Geotechnical Report, Repair of Building 53341, 53 Area, Marine Corps Base, Camp jpendleton, CA APPENDIX C SEISMIC ANALYSIS
|
|
- Joleen Tate
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Geotechnical Report, Repair of Building 53341, 53 Area, Marine Corps Base, Camp jpendleton, CA APPENDIX C SEISMIC ANALYSIS
2 E Q F A U L T Version 3.00 DETERMINISTIC ESTIMATION OF PEAK ACCELERATION FROM DIGITIZED FAULTS DATE: JOB NAME: Bldg CALCULATION NAME: MCE Analysis FAULT-DATA-FILE NAME: C:\Programs\EQFAULTl\CGSFLTE MCE new.dat SEARCH RADIUS: ATTENUATION RELATION: 5} Boore et al. (1997) Horiz. - Vs = 350 m/s UNCERTAINTY (M-Median, S=Sigma): M Number of Sigmas: 0.0 DISTANCE MEASURE: cd_2drp SCOND: 0 Basement Depth: 5.00 km Campbell SSR: Campbell SHR: COMPUTE PEAK HORIZONTAL ACCELERATION FAULT-DATA FILE USED: C:\Programs\EQFAULTl\CGSFLTE_MCE_new.DAT MINIMUM DEPTH VALUE (km]: 0.0
3 EQFAULT SUMMARY DETERMINISTIC SITE PARAMETERS Page 1 ESTIMATED MAX. EARTHQUAKE EVENT I APPROXIMATE ABBREATED DISTANCE ] MAXIMUM PEAK EST. SITE FAULT NAME mi (km) I EARTHQUAKE SITE INTENSITY [ MAG. (Mw) ACCEL, g MOD. MERC. NEWPORT- INGLEWOOD (Offshore) 8.5( ROSE CANYON 18.0( SAN JOAQUIN HILLS { ELSINORE (TEMECULA) { ELSINORE (GLEN IVY) ( CORONADO BANK 24.7 ( ELSINORE (JULIAN) 27. 0( PALOS VERDES 27.3 ( CHIHO-CENTRAL AVE. (Elsinore) 29. 7( NEWPORT-INGLEWOOD (L. A. Basin) 30. 0( WHITT1ER SAN JACINTO-SAN JACINTO VALLEY SAN JACINTO-ANZA PUENTE HILLS BLIND THRUST SAN JACINTO-SAN BERNARDINO SAN JOSE CUCAMONGA SIERRA MADRE EARTHQUAKE VALLEY SAN ANDREAS - SB-Coach. M-lb-2 SAN ANDREAS - SB-Coach. M-2b SAN ANDREAS - San Bernardino M-l SAN ANDREAS - Whole M-la SAN JACINTO-COYOTE CREEK UPPER ELYSIAN PARK BLIND THRUST NORTH FRONTAL FAULT ZONE (West) RAYMOND CLAMSHELL-SAWPIT CLEGHORN SAN ANDREAS Rupture M-2a SAN ANDREAS - Cho-Moj M-lb-1 SAN ANDREAS - Mojave M-lc-3 PINTO MOUNTAIN VERDUGO HOLLYWOOD SAN ANDREAS - Coachella M-lc-5 NORTH FRONTAL FAULT ZONE (East) ELSINORE (COYOTE MOUNTAIN) SANTA MONICA 34. 1( 41 4( 43. 9( 46. 3( 50. 8( ( 53. 6( 53. 6( 54.8 ( 54.8 ( 54.8 ( 54.8 ( 56.4 ( 59. 5( 61. Of 61.6( 62.7! ( ( ( ( 64. 1( ( 69.8 ( 70. 6( 71.8 ( BURNT MTN ( ) 0) 7) 8) IX II II II 31. 9) ) I II 43 5) I 43. 9) 47. 8) 48. 3) 54. 8) 65. 6) 66. 0) 70. 7) 74. 5) II I I I I I I 81. 8) ) I 86. 2) I 86. 3) 88. 2) 88. 2) 88. 2) 88. 2) 90. 8) 95. 8) 98. 2) 99. 2) ) I I I I I ) ) I ) I ) ) ) ) ) } ) ) ) V
4 DETERMINISTIC SITE PARAMETERS Page 2 ABBREATED FAULT NAME rtr rt\wj\j.l-ifij. EI DISTANCE mi ( km ) ESTIMATED MAX. EARTHQUAKE EVENT MAXIMUM EARTHQUAKE MAG. (Mw) PEAK SITE ACCEL, g EST. SITE INTENSITY MOD. MERC. SAN JACINTO - BORREGO MALIBU COAST HELENDALE - S. LOCKHARDT EUREKA PEAK SIERRA MADRE (San Fernando) NORTHRIDGE (E. Oak Ridge) SAN GABRIEL LANDERS ANACAPA-DUME 75. 2( 75. 6( 77. 0{ 77. Of 77. 9f 78. 7( 79. 6( 81.4 ( 81. 6( 121.1) 121.6) 124.0) ) 125.3) 126.7) 128.1) 13} 131.3) V V I LENWOOD-LOCKHART-OLD WOMAN SPRGS 83.2 ( 133.9) JOHNSON VALLEY (Northern) ) V SANTA SUSANA EMERSON So. - COPPER MTN. HOLSER SUPERSTITION MTN. {San Jacinto) SIMI-SANTA ROSA ELMORE RANCH 87.7( 91. 7( f 93. 8{ ( 96. 9( 141.1) 147.6} 149.5) 15) 152.2} 155.9} V V V CALICO - HIDALGO ( 157.0) OAK RIDGE (Onshore) SUPERSTITION HILLS (San Jacinto) 98. 1( 98. 1( 157.8) 157.9) ] V PISGAH-BULLION MTN.-MESQUITE LK 99. 4( 160.0) * ******************************** ********************************************** -END OF SEARCH- 61 FAULTS FOUND WITHIN THE SPECIFIED SEARCH RADIUS. THE NEWPORT-INGLEWOOD (Offshore) FAULT IS CLOSEST TO THE SITE. IT IS ABOUT 8.5 MILES (13.6 km) AWAY. LARGEST MAXIMUM-EARTHQUAKE SITE ACCELERATION: g
5 6/3/ National Seismic Hazard Maps - Source Parameters U.S. Geological Survey- Earthquake Hazards Program National Seismic Hazard Maps - Source Parameters NewSearch Distance in Mites Name... Prc-f cl. Slip Dip Dip Sl.p Rupture Rupture Length Statfi : Rate (degrees) Dir So.se I T P Bottom (,mt ' (mm/yr) <km' 'hm> 8.46 Newnp rt- 1 n gle wo od. (0 ff s h o rp] CA \J S*Nke Newport Ingle wood Connected nit 2 CA V "If * Newport Inglewood Connecter! alt 1 CA S'rike Rose Canyon San Joaqnin Hills CA \J S/' CA SW thrust Elsinor_g:T v > ElsiTiore:GI+r+J+CM Elsinore;W+GI-t-T Elsinore:W+GI+T+J CA 5 90 V S" CA n/a 86 NE "UJ CA n/a 84 NE CA n/a 84 NE E(sinore:GI+T CA 5 90 \! Sm Elsmore;GI+T>J CA n/a 86 NE ; Elsin.ore:T+J+CM CA n/a 85 NE F_!sinorp;T+.l risinore:w+gh 1 i J K.M. 20 Fisinorg^W+GI CA n/a 86 NE CA n/a 84 NE CA n/a 81 NE FKinore-.GI CA 5 90 V S[n Palps yerdesxcnncctgd CoronadoBank CA 3 90 V S" CA 3 90 \J https ^/earthquake, usgs.gov/cfusi orvhazfaults_2008_search/query_resulls.cfm 1/7
6 6/3/ National Seismic Hazard Maps - Source Parameters Pa.losVerdes CA CA 84 NE ElstnoreJ+C_M CA 84 NE Newport-lnelewood. alt 1 CA Chjno.alt Elsinore:W CA! 1 65 SW CA NE Chino. alt San Jacinto:A+C San Jacinto:A+CC+B+_SJj San JadntoA+CC+B Sa_n_Jacinto:A+CC San Jacinto;A 41 Sgn JadntQ:SBV+SJV±A, CA 1 50 SW! S,. : CA n/a 90 V CA n/a 90 V i CA n/a 90 V CA n/a 90 V CA 9 90 V i i., -; - CA n/a 90 V sup San Jadnto :S,)V+A+CC+B 41 Sari JadotoiSJV+A+CC 41 SanJacinto;SJV+A 41 San Jacinto:SJ_V+A+CC+_B+SM 41 San.ladnt&SBV+SJV+A+CC+B+SM 41 San Jadnto;SJV+A+C 41 s Jadnto-.SBV+SJV+A+CC+B CA n/a 90 V S " e CA n/a 90 V CA n/a 90 V i CA n/a 90 V CA n/a 90 V, CA n/a 90 V, i CA n/a 90 V Slip S^n )adnto:5bv+sjv+a+cc CA n/a 90 1 V https ://earthquake.usgs.gov/cfusion/ha2faults_2008_search/query_results. dm 2/7
7 6/3/ National Seismic Hazard Maps - Source Parameters 41 SanJacinto:SBV+SJV+A+C CA n/a 90 i 1? 181 ^4916 Puente Hills (Covote Hills) CA N thrust «San Jar.into:SJV CA V ( SanJacinto:SBV+SJV CA n/a 90 V ( K17 San.Jacinto:SBV CA 6 90 V ( Q nq PnontP Hills f. Santa Fe SorinesS CA N thrust San Jose CA NW : Cucamon?a CA 5 45 N j thrust Sierra Madre CA 2 53 N reverse 0 14 S3 44 Sierra Msdre Connected CA 2 51 reverse 0 14 i ; E^thauakeVallev CA 2 90 V 0 19 i <^1 San.larintoiCC+B+SM CA n/a 90 V ( tjf " M 51 San Jacinto;CC+B CA n/a 90 V !' : i W SI SanJ3cinto;CC CA 4 90 ; V _( ! i! 54fi7 S. SanAndrea-;:NM+SM+NSB+SSB+BG+CO CA n/a 84 ( UKI -s ^^n Anrirpns:BB+NM+SMH-NSB+SSB+BG+CO CA n/a : : ' _. ;. : S4R5 S.SanAndreas:BBiNM+SM+NSB+SSB+BG CA n/a 84 (. 0 14! fi? S. San Andrpas:BR+NM-KSM+NS8+SSB CA n/a 90 V 0 14 : i ' i S4 fi? S. San Andre3S:SSB+BG+CO CA n/a S.SanAndreas:SSR CA V ( i i R2 S..SanAndreas-.SM+NSB+SSB!BG+CO CA n/a 83 ( ks4fi? S SanAndreas:SM+NSB+SSB+BG CA n/a 81 ( F i4 R5 S.San Andrpas:SH+NSB+SSB CA n/a 90 V Strike 0 13 i https ://earthquake.usgs.gov/cfusi on/hazfaults_20q8_search/queryj-esul ts.cfm 3/7
8 6/3/2017 Design Maps Summary Report J2IUSGS D^sign Maps Summary Report Iser-Specified Input Building Code Reference Document Report Title Bldg BSE-1E Sun June 4, :56:49 UTC ASCE Retrofit Standard, BSE-1E (which utilizes USGS hazard data available in 2008) Site Coordinates N, W Site Soil Classification Site Class D - "Stiff Soil" ita Point,, 1 t* S San Clements* '.-.- S m -..,,.«*li!" M R I <** " frav» "FvriF* «Fallbrook. O * Bonsall JJSGS-Provided Output Ss,2o/5o g S^^ g g SxlfBSE.1E g 'la- "io't'-l- S^UL".- JT1 'si-iid. l"('s*c) Although this information is a product of the U.S. Geological Survey, we provide no warranty, expressed or Implied, as to the accuracy of the data contained therein. This tool is not a substitute for technics I subject-matter knowledge. 1/1
9 6/3/2017 Design Maps Detailed Report SGS Desi9n MaPs Detailed Report SCE Retrofit Standard, BSE-1E ( N, W) Site Class D - "Stiff Soil" Section General Procedure for Hazard Due to Ground Shaking 20%/50-year maximum direction spectral response acceleration for 0.2s and s periods, respectively: From Section SS20/50 = g From Section Slj20/50 = g Section Adjustment for Site Class The authority having jurisdiction (not the USGS), site-specific geotechnical data, and/or the default has classified the site as Site Class D, based on the site soil properties in accordance with Section SITE SOIL Soil shear wave Standard penetration CLASS PROFILE velocity, vs, (ft/s) resistance, W NAME A B C D E Hard rock vs > 5,000 Rock 2,500 < vs < 5,000 Very dense 1,200 <vs< 2,500 N > 50 soil and soft rock Stiff soil 600 < vs < 1, < /V S 50 profile Stiff soil vs < 600 N < 15 profile Any profile with more than 10 ft of soil having the characteristics: 1. Plasticity index PI > 20, 2. Moisture content w > 40%, and 3. Undrained shear strength su < 500 psf Soil undrained shear strength, su, (psf) >2,000 psf 1,000 to 2,000 psf <1,000 psf Any profile containing soils having one or more of the following characteristics: 1. Soils vulnerable to potential failure or collapse under seismic loading such as liquefiable soils, quick and highly sensitive clays, collapsible weakly cemented soils. 2. Peats and/or highly organic clays (H > 10 feet of peat and/or highly organic clay where H - thickness of soil) 3. Very high plasticity clays (H > 25 feet with plasticity index PI > 75) 4. Very thick soft/medium stiff clays (H > 120 feet) For SI: Ift/s = m/s lib/ft2 = kn/m2 1/4
10 6/3/2017 Design Maps Detailed Report Table 2-3. Values of Fa as a Function of Site Class and Mapped Short-Period Spectral Response Acceleration Sf Site CldbS Mapped Spectral Acceleration at Short-Period Ss Ss < 0.25 S5 = 0.50 Ss = 0.75 Ss = 0 Ss > 1.25 A B C D E F Site-specific geotechnical and dynamic site response analyses shall be performed Note: Use straight-line interpolation for intermediate values of S5 For Site Class = D and Ss = g, Fa = Table 2-4. Values of Fv as a Function of Site Class and Mapped 1 s Period Sx Spectral Response Acceleration at Site Mapped Spectral Acceleration at 1 s Period S1 Si < Si = 0.20 Si = 0.30 S1 = 0.40 Si > 0.50 A B C D E F Site-specific geotechnical and dynamic site response analyses shall be performed Note: Use straight-line interpolation for intermediate values of Si For Site Class = D and Sx = g, Fv = /4
11 6/3/2017 Design Maps Detailed Report Provided as a reference for Equation (2-4): FaSSi20/50 = x g = g Provided as a reference for Equation (2-5): = x -173 g = -365 g Provided as a reference for Equation (2-4): ->XS,BSE-IN /s X Sxs,BSE-2N ^ X FaSS BSE_2rg g Provided as a reference for SxliBSE_1N = 2A x SX1 BSE_2N - ZA x FVS1 BSE.2N = g Equation (2-5): Equation (2-4): Sx^.^ = MIN[FaSs,20/5D; S^^^] = MIN[0.625g, 0.783g] = 0.625g Equation (2-5): SX1(BSE.IE = MIN[FVSS,20/5D, SX1(BSE_1N] = MIN[0.365g, 0.450g] = 0.365g Section General Horizontal Response Spectrum Figure 2-1. General Horizontal Response Spectrum r < rlt: s\. 3/4
12 6/3/2017 Design Maps Summary Report 21USGS Design Maps Summary Report Iser-Specified Input Building Code Reference Document I1. ReportTitle Bldg BSE-1N Sun June 4, :56:03 UTC ASCE Retrofit Standard, BSE-1N (which utilizes USGS hazard data available in 2008} Site Coordinates N, W Site Soil Classification Site Class D - "Stiff Soil" San Clem en te" Fallbrouk. :, USGS-Provided Output \* Kt'X SXS,BSE-IN SXI,BSE-IN g g Although this information is a product of the U.S. Geological Survey, we provide no warranty, expressed or implied, as to the accuracy of the data contained therein. This tool is not a substitute for technical subject-matter knowledge. 1/1
13 6/3/2017 Design Maps Detailed Report alusgs Des'9n Maps Detailed Report ASCE Retrofit Standard, BSE-1N ( N, W) Site Class D - "Stiff Soil" Section General Procedure for Hazard Due to Ground Shaking Provided as a reference for Equation (2-4) and Equation (2-5), respectively: From Section S<- <-,=.-,, = g From Section Si,BSE-2N = g Section Adjustment for Site Class The authority having jurisdiction (not the USGS), site-specific geotechnical data, and/or the default has classified the site as Site Class D, based on the site soil properties in accordance with Section SITE CLASS A B C D E SOIL PROFILE NAME Hard rock Rock Very dense soil and soft rock Stiff soil profile Stiff soil profile Soil shear wave velocity, vs, (ft/s) vs > 5,000 2,500 < vs < 5,000 1,200 < vs < 2, < vs < 1,200 vs < 600 Standard penetration resistance, N N > < N < 50 N < 15 Any profile with more than 10 ft of soil having the characteristics: Soil undrained shear strength, su, (psf) >2,000 psf 1,000 to 2,000 psf < 1,000 psf 1. Plasticity index PI > 20, 2. Moisture content w > 40%, and 3. Undrained shear strength su < 500 psf Any profile containing soils having one or more of the following characteristics: 1. Soils vulnerable to potential failure or collapse under seismic loading such as liquefiable soils, quick and highly sensitive clays, collapsible weakly cemented soils. 2. Peats and/or highly organic clays (H > 10 feet of peat and/or highly organic clay where H = thickness of soil) 3. Very high plasticity clays (H > 25 feet with plasticity index PI > 75) 4. Very thick soft/medium stiff clays (H > 120 feet) For SI: lft/s = m/s lib/ft2 = kn/m2 1/4
14 6/3/2017 Design Maps Detailed Report Table 2-3. Values of Fa as a Function of Site Class and Mapped Short-Period Spectral Response Acceleration Sc Site Mapped Spectral Acceleration at Short-Period Ss Lldbb Ss < 0.25 Ss = 0.50 Ss = 0.75 Ss = 0 Ss> 1.25 A B C D E F Site-specific geotechnical and dynamic site response analyses shall be performed Note: Use straight-line interpolation for intermediate values of Ss For Site Class = D and Ss = g, Fa = 54 Table 2-4. Values of Ftf as a Function of Site Class and Mapped Spectral Response Acceleration at 1 s Period St Site Mapped Spectral Acceleration at 1 s Period Si Cldbb Sx < Sx = 0.20 B1 = 0.30 S: = 0.40 Si > 0.50 A B C D E F Site-specific geotechnical and dynamic site performed response analyses shall be Note: Use straight-line interpolation for intermediate values of S: For Site Class = D and S1 = g, Ftf = /4
15 6/3/2017 Design Maps Detailed Report Provided as a reference for Equation (2-4): SXs,BSE-2N = FaSs,B5E.2N = 54 x g = g Provided as a reference for Equation (2-5): SX1(BSE.2N = FvSljBSE_2N = x g = g Equation (2-4): SXS,BSE-IN = % x SXSiBSE_2N = 2/3 x g = g Equation (2-5): XI.BSE-IN = % x = % x = OA$Q 9 Section General Horizontal Response Spectrum Figure 2-1. General Horizontal Response Spectrum rz,j 3/4
16 6/3/2017 Design Maps Summary Report Design Maps Summary Report Iser-Specified Input Report Title Bldg BSE-2N Sun June 4, :53:54 UTC Building Code Reference Document ASCE Retrofit Standard, BSE-2N (which utilizes USGS hazard data available in 2008} Site Coordinates N, W Site Soil Classification Site Class D - "Stiff Soil" na Point,. I f.i m 6J San Clemen te" Fallbrook. "Bonsalt USGS-Provided Output ss,bse-2n 1.H4 g Sl(BSE-2N g *XS,BSE-2N g q Although this information is a product of the U.S. Geological Survey, we provide no warranty, expressed or implied, as to the accuracy of the data contained therein. This tool is not a substitute for technical subject-matter knowledge. 1/1
17 6/3/2017 Design Maps Detailed Report Design Maps Detailed Report SCE Retrofit Standard, BSE-2N ( l\l, 117,48096 W) Site Class D - "Stiff Soil" Section 2,4.1 - General Procedure for Hazard Due to Ground Shaking From Section Sqne;F.,. From Section = g Section Adjustment for Site Class The authority having jurisdiction (not the USGS), site-specific geotechnical data, and/or the default has classified the site as Site Class D, based on the site soil properties in accordance with Section SITE CLASS A B C D E SOIL PROFILE NAME Hard rock Rock Very dense soil and soft rock Stiff soil profile Stiff soil profile Soil shear wave Standard penetration velocity, vs, (ft/s) resistance, N vs > 5,000 2,500 < vs < 5,000 1,200 < vs < 2,500 TV > < vs < 1, < TV < 50 vs < 600 TV < 15 Any profile with more than 10 ft of soil having the characteristics: Soil undrained shear strength, su, (psf) > 2,000 psf 1,000 to 2,000 psf < 1,000 psf 1. Plasticity index PI > 20, 2. Moisture content w > 40%, and 3. Undrained shear strength su < 500 psf Any profile containing soils having one or more of the following characteristics: 1. Soils vulnerable to potential failure or collapse under seismic loading such as liquefiable soils, quick and highly sensitive clays, collapsible weakly cemented soils. 2. Peats and/or highly organic clays (H > 10 feet of peat and/or highly organic clay where H = thickness of soil) 3. Very high plasticity clays (H > 25 feet with plasticity index PI > 75) 4. Very thick soft/medium stiff clays (H > 120 feet) For SI: Ift/s m/s lib/ft kn/m2 1/4
18 6/3/2017 Design Maps Detailed Report Table 2-3. Values of Fa as a Function of Site Class and Mapped Short-Period Spectral Response Acceleration S= Site Mapped Spectral Acceleration at Short-Period Ss Ss < 0.25 Ss = 0.50 Ss = 0.75 S.-100 Ss > 1.25 A B C D E F Site-specific geotechnical and dynamic site performed response analyses shall be Note: Use straight-line interpolation for intermediate values of Sc For Site Class = D and Ss = g, Fa = 54 Table 2-4. Values of Ftf as a Function of Site Class and Mapped Spectral Response Acceleration at 1 s Period S1 t ; : Site Mapped Spectral Acceleration at 1 s Period S: S, < Si = 0.20 Sl = 0.30 Sx = 0.40 S1 > 0.50 A B C D E F Site-specific geotechnical and dynamic site performed response analyses shall be Note: Use straight-line interpolation for intermediate values of S1 For Site Class = D and S1 = g, Fv = /4
19 6/3/2017 Design Maps Detailed Report Equation (2-4): = FaSSiBSE.2N - 54 x g = g Equation (2-5): SXi,BSE-2N = FvSliBSE.2N x g = g Section General Horizontal Response Spectrum Figure 2-1. General Horizontal Response Spectrum '0<T<TU : S.\.v 3/4
APPENDIX IV.A Geotechnical Study
City of Los Angeles February 2014 APPENDIX IV.A Geotechnical Study Technical Appendices Museum Square Office Building Draft Environmental Impact Report February 8, 2013 File No. 20477 5757 Wilshire, LLC
More informationPROJECT SITE. Ione St. VICINITY MAP. Sutter. Creek. Jackson. Newman Ridge Quarry Project Amador County, California. Scale in Miles. Old. Rd.
124 Old Hwy. Ione Michigan Bar Irish Hill Ione Sutter Creek Ridge PROJECT SITE Dutschke Mile Dr. 124 Sutter Loch Lane Res. Old Five Stockton Castle Oaks Golf Club Marlette Ione St. 124 Charles Howard Park
More informationIV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS E. GEOLOGY AND SOILS
IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS E. GEOLOGY AND SOILS INTRODUCTION This section evaluates potential impacts related to geology, including seismicity, and soils associated with development of the proposed
More informationGeotechnical Aspects of the Seismic Update to the ODOT Bridge Design Manual. Stuart Edwards, P.E Geotechnical Consultant Workshop
Geotechnical Aspects of the Seismic Update to the ODOT Bridge Design Manual Stuart Edwards, P.E. 2017 Geotechnical Consultant Workshop Changes Role of Geotechnical Engineer Background Methodology Worked
More informationIV. Environmental Impact Analysis E. Geology and Soils
IV. Environmental Impact Analysis E. Geology and Soils 1. Introduction This section of the Draft EIR provides an analysis of the Project s potential impacts with regard to geology and soils. The analysis
More informationENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS C. GEOLOGY
IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS C. GEOLOGY This section summarizes the results of a geotechnical evaluation conducted for the proposed project by Jerry Kovacs and Associates, Inc. in August 1996. The
More informationPROPOSED CHANGE TO THE 2012 BUILDING CODE O. REG. 332/12 AS AMENDED
Ministry of Municipal Affairs PROPOSED CHANGE TO THE 2012 BUILDING CODE O. REG. 332/12 AS AMENDED CHANGE NUMBER: SOURCE: B-04-01-15 Ontario-NBC CODE REFERENCE: Division B / 4.1.8.2. Division B / 4.1.8.4.
More informationAppendix G Geotechnical Report
Appendices Appendix G Geotechnical Report Warner Avenue Widening from Main Street to Grand Avenue Draft EIR City of Santa Ana Appendices This page intentionally left blank. PlaceWorks January 2015 Geologists,
More informationSONGS SSC. Tom Freeman GeoPentech PRELIMINARY RESULTS
SONGS SSC Tom Freeman GeoPentech PRELIMINARY RESULTS Focused Questions Summarize the tectonic setting What is the seismogenic thickness? Are you including deep ruptures in the upper mantle (~30 km)? Do
More informationAppendix 6A Geologic Information about the Project Area prepared by Ninyo & Moore October 2008
Appendix 6A Geologic Information about the Project Area prepared by Ninyo & Moore October 2008 Appendix 6A: Geologic Information about the Project Area 6A-1Existing Geologic and Subsurface Conditions
More informationA Fault-Based Model for Crustal Deformation, Fault Slip Rates, and Off-Fault Strain Rate in California
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Vol. 106, No. 2, pp., April 2016, doi: 10.1785/0120140250 E A Fault-Based Model for Crustal Deformation, Fault Slip Rates, and Off-Fault Strain Rate in
More informationGROUND MOTION TIME HISTORIES FOR THE VAN NUYS BUILDING
GROUND MOTION TIME HISTORIES FOR THE VAN NUYS BUILDING Prepared for the PEER Methodology Testbeds Project by Paul Somerville and Nancy Collins URS Corporation, Pasadena, CA March 7, Site Conditions The
More informationImprovements to the Development of Acceleration Design Response Spectra. Nicholas E. Harman, M.S., P.E., SCDOT
Improvements to the Development of Acceleration Design Response Spectra Nicholas E. Harman, M.S., P.E., SCDOT Thanks Clemson University Dr. Ron Andrus Co-Principal Investigator Dr. Nadarajah Ravichandran
More informationToday: Basic regional framework. Western U.S. setting Eastern California Shear Zone (ECSZ) 1992 Landers EQ 1999 Hector Mine EQ Fault structure
Today: Basic regional framework Western U.S. setting Eastern California Shear Zone (ECSZ) 1992 Landers EQ 1999 Hector Mine EQ Fault structure 1 2 Mojave and Southern Basin and Range - distribution of strike-slip
More informationThe Seismogenic Thickness of the Southern California Crust
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Vol. 94, No. 3, pp. 940 960, June 2004 The Seismogenic Thickness of the Southern California Crust by Julie J. Nazareth and Egill Hauksson Abstract The
More information2.0 DATA COLLECTION AND LITERATURE REVIEW
2.0 DATA COLLECTION AND LITERATURE REVIEW In order to perform the geotechnical evaluation, a comprehensive compilation and review of available publications, reports, and data was performed for all areas
More informationGEOLOGIC RECONNAISSANCE REPORT. Real Properties In and Around Rancho California RV Resort Highway 79 Aguanga, California.
GEOLOGIC RECONNAISSANCE REPORT Real Properties In and Around Rancho California RV Resort 45525 Highway 79 Aguanga, California Prepared for: Rancho California RV Resort HOA c/o Mark Uremovich, Esq. Morris,
More informationIV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS E. GEOLOGY AND SOILS
IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS E. GEOLOGY AND SOILS The following section is a summary of the geotechnical report conducted for the Proposed Project. The Geotechnical Engineering Investigation (the
More informationApplication and Validation of Simulated BBP & Cybershake Motions for Building Response Analyses
Application and Validation of Simulated BBP & Cybershake Motions for Building Response Analyses Greg Deierlein (Stanford) & Ting Lin (Marquette) Kuanshi Zhong, Wen-Yi Yen & Nenad Bijelic (Stanford) SCEC
More informationCHAPTER 1 BASIC SEISMOLOGY AND EARTHQUAKE TERMINOLGY. Earth Formation Plate Tectonics Sources of Earthquakes...
CHAPTER 1 BASIC SEISMOLOGY AND EARTHQUAKE TERMINOLGY Earth Formation... 1-2 Plate Tectonics... 1-2 Sources of Earthquakes... 1-3 Earth Faults... 1-4 Fault Creep... 1-5 California Faults... 1-6 Earthquake
More informationIV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS E. GEOLOGY/SOILS
IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS E. GEOLOGY/SOILS The following discussion is based upon information contained in the Hollywood Redevelopment Plan Amendment EIR and a letter prepared by Geotechnologies,
More informationKinematics of the Southern California Fault System Constrained by GPS Measurements
Title Page Kinematics of the Southern California Fault System Constrained by GPS Measurements Brendan Meade and Bradford Hager Three basic questions Large historical earthquakes One basic question How
More informationTABLE OF CONTENTS. Description
TABLE OF CONTENTS Description Page INTRODUCTION...1 PURPOSE...1 LOCATION...1 SCOPE...1 EXISTING GENERAL PLAN...2 PREVIOUS GEOTECHNICAL STUDIES...2 GENERAL PLAN UPDATE...2 CHAPTER 1: LAND USE ELEMENT...2
More informationOverview of National Seismic Hazard Maps for the next National Building Code
Overview of National Seismic Hazard Maps for the next National Building Code John Adams Earthquakes Canada Geological Survey of Canada Copyright. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2004 CSCE Workshop
More informationPart 2 - Engineering Characterization of Earthquakes and Seismic Hazard. Earthquake Environment
Part 2 - Engineering Characterization of Earthquakes and Seismic Hazard Ultimately what we want is a seismic intensity measure that will allow us to quantify effect of an earthquake on a structure. S a
More informationNew Ground Motion Requirements of ASCE 7-16
New Ground Motion Requirements of ASCE 7-16 Building EERI Seismic Seminar on Safety Next Generation Council Webinar Attenuation Models July 28, 2017 Charlie Kircher Kircher & Associates Palo Alto, California
More informationZone of largest coseismic slips Rupture length (km) Rupture length (km)
Supplementary Figure S; Perrin et al. Relations between earthquake surface traces and slips, and architecture and, for all earthquakes analyzed in present study. 97 Bogd earthquake (Mw.) Gichgeniyn uruu
More informationSimulations in the Los Angeles Basin
83 Chapter 4 Simulations in the Los Angeles Basin This chapter reports the responses of steel moment-resisting frame (MRF) buildings to simulated earthquakes in the Los Angeles basin. I use broadband ground
More informationIV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS G. GEOLOGY AND SOILS
IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS G. GEOLOGY AND SOILS The following section is a summary of the geotechnical report conducted for the proposed project. The Report of Geotechnical Investigation Proposed
More informationGeotechnical Investigation
F A M I L Y R E S O U R C E S C E N T E R A N D D I S T R I C T P O L I C E H E A D Q U A R T E R S P R O J E C T I N I T I A L S T U D Y S A N B E R N A R D I N O C I T Y U N I F I E D S C H O O L D I
More informationChapter 3. Geotechnical Design Considerations
Chapter 3 Geotechnical Design Considerations Marshall Lew, Ph.D., G.E. Corporate Consultant, Law/Crandall, a division of Law Engineering and Environmental Services, Inc. (A LAWGIBB Group Member), Los Angeles
More informationTHE USE OF INPUT ENERGY FOR SEISMIC HAZARD ASSESSMENT WITH DIFFERENT DUCTILITY LEVEL
th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering Vancouver, B.C., Canada August -6, Paper No. 8 THE USE OF INPUT ENERGY FOR SEISMIC HAZARD ASSESSMENT WITH DIFFERENT DUCTILITY LEVEL Mao-Sheng GONG And Li-Li
More information3E. Geology and Soils
The purpose of this section is to evaluate the proposed project s impacts on local geological features and whether it would expose people or structures to adverse geological impacts. Potential geologic
More informationGROUND MOTION TIME HISTORIES FOR THE VAN NUYS BUILDING
GROUND MOTION TIME HISTORIES FOR THE VAN NUYS BUILDING Prepared for the PEER Methodology Testbeds Project by Paul Somerville and Nancy Collins URS Corporation, Pasadena, CA. Preliminary Draft, Feb 11,
More informationEvaluation of Geotechnical Hazards
Evaluation of Geotechnical Hazards by Geoffrey R. Martin Appendix B: Evaluation of Geotechnical Hazards Describes Evaluation Procedures Soil Liquefaction Soil Settlement Surface Fault Rupture Flooding
More informationModel Uncertainties of the 2002 Update of California Seismic Hazard Maps
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Vol. 95, No. 6, pp. 24 257, December 25, doi: 1.1785/12517 Model Uncertainties of the 22 Update of California Seismic Hazard Maps by Tianqing Cao, Mark
More informationTABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1: SEISMIC HAZARDS... 1-1 1.1 SEISMIC CONTEXT EARTHQUAKE BASICS... 1-1 1.2 REGULATORY CONTEXT... 1-4 1.2.1 Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act... 1-4 1.2.2 Seismic Hazards
More informationEVALUATION OF TSUNAMI RISK FOR COASTAL SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA CITIES. Appendix A - Figures
EVALUATION OF TSUNAMI RISK FOR COASTAL SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA CITIES Appendix A - Figures Figure 1.Map showing major faults of the southern California region. Northwest-trending faults are rightslip in character.
More informationIV. Environmental Impact Analysis F. Geology and Soils
IV. Environmental Impact Analysis F. Geology and Soils 1. Introduction This section addresses potential geologic and soils hazards attributable to the Proposed Project. This section is based, in part,
More information3.10 GEOLOGY/SOILS/SEISMIC/TOPOGRAPHY
3.10 GEOLOGY/SOILS/SEISMIC/TOPOGRAPHY The information in this section is based on the Geotechnical Final Report (January 2010) and Geotechnical Memorandum for the northern portion of the Study Area (Department
More information1.0 INTRODUCTION 2.0 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK. 2.1 State and Regional Regulations Seismic Hazards Mapping Act
IV.E GEOLOGY 1.0 INTRODUCTION This section of the Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) identifies and evaluates geologic and soils conditions at Loyola Marymount University (LMU) campus that could affect,
More informationEMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FROM THE NORTHRIDGE EARTHQUAKE FOR SITE- SPECIFIC AMPLIFICATION FACTORS USED IN US BUILDING CODES
EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FROM THE NORTHRIDGE EARTHQUAKE FOR SITE- SPECIFIC AMPLIFICATION FACTORS USED IN US BUILDING CODES Roger D BORCHERDT And Thomas E FUMAL SUMMARY Site-specific amplification factors, F
More informationSEISMIC HAZARD ANALYSIS. Instructional Material Complementing FEMA 451, Design Examples Seismic Hazard Analysis 5a - 1
SEISMIC HAZARD ANALYSIS Instructional Material Complementing FEMA 451, Design Examples Seismic Hazard Analysis 5a - 1 Seismic Hazard Analysis Deterministic procedures Probabilistic procedures USGS hazard
More information3.3 GEOLOGY AND SOILS Environmental Setting Geologic Conditions
3.3 GEOLOGY AND SOILS This section describes existing geologic and soil conditions, such as faults or unstable soils, and analyzes potential impacts that could pose hazards for the Fountain Valley Crossings
More informationGROUND MOTIONS FROM LARGE EARTHQUAKES (MW³7) ON THE SANTA MONICA MOUNTAIN THRUST AND HOLLYWOOD-SANTA MONICA-MALIBU FAULTS
GROUND MOTIONS FROM LARGE EARTHQUAKES (MW³) ON THE SANTA MONICA MOUNTAIN THRUST AND HOLLYWOOD-SANTA MONICA-MALIBU FAULTS C K SAIKIA And P G SOMMERVILLE SUMMARY We have simulated ground motion parameters
More informationRevised Resource Report 6
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION Southern California Edison Company s Devers-Palo Verde No. 2 Project Docket No. PT08-1-000 Revised Resource Report 6 Geological
More information5. Environmental Analysis
5.4 This section of the DEIR evaluates the potential for implementation of the Puente Hills Intermodal Facility (PHIMF) project to impact geology and soils resources in the City of Industry and unincorporated
More informationThe primary native soil types in the San Gabriel Mountains are silt loam and sand (SCAG, 2004).
4.4 GEOLOGY AND SOILS 4.4.1 Existing Setting 4.4.1.1 Regional Geology and Soils The Master Plan study area is a 1-mile wide corridor along 58 river miles of the San Gabriel River in southern California,
More informationUChile - LMMG Shear Wave Velocity (V S. ): Measurement, Uncertainty, and Utility in Seismic Hazard Analysis. Robb Eric S. Moss, Ph.D., P.E.
UChile - LMMG 2015 Shear Wave Velocity (V S ): Measurement, Uncertainty, and Utility in Seismic Hazard Analysis Robb Eric S. Moss, Ph.D., P.E. Assoc. Prof. of Earthquake, Geotechnical, and Risk Engineering
More informationIV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS K. GEOLOGIC AND SEISMIC HAZARDS
IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS K. GEOLOGIC AND SEISMIC HAZARDS 1. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING This section provides an analysis of seismic hazards such as fault rupture, ground shaking, land sliding, and
More informationIV. Environmental Impact Analysis D. Geology
IV. Environmental Impact Analysis D. Geology 1. Introduction This section evaluates potential geologic hazards and soil conditions associated with the proposed project, including fault rupture, ground
More information3.8 Geology/Soils. Environmental Setting. Topography. Geology and Soils
3.8 Geology/Soils This section examines whether implementation of the 2004 Land Use Mobility Elements, Zoning Code Revisions, and Central District Specific Plan the will expose people or structures to
More informationMark Legg COASTAL DEFORMATION AND TECTONIC EVOLUTION OFFSHORE SAN ONOFRE
COASTAL DEFORMATION AND TECTONIC EVOLUTION OFFSHORE SAN ONOFRE August 2013 Coastal Deformation and Tectonic Evolution Offshore San Onofre Mark R. Legg Legg Geophysical, Inc. The true sign of intelligence
More informationBasin & Range / Mojave Desert
Basin & Range / Mojave Desert Basin & Range vs. Great Basin 1 2/20/2016 An overview of the last horst Basin and Range / Mojave Desert Summary: Granitic, volcanic, marine sedimentary, non marine sedimentary,
More informationJocelyn Karen Campbell
THE UNCERTAINTIES IN ASSESSING THE IMPACT OF REGIONAL SEISMICITY AT THE WIL SITE Statement of Evidence by Jocelyn Karen Campbell A CANTERBURY FAULTS coded by type CHARACTERISTICS OF THRUST FAULTS IN CANTERBURY
More informationUNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION Southern California Edison Company s Devers-Palo Verde No. 2 Project Docket No. PT08-1-000 Resource Report 6 Geological Resources
More informationJack Loveless Department of Geosciences Smith College
Geodetic constraints on fault interactions and stressing rates in southern California Jack Loveless Department of Geosciences Smith College jloveless@smith.edu Brendan Meade Department of Earth & Planetary
More information4.10 GEOLOGY, SOILS, AND SEISMICITY
4.10 GEOLOGY, SOILS, AND SEISMICITY 4.10.1 INTRODUCTION This section describes the geology of the SVRTC and the susceptibility of site soils to seismically induced hazards. Faults in the corridor and past
More informationField Trip Notes. It s L.A. s Fault. Active Faults of the northern Los Angeles Basin Field Excursion. Today s Staff & Educators
School Programs Resources It s L.A. s Fault Field Trip Notes Active Faults of the northern Los Angeles Basin Field Excursion January 5, 2013 Today s Staff & Educators (From Yerkes et al., 1965) Lindsey
More informationEarthquake Tectonics and Hazards on the Continents June Recognizing and characterizing strike-slip faults and earthquakes in USA
2464-4 Earthquake Tectonics and Hazards on the Continents 17-28 June 2013 Recognizing and characterizing strike-slip faults and earthquakes in USA S. G. Wesnousky Univ. of Nevada USA Strike-slip Faults
More information5.4 GEOLOGY AND SOILS
5.4 This section of the Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) evaluates the potential for implementation of the Beach Boulevard Specific Plan (Proposed Project) to impact geological and soil resources
More informationC.Y. Geotech, Inc. Soil Engineering Investigation Victory Boulevard, Van Nuys, California. August 31, Ibid.
E. SOILS AND GEOLOGY The purpose of this section is to assess impacts related to geologic resources resulting from construction and development of the proposed project and adjacent Add Area, such as seismically
More informationDevelopment of U. S. National Seismic Hazard Maps and Implementation in the International Building Code
Development of U. S. National Seismic Hazard Maps and Implementation in the International Building Code Mark D. Petersen (U.S. Geological Survey) http://earthquake.usgs.gov/hazmaps/ Seismic hazard analysis
More informationLecture # 6. Geological Structures
1 Lecture # 6 Geological Structures ( Folds, Faults and Joints) Instructor: Dr. Attaullah Shah Department of Civil Engineering Swedish College of Engineering and Technology-Wah Cantt. 2 The wavy undulations
More informationCHAPTER 11 OTHER GEOTECHNICAL EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING ANALYSES
CHAPTER 11 OTHER GEOTECHNICAL EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING ANALYSES The following notation is used in this chapter: SYMBOL DEFINITION a Acceleration a max Maximum horizontal acceleration at ground surface (also
More informationF. GEOLOGY & SOILS. Organization of this Section. a) Regulatory Setting. i) State. ii) City of Los Angeles. iii) Anticipated Building Code Changes
IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS F. GEOLOGY & SOILS This Section describes the geologic conditions at and near the Project Site and identifies the types of geotechnical hazards associated with development
More information3E. Geology and Soils
INTRODUCTION The purpose of this chapter is to evaluate the proposed project s impacts on local geological features and whether it would expose people or structures to adverse geological impacts. Potential
More informationA Time-Dependent Probabilistic Seismic-Hazard Model for California
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 90, 1, pp. 1 21, February 2000 A Time-Dependent Probabilistic Seismic-Hazard Model for California by Chris H. Cramer,* Mark D. Petersen, Tianqing Cao,
More informationGeo736: Seismicity and California s Active Faults Introduction
Geo736: Seismicity and California s Active Faults Course Notes: S. G. Wesnousky Spring 2018 Introduction California sits on the boundary of the Pacific - North American plate boundary (Figure 1). Relative
More informationDate: April 2, 2014 Project No.: Prepared For: Mr. Adam Kates CLASSIC COMMUNITIES 1068 E. Meadow Circle Palo Alto, California 94303
City of Newark - 36120 Ruschin Drive Project Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Appendix C: Geologic Information FirstCarbon Solutions H:\Client (PN-JN)\4554\45540001\ISMND\45540001 36120
More informationQUAKE/W ProShake Comparison
1 Introduction QUAKE/W Comparison is a commercially available software product for doing one-dimensional ground response analyses. It was developed and is being maintained under the guidance of Professor
More informationto: Interseismic strain accumulation and the earthquake potential on the southern San
Supplementary material to: Interseismic strain accumulation and the earthquake potential on the southern San Andreas fault system by Yuri Fialko Methods The San Bernardino-Coachella Valley segment of the
More informationENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS. Tehachapi Renewable Transmission Project 4.7 GEOLOGY AND SOILS Overview
4.7 GEOLOGY AND SOILS 4.7.1 Overview This section of the Proponent s Environmental Assessment (PEA) describes the existing conditions related to geology, geologic hazards, and soils for the proposed TRTP.
More informationPRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION TAYLOR YARD BIKEWAY/PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA
F Geology and Soils PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION TAYLOR YARD BIKEWAY/PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA PREPARED FOR: ICF International 601 W. Fifth
More information3.4 GEOLOGY AND SOILS Environmental Setting
3.4 GEOLOGY AND SOILS This section discusses the existing geologic and soils conditions and evaluates the potential impacts related to geology and soils as a result of the proposed project. This section
More informationIV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS G. GEOLOGY AND SOILS
IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS G. GEOLOGY AND SOILS INTRODUCTION The information and analysis in this section is based primarily on the following report, which is included in Appendix IV.G of this EIR:
More informationPreliminary Earthquake Risk Management Strategy Plan of Eskisehir, Turkey by using GIS
Preliminary Earthquake Risk Management Strategy Plan of Eskisehir, Turkey by using GIS Metin Altan, Ferah Özturk and Can Ayday Space and Satellite Sciences Research Institute Anadolu University, TURKEY
More informationEffects of Surface Geology on Seismic Motion
4 th IASPEI / IAEE International Symposium: Effects of Surface Geology on Seismic Motion August 23 26, 2011 University of California Santa Barbara EFFECTS OF LOCAL GEOLOGY ON EARTHQUAKE GROUND MOTIONS:
More informationOverview of the Seismic Source Characterization for the Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station
Overview of the Seismic Source Characterization for the Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station Scott Lindvall SSC TI Team Lead Palo Verde SSC SSHAC Level 3 Project Tuesday, March 19, 2013 1 Questions from
More informationDCPP Seismic FAQ s Geosciences Department 08/04/2011 GM1) What magnitude earthquake is DCPP designed for?
GM1) What magnitude earthquake is DCPP designed for? The new design ground motions for DCPP were developed after the discovery of the Hosgri fault. In 1977, the largest magnitude of the Hosgri fault was
More information4.4 GEOLOGY AND SOILS
4.4 GEOLOGY AND SOILS This section analyzes potential geotechnical hazards that may adversely affect the project site or that may be exacerbated by implementation of the proposed project. Information presented
More informationStress modulation on the San Andreas fault by interseismic fault system interactions Jack Loveless and Brendan Meade, Geology, 2011
Stress modulation on the San Andreas fault by interseismic fault system interactions Jack Loveless and Brendan Meade, Geology, 2011 A three step process: 1 - Assimilate plate boundary wide GPS data into
More informationDr. P. Anbazhagan 1 of 61
Module 10: Seismic site classification Topics Introduction to seismic Site Characterization, Site characterization data Need for Site Characterization Grids for Site characterization Interpolation of non-filled
More informationLearning goals - January 16, Describe the geometry of a fault (1) orientation of the plane (strike and dip) (2) slip vector
Learning goals - January 16, 2012 You will understand how to: Describe the geometry of a fault (1) orientation of the plane (strike and dip) (2) slip vector Understand concept of slip rate and how it is
More informationMicro Seismic Hazard Analysis
Micro Seismic Hazard Analysis Mark van der Meijde INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR GEO-INFORMATION SCIENCE AND EARTH OBSERVATION Overview Site effects Soft ground effect Topographic effect Liquefaction Methods
More informationEarthquake Loads According to IBC IBC Safety Concept
Earthquake Loads According to IBC 2003 The process of determining earthquake loads according to IBC 2003 Spectral Design Method can be broken down into the following basic steps: Determination of the maimum
More information3.6 GEOLOGY, SOILS, AND MINERAL RESOURCES
3.6 GEOLOGY, SOILS, AND MINERAL RESOURCES This section of the draft EIR discusses the geologic, soil, and mineral resources conditions of the planning area and identifies the related potential environmental
More informationSeismic Issues for California's Nuclear Power Plants. Norman Abrahamson University of California, Berkeley
Seismic Issues for California's Nuclear Power Plants Norman Abrahamson University of California, Berkeley From UCERF 2 Seismic Setting for California s Nuclear Power Plants Major Offshore Strike-Slip Faults
More informationInterpretive Map Series 24
Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries Interpretive Map Series 24 Geologic Hazards, Earthquake and Landslide Hazard Maps, and Future Earthquake Damage Estimates for Six Counties in the Mid/Southern
More informationProject 17 Development of Next-Generation Seismic Design Value Maps
Project 17 Development of Next-Generation Seismic Design Value Maps Geo Structures 2016 16 February 2016 R.O. Hamburger, SE, SECB www.sgh.com Some History Prior to 1988 - maps provided broad seismic zones
More information7 Ground Motion Models
7 Ground Motion Models 7.1 Introduction Ground motion equations are often called attenution relations but they describe much more than just the attenutation of the ground motion; they describe the probability
More informationHandout 1. Amplitude. Time (in s) Amplitude Amplitude. Time (in s) Time (in s) East RUS. North. Vertical. East WLT. North. Vertical KIK. East.
Handout 1 East RUS Amplitude Amplitude Amplitude North Vertical East North Vertical East North Time (in s) Time (in s) WLT KIK Vertical Time (in s) Handout 2 34 30' 34 24' 34 18' 34 12' KIK 34 06' MON
More informationGEOLOGY, SOILS, AND SEISMICITY
4.9 GEOLOGY, SOILS, AND SEISMICITY 4.9.1 Introduction Information about the geological conditions and seismic hazards in the study area was summarized in the FEIR, and was based on the Geotechnical Exploration
More informationFINAL REPORT GEOTECHNICAL STUDY HYDE STREET HARBOR FUEL DOCK
FINAL REPORT GEOTECHNICAL STUDY LIFORNIA Prepared for: PORT OF SAN FRANCISCO Submitted by: AGS, INC. NOVEMBER 29 FINAL REPORT GEOTECHNICAL STUDY LIFORNIA AGS Job No. KF26 Prepared for: PORT OF SAN FRANCISCO
More informationHarmonized European standards for construction in Egypt
Harmonized European standards for construction in Egypt EN 1998 - Design of structures for earthquake resistance Jean-Armand Calgaro Chairman of CEN/TC250 Organised with the support of the Egyptian Organization
More informationSection 5.7 Geology and Soils
Section 5.7 Section 5.7 5.7.1 PURPOSE This section describes the existing geologic, soil, and seismic conditions within the City of Artesia and identifies potential impacts that could result from implementation
More informationEffects of Surface Geology on Seismic Motion
4 th IASPEI / IAEE International Symposium: Effects of Surface Geology on Seismic Motion August 23 26, 2011 University of California Santa Barbara LONG-PERIOD (3 TO 10 S) GROUND MOTIONS IN AND AROUND THE
More informationPRELIMINARY GEOLOGIC AND GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING INVESTIGATION. Proposed Single Family Residence Development
PRELIMINARY GEOLOGIC AND GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING INVESTIGATION Proposed Single Family Residence Development Tract: 26232, Block: 7, APN: 556-026-07 60 Blue Jay Way Los Angeles, California for Global Development
More informationEleventh U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering Integrating Science, Engineering & Policy June 25-29, 2018 Los Angeles, California
Eleventh U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering Integrating Science, Engineering & Policy June 25-29, 2018 Los Angeles, California Site-Specific MCE R Response Spectra for Los Angeles Region
More informationShould you have any questions regarding this clarification, please contact the undersigned at or (925)
October 8, 2015 Revised October 13, 2015 Contra Costa Community College District 500 Court Street Martinez, CA 94553 Attention: Ron Johnson Subject: Clarification of Grading Requirements Diablo Valley
More information