arxiv:math/ v1 [math.qa] 5 Nov 2002
|
|
- Marcus Oliver
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 A new quantum analog of the Brauer algebra arxiv:math/ v1 [math.qa] 5 Nov 2002 A. I. Molev School of Mathematics and Statistics University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia alexm@ maths.usyd.edu.au Abstract We introduce a new algebra B l (z,q) depending on two nonzero complex parameters such that B l (q n,q) at q = 1 coincides with the Brauer algebra B l (n). We establish an analog of the Brauer Schur Weyl duality where the action of the new algebra commutes with the representation of the twisted deformation U q (o n) of the enveloping algebra U(o n ) in the tensor power of the vector representation. 1
2 1 Introduction In the classical Schur Weyl duality the actions of the general linear group GL(n) and the symmetric group S l in the tensor power (C n ) l are centralizers of each other. A quantum analog of this duality is provided by the actions of the quantized enveloping algebra U q (gl n ) and the Iwahori Hecke algebra H l (q) on the same space; see Jimbo [8], Leduc and Ram [10]. If the group GL(n) is replaced with the orthogonal group O(n) or symplectic group Sp(n) (with even n) the corresponding centralizer is generated by the action of a larger algebra B l (n) called the Brauer algebra originally introduced by Brauer in [2]. The group algebra C[S l ] is a natural subalgebra of B l (n). When U q (gl n ) is replaced by the quantized enveloping algebra U q (o n ) or U q (sp n ) then the corresponding centralizer is generated by the action of the algebra BMW l (z,q) introduced by Birman and Wenzl [1] and Murakami [12]; here the parameter z should be appropriately specialized. The algebraic structure and representations of the Brauer algebra and the Birman Wenzl Murakami algebra were also studied by Wenzl [18], Ram and Wenzl [16], Leduc and Ram [10], Halverson Ram [6], Nazarov [13]. Unlike the classical case, the algebras U q (o n ) and U q (sp n ) are not isomorphic to subalgebras of U q (gl n ). Accordingly, the Iwahori Hecke algebra H l (q) isnot a natural subalgebra of BMW l (z,q). On the other hand, there exist subalgebras U q(o n ) and U q (sp n) of U q (gl n ) which specialize respectively to U(o n ) and U(sp n ) as q 1. They were first introduced by Gavrilik and Klimyk [4] (orthogonal case) and by Noumi [14] (both cases). Following Noumi we call them twisted quantized enveloping algebras. Although U q(o n ) and U q(sp n ) are not Hopf algebras, they are coideal subalgebras of U q (gl n ). Thesealgebraswere studiedin[14]inconnectionwiththetheoryofquantum symmetric spaces. The algebra U q (o n) also appears as the symmetry algebra for the q-oscillator representation of the quantized enveloping algebra U q (sp 2m ); see Noumi, Umeda and Wakayama [15]. Central elements and representations of U q (o n) were studied by Gavrilik and Iorgov [5], Havlíček, Klimyk and Pošta [7], Klimyk [9]. A relationship between the algebras U q (o n) and U q (sp n) and their affine analogs was studied in [11]. In this paper we only consider the algebra U q(o n ) although the results can be easily extended to the symplectic case as well. We define a new algebra B l (z,q) and show that its action on the tensor power of the vector representation of U q (gl n ) (with z = q n ) commutes with that of the subalgebra U q (o n) U q (gl n ). We thus have an embedding (at least for generic q) of the Iwahori Hecke algebra H l (q) into B l (z,q). Moreover, the algebra B l (q n,q) coincides with the Brauer algebra B l (n) for q = 1. This work was inspired by Arun Ram s illuminating talks in Sydney and Newcastle. I would also like to thank him for valuable discussions. 2
3 2 Brauer algebra and its quantum analog Let l be a positive integer and η a complex number. An l-diagram d is a collection of 2l dots arranged into two rows with l dots in each row connected by l edges such that any dot belongs to only one edge. The product of two diagrams d 1 and d 2 is determined by placing d 1 above d 2 and identifying the vertices of the bottom row of d 1 with the corresponding vertices in the top row of d 2. Let s be the number of loops in the picture. The product d 1 d 2 is given by η s times the resulting diagram without loops. The Brauer algebra B l (η) isdefined asthe C-linear span ofthe l-diagramswith the multiplication defined above. The dimension of the algebra is 1 3 (2l 1). The following presentation of B l (η) is well-known; see, e.g., [1]. Proposition 2.1 The Brauer algebra B l (η) is isomorphic to the algebra with 2l 2 generators σ 1,...,σ l 1,e 1,...,e l 1 and the defining relations σ 2 i = 1, e 2 i = ηe i, σ i e i = e i σ i = e i, i = 1,...,l 1, σ i σ j = σ j σ i, e i e j = e j e i, σ i e j = e j σ i, i j > 1, σ i σ i+1 σ i = σ i+1 σ i σ i+1, e i e i+1 e i = e i, e i+1 e i e i+1 = e i+1, σ i e i+1 e i = σ i+1 e i, e i+1 e i σ i+1 = e i+1 σ i, i = 1,...,l 2. The generators σ i and e i correspond to the following diagrams respectively: 1 2 i i+1 l 1 l and 1 2 i i+1 l 1 l The subalgebra of B l (η) generated by σ 1,...,σ l 1 is isomorphic to the group algebra C[S l ] so that σ i can be identified with the transposition (i,i+1). It is clear from the presentation that the algebra B l (η) is generated by σ 1,...,σ l 1 and one of the elements e i. The following proposition is easy to verify. We put k = l 1 to make the formulas more readable. Proposition 2.2 The Brauer algebra B l (η) is isomorphic to the algebra with generators σ 1,...,σ l 1,e l 1 and the defining relations σ 2 i = 1, σ i σ j = σ j σ i, σ i σ i+1 σ i = σ i+1 σ i σ i+1, e 2 k = ηe k, σ k e k = e k σ k = e k, e k σ k 1 e k = e k, σ i e k = e k σ i, i = 1,...,k 2, e k τ e k τ = τ e k τ e k, where τ = σ k 1 σ k 2 σ k σ k 1. 3
4 Note that τ is the permutation (k 2,k)(k 1,k+1) and so the last relation of Proposition 2.2 is equivalent to the relation e k 2 e k = e k e k 2 in the presentation of Proposition 2.1. Suppose now that q and z are nonzero complex numbers. Definition 2.3 The algebra B l (z,q) is defined to be the algebra over C with generators σ 1,...,σ l 1,e l 1 and the defining relations σ 2 i = (q q 1 )σ i +1, σ i σ j = σ j σ i, σ i σ i+1 σ i = σ i+1 σ i σ i+1, e 2 k = z z 1 q q 1 e k, σ k e k = e k σ k = qe k, e k σ k 1 e k = ze k, σ i e k = e k σ i, i = 1,...,k 2, e k (zqτ 1 +z 1 q 1 τ)e k (qτ 1 +q 1 τ) = (qτ 1 +q 1 τ)e k (zqτ 1 +z 1 q 1 τ)e k, where k = l 1 and τ = σ k 1 σ k 2 σ k σ k 1. We have used the same symbols for the generators of the both algebras B l (z,q) and B l (η) since B l (z,q) becomes the Brauer algebra for the special case q = 1 where z is chosen in such a way that the ratio (z z 1 )/(q q 1 ) takes value η at q = 1. In particular, if η = n is a positive integer then B l (q n,q) coincides with B l (n) for q = 1. The relations in the first line of Definition 2.3 are precisely the defining relation of the Iwahori Hecke algebra H l (q). So we have a natural homomorphism H l (q) B l (z,q). (2.1) Its injectivity for generic q (not a root of unity) can be deduced from the Schur Weyl duality between U q (gl n ) and H l (q); see Section 4. We can therefore regard H l (q) as a subalgebra of B l (z,q). The algebra B l (z,q) has a presentation analogous to the one given in Proposition 2.1. However, it does not seem to exist an obvious choice of a distinguished family of generators analogous to the e i. As an example of such a family we can take the elements e i of the algebra B l (z,q) defined inductively by the formulas e i = σ i+1 σ i e i+1 σi 1 σi+1 1, i = 1,...,l 2. (2.2) Then the following relations are easily deduced from Definition 2.3: e 2 i = z z 1 q q 1 e i, σ i e i = e i σ i = qe i, i = 1,...,l 1, σ i e j = e j σ i, i j > 1, e i e i+1 e i = e i, e i+1 e i e i+1 = e i+1, e i σ i+1 e i = e i σ i 1 e i = ze i, e i σ 1 i+1 e i = e i σ 1 i 1 e i = z 1 e i, σ i e i+1 e i = zqσ 1 i+1 e i, e i+1 e i σ i+1 = zqe i+1 σ 1 i. 4
5 The analogs of the Brauer algebra relations e i e j = e j e i where i j > 1 have a complicated form and we shall not write them down. 3 Quantized enveloping algebras We shall use an R-matrix presentation of the algebra U q (gl n ); see Jimbo [8] and Reshetikhin, Takhtajan and Faddeev [17]. As before, q is a nonzero complex number. Consider the R-matrix R = q i E ii E ii + i j E ii E jj +(q q 1 ) i<j E ij E ji (3.1) which is an element of EndC n EndC n, where the E ij denote the standard matrix units and the indices run over the set {1,...,n}. The R-matrix satisfies the Yang Baxter equation R 12 R 13 R 23 = R 23 R 13 R 12, (3.2) wherebothsidestakevaluesinendc n EndC n EndC n andthesubindices indicate the copies of EndC n, e.g., R 12 = R 1 etc. The quantized enveloping algebra U q (gl n ) is generated by elements t ij and t ij with 1 i,j n subject to the relations t ij = t ji = 0, 1 i < j n, t ii t ii = t ii t ii = 1, 1 i n, RT 1 T 2 = T 2 T 1 R, RT 1 T 2 = T 2 T 1 R, RT 1 T 2 = T 2 T 1 R. (3.3) Here T and T are the matrices T = i,j E ij t ij, T = i,j E ij t ij, (3.4) which are regarded as elements of the algebra EndC n U q (gl n ). Both sides of each of the R-matrix relations in (3.3) are elements of EndC n EndC n U q (gl n ) and the subindices of T and T indicate the copies of EndC n where T or T acts. We shall also use another R-matrix R given by R = q 1 i E ii E ii + i j E ii E jj +(q 1 q) i>j E ij E ji. (3.5) We have the relation R = PR 1 P, (3.6) 5
6 where P = i,j E ij E ji (3.7) is the permutation operator. The coproduct on U q (gl n ) is defined by the relations (t ij ) = t ik t kj, ( t ij ) = k=1 t ik t kj. (3.8) k=1 The universal enveloping algebra U(gl n ) can be regarded as a limit specialization of U q (gl n ) as q 1 so that and t ij δ ij q q 1 E ij for i j (3.9) t ij δ ij q q 1 E ij for i j. (3.10) Following Noumi [14] introduce the twisted quantized enveloping algebra U q (o n) as the subalgebra of U q (gl n ) generated by the matrix elements s ij of the matrix S = T T t. More explicitly, s ij = t ia t ja. (3.11) It can be easily derived from (3.3) that the matrix S satisfies the relations a=1 s ij = 0, 1 i < j n, (3.12) s ii = 1, 1 i n, (3.13) RS 1 RS 2 = S 2 RS 1 R, (3.14) where R denotes the element obtained from R by the transposition in the first tensor factor: R = q i E ii E ii + i j E ii E jj +(q q 1 ) i<j E ji E ji. (3.15) It can be shown that (3.12) (3.14) are defining relations for the algebra U q(o n ); see [15], [11]. A different presentation of U q (o n) is given in the original paper by Gavrilik and Klimyk[4]. An isomorphism between the presentations is provided by Noumi[14]. As q 1 the algebra specializes to U(o n ) so that s ij q q 1 E ij E ji for i > j. (3.16) 6
7 4 Quantum Brauer duality We start by recalling the well-known quantum analog of the Schur Weyl duality between the quantized enveloping algebra U q (gl n ) and the Iwahori Hecke algebra H l (q); see [8], [10], [3, Chapter 10]. Consider the vector representation U q (gl n ) EndC n of the algebra U q (gl n ) defined by t ii q δ ia E aa, a=1 t ii t ij (q q 1 )E ij, i > j, t ij (q 1 q)e ij, i < j. q δ ia E aa, a=1 (4.1) It will be convenient to interpret the representation in a matrix form. We shall regard it as the homomorphism EndC n U q (gl n ) EndC n EndC n (4.2) so that the images of the matrices T and T are given by T R 01, T R01, (4.3) where we label the copies of EndC n in the tensor product EndC n EndC n by the indices 0 and 1, respectively, and the left prime of the R-matrices denotes the transposition in the first tensor factor; see (3.15). Using the coproduct (3.8) we consider the representation of U q (gl n ) in the tensor product space (C n ) l. In the matrix interpretation it takes the form EndC n U q (gl n ) EndC n EndC n EndC n, (4.4) with T R 01 R 0l, T R01 R0l, (4.5) where the multiple tensor product in (4.4) contains l+1 factors labelled by 0,1,...,l. We let Ř denote the element of the algebra EndCn EndC n defined by Ř = PR = q i E ii E ii + i j E ji E ij +(q q 1 ) i<j E jj E ii. (4.6) The mapping σ i Ři,i+1, i = 1,...,l 1 (4.7) defines a representation of the Iwahori Hecke algebra H l (q) in the space (C n ) l. If the parameter q C is generic (nonzero and not a root of unity) then the actions of 7
8 U q (gl n ) and H l (q) on (C n ) l are centralizers of each other. Moreover, if l < n then H l (q) is isomorphic to the centralizer of U q (gl n ). Consider now the restriction of the U q (gl n )-module (C n ) l to the subalgebra U q(o n ). The action of the elements s ij is given by the formula S R 01 R 0l R0l R 01. (4.8) Clearly, the operators Ři,i+1 belong to the centralizer of the action of U q (o n). Introduce an operator Q EndC n EndC n by Q = q n 2i+1 E ij E ij. (4.9) i,j=1 Proposition 4.1 The operator Q l 1,l commutes with the action of U q (o n) on (C n ) l. Proof. We need to verify that Q l 1,l commutes with the image of the matrix S given in (4.8). It is sufficient to consider the case l = 2 since Q l 1,l commutes with R 0i and R 0i for i l 2. The result will follow from the relations Q 12 R 01 R 02 R02 R01 = Q 12 = R 01 R 02 R02 R01 Q 12. (4.10) Letusprovethefirstequality. Weverifydirectlythattheoperators Rand Rcommute with each other and so the left hand side of (4.10) equals Q 12 R 01 R02 R 02 R01. We also 1 have R 20 = R 02 by (3.6) and Q 12 R 01 = Q 12R 20. (4.11) Therefore, Q 12 R 01 R02 R 02 R01 = Q 12 R 02 R01 = Q 12. (4.12) The proof of the second equality in (4.10) is similar and follows from the relations R 02 R01 Q 12 = Q 12 and R 01 R02 Q 12 = Q 12. (4.13) The following theorem establishes a quantum analog of the Brauer duality between the algebras U q(o n ) and B l (z,q) at z = q n. Theorem 4.2 The mappings and σ i Ři,i+1, i = 1,...,l 1 (4.14) e l 1 Q l 1,l (4.15) define a representation of the algebra B l (q n,q) on the space (C n ) l. Moreover, the actions of the algebras U q (o n) and B l (q n,q) on this space commute with each other. 8
9 Proof. The second statement follows from Proposition 4.1. We now verify the relations of Definition 2.3 with z = q n for the operators Ři,i+1 and Q l 1,l. This is done by an easy calculation for all relations except for the last one whose proof is more involved. Clearly, in order to the verify the latter we may assume that l = 4. We start by proving the following relations and Q 34 Ř 23 Ř 34 Ř 12 Ř 23 Q 34 = Q 12 Q 34 +q n+1 (q q 1 )Q 34 (Ř12 +Iq 1 ) (4.16) Q 34 Ř 23Ř Ř 1 12Ř 1 23 Q 34 = Q 12 Q 34 +q n 1 (q 1 q)q 34 (Ř12 +Iq 1 ), (4.17) where I is the identity operator. Replacing Ř by PR we can rewrite the left hand side of (4.16) as P 13 P 24 Q 12 R 14 R 24 R 13 R 23 Q 34. (4.18) Introducing the diagonal matrix D = we can present the operator Q 12 EndC n EndC n as where where for any operator Q 12 = q n 2i+1 E ii EndC n, (4.19) i=1 Q 12 = D 1 Q 12 = D 2 Q 12, (4.20) i,j=1 E ij E ij = P 12 = P 12, (4.21) A = a ijrs E ij E rs EndC n EndC n (4.22) i,j,r,s we denote by A and A the corresponding transposed operators with respect to the first or second tensor factor: A = a ijrs E ji E rs (4.23) i,j,r,s and We have A = a ijrs E ij E sr. (4.24) i,j,r,s Q 12 R 14 = Q 12 R 24, R 23 Q 34 = D 4 R 24 Q 34. (4.25) 9
10 Now the operator (4.18) takes the form P 13 P 24 Q 12 R 13 R 24 R 24 D 4 R 24 Q 34. (4.26) Multiplying directly the matrices, we get R 24 R 24 D 4 R 24 = R 24 D 4 +q n+1 (q q 1 )Q 24. (4.27) Furthermore, Q 12 R 13 = Q 12 R 23, Q 24 Q 34 = P 23 Q 34, R 24 D 4 Q 34 = D 3 R 23 Q 34. (4.28) The operator (4.26) now becomes ( ) P 13 P 24 Q 12 R 23 D3 R 23 +q n+1 (q q 1 )P 23 Q34. (4.29) Performing another multiplication, we write this as P 13 P 24 Q 12 X 23 Q 34 (4.30) with Furthermore, X 23 = D 3 +q n+1 (q q 1 )(q 1 Q 23 + R 23 P 23 ). (4.31) P 13 P 24 Q 12 X 23 Q 34 = Q 34 P 13 P 24 X 23 Q 34 = Q 34 P 13 P 24 X 24 Q 34 = Q 34 P 13 Y 23 Q 34, (4.32) where Y 23 = P 23 X 23. Finally, since P 13 Y 23 = Y 21 P 13 and Q 34 P 13 Q 34 = Q 34, (4.33) the left hand side of (4.16) takes the form Y 21 Q 34 where Y 21 = Q 12 +q n+1 (q q 1 )(Ř12 +Iq 1 ) (4.34) thus completing the proof of (4.16). Without giving all the details, we note for the proof of (4.17) that Ř 1 12 = R 21 P 12 by (3.6) and so the left hand side of the relation can be written as Q 34 R32 R42 R31 R41 Q 12 P 13 P 24. (4.35) Then we proceed in the same manner as for the proof of (4.16) modifying the argument appropriately. 10
11 Now, (4.16) and (4.17) give ( ) Q 34 q n 1 Ř 23 Ř 34 Ř 12 Ř 23 +q n+1 Ř 23Ř Ř 1 12Ř 1 23 Q34 = ( q n 1 +q n+1) Q 12 Q 34. The proof of the theorem will be completed by verifying the following relations ( ) ( Q 12 Q 34 q 1 Ř 23 Ř 34 Ř 12 Ř 23 +qř 1 23Ř 1 34Ř 1 12 Ř 1 23 = q 3 +q 3) Q 12 Q 34 (4.36) and ( ) q 1 Ř 23 Ř 34 Ř 12 Ř 23 +qř 1 23Ř 1 34 Ř 1 12Ř 1 23 Q12 Q 34 = ( q 3 +q 3) Q 12 Q 34. (4.37) The arguments are similar for both relations, so we only give a proof of (4.36). Since Q 12 Q 34 = D 1 D 3 Q 12 Q 34 we may replace Q 12 Q 34 with Q 12 Q 34 in (4.36). We have Furthermore, Q 12 Q 34 Ř 23 Ř 34 Ř 12 Ř 23 = Q 12 Q 34 P 13 P 24 R 14 R 24 R 13 R 23. (4.38) Q 12 Q 34 P 13 P 24 = Q 12 P 13 P 24 Q 12 = Q 12 Q 23 P 24 Q 12 = Q 12 P 24 Q 34 Q 12 = Q 12 P 24 Q 12 Q 34 = Q 12 Q 34. (4.39) The right hand side of (4.38) now takes the form Q 12 Q 34 R 14 R 24 R 13 R 23. Using the relations Q 12 R 14 = Q 12 R 24, Q 12 Q 34 R 13 = Q 12 Q 34 R 14 = Q 12 Q 34 R 24, (4.40) we can write it as where Q 12 Q 34 V 24 R 23 = Q 12 Q 34 V 23 R 23, (4.41) V 23 = R 23 R 23 R 23. (4.42) Now we transform the second summand on the left hand side of (4.36) in a similar manner. Since Ř 1 = P R we have Q 12 Q 34 Ř 23Ř Ř 1 12Ř 1 23 = Q 12Q 34 R14 R24 R13 R23. (4.43) Exactly as above, we write this operator in the form where A direct calculation shows that completing the proof. Q 12 Q 34 W 23 R 23, (4.44) W 23 = R 23 R23 R23. (4.45) q 1 V R+qW R = ( q 3 +q 3) I, (4.46) 11
12 References [1] J. Birman and H. Wenzl, Braids, link polynomials and a new algebra, Trans. AMS 313 (1989), [2] R. Brauer, On algebras which are connected with the semisimple continuous groups, Ann. Math. 38 (1937), [3] V. Chari and A. Pressley, A guide to quantum groups, Cambridge University Press, [4] A. M. Gavrilik and A. U. Klimyk, q-deformed orthogonal and pseudo-orthogonal algebras and their representations, Lett. Math. Phys. 21 (1991), [5] A. M. Gavrilik and N. Z. Iorgov, On Casimir elements of q-algebras U q(so n ) and their eigenvalues in representations, in Symmetry in nonlinear mathematical physics, Proc. Inst. Mat. Ukr. Nat. Acad. Sci. 30, Kyiv, 1999, pp [6] T. Halverson and A. Ram, Characters of algebras cantaining a Jones basic construction: the Temperley Lieb, Okada, Brauer, and Birman Wenzl algebras, Adv. Math. 116 (1995), [7] M.Havlíček, A.U.KlimykandS.Pošta, Central elements of the algebras U q (so m) and U q (iso m ), Czechoslovak J. Phys. 50 (2000), [8] M. Jimbo, A q-analogue of U q (gl(n + 1)), Hecke algebra and the Yang Baxter equation, Lett. Math. Phys. 11 (1986), [9] A. U. Klimyk, Classification of irreducible representations of the q-deformed algebra U q(so n ), preprint math.qa/ [10] R. Leduc and A. Ram, A ribbon Hopf algebra approach to the irreducible representations of centralizer algebras: the Brauer, Birman Wenzl, and type A Iwahori Hecke algebras, Adv. Math. 125 (1997), [11] A. I. Molev, E. Ragoucy and P. Sorba, Coideal subalgebras of quantum affine algebras, preprint. [12] J. Murakami, The representations of the q-analogue of Brauer s centralizer algebras and the Kauffman polynomial of links, Publ. Res. Inst. Math. Sci. 26 (1990), [13] M. Nazarov, Young s orthogonal form for Brauer s centralizer algebra, J. Algebra 182 (1996),
13 [14] M. Noumi, Macdonald s symmetric polynomials as zonal spherical functions on quantum homogeneous spaces, Adv. Math. 123 (1996), [15] M. Noumi, T. Umeda and M. Wakayama, Dual pairs, spherical harmonics and a Capelli identity in quantum group theory, Compos. Math. 104 (1996), [16] A. Ram and H. Wenzl, Matrix units for centralizer algebras, J. Algebra 145 (1992), [17] N. Yu. Reshetikhin, L. A. Takhtajan and L. D. Faddeev, Quantization of Lie Groups and Lie algebras, Leningrad Math. J. 1 (1990), [18] H. Wenzl, On the structure of Brauer s centralizer algebras, Ann. Math. 128 (1988),
FUSION PROCEDURE FOR THE BRAUER ALGEBRA
FUSION PROCEDURE FOR THE BRAUER ALGEBRA A. P. ISAEV AND A. I. MOLEV Abstract. We show that all primitive idempotents for the Brauer algebra B n ω can be found by evaluating a rational function in several
More informationRepresentation theory and combinatorics of diagram algebras.
Representation theory and combinatorics of diagram algebras. Zajj Daugherty May 15, 2016 Combinatorial representation theory Combinatorial representation theory Representation theory: Given an algebra
More informationHopf Algebras. Zajj Daugherty. March 6, 2012
Hopf Algebras Zajj Daugherty March 6, 2012 Big idea: The Hopf algebra structure is essentially what one needs in order to guarantee that tensor products of modules are also modules Definition A bialgebra
More informationFrom Schur-Weyl duality to quantum symmetric pairs
.. From Schur-Weyl duality to quantum symmetric pairs Chun-Ju Lai Max Planck Institute for Mathematics in Bonn cjlai@mpim-bonn.mpg.de Dec 8, 2016 Outline...1 Schur-Weyl duality.2.3.4.5 Background.. GL
More informationarxiv:math/ v3 [math.qa] 21 Aug 2003
Coideal subalgebras in quantum affine algebras arxiv:math/0208140v3 [math.qa] 21 Aug 2003 A. I. Molev, E. Ragoucy and P. Sorba Abstract We introduce two subalgebras in the type A quantum affine algebra
More informationSCHUR-WEYL DUALITY FOR QUANTUM GROUPS
SCHUR-WEYL DUALITY FOR QUANTUM GROUPS YI SUN Abstract. These are notes for a talk in the MIT-Northeastern Fall 2014 Graduate seminar on Hecke algebras and affine Hecke algebras. We formulate and sketch
More informationUniversal K-matrices via quantum symmetric pairs
Universal K-matrices via quantum symmetric pairs Martina Balagović (joint work with Stefan Kolb) School of Mathematics and Statistics Newcastle University Leicester, September 215 1. Introduction - Universal
More informationNon-Commutative Covariant Differential Calculi on Quantum Spaces and Quantum Groups
Seminar Sophus Lie 1 (1991) 125 132 Non-Commutative Covariant Differential Calculi on Quantum Spaces and Quantum Groups Konrad Schmüdgen 1. Introduction There are two alternative fundamental approaches
More informationCasimir elements for classical Lie algebras. and affine Kac Moody algebras
Casimir elements for classical Lie algebras and affine Kac Moody algebras Alexander Molev University of Sydney Plan of lectures Plan of lectures Casimir elements for the classical Lie algebras from the
More informationCellular structures using U q -tilting modules
Cellular structures using U q -tilting modules Or: centralizer algebras are fun! Daniel Tubbenhauer q(λ) g λ i M f λ j ι λ T q(λ) N g λ i f λ j π λ q(λ) Joint work with Henning Haahr Andersen and Catharina
More informationCitation Osaka Journal of Mathematics. 43(2)
TitleIrreducible representations of the Author(s) Kosuda, Masashi Citation Osaka Journal of Mathematics. 43(2) Issue 2006-06 Date Text Version publisher URL http://hdl.handle.net/094/0396 DOI Rights Osaka
More informationCartan A n series as Drinfeld doubles
Monografías de la Real Academia de Ciencias de Zaragoza. 9: 197 05, (006). Cartan A n series as Drinfeld doubles M.A. del Olmo 1, A. Ballesteros and E. Celeghini 3 1 Departamento de Física Teórica, Universidad
More informationarxiv:math/ v2 [math.qa] 10 Jan 2003
R-matrix presentation for (super) Yangians Y(g) D. Arnaudon a, J. Avan b, N. Crampé a, L. Frappat ac, E. Ragoucy a arxiv:math/0111325v2 [math.qa] 10 Jan 2003 a Laboratoire d Annecy-le-Vieux de Physique
More informationProjective Quantum Spaces
DAMTP/94-81 Projective Quantum Spaces U. MEYER D.A.M.T.P., University of Cambridge um102@amtp.cam.ac.uk September 1994 arxiv:hep-th/9410039v1 6 Oct 1994 Abstract. Associated to the standard SU (n) R-matrices,
More informationIVAN LOSEV. KEK 1 = q 2 E, KF K 1 = q 2 F, EF F E = K K 1 q q 1.
LECTURE 13: REPRESENTATIONS OF U q (g) AND R-MATRICES IVAN LOSEV Introduction In this lecture we study the representation theory of U q (g) when q is not a root of 1. In Section 1, we classify the finite
More informationKnizhnik-Zamolodchikov type equations for the root system B and Capelli central elements
Journal of Physics: Conference Series OPEN ACCESS Knizhnik-Zamolodchikov type equations for the root system B and Capelli central elements To cite this article: D V Artamonov and V A Golubeva 2014 J. Phys.:
More informationarxiv:q-alg/ v1 13 Jul 1995
1 THE EXPONENTIAL MAP FOR REPRESENTATIONS OF U p,q (gl(2)) arxiv:q-alg/9507009v1 13 Jul 1995 Joris Van der Jeugt Department of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Ghent, Krijgslaan
More informationGelfand Tsetlin bases for classical Lie algebras
Gelfand Tsetlin bases for classical Lie algebras A. I. Molev School of Mathematics and Statistics University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia alexm@ maths.usyd.edu.au To appear in Handbook of Algebra (M.
More informationClassical Lie algebras and Yangians
Classical Lie algebras and Yangians Alexander Molev University of Sydney Advanced Summer School Integrable Systems and Quantum Symmetries Prague 2007 Lecture 1. Casimir elements for classical Lie algebras
More informationUse of Quantum Algebras in Quantum Gravity
Proceedings of Institute of Mathematics of NAS of Ukraine 2000, Vol. 30, Part 2, 304 309. Use of Quantum Algebras in Quantum Gravity A.M. GAVRILIK Bogolyubov Institute for Theoretical Physics, Metrologichna
More informationSTRONGLY MULTIPLICITY FREE MODULES FOR LIE ALGEBRAS AND QUANTUM GROUPS
STRONGLY MULTIPLICITY FREE MODULES FOR LIE ALGEBRAS AND QUANTUM GROUPS G.I. LEHRER AND R.B. ZHANG To Gordon James on his 60 th birthday Abstract. Let U be either the universal enveloping algebra of a complex
More informationDeformation of the `embedding'
Home Search Collections Journals About Contact us My IOPscience Deformation of the `embedding' This article has been downloaded from IOPscience. Please scroll down to see the full text article. 1997 J.
More informationarxiv:math/ v3 [math.qa] 16 Feb 2003
arxiv:math/0108176v3 [math.qa] 16 Feb 2003 UNO S CONJECTURE ON REPRESENTATION TYPES OF HECKE ALGEBRAS SUSUMU ARIKI Abstract. Based on a recent result of the author and A.Mathas, we prove that Uno s conjecture
More informationCommuting families in Hecke and Temperley-Lieb Algebras
Commuting families in Hece and Temperley-Lieb Algebras Tom Halverson Department of Mathematics Macalester College Saint Paul, MN 55105 halverson@macalesteredu Manuela Mazzocco Department of Mathematics
More informationq-rook monoid algebras, Hecke algebras, and Schur-Weyl duality
q-rook monoid algebras, Hecke algebras, and Schur-Weyl duality Tom Halverson Department of Mathematics and Computer Science Macalester College St Paul, MN 55105 halverson@macalesteredu and Arun Ram Department
More informationNOTES FOR 128: COMBINATORIAL REPRESENTATION THEORY OF COMPLEX LIE ALGEBRAS AND RELATED TOPICS
NOTES FOR 128: COMBINATORIAL REPRESENTATION THEORY OF COMPLEX LIE ALGEBRAS AND RELATED TOPICS (FIRST COUPLE LECTURES MORE ONLINE AS WE GO) Recommended reading [Bou] N. Bourbaki, Elements of Mathematics:
More informationREPRESENTATIONS OF S n AND GL(n, C)
REPRESENTATIONS OF S n AND GL(n, C) SEAN MCAFEE 1 outline For a given finite group G, we have that the number of irreducible representations of G is equal to the number of conjugacy classes of G Although
More informationREPRESENTATION THEORY OF S n
REPRESENTATION THEORY OF S n EVAN JENKINS Abstract. These are notes from three lectures given in MATH 26700, Introduction to Representation Theory of Finite Groups, at the University of Chicago in November
More informationHigher Schur-Weyl duality for cyclotomic walled Brauer algebras
Higher Schur-Weyl duality for cyclotomic walled Brauer algebras (joint with Hebing Rui) Shanghai Normal University December 7, 2015 Outline 1 Backgroud 2 Schur-Weyl duality between general linear Lie algebras
More informationGenerators of affine W-algebras
1 Generators of affine W-algebras Alexander Molev University of Sydney 2 The W-algebras first appeared as certain symmetry algebras in conformal field theory. 2 The W-algebras first appeared as certain
More informationFigure 1 The term mutant was coined by Conway, and refers to the following general construction.
DISTINGUISHING MUTANTS BY KNOT POLYNOMIALS HUGH R. MORTON and PETER R. CROMWELL Department of Pure Mathematics, University of Liverpool, PO Box 147, Liverpool, L69 3BX ABSTRACT We consider the problem
More informationarxiv:math/ v1 [math.qa] 26 Oct 2006
A GENERALIZATION OF THE CAPELLI IDENTITY arxiv:math/0610799v1 [math.qa] 26 Oct 2006 E. MUKHIN, V. TARASOV, AND A. VARCHENKO Abstract. We prove a generalization of the Capelli identity. As an application
More informationarxiv:math/ v1 [math.qa] 6 Jul 2004
arxiv:math/0407085v1 [math.qa] 6 Jul 2004 EXOTIC BIALGEBRAS : NON-DEFORMATION QUANTUM GROUPS D. ARNAUDON Laboratoire d Annecy-le-Vieux de Physique Théorique LAPTH, UMR 5108 du CNRS associée à l Université
More informationA QUATERNIONIC BRAID REPRESENTATION (AFTER GOLDSCHMIDT AND JONES)
A QUATERNIONIC BRAID REPRESENTATION (AFTER GOLDSCHMIDT AND JONES) ERIC C. ROWELL Abstract. We show that the braid group representations associated with the (3, 6)-quotients of the Hecke algebras factor
More informationAN UPPER BOUND FOR SIGNATURES OF IRREDUCIBLE, SELF-DUAL gl(n, C)-REPRESENTATIONS
AN UPPER BOUND FOR SIGNATURES OF IRREDUCIBLE, SELF-DUAL gl(n, C)-REPRESENTATIONS CHRISTOPHER XU UROP+ Summer 2018 Mentor: Daniil Kalinov Project suggested by David Vogan Abstract. For every irreducible,
More information2 JAKOBSEN, JENSEN, JNDRUP AND ZHANG Let U q be a quantum group dened by a Cartan matrix of type A r together with the usual quantized Serre relations
QUADRATIC ALGEBRAS OF TYPE AIII; I HANS PLESNER JAKOBSEN, ANDERS JENSEN, SREN JNDRUP, AND HECHUN ZHANG 1;2 Department of Mathematics, Universitetsparken 5 DK{2100 Copenhagen, Denmark E-mail: jakobsen,
More informationRepresentations of the Rook-Brauer Algebra
Representations of the Rook-Brauer Algebra Elise delmas Department of Mathematics Macalester College St. Paul, MN 55105 Tom Halverson Department of Mathematics Macalester College St. Paul, MN 55105 June
More informationPonidicherry Conference, Frederick Goodman
and the and the Ponidicherry Conference, 2010 The University of Iowa goodman@math.uiowa.edu and the The goal of this work is to certain finite dimensional algebras that arise in invariant theory, knot
More informationFrom twisted quantum loop algebras to twisted Yangians
From twisted quantum loop algebras to twisted Yangians Patrick Conner, Nicolas Guay May 13, 2015 Abstract We prove how the Yangian of gl N in its RTT presentation and Olshanski s twisted Yangians for the
More informationWeights of Markov Traces on Hecke Algebras. R.C. Orellana y. November 6, Abstract
Weights of Markov Traces on ecke Algebras R.C. Orellana y November 6, 998 Abstract We compute the weights, i.e. the values at the minimal idempotents, for the Markov trace on the ecke algebra of type B
More informationOn the singular elements of a semisimple Lie algebra and the generalized Amitsur-Levitski Theorem
On the singular elements of a semisimple Lie algebra and the generalized Amitsur-Levitski Theorem Bertram Kostant, MIT Conference on Representations of Reductive Groups Salt Lake City, Utah July 10, 2013
More informationLecture Notes Introduction to Cluster Algebra
Lecture Notes Introduction to Cluster Algebra Ivan C.H. Ip Update: May 16, 2017 5 Review of Root Systems In this section, let us have a brief introduction to root system and finite Lie type classification
More informationModular branching rules and the Mullineux map for Hecke algebras of type A
Modular branching rules and the Mullineux map for Hecke algebras of type A 1 Introduction Jonathan Brundan Department of Mathematics University of Oregon Eugene, OR 97403-1222 USA E-mail: brundan@darkwing.uoregon.edu
More informationMath 210C. The representation ring
Math 210C. The representation ring 1. Introduction Let G be a nontrivial connected compact Lie group that is semisimple and simply connected (e.g., SU(n) for n 2, Sp(n) for n 1, or Spin(n) for n 3). Let
More informationA construction of the affine VW supercategory
A construction of the affine VW supercategory Mee Seong Im United States Military Academy West Point, NY Institute for Computational and Experimental Research in Mathematics Brown University, Providence,
More informationIs the Universe Uniquely Determined by Invariance Under Quantisation?
24 March 1996 PEG-09-96 Is the Universe Uniquely Determined by Invariance Under Quantisation? Philip E. Gibbs 1 Abstract In this sequel to my previous paper, Is String Theory in Knots? I explore ways of
More informationarxiv:math/ v1 [math.qa] 20 Feb 2001
COLOURED EXTENSION OF GL (2) AND ITS DUAL ALGEBRA arxiv:math/0102163v1 [math.qa] 20 Feb 2001 Deepak Parashar Max-Planck-Institute for Mathematics in the Sciences Inselstrasse 22-26, D-04103 Leipzig Germany
More informationRadon Transforms and the Finite General Linear Groups
Claremont Colleges Scholarship @ Claremont All HMC Faculty Publications and Research HMC Faculty Scholarship 1-1-2004 Radon Transforms and the Finite General Linear Groups Michael E. Orrison Harvey Mudd
More informationSCHUR-WEYL DUALITY FOR U(n)
SCHUR-WEYL DUALITY FOR U(n) EVAN JENKINS Abstract. These are notes from a lecture given in MATH 26700, Introduction to Representation Theory of Finite Groups, at the University of Chicago in December 2009.
More informationCombinatorial bases for representations. of the Lie superalgebra gl m n
Combinatorial bases for representations of the Lie superalgebra gl m n Alexander Molev University of Sydney Gelfand Tsetlin bases for gln Gelfand Tsetlin bases for gl n Finite-dimensional irreducible representations
More informationSPHERICAL UNITARY REPRESENTATIONS FOR REDUCTIVE GROUPS
SPHERICAL UNITARY REPRESENTATIONS FOR REDUCTIVE GROUPS DAN CIUBOTARU 1. Classical motivation: spherical functions 1.1. Spherical harmonics. Let S n 1 R n be the (n 1)-dimensional sphere, C (S n 1 ) the
More informationRESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES RIMS Bethe subalgebras in Hecke algebra and Gaudin models. A.P. ISAEV and A.N.
RIMS-1775 Bethe subalgebras in Hecke algebra and Gaudin models By A.P. ISAEV and A.N. KIRILLOV February 2013 RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES KYOTO UNIVERSITY, Kyoto, Japan Bethe subalgebras
More informationHighest-weight Theory: Verma Modules
Highest-weight Theory: Verma Modules Math G4344, Spring 2012 We will now turn to the problem of classifying and constructing all finitedimensional representations of a complex semi-simple Lie algebra (or,
More informationAdjoint Representations of the Symmetric Group
Adjoint Representations of the Symmetric Group Mahir Bilen Can 1 and Miles Jones 2 1 mahirbilencan@gmail.com 2 mej016@ucsd.edu Abstract We study the restriction to the symmetric group, S n of the adjoint
More informationarxiv:math/ v2 [math.rt] 27 Nov 2006
DOUBLE AFFINE HECKE ALGEBRAS FOR THE SPIN SYMMETRIC GROUP arxiv:math/0608074v2 [math.rt] 27 Nov 2006 WEIQIANG WANG Abstract. We introduce a new class (in two versions, A u and B u ) of rational double
More informationSPLITTING FIELDS OF CHARACTERISTIC POLYNOMIALS IN ALGEBRAIC GROUPS
SPLITTING FIELDS OF CHARACTERISTIC POLYNOMIALS IN ALGEBRAIC GROUPS E. KOWALSKI In [K1] and earlier in [K2], questions of the following type are considered: suppose a family (g i ) i of matrices in some
More informationSAMPLE TEX FILE ZAJJ DAUGHERTY
SAMPLE TEX FILE ZAJJ DAUGHERTY Contents. What is the partition algebra?.. Graphs and equivalence relations.. Diagrams and their compositions.. The partition algebra. Combinatorial representation theory:
More informationBaxter Q-operators and tau-function for quantum integrable spin chains
Baxter Q-operators and tau-function for quantum integrable spin chains Zengo Tsuboi Institut für Mathematik und Institut für Physik, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin This is based on the following papers.
More informationBPS states, permutations and information
BPS states, permutations and information Sanjaye Ramgoolam Queen Mary, University of London YITP workshop, June 2016 Permutation centralizer algebras, Mattioli and Ramgoolam arxiv:1601.06086, Phys. Rev.
More informationChapter 2 The Group U(1) and its Representations
Chapter 2 The Group U(1) and its Representations The simplest example of a Lie group is the group of rotations of the plane, with elements parametrized by a single number, the angle of rotation θ. It is
More informationRepresentations of algebraic groups and their Lie algebras Jens Carsten Jantzen Lecture III
Representations of algebraic groups and their Lie algebras Jens Carsten Jantzen Lecture III Lie algebras. Let K be again an algebraically closed field. For the moment let G be an arbitrary algebraic group
More informationOn integrals of Quantum Supergroup U q gl(n m)
On integrals of Quantum Supergroup U q gl(n m) Jianjun Paul Tian Department of Mathematical Sciences New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM 88001 Abstract A linear basis of quantum supergroup U q
More informationREPRESENTING HOMOLOGY AUTOMORPHISMS OF NONORIENTABLE SURFACES
REPRESENTING HOMOLOGY AUTOMORPHISMS OF NONORIENTABLE SURFACES JOHN D. MCCARTHY AND ULRICH PINKALL Abstract. In this paper, we prove that every automorphism of the first homology group of a closed, connected,
More informationCharacter values and decomposition matrices of symmetric groups
Character values and decomposition matrices of symmetric groups Mark Wildon Abstract The relationships between the values taken by ordinary characters of symmetric groups are exploited to prove two theorems
More informationSEMISIMPLE SYMPLECTIC CHARACTERS OF FINITE UNITARY GROUPS
SEMISIMPLE SYMPLECTIC CHARACTERS OF FINITE UNITARY GROUPS BHAMA SRINIVASAN AND C. RYAN VINROOT Abstract. Let G = U(2m, F q 2) be the finite unitary group, with q the power of an odd prime p. We prove that
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.rt] 11 Sep 2009
FACTORING TILTING MODULES FOR ALGEBRAIC GROUPS arxiv:0909.2239v1 [math.rt] 11 Sep 2009 S.R. DOTY Abstract. Let G be a semisimple, simply-connected algebraic group over an algebraically closed field of
More informationA 2 G 2 A 1 A 1. (3) A double edge pointing from α i to α j if α i, α j are not perpendicular and α i 2 = 2 α j 2
46 MATH 223A NOTES 2011 LIE ALGEBRAS 11. Classification of semisimple Lie algebras I will explain how the Cartan matrix and Dynkin diagrams describe root systems. Then I will go through the classification
More informationON AN INFINITE-DIMENSIONAL GROUP OVER A FINITE FIELD. A. M. Vershik, S. V. Kerov
ON AN INFINITE-DIMENSIONAL GROUP OVER A FINITE FIELD A. M. Vershik, S. V. Kerov Introduction. The asymptotic representation theory studies the behavior of representations of large classical groups and
More informatione j = Ad(f i ) 1 2a ij/a ii
A characterization of generalized Kac-Moody algebras. J. Algebra 174, 1073-1079 (1995). Richard E. Borcherds, D.P.M.M.S., 16 Mill Lane, Cambridge CB2 1SB, England. Generalized Kac-Moody algebras can be
More informationThe number of simple modules of a cellular algebra
Science in China Ser. A Mathematics 2005 Vol.?? No. X: XXX XXX 1 The number of simple modules of a cellular algebra LI Weixia ( ) & XI Changchang ( ) School of Mathematical Sciences, Beijing Normal University,
More informationLittlewood Richardson polynomials
Littlewood Richardson polynomials Alexander Molev University of Sydney A diagram (or partition) is a sequence λ = (λ 1,..., λ n ) of integers λ i such that λ 1 λ n 0, depicted as an array of unit boxes.
More informationA NOTE ON FREE QUANTUM GROUPS
A NOTE ON FREE QUANTUM GROUPS TEODOR BANICA Abstract. We study the free complexification operation for compact quantum groups, G G c. We prove that, with suitable definitions, this induces a one-to-one
More informationCategory O and its basic properties
Category O and its basic properties Daniil Kalinov 1 Definitions Let g denote a semisimple Lie algebra over C with fixed Cartan and Borel subalgebras h b g. Define n = α>0 g α, n = α
More informationDETECTING RATIONAL COHOMOLOGY OF ALGEBRAIC GROUPS
DETECTING RATIONAL COHOMOLOGY OF ALGEBRAIC GROUPS EDWARD T. CLINE, BRIAN J. PARSHALL AND LEONARD L. SCOTT Let G be a connected, semisimple algebraic group defined over an algebraically closed field k of
More informationTHE 2-MODULAR DECOMPOSITION MATRICES OF THE SYMMETRIC GROUPS S 15, S 16, AND S 17
THE 2-MODULAR DECOMPOSITION MATRICES OF THE SYMMETRIC GROUPS S 15, S 16, AND S 17 Abstract. In this paper the 2-modular decomposition matrices of the symmetric groups S 15, S 16, and S 17 are determined
More informationSYMPLECTIC LEAVES AND DEFORMATION QUANTIZATION
PROCEEDINGS OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 124, Number 1, January 1996 SYMPLECTIC LEAVES AND DEFORMATION QUANTIZATION ALBERT J. L. SHEU (Communicated by Palle E. T. Jorgensen) Abstract. In
More informationne varieties (continued)
Chapter 2 A ne varieties (continued) 2.1 Products For some problems its not very natural to restrict to irreducible varieties. So we broaden the previous story. Given an a ne algebraic set X A n k, we
More informationGROUP THEORY PRIMER. New terms: so(2n), so(2n+1), symplectic algebra sp(2n)
GROUP THEORY PRIMER New terms: so(2n), so(2n+1), symplectic algebra sp(2n) 1. Some examples of semi-simple Lie algebras In the previous chapter, we developed the idea of understanding semi-simple Lie algebras
More informationHarmonic Oscillator Lie Bialgebras and their Quantization
Harmonic Oscillator Lie Bialgebras and their Quantization arxiv:q-alg/9701027v1 27 Jan 1997 Angel Ballesteros and Francisco J. Herranz Departamento de Física, Universidad de Burgos Pza. Misael Bañuelos,
More informationVladimir Kirichenko and Makar Plakhotnyk
São Paulo Journal of Mathematical Sciences 4, 1 (2010), 109 120 Gorenstein Quivers Vladimir Kirichenko and Makar Plakhotnyk Faculty of Mechanics and Mathematics, Kyiv National Taras Shevchenko University,
More informationConference on Infinite Dimensional Lie Theory and its Applications (15-20 December, 2014) Title & Abstract
Conference on Infinite Dimensional Lie Theory and its Applications (15-20 December, 2014) Title & Abstract S. No. Name Title Abstract 1 Yuly Billig Proof of Rao's conjecture on classification of simple
More informationREPRESENTATION THEORY, LECTURE 0. BASICS
REPRESENTATION THEORY, LECTURE 0. BASICS IVAN LOSEV Introduction The aim of this lecture is to recall some standard basic things about the representation theory of finite dimensional algebras and finite
More informationQUANTUM WALLED BRAUER-CLIFFORD SUPERALGEBRAS
QUANTUM WALLED BRAUER-CLIFFORD SUPERALGEBRAS GEORGIA BENKART 1, NICOLAS GUAY 2, JI HYE JUNG 3, SEOK-JIN KANG 4, AND STEWART WILCOX 5 Abstract We introduce a new family of superalgebras, the quantum walled
More informationMultiplicity-Free Products of Schur Functions
Annals of Combinatorics 5 (2001) 113-121 0218-0006/01/020113-9$1.50+0.20/0 c Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, 2001 Annals of Combinatorics Multiplicity-Free Products of Schur Functions John R. Stembridge Department
More informationSCHUR-WEYL DUALITIES FOR SYMMETRIC INVERSE SEMIGROUPS
SCHUR-WEYL DUALITIES FOR SYMMETRIC INVERSE SEMIGROUPS GANNA KUDRYAVTSEVA AND VOLODYMYR MAZORCHUK Abstract. We obtain Schur-Weyl dualities in which the algebras, acting on both sides, are semigroup algebras
More informationModular representations of symmetric groups: An Overview
Modular representations of symmetric groups: An Overview Bhama Srinivasan University of Illinois at Chicago Regina, May 2012 Bhama Srinivasan (University of Illinois at Chicago) Modular Representations
More informationLINEAR EQUATIONS WITH UNKNOWNS FROM A MULTIPLICATIVE GROUP IN A FUNCTION FIELD. To Professor Wolfgang Schmidt on his 75th birthday
LINEAR EQUATIONS WITH UNKNOWNS FROM A MULTIPLICATIVE GROUP IN A FUNCTION FIELD JAN-HENDRIK EVERTSE AND UMBERTO ZANNIER To Professor Wolfgang Schmidt on his 75th birthday 1. Introduction Let K be a field
More informationKirillov-Reshetikhin Crystals and Cacti
Kirillov-Reshetikhin Crystals and Cacti Balázs Elek Cornell University, Department of Mathematics 8/1/2018 Introduction Representations Let g = sl n (C) be the Lie algebra of trace 0 matrices and V = C
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.ra] 23 Dec 2016
Rings of h-deformed differential operators B. Herlemont and O. Ogievetsky 1 arxiv:1612.08001v1 [math.ra] 23 Dec 2016 Aix Marseille Univ, Université de Toulon, CNRS, CPT, Marseille, France Kazan Federal
More informationOn diagonal solutions of the reflection equation
On diagonal solutions of the reflection equation Zengo Tsuboi Osaka city university advanced mathematical institute 3-3-138 Sugimoto Sumiyoshi-ku Osaka 558-8585 Japan arxiv:1811.10407v1 [math-ph] 26 Nov
More informationINTRODUCTION TO QUANTUM LIE ALGEBRAS
QUANTUM GROUPS AND QUANTUM SPACES BANACH CENTER PUBLICATIONS, VOLUME 40 INSTITUTE OF MATHEMATICS POLISH ACADEMY OF SCIENCES WARSZAWA 1997 INTRODUCTION TO QUANTUM LIE ALGEBRAS GUSTAV W. DELIU S Department
More informationMATH 101B: ALGEBRA II PART A: HOMOLOGICAL ALGEBRA
MATH 101B: ALGEBRA II PART A: HOMOLOGICAL ALGEBRA These are notes for our first unit on the algebraic side of homological algebra. While this is the last topic (Chap XX) in the book, it makes sense to
More informationSOLVABLE FUSION CATEGORIES AND A CATEGORICAL BURNSIDE S THEOREM
SOLVABLE FUSION CATEGORIES AND A CATEGORICAL BURNSIDE S THEOREM PAVEL ETINGOF The goal of this talk is to explain the classical representation-theoretic proof of Burnside s theorem in finite group theory,
More informationIntermediate semigroups are groups
Semigroup Forum Version of September 12, 2017 Springer-Verlag New York Inc. Intermediate semigroups are groups Alexandre A. Panin arxiv:math/9903088v3 [math.gr] 4 Dec 1999 Communicated by Mohan Putcha
More informationRepresentation theory and quantum mechanics tutorial Spin and the hydrogen atom
Representation theory and quantum mechanics tutorial Spin and the hydrogen atom Justin Campbell August 3, 2017 1 Representations of SU 2 and SO 3 (R) 1.1 The following observation is long overdue. Proposition
More informationLie Algebras of Finite and Affine Type
Lie Algebras of Finite and Affine Type R. W. CARTER Mathematics Institute University of Warwick CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS Preface page xiii Basic concepts 1 1.1 Elementary properties of Lie algebras 1
More informationDecomposition Matrix of GL(n,q) and the Heisenberg algebra
Decomposition Matrix of GL(n,q) and the Heisenberg algebra Bhama Srinivasan University of Illinois at Chicago mca-13, August 2013 Bhama Srinivasan (University of Illinois at Chicago) Heisenberg algebra
More informationMATH 223A NOTES 2011 LIE ALGEBRAS 35
MATH 3A NOTES 011 LIE ALGEBRAS 35 9. Abstract root systems We now attempt to reconstruct the Lie algebra based only on the information given by the set of roots Φ which is embedded in Euclidean space E.
More informationTetrahedron equation and generalized quantum groups
Atsuo Kuniba University of Tokyo PMNP2015@Gallipoli, 25 June 2015 PMNP2015@Gallipoli, 25 June 2015 1 / 1 Key to integrability in 2D Yang-Baxter equation Reflection equation R 12 R 13 R 23 = R 23 R 13 R
More informationQUATERNIONS AND ROTATIONS
QUATERNIONS AND ROTATIONS SVANTE JANSON 1. Introduction The purpose of this note is to show some well-known relations between quaternions and the Lie groups SO(3) and SO(4) (rotations in R 3 and R 4 )
More information