Casimir elements for classical Lie algebras. and affine Kac Moody algebras

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Casimir elements for classical Lie algebras. and affine Kac Moody algebras"

Transcription

1 Casimir elements for classical Lie algebras and affine Kac Moody algebras Alexander Molev University of Sydney

2 Plan of lectures

3 Plan of lectures Casimir elements for the classical Lie algebras from the Schur Weyl duality.

4 Plan of lectures Casimir elements for the classical Lie algebras from the Schur Weyl duality. Affine Kac Moody algebras: center at the critical level.

5 Plan of lectures Casimir elements for the classical Lie algebras from the Schur Weyl duality. Affine Kac Moody algebras: center at the critical level. Affine Harish-Chandra isomorphism and classical W-algebras.

6 Symmetric group S m Let S m denote the group of permutations of the set {1,..., m}.

7 Symmetric group S m Let S m denote the group of permutations of the set {1,..., m}. Let s ab denote the transposition (a, b) for a < b.

8 Symmetric group S m Let S m denote the group of permutations of the set {1,..., m}. Let s ab denote the transposition (a, b) for a < b. The symmetrizer is the element h (m) = 1 s C[S m ]. m! s S m

9 Symmetric group S m Let S m denote the group of permutations of the set {1,..., m}. Let s ab denote the transposition (a, b) for a < b. The symmetrizer is the element h (m) = 1 s C[S m ]. m! s S m The anti-symmetrizer is the element a (m) = 1 sgn s s C[S m ]. m! s S m

10 Fusion formulas

11 Fusion formulas Theorem [Jucys 1966]. The following factorization formulas hold: h (m) = 1 m! 1 a<b m ( 1 + s ) ab, b a

12 Fusion formulas Theorem [Jucys 1966]. The following factorization formulas hold: h (m) = 1 m! 1 a<b m ( 1 + s ) ab, b a a (m) = 1 m! 1 a<b m ( 1 s ) ab, b a

13 Fusion formulas Theorem [Jucys 1966]. The following factorization formulas hold: h (m) = 1 m! 1 a<b m ( 1 + s ) ab, b a a (m) = 1 m! 1 a<b m ( 1 s ) ab, b a where both products are taken in the lexicographical order on the set of pairs (a, b).

14 Action of S m in tensors

15 Action of S m in tensors The symmetric group S m acts in the tensor space by the rule C N... C N }{{} m s a b P a b, 1 a < b m,

16 Action of S m in tensors The symmetric group S m acts in the tensor space by the rule C N... C N }{{} m s a b P a b, 1 a < b m, where P a b is the permutation operator N P a b = 1 (a 1) e i j 1 (b a 1) e j i 1 (m b) i,j=1

17 Action of S m in tensors The symmetric group S m acts in the tensor space by the rule C N... C N }{{} m s a b P a b, 1 a < b m, where P a b is the permutation operator P a b = N 1 (a 1) e i j 1 (b a 1) e j i 1 (m b) i,j=1 and e i j End C N are the matrix units.

18 The symmetrizer and anti-symmetrizer act as the operators H (m) = 1 m! 1 a<b m ( 1 + P ) ab b a

19 The symmetrizer and anti-symmetrizer act as the operators and H (m) = 1 m! A (m) = 1 m! 1 a<b m 1 a<b m ( 1 + P ) ab b a ( 1 P ) ab b a

20 The symmetrizer and anti-symmetrizer act as the operators and H (m) = 1 m! A (m) = 1 m! 1 a<b m 1 a<b m ( 1 + P ) ab b a ( 1 P ) ab b a which we regard as elements of the algebra End (C N ) m = End } C N. {{.. End C N }. m

21 Lie algebra gln

22 Lie algebra gl N We let E ij be the standard basis elements of gl N.

23 Lie algebra gl N We let E ij be the standard basis elements of gl N. The universal enveloping algebra U(gl N ) is the associative algebra generated by the N 2 elements E ij subject to the defining relations E ij E kl E kl E ij = δ kj E il δ il E kl.

24 Lie algebra gl N We let E ij be the standard basis elements of gl N. The universal enveloping algebra U(gl N ) is the associative algebra generated by the N 2 elements E ij subject to the defining relations E ij E kl E kl E ij = δ kj E il δ il E kl. We will combine the generators into the matrix E = [E ij ] which will also be regarded as the element N E = e ij E ij End C N U(gl N ). i,j=1

25 Consider the algebra } End C N. {{.. End C N } U(gl N ) m

26 Consider the algebra } End C N. {{.. End C N } U(gl N ) m and for a = 1,..., m introduce its elements by E a = N 1 (a 1) e ij 1 (m a) E ij. i,j=1

27 Consider the algebra } End C N. {{.. End C N } U(gl N ) m and for a = 1,..., m introduce its elements by E a = N 1 (a 1) e ij 1 (m a) E ij. i,j=1 Note the property P a b E a = E b P a b.

28 Consider the algebra } End C N. {{.. End C N } U(gl N ) m and for a = 1,..., m introduce its elements by E a = N 1 (a 1) e ij 1 (m a) E ij. i,j=1 Note the property P a b E a = E b P a b. Key Lemma. The defining relations of U(gl N ) are equivalent to the single relation E 1 E 2 E 2 E 1 = (E 1 E 2 )P 12.

29 The trace is the linear map End C N C defined by tr : e ij δ ij.

30 The trace is the linear map End C N C defined by tr : e ij δ ij. The partial trace tr a acts on the a-th copy of End C N in End } C N. {{.. End C N } U(gl N ). m

31 The trace is the linear map End C N C defined by tr : e ij δ ij. The partial trace tr a acts on the a-th copy of End C N in End } C N. {{.. End C N } U(gl N ). m Theorem. For any s C[S m ] and u 1,..., u m C the element tr 1,...,m S (u 1 + E 1 )... (u m + E m ) belongs to the center Z(gl N ) of U(gl N ).

32 Proof. Consider the tensor product End C N End (C N ) m U(gl N ) with the copies of the algebra End C N labelled by 0, 1,..., m.

33 Proof. Consider the tensor product End C N End (C N ) m U(gl N ) with the copies of the algebra End C N labelled by 0, 1,..., m. We will show that [ E0, tr 1,...,m S (u 1 + E 1 )... (u m + E m ) ] = 0.

34 Proof. Consider the tensor product End C N End (C N ) m U(gl N ) with the copies of the algebra End C N labelled by 0, 1,..., m. We will show that [ E0, tr 1,...,m S (u 1 + E 1 )... (u m + E m ) ] = 0. By the Key Lemma, [E 0, u a + E a ] = P 0a (u a + E a ) (u a + E a )P 0a, where we used the relations P a b E b = E a P a b.

35 Hence [ E0, S (u 1 + E 1 )... (u m + E m ) ] m = S P 0a (u 1 + E 1 )... (u m + E m ) a=1 m S (u 1 + E 1 )... (u m + E m ) P 0 a, because E 0 S = SE 0 and P 0 a commutes with E b for b a. a=1

36 Hence [ E0, S (u 1 + E 1 )... (u m + E m ) ] m = S P 0a (u 1 + E 1 )... (u m + E m ) a=1 m S (u 1 + E 1 )... (u m + E m ) P 0 a, because E 0 S = SE 0 and P 0 a commutes with E b for b a. a=1 The sum of the permutation operators P 0a commutes with S (the Schur Weyl duality). Applying the trace tr 1,...,m and using its cyclic property we get 0.

37 Example: Capelli determinant.

38 Example: Capelli determinant. Take m = N and introduce the Capelli determinant by C(u) = tr 1,...,N A (N) (u + E 1 )... (u + E N N + 1).

39 Example: Capelli determinant. Take m = N and introduce the Capelli determinant by C(u) = tr 1,...,N A (N) (u + E 1 )... (u + E N N + 1). Then C(u) coincides with the column-determinant u + E 11 E E 1N E C(u) = cdet 21 u + E E 2N.... E N1 E N2... u + E NN N + 1

40 Example: Capelli determinant. Take m = N and introduce the Capelli determinant by C(u) = tr 1,...,N A (N) (u + E 1 )... (u + E N N + 1). Then C(u) coincides with the column-determinant u + E 11 E E 1N E C(u) = cdet 21 u + E E 2N.... E N1 E N2... u + E NN N + 1 All coefficients of the polynomial C(u) are Casimir elements.

41 Indeed, observe that by the Key Lemma ( 1 P ) ab (u + E a a + 1)(u + E b b + 1) b a ( = (u + E b b + 1)(u + E a a + 1) 1 P ) ab. b a

42 Indeed, observe that by the Key Lemma ( 1 P ) ab (u + E a a + 1)(u + E b b + 1) b a ( = (u + E b b + 1)(u + E a a + 1) 1 P ) ab. b a Hence, the fusion formula for A (N) gives A (N) (u+e 1 )... (u+e N N +1) = (u+e N N +1)... (u+e 1 ) A (N)

43 Indeed, observe that by the Key Lemma ( 1 P ) ab (u + E a a + 1)(u + E b b + 1) b a ( = (u + E b b + 1)(u + E a a + 1) 1 P ) ab. b a Hence, the fusion formula for A (N) gives A (N) (u+e 1 )... (u+e N N +1) = (u+e N N +1)... (u+e 1 ) A (N) and that this equals A (N) C(u).

44 Indeed, observe that by the Key Lemma ( 1 P ) ab (u + E a a + 1)(u + E b b + 1) b a ( = (u + E b b + 1)(u + E a a + 1) 1 P ) ab. b a Hence, the fusion formula for A (N) gives A (N) (u+e 1 )... (u+e N N +1) = (u+e N N +1)... (u+e 1 ) A (N) and that this equals A (N) C(u). It remains to note that tr 1,...,N A (N) = 1.

45 Example: Gelfand invariants.

46 Example: Gelfand invariants. Take s = (m m ) in the Theorem. Then S = P m 1 m... P 2 3 P 1 2.

47 Example: Gelfand invariants. Take s = (m m ) in the Theorem. Then S = P m 1 m... P 2 3 P 1 2. We get the Casimir elements (Gelfand invariants): tr 1,...,m S E 1... E m = tr E m.

48 Example: Gelfand invariants. Take s = (m m ) in the Theorem. Then S = P m 1 m... P 2 3 P 1 2. We get the Casimir elements (Gelfand invariants): tr 1,...,m S E 1... E m = tr E m. For instance, for m = 2 we get tr 1,2 P 12 E 1 E 2 = tr 1,2 E 2 P 12 E 2 = tr E 2 because tr 1 P 12 = 1.

49 The Newton identity Theorem [Perelomov Popov, 1966]. We have the identity ( 1) m tr E m C(u + 1) 1 + =. (u N + 1) m+1 C(u) m=0

50 The Newton identity Theorem [Perelomov Popov, 1966]. We have the identity ( 1) m tr E m C(u + 1) 1 + =. (u N + 1) m+1 C(u) Proof. Verify m=0 tr 1,...,N A (N) (u + E 1 )... (u + E N 1 N + 2)(u + E N + 1) = C(u + 1).

51 The Newton identity Theorem [Perelomov Popov, 1966]. We have the identity ( 1) m tr E m C(u + 1) 1 + =. (u N + 1) m+1 C(u) Proof. Verify m=0 tr 1,...,N A (N) (u + E 1 )... (u + E N 1 N + 2)(u + E N + 1) = C(u + 1). Hence, C(u + 1) C(u) = N tr 1,...,N A (N) (u + E 1 )... (u + E N 1 N + 2) = N tr 1,...,N A (N) C(u) (u + E N N + 1) 1.

52 Harish-Chandra isomorphism

53 Harish-Chandra isomorphism Given an N-tuple of complex numbers λ = (λ 1,..., λ N ), the corresponding irreducible highest weight representation L(λ) of the Lie algebra gl N is generated by a nonzero vector ξ L(λ) (the highest vector) such that

54 Harish-Chandra isomorphism Given an N-tuple of complex numbers λ = (λ 1,..., λ N ), the corresponding irreducible highest weight representation L(λ) of the Lie algebra gl N is generated by a nonzero vector ξ L(λ) (the highest vector) such that E ij ξ = 0 for 1 i < j N, and E ii ξ = λ i ξ for 1 i N.

55 Any element z Z(gl N ) acts in L(λ) by multiplying each vector by a scalar χ(z).

56 Any element z Z(gl N ) acts in L(λ) by multiplying each vector by a scalar χ(z). When regarded as a function of the highest weight, χ(z) is a symmetric polynomial in the variables l 1,..., l N, where l i = λ i i + 1.

57 Any element z Z(gl N ) acts in L(λ) by multiplying each vector by a scalar χ(z). When regarded as a function of the highest weight, χ(z) is a symmetric polynomial in the variables l 1,..., l N, where l i = λ i i + 1. The mapping z χ(z) defines an algebra isomorphism χ : Z(gl N ) C[l 1,..., l N ] S N known as the Harish-Chandra isomorphism.

58 Consider the standard triangular decomposition gl N = n h n +.

59 Consider the standard triangular decomposition gl N = n h n +. Then χ can also be defined as the restriction to Z(gl N ) of the Harish-Chandra homomorphism U(gl N ) h U(h)

60 Consider the standard triangular decomposition gl N = n h n +. Then χ can also be defined as the restriction to Z(gl N ) of the Harish-Chandra homomorphism U(gl N ) h U(h) which is the projection of the h-centralizer U(gl N ) h with respect to the direct sum decomposition ) U(gl N ) h = U(h) (U(gl N ) h U(gl N )n +.

61 Example. Under the Harish-Chandra isomorphism we have χ : C(u) (u + l 1 )... (u + l N ), l i = E ii i + 1.

62 Example. Under the Harish-Chandra isomorphism we have χ : C(u) (u + l 1 )... (u + l N ), l i = E ii i + 1. This is immediate from the definition C(u) = σ S N sgn σ (u + E) σ(1)1... (u + E N + 1) σ(n)n.

63 Example. Under the Harish-Chandra isomorphism we have χ : C(u) (u + l 1 )... (u + l N ), l i = E ii i + 1. This is immediate from the definition C(u) = σ S N sgn σ (u + E) σ(1)1... (u + E N + 1) σ(n)n. By the Newton formula, the Harish-Chandra images of the Gelfand invariants are found by 1 + m=0 ( 1) m χ(tr E m ) N (u N + 1) m+1 = i=1 u + l i + 1 u + l i.

64 Let g be a simple Lie algebra of rank n and g = n h n +.

65 Let g be a simple Lie algebra of rank n and g = n h n +. We have the direct sum decomposition ) U(g) h = U(h) (U(g) h U(g)n +

66 Let g be a simple Lie algebra of rank n and g = n h n +. We have the direct sum decomposition ) U(g) h = U(h) (U(g) h U(g)n + and the Harish-Chandra isomorphism χ : Z(g) U(h) W, with a shifted action of W.

67 Let g be a simple Lie algebra of rank n and g = n h n +. We have the direct sum decomposition ) U(g) h = U(h) (U(g) h U(g)n + and the Harish-Chandra isomorphism χ : Z(g) U(h) W, with a shifted action of W. We have Z(g) = C[P 1,..., P n ], for certain algebraically independent invariants P 1,..., P n whose degrees d 1,..., d n are the exponents of g increased by 1.

68 Brauer algebra B m (ω)

69 Brauer algebra B m (ω) Multiplication of m-diagrams (m = 8):

70 Brauer algebra B m (ω) Multiplication of m-diagrams (m = 8):

71 Brauer algebra B m (ω) Multiplication of m-diagrams (m = 8):

72 Brauer algebra B m (ω) Multiplication of m-diagrams (m = 8): = ω

73 The dimension of the Brauer algebra B m (ω) is (2m 1)!!.

74 The dimension of the Brauer algebra B m (ω) is (2m 1)!!. For 1 a < b m denote by s a b and g a b the diagrams 1 a b m and 1 a b m

75 The dimension of the Brauer algebra B m (ω) is (2m 1)!!. For 1 a < b m denote by s a b and g a b the diagrams 1 a b m and 1 a b m The symmetrizer in B m (ω) is the idempotent s (m) such that s a b s (m) = s (m) s a b = s (m) and g a b s (m) = s (m) g a b = 0.

76 Explicitly, s (m) = 1 m! m/2 r=0 ( 1) r ( ω/2 + m 2 r ) 1 d D (r) d, where D (r) B m (ω) denotes the set of diagrams which have exactly r horizontal edges in the top.

77 Explicitly, s (m) = 1 m! m/2 r=0 ( 1) r ( ω/2 + m 2 r ) 1 d D (r) d, where D (r) B m (ω) denotes the set of diagrams which have exactly r horizontal edges in the top. Also, and s (m) = 1 a<b m ( g ) ab 1 h (m), ω + a + b 3

78 Explicitly, s (m) = 1 m! m/2 r=0 ( 1) r ( ω/2 + m 2 r ) 1 d D (r) d, where D (r) B m (ω) denotes the set of diagrams which have exactly r horizontal edges in the top. Also, s (m) = 1 a<b m ( g ) ab 1 h (m), ω + a + b 3 and s (m) = 1 m! 1 a<b m ( 1 + s ab b a g ) ab, ω/2 + b a 1 where the products are in the lexicographic order.

79 Brauer Schur Weyl duality

80 Brauer Schur Weyl duality There are commuting actions of the classical groups in types B, C or D and the Brauer algebra with a specialized parameter ω on the tensor product space C } N. {{.. C N }. m

81 Brauer Schur Weyl duality There are commuting actions of the classical groups in types B, C or D and the Brauer algebra with a specialized parameter ω on the tensor product space The dual pairs are C } N. {{.. C N }. m ( Bm (N), O N )

82 Brauer Schur Weyl duality There are commuting actions of the classical groups in types B, C or D and the Brauer algebra with a specialized parameter ω on the tensor product space The dual pairs are C } N. {{.. C N }. m ( Bm (N), O N ) and ( Bm ( N), Sp N ) with N = 2n.

83 Action in tensors

84 Action in tensors In the case g = o N set ω = N. The generators of B m (N) act in the tensor space by the rule C N... C N }{{} m s a b P a b, g a b Q a b, 1 a < b m,

85 Action in tensors In the case g = o N set ω = N. The generators of B m (N) act in the tensor space by the rule C N... C N }{{} m s a b P a b, g a b Q a b, 1 a < b m, where i = N i + 1 and N Q a b = 1 (a 1) e i j 1 (b a 1) e i j 1 (m b). i,j=1

86 In the case g = sp N with N = 2n set ω = N. The generators of B m ( N) act in the tensor space (C N ) m by s a b P a b, g a b Q a b, 1 a < b m,

87 In the case g = sp N with N = 2n set ω = N. The generators of B m ( N) act in the tensor space (C N ) m by s a b P a b, g a b Q a b, 1 a < b m, with ε i = ε n+i = 1 for i = 1,..., n and N Q a b = ε i ε j 1 (a 1) e i j 1 (b a 1) e i j 1 (m b). i,j=1

88 In the case g = sp N with N = 2n set ω = N. The generators of B m ( N) act in the tensor space (C N ) m by s a b P a b, g a b Q a b, 1 a < b m, with ε i = ε n+i = 1 for i = 1,..., n and N Q a b = ε i ε j 1 (a 1) e i j 1 (b a 1) e i j 1 (m b). i,j=1 In both cases denote by S (m) the image of the symmetrizer s (m) under the action in tensors, S (m) End } C N. {{.. End C N }. m

89 Explicitly, in the orthogonal case S (m) = 1 m! 1 a<b m ( 1 + P ab b a Q ) ab, N/2 + b a 1

90 Explicitly, in the orthogonal case S (m) = 1 m! 1 a<b m ( 1 + P ab b a Q ) ab, N/2 + b a 1 and in the symplectic case S (m) = 1 m! 1 a<b m ( 1 P ab b a Q ) ab. n b + a + 1

91 Explicitly, in the orthogonal case S (m) = 1 m! 1 a<b m ( 1 + P ab b a Q ) ab, N/2 + b a 1 and in the symplectic case S (m) = 1 m! 1 a<b m ( 1 P ab b a Q ) ab. n b + a + 1 Remark. S (n+1) = 0 for g = sp 2n.

92 Explicitly, in the orthogonal case S (m) = 1 m! 1 a<b m ( 1 + P ab b a Q ) ab, N/2 + b a 1 and in the symplectic case S (m) = 1 m! 1 a<b m ( 1 P ab b a Q ) ab. n b + a + 1 Remark. S (n+1) = 0 for g = sp 2n. Consider γ m ( 2n) S (m), γ m (ω) = ω + m 2 N for g = o N ω + 2m 2, ω = 2n for g = sp 2n.

93 Lie algebras on and spn

94 Lie algebras o N and sp N Let g = o N, sp N with N = 2n or N = 2n + 1.

95 Lie algebras o N and sp N Let g = o N, sp N with N = 2n or N = 2n + 1. Set F i j = E i j E j i or F i j = E i j ε i ε j E j i, respectively.

96 Lie algebras o N and sp N Let g = o N, sp N with N = 2n or N = 2n + 1. Set F i j = E i j E j i or F i j = E i j ε i ε j E j i, respectively. Introduce the N N matrix F = [F ij ] N F = e ij F i j End C N U(g). i,j=1

97 Theorem. For any s B m (ω) with ω = ±N and u 1,..., u m C the element tr 1,...,m S (u 1 + F 1 )... (u m + F m ) belongs to the center Z(g) of U(g).

98 Theorem. For any s B m (ω) with ω = ±N and u 1,..., u m C the element tr 1,...,m S (u 1 + F 1 )... (u m + F m ) belongs to the center Z(g) of U(g). In particular, there are analogues of the Capelli determinant and Gelfand invariants.

99 Theorem. For any s B m (ω) with ω = ±N and u 1,..., u m C the element tr 1,...,m S (u 1 + F 1 )... (u m + F m ) belongs to the center Z(g) of U(g). In particular, there are analogues of the Capelli determinant and Gelfand invariants. A version of the Newton identity also holds.

100 Proof of the theorem relies on the matrix form of the defining relations for U(g):

101 Proof of the theorem relies on the matrix form of the defining relations for U(g): F 1 F 2 F 2 F 1 = (P 12 Q 12 ) F 2 F 2 (P 12 Q 12 )

102 Proof of the theorem relies on the matrix form of the defining relations for U(g): F 1 F 2 F 2 F 1 = (P 12 Q 12 ) F 2 F 2 (P 12 Q 12 ) where both sides are regarded as elements of the algebra End C N End C N U(g) and N N F 1 = e ij 1 F ij, F 2 = 1 e ij F ij. i,j=1 i,j=1

103 Theorem. For g = o N the image of the Casimir element γ 2k (N) tr S (2k) (F 1 k)... (F 2k + k 1) under the Harish-Chandra isomorphism is given by

104 Theorem. For g = o N the image of the Casimir element γ 2k (N) tr S (2k) (F 1 k)... (F 2k + k 1) under the Harish-Chandra isomorphism is given by ( l 2 j1 (j 1 1/2) 2)... ( l 2 j k (j k + k 3/2) 2), 1 j 1 j k n where l i = F ii + n i + 1/2 in the case N = 2n + 1; and

105 Theorem. For g = o N the image of the Casimir element γ 2k (N) tr S (2k) (F 1 k)... (F 2k + k 1) under the Harish-Chandra isomorphism is given by ( l 2 j1 (j 1 1/2) 2)... ( l 2 j k (j k + k 3/2) 2), 1 j 1 j k n where l i = F ii + n i + 1/2 in the case N = 2n + 1; and ( l 2 j1 (j 1 1) 2)... ( l 2 j k (j k + k 2) 2), 1 j 1 j k n where l i = F ii + n i in the case N = 2n.

106 Theorem. For g N = sp 2n the image of the Casimir element γ 2k ( 2n) tr S (2k) (F 1 + k)... (F 2k k + 1) under the Harish-Chandra isomorphism is given by

107 Theorem. For g N = sp 2n the image of the Casimir element γ 2k ( 2n) tr S (2k) (F 1 + k)... (F 2k k + 1) under the Harish-Chandra isomorphism is given by ( 1) k 1 j 1 < <j k n ( l 2 j1 j 2 ) ( 1... l 2 jk (j k k + 1) 2), where l i = F ii + n i + 1 for i = 1,..., n.

108 More constructions of Casimir elements for the Lie algebras gl N, o N and sp 2n are known.

109 More constructions of Casimir elements for the Lie algebras gl N, o N and sp 2n are known. In particular, there is a linear basis of Z(gl N ) formed by the quantum immanants S λ with λ running over partitions with at most N parts (Okounkov Olshanski, 1996, 1998).

110 More constructions of Casimir elements for the Lie algebras gl N, o N and sp 2n are known. In particular, there is a linear basis of Z(gl N ) formed by the quantum immanants S λ with λ running over partitions with at most N parts (Okounkov Olshanski, 1996, 1998). The Harish-Chandra images χ(s λ ) are the shifted Schur polynomials.

111 Affine Kac Moody algebras

112 Affine Kac Moody algebras Define an invariant bilinear form on a simple Lie algebra g, X, Y = 1 tr(ad X ad Y), 2h where h is the dual Coxeter number.

113 Affine Kac Moody algebras Define an invariant bilinear form on a simple Lie algebra g, X, Y = 1 tr(ad X ad Y), 2h where h is the dual Coxeter number. For the classical types, X, Y = const tr X Y, N for g = sl N, const = 1 h = N 2 for g = o N, const = 1 2 n + 1 for g = sp 2n, const = 1.

114 The affine Kac Moody algebra ĝ is the central extension ĝ = g[t, t 1 ] CK

115 The affine Kac Moody algebra ĝ is the central extension ĝ = g[t, t 1 ] CK with the commutation relations [ X[r], Y[s] ] = [X, Y][r + s] + r δr, s X, Y K, where X[r] = X t r for any X g and r Z.

116 The affine Kac Moody algebra ĝ is the central extension ĝ = g[t, t 1 ] CK with the commutation relations [ X[r], Y[s] ] = [X, Y][r + s] + r δr, s X, Y K, where X[r] = X t r for any X g and r Z. Problem: What are Casimir elements for ĝ?

117 The universal enveloping algebra at the critical level U h (ĝ) is the quotient of U(ĝ) by the ideal generated by K + h.

118 The universal enveloping algebra at the critical level U h (ĝ) is the quotient of U(ĝ) by the ideal generated by K + h. By [Kac 1974], the canonical quadratic Casimir element belongs to a completion Ũ h (ĝ) of U h (ĝ) with respect to the left ideals I m, m 0, generated by t m g[t].

119 Let Z(ĝ) be the center of the completed algebra Ũ h (ĝ).

120 Let Z(ĝ) be the center of the completed algebra Ũ h (ĝ). Known results: Algebraic structure of Z(ĝ).

121 Let Z(ĝ) be the center of the completed algebra Ũ h (ĝ). Known results: Algebraic structure of Z(ĝ). Explicit generators for classical types A, B, C, D.

122 Let Z(ĝ) be the center of the completed algebra Ũ h (ĝ). Known results: Algebraic structure of Z(ĝ). Explicit generators for classical types A, B, C, D. Questions: Extension to Lie superalgebras.

123 Let Z(ĝ) be the center of the completed algebra Ũ h (ĝ). Known results: Algebraic structure of Z(ĝ). Explicit generators for classical types A, B, C, D. Questions: Extension to Lie superalgebras. Extension to quantum affine algebras.

124 Example: g = gl N. Defining relations for U(ĝl N): E ij [r] E kl [s] E kl [s] E ij [r] ( = δ kj E i l [r + s] δ i l E kj [r + s] + rδ r, s δ kj δ i l δ ij δ ) kl K. N

125 Example: g = gl N. Defining relations for U(ĝl N): E ij [r] E kl [s] E kl [s] E ij [r] ( = δ kj E i l [r + s] δ i l E kj [r + s] + rδ r, s δ kj δ i l δ ij δ ) kl K. N The critical level is K = N.

126 Example: g = gl N. Defining relations for U(ĝl N): E ij [r] E kl [s] E kl [s] E ij [r] ( = δ kj E i l [r + s] δ i l E kj [r + s] + rδ r, s δ kj δ i l δ ij δ ) kl K. N The critical level is K = N. For all r Z the sums N E ii [r] i=1 are Casimir elements.

127 For r Z set C r = N ( i,j=1 s<0 E ij [s] E ji [r s] + s 0 ) E ji [r s] E ij [s].

128 For r Z set C r = N ( i,j=1 s<0 E ij [s] E ji [r s] + s 0 ) E ji [r s] E ij [s]. All C r are Casimir elements at the critical level, they belong to the completed universal enveloping algebra Ũ N (ĝl N).

129 Introduce the (formal) Laurent series E ij (z) = r Z E ij [r] z r 1

130 Introduce the (formal) Laurent series E ij (z) = r Z E ij [r] z r 1 and use the notation E ij (z) + = r<0 E ij [r] z r 1, E ij (z) = r 0 E ij [r] z r 1.

131 Introduce the (formal) Laurent series E ij (z) = r Z E ij [r] z r 1 and use the notation E ij (z) + = r<0 E ij [r] z r 1, E ij (z) = r 0 E ij [r] z r 1. Given two Laurent series a(z) and b(z), their normally ordered product is defined by : a(z)b(z) : = a(z) + b(z) + b(z) a(z).

132 Note C r z r 2 = r Z N i,j=1 (E ij (z) + E ji (z) + E ji (z)e ij (z) ).

133 Note C r z r 2 = r Z N i,j=1 (E ij (z) + E ji (z) + E ji (z)e ij (z) ). Hence, all coefficients of the series tr : E(z) 2 : = N i,j=1 : E ij (z)e ji (z) : are Casimir elements.

134 Similarly, all coefficients of the series tr : E(z) 3 : = N i,j,k=1 : E ij (z) E jk (z) E ki (z) : are Casimir elements, where the normal ordering is applied from right to left.

135 Similarly, all coefficients of the series tr : E(z) 3 : = N i,j,k=1 : E ij (z) E jk (z) E ki (z) : are Casimir elements, where the normal ordering is applied from right to left. However, the claim does not extend to tr : E(z) 4 :!

136 Similarly, all coefficients of the series tr : E(z) 3 : = N i,j,k=1 : E ij (z) E jk (z) E ki (z) : are Casimir elements, where the normal ordering is applied from right to left. However, the claim does not extend to tr : E(z) 4 :! Correction term: all coefficients of the series tr : E(z) 4 : tr : ( z E(z) ) 2 : are Casimir elements.

137 Invariants of the vacuum module

138 Invariants of the vacuum module The vacuum module at the critical level is the ĝ-module V(g) = U h (ĝ)/u h (ĝ)g[t].

139 Invariants of the vacuum module The vacuum module at the critical level is the ĝ-module V(g) = U h (ĝ)/u h (ĝ)g[t]. The Feigin Frenkel center z(ĝ) is the algebra of g[t]-invariants z(ĝ) = {v V(g) g[t]v = 0}.

140 Invariants of the vacuum module The vacuum module at the critical level is the ĝ-module V(g) = U h (ĝ)/u h (ĝ)g[t]. The Feigin Frenkel center z(ĝ) is the algebra of g[t]-invariants z(ĝ) = {v V(g) g[t]v = 0}. Note V(g) = U ( t 1 g[t 1 ] ) as a vector space.

141 Invariants of the vacuum module The vacuum module at the critical level is the ĝ-module V(g) = U h (ĝ)/u h (ĝ)g[t]. The Feigin Frenkel center z(ĝ) is the algebra of g[t]-invariants z(ĝ) = {v V(g) g[t]v = 0}. Note V(g) = U ( t 1 g[t 1 ] ) as a vector space. Hence, z(ĝ) is a subalgebra of U ( t 1 g[t 1 ] ).

142 Properties: The subalgebra z(ĝ) of U ( t 1 g[t 1 ] ) is commutative.

143 Properties: The subalgebra z(ĝ) of U ( t 1 g[t 1 ] ) is commutative. It is invariant with respect to the translation operator T defined as the derivation T = d/dt.

144 Properties: The subalgebra z(ĝ) of U ( t 1 g[t 1 ] ) is commutative. It is invariant with respect to the translation operator T defined as the derivation T = d/dt. Any element of z(ĝ) is called a Segal Sugawara vector.

145 Theorem (Feigin Frenkel, 1992, Frenkel, 2007). There exist Segal Sugawara vectors S 1,..., S n U ( t 1 g[t 1 ] ), n = rank g, such that

146 Theorem (Feigin Frenkel, 1992, Frenkel, 2007). There exist Segal Sugawara vectors S 1,..., S n U ( t 1 g[t 1 ] ), n = rank g, such that z(ĝ) = C[T k S l l = 1,..., n, k 0].

147 Theorem (Feigin Frenkel, 1992, Frenkel, 2007). There exist Segal Sugawara vectors S 1,..., S n U ( t 1 g[t 1 ] ), n = rank g, such that z(ĝ) = C[T k S l l = 1,..., n, k 0]. We call S 1,..., S n a complete set of Segal Sugawara vectors.

148 Theorem (Feigin Frenkel, 1992, Frenkel, 2007). There exist Segal Sugawara vectors S 1,..., S n U ( t 1 g[t 1 ] ), n = rank g, such that z(ĝ) = C[T k S l l = 1,..., n, k 0]. We call S 1,..., S n a complete set of Segal Sugawara vectors. Explicit constructions of such sets and a new proof of the theorem for the classical types A, B, C, D: [Chervov Talalaev, 2006, Chervov M., 2009, M. 2013].

149 Example: g = gl N.

150 Example: g = gl N. Set τ = d/dt and consider the N N matrix τ + E 11 [ 1] E 12 [ 1]... E 1N [ 1] E τ + E[ 1] = 21 [ 1] τ + E 22 [ 1]... E 2N [ 1] E N1 [ 1] E N2 [ 1]... τ + E NN [ 1]

151 The coefficients φ 1,..., φ N of the polynomial cdet ( τ + E[ 1] ) = τ N + φ 1 τ N φ N 1 τ + φ N form a complete set of Segal Sugawara vectors.

152 The coefficients φ 1,..., φ N of the polynomial cdet ( τ + E[ 1] ) = τ N + φ 1 τ N φ N 1 τ + φ N form a complete set of Segal Sugawara vectors. For N = 2 cdet ( τ + E[ 1] ) = ( τ + E 11 [ 1] )( τ + E 22 [ 1] ) E 21 [ 1]E 12 [ 1] = τ 2 + φ 1 τ + φ 2

153 The coefficients φ 1,..., φ N of the polynomial cdet ( τ + E[ 1] ) = τ N + φ 1 τ N φ N 1 τ + φ N form a complete set of Segal Sugawara vectors. For N = 2 cdet ( τ + E[ 1] ) = ( τ + E 11 [ 1] )( τ + E 22 [ 1] ) E 21 [ 1]E 12 [ 1] = τ 2 + φ 1 τ + φ 2 with φ 1 = E 11 [ 1] + E 22 [ 1], φ 2 = E 11 [ 1] E 22 [ 1] E 21 [ 1] E 12 [ 1] + E 22 [ 2].

154 To get another family of Segal Sugawara vectors, expand tr ( τ + E[ 1] ) m = θm 0 τ m + θ m1 τ m θ m m

155 To get another family of Segal Sugawara vectors, expand tr ( τ + E[ 1] ) m = θm 0 τ m + θ m1 τ m θ m m All coefficients θ m i belong to the Feigin Frenkel center z(ĝl N).

156 To get another family of Segal Sugawara vectors, expand tr ( τ + E[ 1] ) m = θm 0 τ m + θ m1 τ m θ m m All coefficients θ m i belong to the Feigin Frenkel center z(ĝl N). The elements θ 1 1,..., θ N N form a complete set of Segal Sugawara vectors.

157 To get another family of Segal Sugawara vectors, expand tr ( τ + E[ 1] ) m = θm 0 τ m + θ m1 τ m θ m m All coefficients θ m i belong to the Feigin Frenkel center z(ĝl N). The elements θ 1 1,..., θ N N form a complete set of Segal Sugawara vectors. The following are Segal Sugawara vectors for gl N : tr E[ 1], tr E[ 1] 2, tr E[ 1] 3, tr E[ 1] 4 tr E[ 2] 2.

158 The corresponding central elements in Ũ N (ĝl N) are recovered by the state-field correspondence map Y which takes elements of the vacuum module V(gl N ) to Laurent series in z;

159 The corresponding central elements in Ũ N (ĝl N) are recovered by the state-field correspondence map Y which takes elements of the vacuum module V(gl N ) to Laurent series in z; its application to Segal Sugawara vectors yields Laurent series whose coefficients are Casimir elements.

160 The corresponding central elements in Ũ N (ĝl N) are recovered by the state-field correspondence map Y which takes elements of the vacuum module V(gl N ) to Laurent series in z; its application to Segal Sugawara vectors yields Laurent series whose coefficients are Casimir elements. By definition, Y : E ij [ 1] E ij (z) = r Z E ij [r] z r 1.

161 Also, Y : E ij [ r 1] 1 r! r z E ij (z), r 0,

162 Also, Y : E ij [ r 1] 1 r! r z E ij (z), r 0, and Y : E ij [ 1] E kl [ 1] : E ij (z) E kl (z) :

163 Also, Y : E ij [ r 1] 1 r! r z E ij (z), r 0, and Y : E ij [ 1] E kl [ 1] : E ij (z) E kl (z) : We have Y : tr E[ 1] tr E(z) Y : tr E[ 1] 2 tr : E(z) 2 : Y : tr E[ 1] 3 tr : E(z) 3 : Y : tr E[ 1] 4 tr E[ 2] 2 tr : E(z) 4 : tr : ( z E(z) ) 2 :

164 Write tr : ( z + E(z) ) m : = θm0 (z) m z + + θ m m (z).

165 Write tr : ( z + E(z) ) m : = θm0 (z) m z + + θ m m (z). Theorem. The coefficients of the Laurent series θ 1 1 (z),..., θ N N (z) are topological generators of the center of Ũ N (ĝl N).

166 Write tr : ( z + E(z) ) m : = θm0 (z) m z + + θ m m (z). Theorem. The coefficients of the Laurent series θ 1 1 (z),..., θ N N (z) are topological generators of the center of Ũ N (ĝl N). Remark. The theorem holds in the same form for any complete set of Segal Sugawara vectors.

167 Proving the Feigin Frenkel theorem for the classical types:

168 Proving the Feigin Frenkel theorem for the classical types: Produce Segal Sugawara vectors S 1,..., S n explicitly.

169 Proving the Feigin Frenkel theorem for the classical types: Produce Segal Sugawara vectors S 1,..., S n explicitly. Show that all elements T k S l with l = 1,..., n and k 0 are algebraically independent and generate z(ĝ).

170 Proving the Feigin Frenkel theorem for the classical types: Produce Segal Sugawara vectors S 1,..., S n explicitly. Show that all elements T k S l with l = 1,..., n and k 0 are algebraically independent and generate z(ĝ). Use the classical limit: gr U ( t 1 g[t 1 ] ) = S ( t 1 g[t 1 ] )

171 Proving the Feigin Frenkel theorem for the classical types: Produce Segal Sugawara vectors S 1,..., S n explicitly. Show that all elements T k S l with l = 1,..., n and k 0 are algebraically independent and generate z(ĝ). Use the classical limit: gr U ( t 1 g[t 1 ] ) = S ( t 1 g[t 1 ] ) which yields a g[t]-module structure on the symmetric algebra S ( t 1 g[t 1 ] ) = S ( g[t, t 1 ]/g[t] ).

172 Let X 1,..., X d be a basis of g and let P = P(X 1,..., X d ) be a g-invariant in the symmetric algebra S(g).

173 Let X 1,..., X d be a basis of g and let P = P(X 1,..., X d ) be a g-invariant in the symmetric algebra S(g). Then each element P (r) = T r P ( X 1 [ 1],..., X d [ 1] ), r 0, is a g[t]-invariant in the symmetric algebra S ( t 1 g[t 1 ] ).

174 Let X 1,..., X d be a basis of g and let P = P(X 1,..., X d ) be a g-invariant in the symmetric algebra S(g). Then each element P (r) = T r P ( X 1 [ 1],..., X d [ 1] ), r 0, is a g[t]-invariant in the symmetric algebra S ( t 1 g[t 1 ] ). Theorem (Raïs Tauvel 1992, Beilinson Drinfeld 1997). If P 1,..., P n are algebraically independent generators of S(g) g, then the elements P 1,(r),..., P n,(r) with r 0 are algebraically independent generators of S ( t 1 g[t 1 ] ) g[t].

175 Explicit generators of z(ĝ). Type A

176 Explicit generators of z(ĝ). Type A Set E ij [r] = E ij t r gl N [t, t 1 ]

177 Explicit generators of z(ĝ). Type A Set and E ij [r] = E ij t r gl N [t, t 1 ] N E[r] = e ij E ij [r] End C N U ( gl N [t, t 1 ] ). i,j=1

178 Explicit generators of z(ĝ). Type A Set E ij [r] = E ij t r gl N [t, t 1 ] and E[r] = N e ij E ij [r] End C N U ( gl N [t, t 1 ] ). i,j=1 Consider the algebra } End C N. {{.. End C N } U ( gl N [t, t 1 ] ) m

179 Explicit generators of z(ĝ). Type A Set E ij [r] = E ij t r gl N [t, t 1 ] and E[r] = N e ij E ij [r] End C N U ( gl N [t, t 1 ] ). i,j=1 Consider the algebra } End C N. {{.. End C N } U ( gl N [t, t 1 ] ) m and recall its elements H (m) and A (m).

180 Theorem. All coefficients of the polynomials in τ = d/d t

181 Theorem. All coefficients of the polynomials in τ = d/d t tr 1,...,m A (m)( ) ( ) τ + E[ 1] 1... τ + E[ 1]m = φ m 0 τ m + φ m1 τ m φ m m, tr 1,...,m H (m)( ) ( ) τ + E[ 1] 1... τ + E[ 1]m = ψ m 0 τ m + ψ m1 τ m ψ m m, and tr (τ + E[ 1]) m = θ m 0 τ m + θ m 1 τ m θ m m

182 Theorem. All coefficients of the polynomials in τ = d/d t tr 1,...,m A (m)( ) ( ) τ + E[ 1] 1... τ + E[ 1]m = φ m 0 τ m + φ m1 τ m φ m m, tr 1,...,m H (m)( ) ( ) τ + E[ 1] 1... τ + E[ 1]m = ψ m 0 τ m + ψ m1 τ m ψ m m, and tr (τ + E[ 1]) m = θ m 0 τ m + θ m 1 τ m θ m m belong to the Feigin Frenkel center z(ĝl N).

183 Proof. Use the matrix form of the defining relations of U N (ĝl N):

184 Proof. Use the matrix form of the defining relations of U N (ĝl N): For any r Z set N E[r] = e ij E ij [r] End C N U N (ĝl N). i,j=1

185 Proof. Use the matrix form of the defining relations of U N (ĝl N): For any r Z set N E[r] = e ij E ij [r] End C N U N (ĝl N). i,j=1 The defining relations can be written in the form E[r] 1 E[s] 2 E[s] 2 E[r] 1 = ( E[r + s] 1 E[r + s] 2 ) P12 + rδ r, s ( 1 N P12 ).

186 The required relations in the vacuum module are E[0] 0 tr 1,...,m A (m)( τ + E[ 1] 1 )... ( τ + E[ 1]m ) = 0

187 The required relations in the vacuum module are E[0] 0 tr 1,...,m A (m)( τ + E[ 1] 1 )... ( τ + E[ 1]m ) = 0 and E[1] 0 tr 1,...,m A (m)( τ + E[ 1] 1 )... ( τ + E[ 1]m ) = 0.

188 The required relations in the vacuum module are E[0] 0 tr 1,...,m A (m)( τ + E[ 1] 1 )... ( τ + E[ 1]m ) = 0 and E[1] 0 tr 1,...,m A (m)( τ + E[ 1] 1 )... ( τ + E[ 1]m ) = 0. The elements ψ m a and θ m a are expressed in terms of the φ m a through the MacMahon Master Theorem and the Newton identities, respectively.

189 The coefficients of the column-determinant are related to the φ m a through the relation cdet ( τ + E[ 1] ) = tr 1,...,N A (N) ( τ + E[ 1] 1 )... ( τ + E[ 1]N ).

190 The coefficients of the column-determinant are related to the φ m a through the relation cdet ( τ + E[ 1] ) = tr 1,...,N A (N) ( τ + E[ 1] 1 )... ( τ + E[ 1]N ). This follows from the property A (N) ( τ + E[ 1] 1 )... ( τ + E[ 1]N ) = A (N) ( τ + E[ 1] 1 )... ( τ + E[ 1]N ) A (N),

191 The coefficients of the column-determinant are related to the φ m a through the relation cdet ( τ + E[ 1] ) = tr 1,...,N A (N) ( τ + E[ 1] 1 )... ( τ + E[ 1]N ). This follows from the property A (N) ( τ + E[ 1] 1 )... ( τ + E[ 1]N ) = A (N) ( τ + E[ 1] 1 )... ( τ + E[ 1]N ) A (N), implied by the fact that τ + E[ 1] is a Manin matrix.

192 Types B, C and D

193 Types B, C and D Recall the symmetrizers associated with o N and sp 2n : S (m) = 1 m! 1 a<b m ( 1 + P ab b a Q ) ab, N/2 + b a 1

194 Types B, C and D Recall the symmetrizers associated with o N and sp 2n : and S (m) = 1 m! S (m) = 1 m! 1 a<b m 1 a<b m ( 1 + P ab b a Q ) ab, N/2 + b a 1 ( 1 P ab b a Q ) ab. n b + a + 1

195 Types B, C and D Recall the symmetrizers associated with o N and sp 2n : and S (m) = 1 m! S (m) = 1 m! 1 a<b m 1 a<b m ( 1 + P ab b a Q ) ab, N/2 + b a 1 ( 1 P ab b a Q ) ab. n b + a + 1 Also, γ m (ω) = ω + m 2 N for g = o N ω + 2m 2, ω = 2n for g = sp 2n.

196 Let g = o N, sp N with N = 2n or N = 2n + 1.

197 Let g = o N, sp N with N = 2n or N = 2n + 1. As before, F i j = E i j E j i or F i j = E i j ε i ε j E j i

198 Let g = o N, sp N with N = 2n or N = 2n + 1. As before, F i j = E i j E j i or F i j = E i j ε i ε j E j i and F i j [r] = F i j t r g[t, t 1 ].

199 Let g = o N, sp N with N = 2n or N = 2n + 1. As before, F i j = E i j E j i or F i j = E i j ε i ε j E j i and F i j [r] = F i j t r g[t, t 1 ]. Combine into a matrix N F[r] = e ij F i j [r] End C N U ( g[t, t 1 ] ). i,j=1

200 Theorem. All coefficients of the polynomial in τ = d/d t γ m (ω) tr 1,...,m S (m)( τ + F[ 1] 1 )... ( τ + F[ 1]m ) = φ m 0 τ m + φ m1 τ m φ m m

201 Theorem. All coefficients of the polynomial in τ = d/d t γ m (ω) tr 1,...,m S (m)( τ + F[ 1] 1 )... ( τ + F[ 1]m ) = φ m 0 τ m + φ m1 τ m φ m m belong to the Feigin Frenkel center z(ĝ).

202 Theorem. All coefficients of the polynomial in τ = d/d t γ m (ω) tr 1,...,m S (m)( τ + F[ 1] 1 )... ( τ + F[ 1]m ) = φ m 0 τ m + φ m1 τ m φ m m belong to the Feigin Frenkel center z(ĝ). In addition, in the case g = o 2n, the Pfaffian Pf F[ 1] = 1 2 n n! belongs to z(ô 2n ). σ S 2n sgn σ F σ(1) σ(2) [ 1]... F σ(2n 1) σ(2n) [ 1]

203 Moreover, φ 2 2, φ 4 4,..., φ 2n 2n is a complete set of Segal Sugawara vectors for o 2n+1 and sp 2n, whereas

204 Moreover, φ 2 2, φ 4 4,..., φ 2n 2n is a complete set of Segal Sugawara vectors for o 2n+1 and sp 2n, whereas φ 2 2, φ 4 4,..., φ 2n 2 2n 2, φ n is a complete set of Segal Sugawara vectors for o 2n, where φ n = Pf F[ 1].

205 Affine Harish-Chandra isomorphism For a triangular decomposition g = n h n + consider the Harish-Chandra homomorphism U ( t 1 g[t 1 ] ) h U ( t 1 h[t 1 ] ),

206 Affine Harish-Chandra isomorphism For a triangular decomposition g = n h n + consider the Harish-Chandra homomorphism U ( t 1 g[t 1 ] ) h U ( t 1 h[t 1 ] ), the projection modulo the left ideal generated by t 1 n [t 1 ].

207 The restriction to z(ĝ) yields the Harish-Chandra isomorphism f : z(ĝ) W( L g),

208 The restriction to z(ĝ) yields the Harish-Chandra isomorphism f : z(ĝ) W( L g), where W( L g) is the classical W-algebra associated with the Langlands dual Lie algebra L g [Feigin and Frenkel, 1992].

209 Example g = gl N. Set µ i [r] = E i i [r]. We have f : cdet ( τ + E[ 1] ) ( τ + µ N [ 1] )... ( τ + µ 1 [ 1] ).

210 Example g = gl N. Set µ i [r] = E i i [r]. We have f : cdet ( τ + E[ 1] ) ( τ + µ N [ 1] )... ( τ + µ 1 [ 1] ). Define the elements E 1,..., E N by the Miura transformation ( τ + µn [ 1] )... ( τ + µ 1 [ 1] ) = τ N + E 1 τ N E N.

211 Example g = gl N. Set µ i [r] = E i i [r]. We have f : cdet ( τ + E[ 1] ) ( τ + µ N [ 1] )... ( τ + µ 1 [ 1] ). Define the elements E 1,..., E N by the Miura transformation ( τ + µn [ 1] )... ( τ + µ 1 [ 1] ) = τ N + E 1 τ N E N. Explicitly, E m = e m ( T + µ1 [ 1],..., T + µ N [ 1] ) 1 is the noncommutative elementary symmetric function, e m (x 1,..., x p ) = i 1 > >i m x i1... x im.

212 If N = 2 then E 1 = µ 1 [ 1] + µ 2 [ 1], E 2 = µ 1 [ 1] µ 2 [ 1] + µ 1 [ 2].

213 If N = 2 then E 1 = µ 1 [ 1] + µ 2 [ 1], E 2 = µ 1 [ 1] µ 2 [ 1] + µ 1 [ 2]. If N = 3 then E 1 = µ 1 [ 1] + µ 2 [ 1] + µ 3 [ 1], E 2 = µ 1 [ 1] µ 2 [ 1] + µ 1 [ 1] µ 3 [ 1] + µ 2 [ 1] µ 3 [ 1] + 2 µ 1 [ 2] + µ 2 [ 2], E 3 = µ 1 [ 1] µ 2 [ 1] µ 3 [ 1] + µ 1 [ 2] µ 2 [ 1] + µ 1 [ 2] µ 3 [ 1] + µ 1 [ 1] µ 2 [ 2] + 2 µ 1 [ 3].

214 Then W(gl N ) = C[T k E 1,..., T k E N k 0].

215 Then W(gl N ) = C[T k E 1,..., T k E N k 0]. Also, W(gl N ) = C[T k H 1,..., T k H N k 0],

216 Then W(gl N ) = C[T k E 1,..., T k E N k 0]. Also, W(gl N ) = C[T k H 1,..., T k H N k 0], where ( H m = h m T + µ1 [ 1],..., T + µ N [ 1] ) 1 is the noncommutative complete symmetric function, h m (x 1,..., x p ) = i 1 i m x i1... x im.

217 Example g = o N. Set µ i [r] = F i i [r].

218 Example g = o N. Set µ i [r] = F i i [r]. The Harish-Chandra image of the polynomial γ m (N) tr S (m)( τ + F[ 1] 1 )... ( τ + F[ 1]m ) equals

219 Example g = o N. Set µ i [r] = F i i [r]. The Harish-Chandra image of the polynomial γ m (N) tr S (m)( τ + F[ 1] 1 )... ( τ + F[ 1]m ) equals h m ( τ + µ1 [ 1],..., τ + µ n [ 1], τ µ n [ 1],..., τ µ 1 [ 1] )

220 Example g = o N. Set µ i [r] = F i i [r]. The Harish-Chandra image of the polynomial γ m (N) tr S (m)( τ + F[ 1] 1 )... ( τ + F[ 1]m ) equals h m ( τ + µ1 [ 1],..., τ + µ n [ 1], τ µ n [ 1],..., τ µ 1 [ 1] ) for N = 2n + 1.

221 For the Lie algebra g = o 2n the image is 1 2 h ( m τ + µ1 [ 1],..., τ + µ n 1 [ 1], τ µ n [ 1],..., τ µ 1 [ 1] ) h m( τ + µ1 [ 1],..., τ + µ n [ 1], τ µ n 1 [ 1],..., τ µ 1 [ 1] ).

222 For the Lie algebra g = o 2n the image is 1 2 h ( m τ + µ1 [ 1],..., τ + µ n 1 [ 1], τ µ n [ 1],..., τ µ 1 [ 1] ) h m( τ + µ1 [ 1],..., τ + µ n [ 1], τ µ n 1 [ 1],..., τ µ 1 [ 1] ). The Harish-Chandra image of the Pfaffian Pf F[ 1] = 1 2 n n! is found by σ S 2n sgn σ F σ(1) σ(2) [ 1]... F σ(2n 1) σ(2n) [ 1]

223 For the Lie algebra g = o 2n the image is 1 2 h ( m τ + µ1 [ 1],..., τ + µ n 1 [ 1], τ µ n [ 1],..., τ µ 1 [ 1] ) h m( τ + µ1 [ 1],..., τ + µ n [ 1], τ µ n 1 [ 1],..., τ µ 1 [ 1] ). The Harish-Chandra image of the Pfaffian Pf F[ 1] = 1 2 n n! is found by σ S 2n sgn σ F σ(1) σ(2) [ 1]... F σ(2n 1) σ(2n) [ 1] Pf F[ 1] ( µ 1 [ 1] T )... ( µ n [ 1] T ) 1.

224 Example g = sp 2n. Set µ i [r] = F i i [r].

225 Example g = sp 2n. Set µ i [r] = F i i [r]. The Harish-Chandra image of the polynomial γ m ( 2n) tr S (m)( τ + F[ 1] 1 )... ( τ + F[ 1]m ) with 1 m 2n + 1 equals

226 Example g = sp 2n. Set µ i [r] = F i i [r]. The Harish-Chandra image of the polynomial γ m ( 2n) tr S (m)( ) ( ) τ + F[ 1] 1... τ + F[ 1]m with 1 m 2n + 1 equals ( e m τ + µ1 [ 1],..., τ + µ n [ 1], τ, τ µ n [ 1],..., τ µ 1 [ 1] ).

227 Example g = sp 2n. Set µ i [r] = F i i [r]. The Harish-Chandra image of the polynomial γ m ( 2n) tr S (m)( ) ( ) τ + F[ 1] 1... τ + F[ 1]m with 1 m 2n + 1 equals ( e m τ + µ1 [ 1],..., τ + µ n [ 1], τ, τ µ n [ 1],..., τ µ 1 [ 1] ). Miura transformation for o 2n+1 [Drinfeld Sokolov 1985]: ( τ µ1 [ 1] )... ( τ µ n [ 1] ) τ ( τ + µ n [ 1] )... ( τ + µ 1 [ 1] ) = τ 2n+1 + E 2 τ 2n 1 + E 3 τ 2n E 2n+1.

228 Classical W-algebras

229 Classical W-algebras Let µ 1,..., µ n be a basis of the Cartan subalgebra h of g.

230 Classical W-algebras Let µ 1,..., µ n be a basis of the Cartan subalgebra h of g. Set µ i [r] = µ i t r and identify U ( t 1 h[t 1 ] ) = C [ µ 1 [r],..., µ n [r] r < 0 ] =: P n.

231 Classical W-algebras Let µ 1,..., µ n be a basis of the Cartan subalgebra h of g. Set µ i [r] = µ i t r and identify U ( t 1 h[t 1 ] ) = C [ µ 1 [r],..., µ n [r] r < 0 ] =: P n. The classical W-algebra W(g) is defined by W(g) = {P P n V i P = 0, i = 1,..., n},

232 Classical W-algebras Let µ 1,..., µ n be a basis of the Cartan subalgebra h of g. Set µ i [r] = µ i t r and identify U ( t 1 h[t 1 ] ) = C [ µ 1 [r],..., µ n [r] r < 0 ] =: P n. The classical W-algebra W(g) is defined by W(g) = {P P n V i P = 0, i = 1,..., n}, the V i are the screening operators.

233 Example. For W(gl N ) the operators V 1,..., V N 1 are

234 Example. For W(gl N ) the operators V 1,..., V N 1 are V i = ( V i (r) µ i [ r 1] ), µ i+1 [ r 1] r=0

235 Example. For W(gl N ) the operators V 1,..., V N 1 are V i = ( V i (r) µ i [ r 1] ), µ i+1 [ r 1] r=0 V i (r) z r = exp r=0 m=1 µ i [ m] µ i+1 [ m] m z m.

236 Example. For W(gl N ) the operators V 1,..., V N 1 are V i = ( V i (r) µ i [ r 1] ), µ i+1 [ r 1] r=0 V i (r) z r = exp r=0 m=1 µ i [ m] µ i+1 [ m] m z m. One verifies directly that V i ( τ + µn [ 1] )... ( τ + µ 1 [ 1] ) = 0.

237 Equivalently, V i : µ i (z) exp (µi (z) µ i+1 (z) ) dz, V i : µ i+1 (z) exp (µi (z) µ i+1 (z) ) dz,

238 Equivalently, V i : µ i (z) exp (µi (z) µ i+1 (z) ) dz, V i : µ i+1 (z) exp (µi (z) µ i+1 (z) ) dz, and V i : µ j (z) 0 for j i, i + 1,

239 Equivalently, V i : µ i (z) exp (µi (z) µ i+1 (z) ) dz, V i : µ i+1 (z) exp (µi (z) µ i+1 (z) ) dz, and V i : µ j (z) 0 for j i, i + 1, where µ i (z) = µ i [ r 1] z r, i = 1,..., N. r=0

240 Affine Poisson vertex algebra V(g) Let g be a simple Lie algebra over C and let X 1,..., X d be a basis of g.

241 Affine Poisson vertex algebra V(g) Let g be a simple Lie algebra over C and let X 1,..., X d be a basis of g. Consider the differential algebra V = V(g), V = C[X (r) 1,..., X(r) d r = 0, 1, 2,... ] with X (0) i = X i,

242 Affine Poisson vertex algebra V(g) Let g be a simple Lie algebra over C and let X 1,..., X d be a basis of g. Consider the differential algebra V = V(g), V = C[X (r) 1,..., X(r) d r = 0, 1, 2,... ] with X (0) i = X i, equipped with the derivation, (X (r) i ) = X (r+1) i for all i = 1,..., d and r 0.

243 Introduce the λ-bracket on V as a linear map V V C[λ] V, a b {a λ b}.

244 Introduce the λ-bracket on V as a linear map V V C[λ] V, a b {a λ b}. By definition, it is given by {X λ Y} = [X, Y] + X, Y λ for X, Y g,

245 Introduce the λ-bracket on V as a linear map V V C[λ] V, a b {a λ b}. By definition, it is given by {X λ Y} = [X, Y] + X, Y λ for X, Y g, and extended to V by sesquilinearity (a, b V): { a λ b} = λ {a λ b},

246 Introduce the λ-bracket on V as a linear map V V C[λ] V, a b {a λ b}. By definition, it is given by {X λ Y} = [X, Y] + X, Y λ for X, Y g, and extended to V by sesquilinearity (a, b V): { a λ b} = λ {a λ b}, skewsymmetry {a λ b} = {b λ a},

247 Introduce the λ-bracket on V as a linear map V V C[λ] V, a b {a λ b}. By definition, it is given by {X λ Y} = [X, Y] + X, Y λ for X, Y g, and extended to V by sesquilinearity (a, b V): { a λ b} = λ {a λ b}, skewsymmetry {a λ b} = {b λ a}, and the Leibniz rule (a, b, c V): {a λ bc} = {a λ b}c + {a λ c}b.

248 Hamiltonian reduction

249 Hamiltonian reduction For a triangular decomposition g = n h n + set p = n h and define the projection π p : g p.

250 Hamiltonian reduction For a triangular decomposition g = n h n + set p = n h and define the projection π p : g p. Let f n be a principal nilpotent in g.

251 Hamiltonian reduction For a triangular decomposition g = n h n + set p = n h and define the projection π p : g p. Let f n be a principal nilpotent in g. Define the differential algebra homomorphism ρ : V V(p), ρ(x) = π p (X) + f, X, X g.

252 Hamiltonian reduction For a triangular decomposition g = n h n + set p = n h and define the projection π p : g p. Let f n be a principal nilpotent in g. Define the differential algebra homomorphism ρ : V V(p), ρ(x) = π p (X) + f, X, X g. The classical W-algebra W(g) is defined by W(g) = {P V(p) ρ{x λ P} = 0 for all X n + }.

253 The classical W-algebra W(g) is a Poisson vertex algebra equipped with the λ-bracket {a λ b} ρ = ρ{a λ b}, a, b W(g).

254 The classical W-algebra W(g) is a Poisson vertex algebra equipped with the λ-bracket {a λ b} ρ = ρ{a λ b}, a, b W(g). Motivation: Hamiltonian equations u t = {H λ u} λ=0 for u = u(t) W(g) with the Hamiltonian H W(g).

255 The classical W-algebra W(g) is a Poisson vertex algebra equipped with the λ-bracket {a λ b} ρ = ρ{a λ b}, a, b W(g). Motivation: Hamiltonian equations u t = {H λ u} λ=0 for u = u(t) W(g) with the Hamiltonian H W(g). De Sole, Kac and Valeri, ; Drinfeld and Sokolov, 1985.

256 Example. Let g = sl 2 with the basis e, f, h.

257 Example. Let g = sl 2 with the basis e, f, h. W(sl 2 ) = C[u, u, u,... ], u = h h 2 + f V(p).

258 Example. Let g = sl 2 with the basis e, f, h. W(sl 2 ) = C[u, u, u,... ], u = h h 2 + f V(p). The λ-bracket (of Virasoro Magri) on W(sl 2 ) is given by {u λ u} = (2λ + )u λ3 2.

259 Example. Let g = sl 2 with the basis e, f, h. W(sl 2 ) = C[u, u, u,... ], u = h h 2 + f V(p). The λ-bracket (of Virasoro Magri) on W(sl 2 ) is given by {u λ u} = (2λ + )u λ3 2. The Hamiltonian equation with H = u2 is equivalent to 2 the KdV equation u t = 3uu 1 2 u.

260 Another λ-bracket (of Gardner Faddeev Zakharov) on W(sl 2 ) is given by {u λ u} 0 = λ.

261 Another λ-bracket (of Gardner Faddeev Zakharov) on W(sl 2 ) is given by {u λ u} 0 = λ. The Hamiltonian equation with K = 1 2 u3 1 4 u u is also equivalent to the KdV equation.

262 Generators of W(gl N ) Consider gl N = span of {E ij i, j = 1,..., N}. Here p is the subalgebra of lower triangular matrices.

263 Generators of W(gl N ) Consider gl N = span of {E ij i, j = 1,..., N}. Here p is the subalgebra of lower triangular matrices. Set f = E E E N N 1.

264 Generators of W(gl N ) Consider gl N = span of {E ij i, j = 1,..., N}. Here p is the subalgebra of lower triangular matrices. Set f = E E E N N 1. We will work with the algebra V(p) C[ ], E (r) ij E (r) ij = E (r+1) ij.

265 Generators of W(gl N ) Consider gl N = span of {E ij i, j = 1,..., N}. Here p is the subalgebra of lower triangular matrices. Set f = E E E N N 1. We will work with the algebra V(p) C[ ], E (r) ij E (r) ij = E (r+1) ij. The invariant symmetric bilinear form on gl N is defined by X, Y = tr XY, X, Y gl N.

266 Expand the determinant with entries in V(p) C[ ], + E E 21 + E det E N 1 1 E N 1 2 E N E N 1 E N 2 E N E N N = N + w 1 N w N.

267 Expand the determinant with entries in V(p) C[ ], + E E 21 + E det E N 1 1 E N 1 2 E N E N 1 E N 2 E N E N N = N + w 1 N w N. Theorem. All elements w 1,..., w N belong to W(gl N ). Moreover, W(gl N ) = C[w (r) 1,..., w(r) N r 0].

268 Chevalley-type theorem

269 Chevalley-type theorem Let φ : V(p) V(h) denote the homomorphism of differential algebras defined on the generators as the projection p h with the kernel n.

270 Chevalley-type theorem Let φ : V(p) V(h) denote the homomorphism of differential algebras defined on the generators as the projection p h with the kernel n. The restriction of φ to W(g) is injective. The embedding φ : W(g) V(h) is often called the Miura transformation.

271 Theorem. The restriction of the homomorphism φ to the classical W-algebra W(g) yields an isomorphism φ : W(g) W(g),

272 Theorem. The restriction of the homomorphism φ to the classical W-algebra W(g) yields an isomorphism φ : W(g) W(g), where W(g) is the subalgebra of V(h) which consists of the elements annihilated by all screening operators V i, n W(g) = ker V i. i=1

Generators of affine W-algebras

Generators of affine W-algebras 1 Generators of affine W-algebras Alexander Molev University of Sydney 2 The W-algebras first appeared as certain symmetry algebras in conformal field theory. 2 The W-algebras first appeared as certain

More information

Classical Lie algebras and Yangians

Classical Lie algebras and Yangians Classical Lie algebras and Yangians Alexander Molev University of Sydney Advanced Summer School Integrable Systems and Quantum Symmetries Prague 2007 Lecture 1. Casimir elements for classical Lie algebras

More information

On Higher-Order Sugawara Operators

On Higher-Order Sugawara Operators Chervov, A. V., and A. I. Molev. (2009) On Higher-Order Sugawara Operators, International Mathematics Research Notices, Vol. 2009, No. 9, pp. 1612 1635 Advance Access publication January 21, 2009 doi:10.1093/imrn/rnn168

More information

Combinatorial bases for representations. of the Lie superalgebra gl m n

Combinatorial bases for representations. of the Lie superalgebra gl m n Combinatorial bases for representations of the Lie superalgebra gl m n Alexander Molev University of Sydney Gelfand Tsetlin bases for gln Gelfand Tsetlin bases for gl n Finite-dimensional irreducible representations

More information

Highest-weight Theory: Verma Modules

Highest-weight Theory: Verma Modules Highest-weight Theory: Verma Modules Math G4344, Spring 2012 We will now turn to the problem of classifying and constructing all finitedimensional representations of a complex semi-simple Lie algebra (or,

More information

SCHUR-WEYL DUALITY FOR QUANTUM GROUPS

SCHUR-WEYL DUALITY FOR QUANTUM GROUPS SCHUR-WEYL DUALITY FOR QUANTUM GROUPS YI SUN Abstract. These are notes for a talk in the MIT-Northeastern Fall 2014 Graduate seminar on Hecke algebras and affine Hecke algebras. We formulate and sketch

More information

Higher Schur-Weyl duality for cyclotomic walled Brauer algebras

Higher Schur-Weyl duality for cyclotomic walled Brauer algebras Higher Schur-Weyl duality for cyclotomic walled Brauer algebras (joint with Hebing Rui) Shanghai Normal University December 7, 2015 Outline 1 Backgroud 2 Schur-Weyl duality between general linear Lie algebras

More information

On the representation theory of affine vertex algebras and W-algebras

On the representation theory of affine vertex algebras and W-algebras On the representation theory of affine vertex algebras and W-algebras Dražen Adamović Plenary talk at 6 Croatian Mathematical Congress Supported by CSF, grant. no. 2634 Zagreb, June 14, 2016. Plan of the

More information

LECTURE 3: REPRESENTATION THEORY OF SL 2 (C) AND sl 2 (C)

LECTURE 3: REPRESENTATION THEORY OF SL 2 (C) AND sl 2 (C) LECTURE 3: REPRESENTATION THEORY OF SL 2 (C) AND sl 2 (C) IVAN LOSEV Introduction We proceed to studying the representation theory of algebraic groups and Lie algebras. Algebraic groups are the groups

More information

From Schur-Weyl duality to quantum symmetric pairs

From Schur-Weyl duality to quantum symmetric pairs .. From Schur-Weyl duality to quantum symmetric pairs Chun-Ju Lai Max Planck Institute for Mathematics in Bonn cjlai@mpim-bonn.mpg.de Dec 8, 2016 Outline...1 Schur-Weyl duality.2.3.4.5 Background.. GL

More information

Representation theory of W-algebras and Higgs branch conjecture

Representation theory of W-algebras and Higgs branch conjecture Representation theory of W-algebras and Higgs branch conjecture ICM 2018 Session Lie Theory and Generalizations Tomoyuki Arakawa August 2, 2018 RIMS, Kyoto University What are W-algebras? W-algebras are

More information

arxiv:math/ v1 [math.qa] 5 Nov 2002

arxiv:math/ v1 [math.qa] 5 Nov 2002 A new quantum analog of the Brauer algebra arxiv:math/0211082v1 [math.qa] 5 Nov 2002 A. I. Molev School of Mathematics and Statistics University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia alexm@ maths.usyd.edu.au

More information

Representations of algebraic groups and their Lie algebras Jens Carsten Jantzen Lecture III

Representations of algebraic groups and their Lie algebras Jens Carsten Jantzen Lecture III Representations of algebraic groups and their Lie algebras Jens Carsten Jantzen Lecture III Lie algebras. Let K be again an algebraically closed field. For the moment let G be an arbitrary algebraic group

More information

Littlewood Richardson polynomials

Littlewood Richardson polynomials Littlewood Richardson polynomials Alexander Molev University of Sydney A diagram (or partition) is a sequence λ = (λ 1,..., λ n ) of integers λ i such that λ 1 λ n 0, depicted as an array of unit boxes.

More information

Representations Are Everywhere

Representations Are Everywhere Representations Are Everywhere Nanghua Xi Member of Chinese Academy of Sciences 1 What is Representation theory Representation is reappearance of some properties or structures of one object on another.

More information

BRST and Dirac Cohomology

BRST and Dirac Cohomology BRST and Dirac Cohomology Peter Woit Columbia University Dartmouth Math Dept., October 23, 2008 Peter Woit (Columbia University) BRST and Dirac Cohomology October 2008 1 / 23 Outline 1 Introduction 2 Representation

More information

REPRESENTATIONS OF S n AND GL(n, C)

REPRESENTATIONS OF S n AND GL(n, C) REPRESENTATIONS OF S n AND GL(n, C) SEAN MCAFEE 1 outline For a given finite group G, we have that the number of irreducible representations of G is equal to the number of conjugacy classes of G Although

More information

INTRODUCTION TO LIE ALGEBRAS. LECTURE 1.

INTRODUCTION TO LIE ALGEBRAS. LECTURE 1. INTRODUCTION TO LIE ALGEBRAS. LECTURE 1. 1. Algebras. Derivations. Definition of Lie algebra 1.1. Algebras. Let k be a field. An algebra over k (or k-algebra) is a vector space A endowed with a bilinear

More information

Equivariant cohomology of infinite-dimensional Grassmannian and shifted Schur functions

Equivariant cohomology of infinite-dimensional Grassmannian and shifted Schur functions Equivariant cohomology of infinite-dimensional Grassmannian and shifted Schur functions Jia-Ming (Frank) Liou, Albert Schwarz February 28, 2012 1. H = L 2 (S 1 ): the space of square integrable complex-valued

More information

Definition 9.1. The scheme µ 1 (O)/G is called the Hamiltonian reduction of M with respect to G along O. We will denote by R(M, G, O).

Definition 9.1. The scheme µ 1 (O)/G is called the Hamiltonian reduction of M with respect to G along O. We will denote by R(M, G, O). 9. Calogero-Moser spaces 9.1. Hamiltonian reduction along an orbit. Let M be an affine algebraic variety and G a reductive algebraic group. Suppose M is Poisson and the action of G preserves the Poisson

More information

arxiv:q-alg/ v1 7 Dec 1997

arxiv:q-alg/ v1 7 Dec 1997 Capelli Identities for Classical Lie Algebras Alexander Molev 1, Maxim Nazarov 2 arxiv:q-alg/9712021v1 7 Dec 1997 1 Centre for Mathematics and its Applications, Australian National University, Canberra

More information

Gelfand Tsetlin bases for classical Lie algebras

Gelfand Tsetlin bases for classical Lie algebras Gelfand Tsetlin bases for classical Lie algebras A. I. Molev School of Mathematics and Statistics University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia alexm@ maths.usyd.edu.au To appear in Handbook of Algebra (M.

More information

On the singular elements of a semisimple Lie algebra and the generalized Amitsur-Levitski Theorem

On the singular elements of a semisimple Lie algebra and the generalized Amitsur-Levitski Theorem On the singular elements of a semisimple Lie algebra and the generalized Amitsur-Levitski Theorem Bertram Kostant, MIT Conference on Representations of Reductive Groups Salt Lake City, Utah July 10, 2013

More information

arxiv:math/ v2 [math.qa] 12 Jun 2004

arxiv:math/ v2 [math.qa] 12 Jun 2004 arxiv:math/0401137v2 [math.qa] 12 Jun 2004 DISCRETE MIURA OPERS AND SOLUTIONS OF THE BETHE ANSATZ EQUATIONS EVGENY MUKHIN,1 AND ALEXANDER VARCHENKO,2 Abstract. Solutions of the Bethe ansatz equations associated

More information

Yangian Flags via Quasideterminants

Yangian Flags via Quasideterminants Yangian Flags via Quasideterminants Aaron Lauve LaCIM Université du Québec à Montréal Advanced Course on Quasideterminants and Universal Localization CRM, Barcelona, February 2007 lauve@lacim.uqam.ca Key

More information

INTRODUCTION TO LIE ALGEBRAS. LECTURE 7.

INTRODUCTION TO LIE ALGEBRAS. LECTURE 7. INTRODUCTION TO LIE ALGEBRAS. LECTURE 7. 7. Killing form. Nilpotent Lie algebras 7.1. Killing form. 7.1.1. Let L be a Lie algebra over a field k and let ρ : L gl(v ) be a finite dimensional L-module. Define

More information

GEOMETRIC STRUCTURES OF SEMISIMPLE LIE ALGEBRAS

GEOMETRIC STRUCTURES OF SEMISIMPLE LIE ALGEBRAS GEOMETRIC STRUCTURES OF SEMISIMPLE LIE ALGEBRAS ANA BALIBANU DISCUSSED WITH PROFESSOR VICTOR GINZBURG 1. Introduction The aim of this paper is to explore the geometry of a Lie algebra g through the action

More information

W -Constraints for Simple Singularities

W -Constraints for Simple Singularities W -Constraints for Simple Singularities Bojko Bakalov Todor Milanov North Carolina State University Supported in part by the National Science Foundation Quantized Algebra and Physics Chern Institute of

More information

Vertex Operator Algebra Structure of Standard Affine Lie Algebra Modules

Vertex Operator Algebra Structure of Standard Affine Lie Algebra Modules Vertex Operator Algebra Structure of Standard Affine Lie Algebra Modules p. 1/4 Vertex Operator Algebra Structure of Standard Affine Lie Algebra Modules Christopher Sadowski Rutgers University Department

More information

Poisson Manifolds Bihamiltonian Manifolds Bihamiltonian systems as Integrable systems Bihamiltonian structure as tool to find solutions

Poisson Manifolds Bihamiltonian Manifolds Bihamiltonian systems as Integrable systems Bihamiltonian structure as tool to find solutions The Bi hamiltonian Approach to Integrable Systems Paolo Casati Szeged 27 November 2014 1 Poisson Manifolds 2 Bihamiltonian Manifolds 3 Bihamiltonian systems as Integrable systems 4 Bihamiltonian structure

More information

R-matrices, affine quantum groups and applications

R-matrices, affine quantum groups and applications R-matrices, affine quantum groups and applications From a mini-course given by David Hernandez at Erwin Schrödinger Institute in January 2017 Abstract R-matrices are solutions of the quantum Yang-Baxter

More information

ELEMENTARY SUBALGEBRAS OF RESTRICTED LIE ALGEBRAS

ELEMENTARY SUBALGEBRAS OF RESTRICTED LIE ALGEBRAS ELEMENTARY SUBALGEBRAS OF RESTRICTED LIE ALGEBRAS J. WARNER SUMMARY OF A PAPER BY J. CARLSON, E. FRIEDLANDER, AND J. PEVTSOVA, AND FURTHER OBSERVATIONS 1. The Nullcone and Restricted Nullcone We will need

More information

INTRODUCTION TO LIE ALGEBRAS. LECTURE 2.

INTRODUCTION TO LIE ALGEBRAS. LECTURE 2. INTRODUCTION TO LIE ALGEBRAS. LECTURE 2. 2. More examples. Ideals. Direct products. 2.1. More examples. 2.1.1. Let k = R, L = R 3. Define [x, y] = x y the cross-product. Recall that the latter is defined

More information

Explicit realization of affine vertex algebras and their applications

Explicit realization of affine vertex algebras and their applications Explicit realization of affine vertex algebras and their applications University of Zagreb, Croatia Supported by CSF, grant. no. 2634 Conference on Lie algebras, vertex operator algebras and related topics

More information

Knizhnik-Zamolodchikov type equations for the root system B and Capelli central elements

Knizhnik-Zamolodchikov type equations for the root system B and Capelli central elements Journal of Physics: Conference Series OPEN ACCESS Knizhnik-Zamolodchikov type equations for the root system B and Capelli central elements To cite this article: D V Artamonov and V A Golubeva 2014 J. Phys.:

More information

BLOCKS IN THE CATEGORY OF FINITE-DIMENSIONAL REPRESENTATIONS OF gl(m n)

BLOCKS IN THE CATEGORY OF FINITE-DIMENSIONAL REPRESENTATIONS OF gl(m n) BLOCKS IN THE CATEGORY OF FINITE-DIMENSIONAL REPRESENTATIONS OF gl(m n) VERA SERGANOVA Abstract. We decompose the category of finite-dimensional gl (m n)- modules into the direct sum of blocks, show that

More information

STRONGLY MULTIPLICITY FREE MODULES FOR LIE ALGEBRAS AND QUANTUM GROUPS

STRONGLY MULTIPLICITY FREE MODULES FOR LIE ALGEBRAS AND QUANTUM GROUPS STRONGLY MULTIPLICITY FREE MODULES FOR LIE ALGEBRAS AND QUANTUM GROUPS G.I. LEHRER AND R.B. ZHANG To Gordon James on his 60 th birthday Abstract. Let U be either the universal enveloping algebra of a complex

More information

MAT 5330 Algebraic Geometry: Quiver Varieties

MAT 5330 Algebraic Geometry: Quiver Varieties MAT 5330 Algebraic Geometry: Quiver Varieties Joel Lemay 1 Abstract Lie algebras have become of central importance in modern mathematics and some of the most important types of Lie algebras are Kac-Moody

More information

SPHERICAL UNITARY REPRESENTATIONS FOR REDUCTIVE GROUPS

SPHERICAL UNITARY REPRESENTATIONS FOR REDUCTIVE GROUPS SPHERICAL UNITARY REPRESENTATIONS FOR REDUCTIVE GROUPS DAN CIUBOTARU 1. Classical motivation: spherical functions 1.1. Spherical harmonics. Let S n 1 R n be the (n 1)-dimensional sphere, C (S n 1 ) the

More information

IVAN LOSEV. Lemma 1.1. (λ) O. Proof. (λ) is generated by a single vector, v λ. We have the weight decomposition (λ) =

IVAN LOSEV. Lemma 1.1. (λ) O. Proof. (λ) is generated by a single vector, v λ. We have the weight decomposition (λ) = LECTURE 7: CATEGORY O AND REPRESENTATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GROUPS IVAN LOSEV Introduction We continue our study of the representation theory of a finite dimensional semisimple Lie algebra g by introducing

More information

Notes on nilpotent orbits Computational Theory of Real Reductive Groups Workshop. Eric Sommers

Notes on nilpotent orbits Computational Theory of Real Reductive Groups Workshop. Eric Sommers Notes on nilpotent orbits Computational Theory of Real Reductive Groups Workshop Eric Sommers 17 July 2009 2 Contents 1 Background 5 1.1 Linear algebra......................................... 5 1.1.1

More information

The Erwin Schrodinger International Boltzmanngasse 9. Institute for Mathematical Physics A-1090 Wien, Austria

The Erwin Schrodinger International Boltzmanngasse 9. Institute for Mathematical Physics A-1090 Wien, Austria ESI The Erwin Schrodinger International Boltzmanngasse 9 Institute for Mathematical Physics A-1090 Wien, Austria Hypersymmetries of Extremal Equations D.P. Zhelobenko Vienna, Preprint ESI 391 (1996) October

More information

Lecture 5: Admissible Representations in the Atlas Framework

Lecture 5: Admissible Representations in the Atlas Framework Lecture 5: Admissible Representations in the Atlas Framework B. Binegar Department of Mathematics Oklahoma State University Stillwater, OK 74078, USA Nankai Summer School in Representation Theory and Harmonic

More information

Category O and its basic properties

Category O and its basic properties Category O and its basic properties Daniil Kalinov 1 Definitions Let g denote a semisimple Lie algebra over C with fixed Cartan and Borel subalgebras h b g. Define n = α>0 g α, n = α

More information

6 Orthogonal groups. O 2m 1 q. q 2i 1 q 2i. 1 i 1. 1 q 2i 2. O 2m q. q m m 1. 1 q 2i 1 i 1. 1 q 2i. i 1. 2 q 1 q i 1 q i 1. m 1.

6 Orthogonal groups. O 2m 1 q. q 2i 1 q 2i. 1 i 1. 1 q 2i 2. O 2m q. q m m 1. 1 q 2i 1 i 1. 1 q 2i. i 1. 2 q 1 q i 1 q i 1. m 1. 6 Orthogonal groups We now turn to the orthogonal groups. These are more difficult, for two related reasons. First, it is not always true that the group of isometries with determinant 1 is equal to its

More information

CONFORMAL FIELD THEORIES

CONFORMAL FIELD THEORIES CONFORMAL FIELD THEORIES Definition 0.1 (Segal, see for example [Hen]). A full conformal field theory is a symmetric monoidal functor { } 1 dimensional compact oriented smooth manifolds {Hilbert spaces}.

More information

Geometric Realizations of the Basic Representation of ĝl r

Geometric Realizations of the Basic Representation of ĝl r Geometric Realizations of the Basic Representation of ĝl r Joel Lemay Department of Mathematics and Statistics University of Ottawa September 23rd, 2013 Joel Lemay Geometric Realizations of ĝl r Representations

More information

L(C G (x) 0 ) c g (x). Proof. Recall C G (x) = {g G xgx 1 = g} and c g (x) = {X g Ad xx = X}. In general, it is obvious that

L(C G (x) 0 ) c g (x). Proof. Recall C G (x) = {g G xgx 1 = g} and c g (x) = {X g Ad xx = X}. In general, it is obvious that ALGEBRAIC GROUPS 61 5. Root systems and semisimple Lie algebras 5.1. Characteristic 0 theory. Assume in this subsection that chark = 0. Let me recall a couple of definitions made earlier: G is called reductive

More information

On some conjectures on VOAs

On some conjectures on VOAs On some conjectures on VOAs Yuji Tachikawa February 1, 2013 In [1], a lot of mathematical conjectures on VOAs were made. Here, we ll provide a more mathematical translation, along the lines of [2]. I m

More information

THE HARISH-CHANDRA ISOMORPHISM FOR sl(2, C)

THE HARISH-CHANDRA ISOMORPHISM FOR sl(2, C) THE HARISH-CHANDRA ISOMORPHISM FOR sl(2, C) SEAN MCAFEE 1. summary Given a reductive Lie algebra g and choice of Cartan subalgebra h, the Harish- Chandra map gives an isomorphism between the center z of

More information

REPRESENTATION THEORY OF S n

REPRESENTATION THEORY OF S n REPRESENTATION THEORY OF S n EVAN JENKINS Abstract. These are notes from three lectures given in MATH 26700, Introduction to Representation Theory of Finite Groups, at the University of Chicago in November

More information

Vertex algebras generated by primary fields of low conformal weight

Vertex algebras generated by primary fields of low conformal weight Short talk Napoli, Italy June 27, 2003 Vertex algebras generated by primary fields of low conformal weight Alberto De Sole Slides available from http://www-math.mit.edu/ desole/ 1 There are several equivalent

More information

A new perspective on long range SU(N) spin models

A new perspective on long range SU(N) spin models A new perspective on long range SU(N) spin models Thomas Quella University of Cologne Workshop on Lie Theory and Mathematical Physics Centre de Recherches Mathématiques (CRM), Montreal Based on work with

More information

370 INDEX AND NOTATION

370 INDEX AND NOTATION Index and Notation action of a Lie algebra on a commutative! algebra 1.4.9 action of a Lie algebra on a chiral algebra 3.3.3 action of a Lie algebroid on a chiral algebra 4.5.4, twisted 4.5.6 action of

More information

Representations and Linear Actions

Representations and Linear Actions Representations and Linear Actions Definition 0.1. Let G be an S-group. A representation of G is a morphism of S-groups φ G GL(n, S) for some n. We say φ is faithful if it is a monomorphism (in the category

More information

14 From modular forms to automorphic representations

14 From modular forms to automorphic representations 14 From modular forms to automorphic representations We fix an even integer k and N > 0 as before. Let f M k (N) be a modular form. We would like to product a function on GL 2 (A Q ) out of it. Recall

More information

Kac-Moody Algebras. Ana Ros Camacho June 28, 2010

Kac-Moody Algebras. Ana Ros Camacho June 28, 2010 Kac-Moody Algebras Ana Ros Camacho June 28, 2010 Abstract Talk for the seminar on Cohomology of Lie algebras, under the supervision of J-Prof. Christoph Wockel Contents 1 Motivation 1 2 Prerequisites 1

More information

For any 1 M N there exist expansions of the

For any 1 M N there exist expansions of the LIST OF CORRECTIONS MOST OF CORRECTIONS ARE MADE IN THE RUSSIAN EDITION OF THE BOOK, MCCME, MOSCOW, 2009. SOME OF THEM APPLY TO BOTH EDITIONS, AS INDICATED page xiv, line -9: V. O. Tarasov (1985, 1986)

More information

0 A. ... A j GL nj (F q ), 1 j r

0 A. ... A j GL nj (F q ), 1 j r CHAPTER 4 Representations of finite groups of Lie type Let F q be a finite field of order q and characteristic p. Let G be a finite group of Lie type, that is, G is the F q -rational points of a connected

More information

Math 121 Homework 5: Notes on Selected Problems

Math 121 Homework 5: Notes on Selected Problems Math 121 Homework 5: Notes on Selected Problems 12.1.2. Let M be a module over the integral domain R. (a) Assume that M has rank n and that x 1,..., x n is any maximal set of linearly independent elements

More information

Problems in Linear Algebra and Representation Theory

Problems in Linear Algebra and Representation Theory Problems in Linear Algebra and Representation Theory (Most of these were provided by Victor Ginzburg) The problems appearing below have varying level of difficulty. They are not listed in any specific

More information

arxiv: v1 [math.rt] 15 Oct 2008

arxiv: v1 [math.rt] 15 Oct 2008 CLASSIFICATION OF FINITE-GROWTH GENERAL KAC-MOODY SUPERALGEBRAS arxiv:0810.2637v1 [math.rt] 15 Oct 2008 CRYSTAL HOYT AND VERA SERGANOVA Abstract. A contragredient Lie superalgebra is a superalgebra defined

More information

Signatures of GL n Multiplicity Spaces

Signatures of GL n Multiplicity Spaces Signatures of GL n Multiplicity Spaces UROP+ Final Paper, Summer 2016 Mrudul Thatte Mentor: Siddharth Venkatesh Project suggested by Pavel Etingof September 1, 2016 Abstract A stable sequence of GL n representations

More information

QUATERNIONS AND ROTATIONS

QUATERNIONS AND ROTATIONS QUATERNIONS AND ROTATIONS SVANTE JANSON 1. Introduction The purpose of this note is to show some well-known relations between quaternions and the Lie groups SO(3) and SO(4) (rotations in R 3 and R 4 )

More information

e j = Ad(f i ) 1 2a ij/a ii

e j = Ad(f i ) 1 2a ij/a ii A characterization of generalized Kac-Moody algebras. J. Algebra 174, 1073-1079 (1995). Richard E. Borcherds, D.P.M.M.S., 16 Mill Lane, Cambridge CB2 1SB, England. Generalized Kac-Moody algebras can be

More information

THE CENTRALIZER OF K IN U(g) C(p) FOR THE GROUP SO e (4,1) Ana Prlić University of Zagreb, Croatia

THE CENTRALIZER OF K IN U(g) C(p) FOR THE GROUP SO e (4,1) Ana Prlić University of Zagreb, Croatia GLASNIK MATEMATIČKI Vol. 5(7)(017), 75 88 THE CENTRALIZER OF K IN U(g) C(p) FOR THE GROUP SO e (4,1) Ana Prlić University of Zagreb, Croatia Abstract. Let G be the Lie group SO e(4,1), with maximal compact

More information

REPRESENTATIONS OF LIE ALGEBRA OF VECTOR FIELDS ON A TORUS AND CHIRAL DE RHAM COMPLEX

REPRESENTATIONS OF LIE ALGEBRA OF VECTOR FIELDS ON A TORUS AND CHIRAL DE RHAM COMPLEX To Yuri Alexandrovich Bahturin REPRESENTATIONS OF LIE ALGEBRA OF VECTOR FIELDS ON A TORUS AND CHIRAL DE RHAM COMPLEX YULY BILLIG AND VYACHESLAV FUTORNY Abstract. The goal of this paper is to study the

More information

The Gelfand-Tsetlin Realisation of Simple Modules and Monomial Bases

The Gelfand-Tsetlin Realisation of Simple Modules and Monomial Bases arxiv:8.976v [math.rt] 3 Dec 8 The Gelfand-Tsetlin Realisation of Simple Modules and Monomial Bases Central European University Amadou Keita (keita amadou@student.ceu.edu December 8 Abstract The most famous

More information

SCHUR-WEYL DUALITY FOR U(n)

SCHUR-WEYL DUALITY FOR U(n) SCHUR-WEYL DUALITY FOR U(n) EVAN JENKINS Abstract. These are notes from a lecture given in MATH 26700, Introduction to Representation Theory of Finite Groups, at the University of Chicago in December 2009.

More information

Groups of Prime Power Order with Derived Subgroup of Prime Order

Groups of Prime Power Order with Derived Subgroup of Prime Order Journal of Algebra 219, 625 657 (1999) Article ID jabr.1998.7909, available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on Groups of Prime Power Order with Derived Subgroup of Prime Order Simon R. Blackburn*

More information

Connecting Coinvariants

Connecting Coinvariants Connecting Coinvariants In his talk, Sasha taught us how to define the spaces of coinvariants: V 1,..., V n = V 1... V n g S out (0.1) for any V 1,..., V n KL κg and any finite set S P 1. In her talk,

More information

These notes are incomplete they will be updated regularly.

These notes are incomplete they will be updated regularly. These notes are incomplete they will be updated regularly. LIE GROUPS, LIE ALGEBRAS, AND REPRESENTATIONS SPRING SEMESTER 2008 RICHARD A. WENTWORTH Contents 1. Lie groups and Lie algebras 2 1.1. Definition

More information

LECTURE 4: REPRESENTATION THEORY OF SL 2 (F) AND sl 2 (F)

LECTURE 4: REPRESENTATION THEORY OF SL 2 (F) AND sl 2 (F) LECTURE 4: REPRESENTATION THEORY OF SL 2 (F) AND sl 2 (F) IVAN LOSEV In this lecture we will discuss the representation theory of the algebraic group SL 2 (F) and of the Lie algebra sl 2 (F), where F is

More information

Lecture 2 Some Sources of Lie Algebras

Lecture 2 Some Sources of Lie Algebras 18.745 Introduction to Lie Algebras September 14, 2010 Lecture 2 Some Sources of Lie Algebras Prof. Victor Kac Scribe: Michael Donovan From Associative Algebras We saw in the previous lecture that we can

More information

Singularities, Root Systems, and W-Algebras

Singularities, Root Systems, and W-Algebras Singularities, Root Systems, and W-Algebras Bojko Bakalov North Carolina State University Joint work with Todor Milanov Supported in part by the National Science Foundation Bojko Bakalov (NCSU) Singularities,

More information

Peter Hochs. Strings JC, 11 June, C -algebras and K-theory. Peter Hochs. Introduction. C -algebras. Group. C -algebras.

Peter Hochs. Strings JC, 11 June, C -algebras and K-theory. Peter Hochs. Introduction. C -algebras. Group. C -algebras. and of and Strings JC, 11 June, 2013 and of 1 2 3 4 5 of and of and Idea of 1 Study locally compact Hausdorff topological spaces through their algebras of continuous functions. The product on this algebra

More information

Langlands parameters of quivers in the Sato Grassmannian

Langlands parameters of quivers in the Sato Grassmannian Langlands parameters of quivers in the Sato Grassmannian Martin T. Luu, Matej enciak Abstract Motivated by quantum field theoretic partition functions that can be expressed as products of tau functions

More information

A PIERI RULE FOR HERMITIAN SYMMETRIC PAIRS. Thomas J. Enright, Markus Hunziker and Nolan R. Wallach

A PIERI RULE FOR HERMITIAN SYMMETRIC PAIRS. Thomas J. Enright, Markus Hunziker and Nolan R. Wallach A PIERI RULE FOR HERMITIAN SYMMETRIC PAIRS Thomas J. Enright, Markus Hunziker and Nolan R. Wallach Abstract. Let (G, K) be a Hermitian symmetric pair and let g and k denote the corresponding complexified

More information

ne varieties (continued)

ne varieties (continued) Chapter 2 A ne varieties (continued) 2.1 Products For some problems its not very natural to restrict to irreducible varieties. So we broaden the previous story. Given an a ne algebraic set X A n k, we

More information

(Kac Moody) Chevalley groups and Lie algebras with built in structure constants Lecture 1. Lisa Carbone Rutgers University

(Kac Moody) Chevalley groups and Lie algebras with built in structure constants Lecture 1. Lisa Carbone Rutgers University (Kac Moody) Chevalley groups and Lie algebras with built in structure constants Lecture 1 Lisa Carbone Rutgers University Slides will be posted at: http://sites.math.rutgers.edu/ carbonel/ Video will be

More information

Kac Moody superalgebras and integrability

Kac Moody superalgebras and integrability Kac Moody superalgebras and integrability Vera Serganova Dept. of Mathematics, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720 serganov@math.berkeley.edu Summary. The first part of this paper

More information

PART I: GEOMETRY OF SEMISIMPLE LIE ALGEBRAS

PART I: GEOMETRY OF SEMISIMPLE LIE ALGEBRAS PART I: GEOMETRY OF SEMISIMPLE LIE ALGEBRAS Contents 1. Regular elements in semisimple Lie algebras 1 2. The flag variety and the Bruhat decomposition 3 3. The Grothendieck-Springer resolution 6 4. The

More information

Exercises Lie groups

Exercises Lie groups Exercises Lie groups E.P. van den Ban Spring 2009 Exercise 1. Let G be a group, equipped with the structure of a C -manifold. Let µ : G G G, (x, y) xy be the multiplication map. We assume that µ is smooth,

More information

Fock space representations of twisted affine Lie algebras

Fock space representations of twisted affine Lie algebras Fock space representations of twisted affine Lie algebras Gen KUROKI Mathematical Institute, Tohoku University, Sendai JAPAN June 9, 2010 0. Introduction Fock space representations of Wakimoto type for

More information

DEFORMATIONS OF ALGEBRAS IN NONCOMMUTATIVE ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY EXERCISE SHEET 1

DEFORMATIONS OF ALGEBRAS IN NONCOMMUTATIVE ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY EXERCISE SHEET 1 DEFORMATIONS OF ALGEBRAS IN NONCOMMUTATIVE ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY EXERCISE SHEET 1 TRAVIS SCHEDLER Note: it is possible that the numbers referring to the notes here (e.g., Exercise 1.9, etc.,) could change

More information

A relative version of Kostant s theorem

A relative version of Kostant s theorem A relative version of Kostant s theorem 1 University of Vienna Faculty of Mathematics Srni, January 2015 1 supported by project P27072 N25 of the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) This talk reports on joint

More information

REPRESENTATION THEORY. WEEKS 10 11

REPRESENTATION THEORY. WEEKS 10 11 REPRESENTATION THEORY. WEEKS 10 11 1. Representations of quivers I follow here Crawley-Boevey lectures trying to give more details concerning extensions and exact sequences. A quiver is an oriented graph.

More information

QUANTIZATION VIA DIFFERENTIAL OPERATORS ON STACKS

QUANTIZATION VIA DIFFERENTIAL OPERATORS ON STACKS QUANTIZATION VIA DIFFERENTIAL OPERATORS ON STACKS SAM RASKIN 1. Differential operators on stacks 1.1. We will define a D-module of differential operators on a smooth stack and construct a symbol map when

More information

FINITE GROUPS OF LIE TYPE AND THEIR

FINITE GROUPS OF LIE TYPE AND THEIR FINITE GROUPS OF LIE TYPE AND THEIR REPRESENTATIONS LECTURE IV Gerhard Hiss Lehrstuhl D für Mathematik RWTH Aachen University Groups St Andrews 2009 in Bath University of Bath, August 1 15, 2009 CONTENTS

More information

Representation Theory

Representation Theory Representation Theory Representations Let G be a group and V a vector space over a field k. A representation of G on V is a group homomorphism ρ : G Aut(V ). The degree (or dimension) of ρ is just dim

More information

Algebra Homework, Edition 2 9 September 2010

Algebra Homework, Edition 2 9 September 2010 Algebra Homework, Edition 2 9 September 2010 Problem 6. (1) Let I and J be ideals of a commutative ring R with I + J = R. Prove that IJ = I J. (2) Let I, J, and K be ideals of a principal ideal domain.

More information

Lecture Notes Introduction to Cluster Algebra

Lecture Notes Introduction to Cluster Algebra Lecture Notes Introduction to Cluster Algebra Ivan C.H. Ip Update: May 16, 2017 5 Review of Root Systems In this section, let us have a brief introduction to root system and finite Lie type classification

More information

THE THEOREM OF THE HIGHEST WEIGHT

THE THEOREM OF THE HIGHEST WEIGHT THE THEOREM OF THE HIGHEST WEIGHT ANKE D. POHL Abstract. Incomplete notes of the talk in the IRTG Student Seminar 07.06.06. This is a draft version and thought for internal use only. The Theorem of the

More information

Conformal embeddings and realizations of certain simple W -algebras

Conformal embeddings and realizations of certain simple W -algebras Conformal embeddings and realizations of certain simple W -algebras University of Zagreb, Croatia Supported by CSF, grant. no. 2634 Conference: Vertex algebras and quantum groups Ban, Canada February 7-12,

More information

Math 429/581 (Advanced) Group Theory. Summary of Definitions, Examples, and Theorems by Stefan Gille

Math 429/581 (Advanced) Group Theory. Summary of Definitions, Examples, and Theorems by Stefan Gille Math 429/581 (Advanced) Group Theory Summary of Definitions, Examples, and Theorems by Stefan Gille 1 2 0. Group Operations 0.1. Definition. Let G be a group and X a set. A (left) operation of G on X is

More information

A REMARK ON SIMPLICITY OF VERTEX ALGEBRAS AND LIE CONFORMAL ALGEBRAS

A REMARK ON SIMPLICITY OF VERTEX ALGEBRAS AND LIE CONFORMAL ALGEBRAS A REMARK ON SIMPLICITY OF VERTEX ALGEBRAS AND LIE CONFORMAL ALGEBRAS ALESSANDRO D ANDREA Ad Olivia, che mi ha insegnato a salutare il Sole ABSTRACT. I give a short proof of the following algebraic statement:

More information

LECTURE 4: SOERGEL S THEOREM AND SOERGEL BIMODULES

LECTURE 4: SOERGEL S THEOREM AND SOERGEL BIMODULES LECTURE 4: SOERGEL S THEOREM AND SOERGEL BIMODULES DMYTRO MATVIEIEVSKYI Abstract. These are notes for a talk given at the MIT-Northeastern Graduate Student Seminar on category O and Soergel bimodules,

More information

IVAN LOSEV. KEK 1 = q 2 E, KF K 1 = q 2 F, EF F E = K K 1 q q 1.

IVAN LOSEV. KEK 1 = q 2 E, KF K 1 = q 2 F, EF F E = K K 1 q q 1. LECTURE 13: REPRESENTATIONS OF U q (g) AND R-MATRICES IVAN LOSEV Introduction In this lecture we study the representation theory of U q (g) when q is not a root of 1. In Section 1, we classify the finite

More information

Representation Theory

Representation Theory Part II Year 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2018 Paper 1, Section II 19I 93 (a) Define the derived subgroup, G, of a finite group G. Show that if χ is a linear character

More information

Invariant subalgebras of affine vertex algebras

Invariant subalgebras of affine vertex algebras Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Advances in Mathematics 234 (2013) 61 84 www.elsevier.com/locate/aim Invariant subalgebras of affine vertex algebras Andrew R. Linshaw Department of Mathematics,

More information