arxiv:math/ v2 [math.rt] 27 Nov 2006

Transcription

1 DOUBLE AFFINE HECKE ALGEBRAS FOR THE SPIN SYMMETRIC GROUP arxiv:math/ v2 [math.rt] 27 Nov 2006 WEIQIANG WANG Abstract. We introduce a new class (in two versions, A u and B u ) of rational double affine Hecke algebras (DaHa) associated to the spin symmetric group. We establish the basic properties of the algebras, such as PBW and Dunkl representation, and connections to Nazarov s degenerate affine Hecke-Clifford algebra and to a new degenerate affine Hecke algebra introduced here. We formulate a precise connection between the two versions of rational DaHa s. The trigonometric generalization of the above and its relations to the rational counterpart are also established. 1. Introduction 1.1. The double affine Hecke algebras (DaHa) introduced by Cherednik [Ch] are intimately related to K. Saito s elliptic root systems [Sai] and the Dunkl operators [Dun], and they have numerous connections and applications to Macdonald polynomials, integrable systems, and (quantum) affine algebras, etc. The DaHa affords three variants of degeneration: rational, trigonometric, and elliptic. The rational DaHa, which goes back as a special case to Drinfeld [Dr], has been actively studied in recent years by many authors (see Etingof-Ginzburg [EG] and the review of Rouquier [Rou] for extensive references). The question addressed here is whether or not a reasonable notion of DaHa s associated to the spin symmetric group of Schur exists. For Coxeter groups, there is a standard procedure to construct the associated Hecke algebras. The spin symmetric group is not a reflection group, and so a priori it is not clear whether such a DaHa should exist and, if exists, how its characteristic feature looks like. In this paper we provide a natural construction of a new class of rational and trigonometric DaHa s associated to the spin symmetric group, which not only exhibits new phenomenon but also suggests for further natural generalization. Instead of constructing directly the DaHa for the spin symmetric group, our idea is to start with a construction of DaHa for a certain double cover of the hyperoctahedral group. The twisted group algebra of this group is C n CS n and thus is closer to the usual symmetric group S n, where C n is a complex Clifford algebra in n generators We introduce in Section 2 a first version of rational DaHa A u associated to the spin symmetric group and a parameter u. We show that A u is a deformation of A 0 with PBW property. In particular, A u admits a triangular decomposition with 2000 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 20C08. 1

2 2 WEIQIANG WANG the middle part being the algebra C n CS n. In contrast to the classical rational DaHa, the symmetry between the two halves of polynomial generators for A u has to be broken. We further provide a realization of A u in terms of Dunkl operators. A degenerate affine Hecke-Clifford algebra  was introduced by Nazarov [Naz] for studying the Young symmetrizer for the spin symmetric group (cf. Brundan- Kleshchev [BK, Kle] for recent development on representations of  and see [Dr] and Lusztig [Lu] for the classical degenerate affine Hecke algebras). We show that the DaHa A u contains a family of subalgebras isomorphic to Â, analogous to the classical DaHa setup (cf. [Ch, EG]). Such a connection with Nazarov s algebra is a main motivation and justification for our DaHa A u. We then introduce a second version (the genuine version ) of rational DaHa B u associated to the spin symmetric group. According to the PBW theorem, we have B u = C[ξ1,...,ξ n ] T n C[y 1,...,y n ], where T n is the twisted group algebra of the spin symmetric group. A key new feature is that the generators y i s commute with each other but the ξ i s anti-commute with each other (cf. Definition 3.1). We also introduce a new degenerate affine Hecke algebra of spin type B. Just as the spin symmetric group is a double cover of S n, it is easy to modify our definition of B u (respectively, of B) with an additional central generator z of order two such that it specializes to B u (respectively, to B) when setting z = 1 and to the classical rational DaHa (respectively, degenerate affine Hecke algebra) for S n when setting z = 1. The results for B u and B in Section 3 are parallel to those for A u and  in Section 2. In Section 4 we establish an explicit isomorphism of super algebras = A u C n B u. We also establish a super algebra isomorphism  = C n B. Such isomorphisms provide a conceptual explanation and easy proofs for the results in Section 3 parallel to Section 2. Without such a connection to A u, even the definition of B 0 and then of B u is by no means obvious. A finite-dimensional version of such isomorphisms, discovered independently in Sergeev [Ser] and Yamaguchi [Yam], explained for the well-known fact that the representation theory of the spin symmetric group is equivalent to that of the algebra C n S n. The three isomorphisms in the finite, affine, and double affine setups are compatible with each other. We finally introduce the trigonometric DaHa s A tr u and Btr u. We obtain an isomorphism of DaHa s A tr u = C n B tr u. We further establish the precise connections between our rational and trigonometric DaHa s which are analogous to the classical setup (cf. Suzuki [Suz]). This is developed in Section This paper is a first step of a program in which we attempt to develop a general theory of spin Hecke algebras. The new features observed in this paper will be instrumental in how to relax the classical setup (cf. [Dr, EG] and Ram-Shepler [RS] for the degenerate case) in order to define appropriate spin (degenerate/double) affine Hecke algebras more generally. The algebras A u and B u have large centers,

3 DOUBLE AFFINE HECKE ALGEBRAS FOR THE SPIN SYMMETRIC GROUP 3 and are expected to have rich finite-dimensional representation theory. We will return to these topics elsewhere. Acknowledgment. This research is partially supported by NSF and NSA grants. I gratefully acknowledge the sesquicentennial Associateship from University of Virginia which allows me to spend the semester of Spring 2006 at MSRI, Berkeley. I thank MSRI for its stimulating atmosphere and support, where this work was carried out. I thank Ta Khongsap for his careful reading and corrections. 2. The rational DaHa of Clifford type 2.1. The symmetric group S n. Recall that the symmetric group S n is generated by s i (1 i n 1) subject to the relations: s i s j = s j s i, i j > 1 s 2 i = 1, s is i+1 s i = s i+1 s i s i+1. (2.1) Let s ij denote the transposition of i and j in the symmetric group S n The DaHa of Clifford type. Definition 2.1. Let u C. The rational double affine Hecke algebra of Clifford type, or the rational Clifford DaHa, A u is the algebra generated by x i, y i, c i (1 i n) and S n, subject to the following relations: x i x j = x j x i, y i y j = y j y i, ( i, j) σx i = x σi σ, σy i = y σi σ (σ S n ) c i x i = x i c i, c i y i = y i c i, (2.2) c j x i = x i c j, c j y i = y i c j, (i j) σc i = c σi σ (σ S n ), c 2 i = 1, c i c j = c j c i (i j) (2.3) [y j, x i ] = u(1 + c j c i )s ij, (i j) (2.4) [y i, x i ] = u k i(1 + c k c i )s ki. (2.5) Denote by C n, or C(c 1,..., c n ), the Clifford algebra generated by c 1,...,c n. The rational Clifford DaHa A u is a super (i.e. Z 2 -graded) algebra with c i = 1 and x i = y i = s ij = 0. Unlike the usual rational DaHa, the symmetry between x s and y s is broken in the definition of A u, cf. (2.2). For u = 0, we have A 0 = (C[x, y] C n )#S n, where the tilde refers to the unusual sign in (2.2). This A 0 clearly has the PBW property, i.e. A 0 has a linear basis {x a y b σc ǫ }, where σ S n, a, b Z n +, ǫ {0, 1} n and x a denotes the monomials x a 1 1 xan n etc. The algebras A u are all isomorphic for different u 0. Below we always assume u 0 unless otherwise specified.

4 4 WEIQIANG WANG Theorem 2.2 (PBW theorem for A u ). For any fixed u C, the PBW property holds for A u. That is, the multiplication of the subalgebra gives rise to an isomorphism of vector spaces: = C[x 1,...,x n ] CS n C n C[y 1,...,y n ] A. Proof. This can be proved in a similar way as in [EG, Proof of Th. 1.3, pp.256-7] (and see loc. cit. for earlier works on PBW algebras), with one crucial modification. Set V = C 2n with the standard coordinates {x i, y i }, and note that K = C n CS n is a semisimple algebra. The new key observation is that E := V C K is naturally a K-bimodule even though K does not act on V. The right action of K is via the right multiplication g : v a v (ag). The S n acts on the left by σ : v a v σ (σa), while C n acts by c i : x j a ( 1) δ ij x j (c i a) and c i : y j a y j (c i a). The rest of the proof is the same as in loc. cit. Remark 2.3. The observation in the above proof, when applied to more general pairs (V, K), leads to a generalization of Drinfeld s setup [Dr]. The proof above also shows that A u is the only quadratic deformation of A 0 with PBW property. Note the special feature of A u that an additional term t 1 which appeared in the symplectic reflection algebra [EG] is not allowed in (2.5) by the conjugation invariance with respect to c i. Remark 2.4. Introducing an additional central element z such that z 2 = 1 to A u, we can define a modified algebra A mod u with relations c i c j = zc j c i, c i x i = zx i c i replacing the corresponding relations in (2.3) and (2.2). Then A mod u / z + 1 = A u. On the other hand, A mod u / z 1 is isomorphic to the ordinary rational DaHa (cf. [EG]) associated to the reflection group Z n 2 S n with specialized parameters. A similar remark applies to the algebra B u introduced in Section The degenerate affine Hecke-Clifford algebra. The degenerate affine Hecke-Clifford algebra was introduced by Nazarov (also called affine Sergeev algebra in [Naz]). It is the algebra  generated by a i, c i (i = 1,...,n) and S n, subject to the relations (2.1), (2.3) and the following relations: a i+1 s i = s i a i, (j i, i + 1) a i+1 s i s i a i = 1 c i+1 c i c i a i = a i c i, (2.6) a i a j = a j a i, c j a i = a i c j, (i j). Our convention c 2 i = 1 is consistent with [Kle], not with [Naz]. The  is a superalgebra with c i being odd and a i being even for each i. For 1 i n, set M i := k<i(1 c i c k )s ki, The M i s are the Jucys-Murphy elements introduced in [Naz] and they satisfy M i M j = M j M i, ( i, j). (2.7)

5 DOUBLE AFFINE HECKE ALGEBRAS FOR THE SPIN SYMMETRIC GROUP 5 Proposition 2.5. [Naz] (1) The algebra  admits the PBW property. That is, the multiplication of the subalgebras induces a vector space isomorphism = C[a 1,...,a n ] CS n C n Â. (2) There exists a unique algebra homomorphism  C n CS n, which restricts to the identity map on the subalgebra C n CS n Â, and sends a 1 to 0. Moreover, this homomorphism sends each a i to M i (1 i n). (3) The even center of the algebra  is C[a2 1,...,a 2 n] Sn. The intertwining elements φ i := s i (a 2 i a2 i+1 ) + (a i + a i+1 ) + c i c i+1 (a i a i+1 ), 1 i n 1 were introduced in [Naz] (cf. [Kle, Chapter 14]). Proposition 2.6. [Naz] The intertwining elements φ i s satisfy φ 2 i = 2a 2 i + 2a2 i+1 (a2 i a2 i+1 )2 φ i φ i+1 φ i = φ i+1 φ i φ i+1 φ i φ j = φ j φ i ( i j > 1) The affine subalgebra of A u. Set z i := u 1 y i x i + M i. Lemma 2.7. For all i, j and each α C, the following identities hold: Proof. We may assume i < j. Then, by (2.7), we have [z i, z j ] = 0 (2.8) [x i, z j ] [x j, z i ] = 0, (2.9) [αx i + z i, αx j + z j ] = 0. (2.10) u[z i, z j ] = u 1 [y i x i, y j x j ] + [y i x i, M j ] = u 1 (y i [x i, y j ]x j + y j [y i, x j ]x i ) + [y i x i, s ij c j c i s ij ] = y i (s ij c i c j s ij )x j + y j (s ij + c i c j s ij )x i +(y i x i y j x j )s ij (y i x i + y j x j )c j c i s ij = 0. To prove (2.9) for i < j, we calculate that [x i, z j ] [x j, z i ] = [x i, u 1 y j x j + M j ] [x j, u 1 y i x i ] = u 1 [x i, y j ]x j + [x i, s ij c j c i s ij ] u 1 [x j, y i ]x i = (c i c j s ij s ij )x j + (x i x j )s ij (x i + x j )c j c i s ij + (s ij + c i c j s ij )x i = 0. Now (2.10) follows from (2.8) and (2.9). We remark that [y i, z j ] [y j, z i ] 0 (i j).

6 6 WEIQIANG WANG Lemma 2.8. The following identities hold: c i z i = z i c i, c i z j = z j c i (i j). Proof. Recall z i = u 1 y i x i +M i. It is known [Naz] that the Jucys-Murphy elements satisfy c i M i = M i c i, and c j M i = M i c j for i j. Clearly, c i (y i x i ) = (y i x i )c i, and c j (y i x i ) = (y i x i )c j for i j. Now the lemma follows. Lemma 2.9. The following identities hold: z i+1 s i s i z i = 1 c i+1 c i, (αx i+1 + z i+1 )s i s i (αx i + z i ) = 1 c i+1 c i. Proof. The second identity follows from the first one and the equation x i+1 s i = s i x i. Note that z i+1 s i s i z i = (u 1 y i+1 x i+1 + M i+1 )s i s i (u 1 y i x i + M i ) This proves the first identity. = M i+1 s i s i M i = 1 c i+1 c i. The next theorem follows now from Lemmas 2.7, 2.8, and 2.9. Theorem Fix α C. The subalgebra generated by c i, αx i + z i (1 i n) and S n is isomorphic to the degenerate affine Hecke-Clifford algebra  The Dunkl operator for A u. The PBW Theorem 2.2 provides the triangular decomposition of A u : A u = C[x] (Cn CS n ) C[y] where C[x] is the short-hand for C[x 1,...,x n ], etc. Denote by A x u the subalgebra of A u generated by C n CS n and x 1,..., x n. The subalgebra A y u is similarly defined. Take any C n CS n -module W, and extend it to an A x u-module with the trivial action of x i s. Consider the induced A u -module Ind Au A W, which as a vector space x u is isomorphic to C[y 1,...,y n ] W. Denote the action by. The most interesting S n C n -module is the so-called basic spin module L n = C(c 1,...,c n ) of S n C n, (where C n acts by left multiplication and S n acts by permuting the c i s), and the induced A u -module is Ind Au A x u L n = C[y 1,...,y n ] C(c 1,...,c n ). Given operators h and g, h g stands for g 1 h throughout the paper. Theorem Given a C n CS n -module W, the action of x i on C[y 1,...,y n ] W is realized as Dunkl operator as follows. For any polynomial f = f(y) and w W, we have x i (f w) = u k i (1 s ki )(f) y i y k (1 c i c k )s ki (w).

7 DOUBLE AFFINE HECKE ALGEBRAS FOR THE SPIN SYMMETRIC GROUP 7 Proof. We calculate that x i (f w) = [x i, f] w + fx i w = [x i, f] w. Now the theorem follows from Lemma 2.12 (2) below. Lemma (1) For a N and i j, we have [x i, y a j] = u ya i ya j y i y j (1 c i c j )s ij [x i, y a i ] = u k i y a i ya k y i y k (1 c i c k )s ki. (2) Let f(y) be any polynomial in y 1,...,y n. Then, [x i, f(y)] = u k i (1 s ki )f(y) y i y k (1 c i c k )s ki. Proof. (1) is proved by induction on a using [x i, yj] a = [x i, y a 1 j ]y j + y a 1 j [x i, y j ]. (2) It suffices to check for every monomial f. We first prove the case when f = j i ya j j using the first identity in (1). Then we combine with the second identity in (1) to prove for a general monomial f involving powers of y i. Note that the symmetry between x s and y s in our algebra A u is broken. We compute below the Dunkl operator for y i. Lemma For a N and 1 i j n, we have [y i, x a i ] = u ( xa k ) xa i s ki + xa i ( x k ) a c i s ki c i x k x i x k + x i k i [y i, x a j] = u xa j xa i x j x i s ij + u xa j ( x i) a x j + x i c i s ij c i. Proof. Follows by induction on a. We can identify C[x 1,, x n ] W with the induced A u -module Ind Au A y u L n, where W is a CS n C n -module and is then extended to an A y u-module trivially. Proposition The action of y i on C[x 1,, x n ] W is given as follows. For any polynomial f(x) and w W, we have y i (f w) = ( f ski (f) s ki (w) + fc ) ic k c i c k s ki (f) s ik (w). x k x i x k + x i k i Proof. First note that y i commutes with all c j s. So we are reduced to the case f = 1 and w being a monomial. This follows by induction from Lemma 2.13.

8 8 WEIQIANG WANG 2.6. The center of A u. Denote by Z(A) the even center of a superalgebra A. Proposition (1) For u = 0, the even center Z(A 0 ) of the superalgebra A 0 is C[x 2 1,...,x2 n ; y 1,...,y n ] Sn, where denotes the diagonal action on x 2 j s and y j s. (2) For any u C, C[x 2 1,...,x 2 n] Sn Z(A u ) and C[y 1,...,y n ] Sn Z(A u ). Proof. (1) is clear. (2) By Lemma 2.12 (1), for each i we have that [x i, y k y k n] = 0, k 1. By definition of A u, y1 k+ +yk n commutes with CS n C n. So y1 k+ +yk n Z(A u) for all k, and thus C[y 1,...,y n ] Sn Z(A u ). We have C[x 2 1,...,x2 n Z(A ]Sn u ), by arguing similarly using Lemma 2.13 and the definition of A u. Example For n = 2, x 2 1 y 1 + x 2 2 y 2 (x 1 + x 2 )s 12 c 1 (x 1 + x 2 )s 12 c 1 Z(A u ). 3. The rational DaHa of spin type The results in this section are presented in a way parallel to Section 2, but with all proofs omitted except for the PBW theorem. They can be either proved in the same way as for their counterparts in Section 2, or follow directly from the counterparts in Section 2 via the isomorphisms to be established in Section The spin symmetric group. The spin symmetric group S n is a double cover of S n : 1 Z 2 S n S n 1. Denote Z 2 = {1, z}. The twisted group algebra T n = C[ S n ]/ z + 1 is generated by t i, i = 1,, n 1 subject to the following relations: t 2 i = 1, t i t i+1 t i = t i+1 t i t i+1, t i t j = t j t i, i j > 1. (3.1) The algebra T n is naturally a superalgebra by declaring t i for every i to be odd. Define the transpositions of odd parity, for 1 i < j n, [i, j] = [j, i] = ( 1) j i 1 t j 1 t i+1 t i t i+1 t j 1 which satisfies the following relations: Define the odd Jucys-Murphy elements [i, i + 1] = t i, [i, j] 2 = 1, t i [i, j]t i = [i + 1, j], for j i, i + 1. M j = k<j[k, j], (1 j n). We have [Ser] (also see [Kle, Chapter 13]) [M i,m j ] + := M i M j +M j M i = 0, (i j). In general, we shall denote [a, b] + = ab + ba.

9 DOUBLE AFFINE HECKE ALGEBRAS FOR THE SPIN SYMMETRIC GROUP The rational spin DaHa. Definition 3.1. The rational spin double affine Hecke algebra, or the rational spin DaHa, is the algebra B u generated by ξ i, y i (1 i n) and t i (1 i n 1), subject to the relations (3.1) for t i and the following relations: ξ i ξ j = ξ j ξ i, y i y j = y j y i, (i j), t i ξ i = ξ i+1 t i, t i y i = y i+1 t i, t j ξ i = ξ i t j, t j y i = y i t j, (i j, j + 1), [y i, ξ j ] = u[i, j], (i j), [y i, ξ i ] = u k i[i, k]. Denote by C[ξ 1,...,ξ n ] the algebra generated by ξ 1,..., ξ n. Clearly, it has a linear basis ξ a, where a Z n +. Theorem 3.2 (PBW Theorem for B u ). The PBW property holds for B u. That is, the multiplication of the subalgebras gives rise to an isomorphism of vector spaces: = C[ξ 1,...,ξ n ] T n C[y 1,...,y n ] B u. Proof. It follows readily from the definition that B u is spanned by the elements ξ a σy b, where σ runs over a basis for T n and a, b Z n +. Recall the homomorphism Ψ in Theorem 4.2. The images Ψ(ξ a σy b ) in explicit formulas are clearly all linearly independent in A u by the PBW Theorem 2.2 for A u. Thus, all the elements ξ a σy b are linearly independent in B u. Remark 3.3. Note the subtle signs in the definition of B u. The algebra B u is naturally a superalgebra with y i being even and ξ i, t i being odd for each i. The algebras B u are all isomorphic for different u 0. Below we assume u 0 unless otherwise specified The degenerate affine Hecke algebra of spin type. The degenerate spin affine Hecke algebra is the algebra B generated by b i (1 i n) and t i (1 i n 1), subject to the relations (3.1) for t i and the following relations: b i b j = b j b i, (i j) b i+1 t i = t i b i + 1, t j b i = b i t j, (i j, j + 1). The algebra B has a superalgebra structure with both b i and t i being odd elements for every i. Note that the algebra B contains C[b 1,...,b n ] and T n as subalgebras. Proposition 3.4. (1) The algebra B admits the PBW property. That is, the multiplication of the subalgebras induces a vector space isomorphism = C[b 1,..., b n ] T n B.

10 10 WEIQIANG WANG (2) There exists a unique algebra homomorphism B T n, which extends the identity map on the subalgebra T n B and sends b 1 to 0. Moreover, this homomorphism sends each b i to M i (1 i n). (3) The even center of the superalgebra B is C[b 2 1,...,b2 n ]Sn. We define the (odd) intertwining elements in B: ψ i := t i (b 2 i b 2 i+1) (b i b i+1 ), 1 i n 1. Proposition 3.5. The intertwining elements ψ i s satisfy that ψ 2 i = b 2 i + b2 i+1 (b2 i b2 i+1 )2 ψ i ψ i+1 ψ i = ψ i+1 ψ i ψ i+1 ψ i ψ j = ψ j ψ i ( i j > 1) ψ i b j = b j ψ i (j i, i + 1) ψ i b i = b i+1 ψ i, ψ i b i+1 = b i ψ i The affine subalgebra of B u. Let z i := u 1 y i ξ i +M i. Lemma 3.6. For i j, the following identities hold: [z i, z j ] + = 0, [ξ i, z j ] + + [ξ j, z i ] + = 0, [αξ i + z i, αξ j + z j ] + = 0, α C. Lemma 3.7. The following identities hold: (αξ i+1 + z i+1 )t i = t i (αξ i + z i ) + 1, α C. Theorem 3.8. Fix α C. The subalgebra generated by αξ i + z i (1 i n) and T n, is isomorphic to the degenerate spin affine Hecke algebra B Dunkl operators for B u. Denote by B ξ u the subalgebra of B u generated by T n and ξ 1,...,ξ n. Take any T n -module W, and extend it to an B ξ u-module with the trivial action of ξ i s. Consider the induced B u -module Ind Bu W = C[y B ξ 1,...,y n ] W. u Theorem 3.9. The action of ξ i B u on C[y 1,...,y n ] W is realized as Dunkl operator as follows. For any polynomial f = f(y) and w W, we have ξ i (f w) = u k i (1 s ki )(f) y i y k [k, i](w).

11 DOUBLE AFFINE HECKE ALGEBRAS FOR THE SPIN SYMMETRIC GROUP The center of B u. Proposition (1) For u = 0, the even center Z(B 0 ) of the superalgebra B 0 is C[ξ1, 2...,ξn; 2 y 1,...,y n ] Sn, where denotes the diagonal action on the ξj 2 s and y j s. (2) For any u C, C[ξ1 2,...,ξ2 n Z(B ]Sn u ) and C[y 1,...,y n ] Sn Z(B u ). Example For n = 2, ξ 2 1 y 1 + ξ 2 2 y 2 + 2(ξ 1 ξ 2 )t 1 Z(B u ). 4. The algebra isomorphisms The results in this section use earlier notations but are proved independent of Section 3. Note that the multiplication in a tensor product C B of two super algebras C and B has a suitable sign convention: (c b )(c b) = ( 1) b c (c c b b). We shall write a typical element in C B as cb rather than c b, and use short-hand notations c = c 1, b = 1 b. Theorem 4.1. (Isomorphism of degenerate affine Hecke algebras) There exists a superalgebra isomorphism: given by The inverse map is given by Φ :  = C n B c i c i, a i 2c i b i, s i 1 2 (c i c i+1 )t i. Ψ : c i c i, b i 1 2 c i a i, t i 1 2 (c i+1 c i )s i. Proof. Clearly Φ, Ψ are inverses to each other, once we show that they are algebra homomorphisms. Note that C n CS n is a subalgebra of  and Φ extends the isomorphism established in [Ser, Yam] Φ fin : C n CS n C n T n. This takes care of all the defining relations for the images of Φ or Ψ of the generators which do not involve a i or b i (the verification of these relations can be done directly without difficulty). Among the defining relations involving b i, the most complicated one is Ψ(b i+1 t i + t i b i ) = 1, which is equivalent to the following identity in Â: 1 2 c i+1 a i+1 1 (c i+1 c i )s i + 1 (c i+1 c i )s i c i a i = 1. This can be checked directly using the defining relations (2.6) of Â. The verification of the remaining relations is similar, and will be skipped. An argument similar to the above implies the following.

12 12 WEIQIANG WANG Theorem 4.2. (Isomorphism of DaHa s) There exists a superalgebra isomorphism: Φ : A u = C n Bu given by Φ : y i y i, c i c i, x i 2c i ξ i, s i 1 2 (c i c i+1 )t i. The inverse map is given by Ψ : y i y i, c i c i, ξ i 1 2 c i x i, t i 1 2 (c i+1 c i )s i. Remark 4.3. (1) Recall the intertwining elements φ i and ψ i from Sections 2 and 3. The isomorphism Φ sends φ i to 2(c i c i+1 )ψ i for every i. (2) Recall from Propositions 2.10 and 3.8 that αx i + z i (resp. αξ i + z i ) are the polynomial generators of a degenerate affine Hecke algebra isomorphic to  (resp. B). The Φ sends αxi + z i to 2c i (αξ i + z i ) for each i. This is compatible with the fact that Φ sends a i to 2c i b i. (3) Note also that Φ or Φ sends the JM element M i to 2c i M i, which amounts to check the identity Φ( 1 2 (c i c k )s ik ) = [k, i]. 5. The trigonometric DaHa 5.1. The trigonometric Clifford DaHa. Definition 5.1. The trigonometric Clifford double affine Hecke algebra, or the trigonometric Clifford DaHa, is the algebra A tr u generated by e±ǫ i, ǫ i, c i (1 i n) and S n, subject to the following relations: c 2 i = 1, c ic j = c j c i (i j) e ǫ i e ǫ i = 1, e ǫ i e ǫ j = e ǫ j e ǫ i, ǫ i ǫ j = ǫ j ǫ i, c je ǫ i = e ǫ i c j ( i, j), σe ǫ i = e ǫ σi σ, σc i = c σi σ (σ S n ), c i ǫ i = ǫ i c i, c j ǫ i = ǫ i c j (i j), ǫ i+1 s i s i ǫ i = u(1 c i+1 c i ), ǫ j s i = s i ǫ j (j i, i + 1), [ǫ i, eη ] = u e η e s ki(η) sgn(k i) 1 e (1 c sgn(k i) (ǫ k ǫ i ) ic k )s ki. k i The algebra A tr u admits a natural superalgebra structure with c i being odd and all other generators being even. Note that the subalgebra generated by e ǫ i (1 i n), denoted by C[P], is identified with the group algebra of the weight lattice of type GL n ; the subalgebra generated by e ǫ i (1 i n) and S n is identified with the group algebra of the extended affine Weyl group of type GL n ; for u 0, the subalgebra generated by u 1 ǫ i, c i (1 i n) and S n is identified with the degenerate affine Hecke-Clifford algebra (cf. Sect. 2.3).

13 DOUBLE AFFINE HECKE ALGEBRAS FOR THE SPIN SYMMETRIC GROUP 13 Theorem 5.2. (1) There exists a unique homomorphism of superalgebras ι A : A u A tr u, which is an extension of the identity map on the subalgebra C n CS n such that ι A (y i ) = e ǫ i ( ι A (x i ) = e ǫ i ǫ i u ) (1 c i c k )s ki. k<i Moreover, ι A is injective. (2) The homomorphism ι A extends to an algebra isomorphism C[y ± ] C[y] A u = A tr u. The inverse j A is an extension of the identity map on C n CS n such that j A (e ǫ i ) = y i, j A (ǫ i ) = y ix i + u k<i(1 c i c k )s ki. Proof. The j A and (the extended) ι A are clearly inverses to each other, once we show that they are algebra homomorphisms. Recall from (2.4) that uz i = y i x i + u k<i (1 c ic k )s ki. Let us verify j A ([ǫ i, e ǫ i ]) = [j A (ǫ i ), j A (e ǫ i )] = [uz i, y i ]. By a long but straightforward computation we have that [uz i, y j ] = uy i (1 c i c j )s ij, [uz i, y j ] = uy j (1 c i c j )s ij, [uz i, y i ] = u k>i (i < j), (i > j), y i (1 c i c k )s ki + u k<i(1 c i c k )s ki y i. By another direct computation, we see that the commutator [ǫ i, eǫ j ] are given by exactly the right-hand side of [uz i, y j ] above with y i therein replaced by e ǫ i, for i < j, i = j, or i > j. The verification of other relations are even easier and will be skipped. Remark 5.3. Theorem 5.2 is analogous to the relation between the usual rational DaHa and trigonometric DaHa [Suz]. Proposition 5.4. The PBW property holds for A tr u. That is, the multiplication of the subalgebras gives rise to an isomorphism of vector spaces: C[P] CS n C n C[ǫ 1,..., ǫ n ] = A tr u. Proof. Clearly the multiplication homomorphism is surjective. The injectivity of this homomorphism follows from Theorem 5.2 (2) and the PBW property for A u (and thus for C[y ± ] C[y] A u ). More explicitly, j A sends ǫ i to y i x i plus lower terms. Via j A and with such lower terms ignored, any linear relation among ǫ a σc e y b is translated to the same relation among (yx) a σc e y b. But we know the latter are all linearly independent.

14 14 WEIQIANG WANG 5.2. The trigonometric spin DaHa. Definition 5.5. The trigonometric spin double affine Hecke algebra, or the trigonometric spin DaHa, is the algebra B tr u generated by e ±ǫ i, ζ i (1 i n) and t i (1 i n 1), subject to the relations (3.1) for t i and the following relations: e ǫ i e ǫ i = 1, e ǫ i e ǫ j = e ǫ j e ǫ i, t i e ǫ i = e ǫ i+1 t i, t i e ǫ j = e ǫ j t i (j i, i + 1), ζ i+1 t i + t i ζ i = u, ζ j t i = t i ζ j (j i, i + 1), ζ i ζ j = ζ j ζ i (i j), [ζ i, e η ] = u e η e s ki(η) sgn(k i) [k, i]. 1 e sgn(k i) (ǫ k ǫ i ) k i Note that the algebra B tr u is naturally a superalgebra by declaring e±ǫ i to be even and ζ i and t i to be odd for every i. For u 0, the subalgebra generated by ζ i (1 i n) and T n is identified with the degenerate spin affine Hecke algebra B (cf. Sect. 3.3). Theorem 5.6. (1) There exists a unique homomorphism of superalgebras ι B : B u B tr u, which is an extension of the identity map on the subalgebra T n such that ι B (y i ) = e ǫ i ι B (ξ i ) = e ǫ i ( ζ i u k<i[k, i] Moreover, ι B is injective. (2) The ι B extends to an algebra isomorphism: C[y ± ] C[y] B u = B tr u. The inverse map j B is an extension of the identity map on T n such that j B (e ǫ i ) = y i, j B (ζ i ) = y i ξ i + u k<i[k, i]. ). Proof. Follows from Theorem 4.2 and Theorem 5.2; or one argues directly as for Theorem 5.2. Theorem 5.6 and the PBW Theorem 3.2 for B u immediately imply the following. Corollary 5.7. The PBW property holds for B tr. That is, the multiplication of the subalgebras gives rise to an isomorphism of vector spaces: C[P] T n C[ζ 1,...,ζ n ] = B tr u.

15 DOUBLE AFFINE HECKE ALGEBRAS FOR THE SPIN SYMMETRIC GROUP An algebra isomorphism. Theorem 5.8. There exists a superalgebra isomorphism: given by Φ tr : A tr u = C n B tr u e ǫ i e ǫ i, c i c i, ǫ i 2c i ζ i, s i 1 2 (c i c i+1 )t i. The inverse map is given by e ǫ i e ǫ i, c i c i, ζ i 1 2 c i ǫ i, t i 1 2 (c i+1 c i )s i. Proof. Follows by a direct computation. References [BK] J. Brundan and A. Kleshchev, Hecke-Clifford superalgebras, crystals of type A (2) 2l and modular branching rules for Ŝn, Represent. Theory 5 (2001), (electronic). [Ch] I. Cherednik, Double affine Hecke algebras, London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series 319, Cambridge University Press, [Dr] V. Drinfeld, Degenerate affine Hecke algebras and Yangians, Funct. Anal. Appl. 20 (1986), [Dun] C. Dunkl, Differential-difference operators associated to reflection groups, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 311 (1989), [EG] P. Etingof and V. Ginzburg, Symplectic reflection algebras, Calogero-Moser space, and deformed Harish-Chandra homomorphism, Invent. Math. 147 (2002), [Kle] A. Kleshchev, Linear and projective representations of symmetric groups, Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics 163, Cambridge University Press, [Lu] G. Lusztig, Affine Hecke algebras and their graded version, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 2 (1989), [Naz] M. Nazarov, Young s symmetrizers for projective representations of the symmetric group, Adv. Math. 127 (1997), [RS] A. Ram and A. Shepler, Classification of graded Hecke algebras for complex reflection groups, Comment. Math. Helv. 78 (2003), [Rou] R. Rouquier, Representations of rational Cherednik algebras, In: Infinite-dimensional aspects of representation theory and applications (Charlottesville 2004), Contemp. Math. 392 (2005), [Sai] K. Saito, Extended affine root system I. Coxeter transformations, Publ. Res. Inst. Math. Sci. 21 (1985), [Ser] A. Sergeev, The Howe duality and the projective representations of symmetric groups, Represent. Theory 3 (1999), [Suz] T. Suzuki, Rational and trigonometric degeneration of the double affine Hecke algebra of type A, Int. Math. Res. Not. 37 (2005), [Yam] M. Yamaguchi, A duality of the twisted group algebra of the symmetric group and a Lie superalgebra, J. Algebra 222 (1999), Department of Mathematics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA address: ww9c@virginia.edu