DYREGROV ROBINSON INC.

Similar documents

APPENDIX A GEOTECHNICAL REPORT


APPENDIX A. Borehole Logs Explanation of Terms and Symbols

B-1 BORE LOCATION PLAN. EXHIBIT Drawn By: 115G BROOKS VETERINARY CLINIC CITY BASE LANDING AND GOLIAD ROAD SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS.


Depth (ft) USCS Soil Description TOPSOIL & FOREST DUFF

Field Exploration. March 31, J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc. 115 Northstar Avenue Twin Falls, Idaho Attn: Mr. Tracy Ahrens, P. E. E:

APPENDIX C HYDROGEOLOGIC INVESTIGATION

December 5, Junction Gateway, LLC 7551 W. Sunset Boulevard #203 Los Angeles, CA Mr. James Frost P: Dear Mr.

Civil Engineering, Surveying and Environmental Consulting WASP0059.ltr.JLS.Mich Ave Bridge Geotech.docx

APPENDIX C. Borehole Data

ADDENDUM 1 FISHER SLOUGH RESTORATION PROJECT SKAGIT COUNTY, WASHINGTON

Geotechnical Data Report

Limited Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation Classroom Additions Albany County Campus Laramie, Wyoming

Geotechnical Engineering Report

APPENDIX A - PART 2 GEOTECHNICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL REPORTS

DATA REPORT GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION GALVESTON CRUISE TERMINAL 2 GALVESTON, TEXAS

Geotechnical Data Report

Geotechnical Engineering Report

Solution:Example 1. Example 2. Solution: Example 2. clay. Textural Soil Classification System (USDA) CE353 Soil Mechanics Dr.

General. DATE December 10, 2013 PROJECT No TO Mary Jarvis Urbandale/Riverside South Development Corporation

patersongroup Design for Earthquakes Consulting Engineers May 19, 2016 File: PG3733-LET.01

New WW Hastings Hospital Geotechnical Investigation RFP Addendum #1

CITY OF VALDEZ Project Title: East Pioneer Reconstruction Project No.: Contract No.: TO: All Recipients Date: April 14, 2014

CE 240 Soil Mechanics & Foundations Lecture 3.2. Engineering Classification of Soil (AASHTO and USCS) (Das, Ch. 4)

Geotechnical Engineering Report

Clay Robinson, PhD, CPSS, PG copyright 2009

Chapter 12 Subsurface Exploration

DRILL HOLE # BH-BGC13-FN-01

Geotechnical Engineering Report

GEOTECHNICAL REPORT. Matanuska-Susitna Borough. Parks Highway Connections Museum Drive. Matanuska-Susitna Borough, Alaska.

Northern Colorado Geotech

Geotechnical Investigation

Boreholes. Implementation. Boring. Boreholes may be excavated by one of these methods: 1. Auger Boring 2. Wash Boring 3.

Ardaman & Associates, Inc. Geotechnical, Environmental and Materials Consultants

Appendix A. Producer Statement Advisory Note

Soil Mechanics Brief Review. Presented by: Gary L. Seider, P.E.

ATTACHMENT A PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL SUMMARY

B-1 SURFACE ELEVATION

IN SITU SPECIFIC GRAVITY VS GRAIN SIZE: A BETTER METHOD TO ESTIMATE NEW WORK DREDGING PRODUCTION

CONQUEST ENGINEERING LTD.

Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Cadiz / Trigg County I-24 Business Park. Cadiz, Kentucky

3.0 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS


APPENDIX E SOILS TEST REPORTS

patersongroup 1.0 Geotechnical Desktop Review Consulting Engineers April 18, 2017 PG4080-LET.01

PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL REPORT. State College Redevelopment State College Borough, Centre County, Pennsylvania. CMT Laboratories File No.

SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION REPORT FOR THE MARITIME INFRACTURE REHABILITATION AT WHISKEY ISLAND BULK TERMINAL CLEVELAND, OHIO PGI PROJECT NO.


REPORT OF SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION

AN EMPLOYEE OWNED COMPANY

Geotechnical Engineering Report

SOIL FORMATION SOIL CLASSIFICATION FOR GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS. Soil Properties and Classification

Dashed line indicates the approximate upper limit boundary for natural soils. C L o r O L C H o r O H

Report of Preliminary Geotechnical Exploration. CSO-012 Sewer Separation Cincinnati, Hamilton County, Ohio. February, 2011

PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT. Proposed Re-Development 44 Old Worcester Road Charlton, Massachusetts. Prepared For:

Reference No S072 APRIL 2012

M E M O R A N D U M. Mr. Jonathan K. Thrasher, P.E., Mr. Ian Kinnear, P.E. (FL) PSI

ENCE 3610 Soil Mechanics. Site Exploration and Characterisation Field Exploration Methods

CITY OF CAPE CORAL NORTH 2 UTILITIES EXTENSION PROJECT CONTRACT 3

REPORT OF PRELIMINARY SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION. VCU Basketball Practice Facility 1300/1328 West Marshall Street City of Richmond, Virginia.

UAS Student Residence

ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES

CENTRAL REGION GEOHAZARDS RISK ASSESSMENT SITE INSPECTION FORM

SLOPE STABILITY ASSESSMENT PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION 161 LAKESHORE ROAD EAST TOWN OF THE BLUE MOUNTAINS, ONTARIO

BR-01 PAINT BRIDGE NO. 55 C GENERAL PLAN 720'-0" VC 605'-0" VC 1. FOR INDEX TO PLANS, QUANTITIES, AND GENERAL NOTES, SEE "INDEX TO PLANS" SHEET.

Geotechnical Recommendations for Proposed Additions to the Three Mile Creek Severe Weather Attenuation Tank Project

Table of Contents. Description

PLATE 6 FEB G r o v e l a n d F l o o d w a l l - B o r e h o l e M a p. Legend. Groveland Floodwall Boreholes. Contour Lines.

June 9, R. D. Cook, P.Eng. Soils Engineer Special Services Western Region PUBLIC WORKS CANADA WESTERN REGION REPORT ON

Appendix H. Geotechnical Investigation Report. Krosno Creek Flood Reduction Project PROJECT FILE REPORT CITY OF PICKERING

Pierce County Department of Planning and Land Services Development Engineering Section

APPENDIX B: BORING LOGS

REPORT ON SLOPE STABILITY INVESTIGATION DON MILLS ROAD AND EGLINTON AVENUE EAST TORONTO, ONTARIO. Prepared for:

GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES REPORT

Geotechnical Engineering Study, Conifer Senior High School Football Field Improvements, Conifer, Colorado

GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION REPORT

Appendix G GEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION

Terraprobe Consulting Geotechnical & Environmental Engineering Construction Materials Inspection & Testing

Safe bearing capacity evaluation of the bridge site along Syafrubesi-Rasuwagadhi road, Central Nepal

The process of determining the layers of natural soil deposits that will underlie a proposed structure and their physical properties is generally

A. V T = 1 B. Ms = 1 C. Vs = 1 D. Vv = 1

Geology and Soil Mechanics /1A ( ) Mark the best answer on the multiple choice answer sheet.

Ardaman & Associates, Inc. Geotechnical, Environmental and Materials Consultants

GEOTECHNICAL SUBSOIL PROPERTIES FOR WASIT GOVERNORATE

SUPPLEMENTARY INVESTIGATION AND LABORATORY TESTING Aggregate Resource Evaluation Proposed Bernand Quarry San Diego County, California

Appendix J. Geological Investigation

SITE INVESTIGATION 1

GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION. Proposed Douglas Street Bus Lane

Geotechnical Engineering Report

PREPARED FOR MR. JOE WOOD CARTER & SLOOPE, INC PEAKE ROAD MACON, GEORGIA PREPARED BY

The attitude he maintains in his relation to the engineer is very well stated in his own words:

Geotechnical Investigation Juneau Seawalk - Taku Fisheries to Miner s Wharf Juneau, Alaska DM&A Job No

Ardaman & Associates, Inc. Geotechnical, Environmental and Materials Consultants

VOLUME III GEOLOGY, HYDROGEOLOGY & GEOTECHNICAL REPORT CAPITAL REGION RESOURCE RECOVERY CENTRE


PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT

February 22, 2016 AG File No

February 16, 2015 File No Ms. Robin Yates TRC Engineers Inc N. Fresno Street, Suite 200 Fresno, California 93710

Transcription:

DYREGROV ROBINSON INC. Consulting Geotechnical Engineers 101-1555 St. James Street Winnipeg, MB R3H 1B5 TEL (204) 632-7252 FAX (204) 632-1442 June 14, 2013 File No. 133583 Accutech Engineering Inc. 605-287 Broadway Street Winnipeg, Manitoba R3C OR9 Attn: Mr. Ken Drysdale, P. Eng. Dear Sir: RE: Sir John Franklin Community Club Geotechnical Investigation As requested, Dyregrov Robinson Inc. have undertaken a geotechnical investigation to determine limit states design criteria for cast-in-place concrete friction piles to be used for the support of a new structural basement floor slab at the Sir John Franklin Community Club located at 1 Sir John Franklin Road in Winnipeg, MB. The proposed foundation system, which consists of 16-inch diameter friction piles ranging in length from 15 to 20 feet, has been designed on the basis of the working stress design method using an allowable adhesion value of 300 psf. We understand the piles are to be designed in accordance with the current National Building Code which requires limit states design of the foundations. Field Investigation A single test hole was drilled in the parking lot area adjacent to the Community Club at the location shown on Figure 1. On June 4 th, 2013, the upper 10 feet of the test hole was soft dug by Aquajet Canada Inc. of Winnipeg, Manitoba using a hydrovac machine. The soft digging was performed to confirm that there were no buried utilities at the test hole locations (Le. electrical and natural gas). On June 6 th, 2013, the test hole was drilled into the glacial till by Subterranean Ltd. of Winnipeg, Manitoba using a truck-mounted CME 550 drill rig equipped with 125 mm solid stem augers. The subsurface conditions were visually logged during drilling by Dyregrov Robinson Inc. Disturbed (auger cuttings) and undisturbed (Shelby tube) samples were recovered at regular depth intervals. The test hole was backfilled to grade with auger cuttings. All samples were taken to our Soils Laboratory for additional visual classification and testing. The testing consisted of the determination of moisture contents on all samples, measurement of bulk unit weights and undrained shear strengths on the Shelby tube samples. The test hole log is attached in Appendix A and illustrates the subsurface conditions encountered, results of the laboratory testing and notes of the observations made during drilling. SIR JOHN FRANKLIN COMMUNITY CLUB

Subsurface Conditions A 4 inch layer of black, moist clay topsoil covers a 4 inch thick layer of crushed limestone fill. Below the crushed limestone the soil was excavated to a depth of 10 feet using a hydro-excavator. Based on the operation of the hydro-excavator the soil was most likely clay. At a depth of 10 feet, Lake Agassiz lacustrine clay was encountered which extends to the underlying glacial silt till at a depth of 24 feet. Lake Agassiz lacustrine silty clay is mottled brown and grey in color, stiff, moist and highly plastic. The moisture content of the clay decreases from about 55 percent to about 25 percent at a depth of 23 feet. Undrained shear strengths measured using Torvane, Pocket Penetrometer and Unconfined Compressive Strength methods ranged from about 540 to 1970 psf with an average around 1270 psf. The average bulk unit weight of the clay is 110.2 pcf. Glacial silt till was encountered at a depth of 24 feet. The glacial till is grey in color and contains traces of sand, gravel and cobbles. The upper 4 feet of the till is loose to compact and moist with moisture contents ranging from 11 to 13 percent. Below 28 feet, it becomes dense to very dense and dry with moisture contents in the range of 7 to 8 percent. Auger refusal was not encountered in the glacial till and no groundwater seepage or sloughing was observed in the test hole during drilling. Recommendations For Cast-in-Place Concrete Friction Piles Cast-in-place concrete friction piles may be designed in accordance to the current National Building Code (NBC 2010) using a service limit state (SLS) shaft adhesion value of 395 psf and for the ultimate limit state (ULS) case a factored adhesion value of 500 psf along with a factored end bearing pressure of 3000 psf can be used. A resistance factor of 0.4 was used to calculate the factored ULS shaft adhesion. When determining effective pile lengths, the upper 5 feet of the pile shaft below the bottom of the basement floor excavation should be ignored to account for potential soil shrinkage away from the pile. The pile length should be limited to 22 feet below the current site grade to avoid penetrating into the glacial till. Piles should have a minimum spacing of 3 pile diameters on centre. Concrete should be placed as soon as possible after the pile hole is completed. Measures should be taken to protect against sloughing/caving of the pile borings and/or groundwater seepage if encountered. The piles should be inspected at the on-set of construction to confirm that the subsurface conditions encountered in the test hole are consistent with the subsurface conditions below the basement area. Any piles that might be subjected to freezing conditions, although not expected for this project, must be protected from frost heave effects by using flat lying rigid insulation, such as Styrofoam HI, to protect against or minimize frost penetration into the soil around the piles. It is recommended that all concrete in contact with clay soil should be of high quality and manufactured with sulphate-resistant cement. SIR JOHN FRANKLIN COMMUNITY CLUB 2

Closure This report was prepared based on the subsurface conditions encountered in the test hole during the geotechnical investigation. Subsurface conditions are inherently variable and should be expected to vary across the site. This report was prepared for the exclusive use of Accutech Engineering Inc. and their agents for the foundation design for the structural floor to be constructed in the basement of the Sir John Franklin Community Club located in Winnipeg, MS. The information and recommendations contained in this report shall not be used by any third parties for other projects. The findings and recommendations in this report have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practises. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is provided. Please contact us if we can be of further assistance. Sincerely, DYREGROV ROBINSON INC. Reviewed by: 5 Ryan Belbas, P.Eng. Geotechnical Engineer ryanbelbas@drgeotechnical.com Gil Robinson, M.Sc., P.Eng. Principal, Geotechnical Engineer gilrobinson@drgeotechnical.com DyI'wgrov RoblMOn Inc. No. II Date: Itf a013 SIR JOHN FRANKLIN COMMUNITY CLUB 3

" Nortb....., Sir John Franklin Community CI'ub E9 Test Mole 1 I '"C m o 0::: c 32 m u. s::..e e..., s... en DYREGROV ROBINSON INC. CONSULTING GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS SIR JOHN FRANKLIN COMMUNITY CLUB TEST HOLE LOCATION SCALE: NTS MADE BY: RB CHKD BY: AOD PROJECT NO. 133583 DATE: JUNE 2013 FIGURE 1

APPENDIX A Test Hole Log

PROJECT: Sir John Franklin Community Club ICLIENT: Accutech Engineering Inc. TESTHOLE NO: 1 LOCATION: 9 ft north and 13 ft west from northeast corner building PROJECT NO.: 133583 CONTRACTOR: Subterranean Ltd. IMETHOD: Hydrovac & CME Truck Mounted Drill Rig -125 mm SSA ELEVATION (ftl: SAMPLE TYPE GRAB [ill SHELBYTUBE SPLIT SPOON E3BULK IZI NO RECOVERY [J] CORE BACKFILL TYPE BENTONITE o GRAVEL [ll]]slough r;i]grout E2jCUTTINGS DSAND g zo...j W g I I a. w o...j o 0 :;E > en...j o en SOIL DESCRIPTION ""\CLAY (Topsoil) - 4 inches thick, black, stiff, moist V/. 'CRUSHED LIMESTONE (Fill) - 4 inches thick V/ CLAY - no soil recovery during hydro-excavation to 10ft / w + Torvane (5u) psi + a.. '"' "., 50n 750 1000 1750 1500 1750 W W...J t> Pocket Pen. (5u) psi t> 250 500 750 000 1250 1500 1750 5PT N blows/12 In 10 20 30 40 50 60 70...I a. & Unconfined Camp. (5u) psf&.uniiwelghlpcf. a..,.., OWl 7<0,non 1?50,<M 1750 on,no 11n IOn "n 14n,.n eni---"oll..i!llll.1""--"io!li.j.""'-'l!l!li..jl""--+-.i!ll..l.llii..j..l!l.l.<ll..j.,&..clil...!.i!li.--f en LL Mle (%) PL 10 2 30! 50 Jo 70 : : : -5...."...:......:..,..,.. :-. : : -10 CLAY - silty - mouled brown and grey - stiff, moist, high plasticity - trace silt inclusions T1 T2 : ; Lli+ 1-15 T3 : ; a _ T4 a -20 T5 : :.., Q. Cl Z -25 : SILT (Till) - trace sand, trace gravel, trace cobbles - grey - loose to compact, moist G6 GB G9.G10 : - dense to very dense, dry below 2B ft G11 0: : : -"... : : : 1---'"-ae----"".I'l---------------------...J-...r.:t!..! 1!9-?-':---'--'--'---'--'--'-."".---':---'-----'--j 0: END OF TEST HOLE AT 30 ft IN SILT TILL iii ;:: ;t Z 0: Notes: 1. No seepage or sloughing observed. 2. Test hole backfilled with auger cuttings and bentonite chips. I--D-YR-E-G-R-O-V-R-O-B-IN-S-O-N-IN-C-.-----'T'"L-O-GG---E-D --BY-:W-G-----,--CO--M---PL--ET---'O--N---D=EP--TH-:-30-.0-:-tt---I REVIEWED BY: GR COMPLETION DATE: 06/06/13,--_C_o_n_sU_I_ti_n.;;.g_G_e_o_t_e_C_h_n_jC_a_'_En_g.;;...jn_e_e_rs l.'-p.;.;r;::.oj;.:e;=.c.:...t;:;engin.;;:;e;::er;.:;:...:.r.;ly,a:;;;n;.;;b;.::;el.:.::ba:;:.s---' ---'P..:;ail.: Q1e;...1.:...:..;of...;..J1

EXPLANATION OF TERMS & SYMBOLS Laboratory Classification Criteria Description TH Log Symbols USCS Classification Fines (%) Grading Plasticity Notes Well graded gravels, Cu > 4 CLEAN sandy gravels, with little GW 0-5 1<Cc<3 GRAVELS or no fines GRAVELS (Little or no Poorly graded gravels, Not satisfying (More than fines) sandy gravels, with little GP 0-5 GW 50% of or no fines requirements Dual symbols if 5- coarse 12% fines. fraction of Atterberg limits Silty gravels, silty sandy Dual symbols if II) gravel DIRTY GM > 12 below "A" line gravels above"n line and..i size) rml GRAVELS orwp<4 a II) (With some Atterberg limits 4<Wp<7 Q fines) Clayey gravels, clayey w GC > 12 above"a" line z sandy gravels orwp<7 Cl Well graded sands, Cu > 6 D W 60 CLEAN gravelly sands, with little SW 0-5 1 < Cc < 3 C II) u = u: SANDS or no fines Dill «0 (Little or no SANDS Poorly graded sands, Not satisfying u fines) (D)IlY II (More than gravelly sands, with little SP 0-5 SW C C = 50% of or no fines requirements D lll xd 611 coarse fraction of sand size) [ill] [Ill Atterberg limits Silty sands, DIRTY SM > 12 below"n line sand-silt mixtures SANDS orwp<4 (With some Atterberg limits fines) Clayey sands, SC >12 above "A" line sand-clay mixtures orwp<7 SILTS Inorganic sills, silty or (Below 'A' WL<50 clayey fine sands, with ML line slight plasticity negligible organic Inorganic sills of high WL>50 content) plasticity MH II) Inorganic clays, silty..i WL<30 clays, sandy clays of CL is II) CLAYS low plasticity, lean clays Q (Above 'A' w Inorganic clays and silly Classification is z line 30<WL<50 clays of medium CI Based upon negligible plasticity Plasticity Chart organic Cl w content) z Inorganic clays of high WL>50 CH ii: plasticity, fat clays Organic silts and I I I I ORGANIC WL<50 organic silty clays of low t I I I t'll OL SILTS & t I 11 plasticity CLAYS (Below 'A' Organic clays of high line) WL>50 OH plasticity HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS 0 Peat and other highly Pt Von Post Strong colour or odour, and often organic soils Classification Limit fibrous texture Asphalt Glacial Till II Bedrock 111\11 1111 (Igneous) Bedrock Concrete II Clay Shale Fill (Limestone) Bedrock (Undifferentiated) DYREGROV ROBINSON INC" CONSULTING GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS DYREGROV ROBINSON INC. Terms and Symbols

.. Plastldty Chlrt For Solis PIssln, 425 II'" S... PARTICLE SIZE RELATIVE PROPORTIONS FRACTION (mm) (by weight) Min. Max. / Boulders >300 Percent Descriptor so / Cobbles 75 300 >35% main fraction / Coarse 19 75 Gravel 35-50 "and" at / Fine 4.75 u 19.. 1ft Coarse 2.0 4.75 Adjective l 20-35 e.g. silty, Sand Medium 0.425 2.0 I.. clavev.. Fine 0.075 0.425 u f / 1ft 10-20 'some" a MH Of OH Silt (non plastic) <0.075 mm or Clay (plastic) 1-10 "trace".. V n so /, V MI 5011 Classification Example (I... I /...0. II.. so...... so.. so... U. 1-..,. u...- t"i Clay - silty, some sand, trace gravel Clay 50% (main fraction), Silt 25%, Sand 17%, Gravel 8% TERMS and SYMBOLS Laboratory and field tests are identified as follows: Unconfined Camp.: undrained shear strength (kpa or psf) derived from unconfined compression testing. Torvane: undrained shear strength (kpa or psf) measured using a Torvane Pocket Pen.: undrained shear strength (kpa or pst) measured using a pocket penetrometer. Unit Weight bulk unit weight of soil or rock (kn/m 3 or pct). SPT - N Standard Penetration Test: The number of blows (N) required to drive a 51 mm 0.0. split barrel sampler 300 mm into the soil using a 63.5 kg hammer with a free fall drop height of 760 mm. DCPT Dynamic Cone Penetration Test. The number of blows (N) required to drive a 50 mm diameter cone 300 mm into the soil using a 63.5 kg hammer with a free fall drop height of 760 mm. M/C insitu soil moisture content in percent PL Plastic limit, moisture content in percent LL Liquid limit, moisture content in percent The undrained shear strength (Su) of cohesive soil is related to its consistency as follows: Su (kpa) <12 ------------------ 12-25 ------------------ 25-50.----------------- 50-100 ------------------ 100-200 ------------------ 200 Su (pst) 250 250-525 525-1050 1050-2100 ------------------. ------------------. -------------------..-2100 -,:'42C)6 -.. ------------------- 4200 CONSISTENCY.. Y.e.rx :S.... soft firm ---------------------- w. _ stiff ----------------------..._Y.e. _s.tl " _.. hard The SPT - N of non-cohesive soil is related to compactness condition as follows: N - Blows I 300 mm 0-4 4-10 10-30 30-50 50 + ------------------------ ------------_.---------- ------------------------ ------------------------ COMPACTNESS -- --- _!.I. _.. _. loose ------._-------------- l?p. dense ---------------------- very dense References: ASTM 02487 - Classification of Soils For Engineering Purposes (Unified Soil Classification System) Canadian Foundation Engineering Manual, 4 th Edition, Canadian Geotechnical Society, 2006 DYREGROV ROBINSON INC. Terms and Symbols 2