arxiv:math/ v1 [math.rt] 31 Jul 2003
|
|
- Lynne Montgomery
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Representations of rational Cherednik algebras of rank 1 in positive characteristic arxiv:math/ v1 [math.rt] 31 Jul Introduction Frédéric Latour September 13, 2018 Let Γ SL 2 (C) be a finite subgroup, and r be the number of conjugacy classes of Γ. Let D be the algebra of polynomial differential operators in one variable with complex coefficients. In the paper [CBH98], Crawley- Boevey and Holland introduced an r-parameter family of algebras H t,c1,...,c r 1 over C, which is a universal deformation of the semidirect product algebra CΓ D. They also described their representation theory, showing that it is related to the structure of the root system attached to Γ via the McKay s correspondence. The algebras of Crawley-Boevey and Holland are the simplest case of so called symplectic reflection algebras introduced in [EG02]. These algebras have interesting representation theory, about which little is known. The better understood case is that of rational Cherednik algebras corresponding to complex reflection groups [DO03, GGOR, CE], and especially that of real reflection (in particular, Weyl) groups [BEG03, Gor]. In the Weyl case, these algebras admit a q-deformation defined by Cherednik, whose representation theory (while having some similarities to the rational case) can be effectively studied by the technique of intertwiners [Che03] or geometric representation theory [Vas]. The goal of this paper is to begin the study of representation theory of rational Cherednik algebras in positive characteristic. Namely, we study the simplest case of rank 1, i.e. the algebras of [CBH98] for Γ = Z/rZ in characteristic p, which is prime to r. Our main result is a complete description of irreducible representations of such algebras. The paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we state the main results. In Section 3, we prove the results for the quantum case, i.e. the case when the Planck s constant t is nonzero. In this case, generic irreducible representations have dimension pr. In Section 4, we prove the results for the classical case, i.e. the case when the Planck s constant t is zero. In this case, generic irreducible representations have dimension r. Acknowledgements. The author thanks his adviser Pavel Etingof for posing the problem and useful discussions, as well as for helping to write an introduction. The work of the author was partially supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) grant DMS and by a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) Julie Payette research scholarship. 2 Statement of results Let k be an algebraically closed field of characteristic p and r 1 a positive integer relatively prime to p. Let ε k be a primitive r-th root of unity. Definition 2.1. Let t,c 1,...,c r 1 k. The algebra H t,c1,...,c r 1 over k is generated by x,y,s with relations s r = 1, sx = ε 1 xs, sy = εys, [y,x] = t c j s j. 1
2 In characteristic zero, this algebra has been studied in [CBH98]. In the sequel, we fix c 1,...,c r 1 and denote the algebra H t,c1,...,c r 1 simply by H t. We will classify irreducible representations of H t. In particular, we show that they are all finite dimensional. It is clear that for t 0, H t is isomorphic to H 1 with rescaled parameters c j. Thus it is sufficient to classify irreducible representations of H 0 and H 1. So we set H 1 = H, H 0 = H. Remark 2.2. In the trivial case r = 1, H is the polynomial algebra in two variables and H is the Weyl algebra. In the case r = 2, as pointed out in [CM02], H is a quotient of the universal enveloping algebra U(osp(1, 2)) of the Lie superalgebra osp(1, 2) by a central character. Below we will need the element = xy c j (1 ε j ) 1 s j, h def both in H and H. This element (in the case r = 2) was introduced in [CM02]. 2.1 Irreducible representations of H The elements x pr,y pr are central in H. Thus they have to act as scalars in irreducible representations. Proposition 2.3. Suppose that a,b k are not both zero. Then, for each β k which satisfies the equation r 1 m=0 f ( β + c j (1 ε j ) 1 ε mj) = ab, (1) where f(z) = z p z, there exists a unique irreducible representation V β,a,b of H, where x pr acts on V β,a,b through multiplication by a, y pr acts on V β,a,b through multiplication by b, and the spectrum of h in V β,a,b is β +F p. Explicitly, the representation V β,a,b looks as follows. Let µ i = β +i+ c j (1 ε j ) 1 ε ij, for all i = 0,...,pr 1. Then for a 0 the representation V β,a,b has a basis {v 0,v 1,...,v pr 1 } in which xv i = v i+1 for i = 0,...,pr 2, xv pr 1 = av 0, yv i = µ i v i 1 for i = 1,...,pr 1, yv 0 = a 1 µ 0 v pr 1, sv i On the other hand, if a = 0 (but b 0), we have = ε i v i. for i = 0,...,pr 1. xv i = µ i+1 v i+1 for i = 0,...,pr 2, xv pr 1 = b 1 µ 0 v 0, yv i = v i 1 for i = 1,...,pr 1, yv 0 = bv pr 1, sv i = ε i v i. for i = 0,...,pr 1. Thus dimv β,a,b = pr. Two roots β and β of (1) yield isomorphic representations if and only if β β F p. Furthermore, every irreducible representation of H on which x pr and y pr do not both act as zero is of the form V β,a,b for some β,a,b. 2
3 Example 2.4. For r = 2, V β,a,b (a 0) will has the following form: a 0 µ µ 2 0 x ,y µ 2p a 1 µ ,s Proposition 2.5. For each m Z/rZ, there exists a unique irreducible representation W m of H with x pr = y pr = 0 and sv = ε m v whenever yv = 0. The dimension D pr of W m is the smallest positive integer satisfying the equation D = W m has a basis {v 0,v 1,...,v D 1 }, such that D 1 c j ε (m i)j. i=0 xv i = v i+1, for 0 i D 2, xv D 1 = 0, yv i = µ i v i 1 for 1 i D 1, yv 0 = 0, sv i = ε m i v i for 0 i D 1, where µ k = k k 1 r 1 i=0 c jε (m i)j. Every irreducible representation of H on which x pr and y pr both act as zero is of the form W m for some m. Remark 2.6. For generic c j, we have dimw m = pr for all m. 2.2 Irreducible representations of H The elements x r,y r and h are central in H, so they must act as scalars in irreducible representations. Proposition 2.7. Suppose that a,b k are not both zero. Then, for each β which satisfies the equation r 1 ab = β + c j (1 ε j ) 1 ε mj, (2) m=0 there exists a unique irreducible representation V β,a,b of H, where x r acts on V β,a,b through multiplication by a, y r acts on V β,a,b through multiplication by b, and h acts on V β,a,b through multiplication by β. Explicitly, the representation V β,a,b looks as follows. Let µ i = β + c j (1 ε j ) 1 ε ij, for all i = 0,...,r 1. Then for a 0 the representation V β,a,b has a basis {v 0,v 1,...,v r 1 } in which xv i = v i+1 for i = 0,...,r 2, xv r 1 = av 0, yv i = µ i v i 1 for i = 1,...,r 1, yv 0 = a 1 µ 0 v r 1, sv i = ε i v i. for i = 0,...,r 1. 3
4 On the other hand, if a = 0 (but b 0), we have xv i = µ i+1 v i+1 for i = 0,...,r 2, xv r 1 = b 1 µ 0 v 0, yv i = v i 1 for i = 1,...,r 1, yv 0 = bv r 1, sv i = ε i v i. for i = 0,...,r 1. Thus dimv β,a,b = r. Every irreducible representation of H on which x r and y r do not both act as zero is of the form V β,a,b for some β,a,b. Proposition 2.8. For each m Z/rZ, there exists a unique irreducible representation W m of H with x r = y r = 0 and sv = ε m v whenever yv = 0. The dimension D r of W m is the smallest positive integer satisfying the equation W m has a basis {v 0,v 1,...,v D 1 }, such that 0 = D 1 c j ε (m i)j. i=0 xv i = v i+1, for 0 i D 2, xv D 1 = 0, yv i = µ i v i 1 for 1 i D 1, yv 0 = 0, sv i = ε m i v i for 0 i D 1, where µ k = k 1 r 1 i=0 c jε (m i)j. Every irreducible representation of H on which x r and y r both act as zero is of the form W m for some m. 3 Proof of propositions 2.3 and 2.5 Lemma 3.1 (PBW for H, easy direction). The elements x i y j s l, 0 i,j, 0 l r 1 span H over k. Proof. Given a product of x,y,s in any order, one can ensure that the y s are to the right of all the x s by using yx = xy+1 r 1 c js j repeatedly, and one can also ensure that the s s are to the right of all the x s and y s by using sx = ε 1 xs and sy = εys repeatedly. Lemma 3.2. x pr and y pr belong to the center Z(H) of H. Proof. First, let us show that x pr Z(H). It is enough to show that [x pr,y] = [x r,s] = 0. But x r s = ε r sx r = 4
5 sx r, so [x r,s] = 0. Now let g(s) = 1 r 1 c js j. Then, yx r = (yx)x r 1 = (xy+g(s))x r 1 = x(yx)x r 2 +g(s)x r 1 = = x r y+g(s)x r 1 +xg(s)x r 2 + +x r 1 g(s) = x r y+rx r 1 ( + c j s j x r 1 +xs j x r 2 + +x r 1 s j) = x r y+rx r 1 + c j (1+ε j + +ε j(r 1) )s j x r 1 = x r y+rx r 1, since 1 + z + + z r 1 = 0 whenever z 1 is an r-th root of unity. Thus [y,x r ] = rx r 1, and hence [y,x pr ] = prx pr 1 = 0. This completes the proof that x pr Z(H). The proof that y pr Z(H) is similar. Corollary 3.3. H is finitely generated as a module over its center. Proof. From Lemmas 3.1 and 3.2, we see that H is generated over its center by x i y j s l, 0 i,j pr 1, 0 l r 1. Corollary 3.4. Every irreducible H-module is finite-dimensional over k. Proof. Let V be an irreducible H-module. Then V is cyclic; that is, V = H/J, where J is a left ideal of H. By corollary 3.3, it follows that V is a finitely generated Z(H)-module. Hence, there exists a maximal ideal M Z(H) such that V/MV 0. But MV is asubmodule ofthe irreducibleh-module V, somv = 0. Thus the action of H in V factors through H/MH, which is a finite-dimensional algebra. So V = (H/MH)/L for some left ideal L of H/MH. Hence V is finite-dimensional. Thus Schur s lemma implies that central elements of H act as scalars in any irreducible H-module. Lemma 3.5. One has [h,x] = x,[h,y] = y,[h,s] = 0. Proof. We have [h,x] = hx xh = xyx x 2 y+ c j (1 ε j ) 1 (xs j s j x) = x[y,x]+x c j s j = x[y,x]+x(1 [y,x]) = x. Similarly, [h,y] = y. Finally, sxy = ε 1 xsy = xys. From this it follows that s commutes with h. 5
6 Lemma 3.6. Let V be a representation of H. Then, the sum of the common eigenspaces of h and s is a subrepresentation. Proof. Let v V be a common eigenvector of h and s, with eigenvalues λ and µ respectively. Then, using lemma 3.5, h(xv) = xhv +xv = (λ+1)(xv), h(yv) = yhv yv = (λ 1)(yv), h(sv) = shv = λ(sv), s(xv) = ε 1 xsv = ε 1 µ(xv), s(yv) = εysv = εµ(yv), s(sv) = µ(sv). Thus, xv,yv and sv are also common eigenvectors of h and s. The result follows. Corollary 3.7. If V is an irreducible representation of H, then V = β,m V[β,m], where V[β,m] is the common eigenspace of h and s with eigenvalues β and ε m. Corollary 3.8. Let H be the subalgebra of H generated by Z(H),h and s. Then H is commutative. Proof. Follows from lemma 3.5. Lemma 3.9. One has x m y n s l H for all m,n,l such that pr divides m n. Proof. For all m 1, we have x m y m = x m 1 (xy)y m 1 = x m 1 (h+f 0 (s))y m 1 for some f 0 (s) k[s] = f 1 (s)x m 1 y m 1 +x m 1 hy m 1 for some f 1 (s) k[s] = f 1 (s)x m 1 y m 1 +x m 1 y m 1 h (m 1)x m 1 y m 1. Using induction, it follows that x m y m H for all m 0. Using lemma 3.2, we see that x m y n s l H whenever pr divides m n. Corollary Let V be an irreducible H-module. Then dimv[β,m] 1 for each β k,m Z/rZ. Moreover, if V[β,m] 0 and V[β,m ] 0, then β β is an element of the prime field F p k, and thus dimv pr. Proof. Let v V be nonzero. Since V is irreducible, we have Hv = V. By lemma 3.1, we know that V is generated over k by x i y j s l v, 0 i,j,0 l r 1. By lemma 3.2, it follows that V is generated over k by x i y j s l v, 0 i,j pr 1,0 l r 1. Now suppose V[β,m] 0, and let v V[β,m] be nonzero. Then x i y j s l v V[β + i j,m i + j] for all i,j,l. This proves the second part of the corollary, and also implies that V[β,m] is generated by x i y i s l v with 0 i pr 1. Thus V[β,m] Hv, by lemma 3.9. But it is easy to see that Hv V[β,m]. Thus Hv = V[β,m]. Since this is true for all nonzero v V[β,m], we conclude that V[β,m] is an irreducible representation of H. Since H is commutative, we see that V[β,m] is one dimensional. This proves the first part of the corollary. 6
7 Proof of proposition 2.3. Let V be an irreducible representation of H. Let v V[β,m] be nonzero. Then x i v V[β + i,m i] for all i. By lemma 3.2, we know that x pr,y pr act on V by multiplication by scalars a,b respectively. Assume a 0. Then x pr v = av 0, so x i v 0 for all 0 i pr 1, and thus V[β +i,m i] 0 for 0 i pr 1. Applying corollary 3.10, and using the fact that p,r are relatively prime, we conclude that dimv = pr and dimv[β,m ] = 1 for β = β,β +1,...,β +(p 1),0 m r 1. We may now assume that m = 0. def Now let v i = x i v for i = 0,1,...,pr. In particular, v 0 = v and v pr = av. Then the v i,0 i pr 1, form a basis of V. We have v i V[β +i, i], so sv i = ε i v i. For each i, yv i V[β +i 1, i+1], so we let yv i = µ i v i 1 for 1 i pr. Then, for 1 i pr, we have so (β +i)v i = hv i = xy c j (1 ε j ) 1 s j v i = µ i c j (1 ε j ) 1 ε ij v i, µ i = β +i+ c j (1 ε j ) 1 ε ij, which proves uniqueness. Now it is easy to check that V β,a,b = span{v i,0 i pr 1}, xv i = v i+1, 0 i pr 1 yv i = µ i v i 1, 1 i pr sv i = ε i v i, 0 i pr v pr = av 0 defines a representation of H. Furthermore, the representation is irreducible, since any nonzero subrepresentation of V β,a,b would have dimension pr, by the arguments contained in this proof. We note that Therefore, ab = = = abv 0 = bv pr = y pr v pr = pr i=1 r 1 ( pr i=1 µ i )v 0. β +i+ c j (1 ε j ) 1 ε ij m=0 i=0 r 1 m=0 p 1 β +i+ c j (1 ε j ) 1 ε mj f β + c j (1 ε j ) 1 ε mj, where f(z) = z p z. It remainsto showthat V β,a,b = Vβ,a,b ifand only ifβ β F p. But if β β F p, then the common eigenvalues of h and s for V β,a,b and V β,a,b are the same, so V β,a,b = Vβ,a,b by the arguments in this proof. If β β / F p, then the common eigenvalues of h and s for V β,a,b and V β,a,b are different, so V β,a,b and V β a,b cannot be isomorphic. A similar argument works in the case a = 0,b 0. 7
8 Proof of proposition 2.5. Let V be an irreducible representationofhwith x pr = y pr = 0. Let v be a common eigenvector of h and s. Since x pr V = 0 and y pr V = 0, we can find minimal d,d such that x D v = y d v = 0. Let v i = y i v,1 i < d; v 0 = v; v i = x i v,1 i < D. Since V is irreducible, we know that the v i form a basis of V and that xv i 0 for 1 i < d, yv i 0 for 1 i < D. Thus, by scaling and relabeling, and using corollary 3.10, we may assume that V has a basis v 0,v 1,...,v D 1 with xv i = v i+1, for 0 i D 2; xv D 1 = 0; yv i = µ i v i 1 for 1 i D 1; yv 0 = 0; sv i = ε m i v i for 0 i D 1. In order for this to be a representation, we need (yx xy)v i == 1 c j s j v i. Writing µ D = µ 0 = 0, this gives Adding up (3) for 0 i k 1 gives In particular, µ i+1 µ i = 1 c j ε (m i)j for 0 i D 1. (3) k 1 µ k = k c j ε (m i)j. 0 = µ D = D i=0 D 1 c j ε (m i)j. i=0 As we saw earlier, in order for the representation to be irreducible, we need µ k 0 for 1 k D 1, which translates as k 1 0 k c j ε (m i)j, 1 k D 1. i=0 Corollary 3.11 (PBW for H). The elements x i y j s l, 0 i,j, 0 l r 1 form a basis of H over k. Proof. This follows because the elements x i y j s l act as linearly independent operators on β,a,b V β,a,b. 8
9 4 Proof of propositions 2.7 and 2.8 In this section, several proofs will be omitted because they are essentially identical to the corresponding proofs in the previous section. Lemma 4.1 (PBW for H, easy direction). The elements x i y j s l, 0 i,j, 0 l r 1 span H over k. Lemma 4.2. x r and y r belong to the center Z(H ) of H. Proof. First, let us show that x r Z(H ). It is enough to show that [x r,y] = [x r,s] = 0. But x r s = ε r sx r = sx r, so [x r,s] = 0. Now let g(s) = r 1 c js j. Then, yx r = (yx)x r 1 = (xy+g(s))x r 1 = x(yx)x r 2 +g(s)x r 1 = = x r y+g(s)x r 1 +xg(s)x r 2 + +x r 1 g(s) = x r ( y+ c j s j x r 1 +xs j x r 2 + +x r 1 s j) = x r y+ c j (1+ε j + +ε j(r 1) )s j x r 1 = x r y, since 1+z + +z r 1 = 0 whenever z 1 is a r-th root of unity. Thus [y,x r ] = 0. This completes the proof that x r Z(H ). The proof that y r Z(H ) is similar. Corollary 4.3. H is finitely generated as a module over its center. Corollary 4.4. Every irreducible H -module is finite-dimensional over k. In particular, central elements of H act as scalars in its irrreducible representations. Lemma 4.5. One has h Z(H ). Proof. We have [h,x] = hx xh = xyx x 2 y+ c j (1 ε j ) 1 (xs j s j x) = x[y,x]+x c j s j = x[y,x]+x( [y,x]) = 0. Similarly, [h,y] = 0. Finally, sxy = ε 1 xsy = xys, so [h,s] = 0. Let H be the subalgebra of H generated by Z(H ) and s. Obviously, H is commutative. 9
10 Lemma 4.6. x m y n s l H for all m,n,l such that r divides m n. Proof. For all m 1, we have x m y m = x m 1 (xy)y m 1 = x m 1 (h+f 0 (s))y m 1 for some f 0 (s) k[s] = f 1 (s)x m 1 y m 1 +x m 1 y m 1 h for some f 1 (s) k[s]. Using induction, it follows that x m y m H for all m 0. Using lemma 4.2, we see that x m y n s l H whenever r divides m n. If V is an irreducible representation of H, then V = m V[m], where V[m] is the eigenspace of s with eigenvalue ε m. Corollary 4.7. Let V be an irreducible H -module. Then dimv[m] 1 for each m Z/rZ. Thus dimv r. Proof. Let v V be nonzero. Since V is irreducible, we have H v = V. By lemma 4.1, we know that V is generated over k by x i y j s l v, 0 i,j,0 l r 1. By lemma 4.2, it follows that V is generated over k by x i y j s l v, 0 i,j r 1,0 l r 1. Now suppose V[m] 0, and let v V[m] be nonzero. Then x i y j s l v V[m i+j] for all i,j,l. This implies that V[m] is generated over k by x i y i s l v with 0 i r 1. Thus V[m] H v, by lemma 4.6. But it is easy to see that H v V[m]. Thus H v = V[m]. Since this is true for all nonzero v V[m], we conclude that V[m] is an irreducible representation of H, hence one dimensional. This proves the corollary. Proof of proposition 2.7. Let V be an irreducible representation of H. Let v V[m] be nonzero. Then x i v V[m i] for all i. By lemmas 4.2 and 4.5, we know that x r,y r and h act on V by multiplication by scalars, say a,b,β respectively. Assume a 0. Then x r v = av 0, so x i v 0 for all 0 i r 1, and thus V[m i] 0 for 0 i r 1. Applying corollary 4.7, we conclude that dimv = r and dimv[m ] = 1 for 0 m r 1. We may now assume that m = 0. def Now let v i = x i v for i = 0,1,...,r. In particular, v 0 = v and v r = av. Then the v i,0 i r 1, form a basis of V. We have v i V[ i], so sv i = ε i v i. For each i, yv i V[ i +1], so we let yv i = µ i v i 1 for 1 i r. Then, for 1 i r, we have βv i = hv i = xy c j (1 ε j ) 1 s j v i = µ i c j (1 ε j ) 1 ε ij v i, so µ i = β + c j (1 ε j ) 1 ε ij, 10
11 which proves uniqueness. Now it is easy to check that V β,a,b = span{v i,0 i r 1}, xv i = v i+1, 0 i r 1 yv i = µ i v i 1, 1 i r sv i = ε i v i, 0 i r v r = av 0 defines a representation of H. Furthermore, the representation is irreducible, since any nonzero subrepresentation of V β,a,b would have dimension r, by the arguments contained in this proof. We note that ( r abv 0 = bv r = y r v r = µ i )v 0. Therefore, ab = i=1 r β + c j (1 ε j ) 1 ε ij. i=1 A similar argument works in the case b 0. Proof of proposition 2.8. Let V be an irreducible representation of H with x r = y r = 0. Let v be an eigenvector of s. Since x r V = 0 and y r V = 0, we can find minimal d,d such that x D v = y d v = 0. Let v i = y i v,1 i < d; v 0 = v; v i = x i v,1 i < D. Since V is irreducible, we know that the v i form a basis of V and that xv i 0 for 1 i < d, yv i 0 for 1 i < D. Thus, by scaling and relabeling, and using corollary 4.7, we may assume that V has a basis v 0,v 1,...,v D 1 with xv i = v i+1, for 0 i D 2; xv D 1 = 0; yv i = µ i v i 1 for 1 i D 1; yv 0 = 0; In order for this to be a representation, we need sv i = ε m i v i for 0 i D 1. Writing µ D = µ 0 = 0, this gives (yx xy)v i = c j s j v i. Adding up (4) for 0 i t 1 gives µ i+1 µ i = c j ε (m i)j for 0 i D 1. (4) k 1 µ k = c j ε (m i)j. i=0 In particular, 0 = µ D = D 1 c j ε (m i)j. i=0 11
12 As we saw earlier, in order for the representation to be irreducible, we need µ k 0 for 1 k D 1, which translates as k 1 0 c j ε (m i)j, 1 k D 1. i=0 Corollary 4.8 (PBW for H ). The elements x i y j s l, 0 i,j, 0 l r 1 form a basis of H over k. Proof. This follows because the elements x i y j s l act as linearly independent operators on β,a,b V β,a,b. References [BEG03] Yuri Berest, Pavel Etingof, and Victor Ginzburg. Finite-dimensional representations of rational Cherednik algebras. Int. Math. Res. Not., 2003(19): , [CBH98] W. Crawley-Boevey and M. Holland. Noncommutative deformations of Kleinian singularities. Duke Math. J., 92(3): , [CE] Tatyana Chmutova and Pavel Etingof. On some representations of the rational Cherednik algebra. math.qa/ [Che03] Ivan Cherednik. Double affine Hecke algebras and difference Fourier transforms. Invent. Math., 152(2): , [CM02] I. Cherednik and Y. Markov. Hankel transform via double Hecke algebra. In M.W. Baldoni and D. Barbasch, editors, Iwahori Hecke Algebras and their Representation Theory, volume 1804 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics. Springer Verlag, New York, [DO03] C. F. Dunkl and E. M. Opdam. Dunkl operators for complex reflection groups. Proc. London Math. Soc., 86(1):70 108, [EG02] Pavel Etingof and Victor Ginzburg. Symplectic reflection algebras, Calogero Moser space and deformed Harish Chandra homomorphism. Invent. Math., 147(2): , [GGOR] Victor Ginzburg, Nicolas Guay, Eric Opdam, and Raphael Rouquier. On the category O for rational Cherednik algebras. math.rt/ , to appear in Invent. Math. [Gor] [Vas] Iain Gordon. On the quotient ring by diagonal harmonics. math.rt/ , to appear in Invent. Math. E. Vasserot. Induced and simple modules of double affine Hecke algebras. math.rt/
ON SOME REPRESENTATIONS OF THE RATIONAL CHEREDNIK ALGEBRA
REPRESENTATION THEORY An Electronic Journal of the American Mathematical Society Volume 7, Pages 641 650 (November 21, 2003) S 1088-4165(03)00214-0 ON SOME REPRESENTATIONS OF THE RATIONAL CHEREDNIK ALGEBRA
More informationLECTURES ON SYMPLECTIC REFLECTION ALGEBRAS
LECTURES ON SYMPLECTIC REFLECTION ALGEBRAS IVAN LOSEV 18. Category O for rational Cherednik algebra We begin to study the representation theory of Rational Chrednik algebras. Perhaps, the class of representations
More informationDefinition 9.1. The scheme µ 1 (O)/G is called the Hamiltonian reduction of M with respect to G along O. We will denote by R(M, G, O).
9. Calogero-Moser spaces 9.1. Hamiltonian reduction along an orbit. Let M be an affine algebraic variety and G a reductive algebraic group. Suppose M is Poisson and the action of G preserves the Poisson
More informationLECTURE 3: REPRESENTATION THEORY OF SL 2 (C) AND sl 2 (C)
LECTURE 3: REPRESENTATION THEORY OF SL 2 (C) AND sl 2 (C) IVAN LOSEV Introduction We proceed to studying the representation theory of algebraic groups and Lie algebras. Algebraic groups are the groups
More informationReducibility of generic unipotent standard modules
Journal of Lie Theory Volume?? (??)???? c?? Heldermann Verlag 1 Version of March 10, 011 Reducibility of generic unipotent standard modules Dan Barbasch and Dan Ciubotaru Abstract. Using Lusztig s geometric
More informationProof of the Broué Malle Rouquier Conjecture in Characteristic Zero (After I. Losev and I. Marin G. Pfeiffer)
Arnold Math J. DOI 10.1007/s40598-017-0069-7 RESEARCH EXPOSITION Proof of the Broué Malle Rouquier Conjecture in Characteristic Zero (After I. Losev and I. Marin G. Pfeiffer) Pavel Etingof 1 Received:
More informationIRREDUCIBLE REPRESENTATIONS OF SEMISIMPLE LIE ALGEBRAS. Contents
IRREDUCIBLE REPRESENTATIONS OF SEMISIMPLE LIE ALGEBRAS NEEL PATEL Abstract. The goal of this paper is to study the irreducible representations of semisimple Lie algebras. We will begin by considering two
More informationSPHERICAL UNITARY REPRESENTATIONS FOR REDUCTIVE GROUPS
SPHERICAL UNITARY REPRESENTATIONS FOR REDUCTIVE GROUPS DAN CIUBOTARU 1. Classical motivation: spherical functions 1.1. Spherical harmonics. Let S n 1 R n be the (n 1)-dimensional sphere, C (S n 1 ) the
More informationChapter 2: Linear Independence and Bases
MATH20300: Linear Algebra 2 (2016 Chapter 2: Linear Independence and Bases 1 Linear Combinations and Spans Example 11 Consider the vector v (1, 1 R 2 What is the smallest subspace of (the real vector space
More informationPast Research Sarah Witherspoon
Past Research Sarah Witherspoon I work on the cohomology, structure, and representations of various types of rings, such as Hopf algebras and group-graded algebras. My research program has involved collaborations
More informationLIE ALGEBRAS: LECTURE 3 6 April 2010
LIE ALGEBRAS: LECTURE 3 6 April 2010 CRYSTAL HOYT 1. Simple 3-dimensional Lie algebras Suppose L is a simple 3-dimensional Lie algebra over k, where k is algebraically closed. Then [L, L] = L, since otherwise
More information2. Preliminaries In this section we give some basic definitions and known results, which will be useful in the sequel.
M ath. es. Lett. 4 (2007), no. 4, 589 596 c International Press 2007 KOSULITY AND THE HILBET SEIES OF PEPOJECTIVE ALGEBAS Pavel Etingof and Ching-Hwa Eu. Introduction The goal of this paper is to prove
More informationHighest-weight Theory: Verma Modules
Highest-weight Theory: Verma Modules Math G4344, Spring 2012 We will now turn to the problem of classifying and constructing all finitedimensional representations of a complex semi-simple Lie algebra (or,
More informationSOLVABLE FUSION CATEGORIES AND A CATEGORICAL BURNSIDE S THEOREM
SOLVABLE FUSION CATEGORIES AND A CATEGORICAL BURNSIDE S THEOREM PAVEL ETINGOF The goal of this talk is to explain the classical representation-theoretic proof of Burnside s theorem in finite group theory,
More informationSYMPLECTIC REFLECTION ALGEBRAS AND AFFINE LIE ALGEBRAS
SYMPLECTIC REFLECTION ALGEBRAS AND AFFINE LIE ALGEBRAS PAVEL ETINGOF 1. Introduction These are the notes of my talk at the conference Double affine Hecke algebras and algebraic geometry (MIT, May 18, 2010).
More informationHonors Algebra 4, MATH 371 Winter 2010 Assignment 4 Due Wednesday, February 17 at 08:35
Honors Algebra 4, MATH 371 Winter 2010 Assignment 4 Due Wednesday, February 17 at 08:35 1. Let R be a commutative ring with 1 0. (a) Prove that the nilradical of R is equal to the intersection of the prime
More informationLECTURE 4: REPRESENTATION THEORY OF SL 2 (F) AND sl 2 (F)
LECTURE 4: REPRESENTATION THEORY OF SL 2 (F) AND sl 2 (F) IVAN LOSEV In this lecture we will discuss the representation theory of the algebraic group SL 2 (F) and of the Lie algebra sl 2 (F), where F is
More informationLECTURE NOTES ON CHEREDNIK ALGEBRAS
LECTURE NOTES ON CHEREDNIK ALGEBRAS PAVEL ETINGOF AND XIAOGUANG MA Contents 1. Introduction 4 2. Classical and quantum Olshanetsky-Perelomov systems for finite Coxeter groups 6 2.1. The rational quantum
More informationarxiv:math/ v2 [math.rt] 27 Nov 2006
DOUBLE AFFINE HECKE ALGEBRAS FOR THE SPIN SYMMETRIC GROUP arxiv:math/0608074v2 [math.rt] 27 Nov 2006 WEIQIANG WANG Abstract. We introduce a new class (in two versions, A u and B u ) of rational double
More informationarxiv:math/ v1 [math.rt] 6 Mar 2007
CALOGERO-MOSER SPACE, REDUCED RATIONAL CHEREDNIK ALGEBRAS AND TWO-SIDED CELLS. I.G. GORDON AND M. MARTINO arxiv:math/0703153v1 [math.rt] 6 Mar 2007 Abstract. We conjecture that the nilpotent points of
More informationDEFORMATIONS OF ALGEBRAS IN NONCOMMUTATIVE ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY EXERCISE SHEET 1
DEFORMATIONS OF ALGEBRAS IN NONCOMMUTATIVE ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY EXERCISE SHEET 1 TRAVIS SCHEDLER Note: it is possible that the numbers referring to the notes here (e.g., Exercise 1.9, etc.,) could change
More informationPresenting and Extending Hecke Endomorphism Algebras
Presenting and Extending Hecke Endomorphism Algebras Jie Du University of New South Wales Shanghai Conference on Representation Theory 7-11 December 2015 1 / 27 The Hecke Endomorphism Algebra The (equal
More informationGEOMETRIC STRUCTURES OF SEMISIMPLE LIE ALGEBRAS
GEOMETRIC STRUCTURES OF SEMISIMPLE LIE ALGEBRAS ANA BALIBANU DISCUSSED WITH PROFESSOR VICTOR GINZBURG 1. Introduction The aim of this paper is to explore the geometry of a Lie algebra g through the action
More informationRepresentations of semisimple Lie algebras
Chapter 14 Representations of semisimple Lie algebras In this chapter we study a special type of representations of semisimple Lie algberas: the so called highest weight representations. In particular
More informationRepresentation Theory
Representation Theory Representations Let G be a group and V a vector space over a field k. A representation of G on V is a group homomorphism ρ : G Aut(V ). The degree (or dimension) of ρ is just dim
More informationMAT 445/ INTRODUCTION TO REPRESENTATION THEORY
MAT 445/1196 - INTRODUCTION TO REPRESENTATION THEORY CHAPTER 1 Representation Theory of Groups - Algebraic Foundations 1.1 Basic definitions, Schur s Lemma 1.2 Tensor products 1.3 Unitary representations
More informationThe Hilbert Polynomial of the Irreducible Representation of the Rational Cherednik Algebra of Type A n in Characteristic p n
The Hilbert Polynomial of the Irreducible Representation of the Rational Cherednik Algebra of Type A n in Characteristic p n Merrick Cai Mentor: Daniil Kalinov, MIT Kings Park High School May 19-20, 2018
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.rt] 11 Sep 2009
FACTORING TILTING MODULES FOR ALGEBRAIC GROUPS arxiv:0909.2239v1 [math.rt] 11 Sep 2009 S.R. DOTY Abstract. Let G be a semisimple, simply-connected algebraic group over an algebraically closed field of
More informationMath 128: Lecture 4. March 31, 2014
Math 128: Lecture 4 March 31, 2014 Recall if g is a Lie algebra with modules M and N, then x g acts on m n M N by x(m n) = xm n + m xn. So (x) = x 1 + 1 x Ug Ug. Recall if g is a Lie algebra with modules
More informationINTRODUCTION TO LIE ALGEBRAS. LECTURE 2.
INTRODUCTION TO LIE ALGEBRAS. LECTURE 2. 2. More examples. Ideals. Direct products. 2.1. More examples. 2.1.1. Let k = R, L = R 3. Define [x, y] = x y the cross-product. Recall that the latter is defined
More informationarxiv:math/ v1 [math.qa] 5 Nov 2002
A new quantum analog of the Brauer algebra arxiv:math/0211082v1 [math.qa] 5 Nov 2002 A. I. Molev School of Mathematics and Statistics University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia alexm@ maths.usyd.edu.au
More informationarxiv:math/ v1 [math.ra] 9 Jun 2006
Noetherian algebras over algebraically closed fields arxiv:math/0606209v1 [math.ra] 9 Jun 2006 Jason P. Bell Department of Mathematics Simon Fraser University 8888 University Drive Burnaby, BC, V5A 1S6
More informationLECTURE 3: TENSORING WITH FINITE DIMENSIONAL MODULES IN CATEGORY O
LECTURE 3: TENSORING WITH FINITE DIMENSIONAL MODULES IN CATEGORY O CHRISTOPHER RYBA Abstract. These are notes for a seminar talk given at the MIT-Northeastern Category O and Soergel Bimodule seminar (Autumn
More informationREPRESENTATION THEORY. WEEK 4
REPRESENTATION THEORY. WEEK 4 VERA SERANOVA 1. uced modules Let B A be rings and M be a B-module. Then one can construct induced module A B M = A B M as the quotient of a free abelian group with generators
More information2 Garrett: `A Good Spectral Theorem' 1. von Neumann algebras, density theorem The commutant of a subring S of a ring R is S 0 = fr 2 R : rs = sr; 8s 2
1 A Good Spectral Theorem c1996, Paul Garrett, garrett@math.umn.edu version February 12, 1996 1 Measurable Hilbert bundles Measurable Banach bundles Direct integrals of Hilbert spaces Trivializing Hilbert
More information1.4 Solvable Lie algebras
1.4. SOLVABLE LIE ALGEBRAS 17 1.4 Solvable Lie algebras 1.4.1 Derived series and solvable Lie algebras The derived series of a Lie algebra L is given by: L (0) = L, L (1) = [L, L],, L (2) = [L (1), L (1)
More informationON THE CLASSIFICATION OF RANK 1 GROUPS OVER NON ARCHIMEDEAN LOCAL FIELDS
ON THE CLASSIFICATION OF RANK 1 GROUPS OVER NON ARCHIMEDEAN LOCAL FIELDS LISA CARBONE Abstract. We outline the classification of K rank 1 groups over non archimedean local fields K up to strict isogeny,
More informationOn Harish-Chandra bimodules of rational Cherednik algebras at regular parameter values. Christopher Charles Spencer
On Harish-Chandra bimodules of rational Cherednik algebras at regular parameter values. Christopher Charles Spencer Doctor of Philosophy University of Edinburgh August 21, 2012 Abstract This thesis deals
More informationQUALIFYING EXAM IN ALGEBRA August 2011
QUALIFYING EXAM IN ALGEBRA August 2011 1. There are 18 problems on the exam. Work and turn in 10 problems, in the following categories. I. Linear Algebra 1 problem II. Group Theory 3 problems III. Ring
More information1 Last time: least-squares problems
MATH Linear algebra (Fall 07) Lecture Last time: least-squares problems Definition. If A is an m n matrix and b R m, then a least-squares solution to the linear system Ax = b is a vector x R n such that
More informationMath 210C. The representation ring
Math 210C. The representation ring 1. Introduction Let G be a nontrivial connected compact Lie group that is semisimple and simply connected (e.g., SU(n) for n 2, Sp(n) for n 1, or Spin(n) for n 3). Let
More informationOutline. 1 Geometry and Commutative Algebra. 2 Singularities and Resolutions. 3 Noncommutative Algebra and Deformations. 4 Representation Theory
Outline Geometry, noncommutative algebra and representations Iain Gordon http://www.maths.ed.ac.uk/ igordon/ University of Edinburgh 16th December 2006 1 2 3 4 1 Iain Gordon Geometry, noncommutative algebra
More informationA CHARACTERIZATION OF DYNKIN ELEMENTS
A CHARACTERIZATION OF DYNKIN ELEMENTS PAUL E. GUNNELLS AND ERIC SOMMERS ABSTRACT. We give a characterization of the Dynkin elements of a simple Lie algebra. Namely, we prove that one-half of a Dynkin element
More informationALGEBRA QUALIFYING EXAM PROBLEMS LINEAR ALGEBRA
ALGEBRA QUALIFYING EXAM PROBLEMS LINEAR ALGEBRA Kent State University Department of Mathematical Sciences Compiled and Maintained by Donald L. White Version: August 29, 2017 CONTENTS LINEAR ALGEBRA AND
More informationClassification of semisimple Lie algebras
Chapter 6 Classification of semisimple Lie algebras When we studied sl 2 (C), we discovered that it is spanned by elements e, f and h fulfilling the relations: [e, h] = 2e, [ f, h] = 2 f and [e, f ] =
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.rt] 15 Oct 2008
CLASSIFICATION OF FINITE-GROWTH GENERAL KAC-MOODY SUPERALGEBRAS arxiv:0810.2637v1 [math.rt] 15 Oct 2008 CRYSTAL HOYT AND VERA SERGANOVA Abstract. A contragredient Lie superalgebra is a superalgebra defined
More informationTHE LIE ALGEBRA sl(2) AND ITS REPRESENTATIONS
An Şt Univ Ovidius Constanţa Vol 11(1), 003, 55 6 THE LIE ALGEBRA sl() AND ITS REPRESENTATIONS Camelia Ciobanu To Professor Silviu Sburlan, at his 60 s anniversary Abstract In this paper we present same
More informationReal representations
Real representations 1 Definition of a real representation Definition 1.1. Let V R be a finite dimensional real vector space. A real representation of a group G is a homomorphism ρ VR : G Aut V R, where
More informationRECOLLECTION THE BRAUER CHARACTER TABLE
RECOLLECTION REPRESENTATIONS OF FINITE GROUPS OF LIE TYPE LECTURE III: REPRESENTATIONS IN NON-DEFINING CHARACTERISTICS AIM Classify all irreducible representations of all finite simple groups and related
More informationMic ael Flohr Representation theory of semi-simple Lie algebras: Example su(3) 6. and 20. June 2003
Handout V for the course GROUP THEORY IN PHYSICS Mic ael Flohr Representation theory of semi-simple Lie algebras: Example su(3) 6. and 20. June 2003 GENERALIZING THE HIGHEST WEIGHT PROCEDURE FROM su(2)
More informationis an isomorphism, and V = U W. Proof. Let u 1,..., u m be a basis of U, and add linearly independent
Lecture 4. G-Modules PCMI Summer 2015 Undergraduate Lectures on Flag Varieties Lecture 4. The categories of G-modules, mostly for finite groups, and a recipe for finding every irreducible G-module of a
More informationREPRESENTATION THEORY WEEK 7
REPRESENTATION THEORY WEEK 7 1. Characters of L k and S n A character of an irreducible representation of L k is a polynomial function constant on every conjugacy class. Since the set of diagonalizable
More informationCourse 311: Michaelmas Term 2005 Part III: Topics in Commutative Algebra
Course 311: Michaelmas Term 2005 Part III: Topics in Commutative Algebra D. R. Wilkins Contents 3 Topics in Commutative Algebra 2 3.1 Rings and Fields......................... 2 3.2 Ideals...............................
More information0 A. ... A j GL nj (F q ), 1 j r
CHAPTER 4 Representations of finite groups of Lie type Let F q be a finite field of order q and characteristic p. Let G be a finite group of Lie type, that is, G is the F q -rational points of a connected
More informationAlgebra Exam Topics. Updated August 2017
Algebra Exam Topics Updated August 2017 Starting Fall 2017, the Masters Algebra Exam will have 14 questions. Of these students will answer the first 8 questions from Topics 1, 2, and 3. They then have
More informationA REPRESENTATION THEORETIC APPROACH TO SYNCHRONIZING AUTOMATA
A REPRESENTATION THEORETIC APPROACH TO SYNCHRONIZING AUTOMATA FREDRICK ARNOLD AND BENJAMIN STEINBERG Abstract. This paper is a first attempt to apply the techniques of representation theory to synchronizing
More informationTorus Knots and q, t-catalan Numbers
Torus Knots and q, t-catalan Numbers Eugene Gorsky Stony Brook University Simons Center For Geometry and Physics April 11, 2012 Outline q, t-catalan numbers Compactified Jacobians Arc spaces on singular
More informationThe Image of Weyl Group Translations in Hecke Algebras
The Image of Weyl Group Translations in Hecke Algebras UROP+ Final Paper, Summer 2015 Arkadiy Frasinich Mentor: Konstantin Tolmachov Project Suggested By Roman Bezrukavnikov September 1, 2015 Abstract
More informationwhere c R and the content of f is one. 1
9. Gauss Lemma Obviously it would be nice to have some more general methods of proving that a given polynomial is irreducible. The first is rather beautiful and due to Gauss. The basic idea is as follows.
More informationCOLOR LIE RINGS AND PBW DEFORMATIONS OF SKEW GROUP ALGEBRAS
COLOR LIE RINGS AND PBW DEFORMATIONS OF SKEW GROUP ALGEBRAS S. FRYER, T. KANSTRUP, E. KIRKMAN, A.V. SHEPLER, AND S. WITHERSPOON Abstract. We investigate color Lie rings over finite group algebras and their
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.ra] 10 May 2013
ON FINITE-DIMENSIONAL SUBALGEBRAS OF DERIVATION ALGEBRAS arxiv:1305.2285v1 [math.ra] 10 May 2013 Abstract. Let K be a field, R be an associative and commutative K-algebra and L be a Lie algebra over K.
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.ra] 21 Jul 2009
PRESENTATIONS OF MATRIX RINGS MARTIN KASSABOV arxiv:0907.3701v1 [math.ra] 21 Jul 2009 Recently, there has been a significant interest in the combinatorial properties the ring of n n matrices. The aim of
More informationTHE POLYNOMIAL REPRESENTATION OF THE TYPE A n 1 RATIONAL CHEREDNIK ALGEBRA IN CHARACTERISTIC p n
THE POLYNOMIAL REPRESENTATION OF THE TYPE A n RATIONAL CHEREDNIK ALGEBRA IN CHARACTERISTIC p n SHEELA DEVADAS AND YI SUN Abstract. We study the polynoial representation of the rational Cherednik algebra
More informationNotes on nilpotent orbits Computational Theory of Real Reductive Groups Workshop. Eric Sommers
Notes on nilpotent orbits Computational Theory of Real Reductive Groups Workshop Eric Sommers 17 July 2009 2 Contents 1 Background 5 1.1 Linear algebra......................................... 5 1.1.1
More informationMATH 304 Linear Algebra Lecture 20: The Gram-Schmidt process (continued). Eigenvalues and eigenvectors.
MATH 304 Linear Algebra Lecture 20: The Gram-Schmidt process (continued). Eigenvalues and eigenvectors. Orthogonal sets Let V be a vector space with an inner product. Definition. Nonzero vectors v 1,v
More informationAlgebra Homework, Edition 2 9 September 2010
Algebra Homework, Edition 2 9 September 2010 Problem 6. (1) Let I and J be ideals of a commutative ring R with I + J = R. Prove that IJ = I J. (2) Let I, J, and K be ideals of a principal ideal domain.
More informationALGEBRA QUALIFYING EXAM SPRING 2012
ALGEBRA QUALIFYING EXAM SPRING 2012 Work all of the problems. Justify the statements in your solutions by reference to specific results, as appropriate. Partial credit is awarded for partial solutions.
More informationRepresentations and Linear Actions
Representations and Linear Actions Definition 0.1. Let G be an S-group. A representation of G is a morphism of S-groups φ G GL(n, S) for some n. We say φ is faithful if it is a monomorphism (in the category
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.rt] 14 Nov 2007
arxiv:0711.2128v1 [math.rt] 14 Nov 2007 SUPPORT VARIETIES OF NON-RESTRICTED MODULES OVER LIE ALGEBRAS OF REDUCTIVE GROUPS: CORRIGENDA AND ADDENDA ALEXANDER PREMET J. C. Jantzen informed me that the proof
More informationReview of Linear Algebra
Review of Linear Algebra Throughout these notes, F denotes a field (often called the scalars in this context). 1 Definition of a vector space Definition 1.1. A F -vector space or simply a vector space
More informationRings. EE 387, Notes 7, Handout #10
Rings EE 387, Notes 7, Handout #10 Definition: A ring is a set R with binary operations, + and, that satisfy the following axioms: 1. (R, +) is a commutative group (five axioms) 2. Associative law for
More informationArithmetic Analogues of Derivations
JOURNAL OF ALGEBRA 198, 9099 1997 ARTICLE NO. JA977177 Arithmetic Analogues of Derivations Alexandru Buium Department of Math and Statistics, Uniersity of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131 Communicated
More informationTHE MINIMAL POLYNOMIAL AND SOME APPLICATIONS
THE MINIMAL POLYNOMIAL AND SOME APPLICATIONS KEITH CONRAD. Introduction The easiest matrices to compute with are the diagonal ones. The sum and product of diagonal matrices can be computed componentwise
More informationA linear algebra proof of the fundamental theorem of algebra
A linear algebra proof of the fundamental theorem of algebra Andrés E. Caicedo May 18, 2010 Abstract We present a recent proof due to Harm Derksen, that any linear operator in a complex finite dimensional
More informationSince G is a compact Lie group, we can apply Schur orthogonality to see that G χ π (g) 2 dg =
Problem 1 Show that if π is an irreducible representation of a compact lie group G then π is also irreducible. Give an example of a G and π such that π = π, and another for which π π. Is this true for
More informationIntroduction to Arithmetic Geometry Fall 2013 Lecture #18 11/07/2013
18.782 Introduction to Arithmetic Geometry Fall 2013 Lecture #18 11/07/2013 As usual, all the rings we consider are commutative rings with an identity element. 18.1 Regular local rings Consider a local
More informationREPRESENTATION THEORY NOTES FOR MATH 4108 SPRING 2012
REPRESENTATION THEORY NOTES FOR MATH 4108 SPRING 2012 JOSEPHINE YU This note will cover introductory material on representation theory, mostly of finite groups. The main references are the books of Serre
More informationAlgebra Qualifying Exam August 2001 Do all 5 problems. 1. Let G be afinite group of order 504 = 23 32 7. a. Show that G cannot be isomorphic to a subgroup of the alternating group Alt 7. (5 points) b.
More informationSUMMARY ALGEBRA I LOUIS-PHILIPPE THIBAULT
SUMMARY ALGEBRA I LOUIS-PHILIPPE THIBAULT Contents 1. Group Theory 1 1.1. Basic Notions 1 1.2. Isomorphism Theorems 2 1.3. Jordan- Holder Theorem 2 1.4. Symmetric Group 3 1.5. Group action on Sets 3 1.6.
More informationRepresentations of algebraic groups and their Lie algebras Jens Carsten Jantzen Lecture III
Representations of algebraic groups and their Lie algebras Jens Carsten Jantzen Lecture III Lie algebras. Let K be again an algebraically closed field. For the moment let G be an arbitrary algebraic group
More informationLemma 1.3. The element [X, X] is nonzero.
Math 210C. The remarkable SU(2) Let G be a non-commutative connected compact Lie group, and assume that its rank (i.e., dimension of maximal tori) is 1; equivalently, G is a compact connected Lie group
More informationREPRESENTATION THEORY OF S n
REPRESENTATION THEORY OF S n EVAN JENKINS Abstract. These are notes from three lectures given in MATH 26700, Introduction to Representation Theory of Finite Groups, at the University of Chicago in November
More informationGroup Theory. 1. Show that Φ maps a conjugacy class of G into a conjugacy class of G.
Group Theory Jan 2012 #6 Prove that if G is a nonabelian group, then G/Z(G) is not cyclic. Aug 2011 #9 (Jan 2010 #5) Prove that any group of order p 2 is an abelian group. Jan 2012 #7 G is nonabelian nite
More informationA NOTE ON SIMPLE DOMAINS OF GK DIMENSION TWO
A NOTE ON SIMPLE DOMAINS OF GK DIMENSION TWO JASON P. BELL Abstract. Let k be a field. We show that a finitely generated simple Goldie k-algebra of quadratic growth is noetherian and has Krull dimension
More informationZhedanov's algebra AW(3) and the double affine Hecke algebra in the rank one case: II: The spherical subalgebra Koornwinder, T.H.
UvA-DARE Digital Academic Repository Zhedanov's algebra AW3 and the double affine Hecke algebra in the rank one case: II: The spherical subalgebra Koornwinder, T.H. Published in: Symmetry, Integrability
More informationA construction of the affine VW supercategory
A construction of the affine VW supercategory Mee Seong Im United States Military Academy West Point, NY Institute for Computational and Experimental Research in Mathematics Brown University, Providence,
More informationREPRESENTATION THEORY. WEEKS 10 11
REPRESENTATION THEORY. WEEKS 10 11 1. Representations of quivers I follow here Crawley-Boevey lectures trying to give more details concerning extensions and exact sequences. A quiver is an oriented graph.
More informationarxiv:math/ v3 [math.qa] 16 Feb 2003
arxiv:math/0108176v3 [math.qa] 16 Feb 2003 UNO S CONJECTURE ON REPRESENTATION TYPES OF HECKE ALGEBRAS SUSUMU ARIKI Abstract. Based on a recent result of the author and A.Mathas, we prove that Uno s conjecture
More informationLECTURE 10: KAZHDAN-LUSZTIG BASIS AND CATEGORIES O
LECTURE 10: KAZHDAN-LUSZTIG BASIS AND CATEGORIES O IVAN LOSEV Introduction In this and the next lecture we will describe an entirely different application of Hecke algebras, now to the category O. In the
More informationThe Morozov-Jacobson Theorem on 3-dimensional Simple Lie Subalgebras
The Morozov-Jacobson Theorem on 3-dimensional Simple Lie Subalgebras Klaus Pommerening July 1979 english version April 2012 The Morozov-Jacobson theorem says that every nilpotent element of a semisimple
More informationarxiv:math/ v4 [math.rt] 4 Apr 2010
DOUBLE AFFINE HECKE ALGEBRAS FOR THE SPIN SYMMETRIC GROUP arxiv:math/0608074v4 [math.rt] 4 Apr 2010 WEIQIANG WANG Abstract. We introduce a new class (in two versions, Ḧc and Ḧ ) of rational double affine
More informationarxiv:math/ v2 [math.qa] 12 Jun 2004
arxiv:math/0401137v2 [math.qa] 12 Jun 2004 DISCRETE MIURA OPERS AND SOLUTIONS OF THE BETHE ANSATZ EQUATIONS EVGENY MUKHIN,1 AND ALEXANDER VARCHENKO,2 Abstract. Solutions of the Bethe ansatz equations associated
More informationNotes 10: Consequences of Eli Cartan s theorem.
Notes 10: Consequences of Eli Cartan s theorem. Version 0.00 with misprints, The are a few obvious, but important consequences of the theorem of Eli Cartan on the maximal tori. The first one is the observation
More informationFINITE GROUPS OF LIE TYPE AND THEIR
FINITE GROUPS OF LIE TYPE AND THEIR REPRESENTATIONS LECTURE IV Gerhard Hiss Lehrstuhl D für Mathematik RWTH Aachen University Groups St Andrews 2009 in Bath University of Bath, August 1 15, 2009 CONTENTS
More informationDecomposition Matrix of GL(n,q) and the Heisenberg algebra
Decomposition Matrix of GL(n,q) and the Heisenberg algebra Bhama Srinivasan University of Illinois at Chicago mca-13, August 2013 Bhama Srinivasan (University of Illinois at Chicago) Heisenberg algebra
More informationA linear algebra proof of the fundamental theorem of algebra
A linear algebra proof of the fundamental theorem of algebra Andrés E. Caicedo May 18, 2010 Abstract We present a recent proof due to Harm Derksen, that any linear operator in a complex finite dimensional
More informationIrreducible subgroups of algebraic groups
Irreducible subgroups of algebraic groups Martin W. Liebeck Department of Mathematics Imperial College London SW7 2BZ England Donna M. Testerman Department of Mathematics University of Lausanne Switzerland
More informationREPRESENTATION THEORY WEEK 5. B : V V k
REPRESENTATION THEORY WEEK 5 1. Invariant forms Recall that a bilinear form on a vector space V is a map satisfying B : V V k B (cv, dw) = cdb (v, w), B (v 1 + v, w) = B (v 1, w)+b (v, w), B (v, w 1 +
More informationOn the singular elements of a semisimple Lie algebra and the generalized Amitsur-Levitski Theorem
On the singular elements of a semisimple Lie algebra and the generalized Amitsur-Levitski Theorem Bertram Kostant, MIT Conference on Representations of Reductive Groups Salt Lake City, Utah July 10, 2013
More informationIVAN LOSEV. Lemma 1.1. (λ) O. Proof. (λ) is generated by a single vector, v λ. We have the weight decomposition (λ) =
LECTURE 7: CATEGORY O AND REPRESENTATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GROUPS IVAN LOSEV Introduction We continue our study of the representation theory of a finite dimensional semisimple Lie algebra g by introducing
More information