Generalized Tractability for Multivariate Problems
|
|
- Lorin Lamb
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Generalize Tractability for Multivariate Problems Part II: Linear Tensor Prouct Problems, Linear Information, an Unrestricte Tractability Michael Gnewuch Department of Computer Science, University of Kiel, Christian-Albrechts-Platz 4, 4098 Kiel, Germany Henry Woźniaowsi Department of Computer Science, Columbia University New Yor, NY 1007, USA, an Institute of Applie Mathematics, University of Warsaw ul. Banacha, Warszawa, Polan, October 30, 007 Abstract We continue the stuy of generalize tractability initiate in our previous paper Generalize tractability for multivariate problems, Part I: Linear tensor prouct problems an linear information, J. Complexity, 3, 6-95 (007). We stuy linear tensor prouct problems for which we can compute linear information which is given by arbitrary continuous linear functionals. We want to approximate an operator S given as the -fol tensor prouct of a compact linear operator S 1 for = 1,,..., with S 1 = 1 an S 1 has at least two positive singular values. Let n(ε, S ) be the minimal number of information evaluations neee to approximate S to within ε [0, 1]. We stuy generalize tractability by verifying when n(ε, S ) can be boune by a multiple of a power of T (ε 1, ) for all (ε 1, ) Ω [1, ) N. Here, T is a tractability function which is non-ecreasing in both variables an grows slower than exponentially to infinity. We stuy the exponent of tractability which is the smallest power of T (ε 1, ) whose multiple bouns n(ε, S ). We also stuy wea tractability, i.e., when lim ε 1 +,(ε 1,) Ω ln n(ε, S )/(ε 1 + ) = 0. 1
2 In our previous paper, we stuie generalize tractability for proper subsets Ω of [1, ) N, whereas in this paper we tae the unrestricte omain Ω unr = [1, ) N. We consier the three cases for which we have only finitely many positive singular values of S 1, or they ecay exponentially or polynomially fast. Wea tractability hols for these three cases, an for all linear tensor prouct problems for which the singular values of S 1 ecay slightly faster that logarithmically. We provie necessary an sufficient conitions on the function T such that generalize tractability hols. These conitions are obtaine in terms of the singular values of S 1 an mostly limiting properties of T. The tractability conitions tell us how fast T must go to infinity. It is nown that T must go to infinity faster than polynomially. We show that generalize tractability is obtaine for T (x, y) = x 1+ln y. We also stuy tractability functions T of prouct form, T (x, y) = f 1 (x)f (x). Assume that a i = lim inf x (ln ln f i (x))/(ln ln x) is finite for i = 1,. Then generalize tractability taes place iff a i > 1 an (a 1 1)(a 1) 1, an if (a 1 1)(a 1) = 1 then we nee to assume one more conition given in the paper. If (a 1 1)(a 1) > 1 then the exponent of tractability is zero, an if (a 1 1)(a 1) = 1 then the exponent of tractability is finite. It is interesting to a that for T being of the prouct form, the tractability conitions as well as the exponent of tractability epen only on the secon singular eigenvalue of S 1 an they o not epen on the rate of their ecay. Finally, we compare the results obtaine in this paper for the unrestricte omain Ω unr with the results from our previous paper obtaine for the restricte omain Ω res = [1, ) {1,,..., } [1, ε 1 0 ) N with 1 an ε 0 (0, 1). In general, the tractability results are quite ifferent. We may have generalize tractability for the restricte omain an no generalize tractability for the unrestricte omain which is the case, for instance, for polynomial tractability T (x, y) = xy. We may also have generalize tractability for both omains with ifferent or with the same exponents of tractability. 1 Introuction Tractability of multivariate problems has been extensively stuie in information-base complexity an the recent account of the tractability research can be foun in the forthcoming boo [3]. Tractability is the stuy of approximating operators S efine on spaces of functions with variables with proportional to. Problems with huge occur in many applications, see [5]. We approximate S by computing linear information which is given by finitely many, say n, continuous linear functionals, an the error of an algorithm is efine in the worst case setting. Before tractability stuy, the errors of algorithms were stuie as functions of n an the main point was to fin the best possible rate of convergence as n tens to infinity. For large, the errors of algorithms crucially epen also on, an for some problems this epenence is exponential in. Let n(ε, S ) enote the information complexity of S which is the minimal number of continuous linear functionals neee to approximate S to within ε. The main point of
3 tractability is to chec whether n(ε, S ) oes not epen exponentially on ε 1 an. Since there are ifferent ways to measure the lac of exponential behavior, we have ifferent types of tractability. The first type of tractability is polynomial tractability which has been extensively stuie in many papers. In this case we want to verify whether n(ε, S ) can be boune by a multiple of powers of ε 1 an for all (ε 1, ) [1, ) N. There are many positive an negative results for polynomial tractability. Usually, positive results are for problems for which the successive variables or groups of variables of large carinality play a iminishing role, an negative results are for problems for which all variables an groups of variables play the same role. The primary example leaing to negative results is approximation of linear tensor prouct problems. In this case, S is a -fol tensor prouct of a compact linear operator S 1, where S 1 is efine between Hilbert spaces, S 1 = 1 an S 1 has at least two positive singular values. Let { λ j } enote the sequence of the orere singular values of S 1, 0 < λ λ 1 = 1. It is well nown, see [4], that the information complexity of S is n(ε, S ) = { (i 1, i,..., i ) N λ i1 λ i λ i > ε }. Clearly, if λ = 1 then n(ε, ) for all ε < 1, an we have exponential epenence on causing intractability of the problem. That is why we nee to assume that λ < 1. Still, as long as λ is positive, n(ε, ) goes faster to infinity that any power of, see [6], an that is why polynomial tractability oes not hol for linear tensor prouct problems. In [1], we propose to stuy generalize tractability by verifying whether n(ε, S ) can be boune by a multiple of a power of T (ε, ) for all (ε 1, ) Ω [1, ) N. Here T is a tractability function which means that T : [1, ) [1, ) is non-ecreasing in both variables an grows slower than exponentially to infinity, i.e., ln T (x, y) lim x+y x + y = 0. The set Ω is calle tractability omain, an can be a proper subset of [1, ) N but at least one of the parameters ε 1 or is allowe to go to infinity. The exponent of tractability is efine as the smallest (or more precisely as the infimum) power of T (ε 1, ) whose multiple bouns n(ε, S ). There is also the notion of wea tractability when ln n(ε, S ) lim ε 1 + ε 1 + = 0, see [, 3], an it is a necessary conition on the lac of exponential behavior of n(ε, S ). Of course, the hope is that by taing reasonable restricte omains Ω or by allowing tractability functions T that ten to infinity faster than polynomially, we may enlarge the class of tractable problems incluing linear tensor prouct problems. Inee, this is the case. In [1] we showe that polynomial tractability of linear tensor prouct problems hols if we assume that the singular values ten to zero polynomially fast, an we tae the restricte tractability omain Ω = Ω res := [1, ) {1,,..., } [1, ε 1 0 ) N 3
4 with 1 an ε 0 (0, 1). In this paper, we stuy the secon option an we tae the unrestricte omain Ω = Ω unr = [1, ) N, but we allow tractability functions T which go to infinity faster than polynomially. We stuy linear tensor prouct problems for three cases epening on the behavior of the singular values of S 1. In the first case we assume that only finitely many of the singular values are positive, in the secon case we assume that they ecay exponentially fast, an in the thir case that they ecay polynomially fast. For each of these three cases, we have wea tractability. In fact, wea tractability hols if the singular values behave as o((ln(j) ln(ln(j))) 1 ) an it is also almost a necessary conition. We provie necessary an sufficient conitions on T such that generalize tractability hols. These conitions are satisfie if T goes sufficiently fast to infinity. We also provie the formulas for the corresponing exponents of tractability. We illustrate these conitions an formulas for specific tractability functions. For example, tae T (x, y) = x 1+ln y. Then we have tractability for the three cases of singular values. For finitely many positive singular values an for exponentially ecaying singular values, the exponent of tractability is / ln(λ 1 ). Hence it only epens on the secon singular value an is inepenent of how many of them are positive. For polynomially ecaying singular values, λ j = Θ(j β ) for β > 0, the exponent of tractability is max{/β, / ln(λ 1 )}. We also illustrate our results for tractability functions of prouct form, that is when T (x, y) = f 1 (x)f (y) with finite a i = lim inf x (ln ln f i (x))/(ln ln x), i = 1,. Then generalize tractability hols iff a i > 1 an (a 1 1)(a 1) 1, an if (a 1 1)(a 1) = 1 then we nee to assume aitionally conition (1) for = which epens only on the secon singular value. For (a 1 1)(a 1) > 1, the exponent of tractability is zero, whereas for (a 1 1)(a 1) = 1, the exponent of tractability is positive. In fact, in the last case, epening on specific functions f i for which a i are fixe, the exponent of tractability can be arbitrary. Note that a i only epens on the limiting behavior of f i, an is inepenent on the behavior of the singular values. Hence, for (a 1 1)(a 1) > 1, we have the zero exponent of tractability inepenently of the behavior of the singular values, whereas for (a 1 1)(a 1) = 1, the exponent of tractability epens only on the secon singular value an is inepenent of the rest of them. In the final section, we compare the results obtaine in this paper for the unrestricte omain Ω unr with the results from our previous paper obtaine for the restricte omain Ω res. The tractability results for the unrestricte an restricte omains may be quite ifferent. We may have generalize tractability for the restricte omain an no generalize tractability for the unrestricte omain which is the case, as we alreay mentione, for polynomial tractability T (x, y) = xy. We may also have generalize tractability for both omains, however, the exponents of tractability may epen on the omain an can be much larger for the unrestricte omain than for the restricte omain. 4
5 Preliminaries.1 Multivariate Problems For m, N, let F be a norme linear space of functions f : D R m R an let G be a norme linear space. We consier in this paper sequences S = {S } of linear operators S : F G. We call S a multivariate problem. By linear information Λ all = F we mean the class of all continuous linear functionals efine on F. Let Λ F be a class of amissible continuous linear functionals. Without loss of generality, see e.g., [4], we consier linear algorithms that use finitely many amissible information evaluations. An algorithm A n, has the form A n, (f) = n g i L i (f) (1) for some L i Λ an some g i G. In this paper we restrict ourselves to the worst case setting. The worst case error of the algorithm A n, is efine as The initial error is e wor (A n, ) = where A 0, = 0 is the zero algorithm. Let i=1 sup S (f) A n, (f) G. () f F, f F 1 e init (S ) = S = e wor (A 0,), n(ε, S, Λ ) = min{ n A n, : e wor (A n, ) ε e init (S ) } (3) enote the minimal number of amissible information evaluations from Λ neee to reuce the initial error by a factor ε [0, 1]. The number n(ε, S, Λ ) is calle the information complexity of the problem S.. Generalize Tractability A tractability omain Ω is a subset of [1, ) N satisfying [1, ) {1,..., } [1, ε 1 0 ) N Ω (4) for some N {0} an some ε 0 (0, 1] such that + (1 ε 0 ) > 0. In this paper we focus on the unrestricte tractability omain Ω unr := [1, ) N. A function T : [1, ) [1, ) [1, ) is a tractability function if T is non-ecreasing in x an y an ln T (x, y) lim = 0. (5) (x,y) Ω, x+y x + y 5
6 Let now Ω be a tractability omain an T a tractability function. The multivariate problem S = {S } is (T, Ω)-tractable in the class Λ = {Λ } if there exist non-negative numbers C an t such that n(ε, S, Λ ) C T (ε 1, ) t for all (ε 1, ) Ω. (6) The exponent t tra of (T, Ω)-tractability in the class Λ is efine as the infimum of all non-negative t for which there exists a C = C(t) such that (6) hols. The multivariate problem S is strongly (T, Ω)-tractable in the class Λ = {Λ } if there exist non-negative numbers C an t such that n(ε, S, Λ ) C T (ε 1, 1) t for all (ε 1, ) Ω. (7) The exponent t str of strong (T, Ω)-tractability in the class Λ is the infimum of all nonnegative t for which there exists a C = C(t) such that (7) hols. An extensive motivation of the notion of generalize tractability an many examples of tractability omains an functions can be foun in [1]. We say that a multivariate problem S is wealy tractable if ln n(ε, S, Λ ) lim = 0. +ε 1 + ε 1 Obviously, if S is (T, Ω unr )-tractable then S is also wealy tractable. If S is wealy tractable an n(ε, S, Λ ) is at least one an non-ecreasing in ε 1 an, then S is also (T, Ω unr )-tractable for any non-ecreasing extension T : [1, ) [1, ) [1, ) of n(ε, S, Λ )..3 Linear Tensor Prouct Problems We escribe the setting we want to stuy in this paper in more etails. Let F 1 be a separable Hilbert space of real value functions efine on D 1 R m, an let G 1 be an arbitrary separable Hilbert space. Let S 1 : F 1 G 1 be a compact linear operator. Then the non-negative self-ajoint operator W 1 := S 1S 1 : F 1 F 1 is also compact. Let {λ i } enote the sequence of non-increasing eigenvalues of W 1, or equivalently let { λ i } be the sequence of the singular values of S 1. If = im(f 1 ) is finite, then W 1 has just finitely many eigenvalues λ 1, λ,..., λ. Then we formally put λ j = 0 for j >. In any case, the eigenvalues λ j converge to zero. Without loss of generality, we assume that S 1 is not the zero operator, an normalize the problem by assuming that λ 1 = 1. Hence, 1 = λ 1 λ 0. This implies that S 1 = 1 an the initial error is also one. 6
7 For, let F = F 1 F 1 be the complete -fol tensor prouct Hilbert space of F 1 of real value functions efine on D = D 1 D 1 R m. Similarly, let G = G 1 G 1, times. The linear operator S is efine as the tensor prouct operator S = S 1 S 1 : F G. We have S = S 1 = 1, so that the initial error is one for all. We call the multivariate problem S = {S } a linear tensor prouct problem. In this paper we analyze the problem S only for the class of linear information Λ all = {Λ all }. For convenience we write n(ε, S ) instea of n(ε, S, Λ all ). It is nown, see e.g., [4], that n(ε, S ) = {(i 1,..., i ) N λ i1... λ i > ε }, (8) with the convention that the carinality of the empty set is zero. Thus the linear tensor prouct problem S is trivial if λ = 0, since n(ε, S ) = 1 for all ε [0, 1). On the other han, n(ε, S ) grows exponentially in if λ = 1, since n(ε, S ) for all ε [0, 1). Therefore we assume λ (0, 1). We consier here the unrestricte case, i.e., Ω = Ω unr = [1, ) N. We now from [1, Lemma 3.1] that for this tractability omain the linear tensor prouct problem S is not strongly (T, Ω unr )-tractable, regarless of the tractability function T. For ε (0, 1] we efine α(ε) = ln(1/ε)/ ln(1/λ ) 1. (9) Notice that α(ε) is the largest integer n satisfying λ n > ε. We stress that α(ε) epens on λ. It tens to infinity as λ approaches 1, an is zero iff λ ε. From (8) it follows that n(ε, S ) = 1 if α(ε) = 0. For ε (0, 1) an λ (0, 1), let a := min{α(ε), }. Then it is easy to show, see also [1, Lemma 3.], that ( ) n(ε, S ) a 3 Finitely Many Eigenvalues ( ) n(ε, S 1 ) a. (10) a In this section we consier the case when W 1 = S1S 1 has only finitely many positive eigenvalues λ i. First we consier the case where W 1 has eigenvalues ifferent from zero an 1 of them are equal. We now prove an auxiliary lemma which will be helpful in the course of the proof of our first theorem. 7
8 Lemma 3.1. Let, N an let α be an integer satisfying 0 α 1 ( + 1). Then max 0 ν α ( ) ( 1) ν = ν Proof. For 0 ν α the inequality ( ) ( 1) ν 1 ν 1 ( ) ( 1) α. (11) α ( ) ( 1) ν ν hols iff ν ( ν + 1)( 1), an the last inequality hols iff ν 1 ( + 1). This shows that the function ( ) ν ( 1) ν ν is non-ecreasing on [0, α] N. Theorem 3.. Let T be a tractability function. Let λ 1 = 1, 0 < λ =... = λ < 1, an λ l = 0 for l >. Then the linear tensor prouct problem S = {S } is (T, Ω unr )-tractable in the class of linear information iff B := lim inf inf 1 α(ε) 1 ln T (ε 1, ) m (ε, ) (0, ], (1) where m (ε, ) := α(ε) ln( ( 1)) + ( α(ε)) ln( ). α(ε) α(ε) If B > 0, then the exponent t tra of tractability is given by t tra = B 1. (13) Proof. For the eigenvalues specifie in Theorem 3., it is easy to chec that (8) yiels n(ε, S ) = min{α(ε),} ν=0 ( ) ( 1) ν. (14) ν Let us first assume that S is (T, Ω unr )-tractable, i.e., that there exist C, t > 0 such that n(ε, S ) CT (ε 1, ) t. Let 1 α(ε) 1. From (11) an (14) we get the estimate ( ) ( ) ( 1) α(ε) n(ε, S ) (α(ε) + 1) ( 1) α(ε). (15) α(ε) α(ε) 8
9 Using Stirling s formula for factorials m! = m m+1/ e m π (1 + o(1)), we obtain (( ) ln )( 1) α(ε) α(ε) Thus = ln(!) ln(α(ε)!) ln(( α(ε))!) + α(ε) ln( 1) ( = + 1 ) ( ln() α(ε) + 1 ) ( ln(α(ε)) α(ε) + 1 ) ln( α(ε)) ln( π) + ln(o(1)) + α(ε) ln( 1) = m (ε, ) + 1 ( ) ln + O(1). α(ε)( α(ε)) ln T (ε 1, ) m (ε, ) ( 1 ln t + α(ε)( α(ε)) t m (ε, ) ) ln(c) t m (ε, ) + O(1) t m (ε, ). (16) Let {(ε 1 ν, ν )} be a sequence in Ω unr such that 1 α(ε ν ) ( 1)/, an lim ν (α(ε ν )/ ν ) exists (an obviously is at most ( 1)/) with lim ν ν =. If lim ν (α(ε ν )/ ν ) > 0 then m (ε ν, ν ) = Θ( ν ) an the right han sie of (16) tens to 1/t for ν. If lim ν (α(ε ν )/ ν ) = 0 then ( ( )) ν m (ε ν, ν ) = Θ α(ε ν ) ln ( 1), α(ε ν ) since Furthermore, ( ) ν ( ν α(ε ν )) ln ν α(ε ν ) = Θ(α(ε ν )). ( ) ln ν = Θ(ln(α(ε ν ))). α(ε ν )( ν α(ε ν )) Hence, again, the right han sie of (16) tens to 1/t. Since an arbitrary sequence {(ε 1 ν, ν )} with lim ν ν = an 1 α(ε ν ) 1 has a sub-sequence {(ε 1 µ, µ )} for which {α(ε µ )/ µ } converges, we conclue that B 1 t > 0, an ttra B 1. (17) Assume now B > 0. We want to show that for all t > B 1 there exists a C = C(t) > 0 such that n(ε, S ) CT (ε 1, ) t for all N, ε (0, 1). From (14) we see that this inequality is trivial if α(ε) = 0, an, since T (ε 1, ) is non-ecreasing in ε 1, that the case α(ε) > is settle if we have the inequality for α(ε) =. Thus it remains to consier the following two cases: 9
10 Case 1: 1 α(ε) 1. We now show that for all t > B 1 there exists a C = C(t) > 0 such that for all N, ( ) ln T (ε 1, ) 1 ln(1 + α(ε)) ln α(ε)( α(ε)) + + ln(c) m (ε, ) t t m (ε, ) t m (ε, ) t m (ε, ) + O(1) t m (ε, ). (18) ( ( Due to (15) an the formula for ln ) α(ε) ( 1) α(ε)), we conclue that n(ε, S ) CT (ε 1, ) t for all N, 1 α(ε) ( 1. ) To prove (18), observe that ln ln(). Obviously, α(ε)( α(ε)) m (ε, ) α(ε) ln( ( 1)). α(ε) For a given l N let x l R be so large that for all x x l we have ln(1 + x) x ln() 1 l. Let now l (1 + x l ) l+1. Then we get for l an 1 α(ε) 1, ln(1 + α(ε)) α(ε) ln( α(ε) ( 1)) 1 l. Furthermore, let { B l } be a sequence in (0, B ) that converges to B. For each l we fin a l such that for all 1 l an all 1 α(ε) Choose t l := (1 + 1 l ln T (ε 1, ) m (ε, ) 1 ) B l. For all max{ l, l ln T (ε 1, ) m (ε, ) 1 t l ( 1 + B l. } an all 1 α(ε) 1 ln(1 + α(ε)) m (ε, ) ). we have It is now easy to see that (18) hols for t = t l an all N an all 1 α(ε) 1 if we just choose C = C(t l ) suitably large. Observe that t l converges to B 1 as l tens to infinity. 1 Case : < α(ε). Let δ (0, B 1 ) an t (B δ) 1. There exists a δ such that for all δ an all ε with 1 α(ε ) 1, we have ln T (ε 1, ) m (ε, ) B δ. For δ an α(ε) 1, choose ε [ε, 1) such that α(ε ) = 1 =. Then ( m (ε, ) ln() ln 1 + ), 10
11 an t ln T (ε 1, ) (B δ) 1 ln T (ε 1, ) m (ε, ). We fin a number C not epening on such that ln(c) ln(1 + ). From (14) we now that n(ε, S ), an this yiels t ln T (ε 1, ) m (ε, ) ln n(ε, S ) ln(c), implying CT (ε 1, ) t n(ε, S ). Choosing C = C(t) sufficiently large the last inequality extens to all an all ε with 1 α(ε). The statement of the theorem follows from Cases 1 an. We illustrate Theorem 3. by two tractability functions. Let T (x, y) = xy which correspons to polynomial tractability. Then it is easy to chec that B = 0 for all. This means that we o not have polynomial tractability for any linear tensor prouct problem with at least two positive eigenvalues for = 1. This result has been nown before. Let T (x, y) = x 1+ln y. Then it can be chece that B = 1 ln(λ 1 ) for all, an t tra = ln(λ 1 ). Hence, the exponent of tractability only epens on the secon largest eigenvalue an is inepenent of its multiplicity. Note that the exponent of tractability goes to infinity as λ approaches one. We now consier the general case of finitely many positive eigenvalues. Corollary 3.3. Let T be a tractability function. Let an λ 1 = 1, λ (0, 1), an λ l = 0 for l >. Then the linear tensor prouct problem S = {S } is (T, Ω unr )-tractable in the class of linear information iff for some (an thus for all) j {, 3,..., } B j = lim inf inf 1 α(ε) j 1 j ln T (ε 1, ) m j (ε, ) (0, ], (19) where m j (ε, ) = α(ε) ln( of tractability satisfies α(ε) (j 1)) + ( α(ε)) ln( α(ε) ). In this case the exponent ttra B 1 t tra B 1. (0) Proof. Obviously we have B B 3 B. We nee to show that B > 0 implies that B > 0. We first show that B > 0 implies lim inf ln T inf (ε 1, ) 1 α(ε) 1 m (ε, ) > 0. (1) 11
12 Let ε satisfy α(ε ) =. We have m (ε, ) ln() ln(1 + ). Thus for 1 < α(ε) we get m (ε, ) ln() + ln() Cm (ε, ) for an C sufficiently large. Since T is non-ecreasing with respect to the first variable, it is easy to see that B > 0 implies (1). Now we prove that m (ε, ) m (ε, ) = 1 + α(ε) ln( 1) α(ε) ln( ) + ( α(ε)) ln( ) () α(ε) α(ε) is boune uniformly for all N an all ε with 1 α(ε) 1. This follows easily from ( ) ( ) m (ε, ) α(ε) ln α(ε) ln. α(ε) 1 Thus B > 0 implies ( B lim inf ) ( ln T inf (ε 1, ) 1 α(ε) 1 m (ε, ) inf N ; 1 α(ε) 1 m (ε, ) m (ε, ) Since the linear tensor prouct problem S having only the two non-zero eigenvalues λ 1 = λ 1 an λ = λ is at most as ifficult as S an the problem S having eigenvalues λ 1 = λ 1, λ =... = λ = λ an λ l = 0 for l > is at least as as ifficult as S, the corollary follows from Theorem 3.. Remar 3.4. Theorem 3. shows that in the case λ 3 =... = λ = 0 we have t tra = B 1, while in the case λ = λ 3 =... = λ we have t tra = B 1. If we consier a fixe tractability function T, a sequence {S (n) } of tensor prouct problems whose eigenvalues {λ (n) i } satisfy λ (n) 1 = λ 1 = 1, λ (n) = λ (0, 1), λ (n) 3,..., λ (n) > 0, an lim n λ (n) 3 = 0, then we o not necessarily have that the corresponing exponents of tractability t tra n converge to B 1 as the following counterexample shows. Let T (ε 1, ) = min{α(ε),} ν=0 ( ). ν Then it is not har to see that T is inee a tractability function an that B = 1 (we showe that implicitly in the proof of Theorem 3.). Accoring to Corollary 3.3 each problem S (n) is (T, Ω unr )-tractable. For N we obviously have sup ε (0,1) T (ε 1, ) =. If we choose ε = ε (n) = 1 (λ(n) )/, we get n(ε, S (n) for all n. This shows that the sequence {t tra n ) > 0. ) =. This implies t tra n ln()/ ln() } oes not converge to B 1 = 1. 1
13 Example 3.5. Let the conitions of Corollary 3.3 hol. We consier the special tractability function T (x, y) = exp(f 1 (x)f (y)), where f i : [1, ) (0, ), i = 1,, are nonecreasing functions. Let a i := lim inf x f i (x) ln x for i = 1,. Let us assume that S is (T, Ω unr )-tractable. Accoring to Corollary 3.3 we have B > 0, an from m (ε, ) α(ε)(ln() ln(α(ε))) for all ε satisfying 1 α(ε) / we get Thus a > 0, an f 1 (ε 1 )f () 0 < B lim inf α(ε)(ln() ln(α(ε))) f ( ) ( ) 1(ε 1 ) f () ln() lim inf lim sup α(ε) ln() ln() ln(α(ε)) = f 1(ε 1 ) α(ε) a. 0 < B a lim inf ε 0 f 1 (ε 1 ) α(ε) = lim inf ε 0 ( ln(ε 1 ) α(ε) f 1 (ε 1 ) ln(ε 1 ) ) = ln(λ 1 ) a 1. Hence, a 1 > 0 an a > 0 are necessary conitions for the problem S to be (T, Ω unr )- tractable, an the exponent of tractability is boune from below by t tra B 1 a 1 a ln(λ 1 ). In Corollary 5. we will show in particular that the conitions a 1 > 0, a > 0 are also sufficient for (T, Ω unr )-tractability. Remar 3.6. Uner the conitions of Corollary 3.3 we can state a slightly simpler criterion to characterize (T, Ω unr )-tractability. The linear tensor prouct problem S = {S } is (T, Ω unr )-tractable in the class of linear information iff B := lim inf inf 1 α(ε) / ln T (ε 1, ) α(ε) ln(/α(ε)) (0, ]. (3) The necessity an sufficiency of B > 0 follows from (19) an the (easy to chec) inequalities ( ) 1 m (ε, ) α(ε) ln m (ε, ) α(ε) for all ε satisfying 1 α(ε) an large. A rawbac of (3) is that the quantity B is not relate to the exact exponent of tractability as B in Theorem 3.. Example 3.7. The tractability criteria (19) an (3) epen on the secon largest eigenvalue λ via α(ε). In fact, for a given tractability function T, a linear tensor prouct problem S = {S } with only two positive eigenvalues for S 1S 1 may be (T, Ω unr )-tractable, 13
14 but if we increase the value of λ this may not necessarily be the case any more. Choose, e.g., { 1 if x [1, λ 1/ ], T (x, y) := e ln(x)(1+ln(y)) otherwise. From criterion (3) it follows easily that S is (T, Ω unr )-tractable. But if we consier the problem S where we only increase the secon eigenvalue to λ > λ, we see that for λ 1/ < ε 1 λ 1/ we have n(ε, S ) min{ α(ε),} ν=0 ( ) ν ( ) =, where α(ε) := 1 ln(ε 1 ) 1 1. ln( λ 1 ) Thus the problem S is obviously not (T, Ω unr )-tractable since CT (ε 1, ) t = C cannot be larger than for > C. The counterexample above motivates us to state a sufficient conition on T ensuring (T, Ω unr )-tractability of all linear tensor prouct problems S with finitely many eigenvalues regarless of the specific value of λ. Corollary 3.8. Let T be a tractability function. If B := lim inf ln T (ε 1, ) inf 1<ε 1 e ln(ε 1 ) (1 + ln (/ ln(ε 1 ))) (0, ] (4) then arbitrary linear tensor prouct problem S with finitely many eigenvalues is (T, Ω unr )- tractable. However, the exponent of tractability goes to infinity as λ approaches one. Proof. The proof of the corollary is easy. For values of ε [e, 1) satisfying α(ε) [1, /] one can simply show that α(ε) ln(/α(ε)) C ln(ε 1 )(1 + ln(/ ln(ε 1 ))), where the constant C epens only on λ. If we substitute the upper boun on α(ε) in the efinition of B in (3) by the minimum of / an / ln(λ 1 ) 1 we therefore see that this moifie quantity is strictly positive. From that we can euce similarly as in Case in the proof of Theorem 3. that B > 0, an ue to Remar 3.6, the problem S is (T, Ω unr )-tractable. Obviously, n(ε, S ) for ε < λ. Hence, the exponent of tractability must go to infinity as λ goes to one. Remar 3.9. Conition (4) in the corollary above is sufficient for (T, Ω unr )-tractability for all linear tensor prouct problems S with finitely many eigenvalues, but not necessary as the example T (ε 1, ) = exp(ln(ε 1 )(1 + ln())) shows, see Corollary Exponential Decay of Eigenvalues We begin to stuy linear tensor problems with infinitely many positive eigenvalues. As we shall see, tractability results epen on the behavior of the eigenvalues for = 1. In this section we assume that they are exponentially ecaying whereas in the next section that they are polynomially ecaying. 14
15 Theorem 4.1. Let T be a tractability function. Let S be a linear tensor prouct problem with exponentially ecaying eigenvalues λ j, exp( β 1 (j 1)) λ j exp( β (j 1)) for all j N, for some positive numbers β 1, β. For i = 1,, efine B (i) e ln T := lim inf (ε 1, ) ε 1 + ε<σ i m (i) e (ε, ), where σ 1 = e β1/, σ = λ, an ( m (i) e (ε, ) := z i ln 1 + ) ( + ln 1 + z ) i, z i with Then z i = z i (ε) := β i ln(ε 1 ) 1. S is (T, Ω unr )-tractable iff B () e (0, ]. Furthermore, B e () > 0 is equivalent to B e (1) (0, ] an B (0, ] with B given by (1) for =. If S is (T, Ω unr )-tractable then the exponent t tra of tractability satisfies ( min{b, B e (1) } ) 1 t tra ( ) B e () 1. If β 1 = β then t tra = (B () e ) 1. Before we prove Theorem 4.1, we state an auxiliary lemma. Lemma 4.. For N an x > 1 let { µ e (x, ) := (i 1,..., i ) N i j < x + + 1}. j=1 Then Proof. For = 1 we have ( ) x + µ e (x, ) =. µ e (x, 1) = {i N i < x + } = x + 1. Assume by inuction that ( ) y + µ e (y, ) = 15
16 for some N an all y > 1. If x > 1 then µ e (x, + 1) = x +1 =1 µ e (x + 1, ) = x +1 =1 x ( ) ( ) ν + x = =. + 1 ν=0 ( ) x Proof of Theorem 4.1. Let µ e (x, ) be efine as in Lemma 4.. Then { } µ e (z 1, ) = (i 1,..., i ) N exp( β 1 (i j 1)) > ε n(ε, S ). j=1 Similarly, we get n(ε, S ) µ e (z, ). Let us first assume that S is (T, Ω unr )-tractable, i.e., that there exist positive t, C such that n(ε, S ) CT (ε 1, ) t for all (ε 1, ) Ω unr. Let us assume that ε < e β1/, which implies that z 1 1. From this inequality we get ue to Lemma 4. ln T (ε 1, ) ln(c 1 ) + ln ( z 1 ) +. m (1) e (ε, ) t m (1) e (ε, ) Similarly as in the proof of Theorem 3. we use Stirling s formula for factorials, an conclue ( ) z1 + ln = m (1) e (ε, ) + 1 ( ) ln z1 + + O(1). (5) z 1 We have min{ln(), ln z 1 } ln ( ) ( z1 + 1 = ln z 1 z ) ln(). So it is easy to chec that we get B e (1) 1/t, implying B e (1) > 0 an t tra (B e (1) ) 1. Furthermore, we get from Corollary 3.3 that B > 0 an t tra B 1. Let us now show that B > 0 an B e (1) > 0 imply B e () > 0. As a careful analysis reveals, we get m (1) e (ε, ) K := lim inf inf ε 1 + ε<e β 1 / m () e (ε, ) > 0, which gives us lim inf ε 1 + ε<e β 1 / ln T (ε 1, ) m () e (ε, ) B (1) e K > 0. 16
17 In the case e β1/ ε < λ both functions α(ε) an z (ε) are boune. Thus we have m (ε, ) = Θ(ln()) = m () e (ε, ), where m is given in Theorem 3.. Hence which yiels L := lim inf lim inf ε 1 + e β 1 / ε λ m (ε, ) inf e β 1 / ε< λ m () e (ε, ) > 0, ln T (ε 1, ) m () e (ε, ) B L > 0. This means that B e () is positive, as claime. Now let us assume that B e () > 0 an let t δ := ((1 δ)b e () ) 1 for a given δ (0, 1). Then there exists an R(δ) such that for any pair (ε, ) with ε 1 + > R(δ) (an ε < λ, but for convenience we will not mention this restriction in the rest of the proof) we get ( ln T (ε 1, ) > 1 δ ) B e (). m () e (ε, ) We want to show that there exists a number C δ such that n(ε, S ) C δ T (ε 1, ) t δ for all (ε 1, ) Ω unr. Since n(ε, S ) µ e (z, ), it is sufficient to verify the inequality ln T (ε 1, ) ln(c 1 δ ) + ln ( z ) +. (6) m () e (ε, ) t δ m () e (ε, ) The left han sie is at least (1 δ/)b e (). Using Stirling s formula (5) for z instea of z 1, we see that the right han sie can be written as (1 δ)b () e + ln( z + z ) 1 δ ) t δ m () e (ε, ) + ln(c t δ m () e (ε, ) + O(1) t δ m () e (ε, ). The limes superior of all the summans, except of (1 δ)b e (), goes to zero as ε 1 + tens to infinity. Hence, there exists an R(δ) such that for all pairs (ε, ) with ε 1 + > R(δ) inequality (6) hols. Choosing C δ sufficiently large, we see therefore that (6) hols for all (ε 1, ) Ω unr. This shows that we have (T, Ω unr )-tractability an, since δ (0, 1) was arbitrary, the exponent of tractability t tra satisfies t tra (B e () ) 1. As we alreay have seen, tractability implies B e (1) > 0 an B > 0. Finally, if β 1 = β then B e (1) = B e (), an therefore (min{b, B e (1) }) 1 t tra (B e () ) 1 implies that B B e (1) an t tra = (B e () ) 1. We illustrate Theorem 4.1 by taing again the tractability function T (x, y) = x 1+ln y. For β 1 = β = β > 0, we have λ = exp( β). It can be chece that B () e ) = β = ln(λ 1. 17
18 Thus the exponent of tractability is t tra = (B () e ) 1 = β = ln(λ 1 ). We can simplify the necessary an sufficient conitions in Theorem 4.1 for (T, Ω unr )- tractability at the expense of getting goo estimates on the exponent of tractability. Corollary 4.3. Let T be a tractability function. Let S be a linear tensor prouct problem with 0 < λ < λ 1 = 1, an with exponentially ecaying eigenvalues λ j, K 1 exp( β 1 j) λ j K exp( β j) for all j N, for some positive numbers β 1, β, K 1 an K. Then S is (T, Ω unr )-tractable iff lim inf ε 1 + ε< λ ln T (ε 1, ) min{, α(ε)} (1 + ln(/α(ε)) ) (0, ]. (7) Proof. Since λ j min{λ, K exp( β j)} for j, we can choose positive β 1 β 1, β β such that exp( β 1(j 1)) λ j exp( β (j 1)) for all j N. Thus we can apply Theorem 4.1. There we showe that B e () > 0 is necessary an sufficient for (T, Ω unr )-tractability. For 1 α(ε) / an large, we have m (ε, )/ α(ε) ln(/α(ε)) m (ε, ). Furthermore, one can also verify that lim inf inf / α(ε) where q { 1, +1}. Thus (7) hols iff B () e ( ) m () q e (ε, ) > 0, min{, α(ε)}(1 + ln(/α(ε)) ) 5 Polynomial Decay of Eigenvalues (0, ], which proves the corollary In this section we stuy tractability for linear tensor prouct problems with polynomially ecaying eigenvalues for = 1. We believe that such behavior of eigenvalues is typical an therefore the results of this section are probably more important than the results of the previous sections. Theorem 5.1. Let T be a tractability function. Let S be a linear tensor prouct problem with 1 = λ 1 > λ > 0 an λ j = O(j β ) for all j N an some positive β. A sufficient conition for (T, Ω unr )-tractability of S is F := lim inf ε 1 + ε< λ ln T (ε 1, ) ln(ε 1 )(1 + ln()) 18 (0, ].
19 If F (0, ], then the exponent of tractability satisfies { } B 1 t tra max β, ln(λ 1 F 1, ) with B given in (1) for =. Proof. Let C 1 be a positive constant satisfying λ j C 1 j β for all j. With C := C 1/β 1 we have n(ε, S 1 ) = max{j λ j > ε } max{j C 1 j β > ε } C ε /β C ε p for all p > /β. From the ientity n(ε, S ) = it now follows by simple inuction that n(ε, S ) C ( j=1 i=1 λ p/ j n (ε/ ) λ i, S 1 ) 1 ε p for all p > /β. (8) Thus for each 0 N an all p > /β there exists a number C( 0, p) such that n(ε, S ) C( 0, p) ε p for all 0 an ε (0, λ ). Let now δ (0, 1) an ε δ < λ such that for all ε (0, ε δ ) an all 0 ln T (ε 1, ) ln(ε 1 )(1 + ln()) (1 δ) F, where F is assume to be positive. Then for t = t(δ, p, 0 ) := p(1 δ) 1 F 1 an C = C( 0, p) we have ln(ct (ε 1, ) t ) ln C + p(1 + ln()) ln(ε 1 ) ln n(ε, S ) for all 0 an ε (0, ε δ ). This implies that for each t > (/β)f 1 there exists a sufficiently large number C = C t such that n(ε, S ) C T (ε 1, ) t for all 0 an ε (0, λ ). (9) We now consier arbitrarily large. Let us estimate the sum on the right han sie of inequality (8). For this purpose we choose N such that λ > C 1 β. Since λ C 1 β, we have obviously >. We have j=1 λ p/ j 1 + λ p/ + + λ p/ + C p/ 1 19 j=+1 j pβ,
20 an j=+1 j pβ x pβ pβ +1 x = (pβ/) 1. Now we choose p = p() such that ( λ p/ + (C ) 1 β ) p/ = 1 (pβ/) 1. From λ p/ 1/ we conclue From λ > C 1 β we get implying ( ) ln + ln p ln(λ 1. ) ( ) λ p/ 1 (pβ/) 1, ( p ln + ln + ln ln(λ 1 ) (pβ/) 1 ) Thus we have p = ln() ln(λ 1 ) (1 + o (1)) as. Let now σ (0, 1) an σ N such that o (1) σ an ln T (ε 1, ) ln(ε 1 )(1 + ln()) (1 + σ) 1 F for all σ an all ε (0, λ ). For these an ε we have ( n(ε, S ) C 1 + ) 1 1 ( ) ln() ε p e C exp ln(λ 1 ) (1 + σ) ln(ε 1 ) ( ) C 3 exp ln(λ 1 ) F 1 (1 + σ) ln T (ε 1, ), where C 3 := e C. Hence for τ = τ(σ, p, δ ) := (ln(λ 1 )) 1 (1 + σ) F 1 we get n(ε, S ) C 3 T (ε 1, ) τ for all σ an ε (0, λ ). (30) The estimates (9) an (30) show that we have (T, Ω unr )-tractability. Choosing 0 = σ in (9) an letting σ ten to zero yiels the claime upper boun for t tra. Since our problem is at least as har as the problem with only two positive eigenvalues 0 < λ < λ 1 = 1 for = 1, the lower boun t tra B 1 follows from Theorem 3. for =. 0.
21 The upper boun on the exponent t tra in Theorem 5.1 is, in general, sharp. Inee, assume that λ j = Θ(j β ) an tae T (x, y) = x 1+ln y. Then n(ε, S 1 ) = Θ(ε /β ) which easily implies that t tra /β. In this case, we have F = 1 an B = 1 ln(λ 1 ). This shows that the upper boun on t tra in Theorem 5.1 is sharp an { } t tra = max β, ln(λ 1. ) Hence, for β ln(λ 1 ) the exponent of tractability is the same as for the problem with only two positive eigenvalues 0 < λ < λ 1 = 1. For this tractability function, the problem S with polynomially ecaying eigenvalues is as har as the problem with only two positive eigenvalues. However, for β < ln λ 1, the exponent of tractability epens on β an the problem S is harer than the problem with only two positive eigenvalues. Corollary 5.. Let 1 = λ 1 > λ > 0 an λ j = O(j β ) for all j N an some fixe β > 0. Let f i : [1, ) (0, ), i = 1,, be non-ecreasing functions such that f 1 (x)f (y) lim x+y x + y = 0. For T (x, y) = exp(f 1 (x)f (y)), we have (T, Ω unr )-tractability iff a i := lim inf x f i (x) ln x (0, ] for i = 1,. If a 1, a (0, ], then the exponent of tractability satisfies { } a 1 a ln(λ 1 ) ttra max β, 1 ln(λ 1 ) min{a 1 b, b 1 a }, where b 1 = f 1 (ε 1 ) inf ε< λ ln(ε 1 ) an f () b = inf N 1 + ln(). Proof. We have alreay seen in Example 3.5 that even for two non-zero eigenvalues λ 1, λ an 0 = λ 3 = λ 4 =... the conition a 1, a > 0 is necessary for S to be (T, Ω unr )-tractable, an that t tra /(a 1 a ln(λ 1 )). Let us now assume that a 1, a (0, ]. It is easy to see that F = lim inf ε 1 + ε< λ ln T (ε 1, ) ln(ε 1 )(1 + ln()) f 1 = lim inf (ε 1 )f () ε 1 + ln(ε 1 )(1 + ln()) = min{a 1b, b 1 a }, ε< λ an that a 1, a > 0 implies b 1, b > 0. Thus F > 0 an ue to Theorem 5.1 we have (T, Ω unr )-tractability an the state upper boun for t tra. 1
22 We illustrate Corollary 5. again for T (x, y) = x 1+ln y = exp ((ln x)(1 + ln y)). We now have a 1 = a = b 1 = b = 1. If we assume that λ j = Θ(j β ) then, as we have alreay chece, t tra = max{/β, / ln λ 1 }. Hence, the upper boun on t tra in Corollary 5. is, in general, sharp. This proves that for tractability functions T of the form T (x, y) = exp(f 1 (x)f (x)), the exponent of tractability may epen on β, i.e., on how fast the eigenvalues ecay to zero for = 1. We now consier ifferent tractability functions of the form T (x, y) = f 1 (x)f (x) = exp(ln f 1 (x) + ln f (x)) an show that for such functions the exponent of tractability oes not epen on β. The following theorem generalizes a result from [7] which correspons to f i (x) = exp(ln 1+α i (1 + x)). Theorem 5.3. Let S be a linear tensor prouct problem with 1 = λ 1 > λ > 0 an λ j = O(j β ) for all j N. For i = 1, let f i : [1, ) [1, ) be a non-ecreasing function with ln ln f i (x) a i := lim inf <. x ln ln x Then the function T efine by T (x, y) = f 1 (x)f (y) is a tractability function. S is (T, Ω unr )-tractable iff a 1 > 1, a > 1, (a 1 1)(a 1) 1, an B (0, ], where B is given by (1) for =. If a 1 > 1, a > 1 an (a 1 1)(a 1) > 1 then B = an the exponent of tractability t tra is zero. If a 1 > 1, a > 1, (a 1 1)(a 1) = 1 an B > 0 then the exponent of tractability is t tra = B 1 = ln f 1 lim inf (ε 1 ) + ln f () ε 1 + α(ε) ln() ε< λ Proof. Since a 1, a <, it is obvious that T is a tractability function. Let first S be (T, Ω)-tractable, i.e., there exist positive constants C, t such that Due to (10) we have which implies n(ε, S ) C f 1 (ε 1 ) t f () t for all (ε 1, ) Ω unr. n(ε, S ) ( ) ( ) α(ε), α(ε) α(ε) ( ) α(ε) ln ln(c) + t ln f 1 (ε 1 ) + t ln f (). (31) α(ε) Keeping ε fixe an letting grow, we see that for any δ > 0 there exists a = (δ, ε) such that for all we have α(ε) ln() (t + δ) ln f (), an therefore 1 + ln α(ε) ln ln() ln ln f () ln(t + δ) + ln ln() ln ln(). 1.
23 Thus a 1. Let now ε vary an tae = α(ε). Since ln f () = o() = o(α(ε)), we get from (31) for arbitrary δ > 0, for ε = ε (δ) sufficiently small, an for all ε ε that α(ε) ln() (t + δ) ln f 1 (ε 1 ). Since ln α(ε) = ln() + ln ln(ε 1 ) ln ln(λ 1 ) + O(1) as ε tens to zero, the estimate a 1 1 easily follows. Let now η > a 1 1. Define Then (31) yiels = (ε) = α(ε) α(ε)η. (α(ε) η+1 α(ε)) ln(α(ε)) ln(c) + t ln f 1 (ε 1 ) + t ln f (). Due to the choice of η an the fact that α(ε) = ln(ε 1 )/ ln(λ 1 ) + O(1), the function ln f 1 (ε 1 ) is of orer o(α(ε) η+1 ). We thus have for arbitrary δ, for ε(δ) sufficiently small, an for all ε ε(δ), α(ε) η+1 ln(α(ε)) (t + δ) ln f (), leaing to This implies η + 1 η ( lim inf ln ln(α(ε)) ln(α(ε)) ) ( ln ln f () ln ln() ln(t + δ) ln(α(ε)) + ln ln f () ln ln() ln ln() ln(α(ε)). lim ε 1 ) η ln(α(ε)) + ln ln(α(ε)) = a η. ln(α(ε)) Thus η(a 1) 1. Letting η ten to a 1 1 we get (a 1 1)(a 1) 1. This proves that a 1 > 1 an a > 1. Furthermore, ue to Theorem 3., B has to be positive or infinite for any tractable problems with two positive eigenvalues 0 < λ < λ 1 = 1. Assume now that a 1 > 1, a > 1, (a 1 1)(a 1) 1, an B > 0. Due to Theorem 5.1, to prove (T, Ω unr )-tractability it is enough to verify that ln f 1 F = lim inf (ε 1 ) + ln f () ε 1 + ln(ε 1 )(1 + ln()) ε< λ (0, ]. Assume we have an arbitrary sequence {(ε 1 m, m )} such that {ε 1 m + m } tens to infinity, ε m < λ, an the sequence {F m }, where F m := ln f 1(ε 1 m ) + ln f ( m ) ln(ε 1 m )(1 + ln( m )), converges to F. Then we fin a sub-sequence {(ε 1 n, n )} for which {ln ln( n )/ ln ln(ε 1 n )} converges to an element x [0, ]. For this sub-sequence we show that F > B/ ln(λ 1 If the sequence {ε 1 n ). } or { n } is boune, then {F n } tens to infinity, since a 1 an a are } as well as { n } ten to infinity. both strictly larger than 1. So we can assume that {ε 1 n 3
24 First, let us assume that x [0, (a 1 1)). Then ln( n ) ln(ε 1 n ) a1 1 δ for δ sufficiently small an sufficiently large n n(δ). Thus F lim inf n ln f 1 (ε 1 n ) ln(ε 1 n ) =. a 1 δ If x ((a 1) 1, ], we just change the roles of the parameters ε 1 an to get F lim inf n ln f ( n ) ln( n ) a δ =. If (a 1 1)(a 1) > 1, then we have consiere all possible values of x in [0, ] since then [0, (a 1 1)) ((a 1) 1, ] = [0, ], an we have shown that F =. Theorem 5.1 implies then that the exponent of tractability is t tra = 0 an B =. If (a 1 1)(a 1) = 1, we still have to consier the case x = a 1 1. Then ln(α(ε n )) = ln ln(ε 1 n ) + ln() ln ln(λ 1 ) + O(1) [(a 1) δ, (a 1) + δ] ln ln( n ) for arbitrary δ an sufficiently large n n(δ). Then α(ε n ) (ln n ) a 1+δ = o( n ). Hence we have F = lim inf n ln f 1 (ε 1 n ) + ln f ( n ) α(ε n )(1 + ln( n /α(ε n ))) α(ε n )(1 + ln( n /α(ε n ))) ln(ε 1 n )(1 + ln( n )) = B ln(λ 1 ) > 0. To obtain the formula for the exponent t tra we can use the boun on t tra from Theorem 5.1. For β ln λ 1 we get t tra = B 1. To obtain the same result for β < ln λ 1 we procee as follows. In the proof of Theorem 5.1 we showe that for small positive δ there is a positive number C β,δ epening only on β an δ such that ( { } ) + δ (1 + δ) ln() n(ε, S ) C β,δ exp max, β ln(λ 1 ln(ε 1 ) for all (ε 1, ) Ω unr. To show that the last right sie function is at most C (f 1 (ε 1 )f ()) t it is enough to chec that (1 + δ) ln(λ 1 ) ln(ε 1 ) ln() t ( ln(f 1 (ε 1 )) + ln(f ()) ) for large ε 1 an. Or equivalently that t (1 + δ) ln(f 1 lim inf (ε 1 )) + ln(f ()) ε 1 + α(ε) ln() ε< λ The last limit inferior is achieve if α(ε) is a power of ln(), an therefore it is the same as B. Since δ can be arbitrarily small we conclue that t tra B 1. The lower boun on t tra from Theorem 5.1 then implies t tra = B 1, as claime. This completes the proof of Theorem ) 1.
25 Remar 5.4. Let the conitions of Theorem 5.3 hol an assume that a 1 > 1, a > 1 an (a 1 1)(a 1) = 1. Then conition B (0, ] oes not necessarily hol as the following example shows. Let δ : [1, ) [0, ) be a ecreasing function with lim x δ(x) = 0. Define f i (x) = exp ( ln(x) δ(x)) for i = 1,. Then we have obviously a 1 = = a an (a 1 1)(a 1) = 1. But ( ) ln λ 1 1 ln(ε 1 ) δ(ε 1) + ln() δ() B lim inf ε 1 + ln(ε 1 ) ln() ε 1 = = lim inf exp ( δ() ln ln()). If we choose, e.g., δ(x) = (ln ln ln(x)) 1, then we see that B = 0. = lim inf ln() δ() We stress again that the exponent of tractability in Theorem 5.3 oes not epen on β an it is B 1 for all polynomial ecaying eigenvalues with the same two largest eigenvalues 0 < λ < λ 1 = 1. However, B epens on particular functions f i satisfying the conitions of Theorem 5.3. We now show that B can tae any positive value or even be infinite. Inee, tae f i (x) = exp ( c i [ln x] ) (1+α i) for positive c i an α i. Then a i = 1 + α i. For α 1 α = 1 it can be chece that ( ) 1/(1+α1 c1 α ) 1 ln(λ 1 ) B = c (1 + α ). (3) c Taing, c = c 1 = c an varying c for fixe α i, we see that B can be any positive number with the same limits a i. On the other han, for f i (x) = exp (ln(e + ln x) [ln x] 1+α i ), an α 1 α = 1 we get a i = 1 + α i as before, but B =. We also stress that in Theorem 5.3 we assume that the eigenvalues ecay at least polynomially. This assumption hols, in particular, for finitely many positive or exponentially ecaying eigenvalues. We summarize this iscussion in the following remar. Remar 5.5. As long as a tractability function T is of prouct form, T (x, y) = f 1 (x)f (x), then (T, Ω unr )-tractability of S as well as the exponent of tractability epen only on the functions f 1, f an the secon eigenvalue λ as long as the eigenvalues λ j ecay at least polynomially. Hence, if we have two problems, one with only two positive eigenvalues 0 < λ < λ 1 = 1, an the secon with the same two eigenvalues an the rest of them are non-negative an ecaying polynomially, then these two problems lea to the same tractability conitions an to the same exponents of tractability. We stress that this property oes not hol for more general tractability functions. For instance, if we consier T (x, y) = exp(g 1 (x)g (y)), i.e, when ln T is of prouct form, then the exponent of tractability may epen on the rate of ecay of eigenvalues. This hols, for instance, for T (x, y) = exp(ln(x) (1 + ln())) as shown after Corollary 5.. 5
26 6 Wea Tractability So far we iscusse (T, Ω unr )-tractability of linear tensor prouct problems with exponentially an polynomially ecaying eigenvalues. We now verify what we have to assume about the ecay of eigenvalues to obtain wea tractability. As we shall see, in particular, exponential or polynomial ecay of eigenvalues implies wea tractability. Let us consier a logarithmic ecay of the eigenvalues, i.e., λ j = Θ((1 + ln j) β ) for all j an some fixe β > 0. In [1] we prove that ln n(ε, S 1 ) = Θ(ε /β (1 + o(1))). Thus for β not even the one-imensional problem S 1 is tractable. For β >, we characterize (T, Ω res )-tractability for Ω res = [1, ) [ ] [1, ε 1 0 ) N, with + (1 ε 0 ) > 0, see [1]. Here we consier the unrestricte tractability omain an prove, in particular, wea tractability for β >. Theorem 6.1. Let λ 1 = 1, λ (0, 1) an λ j = o ( ( ln j ) ( ln(ln j) ) ) as j. (33) Then the linear tensor prouct problem S is wealy tractable. If S is wealy tractable then λ < 1 an λ j = o ( ( ln j ) ) as j. Proof. To prove the first point, we may assume without loss of generality that λ j > 0 for all j N. Then there exists a function f : N (0, ) with lim j f(j) = 0 an λ j = f(j)(1 + ln j) (1 + ln(1 + ln j)) for all j N. We now show that ln n(ε, 1) = o(ε 1 (ln(ε 1 )) 1 ). Accoring to (8) we have n(ε, 1) = max{j g(j)(1 + ln j)(1 + ln(1 + ln j)) < ε 1 }, (34) where g(j) := f(j) 1/. Now let j = j(ε) = exp( cε 1 (ln(ε 1 )) 1 1) for some c > 0. Then εg(j)(1 + ln j)(1 + ln(1 + ln j)) g(j(ε))(c + (1 + ln c)c(ln(ε 1 )) 1 c ln ln(ε 1 )(ln(ε 1 )) 1 ), which tens to infinity as ε approaches zero. From this calculation an from (34) we conclue that ln n(ε, 1) = o(ε 1 (ln(ε 1 )) 1 ). With a := min{α(ε), } we get from (10) ln n(ε, ) + ε 1 ln ( ) a + a ln n(ε, 1) + ε 1 a(ln(/a) ln n(ε, 1)) + ε 1. 6
27 Case 1 : α(ε). Then ln n(ε, ) + ε 1 α(ε)(ln(/α(ε)) + 1) + ε 1 + o(α(ε)ε 1 (ln(ε 1 )) 1 ) + ε 1. (35) Since α(ε) ln(ε 1 ), the secon term on the right han sie of (35) goes to zero as + ε 1 tens to infinity. If α(ε) = Θ(), the first term goes obviously also to zero if + ε 1 tens to infinity. So let us consier the case α(ε) = o(). If α(ε) = Ω(/(ln )), then ε 1 = exp(ω(/(ln ))), an α(ε)(ln )ε 0 as + ε 1. If α(ε) = o(/(ln )), then α(ε)(ln )/ 0 as + ε 1. Case : α(ε) >. Then ln n(ε, ) + ε 1 + ε + (o(ε 1 (ln(ε 1 ) 1 ))) = o(ε 1 ) ε 1 ε 1 as + ε 1. Altogether we prove lim +ε 1 ln n(ε, )/( + ε 1 ) = 0. We switch to the secon point an assume that S is wealy tractable. Then λ < 1 since otherwise n(ε, S 1 ) for all ε (0, 1). For = 1 we have n(ε, S 1 ) = min{ j λ j+1 ε } = exp ( o ( ε 1)). This can happen only if λ j = o((ln j) ), as claime. This completes the proof. 7 Comparison We briefly compare tractability results of this paper for the unrestricte omain Ω unr = [1, ) N with tractability results of [1] for the restricte omain Ω res = [1, ) {1,,..., } [1, ε 1 0 ) N for 1 an ε 0 (0, 1). We consier linear tensor prouct problems S with ε 0 < λ < λ 1 = 1. Strong (T, Ω unr )-tractability of S as well as strong (T, Ω res )-tractability of S oes not hol regarless of the tractability function T, see [1, Lemma 3.1]. Consier finitely many, say, positive eigenvalues as in Section. This case has not been formally stuie in [1] for Ω res. However, it is easy to see from (14) that for (ε, ) with, the information complexity n(ε, S ) is uniformly boune in ε 1. Therefore the more interesting case is when (ε 1, ) [1, ε 1 0 ) N. Then n(ε, S ) = Θ( α(ε) ) with the factors in the Theta-notation only epenent on ε 0, 7
28 λ an. So we have a polynomial epenence on which obviously implies wea tractability. It follows from [1, Theorem 4.1] that (T, Ω res )-tractability of S hols iff B res := lim inf ln T (ε 1, ) inf 1 α(ε) α(ε 0 ) α(ε) ln() (0, ], (36) an the exponent of tractability is 1/B res. In particular, we have polynomial tractability, i.e., when T (x, y) = xy, with the exponent ln(ε 1 0 ) α(ε 0 ) = ln(λ 1 1. This exponent can be arbitrarily large if ε 0 is small or λ close to one. On the other han, it is interesting that the exponent oes not epen on the total number of positive eigenvalues. As we alreay sai, for the unrestricte omain Ω unr we o not have polynomial tractability of S. This agrees with the fact that the exponent of polynomial tractability for the restricte omain goes to infinity as ε 0 approaches zero, an for the unrestricte omain formally ε 0 = 0. Consier exponentially ecaying eigenvalues λ j = exp( β(j 1)) for a positive β. Then [1, Theorem 4.8] states that (T, Ω res )-tractability of S hols iff ) A e,res := lim inf x ln T (x, 1) ln ln(x) (0, ] an B res (0, ], where B res is given by (36). Furthermore, if A e,res = then the exponent of tractability is Bres 1. Hence, we again have polynomial tractability, an inee since A e,res = an λ = exp( β), the exponent of polynomial tractability is ln ε 1 0 α(ε 0 ) = 1. β As we now, for the unrestricte omain Ω unr we o not have polynomial tractability. Tae now T (x, y) = x 1+ln y. Then A e,res = an B res = β/. Furthermore, as we alreay now, B e () = β/. So we have (T, Ω res )-tractability as well as (T, Ω unr )- tractability with the same exponents /β. Hence, there is no much ifference between the restricte an unrestricte omains for this particular tractability function. Note also the ifference in the exponents for the last two tractability functions an for the restricte omain. For polynomial tractability, the exponent epens on ε 0 an goes to infinity as ε 0 approaches zero. For the secon tractability function, the exponent oes not epen on ε 0. 8
Tractability results for weighted Banach spaces of smooth functions
Tractability results for weighte Banach spaces of smooth functions Markus Weimar Mathematisches Institut, Universität Jena Ernst-Abbe-Platz 2, 07740 Jena, Germany email: markus.weimar@uni-jena.e March
More informationLecture Introduction. 2 Examples of Measure Concentration. 3 The Johnson-Lindenstrauss Lemma. CS-621 Theory Gems November 28, 2012
CS-6 Theory Gems November 8, 0 Lecture Lecturer: Alesaner Mąry Scribes: Alhussein Fawzi, Dorina Thanou Introuction Toay, we will briefly iscuss an important technique in probability theory measure concentration
More informationDiscrete Mathematics
Discrete Mathematics 309 (009) 86 869 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Discrete Mathematics journal homepage: wwwelseviercom/locate/isc Profile vectors in the lattice of subspaces Dániel Gerbner
More informationLower Bounds for the Smoothed Number of Pareto optimal Solutions
Lower Bouns for the Smoothe Number of Pareto optimal Solutions Tobias Brunsch an Heiko Röglin Department of Computer Science, University of Bonn, Germany brunsch@cs.uni-bonn.e, heiko@roeglin.org Abstract.
More informationA Sketch of Menshikov s Theorem
A Sketch of Menshikov s Theorem Thomas Bao March 14, 2010 Abstract Let Λ be an infinite, locally finite oriente multi-graph with C Λ finite an strongly connecte, an let p
More informationON THE OPTIMAL CONVERGENCE RATE OF UNIVERSAL AND NON-UNIVERSAL ALGORITHMS FOR MULTIVARIATE INTEGRATION AND APPROXIMATION
ON THE OPTIMAL CONVERGENCE RATE OF UNIVERSAL AN NON-UNIVERSAL ALGORITHMS FOR MULTIVARIATE INTEGRATION AN APPROXIMATION MICHAEL GRIEBEL AN HENRYK WOŹNIAKOWSKI Abstract. We stuy the optimal rate of convergence
More informationPDE Notes, Lecture #11
PDE Notes, Lecture # from Professor Jalal Shatah s Lectures Febuary 9th, 2009 Sobolev Spaces Recall that for u L loc we can efine the weak erivative Du by Du, φ := udφ φ C0 If v L loc such that Du, φ =
More informationLower bounds on Locality Sensitive Hashing
Lower bouns on Locality Sensitive Hashing Rajeev Motwani Assaf Naor Rina Panigrahy Abstract Given a metric space (X, X ), c 1, r > 0, an p, q [0, 1], a istribution over mappings H : X N is calle a (r,
More informationConvergence of Random Walks
Chapter 16 Convergence of Ranom Walks This lecture examines the convergence of ranom walks to the Wiener process. This is very important both physically an statistically, an illustrates the utility of
More information7.1 Support Vector Machine
67577 Intro. to Machine Learning Fall semester, 006/7 Lecture 7: Support Vector Machines an Kernel Functions II Lecturer: Amnon Shashua Scribe: Amnon Shashua 7. Support Vector Machine We return now to
More informationThe derivative of a function f(x) is another function, defined in terms of a limiting expression: f(x + δx) f(x)
Y. D. Chong (2016) MH2801: Complex Methos for the Sciences 1. Derivatives The erivative of a function f(x) is another function, efine in terms of a limiting expression: f (x) f (x) lim x δx 0 f(x + δx)
More informationREAL ANALYSIS I HOMEWORK 5
REAL ANALYSIS I HOMEWORK 5 CİHAN BAHRAN The questions are from Stein an Shakarchi s text, Chapter 3. 1. Suppose ϕ is an integrable function on R with R ϕ(x)x = 1. Let K δ(x) = δ ϕ(x/δ), δ > 0. (a) Prove
More informationLinear First-Order Equations
5 Linear First-Orer Equations Linear first-orer ifferential equations make up another important class of ifferential equations that commonly arise in applications an are relatively easy to solve (in theory)
More information1 dx. where is a large constant, i.e., 1, (7.6) and Px is of the order of unity. Indeed, if px is given by (7.5), the inequality (7.
Lectures Nine an Ten The WKB Approximation The WKB metho is a powerful tool to obtain solutions for many physical problems It is generally applicable to problems of wave propagation in which the frequency
More informationComputing Exact Confidence Coefficients of Simultaneous Confidence Intervals for Multinomial Proportions and their Functions
Working Paper 2013:5 Department of Statistics Computing Exact Confience Coefficients of Simultaneous Confience Intervals for Multinomial Proportions an their Functions Shaobo Jin Working Paper 2013:5
More information6 General properties of an autonomous system of two first order ODE
6 General properties of an autonomous system of two first orer ODE Here we embark on stuying the autonomous system of two first orer ifferential equations of the form ẋ 1 = f 1 (, x 2 ), ẋ 2 = f 2 (, x
More informationRobust Forward Algorithms via PAC-Bayes and Laplace Distributions. ω Q. Pr (y(ω x) < 0) = Pr A k
A Proof of Lemma 2 B Proof of Lemma 3 Proof: Since the support of LL istributions is R, two such istributions are equivalent absolutely continuous with respect to each other an the ivergence is well-efine
More informationOn the number of isolated eigenvalues of a pair of particles in a quantum wire
On the number of isolate eigenvalues of a pair of particles in a quantum wire arxiv:1812.11804v1 [math-ph] 31 Dec 2018 Joachim Kerner 1 Department of Mathematics an Computer Science FernUniversität in
More informationTHE GENUINE OMEGA-REGULAR UNITARY DUAL OF THE METAPLECTIC GROUP
THE GENUINE OMEGA-REGULAR UNITARY DUAL OF THE METAPLECTIC GROUP ALESSANDRA PANTANO, ANNEGRET PAUL, AND SUSANA A. SALAMANCA-RIBA Abstract. We classify all genuine unitary representations of the metaplectic
More informationA new proof of the sharpness of the phase transition for Bernoulli percolation on Z d
A new proof of the sharpness of the phase transition for Bernoulli percolation on Z Hugo Duminil-Copin an Vincent Tassion October 8, 205 Abstract We provie a new proof of the sharpness of the phase transition
More informationALGEBRAIC AND ANALYTIC PROPERTIES OF ARITHMETIC FUNCTIONS
ALGEBRAIC AND ANALYTIC PROPERTIES OF ARITHMETIC FUNCTIONS MARK SCHACHNER Abstract. When consiere as an algebraic space, the set of arithmetic functions equippe with the operations of pointwise aition an
More informationWitt#5: Around the integrality criterion 9.93 [version 1.1 (21 April 2013), not completed, not proofread]
Witt vectors. Part 1 Michiel Hazewinkel Sienotes by Darij Grinberg Witt#5: Aroun the integrality criterion 9.93 [version 1.1 21 April 2013, not complete, not proofrea In [1, section 9.93, Hazewinkel states
More informationLeast-Squares Regression on Sparse Spaces
Least-Squares Regression on Sparse Spaces Yuri Grinberg, Mahi Milani Far, Joelle Pineau School of Computer Science McGill University Montreal, Canaa {ygrinb,mmilan1,jpineau}@cs.mcgill.ca 1 Introuction
More informationTOEPLITZ AND POSITIVE SEMIDEFINITE COMPLETION PROBLEM FOR CYCLE GRAPH
English NUMERICAL MATHEMATICS Vol14, No1 Series A Journal of Chinese Universities Feb 2005 TOEPLITZ AND POSITIVE SEMIDEFINITE COMPLETION PROBLEM FOR CYCLE GRAPH He Ming( Λ) Michael K Ng(Ξ ) Abstract We
More informationQF101: Quantitative Finance September 5, Week 3: Derivatives. Facilitator: Christopher Ting AY 2017/2018. f ( x + ) f(x) f(x) = lim
QF101: Quantitative Finance September 5, 2017 Week 3: Derivatives Facilitator: Christopher Ting AY 2017/2018 I recoil with ismay an horror at this lamentable plague of functions which o not have erivatives.
More informationAgmon Kolmogorov Inequalities on l 2 (Z d )
Journal of Mathematics Research; Vol. 6, No. ; 04 ISSN 96-9795 E-ISSN 96-9809 Publishe by Canaian Center of Science an Eucation Agmon Kolmogorov Inequalities on l (Z ) Arman Sahovic Mathematics Department,
More informationThe total derivative. Chapter Lagrangian and Eulerian approaches
Chapter 5 The total erivative 51 Lagrangian an Eulerian approaches The representation of a flui through scalar or vector fiels means that each physical quantity uner consieration is escribe as a function
More informationOn colour-blind distinguishing colour pallets in regular graphs
J Comb Optim (2014 28:348 357 DOI 10.1007/s10878-012-9556-x On colour-blin istinguishing colour pallets in regular graphs Jakub Przybyło Publishe online: 25 October 2012 The Author(s 2012. This article
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.na] 17 Jan 2019
TRACTABILITY OF NON-HOMOGENEOUS TENSOR PRODUCT PROBLEMS IN THE WORST CASE SETTING arxiv:190105752v1 [mathna] 17 Jan 2019 RONG GUO AND HEPING WANG Abstract We stuy multivariate linear tensor prouct problems
More informationA. Incorrect! The letter t does not appear in the expression of the given integral
AP Physics C - Problem Drill 1: The Funamental Theorem of Calculus Question No. 1 of 1 Instruction: (1) Rea the problem statement an answer choices carefully () Work the problems on paper as neee (3) Question
More informationSINGULAR PERTURBATION AND STATIONARY SOLUTIONS OF PARABOLIC EQUATIONS IN GAUSS-SOBOLEV SPACES
Communications on Stochastic Analysis Vol. 2, No. 2 (28) 289-36 Serials Publications www.serialspublications.com SINGULAR PERTURBATION AND STATIONARY SOLUTIONS OF PARABOLIC EQUATIONS IN GAUSS-SOBOLEV SPACES
More informationAcute sets in Euclidean spaces
Acute sets in Eucliean spaces Viktor Harangi April, 011 Abstract A finite set H in R is calle an acute set if any angle etermine by three points of H is acute. We examine the maximal carinality α() of
More informationCharacterizing Real-Valued Multivariate Complex Polynomials and Their Symmetric Tensor Representations
Characterizing Real-Value Multivariate Complex Polynomials an Their Symmetric Tensor Representations Bo JIANG Zhening LI Shuzhong ZHANG December 31, 2014 Abstract In this paper we stuy multivariate polynomial
More informationFLUCTUATIONS IN THE NUMBER OF POINTS ON SMOOTH PLANE CURVES OVER FINITE FIELDS. 1. Introduction
FLUCTUATIONS IN THE NUMBER OF POINTS ON SMOOTH PLANE CURVES OVER FINITE FIELDS ALINA BUCUR, CHANTAL DAVID, BROOKE FEIGON, MATILDE LALÍN 1 Introuction In this note, we stuy the fluctuations in the number
More informationSturm-Liouville Theory
LECTURE 5 Sturm-Liouville Theory In the three preceing lectures I emonstrate the utility of Fourier series in solving PDE/BVPs. As we ll now see, Fourier series are just the tip of the iceberg of the theory
More informationOn lower bounds for integration of multivariate permutation-invariant functions
arxiv:1310.3959v1 [math.na] 15 Oct 2013 On lower bouns for integration of multivariate permutation-invariant functions Markus Weimar October 16, 2013 Abstract In this note we stuy multivariate integration
More informationStep 1. Analytic Properties of the Riemann zeta function [2 lectures]
Step. Analytic Properties of the Riemann zeta function [2 lectures] The Riemann zeta function is the infinite sum of terms /, n. For each n, the / is a continuous function of s, i.e. lim s s 0 n = s n,
More informationLectures - Week 10 Introduction to Ordinary Differential Equations (ODES) First Order Linear ODEs
Lectures - Week 10 Introuction to Orinary Differential Equations (ODES) First Orer Linear ODEs When stuying ODEs we are consiering functions of one inepenent variable, e.g., f(x), where x is the inepenent
More informationInterconnected Systems of Fliess Operators
Interconnecte Systems of Fliess Operators W. Steven Gray Yaqin Li Department of Electrical an Computer Engineering Ol Dominion University Norfolk, Virginia 23529 USA Abstract Given two analytic nonlinear
More informationLogarithmic spurious regressions
Logarithmic spurious regressions Robert M. e Jong Michigan State University February 5, 22 Abstract Spurious regressions, i.e. regressions in which an integrate process is regresse on another integrate
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.ap] 6 Jul 2017
Local an global time ecay for parabolic equations with super linear first orer terms arxiv:177.1761v1 [math.ap] 6 Jul 17 Martina Magliocca an Alessio Porretta ABSTRACT. We stuy a class of parabolic equations
More informationII. First variation of functionals
II. First variation of functionals The erivative of a function being zero is a necessary conition for the etremum of that function in orinary calculus. Let us now tackle the question of the equivalent
More informationMath 115 Section 018 Course Note
Course Note 1 General Functions Definition 1.1. A function is a rule that takes certain numbers as inputs an assigns to each a efinite output number. The set of all input numbers is calle the omain of
More informationOn the Cauchy Problem for Von Neumann-Landau Wave Equation
Journal of Applie Mathematics an Physics 4 4-3 Publishe Online December 4 in SciRes http://wwwscirporg/journal/jamp http://xoiorg/436/jamp4343 On the Cauchy Problem for Von Neumann-anau Wave Equation Chuangye
More informationMath 342 Partial Differential Equations «Viktor Grigoryan
Math 342 Partial Differential Equations «Viktor Grigoryan 6 Wave equation: solution In this lecture we will solve the wave equation on the entire real line x R. This correspons to a string of infinite
More informationFinal Exam Study Guide and Practice Problems Solutions
Final Exam Stuy Guie an Practice Problems Solutions Note: These problems are just some of the types of problems that might appear on the exam. However, to fully prepare for the exam, in aition to making
More informationSelf-normalized Martingale Tail Inequality
Online-to-Confience-Set Conversions an Application to Sparse Stochastic Banits A Self-normalize Martingale Tail Inequality The self-normalize martingale tail inequality that we present here is the scalar-value
More informationLATTICE-BASED D-OPTIMUM DESIGN FOR FOURIER REGRESSION
The Annals of Statistics 1997, Vol. 25, No. 6, 2313 2327 LATTICE-BASED D-OPTIMUM DESIGN FOR FOURIER REGRESSION By Eva Riccomagno, 1 Rainer Schwabe 2 an Henry P. Wynn 1 University of Warwick, Technische
More informationarxiv: v2 [math.pr] 27 Nov 2018
Range an spee of rotor wals on trees arxiv:15.57v [math.pr] 7 Nov 1 Wilfrie Huss an Ecaterina Sava-Huss November, 1 Abstract We prove a law of large numbers for the range of rotor wals with ranom initial
More informationLecture 5. Symmetric Shearer s Lemma
Stanfor University Spring 208 Math 233: Non-constructive methos in combinatorics Instructor: Jan Vonrák Lecture ate: January 23, 208 Original scribe: Erik Bates Lecture 5 Symmetric Shearer s Lemma Here
More informationSharp Thresholds. Zachary Hamaker. March 15, 2010
Sharp Threshols Zachary Hamaker March 15, 2010 Abstract The Kolmogorov Zero-One law states that for tail events on infinite-imensional probability spaces, the probability must be either zero or one. Behavior
More informationIterated Point-Line Configurations Grow Doubly-Exponentially
Iterate Point-Line Configurations Grow Doubly-Exponentially Joshua Cooper an Mark Walters July 9, 008 Abstract Begin with a set of four points in the real plane in general position. A to this collection
More informationPhysics 251 Results for Matrix Exponentials Spring 2017
Physics 25 Results for Matrix Exponentials Spring 27. Properties of the Matrix Exponential Let A be a real or complex n n matrix. The exponential of A is efine via its Taylor series, e A A n = I + n!,
More informationAll s Well That Ends Well: Supplementary Proofs
All s Well That Ens Well: Guarantee Resolution of Simultaneous Rigi Boy Impact 1:1 All s Well That Ens Well: Supplementary Proofs This ocument complements the paper All s Well That Ens Well: Guarantee
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.co] 15 Sep 2015
Circular coloring of signe graphs Yingli Kang, Eckhar Steffen arxiv:1509.04488v1 [math.co] 15 Sep 015 Abstract Let k, ( k) be two positive integers. We generalize the well stuie notions of (k, )-colorings
More informationMonotonicity for excited random walk in high dimensions
Monotonicity for excite ranom walk in high imensions Remco van er Hofsta Mark Holmes March, 2009 Abstract We prove that the rift θ, β) for excite ranom walk in imension is monotone in the excitement parameter
More informationLecture 6: Calculus. In Song Kim. September 7, 2011
Lecture 6: Calculus In Song Kim September 7, 20 Introuction to Differential Calculus In our previous lecture we came up with several ways to analyze functions. We saw previously that the slope of a linear
More informationBalancing Expected and Worst-Case Utility in Contracting Models with Asymmetric Information and Pooling
Balancing Expecte an Worst-Case Utility in Contracting Moels with Asymmetric Information an Pooling R.B.O. erkkamp & W. van en Heuvel & A.P.M. Wagelmans Econometric Institute Report EI2018-01 9th January
More informationJUST THE MATHS UNIT NUMBER DIFFERENTIATION 2 (Rates of change) A.J.Hobson
JUST THE MATHS UNIT NUMBER 10.2 DIFFERENTIATION 2 (Rates of change) by A.J.Hobson 10.2.1 Introuction 10.2.2 Average rates of change 10.2.3 Instantaneous rates of change 10.2.4 Derivatives 10.2.5 Exercises
More information19 Eigenvalues, Eigenvectors, Ordinary Differential Equations, and Control
19 Eigenvalues, Eigenvectors, Orinary Differential Equations, an Control This section introuces eigenvalues an eigenvectors of a matrix, an iscusses the role of the eigenvalues in etermining the behavior
More informationSome Examples. Uniform motion. Poisson processes on the real line
Some Examples Our immeiate goal is to see some examples of Lévy processes, an/or infinitely-ivisible laws on. Uniform motion Choose an fix a nonranom an efine X := for all (1) Then, {X } is a [nonranom]
More informationThe Exact Form and General Integrating Factors
7 The Exact Form an General Integrating Factors In the previous chapters, we ve seen how separable an linear ifferential equations can be solve using methos for converting them to forms that can be easily
More informationSYSTEMS OF DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS, EULER S FORMULA. where L is some constant, usually called the Lipschitz constant. An example is
SYSTEMS OF DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS, EULER S FORMULA. Uniqueness for solutions of ifferential equations. We consier the system of ifferential equations given by x = v( x), () t with a given initial conition
More informationFunction Spaces. 1 Hilbert Spaces
Function Spaces A function space is a set of functions F that has some structure. Often a nonparametric regression function or classifier is chosen to lie in some function space, where the assume structure
More informationThe Principle of Least Action
Chapter 7. The Principle of Least Action 7.1 Force Methos vs. Energy Methos We have so far stuie two istinct ways of analyzing physics problems: force methos, basically consisting of the application of
More informationθ x = f ( x,t) could be written as
9. Higher orer PDEs as systems of first-orer PDEs. Hyperbolic systems. For PDEs, as for ODEs, we may reuce the orer by efining new epenent variables. For example, in the case of the wave equation, (1)
More informationON THE DISTANCE BETWEEN SMOOTH NUMBERS
#A25 INTEGERS (20) ON THE DISTANCE BETWEEN SMOOTH NUMBERS Jean-Marie De Koninc Département e mathématiques et e statistique, Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canaa jm@mat.ulaval.ca Nicolas Doyon Département
More informationNotes on Lie Groups, Lie algebras, and the Exponentiation Map Mitchell Faulk
Notes on Lie Groups, Lie algebras, an the Exponentiation Map Mitchell Faulk 1. Preliminaries. In these notes, we concern ourselves with special objects calle matrix Lie groups an their corresponing Lie
More informationProblem Sheet 2: Eigenvalues and eigenvectors and their use in solving linear ODEs
Problem Sheet 2: Eigenvalues an eigenvectors an their use in solving linear ODEs If you fin any typos/errors in this problem sheet please email jk28@icacuk The material in this problem sheet is not examinable
More information1 Heisenberg Representation
1 Heisenberg Representation What we have been ealing with so far is calle the Schröinger representation. In this representation, operators are constants an all the time epenence is carrie by the states.
More informationQubit channels that achieve capacity with two states
Qubit channels that achieve capacity with two states Dominic W. Berry Department of Physics, The University of Queenslan, Brisbane, Queenslan 4072, Australia Receive 22 December 2004; publishe 22 March
More informationPerfect Matchings in Õ(n1.5 ) Time in Regular Bipartite Graphs
Perfect Matchings in Õ(n1.5 ) Time in Regular Bipartite Graphs Ashish Goel Michael Kapralov Sanjeev Khanna Abstract We consier the well-stuie problem of fining a perfect matching in -regular bipartite
More informationSeparation of Variables
Physics 342 Lecture 1 Separation of Variables Lecture 1 Physics 342 Quantum Mechanics I Monay, January 25th, 2010 There are three basic mathematical tools we nee, an then we can begin working on the physical
More informationCalculus of Variations
16.323 Lecture 5 Calculus of Variations Calculus of Variations Most books cover this material well, but Kirk Chapter 4 oes a particularly nice job. x(t) x* x*+ αδx (1) x*- αδx (1) αδx (1) αδx (1) t f t
More informationRamsey numbers of some bipartite graphs versus complete graphs
Ramsey numbers of some bipartite graphs versus complete graphs Tao Jiang, Michael Salerno Miami University, Oxfor, OH 45056, USA Abstract. The Ramsey number r(h, K n ) is the smallest positive integer
More informationThe Natural Logarithm
The Natural Logarithm -28-208 In earlier courses, you may have seen logarithms efine in terms of raising bases to powers. For eample, log 2 8 = 3 because 2 3 = 8. In those terms, the natural logarithm
More informationRobustness and Perturbations of Minimal Bases
Robustness an Perturbations of Minimal Bases Paul Van Dooren an Froilán M Dopico December 9, 2016 Abstract Polynomial minimal bases of rational vector subspaces are a classical concept that plays an important
More informationAbstract A nonlinear partial differential equation of the following form is considered:
M P E J Mathematical Physics Electronic Journal ISSN 86-6655 Volume 2, 26 Paper 5 Receive: May 3, 25, Revise: Sep, 26, Accepte: Oct 6, 26 Eitor: C.E. Wayne A Nonlinear Heat Equation with Temperature-Depenent
More informationUnit #6 - Families of Functions, Taylor Polynomials, l Hopital s Rule
Unit # - Families of Functions, Taylor Polynomials, l Hopital s Rule Some problems an solutions selecte or aapte from Hughes-Hallett Calculus. Critical Points. Consier the function f) = 54 +. b) a) Fin
More informationarxiv: v1 [cond-mat.stat-mech] 9 Jan 2012
arxiv:1201.1836v1 [con-mat.stat-mech] 9 Jan 2012 Externally riven one-imensional Ising moel Amir Aghamohammai a 1, Cina Aghamohammai b 2, & Mohamma Khorrami a 3 a Department of Physics, Alzahra University,
More informationSimilar Operators and a Functional Calculus for the First-Order Linear Differential Operator
Avances in Applie Mathematics, 9 47 999 Article ID aama.998.067, available online at http: www.iealibrary.com on Similar Operators an a Functional Calculus for the First-Orer Linear Differential Operator
More informationOn the minimum distance of elliptic curve codes
On the minimum istance of elliptic curve coes Jiyou Li Department of Mathematics Shanghai Jiao Tong University Shanghai PRChina Email: lijiyou@sjtueucn Daqing Wan Department of Mathematics University of
More informationGlobal Solutions to the Coupled Chemotaxis-Fluid Equations
Global Solutions to the Couple Chemotaxis-Flui Equations Renjun Duan Johann Raon Institute for Computational an Applie Mathematics Austrian Acaemy of Sciences Altenbergerstrasse 69, A-44 Linz, Austria
More informationPETER L. BARTLETT AND MARTEN H. WEGKAMP
CLASSIFICATION WITH A REJECT OPTION USING A HINGE LOSS PETER L. BARTLETT AND MARTEN H. WEGKAMP Abstract. We consier the problem of binary classification where the classifier can, for a particular cost,
More informationThe canonical controllers and regular interconnection
Systems & Control Letters ( www.elsevier.com/locate/sysconle The canonical controllers an regular interconnection A.A. Julius a,, J.C. Willems b, M.N. Belur c, H.L. Trentelman a Department of Applie Mathematics,
More informationChapter 2 Derivatives
Chapter Derivatives Section. An Intuitive Introuction to Derivatives Consier a function: Slope function: Derivative, f ' For each, the slope of f is the height of f ' Where f has a horizontal tangent line,
More informationWhy Bernstein Polynomials Are Better: Fuzzy-Inspired Justification
Why Bernstein Polynomials Are Better: Fuzzy-Inspire Justification Jaime Nava 1, Olga Kosheleva 2, an Vlaik Kreinovich 3 1,3 Department of Computer Science 2 Department of Teacher Eucation University of
More informationOn Decentralized Optimal Control and Information Structures
2008 American Control Conference Westin Seattle Hotel, Seattle, Washington, USA June 11-13, 2008 FrC053 On Decentralize Optimal Control an Information Structures Naer Motee 1, Ali Jababaie 1 an Bassam
More informationDiophantine Approximations: Examining the Farey Process and its Method on Producing Best Approximations
Diophantine Approximations: Examining the Farey Process an its Metho on Proucing Best Approximations Kelly Bowen Introuction When a person hears the phrase irrational number, one oes not think of anything
More informationEquilibrium in Queues Under Unknown Service Times and Service Value
University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Finance Papers Wharton Faculty Research 1-2014 Equilibrium in Queues Uner Unknown Service Times an Service Value Laurens Debo Senthil K. Veeraraghavan University
More informationOn the enumeration of partitions with summands in arithmetic progression
AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF COMBINATORICS Volume 8 (003), Pages 149 159 On the enumeration of partitions with summans in arithmetic progression M. A. Nyblom C. Evans Department of Mathematics an Statistics
More informationRange and speed of rotor walks on trees
Range an spee of rotor wals on trees Wilfrie Huss an Ecaterina Sava-Huss May 15, 1 Abstract We prove a law of large numbers for the range of rotor wals with ranom initial configuration on regular trees
More informationNOTES ON EULER-BOOLE SUMMATION (1) f (l 1) (n) f (l 1) (m) + ( 1)k 1 k! B k (y) f (k) (y) dy,
NOTES ON EULER-BOOLE SUMMATION JONATHAN M BORWEIN, NEIL J CALKIN, AND DANTE MANNA Abstract We stuy a connection between Euler-MacLaurin Summation an Boole Summation suggeste in an AMM note from 196, which
More informationChaos, Solitons and Fractals Nonlinear Science, and Nonequilibrium and Complex Phenomena
Chaos, Solitons an Fractals (7 64 73 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Chaos, Solitons an Fractals onlinear Science, an onequilibrium an Complex Phenomena journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/chaos
More informationEuler equations for multiple integrals
Euler equations for multiple integrals January 22, 2013 Contents 1 Reminer of multivariable calculus 2 1.1 Vector ifferentiation......................... 2 1.2 Matrix ifferentiation........................
More informationPseudo-Free Families of Finite Computational Elementary Abelian p-groups
Pseuo-Free Families of Finite Computational Elementary Abelian p-groups Mikhail Anokhin Information Security Institute, Lomonosov University, Moscow, Russia anokhin@mccme.ru Abstract We initiate the stuy
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.mg] 10 Apr 2018
ON THE VOLUME BOUND IN THE DVORETZKY ROGERS LEMMA FERENC FODOR, MÁRTON NASZÓDI, AND TAMÁS ZARNÓCZ arxiv:1804.03444v1 [math.mg] 10 Apr 2018 Abstract. The classical Dvoretzky Rogers lemma provies a eterministic
More informationShort Intro to Coordinate Transformation
Short Intro to Coorinate Transformation 1 A Vector A vector can basically be seen as an arrow in space pointing in a specific irection with a specific length. The following problem arises: How o we represent
More informationSchrödinger s equation.
Physics 342 Lecture 5 Schröinger s Equation Lecture 5 Physics 342 Quantum Mechanics I Wenesay, February 3r, 2010 Toay we iscuss Schröinger s equation an show that it supports the basic interpretation of
More informationThe effect of dissipation on solutions of the complex KdV equation
Mathematics an Computers in Simulation 69 (25) 589 599 The effect of issipation on solutions of the complex KV equation Jiahong Wu a,, Juan-Ming Yuan a,b a Department of Mathematics, Oklahoma State University,
More information