIMENSIONS FOR CERTAIN CRITICAL RANDOM MATRIX ENSEMBLES. Eugène Bogomolny
FRACTAL DIMENSIONS FOR CERTAIN CRITICAL RANDOM MATRIX ENSEMBLES Eugène Bogomolny Univ. Paris-Sud, CNRS, LPTMS, Orsay, France In collaboration with Olivier Giraud VI Brunel Workshop on PMT Brunel, 7-8 December
More informationMultipartite entanglement in fermionic systems via a geometric
Multipartite entanglement in fermionic systems via a geometric measure Department of Physics University of Pune Pune - 411007 International Workshop on Quantum Information HRI Allahabad February 2012 In
More informationarxiv:quant-ph/ v1 22 Jul 2002
Conditional q-entropies and Quantum Separability: A Numerical Exploration J. Batle 1, A. R. Plastino 1,2, M. Casas 1, and A. Plastino 2 1 Departament de Física, Universitat de les Illes Balears, 07071
More informationEntanglement in Topological Phases
Entanglement in Topological Phases Dylan Liu August 31, 2012 Abstract In this report, the research conducted on entanglement in topological phases is detailed and summarized. This includes background developed
More informationThe general reason for approach to thermal equilibrium of macroscopic quantu
The general reason for approach to thermal equilibrium of macroscopic quantum systems 10 May 2011 Joint work with S. Goldstein, J. L. Lebowitz, C. Mastrodonato, and N. Zanghì. Claim macroscopic quantum
More informationEntanglement: concept, measures and open problems
Entanglement: concept, measures and open problems Division of Mathematical Physics Lund University June 2013 Project in Quantum information. Supervisor: Peter Samuelsson Outline 1 Motivation for study
More informationInduced Ginibre Ensemble and random operations
Induced Ginibre Ensemble and random operations Karol Życzkowski in collaboration with Wojciech Bruzda, Marek Smaczyński, Wojciech Roga Jonith Fischmann, Boris Khoruzhenko (London), Ion Nechita (Touluse),
More informationarxiv:quant-ph/ v2 24 Dec 2003
Quantum Entanglement in Heisenberg Antiferromagnets V. Subrahmanyam Department of Physics, Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur, India. arxiv:quant-ph/0309004 v2 24 Dec 2003 Entanglement sharing among
More informationShared Purity of Multipartite Quantum States
Shared Purity of Multipartite Quantum States Anindya Biswas Harish-Chandra Research Institute December 3, 2013 Anindya Biswas (HRI) Shared Purity December 3, 2013 1 / 38 Outline of the talk 1 Motivation
More informationNullity of Measurement-induced Nonlocality. Yu Guo
Jul. 18-22, 2011, at Taiyuan. Nullity of Measurement-induced Nonlocality Yu Guo (Joint work with Pro. Jinchuan Hou) 1 1 27 Department of Mathematics Shanxi Datong University Datong, China guoyu3@yahoo.com.cn
More informationQuantum Systems Measurement through Product Hamiltonians
45th Symposium of Mathematical Physics, Toruń, June 1-2, 2013 Quantum Systems Measurement through Product Hamiltonians Joachim DOMSTA Faculty of Applied Physics and Mathematics Gdańsk University of Technology
More informationMutual Information in Conformal Field Theories in Higher Dimensions
Mutual Information in Conformal Field Theories in Higher Dimensions John Cardy University of Oxford Conference on Mathematical Statistical Physics Kyoto 2013 arxiv:1304.7985; J. Phys. : Math. Theor. 46
More informationMatrix Product States
Matrix Product States Ian McCulloch University of Queensland Centre for Engineered Quantum Systems 28 August 2017 Hilbert space (Hilbert) space is big. Really big. You just won t believe how vastly, hugely,
More informationINSTITUT FOURIER. Quantum correlations and Geometry. Dominique Spehner
i f INSTITUT FOURIER Quantum correlations and Geometry Dominique Spehner Institut Fourier et Laboratoire de Physique et Modélisation des Milieux Condensés, Grenoble Outlines Entangled and non-classical
More informationVicious Walkers, Random Matrices and 2-d Yang-Mills theory
Vicious Walkers, Random Matrices and 2-d Yang-Mills theory Laboratoire de Physique Théorique et Modèles Statistiques,CNRS, Université Paris-Sud, France Collaborators: A. Comtet (LPTMS, Orsay) P. J. Forrester
More informationMaximal height of non-intersecting Brownian motions
Maximal height of non-intersecting Brownian motions G. Schehr Laboratoire de Physique Théorique et Modèles Statistiques CNRS-Université Paris Sud-XI, Orsay Collaborators: A. Comtet (LPTMS, Orsay) P. J.
More informationMultiplicativity of Maximal p Norms in Werner Holevo Channels for 1 < p 2
Multiplicativity of Maximal p Norms in Werner Holevo Channels for 1 < p 2 arxiv:quant-ph/0410063v1 8 Oct 2004 Nilanjana Datta Statistical Laboratory Centre for Mathematical Sciences University of Cambridge
More informationAsymptotic Pure State Transformations
Asymptotic Pure State Transformations PHYS 500 - Southern Illinois University April 18, 2017 PHYS 500 - Southern Illinois University Asymptotic Pure State Transformations April 18, 2017 1 / 15 Entanglement
More informationarxiv: v3 [quant-ph] 5 Jun 2015
Entanglement and swap of quantum states in two qubits Takaya Ikuto and Satoshi Ishizaka Graduate School of Integrated Arts and Sciences, Hiroshima University, Higashihiroshima, 739-8521, Japan (Dated:
More informationMaximally entangled states and combinatorial designes
Maximally entangled states and combinatorial designes Karol Życzkowski in collaboration with Dardo Goyeneche (Concepcion/ Cracow/ Warsaw) Jagiellonian University (Cracow) & Polish Academy of Sciences (Warsaw)
More informationMutual information-energy inequality for thermal states of a bipartite quantum system
Journal of Physics: Conference Series OPEN ACCESS Mutual information-energy inequality for thermal states of a bipartite quantum system To cite this article: Aleksey Fedorov and Evgeny Kiktenko 2015 J.
More informationNear extreme eigenvalues and the first gap of Hermitian random matrices
Near extreme eigenvalues and the first gap of Hermitian random matrices Grégory Schehr LPTMS, CNRS-Université Paris-Sud XI Sydney Random Matrix Theory Workshop 13-16 January 2014 Anthony Perret, G. S.,
More informationMeasuring Entanglement Entropy in Valence Bond Quantum Monte Carlo Simulations
Measuring Entanglement Entropy in Valence Bond Quantum Monte Carlo Simulations by Ann Berlinsky Kallin A thesis presented to the University of Waterloo in fulfillment of the thesis requirement for the
More informationQuantum Entanglement and the Bell Matrix
Quantum Entanglement and the Bell Matrix Marco Pedicini (Roma Tre University) in collaboration with Anna Chiara Lai and Silvia Rognone (La Sapienza University of Rome) SIMAI2018 - MS27: Discrete Mathematics,
More informationarxiv: v2 [nlin.si] 15 Oct 2008
Random Quantum Operations Wojciech Bruzda 1, Valerio Cappellini 1, Hans-Jürgen Sommers 2, and Karol Życzkowski1,3 1 Mark Kac Complex Systems Research Centre, Institute of Physics, Jagiellonian University,
More informationRandom Matrix: From Wigner to Quantum Chaos
Random Matrix: From Wigner to Quantum Chaos Horng-Tzer Yau Harvard University Joint work with P. Bourgade, L. Erdős, B. Schlein and J. Yin 1 Perhaps I am now too courageous when I try to guess the distribution
More informationSome Bipartite States Do Not Arise from Channels
Some Bipartite States Do Not Arise from Channels arxiv:quant-ph/0303141v3 16 Apr 003 Mary Beth Ruskai Department of Mathematics, Tufts University Medford, Massachusetts 0155 USA marybeth.ruskai@tufts.edu
More informationPhysics 239/139 Spring 2018 Assignment 6
University of California at San Diego Department of Physics Prof. John McGreevy Physics 239/139 Spring 2018 Assignment 6 Due 12:30pm Monday, May 14, 2018 1. Brainwarmers on Kraus operators. (a) Check that
More informationConcentration Inequalities for Random Matrices
Concentration Inequalities for Random Matrices M. Ledoux Institut de Mathématiques de Toulouse, France exponential tail inequalities classical theme in probability and statistics quantify the asymptotic
More informationEntanglement Measures and Monotones
Entanglement Measures and Monotones PHYS 500 - Southern Illinois University March 30, 2017 PHYS 500 - Southern Illinois University Entanglement Measures and Monotones March 30, 2017 1 / 11 Quantifying
More informationPhysics 581, Quantum Optics II Problem Set #4 Due: Tuesday November 1, 2016
Physics 581, Quantum Optics II Problem Set #4 Due: Tuesday November 1, 2016 Problem 3: The EPR state (30 points) The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) paradox is based around a thought experiment of measurements
More informationQuantum Stochastic Maps and Frobenius Perron Theorem
Quantum Stochastic Maps and Frobenius Perron Theorem Karol Życzkowski in collaboration with W. Bruzda, V. Cappellini, H.-J. Sommers, M. Smaczyński Institute of Physics, Jagiellonian University, Cracow,
More informationarxiv: v2 [quant-ph] 14 Mar 2018
God plays coins or superposition principle for classical probabilities in quantum suprematism representation of qubit states. V. N. Chernega 1, O. V. Man ko 1,2, V. I. Man ko 1,3 1 - Lebedev Physical Institute,
More informationCS/Ph120 Homework 4 Solutions
CS/Ph10 Homework 4 Solutions November 3, 016 Problem 1: Robustness of GHZ and W states, part Solution: Due to Bolton Bailey a For the GHZ state, we have T r N GHZ N GHZ N = 1 0 N 1 0 N 1 + 1 N 1 1 N 1
More informationScaling analysis of snapshot spectra in the world-line quantum Monte Carlo for the transverse-field Ising chain
TNSAA 2018-2019 Dec. 3-6, 2018, Kobe, Japan Scaling analysis of snapshot spectra in the world-line quantum Monte Carlo for the transverse-field Ising chain Kouichi Seki, Kouichi Okunishi Niigata University,
More informationarxiv: v1 [cond-mat.str-el] 7 Oct 2017
Universal Spectral Correlations in the Chaotic Wave Function, and the Development of Quantum Chaos Xiao Chen 1, and Andreas W.W. Ludwig 2 1 Kavli Institute for Theoretical Physics, arxiv:1710.02686v1 [cond-mat.str-el]
More informationCompression and entanglement, entanglement transformations
PHYSICS 491: Symmetry and Quantum Information April 27, 2017 Compression and entanglement, entanglement transformations Lecture 8 Michael Walter, Stanford University These lecture notes are not proof-read
More informationEntanglement, quantum critical phenomena and efficient simulation of quantum dynamics
Entanglement, quantum critical phenomena and efficient simulation of quantum dynamics Simons Conference on Reversible and Quantum Computation Stony Brook, May 28-31 2003 Guifre Vidal Institute for Quantum
More information1 Tridiagonal matrices
Lecture Notes: β-ensembles Bálint Virág Notes with Diane Holcomb 1 Tridiagonal matrices Definition 1. Suppose you have a symmetric matrix A, we can define its spectral measure (at the first coordinate
More informationPrinciples of Quantum Mechanics Pt. 2
Principles of Quantum Mechanics Pt. 2 PHYS 500 - Southern Illinois University February 9, 2017 PHYS 500 - Southern Illinois University Principles of Quantum Mechanics Pt. 2 February 9, 2017 1 / 13 The
More informationarxiv: v2 [cond-mat.stat-mech] 20 May 2017
manuscript No. (will be inserted by the editor) Truncated linear statistics associated with the eigenvalues of random matrices II. Partial sums over proper time delays for chaotic quantum dots arxiv:1612.05469v2
More informationAn Introduction to Quantum Computation and Quantum Information
An to and Graduate Group in Applied Math University of California, Davis March 13, 009 A bit of history Benioff 198 : First paper published mentioning quantum computing Feynman 198 : Use a quantum computer
More informationMaximally Entangled State and Bell s Inequality in Qubits
Maximally Entangled State and Bell s Inequality in Qubits arxiv:1711.04415v1 [quant-ph] 13 Nov 2017 Su-Kuan Chu a 1, Chen-Te Ma b 2, Rong-Xin Miao c 3 and Chih-Hung Wu b 4 a Joint Quantum Institute and
More informationarxiv: v2 [cond-mat.stat-mech] 12 Jun 2009
onintersecting Brownian Interfaces and Wishart Random Matrices Céline adal and Satya. Majumdar Laboratoire de Physique Théorique et Modèles Statistiques UMR 866 du CRS, Université Paris-Sud, Bâtiment 945
More informationQuantification of Gaussian quantum steering. Gerardo Adesso
Quantification of Gaussian quantum steering Gerardo Adesso Outline Quantum steering Continuous variable systems Gaussian entanglement Gaussian steering Applications Steering timeline EPR paradox (1935)
More informationPHY305: Notes on Entanglement and the Density Matrix
PHY305: Notes on Entanglement and the Density Matrix Here follows a short summary of the definitions of qubits, EPR states, entanglement, the density matrix, pure states, mixed states, measurement, and
More informationUniversality of local spectral statistics of random matrices
Universality of local spectral statistics of random matrices László Erdős Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany CRM, Montreal, Mar 19, 2012 Joint with P. Bourgade, B. Schlein, H.T. Yau, and J.
More informationarxiv: v1 [cond-mat.stat-mech] 16 Oct 2012
Noname manuscript No. will be inserted by the editor) arxiv:110.4438v1 [cond-mat.stat-mech] 16 Oct 01 Grégory Schehr Satya N. Majumdar Alain Comtet Peter J. Forrester Reunion probability of N vicious walkers:
More informationarxiv: v2 [quant-ph] 13 Aug 2011
Entanglement transitions in random definite particle states Vikram S. Vijayaraghavan, 1, Udaysinh T. Bhosale, 1, and Arul Lakshminarayan 1, 1 Department of Physics, Indian Institute of Technology Madras,
More informationEntanglement Entropy in Extended Quantum Systems
Entanglement Entropy in Extended Quantum Systems John Cardy University of Oxford STATPHYS 23 Genoa Outline A. Universal properties of entanglement entropy near quantum critical points B. Behaviour of entanglement
More informationarxiv: v1 [hep-th] 26 Sep 2017
Eigenstate entanglement in the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model arxiv:709.0960v [hep-th] 6 Sep 07 Yichen Huang ( 黄溢辰 ) Institute for Quantum Information and Matter, California Institute of Technology Pasadena,
More informationarxiv: v2 [quant-ph] 10 Aug 2016
Random MERA States and the Tightness of the Brandao-Horodecki Entropy Bound M. B. Hastings 1, 2 1 Station Q, Microsoft Research, Santa Barbara, CA 93106-6105, USA 2 Quantum Architectures and Computation
More informationarxiv: v1 [quant-ph] 2 Nov 2018
Entanglement and Measurement-induced quantum correlation in Heisenberg spin models arxiv:1811.733v1 [quant-ph] 2 Nov 218 Abstract Indrajith V S, R. Muthuganesan, R. Sankaranarayanan Department of Physics,
More informationBasic Notions of Entropy and Entanglement
Basic Notions of Entropy and Entanglement Frank Wilczek Center for Theoretical Physics, MIT, Cambridge MA 02139 USA March 3, 2014 Abstract Entropy is a nineteenth-century invention, with origins in such
More informationBOGOLIUBOV TRANSFORMATIONS AND ENTANGLEMENT OF TWO FERMIONS
BOGOLIUBOV TRANSFORMATIONS AND ENTANGLEMENT OF TWO FERMIONS P. Caban, K. Podlaski, J. Rembieliński, K. A. Smoliński and Z. Walczak Department of Theoretical Physics, University of Lodz Pomorska 149/153,
More informationarxiv:quant-ph/ v1 9 Apr 1998
On the volume of the set of mixed entangled states Karol Życzkowski Institute for Plasma Research, University of Maryland College Park, MD 20742 USA Pawe l Horodecki Faculty of Applied Physics and Mathematics
More informationEntanglement in Many-Body Fermion Systems
Entanglement in Many-Body Fermion Systems Michelle Storms 1, 2 1 Department of Physics, University of California Davis, CA 95616, USA 2 Department of Physics and Astronomy, Ohio Wesleyan University, Delaware,
More informationarxiv: v2 [quant-ph] 7 Apr 2014
Quantum Chernoff bound as a measure of efficiency of quantum cloning for mixed states arxiv:1404.0915v [quant-ph] 7 Apr 014 Iulia Ghiu Centre for Advanced Quantum Physics, Department of Physics, University
More informationApplications to simulations: Monte-Carlo
Applications to simulations: Monte-Carlo A.C. Maggs ESPCI, Paris June 2016 Summary Algorithms Faster/simpler codes Thermodynamics of Electric fields Partition function of electric field Thermal Casimir/Lifshitz
More informationPh 219/CS 219. Exercises Due: Friday 20 October 2006
1 Ph 219/CS 219 Exercises Due: Friday 20 October 2006 1.1 How far apart are two quantum states? Consider two quantum states described by density operators ρ and ρ in an N-dimensional Hilbert space, and
More informationarxiv:quant-ph/ v1 15 Dec 2004
Entanglement in the XX Spin Chain with Energy Current V. Eisler, and Z. Zimborás 2, Institute for Theoretical Physics, Eötvös University, 7 Budapest, Pázmány sétány /a, Hungary 2 Research Institute for
More informationSupplementary Information
Supplementary Information Supplementary Figures Supplementary Figure : Bloch sphere. Representation of the Bloch vector ψ ok = ζ 0 + ξ k on the Bloch sphere of the Hilbert sub-space spanned by the states
More informationA Holevo-type bound for a Hilbert Schmidt distance measure
Journal of Quantum Information Science, 205, *,** Published Online **** 204 in SciRes. http://www.scirp.org/journal/**** http://dx.doi.org/0.4236/****.204.***** A Holevo-type bound for a Hilbert Schmidt
More informationAVERAGE ENTROPY OF A SUBSYSTEM
AVERAGE ENTROPY OF A SUBSYSTEM arxiv:gr-qc/9305007v2 31 Aug 1993 Don N. Page CIAR Cosmology Program Theoretical Physics Institute Department of Physics University of Alberta Edmonton, Alberta Canada T6G
More informationUniversality of distribution functions in random matrix theory Arno Kuijlaars Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium
Universality of distribution functions in random matrix theory Arno Kuijlaars Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium SEA 06@MIT, Workshop on Stochastic Eigen-Analysis and its Applications, MIT, Cambridge,
More informationAn Entropy depending only on the Probability (or the Density Matrix)
An Entropy depending only on the Probability (or the Density Matrix) December, 2016 The Entropy and Superstatistics The Entropy and Superstatistics Boltzman-Gibbs (BG) statistics works perfectly well for
More informationA Condition for Entropy Exchange Between Atom and Field
Commun. Theor. Phys. 57 (2012) 209 213 Vol. 57, No. 2, February 15, 2012 A Condition for Entropy Exchange Between Atom and Field YAN Xue-Qun ( ) and LÜ Yu-Guang (ù ½) Institute of Physics and Department
More informationProgress in the method of Ghosts and Shadows for Beta Ensembles
Progress in the method of Ghosts and Shadows for Beta Ensembles Alan Edelman (MIT) Alex Dubbs (MIT) and Plamen Koev (SJS) Oct 8, 2012 1/47 Wishart Matrices (arbitrary covariance) G=mxn matrix of Gaussians
More informationVolume of the set of separable states
PHYSICAL REVIEW A VOLUME 58, NUMBER 2 AUGUST 998 Volume of the set of separable states Karol Życzkowski* Institute for Plasma Research, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 2742 Paweł Horodecki
More informationClassical Monte Carlo Simulations
Classical Monte Carlo Simulations Hyejin Ju April 17, 2012 1 Introduction Why do we need numerics? One of the main goals of condensed matter is to compute expectation values O = 1 Z Tr{O e βĥ} (1) and
More informationProducts of Rectangular Gaussian Matrices
Products of Rectangular Gaussian Matrices Jesper R. Ipsen Department of Physics Bielefeld University in collaboration with Gernot Akemann Mario Kieburg Summer School on Randomness in Physics & Mathematics
More informationEigenvectors under a generic perturbation: non-perturbative results from the random matrix approach
epl draft igenvectors under a generic perturbation: non-perturbative results from the random matrix approach K. Truong and A. Ossipov School of Mathematical Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham
More informationInsights into Large Complex Systems via Random Matrix Theory
Insights into Large Complex Systems via Random Matrix Theory Lu Wei SEAS, Harvard 06/23/2016 @ UTC Institute for Advanced Systems Engineering University of Connecticut Lu Wei Random Matrix Theory and Large
More information