arxiv: v1 [hep-th] 5 Sep 2014

Transcription

1 Back-eacion of he Hawking adiaion flux on a gaviaionally collapsing sa II: Fiewoks insead of fiewalls axiv: v1 [hep-h] 5 Sep 1 Laua Mesini-Houghon 1, and Haald P. Pfeiffe 3, 1 DAMTP,Univesiy of Cambidge, Wilbefoce Rd., Cambidge, CB3 WA, England Depamen of Physics and Asonomy, UNC-Chapel Hill, NC 7599, USA 3 Canadian Insiue fo Theoeical Asophysics, 6 S. Geoge See, Univesiy of Toono, Toono, ON M5S 3H8, Canada Canadian Insiue fo Advanced Reseach, 18 Dundas S. Wes, Toono, ON M5G 1Z8, Canada (Daed: Sepembe 8, 1) A sa collapsing gaviaionally ino a black hole emis a flux of adiaion, knowns as Hawking adiaion. When he iniial sae of a quanum field on he backgound of he sa, is placed in he Unuh vacuum in he fa pas, hen Hawking adiaion coesponds o a flux of posiive enegy adiaion avelling ouwads o fuue infiniy. The evapoaion of he collapsing sa can be equivalenly descibed as a negaive enegy flux of adiaion avelling adially inwads owads he cene of he sa. Hee, we ae ineesed in he evoluion of he sa duing is collapse. Thus we include he backeacion of he negaive enegy Hawking flux in he ineio geomey of he collapsing sa and solve he full -dimensional Einsein and hydodynamical equaions numeically. We find ha Hawking adiaion emied jus befoe he sa passes hough is Schwazschild adius slows down he collapse of he sa and subsanially educes is mass hus he sa bounces befoe eaching he hoizon. The aea adius sas inceasing afe he bounce. Beyond his poin ou pogam beaks down due o shell cossing. We find ha he sa sops collapsing a a finie adius lage han is hoizon, uns aound and is coe explodes. This sudy povides a moe ealisic invesigaion of he backeacion of Hawking adiaion on he collapsing sa, ha was fis pesened in [1]. PACS numbes:.5.d-,.5.dg,.3.-w,.3.db I. INTRODUCTION The backeacion of Hawking adiaion on he evoluion of he collapsing sa is he mos impoan poblem in he quanum physics of black holes. This poblem povides an aena fo he ineplay of quanum and gaviaional effecs on black holes and hei especive implicaions fo he singulaiy heoem. A key feaue of Hawking adiaion, which was well esablished in seminal woks by [3,, 9, 11, 17 ], is ha he adiaion is poduced duing he collapse sage of he sa pio o black hole fomaion. The vey las phoon making i o fuue infiniy and hus conibuing o Hawking adiaion, is poduced jus befoe an hoizon foms. Howeve is effec on he collapse evoluion of he sa was consideed fo he fis ime only ecenly [1]. As was shown in [1] once he backeacion of Hawking adiaion is included in he ineio dynamics of he sa, hen he collapse sops and he sa bounces. Solving analyically fo he combined sysem of a collapsing sa wih he Hawking adiaion included, is quie a challenge. The sysem sudied in [1] was idealized in ode o obain an appoximae analyical soluion: hee he sa was aken o be homogeneous; he sa s fluid consideed was dus; he sa was placed in a hemal bah of Hawking adiaion which aises fom he ime-symmeic Hale-Hawking iniial condiions on he quanum field in he fa pas. Wihin hese appoximaions, he main finding of [1] was ha a singulaiy and an hoizon do no fom afe he sa s collapse because he sa eveses is collapse and bounces a a finie adius due o he balancing pessue of he negaive enegy Hawking adiaion in is ineio. Ye, he evoluion of he sa could no be followed beyond he bounce wih he appoximae analyic mehods of [1]. Given he fundamenal impoance of his poblem and he iniguing esuls of [1], we hee aim o sudy he backeacion of Hawking adiaion on he collapsing sa by consideing a moe ealisic seing, namely: we allow he sa o be inhomogeneous and conside an Hawking adiaion flux of negaive enegy which popagaes in he ineio of he sa, wih is counepa of posiive enegy flux avelling ouwads o infiniy. Hawking adiaion flux aises when he iniial condiions imposed on he quanum field on he backgound of he sa, ae chosen o be in he Unuh vacuum sae in he fa pas [9, 18]. In conas o he Hale-Hawking iniial sae which leads o an idealized ime symmeic hemal bah of adiaion pesen befoe and afe he collapse, he choice of he Unuh vacuum descibes a flux of hemal adiaion which is zeo befoe he collapse and swiches on afe he collapse. We solve numeically he full dimensional se of Einsein and of oal enegy consevaion equaions leading o a complee se of hydodynamic equaions fo his model. Numeical soluions allows us o follow he evoluion of he collapsing sa beyond is bounce. The pape is oganized as follows: Secion II descibes he meic in he sa s ineio, he sess enegy enso fo he sa and fo he Hawking adiaion flux, which compise he model we wish o sudy. We hen se up he sysem of he evoluion equaions ha need o be solve fo he combined sysem. In Sec. III we descibe he numeical implemenaion and he wo codes wien,

2 and povide a consisency es fo he codes by applying hem o he well known Oppenheime Snyde model. In Sec. IV we povide he esuls of he numeical soluions fo he evoluion of he ineio geomey of he sa and conclude in Sec. V. II. MODEL Le us sa wih a spheically symmeic and inhomogeneous dus sa, descibed by he following meic ds = e Φ(,) d + e λ d + R dω (1) whee R(, ) is he aeal adius and dω = dθ + sin(θ) dφ. This fom of he meic is convenien fo descibing a adiaing sa. The se of Einsein and enegy consevaion equaions, wee oiginally deived in Misne [1]. We will use he se of equaions [1] and [1], joinly known as he hydodynamic equaions, by modifying hem o eflec ou paicula sysem. A he onse of collapse he sa gadually sas poducing a flux of Hawking adiaion. The posiive enegy flux avels ouwads o fuue infiniy and an equivalen bu negaive enegy flux avels adially inwads in he ineio of he sa owads he cene. Mos of he ougoing null adiaion is poduced on he las sages of collapse [9, 11, 19, ]. We wish o include he backeacion of he negaive enegy Hawking adiaion flux on he ineio of he sa and solve fo is evoluion. The sess enegy enso of he Hawking adiaion flux is given by τ ab = q H k a k b () whee k a is an ougoing null veco k a k a = and q H is he Hawking adiaion enegy densiy elaed o he luminosiy of adiaion by L = πr q H. The fluid of he inhomogenenous dus sa wih a - velociy u a, nomalized such ha u a u a = 1, has a sess enegy enso T ab = ɛu a u b, (3) whee he enegy densiy ɛ is expessed in ems of a specific inenal enegy densiy pe bayon e and he numbe densiy of bayons n by ɛ = n(1 + e) = nh wih h he enhalpy. We nomalize k a by he condiion k a u a = 1, so ha q H denoes he magniude of Hawking enegy flux densiy of he inwad moving adiaion in he es fame of he fluid. Theefoe he oal sess enegy enso of he combined sysem of he sa s fluid (T ab )and of he adiaion (τ ab ) is T ab oal = T ab + τ ab () The equaions ha descibe he dynamics of he ineio of he sa wih he backeacion of he Hawking adiaion flux included ae: he Einsein equaions, G ab = T ab oal, (5) he oal enegy consevaion equaions, b T ab oal =, b T ab = b τ ab, (6) and he bayon numbe consevaion a (nu a ) =. (7) The fom of he enomalized sess enegy enso fo he Hawking adiaion flux in he Unuh vacua, a fuue infiniy and nea he suface of he sa wee calculaed in Candelas [18]. Based on enegy consevaion, he ne inwad negaive enegy flux in he sa s ineio is equal and opposie o is value a infiniy, shown in [3, 18,, 3] who also showed ha he Unuh vacuum bes appoximaes he sae ha follows gaviaional collapse since i such ha i is nealy empy in he fa pas befoe he sa collapses, bu hen poduces a flux of adiaion once he collapse sas. On hese basis he quanum mechanical sess enegy enso of he Hawking adiaion flux in he ineio is as follows 1 1 τ b a = L 1 1 R (8) The oal enegy consevaion is bes wien as a se of wo equaions which conain he adiaive hea ansfe fom he fluid o he Hawking flux, is -componen and he -componen ha ae obained by conacing T ab in 6 wih u a and he uni veco n a ohogonal o he 3-hypesuface Σ a = consan as follows Q a = b τ ab = (e Φ nc, e λ/ nc,, ) (9) Fom Eqn. 9 and he Hawking flux sess enegy enso in he ineio Eqn. 8, i is immediaely clea ha C = C. The lae simply eflec he fac ha he sa is eceiving negaive enegy ansfe avelling inwads in is ineio. We can now wie explicily he full se of hydodynamic equaions, given above. Fis le us define he pope deivaes D, D by he following elaion in ems of he meic D = e λ/ D = e Φ. (1) The evoluionay equaions fo bayon numbe densiy n(, ) fom 7, specific inenal enegy e fom 6, he enegy of null-adiaion wih luminosiy L given fom he -componen of 9 and 6, he pope velociy of he comoving fluid U, aeal adius of comoving fluid elemens R(, ), and he acceleaion equaion obained fom he

3 3 -componen of 9 and he Einsein equaions 5 1 n D n + 1 R R (R U) = πrq H αf 1/, (11a) ( ) 1 D e = C pd, (11b) n D L = πr nc e Φ ( D Le Φ ) ( U L R Lα ), D R = U, D R = f, D U = f Φ R m R + L R. Rf 1/ Two auxiliay quaniies ae given by adial ODEs, (11c) (11d) (11e) m ( ( R = πr ε q H 1 + αuf 1/)), (11f) (ε + p) Φ R = p R + ncf 1/, wih bounday condiions (11g) m =, L =, a =, fo all, (1) Φ = a = sa, fo all. (13) Finally, ε, f, α and R ae sho-cus fo f = 1 + U m R, (1) ε = n(1 + e), (15) α = R R = signr, (16) R = R. (17) A. Choice of enegy convesion ae C The emaining quaniies pessue p and he heaing ansfe ae C ae fee daa, ha mus be specified hough hei funcional dependence on he evolved vaiables. Fo he pesen wok, we assume pessue-less dus, i.e. p = houghou. In he fuue we will exend he analysis o he case p = wɛ wih w he equaion of sae fo he fluid. Having o specify C is somewha inconvenien, as ou goal is a soluion of Eqs. (11a) (11e) fo he scenaio whee he luminosiy a infiniy is equal o he expeced Hawking adiaion: L = L H,S ()(U S + f S ) = L H. (18) whee L H,S () is he luminosiy of he ougoing null adiaion a he moving suface of he sa and L H he Hawking flux a fuue infiniy. Unfounaely, Eqs. (11a) (11e) do no allow o specify L feely. Rahe, L follows fom he choice of he enegy-convesion ae C. Theefoe, ou ask is o choose a suiable funcion C(, ). We being he moivaion of ou choice C(, ) by noing ha fo p =, Eq. (11b) simplifies o e = C e Φ. Theefoe, we can achieve a spaially consan e (i.e. spaially unifom mass evapoaion) wih he choice C(, ) = e Φ(,) C(), (19) whee C() is a no ye deemined funcion of ime. To deemine C(), we conside Eq. (11c), which elaes he luminosiy L o he enegy-convesion ae C. If we disegad all gadien ems and any ohe em independen of C, hen Eq. (11c) becomes L = πr e Φ nc. This epesens he adiaion ceaion ae in a spheical shell a adius R. Inegaing ove adius wih volume elemen e λ/ d, we find a oal adiaion ceaion ae of C oal = s = C() d πr e Φ nc e λ/ () S d πr n αr f. (1) If we disegad adiaion popagaion effecs, i.e. assume ha he sa is unchanged duing a ligh-cossing ime, hen we expec ha L S C oal. Combining his wih Eq. (18), we aive a L H = C() (U S + ) S f S d πr n αr, () f fom which i follows ha C() = III. L H ( US + f S ) ( S d πr n αr f ) 1. (3) NUMERICAL IMPLEMENTATION The numeical implemenaion will use coodinaes and. epesens he pope ime of he fluid-elemen on he suface of he sa (his idenificaion is enfoced hough he bounday condiion (13). is he adial coodinae comoving wih he fluid. Using as adial coodinae in he numeical implemenaion ensues ha he sa always coves he same ange [, sa ]. We ewie Eqs. (11) wih paial deivaives accoding o Eq. (1). A. Disceizaion We implemen Eqs. (11) in a finie-diffeence code, using he Cank-Nicholson mehod. A unifom gid in comoving adius is employed. Spaial deivaives ae disceized wih second ode accuacy using ceneed finiediffeence sencils in he ineio and one-sided sencils a he bounday. Denoing he veco of evolved vaiables wih u = {n, e, L, R, U}, hen disceized equaions have

4 he fom u( i, + ) u( i, ) = 1 (R[u]( i, ) + R[u]( i, + )). () Hee, R epesens he igh-hand-sides of Eq. (11). R involves second ode finie-diffeence sencils (ceneed in he ineio, one-sided a he bounday). When evaluaing R a he oigin, = R =, he ule of L Hospial is used o evaluae ems ha would lead o a division by zeo, e.g L/R, U/R U/ R. We solve Eq. () sepaaely fo each of he vaiables n, e, L, R, U, fixing all ohe vaiables o guesses of hei values a he new ime. Once all vaiables have been solved fo, he auxiliay vaiables f, m, and Φ ae updaed. Now he updaed vaiables ae copied ino he guesses, and if necessay he pocedue is epeaed. We ieae unil he maximal nom of he coecion is less han 1 1. This akes ypically 3-6 ieaions. When inegaing Eq. (11f), cae mus be aken o coecly epesen he m 3 behavio close o he oigin. A second ode finie-diffeence mehod canno esolve his cubic behavio of m(), and would heefoe lead o a loss of accuacy. Insead, we define he auxiliay quaniy η 3m πr 3, (5) which is appoximaely consan close o he oigin. We ewie Eq. (11f) as η R = 3 [ ( ε q 1 + αuf 1/) ] η, (6) R and disceize he paial deivaive diecly in ems of he aeal adius R. Afe solving fo η, we ecove m = 3 πr3 η. Figue 1 demonsaes he expeced second ode convegence of his finie-diffeence code d k - d N k - N 51 /1 m S 8 1 FIG. 1: Convegence es fo he numeical code. The op panel shows he evoluion of aeal adius and oal mass m S fo he un discussed in deail in Sec. IV. This evoluion was pefomed a five diffeen ime-seps, d =,, 8, 16, 3 (in unis of τ collapse /1), and he middle panel shows he diffeence beween uns a he lage fo ime-seps and he smalles ime-sep. The evoluion was also pefomed a five diffeen adial esoluions (N = 3, 6, 18, 56, 51), and he lowe panel shows he diffeence beween he fines esoluion and he coase ones. The hick black lines in he lowe wo panels ae epesenaive of he eos in he uns discussed in his pape. i.e. he lines Λ(, )=cons ae null. To achieve his, Λ mus saisfy φ Λ Λ = k(λ) = e + e λ/. (8) Solving fo Λ/ esuls in an evoluion equaion fo Λ, B. Diagnosics Besides monioing he evolved vaiables and he auxiliay vaiables, we uilize wo addiional diagnosics. Fis, we compue he expansion θ (k) of =cons sufaces along he ougoing null-nomal k µ = D + D = e Φ + e λ/. This quaniy is compued as θ (k) = R ( α ) f + U. (7) When θ (k) =, an appaen hoizon has fomed. Specifically, we will plo Θ (k) R/, a quaniy which is uniy in fla space. Second, we ack duing he evoluion ougoing null geodesics, o gain a deepened undesanding of he causal sucue of he space-ime. The null-geodesics ae epesened by he level-ses of an auxiliay vaiable Λ(, ), Λ = α f eφ R Λ. (9) This is an advecion equaion wih posiive advecion speed, i.e. he chaaceisics of Λ (he null ays) always move owad lage values of. This is an expeced esul fo a comoving coodinae. Because Λ is always adveced ouwad, we mus supply a bounday condiion a =. This bounday condiion ses he value of Λ fo he null ay saing a (, ), and we choose Λ(, ) =. (3) We also need iniial condiions a =, whee we se Λ(, ) =. (31) These iniial- and bounday condiions ensue ha Λ epesens null ays ha inesec he = suface, wheeas Λ epesen null ays ha emenae fom

5 θ S / /R 5 R( i, ) m S U S n S 1 L S 1 L 1 L H e S Oppenh.-Sny. m S () FIG. : Evoluion of pessue-fee collapse wih Hawking adiaion (R =, M =.). The hick lines indicae he evoluion of quaniies evaluaed a he sella suface: aeal adius, adial velociy U S, oal mass m S, numbe densiy n S, expansion θ S. The lowe panel shows he inenal enegy e S, luminosiy a he sella suface L S, luminosiy a infiniy L, and ou age luminosiy L H. Fo easy of ploing, he luminosiies ae scaled by a faco of 1. The hin dashed lines in he uppe panel epesen he especive quaniies in a pue Oppenheime-Snyde collapse of he same iniial condiions FIG. 3: Evoluion of pessue-fee collapse wih Hawking adiaion (R =, M =.). Shown ae he aea adii a sixeen equally-spaced comoving coodinae adii i. The hick ed line indicaes m S, which is scaled such ha = m S would indicae he fomaion of a black hole. The hin dashed blue line indicaes he aeal adius of a Oppenheime- Snyde collapse.. U( i, ) he oigin a coodinae ime = Λ. The bounday condiions (3) and (31) ae consisen wih he evoluion equaion (9), because a he oigin φ(, ) =, f(, ) = α(, ) = R (, ) = 1. Equaion (9) is added as an exa evoluion equaion o Eqs. (11). -. IV. RESULTS We will invesigae sas wih diffeen iniial adius R and wih diffeen iniial masses M. Figue shows a ahe ypical oucome, a sa wih iniial compacness R /M = 1. The evoluion poceeds fis hough a phase which is almos idenical o sandad Oppenheime-Snyde collapse: The sa collapses wih inceasing inwad velociy. The luminosiy is vey small in his ealy phase, esuling in a negligible change in inenal enegy e and mass m s. The uppe panel of Fig. also shows he vaious quaniies fo a sandad Oppenheime-Snyde collapse (dashed lines), which essenially ovelap he one fo he Hawking-adiaion collapse case. The similaiies beween Oppenheime-Snyde collapse and he Hawking-adiaion collapse end, howeve, as he sa appoaches is Schwazschild-adius, which would happen when θ (k) cosses zeo. Jus befoe he sa cosses is Schwazschild-adius, he luminosiy L S di FIG. : Radial velociy U fo he case R =, M =.. Shown ae he aea adii a sixeen equally-spaced comoving coodinae adii i, wih he blue hick lines indicaing he sella suface, = S and he adius = S/. veges, esuling in subsanial educion of inenal enegy e and he oal mass m S. The inenal enegy dops o e., and he oal mass dops o abou half is iniial value. As can be seen, he velociy of he fluid changes behaviou fom negaive o posiive a he bounce adius, descibing a collapsing phase swiching o an expanding phase of he fluid. The inne layes of he sa pick up a lage posiive velociy han he oue layes, esuling in shell cossing. A ha poin, due o shell cossing which

6 6 Aeal adius R Aeal adius R Poenial φ Poenial φ Poenial λ Poenial λ FIG. 5: Conou plos of meic quaniies fo he simulaion wih R =, M =.. The lowe panel show he enie ime-ange on he y-axis, he uppe panels zoom ino he lae-ime phase wih song Hawking adiaion. is an aifac of p = choice in his model, he densiy n(, ) a he suface of he sa diveges ( ci ) 1/, and he simulaion cashes. The divegence in n(, ) a finie sella adius and mass indicaing shell-cossing of he oue layes of he sa, can no be handled by ou code. A moe sophisicaed numeical mehod, in combinaion wih a fluid-descipion wih pessue would be needed o poceed fuhe and will be done in fuue wok. Neveheless, we conside he behavio befoe shell-cossing as geneic. The behavio of his collapse wih Hawking adiaion is exploed fuhe in Fig. 3. Shown ae 16 aeal adii (a consan comoving coodinaes), as well as m S (). The main panel shows clealy he homologous collapse a ealy imes The inse shows an enlagemen of he lae-ime behavio, showing clealy ha he mass m S is educed such ha he oue suface of he sa emains jus ouside is hoizon. Figue shows adial velociy U a 16 comoving adii. When Hawking adiaion becomes dominan duing he las 1 of he evoluion, he inwad moion is significanly slowed down in he oue layes, and even evesed in he inne layes of he sa. The adial gadien in he acceleaion (wih lage ouwad velociies owad he cene of he sa) is esponsible fo he diveging numbe densiy in he sa. To poceed fuhe will eihe equie a eamen of shocks, o a modificaion of ou model o avoid shocks. Figue (5), finally pesens he meic quaniies fo his evoluion. The aeal adius R is vey simila o he sandad Oppenheime-Snyde collapse; he small deviaions duing he Hawking adiaion phase ae no easily visible. The lapse-poenial Φ clealy shows wo disinc phases: Duing he quasi Oppenheime-Snyde collapse Φ. When he Hawking adiaion becomes significan, Φ dops quickly o values aound.5. The poenial λ shows also wo disinc phases: Duing he Oppenheime- Snyde phase, λ emains appoximaely spaially consan, bu slowly deceases. Duing he Hawking adiaion phase, λ quickly deceases close o he suface of he sa, pesumably in accod wih he diveging numbe densiy n close o he sella suface. Figue 6 exploes he paamee space of diffeen R and M. Geneically, we find he behavio shown in Figs. and 3: The sas fis collapse a nealy consan mass unil hey each a size close o he hoizon (in Fig. 6, his epesens a diagonal line a m S = ). As he sas appoach hei hoizons, luminosiy inceases and he mass dops significanly, wih he sa emaining jus ouside = m S. All ajecoies appoach he same limiing behavio, hus we find he expeced geneic behavio of Hawking adiaion. We have shown esuls hee fo vey compac sas as hose ae he moe likely ones o collapse ino a black hole. We conduced he analysis fo sas wih low mass, see he M =.1 daa in Fig. 6. As expeced hese sas behave diffeenly, and subsanially evapoae and explode befoe hey appoach hei hoizon. V. CONCLUSIONS Einsein equaions ell us ha he final desiny of a gaviaionally collapsing massive sa is a black hole []. This sysem saisfies all he condiions of he Penose Hawking singulaiy heoem [5]. Howeve a collapsing sa has a spaceime dependen gaviaional field which by he heoy of quanum fields on cuved spaceime should give ise o a flux of paicles ceaed [11]. Hawking discoveed in he ealy 7 s ha his is in-

7 7 m S () () FIG. 6: Collapsing sas wih Hawking adiaion fo seveal choices of iniial mass and iniial adius. Shown ae ajecoies in he ((), m S())-plane, wih he cicles indicaing he iniial condiions of each un. The filled blue cicle maks he evoluion discussed in deail in Figs. 5. The dashed oange line indicaes he Schwazschild hoizon, = m S. The inse shows an enlagemen, o emphasize he univesal naue of he nea-hoizon behavio. deed he case fo sas collapsing o a black hole, hey poduce Hawking adiaion [3]. The conclusions deived fom boh heoies, he exisence of black holes fom Einsein s heoy of gaviy and he exisence of Hawking adiaion fom he heoy of quanum fields in cuved spaceime, wee soon found o be in high ficion wih one anohe, (see [6] fo an ineesing eamen). They led o a seies of paadoxes, mos noably he infomaion loss [5] and fiewalls [7]. Being foced o give up on eihe uniaiy o causaliy is a he hea of he poblem. Bu he quanum heoy is violaed if uniaiy is boken. Einsein s heoy is violaed if causaliy is boken. Violaions of he quanum heoy imply Hawking adiaion may no exis. Violaions of Einsein s heoy of gaviy, on which he singulaiy heoem is based, imply black holes may no exis. Thus black hole physics povides he bes aena fo undesanding he ficion beween quanum and gaviaional physics. In his ligh, an invesigaion of he evoluion of he sa s ineio as i is appoaching is singulaiy wih he backeacion of he Hawking adiaion poduced by quanum effecs, is of fundamenal impoance. This poblem was fis invesigaed wih semianalyical mehods and a seies of appoximaions, such as a homogeneous sa placed in he Hale Hawking hemal bah in [1]. In his wok we exend ou invesigaion o sudy a moe ealisic sysem of a collapsing sa wih he quanum field in he Unuh vacuum, which gives ise o a Hawking flux poduced only duing he collapse. Hee we solved he full se of Einsein and enegy consevaion equaions numeically heefoe he exac soluions we obain ae obus. We find fo a ange of iniial masses and adii of he collapsing sa ha he evoluion poceeds hough wo phases: Fis, a collapsing phase whee Hawking adiaion is unimpoan, and he sa follows vey closely sandad Oppenheime-Snyde collapse. When he sa appoaches fomaion of an hoizon, hen Hawking adiaion ses in. This slows down he collapse (e.g. Fig. ) while significanly educing he mass of he sa. Boh effecs (slowdown and mass-loss) balance such ha he evapoaing sa emains vey slighly ouside is even hoizon, cf. Fig. 6. The key idea ha enables his pogam is he fac ha adiaion is poduced duing he collapse sage of he sa, pio o black hole fomaion. Once he sa becomes a black hole nohing can escape i, no even ligh. Since Hawking adiaion is poduced pio o black hole fomaion hen is backeacion on he sa s evoluion can be included in he se of hydodynamic equaions fo he coupled sysem of he quanum field and he sa. Thus we solve numeically he se of hydodynamics equaions descibing he evoluio of collapse fo he inhomogeneous dus sa absobing negaive enegy Hawking flux duing is collapse. We discove ha he sas explode insead of collapsing o a black hole, as hey ge close o hei las sage of collapse, jus when Hawking adiaion eaches a maximum, bu hey neve coss wha would have been he appaen hoizon. Jus like Hawking adiaion which is univesal, we discove ha his behaviou of he collapsing sas bouncing and exploding befoe he hoizon and singulaiy would have fomed, is univesal, i.e independen of hei chaaceisics such as mass and size. Physically he backeacion of ingoing negaive enegy Hawking adiaion educes he gaviaional binding enegy in he sa wih he maximum loss nea he las sages of collapse, while aking momenum away fom he sa. This is he eason fo he univesal feaue of he explosion in he sa insead of is collapse o a black hole singulaiy. Independen of wha size and mass he sa sas fom, mos if is adiaion will be poduced as he sa neas is fuue hoizon. A ha sage he dop in mass and inenal enegy is maximum and he sa goes hough a bounce fom collapse o explosion. The negaive enegy Hawking adiaion absobed by he sa, violaes he enegy condiion of he singulaiy heoem [5] hus i is no supising ha a singulaiy and an hoizon do no fom, feaues adiionally associaed wih he definiion of black holes. Saed simply ou findings indicae ha singulaiies and hoizon do no exis due o quanum effec and ha univesally sas blow up on hei las sage of collapse. Moe specifically, we find ha collapsing sas slow down hei collapse igh ouside hei hoizon, while subsanially educing hei mass hough Hawking adiaion. In he cases sudied, he mass of he black hole is educed by oughly a faco of, wih he adius of he

8 8 sa shinking in popoion, o peseve /m S >, cf. Figs. 3 and 6. The velociy of he collapsing mae hen eveses owad an expanding phase, cf. Fig. wih he inne layes expanding fase han he oue layes. Unfounaely he lae behaviou, i.e. he unfolding of he sa fom inside ou leads numeically o shell-cossing which ou code can no handle. Once shell cossing occus we can no follow he evoluion fuhe o deemine whehe in he expanding phase, he sella emnan explode, o simply evapoae away, despie ha fom he low mass cases and fom he velociy esuls he explosion seems o be he case. The sa neve cosses is hoizon, so neihe uniaiy no causaliy ae violaed, heeby solving he longsanding infomaion loss paadox. This invesigaion shows ha univesally collapsing sas bounce ino an expanding phase and pobably blow up, insead of collapsing o a black hole. Thus fiewoks should eplace fiewalls. Acknowledgmens LMH is gaeful o DAMTP Cambidge Univesiy fo hei hospialiy when his wok was done. LMH would like o hank M.J. Pey, L. Pake, J. Bekensein, P. Spindel, and G. Ellis fo useful discussions. LMH acknowledges suppo fom he Bahnson us fund. HPP gaefully acknowledges suppo fom NSERC of Canada and he Canada Reseach Chais Pogam. [1] L. Mesini-Houghon, axiv: [hep-h]. [] J. R. Oppenheime and H. Snyde, Phys. Rev. 56, 55 (1939). [3] S. W. Hawking Naue 8, 3-31, (197); S. W. Hawking, Commun. Mah. Phys. 3, 199, (1975). [] L. Pake, Phys. Rev. D 1, 1519 (1975); L. Pake and S. A. Fulling, Phys. Rev. D 7, 357 (1973). [5] R. Penose, The big bang, quanum gaviy and black-hole infomaion loss, Foundaions of Space and Time: Reflecions on Quanum Gaviy 1-1 Aug 9. Cape Town, Souh Afica, CNUM: C9-8-1.; W. Isael and Z. Yun, Phys. Rev. D 8, 136 (1) [axiv: [hep-h]]; M. Vaadaajan, J. Phys. Conf. Se. 1, 17 (8); T. Vachaspai, D. Sojkovic and L. M. Kauss, Phys. Rev. D 76, 5 (7) [g-qc/69]; S. W. Hawking, Phys. Rev. D 7, 813 (5) [hep-h/57171]; S. Hossenfelde, axiv:11.88 [hep-h]; C. Kiefe, Lec. Noes Phys. 633, 8 (3) [g-qc/31]; G. Hoof, gqc/9595; C. G. Callan, J., In *Meibel les Allues 199, Elecoweak ineacions and unified heoies* ; T. Banks, Nucl. Phys. Poc. Suppl. 1, 1 (1995) [hep-h/91131]; C. R. Sephens, G. Hoof and B. F. Whiing, Class. Quan. Gav. 11, 61 (199) [g-qc/9316]; T. M. Fiola, J. Peskill, A. Sominge and S. P. Tivedi, Phys. Rev. D 5, 3987 (199) [heph/93137]; S. B. Giddings, Phys. Rev. D 9, 78 (199) [hep-h/93111]; L. Smolin, In *College Pak 1993, Diecions in geneal elaiviy, vol. * 37-9 [gqc/93116]. [6] R. Bou, S. Massa, R. Paenani, Ph. Spindel, Phys. Rep. 6, (1995), 39-5 ; F. Engle, Ph. Spindel, JHEP 11 (1) 65. [7] S. L. Baunsein, H. -J. Sommes and K. Zyczkowski, axiv: [quan-ph]; A. Almheii, D. Maolf, J. Polchinski and J. Sully, JHEP 13, 6 (13) [axiv: [hep-h]];a. Almheii, D. Maolf, J. Polchinski, D. Sanfod and J. Sully, JHEP 139, 18 (13) [axiv: [hep-h]]; A. Almheii, D. Maolf, J. Polchinski, D. Sanfod and J. Sully, JHEP 139, 18 (13) [axiv: [hep-h]]; S. L. Baunsein and A. K. Pai, Phys. Rev. Le. 98, 85 (7) [g-qc/636]. [8] S. W. Hawking, axiv: [hep-h]. [9] W. G. Unuh, Phys. Rev. D 1, 87 (1976). [1] S. Yamada [aso-ph/961]. [11] L. Pake, Phys. Rev. Le. 1, 56 (1968); L. Pake, Phys. Rev. 183, 157 (1969); L. Pake, Phys. Rev. D 3, 36 (1971) [Eaum-ibid. D 3, 56 (1971)]; L. Pake, Phys. Rev. Le. 8, 75 (197) [Eaum-ibid. 8, 197 (197)]; L. Pake, In *Cincinnai 1976, Poceedings, Asympoic Sucue Of Space-ime*, New Yok 1977, 17-6; L. Pake and S. A. Fulling, Phys. Rev. D 9, 31 (197). [1] W. C. Henandez and C. W. Misne, Asophys. J. 13, 5 (1966). [13] S. Bose, L. Pake and Y. Peleg, Phys. Rev. D 53, 789 (1996) [g-qc/96135]. [1] Ingema Bengsson Spheical Symmey and Black Holes hp:// ingema/sfa.pdf; Luciano Rezzolla An inoducion o gaviaional collapse o black holes hp:// ezzolla/lnoes/mondagone/collapse.pdf. [15] J. B. Hale and S. W. Hawking, Phys. Rev. D 13, 188 (1976). [16] K. W. Howad and P. Candelas, Phys. Rev. Le. 53, 3 (198). [17] S. M. Chisensen and S. A. Fulling, Phys. Rev. D 15, 88 (1977); P. C. W. Davies, S. A. Fulling, S. M. Chisensen and T. S. Bunch, Annals Phys. 19, 18 (1977); N. D. Biell and P. C. W. Davies, Quanum Fields in Cuved Space,, Cambidge Monog.Mah.Phys; N. D. Biell and P. C. W. Davies, Naue 7, 35 (1978); N. D. Biell and P. C. W. Davies, Phys. Rev. D 18, 8 (1978); G. Hoof, Nucl. Phys. Poc. Suppl. 3-, 155 (1). [18] P. Candelas, Phys. Rev. D 1, 185 (198). [19] P. C. W. Davies and S. A. Fulling, Poc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 38, 393 (1976); P. C. W. Davies and S. A. Fulling, Poc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 356, 37 (1977); P. Candelas and D. J. Raine, J. Mah. Phys. 17, 11 (1976);L. Pake and D. J. Toms, Gen. Rel. Gav. 17, 167 (1985). [] P. Davies Roy. Soc. Pub. P. Davies, Fulling and Unuh Phys. Rev. D 13 (1975);S. A. Fulling and W. G. Unuh, Phys. Rev. D 7, 871 () [1] G. Abeu and M. Visse, Phys. Rev. D 8, 7 (1)

9 9 [axiv:1.156 [g-qc]]. [] C. Bacelo, S. Libeai, S. Sonego and M. Visse, Phys. Rev. Le. 97, (6) [g-qc/678]. [3] Hideo Kodama Pog.Theo.Phys. 63 (198) 117. [] W. Isael, Phys. Le. A 57, 17 (1976); W. Isael, Phys. Rev. 153, 1388 (1967); W. Isael Aspecs of Black Hole Enopy (1985). [5] S. W. Hawking and R. Penose, Poc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 31, 59 (197). [6] J. T. Fiouzjaee and G. F. R. Ellis, axiv: [g-qc];g. F REllis, R. Goswami, A. I. M. Hamid and S. D. Mahaaj, axiv: [g-qc]. [7] K. z. Felde, axiv:17.65 [physics.gen-ph];h. Culeu, axiv: [g-qc];m. Visse, axiv: [gqc];j. M. Badeen, axiv:16.98 [g-qc].