Feedback Linearization

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Feedback Linearization"

Transcription

1 Feedback Linearization Peter Al Hokayem and Eduardo Gallestey May 14, Introduction Consider a class o single-input-single-output (SISO) nonlinear systems o the orm ẋ = (x) + g(x)u (1) y = h(x) (2) where x D R n, u R 1, : D R n, g : D R n, and the domain D contains the origin 1 In this lecture, we shall answer the ollowing two (tightly related) questions: [ ] η 1 Does there exist a nonlinear change o variables z = = T (x), and a ξ control input u = α(x)+β(x)v that would transorm the system (1)-(2) into the ollowing partially linear orm? η = 0 (η, ξ) ξ = Aξ + Bv y = Cξ 2 Does there exist a nonlinear change o variables z = T (x) and a control input u = α(x) + β(x)v that would transorm the system (1) into the ollowing ully linear orm? ż = Ãz + Bv 1 This condition is not a limitation to the theory o eedback linearization and the results can be extended to the multiple-input-multiple-output (MIMO) cases Feedback Linearization 1 o 14

2 I the answer to question 2 is positive, then we say that the system (1) is eedback linearizable I the answer to question 1 is positive, then we say that the system (1)-(2) is input-output linearizable Both scenarios are very attractive rom the control design point o view, since in either case we can rely on linear design techniques to render the closed-loop system stable Since we cannot expect every nonlinear system to possess such properties o eedback linearization, it is interesting to understand the structural properties that the nonlinear system should possess that render it eedback linearizable Beore we dive into the theoretical developments o eedback linearization, let us irst look into two simple examples v α(x) + β(x)v u ẋ = (x) + g(x)u y = h(x) y x Figure 1: General idea o eedback linearization Example 1 Consider the example o the pendulum that we have seen in previous lectures The dynamics are given by I we choose the control ẋ 1 = x 2 ẋ 2 = a [sin (x 1 + δ) sin δ] bx 2 + cu u = a c [sin (x 1 + δ) sin δ] + v c we can cancel the nonlinear term a [sin (x 1 + δ) sin δ] The resulting linear system is given by ẋ 1 = x 2 ẋ 2 = bx 2 + v As such, the stabilization problem or the nonlinear system has been reduced to a stabilization problem or a controllable linear system We can proceed to design a stabilizing linear state eedback control v = k 1 x 1 k 2 x 2 Feedback Linearization 2 o 14

3 that renders the closed-loop system ẋ 1 = x 2 ẋ 2 = k 1 x 1 (k 2 + b) x 2 asymptotically stable The overall state eedback control law comprises linear and nonlinear parts u = Example 2 Consider the system ( a c ) [sin (x 1 + δ) sin δ] 1 c (k 1x 1 + k 2 x 2 ) ẋ 1 = a sin x 2 ẋ 2 = x u We cannot simply choose u to cancel the nonlinear term a sin x 2 However, let us irst apply the ollowing change o variables z 1 = x 1 z 2 = a sin x 2 = ẋ 1 Then, the new variables z 1 and z 2 satisy ż 1 = z 2 ( ż 2 = a cos x 2 ẋ 2 = a cos sin 1 z 2 a and the nonlinearities can be canceled by the control u = x a cos x 2 v ) (u ) z 2 1 which is well deined or π < x < π The state equation in the new coordinates can be ound by inverting the transormation to express (x 1, x 2 ) in the 2 2 terms o (z 1, z 2 ), that is, x 1 = z 1 x 2 = sin 1 ( z2 a ) Feedback Linearization 3 o 14

4 which is well deined or a < z 2 < a The transormed state equation is given by ż 1 = z 2 ( ż 2 = a cos sin 1 ( z2 a )) ( z u ) which is in the required orm to use state eedback Finally, the control input that we would use is o the ollowing orm u = x ( k 1 z 1 k 2 z 2 ) = x ( k 1 x 1 k 2 a sin(x 2 )) a cos x 2 a cos x 2 2 Input-Output Linearization Consider the single-input-single-output system (1)-(2), where the vector ields : D R n and g : D R n and the unction h : D R are suiciently smooth Deinition 1 is called smooth i C, that is, is continuous and all its derivatives o all orders are continuous The goal is to derive conditions under which the input-output map can be rendered linear The idea is to take a suicient number o derivatives o the output, until the input appears We proceed by taking the derivative o y, which is given by ẏ = h x [ (x) + g (x) u] = L + L g u where L h (x) is called the Lie Derivative o h with respect to x (along) I L g = 0, then ẏ = L, independent o u and we repeat the dierentiation process again Calculating the second derivative o y, denoted by y (2), we obtain y (2) = (L h) x [ (x) + g (x) u] = L 2 + L g L u Once again, i L g L = 0, then y (2) = L 2 is independent o u and we repeat the process Actually, we repeat the processes o taking derivatives o the output until we see that satisies L g L i 1 = 0, i = 1, 2,, ρ 1; L g L ρ 1 0 Feedback Linearization 4 o 14

5 Thereore, u does not appear in the expressions o y, ẏ,,y (ρ 1) and appears in the expression o y (ρ) with a nonzero coeicient, ie, y (ρ) = L ρ + L gl ρ 1 u (3) We can clearly see rom (3), that the system is input-output linearizable, since the state eedback control 1 ( u = L ρ L g L ρ 1 + v) (4) reduces the input-output map (in some domain D 0 D) to y (ρ) = v which is a chain o ρ integrators In this case, the integer ρ is called the relative degree o the system Deinition 2 The nonlinear system (1)-(2) is said to have a relative degree ρ, 1 ρ n, in the region D 0 D i { Lg L i h(x) = 0, i = 1,, ρ 2 L g L ρ 1 (5) h(x) 0 or all x D 0 Example 3 Consider the controlled van der Pol equation ẋ 1 = x 2 ẋ 2 = x 1 + ε ( 1 x 2 1) x2 + u with output y = x 1 Calculating the derivatives o the output, we obtain ẏ = ẋ 1 = x 2 ÿ = ẋ 2 = x 1 + ε (1 x 2 1) x 2 + u Hence, the system has relative degree two in R 2 For the output y = x 1 + x 2 2, we have that [ ẏ = x 2 + 2x 2 x1 + ε ( ) 1 x 2 1 x2 + u ] and the system has relative degree one in D 0 = {x R 2 x 2 0} As such, we can see that the procedure o input-output linearization is dependent on the choice o the output map h(x) Feedback Linearization 5 o 14

6 Continuing with our derivations, we now let T 1 (x) z = T (x) = T 2 (x) φ 1 (x) φ n ρ (x) L ρ 1 where φ 1 (x) to φ n ρ (x) are chosen such that φ (x) ψ (x) η ξ (6) φ i g (x) = 0, 1 i n ρ (7) x which ensures that the η-dynamics η = φ φ [ (x) + g (x) u] = x x (x) x=t 1 (z) are independent o u Note also that our deinition o T 2 (x) in (6) results in y y (1) ξ = y (ρ 1) O course, it is crucial to know at this point i such unctions φ exist in order to deine the transormation T ; the next result shows that Deinition 3 A continuously dierentiable transormation T with a continuously dierential inverse is a called a dieomorphism Theorem 1 Consider the system (1)-(2), and suppose that it has a relative degree ρ n in D I ρ = n, then or every x 0 D, a neighborhood N o x 0 exists such that the map T (x) = L h(x) L n 1 Feedback Linearization 6 o 14

7 restricted to N is a dieomorphism on N I ρ < n, then or every x 0 D, a neighborhood N o x 0 and smooth maps φ 1 (x),, φ n ρ (x) exist such that the map such that the map T (x) = φ 1 (x) φ n ρ (x) L ρ 1 restricted to N, is a dieomorphism on N We can now apply the change o variables (see the Appendix) z = T (x) to transorm the system (1)-(2) into η= 0 (η, ξ) (8) ξ=a c ξ + B c γ (x) [u α (x)] (9) y=c c ξ (10) where ξ R ρ, η R n ρ, (A C, B C, C C ) is a canonical orm representation o a chain o ρ integrators, ie, A c =, B c = , C c = [ ] and 0 (η, ξ) = φ x (x) x=t 1 (z) (11) γ (x) = L g L ρ 1 (12) α (x) = Lρ L g L ρ 1 (13) Feedback Linearization 7 o 14

8 v = ξ ξρ 1 = ξ ρ ξ ξ ρ 2 = ξ ρ 1 1 = ξ 2 ρ y = ξ 1 ξ η = 0 (η, ξ) Figure 2: Transormed system (8)-(10) and the input deined as in (4) We have kept α and γ expressed in the original coordinates These two unctions are uniquely determined in terms o, g, and h and are independent o the choice o φ They can be expressed in the new coordinates by setting α 0 (η, ξ) = α ( T 1 (z) ), γ 0 (η, ξ) = γ ( T 1 (z) ) (14) but now they are dependent on the choice o the unctions φ Regarding the deinition o the equilibrium point or the transormed system, assume that x is the open-loop equilibrium o the system (1), then η = φ( x), ξ = [ h( x) 0 0 ] T (15) The transormed system (8)-(10) is said to be in the normal orm This orm decomposes the system into an external part ξ and an internal part η The external part is linearized by the state eedback control u = α (x) + β (x) v (16) where β (x) = γ 1 (x), while the internal part is made unobservable by the same control (see Figure 2) Setting ξ = 0 in the internal dynamics (8), results in η = 0 (η, 0) (17) which is called the zero dynamics o the system I the zero dynamics o the system are (globally) asymptotically stable, the system is called minimum phase Finally, the linearized system may then be stabilized by the choice o an appropriate state eedback: v = Kξ Feedback Linearization 8 o 14

9 21 Relationship to Linear Systems The notions o relative degree and minimum phase can also be ound in linear systems Consider a linear system represented by the transer unction G (s) = b ms m + b m 1 s m b 0 s n + a n 1 s n a 0 (18) where m < n and b m 0 We can realize the transer unction in (18) in state-space orm as ẋ = Ax + Bu, y = Cx (19) where A =, B = a 0 a 1 a n 1 C = [ b 0 b 1 b m 0 0 ] This linear space model is a special case o ẋ = (x) + g (x) u, y = where (x) = Ax, g = B, and = Cx We know that the relative degree o the transer unction is given by n m However, let us veriy that this is the case We take the derivative o the output, ie, ẏ = Cẋ = CAx + CBu (20) Now, i m = n 1, then CB = b n 1 0 and the system has relative degree one In general we have that and we have the conditions that y (n m) = CA (n m) x + CA (n m 1) Bu (21) CA (i 1) B = 0, i = 1, 2,, n m 1, and CA (n m 1) B = b m 0 (22) Feedback Linearization 9 o 14

10 and the relative degree o the system is n m, ie, the dierence between the order o the denominator and the numerator o the transer unction G(s) Moreover, we know that a minimum phase system means that the zeros o the transer unction G(s) lie in the open let-hal complex plane We can show as well that there is a correspondence o the zeros o H(s) and the normal orm zero dynamics 3 Full State Feedback Linearization We know rom the previous section, that the system (1) is eedback linearizable i we can ind a suiciently smooth unction h(x) in a domain D such that the system (1)-(2) has relative degree n within some region D 0 D This is because the normal orm would have no zero dynamics In act, we can show that this result holds as an i and only i statement As such, it remains to show that such a unction h(x) exists We begin with some deinitions For any two vector ields and g on D R n, the Lie bracket [, g] is a third vector ield that is deined as [, g](x) g (x) x x g(x) = L g(x) L g (x) (23) Taking Lie brackets can be repeated, as such we deine the ollowing notation: ad 0 g(x) = g(x) ad g(x) = [, g](x) ad k g(x) = [, ad k 1 g](x), k 1 Example 4 Consider the two vector ields (x) = Ax and g is constant Then, ad g(x) = [, g](x) = Ag, ad 2 g(x) = [, ad g](x) = A( Ag) = A 2 g, and ad k g = ( 1)k A k g Deinition 4 (Distribution) Consider the vector ields 1,, k on a domain D R n The distribution, denoted by = { 1, 2,, k } (24) is the collection o all vectors spaces (x) or x D, where (x) = span{ 1 (x), 2 (x),, k (x)} is the subspace o R n spanned by the vectors 1 (x), k (x) Feedback Linearization 10 o 14

11 Deinition 5 A distribution is called involutive, i g 1, and g 2 [g 1, g 2 ] And now we are ready to state the main result o this section Theorem 2 (Feedback Linearization) The SISO system (1) is eedback linearizable i and only i 1 the matrix M(x) = [g(x), ad g(x),, ad n 1 g(x)] has ull rank (= n) or all x D 0, and 2 the distribution = span{g, ad g,, ad n 2 g} is involutive on D 0 Example 5 Consider the system [ ] a sin(x2 ) ẋ = (x) + gu = + We compute the Lie bracket Accordingly, the matrix x 2 1 ad g = [, g](x) = x g = M(x) = [g, ad g] = [ ] 0 u 1 [ ] a cos(x2 ) 0 [ ] 0 a cos(x2 ) 1 0 has ull rank or any x such that cos(x 2 ) 0 Moreover, the distribution = span{g} is involutive Thereore, the conditions o Theorem (2) are satisied and the system is eedback linearizable in the domain D 0 = {x R 2 cos(x 2 ) 0} Let us now ind the unction h(x) or which the system is eedback linearizable h(x) should satisy the ollowing conditions Now, h x g = h x 2 h x g = 0, (L h) g 0, h(0) = 0 x = 0 which implies that h(x) is independent o x 2 Thereore, = h x 1 a cos(x 2 ) 0 is satisied in D 0 or any choice o h that satisies h x 1 0 There are many such choices or h, or example, h(x) = x 1 or h(x) = x 1 + x 3 1 L h(x) = h x 1 a sin(x 2 ) The condition (L h) x g = (L h) x 2 Feedback Linearization 11 o 14

12 4 Stability Consider again the input-output linearized system in normal orm (8)-(10), and assume that we have designed the eedback control law u = α(x) + β(x)v where β(x) = γ 1 (x), and v = Kξ, such that (A c B c K) is Hurwitz The resulting system reduces to the ollowing dynamics η = 0 (η, ξ) (25) ξ = (A c B c K)ξ (26) Theorem 3 The origin o the system (25)-(25) is asymptotically stable, i the origin o the zero dynamics η = 0 (η, 0) is asymptotically stable (minimum phase) Proo: The idea is to construct a special Lyapunov unction Since the zero dynamics are asymptotically stable, there exists (by converse Lyapunov theorem) a continuously dierentiable unction V η (η) such that V η (η, 0) < α ( η ) η in some neighborhood o η = 0, where α is a strictly increasing continuous unction with α(0) = 0 Let P = P T > 0 be the solution o the Lyapunov equation P (A c B c K) + (A c B c K) T P = I Consider the unction The derivative o V is given by V = V 1 η 0(η, ξ) + V (η, ξ) = V η (η) + k ξ T P ξ, k > 0 (27) k 2 ξ T P ξ ξt [P (A C B C K) + (A C B C K)P ] ξ }{{} = V 1 η (η, 0) + V 1 η ( k 0(η, ξ) 0 (η, 0)) 2 ξ T P ξ ξt ξ α 3 ( ξ ) + k 1 ( ξ ) kk 2 ( ξ ) I Feedback Linearization 12 o 14

13 or k 1, k 2 > 0 2 By choosing k large enough, we guarantee V < 0, and the result ollows Remark 1 The result in the last theorem is local and does not extend to the global setup, even i the zero dynamics are globally asymptotically stable In order to make the result global, we have to impose more restrictive requirements regarding the zero dynamics, namely the notion o input-tostate stability o the zero dynamics (which is beyond the current scope o the course) 5 Robustness Feedback linearization is based on exact cancellation o the nonlinearities in the system dynamics, which is practically very diicult to achieve In a realistic setup, we would have only approximations ˆα, ˆβ and ˆT (x) o the true α, β, and T (x) The eedback control law has then the orm u = ˆα(x) + ˆβ(x)v = ˆα(x) ˆβ(x)Kξ = ˆα(x) ˆβ(x)K ˆT 2 (x) Accordingly, the closed-loop system o the normal orm is given by η = (η, ξ) (28) [ ξ = Aξ + Bγ (x) (ˆα(x) α(x)) ˆβ(x)K ˆT ] 2 (x) (29) Adding and subtracting BKξ to the ξ equation we obtain where δ (z) = γ(x) η = (η, ξ) (30) ξ = (A BK) ξ + Bδ (z) (31) [ ( ) (ˆα(x) α(x)) ˆβ(x) β(x) KT ˆβ(x)K ( )] ˆT2 (x) T (x) x=t 1(z) Hence, the local closed loop system diers rom the nominal one by an additive perturbation Thus, we can show that locally the closed-loop system remains stable, despite small uncertainties in the eedback linearization maps For more details on eedback linearization concepts and extensions, see [1] and [2, Ch13] 2 k 1 > 0 ollows rom local continuity and dierentiability o the unction 0, and k 2 > 0 ollows rom P Feedback Linearization 13 o 14

14 Reerences [1] A Isidori Nonlinear control systems Springer-Verlag, 3rd edition, 1995 [2] H K Khalil Nonlinear systems Prentice hall, 3rd edition, 2002 Appendix The η-dynamics can be derived as ollows η = φ(x) = φ xẋ = φ ((x) + g(x)u) x = φ φ (x) = x x (x) 0 (η, ξ) x=t 1 (x) The ξ-dynamics can be derived as ollows ξ 1 y y (1) ξ 2 ξ 2 ξ = = d y (1) dt = y (2) = ξ ρ ξ ρ y (ρ 1) y (ρ) y (ρ) [ = A c ξ + B c y (ρ) = A c ξ + B c (L g L ρ 1 h(x)) we can now deine (u γ(x) L g L ρ 1 h(x), α(x) Lρ h(x) L g L ρ 1 h(x) Finally, our choice o the transormation T 2 (x) yields y = h(x) = ξ 1 = C c ξ ( Lρ h(x) L g L ρ 1 h(x) )] Feedback Linearization 14 o 14

Nonlinear Control Systems

Nonlinear Control Systems Nonlinear Control Systems António Pedro Aguiar pedro@isr.ist.utl.pt 7. Feedback Linearization IST-DEEC PhD Course http://users.isr.ist.utl.pt/%7epedro/ncs1/ 1 1 Feedback Linearization Given a nonlinear

More information

1 Relative degree and local normal forms

1 Relative degree and local normal forms THE ZERO DYNAMICS OF A NONLINEAR SYSTEM 1 Relative degree and local normal orms The purpose o this Section is to show how single-input single-output nonlinear systems can be locally given, by means o a

More information

Feedback Linearization Lectures delivered at IIT-Kanpur, TEQIP program, September 2016.

Feedback Linearization Lectures delivered at IIT-Kanpur, TEQIP program, September 2016. Feedback Linearization Lectures delivered at IIT-Kanpur, TEQIP program, September 216 Ravi N Banavar banavar@iitbacin September 24, 216 These notes are based on my readings o the two books Nonlinear Control

More information

Lecture : Feedback Linearization

Lecture : Feedback Linearization ecture : Feedbac inearization Niola Misovic, dipl ing and Pro Zoran Vuic June 29 Summary: This document ollows the lectures on eedbac linearization tought at the University o Zagreb, Faculty o Electrical

More information

Robust feedback linearization

Robust feedback linearization Robust eedback linearization Hervé Guillard Henri Bourlès Laboratoire d Automatique des Arts et Métiers CNAM/ENSAM 21 rue Pinel 75013 Paris France {herveguillardhenribourles}@parisensamr Keywords: Nonlinear

More information

Nonlinear Control. Nonlinear Control Lecture # 24 State Feedback Stabilization

Nonlinear Control. Nonlinear Control Lecture # 24 State Feedback Stabilization Nonlinear Control Lecture # 24 State Feedback Stabilization Feedback Lineaization What information do we need to implement the control u = γ 1 (x)[ ψ(x) KT(x)]? What is the effect of uncertainty in ψ,

More information

Output Feedback and State Feedback. EL2620 Nonlinear Control. Nonlinear Observers. Nonlinear Controllers. ẋ = f(x,u), y = h(x)

Output Feedback and State Feedback. EL2620 Nonlinear Control. Nonlinear Observers. Nonlinear Controllers. ẋ = f(x,u), y = h(x) Output Feedback and State Feedback EL2620 Nonlinear Control Lecture 10 Exact feedback linearization Input-output linearization Lyapunov-based control design methods ẋ = f(x,u) y = h(x) Output feedback:

More information

NONLINEAR CONTROL OF POWER NETWORK MODELS USING FEEDBACK LINEARIZATION

NONLINEAR CONTROL OF POWER NETWORK MODELS USING FEEDBACK LINEARIZATION NONLINEAR CONTROL OF POWER NETWORK MODELS USING FEEDBACK LINEARIZATION Steven Ball Science Applications International Corporation Columbia, MD email: sball@nmtedu Steve Schaer Department o Mathematics

More information

Lyapunov Stability Theory

Lyapunov Stability Theory Lyapunov Stability Theory Peter Al Hokayem and Eduardo Gallestey March 16, 2015 1 Introduction In this lecture we consider the stability of equilibrium points of autonomous nonlinear systems, both in continuous

More information

Nonlinear Control Lecture 9: Feedback Linearization

Nonlinear Control Lecture 9: Feedback Linearization Nonlinear Control Lecture 9: Feedback Linearization Farzaneh Abdollahi Department of Electrical Engineering Amirkabir University of Technology Fall 2011 Farzaneh Abdollahi Nonlinear Control Lecture 9 1/75

More information

Feedback linearization and stabilization of second-order nonholonomic chained systems

Feedback linearization and stabilization of second-order nonholonomic chained systems Feedback linearization and stabilization o second-order nonholonomic chained systems S. S. GE, ZHENDONG SUN, T. H. LEE and MARK W. SPONG Department o Electrical Engineering Coordinated Science Lab National

More information

PIECEWISE linear (PL) systems which are fully parametric

PIECEWISE linear (PL) systems which are fully parametric Proceedings o the International MultiConerence o Engineers and Computer Scientists 4 Vol I,, March - 4, 4, Hong Kong Designs o Minimal-Order State Observer and Servo Controller or a Robot Arm Using Piecewise

More information

Physics 5153 Classical Mechanics. Solution by Quadrature-1

Physics 5153 Classical Mechanics. Solution by Quadrature-1 October 14, 003 11:47:49 1 Introduction Physics 5153 Classical Mechanics Solution by Quadrature In the previous lectures, we have reduced the number o eective degrees o reedom that are needed to solve

More information

Disturbance Decoupling Problem

Disturbance Decoupling Problem DISC Systems and Control Theory of Nonlinear Systems, 21 1 Disturbance Decoupling Problem Lecture 4 Nonlinear Dynamical Control Systems, Chapter 7 The disturbance decoupling problem is a typical example

More information

Strong Lyapunov Functions for Systems Satisfying the Conditions of La Salle

Strong Lyapunov Functions for Systems Satisfying the Conditions of La Salle 06 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, VOL. 49, NO. 6, JUNE 004 Strong Lyapunov Functions or Systems Satisying the Conditions o La Salle Frédéric Mazenc and Dragan Ne sić Abstract We present a construction

More information

MANEUVER REGULATION, TRANSVERSE FEEDBACK LINEARIZATION, AND ZERO DYNAMICS

MANEUVER REGULATION, TRANSVERSE FEEDBACK LINEARIZATION, AND ZERO DYNAMICS MANEUVER REGULATION, TRANSVERSE FEEDBACK LINEARIZATION, AND ZERO DYNAMICS Chris Nielsen,1 Manredi Maggiore,1 Department o Electrical and Computer Engineering, University o Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

More information

Introduction to Geometric Control

Introduction to Geometric Control Introduction to Geometric Control Relative Degree Consider the square (no of inputs = no of outputs = p) affine control system ẋ = f(x) + g(x)u = f(x) + [ g (x),, g p (x) ] u () h (x) y = h(x) = (2) h

More information

EN Nonlinear Control and Planning in Robotics Lecture 10: Lyapunov Redesign and Robust Backstepping April 6, 2015

EN Nonlinear Control and Planning in Robotics Lecture 10: Lyapunov Redesign and Robust Backstepping April 6, 2015 EN530.678 Nonlinear Control and Planning in Robotics Lecture 10: Lyapunov Redesign and Robust Backstepping April 6, 2015 Prof: Marin Kobilarov 1 Uncertainty and Lyapunov Redesign Consider the system [1]

More information

MCE693/793: Analysis and Control of Nonlinear Systems

MCE693/793: Analysis and Control of Nonlinear Systems MCE693/793: Analysis and Control of Nonlinear Systems Input-Output and Input-State Linearization Zero Dynamics of Nonlinear Systems Hanz Richter Mechanical Engineering Department Cleveland State University

More information

Sliding Mode Control and Feedback Linearization for Non-regular Systems

Sliding Mode Control and Feedback Linearization for Non-regular Systems Sliding Mode Control and Feedback Linearization or Non-regular Systems Fu Zhang Benito R. Fernández Pieter J. Mosterman Timothy Josserand The MathWorks, Inc. Natick, MA, 01760 University o Texas at Austin,

More information

Numerical Solution of Ordinary Differential Equations in Fluctuationlessness Theorem Perspective

Numerical Solution of Ordinary Differential Equations in Fluctuationlessness Theorem Perspective Numerical Solution o Ordinary Dierential Equations in Fluctuationlessness Theorem Perspective NEJLA ALTAY Bahçeşehir University Faculty o Arts and Sciences Beşiktaş, İstanbul TÜRKİYE TURKEY METİN DEMİRALP

More information

Feedback linearization control of systems with singularities: a ball-beam revisit

Feedback linearization control of systems with singularities: a ball-beam revisit Chapter 1 Feedback linearization control o systems with singularities: a ball-beam revisit Fu Zhang The Mathworks, Inc zhang@mathworks.com Benito Fernndez-Rodriguez Department o Mechanical Engineering,

More information

MANEUVER REGULATION VIA TRANSVERSE FEEDBACK LINEARIZATION: THEORY AND EXAMPLES

MANEUVER REGULATION VIA TRANSVERSE FEEDBACK LINEARIZATION: THEORY AND EXAMPLES MANEUVER REGULATION VIA TRANSVERSE FEEDBACK LINEARIZATION: THEORY AND EXAMPLES Chris Nielsen,1 Manredi Maggiore,1 Department o Electrical and Computer Engineering, University o Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

More information

Feedback Linearizability of Strict Feedforward Systems

Feedback Linearizability of Strict Feedforward Systems Proceedings o the 47th IEEE Conerence on Decision and Control Cancun, Mexico, Dec 9-11, 28 WeB11 Feedback Linearizability o Strict Feedorward Systems Witold Respondek and Issa Amadou Tall Abstract For

More information

CONTROL DESIGN FOR SET POINT TRACKING

CONTROL DESIGN FOR SET POINT TRACKING Chapter 5 CONTROL DESIGN FOR SET POINT TRACKING In this chapter, we extend the pole placement, observer-based output feedback design to solve tracking problems. By tracking we mean that the output is commanded

More information

High-Gain Observers in Nonlinear Feedback Control. Lecture # 2 Separation Principle

High-Gain Observers in Nonlinear Feedback Control. Lecture # 2 Separation Principle High-Gain Observers in Nonlinear Feedback Control Lecture # 2 Separation Principle High-Gain ObserversinNonlinear Feedback ControlLecture # 2Separation Principle p. 1/4 The Class of Systems ẋ = Ax + Bφ(x,

More information

Exponential and Logarithmic. Functions CHAPTER The Algebra of Functions; Composite

Exponential and Logarithmic. Functions CHAPTER The Algebra of Functions; Composite CHAPTER 9 Exponential and Logarithmic Functions 9. The Algebra o Functions; Composite Functions 9.2 Inverse Functions 9.3 Exponential Functions 9.4 Exponential Growth and Decay Functions 9.5 Logarithmic

More information

A nemlineáris rendszer- és irányításelmélet alapjai Relative degree and Zero dynamics (Lie-derivatives)

A nemlineáris rendszer- és irányításelmélet alapjai Relative degree and Zero dynamics (Lie-derivatives) A nemlineáris rendszer- és irányításelmélet alapjai Relative degree and Zero dynamics (Lie-derivatives) Hangos Katalin BME Analízis Tanszék Rendszer- és Irányításelméleti Kutató Laboratórium MTA Számítástechnikai

More information

THE GAMMA FUNCTION THU NGỌC DƯƠNG

THE GAMMA FUNCTION THU NGỌC DƯƠNG THE GAMMA FUNCTION THU NGỌC DƯƠNG The Gamma unction was discovered during the search or a actorial analog deined on real numbers. This paper will explore the properties o the actorial unction and use them

More information

OBSERVER DESIGN USING A PARTIAL NONLINEAR OBSERVER CANONICAL FORM

OBSERVER DESIGN USING A PARTIAL NONLINEAR OBSERVER CANONICAL FORM Int J Appl Math Comput Sci, 26, Vol 16, No 3, 333 343 OBSERVER DESIGN USING A PARTIAL NONLINEAR OBSERVER CANONICAL FORM KLAUS RÖBENACK,ALAN F LYNCH Technische Universität Dresden Department o Mathematics,

More information

The use of differential geometry methods for linearization of nonlinear electrical circuits with multiple inputs and multiple outputs (MIMOs)

The use of differential geometry methods for linearization of nonlinear electrical circuits with multiple inputs and multiple outputs (MIMOs) Electrical Engineering (08) 00:85 84 https://doiorg/0007/s000-08-0746-0 ORIGINAL PAPER The use o dierential geometry methods or linearization o nonlinear electrical circuits with multiple inputs and multiple

More information

ELEG 3143 Probability & Stochastic Process Ch. 4 Multiple Random Variables

ELEG 3143 Probability & Stochastic Process Ch. 4 Multiple Random Variables Department o Electrical Engineering University o Arkansas ELEG 3143 Probability & Stochastic Process Ch. 4 Multiple Random Variables Dr. Jingxian Wu wuj@uark.edu OUTLINE 2 Two discrete random variables

More information

Lecture 9 Nonlinear Control Design

Lecture 9 Nonlinear Control Design Lecture 9 Nonlinear Control Design Exact-linearization Lyapunov-based design Lab 2 Adaptive control Sliding modes control Literature: [Khalil, ch.s 13, 14.1,14.2] and [Glad-Ljung,ch.17] Course Outline

More information

Stabilization and Passivity-Based Control

Stabilization and Passivity-Based Control DISC Systems and Control Theory of Nonlinear Systems, 2010 1 Stabilization and Passivity-Based Control Lecture 8 Nonlinear Dynamical Control Systems, Chapter 10, plus handout from R. Sepulchre, Constructive

More information

Chap. 3. Controlled Systems, Controllability

Chap. 3. Controlled Systems, Controllability Chap. 3. Controlled Systems, Controllability 1. Controllability of Linear Systems 1.1. Kalman s Criterion Consider the linear system ẋ = Ax + Bu where x R n : state vector and u R m : input vector. A :

More information

( x) f = where P and Q are polynomials.

( x) f = where P and Q are polynomials. 9.8 Graphing Rational Functions Lets begin with a deinition. Deinition: Rational Function A rational unction is a unction o the orm ( ) ( ) ( ) P where P and Q are polynomials. Q An eample o a simple rational

More information

Solution of Additional Exercises for Chapter 4

Solution of Additional Exercises for Chapter 4 1 1. (1) Try V (x) = 1 (x 1 + x ). Solution of Additional Exercises for Chapter 4 V (x) = x 1 ( x 1 + x ) x = x 1 x + x 1 x In the neighborhood of the origin, the term (x 1 + x ) dominates. Hence, the

More information

Fluctuationlessness Theorem and its Application to Boundary Value Problems of ODEs

Fluctuationlessness Theorem and its Application to Boundary Value Problems of ODEs Fluctuationlessness Theorem and its Application to Boundary Value Problems o ODEs NEJLA ALTAY İstanbul Technical University Inormatics Institute Maslak, 34469, İstanbul TÜRKİYE TURKEY) nejla@be.itu.edu.tr

More information

From acceleration-based semi-active vibration reduction control to functional observer design

From acceleration-based semi-active vibration reduction control to functional observer design MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC RESEARCH LABORATORIES http://wwwmerlcom From acceleration-based semi-active vibration reduction control to unctional observer design Wang, Y; Utsunomiya, K TR18-35 March 18 Abstract

More information

Basic mathematics of economic models. 3. Maximization

Basic mathematics of economic models. 3. Maximization John Riley 1 January 16 Basic mathematics o economic models 3 Maimization 31 Single variable maimization 1 3 Multi variable maimization 6 33 Concave unctions 9 34 Maimization with non-negativity constraints

More information

2. ETA EVALUATIONS USING WEBER FUNCTIONS. Introduction

2. ETA EVALUATIONS USING WEBER FUNCTIONS. Introduction . ETA EVALUATIONS USING WEBER FUNCTIONS Introduction So ar we have seen some o the methods or providing eta evaluations that appear in the literature and we have seen some o the interesting properties

More information

ROBUST FAULT DETECTION AND ISOLATION IN CONSTRAINED NONLINEAR SYSTEMS VIA A SECOND ORDER SLIDING MODE OBSERVER. Wen Chen, Mehrdad Saif 1

ROBUST FAULT DETECTION AND ISOLATION IN CONSTRAINED NONLINEAR SYSTEMS VIA A SECOND ORDER SLIDING MODE OBSERVER. Wen Chen, Mehrdad Saif 1 Copyright IFAC 5th Triennial World Congress, Barcelona, Spain ROBUST FAULT DETECTION AND ISOLATION IN CONSTRAINED NONLINEAR SYSTEMS VIA A SECOND ORDER SLIDING MODE OBSERVER Wen Chen, Mehrdad Sai School

More information

Mathematics for Control Theory

Mathematics for Control Theory Mathematics for Control Theory Geometric Concepts in Control Involutivity and Frobenius Theorem Exact Linearization Hanz Richter Mechanical Engineering Department Cleveland State University Reading materials

More information

Asymptote. 2 Problems 2 Methods

Asymptote. 2 Problems 2 Methods Asymptote Problems Methods Problems Assume we have the ollowing transer unction which has a zero at =, a pole at = and a pole at =. We are going to look at two problems: problem is where >> and problem

More information

EN Nonlinear Control and Planning in Robotics Lecture 3: Stability February 4, 2015

EN Nonlinear Control and Planning in Robotics Lecture 3: Stability February 4, 2015 EN530.678 Nonlinear Control and Planning in Robotics Lecture 3: Stability February 4, 2015 Prof: Marin Kobilarov 0.1 Model prerequisites Consider ẋ = f(t, x). We will make the following basic assumptions

More information

Solution of the Synthesis Problem in Hilbert Spaces

Solution of the Synthesis Problem in Hilbert Spaces Solution o the Synthesis Problem in Hilbert Spaces Valery I. Korobov, Grigory M. Sklyar, Vasily A. Skoryk Kharkov National University 4, sqr. Svoboda 677 Kharkov, Ukraine Szczecin University 5, str. Wielkopolska

More information

WIND energy is a renewable energy source. It has

WIND energy is a renewable energy source. It has or Standalone Wind Energy Conversion Systems Hoa M. Nguyen, Member, IAENG and D. S. Naidu. Abstract This paper presents a direct uzzy adaptive control or standalone Wind Energy Conversion Systems (WECS)

More information

Categories and Natural Transformations

Categories and Natural Transformations Categories and Natural Transormations Ethan Jerzak 17 August 2007 1 Introduction The motivation or studying Category Theory is to ormalise the underlying similarities between a broad range o mathematical

More information

Supplementary material for Continuous-action planning for discounted infinite-horizon nonlinear optimal control with Lipschitz values

Supplementary material for Continuous-action planning for discounted infinite-horizon nonlinear optimal control with Lipschitz values Supplementary material or Continuous-action planning or discounted ininite-horizon nonlinear optimal control with Lipschitz values List o main notations x, X, u, U state, state space, action, action space,

More information

Topic # /31 Feedback Control Systems. Analysis of Nonlinear Systems Lyapunov Stability Analysis

Topic # /31 Feedback Control Systems. Analysis of Nonlinear Systems Lyapunov Stability Analysis Topic # 16.30/31 Feedback Control Systems Analysis of Nonlinear Systems Lyapunov Stability Analysis Fall 010 16.30/31 Lyapunov Stability Analysis Very general method to prove (or disprove) stability of

More information

Minimum-Phase Property of Nonlinear Systems in Terms of a Dissipation Inequality

Minimum-Phase Property of Nonlinear Systems in Terms of a Dissipation Inequality Minimum-Phase Property of Nonlinear Systems in Terms of a Dissipation Inequality Christian Ebenbauer Institute for Systems Theory in Engineering, University of Stuttgart, 70550 Stuttgart, Germany ce@ist.uni-stuttgart.de

More information

Passivity-based Stabilization of Non-Compact Sets

Passivity-based Stabilization of Non-Compact Sets Passivity-based Stabilization of Non-Compact Sets Mohamed I. El-Hawwary and Manfredi Maggiore Abstract We investigate the stabilization of closed sets for passive nonlinear systems which are contained

More information

Modeling and Analysis of Dynamic Systems

Modeling and Analysis of Dynamic Systems Modeling and Analysis of Dynamic Systems Dr. Guillaume Ducard Fall 2017 Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control ETH Zurich, Switzerland G. Ducard c 1 / 57 Outline 1 Lecture 13: Linear System - Stability

More information

Finite time observation of nonlinear time-delay systems with unknown inputs

Finite time observation of nonlinear time-delay systems with unknown inputs Author manuscript, published in "NOLCOS21 (21)" Finite time observation o nonlinear time-delay systems with unknown inputs G. Zheng J.-P. Barbot, D. Boutat, T. Floquet, J.-P. Richard INRIA Lille-Nord Europe,

More information

Feedback Optimal Control for Inverted Pendulum Problem by Using the Generating Function Technique

Feedback Optimal Control for Inverted Pendulum Problem by Using the Generating Function Technique (IJACSA) International Journal o Advanced Computer Science Applications Vol. 5 No. 11 14 Feedback Optimal Control or Inverted Pendulum Problem b Using the Generating Function echnique Han R. Dwidar Astronom

More information

Nonlinear Systems and Control Lecture # 12 Converse Lyapunov Functions & Time Varying Systems. p. 1/1

Nonlinear Systems and Control Lecture # 12 Converse Lyapunov Functions & Time Varying Systems. p. 1/1 Nonlinear Systems and Control Lecture # 12 Converse Lyapunov Functions & Time Varying Systems p. 1/1 p. 2/1 Converse Lyapunov Theorem Exponential Stability Let x = 0 be an exponentially stable equilibrium

More information

Mathematical Systems Theory: Advanced Course Exercise Session 5. 1 Accessibility of a nonlinear system

Mathematical Systems Theory: Advanced Course Exercise Session 5. 1 Accessibility of a nonlinear system Mathematical Systems Theory: dvanced Course Exercise Session 5 1 ccessibility of a nonlinear system Consider an affine nonlinear control system: [ ẋ = f(x)+g(x)u, x() = x, G(x) = g 1 (x) g m (x) ], where

More information

A Simple Explanation of the Sobolev Gradient Method

A Simple Explanation of the Sobolev Gradient Method A Simple Explanation o the Sobolev Gradient Method R. J. Renka July 3, 2006 Abstract We have observed that the term Sobolev gradient is used more oten than it is understood. Also, the term is oten used

More information

LMI Methods in Optimal and Robust Control

LMI Methods in Optimal and Robust Control LMI Methods in Optimal and Robust Control Matthew M. Peet Arizona State University Lecture 15: Nonlinear Systems and Lyapunov Functions Overview Our next goal is to extend LMI s and optimization to nonlinear

More information

Numerical Methods - Lecture 2. Numerical Methods. Lecture 2. Analysis of errors in numerical methods

Numerical Methods - Lecture 2. Numerical Methods. Lecture 2. Analysis of errors in numerical methods Numerical Methods - Lecture 1 Numerical Methods Lecture. Analysis o errors in numerical methods Numerical Methods - Lecture Why represent numbers in loating point ormat? Eample 1. How a number 56.78 can

More information

Observability for deterministic systems and high-gain observers

Observability for deterministic systems and high-gain observers Observability for deterministic systems and high-gain observers design. Part 1. March 29, 2011 Introduction and problem description Definition of observability Consequences of instantaneous observability

More information

Prof. Krstic Nonlinear Systems MAE281A Homework set 1 Linearization & phase portrait

Prof. Krstic Nonlinear Systems MAE281A Homework set 1 Linearization & phase portrait Prof. Krstic Nonlinear Systems MAE28A Homework set Linearization & phase portrait. For each of the following systems, find all equilibrium points and determine the type of each isolated equilibrium. Use

More information

Analysis of the regularity, pointwise completeness and pointwise generacy of descriptor linear electrical circuits

Analysis of the regularity, pointwise completeness and pointwise generacy of descriptor linear electrical circuits Computer Applications in Electrical Engineering Vol. 4 Analysis o the regularity pointwise completeness pointwise generacy o descriptor linear electrical circuits Tadeusz Kaczorek Białystok University

More information

Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR) Design I

Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR) Design I Lecture 7 Linear Quadratic Regulator LQR) Design I Dr. Radhakant Padhi Asst. Proessor Dept. o Aerospace Engineering Indian Institute o Science - Bangalore LQR Design: Problem Objective o drive the state

More information

Nonlinear Control. Nonlinear Control Lecture # 2 Stability of Equilibrium Points

Nonlinear Control. Nonlinear Control Lecture # 2 Stability of Equilibrium Points Nonlinear Control Lecture # 2 Stability of Equilibrium Points Basic Concepts ẋ = f(x) f is locally Lipschitz over a domain D R n Suppose x D is an equilibrium point; that is, f( x) = 0 Characterize and

More information

Definition: Let f(x) be a function of one variable with continuous derivatives of all orders at a the point x 0, then the series.

Definition: Let f(x) be a function of one variable with continuous derivatives of all orders at a the point x 0, then the series. 2.4 Local properties o unctions o several variables In this section we will learn how to address three kinds o problems which are o great importance in the ield o applied mathematics: how to obtain the

More information

TTK4150 Nonlinear Control Systems Solution 6 Part 2

TTK4150 Nonlinear Control Systems Solution 6 Part 2 TTK4150 Nonlinear Control Systems Solution 6 Part 2 Department of Engineering Cybernetics Norwegian University of Science and Technology Fall 2003 Solution 1 Thesystemisgivenby φ = R (φ) ω and J 1 ω 1

More information

Solutions. Problems of Chapter 1

Solutions. Problems of Chapter 1 Solutions Problems of Chapter 1 1.1 A real square matrix A IR n n is invertible if and only if its determinant is non zero. The determinant of A is a polynomial in the entries a ij of A, whose set of zeros

More information

Control design using Jordan controllable canonical form

Control design using Jordan controllable canonical form Control design using Jordan controllable canonical form Krishna K Busawon School of Engineering, Ellison Building, University of Northumbria at Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 8ST, UK email: krishnabusawon@unnacuk

More information

THE CAUCHY PROBLEM VIA THE METHOD OF CHARACTERISTICS

THE CAUCHY PROBLEM VIA THE METHOD OF CHARACTERISTICS THE CAUCHY PROBLEM VIA THE METHOD OF CHARACTERISTICS ARICK SHAO In this short note, we solve the Cauchy, or initial value, problem or general ully nonlinear irst-order PDE. Throughout, our PDE will be

More information

Nonlinear disturbance observer-based control for multi-input multi-output nonlinear systems subject to mismatching condition

Nonlinear disturbance observer-based control for multi-input multi-output nonlinear systems subject to mismatching condition Loughborough University Institutional Repository Nonlinear disturbance observer-based control or multi-input multi-output nonlinear systems subject to mismatching condition This item was submitted to Loughborough

More information

LIE TRANSFORM CONSTRUCTION OF EXPONENTIAL NORMAL FORM OBSERVERS. Suba Thomas Harry G. Kwatny Bor-Chin Chang

LIE TRANSFORM CONSTRUCTION OF EXPONENTIAL NORMAL FORM OBSERVERS. Suba Thomas Harry G. Kwatny Bor-Chin Chang LIE TRANSFORM CONSTRUCTION OF EXPONENTIAL NORMAL FORM OBSERVERS Suba Thomas Harry G Kwatny Bor-Chin Chang Department of Mechanical Engineering and Mechanics, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA 1914, USA

More information

VALUATIVE CRITERIA BRIAN OSSERMAN

VALUATIVE CRITERIA BRIAN OSSERMAN VALUATIVE CRITERIA BRIAN OSSERMAN Intuitively, one can think o separatedness as (a relative version o) uniqueness o limits, and properness as (a relative version o) existence o (unique) limits. It is not

More information

Separation Theorems for a Class of Retarded Nonlinear Systems

Separation Theorems for a Class of Retarded Nonlinear Systems Separation Theorems or a Class o Retarded Nonlinear Systems A. Germani C. Manes P. Pepe Dipartimento di Ingegneria Elettrica e dell Inormazione 674 Poggio di Roio L Aquila Italy e-mail: alredo.germani@univaq.it

More information

Roberto s Notes on Differential Calculus Chapter 8: Graphical analysis Section 1. Extreme points

Roberto s Notes on Differential Calculus Chapter 8: Graphical analysis Section 1. Extreme points Roberto s Notes on Dierential Calculus Chapter 8: Graphical analysis Section 1 Extreme points What you need to know already: How to solve basic algebraic and trigonometric equations. All basic techniques

More information

Lecture 2: Controllability of nonlinear systems

Lecture 2: Controllability of nonlinear systems DISC Systems and Control Theory of Nonlinear Systems 1 Lecture 2: Controllability of nonlinear systems Nonlinear Dynamical Control Systems, Chapter 3 See www.math.rug.nl/ arjan (under teaching) for info

More information

Received: 30 July 2017; Accepted: 29 September 2017; Published: 8 October 2017

Received: 30 July 2017; Accepted: 29 September 2017; Published: 8 October 2017 mathematics Article Least-Squares Solution o Linear Dierential Equations Daniele Mortari ID Aerospace Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA; mortari@tamu.edu; Tel.: +1-979-845-734

More information

9.3 Graphing Functions by Plotting Points, The Domain and Range of Functions

9.3 Graphing Functions by Plotting Points, The Domain and Range of Functions 9. Graphing Functions by Plotting Points, The Domain and Range o Functions Now that we have a basic idea o what unctions are and how to deal with them, we would like to start talking about the graph o

More information

Nonlinear Control Lecture 1: Introduction

Nonlinear Control Lecture 1: Introduction Nonlinear Control Lecture 1: Introduction Farzaneh Abdollahi Department of Electrical Engineering Amirkabir University of Technology Fall 2011 Farzaneh Abdollahi Nonlinear Control Lecture 1 1/15 Motivation

More information

Observability Analysis of Nonlinear Systems Using Pseudo-Linear Transformation

Observability Analysis of Nonlinear Systems Using Pseudo-Linear Transformation 9t IFAC Symposium on Nonlinear Control Systems Toulouse, France, September 4-6, 2013 TC3.4 Observability Analysis o Nonlinear Systems Using Pseudo-Linear Transormation Yu Kawano Tosiyui Otsua Osaa University,

More information

Rigorous pointwise approximations for invariant densities of non-uniformly expanding maps

Rigorous pointwise approximations for invariant densities of non-uniformly expanding maps Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 5, 35, 8 44 c Cambridge University Press, 4 doi:.7/etds.3.9 Rigorous pointwise approximations or invariant densities o non-uniormly expanding maps WAEL BAHSOUN, CHRISTOPHER BOSE

More information

Introduction to Nonlinear Control Lecture # 3 Time-Varying and Perturbed Systems

Introduction to Nonlinear Control Lecture # 3 Time-Varying and Perturbed Systems p. 1/5 Introduction to Nonlinear Control Lecture # 3 Time-Varying and Perturbed Systems p. 2/5 Time-varying Systems ẋ = f(t, x) f(t, x) is piecewise continuous in t and locally Lipschitz in x for all t

More information

Avoiding feedback-linearization singularity using a quotient method The field-controlled DC motor case

Avoiding feedback-linearization singularity using a quotient method The field-controlled DC motor case Avoiding eedack-linearization singularity using a quotient method The ield-controlled DC motor case S S Willson, Philippe Müllhaupt and Dominique Bonvin Astract Feedack linearization requires a unique

More information

Math 754 Chapter III: Fiber bundles. Classifying spaces. Applications

Math 754 Chapter III: Fiber bundles. Classifying spaces. Applications Math 754 Chapter III: Fiber bundles. Classiying spaces. Applications Laurențiu Maxim Department o Mathematics University o Wisconsin maxim@math.wisc.edu April 18, 2018 Contents 1 Fiber bundles 2 2 Principle

More information

Robust Stabilization of Non-Minimum Phase Nonlinear Systems Using Extended High Gain Observers

Robust Stabilization of Non-Minimum Phase Nonlinear Systems Using Extended High Gain Observers 28 American Control Conference Westin Seattle Hotel, Seattle, Washington, USA June 11-13, 28 WeC15.1 Robust Stabilization of Non-Minimum Phase Nonlinear Systems Using Extended High Gain Observers Shahid

More information

1. Find the solution of the following uncontrolled linear system. 2 α 1 1

1. Find the solution of the following uncontrolled linear system. 2 α 1 1 Appendix B Revision Problems 1. Find the solution of the following uncontrolled linear system 0 1 1 ẋ = x, x(0) =. 2 3 1 Class test, August 1998 2. Given the linear system described by 2 α 1 1 ẋ = x +

More information

Example: When describing where a function is increasing, decreasing or constant we use the x- axis values.

Example: When describing where a function is increasing, decreasing or constant we use the x- axis values. Business Calculus Lecture Notes (also Calculus With Applications or Business Math II) Chapter 3 Applications o Derivatives 31 Increasing and Decreasing Functions Inormal Deinition: A unction is increasing

More information

Control design with guaranteed ultimate bound for feedback linearizable systems

Control design with guaranteed ultimate bound for feedback linearizable systems Control design with guaranteed ultimate bound for feedback linearizable systems Ernesto Kofman, Fernando Fontenla Hernan Haimovich María M. Seron CONICET; Depto. de Electrónica, Fac. de Cs. Exactas, Ing.

More information

Maneuvering assistant for truck and trailer combinations with arbitrary trailer hitching

Maneuvering assistant for truck and trailer combinations with arbitrary trailer hitching Maneuvering assistant or truck and trailer combinations with arbitrary trailer hitching Yevgen Sklyarenko, Frank Schreiber and Walter Schumacher Abstract Stabilizing controllers can assist the driver to

More information

arxiv: v1 [math.gt] 20 Feb 2008

arxiv: v1 [math.gt] 20 Feb 2008 EQUIVALENCE OF REAL MILNOR S FIBRATIONS FOR QUASI HOMOGENEOUS SINGULARITIES arxiv:0802.2746v1 [math.gt] 20 Feb 2008 ARAÚJO DOS SANTOS, R. Abstract. We are going to use the Euler s vector ields in order

More information

Consider the function f(x, y). Recall that we can approximate f(x, y) with a linear function in x and y:

Consider the function f(x, y). Recall that we can approximate f(x, y) with a linear function in x and y: Taylor s Formula Consider the unction (x, y). Recall that we can approximate (x, y) with a linear unction in x and y: (x, y) (a, b)+ x (a, b)(x a)+ y (a, b)(y b) Notice that again this is just a linear

More information

Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR) I

Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR) I Optimal Control, Guidance and Estimation Lecture Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR) I Pro. Radhakant Padhi Dept. o Aerospace Engineering Indian Institute o Science - Bangalore Generic Optimal Control Problem

More information

Feedback Linearization based Arc Length Control for Gas Metal Arc Welding

Feedback Linearization based Arc Length Control for Gas Metal Arc Welding 5 American Control Conference June 8-, 5. Portland, OR, USA FrA5.6 Feedback Linearization based Arc Length Control for Gas Metal Arc Welding Jesper S. Thomsen Abstract In this paper a feedback linearization

More information

In the index (pages ), reduce all page numbers by 2.

In the index (pages ), reduce all page numbers by 2. Errata or Nilpotence and periodicity in stable homotopy theory (Annals O Mathematics Study No. 28, Princeton University Press, 992) by Douglas C. Ravenel, July 2, 997, edition. Most o these were ound by

More information

BIFURCATION PHENOMENA Lecture 1: Qualitative theory of planar ODEs

BIFURCATION PHENOMENA Lecture 1: Qualitative theory of planar ODEs BIFURCATION PHENOMENA Lecture 1: Qualitative theory of planar ODEs Yuri A. Kuznetsov August, 2010 Contents 1. Solutions and orbits. 2. Equilibria. 3. Periodic orbits and limit cycles. 4. Homoclinic orbits.

More information

Robust and Optimal Control of Uncertain Dynamical Systems with State-Dependent Switchings Using Interval Arithmetic

Robust and Optimal Control of Uncertain Dynamical Systems with State-Dependent Switchings Using Interval Arithmetic Robust and Optimal Control o Uncertain Dynamical Systems with State-Dependent Switchings Using Interval Arithmetic Andreas Rauh Chair o Mechatronics, University o Rostock, D-1859 Rostock, Germany Andreas.Rauh@uni-rostock.de

More information

Math 216A. A gluing construction of Proj(S)

Math 216A. A gluing construction of Proj(S) Math 216A. A gluing construction o Proj(S) 1. Some basic deinitions Let S = n 0 S n be an N-graded ring (we ollows French terminology here, even though outside o France it is commonly accepted that N does

More information

SEPARATED AND PROPER MORPHISMS

SEPARATED AND PROPER MORPHISMS SEPARATED AND PROPER MORPHISMS BRIAN OSSERMAN The notions o separatedness and properness are the algebraic geometry analogues o the Hausdor condition and compactness in topology. For varieties over the

More information

FEEDFORWARD CONTROLLER DESIGN BASED ON H ANALYSIS

FEEDFORWARD CONTROLLER DESIGN BASED ON H ANALYSIS 271 FEEDFORWARD CONTROLLER DESIGN BASED ON H ANALYSIS Eduardo J. Adam * and Jacinto L. Marchetti Instituto de Desarrollo Tecnológico para la Industria Química (Universidad Nacional del Litoral - CONICET)

More information

VALUATIVE CRITERIA FOR SEPARATED AND PROPER MORPHISMS

VALUATIVE CRITERIA FOR SEPARATED AND PROPER MORPHISMS VALUATIVE CRITERIA FOR SEPARATED AND PROPER MORPHISMS BRIAN OSSERMAN Recall that or prevarieties, we had criteria or being a variety or or being complete in terms o existence and uniqueness o limits, where

More information