Minnesota Department of Transportation Geotechnical Section Cone Penetration Test Index Sheet 1.0 (CPT 1.0)

Similar documents
Minnesota Department of Transportation Geotechnical Section Cone Penetration Test Index Sheet 1.0 (CPT 1.0)

CPT Data Interpretation Theory Manual

SP TH 169 MSE Wall N169RW2 Located at the NE quadrant of proposed TH 169 and CSAH 81 Foundation Investigation and Recommendations

Subcut Elevation. Proposed Subcut N/A

From R. Lamb, Foundations Project Engineer Concurred By G. Person,Foundations Engineer

SP TH 169 MSE Wall N169RW1 Located at the SW quadrant of proposed TH 169 and CSAH 81 Foundation Investigation and Recommendations

IGC. 50 th INDIAN GEOTECHNICAL CONFERENCE ESTIMATION OF FINES CONTENT FROM CPT PARAMETERS FOR CALCAREOUS SOILS OF WESTERN INDIAN OFFSHORE

Cone Penetration Test (CPT) Interpretation

Soil Behaviour Type from the CPT: an update

CPT: Geopractica Contracting (Pty) Ltd Total depth: m, Date:


Rich Lamb, Foundations Design/Build Engineer


Examples of CPTU results in other soil types. Peat Silt/ clayey sands Mine tailings Underconsolidated clay Other

Soil type identification and fines content estimation using the Screw Driving Sounding (SDS) data

Jose Brito, Cenor, Portugal

Cone Penetration Testing in Geotechnical Practice

Chapter 12 Subsurface Exploration

This document downloaded from vulcanhammer.net vulcanhammer.info Chet Aero Marine

ISC 5 SELF-BORING PRESSUREMETER TESTS AT THE NATIONAL FIELD TESTING FACILITY, BALLINA 5 9 SEPT 2016

Conventional Field Testing & Issues (SPT, CPT, DCPT, Geophysical methods)

CONE PENETRATION TEST DATA

GEOTECHNICAL SITE CHARACTERIZATION

NAPLES MUNICIPAL AIRPORT

Keywords: CPTu, pore water pressure, liquefaction analysis, Canterbury earthquake sequence

Cone Penetration Test Design Guide for State Geotechnical Engineers

Interpretation of SCPTu Data in Stiff Soils and Soft Rock

The CPT in unsaturated soils

GUIDE TO CONE PENETRATION TESTING

CPT: _CPTU1. GEOTEA S.R.L. Via della Tecnica 57/A San Lazzaro di Savena (BO)

Introduction to Cone Penetration Testing

REPORT OF PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION. Marion County Industrial Park. Marion County, South Carolina S&ME Project No.

Pierce County Department of Planning and Land Services Development Engineering Section

ABSTRACT. Use and Application of Piezocone Penetration Testing in Presumpscot Formation

Engineering Units. Multiples Micro ( ) = 10-6 Milli (m) = 10-3 Kilo (k) = Mega (M) = 10 +6

Field Exploration. March 31, J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc. 115 Northstar Avenue Twin Falls, Idaho Attn: Mr. Tracy Ahrens, P. E. E:

REPORT OF PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION. Marion County Industrial Park Lot 4. Marion County, South Carolina S&ME Project No.

Interpretation of the CPT in engineering practice

(THIS IS ONLY A SAMPLE REPORT OR APPENDIX OFFERED TO THE USERS OF THE COMPUTER PROGRAM

SOIL MECHANICS AND APPLIED FOUNDATION ENGINEERING FUNDAMENTAL FACTS OF SOIL BEHAVIOR

REPORT OF PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION. Coastal Technology Park. Georgetown County, South Carolina S&ME Project No.

Mechanical Wave Measurements. Electromagnetic Wave Techniques. Geophysical Methods GEOPHYSICAL SITE CHARACTERIZATION. Mechanical Wave Geophysics

Interpretation of in-situ tests some insights

EVALUATION OF STRENGTH OF SOILS AGAINST LIQUEFACTION USING PIEZO DRIVE CONE

C.P.T.U. TEST REPORT CPTU /14

Minnesota Department of Transportation MEMO Office of Materials Mailstop Gervais Avenue Maplewood, MN 55109

CPT Applications - Liquefaction 2

Use of CPT in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering

3. EVOLUTION In 1948 the basic mechanical cone was developed (Figure 1) and this cone is still in use today as the

Project No: 68R3056 Client: City of Frederick Project: RFQ 14-H Future North Side Water Tank City/State: 7516 Hayward Road, Frederick, MD

LECTURE 10. Module 3 : Field Tests in Rock 3.6 GEOPHYSICAL INVESTIGATION

PROBABILISTIC APPROACH TO DETERMINING SOIL PARAMETERS

A Comparison of Four Geophysical Methods for Determining the Shear Wave Velocity of Soils

DATA REPORT GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION GALVESTON CRUISE TERMINAL 2 GALVESTON, TEXAS

Use of CPT for design, monitoring, and performance verification of compaction projects


Evaluation of soil liquefaction using the CPT Part 2

USE OF CPT/CPTU FOR SOLUTION OF

Geotechnical verification of impact compaction

Geotechnical Recommendations for Proposed Additions to the Three Mile Creek Severe Weather Attenuation Tank Project

B-1 BORE LOCATION PLAN. EXHIBIT Drawn By: 115G BROOKS VETERINARY CLINIC CITY BASE LANDING AND GOLIAD ROAD SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS.

APPENDIX A. Borehole Logs Explanation of Terms and Symbols

APPENDIX F CORRELATION EQUATIONS. F 1 In-Situ Tests

Performance based earthquake design using the CPT

DRILLED DISPLACMENT PILE PERFORMANCE IN COASTAL PLAIN AND RESIDUAL SOILS

CPTu in Consolidating Soils PAULUS P. RAHARDJO. PROFESSOR OF GEOTECNICAL ENGINEERING, UNIVERSITAS KATOLIK PARAHYANGAN - INDONESIA

Importance of CPT in development of offshore windfarms

GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION REPORT

Interpretation of Flow Parameters from In-Situ Tests (P.W. Mayne, November 2001)

The process of determining the layers of natural soil deposits that will underlie a proposed structure and their physical properties is generally

Date: April 2, 2014 Project No.: Prepared For: Mr. Adam Kates CLASSIC COMMUNITIES 1068 E. Meadow Circle Palo Alto, California 94303

Station Description Sheet GRA

Prof. Dr.-Ing. Martin Achmus Institute of Soil Mechanics, Foundation Engineering and Waterpower Engineering. Offshore subsoil investigations

Advanced Foundation Engineering

Existing Bridge Proposed Bridge 66003

IN SITU TESTING TECHNOLOGY FOR FOUNDATION & EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING. Wesley Spang, Ph.D., P.E. AGRA Earth & Environmental, Inc.

GEOTECHNICAL REPORT. Matanuska-Susitna Borough. Parks Highway Connections Museum Drive. Matanuska-Susitna Borough, Alaska.

Evaluation of Geotechnical Hazards

M E M O R A N D U M. Mr. Jonathan K. Thrasher, P.E., Mr. Ian Kinnear, P.E. (FL) PSI

Chapter 7 GEOMECHANICS

Technical Memorandum. Soil Borings

Soil Behaviour in Earthquake Geotechnics

Soil Dynamics Prof. Deepankar Choudhury Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay

Data Acquisition for Geotechnical Analysis in Tailing Design and Survey: Approach using CPT Technique

Prof. B V S Viswanadham, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

Geotechnical Investigation

BP Connect Development Turangi Preliminary Geotechnical Assessment Report

(C) Global Journal of Engineering Science and Research Management

Enhanced In-Situ Testing for Geotechnical Site Characterization. Graduate Course CEE 6423

Interpretation of Seismic Cone Penetration Testing in Silty Soil

Fellenius, B. H., and Eslami, A.

Boreholes. Implementation. Boring. Boreholes may be excavated by one of these methods: 1. Auger Boring 2. Wash Boring 3.

Evaluation of Cone Penetration Resistance in Loose Silty Sand Using Calibration Chamber

6.2 Geotechnical Investigation and Construction Material Survey

Mitigation of Liquefaction Potential Using Rammed Aggregate Piers

ADDENDUM NO. 1. PROJECT NAME: Surf Road NRCS Drainage Improvements PRI PROJECT NO: Wakulla Co ITB #

, with SPT N value is a very profitable approach since most field parameters are based on SPT N values and CPT tip resistance.

Geotechnical Subsurface Exploration and Laboratory Testing Data Report

Seismic piezocone and seismic flat dilatometer tests at Treporti

Master Thesis, Department of Geosciences. Interpretation of CPTu results in silty clay and assessment of strength parameters

Transcription:

This Cone Penetration Test (CPT) Sounding follows ASTM D 5778 and was made by ordinary and conventional methods and with care deemed adequate for the Department's design purposes. Since this sounding was not taken to gather information relating to the construction of the project, the data noted in the field and recorded may not necessarily be the same as that which a contractor would desire. While the Department believes that the information as to the conditions and materials reported is accurate, it does not warrant that the information is necessarily complete. This information has been edited or abridged and may not reveal all the information which might be useful or of interest to the contractor. Consequently, the Department will make available at its offices, the field logs relating to this sounding. Minnesota Department of Transportation Geotechnical Section Cone Penetration Test Index Sheet 1.0 (CPT 1.0) USER NOTES, ABBREVIATIONS AND DEFINITIONS This Index sheet accompanies Cone Penetration Test Ratio of sleeve friction over corrected tip Data. Please refer to the Boring Log Descriptive resistance. Terminology Sheet for information relevant to FR = fs/qt conventional boring logs. Vs Shear Wave Velocity A measure of the speed at which a siesmic wave travels through soil/rock. PORE WATER MEASUREMENTS Pore water measurements reported on CPT Log are representative of water pressures measured at the U2 location, just behind the cone tip, prior to the sleeve, as shown in the figure below. These measurements are considered to be dynamic water pressures due to the local disturbance caused by the cone tip. Dynamic water pressure decay and Static water pressure measurements are reported on a Pore Water Pressure Dissipation Graph. Since subsurface conditions outside each CPT Sounding are unknown, and soil, rock and water conditions cannot be relied upon to be consistent or uniform, no warrant is made that conditions adjacent to this sounding will necessarily be the same as or similar to those shown on this log. Furthermore, the Department will not be responsible for any interpretations, assumptions, projections or interpolations made by contractors, or other users of this log. U2 Robertson CPTU 1990 Soil Behavior type based on pore pressure Water pressure measurements and subsequent interpreted water levels shown on this log should be used with discretion since they represent dynamic conditions. Dynamic Pore water pressure measurements may deviate substantially from hydrostatic conditions, especially in cohesive soils. In cohesive soils, water pressures often take extended periods of time to reach equilibrium and thus reflect their true field level. Water levels can be expected to vary both seasonally and yearly. The absence of notations on this log regarding water does not necessarily mean that this boring was dry or that the contractor will not encounter subsurface water during the course of construction. CPT Terminology CPT...Cone Penetration Test CPTU...Cone Penetration Test with Pore Pressure measurements SCPTU...Cone Penetration Test with Pore Pressure and Seismic measurements Piezocone...Common name for CPTU test (Note: This test is not related to the Dynamic Cone Penetrometer DCP) qt TIP RESISTANCE The resistance at the cone corrected for water pressure. Data is from cone with 60 degree apex angle and a 10 cm 2 end area. fs SLEEVE FRICTION RESISTANCE The resistance along the sleeve of the penetrometer. FR SBT SOIL BEHAVIOR TYPE Soil Classification methods for the Cone Penetration Test are based on correlation charts developed from observations of CPT data and conventional borings. Please note that these classification charts are meant to provide a guide to Soil and should not be used to infer a soil classification based on grain size distribution. The numbers corresponding to different regions on the charts represent the following soil behavior types: 1. Sensitive, Fine Grained 2. Organic Soils - Peats 3. Clays - Clay to Silty Clay 4. Silt Mixtures - Clayey Silt to Silty Clay 5. Sand Mixtures - Silty Sand to Sandy Silt 6. Sands - Clean Sand to Silty Sand 7. Gravelly Sand to Sand 8. Very Stiff Sand to Clayey Sand 9. Very Stiff, Fine Grained Note that engineering judgment, and comparison with conventional borings is especially important in the proper interpretation of CPT data in certain geomaterials. The following charts are used to provide a Soil for the CPT Data. Robertson CPT 1990 Soil Behavior type based on friction ratio where... QT... normalized cone resistance Bq... pore pressure ratio Fr... Normalized friction ratio σvo... overburden pressure σ vo... effective over burden pressure u2... measured pore pressure u0... equilibrium pore pressure G:\GEOTECH\PUBLIC\FORMS\CPTINDEX.DOC January 30, 2002

State Project Location 0 939.0 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - GEOTECHNICAL SECTION Latitude (North)=45 00'36.58" No Station-Offset Information Available UNIQUE NUMBER 78724 Ramsey Co. Coordinate: X=561198 Y=179958 (ft.) Longitude (West)=93 08'48.21" CPT Machine CPT Operator Ground s03 Hasselquist Hole Type CPT-SEISMIC 205146 CPT Truck (H) 939.0 SHEET 1 of 2 Date Completed 8/1/14 5 934.0 10 929.0 15 924.0 20 919.0 25 914.0 30 909.0 35 904.0 40 899.0 45 894.0 50 889.0 884.0 Index Sheet Code 3.0 (Continued Next Page) C:\6212-62731\Cone\H01G1402C.DAT Soil Class: Rock Class: Edit: Date: 9/22/14 G:\GINT\PROJECTS-ACTIVE\.GPJ

MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - GEOTECHNICAL SECTION UNIQUE NUMBER 78724 State Project s03 Ground 939.0 Mn/DOT GEOTECHNICAL SECTION - SHEET 2 of 2 884.0 60 879.0 65 874.0 70 869.0 75 864.0 80 859.0 85 854.0 90 849.0 95 844.0 100 839.0 End of Data Bottom of Hole 100.49,Refusal from accumulated side friction C:\6212-62731\Cone\H01G1402C.DAT Soil Class: Rock Class: Edit: Date: 9/22/14 G:\GINT\PROJECTS-ACTIVE\.GPJ

State Project Location 0 940.0 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - GEOTECHNICAL SECTION Latitude (North)=45 00'36.47" No Station-Offset Information Available UNIQUE NUMBER 78725 Ramsey Co. Coordinate: X=561317 Y=179947 (ft.) Longitude (West)=93 08'46.56" CPT Machine CPT Operator s04b Hasselquist Hole Type CPT-SEISMIC 205146 CPT Truck (H) Ground 940.0 SHEET 1 of 2 Date Completed 8/5/14 5 935.0 10 930.0 15 925.0 20 920.0 25 915.0 30 910.0 35 905.0 40 900.0 45 895.0 50 890.0 885.0 Index Sheet Code 3.0 (Continued Next Page) C:\6212-62731\Cone\H05G1403C.DAT Soil Class: Rock Class: Edit: Date: 9/22/14 G:\GINT\PROJECTS-ACTIVE\.GPJ

MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - GEOTECHNICAL SECTION UNIQUE NUMBER 78725 State Project s04b Ground 940.0 Mn/DOT GEOTECHNICAL SECTION - SHEET 2 of 2 885.0 60 880.0 65 875.0 70 870.0 75 865.0 80 860.0 85 8.0 90 850.0 95 845.0 100 840.0 End of Data Bottom of Hole 103.24,Refusal from accumulated side friction C:\6212-62731\Cone\H05G1403C.DAT Soil Class: Rock Class: Edit: Date: 9/22/14 G:\GINT\PROJECTS-ACTIVE\.GPJ

State Project Location 0 937.7 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - GEOTECHNICAL SECTION Latitude (North)=45 00'38.4" No Station-Offset Information Available UNIQUE NUMBER 78722 Ramsey Co. Coordinate: X=561315 Y=180143 (ft.) Longitude (West)=93 08'46.58" CPT Machine CPT Operator Ground s01 Hasselquist Hole Type CPT-SEISMIC 205146 CPT Truck (H) 937.7 SHEET 1 of 2 Date Completed 7/31/14 5 932.7 10 927.7 15 922.7 20 917.7 25 912.7 30 907.7 35 902.7 40 897.7 45 892.7 50 887.7 882.7 Index Sheet Code 3.0 (Continued Next Page) C:\6212-62731\Cone\H31L1402C.DAT Soil Class: Rock Class: Edit: Date: 9/22/14 G:\GINT\PROJECTS-ACTIVE\.GPJ

MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - GEOTECHNICAL SECTION UNIQUE NUMBER 78722 State Project s01 Ground 937.7 Mn/DOT GEOTECHNICAL SECTION - SHEET 2 of 2 882.7 60 877.7 65 872.7 70 867.7 75 862.7 80 857.7 85 852.7 90 847.7 End of Data Bottom of Hole 91.7,Stopped push due to high inclination (crooked rods) C:\6212-62731\Cone\H31L1402C.DAT Soil Class: Rock Class: Edit: Date: 9/22/14 G:\GINT\PROJECTS-ACTIVE\.GPJ

State Project Location 0 939.4 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - GEOTECHNICAL SECTION Latitude (North)=45 00'38.31" No Station-Offset Information Available UNIQUE NUMBER 78723 Ramsey Co. Coordinate: X=561199 Y=180133 (ft.) Longitude (West)=93 08'48.19" CPT Machine CPT Operator Ground s02 Hasselquist Hole Type CPT-SEISMIC 205146 CPT Truck (H) 939.4 SHEET 1 of 2 Date Completed 8/1/14 5 934.4 10 929.4 15 924.4 20 919.4 25 914.4 30 909.4 35 904.4 40 899.4 45 894.4 50 889.4 884.4 Index Sheet Code 3.0 (Continued Next Page) C:\6212-62731\Cone\H01G1401C.DAT Soil Class: Rock Class: Edit: Date: 9/22/14 G:\GINT\PROJECTS-ACTIVE\.GPJ

MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - GEOTECHNICAL SECTION UNIQUE NUMBER 78723 State Project s02 Ground 939.4 Mn/DOT GEOTECHNICAL SECTION - SHEET 2 of 2 884.4 60 879.4 65 874.4 70 869.4 75 864.4 80 859.4 85 854.4 90 849.4 95 844.4 100 839.4 End of Data Bottom of Hole 101.59,Refusal from accumulated side friction C:\6212-62731\Cone\H01G1401C.DAT Soil Class: Rock Class: Edit: Date: 9/22/14 G:\GINT\PROJECTS-ACTIVE\.GPJ