5. Environmental Analysis

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "5. Environmental Analysis"

Transcription

1 5.4 This section of the DEIR evaluates the potential for implementation of the Puente Hills Intermodal Facility (PHIMF) project to impact geology and soils resources in the City of Industry and unincorporated County of Los Angeles. The analysis in this section is based in part on the following technical report: Limited Geotechnical Investigation Feasibility-Level Report, LACSD Intermodal Facility Project, KFM GeoScience, July 18, A complete copy of this study is included in Appendix E in Volume IIA of this DEIR. The analysis below is based on construction of the Preferred Access Option, which is referenced in the Limited Geotechnical Investigation as Alternative D Environmental Setting Regional Geologic Setting The proposed project is located within the San Gabriel River Basin, adjacent to the western flank of the Puente Hills. California is divided into geomorphic provinces, which are distinctive natural regions in which the geologic record, types of landforms, pattern of landscape features, and climate in all parts are similar. The project site is located within the Peninsular Ranges province. Regional faults within the Peninsular Ranges province are oriented in a southeast to northwest direction, including the Whittier fault, located approximately two miles southwest of the site. Uplift of the Puente Hills has exposed a thick sequence of tertiary marine sedimentary rocks, including the Pico Member of the Fernando Formation exposed in the lower western cut slope east of the project site. The predominately siltstone bedrock has been deformed by folding and faulting as the Puente Hills were uplifted. Alluvium deposited by the San Gabriel River and San Jose Creek overlies the bedrock beneath the majority of the PHIMF site. Geologic materials found within the existing Puente Hills Materials Recovery Facility (PHMRF) and proposed PHIMF project site include: Fill (af). Man-made fill was placed across much of the PHMRF site and beneath Workman Mill Road during construction of the storm drain within the San Jose Creek drainage. The fill encountered in an exploratory boring at the PHMRF consists of silty sand, clayey sand, sandy and gravelly silt, sandy and gravely clay, silt, and clay. The fill was also found to contain some scattered amount of rock fragments, concrete, asphaltic pavement, brick, plastic, and wood. In another soil boring, fill was found to consist of clay containing siltstone fragments and silty sand. Based on the available data, the fill thickness ranges up to 25 feet deep. Based on the limited geotechnical investigation, only limited, thin pockets of fill are anticipated to occur at the PHIMF site. Alluvium (Qal). Alluvium deposited by the San Gabriel River and San Jose Creek underlies the majority of the PHIMF site and railroad corridor alignment. The alluvium consists of loose to dense silty sand and sand, and medium stiff to stiff silt and clay. On the northwest side of Workman Mill Road, soil borings encountered 28 feet of alluvium consisting of silty sand, silt, and clay overlying siltstone bedrock. At the PHIMF site, soil borings encountered alluvium to the maximum explored depth of 60 feet below ground surface (bgs). The alluvium consists of approximately 25 to 30 feet of interlayered silty sand and sand overlying 5 to 15 feet of silt and clay, which is lying over 5 to 12 feet of silty sand. Puente Hills Intermodal Facility Draft EIR City of Industry Page 5.4-1

2 Landslide Debris (Qls). Based on previous investigations conducted for the PHMRF site, and the as-built mapping of the lower western cut slope, a portion of the PHMRF is underlain by landslide debris. The landslide debris has been described as blocky intact and disturbed weathered Pico Member bedrock that is closely to moderately fractured with widely variable bedding. The base of the landslide mass is characterized by a disturbed breccia zone 1 and thin, highly sheared clay seams. The landfill debris would impact only the construction of an approximately 250-foot section of a retaining wall proposed at the base of the lower western cut, where the existing internal access road at the PHMRF would be modified. Pico Member, Fernando Formation Bedrock (Tfp). Pico Member bedrock was encountered in the bottom of the investigation borings at the existing PHMRF site and near Workman Mill Road. The Pico Member bedrock was observed to consist primarily of massive siltstone and clayey siltstone that was typically gray to olive gray. The Pico Member contains infrequent lenses and thin beds of fine-grained sandstone, thin-sheared clay seams, and locally cemented layers. Bedding planes in the Pico Member generally dip 20 to 55 degrees toward the north, producing potentially adverse bedding conditions when the beds dip more shallowly than the adjacent descending slope. The presence of adverse bedding was most likely a controlling factor in the formation of the landslide described above. The Zee Medical Facility (Parcel A) is underlain by 15 to 20 feet of silty sand, which overlies about 15 feet of silt and silty sand. Groundwater is interpreted to be about 25 feet deep under the southeast end of the Zee Medical Facility and about 36 feet deep under the northwest end of the building that occupies this property. Based on review of the Quaternary Geologic Map of the El Monte Quadrangle contained in the California Geologic Survey (CGS) Seismic Hazard Evaluation of this quadrangle (CGS 1999), most of the rail corridor south of State Route 60 (SR-60) is underlain by younger alluvial basin deposits composed of sand, silt, and clay similar to the stratigraphy encountered at the PHIMF and PHMRF. Locally, an abandoned active stream wash 2 may be present where the rail corridor crosses Peck Road, resulting in the potential to uncover locally unconsolidated and looser/softer deposits. North of SR-60, the rail corridor may be underlain by older alluvial basin sediments that are expected to be dense to very dense. Geologic Hazards Slope Failure (Landslides) Landslides are movements of relatively large landmasses, either as nearly intact bedrock blocks, or as jumbled mixes of bedrock blocks, fragments, debris, and soils. Landslide materials are commonly porous and very weathered in the upper portions and along the margins of the slide. They may also have open fractures and joints. Slope failures can occur during or after periods of intense rainfall or in response to strong seismic shaking. Areas of high topographic relief, such as steep canyon walls, are most likely to be impacted by rockfalls, rockslides, and soil slips, and to a lesser degree, landslides. As shown in the Seismic Hazard Zones, El Monte Quadrangle map the project site is not located within an area with earthquakeinduced landslides (CGS 1999). 1 Breccia, or castic rock, is a sedimentary rock comprised of angular fragments from a previous rock structure, cemented in a matrix that may be of similar or different material 2 An abandoned active stream wash relates to streams that have not been abandoned in geologic time by directional changes of the flow, but rather abandoned due to recent development. Page The Planning Center December 2007

3 Compressible Soils Compressible soils are typically geologically young (Holocene age) unconsolidated sediments of low density that may compress under the weight of proposed fill embankments and structures. Geologic units that are generally susceptible to this hazard include young alluvium, the upper weathered part of older alluvium, colluvium/slope wash that collects near the base of natural slopes, slope failure debris and, in some cases, very weathered bedrock. The settlement potential and the rate of settlement in these sediments can vary greatly, depending on the soil characteristics (texture and grain size), natural moisture, density, and thickness of the compressible layer(s), the weight of the proposed load, the rate at which the load is applied, and drainage. Typically, overexcavation is required when grading sites with compressible soils. Overall, the on-site soils pose a moderate settlement potential and are not expected to impact construction options. Settlement at the administration and maintenance buildings at the PHIMF is expected to be less than 1 inch and less than 1.5 inches for the rubber-tired cranes foundation. The railroad bridges will be placed on piles and experience minimal settlement. Expansive Soils Fine-grained soils, such as silts and clays, may contain variable amounts of expansive clay minerals. These minerals can undergo significant volumetric changes as a result of changes in moisture content. The upward pressures induced by the swelling of expansive soils can have significant harmful effects upon structures and other surface improvements. Erosion Erosion, runoff, and sedimentation are influenced by several factors, including climate, topography, soil and rock types, and vegetation. Natural erosion processes are often accelerated through human activities. The project site is not located in an area with substantial variation in topography. Currently the majority of the site and surrounding areas have been developed and covered with impervious surfaces. Consequently, erosion is not a potential geologic hazard for the project site during post-construction conditions. Grading increases the potential for erosion and sedimentation by removing protective vegetation, altering natural drainage patterns, compacting the soil, and constructing cut-and-fill slopes that may be more susceptible to erosion than the natural condition. Developments also reduce the surface area available for infiltration, leading to increased flooding and sedimentation downstream of the project. Construction sites greater than one acre are required to prepare and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) to control for, among other pollutants, erosion and sedimentation generated during construction activities (see Section 5.6, Hydrology and Water Quality). Seismic Hazards The southern California region is known to be seismically active. The project site is located within Seismic Zone 4. Earthquakes occurring within approximately 60 kilometers of the site are generally capable of generating ground shaking of engineering significance to the proposed construction, as evidenced by the 1987 Whittier and 1994 Northridge earthquakes. Surface (Fault) Rupture Primary fault rupture refers to fissuring and offset of the ground surface along a rupturing fault during an earthquake. Primary ground rupture due to fault movement typically results in a relatively small percentage of the total damage in an earthquake, yet being too close to a rupturing fault can result in extensive damage. Secondary fault rupture refers to ground surface displacements along faults other than the main traces of Puente Hills Intermodal Facility Draft EIR City of Industry Page 5.4-3

4 active regional faults. Movement along these faults generally occurs in response to movement on a nearby regional fault. Secondary ground deformation includes fracturing, shattering, warping, tilting, uplift, and/or subsidence. Deformation and secondary faulting can also occur without primary ground rupture, as in the case of ground deformation above a blind (buried) thrust fault. Earthquake Fault Zones (known as Special Studies Zones prior to 1994) have been established in accordance with the Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zones Act of The Act directs the State Geologist to delineate the regulatory zones that encompass surface traces of active faults that have a potential for future surface fault rupture. The purpose of the Alquist-Priolo Act is to regulate development near active faults in order to mitigate the hazard of surface fault rupture. The site is not located within an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone for fault surface rupture hazard. The surface traces of any active or potentially active faults are not known to pass directly through or project toward the site. Therefore, the potential for surface fault rupture at the site during the design life of the proposed development is considered low. Strong Seismic Ground Shaking The closest mapped active fault to the site is the Whittier fault, located approximately two miles to the southwest. During the past decade, researchers have speculated that low-angle thrust faults, capable of producing moderate to large earthquakes, may be present beneath the Los Angeles basin. The Puente Hills Blind Thrust and the Elysian Park Thrust are both located in close proximity to the PHIMF site. Table provides a list of the faults and fault systems within a 60-kilometer radius that are considered to contribute to the seismic exposure of the site. The estimated geoseismic characteristics of each fault are summarized in the table based on available published geologic and seismologic data. Due to the location of the project site within a region known to be seismically active, the project is required to adhere to design criteria as presented in the most recent California Building Code (CBC), including criteria for structures within Seismic Zone 4 and structures within five kilometers of a known active fault. Compliance with these seismic design criteria is a standard condition of all project approvals and would minimize seismic hazards to the extent feasible. In addition to these design considerations, the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) has additional design parameters based on the maximum credible earthquake event from the Whittier-Elsinore fault and Elysian Park thrust. Based on the soil profile for the project site, Caltrans s ATC-32 report, Improved Seismic Design Criteria for Bridges, would apply. For improvements within the UPRR right-of-way, Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) and American Railway Engineering and Maintenance-of-Way Association (AREMA) seismic standards would also apply. Page The Planning Center December 2007

5 Table Faults and Fault Systems within 60 Kilometers of the Proposed PHIMF Maximum Fault Name Distance to PHIMF (km) Slip (mm/yr) Earthquake Magnitude (M w ) Type of Fault Whittier-Elsinore Strike Slip Puente Hills Thrust System Santa Fe Springs Segment Reverse Puente Hills Thrust System Coyote Hills Segment Reverse Puente Hills Thrust System Las Cienegas Segment Reverse Elysian Park Thrust Reverse Raymond Left Lateral Reverse Oblique San Jose Left Lateral Reverse Oblique Sierra Madre Reverse Clamshell Sawpit Reverse Verdugo Reverse Compton Thrust Reverse Hollywood Left Lateral Reverse Oblique Newport Inglewood (LA Basin) Strike Slip Chino Central Ave Right Lateral Reverse Oblique Cucamonga Reverse Santa Monica Left Lateral Reverse Oblique Palos Verdes Hills Strike Slip San Gabriel Stike Slip Elsinore Glen Ivy Strike Slip San Andreas - Mojave Strike Slip San Jacinto San Bernardino Strike Slip Source: KFM GeoScience Liquefaction and Related Ground Failure The entire project area is located within the Zone of Required Investigation for Liquefaction, as shown on the State of California Seismic Hazard Zones map, El Monte Quadrangle, issued in March Maps of seismic hazard zones are issued by CGS in accordance with the Seismic Hazards Mapping Act, ratified on April 1, Liquefaction of saturated soils can be caused by ground shaking during earthquakes. Research and historical data indicate that loose, relatively clean granular soils are susceptible to liquefaction and dynamic settlement, whereas the stability of the majority of clayey silts, silty clays, and clays is not adversely affected by ground shaking. Liquefaction typically occurs within the upper 50 feet of the surface, when saturated, loose, fine- to medium-grained soils (sand and silt) are present. Earthquake shaking suddenly increases pressure on the water that fills the pores between soil grains, causing the soil to lose strength and behave as a liquid. This process can be observed at the beach by standing on the wet sand near the surf zone. Standing still, the sand will support your weight. However, when you tap the sand with your feet, water comes to the surface, the sand liquefies, and your feet sink. When soils liquefy, the structures built on them can sink, tilt, and suffer significant structural damage. Liquefaction-related effects include loss of bearing strength, ground oscillations, lateral spreading, and flow Puente Hills Intermodal Facility Draft EIR City of Industry Page 5.4-5

6 failures or slumping. The excess water pressure is relieved by the ejection of material upward through fissures and cracks. A water-soil slurry bubbles onto the ground surface, resulting in features called sand boils, sand blows, or sand volcanoes. There are three general conditions that need to be met for liquefaction to occur: Strong ground shaking of relatively long duration Poorly consolidated granular sediments Water-saturated sediments within about 50 feet of the surface Strong ground shaking of relatively long duration can be expected to occur in the project vicinity as a result of an earthquake on any of several active faults in the region. The limited geotechnical study evaluated the liquefaction potential and seismically-induced dry settlement of the project site based on site-specific conditions. For depth to groundwater, analysis of liquefaction potential was conducted for both recent groundwater levels and historically high groundwater levels. Liquefaction potential of the proposed PHIMF project site and the existing PHMRF are shown in Table Table Liquefaction Potential Depth to Groundwater (feet bgs) Maximum Liquefaction Settlement (inches) Seismically Induced Dry Settlement (inches) Location Historical Groundwater Elevations (as presented by CGS) Boring to 0.5 PHIMF Near PHMRF southwest entrance Recent Groundwater Elevations PHIMF Near PHMRF southwest entrance Source: KFM GeoScience Boring Boring 3 5 Not Liquefiable 0 Boring Boring to 0.9 Boring 6 10 Not Liquefiable 0.2 to 0.9 Boring 1 43 Not Liquefiable 0.4 to 1.3 Boring 2 45 Not Liquefiable 0.2 to 0.6 Boring 3 43 Not Liquefiable 0.1 to 0.2 Boring 4 35 Not Liquefiable 0.2 to 0.3 Boring to 1.8 Boring 6 21 Not Liquefiable 0.4 to 2.3 Based on the results of the analysis, only a limited potential for localized liquefaction exists under recent groundwater conditions, but a relatively significant potential for liquefaction exists throughout the project site under historically high groundwater conditions. The soil boring taken at the PHMRF that exhibited the potential for liquefaction under recent groundwater conditions (Boring 5) is indicative of localized zones of liquefaction-susceptible materials throughout the local vicinity. The potential for seismically induced dry settlement of materials above recent groundwater levels ranges from 0.1 to 1.3 inches at the PHIMF site and from 0.4 to 2.3 inches at the PHMRF site. Page The Planning Center December 2007

7 Proposed Project Table presents construction aspects of the Preferred Access Option that require detailed geotechnical evaluation. PHMRF West Side of PHMRF Building & Storm Drain Reconfiguration Workman Mill Road Zee Medical (Parcel A) UPRR PHIMF Source: KFM GeoScience Table Key Geotechnical Components No Improvements 1) Open trench with walls retaining 0 to 18 feet. 2) Bridge over trench to access PHMRF and alley. 3) Storm drain reconfiguration (350 x 50 feet excavation 30 feet deep) 1) Embankment 0 to 4 feet high to raise grade and bridge over access corridor. 2) Open trench with side walls retaining 14 feet below existing grade. Open trench with walls retaining 14 feet to 18 feet high. Railroad bridge over trench 18 feet to 19 feet deep. Open trench with walls 0 to 18 feet Thresholds of Significance According to Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines, a project would normally have a significant effect on the environment if the project would: G-1 Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault (refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42). ii) Strong seismic ground shaking. iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction. iv) Landslides. G-2 Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil. G-3 Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project and potentially result in on-or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse. G-4 Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property. G-5 Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water. Puente Hills Intermodal Facility Draft EIR City of Industry Page 5.4-7

8 The Initial Study, included Appendix A in Volume IIA, substantiates that impacts associated with the following thresholds would be less than significant: Threshold G-1 (except for seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction) Threshold G-2 Threshold G-5. These impacts will not be addressed in the following analysis Environmental Impacts The following impact analysis addresses thresholds of significance for which the Initial Study disclosed potentially significant impacts. The applicable thresholds are identified in brackets after the impact statement. IMPACT 5.4-1: THE PHIMF, PREFERRED ACCESS OPTION, AND UPRR RAIL CORRIDOR ARE LOCATED IN AN AREA SUSCEPTIBLE TO LIQUEFACTION AND SEISMICALLY INDUCED DRY SETTLEMENT AND WOULD REQUIRE SITE-SPECIFIC FIELD INVESTIGATION PRIOR TO GRADING ACTIVITIES. [THRESHOLDS G-1 (iii) AND G-3] Impact Analysis: As shown in the El Monte quadrangle of the State of California Seismic Hazard Zones map, released March 25, 1999, the majority of the PHIMF and the Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) alignment are located within a zone subject to potential liquefaction hazards and seismically induced dry-settlement hazards. Analysis of the liquefaction potential and seismically induced dry-settlement hazards of the project site was conducted by KFM GeoScience and is shown in Table Based on the results of the analysis, only a limited potential for localized liquefaction exists under recent groundwater conditions. The majority of soil materials encountered in borings are deemed to possess limited potential for liquefaction. However, a soil boring drilled near the southwest entrance of the PHMRF encountered soils potentially susceptible to liquefaction, indicating that localized areas and zones of liquefaction-susceptible material could be present throughout the site. If historical high groundwater conditions were to occur, the potential for liquefaction at the project site would be significant. Based on current groundwater conditions, KFM GeoScience estimated that the potential for seismically induced dry settlement ranges from 0.1 to 2.3 inches. No field investigation was performed along the UPRR alignment, but based on a review of available documents it is likely that similar conditions to those observed at the PHMRF/PHIMF exist along the alignment. Additional investigation of the soil conditions at the PHIMF, along the Preferred Access Option, and along the UPRR right-of-way would be required to evaluate localized areas and zones of liquefaction susceptibility and seismically induced dry settlement. The effects of liquefaction may occur below the proposed bridge foundations, in the trench bottom, and outside the trench, and could result in increased loads on retaining structures and reduction in capacity of tieback bonds. IMPACT 5.4-2: CONSTRUCTION OF THE PREFERRED ACCESS OPTION WOULD REQUIRE RECONFIGURATION OF THE INDUSTRY PRIVATE DRAIN NO. 161, LINE A, IN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO THE GROUNDWATER TABLE. [THRESHOLD G-3] Impact Analysis: The highest groundwater elevation encountered along the Preferred Access Option alignment during various geotechnical investigations between 1974 and 2005 was approximately 223 feet above mean sea level (amsl). Based on review of the available geotechnical data and the well records from Page The Planning Center December 2007

9 the general project area, it is expected that groundwater level fluctuations within the foreseeable future will not substantially change the anticipated design conditions. The Preferred Access Option design indicates that the base of the trench would be at an elevation of 223 feet amsl at its deepest point. Therefore, the Preferred Access Option would not encroach into the groundwater table and dewatering or groundwater control would not be necessary. Construction of the Preferred Access Option would require reconfiguration of the existing San Jose Creek box culvert by widening the culvert to allow the top to be lowered while retaining the same flow capacity. The lowering of the box culvert profile is necessary to provide sufficient clearance for the access corridor to cross over the culvert and under Workman Mill Road. The elevation of the existing culvert flow line is approximately 223 feet amsl and the bottom of the culvert box is approximately 220 feet amsl. Therefore, reconfiguration of the box culvert would require excavation to an approximate elevation of 220 feet amsl, i.e., very close to or slightly into the groundwater. Consequently, a handling of localized seeps and nuisance water will likely be necessary. Additionally, the excavation would terminate in finer-grained alluvial deposits that would be susceptible to loosening and disturbance and may present difficulty for controlled excavation conditions. Consequently, additional measures would be necessary during construction to limit disturbance to the foundation soils at the excavation base. IMPACT 5.4-3: EXPANSIVE SOILS ARE NOT ANTICIPATED TO POSE A SIGNIFICANT RISK TO LIFE OR PROPERTY FOR THE PROPOSED PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS. [THRESHOLD G-4] Impact Analysis: Based on the proximity of the PHIMF and the rail improvements to the San Gabriel River and available Quaternary Geologic Mapping of the El Monte Quadrangle, soils within the project area are expected to consist of younger alluvial basin deposits composed of sand and silt with variable amounts of gravel and lean clay. The amount of clay contained in localized layers is expected to be relatively minor compared to the sand and silt fractions. Therefore, expansive soils conditions are not anticipated to pose a significant risk to life or property for the proposed improvements. Nevertheless, determination of expansion indices and chemical testing of the on-site materials would be required at the conclusion of rough grading to confirm that the soils are suitable for construction under the requirements of the Uniform Building Code Cumulative Impacts While potential geologic impacts associated with the project would be confined to the immediate project vicinity, construction of other planned or proposed projects in the vicinity of the site would cumulatively expose more people and structures to geotechnical constraints, such as earthquakes, expansive soils, landslides, and liquefaction. Adherence to Mitigation Measures contained in site-specific geotechnical reports, building codes, and grading ordinances would reduce geotechnical impacts to a level of less than significant at these individual project sites and, thus, no significant cumulative impact would occur Existing Regulations and Standard Conditions Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act. If a project site is located in an Earthquake Fault Zone (formerly known as Special Studies Zones), the City of Industry and the County of Los Angeles must withhold development permits for the site until geologic investigations demonstrate that the site is not threatened by surface displacement from future faulting, as required by the Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act, adopted by the state in The purpose of this Act is to regulate development near active faults so as to mitigate the hazard of surface fault rupture. Pursuant to this Act, structures for human occupancy are not allowed within 50 feet of the trace of an active fault. Puente Hills Intermodal Facility Draft EIR City of Industry Page 5.4-9

10 Seismic Hazard Mapping Act. The Seismic Hazard Mapping Act was adopted by the state in 1990 for the purpose of protecting public safety from the effects of strong ground shaking, liquefaction, landslides, or other ground failure caused by earthquakes. California Building Code (CBC) and Uniform Building Code (UBC). Development in the state is required to adhere to the building standards of the most recent CBC, which is included in Title 24 of the California Administrative Code, which incorporates the UBC. These codes provide minimum standards to protect property and the public welfare by regulating the design and construction of excavations, foundations, building frames, retaining walls, and other building elements to mitigate the effects of seismic shaking and adverse soil conditions. The procedures and limitations for the design of structures are based on site characteristics, occupancy type, configuration, structural system height, and seismic zoning for Seismic Zone 4. Seismic ratings are derived from UBC specifications, which divided the U.S. into four geographical zones, of which Zone 4 comprising most of central and coastal California was rated the most prone to earthquake activity. AREMA Standards. Design, construction and maintenance of railway infrastructure are required to adhere to the AREMA Standards, which include the Manual for Railway Engineering (Fixed Properties) and Trackwork Plans. These standards include guidelines for design, construction, and maintenance of ballast, ties, timber, concrete and steel structures, railway crossings, yards and terminals, track layout, and waterproofing Project Design Features No specific project design features are related to geology and soils Level of Significance Before Mitigation Upon implementation of regulatory requirements and standard conditions of approval, Impact would be less than significant. Without mitigation, the following impacts would be potentially significant: Impact The PHIMF, Preferred Access Option, and the UPRR rail corridor are located in an area susceptible to liquefaction and seismically induced dry settlement and would require site-specific field investigation prior to grading activities. Impact Construction of the Preferred Access option would require reconfiguration of the Industry Private Drain No. 161, Line A, in close proximity to the groundwater table Mitigation Measures Impact Site-specific geotechnical analysis shall be required for all proposed improvements to provide recommendations for fill material and compaction to ensure slope stability and reduce liquefaction and settlement potential. All formal grading plans and structural recommendations shall be reviewed and approved by appropriate agencies/stakeholders (e.g., the City of Industry Engineer, Los Angeles County Department of Public Works, and/or Union Pacific Railroad). Page The Planning Center December 2007

11 4-2 All grading and earthwork shall be performed under the oversight and supervision of a registered Geotechnical Engineer. Impact During subgrade preparation of the Industry Private Drain No. 161, Line A, reconfiguration associated with construction of the Preferred Access Option, the drainage system installed at the bottom of the excavation shall control nuisance water and localized seepage into the excavation. Open dewatering trenches or drains and sump pump systems shall be used for adequate drainage, as necessary. 4-4 During subgrade preparation of the Industry Private Drain No. 161, Line A, reconfiguration associated with construction of the Preferred Access Option, provisions shall be made for the overexcavation and replacement of disturbed or loosened material resulting from construction activity. Any loose and/or disturbed soil below the bearing area of the storm drain invert shall be removed and replaced with compacted fine concrete aggregate (concrete sand), aggregate base, or concrete. Concrete can be used as an alternative to compacted concrete aggregate. Such concrete shall satisfy the minimum requirements given for seal courses in Section 90 of Caltrans Standard Specifications. 4-5 During subgrade preparation of the Industry Private Drain No. 161, Line A, reconfiguration associated with construction of the Preferred Access Option, a working platform shall be established at the excavation bottom to protect against subgrade disturbance and to provide a platform for traffic and construction. The platform may be a granular base reinforced with geotextile. The granular working platform shall be constructed in accordance with recommended geotechnical design standards, such as those provided in the KFM GeoScience report of Level of Significance After Mitigation The Mitigation Measures above would reduce potential impacts associated with proposed improvements to the Puente Hills Intermodal Facility, Puente Hills Material Recovery Facility, the UPRR corridor, and the Preferred Access Option to a level that is less than significant. Therefore, no significant unavoidable adverse impacts related to geology and soils systems remain. Puente Hills Intermodal Facility Draft EIR City of Industry Page

12 This page intentionally left blank. Page The Planning Center December 2007

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS G. GEOLOGY AND SOILS

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS G. GEOLOGY AND SOILS IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS G. GEOLOGY AND SOILS The following section is a summary of the geotechnical report conducted for the proposed project. The Report of Geotechnical Investigation Proposed

More information

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS E. GEOLOGY AND SOILS

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS E. GEOLOGY AND SOILS IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS E. GEOLOGY AND SOILS The following section is a summary of the geotechnical report conducted for the Proposed Project. The Geotechnical Engineering Investigation (the

More information

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS E. GEOLOGY AND SOILS

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS E. GEOLOGY AND SOILS IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS E. GEOLOGY AND SOILS INTRODUCTION This section evaluates potential impacts related to geology, including seismicity, and soils associated with development of the proposed

More information

GEOLOGY AND SOILS. This chapter summarizes geologic and geotechnical aspects of the site as they relate to the Project.

GEOLOGY AND SOILS. This chapter summarizes geologic and geotechnical aspects of the site as they relate to the Project. 9 GEOLOGY AND SOILS INTRODUCTION This chapter summarizes geologic and geotechnical aspects of the site as they relate to the Project. This chapter utilizes information from the following reports prepared

More information

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS E. GEOLOGY AND SOILS

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS E. GEOLOGY AND SOILS IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS E. GEOLOGY AND SOILS The following analysis is based on the Geotechnical Investigation Report, Proposed Mid-Rise Multi- Family Residential Development Project Wetherly

More information

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS E. GEOLOGY/SOILS

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS E. GEOLOGY/SOILS IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS E. GEOLOGY/SOILS The following discussion is based upon information contained in the Hollywood Redevelopment Plan Amendment EIR and a letter prepared by Geotechnologies,

More information

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS E. GEOLOGY/SOILS

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS E. GEOLOGY/SOILS IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS E. GEOLOGY/SOILS Except where otherwise noted, the following Section is based on the Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation, Proposed Medical Office Buildings and Mixed-Use

More information

5.11 Geology and Soils

5.11 Geology and Soils 5.11 Geology and Soils 5.11 GEOLOGY AND SOILS This section evaluates the geologic and seismic conditions within the City of Azusa and evaluates the potential for geologic hazard impacts associated with

More information

5. Environmental Analysis

5. Environmental Analysis 5.3 GEOLOGY AND SOILS The potential geology and soils impacts associated with development within The Platinum Triangle have been fully analyzed in two previous EIRs, including: Anaheim Stadium Area Master

More information

3E. Geology and Soils

3E. Geology and Soils INTRODUCTION The purpose of this chapter is to evaluate the proposed project s impacts on local geological features and whether it would expose people or structures to adverse geological impacts. Potential

More information

3.8 Geology/Soils. Environmental Setting. Topography. Geology and Soils

3.8 Geology/Soils. Environmental Setting. Topography. Geology and Soils 3.8 Geology/Soils This section examines whether implementation of the 2004 Land Use Mobility Elements, Zoning Code Revisions, and Central District Specific Plan the will expose people or structures to

More information

GEOLOGY, SOILS, AND SEISMICITY

GEOLOGY, SOILS, AND SEISMICITY 4.9 GEOLOGY, SOILS, AND SEISMICITY 4.9.1 Introduction Information about the geological conditions and seismic hazards in the study area was summarized in the FEIR, and was based on the Geotechnical Exploration

More information

Setting MOUNTAIN HOUSE NEIGHBORHOODS I AND J INITIAL STUDY 5. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Issue

Setting MOUNTAIN HOUSE NEIGHBORHOODS I AND J INITIAL STUDY 5. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Issue Issue Less Than Significant or No Impact Potential Significant Impact Adequately Addressed in MEIR MEIR Required Additional Review: No Significant Impact Less Than Significant Impact Due to Mitigation

More information

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS C. GEOLOGY/SOILS

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS C. GEOLOGY/SOILS IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS C. GEOLOGY/SOILS The following section is a summary of the preliminary geotechnical consultation conducted for the Proposed Project. The Report of Geotechnical Engineering

More information

Impact : Changes to Existing Topography (Less than Significant)

Impact : Changes to Existing Topography (Less than Significant) 4.2 Land Resources 4.2.1 Alternative A Proposed Action Impact 4.2.1-1: Changes to Existing Topography (Less than Significant) Development of the project site would involve grading and other earthwork as

More information

9. GEOLOGY, SOILS, AND MINERALS

9. GEOLOGY, SOILS, AND MINERALS June 28, 2018 Page 9-1 9. GEOLOGY, SOILS, AND MINERALS This EIR chapter describes the existing geological, soil, and mineral conditions in the planning area. The chapter includes the regulatory framework

More information

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS G. GEOLOGY AND SOILS

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS G. GEOLOGY AND SOILS IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS G. GEOLOGY AND SOILS INTRODUCTION The information and analysis in this section is based primarily on the following report, which is included in Appendix IV.G of this EIR:

More information

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS G. GEOLOGY AND SOILS

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS G. GEOLOGY AND SOILS IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS G. GEOLOGY AND SOILS The following section is based upon the City of El Segundo General Plan and General Plan EIR and addresses the following geologic issues: soil erosion,

More information

Geology, Soils, and Seismicity

Geology, Soils, and Seismicity Section 3.8 Geology, Soils, and Seismicity Introduction This section generally evaluates the effects of the alternatives analyzed in this Supplemental DEIS with regard to geology, soils and seismicity.

More information

IV. Environmental Impact Analysis D. Geology

IV. Environmental Impact Analysis D. Geology IV. Environmental Impact Analysis D. Geology 1. Introduction This section evaluates potential geologic hazards and soil conditions associated with the proposed project, including fault rupture, ground

More information

4.5 GEOLOGY AND SOILS

4.5 GEOLOGY AND SOILS 4.5 GEOLOGY AND SOILS This section addresses the project site geology and soils and analyzes potential changes that would result from development of the Wye Specific Plan project. 4.5.1 Environmental Setting

More information

5. Environmental Analysis

5. Environmental Analysis 5.4 This section of the Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) evaluates the potential for implementation of the San Gorgonio Pass Campus Master Plan to impact geological and soil resources. The analysis

More information

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS C. GEOLOGY

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS C. GEOLOGY IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS C. GEOLOGY This section summarizes the results of a geotechnical evaluation conducted for the proposed project by Jerry Kovacs and Associates, Inc. in August 1996. The

More information

5.3 GEOLOGY AND SOILS

5.3 GEOLOGY AND SOILS 5.3 GEOLOGY AND SOILS SUMMARY The impact analysis presented in this section evaluates project impacts related to geologic hazards. The geotechnical analyses prepared for the project concluded that the

More information

Appendix 6A Geologic Information about the Project Area prepared by Ninyo & Moore October 2008

Appendix 6A Geologic Information about the Project Area prepared by Ninyo & Moore October 2008 Appendix 6A Geologic Information about the Project Area prepared by Ninyo & Moore October 2008 Appendix 6A: Geologic Information about the Project Area 6A-1Existing Geologic and Subsurface Conditions

More information

3.4 GEOLOGY AND SOILS Environmental Setting

3.4 GEOLOGY AND SOILS Environmental Setting 3.4 GEOLOGY AND SOILS This section discusses the existing geologic and soils conditions and evaluates the potential impacts related to geology and soils as a result of the proposed project. This section

More information

Converse Consultants Geotechnical Engineering, Environmental & Groundwater Science, Inspection & Testing Services

Converse Consultants Geotechnical Engineering, Environmental & Groundwater Science, Inspection & Testing Services Converse Consultants Geotechnical Engineering, Environmental & Groundwater Science, Inspection & Testing Services Ms. Rebecca Mitchell Mt. San Antonio College Facilities Planning & Management 1100 North

More information

4.L GEOLOGY, SOILS, AND SEISMICITY 4.L.1 INTRODUCTION

4.L GEOLOGY, SOILS, AND SEISMICITY 4.L.1 INTRODUCTION 4.L GEOLOGY, SOILS, AND SEISMICITY 4.L.1 INTRODUCTION This section addresses potential environmental effects of the proposed TOD Plan for Downtown Inglewood and Fairview Heights related to geology, soils,

More information

4.5 GEOLOGY AND SOILS

4.5 GEOLOGY AND SOILS 4.5.1 Setting 4.5 GEOLOGY AND SOILS a. Regional Geology. The is located in the south central Santa Cruz Mountains in the heart of the Central Coast ranges of California. This is a seismically active region

More information

Section 4.6 Geology and Soils Introduction

Section 4.6 Geology and Soils Introduction 4.6 invisible_toc_marker County of Kern Section 4.6 Geology and Soils 4.6.1 Introduction As described in Chapter 2 of this Supplemental EIR (SEIR), an EIR was previously certified for the Alta Oak Creek

More information

3.3 GEOLOGY AND SOILS Environmental Setting Geologic Conditions

3.3 GEOLOGY AND SOILS Environmental Setting Geologic Conditions 3.3 GEOLOGY AND SOILS This section describes existing geologic and soil conditions, such as faults or unstable soils, and analyzes potential impacts that could pose hazards for the Fountain Valley Crossings

More information

5.9 Geology and Soils

5.9 Geology and Soils 5.9 Geology and Soils 5.9 GEOLOGY AND SOILS This section evaluates the geologic and seismic conditions within the City of Azusa and evaluates the potential for geologic hazard impacts associated with

More information

3.0 SUMMARY OF POTENTIAL GEOTECHNICAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES

3.0 SUMMARY OF POTENTIAL GEOTECHNICAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES 3.0 SUMMARY OF POTENTIAL GEOTECHNICAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES This section summarizes the principal geotechnical conditions that occur in the project area. The potential impact that each condition

More information

4.5 GEOLOGY, SOILS AND SEISMICITY

4.5 GEOLOGY, SOILS AND SEISMICITY 4.5 This section summarizes information on geology, soils and seismic hazards, and mineral resources in the Truckee area, as well as potential area-wide geologic hazards and regional seismic characteristics

More information

4.9 GEOLOGY AND SOILS

4.9 GEOLOGY AND SOILS 4.9 GEOLOGY AND SOILS 4.9.1 EXISTING CONDITIONS TOPOGRAPHY AND RELIEF Zone 40 is located in the central portion of Sacramento County. The topography of the county is represented by three physiographic

More information

4.4 GEOLOGY AND SOILS Existing Conditions

4.4 GEOLOGY AND SOILS Existing Conditions 4.4 GEOLOGY AND SOILS This section evaluates the direct, indirect, short-term, and long-term effects of the proposed Cypress College Facilities Master Plan (proposed project) on geology, soils, and exposure

More information

3.10 GEOLOGY/SOILS/SEISMIC/TOPOGRAPHY

3.10 GEOLOGY/SOILS/SEISMIC/TOPOGRAPHY 3.10 GEOLOGY/SOILS/SEISMIC/TOPOGRAPHY The information in this section is based on the Geotechnical Final Report (January 2010) and Geotechnical Memorandum for the northern portion of the Study Area (Department

More information

3.18 GEOLOGY AND SOILS

3.18 GEOLOGY AND SOILS 3.18 GEOLOGY AND SOILS This section discusses geologic resource concerns as they relate to the environment, public safety, and project design both during construction and after completion of the project.

More information

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS K. GEOLOGIC AND SEISMIC HAZARDS

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS K. GEOLOGIC AND SEISMIC HAZARDS IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS K. GEOLOGIC AND SEISMIC HAZARDS 1. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING This section provides an analysis of seismic hazards such as fault rupture, ground shaking, land sliding, and

More information

3.1.3 Geology and Soils

3.1.3 Geology and Soils 3.1.3 Geology and Soils This section addresses the potential geology and soils impacts associated with implementation of The Villages Escondido Country Club Project (Project). The section describes the

More information

4.6 GEOLOGY AND SOILS

4.6 GEOLOGY AND SOILS LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. MARCH 2008 FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT YUCCA VALLEY RETAIL SPECIFIC PLAN The purpose of the Geology and Soils section is to evaluate whether the proposed project would create

More information

4.5 GEOLOGY AND SOILS

4.5 GEOLOGY AND SOILS 4.5 GEOLOGY AND SOILS This section discusses the proposed project s potential impacts relating to geologic hazards. This section is partially based on the Preliminary Soil Engineering and Geologic Hazards

More information

PHIMF Project - Limited Geotechnical Investigation - Feasibility-Level Report RESPONSE TO INITIAL REVIEW LETTER

PHIMF Project - Limited Geotechnical Investigation - Feasibility-Level Report RESPONSE TO INITIAL REVIEW LETTER Connie Christian, P.E. County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County 1955 Workman Mill Road Whittier, California 90601 Project No. BAS 04-02E January 29, 2008 Subject: PHIMF Project - Limited Geotechnical

More information

APPENDIX IV.A Geotechnical Study

APPENDIX IV.A Geotechnical Study City of Los Angeles February 2014 APPENDIX IV.A Geotechnical Study Technical Appendices Museum Square Office Building Draft Environmental Impact Report February 8, 2013 File No. 20477 5757 Wilshire, LLC

More information

C.Y. Geotech, Inc. Soil Engineering Investigation Victory Boulevard, Van Nuys, California. August 31, Ibid.

C.Y. Geotech, Inc. Soil Engineering Investigation Victory Boulevard, Van Nuys, California. August 31, Ibid. E. SOILS AND GEOLOGY The purpose of this section is to assess impacts related to geologic resources resulting from construction and development of the proposed project and adjacent Add Area, such as seismically

More information

4.6 GEOLOGY AND SOILS

4.6 GEOLOGY AND SOILS The analysis in this Subsection is based, in part, on information contained in four (4) reports prepared by Southern California Geotechnical that assessed the existing surface and subsurface geologic conditions.

More information

3.10 GEOLOGY AND SOILS

3.10 GEOLOGY AND SOILS 3.10 GEOLOGY AND SOILS This section evaluates the potential impacts of the proposed project on geology, soils, and seismic hazards. This evaluation is based on the Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation

More information

4.4 GEOLOGY AND SOILS

4.4 GEOLOGY AND SOILS 4.4 GEOLOGY AND SOILS This section analyzes potential geotechnical hazards that may adversely affect the project site or that may be exacerbated by implementation of the proposed project. Information presented

More information

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS F. GEOLOGY AND SOILS

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS F. GEOLOGY AND SOILS IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS F. GEOLOGY AND SOILS INTRODUCTION This section of the DEIR evaluates potential impacts to the project site s geologic environment that may result from implementation of

More information

IV. Environmental Impact Analysis D. Geology and Soils

IV. Environmental Impact Analysis D. Geology and Soils IV. Environmental Impact Analysis D. Geology and Soils 1. Introduction This section evaluates geologic and soils hazards that could potentially result due to implementation of the proposed project. Geologic

More information

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS E. GEOLOGY/SEISMIC HAZARDS

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS E. GEOLOGY/SEISMIC HAZARDS IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS E. GEOLOGY/SEISMIC HAZARDS 1. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING The following analysis of geology and seismic hazards for the Middle School Project is based on the Report of Geotechnical

More information

PHYSICAL SCIENCE FINAL

PHYSICAL SCIENCE FINAL PHYSICAL SCIENCE FINAL Liquefaction Doreen Wallace, Tesla Grogan, Amber Ward, Erik Garcia, Cinthia Salas, Alexis Albers Liquefaction What is it? Conditions needed How it works Effects of Liquefaction Soil

More information

4.5 GEOLOGY AND SEISMICITY

4.5 GEOLOGY AND SEISMICITY 4.5 GEOLOGY AND SEISMICITY INTRODUCTION This section identifies the potential for geologic and seismic hazards to occur on or near the proposed project site. Issues of concern include suitability of soil

More information

CHAPTER GEOLOGICALLY HAZARDOUS AREAS Applicability Regulations.

CHAPTER GEOLOGICALLY HAZARDOUS AREAS Applicability Regulations. CHAPTER 19.07 GEOLOGICALLY HAZARDOUS AREAS 19.07.010 Applicability. Geologically hazardous areas may pose a threat to the health and safety of citizens when incompatible development is sited in areas of

More information

3.12 Geology and Topography Affected Environment

3.12 Geology and Topography Affected Environment 3 Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences 3.12 Geology and Topography 3.12.1 Affected Environment 3.12.1.1 Earthquakes Sterling Highway MP 45 60 Project Draft SEIS The Kenai Peninsula is predisposed

More information

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS E. GEOLOGY AND SOILS

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS E. GEOLOGY AND SOILS IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS E. GEOLOGY AND SOILS INTRODUCTION This section of the (Draft EIR) evaluates potential geology and soils impacts associated with development of the proposed (proposed Project

More information

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT POLICY & PROCEDURE

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT POLICY & PROCEDURE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT POLICY & PROCEDURE Policy No: DSP-OO3 Release Date: January 1, 2014 Effective Date: January 1, 2014 Revision Date: March 1, 2018 TITLE: The City Policy for Site Specific

More information

2. Initial Summary of Preliminary Expert Opinion of Converse and Psomas Reports

2. Initial Summary of Preliminary Expert Opinion of Converse and Psomas Reports UNITED WALNUT TAXPAYERS PRELIMINARY REVIEW OF NEGATIVE GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF CONSTRUCTING EARTHFILL PAD FOR A SOLAR FARM ON THE WEST PARCEL - DRAFT 1. Introduction A licensed Engineering

More information

4.6 GEOLOGY AND SOILS

4.6 GEOLOGY AND SOILS 4.6 GEOLOGY AND SOILS The purpose of the Geology and Soils section is to evaluate whether the proposed project would expose people or structures to major geotechnical hazards or substantially contribute

More information

appendix e: geologic and seismic hazards

appendix e: geologic and seismic hazards appendix e: geologic and seismic hazards CONTENTS: E-2 Fault Rupture E-3 Ground Shaking E-5 Seismic Ground Deformation E-5 Liquification E-6 Seismically Induces Landslide E-6 Landslide Hazard E The following

More information

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS C. GEOLOGY AND SOILS

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS C. GEOLOGY AND SOILS IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS The following analysis of geology, soils and seismic hazards is based primarily upon the technical report Geotechnical Engineering Investigation Proposed Fashion Square

More information

Date: April 2, 2014 Project No.: Prepared For: Mr. Adam Kates CLASSIC COMMUNITIES 1068 E. Meadow Circle Palo Alto, California 94303

Date: April 2, 2014 Project No.: Prepared For: Mr. Adam Kates CLASSIC COMMUNITIES 1068 E. Meadow Circle Palo Alto, California 94303 City of Newark - 36120 Ruschin Drive Project Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Appendix C: Geologic Information FirstCarbon Solutions H:\Client (PN-JN)\4554\45540001\ISMND\45540001 36120

More information

3.6 GEOLOGY AND SOILS

3.6 GEOLOGY AND SOILS 3.6 GEOLOGY AND SOILS This section of the EIR examines the regional and local geologic and soil characteristics of the project site and surrounding area. For the lagoon enhancement component, the analysis

More information

3.4 Geology/Soils/Paleontological Resources

3.4 Geology/Soils/Paleontological Resources Section 3.4 Geology, Soils, and Paleontological Resources This section evaluates potential geology and soils impacts, and also paleontological impacts. The analysis is based on a preliminary geotechnical

More information

Section 5.7 Geology and Soils

Section 5.7 Geology and Soils Section 5.7 Section 5.7 5.7.1 PURPOSE This section describes the existing geologic, soil, and seismic conditions within the City of Artesia and identifies potential impacts that could result from implementation

More information

SLOPE STABILITY EVALUATION AND ACCEPTANCE STANDARDS

SLOPE STABILITY EVALUATION AND ACCEPTANCE STANDARDS INFORMATION BULLETIN / PUBLIC - BUILDING CODE REFERENCE NO.: LABC 7006.3, 7014.1 Effective: 01-01-2017 DOCUMENT NO.: P/BC 2017-049 Revised: 12-21-2016 Previously Issued As: P/BC 2014-049 SLOPE STABILITY

More information

Pierce County Department of Planning and Land Services Development Engineering Section

Pierce County Department of Planning and Land Services Development Engineering Section Page 1 of 7 Pierce County Department of Planning and Land Services Development Engineering Section PROJECT NAME: DATE: APPLICATION NO.: PCDE NO.: LANDSLIDE HAZARD AREA (LHA) GEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

More information

ENGINEER S CERTIFICATION OF FAULT AREA DEMONSTRATION (40 CFR )

ENGINEER S CERTIFICATION OF FAULT AREA DEMONSTRATION (40 CFR ) PLATTE RIVER POWER AUTHORITY RAWHIDE ENERGY STATION BOTTOM ASH TRANSFER (BAT) IMPOUNDMENTS LARIMER COUNTY, CO ENGINEER S CERTIFICATION OF FAULT AREA DEMONSTRATION (40 CFR 257.62) FOR COAL COMBUSTION RESIDUALS

More information

F. GEOLOGY & SOILS. Organization of this Section. a) Regulatory Setting. i) State. ii) City of Los Angeles. iii) Anticipated Building Code Changes

F. GEOLOGY & SOILS. Organization of this Section. a) Regulatory Setting. i) State. ii) City of Los Angeles. iii) Anticipated Building Code Changes IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS F. GEOLOGY & SOILS This Section describes the geologic conditions at and near the Project Site and identifies the types of geotechnical hazards associated with development

More information

4.2.5 Geology and Soils

4.2.5 Geology and Soils 4.2.5 Geology and Soils Introduction This section evaluates potential geologic, seismic, and soils (geological) impacts associated with construction and operation of the proposed (WVLCSP) project. Specifically,

More information

4.4 GEOLOGY AND SOILS

4.4 GEOLOGY AND SOILS 4.4 GEOLOGY AND SOILS SUMMARY This section describes the existing geologic and soils conditions on the project site, and the potential for geotechnical hazards to affect the Via Princessa East Extension

More information

IV. Environmental Impact Analysis F. Geology and Soils

IV. Environmental Impact Analysis F. Geology and Soils IV. Environmental Impact Analysis F. Geology and Soils 1. Introduction This section addresses potential geologic and soils hazards attributable to the Proposed Project. This section is based, in part,

More information

14 Geotechnical Hazards

14 Geotechnical Hazards Volume 2: Assessment of Environmental Effects 296 14 Geotechnical Hazards Overview This Chapter provides an assessment of the underlying geotechnical conditions to identify: any potential liquefaction

More information

4.5 GEOLOGY AND SOILS

4.5 GEOLOGY AND SOILS 4.5 GEOLOGY AND SOILS This section discusses the Project s potential impacts relating to geologic hazards. This section is partially based on the Geotechnical Engineering Report included in Appendix E.

More information

Sacramento Modesto Roseville Pleasanton September 19, 2013 Marcia Medina GHD Inc. 417 Montgomery Street, Suite 700 San Francisco, CA Subject: GE

Sacramento Modesto Roseville Pleasanton September 19, 2013 Marcia Medina GHD Inc. 417 Montgomery Street, Suite 700 San Francisco, CA Subject: GE Sacramento Modesto Roseville Pleasanton September 19, 2013 Marcia Medina GHD Inc. 417 Montgomery Street, Suite 700 San Francisco, CA 94104 Subject: GEOTECHNICAL REPORT AMENDMENT Stonybrook Creek Crossings

More information

SECTION 3. Housing. EAppendix E GEOLOGIC AND SEISMIC HAZARDS

SECTION 3. Housing. EAppendix E GEOLOGIC AND SEISMIC HAZARDS SECTION 3 Housing EAppendix E GEOLOGIC AND SEISMIC HAZARDS E-2 Housing Commission Attachment B Appendix E Geologic and Seismic Hazards The following definitions provide a more comprehensive discussion

More information

Guidelines for Site-Specific Seismic Hazard Reports for Essential and Hazardous Facilities and Major and Special-Occupancy Structures in Oregon

Guidelines for Site-Specific Seismic Hazard Reports for Essential and Hazardous Facilities and Major and Special-Occupancy Structures in Oregon Guidelines for Site-Specific Seismic Hazard Reports for Essential and Hazardous Facilities and Major and Special-Occupancy Structures in Oregon By the Oregon Board of Geologist Examiners and the Oregon

More information

The primary native soil types in the San Gabriel Mountains are silt loam and sand (SCAG, 2004).

The primary native soil types in the San Gabriel Mountains are silt loam and sand (SCAG, 2004). 4.4 GEOLOGY AND SOILS 4.4.1 Existing Setting 4.4.1.1 Regional Geology and Soils The Master Plan study area is a 1-mile wide corridor along 58 river miles of the San Gabriel River in southern California,

More information

Mass Wasting. Revisit: Erosion, Transportation, and Deposition

Mass Wasting. Revisit: Erosion, Transportation, and Deposition Mass Wasting Revisit: Erosion, Transportation, and Deposition While landslides are a normal part of erosion and surface processes, they can be very destructive to life and property! - Mass wasting: downslope

More information

5.5 Geology, Soils and Seismicity

5.5 Geology, Soils and Seismicity 5.5 Geology, Soils and Seismicity 5.5.1 Introduction Information and recommendations presented in this section were taken from the original East Lake Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR) [State

More information

4.6 GEOLOGY AND SOILS

4.6 GEOLOGY AND SOILS 4.6 GEOLOGY AND OIL 4.6.1 ummary able 4.6-1 summarizes the identified environmental impacts, proposed mitigation measures, and residual impacts of the proposed project with regard to geology and soils.

More information

4.10 GEOLOGY, SOILS, AND SEISMICITY

4.10 GEOLOGY, SOILS, AND SEISMICITY 4.10 GEOLOGY, SOILS, AND SEISMICITY 4.10.1 INTRODUCTION This section describes the geology of the SVRTC and the susceptibility of site soils to seismically induced hazards. Faults in the corridor and past

More information

4.5 GEOLOGY AND SOILS

4.5 GEOLOGY AND SOILS 4.5 GEOLOGY AND SOILS Geologic and soil conditions on campus are generally as described in the 1989 LRDP EIR. Relevant information from the Earth Resources section (pages 147-157) in Volume I of that document

More information

Important Concepts. Earthquake hazards can be categorized as:

Important Concepts. Earthquake hazards can be categorized as: Lecture 1 Page 1 Important Concepts Monday, August 17, 2009 1:05 PM Earthquake Engineering is a branch of Civil Engineering that requires expertise in geology, seismology, civil engineering and risk assessment.

More information

Converse Consultants Geotechnical Engineering, Environmental & Groundwater Science, Inspection & Testing Services

Converse Consultants Geotechnical Engineering, Environmental & Groundwater Science, Inspection & Testing Services Converse Consultants Geotechnical Engineering, Environmental & Groundwater Science, Inspection & Testing Services July 27, 2017 Ms. Rebecca Mitchell Mt. San Antonio College Facilities Planning & Management

More information

5.5 GEOLOGY, SOILS, AND SEISMICITY

5.5 GEOLOGY, SOILS, AND SEISMICITY 5.5 GEOLOGY, SOILS, AND SEISMICITY This section of the environmental impact report (EIR) describes the existing geology and soils conditions in the Project area and analyzes the potential for impacts associated

More information

SLOPE STABILITY EVALUATION AND ACCEPTANCE STANDARDS

SLOPE STABILITY EVALUATION AND ACCEPTANCE STANDARDS INFORMATION BULLETIN / PUBLIC - BUILDING CODE REFERENCE NO.: LAMC 98.0508 Effective: 1-26-84 DOCUMENT NO. P/BC 2002-049 Revised: 11-1-02 Previously Issued As: RGA #1-84 SLOPE STABILITY EVALUATION AND ACCEPTANCE

More information

3.6 Geology, Soils, and Seismicity

3.6 Geology, Soils, and Seismicity 0 0... Existing Conditions... Regulatory Setting Federal There are no federal laws, regulations, or standards related to geology and soils that are applicable to the Proposed Project. State Alquist-Priolo

More information

2.0 DATA COLLECTION AND LITERATURE REVIEW

2.0 DATA COLLECTION AND LITERATURE REVIEW 2.0 DATA COLLECTION AND LITERATURE REVIEW In order to perform the geotechnical evaluation, a comprehensive compilation and review of available publications, reports, and data was performed for all areas

More information

4.6 GEOLOGY, SOILS, AND MINERAL RESOURCES

4.6 GEOLOGY, SOILS, AND MINERAL RESOURCES Ascent Environmental 4.6 GEOLOGY, SOILS, AND MINERAL RESOURCES This section of the EIR describes the existing geology, soils, and mineral resources at and in the vicinity of the project site and analyzes

More information

PRELIMINARY WORKING DRAFT Work in Progress

PRELIMINARY WORKING DRAFT Work in Progress IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS H. MINERAL RESOURCES 1.0 INTRODUCTION This section addresses the potential impacts of the Proposed Project on mineral resources (i.e., sand, gravel and petroleum). The

More information

5.5 Geology and Soils

5.5 Geology and Soils 5.5 Geology and Soils The analysis in this section of the EIR addresses the potential impacts associated with geology and soils that may occur due to implementation of the proposed Collier Park Renovations

More information

Geotechnical Engineering and Resilience

Geotechnical Engineering and Resilience Chapter 14 Part G VOLUME 2 Geotechnical Engineering and Resilience Page 192 Overview Key geotechnical aspects of the Project include: Cut slopes in dune sand, including erodibility and erosion protection;

More information

Section 3.5 Geology and Soils ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING GEOLOGIC SETTING

Section 3.5 Geology and Soils ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING GEOLOGIC SETTING Section 3.5 Geology and Soils This section discusses the environmental setting, existing conditions, regulatory context, and potential impacts of the project in relation to geology and soils. The information

More information

4.6 GEOLOGY AND SOILS

4.6 GEOLOGY AND SOILS 4.6 GEOLOGY AND SOILS This section provides an overview of geological and seismic conditions in the CPAs and evaluates geology and soils impacts associated with the Proposed Plans. This section was prepared

More information

3.5 Geology and Soils

3.5 Geology and Soils 3.5 GEOLOGY AND SOILS The following reports have been prepared to analyze the geological impacts of the proposed project and are included in their entirety in Appendices F1 through F7 of this Draft Environmental

More information

4.5 Geology and Soils

4.5 Geology and Soils Environmental Impact Analysis Geology and Soils 4.5 Geology and Soils This section assesses potential impacts related to geologic and soil hazards. 4.5.1 Setting a. Topography and Geology San Leandro is

More information

4.5 GEOLOGY AND SOILS

4.5 GEOLOGY AND SOILS 4.5.1 INTRODUCTION This resource section evaluates the potential environmental effects related to geology and soils from implementation of. The analysis includes a review of regional geology, seismicity

More information

Section 5.8 GEOLOGY, SOILS, AND SEISMICITY

Section 5.8 GEOLOGY, SOILS, AND SEISMICITY Section 5.8 GEOLOGY, SOILS, AND SEISMICITY 5.8 GEOLOGY, SOILS, AND SEISMICITY This section describes the geologic, soil, and seismic setting of the project area; identifies potential impacts of the proposed

More information

4.4 Geological Resources Environmental Setting Physiography Regional Geologic Setting. 4.4 Geological Resources

4.4 Geological Resources Environmental Setting Physiography Regional Geologic Setting. 4.4 Geological Resources This section addresses and outlines the geologic setting and geologic impacts relevant to the Project Area and the proposed Project. These impacts involve the geologic structure, geomorphology, tectonic

More information