NOTES WEEK 01 DAY 1 SCOT ADAMS
|
|
- Winfred Cain
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 NOTES WEEK 01 DAY 1 SCOT ADAMS Question: What is Mathematics? Answer: The study of absolute truth. Question: Why is it so hard to teach and to learn? Answer: One must learn to play a variety of games called theorems. One must also learn a language to describe strategies for winning those games. The strategies have to be perfect, and the writing has to have no ambiguities whatsoever. Propositional Logic: Truth tables. We proved, via a truth table, for any propositions P and Q, that: r P ñ Q s ô r Q or pnot P q s. Unassigned HW: Show that pp &Qq ô pq&p q. Unassigned HW: Show that rpp ñ Qq&pQ ñ Rqs ñ rp ñ Rs. Convention: We will use Propositional Logic results in our proofs, typically without comment. = for all, D = there exists, ñ = implies, ô = iff = if and only if, s.t. = such that. NOTE TO SELF: Introduce an object denoted which is NOT an element of any set. will refer to all objects that are NOT equal to. So, for example, the x is true. Similarly, D also refers only to objects that are NOT equal to. So, for example, Dx s.t. x 2 4 is understood to mean that there exists an object x such that both x and x 2 4 are true. Note: (if P, then Q) = (P ñ Q) ( x x ). Fact: ( If two things are equal to the same thing, then they must be equal to each other. y, z, ( rpx zq&py zqs ñ rx ys ). Date: September 6, 2016 Printout date: November 28,
2 2 SCOT ADAMS A null true statement: For any x, for any proposition P, we have: px xq ñ P. Basic Set Thory: Fact: 1 P t1, 2, 3u and 4 R t1, 2, 3u. Definition: Let P and Q be sets. Then P Ď Q px P P q ñ px P Qq. px P P q ñ px P Qq can be simplified P P, x P Q. Q, if P and Q are sets, then pp Qq ô ppp Ď Qq&pQ Ď P qq. Q, if P and Q are sets, then pp Qq ô ppp Ď Qq&pQ Ď P qq can be simplified sets P, Q, r pp Qq ô ppp Ď Qq&pQ Ď P qq s. Definition: H : tx x xu t u. Definition: Let P and Q be sets. Then P Y Q : tx px P P q or px P Qqu, P X Q : tx px P P q and px P Qqu, and P zq : tx px P P q and pnot px P Qqqu. Definitions: N : t1, 2, 3,...u tpositive integersu, N 0 : t0, 1, 2, 3,...u tsemipositive integersu, Z : t..., 3, 2, 1, 0, 1, 2, 3,...u tintegersu, Q : tm{n m P Z, n P Nu trational numbersu, R : treal numbersu, R : R Y t 8, 8u textended real numbersu, C : tcomplex numbersu, Note: Any coordinatized line is in 1-1 correspondene with R.
3 NOTES WEEK 01 DAY 1 3 Any coordinatized plane is in 1-1 correspondence with C. Note: In this class, number will typically mean real number. Note: N Ď N 0 Ď Z Ď Q Ď R Ď R. Also, R Ď C. Convention: We understand the binary operators `,,, { on R. Avoid ˆ and. Convention: We understand the binary Boolean operators ă, ą, ď, ě on R. Convention: The basic properties of `,,, {, ă, ą, ď, ě will be used, as needed, without proof. For example, there s no need to prove the b, c P R, pa ď bq ñ pa ` c ď b ` cq. Bounded intervals: pa, bq, ra, bq, pa, bs, ra, bs. Unbounded intervals: p 8, aq, p 8, as, pa, 8q, ra, 8q. Remark: The interval r1, 1s is equal to t1u. This kind of interval is called a degenerate interval. A degenerate interval is an interval containing only one number. Remark: Every interval is nonempty. Every interval is a subset of R. We do define, for example, r3, 8s : tx P R 3 ď x ď 8u, but call this an extended interval; it is not an interval. Every extended interval is a subset of R. The handout is our main reference for rules in writing proofs. Note: A key focus of the handout is on binding variables. Note: The past tense of the verb to bind is bound. The past tense of the verb to bound is bounded. We bind variables, after which they become bound, NOT bounded. (The misuse of bounded as a past tense of to bind is a pet peeve of mine!) We sometimes bound variables and functions, after which they become bounded. However, there is no discussion of bounding variables and/or functions in the handout. In the handout, we only use to bind and bound, never to bound and bounded. Note: An unbound variable is sometimes called a free variable.
4 4 SCOT ADAMS Verboten: a ` b b ` a This is incorrect, because the variables a and b are free. Do not use any variable until it is bound. There are only a few ways to bind variables and we will be discussing all of them in depth. Using a variable before it is bound is strictly forbidden and can result in loss of credit. The use of even just one free variable in a proof can, in some cases, render the entire proof invalid, and can result in a zero score. b P R, a ` b b ` a. Note: There are exactly two quantifiers. They and D. The universal quantifier The existential quantifier is D. Note: The use of a quantifier before a variable causes the variable to become bound until the end of the sentence. Consider the b P R, a ` b b ` a. In this sentence, the variables a and b are bound from to the period. It s not acceptable to b P R, a`b b`a. Also, ab ba. Here, the a and b in ab ba are free variables, which is not allowed. On the other hand, it s fine to b P R, a ` b b ` a. b P R, ab ba. Other methods of binding: In ta P R a 2 ď 1u r 1, 1s, the variable a is bound from t to u. In lim añ 2 a2 4, the variable a is bound from lim to. In max apr 2,1s In max app 2,1s In sup app 2,1s a 2 4, the variable a is bound from max to. a 2, the variable a is bound from max to. a 2 4, the variable a is bound from sup to. Similar remarks for min and inf. Note that supremum sup lub least upper bound. Note that infimum inf glb greatest lower bound. Still more methods of binding: The sentence Let x : 1 binds x until the end of the current section of proof. The sentence Given x P S binds x until the end of the current section of proof. The sentence Choose x P S binds x until the end of the current section of proof.
5 NOTES WEEK 01 DAY 1 5 Next goal: Prove ą 0, Dδ ą 0 P R, p0 ă x ă 2δq ñ px ` x 2 ă εq. This is a triply quantified statement because of the then D, By interpreting this statement as a game, we understood exactly why the statement is true. Game rules: You choose ε ą 0. I choose δ ą 0. You choose x P R satisfying 0 ă x ă 2δ. We check to see if px ` x 2 ă εq is true. If it is, I win. If not, you win. We need to develop a strategy for winning this game, and then convert that strategy into a formal proof that the triply quantified statement is true.
NOTES WEEK 02 DAY 1. THEOREM 0.3. Let A, B and C be sets. Then
NOTES WEEK 02 DAY 1 SCOT ADAMS LEMMA 0.1. @propositions P, Q, R, rp or pq&rqs rp p or Qq&pP or Rqs. THEOREM 0.2. Let A and B be sets. Then (i) A X B B X A, and (ii) A Y B B Y A THEOREM 0.3. Let A, B and
More informationNOTES WEEK 13 DAY 2 SCOT ADAMS
NOTES WEEK 13 DAY 2 SCOT ADAMS Recall: Let px, dq be a metric space. Then, for all S Ď X, we have p S is sequentially compact q ñ p S is closed and bounded q. DEFINITION 0.1. Let px, dq be a metric space.
More informationADVANCE TOPICS IN ANALYSIS - REAL. 8 September September 2011
ADVANCE TOPICS IN ANALYSIS - REAL NOTES COMPILED BY KATO LA Introductions 8 September 011 15 September 011 Nested Interval Theorem: If A 1 ra 1, b 1 s, A ra, b s,, A n ra n, b n s, and A 1 Ě A Ě Ě A n
More informationNOTES WEEK 14 DAY 2 SCOT ADAMS
NOTES WEEK 14 DAY 2 SCOT ADAMS For this lecture, we fix the following: Let n P N, let W : R n, let : 2 P N pr n q and let I : id R n : R n Ñ R n be the identity map, defined by Ipxq x. For any h : W W,
More informationScalar multiplication and addition of sequences 9
8 Sequences 1.2.7. Proposition. Every subsequence of a convergent sequence (a n ) n N converges to lim n a n. Proof. If (a nk ) k N is a subsequence of (a n ) n N, then n k k for every k. Hence if ε >
More informationErdinç Dündar, Celal Çakan
DEMONSTRATIO MATHEMATICA Vol. XLVII No 3 2014 Erdinç Dündar, Celal Çakan ROUGH I-CONVERGENCE Abstract. In this work, using the concept of I-convergence and using the concept of rough convergence, we introduced
More informationIntroduction to computability Tutorial 7
Introduction to computability Tutorial 7 Context free languages and Turing machines November 6 th 2014 Context-free languages 1. Show that the following languages are not context-free: a) L ta i b j a
More informationNOTES WEEK 10 DAY 2. Unassigned HW: Let V and W be finite dimensional vector spaces and let x P V. Show, for all f, g : V W, that
NOTES WEEK 10 DAY 2 SCOT ADAMS Unassigned HW: Let V and W be finite dimensional vector spaces and let x P V. Show, for all f, g : V W, that D x pf ` gq pd x fq ` pd x gq. Also, show, for all c P R, for
More informationNOTES WEEK 15 DAY 1 SCOT ADAMS
NOTES WEEK 15 DAY 1 SCOT ADAMS We fix some notation for the entire class today: Let n P N, W : R n, : 2 P N pw q, W : LpW, W q, I : id W P W, z : 0 W 0 n. Note that W LpR n, R n q. Recall, for all T P
More informationNOTES WEEK 04 DAY 1 SCOT ADAMS
NOTES WEEK 0 DAY 1 SCOT ADAMS DEFINITION 01 Let m, n P N, B P BpR m, R n q Let e 1,, e m be the standard basis of R m Let f 1,, f n be the standard basis of R n Then we define rbs P R nˆm by rbs ji Bpe
More information2-4: The Use of Quantifiers
2-4: The Use of Quantifiers The number x + 2 is an even integer is not a statement. When x is replaced by 1, 3 or 5 the resulting statement is false. However, when x is replaced by 2, 4 or 6 the resulting
More informationNOTES WEEK 11 DAY 2 SCOT ADAMS
NOTES WEEK 11 DAY 2 SCOT ADAMS In Proposition 0.1 below, Bp0, δq is just the open interval p δ, δq and Bp0, x q is just the closed interval r x, x s. PROPOSITION 0.1. Let g : R R and let δ ą 0. Assume
More informationPRINCIPLES OF ANALYSIS - LECTURE NOTES
PRINCIPLES OF ANALYSIS - LECTURE NOTES PETER A. PERRY 1. Constructions of Z, Q, R Beginning with the natural numbers N t1, 2, 3,...u we can use set theory to construct, successively, Z, Q, and R. We ll
More information3. The Logic of Quantified Statements Summary. Aaron Tan August 2017
3. The Logic of Quantified Statements Summary Aaron Tan 28 31 August 2017 1 3. The Logic of Quantified Statements 3.1 Predicates and Quantified Statements I Predicate; domain; truth set Universal quantifier,
More informationSection 2.3: Statements Containing Multiple Quantifiers
Section 2.3: Statements Containing Multiple Quantifiers In this section, we consider statements such as there is a person in this company who is in charge of all the paperwork where more than one quantifier
More informationMATH 360 Final Exam Thursday, December 14, a n 2. a n 1 1
MATH 36 Final Exam Thursday, December 4, 27 Name. The sequence ta n u is defined by a and a n (a) Prove that lim a n exists by showing that ta n u is bounded and monotonic and invoking an appropriate result.
More informationLecture Notes 1 Basic Concepts of Mathematics MATH 352
Lecture Notes 1 Basic Concepts of Mathematics MATH 352 Ivan Avramidi New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology Socorro, NM 87801 June 3, 2004 Author: Ivan Avramidi; File: absmath.tex; Date: June 11,
More informationStructure of R. Chapter Algebraic and Order Properties of R
Chapter Structure of R We will re-assemble calculus by first making assumptions about the real numbers. All subsequent results will be rigorously derived from these assumptions. Most of the assumptions
More informationMATH202 Introduction to Analysis (2007 Fall and 2008 Spring) Tutorial Note #7
MATH202 Introduction to Analysis (2007 Fall and 2008 Spring) Tutorial Note #7 Real Number Summary of terminology and theorems: Definition: (Supremum & infimum) A supremum (or least upper bound) of a non-empty
More informationAN INTRODUCTION TO MATHEMATICAL PROOFS NOTES FOR MATH Jimmy T. Arnold
AN INTRODUCTION TO MATHEMATICAL PROOFS NOTES FOR MATH 3034 Jimmy T. Arnold i TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1: The Structure of Mathematical Statements.............................1 1.1. Statements..................................................................
More informationPredicates, Quantifiers and Nested Quantifiers
Predicates, Quantifiers and Nested Quantifiers Predicates Recall the example of a non-proposition in our first presentation: 2x=1. Let us call this expression P(x). P(x) is not a proposition because x
More informationProofs. Chapter 2 P P Q Q
Chapter Proofs In this chapter we develop three methods for proving a statement. To start let s suppose the statement is of the form P Q or if P, then Q. Direct: This method typically starts with P. Then,
More information{x : P (x)} P (x) = x is a cat
1. Sets, relations and functions. 1.1. Set theory. We assume the reader is familiar with elementary set theory as it is used in mathematics today. Nonetheless, we shall now give a careful treatment of
More informationUpper and Lower Bounds
James K. Peterson Department of Biological Sciences and Department of Mathematical Sciences Clemson University August 30, 2017 Outline 1 2 s 3 Basic Results 4 Homework Let S be a set of real numbers. We
More informationThat is, there is an element
Section 3.1: Mathematical Induction Let N denote the set of natural numbers (positive integers). N = {1, 2, 3, 4, } Axiom: If S is a nonempty subset of N, then S has a least element. That is, there is
More informationT i t l e o f t h e w o r k : L a M a r e a Y o k o h a m a. A r t i s t : M a r i a n o P e n s o t t i ( P l a y w r i g h t, D i r e c t o r )
v e r. E N G O u t l i n e T i t l e o f t h e w o r k : L a M a r e a Y o k o h a m a A r t i s t : M a r i a n o P e n s o t t i ( P l a y w r i g h t, D i r e c t o r ) C o n t e n t s : T h i s w o
More informationLecture 2: Period Three Implies Chaos
Dynamical Systems Instructor: Padraic Bartlett Lecture 2: Period Three Implies Chaos Week 3 Mathcamp 2014 We ended our last class by proving the following result (whose name I found while doing some research
More informationProofs. Chapter 2 P P Q Q
Chapter Proofs In this chapter we develop three methods for proving a statement. To start let s suppose the statement is of the form P Q or if P, then Q. Direct: This method typically starts with P. Then,
More informationHomework for MATH 4603 (Advanced Calculus I) Fall Homework 13: Due on Tuesday 15 December. Homework 12: Due on Tuesday 8 December
Homework for MATH 4603 (Advanced Calculus I) Fall 2015 Homework 13: Due on Tuesday 15 December 49. Let D R, f : D R and S D. Let a S (acc S). Assume that f is differentiable at a. Let g := f S. Show that
More informationQuantifier elimination
Quantifier elimination Definition We say that a theory T has quantifier elimination if for any formula ϕp xq and ɛ 0 there is a quantifier-free formula ψp xq such that sup ϕp xq ψp xq ɛ x holds in all
More informationEssential Background for Real Analysis I (MATH 5210)
Background Material 1 Essential Background for Real Analysis I (MATH 5210) Note. These notes contain several definitions, theorems, and examples from Analysis I (MATH 4217/5217) which you must know for
More informationLecture 4. Algebra, continued Section 2: Lattices and Boolean algebras
V. Borschev and B. Partee, September 21-26, 2006 p. 1 Lecture 4. Algebra, continued Section 2: Lattices and Boolean algebras CONTENTS 1. Lattices.... 1 1.0. Why lattices?... 1 1.1. Posets... 1 1.1.1. Upper
More informationA. Propositional Logic
CmSc 175 Discrete Mathematics A. Propositional Logic 1. Statements (Propositions ): Statements are sentences that claim certain things. Can be either true or false, but not both. Propositional logic deals
More informationApproximation Algorithms using Allegories and Coq
Approximation Algorithms using Allegories and Coq Durjay Chowdhury Supervisor: Dr. Michael Winter Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Department of Computer
More informationa. ~p : if p is T, then ~p is F, and vice versa
Lecture 10: Propositional Logic II Philosophy 130 3 & 8 November 2016 O Rourke & Gibson I. Administrative A. Group papers back to you on November 3. B. Questions? II. The Meaning of the Conditional III.
More informationIntroduction. Itaï Ben-Yaacov C. Ward Henson. September American Institute of Mathematics Workshop. Continuous logic Continuous model theory
Itaï Ben-Yaacov C. Ward Henson American Institute of Mathematics Workshop September 2006 Outline Continuous logic 1 Continuous logic 2 The metric on S n (T ) Origins Continuous logic Many classes of (complete)
More information1.4 Outer measures 10 CHAPTER 1. MEASURE
10 CHAPTER 1. MEASURE 1.3.6. ( Almost everywhere and null sets If (X, A, µ is a measure space, then a set in A is called a null set (or µ-null if its measure is 0. Clearly a countable union of null sets
More informationAnalysis I. Classroom Notes. H.-D. Alber
Analysis I Classroom Notes H-D Alber Contents 1 Fundamental notions 1 11 Sets 1 12 Product sets, relations 5 13 Composition of statements 7 14 Quantifiers, negation of statements 9 2 Real numbers 11 21
More informationLogic and Modelling. Introduction to Predicate Logic. Jörg Endrullis. VU University Amsterdam
Logic and Modelling Introduction to Predicate Logic Jörg Endrullis VU University Amsterdam Predicate Logic In propositional logic there are: propositional variables p, q, r,... that can be T or F In predicate
More informationWarmup Recall, a group H is cyclic if H can be generated by a single element. In other words, there is some element x P H for which Multiplicative
Warmup Recall, a group H is cyclic if H can be generated by a single element. In other words, there is some element x P H for which Multiplicative notation: H tx l l P Zu xxy, Additive notation: H tlx
More informationWe say that the function f obtains a maximum value provided that there. We say that the function f obtains a minimum value provided that there
Math 311 W08 Day 10 Section 3.2 Extreme Value Theorem (It s EXTREME!) 1. Definition: For a function f: D R we define the image of the function to be the set f(d) = {y y = f(x) for some x in D} We say that
More informationDR.RUPNATHJI( DR.RUPAK NATH )
Contents 1 Sets 1 2 The Real Numbers 9 3 Sequences 29 4 Series 59 5 Functions 81 6 Power Series 105 7 The elementary functions 111 Chapter 1 Sets It is very convenient to introduce some notation and terminology
More informationNOTES WEEK 14 DAY 2 SCOT ADAMS
NOTES WEEK 14 DAY 2 SCOT ADAMS We igligt tat it s possible to ave two topological spaces and a continuous bijection from te one to te oter wose inverse is not continuous: Let I : r0, 2πq and let C : tpx,
More information1. Supremum and Infimum Remark: In this sections, all the subsets of R are assumed to be nonempty.
1. Supremum and Infimum Remark: In this sections, all the subsets of R are assumed to be nonempty. Let E be a subset of R. We say that E is bounded above if there exists a real number U such that x U for
More information1. Examples. We did most of the following in class in passing. Now compile all that data.
SOLUTIONS Math A4900 Homework 12 11/22/2017 1. Examples. We did most of the following in class in passing. Now compile all that data. (a) Favorite examples: Let R tr, Z, Z{3Z, Z{6Z, M 2 prq, Rrxs, Zrxs,
More information1.3. The Completeness Axiom.
13 The Completeness Axiom 1 13 The Completeness Axiom Note In this section we give the final Axiom in the definition of the real numbers, R So far, the 8 axioms we have yield an ordered field We have seen
More informationTopic #3 Predicate Logic. Predicate Logic
Predicate Logic Predicate Logic Predicate logic is an extension of propositional logic that permits concisely reasoning about whole classes of entities. Propositional logic treats simple propositions (sentences)
More informationAPPROXIMATE HOMOMORPHISMS BETWEEN THE BOOLEAN CUBE AND GROUPS OF PRIME ORDER
APPROXIMATE HOMOMORPHISMS BETWEEN THE BOOLEAN CUBE AND GROUPS OF PRIME ORDER TOM SANDERS The purpose of this note is to highlight a question raised by Shachar Lovett [Lov], and to offer some motivation
More informationBackground on Metric Geometry, I. Facundo Mémoli Math and CSE Departments, OSU.
Math and CSE Departments, OSU. memoli@math.osu.edu 2014 Table of Contents 1. metric A question about nets metric metric : a first metric 2. Bibliography metric metric Burago, Burago and Ivanov s book [BBI01].
More informationThe Emptiness Problem for Valence Automata or: Another Decidable Extension of Petri Nets
The Emptiness Problem for Valence Automata or: Another Decidable Extension of Petri Nets Georg Zetzsche Technische Universität Kaiserslautern Reachability Problems 2015 Georg Zetzsche (TU KL) Emptiness
More informationDS-GA 1002: PREREQUISITES REVIEW SOLUTIONS VLADIMIR KOBZAR
DS-GA 2: PEEQUISIES EVIEW SOLUIONS VLADIMI KOBZA he following is a selection of questions (drawn from Mr. Bernstein s notes) for reviewing the prerequisites for DS-GA 2. Questions from Ch, 8, 9 and 2 of
More informationSemantic Groundedness I: Kripke and Yablo
Semantic Groundedness I: Kripke and Yablo Jönne Speck 21st April 2012 The full Tarski T-schema leads to paradox. It is consistent, if restricted to sentences without truth predicate but we want more. What
More information1. For each statement, either state that it is True or else Give a Counterexample: (a) If a < b and c < d then a c < b d.
Name: Instructions. Show all work in the space provided. Indicate clearly if you continue on the back side, and write your name at the top of the scratch sheet if you will turn it in for grading. No books
More informationExtensive Form Abstract Economies and Generalized Perfect Recall
Extensive Form Abstract Economies and Generalized Perfect Recall Nicholas Butler Princeton University July 30, 2015 Nicholas Butler (Princeton) EFAE and Generalized Perfect Recall July 30, 2015 1 / 1 Motivation
More informationCauchy Sequences. x n = 1 ( ) 2 1 1, . As you well know, k! n 1. 1 k! = e, = k! k=0. k = k=1
Cauchy Sequences The Definition. I will introduce the main idea by contrasting three sequences of rational numbers. In each case, the universal set of numbers will be the set Q of rational numbers; all
More informationDiscrete Mathematics
Department of Mathematics National Cheng Kung University 2008 2.4: The use of Quantifiers Definition (2.5) A declarative sentence is an open statement if 1) it contains one or more variables, and 1 ) quantifier:
More informationTHE LOGIC OF QUANTIFIED STATEMENTS. Predicates and Quantified Statements I. Predicates and Quantified Statements I CHAPTER 3 SECTION 3.
CHAPTER 3 THE LOGIC OF QUANTIFIED STATEMENTS SECTION 3.1 Predicates and Quantified Statements I Copyright Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. Copyright Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. Predicates
More informationCharacterizing First Order Logic
Characterizing First Order Logic Jared Holshouser, Originally by Lindstrom September 16, 2014 We are following the presentation of Chang and Keisler. 1 A Brief Review of First Order Logic Definition 1.
More informationApproximation in the Zygmund Class
Approximation in the Zygmund Class Odí Soler i Gibert Joint work with Artur Nicolau Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona New Developments in Complex Analysis and Function Theory, 02 July 2018 Approximation
More informationECS 20: Discrete Mathematics for Computer Science UC Davis Phillip Rogaway June 12, Final Exam
ECS 20: Discrete Mathematics for Computer Science Handout F UC Davis Phillip Rogaway June 12, 2000 Final Exam Instructions: Read the questions carefully; maybe I m not asking what you assume me to be asking!
More informationSection 2.5 : The Completeness Axiom in R
Section 2.5 : The Completeness Axiom in R The rational numbers and real numbers are closely related. The set Q of rational numbers is countable and the set R of real numbers is not, and in this sense there
More informationRandom Variables. Andreas Klappenecker. Texas A&M University
Random Variables Andreas Klappenecker Texas A&M University 1 / 29 What is a Random Variable? Random variables are functions that associate a numerical value to each outcome of an experiment. For instance,
More information03 Review of First-Order Logic
CAS 734 Winter 2014 03 Review of First-Order Logic William M. Farmer Department of Computing and Software McMaster University 18 January 2014 What is First-Order Logic? First-order logic is the study of
More informationEntropy and Ergodic Theory Lecture 27: Sinai s factor theorem
Entropy and Ergodic Theory Lecture 27: Sinai s factor theorem What is special about Bernoulli shifts? Our main result in Lecture 26 is weak containment with retention of entropy. If ra Z, µs and rb Z,
More informationBasic Algebraic Logic
ELTE 2013. September Today Past 1 Universal Algebra 1 Algebra 2 Transforming Algebras... Past 1 Homomorphism 2 Subalgebras 3 Direct products 3 Varieties 1 Algebraic Model Theory 1 Term Algebras 2 Meanings
More informationQuantifiers For and There exists D
Quantifiers For all @ and There exists D A quantifier is a phrase that tells you how many objects you re talking about. Good for pinning down conditional statements. For every real number x P R, wehavex
More informationUnderstand the formal definitions of quotient and remainder.
Learning Module 01 Integer Arithmetic and Divisibility 1 1 Objectives. Review the properties of arithmetic operations. Understand the concept of divisibility. Understand the formal definitions of quotient
More informationGround States are generically a periodic orbit
Gonzalo Contreras CIMAT Guanajuato, Mexico Ergodic Optimization and related topics USP, Sao Paulo December 11, 2013 Expanding map X compact metric space. T : X Ñ X an expanding map i.e. T P C 0, Dd P Z`,
More informationPeano Arithmetic. CSC 438F/2404F Notes (S. Cook) Fall, Goals Now
CSC 438F/2404F Notes (S. Cook) Fall, 2008 Peano Arithmetic Goals Now 1) We will introduce a standard set of axioms for the language L A. The theory generated by these axioms is denoted PA and called Peano
More informationTHEORY OF PROBABILITY VLADIMIR KOBZAR
THEORY OF PROBABILITY VLADIMIR KOBZAR Lecture 3 - Axioms of Probability I Sample Space and Events. In probability theory, an experiment is any situation which has several possible outcomes, exactly one
More information1 The Real Number System
1 The Real Number System The rational numbers are beautiful, but are not big enough for various purposes, and the set R of real numbers was constructed in the late nineteenth century, as a kind of an envelope
More informationSingular integral operators and the Riesz transform
Singular integral operators and the Riesz transform Jordan Bell jordan.bell@gmail.com Department of Mathematics, University of Toronto November 17, 017 1 Calderón-Zygmund kernels Let ω n 1 be the measure
More informationReexamining Sequential Rationality in Games with Imperfect Recall
Reexamining Sequential Rationality in Games with Imperfect Recall Nicholas Butler Princeton University October 7, 2015 Nicholas Butler ( Princeton University) Sequential Rationality 1 / 1 Motivation Imperfect
More informationMAT 570 REAL ANALYSIS LECTURE NOTES. Contents. 1. Sets Functions Countability Axiom of choice Equivalence relations 9
MAT 570 REAL ANALYSIS LECTURE NOTES PROFESSOR: JOHN QUIGG SEMESTER: FALL 204 Contents. Sets 2 2. Functions 5 3. Countability 7 4. Axiom of choice 8 5. Equivalence relations 9 6. Real numbers 9 7. Extended
More informationJUSTIFYING BOOLE S ALGEBRA of LOGIC for CLASSES
Outline The Paradigm The Starting Point Boole s Partial Algebras Boole s Translations Laws and Rules of Inference Characteristic Functions Signed Multisets NCR 1 R01 Horn Formulas Relativizing Quantifiers
More informationSTA2112F99 ε δ Review
STA2112F99 ε δ Review 1. Sequences of real numbers Definition: Let a 1, a 2,... be a sequence of real numbers. We will write a n a, or lim a n = a, if for n all ε > 0, there exists a real number N such
More informationEconomics 204 Summer/Fall 2011 Lecture 5 Friday July 29, 2011
Economics 204 Summer/Fall 2011 Lecture 5 Friday July 29, 2011 Section 2.6 (cont.) Properties of Real Functions Here we first study properties of functions from R to R, making use of the additional structure
More informationFunctions. Ex. f : R 0 Ñ R 0 defined by x fiñ x 2.
Functions Let f : X Ñ Y be a function. Recall, the image of f is fpxq ty P Y fpxq y for some x P Xu. Further, f is... injective if at most one x P X maps to each y P Y,i.e. if fpx q fpx q then x x. Ex.
More informationMat 243 Exam 1 Review
OBJECTIVES (Review problems: on next page) 1.1 Distinguish between propositions and non-propositions. Know the truth tables (i.e., the definitions) of the logical operators,,,, and Write truth tables for
More informationThis exam contains 5 pages (including this cover page) and 4 questions. The total number of points is 100. Grade Table
MAT25-2 Summer Session 2 207 Practice Final August 24th, 207 Time Limit: Hour 40 Minutes Name: Instructor: Nathaniel Gallup This exam contains 5 pages (including this cover page) and 4 questions. The total
More informationSets and Motivation for Boolean algebra
SET THEORY Basic concepts Notations Subset Algebra of sets The power set Ordered pairs and Cartesian product Relations on sets Types of relations and their properties Relational matrix and the graph of
More informationTheory of Computation
Theory of Computation Prof. Michael Mascagni Florida State University Department of Computer Science 1 / 33 This course aims to cover... the development of computability theory using an extremely simple
More informationIntro to Logic and Proofs
Intro to Logic and Proofs Propositions A proposition is a declarative sentence (that is, a sentence that declares a fact) that is either true or false, but not both. Examples: It is raining today. Washington
More informationL E C T U R E 2 1 : P R O P E RT I E S O F M AT R I X T R A N S F O R M AT I O N S I I. Wednesday, November 30
L E C T U R E 2 1 : P R O P E RT I E S O F M AT R I X T R A N S F O R M AT I O N S I I Wednesday, November 30 1 the range of a linear transformation Let s begin by defining the range of a linear transformation.
More informationPredicate Logic. Andreas Klappenecker
Predicate Logic Andreas Klappenecker Predicates A function P from a set D to the set Prop of propositions is called a predicate. The set D is called the domain of P. Example Let D=Z be the set of integers.
More informationMath LM (24543) Lectures 01
Math 32300 LM (24543) Lectures 01 Ethan Akin Office: NAC 6/287 Phone: 650-5136 Email: ethanakin@earthlink.net Spring, 2018 Contents Introduction, Ross Chapter 1 and Appendix The Natural Numbers N and The
More information6c Lecture 14: May 14, 2014
6c Lecture 14: May 14, 2014 11 Compactness We begin with a consequence of the completeness theorem. Suppose T is a theory. Recall that T is satisfiable if there is a model M T of T. Recall that T is consistent
More informationPredicate Logic. CSE 191, Class Note 02: Predicate Logic Computer Sci & Eng Dept SUNY Buffalo
Predicate Logic CSE 191, Class Note 02: Predicate Logic Computer Sci & Eng Dept SUNY Buffalo c Xin He (University at Buffalo) CSE 191 Discrete Structures 1 / 22 Outline 1 From Proposition to Predicate
More informationPredicate Calculus lecture 1
Predicate Calculus lecture 1 Section 1.3 Limitation of Propositional Logic Consider the following reasoning All cats have tails Gouchi is a cat Therefore, Gouchi has tail. MSU/CSE 260 Fall 2009 1 MSU/CSE
More informationMath 5801 General Topology and Knot Theory
Lecture 3-8/27/2012 Math 5801 Ohio State University August 27, 2012 Course Info Textbook (required) J. R. Munkres, Topology (2nd Edition), Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 2000. ISBN-10: 0131816292
More informationRelations. Relations. Definition. Let A and B be sets.
Relations Relations. Definition. Let A and B be sets. A relation R from A to B is a subset R A B. If a A and b B, we write a R b if (a, b) R, and a /R b if (a, b) / R. A relation from A to A is called
More informationHomework for MATH 4604 (Advanced Calculus II) Spring 2017
Homework for MATH 4604 (Advanced Calculus II) Spring 2017 Homework 14: Due on Tuesday 2 May 55. Let m, n P N, A P R mˆn and v P R n. Show: L A pvq 2 ď A 2 v 2. 56. Let n P N and let A P R nˆn. Let I n
More information1 FUNDAMENTALS OF LOGIC NO.10 HERBRAND THEOREM Tatsuya Hagino hagino@sfc.keio.ac.jp lecture URL https://vu5.sfc.keio.ac.jp/slide/ 2 So Far Propositional Logic Logical connectives (,,, ) Truth table Tautology
More informationETIKA V PROFESII PSYCHOLÓGA
P r a ž s k á v y s o k á š k o l a p s y c h o s o c i á l n í c h s t u d i í ETIKA V PROFESII PSYCHOLÓGA N a t á l i a S l o b o d n í k o v á v e d ú c i p r á c e : P h D r. M a r t i n S t r o u
More informationarxiv: v6 [math.nt] 6 Nov 2015
arxiv:1406.0429v6 [math.nt] 6 Nov 2015 Periodicity related to a sieve method of producing primes Haifeng Xu, Zuyi Zhang, Jiuru Zhou November 9, 2015 Abstract In this paper we consider a slightly different
More informationPhilosophy 240 Symbolic Logic Russell Marcus Hamilton College Fall 2014
Philosophy 240 Symbolic Logic Russell Marcus Hamilton College Fall 2014 Class #23 - Translation into Predicate Logic II ( 3.2) Only as a Quantifier P Only Ps are Qs is logically equivalent to all Qs are
More information4130 HOMEWORK 4. , a 2
4130 HOMEWORK 4 Due Tuesday March 2 (1) Let N N denote the set of all sequences of natural numbers. That is, N N = {(a 1, a 2, a 3,...) : a i N}. Show that N N = P(N). We use the Schröder-Bernstein Theorem.
More informationPrinciple of Mathematical Induction
Advanced Calculus I. Math 451, Fall 2016, Prof. Vershynin Principle of Mathematical Induction 1. Prove that 1 + 2 + + n = 1 n(n + 1) for all n N. 2 2. Prove that 1 2 + 2 2 + + n 2 = 1 n(n + 1)(2n + 1)
More informationFirst-Order Predicate Logic. Basics
First-Order Predicate Logic Basics 1 Syntax of predicate logic: terms A variable is a symbol of the form x i where i = 1, 2, 3.... A function symbol is of the form fi k where i = 1, 2, 3... und k = 0,
More informationLING 106. Knowledge of Meaning Lecture 3-1 Yimei Xiang Feb 6, Propositional logic
LING 106. Knowledge of Meaning Lecture 3-1 Yimei Xiang Feb 6, 2016 Propositional logic 1 Vocabulary of propositional logic Vocabulary (1) a. Propositional letters: p, q, r, s, t, p 1, q 1,..., p 2, q 2,...
More information