arxiv: v1 [cs.it] 21 Aug 2017

Transcription

1 Performance Gains of Optimal Antenna Deployment for Massive MIMO ystems Erem Koyuncu Department of Electrical an Computer Engineering, University of Illinois at Chicago arxiv: v [cs.it] 2 Aug 207 Abstract We consier the uplink of a single-cell multi-user multiple-input multiple-output MIMO system with several single antenna transmitters/users an one base station with N antennas in the N regime. The base station antennas are evenly istribute to n amissable locations throughout the cell. First, we show that a reliable per-user rate of Olog n is achievable through optimal locational optimization of base station antennas. We also prove that an Olog n rate is the best possible. Therefore, in contrast to a centralize or circular eployment, where the achievable rate is at most a constant, the rate with a general eployment can grow logarithmically with n, resulting in a certain form of macromultiplexing gain. econ, using tools from high-resolution quantization theory, we erive an accurate formula for the best achievable rate given any n an any user ensity function. Accoring to our formula, the epenence of the optimal rate on the user ensity function f is curiously only through the ifferential entropy of f. In fact, the optimal rate ecreases linearly with the ifferential entropy, an the worst-case scenario is a uniform user ensity. Numerical simulations confirm our analytical finings. Inex Terms Multiple-antenna systems, massive MIMO, istribute antenna systems, locational optimization, quantization. I. INTRODUCTION Massive multiple-input multiple-output MIMO is a recently-propose [] promising metho that can greatly improve the energy efficiency, spectral efficiency, an coverage of cellular networks [2]. The efining feature of massive MIMO is the large number of base station antennas, which naturally provies spatially-orthogonal channels to ifferent users. This enables interference-free inter-cell communication. The existence of many antennas comes with the opportunity of istributing them to ifferent geographical locations. The iea of utilizing such a istribute antenna system DA as oppose to a colocate antenna system CA preates massive MIMO or even regular MIMO itself, an goes back to at least [3]. Another early work [4] stuies the signalto-noise ratios NRs an the signal-to-interference ratios IRs for a DA where each antenna transmits the same message. Due to reuce istance between the users an the base station, a DA can significantly improve coverage an power-efficiency, an even reuce intra-cell interference [5]. With the avent of multi-user MIMO an massive MIMO techniques, DA esign an analysis have rawn renewe interest. Achievable rates for a circular DA an the corresponing optimal antenna raii have been stuie in [6] [9]. These works show that using circular DA can greatly improve upon a CA in terms of the sum rate. However, the improvement is only a fixe constant an oes not grow asymptotically with the number of istinct antenna locations. Lloy-algorithm base numerical approaches to antenna location optimization can be foun in [0], []. Another numerical approach to optimal antenna placement base on stochastic approximation theory can be foun in [2]. The performance of circular antenna arrays with or without a central antenna has been stuie in [3]. In [4], upper bouns on the single-user capacity an approximations to the sum capacity have been obtaine for both ranomly-istribute an colocate antenna systems. It is emonstrate that istribute antennas can provie significant gains over colocate antennas, especially when the users have channel state information CI. In [5], antenna locations are optimize to maximize a lower boun on the energy efficiency of a cellular DA with two types of users. In [6], the authors provie eterministic approximations for the sum-rate of massive MIMO uplink with istribute an possibly-correlate antennas. Most of the above work have focuse on a fixe antenna topology, such as a circular DA. Clearly, a better performance can be achieve by consiering base station antennas in general position. However, in a massive MIMO system, allowing all the base station antennas to be in ifferent locations may not be feasible ue to costs of backhaul implementation an lan. One novelty of this work is to consier a moel where N base station antennas are evenly istribute to a fixe number n of istinct locations in the N regime. This allows us to obtain the benefits of a istribute massive MIMO system, while avoiing potentially-high implementation costs. Also, most existing work on antenna location optimization relies on numerical methos. To the best of our knowlege, when the base station antennas of a massive MIMO system are allowe arbitrary positions, a formal analysis of the benefits of antenna location optimization is not available in the literature. In this work, we present such an analysis with a particular focus on etermining the achievable per-user rates. The rest of this paper is organize as follows: In ection II, we introuce the system moel. In ection III, we present rigorous bouns on the achievable rates with optimize antenna locations. In ection IV, we provie a quantization-theoretical analysis of the best possible rates. In ection V, we provie simulation results. Finally, in ection VI, we raw our main conclusions. Due to space limitations, some of the technical proofs are provie in the extene version [7] of this paper. Notation: is the Frobenius norm. A k is the kth Cartesian power an A is the carinality of a set A. Given b R an A R, we let A + b {x + b : x A}. A b an ba are similar. Given sets A an B, A\B is the set of elements of A that are not in B. CN 0, α is a circularly-symmetric complex Gaussian ranom variable with variance α 2 per real imension. log is the natural logarithm, Γ is the Gamma

2 function. For a logical statement T, we let T = is T is true, an T = 0, otherwise. µa is the Lebesgue measure of a set A. For x R, we let x + xx 0. O an o are the stanar Bachmann-Lanau symbols. For sequences a n, b n, the notation a n b n means lim n a n bn =. II. YTEM MODEL We consier a single-cell multi-user istribute MIMO system with N base station antennas. The base station antennas are ivie to n groups, where each group consists of N n antennas. We assume that N is a multiple of n. This ensures that the number of antennas at each group is an integer. Given i {,..., n}, suppose that the antennas in Group i are all locate at the same point x i R, where the ambient imension is a positive integer In practice, one is usually intereste in the case {, 2, 3}.. Therefore, the N base station antennas are geographically istribute to n co-locate antenna groups, where each group consists of N n antennas. The practical motivation for such a colocateistribute architecture has been escribe in ection I. We stuy an uplink scenario where m single-antenna users simultaneously wish to communicate with the base station. pecifically, given j {,..., m}, User j wishes to communicate the complex Gaussian symbol s j CN 0, to the base station. Following the massive MIMO literature, we assume that each user transmits with normalize power P/N. Thus, User j transmits the signal s j P/N over its antenna. Given i {,..., n}, j {,..., m}, an l {,..., N n }, let h jil C be the channel gain between User j an Antenna l of Group i. We assume that h jil CN 0, x i u j r, where r 0 is the path-loss exponent, an u j R is the location of User j. The channel input-output relationships are y il = m j= h jils j P/N + τil, where τ il CN 0, is the noise at the lth antenna of Group i. We assume that all the channel gains, noises, an the ata symbols are inepenent. We consier the massive MIMO regime where the number of base station antennas N grows to infinity. Meanwhile, the number of users m an the number of antenna groups n remain fixe N-inepenent constants. Uner such conitions, using zero forcing at the base station, a reliable ata rate of log + P lim N N N n n nats x i u j r sec Hz i= l= is achievable for User j, as N [8, Proposition ]. Noting that the summan in is inepenent of l, the achievable rate in for a generic user at location u simplifies to Ru, X log + P n n i= x i u r, 2 where X {x,..., x n } is the set of the istinct locations of base station antennas. The achievabilities of or 2 require the typical assumptions of full CI at the base station an perfect cooperation among the base station antennas. We moel the user location as a ranom variable with a certain probability ensity function f over the cell. We also assume that the cell shape is boune. Thus, [0, M], where M 0 is finite, an the ensity f vanishes outsie. Given a eployment X of base station antennas, the average rate of a typical user can then be expresse as RX Ru, X fuu 3 = log + P n n u x i r fuu 4 i= Our goal is to fin the optimal eployment of antennas that maximize the average rate In orer to avoi unnecessary technicalities, we assume that such an optimal eployment exists.. In other wors, we wish to etermine R n max RX, 5 X an the structure of eployments that can achieve 5. III. BOUND ON THE BET PER-UER RATE We first present the achievable performance gains through an optimal eployment of antennas. Clearly, the best per-user rate R n is a monotonically non-ecreasing function of n. This leas to the lower boun R n R, which is achievable when all the base station antennas are colocate to a certain unique optimal location. A natural starting point may be to improve upon this best-possible rate R with colocate antennas. It has been previously establishe [6] [9] that a circular array of antennas can improve upon the rate R. Unfortunately, the improvement is only an aitive constant. We will show in the following that R n grows at least proportionally to log n. Therefore, the per-user rate can, in fact, be arbitrarily large. As also suggeste several times in ifferent contexts see, e.g., [4], the iea is to istribute the antenna groups evenly throughout the cell. For example, in two imensions, we can position the n groups of base station antennas in a uniform square lattice so that, for any user at location u, there exists a group of base station antennas that is at most On 2 -far. Accoring to 2, this guarantees a rate of Olog+P n r 2, regarless of the location of the user. It follows that for r > 2, the per-user rate is unboune as n, growing at least as r 2 log n. In contrast, for colocate an circular topologies, the nearest base station antenna is O-apart for a positive fraction of user locations, which leas to a boune rate. Extension of the above iea of a uniform square lattice to any imension leas to the following result. Proposition. For any n, we have R n log + P n r. 6 M r Proof. The proof is provie in [7, Appenix A]. Accoring to Proposition, we can observe that R n grows at least as r + log n + O. Therefore, the optimal peruser rate grows at least logarithmically with the number of amissable antenna locations, inicating an unboune rate

3 improvement over centralize or circular antenna arrangements. A funamental question is then whether the Olog n growth of the rate is the best possible. The affirmative answer is provie by the following result. Proposition 2. Let η µ sup u fu. We have P log n + η log + R n ηr µ r + 2ηr, n. Proof. The proof is provie in [7, Appenix B]. Together, Propositions an 2 reveal that R n grows exactly logarithmically with the number of antenna locations n. This motivates us to capture the constant multiplicative factor of log n that appears in the expression of R n through the quantity 7 R n ρ lim n log n. 8 We have assume that the limit exists for a simpler exposition. From a mathematical point of view, the efinition in 8 is very similar to the efinition of the multiplexing gain of a regular MIMO system. The only ifference is that 8 escribes the factor of log n in the ata rate formula, where as the multiplexing gain usually refers to the factor of log P. The quantity ρ can also be consiere as a certain form of macroiversity gain as it emerges ue the macroscale much larger than carrier wavelength separation of antennas. ince, to the best of our knowlege, there is no unique establishe efinition of a macroiversity gain, an since the nature of ρ is very similar to that of the multiplexing gain, we refer to ρ as the macromultiplexing gain of the system. The macromultiplexing gain provies a precise asymptotic characterization of the gains that are achievable through locational optimization of antennas. The following theorem, which immeiately follows from Propositions an 2, escribes the bouns on ρ that we have obtaine so far. Theorem. For any user ensity f, we have r + ρ ηr, 9 where η = µ sup u fu, an R is the cell. Note that η with equality if f is uniform on. Thus, for a uniform f, the upper an lower bouns on ρ iffer by only unity. In general, epening on how non-uniform f is, the gap between the bouns may be larger than. It oes not seem straightforwar to close this gap even in the case of a uniform istribution, at least by completely formal means. On the other han, our analysis in the next section suggest that, in fact, ρ = r +, regarless of the user ensity. IV. ANALYI OF THE BET PER-UER RATE UING HIGH-REOLUTION QUANTIZATION THEORY The bouns on R n in Propositions an 2 o not provie much insight on the exact value of R n for a given finite n, as they are not tight in general. Also, espite the fact that the bouns provie the asymptotic formula R n = ρ log n + O via Theorem, they are not strong enough to reveal the exact value of ρ, or the nature of O term. The goal of this section is to fin an accurate formula for R n. To achieve accuracy, we utilize certain approximations that hol for large values of the esign parameters n an r. Each step of approximation is escribe in the following together with the corresponing justifications an analysis. A. Reuction to a Quantization Problem The first step involves approximating the cost function in 4 via another function that allows a quantization-theoretical approach. For this purpose, we begin by noting the boun n u x i r min i {,...,n} u x i r 0 i= that hols for any u an X. When searching for an optimal set of locations, our iea is to use the approximation n u x i r min i {,...,n} u x i r. i= Clearly, is potentially inaccurate for an arbitrary X. For example, if all x i are equal, then the left han sie of is n times the right han sie. However, as also iscusse in the beginning of ection III, we expect the optimal antenna locations to not be superimpose, but instea be evenly istribute throughout the cell through some lattice-like structure. For such scenarios, the following lemma shows that is, in fact, an asymptotic equality as r. Lemma. Let Λ = {βbx : x Z } be a lattice in R, where β > 0, an B R has unit eterminant. For r >, there is a constant K that is inepenent of β, an a set A of measure zero such that for every u R \A, we have x Λ u x r K min x Λ u x r. 2 Moreover, for every u R \A, we have u x r min x Λ u x r as r. 3 x Λ Proof. The proof is provie in [7, Appenix C]. As a result of 3, for antenna locations X of interest, we may approximate RX in 4 via RX log + P n min i n u x i r fuu, 4 We expect 4 to be tight as r. For a finite r, accoring to 2, we expect the approximation error to be at most a constant n-inepenent rate. Numerical results in ection V suggest that the error is negligible even for small r. econ, as also shown in the proof of Proposition in [7, Appenix A], the term n min i n u x i r in 4 can grow at fast as On r, which means that the + term insie the logarithm will be insignificant. As a result, we have RX r RX + log P n, 5

4 where RX log fuu. 6 min i {,...,n} u x i Maximizing RX over all X as R n max X RX, we obtain R n r R n + log P n. 7 We now make a slight igression into a ifferent but very relevant problem. Given X = {x,..., x n } as usual, let RX min u x i r fuu. 8 i {,...,n} Determining the performance an structure of the minimizers of RX is the funamental problem of quantization theory an has been the subject of many publications [8]. Exact solutions are out of reach for a given arbitrary n an ensity f, but tight asymptotic results are known for the so-calle high-resolution regime n, see. e.g. [9]. The problem of maximizing RX in 6 is very similar to the problem of minimizing RX in 8. The only ifference is that in 6, one consiers a monotonic function logarithm of the minimum of norms instea of a mere minimum of rth powers of norms in 8. It is thus natural to expect that the methos an ieas for minimizing 8 can successfully be applie for maximizing 6. In the following, we first consier a uniform user ensity over a cubic cell = [0, M], M > 0. We shall then procee to a general non-uniform ensity f. B. olution to the Quantization Problem: Uniform Case We begin with some efinitions that will be useful for our iscussion in this section. Given X = {x,..., x n }, let V i X { u : u x i u x j, j {,..., n} }, i {,..., n} 9 enote the Voronoi cells that are generate by X. We have n RX = log fuu 20 i= V i u x i Also, given A R with centroi ca µa uu, let A ζa = log µa u u + log µa 2 A ca enote the normalize logarithmic moment of A. The moment ζa is normalize in the sense that ζαa = ζa, α > 0. In particular, we let ζ b, ζ[0, ] an ζ s, ζ{x : x } an enote the normalize logarithmic moment of the - imensional ball an the -imensional cube, respectively. By using, for example, generalize spherical coorinates, it can be shown that for any, we have ζ b, = eπ/2 log Γ+ 2. It oes not appear as straightforwar to obtain a general formula for ζ s,. till, we can calculate the special cases ζ s, = log2e an ζ s,2 = log 2 π. One important consequence of the moment efinition in 2 is provie by the following proposition. Proposition 3. uppose that the Voronoi cells V i X generate by X are all congruent to a certain polytope T, an each Voronoi cell has the same -imensional volume. Then, RX = log n + ζt. 22 M Proof. The result follows immeiately from 20 an 2. Proposition 3 will be very useful for interpreting the conclusions of the following result. Proposition 4. Let fu = M u [0, M ]. For the case of one imension =, for every n, we have R n = log n M + ζ, 23 where ζ = ζ b, = ζ s, = log2e = is the normalize logarithmic moment of the interval. For 2, as n, we have for some constant ζ R n = log n M + ζ + o, 24 that satisfies ζ s, ζ ζ b, 25 an epens only on the imension. In particular, ζ 2 = 3 2 π log = is the normalize logarithmic moment of the regular hexagon. Proof. The proof is provie in [7, Appenix D]. Let us first consier the case of one imension =. Accoring to Proposition 3, the performance in 23 is achieve by the uniform quantizer coebook { M 2n, 3M 2n M,..., 2n 2n }, 27 whose Voronoi cells intervals of length M/n. ince, accoring to 5, maximizers of R approximately coincie with the maximizers of R, the coebook 27 also correspons to the approximately optimal set of antenna locations for the case of one imension an uniform istribution of users. ubstituting 23 to 7, we obtain R n r log n + log P M r + rζ. 28 For = an a uniform istribution of users, we thus conclue that the approximately-optimal antenna configuration is 27, an the corresponing best per-user rate is 28. For more than one imension, the asymptotic behavior of R n is provie by 24. In particular, for two imensions, the constant ζ in 24 can be etermine to be the normalize logarithmic moment of the regular hexagon, as shown in 26. Corresponingly, a hexagonal arrangement of antenna groups is asymptotically optimal for maximizing R. By 5, we can then argue that a hexagonal arrangement is approximately optimal for maximizing the per-user rate.

5 For three or more imensions, there is uncertainty regaring the value of ζ, an only the upper an lower bouns in 25 are known. The optimal arrangement of antenna groups also remains to be etermine. till, for 3, the constant ζ can be estimate by matching the performance of a numericallyesigne maximizer of R to 24 at some large n. C. olution to the Quantization Problem: Non-Uniform Case We now work out the case of a general ensity f using the iea of point ensity functions of high-resolution quantization theory [8, ection IV]. pecifically, given any set of antenna locations X, consier the existence of a point ensity function λ : R R 0 such that the cube [x, x + x] contains nλxx antenna locations an λxx =. ince f is approximately uniform on [x, x + x], the average per-user rate conitione on the users being in [x, x + x] is then lognλx + ζ + o, 29 accoring to 24. Averaging out the user ensity, we obtain RX = log n + ζ + fx log λxx + o. 30 Maximizing RX over all X is equivalent to maximizing RX over all point ensity functions λx subject to the normalization λxx =. Let Hf fx log x 3 fx enote the ifferential entropy of the user ensity. Accoring to Gibbs inequality, we have RX log n + ζ Hf + o. 32 Equality is achieve when λx = fx, x, i.e., when the antenna ensity matches the user ensity. D. A Close-Form Formula for the Best Per-User Rate We can now combine 32 with 5 to obtain the following main result of this section. Theorem 2. Let r >. For large n an r, the best per-user rate can be approximate by r R n log n + log P + rζ r Hf. 33 uch a performance is achievable when the ensity of antenna groups is the same as the user ensity. Even though the approximations to obtain 33 are shown to be vali for large n an r, numerical results in the next section show that 33 is very accurate even for small n an/or r. In particular, we can observe that the best per-user rate ecreases linearly with the ifferential entropy of the user ensity. ince a uniform ensity maximizes the ifferential entropy, the worst per-user rate is achieve for a uniform istribution of users. Also, accoring to 33, the maximum achievable macromultiplexing gain of the massive MIMO system is r +, as also claime in ection III. A formal erivation of 33 or its refinements are left as future work. Rn nats/sec/hz f = f, analysis f = f, simulation f = f 2, analysis f = f 2, simulation r = 8 r = 4 r = n Fig. : Best per-user rates for a one-imensional cell. V. NUMERICAL REULT In this section, we present numerical simulations that verify our analytical results. We have numerically optimize the peruser rate RX in 4 using graient ascent, an compare the resulting per-user rate with the close-form formula 33. We present simulation results for the one-imensional cell = [0, ] in Fig.. The horizontal axis represents the number of istinct antenna locations n. The vertical axis represents the best-possible per-user rate R n. We have consiere the three cases r {2, 4, 8} for the path loss exponent. Also, we have consiere a uniform istribution f u u [0, ], as well as a Beta istribution f 2 u 30u u 4 f u of users with Hf 2 = 35 2 log 30 = The label analysis refers to our general formula 33 for the best peruser rate, while the label simulation refers to the per-user rate we have obtaine through the graient ascent proceure. Our analysis has suggeste that 33 will be accurate for large n an r. The results of Fig. suggest that our formula 33 agrees well with the simulations even for small n an r. For example, for r = 2, the ifference between analysis an simulation is at most 0.6 nats/sec/hz. For r {4, 8} an a uniform istribution, the analysis is almost an exact match to the simulation with barely noticeable ifferences. For the Beta istribution of users, the analysis converges to an exact match only as n increases. In general, for non-uniform istributions, a large-enough n is necessary for the accuracy of 33 so

6 Rn nats/sec/hz f = f 3, analysis f = f 3, simulation f = f 4, analysis f = f 4, simulation r = 8 r = 4 r = n Fig. 2: Best per-user rates for a two-imensional cell. that the high-resolution arguments in ection IV-C become vali. Also, in all the 6 cases, the slope of analysis curves matches their respective simulation curves, inicating that the macromultiplexing gain of the system is inee r. We present simulations results for two-imensional cells in Fig. 2. We have consiere a uniform istribution f 3 u u [0, ] 2 of users over the square cell = [0, ] 2. In orer to emonstrate that 33 can also be applie to unboune cells, we have also consiere a Gaussian istribution f 4 u = π e u 2 with = R 2 an Hf 4 = logeπ. We can observe that, as in the case of = in Fig., the analysis is almost an exact match to the simulation for r = 8 an a uniform istribution. For r = 8 an the Gaussian istribution, the analysis correctly preicts the asymptotic behavior of the best per-user rate. In general, compare to the results in Fig. for =, the gaps between the analysis an the corresponing simulation results are larger for = 2. The reason for the larger mismatch is that a point u has potentially more neighboring antenna locations in a higher imensional cell. As a result, for a given finite r, the approximation 3 will be off by a larger multiplicative factor as increases. till, the simulations agree well with the analysis even when r is as low as 4, an correctly preict the maximum achievable macromultiplexing gains at any r. In particular, accoring to 33, an as can also be observe in Fig. 2, the maximum macromultiplexing gain for r = = 2 is 0, meaning that the per-user rate will be boune even as n. VI. CONCLUION We have stuie a massive MIMO uplink where the base station antennas are evenly istribute to n ifferent locations of the cell. We have shown that a per-user rate of Olog n is achievable through optimization of antenna locations. We have characterize the corresponing macromultiplexing gains in terms of the ambient imension of the cell an the path loss exponent. Also, using tools from high-resolution quantization theory, we have foun an accurate formula for the achievable per-user rate for any istribution of users throughout the cell. REFERENCE [] T. L. Marzetta, Noncooperative cellular wireless with unlimite numbers of base station antennas, IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 9, no., pp , Nov [2] L. Lu, G. Y. Li, A. L. winlehurst, A. Ashikhmin, an R. Zhang, An overview of massive MIMO: Benefits an challenges. IEEE J. elect. Areas ignal Process., vol. 8, no. 5, Oct [3] A. A. M. aleh, A. J. Rustako, Jr., an R.. Roman, Distribute antennas for inoor raio communications, IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. COM-35, no. 2, pp , Dec [4] K. J. Kerpez, A raio access system with istribute antennas, IEEE Trans. Veh. Tech., vol. 45, no. 2, pp , May [5] W. Choi, J. G. Anrews, Downlink performance an capacity of istribute antenna systems in a multicell environment, IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 6, no., pp , Jan [6] J. Gan,. Zhou, J. Wang, an K. Park, On the sum-rate capacity of multi-user istribute antenna system with circular antenna layout, IEICE Trans. Commun., vol. E89-B, no. 9, pp , ept [7] J. Gan, Y. Li, L. Xiao,. Zhou, an J. Wang, On sum rate an power consumption of multi-user istribute antenna system with circular antenna layout, EURAIP J. Wireless Commun. Networking, vol. 2007, Article ID [8] A. Yang, Y. Jing, C. Xing, Z. Fei, an J. Kuang, Performance analysis an location optimization for massive MIMO systems with circularly istribute antennas, IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 4, no. 0, pp , Oct [9] G. N. Kamga, M. Xia, an. Aissa, pectral-efficiency analysis of massive MIMO systems in centralize an istribute schemes, accepte to IEEE Trans. Commun., Jan [0] X. Wang, P. Zhu, an M. Chen, Antenna location esign for generalize istribute antenna systems, IEEE Commun. Letters, vol. 3, no. 5, pp , May [] Y. Qian, M. Chen, X. Wang, an P. Zhu, Antenna location esign for istribute antenna systems with selective transmission, Intl. Conf. Wireless Commun. ignal Process., Nov [2]. Firouzabai an A. Golsmith, Optimal placement of istribute antennas in cellular systems, IEEE Intl. Workshop on ignal Process. Avances in Wireless Commun., June 20. [3] E. Park,.-R. Lee, an I. Lee, Antenna placement optimization for istribute antenna systems, IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol., no. 7, pp , July 202. [4] L. Dai, A comparative stuy on uplink sum capacity with co-locate an istribute antennas, IEEE J. elect. Areas Commun., vol. 29, no. 6, pp , June 20. [5] J. Liu, J. Wu, G. Wei, an W. Li, Antenna location optimization for hybri user istribution, IEEE Intl. Conf. Commun. Workshop, June 205. [6] J. Zhang, C.-K. Wen,. Jin, X. Gao, an K.-K. Wong, On capacity of large-scale MIMO multiple access channels with istribute sets of correlate antennas, IEEE J. el. Areas Commun., vol. 3, no. 2, pp , Feb [7] E. Koyuncu, Performance gains of optimal antenna eployment for massive MIMO systems, Tech. Rep., Apr [Online] Available: [8] R. M. Gray an D. L. Neuhoff, Quantization, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 44, no. 6, pp , Oct [9] P. L. Zaor, Asymptotic quantization error of continuous signals an the quantization imension, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 28, no. 2, pp , Mar. 982.