Asymptotic determination of edge-bandwidth of multidimensional grids and Hamming graphs
|
|
- Harvey Bernard Lambert
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Asymptotic etermination of ege-banwith of multiimensional gris an Hamming graphs Reza Akhtar Tao Jiang Zevi Miller. Revise on May 7, 007 Abstract The ege-banwith B (G) of a graph G is the banwith of the line graph of G. More specifically, for any bijection f : E(G) {,,..., E(G) }, let B (f, G) = max{ f(e ) f(e ) : e an e are incient eges of G}, an let B (G) = min f B (f, G). We etermine asymptotically the ege-banwith of -imensional gris P n an of the Hamming graph K n, the -fol Cartesian prouct of K n. Our results are as follows. () For fixe an n, B (P n) = c()n + O(n 3 ), where c() is a constant epening on, which we etermine explicitly. () For fixe even n an, B (K n) = ( + o()) π n (n ). Our results exten recent results by Balogh et al. [5] who etermine B (P n) asymptotically as a function of n an B (K ) asymptotically as a function of. Introuction Let G = (V (G), E(G)) be a simple graph on n vertices. A labeling f is a bijection of V (G) to {,..., n}. When there is no ambiguity, we will simply write B(f) for B(f, G). The banwith of f is B(f, G) := max{ f(u) f(v) : uv E(G)}. The banwith B(G) of G is B(G) := min{b(f, G)}. f Dept. of Mathematics an Statistics, Miami University, Oxfor, OH 45056, USA, reza@calico.mth.muohio. eu. Dept. of Mathematics an Statistics, Miami University, Oxfor, OH 45056, USA, jiangt@muohio.eu. Research supporte in part by the National Security Agency uner Grant Number H Dept. of Mathematics an Statistics, Miami University, Oxfor, OH 45056, USA, millerz@muohio.eu
2 The notion was introuce by Harper in his influential paper [3] in which he etermine the banwith of the -imensional hypercube by solving the corresponing vertex isoperimetric problem in the hypercube. There are several motivations for stuying the banwith problem: sparse matrix computations, representing ata structures by linear arrays, VLSI layouts, mutual simulations of interconnection networks an minimizing the effects of noise in the multi-channel communication of ata (see [0,, 4, 7]). The banwith problem is NPhar an is inappromaximable by any multiplicative constant even for trees [8]. Banwiths are known only for a few families of graphs incluing hypercubes [3], multiimensional gris [8,, 3], complete trees [6], an various mesh-like graphs (see [6, 7, 0]). The ege-banwith was introuce by Hwang an Lagarias [8]. Here we label the eges instea of the vertices, an the banwith of an ege-labeling f of a graph G is B (f, G) := max{ f(uv) f(vw) : uv, vw E(G)}. In other wors, it is the maximum ifference of labels between a pair of incient eges. When there is no ambiguity, we will write B (f) for B(f, G). The ege-banwith of a graph G is B (G) := min B (f, G). f Naturally, B (G) = B(L(G)), where L(G) is the line graph of G. In [9], Jiang et al. reintrouce the notion of ege-banwith an stuie the relationship between B(G) an B (G). They etermine the ege-banwith of caterpillars, the complete graph K n, an the balance complete bipartite graph K n,n. A. Gupta [] pointe out that the inequality B(T ) B (T ) B(T ) for a tree T obtaine in [9] together with Unger s inappromixation result [8] for banwith imply that etermining the ege-banwith is also NP-har. Recently, there has been an increase of interest in the stuy of ege-banwith. Calamoneri et al [9] obtaine tight bouns on the ege-banwith of complete k-ary trees an bouns on the ege-banwith of the hypercube an butterfly graphs. Balogh et al [5] subsequently obtaine asymptotically tight bouns on the ege-banwith of two imensional gris an tori, the Cartesian prouct of two cliques an the hypercube. Sharpening the result of Balogh et al [5] on the two imensional gris an tori while confirming a conjecture of Calamoneri et al [9], Pikhurko an Wojciechowski [7] showe that the ege-banwith of an m by n gri, where m n, is n. They also showe that the ege-banwith of an m by n torus, where m n, is between 4n 5 an 4n. In an unpublishe manuscript, Akhtar, Jiang, an Pritikin have inepenently shown that the ege-banwith of an m by n gri, where m n, is between n an n, an that the ege-banwith of an m by n torus, where m n, is between 4n 5 an 4n. In this paper, we etermine the ege-banwith of the -imensional gris Pn asymptotically when is fixe an n, an we obtain lower an upper bouns on the egebanwith of the Hamming graph Kn. When n is a fixe positive even integer an our lower an upper bouns match asymptotically. The Cartesian prouct of graphs G an H, enote by G H, is the graph with vertex set V (G H) = {(u, v) : u V (G), v V (H)} specifie by putting (u, v) ajacent to (u, v ) if an only if () u = u an vv e(h), or () v = v an uu E(G). The -fol Cartesian prouct G G G is enote by G. Let P n enote a path on n vertices.
3 The -fol Cartesian prouct P n, enote by P n, is also known as the -imensional gri. Equivalently, we can view P n as a graph whose vertices are vectors u, u,..., u of length where i, u i {0,,..., n } an any two vertices x, x,..., x an y, y,..., y are ajacent if an only if there exists i {,,..., } such that x i y i = an x j = y j for all j i. Given a vertex x = x, x,..., x, we efine the weight of x by wt(x) = x +x + +x. For each r {,,..., n}, let L(n,, r) = {x V (P n) : wt(x) = r}. Let l(n,, r) = L(n,, r) an l (n, ) = max{l(n,, r) : 0 r (n )}. We etermine B (P n) asymptotically as a function of n. Theorem. Let be a fixe positive integer. We have B (P n) = ( + o())l (n, ) = c()n + O(n 3 ), ( )!. Further- where c() is a constant epening on, given by c() = Σ / j=0 ( ) j( j more, c(). ) ( j) A simple calculation shows that c() =. Hence B (Pn) = ( + o())n, which was obtaine by Balogh et al[5]. For another example, c(3) = 3, yieling 4 B (Pn) 3 = ( + o()) 9 4 n. Theorem. etermines asymptotically the ege-banwith of gris of arbitrary imension. The -fol Cartesian prouct of the complete graph K n, enote by Kn, is also calle the Hamming graph. We obtain lower an upper bouns on B (Kn) for fixe n as a function of. When n is even, our lower an upper bouns match asymptotically, yieling Theorem. Let n be a fixe positive even integer. We have B (Kn) = ( + o()) n (n ). π General bouns The stanar techniques for obtaining lower bouns on banwith use isoperimetric inequalities. Many vertex an ege isoperimetric problems have been consiere in the literature. Given a graph G an a set S V (G), let (S) = {v V (G) S : u S such that uv E(G)}. We call (S) the (vertex) bounary of S. In other wors, (S) = N G (S) S. Given an optimal numbering f of V (G), let S be the set of vertices receiving labels,,, k. Then the highest label assigne to a vertex in (S) is at least k + (S). Let v be the vertex with the highest label in (S). It has a neighbor u in S, whose label is at most k. So f(v) f(u) (S), which implies B(G) = B(f, G) (S). Similarly, consier a vertex x in (V S) with the smallest label. Its label is at most k (V S) +. It has a neighbor y in V S, whose assigne label is at least k +. So f(y) f(x) (V S). Thus, B(G) = B(f, G) (V S). Therefore, we have B(G) max{ (S), (V S) }. This yiels the following 3
4 Proposition. [3] Let G be a graph an k an integer, where 0 k V (G). Then B(G) min max{ (S), (V S) }. S V (G), S =k For each k, let L k (G) = min S V (G), S =k (S). By Proposition., B(G) L k (G). Since this hols for each k with 0 k V (G), we have B(G) max k L k (G). This lower boun max k L k (G) for B(G) is often referre to as the Harper boun. In general, the Harper boun nees not be sharp an calculating it is ifficult (NP-har). When the Harper boun is not very useful, it is sometimes useful to consier the iterate bounary (shaow) instea. Given a nonnegative integer q, let ( q) (S) = {v V (G) S : v is at istance at most q from some vertex in S}. Hence, in particular, (S) = ( ) (S). Consier an optimal numbering f of V (G). Let S be the set of vertices receiving labels,,..., k. Let q be any integer such that q n. Let v be a vertex in q (S) with the highest label. Then f(v) k + q (S). Vertex v is at istance at most q from some vertex u in S. Note that f(u) k. Hence for some ege on a shortest u, v-path, the ifference between the f-labels of its two enpoints is at least f(u) f(v) /q q (S) /q. This yiels Proposition. Let G be a graph an k an integer, where 0 k V (G). Then B(G) min max S V (G), S =k q q n ( q) (S) Our iscussions above apply similarly to a set of eges. We efine the bounary of a set S E(G) of eges in G by (S ) = {e E(G) S : e S such that e an e are incient}. The iterate bounary for S is then given, for q, by ( q) (S ) = {e E(G) S : e is at istance at most q from some ege of S }. We see that (S ) = ( ) (S) an ( q) (S ) = ( q ) (S) ( ( q ) (S )). The ege analogues of Propositions. an. are then obtaine by replacing B(G) by B (G) an V (G) by E(G).. 3 The weight function in multiimensional gris Recall that V (P n) = { x, x,..., x : x i {0,,..., n } for all i =,,..., }. Two vertices x, x,..., x an y, y,..., y are ajacent if they iffer by in one coorinate an agree in all other coorinates. Again, the weight wt(x) of a vertex x = x, x,..., x is efine by wt(x) = x + x + + x. Given positive integers n, an an integer r with 0 r (n ), let L(n,, r) = {x V (P n) : wt(x) = r}. Let l(n,, r) = L(n,, r). Let l (n, ) = max{l(n,, r) : 0 r (n )}. It is easy to see that l(n,, r) is the number of integer solutions to the equation x + x + + x = r, where 0 x i n for each i []. By consiering the value of x one can easily erive the following recurrence relation on l(n,, r), which also appeare in [6]. 4
5 Proposition 3. Let n, be positive integers an r an integer. We have l(n,, r) = if 0 r n an l(n,, r) = 0 otherwise. For all an r with an 0 r (n ), l(n,, r) = Σ n j=0 l(n,, r j), an for other values of r we have l(n,, r) = 0. It is straightforwar to erive an exact formula for l(n,, r) using a generating function. This was one in [6], we inclue a short proof for completeness. Proposition 3. Let n,, r be positive integers. We have ( )( ) l(n,, r) = Σ r j=0( ) r jn + j. j Proof. By prior iscussion, l(n,, r) is the number of integer solutions to x +x + +x = r with 0 x i n for each i []. For fixe n,, the generating function for l(n,, r) is ( x g(x) = ( + + x n ) n ) = = ( x n ) ( x x ). As l(n,, r) equals coefficient of x r in the above expansion, we have ( )( ) ( )( ) r jn + l(n,, r) = Σ j=0( ) j = Σ r r jn + j j=0( ) j. j The function l(n,, r) is well-stuie in the theory of posets as the rank number in the poset of ivisors of a number. Consier a positive integer m with prime factorization m = p k p k... p k, where the p i are istinct primes an k i for each i. The rank of m is K = k + k an N r (m) is the number of ivisors of m of rank r. It is easy to see that in the case k = k = = k = n, N r (m) is precisely l(n,, r). Chapter 4 of Anerson [3] gives a etaile iscussion about the function N r (m). In particular, we have Proposition 3.3 ([3] Chapter 4) Let K = (n ). Then. l(n,, i) = l(n,, K i) for each i with 0 i K.. For fixe n an, l(n,, i) is strictly increasing in i for i K an strictly ecreasing in i for i K. By Proposition 3.3, for fixe n an, l(n,, r) is a symmetric an unimoal function of r on {0,,..., (n )} with maximum value at r = (n ) an at r = (n ). Thus, l (n, ) = l(n,, (n ) ). Setting r = (n ) in the formula in Proposition 3. for l(n,, r) then gives us a formula for l (n, ). When is fixe an n tens to infinity, the leaing term is a multiple of n whose leaing coefficient can be expresse exactly as a sum. We then give a close form estimate of this leaing coefficient using earlier results of Anerson [] given below. 5
6 Theorem 3.4 ([]) Let k, k,, k be nonnegative integers. Let K = k + + k. Let s enote the number of integer solutions to the equation x + x + + x = K, where i 0 x i k i. Let A = 3 Σ i=k i (k i + ) an τ = Π i=( + k i ). Then there exist positive constants C an C such that τ τ s C. A A C Furthermore, we can take C = an for any small ɛ > 0 we can take C = 3 ɛ when K is sufficiently large. Corollary 3.5 Let n, be positive integers, where n. There exist positive constants C an C such that n C l n (n, ) C. Furthermore, we can take C = an for any small ɛ > 0 we can take C = ɛ when n is sufficiently large. Proof. By our earlier iscussion, l (n, ) = l(n,, (n ) ) is the number of integer solutions to the equation x + x + + x = (n ), where 0 x i n for each i. We apply Theorem 3.4. Here, k i = n, for each i []. So A = 3 (n ) an τ = n. Also, s = l (n, ). The claim follows. We now give the exact formula for l (n, ) together with an asymptotic formula for it. There is an exact formula for the coefficient of the leaing term in the form of a summation; this coefficient can be boune using Corollary 3.5. Before we procee, we nee the following routine estimation of binomial coefficients. Recall that if x is a real number an k is an integer then ( ) x k := x(x ) (x k+). Also, it is straightforwar to check that e x x for all reals k! x an x e x for x with 0 < x <. Lemma 3.6 Let k be a positive integer an N, m nonnegative real numbers such that N > max{k, mk}. Then N k k ( ) ( ) N+m k! N k N k mk ( + ). So, ) k! N ( N+m k N k (m + )N k. k! Proof. For the lower boun, we have ( ) N+m k / N k > (N+m k)k / N k > (N k)k / N k = ( k k! k! k! k! k! N )k. Since 0 < k <, ( k N N )k e k N k k ). N / N k For the upper boun, we have ( N+m k ( + x )x < e when x > 0, we have ( + m) N m < e an hence ( + m N N )k < e mk k! < (N+m)k k! / N k k! = ( N+m N )k = ( + m N )k. Since N. Since mk < N an e x < + x when 0 < x <, we have e mk N < + mk. Therefore, ( ) N+m N k / N k < + mk. k! N The last statement follows reaily from the lower an upper bouns. 6
7 Theorem 3.7 Let n, be positive integers. Then l (n, ) = Σ j=0( ) j ( )( ( j)n j + We have l (n, ) =, l (n, ) =. For fixe 3, as n, we have l (n, ) = c()n + O(n ), where c() is a constant epening on, given by Also, c(). ( ) c() = Σ / ( j) j=0( ) j j ( )!. Proof. The exact formula for l (n, ) given above is obtaine by setting r = (n ) in the formula for l(n,, r) in Proposition 3.. For fixe, we erive an asymptotic formula for l (n, ) as a function of n. Fix j with j > 0. Let N = ( j)n an m = ( ( j)n + ) N. Then m /. For sufficiently large n, since is fixe, we have N > max{( ), m( )}. Applying Lemma 3.6, we have ( ( j)n + ) ( j) ( )! n (m + )n ( + 4)n. ). So, l = Σ j=0( ) j ( j = Σ / j=0 ( ) j )( (n jn ( ) j + ) ( j) ( )! n + O(n ). Let c() = Σ / j=0 ( ) j( ) ( j). We have j ( )! l (n, ) = c()n + O(n ). Note that c() is a constant epening only on an by Corollary 3.5, c(). Remark 3.8 When n is fixe an, using Laplace s metho one can show that l (n, ) = 6 π ( n n ) n + o(n ). See the concluing remarks section for further iscussion. Next, we show that for all r relatively close to (n ) an (n ), l(n,, r) is close to the maximum value l (n, ). This property is important to establishing our lower boun on the ege-banwith of Pn in the next section. 7
8 Lemma 3.9 Let n,, r be integers such that n,. If r (n ) = t, where 0 t n, then l(n,, r) ( t n )l (n, ). Proof. Let M = (n ). By Proposition 3.3, l (n, ) = l(n,, M). For convenience, let f(j) = l(n,, j). By Proposition 3.3, f(j) is symmetric on [0, (n )( )] an it is unimoal with peak(s) at M = (n )( ) an M = (n )( ). By Proposition 3., l (n, ) = l(n,, M) = Σ M i=m (n )f(i). Consier the interval of integers I = [M (n ), M]. Assume first that n is o. In this case M = M = (n )( ) is the only element at the center of I. The function f(j) is symmetric an unimoal on I with a single peak at (n )( ). Let A enote the sum of f(j) over the first t elements of I, B the sum of f(j) over the last t elements of I, an C the sum of f(j) over the mile n t elements of I. The symmetry an unimoality of f(j) imply that A = B an C n t. So, l (n, ) = A + B + C ( + n t )A, which implies A t t A = B t n l (n, ). Now, by Proposition 3., l(n,, M + t) is the sum of f(j) over I + t, the translate of I by t. So clearly, l(n,, M + t) l(n,, M) A ( t n )l (n, ). Similarly, l(n,, M t) l(n,, M) B ( t n )l (n, ). When n is even, we consier the subcases epening on whether is even or o. In each subcase, similar analysis shows that A, B ( t n )l (n, ) an hence l(n,, M + t) ( t n )l (n, ) an l(n,, M t) ( t n )l (n, ). 4 The ege-banwith of a multiimensional gri Bollobás an Leaer [8] solve the vertex isoperimetric problem in gris. We will use their result to obtain asymptotically tight bouns on the ege-banwith of a multiimensional gris. Our result extens that of Balogh et al. on -imensional gris to gris of any imension. Definition 4. The simplicial orer on V (P n) is efine by x < y if either wt(x) < wt(y) or wt(x) = wt(y) an x s > y s, where s = min{t : x t y t }. Bollobás an Leaer [8] showe that for any k, with 0 k V (P n), the initial segment of length k in the simplicial orer has the smallest bounary among all sets of k vertices. For each r with 0 r (n ), let B(n,, r) = {x V (P n) : wt(x) r}. In other wors, B(n,, r) = r j=0 L(n,, j). Note that each ege in P n has one enpoint in L(n,, r) an the other enpoint in L(n,, r + ) for some r. Theorem 4. (Vertex isoperimetric inequality in the gri) [8] Let A V (P n) an let C be the initial segment of length A in the simplicial orer on V (P n). Then N(A) N(C). In particular, if A B(n,, r) then N(A) B(n,, r + ). Also, for all q we have N ( q) (A) B(n,, r + q). 8
9 Definition 4.3 Let G be a graph on n vertices. Let σ : x < x < < x n be a linear orer on V (G). The labeling f of V (G) satisfying f(x i ) = i is the vertex labeling of V (G) inuce by σ. Lemma 4.4 Let G = P n. Let f be the labeling of V (G) inuce by the simplicial orer on G. For every uv E(G), we have f(u) f(v) l (n, ) + l (n, ). Proof. Without loss of generality, suppose wt(u) = r an wt(v) = r +. Let A = {x L(n,, r) : f(x) > f(u)}, B = {x L(n,, r + ) : f(x) < f(v)} an C = {x L(n,, r + ) : f(x) > f(v)}. Let a = A, b = B, c = C. Then f(u) f(v) = a + b + an b + c + = l(n,, r + ). Suppose u = u, u,..., u an v = v, v,..., v. Since uv E(G) an wt(v) = wt(u) +, there exists j [] such that v j = u j + an v i = u i for all i [] j. By our efinition of A, vertices in A all have their first coorinate at most u. Let A = {x A : x = u or u } an let A = {x A : x u }. We have A = A A. Since there are at most l (n, ) vertices other than u that have u in the first coorinate an there are at most l (n, ) vertices that have u in the first coorinate, A l (n, ). For each x A, let g(x) = x +, x,..., x. It is easy to see that g is an injection of A into L(n,, r + ). Furthermore, for each x A, since x + < u v, we have f(g(x)) > f(v) by the efinition of the simplicial orer. So g(x) C. So, g is an injection of A into C. Thus, A c an a = A = A + A l (n, ) + c. Now, we have f(u) f(v) = a + b + l (n, ) + c + b + = l (n, ) + l(n,, r + ) l (n, ) + l (n, ). Theorem 4.5 Let be a fixe positive integer. For all positive integers n we have B (P n) [l (n, ) + l (n, )] = c()n + O(n ), where c() is efine as in Theorem 3.7. Proof. First, we efine a igraph H from G = Pn by orienting each ege xy from x to y if x < y in the simplicial orer. For each vertex x, let E + (x) enote the set of out-eges from x. Note that E + (x) for each x. We efine a labeling g of E(H) (an of E(G)) using,,..., E(H) as follows. Suppose the vertices are u, u,... where u < u < in the simplicial orer. Starting with we assign the first E + (u ) consecutive labels to E + (u ), then the next E + (u ) consecutive labels to E + (u ), an so on. Let e = u i u j an e = u j u k be two incient eges in G at the vertex u j. We consier three cases epening on how e an e are oriente. Case. i < j < k or i > j > k. 9
10 By symmetry, we may assume i < j < k. Then we have wt(u i ) = r, wt(u j ) = r, wt(u k ) = r + for some r. By Lemma 4.4, j i l (n, ) + l (n, ). Note that e E + (u i ) an e E + (u j ). By our efinition of g, we have g(e ) g(e) j t=i E + (u t ) (j i + ) (l (n, ) + l (n, )). Case. i < j an j > k. In this case, we have wt(u i ) = wt(u k ) = r an wt(u j ) = r for some r. In particular, k i l(n,, r ) l (n, ). Also, e E + (u i ) an e E + (u k ). Without loss of generality, suppose i < k. By our efinition of g, we have g(e ) g(e) k t=i E + (u t ) k i + l (n, ) (l (n, ) + l (n, )). Case 3. i > j an k > j. In this case, e, e E + (u j ), an g(e) g(e ) < (l (n, ) + l (n, )). We have shown that g(e) g(e ) (l (n, ) + l (n, )) for every pair of incient eges e an e in G. This yiels B (G) B (g, G) (l (n, ) + l (n, )). Using l (n, ) = c()n + O(n ), we get B (G) c()n + O(n ). We now erive a lower boun on B (Pn) that matches the upper boun in Theorem 4.5 asymptotically when is fixe an n. Our proof is base on the metho use by Calamoneri et al. [9] an Balogh et al. [5]. We nee an easy lemma. Lemma 4.6 Let n an be positive integers. Let A V (P n). Then there are at least A n eges incient to A in P n. Also, E(P n) = n n. Proof. The graph Pn is a spanning subgraph of Cn, the -fol cartesian prouct of C n. We can think of obtaining Cn from Pn by aing eges of the form uv, where u = u, u,..., u an v = v, v,..., v satisfy that u i = 0, v i = n or u i = n, v i = 0 for some i [] an u j = v j for all j [] {i}. It is easy to see that there are n such eges. Since Cn is -regular, we have E(Pn) = E(Cn) n = n n. In Cn, since each vertex has egree, there are at least A / = A eges incient to A. So in Pn, there are at least A n eges incient to A. Theorem 4.7 Let be a fixe positive integer. Then we have as n B (P n) l (n, )( o()) = c()n + Ω(n 3 ). Proof. Throughout the proof, whenever necessary, we assume that n is sufficiently large. Let g be an ege-labeling of G = Pn with B (g, G) = B (G). Let S enote the set of eges receiving labels,..., E(G) /. We color the eges in S re an the rest of the eges white. Let us call a vertex re if all of its incient eges are re, a vertex white if all of its incient eges are white, a vertex mixe if it is incient to both re eges an white eges. Let R enote the set of re vertices, W the set of white vertices, an M the set of mixe vertices. We consier two cases. For convenience, let l = l (n, ). Case. M 5l. 0
11 Call a vertex v ba if (v) 3. Let D enote the set of ba vertices in G. If v = v, v,..., v is ba, then it has a 0 or n in at least three of the coorinates. So D ( ) 3 3 n 3 < 3 n 3. By Corollary 3.5, when n is sufficiently large, we have l n > 3 n 3 > D. Hence, M D 5l l = 4l. Each vertex in M D has egree at least. So the total number of eges incient to M is at least ( ) M D / = ( ) M D 4( )l l, since. Let E(M) enote the set of eges in G incient to M an let E = E(G). We have E(M) l. So, either E(M) (E S) l or E(M) S l. Note that E(M) (E S) (S) an E(M) S (E S). Hence, we have either (S) l or (E S) l. By Proposition., we have B (g, G) l = c()n + O(n ). Case. M < 5l. We have R + M + W = n. Hence, either R < n / or W < n /. Without loss of generality, we may assume that R < n /; otherwise we switch S with E S an hence R with W. Let H = G[R M] enote the subgraph of G inuce by R an M. Note that S E(H). Hence, S E(H) ( R + M )/ = ( R + M ). On the other han, S = E(G) / (/)(n n ). So, we have ( R + M ) S n n. From this we get So, R + M n n. R n n M n n 5l. By Corollary 3.5, for sufficiently large n we have l n. Hence, n l an R n l 5l n ( + 5)l. We have n ( + 5)l < R < n. () Since l(n,, j) is symmetric on [0, (n )] an Σ (n ) j=0 l(n,, j) = V (G) = n, we have Σ (n ) j=0 l(n,, j) n Σ (n ) j=0 l(n,, j). () For convenience, let M = (n ). By Lemma 3.9, l(n,, M t) ( t n )l, for t [0, n ]. Let n be sufficiently large so that n > ( ) +7. We have ( ) Σ +6 t= l(n,, M t) Σ +6 t= ( t +7 n )l = ( + 6)l n l ( + 5)l. (3) By () an (3), we have Σ M 7 j=0 l(n,, j) R Σ M j=0l(n,, j). In other wors, B(n,, M 7) < R < B(n,, M + ). (4)
12 Therefore, we have B(n,, r) R < B(n,, r + ) for some r [M 7, M + ]. Let q = n. We may assume that n is sufficiently large so that q + 7. Let A be a subset of R with A = B(n,, r). By Theorem 4., N ( q) (A) B(n,, r + q). Since N ( q) (A) N ( q) (R), we have N ( q) (R) B(n,, r + q). Hence, ( q) (R) = N ( q) (R) R B(n,, r + q) B(n,, r + ) = Σ q j=l(n,, r + j). (5) For each j [r +, r + q], we have j [M 7, M + q + ]. Since j M q +, by Lemma 3.9, l(n,, j) ( q + n )l ( n n )l ( )l. n Hence, ( q) (R) Σ q j=l(n,, r + j) (q )( n )l. Let E( ( q) (R)) enote the set of eges incient to ( q) (R). By Lemma 4.6, E( ( q) (R)) ( q) (R) n. Finally, note that E( ( q) (R)) ( q+) (S). Applying Proposition. to the line graph L(G), we have B (g, G) ( q+) (S) /(q + ) E( ( q) (R)) /(q + ) ( (q) (R) n ) /(q + ) [ (q )( ] ) l /(q + ) n /(q + ) n ( ) ( n = l ) + O(n 3 ) (using q = n ) n n = c()n + O(n 3 ). (by Theorem 3.7) 5 Ege-banwith of the Hamming graph I: upper boun In this section we erive an upper boun on B (K n). We view any vertex x in K n as an n-ary -string x = x, x,..., x, where i x i {0,,..., n }. Two vertices x = x, x,..., x an y = y, y,..., y are ajacent in K n if an only if the two strings iffer in precisely one coorinate. As in Section 4, for each x = x, x,..., x, we efine the weight of x as wt(x) = x + x x. Note that when n =, K n is just the -imensional hypercube Q an for each vertex x, wt(x) is the number of s in the binary string that represents x. The ege-banwith B (Q ) was asymptotically etermine by Balogh, Mubayi, an Pluhár
13 [5] while the vertex banwith B(Q ) was completely etermine by Harper in his paper [3]. We will combine the labelings use in these results to esign a labeling that yiels an upper boun on B (K n). Let us recall the labelings use in [5] an [3]. Definition 5. The vertex-hales numbering of V (Q ) is a bijection h : V (Q ) {,,..., } such that h(x) < h(y) if either wt(x) < wt(y) or wt(x) = wt(y) an x s s = min{t : x t y t }. > y s, where Note that in Section 4, we calle a similar orering on V (P n) the simplicial orer. Harper showe that the vertex-hales numbering achieves the vertex banwith for Q. Theorem 5. [3] Let h be the vertex-hales numbering of Q. Then ( ) ( ) k B(Q ) = B(h) = Σ k=0 = ( + o()). k/ / The last equality use stanar estimates of binomial coefficients. Next we escribe the labeling use by Balogh, Mubayi, an Pluhár in establishing an asymptotically tight upper boun on B (Q ). For convenience, we will call this numbering the ege-hales numbering. Our escription of the numbering is equivalent to the one use in [5]. Definition 5.3 [5] The ege-hales numbering of Q is a bijection f : E(Q ) {,,..., } such that for any two eges vw an xy where wt(w) = wt(v) + an wt(y) = wt(x) + we have f(vw) < f(xy) if either () h(v) < h(x) or () v = x an h(w) < h(y). Theorem 5.4 [5] Let f enote the ege-hales labeling of Q. Then ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) + o() B (Q ) B (f) / + o(). / Now, we combine the two numberings mentione above to obtain a total numbering on V (Q ) E(Q ), which we will call the mixe-hales numbering of Q. This numbering is prouce by the following algorithm. Algorithm 5.5 (The mixe-hales numbering m of Q ) Input: The -imensional hypercube Q. Output: A bijection m: V (Q ) E(Q ) {,,..., + }. Initialization: () Denote the eges of Q by e i, i, accoring to the ege-hales numbering f of Q. That is, e i is the ege e with f(e) = i. () Let m(0 ) =, where 0 enotes the all 0 string of length. (3) For all i, i, let m(e i ) = i +. (4) Set i =. 3
14 Iteration: (5) Suppose e i = xy, where wt(y) = wt(x) +. If m(y) is not yet efine, then (5a) Let m(y) = m(e i ) + ; (5b) For all j > i, let m(e j ) = m(e j ) +. (6) Let i = i +. (7) If i = +, terminate; otherwise go to step (5) Figure. The mixe-hales numbering of Q 3. 8 Intuitively speaking, to obtain the mixe-hales numbering we process the eges one by one in increasing orer of ege-hales label. The algorithm gives a vertex y an m-label at the earliest opportunity, as soon as we process the first ege in the ege-hales numbering incient to y. See Figure for the mixe-hales labeling of Q 3. Next, we summarize some useful facts about mixe-hales numbering in the following proposition. In particular, we see that the orering on V (Q ) an the orering on E(Q ) inherite from the mixe-hales numbering m of Q are precisely the vertex-hales numbering h an the ege-hales numbering f of Q, respectively. Proposition 5.6 Let h, f, m enote the vertex-hales, ege-hales, an mixe-hales numberings of Q, respectively. Let 0 enote the all 0 string of length an the all string of length. For each vertex x V (Q ) {0, }, let x enote the neighbor of x with smallest h label an x + the neighbor of x with largest h label. Then. For each vertex x V (Q ) {0, }, the string representing x is obtaine from the string for x by flipping the rightmost to a 0 an the string representing x + is obtaine from the string for x by flipping the rightmost 0 to a.. For each vertex x V (Q ) {0, }, among the eges incient to x, xx has the smallest m label an xx + has the largest m label. Hence, in particular, m(x) = m(xx ) +. 4
15 3. For any two eges e, e in Q, if f(e) < f(e ) then m(e) < m(e ). 4. For any two eges vw, xy in Q, where wt(w) = wt(v) + an wt(y) = wt(x) +, m(vw) < m(xy) if an only if either h(v) < h(x) or v = x an h(w) < h(y). 5. For any two vertices x, y V (Q ) {0, }, if h(x) < h(y), then h(x ) h(y ) an h(x + ) h(y + ). 6. For any two vertices, x, y in Q, if h(x) < h(y) then m(x) < m(y). Proof. Part follows immeiately from the efinition of the vertex-hales numbering (Definition 5.). Parts an 3 follow immeiately from Algorithm 5.5. Part 4 follows from the efinition of the ege-hales numbering f (Definition 5.3) an Part 3. To prove Part 5, suppose h(x) < h(y). Since h(x) < h(y), we have wt(x) wt(y). If wt(x) < wt(y), then wt(x ) < wt(y ) an h(x ) < h(y ) hol trivially. So we may assume that wt(x) = wt(y). By Part, the string representing x is obtaine from the string representing x by flipping the rightmost in x to 0 an the string for y is obtaine from the string for y by flipping the rightmost in y to 0. Let j enote the smallest coorinate in which x an y iffer. Since h(x) < h(y), we have x j = an y j = 0. Since wt(x) = wt(y), if x has k many s in coorinates j +, j +,..., then y shoul have exactly k + many s in coorinates j +, j +,...,. If k, then clearly h(x ) < h(y ). If k = 0, then x = y an hence h(x ) = h(y ). By a very similar argument, we have h(x + ) h(y + ). To prove Part 6, we may assume without loss of generality that x, y / {0, }. Suppose h(x) < h(y). Since m(x) = m(xx ) + an m(y) = m(yy ) +, to prove m(x) < m(y) it suffices to prove that m(xx ) < m(yy ). By Part 5, h(x ) h(y ). Thus, we have either h(x ) < h(y ) or x = y an h(x) < h(y). By Part 4, we have m(xx ) < m(yy ). This completes the proof. In the next proposition, we boun the number of vertices an the number of eges whose m-labels lie between the m-labels of two incient eges. Proposition 5.7 Let h, f, m enote the vertex-hales, ege-hales, an mixe-hales numberings of Q, respectively. Let e, e be two incient eges in Q, where m(e) < m(e ). Then there are at most B(h) + vertices z with m(e) m(z) m(e ) an there are at most B (f) + eges e with m(e) m(e ) m(e ). Proof. By Proposition 5.6 part, an ege e satisfies m(e) m(e ) m(e ) if an only if f(e) f(e ) f(e ). Hence, since e an e are incient, there are at most f(e ) f(e) + B (f) + such eges e. Next, suppose e an e are both incient to x. Let z be a vertex with m(e) m(z) m(e ). If x = 0 or, then it is easy to see that there are at most < B(h) such vertices z. Hence, we may assume that x / {0, }. By Proposition 5.6 Part, m(xx ) m(z) m(xx + ). Since m(x) = m(xx ) + an m(z) > m(xx ), we have m(z) m(x). We show that also m(z) m(x + ). Suppose first that h(z ) > h(x). Then by Proposition 5.6 Part 4, m(zz ) > m(xx + ), an hence m(z) = m(zz ) + > m(xx + ), a contraiction. So, we must have h(z ) h(x). By Proposition 5.6 Part 5, h((z ) + ) h(x + ). 5
16 Since h(z) h((z ) + ), we have h(z) h(x + ) an thus m(z) m(x + ). So, any vertex z satisfying m(e) m(z) m(e ) must satisfy h(x) h(z) h(x + ). There are at most h(x + ) h(x) + B(h) + such vertices z. Lemma 5.8 Let p, q, t be positive integers. Let G be a graph obtaine from Q by replacing each vertex x of Q by a t-vertex graph G x having p eges an each ege xy of Q by a set of q cross eges between V (G x ) an V (G y ). Then B (G) p(b(h) + ) + q(b (f) + ), where h, f enote the vertex-hales an ege-hales numberings of Q, respectively. Proof. Apply Algorithm 5.5 to obtain the mixe Hales numbering m of Q. List elements of V (Q ) E(Q ) in the orer etermine by m, call this list L. We prouce a labeling g of E(G) as follows. Start with label. As we scan L, each time we encounter a vertex x, we allocate the next p consecutive labels to the eges of G x, an each time we encounter an ege e = xy, we allocate the next q consecutive labels to the set of q cross eges between V (G x ) an V (G y ). Consier any pair of incient eges e an e in G with g(e) < g(e ). Suppose both are incient to vertex w, an w lies in G x. If x {0, }, then it is easy to see that g(e) g(e ) p + q < p(b(h) + ) + q(b (f) + ). Hence we may assume that x / {0, }. By our labeling scheme g(e) g(e ) is maximum when e is among the set of q eges of G associate with ege xx in Q an e is among the set of q eges of G associate with ege xx + in Q. By Proposition 5.7 an the efinition of g, g(e) g(e ) p(b(h) + ) + q(b (f) + ). Now, we apply Lemma 5.8 to get an upper boun on B (Kn). For convenience, we consier only even n. For o n, we can upper boun B (Kn) by B (Kn+). We can view Kn as being obtaine from Q by replacing each vertex of Q with a copy of Kn/ an replacing each ege of Q by the set of eges between two neighboring copies of Kn/ in K n. More specifically, for each x = x,..., x V (Q ), let O(x) enote the subgraph of Kn inuce by the set of vertices {w = w,..., w : 0 w i n/ if x i = 0, n/ w i n if x i = }. Then each O(x) is a copy of Kn/. For each ege xy E(Q ), let E(O(x), O(y)) enote the set of eges in Kn having on enpoint in O(x) an the other enpoint in O(y). It is easy to see that E(O(x), O(y)) = ( n ) ( n ) = ( n )+ for all xy E(Q ). We enote this quantity by q(n, ). Applying Lemma 5.8 with p = e(kn/ ) an q = q(n, ), we have the following. Lemma 5.9 Let be a positive integer an n a positive even integer. We have B (K n) e(k n)(b(h) + ) + q(n, )(B (f) + ). Theorem 5.0 Let n be a fixe positive even integer. Let be a positive integer. We have as. B (K n) ( + o()) ( / ) (n ) (n ) = ( + o()) π n (n ), 6
17 Proof. Using Lemma 5.9, Theorem 5., an Theorem 5.4, e(kn/ ) = ( ) n ) ( n/, q(n, ) = ) ( ) ( n )+, an Σk=0 = ( + o()) = ( + o()) π, we have B (K n) ( k k/ / [ ( ) ( )] [ ( )] n ( ) [( ) ( )] n/ k n + + Σ k=0 + k/ + o() / ( ) [ ( ) ( )] n n/ = ( + o()) + ( + o()) ( ) ( ) n + / / ( ) ( ) (( ) n n/ = ( + o()) + ( ) ) n / ( ) ( ) + = ( + o()) n (n ) / = ( + o()) n (n ). π On a historic note, the iea of blowing up each vertex of Q to an orthant subgraph O(x) of Kn was use by Harper in [5] in his constructive upper boun for B(Kn). It was inepenently iscovere by one of us while supervising an M.A. thesis [4]. To evelop a constructive upper boun on B (Kn), we use this iea by labeling eges internal to orthants in blocks in the orer of the vertex-hales numbering of Q which achieve B(Q ) [3]. Our next step was to label cross eges between neighboring orthants in blocks in the orer of the ege-hales labeling of Q achieving B (Q ) asymptotically, escribe earlier an originating in [5]. In this way both classes of eges, either internal to orthants or crossing between orthants, are labele. The final step was to merge these two labelings efficiently. The key iea here is to notice that the ege-hales labeling of Q is in some natural sense inuce by the vertex-hales numbering. 6 Ege-banwith of the Hamming graph II: lower boun In this section we establish a lower boun for B (Kn) which matches the upper boun of the previous section asymptotically when n is even. Our technique employs a theorem of Harper giving a solution to the isoperimetric problem in [0, ]. The approach is to look at Kn geometrically as a -imensional box having sie length an so containing n many -imensional cells of length /n in each imension. More specifically, we consier the following mapping from V (Kn) to [0, ]. For each i {0,,..., n }, let I i enote the interval [ i, i+] of real numbers. For each vertex x = x n n, x,, x in Kn, where each x i {0,,..., n }, let g(x) = I x I x I x. Thus g(x) is a -imensional cell of length /n in each imension. Uner this mapping, a subset W of k vertices in V (Kn) then correspons to a collection S of k of these cells. S is a set of measure k/n in [0, ], the -fol prouct of the unit interval, equippe with the Lebesque measure. Given two points x = x, x,..., x an y = y, y,..., y in [0, ], we say that x an y are neighbors if there exists k {,,..., } such that x k y k but x i = y i for all i k. We 7
18 write x y if x an y are neighbors. Given a measurable subset S of [0, ], we efine the shaow Φ(S) to be Φ(S) = {y [0, ] S : x S x y}. We efine iterate shaows of S recursively as following. Let Φ () (S) = Φ(S), an inuctively efine Φ (l+) (S) = Φ(Φ (l) (S)). For a measurable subset S of [0, ], let S enote its measure. The following proposition is clear from our efinitions an iscussions above. Proposition 6. Let g be the mapping from V (K n) to [0, ] efine above. Let W be a subset of V (K n) an l a positive integer with l. We have g( ( l) (W )) = Φ ( l) (g(w )). Hence, ( l) (W ) = Φ ( l) (g(w ) n. To establish a lower boun on B (K n) we will nee to establish a lower boun on (W ) for any subset W of V (K n) of a given size k. By Proposition 6., it suffices to consier the problem of minimizing Φ(S) over all measurable subsets S of [0, ] of a given measure. In [4], Harper showe that the problem of minimizing Φ(S) over all measurable subsets S of [0, ] of a given measure reuces to that of minimizing Φ(S) over all suitably compresse such subsets. He then showe using variational methos that for any given v, 0 v, the smallest value of Φ(S) over all such subsets of measure v is achieve by a Hamming ball, which we efine as follows. Definition 6. Let t be real number with 0 t. For any binary -tuple x of Q, let K(x, t) be the subset of [0, ] efine by K(x, t) = {y [0, ] : 0 y i t if x i =, an t < y i if x i = 0, i }. Define the subset HB(, k, t) of [0, ] calle a Hamming ball by HB(, k, t) = wt(x) k K(x, t). Note that if x has weight i, then ( ) the measure of K(x, t) is t i ( t) i. So the measure of HB(, k, t) is v = v(, k, t) = Σ k i=0 i t i ( t) i an the size of its shaow is Φ(HB(, k, t)) = ) t k+ ( t) k. For convenience, we use α(, m, t) to enote ( ) t m ( t) m. Then ( k+ Φ(HB(, k, t)) = α(, k +, t). We can now state Harper s theorem. Theorem 6.3 ([4] Theorem ) For any given v with 0 v, the minimum of Φ(S) over all subsets S of [0, ] of measure v is achieve by some HB(, k, t) for suitable k an t. To make effective use of Theorem 6.3, we nee to analyze Φ(HB(, k, t)) = α(, k +, t). Observe that if X( is ) a ranom variable rawn from the binomial istribution BIN(, t), then v(, k, t) = Σ k i=0 i t i ( t) i = P r(x k) an α(, k +, t) = ( ) k+ t k+ ( t) k = P r(x = k + ). 8 m
19 Our general approach is again the one use in [9], [5], an the proof of Theorem 4.7. Given an optimal ege labeling of E(Kn), we consier the set S E(Kn) of size about E(Kn) / receiving the smallest labels. We then lower boun (S ) or ( q) (S) for an aequate q. By an argument similar to the one use the proof of Theorem 4.7, lower bouning (S ) is reuce to lower bouning (S) for a corresponing set S V (Kn) with S near n. This then reuces to lower bouning Φ(S) where S [0, ], with S having measure near. By Theorem 6.3, we nee to estimate Φ(HB(, k, t)) = α(, k +, t) when v(, k, t) is near. In light of our earlier observation, this means lower bouning P r(x = k + ) when P r(x k) is close to, where X is a ranom variable rawn from BIN(, t). One coul in principle obtain such a lower boun by approximating BIN(, t) using a normal istribution. But the error analysis in such an approximation is quite involve. Further, when the expecte value t is either too close to 0 or too close to, a normal istribution approximation becomes infeasible. Here we use a self-containe an completely combinatorial approach to obtain our estimates. We think our approach is of inepenent interest. We nee a lemma from []. Lemma 6.4 ([] Lemma B.7.) Let n be a positive integer an p a real number such that 0 p. Let X be a ranom variable rawn from the binomial istribution B(n, p) (where n is the number of inepenent trials an p is the probability of success of each trial). Then P r(x np ) / P r(x np ). Lemma 6.4 suggests that if P r(x k) is close to then k is close to the expecte value np. Thus, we nee to lower boun P r(x = k + ) for those k close to np. Lemma 6.5 If z be a real number with 0 < z <, then z e z. Let x, y, a be positive real numbers such that x, y a. Then ( + a x )x ( a y )y e a x a y. Proof. For any real number w with 0 < w, we have ln( + w) = w w + w3 3 w4 4 + w w > w w, ln( w) = w w w3 3 w4 4 w w. If 0 < z <, then ln( z) z z z. So, z e z. Since x, y a, 0 < a x, a y. Let K = ( + a x )x ( a y )y. It suffices to show that ln K a a x y. Inee, we have ln K = x ln( + a x ) + y ln( a y ) x(a x a x ) + y( a y a y ) = a x a y. Our next lemma says that for if X is a ranom variable rawn from BIN(n, p) where np is not too small or too large an k is near np then P r(x = k) is lower boune by ( o()) πn as n. We postpone its somewhat technical proof to the Appenix. 9
20 Lemma 6.6 Let n be a positive integer. Let p be a real number such that 0 < p <. Suppose 5 ln n np n 5 ln n. Let k be a nonegative integer. Let X be a ranom variable rawn from BIN(n, p). If k np ln n, then P r(x = k) πn e n when n is sufficiently large. Now we use Lemma 6.6 to give lower bouns on Φ(S), for subsets S of [0, ] having measure near. Theorem 6.7 Let be a sufficiently large positive integer. Let S be a subset of [0, ] with measure v = S. If S π ln e 0 ln, then Φ(S) π e Proof. By Theorem 6.3, Φ(S) is minimum when S is a Hamming ball. Hence, we may assume S = HB(, k, t) for some k an t, where k is an integer with 0 k an t is a real number with 0 t. We have S = v(, k, t) = Σ k i=0α(, i, t) an Φ(S) = α(, k +, t). As observe earlier, if X is a ranom variable rawn from BIN(, t), then S = P r(x k) an Φ(S) = P r(x = k + ). By our assumption,. P r(x k) π ln e 0 ln. (6) By Lemma 6.4, P r(x t ) P r(x t ). (7) We consier several cases. Case. 5 ln t 5 ln. By Lemma 6.6, for each integer m with m t ln, we have P r(x = m) π e when is large. Hence, for sufficiently large, we have P r(x t + ln 3 ) + ( ln 3) π e + π ln e 0 ln P r(x k), where the last inequailty follows from (6). So k t + ln 3. By a similar argument, we have k t ( ln 3). It follows that (k + ) t ln. Since 5 ln t 5 ln, by Lemma 6.6, we have Φ(S) = P r(x = k + ) π e 0.,
21 Case. t < 5 ln. In this case, we have t < 5 ln. Suppose t 4. Then P r(x k) P r(x = 0) = ( t) ( 4 ) e 4 e > 0.6, contraicting (6) for large. So, t >. 4 If k > 3t, then by Markov s inequality we have P r(x > k) < an hence P r(x k), 3 3 contraicting (6) for large. So, we have k 3t 5 ln. Let m = k +. Then m 6 ln. We have (recalling that t 5 ln ) 4 ( ) Φ(S) = P r(x = k + ) = P r(x = m) = t m ( t) m m ( ) m ( ) m ( ) t m t m ( t) e t e 0 ln. m m 4m = e m ln 4m 0 ln e 4 ln π e, for large. 4 Case 3. t > 5 ln. In this case, we apply almost ientical reasoning as in Case, but with t playing the role of t. First we show t. Then we apply Markov s inequality to X to show 4 that k 5 ln an therefore m 6 ln. Then we establish the lower boun on Φ(S) as in Case, with t playing the role of t an m playing the role of m. We omit the etails. Corollary 6.8 Let be a sufficiently large positive integer. Let S be a subset of [0, ] with measure v = S. Suppose Then either π ln e or there exists an integer l such that Φ(S) π e 0 ln S 0 ln,. Φ ( l) (S) Φ(S) l + π e 0 ln.
22 Proof. For each i, let S i = Φ (i) (S). Let l enote the smallest m such that S S S m ln e 0 ln π. Let i {,..., l}. Let S = S S S i. Then S = S + S S i + π ln e Since also S S ln e 0 ln π, by Theorem 6.7, we have Since this hols for all i l, we have If l > ln 3, then S i = Φ(S ) π e. S S l (l ) π e. 0 ln. S S l > ( ln 4) π e > π ln e 0 ln, contraicting our choice of l. So, we have l ln 3. Now, if S = Φ(S) 0 e ln π, then we are one. Otherwise, we have Φ ( l) (S) Φ(S) = S S l S Thus since l + ln 3, we get π ( ln ) e 0 ln. Φ ( l) (S) Φ(S) l + π e 0 ln. The next two corollaries are just the equivalents of Theorem 6.7 an Corollary 6.8 for K n, uner the corresponence between [0, ] an K n escribe in Proposition 6.. Corollary 6.9 Let n an be positive integers, where is sufficiently large. Let S be a subset of V (K n). If S n π ln e 0 ln n, then Φ(S) π e n.
23 Corollary 6.0 Let n an be positive integers, where is sufficiently large. Let S be a subset of V (K n). Suppose π ln e 0 ln n S n. Then either (S) π 0 e ln n or there exists an integer l such that ( l) (S) (S) l + π 0 e ln n. Corollary 6.9 reaily yiels the following lower boun on the vertex banwith B(K n). Theorem 6. Let n be a fixe positive integer. We have B(K n) ( o()) π n, as. Proof. Consier a labeling f of V (Kn) that achieves the banwith. Let S enote the set of vertices receiving labels,,..., n /. By Corollary 6.9, (S) ( o()) π n. Thus, B(Kn) = B(f) (S) ( o()) π n. In [5], Harper obtaine the same lower boun on B(K n) when both n an go to. For even n, the lower boun for B(K n) in Theorem 6. matches asymptotically the upper boun for B(K n) given in [5] as. Recently, Balogh et al [6] obtaine improve upper an lower bouns on B(K 3 n). We now establish a lower boun on B (K n) that asymptotically matches the upper boun given in Theorem 5.0 when n is even. We follow the approach use in [9] an [5]. Theorem 6. Let n be a fixe positive integer. We have B (Kn) ( o()) π n (n ), as. Proof. Let f be an optimal labeling of E(Kn) using labels,..., ( ) n n. Let S enote the set of eges receiving ( ) the first half of the labels. That is, S is the set of the eges receiving labels,,..., n n. Let us call the eges in S re an the rest of the eges white. For a vertex x V (Kn), let E(x) enote the set of eges incient to x. A vertex x is calle re if all the eges in E(x) is re, an white if all the eges in E(x) are white; otherwise it is calle mixe. Let R, W, an M enote the set of re, white, an mixe vertices, respectively. We have R + W + M = n. (8) For x M, let r(x) enote the number of re eges in E(x). Hence r(x) (n ). By (ouble) counting the re eges an the white eges, we have 3
24 R (n ) + Σ x M r(x) = ( ) n n = W (n ) + Σ x M ((n ) r(x)). (9) It reaily follows from (9) that R, W < n. Note that the white eges incient to M belong to (S). Similarly, the re eges incient to M belong to (E(K n) S). Therefore, we have (S) Σ x M((n ) r(x)) an (E(K n) S) Σ x Mr(x) (0) Combining these two inequalities we obtain B (K n) max{ (S), (E(K n) S)} If M π n e 0 ln, then by (), we have M (n ). () 4 B (K n) M (n ) 4 π n (n ) e an we are one. Hence, we may assume that 0 ln = ( o()) π n (n ), Either M < π n e 0 ln. () Σ x M r(x) M (n )/ or Σ x M ((n ) r(x)) M (n )/. Without loss of generality, let us assume that the first inequality hols, since otherwise we coul switch the roles of re an white vertices. Combining this with (9) an (), we have ( ) n n R (n ) + M (n )/ R (n ) + n (n ). (3) π This yiels the lower boun n R < π n. By Corollary 6.0, we have either (R) π 0 e ln n, (4) or there exists an integer l such that ( l) (R) (R) l + π 0 e ln n. (5) 4
25 Now, clearly (R) M. So if (4) hols then we have M π n e 0 ln, contraicting (). Hence, we may assume that (5) hols instea. Let C = ( l) (R) (R). Let E(C) enote the set of eges incient to C. Recalling that S is the set of re eges, we have E(C) ( l+) (S). Note that E(C) C (n )/. Applying Proposition. to the line graph L(K n), we have B (K n) B (f) ( l+) (S) (l + ) E(C) (l + ) = ( l) (R) (R) (n ) (l + ) π 0 e (n ) ln n = ( o()) π n (n ). C (n ) (l + ) (by (5)) 7 Concluing Remarks. We thank one of the referees for pointing us to the work of Pellegrini [6]. There the weight function l(n,, r) is expresse as an exponential sum, using the recurrence in Proposition 3. an stanar results in Fourier series. This le to ([6] Proposition 3) l(n,, r) = π π 0 ( ) sin(nx) cos(x(r (n ))) x. sin x Recall that l (n, ) = l(n,, n( ) ). So letting r = n( ) an aapating Pellegrini s application of Laplace s metho to estimate this integral for fixe n an, we obtain l (n, ) = 6 π ( n n ) n + o(n ), when n is fixe an. (6) We note that in Pellegrini s application it is important to have n fixe an. Since we are concerne with the case when is fixe an n, we cannot use formula (6) in our result. Formula (6) will be useful when one stuies B (P n) when n is fixe an.. We have asymptotically etermine B (Kn) for fixe even n an, showing that B π n (n ). In the upper boun labeling, the evenness of n mae it possible to partition Kn into many orthants, each isomorphic to Kn/. 5
26 When n = m + is o, a similar partition is possible. Here, an orthant corresponing to a weight k vertex of Q is the Cartesian prouct of k copies of K m+ an k copies of K m. Applying the same labeling scheme, an noting that a maximum ilation occurs at a pair of cross eges incient to a vertex in an orthant associate with a hypercube noe of weight ( ), we obtain an upper boun (m+) m+ B (Kn) m + m m m + π n (n )( + o()), when n = m + is fixe an. This upper boun is within a factor of m+ m from the lower boun in Theorem 6.. m m+ Note that this factor is close to an tens to as m. It woul be interesting to etermine B (Kn) asymptotically when n is o an. We suspect that the upper boun given here is closer to the truth. 8 Appenix: Proof of Lemma 6.6 Proof. We recall Stirling s formula that for all integers n, n! = πn (n/e) n e θ n for some θ = θ(n) with 0 < θ <. We have for some θ, θ, θ 3 (0, ) P r(x = k) = = ( ) n p k ( p) n k k πn( n e )n πk( k π e )k π(n k)( n k pk ( p) n k e e )n k ( ) np k ( n np k n k n k(n k) θ n θ k θ 3 (n k) ) n k e k (n k). (7) Let a = np k. Then np = k + a an a ln n by our assumption. We have ( ) np k k ( ) n np n k ( = + a ) k ( a ) n k e a k a n k e ln n( k + n k ), (8) n k k n k where the first inequality follows from Lemma 6.5. By (7) an (8), we have for large n P r(x = k) n π k(n k) n+ e (ln )( k + n k ) π n k(n k) ln n( e k + n k ) (9) Note that k(n k) is unimoal an is maximize at k = n/. We consier two cases. Case. k n 3 4 or n k n 3 4. In this case, k(n k) n 3 4 n. So n n k(n k) n 4 ln n(n 4 ln n) k(n k) n 3 4 ln n. By (9), we have. Also, 4 n k 4 ln n. So, P r(x = k) π n 3 8 e ln n ln n = π n 3 8 ln n πn e n, for large n. 6
Ramsey numbers of some bipartite graphs versus complete graphs
Ramsey numbers of some bipartite graphs versus complete graphs Tao Jiang, Michael Salerno Miami University, Oxfor, OH 45056, USA Abstract. The Ramsey number r(h, K n ) is the smallest positive integer
More informationThe chromatic number of graph powers
Combinatorics, Probability an Computing (19XX) 00, 000 000. c 19XX Cambrige University Press Printe in the Unite Kingom The chromatic number of graph powers N O G A A L O N 1 an B O J A N M O H A R 1 Department
More informationLower Bounds for the Smoothed Number of Pareto optimal Solutions
Lower Bouns for the Smoothe Number of Pareto optimal Solutions Tobias Brunsch an Heiko Röglin Department of Computer Science, University of Bonn, Germany brunsch@cs.uni-bonn.e, heiko@roeglin.org Abstract.
More informationChromatic number for a generalization of Cartesian product graphs
Chromatic number for a generalization of Cartesian prouct graphs Daniel Král Douglas B. West Abstract Let G be a class of graphs. The -fol gri over G, enote G, is the family of graphs obtaine from -imensional
More informationDiscrete Mathematics
Discrete Mathematics 309 (009) 86 869 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Discrete Mathematics journal homepage: wwwelseviercom/locate/isc Profile vectors in the lattice of subspaces Dániel Gerbner
More informationLower Bounds for Local Monotonicity Reconstruction from Transitive-Closure Spanners
Lower Bouns for Local Monotonicity Reconstruction from Transitive-Closure Spanners Arnab Bhattacharyya Elena Grigorescu Mahav Jha Kyomin Jung Sofya Raskhonikova Davi P. Wooruff Abstract Given a irecte
More informationLecture Introduction. 2 Examples of Measure Concentration. 3 The Johnson-Lindenstrauss Lemma. CS-621 Theory Gems November 28, 2012
CS-6 Theory Gems November 8, 0 Lecture Lecturer: Alesaner Mąry Scribes: Alhussein Fawzi, Dorina Thanou Introuction Toay, we will briefly iscuss an important technique in probability theory measure concentration
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.co] 15 Sep 2015
Circular coloring of signe graphs Yingli Kang, Eckhar Steffen arxiv:1509.04488v1 [math.co] 15 Sep 015 Abstract Let k, ( k) be two positive integers. We generalize the well stuie notions of (k, )-colorings
More informationLeast-Squares Regression on Sparse Spaces
Least-Squares Regression on Sparse Spaces Yuri Grinberg, Mahi Milani Far, Joelle Pineau School of Computer Science McGill University Montreal, Canaa {ygrinb,mmilan1,jpineau}@cs.mcgill.ca 1 Introuction
More informationALGEBRAIC AND ANALYTIC PROPERTIES OF ARITHMETIC FUNCTIONS
ALGEBRAIC AND ANALYTIC PROPERTIES OF ARITHMETIC FUNCTIONS MARK SCHACHNER Abstract. When consiere as an algebraic space, the set of arithmetic functions equippe with the operations of pointwise aition an
More informationPermanent vs. Determinant
Permanent vs. Determinant Frank Ban Introuction A major problem in theoretical computer science is the Permanent vs. Determinant problem. It asks: given an n by n matrix of ineterminates A = (a i,j ) an
More informationSurvey Sampling. 1 Design-based Inference. Kosuke Imai Department of Politics, Princeton University. February 19, 2013
Survey Sampling Kosuke Imai Department of Politics, Princeton University February 19, 2013 Survey sampling is one of the most commonly use ata collection methos for social scientists. We begin by escribing
More informationIterated Point-Line Configurations Grow Doubly-Exponentially
Iterate Point-Line Configurations Grow Doubly-Exponentially Joshua Cooper an Mark Walters July 9, 008 Abstract Begin with a set of four points in the real plane in general position. A to this collection
More informationPerfect Matchings in Õ(n1.5 ) Time in Regular Bipartite Graphs
Perfect Matchings in Õ(n1.5 ) Time in Regular Bipartite Graphs Ashish Goel Michael Kapralov Sanjeev Khanna Abstract We consier the well-stuie problem of fining a perfect matching in -regular bipartite
More informationTopic 7: Convergence of Random Variables
Topic 7: Convergence of Ranom Variables Course 003, 2016 Page 0 The Inference Problem So far, our starting point has been a given probability space (S, F, P). We now look at how to generate information
More informationThe derivative of a function f(x) is another function, defined in terms of a limiting expression: f(x + δx) f(x)
Y. D. Chong (2016) MH2801: Complex Methos for the Sciences 1. Derivatives The erivative of a function f(x) is another function, efine in terms of a limiting expression: f (x) f (x) lim x δx 0 f(x + δx)
More informationAcute sets in Euclidean spaces
Acute sets in Eucliean spaces Viktor Harangi April, 011 Abstract A finite set H in R is calle an acute set if any angle etermine by three points of H is acute. We examine the maximal carinality α() of
More informationOn colour-blind distinguishing colour pallets in regular graphs
J Comb Optim (2014 28:348 357 DOI 10.1007/s10878-012-9556-x On colour-blin istinguishing colour pallets in regular graphs Jakub Przybyło Publishe online: 25 October 2012 The Author(s 2012. This article
More informationTOEPLITZ AND POSITIVE SEMIDEFINITE COMPLETION PROBLEM FOR CYCLE GRAPH
English NUMERICAL MATHEMATICS Vol14, No1 Series A Journal of Chinese Universities Feb 2005 TOEPLITZ AND POSITIVE SEMIDEFINITE COMPLETION PROBLEM FOR CYCLE GRAPH He Ming( Λ) Michael K Ng(Ξ ) Abstract We
More informationComputing Exact Confidence Coefficients of Simultaneous Confidence Intervals for Multinomial Proportions and their Functions
Working Paper 2013:5 Department of Statistics Computing Exact Confience Coefficients of Simultaneous Confience Intervals for Multinomial Proportions an their Functions Shaobo Jin Working Paper 2013:5
More informationu!i = a T u = 0. Then S satisfies
Deterministic Conitions for Subspace Ientifiability from Incomplete Sampling Daniel L Pimentel-Alarcón, Nigel Boston, Robert D Nowak University of Wisconsin-Maison Abstract Consier an r-imensional subspace
More informationWitt#5: Around the integrality criterion 9.93 [version 1.1 (21 April 2013), not completed, not proofread]
Witt vectors. Part 1 Michiel Hazewinkel Sienotes by Darij Grinberg Witt#5: Aroun the integrality criterion 9.93 [version 1.1 21 April 2013, not complete, not proofrea In [1, section 9.93, Hazewinkel states
More informationNOTES ON EULER-BOOLE SUMMATION (1) f (l 1) (n) f (l 1) (m) + ( 1)k 1 k! B k (y) f (k) (y) dy,
NOTES ON EULER-BOOLE SUMMATION JONATHAN M BORWEIN, NEIL J CALKIN, AND DANTE MANNA Abstract We stuy a connection between Euler-MacLaurin Summation an Boole Summation suggeste in an AMM note from 196, which
More informationOn the minimum distance of elliptic curve codes
On the minimum istance of elliptic curve coes Jiyou Li Department of Mathematics Shanghai Jiao Tong University Shanghai PRChina Email: lijiyou@sjtueucn Daqing Wan Department of Mathematics University of
More informationMath 342 Partial Differential Equations «Viktor Grigoryan
Math 342 Partial Differential Equations «Viktor Grigoryan 6 Wave equation: solution In this lecture we will solve the wave equation on the entire real line x R. This correspons to a string of infinite
More informationTechnion - Computer Science Department - M.Sc. Thesis MSC Constrained Codes for Two-Dimensional Channels.
Technion - Computer Science Department - M.Sc. Thesis MSC-2006- - 2006 Constraine Coes for Two-Dimensional Channels Keren Censor Technion - Computer Science Department - M.Sc. Thesis MSC-2006- - 2006 Technion
More informationd-dimensional Arrangement Revisited
-Dimensional Arrangement Revisite Daniel Rotter Jens Vygen Research Institute for Discrete Mathematics University of Bonn Revise version: April 5, 013 Abstract We revisit the -imensional arrangement problem
More informationRobust Forward Algorithms via PAC-Bayes and Laplace Distributions. ω Q. Pr (y(ω x) < 0) = Pr A k
A Proof of Lemma 2 B Proof of Lemma 3 Proof: Since the support of LL istributions is R, two such istributions are equivalent absolutely continuous with respect to each other an the ivergence is well-efine
More informationA new proof of the sharpness of the phase transition for Bernoulli percolation on Z d
A new proof of the sharpness of the phase transition for Bernoulli percolation on Z Hugo Duminil-Copin an Vincent Tassion October 8, 205 Abstract We provie a new proof of the sharpness of the phase transition
More informationLeaving Randomness to Nature: d-dimensional Product Codes through the lens of Generalized-LDPC codes
Leaving Ranomness to Nature: -Dimensional Prouct Coes through the lens of Generalize-LDPC coes Tavor Baharav, Kannan Ramchanran Dept. of Electrical Engineering an Computer Sciences, U.C. Berkeley {tavorb,
More informationLower bounds on Locality Sensitive Hashing
Lower bouns on Locality Sensitive Hashing Rajeev Motwani Assaf Naor Rina Panigrahy Abstract Given a metric space (X, X ), c 1, r > 0, an p, q [0, 1], a istribution over mappings H : X N is calle a (r,
More informationEuler equations for multiple integrals
Euler equations for multiple integrals January 22, 2013 Contents 1 Reminer of multivariable calculus 2 1.1 Vector ifferentiation......................... 2 1.2 Matrix ifferentiation........................
More informationEntanglement is not very useful for estimating multiple phases
PHYSICAL REVIEW A 70, 032310 (2004) Entanglement is not very useful for estimating multiple phases Manuel A. Ballester* Department of Mathematics, University of Utrecht, Box 80010, 3508 TA Utrecht, The
More informationREAL ANALYSIS I HOMEWORK 5
REAL ANALYSIS I HOMEWORK 5 CİHAN BAHRAN The questions are from Stein an Shakarchi s text, Chapter 3. 1. Suppose ϕ is an integrable function on R with R ϕ(x)x = 1. Let K δ(x) = δ ϕ(x/δ), δ > 0. (a) Prove
More informationExact distance graphs of product graphs
Exact istance graphs of prouct graphs Boštjan Brešar a,b Nicolas Gastineau c Sani Klavžar a,b, Olivier Togni c August 31, 2018 a Faculty of Natural Sciences an Mathematics, University of Maribor, Slovenia
More informationn 1 conv(ai) 0. ( 8. 1 ) we get u1 = u2 = = ur. Hence the common value of all the Uj Tverberg's Tl1eorem
8.3 Tverberg's Tl1eorem 203 hence Uj E cone(aj ) Above we have erive L;=l 'Pi (uj ) = 0, an so by ( 8. 1 ) we get u1 = u2 = = ur. Hence the common value of all the Uj belongs to n;=l cone(aj ). It remains
More informationAgmon Kolmogorov Inequalities on l 2 (Z d )
Journal of Mathematics Research; Vol. 6, No. ; 04 ISSN 96-9795 E-ISSN 96-9809 Publishe by Canaian Center of Science an Eucation Agmon Kolmogorov Inequalities on l (Z ) Arman Sahovic Mathematics Department,
More informationCHAPTER 1 : DIFFERENTIABLE MANIFOLDS. 1.1 The definition of a differentiable manifold
CHAPTER 1 : DIFFERENTIABLE MANIFOLDS 1.1 The efinition of a ifferentiable manifol Let M be a topological space. This means that we have a family Ω of open sets efine on M. These satisfy (1), M Ω (2) the
More informationTime-of-Arrival Estimation in Non-Line-Of-Sight Environments
2 Conference on Information Sciences an Systems, The Johns Hopkins University, March 2, 2 Time-of-Arrival Estimation in Non-Line-Of-Sight Environments Sinan Gezici, Hisashi Kobayashi an H. Vincent Poor
More informationTable of Common Derivatives By David Abraham
Prouct an Quotient Rules: Table of Common Derivatives By Davi Abraham [ f ( g( ] = [ f ( ] g( + f ( [ g( ] f ( = g( [ f ( ] g( g( f ( [ g( ] Trigonometric Functions: sin( = cos( cos( = sin( tan( = sec
More information6 General properties of an autonomous system of two first order ODE
6 General properties of an autonomous system of two first orer ODE Here we embark on stuying the autonomous system of two first orer ifferential equations of the form ẋ 1 = f 1 (, x 2 ), ẋ 2 = f 2 (, x
More informationMonotonicity for excited random walk in high dimensions
Monotonicity for excite ranom walk in high imensions Remco van er Hofsta Mark Holmes March, 2009 Abstract We prove that the rift θ, β) for excite ranom walk in imension is monotone in the excitement parameter
More information7. Localization. (d 1, m 1 ) (d 2, m 2 ) d 3 D : d 3 d 1 m 2 = d 3 d 2 m 1. (ii) If (d 1, m 1 ) (d 1, m 1 ) and (d 2, m 2 ) (d 2, m 2 ) then
7. Localization To prove Theorem 6.1 it becomes necessary to be able to a enominators to rings (an to moules), even when the rings have zero-ivisors. It is a tool use all the time in commutative algebra,
More informationA Sketch of Menshikov s Theorem
A Sketch of Menshikov s Theorem Thomas Bao March 14, 2010 Abstract Let Λ be an infinite, locally finite oriente multi-graph with C Λ finite an strongly connecte, an let p
More informationMath 1B, lecture 8: Integration by parts
Math B, lecture 8: Integration by parts Nathan Pflueger 23 September 2 Introuction Integration by parts, similarly to integration by substitution, reverses a well-known technique of ifferentiation an explores
More informationthere is no special reason why the value of y should be fixed at y = 0.3. Any y such that
25. More on bivariate functions: partial erivatives integrals Although we sai that the graph of photosynthesis versus temperature in Lecture 16 is like a hill, in the real worl hills are three-imensional
More information1. Aufgabenblatt zur Vorlesung Probability Theory
24.10.17 1. Aufgabenblatt zur Vorlesung By (Ω, A, P ) we always enote the unerlying probability space, unless state otherwise. 1. Let r > 0, an efine f(x) = 1 [0, [ (x) exp( r x), x R. a) Show that p f
More informationCharacterizing Real-Valued Multivariate Complex Polynomials and Their Symmetric Tensor Representations
Characterizing Real-Value Multivariate Complex Polynomials an Their Symmetric Tensor Representations Bo JIANG Zhening LI Shuzhong ZHANG December 31, 2014 Abstract In this paper we stuy multivariate polynomial
More informationA note on asymptotic formulae for one-dimensional network flow problems Carlos F. Daganzo and Karen R. Smilowitz
A note on asymptotic formulae for one-imensional network flow problems Carlos F. Daganzo an Karen R. Smilowitz (to appear in Annals of Operations Research) Abstract This note evelops asymptotic formulae
More informationCounting Lattice Points in Polytopes: The Ehrhart Theory
3 Counting Lattice Points in Polytopes: The Ehrhart Theory Ubi materia, ibi geometria. Johannes Kepler (1571 1630) Given the profusion of examples that gave rise to the polynomial behavior of the integer-point
More informationAssignment 1. g i (x 1,..., x n ) dx i = 0. i=1
Assignment 1 Golstein 1.4 The equations of motion for the rolling isk are special cases of general linear ifferential equations of constraint of the form g i (x 1,..., x n x i = 0. i=1 A constraint conition
More informationIMFM Institute of Mathematics, Physics and Mechanics Jadranska 19, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia. Preprint series Vol. 50 (2012), 1173 ISSN
IMFM Institute of Mathematics, Physics an Mechanics Jaransa 19, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia Preprint series Vol. 50 (2012), 1173 ISSN 2232-2094 PARITY INDEX OF BINARY WORDS AND POWERS OF PRIME WORDS Alesanar
More informationLinear First-Order Equations
5 Linear First-Orer Equations Linear first-orer ifferential equations make up another important class of ifferential equations that commonly arise in applications an are relatively easy to solve (in theory)
More informationDIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY OF CURVES AND SURFACES 7. Geodesics and the Theorem of Gauss-Bonnet
A P Q O B DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY OF CURVES AND SURFACES 7. Geoesics an the Theorem of Gauss-Bonnet 7.. Geoesics on a Surface. The goal of this section is to give an answer to the following question. Question.
More informationLATTICE-BASED D-OPTIMUM DESIGN FOR FOURIER REGRESSION
The Annals of Statistics 1997, Vol. 25, No. 6, 2313 2327 LATTICE-BASED D-OPTIMUM DESIGN FOR FOURIER REGRESSION By Eva Riccomagno, 1 Rainer Schwabe 2 an Henry P. Wynn 1 University of Warwick, Technische
More informationThe Subtree Size Profile of Plane-oriented Recursive Trees
The Subtree Size Profile of Plane-oriente Recursive Trees Michael FUCHS Department of Applie Mathematics National Chiao Tung University Hsinchu, 3, Taiwan Email: mfuchs@math.nctu.eu.tw Abstract In this
More informationOn the enumeration of partitions with summands in arithmetic progression
AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF COMBINATORICS Volume 8 (003), Pages 149 159 On the enumeration of partitions with summans in arithmetic progression M. A. Nyblom C. Evans Department of Mathematics an Statistics
More informationJUST THE MATHS UNIT NUMBER DIFFERENTIATION 2 (Rates of change) A.J.Hobson
JUST THE MATHS UNIT NUMBER 10.2 DIFFERENTIATION 2 (Rates of change) by A.J.Hobson 10.2.1 Introuction 10.2.2 Average rates of change 10.2.3 Instantaneous rates of change 10.2.4 Derivatives 10.2.5 Exercises
More informationCombinatorica 9(1)(1989) A New Lower Bound for Snake-in-the-Box Codes. Jerzy Wojciechowski. AMS subject classification 1980: 05 C 35, 94 B 25
Combinatorica 9(1)(1989)91 99 A New Lower Boun for Snake-in-the-Box Coes Jerzy Wojciechowski Department of Pure Mathematics an Mathematical Statistics, University of Cambrige, 16 Mill Lane, Cambrige, CB2
More informationImplicit Differentiation
Implicit Differentiation Thus far, the functions we have been concerne with have been efine explicitly. A function is efine explicitly if the output is given irectly in terms of the input. For instance,
More informationPDE Notes, Lecture #11
PDE Notes, Lecture # from Professor Jalal Shatah s Lectures Febuary 9th, 2009 Sobolev Spaces Recall that for u L loc we can efine the weak erivative Du by Du, φ := udφ φ C0 If v L loc such that Du, φ =
More informationLecture 5. Symmetric Shearer s Lemma
Stanfor University Spring 208 Math 233: Non-constructive methos in combinatorics Instructor: Jan Vonrák Lecture ate: January 23, 208 Original scribe: Erik Bates Lecture 5 Symmetric Shearer s Lemma Here
More informationFinal Exam Study Guide and Practice Problems Solutions
Final Exam Stuy Guie an Practice Problems Solutions Note: These problems are just some of the types of problems that might appear on the exam. However, to fully prepare for the exam, in aition to making
More informationMath Notes on differentials, the Chain Rule, gradients, directional derivative, and normal vectors
Math 18.02 Notes on ifferentials, the Chain Rule, graients, irectional erivative, an normal vectors Tangent plane an linear approximation We efine the partial erivatives of f( xy, ) as follows: f f( x+
More informationMath 115 Section 018 Course Note
Course Note 1 General Functions Definition 1.1. A function is a rule that takes certain numbers as inputs an assigns to each a efinite output number. The set of all input numbers is calle the omain of
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.co] 27 Nov 2018
FURTHER RESULTS ON THE INDUCIBILITY OF -ARY TREES AUDACE A. V. DOSSOU-OLORY AND STEPHAN WAGNER arxiv:1811.11235v1 [math.co] 27 Nov 2018 Abstract. For a -ary tree every vertex has outegree between 2 an
More informationSharp Thresholds. Zachary Hamaker. March 15, 2010
Sharp Threshols Zachary Hamaker March 15, 2010 Abstract The Kolmogorov Zero-One law states that for tail events on infinite-imensional probability spaces, the probability must be either zero or one. Behavior
More informationIntroduction to the Vlasov-Poisson system
Introuction to the Vlasov-Poisson system Simone Calogero 1 The Vlasov equation Consier a particle with mass m > 0. Let x(t) R 3 enote the position of the particle at time t R an v(t) = ẋ(t) = x(t)/t its
More informationGeneralized Tractability for Multivariate Problems
Generalize Tractability for Multivariate Problems Part II: Linear Tensor Prouct Problems, Linear Information, an Unrestricte Tractability Michael Gnewuch Department of Computer Science, University of Kiel,
More informationarxiv: v2 [math.st] 29 Oct 2015
EXPONENTIAL RANDOM SIMPLICIAL COMPLEXES KONSTANTIN ZUEV, OR EISENBERG, AND DMITRI KRIOUKOV arxiv:1502.05032v2 [math.st] 29 Oct 2015 Abstract. Exponential ranom graph moels have attracte significant research
More informationProbabilistic Analysis of Power Assignments
Probabilistic Analysis of Power Assignments Maurits e Graaf 1,2 an Boo Manthey 1 1 University of Twente, Department of Applie Mathematics, Enschee, Netherlans m.egraaf/b.manthey@utwente.nl 2 Thales Neerlan
More informationarxiv: v4 [cs.ds] 7 Mar 2014
Analysis of Agglomerative Clustering Marcel R. Ackermann Johannes Blömer Daniel Kuntze Christian Sohler arxiv:101.697v [cs.ds] 7 Mar 01 Abstract The iameter k-clustering problem is the problem of partitioning
More informationMake graph of g by adding c to the y-values. on the graph of f by c. multiplying the y-values. even-degree polynomial. graph goes up on both sides
Reference 1: Transformations of Graphs an En Behavior of Polynomial Graphs Transformations of graphs aitive constant constant on the outsie g(x) = + c Make graph of g by aing c to the y-values on the graph
More informationSome Examples. Uniform motion. Poisson processes on the real line
Some Examples Our immeiate goal is to see some examples of Lévy processes, an/or infinitely-ivisible laws on. Uniform motion Choose an fix a nonranom an efine X := for all (1) Then, {X } is a [nonranom]
More informationOn the number of isolated eigenvalues of a pair of particles in a quantum wire
On the number of isolate eigenvalues of a pair of particles in a quantum wire arxiv:1812.11804v1 [math-ph] 31 Dec 2018 Joachim Kerner 1 Department of Mathematics an Computer Science FernUniversität in
More informationZachary Scherr Math 503 HW 5 Due Friday, Feb 26
Zachary Scherr Math 503 HW 5 Due Friay, Feb 26 1 Reaing 1. Rea Chapter 9 of Dummit an Foote 2 Problems 1. 9.1.13 Solution: We alreay know that if R is any commutative ring, then R[x]/(x r = R for any r
More informationUnit vectors with non-negative inner products
Unit vectors with non-negative inner proucts Bos, A.; Seiel, J.J. Publishe: 01/01/1980 Document Version Publisher s PDF, also known as Version of Recor (inclues final page, issue an volume numbers) Please
More informationTractability results for weighted Banach spaces of smooth functions
Tractability results for weighte Banach spaces of smooth functions Markus Weimar Mathematisches Institut, Universität Jena Ernst-Abbe-Platz 2, 07740 Jena, Germany email: markus.weimar@uni-jena.e March
More informationLECTURE NOTES ON DVORETZKY S THEOREM
LECTURE NOTES ON DVORETZKY S THEOREM STEVEN HEILMAN Abstract. We present the first half of the paper [S]. In particular, the results below, unless otherwise state, shoul be attribute to G. Schechtman.
More information12.11 Laplace s Equation in Cylindrical and
SEC. 2. Laplace s Equation in Cylinrical an Spherical Coorinates. Potential 593 2. Laplace s Equation in Cylinrical an Spherical Coorinates. Potential One of the most important PDEs in physics an engineering
More informationProof of SPNs as Mixture of Trees
A Proof of SPNs as Mixture of Trees Theorem 1. If T is an inuce SPN from a complete an ecomposable SPN S, then T is a tree that is complete an ecomposable. Proof. Argue by contraiction that T is not a
More informationRobustness and Perturbations of Minimal Bases
Robustness an Perturbations of Minimal Bases Paul Van Dooren an Froilán M Dopico December 9, 2016 Abstract Polynomial minimal bases of rational vector subspaces are a classical concept that plays an important
More informationTwo formulas for the Euler ϕ-function
Two formulas for the Euler ϕ-function Robert Frieman A multiplication formula for ϕ(n) The first formula we want to prove is the following: Theorem 1. If n 1 an n 2 are relatively prime positive integers,
More informationEstimation of the Maximum Domination Value in Multi-Dimensional Data Sets
Proceeings of the 4th East-European Conference on Avances in Databases an Information Systems ADBIS) 200 Estimation of the Maximum Domination Value in Multi-Dimensional Data Sets Eleftherios Tiakas, Apostolos.
More information7.1 Support Vector Machine
67577 Intro. to Machine Learning Fall semester, 006/7 Lecture 7: Support Vector Machines an Kernel Functions II Lecturer: Amnon Shashua Scribe: Amnon Shashua 7. Support Vector Machine We return now to
More informationFLUCTUATIONS IN THE NUMBER OF POINTS ON SMOOTH PLANE CURVES OVER FINITE FIELDS. 1. Introduction
FLUCTUATIONS IN THE NUMBER OF POINTS ON SMOOTH PLANE CURVES OVER FINITE FIELDS ALINA BUCUR, CHANTAL DAVID, BROOKE FEIGON, MATILDE LALÍN 1 Introuction In this note, we stuy the fluctuations in the number
More informationCOUPLING REQUIREMENTS FOR WELL POSED AND STABLE MULTI-PHYSICS PROBLEMS
VI International Conference on Computational Methos for Couple Problems in Science an Engineering COUPLED PROBLEMS 15 B. Schrefler, E. Oñate an M. Paparakakis(Es) COUPLING REQUIREMENTS FOR WELL POSED AND
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.co] 13 Dec 2017
The List Linear Arboricity of Graphs arxiv:7.05006v [math.co] 3 Dec 07 Ringi Kim Department of Mathematical Sciences KAIST Daejeon South Korea 344 an Luke Postle Department of Combinatorics an Optimization
More informationHyperbolic Systems of Equations Posed on Erroneous Curved Domains
Hyperbolic Systems of Equations Pose on Erroneous Curve Domains Jan Norström a, Samira Nikkar b a Department of Mathematics, Computational Mathematics, Linköping University, SE-58 83 Linköping, Sween (
More informationA Weak First Digit Law for a Class of Sequences
International Mathematical Forum, Vol. 11, 2016, no. 15, 67-702 HIKARI Lt, www.m-hikari.com http://x.oi.org/10.1288/imf.2016.6562 A Weak First Digit Law for a Class of Sequences M. A. Nyblom School of
More informationLagrangian and Hamiltonian Mechanics
Lagrangian an Hamiltonian Mechanics.G. Simpson, Ph.. epartment of Physical Sciences an Engineering Prince George s Community College ecember 5, 007 Introuction In this course we have been stuying classical
More informationGeneralizing Kronecker Graphs in order to Model Searchable Networks
Generalizing Kronecker Graphs in orer to Moel Searchable Networks Elizabeth Boine, Babak Hassibi, Aam Wierman California Institute of Technology Pasaena, CA 925 Email: {eaboine, hassibi, aamw}@caltecheu
More informationDiophantine Approximations: Examining the Farey Process and its Method on Producing Best Approximations
Diophantine Approximations: Examining the Farey Process an its Metho on Proucing Best Approximations Kelly Bowen Introuction When a person hears the phrase irrational number, one oes not think of anything
More informationLecture 2 Lagrangian formulation of classical mechanics Mechanics
Lecture Lagrangian formulation of classical mechanics 70.00 Mechanics Principle of stationary action MATH-GA To specify a motion uniquely in classical mechanics, it suffices to give, at some time t 0,
More informationQuantum Mechanics in Three Dimensions
Physics 342 Lecture 20 Quantum Mechanics in Three Dimensions Lecture 20 Physics 342 Quantum Mechanics I Monay, March 24th, 2008 We begin our spherical solutions with the simplest possible case zero potential.
More information1 dx. where is a large constant, i.e., 1, (7.6) and Px is of the order of unity. Indeed, if px is given by (7.5), the inequality (7.
Lectures Nine an Ten The WKB Approximation The WKB metho is a powerful tool to obtain solutions for many physical problems It is generally applicable to problems of wave propagation in which the frequency
More informationOptimization Notes. Note: Any material in red you will need to have memorized verbatim (more or less) for tests, quizzes, and the final exam.
MATH 2250 Calculus I Date: October 5, 2017 Eric Perkerson Optimization Notes 1 Chapter 4 Note: Any material in re you will nee to have memorize verbatim (more or less) for tests, quizzes, an the final
More informationFall 2016: Calculus I Final
Answer the questions in the spaces provie on the question sheets. If you run out of room for an answer, continue on the back of the page. NO calculators or other electronic evices, books or notes are allowe
More informationSYMMETRIC KRONECKER PRODUCTS AND SEMICLASSICAL WAVE PACKETS
SYMMETRIC KRONECKER PRODUCTS AND SEMICLASSICAL WAVE PACKETS GEORGE A HAGEDORN AND CAROLINE LASSER Abstract We investigate the iterate Kronecker prouct of a square matrix with itself an prove an invariance
More informationDifferentiation ( , 9.5)
Chapter 2 Differentiation (8.1 8.3, 9.5) 2.1 Rate of Change (8.2.1 5) Recall that the equation of a straight line can be written as y = mx + c, where m is the slope or graient of the line, an c is the
More information