Exploration of Compact Stellarators as Power Plants: Initial Results from ARIES-CS Study
|
|
- Tracey Houston
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Exploration of Compact Stellarators as Power Plants: Initial Results from ARIES-CS Study Farrokh Najmabadi, Long-Poe Ku Jim Lyon, Rene Raffray, and the ARIES Team September 23, 2004 OFES Electronic copy: UCSD IFE Web Site:
2 For ARIES Publications, see: For ARIES Publications, see:
3 Exploration and Optimization of Compact Stellarators as Power Plants -- Motivations Timeliness: Initiation of of NCSX NCSX and and QPS QPS experiments in in US; US; PE PE experiments in injapan (LHD) (LHD) and and Germany (W7X (W7X under under construction). Progress in in our our theoretical understanding, new new experimental results, results, and and development of of a a host host of of sophisticated physics physics tools. tools. Benefits: Such Such a a study study will will advance advance physics physics and and technology of of compact stellarator concept concept and and addresses concept concept attractiveness issues issues that that are are best best addressed in in the the context context of of power power plant plant studies, studies, e.g., e.g., α particle particle loss loss Divertor (location, particle particle and and energy energy distribution and and management) Practical coil coil configurations. NCSX NCSX and and QPS QPS plasma/coil configurations are are optimized for for most most flexibility for for scientific investigations at at PoP PoPscale. Optimum plasma/coil configuration for for a a power power plant plant (or (or even even a a PE PE experiment) will will be be different. Identification of of such such optimum configuration will will help help define define key key R&D R&D for for compact stellarator research research program.
4 ARIES-Compact Stellarator Program Has Three Phases FY03/FY04: Exploration of of Plasma/coil Configuration and and Engineering Options Develop physics physics requirements and and modules (power (power balance, balance, stability, α FY04/FY05: Exploration of of confinement, divertor, etc.) etc.) Configuration Design Design Space Space Develop engineering requirements and and Physics: Physics: β, β, aspect aspect ratio, ratio, number number of of constraints. periods, periods, rotational transform, sheer, sheer, etc. etc Explore Explore attractive coil coil topologies Engineering: configuration optimization, management of of space space between between plasma plasma and and coils, coils, etc. etc Choose Choose one one configuration for for detailed detailed design. design. FY05/FY06: Detailed system system design design and and optimization
5 Configuration Development for ARIES Compact Stellarator Reactors Long-Poe Ku Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Department of Energy, Office of Fusion Energy Sciences September 23, 2004
6 Outline of Presentation What we have been studying and why, what our goals are. How we do it. Highlight of results. What s next.
7 The discovery of quasi-axially symmetric stellarators opens up the possibility of designing fusion reactors that have tokamak transport and stellarator stability. In 3-D magnetic field topology, particle drift trajectories depend only on the strength of the magnetic field, not on the vector components of the field nor on the shape of the magnetic flux surfaces. QA tokamak-like field topology good particle confinement. Stellarators with externally supplied poloidal flux have shown resilience to plasma disruption and the achieved β s have exceeded limits predicted by linear MHD theories. QA can be achieved at lower aspect ratios with smaller number of field periods. more compact device (R<10 m), bootstrap can be used to our advantage to supplement rotational transform, shown to have favorable MHD stability at high beta.
8 There are many stellarator reactors studied in the past based on a variety of confinement concepts but all have large sizes. We aim at QA reactors having sizes competitive with advanced tokamaks. Helias Reactors based on the concept of W7X (linked mirror, omnigeneous): HSR5/22, 5-field period, A=10, R=22 m, B=5 T, B max =10 T, P f =3 GW, β~4%. HSR4/18, 4-field period, A=8, R=18 m. HSR3/15, 3-field period, A=6, R=15 m. SPPS, Modular Helias-like Heliac (QA) MHH4, 4-field period, A=8.54, R=13.95 m, B=4.94 T, B max =14.5 T. Haliotron/Torsatron (classical l=2 stellarator) FFHR, 10-field period, A=10, R=10-20 m.
9 Tokamak-like magnetic field topology can be achieved approximately by three dimensional shaping of the plasma without relying on toroidal current. Because we can only find approximate solutions, configurations are not unique. The normally over-determined system allows one to impose further constraints, such as MHD stability to the kink or ballooning modes, the shape and magnitude of rotational transform and so on, in the solution. Optimization of solution is sought once a set of constraints are defined. The configuration space is immense, however.
10 Plasma boundary represented as Fourier harmonics ballooning kink α loss transport shape/position coil complexity Plasma optimization Initial guess, boundary as independent variables Constraints/weights 1) Evaluate equilibrium (VMEC, NSTAB), 2) Jacobian calculation, 3) determine direction of descent, 4) perform functional minimization (Levenberg-Marquardt, GA). 1) Select p, J profiles, β, B, FP 2) Iota target 3) MHD stability target (Mercier, ballooning, kink) 4) Transport target (QA, ripple) 5) Coil target (complexity, current density) Targets met? Yes No Modify weights Flux surface quality, islands healing, PIES Refined calculation and detailed analysis
11 An important element in our effort is to find coils that would produce the desirable plasma with low complexity and good engineering properties. For coil design, we want, on the last closed magnetic surface, B norm (coil) = -B norm (plasma pressure) In seeking the solution, we also try to maximize min (coil-plasma), min (coil-coil) and minimize B max /B 0 to the extent possible. Again, optimization process is invoked since there may involve a large number of independent variables (> 100) as well as constraints.
12 Coil Design and Optimization 1) Winding surface 2) Number of coils 3) Coil representation 4) Coil currents Constraints & weights 1) Radius of curvature 2) Coil-coil separation 3) Coil plasma separation 4) Coil length 5) Linear current density 6) Coil currents Initial coil parameters Evaluate B n from coils, calculate residual B n on LCFS, calculate Jacobian, find direction of descent, perform functional minimization (LM). Target met? Yes No Equilibrium data from optimized plasma Evaluate B n due to plasma current on LCFS Modify weights
13 We have refined, improved and expand configurations developed in the NCSX project and discovered new classes of configurations as well. We have explored configuration space with respect to plasma aspect ratio, number of field periods, rotational transform both magnitude and shear, vacuum magnetic well depth, linear and non-linear MHD stabilities. We have devised ways to minimize the loss of α particles. We have investigated ways to mitigate the problem of magnetic islands and methods to improve flux surface integrity. We have studied coil topology to improve their overall physics and engineering performance.
14 Three classes of QA configurations may be of interest for further reactor studies. NCSX-like SNS-QA MHH-2 These are not the only possibilities, nor are they the only configurations we studied.
15 NCSX-like configurations Good QA, low effective ripple (<1%), α energy loss 15% in 1000 m 3 device. Stable to MHD modes at β 4% Coils can be designed with aspect ratio 6 and are able to yield plasmas that capture all essential physics properties. Resonance perturbation can be minimized. Footprints of escaping α on LCMS for the α- loss improved configuration B5D. Energy loss ~12% in model calculation. Optimization of modular coils has led to configurations with coil aspect ratios < 6, hence reactors of smaller sizes are realizable. Poloidal Angle Toroidal Angle Heat load maybe localized and high (~a few MW/m 2 ) For R=8.25 m min (c-p)=1.4 m min (c-c)=0.83 m I max =16.4 T B max /B 0 ~2 for 0.4 m x 0.4 m conductor
16 SNS-QA configurations Aimed particularly at having good flux surface quality. Characterized by strong negative magnetic shear from shaping coils. Have excellent QA and good α confinement characteristic (loss ~10%). Inherently deep magnetic well in 2 and 3 field periods. 3/16 3/17 2/11 Total including bootstrap current expected at 6% β A case having excellent flux surface quality has been identified at 6% β. Rotational Transform 1/6 2/13 1/7 2/15 1/8 Transform due to 3D shaping Poincaré plot for KJC167 based on a PIES calculation. Normalized Toroidal Flux Label
17 MHH2 Small plasma aspect ratio (A<3.5) in 2 field periods. Simple shape, clean coils. MHH2 with A=3.7 and 16 coils MHH2 with A=2.7 and 8 coils
18 Summary The physics basis of QA as candidate for compact stellarator reactors has been assessed. New configurations have been developed, others refined and improved, all aimed at low plasma aspect ratios, hence compact size at a given fusion power. Configurations with excellent QA have been found with A 6. Configurations with both 2 and 3 field periods possible. Progress has been made to reduce loss of α particles. Losses ~10% have been achieved. This is still higher than desirable, however. Numerical calculations using codes based on linear, ideal MHD theories show that stability to the kink, ballooning, and Mercier modes may be attained in most cases but at the expense of reduced QA and increased complexity of plasma shape. Recent experimental results indicated that linear, ideal MHD stability theories may be too pessimistic, however. Modular coils are designed to examine the geometric complexity and to understand the constraints imposed by the maximum allowable field, desirable coil-plasma separation, coil-coil spacing, and other coil parameters. Adequate space available for blanket/shield without the need of having unduly large reactors, although in some cases ingenuity needed in designs. Strong incentive to simplify coils for remote maintenance without compromising the fundamental requirement of meeting physics objectives.
19 .. And beyond Codes and numerical issues and configuration robustness Development of configurations relies on numerical calculations. There are assumptions/approximations, numerical errors, etc. How robust a configuration is? How we can make it more robust? Existence of nested flux surfaces, number of Fourier modes, convergence, etc. Codes for equilibrium and stability calculations (NSTAB, VMEC, ) Data base and adequacy of physics basis There are no data yet for QA devices. Data from other types of stellarators are encouraging, especially with respect to MHD stability (experiments exceed prediction based on linear theory). How we should extrapolate the available data in designing reactors years away? Have we sampled enough configuration space? Are there attractive regions missed? It requires tremendous resource to survey the landscape. We only manage to explore a little farther from where we were. How about other symmetries? Do other symmetries necessarily conflict with compactness? Can we take advantage of other symmetry approach?
20 There Are Unique Integration Issues Associated with a Compact Stellarator Maintenance and assembly - 3-D assessment of possible schemes (field-period based and port-based) Coil structure Shielding requirement (minimum distance) Alpha losses and impact on PFC - Divertor Power core - Scoping analysis of possible concepts (blanket/shield thickness, size, performance) September 23, 2004/ARR
21 Initial Configurations for ARIES-CS Phase I Scoping Studies Parameter 3-field period (NCSX) 2-field period (MHH2) Coil-plasma distance, (m) <R> (m) <a> (m) Aspect ratio β (%) Number of coils 18 16* B o (T) B max (T) Fusion power (GW) 2 2 Avg. wall load (MW/m 2 ) September *Cases 23, 2004/ARR of 12 and 8 coils also considered for 2-field period configuration.
22 Coil Structure Design for CS to Accommodate Load within One Field Period and Provide Openings for Coolant and Support Access Planar coil for illustration Actual geometry No net forces between coils from one field period to the other. Out-of plane forces acting between neighbouring coils inside a field period reacted by inter-coil structure. Large centering forces need to be reacted by strong bucking cylinder. Design can be adapted to be used with either field-period-based or port-based maintenance schemes. September 23, 2004/ARR
23 Field-Period Based Maintenance Scheme With External Vacuum Vessel Radial movement of a field period unit without disassembling coils in order to avoid unacceptably long down time. Key issue is minimum distance between plasma and coil for clearance (3-D assessment to demonstrate possibility). Advantage of nearly no weight limit on blanket (use of air cushions) but local limit on thickness of blanket for clearance However, better suited for 3-field period or more because of scale of field period unit movement. Cross section of 3 field-period configuration at 0 illustrating the layout for field-period based maintenance. September 23, 2004/ARR
24 Port-Based Maintenance Approach ITER-like rail system extremely challenging in CS geometry due to roller coaster effect and to non-uniform plasma shape and space Preferable to design maintenance based on articulated boom only - required reach a function of machine size and number of ports Maintenance through limited number of ports - Compatible with 2 or 3 field-period - Constraints on module weight Maintenance through ports between each pair of adjacent coil - Seems only possible with 2-field period for reasonable-size reactor (space availability) - heavier blanket module possible September 23, 2004/ARR
25 ARIES-CS Divertor Further effort to minimize alpha losses Need tools to estimate location and heat fluxes - Collaboration with Garching colleagues (Dr. Erika Strumberger - Code development under way (H. McGuinness from RPI in Garching and then working visit at UCSD) - Suite of codes to be adapted for ARIES-CS: MFBE + GOURDON + GEOM He cooling most probably for ARIES-CS divertor - Compatible with He coolant for blanket - Collaboration with FZK on divertor design (T. Ihli as visiting scientist at UCSD for 6 months next year to work on this) Major effort for Phase II September 23, 2004/ARR
26 We have Performed a Scoping Study of Possible Blanket Concepts Most Applicable for a Compact Stellarator Key parameters - Thickness of blanket as compared to available space - Possibility of design based on modular and/or larger unit (module size and weight important for port-based maintenance) - Breeding performance since, to minimize power plant size, we shield-only regions locally where the plasma to coil distance is a minimum (a few % coverage) - Cycle efficiency (emphasizing Brayton cycle to avoid safety concerns associated with steam) We are converging on two concepts: - Self-cooled Pb-17Li concept with SiC f /SiC (ARIES-AT) - Pb-17Li/He dual coolant concept with ferritic steel (similar to ARIES-ST) - Interesting to see that blanket concepts can be adapted to different MFE configurations - Similar concepts have also been studied abroad - Impact of ARIES on design and R&D - e.g. Pb-17Li/He dual coolant concept in EU (FZK) and now for September US ITER 23, 2004/ARR TBM ODS Layers Plated to the FW He System 2 1 Pb-17Li EUROFER Structure (FW+Grids) Shield 1 2 SiC f /SiC Channel Inserts
27 We Have Addressed the Unique Integration Issues Associated with a Compact Stellarator and Help Define Design Windows Maintenance and assembly - Minimum distance between plasma/coil may be set by assembly/maintenance and not by shielding. - Maintenance and assembly scheme influenced by coil configuration (2-field period or 3-field period). Coil structure - A feasible coil support structure has been worked out. Shielding requirement (minimum distance) - Localized shielding is possible while achieving sufficient TBR. Alpha losses and impact on PFC - Divertor is a critical system. High alpha losses is a major concern. Power core - Blankets comparable to those developed for tokamaks can be utilized. September 23, 2004/ARR
28 Results of ARIES-CS Phase I Effort Presented at 16 th TOFE Invited Oral Papers for ARIES Special Session 1. F. Najmabadi and the ARIES Team, Overview of ARIES-CS Compact Stellarator Study 2. P. Garabedian, L. P. Ku, and the ARIES Team, Reactors with Stellarator Stability and Tokamak Transport 3. J.F. Lyon, L. P. Ku, P. Garabedian and the ARIES Team, Optimization of Stellarator Reactor Parameters 4. A. R. Raffray, L. El-Guebaly, S. Malang, X. Wang and the ARIES Team, Attractive Design Approaches for Compact Stellarator 5. L. El-Guebaly, R. Raffray, S. Malang, J. Lyon, L.P. Ku and the ARIES Team, "Benefits of Radial Build Minimization and Requirements Imposed on ARIES-CS Stellarator Design" Contributed Papers 6. L. El-Guebaly, P. Wilson, D. Paige and the ARIES Team, "Initial Activation Assessment for ARIES-CS Stellarator Power Plant" 7. L. El-Guebaly, P. Wilson, D. Paige and the ARIES Team "Views on Clearance Issues Facing Radwaste Management of Fusion Power Plants" 8. S. Abdel-Khalik, S. Shin, M. Yoda, and the ARIES Team, "Design Constraints for Liquid- Protected Divertors" 9. X. Wang, S. Malang, A. R. Raffray and the ARIES Team, Maintenance Approaches for ARIES- CS Power 10. A. R. Raffray, S. Malang, L. El-Guebaly, X. Wang and the ARIES Team, Ceramic Breeder Blanket for ARIES-CS September 23, 2004/ARR
29 Determination of ARIES Compact Stellarator Reactor Parameters J. F. Lyon, ORNL for the ARIES Team OFES ARIES Briefing Sept.23, 2004
30 Goal: Stellarator Reactors Similar in Size to Tokamak Reactors Need a factor of 2-4 reduction => compact stellarators Plasma Aspect Ratio <R>/<a> Tokamak Reactors 2 Compact Stellarator Reactors SPPS LHD-R HSR-4 Stellarator Reactors Average Major Radius <R> (m) HSR-5
31 Interaction between ARIES & CS Programs Integrated Plasma and Coil Optimization NCSX, QPS Experiments Theory Candidate Plasma and Coil Geometry Compact Stellarator Development Determination of Parameters and Assessment as Reactor ARIES CS Study Information to Improve CS Plasma, Coil and Reactor Concept NCSX, QPS Programs Theory Sensitivity to confinement, β limits, profiles, divertor, α losses Attractive Reactor Option
32 Parameter Determination Integrates Plasma/Coil Geometry and Reactor Constraints Plasma & Coil Geometry Shape of last closed flux surface and <R axis >/<a plasma >, β limit?? Shape of modular coils and B max,coil /B axis vs coil cross section, <R coil >/<R axis >, min /<R axis > Alpha-particle loss fraction Reactor Constraints Blanket and shield thickness B max,coil vs j coil for superconductor Acceptable wall power loading Access for assembly/disassembly Component costs/volume Parameter Determination <R axis >, <a plasma >, <B axis > B max,coil, coil cross section, gaps n e,i,z (r),t e,i (r), <β>, P fusion, P rad, etc. Operating point, path to ignition Cost of components, operating cost cost of electricity
33 Staged Approach in Defining Parameters 0-D scoping study determines device parameters calculates <R axis >, <B axis >, <β>, <p n,wall >, B max, j coil, etc. subject to limits and constraints 1-D power balance determines plasma parameters and path to ignition incorporates density and temperature profiles; overall power balance; radiation, conduction, alpha-particle losses 1-D systems cost optimization code calculates self-consistent temperature profiles, power balance calculates reactor component and operating costs Examine sensitivity to models, assumptions and constraints at each stage
34 Four Configurations Have Been Studied NCSX MHH2 port or sector (end) access access through ports QuickTime and a TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor are needed to see this picture. both quasi-axisymmetric Key Configuration Properties NCSX-1 NCSX-2 MHH2-8 MHH2-16 Plasma aspect ratio A p = <R>/<a> Wall (plasma) surface area/<r> Min. plasma-coil separation ratio <R >/ min Min. coil-coil separation ratio <R>/(c-c) min Total coil length/<r> B max,coil /<B axis > for 0.4-m x 0.4-m coil pack <R coil >/<R> constant for each case, can t change separately
35 B max /B axis Depends on Coil Cross Section square coil pack cross section (k = 1) m m m m 2 B max /<B axis > NCSX-2 MHH2-8 MHH2-16 NCSX-1 B max (k)/ B max (1) NCSX-2 with A = m m 2 d 2 = 0.04 m d = (cross section) 1/2, m k = coil width/radial depth Larger plasma-coil spacings lead to more convoluted coils and higher B max /<B axis > Minimum coil-coil separation distance determines k max
36 NCSX-1 Values Limited to p n,max = 5 MW/m 2 j (MA/m 2 ) decreasing d 2 j SC <p > (MW/m 2 ) n,wall B max (T) <R> (m), <B axis > (T) NCSX-1 cases <R> <R > min, blanket <R > min, no blanket <B > axis <p n,wall > (MW/m 2 ) <R> = 6.22 m, <B axis > = 6.48 T, B max = T j coil approximately constant <R>, <B axis >, B max & d are constrained for other cases by radial build to lower <p n,wall > ( MW/m 2 )
37 Main Reactor Parameters from 0-D Study NCSX-1 NCSX-2 MHH2-8 MHH2-16 <p n,wall > (MW/m 2 ) <R> (m) <a> (m) <B axis > (T) B max (T) j coil (MA/m 2 ) k max coil width (m) coil depth (m) radial gap (m) Coil volume (m 3 ) Wall area (m 2 ) Wall (blanket, shield, structure, vacuum vessel) area smallest for NCSX-1case, chosen for more detailed study
38 NCSX-1: τ E /τ E ISS-95 = 4.2, <T> = 9.5 kev, <n> = m 3, <β> = 6.1% H-ISS95 = τ E /τ E ISS ignition contour (P in = 0) operating point 10 thermally stable branch % <β> 2-GW P fus n Sudo P in = 10 MW τ E ISS-95 = 0.26P heating 0.59 <n e > 0.51 <B axis > 0.83 <R> 0.65 <a> 2.21 ι 2/3 0.4
39 Plasma Parameters from 1-D Power Balance NCSX-1 NCSX-2 MHH2-8 MHH2-16 <R> (m) <a> (m) <B axis > (T) H-ISS n (10 20 m 3 ) f DT f He T (kev) β, (%) ISS-95 of 3.75 to 4.2 is required; present stellarator experiments have up to 2.5 ISS-2004 scaling ~ 2 x ISS-95 and has ε eff 0.4 improvement, so compact stellarators should have high H-ISS values
40 H-ISS95 Is Sensitive to Some Assumptions <β> (%) <β> (%) H-ISS95 NCSX-1 Case 4 H-ISS95 NCSX-1 Case Fraction of Alpha-Particle Power Lost τ He */τ E Need to control alpha-particle power loss and helium recycling back into plasma -- both divertor issues Results are relatively insensitive to profile assumptions
41 Next Steps Analysis of newer plasma configurations with low alpha-particle losses when coils are developed Refinement of parameters with the 1-D systems/ cost optimization code
42 Reactor Issues for CS Experiments Density and temperature profiles were assumed What are reasonable transport coefficients (D, χ)? ambipolar electric field? bootstrap current? Is neoclassical impurity model OK? Is n(r) hollow? Required confinement multiplier H-ISS95 is ~ 4 How does confinement scale with plasma and configuration parameters at low aspect ratio? Does quasi-symmetry, smaller ε eff and reduced flow damping lead to improved confinement? β limit is assumed -- no credible model exists What are β limits and dependence on configuration parameters? Power density to the divertor is very high Can power density on the divertor be reduced? Can radiated power to the wall be increased? Alpha-particle losses are high at present What are energetic ion losses? Can they be reduced?
43 Summary Parameter determination integrates plasma & coil geometry with physics & engineering constraints and assumptions Initial results lead to factor ~2 smaller stellarator reactors (<R> = 6 7 m), closer to tokamaks in size Results are relatively insensitive to profile assumptions but sensitive to helium accumulation and alpha-particle losses Next step is to refine results with the 1-D systems/ cost optimization code Study points up uncertainties in reactor physics assumptions that CS experiments can help clarify
44 BACKUP
45 ISS-95 Confinement Scaling Is Being Updated τ ISS 04 v 3 E = 0.148a 2.33 R 0.64 P 0.61 n 0.55 e B 0.85 ι /3 τ Bohm ρ * 0.90 β 0.14 ν * 0.01 b H. Yamada, J. Harris et al. EPS 2004 ~ε eff 0.4? Determine τ E increase with lower ε eff in HSX, NCSX, QPS
46 Systems Optimization Approach Minimizes core cost or size or COE with constraints for a particular plasma and coil geometry using a nonlinear constrained optimizer with a large number of variables Large number of constraints allowed (=, <, or >) P electric, ignition margin, β limit, ISS-95 multiplier, radial build, coil j and B max, plasma-coil distance, blanket and shielding thicknesses, TBR, access for divertors and maintenance, etc. Large number of fixed parameters for plasma and coil configuration, plasma parameters and profiles, transport coefficients, cost component algorithms, and engineering model parameters Calculates (and iterates on) a large number of variables plasma: T e (r), T i (r), n e (r), n e (r), E r (r), β, Z eff, H-ISS95, power components (coronal and bremsstrahlung radiation, α => i, α => e), α losses, etc. coils: max. & min. width/depth of coils, clearance between coils, components volumes and costs, j, B max, forces reactor variables: B 0, <R>, blanket volumes, TBR, neutron wall loading, P electric, divertor area, access between coils, radial build, etc. costs: equipment cost, annual operating cost, total project cost, CoE
47 MHHOPT Reactor Optimization Code input: physics, coil, costing, and reactor component parameters and constraints output: all parameters and profiles plasma solver: T e (r), T i (r), n e (r), n i (r), E r (r), β, Z eff, P rad, P fusion, P α,loss, P wall, P divertor, τ E, etc. nonlinear optimizer: optimizes targets with constraints masses of coil and structure, j, B max blanket volumes, TBR, access, radial build forces on coil and structure evaluate all parameters & constraints costs of all ARIES accounts, P electric
STELLARATOR REACTOR OPTIMIZATION AND ASSESSMENT
STELLARATOR REACTOR OPTIMIZATION AND ASSESSMENT J. F. Lyon, ORNL ARIES Meeting October 2-4, 2002 TOPICS Stellarator Reactor Optimization 0-D Spreadsheet Examples 1-D POPCON Examples 1-D Systems Optimization
More informationOPTIMIZATION OF STELLARATOR REACTOR PARAMETERS
OPTIMIZATION OF STELLARATOR REACTOR PARAMETERS J. F. Lyon, L.P. Ku 2, P. Garabedian, L. El-Guebaly 4, L. Bromberg 5, and the ARIES Team Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, lyonjf@ornl.gov 2 Princeton
More informationOptimization of Compact Stellarator Configuration as Fusion Devices Report on ARIES Research
Optimization of Compact Stellarator Configuration as Fusion Devices Report on ARIES Research Farrokh Najmabadi and the ARIES Team UC San Diego OFES Briefing November 16, 2005 Germantown Electronic copy:
More informationStatus of Physics and Configuration Studies of ARIES-CS. T.K. Mau University of California, San Diego
Status of Physics and Configuration Studies of ARIES-CS T.K. Mau University of California, San Diego L.P. Ku, PPPL J.F. Lyon, ORNL P.R. Garabedian, CIMS/NYU US/Japan Workshop on Power Plant Studies and
More informationSystems Code Status. J. F. Lyon, ORNL. ARIES Meeting April 26, 2006
Systems Code Status J. F. Lyon, ORNL ARIES Meeting April 26, 2006 Topics Status at January meeting and requested revisions and additions Systems code changes since last meeting Parameters for present ARE
More informationDer Stellarator Ein alternatives Einschlusskonzept für ein Fusionskraftwerk
Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik Der Stellarator Ein alternatives Einschlusskonzept für ein Fusionskraftwerk Robert Wolf robert.wolf@ipp.mpg.de www.ipp.mpg.de Contents Magnetic confinement The stellarator
More informationPHYSICS DESIGN FOR ARIES-CS
PHYSICS DESIGN FOR ARIES-CS L. P. KU, a * P. R. GARABEDIAN, b J. LYON, c A. TURNBULL, d A. GROSSMAN, e T. K. MAU, e M. ZARNSTORFF, a and ARIES TEAM a Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory, Princeton University,
More informationAN UPDATE ON DIVERTOR HEAT LOAD ANALYSIS
AN UPDATE ON DIVERTOR HEAT LOAD ANALYSIS T.K. Mau, A. Grossman, A.R. Raffray UC-San Diego H. McGuinness RPI ARIES-CS Project Meeting June 4-5, 5 University of Wisconsin, Madison OUTLINE Divertor design
More informationStatus of Engineering Effort on ARIES-CS Power Core
Status of Engineering Effort on ARIES-CS Power Core Presented by A. René Raffray University of California, San Diego With contributions from L. El-Guebaly, S. Malang, B. Merrill, X. Wang and the ARIES
More informationOverview of Pilot Plant Studies
Overview of Pilot Plant Studies and contributions to FNST Jon Menard, Rich Hawryluk, Hutch Neilson, Stewart Prager, Mike Zarnstorff Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Fusion Nuclear Science and Technology
More informationEU PPCS Models C & D Conceptual Design
Institut für Materialforschung III EU PPCS Models C & D Conceptual Design Presented by P. Norajitra, FZK 1 PPCS Design Studies Strategy definition [D. Maisonnier] 2 models with limited extrapolations Model
More informationDesign window analysis of LHD-type Heliotron DEMO reactors
Design window analysis of LHD-type Heliotron DEMO reactors Fusion System Research Division, Department of Helical Plasma Research, National Institute for Fusion Science Takuya GOTO, Junichi MIYAZAWA, Teruya
More informationStudies of Next-Step Spherical Tokamaks Using High-Temperature Superconductors Jonathan Menard (PPPL)
Studies of Next-Step Spherical Tokamaks Using High-Temperature Superconductors Jonathan Menard (PPPL) 22 nd Topical Meeting on the Technology of Fusion Energy (TOFE) Philadelphia, PA August 22-25, 2016
More information2. STELLARATOR PHYSICS. James F. Lyon James A. Rome John L. Johnson
2. STELLARATOR PHYSICS James F. Lyon James A. Rome John L. Johnson David T. Anderson Paul R. Garabedian Contents 2.1. INTRODUCTION............................... 2-1 2.1.1. Stellarator Advantages and Drawbacks...............
More informationMHD. Jeff Freidberg MIT
MHD Jeff Freidberg MIT 1 What is MHD MHD stands for magnetohydrodynamics MHD is a simple, self-consistent fluid description of a fusion plasma Its main application involves the macroscopic equilibrium
More informationPhysics Considerations in the Design of NCSX *
1 IAEA-CN-94/IC-1 Physics Considerations in the Design of NCSX * G. H. Neilson 1, M. C. Zarnstorff 1, L. P. Ku 1, E. A. Lazarus 2, P. K. Mioduszewski 2, W. A. Cooper 3, M. Fenstermacher 4, E. Fredrickson
More informationPhysics of fusion power. Lecture 14: Anomalous transport / ITER
Physics of fusion power Lecture 14: Anomalous transport / ITER Thursday.. Guest lecturer and international celebrity Dr. D. Gericke will give an overview of inertial confinement fusion.. Instabilities
More informationUtilization of ARIES Systems Code
Utilization of ARIES Systems Code Zoran Dragojlovic, Rene Raffray, Farrokh Najmabadi, Charles Kessel, Leslie Bromberg, Laila El-Guebaly, Les Waganer Discussion Topics Rationale for improvement of systems
More informationRecent Development of LHD Experiment. O.Motojima for the LHD team National Institute for Fusion Science
Recent Development of LHD Experiment O.Motojima for the LHD team National Institute for Fusion Science 4521 1 Primary goal of LHD project 1. Transport studies in sufficiently high n E T regime relevant
More informationDesign concept of near term DEMO reactor with high temperature blanket
Design concept of near term DEMO reactor with high temperature blanket Japan-US Workshop on Fusion Power Plants and Related Advanced Technologies March 16-18, 2009 Tokyo Univ. Mai Ichinose, Yasushi Yamamoto
More informationGA A23168 TOKAMAK REACTOR DESIGNS AS A FUNCTION OF ASPECT RATIO
GA A23168 TOKAMAK REACTOR DESIGNS AS A FUNCTION OF ASPECT RATIO by C.P.C. WONG and R.D. STAMBAUGH JULY 1999 DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United
More informationMultifarious Physics Analyses of the Core Plasma Properties in a Helical DEMO Reactor FFHR-d1
1 FTP/P7-34 Multifarious Physics Analyses of the Core Plasma Properties in a Helical DEMO Reactor FFHR-d1 J. Miyazawa 1, M. Yokoyama 1, Y. Suzuki 1, S. Satake 1, R. Seki 1, Y. Masaoka 2, S. Murakami 2,
More informationActive MHD Control Needs in Helical Configurations
Active MHD Control Needs in Helical Configurations M.C. Zarnstorff 1 Presented by E. Fredrickson 1 With thanks to A. Weller 2, J. Geiger 2, A. Reiman 1, and the W7-AS Team and NBI-Group. 1 Princeton Plasma
More informationDeveloping a Robust Compact Tokamak Reactor by Exploiting New Superconducting Technologies and the Synergistic Effects of High Field D.
Developing a Robust Compact Tokamak Reactor by Exploiting ew Superconducting Technologies and the Synergistic Effects of High Field D. Whyte, MIT Steady-state tokamak fusion reactors would be substantially
More informationINITIAL EVALUATION OF COMPUTATIONAL TOOLS FOR STABILITY OF COMPACT STELLARATOR REACTOR DESIGNS
INITIAL EVALUATION OF COMPUTATIONAL TOOLS FOR STABILITY OF COMPACT STELLARATOR REACTOR DESIGNS A.D. Turnbull and L.L. Lao General Atomics (with contributions from W.A. Cooper and R.G. Storer) Presentation
More informationAspects of Advanced Fuel FRC Fusion Reactors
Aspects of Advanced Fuel FRC Fusion Reactors John F Santarius and Gerald L Kulcinski Fusion Technology Institute Engineering Physics Department CT2016 Irvine, California August 22-24, 2016 santarius@engr.wisc.edu;
More informationFusion Nuclear Science - Pathway Assessment
Fusion Nuclear Science - Pathway Assessment C. Kessel, PPPL ARIES Project Meeting, Bethesda, MD July 29, 2010 Basic Flow of FNS-Pathways Assessment 1. Determination of DEMO/power plant parameters and requirements,
More informationMHD Analysis of Dual Coolant Pb-17Li Blanket for ARIES-CS
MHD Analysis of Dual Coolant Pb-17Li Blanket for ARIES-CS C. Mistrangelo 1, A. R. Raffray 2, and the ARIES Team 1 Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe, 7621 Karlsruhe, Germany, mistrangelo@iket.fzk.de 2 University
More informationA SUPERCONDUCTING TOKAMAK FUSION TRANSMUTATION OF WASTE REACTOR
A SUPERCONDUCTING TOKAMAK FUSION TRANSMUTATION OF WASTE REACTOR A.N. Mauer, W.M. Stacey, J. Mandrekas and E.A. Hoffman Fusion Research Center Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta, GA 30332 1. INTRODUCTION
More informationStudy on supporting structures of magnets and blankets for a heliotron-type type fusion reactors
JA-US Workshop on Fusion Power Plants and Related Advanced Technologies with participation of EU, Jan. 11-13, 2005, Tokyo, Japan. Study on supporting structures of magnets and blankets for a heliotron-type
More informationARIES-AT Blanket and Divertor Design (The Final Stretch)
ARIES-AT Blanket and Divertor Design (The Final Stretch) The ARIES Team Presented by A. René Raffray and Xueren Wang ARIES Project Meeting University of Wisconsin, Madison June 19-21, 2000 Presentation
More informationShear Flow Generation in Stellarators - Configurational Variations
Shear Flow Generation in Stellarators - Configurational Variations D. A. Spong 1), A. S. Ware 2), S. P. Hirshman 1), J. H. Harris 1), L. A. Berry 1) 1) Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee
More informationUS-Japan workshop on Fusion Power Reactor Design and Related Advanced Technologies, March at UCSD.
US-Japan workshop on Fusion Power Reactor Design and Related Advanced Technologies, March 5-7 28 at UCSD. Overview Overview of of Design Design Integration Integration toward toward Optimization -type
More informationDesign Windows and Economic Aspect of Helical Reactor
Design Windows and Economic Aspect of Helical Reactor Y. Kozaki, S. Imagawa, A. Sagara National Institute for Fusion Science, Toki, Japan Japan-US Workshop, Kashiwa, March 16-18,2009 - Background and Objectives
More informationPossibilities for Long Pulse Ignited Tokamak Experiments Using Resistive Magnets
PFC/JA-91-5 Possibilities for Long Pulse Ignited Tokamak Experiments Using Resistive Magnets E. A. Chaniotakis L. Bromberg D. R. Cohn April 25, 1991 Plasma Fusion Center Massachusetts Institute of Technology
More informationConcept of Multi-function Fusion Reactor
Concept of Multi-function Fusion Reactor Presented by Songtao Wu Institute of Plasma Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, P.O. Box 1126, Hefei, Anhui, 230031, P.R. China 1. Motivation 2. MFFR Concept
More informationInnovative fabrication method of superconducting magnets using high T c superconductors with joints
Innovative fabrication method of superconducting magnets using high T c superconductors with joints (for huge and/or complicated coils) Nagato YANAGI LHD & FFHR Group National Institute for Fusion Science,
More informationTokamak/Helical Configurations Related to LHD and CHS-qa
9TH WORKSHOP ON MHD STABILITY CONTROL: "CONTROL OF MHD STABILITY: BACK TO THE BASICS" NOVEMBER 21-23, 2004, PRINCETON PLASMA PHYSICS LABORATORY Tokamak/Helical Configurations Related to LHD and CHS-qa
More informationSystems Code Analysis of HELIAS-type Fusion Reactor and Economic Comparison to Tokamaks
Systems Code Analysis of HELIAS-type Fusion Reactor and Economic Comparison to Tokamaks F. Warmer, S.B. Torrisi, C.D. Beidler, A. Dinklage, Y. Feng, J. Geiger, F. Schauer, Y. Turkin, R. Wolf, P. Xanthopoulos
More informationInnovative Concepts Workshop Austin, Texas February 13-15, 2006
Don Spong Oak Ridge National Laboratory Acknowledgements: Jeff Harris, Hideo Sugama, Shin Nishimura, Andrew Ware, Steve Hirshman, Wayne Houlberg, Jim Lyon Innovative Concepts Workshop Austin, Texas February
More informationRole and Challenges of Fusion Nuclear Science and Technology (FNST) toward DEMO
Role and Challenges of Fusion Nuclear Science and Technology (FNST) toward DEMO Mohamed Abdou Distinguished Professor of Engineering and Applied Science (UCLA) Director, Center for Energy Science & Technology
More informationMHD Stabilization Analysis in Tokamak with Helical Field
US-Japan Workshop on MHD Control, Magnetic Islands and Rotation the University of Texas, Austin, Texas, USA AT&T Executive Education & Conference Center NOVEMBER 3-5, 8 MHD Stabilization Analysis in Tokamak
More informationYuntao, SONG ( ) and Satoshi NISHIO ( Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute
Conceptual design of liquid metal cooled power core components for a fusion power reactor Yuntao, SONG ( ) and Satoshi NISHIO ( Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute Japan-US workshop on Fusion Power
More informationStellarators. Dr Ben Dudson. 6 th February Department of Physics, University of York Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UK
Stellarators Dr Ben Dudson Department of Physics, University of York Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UK 6 th February 2014 Dr Ben Dudson Magnetic Confinement Fusion (1 of 23) Previously... Toroidal devices
More informationDEMO Concept Development and Assessment of Relevant Technologies. Physics and Engineering Studies of the Advanced Divertor for a Fusion Reactor
FIP/3-4Rb FIP/3-4Ra DEMO Concept Development and Assessment of Relevant Technologies Y. Sakamoto, K. Tobita, Y. Someya, H. Utoh, N. Asakura, K. Hoshino, M. Nakamura, S. Tokunaga and the DEMO Design Team
More informationMission Elements of the FNSP and FNSF
Mission Elements of the FNSP and FNSF by R.D. Stambaugh PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE FOR PIPELINE PROTECTION AND THREAT INTERDICTION Presented at FNST Workshop August 3, 2010 In Addition to What Will Be Learned
More informationTHERMAL ANALYSIS OF A SOLID BREEDER TBM UNDER ITER OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS. A. Abou-Sena, A. Ying, M. Youssef, M. Abdou
THERMAL AALYSIS OF A SOLID BREEDER TBM UDER ITER OPERATIOAL CODITIOS A. Abou-Sena, A. Ying, M. Youssef, M. Abdou Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Dep., UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095 aliabousena@engineering.ucla.edu
More information19 th IAEA- Fusion Energy Conference FT/1-6
1 19 th IAEA- Fusion Energy Conference FT/1-6 RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN HELIAS REACTOR STUDIES H. Wobig 1), T. Andreeva 1), C.D. Beidler 1), E. Harmeyer 1), F. Herrnegger 1), Y. Igitkhanov 1), J. Kisslinger
More informationIntroduction to Fusion Physics
Introduction to Fusion Physics Hartmut Zohm Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik 85748 Garching DPG Advanced Physics School The Physics of ITER Bad Honnef, 22.09.2014 Energy from nuclear fusion Reduction
More informationQuasi-Symmetric Stellarators as a Strategic Element in the US Fusion Energy Research Plan
Quasi-Symmetric Stellarators as a Strategic Element in the US Fusion Energy Research Plan Quasi-Symmetric Stellarator Research The stellarator offers ready solutions to critical challenges for toroidal
More informationIntroduction to Nuclear Fusion. Prof. Dr. Yong-Su Na
Introduction to Nuclear Fusion Prof. Dr. Yong-Su Na What is a stellarator? M. Otthe, Stellarator: Experiments, IPP Summer School (2008) 2 Closed Magnetic System ion +++ ExB drift Electric field, E - -
More informationResults of Compact Stellarator engineering trade studies
Results of Compact Stellarator engineering trade studies The MIT Faculty has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters. Citation As Published Publisher
More informationNeutron Testing: What are the Options for MFE?
Neutron Testing: What are the Options for MFE? L. El-Guebaly Fusion Technology Institute University of Wisconsin - Madison http://fti.neep.wisc.edu/uwneutronicscenterofexcellence Contributors: M. Sawan
More informationThis article was originally published in a journal published by Elsevier, and the attached copy is provided by Elsevier for the author s benefit and for the benefit of the author s institution, for non-commercial
More informationRotation and Neoclassical Ripple Transport in ITER
Rotation and Neoclassical Ripple Transport in ITER Elizabeth J. Paul 1 Matt Landreman 1 Francesca Poli 2 Don Spong 3 Håkan Smith 4 William Dorland 1 1 University of Maryland 2 Princeton Plasma Physics
More informationHOW THE DEMO FUSION REACTOR SHOULD LOOK IF ITER FAILS. Paul Garabedian and Geoffrey McFadden
HOW THE DEMO FUSION REACTOR SHOULD LOOK IF ITER FAILS Paul Garabedian and Geoffrey McFadden 1. Summary Runs of the NSTAB equilibrium and stability code show there are many 3D solutions of the advanced
More informationThe Path to Fusion Energy creating a star on earth. S. Prager Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory
The Path to Fusion Energy creating a star on earth S. Prager Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory The need for fusion energy is strong and enduring Carbon production (Gton) And the need is time urgent Goal
More informationDT Fusion Ignition of LHD-Type Helical Reactor by Joule Heating Associated with Magnetic Axis Shift )
DT Fusion Ignition of LHD-Type Helical Reactor by Joule Heating Associated with Magnetic Axis Shift ) Tsuguhiro WATANABE National Institute for Fusion Science, 322-6 Oroshi-cho, Toki 509-5292, Japan (Received
More informationThermo-fluid and Thermo-mechanical Analysis of He-cooled Flat Plate and T- tube Divertor Concepts
Thermo-fluid and Thermo-mechanical Analysis of He-cooled Flat Plate and T- tube Divertor Concepts Presented by: X.R. Wang R. Raffray, S. Malang and the ARIES Team Japan-US Workshop on Fusion Power Plant
More informationStatus of UST_2 stellarator construction
Status of UST_2 stellarator construction Vicente M. Queral Mas Seminar given in National Fusion Laboratory CIEMAT Madrid, Spain 31 May 2013 Status of UST_2 construction Vicente Queral L 1 Outline Background.
More informationToward the Realization of Fusion Energy
Toward the Realization of Fusion Energy Nuclear fusion is the energy source of the sun and stars, in which light atomic nuclei fuse together, releasing a large amount of energy. Fusion power can be generated
More informationDesign of structural components and radial-build for FFHR-d1
Japan-US Workshop on Fusion Power Plants and Related Advanced Technologies with participations from China and Korea February 26-28, 2013 at Kyoto University in Uji, JAPAN 1 Design of structural components
More informationAiming at Fusion Power Tokamak
Aiming at Fusion Power Tokamak Design Limits of a Helium-cooled Large Area First Wall Module Clement Wong General Atomics International Workshop on MFE Roadmapping in the ITER Era Princeton University,
More informationPrinceton Plasma Physics Laboratory
Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory PPPL- Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract DE-AC02-09CH11466. Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Report Disclaimers Full Legal Disclaimer This
More informationConfinement Study of Net-Current Free Toroidal Plasmas Based on Extended International Stellarator Database
EX/1-5 IAEA FEC24, Vilamoura, Nov.2, 24 Confinement Study of Net-Current Free Toroidal Plasmas Based on Extended International Stellarator Database H.Yamada 1), J.H.Harris 2), A.Dinklage 3), E.Ascasibar
More informationStatus of helium-cooled Plate-Type Divertor Design, CFD and Stress Analysis
Status of helium-cooled Plate-Type Divertor Design, CFD and Stress Analysis Presented by: X.R. Wang Contributors: R. Raffray, S. Malang and the ARIES Team ARIES-TNS Meeting March 3-4, 2008 UCSD, La Jolla,
More information1) H-mode in Helical Devices. 2) Construction status and scientific objectives of the Wendelstein 7-X stellarator
Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik 1) H-mode in Helical Devices M. Hirsch 1, T. Akiyama 2, T.Estrada 3, T. Mizuuchi 4, K. Toi 2, C. Hidalgo 3 1 Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik, EURATOM-Ass., D-17489
More informationPlasma and Fusion Research: Regular Articles Volume 10, (2015)
Possibility of Quasi-Steady-State Operation of Low-Temperature LHD-Type Deuterium-Deuterium (DD) Reactor Using Impurity Hole Phenomena DD Reactor Controlled by Solid Boron Pellets ) Tsuguhiro WATANABE
More information22.615, MHD Theory of Fusion Systems Prof. Freidberg Lecture 15: Alternate Concepts (with Darren Sarmer)
22.615, MHD Theory of Fusion Systems Prof. Freidberg Lecture 15: Alternate Concepts (with Darren Sarmer) 1. In todays lecture we discuss the basic ideas behind the main alternate concepts to the tokamak.
More information- Effect of Stochastic Field and Resonant Magnetic Perturbation on Global MHD Fluctuation -
15TH WORKSHOP ON MHD STABILITY CONTROL: "US-Japan Workshop on 3D Magnetic Field Effects in MHD Control" U. Wisconsin, Madison, Nov 15-17, 17, 2010 LHD experiments relevant to Tokamak MHD control - Effect
More informationReduced-Size LHD-Type Fusion Reactor with D-Shaped Magnetic Surface )
Reduced-Size LHD-Type Fusion Reactor with D-Shaped Magnetic Surface ) Tsuguhiro WATANABE National Institute for Fusion Science, Toki 509-59, Japan (Received 6 December 011 / Accepted 1 June 01) A new winding
More informationARTICLE IN PRESS Fusion Engineering and Design xxx (2010) xxx xxx
Fusion Engineering and Design xxx (2010) xxx xxx Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Fusion Engineering and Design journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/fusengdes Review of stellarator/heliotron
More informationEnergetic Particle Stability and Confinement Issues in 3D Configurations
Energetic Particle Stability and Confinement Issues in 3D Configurations D. A. Spong Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA Collaborators: Y. Todo, M. Osakabe, B. Breizman, D. Brower,
More informationStudies of Lower Hybrid Range of Frequencies Actuators in the ARC Device
Studies of Lower Hybrid Range of Frequencies Actuators in the ARC Device P. T. Bonoli, Y. Lin. S. Shiraiwa, G. M. Wallace, J. C. Wright, and S. J. Wukitch MIT PSFC, Cambridge, MA 02139 59th Annual Meeting
More informationSafety considerations for Fusion Energy: From experimental facilities to Fusion Nuclear Science and beyond
Safety considerations for Fusion Energy: From experimental facilities to Fusion Nuclear Science and beyond 1st IAEA TM on the Safety, Design and Technology of Fusion Power Plants May 3, 2016 Susana Reyes,
More informationTechnological and Engineering Challenges of Fusion
Technological and Engineering Challenges of Fusion David Maisonnier and Jim Hayward EFDA CSU Garching (david.maisonnier@tech.efda.org) 2nd IAEA TM on First Generation of FPP PPCS-KN1 1 Outline The European
More information1 EX/P5-9 International Stellarator/Heliotron Database Activities on High-Beta Confinement and Operational Boundaries
1 International Stellarator/Heliotron Database Activities on High-Beta Confinement and Operational Boundaries A. Weller 1), K.Y. Watanabe 2), S. Sakakibara 2), A. Dinklage 1), H. Funaba 2), J. Geiger 1),
More informationHighlights from (3D) Modeling of Tokamak Disruptions
Highlights from (3D) Modeling of Tokamak Disruptions Presented by V.A. Izzo With major contributions from S.E. Kruger, H.R. Strauss, R. Paccagnella, MHD Control Workshop 2010 Madison, WI ..onset of rapidly
More informationPhysics and Engineering Studies of the Advanced Divertor for a Fusion Reactor
1 FIP/3-4Ra Physics and Engineering Studies of the Advanced Divertor for a Fusion Reactor N. Asakura 1, K. Hoshino 1, H. Utoh 1, K. Shinya 2, K. Shimizu 3, S. Tokunaga 1, Y.Someya 1, K. Tobita 1, N. Ohno
More informationand expectations for the future
39 th Annual Meeting of the FPA 2018 First operation of the Wendelstein 7-X stellarator and expectations for the future Hans-Stephan Bosch Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik Greifswald, Germany on behalf
More information1 FT/P5-15. Assessment of the Shielding Efficiency of the HCLL Blanket for a DEMOtype Fusion Reactor
1 FT/P5-15 Assessment of the Shielding Efficiency of the HCLL Blanket for a DEMOtype Fusion Reactor J. Jordanova 1), U. Fischer 2), P. Pereslavtsev 2), Y. Poitevin 3), J. F. Salavy 4), A. Li Puma 4), N.
More informationCompact, spheromak-based pilot plants for the demonstration of net-gain fusion power
Compact, spheromak-based pilot plants for the demonstration of net-gain fusion power Derek Sutherland HIT-SI Research Group University of Washington July 25, 2017 D.A. Sutherland -- EPR 2017, Vancouver,
More informationCritical Gaps between Tokamak Physics and Nuclear Science. Clement P.C. Wong General Atomics
Critical Gaps between Tokamak Physics and Nuclear Science (Step 1: Identifying critical gaps) (Step 2: Options to fill the critical gaps initiated) (Step 3: Success not yet) Clement P.C. Wong General Atomics
More informationPRINCETON PLASMA PHYSICS LABORATORY PRINCETON UNIVERSITY, PRINCETON, NEW JERSEY
PREPARED FOR THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, UNDER CONTRACT DE-AC02-76CH03073 PPPL-3517 UC-70 PPPL-3517 Physics Issues in the Design of Low Aspect-Ratio, High-Beta, Quasi-Axisymmetric Stellarators by M.C.
More informationInitial Experimental Program Plan for HSX
Initial Experimental Program Plan for HSX D.T. Anderson, A F. Almagri, F.S.B. Anderson, J. Chen, S. Gerhardt, V. Sakaguchi, J. Shafii and J.N. Talmadge, UW-Madison HSX Plasma Laboratory Team The Helically
More informationJapan-US Workshop on Fusion Power Plants Related Advanced Technologies with participants from China and Korea (Kyoto University, Uji, Japan, 26-28
Japan-US Workshop on Fusion Power Plants Related Advanced Technologies with participants from China and Korea (Kyoto University, Uji, Japan, 26-28 Feb. 2013) 2/22 FFHR-d1 R c = 15.6 m B c = 4.7 T P fusion
More informationThe Dynomak Reactor System
The Dynomak Reactor System An economically viable path to fusion power Derek Sutherland HIT-SI Research Group University of Washington November 7, 2013 Outline What is nuclear fusion? Why do we choose
More informationVolume 114 Number 4 July-August Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology
[J. Res. Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol. 114, 229-236 (2009)] Design of the DEMO Fusion Reactor Following ITER Volume 114 Number 4 July-August 2009 Paul R. Garabedian Courant Institute, New York University,
More informationNeutronics analysis of inboard shielding capability for a DEMO fusion reactor
*Manuscript Click here to view linked References Neutronics analysis of inboard shielding capability for a DEMO fusion reactor Songlin Liu a, Jiangang Li a, Shanliang Zheng b, Neil Mitchell c a Institute
More informationEffect of rotational transform and magnetic shear on confinement of stellarators
Effect of rotational transform and magnetic shear on confinement of stellarators E. Ascasíbar(1), D. López-Bruna(1), F. Castejón(1), V.I. Vargas(1), V. Tribaldos(1), H. Maassberg(2), C.D. Beidler(2) R.
More informationINTRODUCTION TO MAGNETIC NUCLEAR FUSION
INTRODUCTION TO MAGNETIC NUCLEAR FUSION S.E. Sharapov Euratom/CCFE Fusion Association, Culham Science Centre, Abingdon, Oxfordshire OX14 3DB, UK With acknowledgments to B.Alper for use of his transparencies
More informationConceptual design of an energy recovering divertor
Conceptual design of an energy recovering divertor Derek Baver Lodestar Research Corporation Conceptual design of an energy recovering divertor, D. A. Baver, Lodestar Research Corporation. Managing divertor
More informationConfiguration Optimization of a Planar-Axis Stellarator with a Reduced Shafranov Shift )
Configuration Optimization of a Planar-Axis Stellarator with a Reduced Shafranov Shift ) Shoichi OKAMURA 1,2) 1) National Institute for Fusion Science, Toki 509-5292, Japan 2) Department of Fusion Science,
More informationFirst plasma operation of Wendelstein 7-X
First plasma operation of Wendelstein 7-X R. C. Wolf on behalf of the W7-X Team *) robert.wolf@ipp.mpg.de *) see author list Bosch et al. Nucl. Fusion 53 (2013) 126001 The optimized stellarator Wendelstein
More informationDevelopment of a Systematic, Self-consistent Algorithm for the K-DEMO Steady-state Operation Scenario
Development of a Systematic, Self-consistent Algorithm for the K-DEMO Steady-state Operation Scenario J.S. Kang 1, J.M. Park 2, L. Jung 3, S.K. Kim 1, J. Wang 1, D. H. Na 1, C.-S. Byun 1, Y. S. Na 1, and
More informationMagnetic Flux Surface Measurements at Wendelstein 7-X
EUROFUSION WPS1-PR(16) 15578 M. Otte et al. Magnetic Flux Surface Measurements at Wendelstein 7-X Preprint of Paper to be submitted for publication in 43rd European Physical Society Conference on Plasma
More informationProvisional scenario of radioactive waste management for DEMO
US-Japan Workshop on Fusion power plants and Related advanced technologies 13-14 March 2014 UCSD, USA Provisional scenario of radioactive waste management for DEMO Youji Someya Japan Atomic Energy Agency,
More information(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) r (minor radius) time. time. Soft X-ray. T_e contours (ECE) r (minor radius) time time
Studies of Spherical Tori, Stellarators and Anisotropic Pressure with M3D 1 L.E. Sugiyama 1), W. Park 2), H.R. Strauss 3), S.R. Hudson 2), D. Stutman 4), X-Z. Tang 2) 1) Massachusetts Institute of Technology,
More informationConceptual Design of CFETR Tokamak Machine
Japan-US Workshop on Fusion Power Plants and Related Advanced Technologies February 26-28, 2013 at Kyoto University in Uji, JAPAN Conceptual Design of CFETR Tokamak Machine Yuntao Song for CFETR Design
More informationSummary Tritium Day Workshop
Summary Tritium Day Workshop Presentations by M. Abdou, A. Loarte, L. Baylor, S. Willms, C. Day, P. Humrickhouse, M. Kovari 4th IAEA DEMO Programme Workshop November 18th, 2016 - Karlsruhe, Germany Overall
More information