Robust and Optimal Control of Uncertain Dynamical Systems with State-Dependent Switchings Using Interval Arithmetic
|
|
- Alfred August Clarke
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Robust and Optimal Control o Uncertain Dynamical Systems with State-Dependent Switchings Using Interval Arithmetic Andreas Rauh Chair o Mechatronics, University o Rostock, D-1859 Rostock, Germany Andreas.Rauh@uni-rostock.de Johanna Minisini and Eberhard P. Hoer Institute o Measurement, Control, and Microtechnology, University o Ulm, D-8969 Ulm, Germany {Johanna.Minisini,Eberhard.Hoer}@uni-ulm.de Harald Aschemann Chair o Mechatronics, University o Rostock, D-1859 Rostock, Germany Harald.Aschemann@uni-rostock.de Abstract In this paper, interval arithmetic techniques or controller design o nonlinear dynamical systems with uncertainties are summarized. The main reason or the application o interval techniques in this context is the quantiication o the inluence o uncertainties and modeling errors. They result rom neglecting nonlinear phenomena in the mathematical description o real-world systems. Furthermore, measured data usually do not provide exact inormation about the system parameters. Oten simpliications o nonlinear models or controller structures are necessary to enable the implementation o controllers. Thereore, these uncertainties have to be taken into account during the design o controllers or veriication o observability, controllability, stability, and robustness. Keywords: interval arithmetic, controller design, optimization, approximation techniques, saety-critical applications AMS subject classiications: 65G2, 65G4, 65K1, 34H5, 49J15, 49K15, 93C15, 93D9 Submitted: January 19, 29; Revised: February 9, 21; Accepted: March 1,
2 334 A. Rauh et al., Robust and Optimal Control o Dynamical Systems 1 Introduction This paper gives an overview o general interval arithmetic procedures or the design o controllers or continuous-time dynamical systems [9]. To guarantee robustness with respect to uncertain initial conditions as well as uncertain system parameters, interval variables and veriied computational techniques are taken into account during all design stages. For that purpose, the notion o optimality o control strategies is extended to systems with uncertainties by minimization o guaranteed upper bounds o suitable perormance indices. In the irst part o this paper, techniques or the veriication o controllability, reachability, and observability o states in the presence o uncertainties as well as stabilizability o instable systems are demonstrated. These techniques are based on the veriied evaluation o the corresponding system theoretic criteria [6, 3]. Thereore, underlying computational approaches are required which yield guaranteed enclosures o all reachable states o dynamical systems. Especially or saety-critical applications, asymptotic stability and compliance with given restrictions or the state variables have to be assured or all possible operating conditions using analytical or numerical techniques. For both open-loop and closed-loop control systems, possibilities or the combination o veriied techniques with classical approaches or robust and stabilitybased controller design in the time-domain are highlighted (Sections 2 4). In the second part, procedures or structure and parameter optimization o continuous-time dynamical systems with bounded uncertainties are derived that rely on the above-mentioned basic concepts [8]. For that purpose, an interval-based algorithm is presented. This algorithm computes approximations o globally optimal openloop and closed-loop control laws or dynamical systems. Focusing on continuous-time applications, we present new strategies which allow to combine piecewise constant approximations o optimal control laws with continuous approximations (Sections 5,6). The ocus o the third part is the application o the previously introduced methods and procedures to the design o robust and optimal control strategies or dynamical systems with state-dependent switching characteristics [8]. In practically relevant applications, the act that control variables are usually bounded has to be taken into account directly during design. This aims at building a new uniied, general-purpose ramework or the veriied synthesis o dynamical systems integrating trajectory planning, unction-oriented and saety-related controller design, as well as robustness and optimality assessment and veriication. Computational routines or the previously mentioned tasks already exist. However, they are usually not integrated into a common tool veriying the design using interval arithmetic (Section 6). 2 Control-Oriented Modeling o Dynamical Systems In control engineering, commonly two tasks are distinguished: the design o open-loop control strategies and observer-based closed-loop control strategies. In the ollowing, we restrict the discussion to continuous-time dynamical system models which are described by sets o (nonlinear) ordinary dierential equations ẋ s (t) = (x s (t), p (t), u (t), t) (1)
3 Reliable Computing 15, and nonlinear mathematical models speciying the sensor characteristics y (t) = h (x s (t), u (t), q (t), t). (2) In (1) and (2), the state vector is denoted by x s (t), the control vector by u (t), and the parameter vectors corresponding to uncertainties and disturbances by p (t) and q (t), resp. Finally, the reerence signal w (t) describes the trajectories o the desired system outputs, where y (t) = w (t) holds in the ideal case. For open-loop control strategies (Fig. 1) the control sequence u (w) only depends on the reerence signal w (t) and (oten) a inite number o its time derivatives. In contrast to the openloop case, inormation on the current system states x s (t) is ed back additionally in closed-loop control structures (Fig. 2). w control law u (w) u plant sensor characteristics x s ẋ s = (x s, p, u, t) y = h (x s, u, q, t) y Figure 1: Open-loop control o nonlinear dynamical systems. w control law u (ˆx, w) u plant ẋ s = (x s, p, u, t) x s sensor characteristics y = h (x s, u, q, t) y ˆx observer or state reconstruction Figure 2: Observer-based closed-loop control o nonlinear dynamical systems. Figure 2: Observer-based closed-loop control o nonlinear dynamical systems. I the complete state vector x s (t) and the parameters p (t) and q (t) are not directly accessible or measurements, estimated values ˆx (t) are used as a substitute or these quantities in the implementation o the eedback controller. These estimates are determined with the help o state observers (c. [6]). They are computed in terms o the known control u (t) and the measured output y (t). The goal o this paper is to highlight the components o a general-purpose sotware tool which uses interval arithmetic routines to quantiy the inluence o uncertainties resulting rom uncertain initial system states x s () [ x s, ; x s, ] as well as uncertain parameters p (t) [ p (t) ; p (t) ], q (t) [ q (t) ; q (t) ] at the earliest possible design stages. Thus, a system design becomes possible which does not rely on the implementation o controllers or a simpliied, nominal model with an a-posteriori assessment o the inluence o uncertainties. This oten leads to tedious iterations in the design until robustness o the complete control system can be shown or all possible values o the uncertain quantities. Instead, uncertainties are propagated through the com-
4 336 A. Rauh et al., Robust and Optimal Control o Dynamical Systems plete design process by guaranteed bounds on the system states computed by veriied techniques. The basic properties o control systems to be addressed are (global) asymptotic stability and stabilization o instable plants, improvement o the dynamics o the openloop system, robustness and optimality, as well as easibility o the necessary openloop and closed-loop control laws that are required to minimize the control errors w (t) y (t) and x s (t) ˆx (t), resp., or all t. 3 Classical Approaches or Robust Control In the ollowing, an overview o the most important design strategies or robust controllers o linear and nonlinear dynamical system models is given. As discussed in this section, the use o interval techniques and other veriied approaches during the complete control system design is not yet state-o-the-art in industrial control applications. Instead, approximations and simple design techniques based on linear system theoretic properties are oten employed. For linear inite-dimensional time-invariant system representations described by rational transer unctions, i.e., system models without time delay, pole placement is usually perormed to parameterize linear state eedback controllers or single-inputsingle-output systems using Ackermann s ormula (1972). This ormula provides a unique solution or the eedback gains K in u (t) = K x s (t). For multiple-inputmultiple-output systems, additional constraints (such as the decoupling o the inluence o input and output variables) are taken into account to ind a unique solution o the eedback gain matrix K. In both cases, controllability (as introduced by Kalman in 196) is a suicient condition or the assignment o arbitrary poles to the closed-loop control system. Furthermore, observability is necessary i not all state variables are directly accessible by measurements such that they have to be reconstructed using model-based estimators as, or example, shown in Fig. 2. Extensions that are commonly used or the design o controllers or systems with uncertainties and nonlinearities are: The Kharitonov criterion (1978) to prove asymptotic stability o characteristic polynomials with interval coeicients which is basically a generalization o the Hurwitz criterion or nominal system models. The parameter space approach by Ackermann and Kaesbauer [1], which is implemented in the Matlab toolbox PARADISE based on the boundary crossing theorem by Frazer and Duncan (1929). It shows that the poles o rational transer unctions depend continuously on continuous parameter variations (Γstability). Extensions to nonlinear systems with sector-bounded static nonlinearities on the basis o the Popov criterion (1962). Handling o constant time delays using the notion o B-stability. Design approaches based on control Lyapunov unctions as well as symbolic design approaches relying on state-eedback linearization, backstepping, and latness-based eedorward and eedback control [3, 6]. However, general approaches or controller design o nonlinear dynamical systems with bounded parameter uncertainties and bounded errors in the state reconstruction
5 Reliable Computing 15, are not yet commonly used by engineers in industrial applications. Thereore, intervalbased implementations o both classical design approaches and novel numerical techniques are inevitable to obtain general sotware tools or veriication and validation o controller design. 4 An Interval-Based Framework or Robust and Optimal Controller Design 4.1 Overview In this section, selected components o an interval arithmetic ramework or veriied design o robust and optimal control strategies are presented [8, 9], see Fig. 3. They are extensions o classical techniques or the analysis o asymptotic stability o dynamical systems, parameter and structure optimization based on dynamic programming, and trajectory planning techniques using inormation about reachability and observability o states. Especially with respect to optimal control o dynamical systems with uncertainties, non-veriied approaches based on Bellman s dynamic programming and Pontryagin s maximum principle have also been used in other interval-based approaches [4, 5]. 4.2 Veriied Reachability Analysis Reachability analysis or nonlinear input-aine dynamical systems ẋ (t) = (x (t)) + g (x (t)) u (t), x R nx (3) is the prerequisite or the design o most closed-loop control strategies. To analyze the applicability o control sequences u (t) such that the state variables can be inluenced in a desired way, the Lie brackets o (x) and g(x) have to be evaluated, which are deined according to [ (x), g (x)] := g(x) x (x) (x) g (x). (4) x [ Using (4), the state-dependent reachability matrix P (x) deined by P (x) := P (x) P 1 (x)... P nx 1 (x) ] with P (x) := g (x), P 1 (x) := [ (x), g (x)],..., P k (x) := [ (x), P k 1 (x)], k = 2,..., n x 1 can be obtained. The rank o the matrix P (x) is usually state-dependent. To guarantee that all states can be inluenced in a desired way, P (x) must have ull rank n x along the complete trajectory or all possible values o the uncertain system parameters and all possible state variables. For linear systems, the rank criterion or the reachability matrix is identical to Kalman s criterion or state controllability. 4.3 Veriied Observability Analysis Similarly, the observability matrix Q(x) is deined by Q(x) := [ ( h(x) x ) T ( ) T L h(x)... x ( ) L n x 1 T ] T h(x) (5) x
6 338 A. Rauh et al., Robust and Optimal Control o Dynamical Systems Reachability and observability analysis o open-loop control system with uncertainties Stability analysis o open-loop control system Coice between parameterization o predeined control structure or structure optimization Combination o structure optimization and eedback control N1 piecewise constant/ lin. controls Nm piecewise constant/ lin. controls task 1 task m Splitting o L1 control strategies Splitting o Lm control strategies Evaluation o state equations: piecewise constant/ linear control Evaluation o state equations: piecewise constant/ linear control Computation o guaranteed state enclosures Computation o guaranteed bounds or the cost unction Computation o guaranteed state enclosures Computation o guaranteed bounds or the cost unction Exclusion o control strategies (1) Exclusion o control strategies (1) Violation o state constaints Computation o upper bound J N1 or the perormance index Exclusion o non-optimal control sequences Violation o state constaints Computation o upper bound J Nm or the perormance index Exclusion o non-optimal control sequences no Has the desired number o iterations been reached? Has the desired number o iterations been reached? no yes yes Comparison o the upper bounds J or the perormance index obtained or control Nj strategies with dierent Nj: Calculation o the best upper bound J { } := min J Nj j=1,...,m Elimination o non-optimal control strategies i J <l> > J holds Nj Output o the best approximation or the optimal control strategy or continuation o the parallelized optimization routine Stability analysis o the closed-loop control system Veriied sensitivity analysis o the trajectories with respect to uncertain parameters Computation o regions o attraction and maximum admissible deviations rom desired trajectories to ensure asymptotic stability (1) Extension to robust trajectory planning by exclusion o inadmissible controls and inadmissible reerence signals Figure 3: Components o an interval-based ramework or the design o optimal Figure and robust 3: Components controllers. o an interval-based ramework or the design o optimal and robust controllers. 6
7 Reliable Computing 15, with the Lie derivatives L i h(x) := L ( x L i 1 ) h(x) with L h(x) := h (x) and L h(x) := h(x) (x). These Lie derivatives provide inormation about the variation o the output y = h (x) o the dynamical system along the vector ield (x). Similar to the reachability analysis, the rank o the matrix Q(x) is usually state-dependent. For linear systems, the procedure leads to Kalman s observability matrix. Using techniques or automatic dierentiation, the matrices P (x) and Q(x) can also be constructed or systems with uncertainties, where enclosures o the sets o reachable states are determined by veriied ODE solvers such as VNODE, VSPODE, ValEncIA-IVP, or COSY VI. A suicient condition or the applicability o a speciic procedure or controller design is that both matrices have ull rank or the desired trajectories [9]. 4.4 Controller Design Using Input-to-State Linearization The use o veriied computational methods is shown exemplarily or the design o nonlinear controllers aiming at input-to-state linearization. The goal is to convert the input-aine dynamical system (3) into a set o linear ODEs ż (t) = A z (t) + B w (t) with y (t) = C z (t) (6) using dieomorphism T : D R n R n deining a dieomorphism z = τ (x) : D R nx R nx and a control law u = r (x) + W (x) w. Let δ i be the relative degree o the output y i, i = 1,..., m, i.e., the smallest order o the derivative d δ i y/dt δ i which explicitly depends on the control input u. Then, the state transormation z = τ(x) = [ τ 1 1 (x)... τ δ 1 1 (x) τ 1 2 (x)... ] T can be computed using the Lie derivatives τ r i i = L r i 1 h i(x), r i = 1,..., δ i. The eedback control law u = r(x) + W (x) w is given by In (8), the vector r(x) = D 1 (x)ϕ(x) and W (x) = D 1 (x). (8) ϕ(x) = [ ϕ 1(x) ϕ 2(x)... ϕ m(x) ] T x(t)=τ 1 (z) is deined by ϕ i(x) = L δ i hi(x) or all i = 1,..., m. matrix D(x) is computed by L g1 L δ 1 1 L g1 L δ 2 1 (7) (9) Furthermore, the decoupling h 1(x) L gm L δ 1 1 h 1(x) h 2(x) L gm L δ 2 1 h 2(x) D(x) =.. (1).. L g1 L δm 1 h m(x) L gm L δm 1 h m(x) Linear eedback controllers can be designed or (6) i rank{d (x)} = n x and δ = δ δ m = n x hold or all desired states x (t), all possible parameter values p, and uncertainties o x (t ). These prerequisites can be veriied by interval evaluation o D(x) or guaranteed enclosures [x (t)] o the sets o all reachable states. Note that the derivatives which are required to evaluate (9) and (1) have already been computed by automatic dierentiation or the reachability and observability matrices P (x) and Q (x).
8 34 A. Rauh et al., Robust and Optimal Control o Dynamical Systems 4.5 Veriied Stability Analysis An approach or veriied stability analysis which is used in Matlab and C++ routines or controller design implemented by the authors is summarized in the ollowing. It is based on a procedure described in [2]. Ater computation o the interval enclosure [x ] o the equilibrium o the system (1), a double-valued approximate solution x [x ] is chosen. Then, an approximation A o the Jacobian is determined or x. Using this matrix, the Lyapunov equation A T P + P A = I with A := x (11) x= x is solved or the symmetric matrix P. I P is positive deinite, i.e., i the linearized system can be proven to be asymptotically stable, an estimate or the region o attraction o the asymptotically stable equilibrium o the original nonlinear system can be determined. For that purpose, an interval box [x ] or which [x ] [x ] holds is assumed. Additionally, this box must not contain urther equilibria. Typically, the initialization o the interval Newton iteration used to determine [x ] is chosen at this stage since it ulills the above-mentioned requirements. To analyze the stability o the dynamical system, the quadratic Lyapunov unction V (x, p) = (x x ) T P (x x ), (12) with P determined in (11), is used. For the time derivative o this Lyapunov unction, the properties V (x, p) = and V (x, p) x=x x = (13) x=x hold. Then, the Hessian H := 2 V (x, p) (14) x 2 has to be positive deinite or all x [x ]. This can be shown using a procedure described by Rohn in [11]. ( A symmetric ) interval ( matrix ) [H] = { H H c H H c + } with H c = 1 2 H + H and = 1 2 H H is positive deinite i the ollowing 2 n x 1 point matrices H z = H z are positive deinite. The matrices H z are deined according to H z := H c T z T z with T z := diag(z). The vector z has to be replaced by all possible combinations o the components z i = ±1, i = 1,..., n x. Thus, H z = H z holds. As shown in [2], the interval box [x] with center in [x ] and radius λ min n x d ([x ], [x ]) (15) λ max certainly belongs to the region o attraction o an asymptotically stable equilibrium x. In (15), λ min and λ max are the minimum and maximum eigenvalues o P, resp. Furthermore, d is a unction deined on IR nx IR nx with d : ([x], [y]) sup { r R B (r, [x]) [y]}, (16) an interval box [x] IR nx, and B (r, [x]) denoting the set { } x R nx min a x < r. (17) a [x]
9 o P, resp. Furthermore, d is a unction deined on IR nx IR nx with d : ([x], [y]) sup {r R B (r, [x]) [y]}, (16) an interval box [x] IR nx, and B (r, [x]) denoting the set { } Reliable Computing x 15, R nx 211 min a x < r. (17) 341 a [x] 5 Robustness 5 Robustness and Optimality and Optimality A general, Ainterval-arithmetic general, interval-arithmetic ramework ramework or structure or structure and parameter and parameter optimization o dynamical systems with both nominal and uncertain parameters has beenpresented presentedin in [8]. Accordingto to the deinitiono o optimalityor or uncertain systemsintroduced introduced therein, a control a control strategy strategy is optimal is optimal i it leads i it leads to thetosmallest smallest upper up- bound o the optimization o per boundperormance o the perormance index all index possible or all p possible [p]. Thispis depicted [p]. This exemplarily is depicted in Fig. 4 or exemplarily l max indierent Fig. 4 or control l laws. max dierent control laws. [ J <l> ] sup ([ J <l > ]) best approximation guaranteed non-optimal control sequences interval enclosure o the range o necessary costs l l l max Figure 4: Figure Optimality 4: Optimality o control o strategies control strategies with interval with uncertainties. interval uncertainties. These controls can either result rom dierent parameterizations o a controller with These controls can either result rom dierent parameterizations o a controller with a a ixed ixed structure structure (parameter (parameter optimization) optimization) or or rom rom dierent dierent control control structures (determined (determined during structure during structure optimization). optimization). In the latterincase, thepiecewise latter case, constant and structures piecewise piecewise constantlinear and piecewise approximations linear o approximations the globally optimal o thecontrol globallysequence optimalare determined. are determined. control sequence In both cases, In bothveriication cases, veriication techniques techniques are used are used to evaluate to evaluate the the integral perormanceindex perormance t J = t (x (t ), p (t ), t ) + (x (t), p (t), u (t), t) dt (18) J = t (x (t ), p (t ), t ) + (x (t), p (t), u (t), t) dt (18) to be minimized. The term t (x (t ), p (t ), t ) corresponds to terminal costs at the prescribed inal point o time t i inal states x (t ) are not speciied exactly. The integrand (x (t), p (t), u (t), t) quantiies deviations between the current states and the desired trajectories o the state i variables inal states as wellx as (t the ) are required not speciied control eort u (t). to be minimized. The term t (x (t ), p (t ), t ) corresponds to terminal costs at the prescribed inal point o time t exactly. The integrand (x (t), p (t), u (t), t) quantiies deviations between the current states and the desired trajectories o the state variables as well as the required control eort u (t). 6 Optimal Control o a Mechanical Positioning System with Friction In the remainder o this paper, 9 optimal control o a mechanical positioning system with state-dependent switchings between dierent dynamical models is discussed [8]. For that purpose, a sliding mass m is considered. For a given initial position x 1 () and given initial velocity x 2 (), an approximation o an optimal control strategy or the accelerating orce u (t) = F ext (t) is determined under consideration o the riction orce F (x 2). The state equations or this system are given by ẋ (t) = t [ ] [ ] 1 x (t) + 1 m (Fext (t) F (x 2)) with x = [ x1 x 2 ]. (19)
10 342 A. Rauh et al., Robust and Optimal Control o Dynamical Systems The riction characteristic is modeled by l = 3 discrete states S = {S 1, S 2, S 3}, which are sliding riction or motion in negative (backward) direction (= S 1), static riction (= S 2), and sliding riction or motion in positive (orward) direction (= S 3). In this riction model, interval parameters are considered or both the static riction coeicient [F s] = [ ] [ ] F s ; F s and the sliding riction coeicient [µ] = µ ; µ. The resulting sliding riction orce is then given by F (x 2) = { [Fs] + [µ] x 2 or S 1 = true + [F s] + [µ] x 2 or S 3 = true (2) and the static riction by F (x 2) [F max s ] = [ F s ; F s ] or S 2 = true. (21) In Fig. 5, the results or an approximate solution o the optimal control problem are shown. I a piecewise constant approximation o the optimal control strategy is determined, the perormance index J = t ( (x1 (t) 1) 2 + x 2 (t) 2 + u (t) 2) dt + 1 T k max k=1 (u k u k 1 ) 2 (22) is minimized by a control strategy with a maximum number o 5 switchings in the considered time span. Analogously, the perormance index J = t ( (x1 (t) 1) 2 + x 2 (t) 2 + u (t) 2) dt + 1 T k max k=1 u 2 k (23) is minimized with u k := u (t), t k 1 < t < t k i piecewise linear control strategies are considered. Note that the absolute values o both perormance indices cannot be compared directly. However, these criteria have been chosen to guarantee a maximum similarity between both types o approximations. For the parameters F s =.15, µ =.1, u [ 1. ; 1.], and u [.5 ;.5] it can be shown that the inequalities J 2.56 and J 4.43 hold or the piecewise constant and piecewise linear approximation, resp. In this example, the range o admissible inal positions is described by the interval x 1 (t = 5) [.9 ; 1.1]. The admissible inal velocities are characterized by x 2 (t = 5) [.1 ;.1]. 7 Conclusions and Outlook on Future Research In this paper, interval-based techniques or the veriication o reachability, observability, and robust asymptotic stability o dynamical systems have been presented. They represent suicient conditions or the corresponding system theoretic properties. Overestimation in the computation o guaranteed lower bounds o the rank o the reachability and observability matrices might lead to conservative results i large domains are considered or state variables and uncertain parameters. Eicient routines employing subdivision o those regions are available which help to express the resulting dependencies during rank computation as precisely as necessary. Together with the routine or veriied stability analysis, they are included in a general-purpose ramework or optimal and robust controller design. In this ramework, also dynamical
11 Reliable Computing 15, position x t velocity x t orce Fext t Figure Figure 5: 5: Approximate Approximate solution solution o o the the optimal optimal control control problem problem with with statedependent statedependent switchings. switchings. Solid Solid lines: lines: piecewise piecewise constant constant control, control, dashed dashed lines: lines: piecewise piecewise linear linear control. control. systems with state-dependent switchings between dierent dynamical models can be considered. In uture work, we will develop extensions towards the design o state and disturbance estimators using interval techniques. These estimators will be used or the computation o worst-case bounds or the inluence o approximation techniques in the design o both observers and controllers [7, 1]. A urther step will be real-time state estimation in model-predictive control approaches or dynamical systems with interval uncertainties. For that purpose, the use o veriied solvers or systems o dierential-algebraic equations (DAEs) will be included and relations between criteria or solvability o DAEs and the criteria or controllability and observability o states in control theory will be investigated. Reerences [1] J. Ackermann, P. Blue, T. Bünte, L. Güvenc, D. Kaesbauer, M. Kordt, M. Muhler, and D. Odenthal, Robust Control: The Parameter Space Approach. Springer- Verlag, London, 2nd edition, 22. [2] N. Delanoue, Algoritmes numriques pour l analyse topologique Analyse par intervalles et thorie des graphes, PhD thesis, cole Doctorale d Angers, 26, in French. [3] A. Isidori. Nonlinear Control Systems 1. An Introduction, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, [4] Y. Lin and M. A. Stadtherr, Deterministic Global Optimization or Dynamic Systems Using Interval Analysis, In CD-Proc. o the 12th GAMM-IMACS Intl. Symposium on Scientiic Computing, Computer Arithmetic, and Validated Numerics SCAN 26, Duisburg, Germany, IEEE Computer Society, 27. [5] Y. Lin and M. A. Stadtherr, Deterministic Global Optimization o Nonlinear Dynamic Systems AIChE Journal, vol. 53, no. 4, pp , 27. [6] H. J. Marquez. Nonlinear Control Systems, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New Jersey, 23. [7] J. Minisini, A. Rauh, and E. P. Hoer, Carleman Linearization or Approximate Solutions o Nonlinear Control Problems: Part 1 Theory, In F. L. Chernousko, 1
12 344 A. Rauh et al., Robust and Optimal Control o Dynamical Systems G. V. Kostin, and V. V. Saurin, editors, Advances in Mechanics: Dynamics and Control: Proc. 14th Intl. Workshop on Dynamics and Control, pp , Moscow-Zvenigorod, Nauka Publ., Russia, 28. [8] A. Rauh and E. P. Hoer, Interval Methods or Optimal Control, In: A. Frediani and G. Buttazzo, editors, Proc. o the 47th Workshop on Variational Analysis and Aerospace Engineering 27, pp , School o Mathematics, Erice, Italy, Springer Verlag, 29. [9] A. Rauh, J. Minisini, and E. P. Hoer, Veriication Techniques or Sensitivity Analysis and Design o Controllers or Nonlinear Dynamic Systems with Uncertainties, Intl. Journal o Applied Mathematics and Computer Science AMCS, vol. 19, no. 3, pp , 29. [1] A. Rauh, J. Minisini, and E. P. Hoer, Carleman Linearization or Approximate Solutions o Nonlinear Control Problems: Part 2 Applications, In: F. L. Chernousko, G. V. Kostin, and V. V. Saurin, editors, Advances in Mechanics: Dynamics and Control: Proc. 14th Intl. Workshop on Dynamics and Control, pp , Moscow-Zvenigorod, Russia, Nauka Publ., 28. [11] J. Rohn, Positive Deiniteness and Stability o Interval Matrices, SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications, vol. 15, no. 1, pp , 1994.
Feedback Linearization
Feedback Linearization Peter Al Hokayem and Eduardo Gallestey May 14, 2015 1 Introduction Consider a class o single-input-single-output (SISO) nonlinear systems o the orm ẋ = (x) + g(x)u (1) y = h(x) (2)
More informationInterval Approaches to Reliable Control of Dynamical Systems
Interval Approaches to Reliable Control of Dynamical Systems Andreas Rauh 1 and Ekaterina Auer 2 1 Chair of Mechatronics, University of Rostock D-1859 Rostock, Germany andreas.rauh@uni-rostock.de 2 Faculty
More informationRobust feedback linearization
Robust eedback linearization Hervé Guillard Henri Bourlès Laboratoire d Automatique des Arts et Métiers CNAM/ENSAM 21 rue Pinel 75013 Paris France {herveguillardhenribourles}@parisensamr Keywords: Nonlinear
More informationStrong Lyapunov Functions for Systems Satisfying the Conditions of La Salle
06 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, VOL. 49, NO. 6, JUNE 004 Strong Lyapunov Functions or Systems Satisying the Conditions o La Salle Frédéric Mazenc and Dragan Ne sić Abstract We present a construction
More information1 Relative degree and local normal forms
THE ZERO DYNAMICS OF A NONLINEAR SYSTEM 1 Relative degree and local normal orms The purpose o this Section is to show how single-input single-output nonlinear systems can be locally given, by means o a
More informationA new Control Strategy for Trajectory Tracking of Fire Rescue Turntable Ladders
Proceedings o the 17th World Congress The International Federation o Automatic Control Seoul, Korea, July 6-11, 28 A new Control Strategy or Trajectory Tracking o Fire Rescue Turntable Ladders N. Zimmert,
More informationRobust Residual Selection for Fault Detection
Robust Residual Selection or Fault Detection Hamed Khorasgani*, Daniel E Jung**, Gautam Biswas*, Erik Frisk**, and Mattias Krysander** Abstract A number o residual generation methods have been developed
More informationNONLINEAR CONTROL OF POWER NETWORK MODELS USING FEEDBACK LINEARIZATION
NONLINEAR CONTROL OF POWER NETWORK MODELS USING FEEDBACK LINEARIZATION Steven Ball Science Applications International Corporation Columbia, MD email: sball@nmtedu Steve Schaer Department o Mathematics
More informationFeedback Linearization Lectures delivered at IIT-Kanpur, TEQIP program, September 2016.
Feedback Linearization Lectures delivered at IIT-Kanpur, TEQIP program, September 216 Ravi N Banavar banavar@iitbacin September 24, 216 These notes are based on my readings o the two books Nonlinear Control
More informationRESOLUTION MSC.362(92) (Adopted on 14 June 2013) REVISED RECOMMENDATION ON A STANDARD METHOD FOR EVALUATING CROSS-FLOODING ARRANGEMENTS
(Adopted on 4 June 203) (Adopted on 4 June 203) ANNEX 8 (Adopted on 4 June 203) MSC 92/26/Add. Annex 8, page THE MARITIME SAFETY COMMITTEE, RECALLING Article 28(b) o the Convention on the International
More informationConstrained Optimal Control I
Optimal Control, Guidance and Estimation Lecture 34 Constrained Optimal Control I Pro. Radhakant Padhi Dept. o Aerospace Engineering Indian Institute o Science - Bangalore opics Motivation Brie Summary
More informationAnalysis of the regularity, pointwise completeness and pointwise generacy of descriptor linear electrical circuits
Computer Applications in Electrical Engineering Vol. 4 Analysis o the regularity pointwise completeness pointwise generacy o descriptor linear electrical circuits Tadeusz Kaczorek Białystok University
More informationInterval Methods for the Implementation of Real-Time Capable Robust Controllers for Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Systems
Interval Methods for the Implementation of Real-Time Capable Robust Controllers for Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Systems SWIM 2013: 6th Small Workshop on Interval Methods Brest, France June 5th, 2013 Andreas
More informationScenario-based Model Predictive Control: Recursive Feasibility and Stability
Preprints o the 9th International Symposium on Advanced Control o Chemical Processes The International Federation o Automatic Control MoM1.6 Scenario-based Model Predictive Control: Recursive Feasibility
More informationYURI LEVIN AND ADI BEN-ISRAEL
Pp. 1447-1457 in Progress in Analysis, Vol. Heinrich G W Begehr. Robert P Gilbert and Man Wah Wong, Editors, World Scientiic, Singapore, 003, ISBN 981-38-967-9 AN INVERSE-FREE DIRECTIONAL NEWTON METHOD
More informationReview of Prerequisite Skills for Unit # 2 (Derivatives) U2L2: Sec.2.1 The Derivative Function
UL1: Review o Prerequisite Skills or Unit # (Derivatives) Working with the properties o exponents Simpliying radical expressions Finding the slopes o parallel and perpendicular lines Simpliying rational
More informationOn High-Rate Cryptographic Compression Functions
On High-Rate Cryptographic Compression Functions Richard Ostertág and Martin Stanek Department o Computer Science Faculty o Mathematics, Physics and Inormatics Comenius University Mlynská dolina, 842 48
More informationFluctuationlessness Theorem and its Application to Boundary Value Problems of ODEs
Fluctuationlessness Theorem and its Application to Boundary Value Problems o ODEs NEJLA ALTAY İstanbul Technical University Inormatics Institute Maslak, 34469, İstanbul TÜRKİYE TURKEY) nejla@be.itu.edu.tr
More informationChapter 2 Optimal Control Problem
Chapter 2 Optimal Control Problem Optimal control of any process can be achieved either in open or closed loop. In the following two chapters we concentrate mainly on the first class. The first chapter
More information2. ETA EVALUATIONS USING WEBER FUNCTIONS. Introduction
. ETA EVALUATIONS USING WEBER FUNCTIONS Introduction So ar we have seen some o the methods or providing eta evaluations that appear in the literature and we have seen some o the interesting properties
More informationManeuvering assistant for truck and trailer combinations with arbitrary trailer hitching
Maneuvering assistant or truck and trailer combinations with arbitrary trailer hitching Yevgen Sklyarenko, Frank Schreiber and Walter Schumacher Abstract Stabilizing controllers can assist the driver to
More informationNumerical Solution of Ordinary Differential Equations in Fluctuationlessness Theorem Perspective
Numerical Solution o Ordinary Dierential Equations in Fluctuationlessness Theorem Perspective NEJLA ALTAY Bahçeşehir University Faculty o Arts and Sciences Beşiktaş, İstanbul TÜRKİYE TURKEY METİN DEMİRALP
More informationReceived: 30 July 2017; Accepted: 29 September 2017; Published: 8 October 2017
mathematics Article Least-Squares Solution o Linear Dierential Equations Daniele Mortari ID Aerospace Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA; mortari@tamu.edu; Tel.: +1-979-845-734
More informationLecture : Feedback Linearization
ecture : Feedbac inearization Niola Misovic, dipl ing and Pro Zoran Vuic June 29 Summary: This document ollows the lectures on eedbac linearization tought at the University o Zagreb, Faculty o Electrical
More informationFEEDFORWARD CONTROLLER DESIGN BASED ON H ANALYSIS
271 FEEDFORWARD CONTROLLER DESIGN BASED ON H ANALYSIS Eduardo J. Adam * and Jacinto L. Marchetti Instituto de Desarrollo Tecnológico para la Industria Química (Universidad Nacional del Litoral - CONICET)
More informationSupplementary material for Continuous-action planning for discounted infinite-horizon nonlinear optimal control with Lipschitz values
Supplementary material or Continuous-action planning or discounted ininite-horizon nonlinear optimal control with Lipschitz values List o main notations x, X, u, U state, state space, action, action space,
More informationMapping MIMO control system specifications into parameter space
Mapping MIMO control system specifications into parameter space Michael Muhler 1 Abstract This paper considers the mapping of design objectives for parametric multi-input multi-output systems into parameter
More informationLecture 8 Optimization
4/9/015 Lecture 8 Optimization EE 4386/5301 Computational Methods in EE Spring 015 Optimization 1 Outline Introduction 1D Optimization Parabolic interpolation Golden section search Newton s method Multidimensional
More informationDeterministic Global Optimization for Dynamic Systems Using Interval Analysis
Deterministic Global Optimization for Dynamic Systems Using Interval Analysis Youdong Lin and Mark A. Stadtherr Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame,
More informationLyapunov Stability of Linear Predictor Feedback for Distributed Input Delays
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL VOL. 56 NO. 3 MARCH 2011 655 Lyapunov Stability of Linear Predictor Feedback for Distributed Input Delays Nikolaos Bekiaris-Liberis Miroslav Krstic In this case system
More informationSimpler Functions for Decompositions
Simpler Functions or Decompositions Bernd Steinbach Freiberg University o Mining and Technology, Institute o Computer Science, D-09596 Freiberg, Germany Abstract. This paper deals with the synthesis o
More informationNumerical Methods - Lecture 2. Numerical Methods. Lecture 2. Analysis of errors in numerical methods
Numerical Methods - Lecture 1 Numerical Methods Lecture. Analysis o errors in numerical methods Numerical Methods - Lecture Why represent numbers in loating point ormat? Eample 1. How a number 56.78 can
More informationThe use of differential geometry methods for linearization of nonlinear electrical circuits with multiple inputs and multiple outputs (MIMOs)
Electrical Engineering (08) 00:85 84 https://doiorg/0007/s000-08-0746-0 ORIGINAL PAPER The use o dierential geometry methods or linearization o nonlinear electrical circuits with multiple inputs and multiple
More informationFeedback linearization and stabilization of second-order nonholonomic chained systems
Feedback linearization and stabilization o second-order nonholonomic chained systems S. S. GE, ZHENDONG SUN, T. H. LEE and MARK W. SPONG Department o Electrical Engineering Coordinated Science Lab National
More informationFeedback Linearizability of Strict Feedforward Systems
Proceedings o the 47th IEEE Conerence on Decision and Control Cancun, Mexico, Dec 9-11, 28 WeB11 Feedback Linearizability o Strict Feedorward Systems Witold Respondek and Issa Amadou Tall Abstract For
More informationPropagation of Uncertainties in Nonlinear Dynamic Models
Propagation of Uncertainties in Nonlinear Dynamic Models Youdong Lin 1, Scott Ferson 2, George F. Corliss 3 and Mark A. Stadtherr 1 1 Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of
More informationPhysics 5153 Classical Mechanics. Solution by Quadrature-1
October 14, 003 11:47:49 1 Introduction Physics 5153 Classical Mechanics Solution by Quadrature In the previous lectures, we have reduced the number o eective degrees o reedom that are needed to solve
More informationROBUST STABILITY AND PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF UNSTABLE PROCESS WITH DEAD TIME USING Mu SYNTHESIS
ROBUST STABILITY AND PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF UNSTABLE PROCESS WITH DEAD TIME USING Mu SYNTHESIS I. Thirunavukkarasu 1, V. I. George 1, G. Saravana Kumar 1 and A. Ramakalyan 2 1 Department o Instrumentation
More informationFeedback Optimal Control for Inverted Pendulum Problem by Using the Generating Function Technique
(IJACSA) International Journal o Advanced Computer Science Applications Vol. 5 No. 11 14 Feedback Optimal Control or Inverted Pendulum Problem b Using the Generating Function echnique Han R. Dwidar Astronom
More informationScattered Data Approximation of Noisy Data via Iterated Moving Least Squares
Scattered Data Approximation o Noisy Data via Iterated Moving Least Squares Gregory E. Fasshauer and Jack G. Zhang Abstract. In this paper we ocus on two methods or multivariate approximation problems
More informationAn Ensemble Kalman Smoother for Nonlinear Dynamics
1852 MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW VOLUME 128 An Ensemble Kalman Smoother or Nonlinear Dynamics GEIR EVENSEN Nansen Environmental and Remote Sensing Center, Bergen, Norway PETER JAN VAN LEEUWEN Institute or Marine
More informationA Simple Explanation of the Sobolev Gradient Method
A Simple Explanation o the Sobolev Gradient Method R. J. Renka July 3, 2006 Abstract We have observed that the term Sobolev gradient is used more oten than it is understood. Also, the term is oten used
More information2.6 Two-dimensional continuous interpolation 3: Kriging - introduction to geostatistics. References - geostatistics. References geostatistics (cntd.
.6 Two-dimensional continuous interpolation 3: Kriging - introduction to geostatistics Spline interpolation was originally developed or image processing. In GIS, it is mainly used in visualization o spatial
More informationReview D: Potential Energy and the Conservation of Mechanical Energy
MSSCHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Department o Physics 8. Spring 4 Review D: Potential Energy and the Conservation o Mechanical Energy D.1 Conservative and Non-conservative Force... D.1.1 Introduction...
More informationSymbolic-Numeric Methods for Improving Structural Analysis of DAEs
Symbolic-Numeric Methods or Improving Structural Analysis o DAEs Guangning Tan, Nedialko S. Nedialkov, and John D. Pryce Abstract Systems o dierential-algebraic equations (DAEs) are generated routinely
More informationTelescoping Decomposition Method for Solving First Order Nonlinear Differential Equations
Telescoping Decomposition Method or Solving First Order Nonlinear Dierential Equations 1 Mohammed Al-Reai 2 Maysem Abu-Dalu 3 Ahmed Al-Rawashdeh Abstract The Telescoping Decomposition Method TDM is a new
More informationFeedback linearization control of systems with singularities: a ball-beam revisit
Chapter 1 Feedback linearization control o systems with singularities: a ball-beam revisit Fu Zhang The Mathworks, Inc zhang@mathworks.com Benito Fernndez-Rodriguez Department o Mechanical Engineering,
More information(One Dimension) Problem: for a function f(x), find x 0 such that f(x 0 ) = 0. f(x)
Solving Nonlinear Equations & Optimization One Dimension Problem: or a unction, ind 0 such that 0 = 0. 0 One Root: The Bisection Method This one s guaranteed to converge at least to a singularity, i not
More informationFinite time observation of nonlinear time-delay systems with unknown inputs
Author manuscript, published in "NOLCOS21 (21)" Finite time observation o nonlinear time-delay systems with unknown inputs G. Zheng J.-P. Barbot, D. Boutat, T. Floquet, J.-P. Richard INRIA Lille-Nord Europe,
More informationFatigue verification of high loaded bolts of a rocket combustion chamber.
Fatigue veriication o high loaded bolts o a rocket combustion chamber. Marcus Lehmann 1 & Dieter Hummel 1 1 Airbus Deence and Space, Munich Zusammenassung Rocket engines withstand intense thermal and structural
More informationClassification of effective GKM graphs with combinatorial type K 4
Classiication o eective GKM graphs with combinatorial type K 4 Shintarô Kuroki Department o Applied Mathematics, Faculty o Science, Okayama Uniervsity o Science, 1-1 Ridai-cho Kita-ku, Okayama 700-0005,
More informationAn Integrodifferential Approach to Adaptive Control Design for Heat Transfer Systems with Uncertainties
An Integrodifferential Approach to Adaptive Control Design for Heat Transfer Systems with Uncertainties Vasily Saurin Georgy Kostin Andreas Rauh Luise Senkel Harald Aschemann Institute for Problems in
More informationTESTING TIMED FINITE STATE MACHINES WITH GUARANTEED FAULT COVERAGE
TESTING TIMED FINITE STATE MACHINES WITH GUARANTEED FAULT COVERAGE Khaled El-Fakih 1, Nina Yevtushenko 2 *, Hacene Fouchal 3 1 American University o Sharjah, PO Box 26666, UAE kelakih@aus.edu 2 Tomsk State
More informationGlobal stabilization of feedforward systems with exponentially unstable Jacobian linearization
Global stabilization of feedforward systems with exponentially unstable Jacobian linearization F Grognard, R Sepulchre, G Bastin Center for Systems Engineering and Applied Mechanics Université catholique
More informationFinding all Bessel type solutions for Linear Differential Equations with Rational Function Coefficients
Finding all essel type solutions or Linear Dierential Equations with Rational Function Coeicients Mark van Hoeij & Quan Yuan Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 06-07, USA hoeij@math.su.edu & qyuan@math.su.edu
More informationROBUST FAULT DETECTION AND ISOLATION IN CONSTRAINED NONLINEAR SYSTEMS VIA A SECOND ORDER SLIDING MODE OBSERVER. Wen Chen, Mehrdad Saif 1
Copyright IFAC 5th Triennial World Congress, Barcelona, Spain ROBUST FAULT DETECTION AND ISOLATION IN CONSTRAINED NONLINEAR SYSTEMS VIA A SECOND ORDER SLIDING MODE OBSERVER Wen Chen, Mehrdad Sai School
More informationChapter 6 Reliability-based design and code developments
Chapter 6 Reliability-based design and code developments 6. General Reliability technology has become a powerul tool or the design engineer and is widely employed in practice. Structural reliability analysis
More informationSliding Mode Control and Feedback Linearization for Non-regular Systems
Sliding Mode Control and Feedback Linearization or Non-regular Systems Fu Zhang Benito R. Fernández Pieter J. Mosterman Timothy Josserand The MathWorks, Inc. Natick, MA, 01760 University o Texas at Austin,
More informationSolving Continuous Linear Least-Squares Problems by Iterated Projection
Solving Continuous Linear Least-Squares Problems by Iterated Projection by Ral Juengling Department o Computer Science, Portland State University PO Box 75 Portland, OR 977 USA Email: juenglin@cs.pdx.edu
More informationOPTIMAL CONTROL AND ESTIMATION
OPTIMAL CONTROL AND ESTIMATION Robert F. Stengel Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey DOVER PUBLICATIONS, INC. New York CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION
More informationBANDELET IMAGE APPROXIMATION AND COMPRESSION
BANDELET IMAGE APPOXIMATION AND COMPESSION E. LE PENNEC AND S. MALLAT Abstract. Finding eicient geometric representations o images is a central issue to improve image compression and noise removal algorithms.
More informationOUTPUT REGULATION OF RÖSSLER PROTOTYPE-4 CHAOTIC SYSTEM BY STATE FEEDBACK CONTROL
International Journal in Foundations of Computer Science & Technology (IJFCST),Vol., No., March 01 OUTPUT REGULATION OF RÖSSLER PROTOTYPE-4 CHAOTIC SYSTEM BY STATE FEEDBACK CONTROL Sundarapandian Vaidyanathan
More informationMANEUVER REGULATION, TRANSVERSE FEEDBACK LINEARIZATION, AND ZERO DYNAMICS
MANEUVER REGULATION, TRANSVERSE FEEDBACK LINEARIZATION, AND ZERO DYNAMICS Chris Nielsen,1 Manredi Maggiore,1 Department o Electrical and Computer Engineering, University o Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
More informationPredictive Control for Tight Group Formation of Multi-Agent Systems
Predictive Control or Tight Group Formation o Multi-Agent Systems Ionela Prodan, Sorin Olaru Cristina Stoica Silviu-Iulian Niculescu SUPELEC Systems Sciences (E3S) - Automatic Control Department, France,
More informationPrashant Mhaskar, Nael H. El-Farra & Panagiotis D. Christofides. Department of Chemical Engineering University of California, Los Angeles
HYBRID PREDICTIVE OUTPUT FEEDBACK STABILIZATION OF CONSTRAINED LINEAR SYSTEMS Prashant Mhaskar, Nael H. El-Farra & Panagiotis D. Christofides Department of Chemical Engineering University of California,
More informationOptimization based robust control
Optimization based robust control Didier Henrion 1,2 Draft of March 27, 2014 Prepared for possible inclusion into The Encyclopedia of Systems and Control edited by John Baillieul and Tariq Samad and published
More informationAH 2700A. Attenuator Pair Ratio for C vs Frequency. Option-E 50 Hz-20 khz Ultra-precision Capacitance/Loss Bridge
0 E ttenuator Pair Ratio or vs requency NEEN-ERLN 700 Option-E 0-0 k Ultra-precision apacitance/loss ridge ttenuator Ratio Pair Uncertainty o in ppm or ll Usable Pairs o Taps 0 0 0. 0. 0. 07/08/0 E E E
More informationRELIABILITY OF BURIED PIPELINES WITH CORROSION DEFECTS UNDER VARYING BOUNDARY CONDITIONS
REIABIITY OF BURIE PIPEIES WITH CORROSIO EFECTS UER VARYIG BOUARY COITIOS Ouk-Sub ee 1 and ong-hyeok Kim 1. School o Mechanical Engineering, InHa University #53, Yonghyun-ong, am-ku, Incheon, 40-751, Korea
More informationSWEEP METHOD IN ANALYSIS OPTIMAL CONTROL FOR RENDEZ-VOUS PROBLEMS
J. Appl. Math. & Computing Vol. 23(2007), No. 1-2, pp. 243-256 Website: http://jamc.net SWEEP METHOD IN ANALYSIS OPTIMAL CONTROL FOR RENDEZ-VOUS PROBLEMS MIHAI POPESCU Abstract. This paper deals with determining
More informationLinear Quadratic Regulator (LQR) I
Optimal Control, Guidance and Estimation Lecture Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR) I Pro. Radhakant Padhi Dept. o Aerospace Engineering Indian Institute o Science - Bangalore Generic Optimal Control Problem
More informationExtreme Values of Functions
Extreme Values o Functions When we are using mathematics to model the physical world in which we live, we oten express observed physical quantities in terms o variables. Then, unctions are used to describe
More informationLinear Quadratic Regulator (LQR) Design I
Lecture 7 Linear Quadratic Regulator LQR) Design I Dr. Radhakant Padhi Asst. Proessor Dept. o Aerospace Engineering Indian Institute o Science - Bangalore LQR Design: Problem Objective o drive the state
More informationOne-Dimensional Motion Review IMPORTANT QUANTITIES Name Symbol Units Basic Equation Name Symbol Units Basic Equation Time t Seconds Velocity v m/s
One-Dimensional Motion Review IMPORTANT QUANTITIES Name Symbol Units Basic Equation Name Symbol Units Basic Equation Time t Seconds Velocity v m/s v x t Position x Meters Speed v m/s v t Length l Meters
More information18-660: Numerical Methods for Engineering Design and Optimization
8-66: Numerical Methods or Engineering Design and Optimization Xin Li Department o ECE Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, PA 53 Slide Overview Linear Regression Ordinary least-squares regression Minima
More informationVariable Structure Control of Pendulum-driven Spherical Mobile Robots
rd International Conerence on Computer and Electrical Engineering (ICCEE ) IPCSIT vol. 5 () () IACSIT Press, Singapore DOI:.776/IPCSIT..V5.No..6 Variable Structure Control o Pendulum-driven Spherical Mobile
More informationH-infinity Vehicle Control Using NonDimensional Perturbation Measures
H-ininity Vehicle Control sing NonDimensional Perturbation Measures Abstract Robust controller design techniques have been applied to the ield o vehicle control to achieve many dierent perormance measures:
More informationAn Improved Expression for a Classical Type of Explicit Approximation of the Colebrook White Equation with Only One Internal Iteration
International Journal o Hydraulic Engineering 06, 5(): 9-3 DOI: 0.593/j.ijhe.06050.03 An Improved Expression or a Classical Type o Explicit Approximation o the Colebrook White Equation with Only One Internal
More informationOn Convexity of Reachable Sets for Nonlinear Control Systems
Proceedings o the European Control Conerence 27 Kos, Greece, July 2-5, 27 WeC5.2 On Convexity o Reachable Sets or Nonlinear Control Systems Vadim Azhmyakov, Dietrich Flockerzi and Jörg Raisch Abstract
More informationPresenters. Time Domain and Statistical Model Development, Simulation and Correlation Methods for High Speed SerDes
JANUARY 28-31, 2013 SANTA CLARA CONVENTION CENTER Time Domain and Statistical Model Development, Simulation and Correlation Methods or High Speed SerDes Presenters Xingdong Dai Fangyi Rao Shiva Prasad
More informationEvent-Triggered Strategies for Decentralized Model Predictive Controllers
Preprints o the 18th IFAC World Congress Event-Triggered Strategies or Decentralized Model Predictive Controllers Alina Eqtami Dimos V. Dimarogonas Kostas J. Kyriakopoulos Control Systems Lab, Department
More informationUltra Fast Calculation of Temperature Profiles of VLSI ICs in Thermal Packages Considering Parameter Variations
Ultra Fast Calculation o Temperature Proiles o VLSI ICs in Thermal Packages Considering Parameter Variations Je-Hyoung Park, Virginia Martín Hériz, Ali Shakouri, and Sung-Mo Kang Dept. o Electrical Engineering,
More informationRATIONAL FUNCTIONS. Finding Asymptotes..347 The Domain Finding Intercepts Graphing Rational Functions
RATIONAL FUNCTIONS Finding Asymptotes..347 The Domain....350 Finding Intercepts.....35 Graphing Rational Functions... 35 345 Objectives The ollowing is a list o objectives or this section o the workbook.
More informationSensor-fault Tolerance using Robust MPC with Set-based State Estimation and Active Fault Isolation
Sensor-ault Tolerance using Robust MPC with Set-based State Estimation and Active Fault Isolation Feng Xu, Sorin Olaru, Senior Member IEEE, Vicenç Puig, Carlos Ocampo-Martinez, Senior Member IEEE and Silviu-Iulian
More informationThe achievable limits of operational modal analysis. * Siu-Kui Au 1)
The achievable limits o operational modal analysis * Siu-Kui Au 1) 1) Center or Engineering Dynamics and Institute or Risk and Uncertainty, University o Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3GH, United Kingdom 1)
More informationChapter 8 Conservation of Energy and Potential Energy
Chapter 8 Conservation o Energy and Potential Energy So ar we have analyzed the motion o point-like bodies under the action o orces using Newton s Laws o Motion. We shall now use the Principle o Conservation
More informationCategories and Natural Transformations
Categories and Natural Transormations Ethan Jerzak 17 August 2007 1 Introduction The motivation or studying Category Theory is to ormalise the underlying similarities between a broad range o mathematical
More informationGlobal Weak Solution of Planetary Geostrophic Equations with Inviscid Geostrophic Balance
Global Weak Solution o Planetary Geostrophic Equations with Inviscid Geostrophic Balance Jian-Guo Liu 1, Roger Samelson 2, Cheng Wang 3 Communicated by R. Temam) Abstract. A reormulation o the planetary
More informationNonlinear Discrete-Time Observer Design with Linearizable Error Dynamics
622 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, VOL. 48, NO. 4, APRIL 2003 Nonlinear Discrete-Time Observer Design with Linearizable Error Dynamics MingQing Xiao, Nikolaos Kazantzis, Costas Kravaris, Arthur
More informationRoberto s Notes on Differential Calculus Chapter 8: Graphical analysis Section 1. Extreme points
Roberto s Notes on Dierential Calculus Chapter 8: Graphical analysis Section 1 Extreme points What you need to know already: How to solve basic algebraic and trigonometric equations. All basic techniques
More informationRiccati difference equations to non linear extended Kalman filter constraints
International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research Volume 3, Issue 12, December-2012 1 Riccati difference equations to non linear extended Kalman filter constraints Abstract Elizabeth.S 1 & Jothilakshmi.R
More informationToday. Introduction to optimization Definition and motivation 1-dimensional methods. Multi-dimensional methods. General strategies, value-only methods
Optimization Last time Root inding: deinition, motivation Algorithms: Bisection, alse position, secant, Newton-Raphson Convergence & tradeos Eample applications o Newton s method Root inding in > 1 dimension
More informationTu G Nonlinear Sensitivity Operator and Its De Wolf Approximation in T-matrix Formalism
Tu G13 7 Nonlinear Sensitivity Operator and Its De Wol Approximation in T-matrix Formalism R.S. Wu* (University o Caliornia), C. Hu (Tsinghua University) & M. Jakobsen (University o Bergen) SUMMARY We
More informationNONPARAMETRIC PREDICTIVE INFERENCE FOR REPRODUCIBILITY OF TWO BASIC TESTS BASED ON ORDER STATISTICS
REVSTAT Statistical Journal Volume 16, Number 2, April 2018, 167 185 NONPARAMETRIC PREDICTIVE INFERENCE FOR REPRODUCIBILITY OF TWO BASIC TESTS BASED ON ORDER STATISTICS Authors: Frank P.A. Coolen Department
More informationInterval solutions for interval algebraic equations
Mathematics and Computers in Simulation 66 (2004) 207 217 Interval solutions for interval algebraic equations B.T. Polyak, S.A. Nazin Institute of Control Sciences, Russian Academy of Sciences, 65 Profsoyuznaya
More informationSupervision Patterns in Discrete Event Systems Diagnosis
Supervision Patterns in Discrete Event Systems Diagnosis Thierry Jéron, Hervé Marchand, Sophie Pinchinat, Marie-Odile Cordier IRISA, Campus Universitaire de Beaulieu, 35042 Rennes, rance {irstame.ame}@irisa.r
More informationProbabilistic Optimisation applied to Spacecraft Rendezvous on Keplerian Orbits
Probabilistic Optimisation applied to pacecrat Rendezvous on Keplerian Orbits Grégory aive a, Massimiliano Vasile b a Université de Liège, Faculté des ciences Appliquées, Belgium b Dipartimento di Ingegneria
More informationSTABILITY OF PLANAR NONLINEAR SWITCHED SYSTEMS
LABORATOIRE INORMATIQUE, SINAUX ET SYSTÈMES DE SOPHIA ANTIPOLIS UMR 6070 STABILITY O PLANAR NONLINEAR SWITCHED SYSTEMS Ugo Boscain, régoire Charlot Projet TOpModel Rapport de recherche ISRN I3S/RR 2004-07
More informationEstimation and detection of a periodic signal
Estimation and detection o a periodic signal Daniel Aronsson, Erik Björnemo, Mathias Johansson Signals and Systems Group, Uppsala University, Sweden, e-mail: Daniel.Aronsson,Erik.Bjornemo,Mathias.Johansson}@Angstrom.uu.se
More informationHybrid Systems Course Lyapunov stability
Hybrid Systems Course Lyapunov stability OUTLINE Focus: stability of an equilibrium point continuous systems decribed by ordinary differential equations (brief review) hybrid automata OUTLINE Focus: stability
More informationCONSISTENCY TECHNIQUES FOR SIMULATION OF WASTEWATER TREATMENT PROCESSES WITH UNCERTAINTIES
CONSISTENCY TECHNIQUES FOR SIMULATION OF WASTEWATER TREATMENT PROCESSES WITH UNCERTAINTIES Marco Kletting Andreas Rauh Harald Aschemann Eberhard P. Hofer University of Ulm Department of Measurement, Control,
More information