P.E. Civil Exam Review: GEOMECHANICS. Jerry Vandevelde, P.E.

Similar documents
Chapter 1 - Soil Mechanics Review Part A

Geotechnical Properties of Soil

Geology 229 Engineering Geology. Lecture 8. Elementary Soil Mechanics (West, Ch. 7)

CE 240 Soil Mechanics & Foundations Lecture 3.2. Engineering Classification of Soil (AASHTO and USCS) (Das, Ch. 4)

Class Principles of Foundation Engineering CEE430/530

Solution:Example 1. Example 2. Solution: Example 2. clay. Textural Soil Classification System (USDA) CE353 Soil Mechanics Dr.

SOIL MECHANICS Assignment #5: Stresses in a Soil Mass.

Principles of Foundation Engineering 8th Edition Das SOLUTIONS MANUAL


This document downloaded from vulcanhammer.net vulcanhammer.info Chet Aero Marine


Module 1 GEOTECHNICAL PROPERTIES OF SOIL AND OF REINFORCED SOIL (Lectures 1 to 4)

CE 240 Soil Mechanics & Foundations Lecture 5.2. Permeability III (Das, Ch. 6) Summary Soil Index Properties (Das, Ch. 2-6)

Chapter 2. 53% v. 2.2 a. From Eqs. (2.11) and (2.12), it can be seen that, 2.67

Effects Of The Soil Properties On The Maximum Dry Density Obtained Fro

A. V T = 1 B. Ms = 1 C. Vs = 1 D. Vv = 1

Geology and Soil Mechanics /1A ( ) Mark the best answer on the multiple choice answer sheet.

APPENDIX F CORRELATION EQUATIONS. F 1 In-Situ Tests

VALLIAMMAI ENGINEERING COLLEGE

Depth (ft) USCS Soil Description TOPSOIL & FOREST DUFF

Compressibility & Consolidation

Tikrit University College of Engineering Civil engineering Department

CONSOLIDATION TEST REPORT

CONSOLIDATION OF SOIL


Philadelphia University Faculty of Engineering

IN SITU SPECIFIC GRAVITY VS GRAIN SIZE: A BETTER METHOD TO ESTIMATE NEW WORK DREDGING PRODUCTION

Prof. B V S Viswanadham, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

CIVE.5370 EXPERIMENTAL SOIL MECHANICS Soil Sampling, Testing, & Classification Review

ADDENDUM 1 FISHER SLOUGH RESTORATION PROJECT SKAGIT COUNTY, WASHINGTON

Clay Robinson, PhD, CPSS, PG copyright 2009

ADVANCED SOIL MECHANICS FINAL EXAM (TAKE HOME):DUE THURSDAY, DECEMBER 19, 6PM.

December 5, Junction Gateway, LLC 7551 W. Sunset Boulevard #203 Los Angeles, CA Mr. James Frost P: Dear Mr.

B-1 BORE LOCATION PLAN. EXHIBIT Drawn By: 115G BROOKS VETERINARY CLINIC CITY BASE LANDING AND GOLIAD ROAD SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS.

SOILS/AGGREGATE TECHNICIAN REVIEW

Table of Contents Chapter 1 Introduction to Geotechnical Engineering 1.1 Geotechnical Engineering 1.2 The Unique Nature of Soil and Rock Materials

FUNDAMENTALS OF CONSOLIDATION

SOIL FORMATION SOIL CLASSIFICATION FOR GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS. Soil Properties and Classification

Introduction to Soil Mechanics

Chapter I Basic Characteristics of Soils

B-1 SURFACE ELEVATION

Technical Supplement 14Q. Abutment Design for Small Bridges. (210 VI NEH, August 2007)

Guide to Passing the Civil PE Exam Geotechnical AM Edition 1. Michael Frolov, P.E. Mark F. DeSantis, P.E., PMP

APPENDIX B ABBREVIATIONS, SYMBOLS AND CONVERSION FACTORS Abbreviations

Unbound Pavement Applications of Excess Foundry System Sands: Subbase/Base Material

4. Soil Consistency (Plasticity) (Das, chapter 4)

Soil Mechanics Brief Review. Presented by: Gary L. Seider, P.E.

The Development of a Performance Specification for Granular Base and Subbase Material

FUNDAMENTALS SOIL MECHANICS. Isao Ishibashi Hemanta Hazarika. >C\ CRC Press J Taylor & Francis Group. Taylor & Francis Group, an Informa business

APPENDIX H CONVERSION FACTORS


Soil Mechanics III. SOIL COMPOSITION WEIGHT-VOLUME RELATIONSHIPS TERMINOLOGY AND DEFINITIONS

Civil Engineering Department College of Engineering

Assessment of accuracy in determining Atterberg limits for four Iraqi local soil laboratories

GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION REPORT

Field Exploration. March 31, J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc. 115 Northstar Avenue Twin Falls, Idaho Attn: Mr. Tracy Ahrens, P. E. E:

UNIVERSITY OF BOLTON WESTERN INTERNATIONAL COLLEGE FZE. BEng (HONS) IN CIVIL ENGINEERING SEMESTER ONE EXAMINATION 2016/2017 GROUND AND WATER STUDIES 1

Soils. Technical English - I 10 th week

REQUIRED: Calculate the total consolidation settlement in the CL layers due to the addition of the 5 ft of fill.

State of Wisconsin/Department of Transportation RESEARCH PROGRESS REPORT FOR THE QUARTER ENDING: JUNE 30, 2008

Effect of Lime on the Compressibility Characteristics of a Highly Plastic Clay

Geotechnical Recommendations for Proposed Additions to the Three Mile Creek Severe Weather Attenuation Tank Project

Correlation of unified and AASHTO soil classification systems for soils classification

PRINCIPLES OF GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING

SOIL MECHANICS SAB1713 DR. HETTY

Instructor : Dr. Jehad Hamad. Chapter (7)

Tikrit University. College of Engineering Civil engineering Department CONSOILDATION. Soil Mechanics. 3 rd Class Lecture notes Up Copyrights 2016

APPENDIX C. Borehole Data

Tikrit University. College of Engineering Civil engineering Department SOIL PROPERTES. Soil Mechanics. 3 rd Class Lecture notes Up Copyrights 2016

Compute the lateral force per linear foot with sloping backfill and inclined wall. Use Equation No. 51, page 93. Press ENTER.

*** ***! " " ) * % )!( & ' % # $. 0 1 %./ +, - 7 : %8% 9 ) 7 / ( * 7 : %8% 9 < ;14. " > /' ;-,=. / ١

Soil Mechanics Course Contents

Hydraulic conductivity of granular materials

Civil Engineering, Surveying and Environmental Consulting WASP0059.ltr.JLS.Mich Ave Bridge Geotech.docx

Soil Mechanics I CE317

8.1. What is meant by the shear strength of soils? Solution 8.1 Shear strength of a soil is its internal resistance to shearing stresses.

Course Scheme -UCE501: SOIL MECHANICS L T P Cr

2012 Road School Light Weight Deflectometer (LWD)

Seismic stability analysis of quay walls: Effect of vertical motion

12 th ICSGE Dec Cairo - Egypt

Water in Soil Sections in Craig

Geotechnical Engineering I CE 341

SOIL MECHANICS-01 LAB COPY INSTRUCTER: ENGR HALLEMA ATAULLAH PREPARED BY: KAMRAN KHAN PRACTICLE NO. 01 TITLE: TO DETERMINE THE MOISRURE CONTENT OF A

Introduction to Soil Mechanics Geotechnical Engineering-II

THE GEOTECHNICAL INDEX PROPERTIES OF SOIL IN WARRI, DELTA STATE, NIGERIA

APPLIED SOIL MECHANICS

pcf REQUIRED: Determine the shear strength parameters for use in a preliminary shallow foundation design. SOLUTION:

CE330L Student Lab Manual Mineral Aggregate Properties

PREDICTIONS OF MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY AND OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT FROM SIMPLE MATERIAL PROPERTIES

Asst. L.Musaab.S.A. ch.2 Soil Aggregate Basic Relationships (composition of soil terminology and definitions) 2.1Composition of soil

Shear Strength of Soils

SHEAR STRENGTH OF SOIL

YOUR HW MUST BE STAPLED YOU MUST USE A PENCIL (no pens)

SEM-2016(01HI CIVIL ENGINEERING. Paper Answer all questions. Question No. 1 does not have internal choice,

research report Characterization of Unbound Pavement Materials From New Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Procedure

Effect of Cementation on the Shear Strength of Tehran Gravelly Sand Using Triaxial Tests

THE INFLUENCE OF SAND s GRADATION AND CLAY CONTENT OF DIRECT SHEART TEST ON CLAYEY SAND

Geotechnical Data Report

Effect of Cementation on the Shear Strength of Tehran Gravelly Sand Using Triaxial Tests

GEOTECHNICAL REPORT. Matanuska-Susitna Borough. Parks Highway Connections Museum Drive. Matanuska-Susitna Borough, Alaska.

Transcription:

P.E. Civil Exam Review: GEOMECHANICS Jerry Vandevelde, P.E. gtv@gemeng.com

GEOMECHANICS

National Council of Examiners for Engineering and Surveying http://www.ncees.org/ 3

STUDY REFERENCES Foundation Engineering; Peck Hanson & Thornburn Introductory Soil Mechanics and Foundations; Sowers NAVFAC Design Manuals DM-7.1 & 7.2 Foundation Analysis and Design; Bowles Practical Foundation Engineering Handbook; Brown 4

Soil Classification Systems * Unified Soil Classification System * AASHTO Need: Particle Sizes and Atterberg Limits 5

Particle Sizes (Sieve Analysis) (Well Graded) (Poorly Graded) 0.1 6

Atterberg Limits Liquid, Plastic & Shrinkage Limits Plasticity Index (PI) PI = Liquid Limit - Plastic Limit (range of moisture content over which soil is plastic or malleable) 7

UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM ASTM D-2487 8

Ref: Peck Hanson & Thornburn 2nd Ed. 9

Effective Size = D10 10 percent of the sample is finer than this size D 60 = 1.6mm D 30 = 0.2mm D 10 = 0.03mm 0.1 0.1 10

Uniformity Coefficient (Cu) = D60/D10 Coefficient of Curvature (Cz) = (D30) 2 /(D10xD60) D 60 = 1.6mm D 30 = 0.2mm D 10 = 0.03mm 0.1 11

Well Graded - Requirements 50% coarser than No. 200 sieve Uniformity Coefficient (Cu) D60/D10 >4 for Gravel > 6 for Sand Coefficient of Curvature (Cz) = (D30) 2 /(D10xD60) = 1 to 3 12

Is the better graded material a gravel? 81% Passing No. 4 18% Finer No. 200 0.1 0.1 13

Gravel if > 50 Percent Coarse Fraction retained on No. 4 sieve 81% Passing No. 4 18% Finer No. 200 % Retained on No. 200 = 82% 1/2 = 41% 19% (100-81) retained on No. 4 sieve (gravel) 19< 41 half of coarse fraction sand ( S ) 0.1 14

Well Graded Sand? D60 = 1.6mm D30 = 0.2mm D10 = 0.03mm 0.1 Uniformity Coefficient (Cu) must be > 6 = D60/D10 Coefficient of Curvature (Cz) must = 1 to 3 = (D30) 2 /(D10xD60) 15

Well Graded Sand? D60 = 1.6mm Uniformity Coefficient (Cu) D60/D10 = 1.6/.03 = 53 > 6 D30 = 0.2mm 0.1 D10 = 0.03mm Coefficient of Curvature (Cz) = (D30) 2 /(D10xD60) = 0.2 2 /(.03x1.6) = 0.83 <1 to 3 Poorly graded 16

What classification? Unified Classification of Coarse Soils with Fines < 5% Passing No. 200 sieve:gw,gp, SW, SP 81% Passing No. 4 5% - 12% Passing No. 200 sieve: Borderline- use dual symbols 18% Finer No. 200 > 12% Passing No. 200 sieve: GM, GC, SM, SC 0.1 >12% passing No. 200 sieve Since = S SC or SM 17

What Unified Classification if LL= 45 & PI = 25? From sieve data SC or SM 0.1 A) SC B) SM C) CL or D) SC & SM 18

Unified Classification Answer is A SC 19

AASHTO (American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials) 20

What is the AASHTO Classification? 65% Passing No. 10 40% Passing No. 40 1) 18 % passing No. 200 sieve 2) 65% passing No. 10 sieve 3) 40% passing No. 40 sieve 4) assume LL = 45 & PI = 25 18% Finer No. 200 0.1 21

18 percent passing No. 200 sieve; 65 percent passing No. 10 sieve 40 percent passing No. 40 sieve; assume LL = 45 & PI = 25 22

AASHTO Classification 1 2 3 4 4 1) 18 % passing No. 200 sieve 2) 65% passing No. 10 sieve 3) 40% passing No. 40 sieve 4) assume LL = 45 & PI = 25 23

GI = (F 200 + 0.01(F AASHTO Group Index 35) 200 [ 0.2 + 0.005(LL 40) ] 15)(PI 10) For Group A-2-6 and A-2-7 The first term is determined by the LL The second term is determined by the PI F200: percentage passing through the No.200 sieve GI = 0.01(F 200 15)(PI 10) use the second term only In general, the rating for a pavement subgrade is inversely proportional to the group index, GI. 24

Mass-Volume (Phase Diagram) Total Va Volume Air Vt Vv Total Water Vw Ww Weight Vs Soil Ws Wt Unit volume of soil contains: Air (gases) Water (fluid) Solid Particles 25

Moisture Content = ω weight of water/ weight of dry soil ω = Ww/Wd water loss/(moist soil weight - water loss) ω = Ww/(Wm-Ww) and ω =(Wm-Wd)/Wd 26

Mass - Volume Relationships Density or Unit Weight = γ Moist Unit Weight = γm γm = Wm/Vt = γd + ω γd ω = (γ m - γ d )/ γd ω γd + γd = γm γm= (1+ ω) γd γd = γm/(1+ ω) b 27

Total Volume = Volume (solid + water + air) = Vs+Vw+Va Va = Vt - Vs- Vw Total Va Volume Air Vt Vv Total Water Vw Ww Weight Vs Soil Ws Wt 28

Relationship Between Mass & Volume Volume = Mass/(Specific Gravity x Unit Weight of Water) = Ws/(SGxWw) Total Va Volume Air Vt Vv Total Water Vw Ww Weight Vs Soil Ws Wt 29

Specific Gravity = weight of material/ weight of same volume of water Soil Specific Gravity Typical Range 2.65 to 2.70 Specific Gravity of Water = 1 30

Saturation = S expressed as percent S = volume of water/ volume of voids x 100 Total Va Volume Air Vt Vv Total Water Vw Ww Weight Vs Soil Ws Wt S = Vw/Vv x 100 Always 100 31

Porosity n = volume of voids/ total volume n = Vv/Vt Total Va Volume Void Ratio e = volume of voids/ volume of solids Air Vt Vv Total Water Vw Ww Weight Vs Soil Ws e = Vv/Vs Wt 32

What is the degree of saturation for a soil with: SG = 2.68, γ m = 127.2 pcf & ω = 18.6 percent A) 88.4 Total Va Volume Air Vt Vv Total Water Vw Ww Weight Vs Soil Ws Wt B) 100.0 C) 89.1 33

What is degree of saturation for a soil with: SG = 2.68, γm = 127.2 pcf & ω = 18.6 percent Air Total Va Volume Vt Vv Total Vw Water Ww Weight Wt Vs Soil Ws γd = γm/(1+ ω) = 127.2/(1.186) = 107.3pcf Ww = γm- γd = 19.9 pcf Vw = Ww/62.4 = 0.319 cf Vs = γd /(SGx62.4) = 0.642 cf Va = Vt - Vw - Vs = 1-0.319-0.642 = 0.039 cf Vv = Vw + Va = 0.358 cf 34

What is degree of saturation for a soil with: SG = 2.68, γm = 127.2 pcf & ω = 18.6 percent Vw = 0.319 cf, Vs = 0.642 cf, Vv = 0.358 cf Air Total Va Volume Vt Vv Total Vw Water Ww Weight Wt Vs Soil Ws Degree of Saturation = Vw/Vv x 100 = 0.319/0.358 x 100 = 89.1% Answer is C 35

Ref: NAVFAC DM-7 36

Borrow Fill Adjustments Borrow Material Properties: γm = 110 pcf & ω = 10% Placed Fill Properties:γd = 105 pcf & ω = 20% How much borrow is needed to produce 30,000 cy of fill? How much water must be added or removed from each cf of fill? Air Total Va Volume Vt Vv Total Water Vw Ww Weight Wt Vs Soil Ws 37

Borrow Fill Adjustments Borrow Material Properties: γm = 110 pcf & ω = 10% γd = γm /(1+ω) = 110/(1.10) =100 pcf; Ww = 110-100=10 lbs Placed Fill Properties:γd = 105 pcf & ω = 17% Ww = ωx γd = 0.17x 105 = 17.9 lbs Total Va Volume Air Vt Vv Total Water Vw Ww Weight Vs Soil Ws Wt 38

Borrow Fill Adjustments Borrow Properties: γm = 110 pcf, γd =100 & ω = 10% Placed Fill Properties:γd = 105 pcf & ω = 20% Since borrow γd =100pcf & fill γd =105pcf, 105/100 =1.05 It takes 1.05 cy of borrow to make 1.0 cy of fill For 30,000 cy, 30,000 x 1.05 = 31,500 cy of borrow Air Total Va Volume Vt Vv Total Water Vw Ww Weight Vs Soil Ws Wt 39

Borrow Fill Adjustments Borrow Material Properties: Ww = 10 lbs Placed Fill Properties:Ww = 17.9 lbs Water supplied from borrow in each cf of fill = 10 x 1.05 = 10.5 lbs; 17.9 lbs - 10.5 = 7.4 lbs short/1.05 cf 7.4 lbs/1.05 cf = 7.0 lbs of water to be added per cf borrow Air Total Va Volume Vt Vv Total Water Vw Ww Weight Wt Vs Soil Ws 40

Proctor: Moisture Density Relationships Establishes the unique relationship of moisture to dry density for each specific soil at a specified compaction energy MOISTURE-DENSITY RELATIONSHIP 108.0 106.0 104.0 Dry Density (pcf) 102.0 100.0 98.0 96.0 94.0 92.0 90.0 88.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0 22.0 24.0 26.0 28.0 Moisture Content (%) 41

Proctor: Moisture Density Relationships Standard: ASTM D-698 AASHTO T-99 Modified: ASTM D-1557 AASHTO T-180 4 mold 25 blows 6 mold 56 blows Standard 5.5 lb hammer dropped 12 in 3 layers Modified 10 lb hammer dropped 18 in 5 layers 42

PROCTOR COMPACTION TEST Maximum Dry Density - Highest density for that degree of compactive effort Optimum Moisture Content - Moisture content at which maximum dry density is achieved for that compactive effort 43

Proctor: Moisture Density Relationships Dry Density (pcf) MOISTURE-DENSITY RELATIONSHIP 108.0 106.0 104.0 102.0 100.0 98.0 96.0 94.0 92.0 90.0 88.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0 22.0 24.0 26.0 28.0 Moisture Content (%) What density is required for 95% Compaction? What range of moisture would facilitate achieving 95% compaction? 44

Proctor: Moisture Density Relationships 108.0 106.0 MOISTURE-DENSITY RELATIONSHIP 104 x.95 = 98.8 pcf Dry Density (pcf) 104.0 102.0 100.0 98.0 96.0 94.0 92.0 90.0 88.0 95% A B 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0 22.0 24.0 26.0 28.0 Moisture Content (%) Range of moisture is within the curve A to B (14 to 24 %) 45

Proctor: Zero Air Voids Line Dry Density (pcf) 108.0 106.0 104.0 102.0 100.0 98.0 96.0 94.0 92.0 90.0 88.0 MOISTURE-DENSITY RELATIONSHIP Z 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0 22.0 24.0 26.0 28.0 Moisture Content (%) Relationship of density to moisture at saturation for constant specific gravity (SG) Can t achieve fill in zone right of zero air voids line 46

Proctor: Moisture Density Relationships Dry Density (pcf) 108.0 106.0 104.0 102.0 100.0 98.0 96.0 94.0 MOISTURE-DENSITY RELATIONSHIP If SG = 2.65 & moisture content is 24% What dry density achieves 100% saturation? 92.0 90.0 88.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0 22.0 24.0 26.0 28.0 Moisture Content (%) A) 100.0 pcf B) 101.1 pcf 47

Proctor: Moisture Density Relationships 108.0 MOISTURE-DENSITY RELATIONSHIP γd=sg62.4/(1+ωsg/100) Dry Density (pcf) 106.0 104.0 102.0 100.0 98.0 96.0 94.0 X γd=2.65x62.4/(1+24x2.65/100) γd=101.1 pcf 92.0 90.0 88.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0 22.0 24.0 26.0 28.0 Moisture Content (%) Answer is B 48

Ref: Peck Hanson & Thornburn Static Head 49

Calculate effective stress at point x Ref: Peck Hanson & Thornburn 5 Saturated Unit Weight δ sat Moist Unit Weight δ M δ sat = 125 pcf 7 x Dry Unit Weight δ Dry Submerged (buoyant) Unit Weight = δ sat - 62.4 50

Calculate effective stress at point x Ref: Peck Hanson & Thornburn Total Stress at X 5 = 5 x 62.4+ 7x 125= 1187psf Pore Pressure at X δ sat = 125 pcf x 7 = 12 x 62.4 = 749 psf Effective Stress at X = 1187-749= 438 psf or (125-62.4) x 7=438 psf 51

Ref: Peck Hanson & Thornburn Downward Flow Gradient 52

Downward Flow Gradient 3 δ sat = 125 pcf x 5 7 Total Stress at X = 5 x 62.4+ 7x 125= 1187psf Pore Pressure at X = (12-3) x 62.4 = 562 psf Effective Stress at X = 1187-562 = 625 psf or 438 + 3 x 62.4 = 625psf see previous problem 53

Upward Flow Gradient Ref: Peck Hanson & Thornburn 54

One Dimensional Consolidation Δe/p n 55

Primary Phase Settlement (e log p) ΔH = (H xδe)/(1+e o ) e o ΔH H 56

Consolidation Test Pre-consolidation Pressure C c = slope of e log p virgin curve est. C c = 0.009(LL-10%) Skempton Rebound or recompression curves 57 56

e-log p Calculate Compression Index; C c Void Ratio (e) 1.50 1.40 1.30 1.20 1.10 1.00 0.90 0.80 0.1 1 10 100 Pressure (ksf) ksf (e) 0.1 1.404 1 1.404 4 1.375 8 1.227 16 1.08 32 0.932 A) 0.21 B) 0.49 58

C c is the slope of the virgin e-log p Void Ratio (e) e-log p 0.1 1 10 100 Pressure (ksf) Cc 1.50 1.40 1.30 1.20 1.10 1.00 0.90 0.80 Cc = -(e 1 -e 2 )/log (p 1 /p 2 ) Cc=-(1.375-1.227)/log(4/8) Cc = 0.49 Answer is B ksf (e) 0.1 1.404 1 1.404 4 1.375 8 1.227 16 1.08 32 0.932 59

Permeability Constant Head Conditions Q=kiAt Q= k (h/l)at k=ql/(ath) Q= flow Volume k = permeability i = hydraulic gradient h/l A = x-sectional area t = time q = flow rate Q/t 60

If Q =15cc & t = 30 sec what is the permeability k=ql/(ath) 10cm 5cm A) 0.01 cm/sec B) 0.01x10-2 cm/sec 25cm 2 C) 0.1 cm/sec 61

Constant Head Permeability 10cm 25cm 2 5cm Calculate k Q =15cc & t = 30 sec k=ql/(ath) k= (15x5)/(25x30x10) k= 0.01 cm/sec Answer is A 62

Falling Head Permeability k=ql/(ath) (but h varies) k=(2.3al/(at)) log (h1/h2) where a = pipette area h1 = initial head h2 = final head 63

If t = 30 sec; h1= 30 cm; h2 = 15 cm L= 5 cm; a= 0.2 cm 2; A= 30 cm 2 ; calculate k A) 2.3x10-3 cm/sec B) 8.1x10-6 cm/sec C) 7.7x10-4 cm/sec 64

Falling Head Permeability k=(2.3al/(at)) log (h1/h2) k= (2.3 (0.2) 5 /(30x30)) log (30/15) k= 7.7x10-4 cm/sec Answer is C 65

Flow lines & head drop lines must intersect at right angles All areas must be square Draw minimum number of lines Results depend on ratio of Nf/Nd Flow Nets 6ft 2ft 66

Q=kia=kHN f /N d wt (units = volume/time) w= unit width of section t=time Flow Nets 6ft 2ft 1 2 3 4 4.4 67

What flow/day? assume k= 1x10-5 cm/sec =0.0283 ft/day Q= kh (N f /N d )wt Q= 0.0283x8x(4.4/8)x1x1 Q= 0.12 cf/day Flow Nets 6ft 2ft 68

Check for quick conditions Flow Nets p c =2(120)= 240 psf (total stress) μ= 2(62.4) = 124.8 (static pressure) Δμ= 1/8(8)(62.4)= 62.4 (flow gradient) p c = p c -(μ+ Δμ) = 240-(124.8+62.4) p c = 52.8 psf >0, soil is not quick 2ft 2ft 6ft Below water level use saturated unit weight for total stress γ sat =120 pcf 69

Stress Change Influence (1H:2V) For square footing Δσ z =Q/(B+z) 2 70

If Q= 20 kips, Calculate the vertical stress increase at 7 feet below the footing bottom 5 8 7 71

If Q= 20 kips, Calculate the vertical stress increase at 7 feet below the footing bottom 5 8 Δσ z = 20000 (8+7)(5+7) 7 Δσ z = 111 psf 72

Westergaard (layered elastic & inelastic material) If B= 6.3 in a square footing with 20 kips load, what is the vertical stress increase at 7 below the footing bottom? 73

Westergaard Square Footings Q = 20 kips B = 6.3 Z = 7 Δσ z =? 74

Westergaard 7 /6.3 = 1.1B Δσ z = 0.18 x 20000/6.3 2 = 90.7 psf 75

Boussinesq (homogeneous elastic) Q = 20 kips B = 6.3 Z = 7 Δσ z =? 76

Boussinesq Z/B = 1.1 Square Footing Δσ z = 0.3 x 20000/6.3 2 = 151 psf 77

Thanks for participating in the PE review course on Soil Mechanics! More questions or comments? You can email me at: gtv@gemeng.com 78