Procedure for Uncertainty Determination for Calibration Consoles
|
|
- Lenard Bryan
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Category: ELECTRICITY Procedure: EL-ENG Page: 1 of 19 Procedure for Uncertainty Determination for Calibration Consoles Adnan Rashid Senior Electrical Engineer Engineering and Laboratory Services Directorate Measurement Canada
2 Category: ELECTRICITY Procedure: EL-ENG Page: 2 of 19 Table of content 1.0 Scope References General Guidelines Basic Reduction Equation for Calibration Console Uncertainties Determination of Burden Uncertainty Determination of Uncertainty due to Number of Meters Under Test Determination of Uncertainty due to Position to Position Errors Uncertainty Due to Current Switching Effects Uncertainty Due to Regulation Reference Standard Uncertainty Uncertainty Due to Interchangeable Console Reference Meters Uncertainty Determination Using Commercially Available Software Examples Example Example
3 Category: ELECTRICITY Procedure: EL-ENG Page: 3 of 19 Uncertainty Determination for Calibration Consoles 1.0 Scope This document establishes a procedure for determining measurement uncertainty for calibration console certification. 2.0 References GUM Guide to the Expression of Uncertainties S-E-01 Specifications for the Calibration, Certification and Use of Electricity Calibration Consoles S-E-02 Specifications for the Verification and Reverification of Electricity Meters S-S-02 Measurement Uncertainty and Meter Conformity Evaluation Specifications 3.0 General Guidelines Typically the certified errors of a console will be provided with uncertainty figures determined by analysing the process(es) provided in this document. The uncertainty will be established using guidelines and recommendations found in the International Standards Organization (ISO) document, Guide to the Expression of Uncertainties (GUM). The uncertainty contributors are determined by assessments made under section 7 of S-E-01, Specifications for the Calibration, Certification and Use of Electricity Calibration Consoles. The procedure provided in this document applies specifically to certification errors used in verifying single phase, network, and polyphase electronic energy and demand meters as well as electromechanical energy meters. Uncertainty in console calibration is influenced by the following contributors: Test Burden (S-E-01 clause 7.1.5a) Burden Effect (S-E-01 clause 7.2) Number of Meters Under Test (S-E-01 clause 7.3) Variation from Position to Position (S-E-01 clause 7.4) Current Switching Effects (S-E-01 clause 7.7) Regulation (S-E-01 clause 7.6) Calibration reference standard The uncertainty is established by reviewing the data gathered in respect of the requirements of the S-E-01 clauses above. This data can be extracted from the worksheets which are completed during the certification process of an electricity calibration console under S-E-01. The test burden data is used to identify the burden effects data which in turn is used in uncertainty determination. Calibration consoles are certified to assess many types of meters. The data gathered when certifying consoles needs to be reviewed for the intended application. In this respect also applies for determining applicable burdens and the resulting uncertainty. For the case of consoles which are equipped with interchangeable standards, an additional source of uncertainty is also applicable. This is the uncertainty of the reference meter which is being exchanged.
4 Category: ELECTRICITY Procedure: EL-ENG Page: 4 of Basic Reduction Equation for Calibration Console Uncertainties As mentioned above the console uncertainties are established on the basis of data gathered through the assessment of requirements of the relevant sections of S-E-01. This data can be resolved by the following equation to provide an uncertainty for the calibration console. u where: ccon ( ) u c(con) u be u nm u ptp u cse ** u u u be nm ptp ucse ucre ucrm urs urm = Combined Standard Uncertainty of console = Uncertainty due to burden = Uncertainty due to # of meters = Uncertainty due to position to position errors = Uncertainty due to current switching effects u cre = Uncertainty due to load regulation (1-hour test) 1 u crm = Uncertainty due to load regulation (1-minute test) 1 u rs = Uncertainty due to reference standard used to calibrate console u rm = Uncertainty due to interchangeable console reference meter 2 Note 1: Applicable to demand calibration test points Note 2: this value is included for the case of Section 7.9 certification The value determined by the equation above is the standard uncertainty. A coverage factor of 2 is applied to provide an expanded uncertainty value. 4.1 Determination of Burden Uncertainty The burden effects uncertainty is a Type B uncertainty contributor. S-E-01 requires assessment of burden effects under several criteria. The criteria are identified in section of S-E-01. Additional criteria for burden are also identified in Measurement Canada bulletin E-29: Electricity Meter Calibration Console Burden Effects. A simplified breakdown of this criteria results in burdens for self-contained single-phase meters, burdens for transformer type meters, and burdens for single-phase and/or polyphase self contained meters. The relevant uncertainty contributor is determined on the basis of the errors which are being established for a console. This will be the error of the burden which is used when calibrating the console for the given test points. If a console is calibrated with only one set of errors then the test burden which has been identified under of S-E-01 or is used to establish the uncertainty contribution due to burden effects. In this case the results of the spread of errors between high burden and low burden will be used for the uncertainty figure. If a console has an error for each position, as in the case of testing with 1:1 transformers, then the burden error established under of S-E-01 shall be used for the uncertainty errors with 1:1 transformers.
5 Category: ELECTRICITY Procedure: EL-ENG Page: 5 of Determination of Uncertainty due to Number of Meters Under Test This uncertainty contributor is a type B source. It is only applicable for multi-position consoles. Section 7.3 of S-E-01 provides the information needed to establish this contribution. The difference in console error with only the reference standard in the meter-under-test position versus the error with the reference meter and meters in all other test positions establishes the uncertainty. 4.3 Determination of Uncertainty due to Position to Position Errors Section 7.4 of S-E-01 establishes position to position errors for multi-position consoles. A single position console will not have any uncertainty contribution due to position to position errors. This uncertainty is a Type B value. The value of the maximum spread between the errors established under this assessment of section 7.4 establishes the uncertainty resulting from position to position errors. Where a console has position to position errors between 0.1% and 0.2% as defined by the criteria of section of S-E-01, the uncertainty due to position to position errors does not apply. In this situation each position is required to be calibrated. When each position is calibrated then an associated uncertainy applies to each position. 4.4 Uncertainty Due to Current Switching Effects Current switching effects provides a Type B uncertainty contribution to overall console uncertainty. As identified in S-E-01, current switching effects applies only to automatic and semi-automatic consoles. The maximum spread between the errors observed during the assessment of current switching errors in section 7.7 provides the value of uncertainty. 4.5 Uncertainty Due to Regulation Consoles which are used to verify demand meters will have an uncertainty in the certified demand errors due to the console regulation. Console regulation is assessed using three criteria. First the test load is assessed in terms of its stability over a one hour period. Second the test load is assessed for its stability at one minute intervals. Finally the test load is assessed for its variations between one minute intervals. There are two contributors to uncertainty from these assessments. The first is the one hour load stability. The uncertainty due to the load variation is determined by using the variation figure established under the test of section of S-E-01, and dividing it by four. This applies for block interval demand meters having a fifteen minute demand. The second uncertainty contributor relates to the variation between one minute energy readings. The maximum variation from the expected energy as established under section of S-E-01 provides the value of the uncertainty. The regulation assessment is performed at two loads. This can provide two uncertainty values which can be applied for test loads which are representative of the assessment loads. A second option which is acceptable is to use the higher uncertainty value for all demand meter calibrations. 4.6 Reference Standard Uncertainty
6 Category: ELECTRICITY Procedure: EL-ENG Page: 6 of 19 The reference standard which is used to calibrate the console and to establish the influence errors of sections of S-E-01 is a source for uncertainty in console calibration. The uncertainty of the reference standard can be found on the calibration certificate for the standard. Note: Measurement Canada Laboratories are in the process of updating certificates of calibration for reference meters which will include uncertainty figures. In the interim a default uncertainty figure of 0.005% may be used for all reference meters provided by Radian Research. Uncertainties for other reference meter types will need to be established prior to their use in console calibration. 4.7 Uncertainty Due to Interchangeable Console Reference Meters Consoles which are being certified with errors for interchangeable reference meters will have an additional uncertainty associated with the reference meter which would be interchanged. The uncertainty of this reference meter will be found on the certificate of errors for the reference meter. 5.0 Uncertainty Determination Using Commercially Available Software The electricity industry has standardized on a software package from Quametec which is Uncertainty Toolbox. This procedure is not intended to be a guide to using the program specifically. It is intended to provide guidance in identifying appropriate parameters to allow the software to calculate an uncertainty value for console certification. For the purposes of this program a base template is being provided. This procedure will identify the parameters which can be updated to enable the program to calculate the uncertainty value. A basic template is provided which can be executed on any excel program which has been updated with the Quametec Uncertainty Toolbox add-in program. The basic template is an Excel file with filename: Console Calibration Template.xls. The tab labelled Budget provides the tools to determine console uncertainties on the basis of the console calibration data described above. In order to determine the uncertainty value for a given console simply update column E (Parameter Uncertainty Limits) with the appropriate values obtained from the console worksheets.
7 Category: ELECTRICITY Procedure: EL-ENG Page: 7 of 19 Figure Examples 6.1 Example 1 Extracts from a worksheets representing data from a console calibration exercise will be used to establish an uncertainty for the console calibration. In this example, the console is a multi-position board used to verify many different types of meters, including single-phase and polyphase meters. As a result, there is calibration data for single-phase meters (1:1 transformers are in circuit) as well as data for all other meter types. In this particular example the 1:1 transformers are used for energy meter testing only. There may be situations where the demand meter testing may also require the use of 1:1 transformers. In this case the uncertainty due to regulation will need to be included as well. There are two sets of calibration errors established for this console. The uncertainty contributors are identified first.
8 Category: ELECTRICITY Procedure: EL-ENG Page: 8 of Uncertainty due to burden effects Figure 2 In this example the test burden is established for the two conditions of use. One is the test burden with the 1:1 transformers in circuit and the other is the test burden for all other applications. Data is established for each 1:1 transformer position under S-E-01 section 7.8, console calibration. This means that there will be an uncertainty figure associated with each of the 1:1 positions. The data from section is used for the uncertainty figures for each position. As an example for the case of position 3, the spread of errors between high burden and low burden is 0.02%. This represent the uncertainty figure which will be used in the uncertainty budget. It should be noted here that a console for which burden errors are also established as determined by the requirements of bulletin E-29 will have the uncertainty determined on the basis of the spread of errors which includes the capacitive and inductive burdens.
9 Category: ELECTRICITY Procedure: EL-ENG Page: 9 of 19 Figure 3 For the case of calibration when 1:1 transformers are not in circuit the uncertainty is determined using the data for both single phase and polyphase meters. From the worksheets, the uncertainty is the error spread identified in entry C of the table in Section This spread is 0.01%.
10 Category: ELECTRICITY Procedure: EL-ENG Page: 10 of Uncertainty due to number of meters under test Figure 4 The uncertainty due to number of meters under test is determined by looking at the difference in the error with the reference meter only in circuit and the error with burdens in all meter under test positions. In the case of the example, from section 7.3 of the worksheets, the difference is 0.0% This uncertainty contributor only applies to the uncertainty determination for the case when one 1:1 transformers are not in circuit.
11 Category: ELECTRICITY Procedure: EL-ENG Page: 11 of Uncertainty due to position to position errors Figure 5 The uncertainty contribution from position to position errors only applies to the case when 1:1 transformers are not in circuit. In this case the difference between the greatest and smallest errors represents the uncertainty due to position to position errors. For this example, from section 7.4 of the worksheets, the maximum spread is 0.01%.
12 Category: ELECTRICITY Procedure: EL-ENG Page: 12 of Uncertainty due to current switching effects Figure 6 The uncertainty contribution due to current switching effects is established from the spread of errors observed over five runs. In this case table 7.7 indicates a spread of 0.03% Uncertainty due to the reference standard used for console calibration The reference standard which is used to certify the console will have an uncertainty found on the certificate of calibration for the standard. For this example a value of 0.005%.
13 Category: ELECTRICITY Procedure: EL-ENG Page: 13 of Calculations Use the formula below with the applicable contributors. For the case when 1:1 transformers are not in circuit. u where: ccon ( ) u u u be nm ptp ucse urs u c(con) u be u nm u ptp u cse u rs = Combined Standard Uncertainty of console = 0.01% Uncertainty due to burden = 0.00% Uncertainty due to # of meters = 0.01% Uncertainty due to position to position errors = 0.03% Uncertainty due to current switching effects = 0.005% Uncertainty due to reference standard used to certify the console uc( con) = +/-.01% (rounded to 2 decimal places) This uncertainty represents the combined standard console uncertainty for the errors established for the case of no intervening transformers (1:1) A coverage factor of k=2 provides an expanded uncertainty value of +/-0.02% This value should be stated on the certificate of errors. For the case when 1:1 transformers are in circuit an uncertainty figure will be established for each position of the console. For each case the uncertainty will be stated with the respective console position errors established under section 7.8. As an example for position # 3 in the data sheets the relevant contributors are: u where: ccon ( ) u u u be nm ptp ucse urs u c(con) u be u nm = Combined Standard Uncertainty of console = 0.02% Uncertainty due to burden = N/A Uncertainty due to # of meters (because each position is being calibrated)
14 Category: ELECTRICITY Procedure: EL-ENG Page: 14 of 19 u ptp u cse u rs = N/AUncertainty due to position to position errors (because each position is being calibrated) = 0.03% Uncertainty due to current switching effects = 0.005% Uncertainty due to reference standard used to certify the console uc( con) = +/-.01% (rounded to 2 decimal places) With similar entries in the Quamatec software a standard uncertainty of +/-0.01% is also established. The expanded uncertainty of +/-0.02% with k=2 can be stated on the certificate of errors for position #3 with 1:1 transformers in circuit.
15 Category: ELECTRICITY Procedure: EL-ENG Page: 15 of Example 2 This example relates to a console used to assess an electronic polyphase transformer type demand meter. The extracts from worksheets relevant to uncertainty determination are provided. This is a multi position console used for testing both single phase and polyphase meters Uncertainty due to burden effects Figure 7 The worksheets provide burden data for three scenarios. Under section of the worksheets, the section B results provide data for the case of testing polyphase transformer type meters. In this case the 2-element burden results in an error difference of 0.03%. Since the 2-element meter will be used as the burden for console calibration, an uncertainty of 0.03% is used as the value in establishing the combined uncertainty for the console calibration.
16 Category: ELECTRICITY Procedure: EL-ENG Page: 16 of Uncertainty due to number of meters under test Figure 8 The uncertainty due to number of meters under test is determined by looking at the difference in the error with the reference meter only in circuit and the error with burdens in all meter under test positions. In the case of the example, from section 7.3 of the worksheets, the difference is 0.04% Uncertainty due to position to position errors Figure 9 The uncertainty contribution from position to position errors only applies to the case when 1:1 transformers are not in circuit. In this case the difference between the greatest and smallest errors represents the uncertainty due to position to position errors. For this example, from section 7.4 of the worksheets, the maximum spread is 0.03%.
17 Category: ELECTRICITY Procedure: EL-ENG Page: 17 of Uncertainty due to current switching effects Figure 10 The uncertainty contribution due to current switching effects is established from the spread of errors observed over five runs. In this case table 7.7 indicates a spread of 0.02%.
18 Category: ELECTRICITY Procedure: EL-ENG Page: 18 of Uncertainty due to regulation The uncertainty due to console regulation has two components. The first is the contribution due to the load holding capability of the console. This is determined from the one hour load monitoring test result. The data for this console shows that the load was held to within 0.01%. over one hour. The uncertainty contribution over a fifteen minute period is them determined to be % (= 0.01/4). The second component to uncertainty due to regulation relates to the consoles ability to provide steady loads over one minute intervals. For this contribution the maximum departure from the expected energy for one minute establishes the uncertainty. Figure 11 For the case of this example, from section 7.6 of the worksheets, the variation is 0.15% to -0.11%. 0.15% is the maximum excursion and therefore is the value used to establish an uncertainty contribution of 0.15% due to one minute load regulation test Uncertainty due to the reference standard used for console calibration The reference standard which is used to certify the console will have an uncertainty found on the certificate of calibration for the standard. For this example a value of 0.005% Calculations Use the formula below with the applicable contributors. u where: ccon ( ) u c(con) ** u u u be nm ptp ucse ucre ucrm urs urm = Combined Standard Uncertainty of console
19 u be u nm u ptp u cse u cre u crm u rs = 0.03% Uncertainty due to burden = 0.04% Uncertainty due to # of meters = 0.03% Uncertainty due to position to position errors = 0.02% Uncertainty due to current switching effects = % Uncertainty due to load regulation (1-hour test) = 0.15% Uncertainty due to load regulation (1-minute test) = 0.005% Uncertainty due to reference standard used to calibrate console uc( con) = +/ % = +/-0.05% (rounded to two decimal places) This uncertainty represents the standard console uncertainty for the errors established for the case of a console used for assessing transformer type polyphase demand meters. This example provides the standard uncertainty at the low load test point as provided under the regulation assessments. This uncertainty can be applied for all transformer type meters. Another assessment can be performed for the high load regulation assessment and this would be applied for self contained meters. The uncertainty for polyphase energy meters would be the same as above except the uncertainties for regulation would be removed from the formula. The expanded uncertainty with a k=2 factor for the example above is +/-0.10%
20
APPENDIX G EVALUATION OF MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY
APPENDIX G EVALUATION OF MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY Table of Contents 1. SCOPE... 2 2. REFERENCES... 2 3. TERMS AND DEFINITIONS... 2 4. BACKGROUND... 4 5. EVALUATION OF MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY POLICY... 5
More informationMEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY PREPARED FOR ENAO ASSESSOR CALIBRATION COURSE OCTOBER/NOVEMBER Prepared by MJ Mc Nerney for ENAO Assessor Calibration
MEASUREMENT PREPARED FOR ENAO ASSESSOR CALIBRATION COURSE UNCERTAINTY OCTOBER/NOVEMBER 2012 Prepared by for ENAO Assessor Calibration B SCOPE Introduction House Rules Overview 17025 & 15189 MU Approaches
More informationAPPENDIX G ESTIMATION OF UNCERTAINTY OF MEASUREMENT
APPENDIX G ESTIMATION OF UNCERTAINTY OF MEASUREMENT Table of Contents 1. SCOPE... 2 2. REFERENCES... 2 3. TERMS AND DEFINITIONS... 2 4. BACKGROUND... 4 5. ESTIMATION OF UNCERTAINTY OF MEASUREMENT POLICY...
More informationDocument No: TR 12 Issue No: 1
ESTIMATION OF THE UNCERTAINTY OF MEASUREMENT BY CALIBRATION LABORATORIES AND SPECIFICATION OF CALIBRATION AND MEASUREMENT CAPABILITY ON SCHEDULES OF ACCREDITATION Prepared by: SADCAS Technical Manage Approved
More informationVAM Project Development and Harmonisation of Measurement Uncertainty Principles
VAM Project 3.2.1 Development and Harmonisation of Measurement Uncertainty Principles Part (d): Protocol for uncertainty evaluation from validation data V J Barwick and S L R Ellison January 2000 LGC/VAM/1998/088
More informationComparison of measurement uncertainty budgets for calibration of sound calibrators: Euromet project 576
NPL REPORT CMAM 73 Comparison of measurement uncertainty budgets for calibration of sound calibrators: Euromet project 576 Peter Hanes October 2001 The National Physical Laboratory is operated on behalf
More informationMorehouse. Edward Lane, Morehouse Instrument Company 1742 Sixth Ave York, PA PH: web: sales:
Morehouse 1 Morehouse Edward Lane, Morehouse Instrument Company 1742 Sixth Ave York, PA 17403 PH: 717-843-0081 web: www.mhforce.com sales: edlane@mhforce.com 2 This presentation will cover the calibration
More informationR SANAS Page 1 of 7
ESTIMATION OF THE UNCERTAINTY OF MEASUREMENT BY CALIBRATION LABORATORIES AND SPECIFICATION OF CALIBRATION AND MEASUREMENT CAPABILITY ON SCHEDULES OF ACCREDITATION Approved By: Chief Executive Officer:
More informationPOWER QUALITY MEASUREMENT PROCEDURE. Version 4 October Power-Quality-Oct-2009-Version-4.doc Page 1 / 12
POWER QUALITY MEASUREMENT PROCEDURE Version 4 October 2009 Power-Quality-Oct-2009-Version-4.doc Page 1 / 12 MEASNET 2009 Copyright all rights reserved This publication may not be reproduced or utilized
More informationSAMM POLICY 5 (SP5) POLICY ON MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY REQUIREMENTS FOR SAMM TESTING LABORATORIES Issue 2, 28 February 2007 (Amd. 1, 11 August 2014)
SKIM AKREDITASI MAKMAL MALAYSIA (SAMM) LABORATORY ACCREDITATION SCHEME OF MALAYSIA SAMM POLICY 5 (SP5) POLICY ON MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY REQUIREMENTS FOR SAMM TESTING LABORATORIES Issue 2, 28 February
More informationISO 376 Calibration Uncertainty C. Ferrero
ISO 376 Calibration Uncertainty C. Ferrero For instruments classified for interpolation, the calibration uncertainty is the uncertainty associated with using the interpolation equation to calculate a single
More informationCalibration Traceability Guidelines
Calibration Traceability Guidelines Check the website of accrediting bodies for the accredited laboratories individual scope of accreditation www.a2la.org ts.nist.gov/standards/accreditation/index.cfm
More informationTechnical Procedure for Glass Refractive Index Measurement System 3 (GRIM 3)
Technical Procedure for Glass Refractive Index Measurement System 3 (GRIM 3) 1.0 Purpose - This technical procedure shall be followed for the operation of the GRIM 3. 2.0 Scope - This procedure applies
More informationCALCULATION OF UNCERTAINTY IN CHEMICAL ANALYSIS. A.Gnanavelu
CALCULATION OF UNCERTAINTY IN CHEMICAL ANALYSIS A.Gnanavelu UNCERTAINTY (U) Every measurement has error which is unknown and unknowable. This unknown error is called measurement uncertainty. Types of Error
More informationTechnical Procedure for General Laboratory Equipment
Technical Procedure for General Laboratory Equipment 1.0 Purpose - This procedure specifies the required elements for the use of general laboratory equipment. 2.0 Scope - This procedure applies to all
More informationJAB NOTE4. ESTIMATION OF MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY (Electrical Testing / High Power Testing) Japan Accreditation Board (JAB)
JAB NOTE4 ESTIMATION OF MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY (Electrical Testing / High Power Testing) nd edition: January 5 01 1 st edition: March 5 00 Japan Accreditation Board (JAB) Initial edition: 00-0-5 1/ nd
More informationOIML R 141 RECOMMENDATION. Edition 2008 (E) ORGANISATION INTERNATIONALE INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION
INTERNATIONAL RECOMMENDATION OIML R 141 Edition 2008 (E) Procedure for calibration and verification of the main characteristics of thermographic instruments Procédure pour l'étalonnage et la vérification
More informationOIML D 28 DOCUMENT. Edition 2004 (E) ORGANISATION INTERNATIONALE INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION. Conventional value of the result of weighing in air
INTERNATIONAL DOCUMENT OIML D 28 Edition 2004 (E) Conventional value of the result of weighing in air Valeur conventionnelle du résultat des pesées dans l'air OIML D 28 Edition 2004 (E) ORGANISATION INTERNATIONALE
More informationGuidelines on the Calibration of Automatic Instruments for Weighing Road Vehicles in Motion and Measuring Axle Loads AWICal WIM Guide May 2018
Guidelines on the Calibration of Automatic Instruments for Weighing Road Vehicles in Motion and Measuring Axle Loads AWICal WIM Guide May 2018 Guidelines on the Calibration of Automatic Instruments for
More informationWGFF Guidelines for CMC Uncertainty and Calibration Report Uncertainty
WGFF Guidelines for CMC Uncertainty and Calibration Report Uncertainty October 21, 2013 Summary The Working Group for Fluid Flow (WGFF) defines Calibration and Measurement Capability (CMC) uncertainty
More informationEA-10/14. EA Guidelines on the Calibration of Static Torque Measuring Devices. Publication Reference PURPOSE
Publication Reference EA-10/14 EA Guidelines on the Calibration of Static Torque Measuring Devices PURPOSE This document has been produced by EA to improve harmonisation in determining the calibration
More informationEA-10/13. EA Guidelines on the Calibration of Temperature Block Calibrators. Publication Reference PURPOSE
Publication Reference EA-10/13 EA Guidelines on the Calibration of Temperature Block Calibrators PURPOSE This document been produced by EA to improve the harmonisation in the calibration of temperature
More informationPart 5: Total stations
Provläsningsexemplar / Preview INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ISO 17123-5 Third edition 2018-02 Optics and optical instruments Field procedures for testing geodetic and surveying instruments Part 5: Total stations
More informationDATA SHEET General Purpose Thick Film Chip Resistor CR Series
Towards Excellence in Quality, Service & Innovation DATA SHEET General Purpose Thick Film Chip Resistor 1% TO 5%, TCR -200 TO +600 SIZE: 01005/0201/0402/0603/0805/1206/1210/2010/2512 RoHs Compliant Jan
More informationAn area chart emphasizes the trend of each value over time. An area chart also shows the relationship of parts to a whole.
Excel 2003 Creating a Chart Introduction Page 1 By the end of this lesson, learners should be able to: Identify the parts of a chart Identify different types of charts Create an Embedded Chart Create a
More informationUncertainties associated with the use of a sound level meter
NPL REPORT DQL-AC 002 Uncertainties associated with the use of a sound level meter Richard Payne April 2004 April 2004 ABSTRACT Uncertainties associated with the use of a sound level meter Richard Payne
More informationThe Determination of Uncertainties in Bend Tests on Metallic Materials
Manual of Codes of Practice for the Determination of Uncertainties in Mechanical Tests on Metallic Materials Code of Practice No. 09 The Determination of Uncertainties in end Tests on Metallic Materials
More informationUncertainty of Measurement A Concept
Uncertainty of Measurement A Concept Shweta V. Matey 1, Dr. Nitin K. Mandavgade 2, and Dr. R.R. Lakhe 3 1 (Asst. Professor, Dept. of Mechanical Engg, Lokmanya Tilak College of Engineering, Mumbai University,
More informationThis Unit may form part of a National Qualification Group Award or may be offered on a freestanding
National Unit Specification: general information CODE F5H7 11 SUMMARY This Unit introduces candidates to the three basic electrical circuit element devices of resistance, capacitance and inductance. The
More informationMeasurement method for the proficiency testing program
APLAC T088 Appendix Measurement method for the proficiency testing program Introductions This measurement method is prepared for use by the APLAC Proficiency Testing Program Photometric measurement of
More informationMeasurement Uncertainty in Mechanical Testing
Intelligent testing Measurement Uncertainty in Mechanical Testing 27. testxpo 2018 ZwickRoell GmbH & Co. KG Ulm Dr. Eduard Schenuit Industry Manager Metal Agenda Why do we need measurement uncertainty?
More informationComparison of Results Obtained from Calibration of a Measuring Arm Performed According to the VDI/VDE, ASME and ISO Standards
Int. J. Mech. Eng. Autom. Volume 2, Number 2, 2015, pp. 61-68 Received: November 27, 2014; Published: February 25, 2015 International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Automation Comparison of Results
More informationSCOPE OF ACCREDITATION
Standards Council of Canada 600-55 Metcalfe Street Ottawa, ON K1P 6L5 Canada Conseil canadien des normes 55, rue Metcalfe, bureau 600 Ottawa, ON K1P 6L5 Canada SCOPE OF ACCREDITATION Transcat Canada, Inc.
More informationCMM Uncertainty Budget
Table of Contents Purpose...3 Scope...3 Measurement Example...3 Uncertainty Groups...4 Probe Group...5 Calibration Artifact Group...6 Environment Group...7 CMM Group...8 Part Group...10 Conversion of Potential
More informationReproducibility within the Laboratory R w Control Sample Covering the Whole Analytical Process
Flowchart for Nordtest Method (a) Specify measurand Quantify components for within lab reproducibility A control samples B possible steps, not covered by the control sample Quantify bias components Convert
More informationSCOPE OF ACCREDITATION TO ISO/IEC 17025:2005 & ANSI/NCSL Z
SCOPE OF ACCREDITATION TO ISO/IEC 17025:2005 & ANSI/NCSL Z540-1-1994 RS CALIBRATION SERVICES, INC. 1047 Serpentine Lane Pleasanton, CA 94566 Mr. Ralph Sabiel Phone: 925 462 4217 CALIBRATION Valid To: April
More informationISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD
INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ISO 10360-7 First edition 2011-06-01 Geometrical product specifications (GPS) Acceptance and reverification tests for coordinate measuring machines (CMM) Part 7: CMMs equipped with
More informationInternational Atomic Energy Agency. Department of Nuclear Sciences and Applications. IAEA Environment Laboratories
International Atomic Energy Agency Department of Nuclear Sciences and Applications IAEA Environment Laboratories Vienna International Centre, P.O. Box 100, 1400 Vienna, Austria REFERENCE SHEET CERTIFIED
More informationMetallic materials Brinell hardness test. Part 3: Calibration of reference blocks
INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ISO 6506-3 Third edition 2014-10-01 Metallic materials Brinell hardness test Part 3: Calibration of reference blocks Matériaux métalliques Essai de dureté Brinell Partie 3: Étalonnage
More informationMeasurement uncertainty and legal limits in analytical measurements
UNCERTAINTY Measurement uncertainty and legal limits in analytical measurements MIRELLA BUZOIANU, Reference Materials Laboratory, National Institute of Metrology (INM), Bucharest, Romania 1 Introduction
More informationProvläsningsexemplar / Preview INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ISO Second edition
INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ISO 6974-1 Second edition 2012-05-15 Natural gas Determination of composition and associated uncertainty by gas chromatography Part 1: General guidelines and calculation of composition
More informationCalculation of Measurement Uncertainty
Handbook for Calculation of Measurement Uncertainty in Environmental Laboratories i ii Handbook for Calculation of Measurement Uncertainty in Environmental Laboratories Nordtest project 1589-0 Version
More informationAcceleration/Velocity/Displacement VIBRATION METER
Acceleration/Velocity/Displacement VIBRATION METER Model : VB-8220 Your purchase of this VIBRATION METER marks a step forward for you into the field of precision measurement. Although this METER is a complex
More informationSpecific Accreditation Guidance
Specific Accreditation Guidance Materials Characterisation of Metallic Items by X-Ray Fluorescence and Atomic (Arc/Spark) Emission Techniques August 2018 Copyright National Association of Testing Authorities,
More informationDetermination of particle size distribution Single particle light interaction methods. Part 4:
Provläsningsexemplar / Preview INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ISO 21501-4 Second edition 2018-05 Determination of particle size distribution Single particle light interaction methods Part 4: Light scattering airborne
More informationUV Quality Assurance. Dark Current Correction
UV Quality Assurance This document presents the Quality Assurance protocol used for the measurement of broad spectrum UV spectra according to the guidelines given by the United States Environmental Protection
More informationM. A. Navacerrada, C. Díaz, A. Pedrero and L. Iglesias
Acústica 2008 20-22 de Outubro, Coimbra, Portugal Universidade de Coimbra CALCULUS OF THE UNCERTAINTY IN ACOUSTIC FIELD MEASUREMENTS: COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN THE UNCERTAINTY PROPAGATION METHOD AND THE
More informationUncertainty Propagation for Force Calibration Systems
Uncertainty Propagation for Force Calibration Systems Morehouse Instruments Figure 1. Measurement Uncertainty Pyramid Introduction There are several labs operating throughout the world, whom do not follow
More informationDoubt-Free Uncertainty In Measurement
Doubt-Free Uncertainty In Measurement Colin Ratcliffe Bridget Ratcliffe Doubt-Free Uncertainty In Measurement An Introduction for Engineers and Students Colin Ratcliffe United States Naval Academy Annapolis
More informationMOY/SCMI/36 SPECIFICATION OF ACCURACY FOR A PRECISION CLINOMETER
Centre for Basic, Thermal and Length Metrology National Physical Laboratory MOY/SCMI/36 SPECIFICATION OF ACCURACY FOR A PRECISION CLINOMETER A Watts Precision Clinometer fitted with a circular glass scale
More informationINTER-COMPARISONON TEMPERATURE MEASUREMENT USING FLUKE THERMOMETER MODEL 1502A
INTER-COMPARISONON TEMPERATURE MEASUREMENT USING FLUKE THERMOMETER MODEL 1502A Drs. Untung Merdijanto M.Si, Drs. Damianus Tri Heryanto, Drs. Kanton Lumban Toruan, M.Si, and Budi Santoso Agency for Meteorology,
More informationA61-02 CALA Guidance on Traceability Revision 1.2 October 15, 2012
Revision 1.2 October 15, 2012 PAGE II TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS... 1 GUIDANCE...2 1.0 Introduction... 2 2.0 Uncertainty and Traceability... 2 3.0 Need for Traceability... 3 3.1 What does traceability
More informationOIML R 50-3 RECOMMENDATION. Edition 2014 (E) ORGANISATION INTERNATIONALE INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION
INTERNATIONAL RECOMMENDATION OIML R 50-3 Edition 2014 (E) Continuous totalizing automatic weighing instruments (belt weighers). Part 3: Test report format Instruments de pesage totalisateurs continus à
More informationIntegrated Circuits Thermal Test Method Environment Conditions - Natural Convection (Still Air)
EIA/JEDEC STANDARD Integrated Circuits Thermal Test Method Environment Conditions - Natural Convection (Still Air) EIA/JESD51-2 DECEMBER 1995 ELECTRONIC INDUSTRIES ASSOCIATION ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT NOTICE
More informationIntroduction to the evaluation of uncertainty
Manual of Codes of Practice for the Determination of Uncertainties in Mechanical Tests on Metallic Materials SECTION 1 Introduction to the evaluation of uncertainty F A Kandil National Physical Laboratory
More informationDemonstrating Competency and Equivalency of Two Commercial SPRT Calibration Facilities
Demonstrating Competency and Equivalency of Two Commercial SPRT Calibration Facilities T. J. Wiandt 1,2 1 Fluke Corporation, Hart Scientific Division, American Fork, Utah United States. 2 E-mail: tom.wiandt@hartscientific.com
More informationEDITION 1 OCTOBER 1997 EA-10/09 PAGE 1 OF
European cooperation for Accreditation of Laboratories Publication Reference EAL-G32 Measurement and Generation of Small AC Voltages with Inductive Voltage Dividers PURPOSE This document has been produced
More informationAcceleration, Velocity, Separate probe VIBRATION METER Model : VB-8202
Acceleration, Velocity, Separate probe VIBRATION METER Model : VB-8202 Your purchase of this VIBRATION METER marks a step forward for you into the field of precision measurement. Although this METER is
More informationPart 2: Methods for special reverberation test rooms
Provläsningsexemplar / Preview INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ISO 3743-2 Second edition 2018-02 Acoustics Determination of sound power levels of noise sources using sound pressure Engineering methods for small,
More informationUncertainty in Measurement of Isotope Ratios by Multi-Collector Mass Spectrometry
1 IAEA-CN-184/168 Uncertainty in Measurement of Isotope Ratios by Multi-Collector Mass Spectrometry R. Williams Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Livermore, California U.S.A. williams141@llnl.gov
More informationTraceability, validation and measurement uncertainty 3 pillars for quality of measurement results. David MILDE
Traceability, validation and measurement uncertainty 3 pillars for quality of measurement results David MILDE Traceability Validation Measurement Uncerainty Outline Introduction to 3 pillars Recommended
More informationGuidelines on the Calibration of Static Torque Measuring Devices
European Association of National Metrology Institutes Guidelines on the Calibration of Static Torque Measuring Devices EURAMET/cg-14/v.01 Previously EA-10/14 July 2007 Calibration Guide EURAMET/cg-14/v.01
More informationUSER S GUIDE. ESTCP Project ER
USER S GUIDE Demonstration of a Fractured Rock Geophysical Toolbox (FRGT) for Characterization and Monitoring of DNAPL Biodegradation in Fractured Rock Aquifers ESTCP Project ER-201118 JANUARY 2016 F.D.
More informationMethod of Estimating Uncertainty of Measurement Values in Case of Measurement Methods Involving Non-Linear Calibration
Method of Estimating Uncertainty of Measurement Values in Case of Measurement Methods Involving Non-Linear Calibration Shigemi Hosogaya *1, Masato Ota *1, Yukio Ozaki *1, Katsuhiko Kuwa *2, Naotaka Hamasaki
More informationProvläsningsexemplar / Preview INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ISO Second edition
INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ISO 17123-4 Second edition 2012-06-01 Optics and optical instruments Field procedures for testing geodetic and surveying instruments Part 4: Electro-optical distance meters (EDM
More informationTYPICAL PRESSURE MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY DEFINED BY AN FPG8601 FORCE BALANCED PISTON GAUGE
TYPICAL PRESSURE MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY DEFINED BY AN FPG8601 FORCE BALANCED PISTON GAUGE Michael Bair and Pierre Delajoud 2002 DEC 10 Revised 2004 MAR 26 FORWARD FPG8601 is a pressure standard designed
More informationMetallic materials Brinell hardness test. Part 2: Verification and calibration of testing machines
INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ISO 6506-2 Third edition 2014-10-01 Metallic materials Brinell hardness test Part 2: Verification and calibration of testing machines Matériaux métalliques Essai de dureté Brinell
More informationThe Monte Carlo method what and how?
A top down approach in measurement uncertainty estimation the Monte Carlo simulation By Yeoh Guan Huah GLP Consulting, Singapore (http://consultglp.com) Introduction The Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology
More information1. Prepare the MALDI sample plate by spotting an angiotensin standard and the test sample(s).
Analysis of a Peptide Sequence from a Proteolytic Digest by MALDI-TOF Post-Source Decay (PSD) and Collision-Induced Dissociation (CID) Standard Operating Procedure Purpose: The following procedure may
More informationDECISION LIMITS FOR THE CONFIRMATORY QUANTIFICATION OF THRESHOLD SUBSTANCES
Introduction DECISION LIMITS FOR THE CONFIRMATORY QUANTIFICATION OF THRESHOLD SUBSTANCES This Technical Document shall be applied to the quantitative determination of a Threshold Substance in a Sample
More informationCALIBRATION CERTIFICATE # 503
CALIBRATION CERTIFICATE # 503 Calibration date : 2011-02-23 Certificate issued : 2012-04-18 Company name Company address City, Province, Canada CLAS 2009-02 Calibration of Mass flow meter Micro Motion
More informationOECD QSAR Toolbox v.4.1. Tutorial of how to use Automated workflow for ecotoxicological prediction
OECD QSAR Toolbox v.4.1 Tutorial of how to use Automated workflow for ecotoxicological prediction Outlook Aim Automated workflow The exercise Report The OECD QSAR Toolbox for Grouping Chemicals into Categories
More informationHonorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
TO: ATTENTION: FROM: SUBJECT: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Jeffrey L. Stewart, City Manager Len Gorecki, Director of Public Works Jerry Stock, City Engineer Public Hearing to Consider
More informationReference Materials and Proficiency Testing. CropLife International Meeting October 2015 Gina M. Clapper
Reference Materials and Proficiency Testing CropLife International Meeting 15-16 October 2015 Gina M. Clapper Approaches to Improving and Demonstrating Method and Laboratory Performance Analytical quality
More informationUncertainty due to Finite Resolution Measurements
Uncertainty due to Finite Resolution Measurements S.D. Phillips, B. Tolman, T.W. Estler National Institute of Standards and Technology Gaithersburg, MD 899 Steven.Phillips@NIST.gov Abstract We investigate
More informationCreating Empirical Calibrations
030.0023.01.0 Spreadsheet Manual Save Date: December 1, 2010 Table of Contents 1. Overview... 3 2. Enable S1 Calibration Macro... 4 3. Getting Ready... 4 4. Measuring the New Sample... 5 5. Adding New
More informationRaw Materials More detailed Information can be found in the Manual to ChemGes.
Raw Materials More detailed Information can be found in the Manual to ChemGes. Introduction: ChemGes has a Database of ca. 22,000 Raw Materials (RMs) These are taken from official lists and major data
More informationA basic introduction to reference materials. POPs Strategy
A basic introduction to reference materials POPs Strategy 2009-2010+ A tutorial 16 September 2009 Angelique Botha R&D metrologist Contents Why do we need reference materials? comparability of results metrological
More information2W, 2816, SL Type Low Resistance Chip Resistor (Lead / Halogen Free)
2W, 2816, SL Type (Lead / Halogen Free) 1. Scope This specification applies to 4.2mm x 7.1mm size 2W, fixed metal foil current sensing resistors used in electronic equipment. 2. Features / Applications
More informationMeasurement Uncertainty - How to Calculate It In The Medical Laboratory
Measurement Uncertainty - How to Calculate It In The Medical Laboratory Godfrey C. Moses, PhD, FCACB National Director, Gamma-Dynacare Medical Laboratories 11/18/2009 Moses, GC; GDML 1 Introduction Disclaimers
More informationISCC Audit Procedure Classified chemicals
ISCC Audit Procedure 202-02 Classified chemicals No. Template Remarks Page 1 Basic data Basic data of the entity to be audited 2 2 Biodiversity Action Plan Template for agricultural production area subject
More informationMILITARY SPECIFICATION MICROCIRCUITS, DIGITAL, BIPOLAR, TTL, DECODERS MONOLITHIC SILICON. Inactive for new design after 7 September 1995.
INCH-POUND 16 February 2005 SUPERSEDING MIL-M-38510/10C 3 March 1986 MILITARY SPECIFICATION MICROCIRCUITS, DIGITAL, BIPOLAR, TTL, DECODERS MONOLITHIC SILICON This specification is approved for use by all
More informationInternal Audit Report
Internal Audit Report Right of Way Mapping TxDOT Internal Audit Division Objective To determine the efficiency and effectiveness of district mapping procedures. Opinion Based on the audit scope areas reviewed,
More informationAdvanced Forecast. For MAX TM. Users Manual
Advanced Forecast For MAX TM Users Manual www.maxtoolkit.com Revised: June 24, 2014 Contents Purpose:... 3 Installation... 3 Requirements:... 3 Installer:... 3 Setup: spreadsheet... 4 Setup: External Forecast
More informationUnit certificate for solar inverters
Unit certificate for solar inverters Certificate number: MOE 09-0326-14 Original 2013-08-07 _ of 4 This certificate replaces certificate number MOE 09-0326-11. For restrictions and conditions of validity,
More informationGuide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM) and its supplemental guides
National Physical Laboratory Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM) and its supplemental guides Maurice Cox National Physical Laboratory, UK maurice.cox@npl.co.uk http://www.npl.co.uk/ssfm/index.html
More informationThe measurement of tritium in environmental water samples
The measurement of tritium in environmental water samples 1. Introduction The Hidex 300 SL automatic TDCR liquid scintillation provides an excellent solution for the determination of H-3 in drinking water.
More informationTHE DIMENSIONING OF ELECTRICAL CONDUCTORS FOR USE IN "PANEL BOARDS" ADDRESSED TO HAZARDOUS AREAS - PART THREE
July 04 THE DIMENSIONING OF ELECTRICAL CONDUCTORS FOR USE IN "PANEL BOARDS" ADDRESSED TO HAZARDOUS AREAS - PART THREE In this third part. we want to speak about how important is the correct sizing of the
More informationParticipants in the Proficiency Test THM 02/2016
2 February 2016 Participants in the Proficiency Test THM 02/2016 Reference: Letter 5th November 2015 Enclosed we will distribute the samples for the Proficiency Test THM 02/2016. In total, 6 laboratories
More informationUncertainties in Acoustics
Uncertainties in Acoustics Norm Broner Broner Consulting Pty Ltd, Melbourne, Australia ABSTRACT In acoustics, we are often required to demonstrate compliance with a given criterion. The criteria may be
More informationThis Unit may form part of a National Qualifications Group Award or may be offered on a freestanding
National Unit Specification: general information CODE F5HL 12 SUMMARY This Unit has been designed to introduce candidates to Electrical Principles and provide opportunities to develop their knowledge and
More informationEA Guidelines on the Calibration of Temperature Indicators and Simulators by Electrical Simulation and Measurement
Publication Reference EA-10/11 EA Guidelines on the Calibration of Temperature Indicators and Simulators by Electrical PURPOSE This document has been produced by EA as a means of giving advice for calibrating
More information5730A High Performance Multifunction Calibrator. Extended specifications
730A High Performance Multifunction Calibrator Extended specifications General Specifications Warm-Up Time... Twice the time since last warmed up, to a maximum of 30 minutes. System Installation... Rack
More informationApplication Note. Electrical. Optical
Application Note Electrical Vector Network Analyzer Port 1 Port 2 Electrical Electrical MX40G E-O Converter Optical O-E Device Under Test Using the MX40G: De Embedding Procedures One of the primary applications
More informationEstimating MU for microbiological plate count using intermediate reproducibility duplicates method
Estimating MU for microbiological plate count using intermediate reproducibility duplicates method Before looking into the calculation aspect of this subject, let s get a few important definitions in right
More informationMethod Verification. The How M.L. Jane Weitzel ALACC Chair
Method Verification The How M.L. Jane Weitzel ALACC Chair The What Released early 2008 http://www.aoac.org/a lacc_guide_2008.pdf Meet ISO 17025 Requirement Categories of Methods The six categories of chemical
More informationOECD QSAR Toolbox v.4.1. Tutorial illustrating new options for grouping with metabolism
OECD QSAR Toolbox v.4.1 Tutorial illustrating new options for grouping with metabolism Outlook Background Objectives Specific Aims The exercise Workflow 2 Background Grouping with metabolism is a procedure
More informationCEDEN. California Environmental Data Exchange Network
CEDEN California Environmental Data Exchange Network Chemistry Data Submission Guidance Document Updated January 3, 2017 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION... 1 CHEMISTRY DATA SUBMISSION STEPS... 1 CEDEN CHEMISTRY
More informationIPC-TM-650 TEST METHODS MANUAL
3000 Lakeside Drive, Suite 105N Bannockburn, IL 60015-1249 TEST METHODS MNUL Number Thermal Stress, Convection Reflow ssembly Simulation Originating Task Group Thermal Stress Test Methodology Subcommittee
More informationThe Role of Uncertainty Quantification in Model Verification and Validation. Part 2 Model Verification and Validation Plan and Process
The Role of Uncertainty Quantification in Model Verification and Validation Part 2 Model Verification and Validation Plan and Process 1 Case Study: Ni Superalloy Yield Strength Model 2 3 What is to be
More information