arxiv: v1 [math.ra] 10 May 2013

Transcription

1 ON FINITE-DIMENSIONAL SUBALGEBRAS OF DERIVATION ALGEBRAS arxiv: v1 [math.ra] 10 May 2013 Abstract. Let K be a field, R be an associative and commutative K-algebra and L be a Lie algebra over K. We give some descriptions of injections from L to Lie algebra of K-derivations of R in the terms of L. 1. Introduction Let K be a field, R be an associative and commutative K-algebra and L be a Lie algebra over K. Let Der K R be a Lie algebra of K-derivations of the algebra R. We study subalgebras from Der K R. This questions are studied in many papers (see [1], [2], [3], [5]). Jan Draisma in his PhD. thesis ([6]) studied so called transitive derivation of K[x 1,...,x n ]. More precisely we study injective morphisms ϕ from L to Der K R. Der K R has a structure of R-module. Put M = Rϕ(L) Der K R. If R is a field then M is a vector space over R. Put k = Dim R M. We prove that if such injection exists then R L has an R-subalgebra of codimension k and if L is finite dimensional then L has a subalgebra of codimension k. Given a Lie algebra L and k N. We want to give an answer in terms of L where there exist a field R and an injection ϕ : L Der K R such that Dim R RϕL = k. Let M k (L) be an affine algebraic set of all elements (l 1,...l k ) L k such that a vector space Kl Kl k is a subalgebra and Mk 0(L) be a subset of M k(l) such that an elements l 1,...l k are linear dependent. The main result of this paper is the following Theorem. For a closed point p of an affine algebraic variety we denote an evaluation of element x from coordinate ring in p by p(x). Theorem 1. Let L be a finite dimensional Lie algebra over an algebraically closed field K. Then the following conditions are equivalent: (i) there exists a field R and an injective homomorphism ϕ : L Der K R such that Dim R Rϕ(L) = k; (ii) there exist an irreducible subvariety of V M k (L), V Mk 0 (L), such that an intersection of subalgebras associated to points of V is equal to {0}. A technique of this paper gives some algorithms constructing injections. They are used in examples. 2. Construction of some Lie algebras Let K be a field, R be associative and commutative K-algebra and L be a Lie algebra over K. Consider a Lie algebra Der K R. Let M be an R-submodule of Der K R closed under Lie bracket and ϕ : L M be an injective morphism of Lie algebras. Consider a Lie algebra R L which is a free R-module. For an arbitrary derivation d Der K R denote a derivation of the Lie algebra d Der K (R L): d (m l) = d(m) l. Note that a mapping d d is a monomorphism of Lie algebras. Thus we can define a following Lie algebra. 1

2 2 ON FINITE-DIMENSIONAL SUBALGEBRAS OF DERIVATION ALGEBRAS Definition 1. Let L be a Lie algebra over a field K, R be an associative and commutative K-algebra and M be an R-submodule of Der K R. Define the following Lie algebra D = D(L,R,M) = M (R L). Remark 1. In the case R = K[x 1,...,x n ] D is a polynomial Lie algebra that are defined in [4]. Denote an action of this algebra on the ring R: (D +r l)(s) = D(s) for D M, l L, r,s R. Lemma 1. Let d 1,d 2 be an elements of D, r,s be an elements of R. Then: [rd 1,sd 2 ] = rd 1 (s)d 2 sd 2 (r)d 1 +rs[d 1,d 2 ]. Proof. Straightforward calculation. Let {l i },i I be a basis of L. Denote a following monomorphism from L to D: ϕ : l i ϕ(l i )+1 l i,i I. Note that ϕ (L) is a Lie algebra isomorphic to L. Definition 2. L = Rϕ (L) R L. It is easy to see that L is a subalgebra of a Lie algebra R L considered as an algebra over R. Lemma 2. Let r 1,...,r p be an elements of R. Then r 1 ϕ(l i1 )+ +r p ϕ(l ip ) = 0 if and only if r 1 l i1 + +r p l ip L. Proof. Let r 1 ϕ(l i1 )+ +r p ϕ(l ip ) = 0. Then: r 1 (ϕ(l i1 )+1 l i1 )+ +r p (ϕ(l ip )+1 l ip ) = r 1 l i1 + +r p l ip Rϕ (L) R L. Conversely let r 1 l i1 + +r p l ip L. Then: r 1 l i1 + +r p l ip = i I (s i ϕ(l i )+s i l i ), where only finite number of the elements s i are nonzero. But D = M R L as R-module. Therefore i I s iϕ(l i ) = 0 and i I s i l i = r 1 l i1 + +r p l ip. A set {l i } is a free basis of R L. Thus r j = s ij,j = 1...p and all other s i s are equal to 0. This completes the proof of Lemma. Lemma 3. L 1 L = {0}. Proof. Assume that 0 1 l L 1 L, i. e. 1 l Rϕ (L). Therefore for some nonzero r 1,...,r m R we have: l = r 1 (ϕ(l i1 )+1 l i1 )+ +r m (ϕ(l im )+1 l im ). Therefore r 1 ϕ(l i1 ) + + r m ϕ(l im ) = 0 and r 1 l i1 + + r m l im = l. Hence r j K, j = 1,...,m. Thus ϕ(r 1 l i1 + +r m l im ) = 0 with contradiction to injectivity of ϕ.

3 ON FINITE-DIMENSIONAL SUBALGEBRAS OF DERIVATION ALGEBRAS 3 During this chapter R will be a field. 3. Subalgebras of codimension k Proposition 1. Let L be a Lie algebra over K, ϕ : L Der K R be an injection, M = Rϕ(L) be a vector space of dimension k over R. Then L is a subalgebra of R-algebra R L with codimension k. Proof. Let {l 1,...,l k } L be an elements of L such that {ϕ(l 1 ),...,ϕ(l k )} form a basis of M. It is easy to see that M is closed under multiplication. For any element of l L and some elements r 1,...,r k we have: ϕ(l)+r 1 ϕ(l 1 )+ +r k ϕ(l k ) = 0. Therefore using Lemma 2 we have that l + r 1 l r k l k L. Also we have that {ϕ(l 1 ),...,ϕ(l k )} are linear independent over R. Hence using Lemma 2 we have that for any r 1,...,r k R r 1 l 1 + +r k l k / L. Thus L has codimension k in R L. Lemma 4. Let R be a field, L be a finite dimensional Lie algebra over K. Then there exist an injection ϕ : L Der K R such that Dim R Rϕ(L) = k if and only if there exist a subalgebra L R L of R-codimension k, L 1 L = {0}, a set of elements b 1,..., b k R L, L+R b 1 + +R b k = R L and a set of linear independent over R derivations D 1,...D k such that an R-module R(D 1 + b 1 )+ +R(D k + b k )+ L is closed under Lie bracket. Proof. Assume that there exist a needed injection L Der K R. Consider a Lie algebra Rϕ (L). Take an elements l 1,...,l k such that ϕ(l i ),i = 1,...k are linearly independent over K. Then Rϕ (L) = R(ϕ(l 1 ) + 1 l 1 ) + + R(ϕ(l k ) + 1 l k ) + L. Put L = L. Assume that r 1 l 1 + +r k l k L for some r 1,...,r k R. Then using Lemma 2 we have that r 1 ϕ(l 1 )+ +r k ϕ(l k ) = 0 with contradiction to linear independency of {ϕ(l i ),i = 1,...,k}. Therefore L+R l 1 + +R l k = R L. Conversely, consider an R-basis of subalgebra L, L = m i=k+1 R m b ij l j, b ij R. Put b i = m b ij l j,i = i,...,k. Put M = RD RD k. It is easy to see that M R(D 1 + b 1 ) + +R(D k + b k ) + L/ ( R(D 1 + b 1 )+ +R(D k + b k )+ L R L ) is closed under Lie bracket. Consider the following linear system: (1) b ij d j = D i,i = 1...k; b ij d j = 0,i = k +1,...m. It is easy to see that this system has a unique solution. Denote a linear map ϕ from L to M on basis as ϕ(l i ) = d i,i = 1,...,m. For this map we have that {ϕ(l i )+l i } is a basis of R-module R(D 1 + b 1 ) + +R(D k + b k ) + L. This module is closed under Lie bracket. Therefore we obtain: [ϕ(l i )+l i,ϕ(l j )+l j ] = c s ij (ϕ(l s)+l s ). Hence: [ϕ(l i ),ϕ(l j )] = k=1 c s ij ϕ(l s); s=1

4 4 ON FINITE-DIMENSIONAL SUBALGEBRAS OF DERIVATION ALGEBRAS [l i,l j ] = c k ijl k. Thus we have that c s ij K, i,j,s = 1,...,m. Therefore a K-space generated by ϕ(l i ),i = 1,...m is closed under Lie bracket and a linear map defined on a basis as l i ϕ(l i ) is a morphism of Lie algebras. This completes the proof of Lemma. Remark 2. Analogously to proof of the previous Lemma we obtain that in conditions of this Lemma without condition L 1 L we have an analogous morphism ϕ : L Der K R that is not injective. Consider a following algebraic variety. Definition 3. Let L be a finitely dimension Lie algebras, DimL = m. Consider a following variety: m k (2) M k L = {(a ij ),i = 1...m k,j = 1...m K a ij l j is a subalgebra.} It is easy to see that it is an affine algebraic variety. We will denote it as a variety of subalgebra bases with codimension k. Consider a following closed subspace of M k L. k=1 m k (3) Mk 0 L = {(a ij),i = 1...m k,j = 1...m K and{ i=1 i=1 a ij l j is a subalgebra a ij l j } is linear dependent set.} For any point (a ij ) of M k (L) consider an associated subalgebra m k i=1 K m a ijl j. It has codimension k if and only if (a ij ) / M 0 k (L). Proposition 2. Let K be an algebraically closed field. Let L be a finite dimensional Lie algebra over the field K. Assume that there exist an injection ϕ : L Der K R, k = Dim R Rϕ(L). Then: (i) L has a subalgebra of codimension k; (ii) there exist an irreducible subvariety V of M k (L) such that V Mk 0 (L) and intersection of all associated subalgebras to points of V is {0}. Proof. Put m = DimL Consider a subalgebra L. It has codimension k. Let { m z ijl j }, i = 1,...,m be a basis of L. Let S be a ring generated by {z ij }, in is a subring of field and therefore integral domain. Then we have an obvious injection τ : SpecS M k (L). Assume that all subalgebras associated to points of τ(specs) have codimension greater then k. Then all maximal minors of (p(z ij )) are equal to zero for any evaluation in point p. Hence using Hilbert s Nullstellensatz (see, for example, [7], p. 4) we have that all maximal minors of (z ij ) are equal to 0. Thus L has codimension greater then k. This completes the proof of part (i). Assume that for any closed point p we have that m p(z ij) l j,i = 1...m k has an element m α j l j, α j K. Then the set { m p(z ij) l j } { m α j l j } is linear

5 ON FINITE-DIMENSIONAL SUBALGEBRAS OF DERIVATION ALGEBRAS 5 dependent. Analogously to the proof of (i) we obtain that a set { m z ijl j } { m α j l j } is linear dependent. Thus m α j l j is an element of L with contradiction to Lemma 3. Thus completes the proof of part (ii). Lemma 5. Let K be a field, R be a field containing K, L be a finite dimensional Lie algebra over K. Assume that there exist an R-subalgebra L R L of codimension k. Then there exist a monomorphism ϕ : L Der K F, where F is a quotient field of R[[x 1,...,x k ]] such that Dim F Fϕ(L) = k. If L is nilpotent then F can be changed to K(x 1,...,x k ). Proof. Let l 1,...,l k be an elements of L such that R l 1 + +R l k + L = R L. Put M = F + + = F, D = M F L. ThenwehaveanaturalembeddingR L F L. Let b k+1,..., b m be a basis of L. Then it is a basis of F L. Put w = x 1 l 1 + +x k l k. N = F + +F +F L is closed under Lie bracket. Then an F-module e adw N is closed under Lie bracket. It has a basis {e adw,e adw,e adw bk+1,...,,e adw bm }. Note that all these elements lie in R[[x 1,...,x k ]] and: e adw 1 l i (modj),i = 1,...,k; e adw bi b i (modj), where J is an ideal of R[[x 1,...x k ]] generated by x 1,...,x k. The elements {l 1,...,l k, b k+1,..., b m } are linear independent. Therefore e adw,...,e adw,e adw ( b k+1 ),...,e adw ( b m ) are linear independent and thus give a basis of R L. Analogously we obtain that if 0 l e adw L 1 L then 0 l L 1 L. Hence using Lemma 4 we complete the proof of Lemma. If L is nilpotent (more precisely if l 1,...l k lie in subalgebra L such that ad : L Der(L) is nilpotent representation) then adw is nilpotent derivation of R[x 1,...,x k ] L and thus e adw x i R(x 1,...,x k ),i = k +1,...,m. Thus we can change F to R(x 1,...,x k ). Theorem 1. Let L be a finite dimensional Lie algebra over an algebraically closed field K. Then the following conditions are equivalent: (i) there exists a field R and an injective homomorphism ϕ : L Der K R such that Dim R Rϕ(L) = k; (ii) there exists an irreducible subvariety of V M k (L), V Mk 0 (L), such that an intersection of subalgebras associated to points of V is equal to {0}. Proof. (i) (ii) It is immediate consequence of Proposition 2. (ii) (i) Let S be a coordinate ring of the variety V. Put S = K[z ij,i = 1...m k,j = 1...m]/I = K[ z ij ], z ij = z ij +I such that for any closed point p of S we have { m p( z ij)l j } be a basis of subalgebra of codimension k. V is irreducible. Hence S is an integral domain. Let R be a quotient field of S. Then { m p( z ij)l j } is a basis of subalgebra L R L. Assume that this set is linear dependent. Then it is linear dependent in every point of V. Thus we have that V Mk 0L with contradiction to (ii). Therefore L has codimension k. Finally if l 1 L L then l lies in all subalgebras associated to points S. Thus using Lemma 5 we obtain (i).

6 6 ON FINITE-DIMENSIONAL SUBALGEBRAS OF DERIVATION ALGEBRAS 4. Case of simple Lie algebras Proposition 3. Let K be an arbitrary field, L be a simple Lie algebra over K. Assume that L = L 1 + L 2, where L 1 has codimension k and a representation ad : L 2 DerL is nilpotent. Then there exists a subalgebra ϕ(l) Der K K(x 1,...x k ) such that Dim K(x1,...x k )K(x 1,...x k )ϕ(l) = k. Proof. Denote R = K(x 1,...x k ). Denote M = Der K K(x 1,...x k ), D = M K(x 1,...x k ) L. Put w = x 1 l x k l k. It is easy to see that adw is a nilpotent derivation of D. Put N = R,...,R +R L 1 and consider an R-module e adw N. Let {l k+1,...,l m } be a basis of L 1. Then we have that {e adw ( ),...,e adw ( ),e adw l k+1,...,e adw l m } is a basis of e adw N. Note that all these elements lie in polynomial ring K[x 1,...,x k ] and e adw ( ) l i modj, i = 1,...,k, e adw l j l j modj, j = k+1,...,m, where J is an ideal of K[x 1,...,x k ], generated by x 1,...,x k. Thus we have that e adw ( ),e adw l j give an R basis of R L. Using Remark 2 we have a morphism ϕ : L Der K R. It is injective because L is simple. This completes the proof of Proposition. Corollary 1. There exist an injection ϕ : sl n K Der K K(x 1,...,x n 1 ). Proof. Let α 1,...,α n 1 be a basis of root system, sl n (K) = n + h + n +, where h is a Cartan subalgebra, n + (n ) is a linear span of all positive (negative) root vectors. Put L 1 = h+n + n + wheren + isasubalgebrageneratedbyrootvectorswithrootsinα 1,...,α n 2. It is easy to see that L 1 is a subalgebra and it has codimension n 1. L = L 1 +n. Thus using Proposition 3 we complete the proof of Lemma. Example 1. Let L = sl 3 (K), ±α,±β,±(α + β) be a root system. Let L 1 = h α,h β,e α,e β,e α β,e β. Put w = x 1 e α +x 2 e α+β. Then: e adw = 1 e α, e adw x 2 = x 2 1 e α+β, e adw h α = 1 h α 2x 1 e α x 2 e α+β, e adw h β = 1 h β +x 1 e α x 2 e α+β, e adw e β = 1 e β x 2 e α, e adw e β = 1 e β x 1 e α+β, e adw e α = 1 e α +x 1 h α +x 2 e β x 2 1 e α x 1 x 2 e α+β, e adw e α β = 1 e α β +x 1 e β +x 2 (h α +h β ) x 2 2 e α+β x 1 x 2 e α. Then solving the linear system 1 we have:

7 ON FINITE-DIMENSIONAL SUBALGEBRAS OF DERIVATION ALGEBRAS 7 ϕ(e α ) =,ϕ(e α+β ) =,ϕ(h α ) = 2x 1 x 2,ϕ(h β ) = x 1 x 2, x 2 x 2 x 2 ϕ(e β ) = x 1,ϕ(e β ) = x 2,ϕ(e α ) = x 2 1 x 1 x 2, x 2 x 2 ϕ(e α β ) = x 1 x 2 x 2 2. x 2 References [1] S. Lie, Theorie der Transformationsgruppen, Vol. 1-3, Leipzig, 1888, 1890, [2] A. Nowicki, Polynomial derivations and their rings of constants, N. Copernicus University Press, Torun, [3] I.V. Arzhantsev, E.A. Makedonskii and A.P. Petravchuk, Finite-dimensional subalgebras in polynomial Lie algebras of rank one, Ukrainian Math. Journal, 63 (2011) no. 5, [4] V.M. Buchstaber and D.V. Leykin, Polynomial Lie algebras. Funk. Anal. Pril. 36 (2002), no. 4, (Russian); English transl.: Funct. Anal. Appl. 36 (2002), no. 4, [5] R.O. Popovych, V.M. Boyko, M.O. Nesterenko and M.W. Lutfullin, Realizations of real low-dimensional Lie algebras, J. Phys. A 36 (2003), no. 26, , arxiv:math-ph/ v3. [6] J. Draisma. Lie Algebras of Vector Fields. PhD. Thesis. [7] R. Hartshorne, Algebraic geometry, 1977 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.