pcf REQUIRED: Determine the shear strength parameters for use in a preliminary shallow foundation design. SOLUTION:

Similar documents
SOIL MECHANICS Assignment #7: Shear Strength Solution.

Shear Strength of Soils

Chapter 5 Shear Strength of Soil

Soil strength. the strength depends on the applied stress. water pressures are required

8.1. What is meant by the shear strength of soils? Solution 8.1 Shear strength of a soil is its internal resistance to shearing stresses.

SHEAR STRENGTH OF SOIL

Laboratory Testing Total & Effective Stress Analysis

SHEAR STRENGTH OF SOIL

Theory of Shear Strength

Welcome back. So, in the last lecture we were seeing or we were discussing about the CU test. (Refer Slide Time: 00:22)

Chapter (12) Instructor : Dr. Jehad Hamad

1.5 STRESS-PATH METHOD OF SETTLEMENT CALCULATION 1.5 STRESS-PATH METHOD OF SETTLEMENT CALCULATION

Table of Contents Chapter 1 Introduction to Geotechnical Engineering 1.1 Geotechnical Engineering 1.2 The Unique Nature of Soil and Rock Materials

Theory of Shear Strength

Ch 4a Stress, Strain and Shearing

Triaxial Shear Test. o The most reliable method now available for determination of shear strength parameters.

Prof. B V S Viswanadham, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

Following are the results of four drained direct shear tests on an overconsolidated clay: Diameter of specimen 50 mm Height of specimen 25 mm

1.8 Unconfined Compression Test

Stress and Strains in Soil and Rock. Hsin-yu Shan Dept. of Civil Engineering National Chiao Tung University

SOIL SHEAR STRENGTH. Prepared by: Dr. Hetty Muhammad Azril Fauziah Kassim Norafida

B-1 SURFACE ELEVATION

Module 4 Lecture 20 Pore water pressure and shear strength - 4 Topics

Geotechnical Parameters for Retaining Wall Design

Shear strength. Common cases of shearing In practice, the state of stress in the ground will be complex. Common cases of shearing Strength

Lateral Earth Pressure

SHEAR STRENGTH OF SOIL UNCONFINED COMPRESSION TEST

Foundation Analysis LATERAL EARTH PRESSURE

PRINCIPLES OF GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING

Shear Strength of Soils

(Refer Slide Time: 02:18)

Module 6 (Lecture 23) LATERAL EARTH PRESSURE

Earth Pressure Theory

Class Principles of Foundation Engineering CEE430/530

Appendix A Results of Triaxial and Consolidation Tests

SHEAR STRENGTH I YULVI ZAIKA

Reciprocal of the initial shear stiffness of the interface K si under initial loading; reciprocal of the initial tangent modulus E i of the soil

file:///d /suhasini/suha/office/html2pdf/ _editable/slides/module%202/lecture%206/6.1/1.html[3/9/2012 4:09:25 PM]

FUNDAMENTALS SOIL MECHANICS. Isao Ishibashi Hemanta Hazarika. >C\ CRC Press J Taylor & Francis Group. Taylor & Francis Group, an Informa business

Introduction to Soil Mechanics

H.1 SUMMARY OF SUBSURFACE STRATIGRAPHY AND MATERIAL PROPERTIES (DATA PACKAGE)

Prof. B V S Viswanadham, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

Soil Mechanics Prof. B.V.S. Viswanathan Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay Lecture 51 Earth Pressure Theories II

Introduction to Geotechnical Engineering. ground

Recent Research on EPS Geofoam Seismic Buffers. Richard J. Bathurst and Saman Zarnani GeoEngineering Centre at Queen s-rmc Canada

D1. A normally consolidated clay has the following void ratio e versus effective stress σ relationship obtained in an oedometer test.

With high enough plate forces in opposite directions Bolts. How do these fail? Each pin has sheared into two pieces.

Chapter 12: Lateral Earth Pressure

Geology 229 Engineering and Environmental Geology. Lecture 5. Engineering Properties of Rocks (West, Ch. 6)

Principles of Foundation Engineering 8th Edition Das SOLUTIONS MANUAL

Ch 5 Strength and Stiffness of Sands

Analysis of shear strength of armourstone based on 1 m 3 direct shear tests

2017 Soil Mechanics II and Exercises Final Exam. 2017/7/26 (Wed) 10:00-12:00 Kyotsu 4 Lecture room

Table 3. Empirical Coefficients for BS 8002 equation. A (degrees) Rounded Sub-angular. 2 Angular. B (degrees) Uniform Moderate grading.

Cyclic Behavior of Sand and Cyclic Triaxial Tests. Hsin-yu Shan Dept. of Civil Engineering National Chiao Tung University

LATERAL EARTH PRESSURE AND RETAINING STRUCTURES

YOUR HW MUST BE STAPLED YOU MUST USE A PENCIL (no pens)

(C) Global Journal of Engineering Science and Research Management

Soils. Technical English - I 10 th week

SOIL MODELS: SAFETY FACTORS AND SETTLEMENTS

Compute the lateral force per linear foot with sloping backfill and inclined wall. Use Equation No. 51, page 93. Press ENTER.

Chapter 2. 53% v. 2.2 a. From Eqs. (2.11) and (2.12), it can be seen that, 2.67

FOUNDATION ENGINEERING UNIT V

LATERAL EARTH PRESSURE

Three-dimensional settlement analysis of a primary crusher station at a copper mine in Chile

Intro to Soil Mechanics: the what, why & how. José E. Andrade, Caltech

Jaky s formula was often used to calculate the earth pressure at-rest behind a

Page 1 of 10. PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS ONTARIO NATIONAL EXAMINATIONS Mav CIV-A4 GEOTECHNICAL MATERIALS AND ANALYSIS 3 HOURS DURATION

Small and large scale direct shear tests on sand-concrete Interface

INTERPRETATION OF UNDRAINED SHEAR STRENGTH OF UNSATURATED SOILS IN TERMS OF STRESS STATE VARIABLES

Geology 229 Engineering Geology. Lecture 5. Engineering Properties of Rocks (West, Ch. 6)

The Ohio Department of Transportation Office of Research & Development Executive Summary Report

Geotechnical Properties of Soil


Shear Strength of Soils


CORRELATIONS BETWEEN GEOTECHNICAL PARAMETERS OF TRANSILVANIAN COHESIONLESS SOILS BASED ON TRIAXIAL LABORATORY TESTS RESULTS

Chapter 7 GEOMECHANICS

Shear Strength of Soil

Prof. B V S Viswanadham, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

23/04/2016. Centrifuge Tests. Coulomb s (1773) design strength. = c + tan d

B-1 BORE LOCATION PLAN. EXHIBIT Drawn By: 115G BROOKS VETERINARY CLINIC CITY BASE LANDING AND GOLIAD ROAD SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS.

VALLIAMMAI ENGINEERING COLLEGE

Shear Strength of. Charles Aubeny. Department of Civil Engineering Texas A&M University

Soil and Rock Strength. Chapter 8 Shear Strength. Steel Strength. Concrete Strength. Dr. Talat Bader May Steel. Concrete.

Verification of the Hyperbolic Soil Model by Triaxial Test Simulations

Geotechnical Indications Of Eastern Bypass Area In Port Harcourt, Niger Delta

Material is perfectly elastic until it undergoes brittle fracture when applied stress reaches σ f

Adapting The Modified Cam Clay Constitutive Model To The Computational Analysis Of Dense Granular Soils

SHEAR STRENGTH OF SOIL. Chapter 10: Sections Chapter 12: All sections except

BACKFILL AND INTERFACE CHARACTERISTICS

Analysis of a single pile settlement

Module 12:Insitu Ground Reinforcement and liquefaction of soils Lecture 38:Definition and mechanism of Liquefaction. The Lecture Contains:

Chapter (3) Ultimate Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundations

both an analytical approach and the pole method, determine: (a) the direction of the

PLANES OF WEAKNESS IN ROCKS, ROCK FRCTURES AND FRACTURED ROCK. Contents

NEW DOWN-HOLE PENETROMETER (DHP-CIGMAT) FOR CONSTRUCTION APPLICATIONS

Chapter (7) Lateral Earth Pressure

Activity Submitted by Tim Schroeder, Bennington College,

Soil Mechanics. Chapter # 1. Prepared By Mr. Ashok Kumar Lecturer in Civil Engineering Gpes Meham Rohtak INTRODUCTION TO SOIL MECHANICS AND ITS TYPES

Transcription:

14.330 SOIL MECHANICS Assignment #8: Shear Strength Solution. PROBLEM #1: GIVEN: A regional residential building contractor is planning on building a custom 4,100 ft² home on Martha s Vineyard, MA. The subsurface investigation for the house site shows that a poorly graded sand deposit exists from the existing ground surface to a depth of 25 ft. Density testing on the sand in-situ showed yielded an average moist unit weight of 120 pcf at an average moisture content of 10%. REQUIRED: Determine the shear strength parameters for use in a preliminary shallow foundation design. SOLUTION: 120 pcf pcf d 1 w 1 0.10 109. SP. Use Figure 7 (NAVFAC DM 7.01, 1986). 35 31 Figure 7. NAVFAC DM 7.01, 1986. Using Figure 7 of NAVFAC DM7.01: 31 ' 35. I d be conservative and use 31. 14.330 2014 Assignment 8 Solution Page 1 of 9

PROBLEM #2: GIVEN: Soil from a local contractors soil pit is proposed for use as backfill behind a Mechanically Stabilized Earth (MSE) Wall for a local project. The project specifications require that the backfill material have a minimum residual soil friction angle of 35 at the required compaction (i.e. 98% D1557). The results from the direct shear testing performed at the minimum required compaction by a local testing firm are provided in a CSV file (14.330_2014_Assignment_8_P2.csv). From the provided information, answer the following: REQUIRED: Determine the peak and residual friction angles ( peak and residual ) for this soil. Determine if the soil meets the project specifications. Explain density (loose or dense) of the soil based on direct shear results. SOLUTION: Using data provided in Figure A (plotted from the provided data), determine the peak and residual shear strengths for the tests at the three (3) confining (i.e. normal) stresses. This summary is provided in Table A. Table A. Direct Shear Results (from Figure A). Test Confining Stress ( ) Shear Stress ( ) Peak Residual 1 7.0 5.5 4.4 2 17.5 14.0 11.8 3 23.1 18.4 17.0 Plot of shear stress vs. normal stress to determine peak and residual is presented in Figure B. Assume no cohesion (i.e. c=0) since no soil classification is provided. A summary of the Mohr-Coulomb Failure Criteria from the direct shear testing is presented in Table B. 14.330 2014 Assignment 8 Solution Page 2 of 9

Figure A. Direct Shear Results for Problem #2. 14.330 2014 Assignment 8 Solution Page 3 of 9

Figure B. Shear Stress vs. Confining Stress for Direct Shear Results for Problem 2. Table B. Direct Shear Results Summary for Problem #2. State Friction Angle ( ) ( ) Cohesion (c) Peak 38.5 0 Residual 35.5 0 Since residual = 35.5 > 35 (Required residual by specification), this soil CAN be used for the project. This soil was tested in a dense state. That can be determined by volumetric behavior of the soil during the direct shear test and from the fact that peak > residual. 14.330 2014 Assignment 8 Solution Page 4 of 9

PROBLEM #3: GIVEN: During the subsurface exploration at a new roadway embankment, soil samples were collected from a CL soil layer. The results of the CD triaxial testing for this soil are presented in Table 1. Table 1. CD Triaxial Testing Results for CL soil layer samples. Test Minor Principal Stress at Failure ( ' 3f ) Major Principal Stress at Failure ( ' 1f ) 1 6 24 2 11 39.5 3 16 54.6 REQUIRED: Determine the effective and total Mohr-Coulomb Failure Criteria for this soil. SOLUTION: The effective Mohr circles are presented in Figure C. Using Figure C, the Mohr- Coulomb Failure Criteria were determined for the effective stresses case. Friction angles and cohesion for the effective stress envelope are summarized in Table C. Table C. CU Triaxial Test Results Summary for CL soil. State Friction Angle ( ) Cohesion Effective ( and c ) 30 2 Note that since no determination of the soils overconsolidation was provided, fit the best fit line in Figure C to the tangent of all the Mohr circles. Since c' > 0, the soil is overconsolidated. 14.330 2014 Assignment 8 Solution Page 5 of 9

Figure C. CD Test Results for Problem 3 (Effective Stresses). PROBLEM #4: GIVEN: You have been asked to evaluate metal slag from a steel plant for use as backfill for a project you are assigned. The project specifications require that the backfill material have a minimum residual friction angle of 30 at the required compaction (i.e. 98% D1557). The results from the direct shear testing performed at the minimum required compaction by a local testing firm are provided in a CSV file (14.330_2014_Assignment_8_P4.csv). From the provided information, answer the following: REQUIRED: Determine the peak and residual friction angles ( peak and residual ) for this soil. Determine if the soil meets the project specifications. Explain density (loose or dense) of the soil based on direct shear results. SOLUTION: Using data provided in Figure D (plotted from the provided data), determine the peak and residual shear strengths for the tests at the three (3) confining (i.e. normal) stresses. This summary is provided in Table D. 14.330 2014 Assignment 8 Solution Page 6 of 9

Figure D. Direct Shear Results for Problem #2. 14.330 2014 Assignment 8 Solution Page 7 of 9

Table D. Direct Shear Results (from Figure D). Test Confining Stress ( ) Shear Stress ( ) Peak Residual 1 17.50 14.0 11.7 2 27.00 18.4 16.5 3 35.80 23.4 18.4 Plot of shear stress vs. normal stress to determine peak and residual is presented in Figure B. Assume cohesion (if applicable) since no soil classification is provided. Note cohesion cannot be negative! A summary of the Mohr-Coulomb Failure Criteria from the direct shear testing is presented in Table E. Figure E. Shear Stress vs. Confining Stress for Direct Shear Results for Problem 2. Table B. Direct Shear Results Summary for Problem #2. 14.330 2014 Assignment 8 Solution Page 8 of 9

State Friction Angle ( ) ( ) Cohesion (c) Peak 27.1 5 Residual 20.2 6 Since residual = 20.2 < 30 (Required residual by specification), this material CANNOT be used for the project. This soil was tested in a dense state. That can be determined by volumetric behavior of the soil during the direct shear test and from the fact that peak > residual. 14.330 2014 Assignment 8 Solution Page 9 of 9