arxiv: v2 [math.pr] 18 May 2018

Transcription

1 ASYMPTOTIC ARBITRAGE IN FRACTIONAL MIXED MARKETS FERNANDO CORDERO, IRENE KLEIN, AND LAVINIA PEREZ-OSTAFE arxiv: v2 [mah.pr] 18 May 2018 Absrac. We cosider a family of mixed processes give as he sum of a fracioal Browia moio wih Hurs parameer H 3/4, 1 ad a muliple of a idepede sadard Browia moio, he family beig idexed by he scalig facor i fro of he Browia moio. We aalyze he family of uderlyig markes wih mehods from he heory of large fiacial markes. More precisely, we show he exisece of a srog asympoic arbirage SAA whe he scalig facor coverges o zero. The proofs are based o a dichoomy resul for sequeces of Gaussia measures ad he cocep of relaive eropy. Addiioally, he relaio bewee SAA ad he oio of eire asympoic separaio for sequeces of probabiliy measures is exploied. 1. Iroducio Empirical sudies of fiacial ime series led o he coclusio ha he logreur icremes exhibi log-rage depedece. This fac suppors he idea of modellig he radomess of a risky asse usig a fracioal Browia moio wih Hurs parameer H > 1/2. However, markes drive by a fracioal Browia moio have bee exesively dispued, as he laer fails o be a semimarigale ad, hece, hey allow for a free luch wih vaishig risk see [6]. May aemps were proposed o overcome he drawbacks of he fracioal Browia moio. I his work, we deal wih he regularizaio mehod proposed by Cheridio i [2, 1] whe H > 3/4. The laer cosiss i addig o he fracioal Browia moio a muliple of a idepede Browia moio, he resulig process, called mixed fracioal Browia moio, beig Gaussia wih he log-rage depedece propery. Moreover, as show i [2, 1], whe H > 3/4 he mixed fracioal Browia moio is equivale o a muliple of a Browia moio. Therefore, a Black-Scholes ype model i which he radomess of he risky asse is drive by a mixed fracioal Browia moio is arbirage free ad complee. We call such a model a mixed fracioal Black-Scholes model. O oe had he fracioal Black-Scholes model admis arbirage. O he oher had, whe he Hurs parameer H > 3/4, addig a Browia compoe i he above explaied way makes he arbirage disappear. I his paper we aim o go a sep furher ad sudy he sesiiviy o arbirage of he mixed fracioal Black-Scholes model whe he Browia compoe asympoically vaishes. I [3, 4] i was argued ha a good way of seeig he sesiiviy o arbirage of a marke whe oe of is parameers coverges o zero or ifiiy, is o cosider he family of markes idexed by he correspodig parameer ad o use mehods from large fiacial markes. To be precise, we sudy he asympoic arbirage opporuiies i he sequece of mixed fracioal Black-Scholes models whe he scalig facor i fro of he Browia moio coverges o zero. We focus o he Dae: May 21, Mahemaics Subjec Classificaio. 60G22, 60G15, 91B24, 91B26. Key words ad phrases. Mixed fracioal Browia moio, relaive eropy, large fiacial marke, eire asympoic separaio, srog asympoic arbirage. 1

2 2 FERNANDO CORDERO, IRENE KLEIN, AND LAVINIA PEREZ-OSTAFE oio of srog asympoic arbirage iroduced by Kabaov ad Kramkov i [9] as he possibiliy of geig arbirarily rich wih probabiliy arbirarily close o oe by akig a vaishig risk. Our model fis he sadard framework of large fiacial markes, as each mixed fracioal Black-Scholes model is arbirage free ad eve complee. We poi ou ha he exisece of arbirage i he limiig marke does o imply he exisece of ay kid of asympoic arbirage i he approximaig sequece of mixed markes. I his seig, a coecio bewee he exisece of srog asympoic arbirage ad he eire asympoic separaio of he sequece of objecive probabiliy measures ad he sequece of equivale marigale measures was esablished i [9]. We aim o show he exisece of srog asympoic arbirage i he previously described family of markes. Based o he above discussio, we show ha he sequece of objecive probabiliy measures is eirely asympoically separable from he sequece of equivale marigale measures. The proof uses he oio of relaive eropy ad a dichoomy resul for sequeces of Gaussia measures. Ideed, ispired by he work of Cheridio [2, 1], we firs show, for each fixed marke, ha he eropy of he objecive probabiliy measure relaive o he equivale marigale measure, boh resriced o a discree pariio, coverges o ifiiy. Our proof he follows usig ighess argumes for he sequece of Rado-Nikodym derivaives of he objecive probabiliy measures wih respec o equivale marigale measures ad he fac ha wo sequeces of Gaussia measures are eiher muually coiguous or eirely separable. The laer is kow i he lieraure as he equivalece/sigulariy dichoomy for sequeces of Gaussia processes, see [5]. The paper is srucured as follows. I Secio 2, we se he mixed fracioal Black-Scholes model ad recall he framework of he large fiacial marke. A he ed of his par, we sae he mai resul Theorem 1. Secio 3 is dedicaed o he proof of Theorem 1, whereas Secio 4 provides a discussio abou he exisece of srog asympoic arbirage usig self-fiacig sraegies cosraied o jump oly i a fiie se of imes. We ed our work wih Appedix A i which we recall he defiiio of relaive eropy ad a equivale characerizaio i erms of he Rado-Nikodym derivaive. 2. Prelimiaries ad mai resuls 2.1. Seig he model. Le Ω, F, P be a probabiliy space. Defiiio 1. A fracioal Browia moio Z H = Z H 0 wih Hurs parameer H 0, 1 is a coiuous cered Gaussia process wih covariace fucio CovZ H, Zs H = EZ H Zs H = 1 2H + s 2H s 2H, s, 0. 2 I paricular, Z 1 2 is a sadard Browia moio. A liear combiaio of differe fracioal Browia moios is refered i he lieraure as a mixed fracioal Browia moio. I order o avoid localizaio argumes we oly cosider fiie ime horizo processes. I addiio we focus o liear combiaios of a sadard Browia moio B [0,1] ad a idepede fracioal Browia moio Z H [0,1] wih Hurs parameer H 3/4, 1, boh defied o Ω, F, P. Cheridio shows i [2, 1] ha, for each α R he mixed process M H,α := M H,α [0,1] defied by M H,α := α Z H + B, [0, 1], is equivale o a Browia moio. By his we mea ha he measure Q H,α iduced o C[0, 1] by M H,α ad he Wieer measure Q W iduced by he Browia moio o C[0, 1] are equivale. As a cosequece, he process M H,α is a

3 ASYMPTOTIC ARBITRAGE IN FRACTIONAL MIXED MARKETS 3 F H,α [0,1] -semimarigale, where, for each 0, F H,α he righ-coiuous aural filraio augmeed by he ullses. Now, for each α > 0, we refer as he α-mixed fracioal Black-Scholes model o he fiacial marke cosisig of a risk free asse ormalized o oe ad a risky asse S H,α [0,1] give by := S H,α 0 exp µ 2 S H,α 2α 2 + Z H := Ms H,α s [0,] is + 1 α B, [0, 1], 1 where µ R ad > 0 represe he drif ad he volailiy of he asse. We deoe by X := X [0,1] he coordiae process i C[0, 1] ad we defie he process S α := S α [0,1] as S α := S0 α exp µ 2 2α 2 + α X, [0, 1]. 2 From he above discussio, we coclude ha S H,α uder P is equivale o S α uder Q W, which is a marigale whe µ = 0. For a geeral drif, we deoe by Q µα he measure iduced o C[0, 1] by he Browia moio wih drif µα i paricular Q 0 = Q W. Thaks o he Girsaov heorem, he process S H,α uder P is also equivale o S α uder Q µα, which is a marigale. Therefore, he α- mixed fracioal Black-Scholes model wih he filraio F H,α [0,1] has a uique equivale marigale measure, ad herefore is arbirage-free ad complee Asympoic arbirage. I his work, we rea he collecio of α-mixed fracioal Black-Scholes models wih mehods from large fiacial markes. This idea is formalized i he followig defiiio. Defiiio 2 The large mixed fracioal marke. We call large mixed fracioal marke o he family of α-mixed fracioal Black-Scholes models, α > 0, i.e. he family of markes L H := Ω, F, F H,α [0,1], P, S H,α. α>0 We aim o sudy he presece of asympoic arbirage i he large fiacial mixed fracioal marke whe α eds o ifiiy, i.e. whe he Browia compoe asympoically disappears. More precisely, we ied o ivesigae, usig mehods of [9], he presece of a so-called srog asympoic arbirage. The laer is a aalogue cocep of arbirage bu for sequeces of markes raher ha for a sigle marke model. Iuiively, his kid of arbirage for sequeces of markes gives he possibiliy of geig arbirarily rich wih probabiliy arbirarily close o oe while akig a vaishig risk. I order o make his idea precise we firs specify he se of admissible radig sraegies. Defiiio 3 Admissible radig sraegy. A radig sraegy for S H,α is a realvalued predicable S H,α -iegrable sochasic process Φ := Φ [0,1]. The radig sraegy is said o be admissible if here is m R + such ha for all [0, 1]: Φ S H,α m almos surely. Now we proceed o recall he defiiio of srog asympoic arbirage. Defiiio 4. There exiss a srog asympoic arbirage SAA i he large mixed fracioal marke as α eds o ifiiy if here exiss a sequece α l l 1 covergig o ifiiy ad a sequece Φ l l 1, where Φ l is a admissible radig sraegy for S H,α l, such ha 1 Φ l S H,α l m l, [0, 1], l 1, S H,α is he soluio of ds H,α = µ S H,α d + S H,α dz H + 1 α B.

4 4 FERNANDO CORDERO, IRENE KLEIN, AND LAVINIA PEREZ-OSTAFE 2 lim l P Φ l S H,α l 1 M l = 1, where m k ad M k are sequeces of posiive real umbers covergig o zero ad o ifiiy, respecively. Our approach o show he exisece of his kid of arbirage will be o cosrucive. Isead, we use a equivale characerizaio of srog asympoic arbirage based o he oio of eire asympoic separabiliy of sequeces of measures, which is defied as follows. Defiiio 5. The sequeces of probabiliy measures P l l 1 ad Q l l 1 are said o be eirely asympoically separable if here exiss a subsequece l k ad a sequece of ses A k F l k such ha lim k P lk A k = 1 ad lim k Q lk A k = 0. I his case we wrie P l l 1 Q l l 1. I addiio, wo families of probabiliy measures P α α>0 ad Q α α>0 are said o be eirely asympoically separable, ad we wrie P α α>0 Q α α>0, if here is a sequece α l l 1 covergig o ifiiy such ha P α l l 1 Q α l l 1. The precise relaio bewee his oio ad he exisece of SAA is give i [9, Proposiio 4]. I he case of complee markes, his resul akes he followig simple form. Proposiio 1. Cosider a large fiacial marke Ω α, F α, F α [0,T ], P α α>0 ad assume ha each small marke is complee. For each α > 0, le Q α P α be he uique equivale marigale measure. The he followig codiios are equivale 1 There is a SAA. 2 P α α>0 Q α α>0. Therefore he sudy of SAA i L H reduces o deermiig wheher Q H,α α>0 is eirely asympoically separable from Q µα α>0 or o Mai resul. We sae ow our mai resul. Theorem 1. There exiss a srog asympoic arbirage i he large mixed fracioal marke L H for α. As meioed we will show ha Q H,α α>0 Q µα α>0. 3. Proof of Theorem 1 I order o prove Theorem 1, we provide a series of lemmas from which he desired resul is obaied as a direc cosequece. Before proceedig, we iroduce hough some oaios. Followig he lies of [2, 1], we defie, for all N, Y : C[0, 1] R by: T Y ω = ω ω0, ω ω,..., ω1 ω ad deoe Q H,α, ad Q µα he resricios of Q H,α ad Q µα o he -algebra F := Y. We fix he Hurs parameer H 3/4, 1 ad we avoid o meio he depedece o i by seig Q H,α Q α ad Q H,α, Q α,. We deoe by C he covariace marix of he icremes of he fracioal Browia moio Z H : C i, j := Cov Z H i Z H i 1, Z H j Z H j 1, 1 i, j, ad by λ 1,..., λ is eigevalues. Sice he marix C is symmeric ad posiive semi-defiie, all he λ i, 1 i, are real ad oegaive. I he case whe µ = 0, he sudy of SAA reduces o show ha Q H,α α>0 Q W.

5 ASYMPTOTIC ARBITRAGE IN FRACTIONAL MIXED MARKETS 5 We moreover se Σ 0 := 1 I + α 2 C ad Σ 1 := 1 I + 1 µ 2 α , where I is he ideiy marix ad 1 is he marix wih all coefficies equal o 1. Clearly, he marices Σ 0 ad Σ 1 are posiive defiie ad herefore iverible. The proof of Theorem 1 srogly relies o he cocep of relaive eropy also called someimes Kullback-Leibler divergece of he probabiliy measure Q α, respecively, Q α relaive o Q µα respecively, Q µα, deoed by HQα, Q µα respecively, HQ α Q µα, see [7, Secio 6]. We recall he defiiio of relaive eropy ad some releva resuls i he Appedix A. Lemma 1. For each 1, we have H Q α, Q µα = 1 2 [ rσ 1 1 Σ 0 + µ2 α T Σ l ] de Σ1, 3 de Σ 0 where 1 R is he vecor wih all coordiaes equal o 1, ad, for each square marix A, ra ad dea deoe he race ad he deermia of A, respecively. Proof. Noe firs ha Noe also ha E Q α, [ Y Y T ] = Σ0 ad [ E Q µα Y Y T ] = Σ1. E Q α, [Y ] = 0 ad E Q µα [Y ] = µα 1, where 0 R is he vecor wih all coordiaes equal o 0. Sice Y is a Gaussia vecor uder he wo measures, he resul follows usig Lemma 7 ad performig a sraighforward calculaio. Usig sadard properies of he race ad he deermia, i is o difficul o see ha 1 1 r Σ 0 = + α2 λ i ad l de Σ 0 = l + α2 λ i. 4 We se a := 1 µ 2 α 2 ad oe ha Σ 2 1 = 1 I + a 1. The ex lemma summarizes he properies of he marix Σ 1. Lemma 2. For each > 1, he eigevalues of Σ 1 are 1/ wih mulipliciy 1 ad 1 + a wih mulipliciy 1. I paricular, we have The iverse of Σ 1 is give by Σ 1 1 = de Σ 1 = a + 1. I a a Proof. Deoe by d λ := deσ 1 λi = de 1 λ I + a 1. Subracig he row i from he row i + 1, for each 1 i <, i he marix Σ 1 λi, we see ha d λ is equal o he deermia of he marix 1 λ + a a a a λ 1 1 λ λ 1 1 λ λ 1 1 λ

6 6 FERNANDO CORDERO, IRENE KLEIN, AND LAVINIA PEREZ-OSTAFE Developig he deermia wih respec o he las colum we ge 1 d λ = λ d λ 1 + a 1 1 λ, > 2. Ieraig his ideiy, we obai 2 1 d λ = λ d λ a λ = λ λ + a. The firs wo saemes follow. For he las saeme, oe ca easily check ha Σ 1 I a a = I. This shows he desired resul. Lemma 3. For all > 1, we have lim H Q α, Q µα =. α Proof. Our sarig poi is Lemma 1. Evaluaig each erm eerig 3, we firs obai Noe ha rσ 1 1 Σ 0 = rσ 0 a a + 1 r1 Σ 0 Thus, replacig a = 1 = r1 C = µ 2 α 2 2 rσ 1 1 Σ 0 = α 2 λ i a a α2 r1 C. 6 i,j=1 [ Z H 2 ] C i, j = E 1 = 1., equaio 6 becomes α 2 λ i µ2 α 2 µ 2 α α2. 7 For he hird erm i 3, usig ha 1 T 1 1 = 2, oe ca easily derive ha 1 T Σ = a + 1 = 2 2 µ 2 α For he las erm i 3, we use 4 ad Lemma 2 o obai de Σ1 l = la + 1 l1 + α 2 λ i de Σ 0 µ 2 α = l l1 + α 2 λ i. 9 2 Iserig 7, 8 ad 9 i 3 i follows [ H Q α, Q µα = 1 α 2 λ i 2 l1 + α2 λ i µ2 α 4 µ 2 µ 2 α l α ] Sice he race is similariy-ivaria, we deduce ha λ i = rc = C i, i = 1 2H 1.

7 ASYMPTOTIC ARBITRAGE IN FRACTIONAL MIXED MARKETS 7 I addiio, we have l µ 2 α Therefore, 10 leads o 2 H Q α, Q µα α2 2 α2 2 2H µ2 α 2 µ 2 α l1 + α2 λ max 2 2 2H 1 2 l1 + α2 λ max = 1 2 l e θα2 1 + α 2 λ max, 11 where θ := 2 2H 1 > 0 ad λ max = max... λ i. The resul follows akig he limi whe α eds o ifiiy i he previous expressio. Remark 1. If µ = 0, usig Lemma 1, he previous resul exeds direcly o he case = 1. Remark 2. The above proof also gives us he relaio bewee he relaive eropy of Q α, relaive o Q µα, i.e. H Q α, Q µα, ad he relaive eropy of Q α, relaive o Q W, i.e. H Qα, Q W. Ideed, usig [1, Lemma 5.3] oe ca deduce from 10 ha H Q α, Q µα = H Q α, Q W 1 µ 2 α 4 2 µ 2 α µ 2 2 l α Remark 3. We poi ou ha we also have lim H Q α Q µα =. α. 12 Ideed, we kow from [1, Lemma 5.3] ha sup H Q α, Q W <, which direcly implies ha also sup H Q α, Q µα <. Therefore, applyig [7, Lemma 6.3] we obai H Q α Q W = sup H Q α, Q W ad H Q α Q µα = sup H Q α, Q µα. The saeme he follows from he resul for he resricios. Q µα For each 1, we deoe he Rado-Nikodym derivaive of Q α, relaive o by L α := dqα, dq. µα Usig [7, Lemma 6.1] see Lemma 7 i Appedix A, we see ha H Q α, Q µα = E Q α,[ll α ] = E Q [L µα α ll α ]. Moreover, le us recall he oio of Q α, α>0 -ighess: L α α>0 is Q α, α>0 - igh if he followig holds: lim N lim sup Q α, L α > N = 0. α Lemma 4. For each > 1, he family L α α>0 is o Q α, α>0 -igh. Proof. We kow, by Lemma 3, ha E Q α,[ll α] = H Q α, Q µα eds o ifiiy whe α eds o. Sice he measures Q α, ad Q µα are Gaussia, he resul follows as a direc applicaio of he remark o [5, p. 457] which says ha ighess is equivale o he boudedess of he followig wo families: E Q α,[ll α ], α > 0, ad Var Q α,[ll α], α > 0.

8 8 FERNANDO CORDERO, IRENE KLEIN, AND LAVINIA PEREZ-OSTAFE Before we ca sae ad prove he las lemma of his secio, we recall ow he defiiio of coiguiy of sequeces/families of probabiliy measures. Defiiio 6. A sequece of probabiliy measures P l l 1 is coiguous wih respec o he sequece of probabiliy measures Q l l 1, P l l 1 Q l l 1, if for ay sequece A l F l : lim Q l A l = 0 lim P l A l = 0. We say ha P l l 1 ad l l Q l l 1 are muually coiguous if P l l 1 Q l l 1 ad Q l l 1 P l l 1, i which case we wrie P l l 1 Q l l 1. These oios exed o families of probabiliy measures P α α>0 ad Q α α>0 as follows. We say ha P α α>0 is coiguous resp. muually coiguous o Q α α>0 if for every sequece α l l 1 covergig o ifiiy we have P α l l 1 Q α l l 1 resp. P α l l 1 Q α l l 1, i which case we wrie P α α>0 Q α α>0 resp. P α α>0 Q α α>0. Lemma 5. For each > 1, we have Q α, α>0 Proof. Sice, by Lemma 4, L α α>0 is o igh wih respec o Q α, α>0 we apply [8, Lemma V.1.6] ad deduce ha, for each > 1, Q α, α Q µα. The dichoomy for sequeces of Gaussia measures of [5, Corollary 4] says ha wo sequeces of Gaussia measures o R are eiher muually coiguous or eirely separable. So we coclude ha, for each > 1, Q α, α>0 Q µα α>0. Remark 4. From Remark 1, whe µ = 0, he same argumeaio leads o he coclusio ha Lemma 5 holds rue for = 1. Proof of Theorem 1. From Proposiio 1 see also [9, Proposiio 4], we kow ha here is a SAA if ad oly if Q α α>0 Q µα α>0. Fix > 1. By Lemma 5, here exis a sequece α l l 1 covergig o ifiiy ad ses A l F such ha ad The resul follows. Q µα α>0 lim l Qα l A l = lim Q αl, A l = 0 l lim Q µα l l A l = lim Q µα l l. A l = Ierpreaio of he resuls i he resriced markes Lemma 5 migh sugges ha, for each > 1 or followig Remark 4, for each 1 if µ = 0, here exiss also some kid of asympoic arbirage i he large fiacial marke cosisig of he resricios of he α-mixed fracioal Black-Scholes models, α > 0, o he grid E := {0, 1 1,...,, 1}. However, we will show ha his is impossible. For simpliciy, we oly cosider he case = 1 ad µ = 0. We also assume ha S H,α 0 = 1. Thus, for each α > 0, he correspodig marke is Z H S H,α = exp + 1 α B 2 2α 2, = 0, I his case all possible sraegies are cosas ad hece he value process V1 α akes he followig form V α 1 = c α S H,α 1 1, where c α R. Obviously, we cao hope for admissibiliy boudedess from below, see he discussio i he iroducio of [10]. Bu eve if we do o require

9 ASYMPTOTIC ARBITRAGE IN FRACTIONAL MIXED MARKETS 9 ay admissibiliy here, here is o way o choose a sequece of α l ad correspodig value processes V α l such ha he followig holds: here exiss β > 0 ad ε l 0 wih i P V α l 1 > β > β, for all l, ii lim P V α l 1 ε l = l This is o possible as Z1 H as well as B 1 are idepede N0, 1 ad hece are sricly posiive as well as sricly egaive wih posiive P -probabiliy ad here eiher leig α or muliplyig S H,α 1 1 by some cosas eiher posiive or egaive will be of ay help: wheever here will be a sricly posiive par i he limi here will also be a sricly egaive par i he limi wih a o-disappearig probabiliy. Hece here is o such hig as 14 which, i our discree ime = 0, 1 siuaio, is he appropriae versio of a asympoic arbirage. The reaso behid his appare coradicio is ha i coras o he coiuous ime large fiacial marke is discree couerpar is o complee. Uder he origial measure P which iduces Q α o C[0, 1] we have ha Z1 H N0, 1 ad B 1 N0, 1 ad he wo radom variables are idepede. We kow ha he Wieer measure Q W is a marigale measure for S α udersood o C[0, 1] for all α, hece Q W F1 is a equivale marigale measure for 13. We will ow cosruc a differe marigale measure for he process 13 which is equivale o P o Ω, F. Ideed, defie a measure P d o Ω, F as follows: P dp = gx where we have X := expz1 H 1 ad gx = e x hx where hx = 1 2πx exp 1 2 lx 2 is he desiy of a logormal disribuio, i.e., he desiy of he law of X uder P. Obviously his measure chage has he purpose o make he disribuio of X expoeial wih parameer 1. Recall ha he measure Q α,1 is cosidered as a measure o R he measure iduced by M H,α 1 := αz1 H + B 1. Lemma 6. The measure P saisfies: 1 P P 2 E P [S H,α 1 ] = 1 = S H,α 0, which meas ha P is a marigale measure for 13, for each α. 3 Le Q α,1 be he measure ha is iduced by M H,α 1, P o R, for each α > 0. The Q α,1 α>0 Q α,1 α>0. Proof. To prove 1 observe ha gx > 0 for all 0 < x < ad 0 < X < P -a.s. ad hece d P α dp = gx > 0 P -a.s. Moreover E P [gx] = 0 gxhxdx = ad so P is a probabiliy equivale o P. 0 e x dx = 1, For 2 we see ha E P [S H,α 1 ] = E P [g e ZH 1 exp Z1 H + 1 ] α B 1 2 2α 2 = E P [g e ZH 1 exp Z1 H ] [ ] E P exp α B 1 2 2α 2 = E P [gxx], where we used he idepedece of Z H 1 E P [gxx] = 0 ad B 1 uder P. Fially we have ha gxxhxdx = 0 xe x dx = 1,

10 10 FERNANDO CORDERO, IRENE KLEIN, AND LAVINIA PEREZ-OSTAFE provig 2. For 3 oe ha, for each A BR, we have Q α,1 A = P M H,α 1 A ad Q α,1 A = P M H,α 1 A. Thus, usig ha P P, we ifer, for a family of ses A α, ha Q α,1 A α = P D α 0, for α, if ad oly if Q α,1 A α = PD α 0, where D α = {M H,α 1 A α } F 1. The resul follows. I coclusio, Lemma 6 shows ha here exiss a family of equivale marigale measures for he model 13 wih good properies, i his case muual coiguiy. Ad his fac is refleced by he impossibiliy o fid asympoic arbirage opporuiies for he family of models 13, α > 0. Appedix A. Relaive eropy I his secio, we recall he cocep of relaive eropy ad some equivale characerizaio. A more deailed preseaio of he opic ca be foud i [7]. Defiiio 7. Le Q 1 ad Q 2 be probabiliy measures o a measurable space Ω, F ad le P = {F i : i = 1,..., } be a fiie pariio of Ω, i.e. Ω = F i ad F i are pairwise disjoi. The eropy of he measure Q 1 relaive o Q 2 is he quaiy HQ 1 Q 2 = sup P Q 1 F j l j=1 Q1 F j Q 2 F j where P is he class of all possible fiie pariios P of Ω. I he above formula, we assume ha 0 l 0 = 0 ad l 0 =. Lemma 7. [7, Lemma 6.1] If a probabiliy measure Q 1 is absoluely coiuous w.r.. aoher probabiliy measure Q 2, he he relaive eropy HQ 1 Q 2 is relaed o he Rado-Nikodym derivaive ϕ = dq1 dq 2 as follows: HQ 1 Q 2 = E Q1 [lϕ] = E Q2 [ϕ lϕ]. Ackowledgmes The hird auhor graefully ackowledges fiacial suppor from he Ausria Sciece Fud FWF: J3453-N25. Refereces [1] Cheridio, P. Mixed fracioal Browia moio. Beroulli 7, , [2] Cheridio, P. Regularizig fracioal Browia moio wih a view owards sock price modellig. PhD hesis, ETH Zurich, [3] Cordero, F., ad Perez-Osafe, L. Criical rasacio coss ad 1-sep asympoic arbirage i fracioal biary markes. I. J. Theor. Appl. Fiace 18, , , 26. [4] Cordero, F., ad Perez-Osafe, L. Srog asympoic arbirage i he large fracioal biary marke. Mah. Fiac. Eco. 10, , [5] Eagleso, G. K. A exeded dichoomy heorem for sequeces of pairs of Gaussia measures. A. Probab. 9, , [6] Guasoi, P., Rásoyi, M., ad Schachermayer, W. The fudameal heorem of asse pricig for coiuous processes uder small rasacio coss. Aals of Fiace 6, , [7] Hida, T., ad Hisuda, M. Gaussia processes, vol. 120 of Traslaios of Mahemaical Moographs. America Mahemaical Sociey, Providece, RI, Traslaed from he 1976 Japaese origial by he auhors. [8] Jacod, J., ad Shiryaev, A. N. Limi heorems for sochasic processes, secod ed., vol. 288 of Grudlehre der Mahemaische Wisseschafe [Fudameal Priciples of Mahemaical Scieces]. Spriger-Verlag, Berli, [9] Kabaov, Y. M., ad Kramkov, D. O. Asympoic arbirage i large fiacial markes. Fiace Soch. 2, , [10] Rásoyi, M. Equivale marigale measures for large fiacial markes i discree ime. Mah. Mehods Oper. Res. 58, , ,

11 ASYMPTOTIC ARBITRAGE IN FRACTIONAL MIXED MARKETS 11 Faculy of Techology, Uiversiy of Bielefeld, Uiversiässr. 25, Bielefeld, Germay address: Deparme of Saisics ad Operaios Research, Uiversiy of Viea, Oskar- Morgeser-Plaz 1, 1090 Viea, Ausria address: Deparme of Mahemaics, Uiversiy of Viea, Oskar-Morgeser-Plaz 1, 1090 Viea, Ausria address: