arxiv: v1 [hep-th] 26 Sep 2017

Transcription

1 Eigenstate entanglement in the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model arxiv: v [hep-th] 6 Sep 07 Yichen Huang ( 黄溢辰 ) Institute for Quantum Information and Matter, California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California 95, USA ychuang@caltech.edu Yingfei Gu ( 顾颖飞 ) Department of Physics, Harvard University Cambridge, Massachusetts 038, USA yingfei gu@g.harvard.edu September 7, 07 Abstract In the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model, we argue that the entanglement entropy of any eigenstate (including the ground state) obeys a volume law, whose coefficient can be calculated analytically from the energy and subsystem size. We expect that the argument applies to a broader class of chaotic models with all-to-all interactions. Introduction Entanglement, a concept of quantum information theory, has been widely used in condensed matter and statistical physics to provide insights beyond those obtained via conventional quantities. For ground states of local Hamiltonians, it characterizes quantum criticality [34, 9,, ] and topological order [6, 0]. Its scaling [7] is quantitatively related to the classical simulability of quantum manybody systems [33, 9, 4, ]. Besides ground states, it is also important to understand the entanglement of excited eigenstates. For chaotic local Hamiltonians, one expects a volume law, i.e., the eigenstate entanglement between a subsystem and its complement is proportional to the subsystem size with a coefficient depending on the energy of the eigenstate [3]. In particular, analytical arguments [5] and numerical simulations [8, 6, ] suggest that for a subsystem smaller than half the system size, the entanglement entropy of an eigenstate has the same scaling as the thermodynamic entropy (or the entropy of a microcanonical ensemble, due to the equivalence of ensembles) with the same energy density. We briefly explain the reasonings behind such a result. The eigenstate thermalization hypothesis (ETH) states that for expectation values of local observables, an individual eigenstate resembles a thermal state with the same energy density [4, 3, 5]. The equivalence between entanglement and thermodynamic entropies is just a variant of ETH for entropy. The Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev (SYK) model [7, 5, 3] is a random all-to-all interacting model with a large number (denoted by N) of Majorana fermions. The model is solvable in the large N limit, and possesses an extensive zero-temperature entropy. A recent numerical study [9] suggests the breakdown of the equivalence between entanglement and thermodynamic entropies in the SYK model: The ground-state entanglement entropy appears to be slightly less than maximal and is significantly larger than the zero-temperature thermodynamic entropy.

2 We show that due to the presence of all-to-all interactions, the equivalence between entanglement and thermodynamic entropies needs to be modified. In particular, we argue that the entanglement entropy of an eigenstate has the same scaling as the entropy of a microcanonical ensemble, whose energy, however, becomes a function of the energy of the eigenstate and the subsystem size. Thus, we obtain an analytical formula for the scaling of eigenstate entanglement in the SYK model from its spectral properties. The SYK model is maximally chaotic in the sense of a maximal Lyapunov exponent [5, 3, ] for the exponential growth of out-of-time-ordered correlators [8, 30, 3, 6, 4]. Our argument is not related to such dynamical behavior, and should apply to a broader class of chaotic models with all-to-all interactions. Preliminaries We use the natural logarithm throughout this paper. As the standard measure of entanglement for pure states, we define Definition (entanglement entropy). The entanglement entropy of a bipartite (pure) state ρ AB = ψ ψ is defined as the von Neumann entropy of the reduced density matrix ρ A = tr B ρ AB : S(ρ A ) = tr(ρ A lnρ A ). () Consider a quantum many-body system of N Majorana fermions χ,χ,...,χ N with the Hilbert space dimension d = N/. Without loss of generality, assume N is a multiple of 4. The Hamiltonian of the SYK model reads H = J ijkl χ i χ j χ k χ l, {χ j,χ k } = δ jk, () i<j<k<l N wherej ijkl s are independent real Gaussian random variables with zero mean J ijkl = 0 and variance Jijkl = 3! N3. (3) We brieflyreview thespectral propertiesofthesykmodelinthethermodynamiclimitn : (i) The mean energy of H is trh/d = 0. (ii) The distribution of eigenvalues near the mean energy is approximately Gaussian whose variance istr(h )/d = Θ(N). Thisisageneral feature[8]ofsuchmodelswithrandomfew-bodyinteractions. (iii) The ground-state energy is NE 0 (extensive), where E 0 is a known constant. (iv) To leading order, the density of states at energy NE is given by [0] [ ( )] D(E,E 0,N) = e ln E 6 arcsin N E 0. (4) The arguments are energy density, ground-state energy density, and the number of fermions respectively. According to the Ref. [0], this formula is empirically valid except very close to the edge. In particular, it works when E E 0 is a non-zero constant independent of N. 3 Argument We divide the system into two parts A and B. Suppose the subsystem A consists of M Majorana fermions, where M is even and satisfies M N/. We decompose the Hamiltonian () into three

3 parts: H = H A +H +H B, where H A(B) includes the terms acting only on the subsystem A(B), and H consists of the cross terms. As (N/M) 3/ H A is an SYK model of M Majorana fermions, the ground-state energy of H A is M(M/N) 3/ E 0. Let { j A } j= M/ be a complete set of eigenstates of H A with the corresponding eigenvalues {ǫ j }. Any (normalized) eigenstate ψ of H with energy NE can be expanded as ψ = M/ j= c j j A φ j B, (5) where φ j B s are (generically) non-orthogonal states in the subsystem B. Thus, measuring H A on the state ψ results in a probability distribution, where ǫ j occurs with probability c j. By counting the number of terms in the Hamiltonian, the mean of the probability distribution is ψ H A ψ = ( ) M 4 NE. (6) N It is reasonable to expect that the probability distribution is sharply peaked around the mean value. This imposes a strong constraint on the expansion (5): The term on the right-hand side contributes significantly only if ǫ j is close to the mean energy (6). Thus, the effective Hilbert space dimension of the subsystem A for the state ψ is given by the density of states of H A at the energy (6), which is ( (M ) 3 ( ) [ ( )3 M D E, E0,M = e ln 6 arcsin ( M N) 3 )] E M E 0. (7) N N In chaotic systems, one may expect that the eigenstate entanglement is maximal subject to such a constraint on the effective Hilbert space dimension. Thus, we obtain a volume law [ ( (M )] ln )3 E 6 arcsin M (8) N E 0 with a coefficient depending on the subsystem size M. This is scaling of eigenstate entanglement to leading order, and we are not able to calculate subleading corrections. Example. For M = N/, the ground-state entanglement scales as [ ln ( )] 6 arcsin M ( )M = M. (9) In summary, we have argued that the entanglement entropy of an eigenstate with energy NE has the same scaling as the entropy of a microcanonical ensemble, whose energy over the groundstate energy is (M/N) 3/ E/E 0. Therefore, (i) The eigenstate entanglement obeys a volume law with a maximal coefficient if the smaller subsystem is a vanishing fraction of the system size. This is because the corresponding microcanonical ensemble is at the mean energy density of the Hamiltonian. (ii) For an eigenstate with nonzero energy density, the entanglement obeys a volume law with a non-maximal coefficient if the subsystem is a constant fraction of the system size. 3

4 Note added Very recently, we became aware of a related work [], which also studied eigenstate entanglement in the SYK model. For the case that the subsystems are half the system size, the authors calculated the ground-state entanglement using exact diagonalization up to the system size N = 44, and their numerical results are well fitted by the formula M 0.666, which is consistent with our analytical result Eq. (9). Acknowledgments Y.H. acknowledges funding provided by the Institute for Quantum Information and Matter, an NSF Physics Frontiers Center (NSF Grant PHY-5565) with support of the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation (GBMF-644). Y.H. is also supported by NSF DMR Y.G. is supported by the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation EPiQS Initiative through Grant (GBMF-4306). References [] P. Calabrese and J. Cardy. Entanglement entropy and quantum field theory. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 004(06):P0600, 004. [] P. Calabrese and J. Cardy. Entanglement entropy and conformal field theory. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 4(50):504005, 009. [3] L. D Alessio, Y. Kafri, A. Polkovnikov, and M. Rigol. From quantum chaos and eigenstate thermalization to statistical mechanics and thermodynamics. Advances in Physics, 65(3):39 36, 06. [4] J. M. Deutsch. Quantum statistical mechanics in a closed system. Physical Review A, 43(4): , 99. [5] J. M. Deutsch. Thermodynamic entropy of a many-body energy eigenstate. New Journal of Physics, (7):0750, 00. [6] J. M. Deutsch, H. Li, and A. Sharma. Microscopic origin of thermodynamic entropy in isolated systems. Physical Review E, 87(4):0435, 03. [7] J. Eisert, M. Cramer, and M. B. Plenio. Colloquium: Area laws for the entanglement entropy. Reviews of Modern Physics, 8():77 306, 00. [8] L. Erdős and D. Schröder. Phase transition in the density of states of quantum spin glasses. Mathematical Physics, Analysis and Geometry, 7(3):964, 04. [9] W. Fu and S. Sachdev. Numerical study of fermion and boson models with infinite-range random interactions. Physical Review B, 94(3):03535, 06. [0] A. M. García-García and J. J. M. Verbaarschot. Analytical spectral density of the Sachdev- Ye-Kitaev model at finite N. Physical Review D, 96(6):0660, 07. [] J. R. Garrison and T. Grover. Does a single eigenstate encode the full Hamiltonian? arxiv: , 05. For other recent studies of entanglement in the SYK model, see Refs. [7, 3]. 4

5 [] S. Gharibian, Y. Huang, Z. Landau, and S. W. Shin. Quantum Hamiltonian complexity. Foundations and Trends in Theoretical Computer Science, 0(3):59 8, 05. [3] Y. Gu, A. Lucas, and X.-L. Qi. Spread of entanglement in a Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev chain. arxiv: , 07. [4] A. Kitaev. Hidden correlations in the Hawking radiation and thermal noise. In 05 Breakthrough Prize in Fundamental Physics Symposium, 04. [5] A. Kitaev. A simple model of quantum holography. In KITP Program: Entanglement in Strongly-Correlated Quantum Matter, [6] A. Kitaev and J. Preskill. Topological entanglement entropy. Physical Review Letters, 96():0404, 006. [7] I. Kourkoulou and J. Maldacena. Pure states in the SYK model and nearly-ads gravity. arxiv: , 07. [8] A. I. Larkin and Y. N. Ovchinnikov. Quasiclassical method in the theory of superconductivity. Sov. Phys. JETP, 8(6):00 05, 969. [9] J. I. Latorre, E. Rico, and G. Vidal. Ground state entanglement in quantum spin chains. Quantum Information and Computation, 4():48 9, 004. [0] M. Levin and X.-G. Wen. Detecting topological order in a ground state wave function. Physical Review Letters, 96():0405, 006. [] C. Liu, X. Chen, and L. Balents. Quantum entanglement of the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev models. arxiv: , 07. [] J. Maldacena, S. H. Shenker, and D. Stanford. A bound on chaos. Journal of High Energy Physics, 06(8):06, 06. [3] J. Maldacena and D. Stanford. Remarks on the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model. Physical Review D, 94(0):0600, 06. [4] T. J. Osborne. Hamiltonian complexity. Reports on Progress in Physics, 75():000, 0. [5] M. Rigol, V. Dunjko, and M. Olshanii. Thermalization and its mechanism for generic isolated quantum systems. Nature, 45(7): , 008. [6] D. A. Roberts, D. Stanford, and L. Susskind. Localized shocks. Journal of High Energy Physics, 05(3):5, 05. [7] S. Sachdev and J. Ye. Gapless spin-fluid ground state in a random quantum Heisenberg magnet. Physical Review Letters, 70(): , 993. [8] L. F. Santos, A. Polkovnikov, and M. Rigol. Weak and strong typicality in quantum systems. Physical Review E, 86():000, 0. [9] N. Schuch, M. M. Wolf, F. Verstraete, and J. I. Cirac. Entropy scaling and simulability by matrix product states. Physical Review Letters, 00(3):030504,

6 [30] S. H. Shenker and D. Stanford. Black holes and the butterfly effect. Journal of High Energy Physics, 04(3):67, 04. [3] S. H. Shenker and D. Stanford. Multiple shocks. Journal of High Energy Physics, 04():46, 04. [3] M. Srednicki. Chaos and quantum thermalization. Physical Review E, 50():888 90, 994. [33] F. Verstraete and J. I. Cirac. Matrix product states represent ground states faithfully. Physical Review B, 73(9):09443, 006. [34] G. Vidal, J. I. Latorre, E. Rico, and A. Kitaev. Entanglement in quantum critical phenomena. Physical Review Letters, 90():790,