May, Cadarache, France. Organized by. & hosted by
|
|
- Rodger Stafford
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 2 nd International Workshop on Best Practices in Physics-based Fault Rupture Models for Seismic Hazard Assessment of Nuclear Installations: Issues and Challenges towards th full Seismic Risk Analysis May, Cadarache, France Organized by & hosted by 0
2 Monday, May 14 th, 2018 Agenda 8:00 Departure of the buses from Aix-en-Provence to INSTN Cadarache 9:00 9:30 Registration, welcome coffee 9:30 9:45 Welcome address o Welcome address 1 (C. Berge-Thierry on behalf of CEA) o Welcome address 2 (Y. Fukushima on behalf of IAEA) 9:45 14:00 The CEA and French Sinaps@ research project session 9:45 10:30 KEYNOTE The Durance Area and the Cadarache Research Center Presented by CEA o Introduction by the Head of CEA/Cadarache (research activities, nuclear facilities & safety issues) by Ch. Bonnet / D. Dall ava 15 o Geophysical & Seismotectonical regional context Focus on knowledge improvement through instrumentation effort illustration on site effects characterization by F. Hollender 15 o Nuclear facilities, civil engineering & seismic safety topics by F. Méméteau 15 o Questions/discussion 15 10:30 11:30 An innovative approach to perform seismic risk analysis of nuclear facilities through the multidisciplinary Sinaps@ research project, by C. Berge-Thierry, F. Voldoire, F. Ragueneau, F. Lopez-Caballero and A. Le Maoult [ID 10] 45 o Questions/discussion 15 11:30 12:00 KEYNOTE Conceptual framework for physics-based simulations in practical projects and interface to engineering demands, by Ph. Renault [ID 76] 12:00 13:30 - Lunch 13:30 14:00 A Practical study-case: the SINOP SSHAC by Ch. Martin, Th. Bontemps, A. Gürpinar and D. Baumont [ID 46] 14:00 17:30 Empirical Ground Motion Models and Simulations session (first part) 14:00 14:30 KEYNOTE The interface between empirical and simulation-based ground motion models, by G. Atkinson [ID 06] 14:30 14:45 A preliminary study to investigate the regional effects on ground motion predictive models for Turkey, by G. Tarnican [ID 65] 14:45 15:00: Developing site-specific vertical ground motions for Turkey Part 1: using V/H ratio ground motion models, by Z. Gülerce [ID 27] 15:00 15:30 KEYNOTE Current status and issues of strong-motion prediction method in seismic hazard assessment for the national seismic hazard maps for Japan, by H. Fujiwara [ID 23] 1
3 15:30 15:45 Are the standard Vs30-kappa host-to-target adjustments the best way to get consistent hard-rock ground motion prediction?, by P.Y Bard [ID 08] 15:45 16:15 Coffee Break 16:15 16:45 KEYNOTE Calibrating the backbone approach for the development of earthquake ground motion models, by J. Douglas [ID 19] 16:45 17:00 The Bayesian model averaging of ground motion prediction equations, by M. Bertin [ID 11] 17:00-17:30 PANNEL DISCUSSION 17:30-18:00 Flash presentation of each Poster (1 30 / poster) 18:00 Departure of the buses from INSTN Cadarache to Aix-en-Provence Tuesday, May 15 th, :30 Departure of the buses from Aix-en-Provence to INSTN Cadarache 8:30 9:30 Empirical Ground Motion Models and Simulations session (second part) 8:30 9:00 KEYNOTE Probabilistic hazard incorporating 3D simulations into no ergodic groundmotion models, by N. Abrahamson [ID 01] 9:00 9:15 The needs for filling the gaps in empirical data for reliable seismic hazard estimates: lessons learned from the GMPE developments, by V. Graizer [ID 26] 9:15 9:30 Uncertainty analysis relevant to the fault modeling method, by C. Wu [ID 74] 9:30 12:30 Source Characterization for ground motion prediction session 9:30 10:00 KEYNOTE Earthquakes and ground-motion variabilities: evaluation and impacts on physics based ground-motions simulations and associated probabilistic seismic hazard assessments, by F. Cotton [ID 16] 10:00 10:15 Capturing the source parameters controlling the high-frequency ground motion, by R. Fayjaloun [ID 22] 10:15-10:45 Coffee Break 10:45 11:15 KEYNOTE A double-corner source spectrum for 5.3 M 7.7 that predicts PGA, PGV, duration, radiated energy and apparent stress, by R. Archuleta [ID 04] 11:15 11:45 KEYNOTE Procedure of evaluating fault parameters of subduction plate-boundary earthquakes with surface fault breakings for strong motion prediction, by K. Dan [ID 18] 11:45 12:00 Scaling laws of fault parameters of intra-slab earthquakes and strong motion simulation, by D. Ju [ID 38] 2
4 12:00 12:15 Long-term rate of earthquake ruptures in complex fault systems, by F. Visini [ID 57] 12:15 12:30 PANNEL DISCUSSION 12:30 14:00 Lunch 14:00 15:30 Poster Session 15:30 18:15: Physic based ground motion simulation session: Dynamic and Kinematic 15:30 16:00 KEYNOTE On near-field ground motions of normal and reverse faults from viewpoint of dynamic rupture model, by H. Aochi [ID 02] 16:00 16:15 Broadband dynamic source model for the 2011 Tohoku earthquake using slip reactivation and EGF simulation, by P. Galvez-Barron [ID 24] 16:15 16:30 Parametric study of the slip distribution on the vertical strike-slip fault for different source parameters based on the dynamic rupture simulation, by H. Kawase [ID 40] 16:30 16:45 Coffee Break 16:45 17:00 Physics-based simulations of the M7 Kumamoto, japan earthquake: implication of rupture models for near-fault ground motion variability estimates, by A. Pitarka [ID 51] 17:00 17:15 Challenges for near-field ground-motion modelling using extended-fault rupture in moderate seismicity areas: model parameters and data, by A. Dujardin [ID 20] 17:15 17:30 Physically based Seismic Hazard assessment for Egypt and its implication on Critical structures, by M. Elgabry [ID 21] 17:30 18:00: PANNEL DISCUSSION 18:00 Departure of the buses from INSTN Cadarache to Social Event 19:00 Aperitif & wine tasting 19:30 22:00 Dinner 22:30 Departure of the buses from Social Event to the hotels Wednesday, May 16 th, :30 Departure of the buses from Aix-en-Provence to INSTN Cadarache. 8:30 10:45 Fault displacement and long-period ground motion simulation session 8:30 9:00 KEYNOTE Outline of the PFDHA Method and Recent Studies on PFDHA in Japan, by M. Takao [ID 64] 9:00 9:30 KEYNOTE Estimation of surface fault displacement by high performance computing, by M. Hori [ID 31] 3
5 9:30 9:45 Asperity models to predict surface fault displacement caused by earthquakes: the 2010 Mw 7.0 Darfield (New Zealand) earthquake, by L.A. Dalguer et al. [ID 17] 9:45 10:00 Numerical simulation of M9 megathrust earthquakes in the Cascadia Subduction zone, by D. Roten [ID 56] 10:00 10:15 Extension of characterized source model for near-source long-period ground motions: experience of the 2016 Mw 7.0 Kumamoto earthquake in Japan, by K. Irikura [ID 36] 10:15 10:45 PANNEL DISCUSSION 10:45 11:15 Coffee Break 11:15 12:45: Site Characterization & Response Site specific Studies session 11:15 11:45 KEYNOTE Analysis of the spatial correlation of earthquake ground motion from physicsbased numerical simulations, by R. Paolucci [ID 49] 11:30 11:45 The Argostoli test-site: a tool for simulation validation and for a better understanding of phenomena involved in seismic hazard assessment, by F. Hollender [ID 30] 11:45 12:00 Argostoli site, from site test to numerical model: a holistic approach, by S. Touhami [ID 68] 12:00 12:15 Broad-band 3-D physics-based simulation of earthquake-induced wave-field at the Kashiwazaki-Kariwa nuclear power plant (Japan): an all-embracing source-to-site approach, by F. Gatti [ID 25] 12:15 12:45 PANNEL DISCUSSION 12:45 14:00 - Lunch 14:00 18:15 Engineering needs, Soil-Structure Interaction, Structural & components vulnerabilities & Risk assessment session 14:00 14:30 KEYNOTE Interface between earthquake ground motions and structural response: numerical modeling and simulation of ESSI behavior, by B. Jeremic [ID 37] 14:30 14:45 From seismic sources to engineering demand parameters: an interdisciplinary framework for estimation of seismic losses in urban regions, by A. Askan [ID 05] 14:45 15:00 New advances in the seismic analysis of nuclear structures and equipment from the SINAPS@ project, by F. Voldoire [ID 72] 15:00 15:15 Multi-level modelling approach of structures under earthquake loading: contributions from the SINAPS@ project, by F. Ragueneau [ID 53] 15:15 15:30 Nonlinear behaviors and structural damping identification in reinforced concrete elements, by C. Giry [ID 28] 4
6 15:30 15:45 Shake table test of large scale structures subject to pounding, by A. Le Maoult [ID 42] 15:45 16:15 Coffee break 16:15 16:30 Progress in the understanding and modelling of components that could drive the overall fragility of a nuclear power plant, by M.C. Robin-Boudaoud [ID 54] 16:30 16:45 Framework for non-structural component fragility curve estimation using synthetic ground motions with conditional spectra, by K. Trevlopoulos [ID 69] 16:45 17:00 Equipment s seismic fragility curve estimation using signals generated with GMPEs Case study on the Kashiwazaki-Kariwa power plant, by F. Wang [ID 73] 17:00 17:30 KEYNOTE Should we go ahead with the response spectrum?, by P. Labbé [ID 78] 17:30 18:00 PANNEL DISCUSSION 18:00 18:15 Final conclusion and Closure 18:30 Departure of the buses from INSTN Cadarache 5
7
May, Cadarache, France. Organized by. & hosted by. Irikura
2 nd International Workshop on Best Practices in Physics-based Fault Rupture Models for Seismic Hazard Assessment of Nuclear Installations: Issues and Challenges towards th full Seismic Risk Analysis May,
More informationThe Role of Physics-Based Ground Motion Models in Non-Ergodic Site-Specific PSHA Studies
The Role of Physics-Based Ground Motion Models in Non-Ergodic Site-Specific PSHA Studies Luis A. Dalguer and Philippe Renault Hazard and Structural Analysis Swissnuclear, Switzerland Disclaimer: This presentation
More informationVertical to Horizontal (V/H) Ratios for Large Megathrust Subduction Zone Earthquakes
Vertical to Horizontal (V/H) Ratios for Large Megathrust Subduction Zone Earthquakes N.J. Gregor Consultant, Oakland, California, USA N.A. Abrahamson University of California, Berkeley, USA K.O. Addo BC
More informationModelling Strong Ground Motions for Subduction Events in the Wellington Region, New Zealand
Proceedings of the Ninth Pacific Conference on Earthquake Engineering Building an Earthquake-Resilient Society 14-16 April, 2011, Auckland, New Zealand Modelling Strong Ground Motions for Subduction Events
More informationIncorporating simulated Hikurangi subduction interface spectra into probabilistic hazard calculations for Wellington
Incorporating simulated Hikurangi subduction interface spectra into probabilistic hazard calculations for Wellington G.H. McVerry & C. Holden GNS Science, Lower Hutt, New Zealand. 2014 NZSEE Conference
More informationOutstanding Problems. APOSTOLOS S. PAPAGEORGIOU University of Patras
NEAR-FAULT GROUND MOTIONS: Outstanding Problems APOSTOLOS S. PAPAGEORGIOU University of Patras Outline Characteristics of near-fault ground motions Near-fault strong ground motion database A mathematical
More informationRECORD OF REVISIONS. Page 2 of 17 GEO. DCPP.TR.14.06, Rev. 0
Page 2 of 17 RECORD OF REVISIONS Rev. No. Reason for Revision Revision Date 0 Initial Report - this work is being tracked under Notification SAPN 50638425-1 8/6/2014 Page 3 of 17 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page
More informationActual practices of seismic strong motion estimation at NPP sites
ANSN Regional Workshop on Site Selection and Evaluation for Nuclear Power Plants June 2010, Hanoi Vietnam IAEA/ISSC Actual practices of seismic strong motion estimation at NPP sites Yoshi. FUKUSHIMA (JNES)
More informationSEISMIC FRAGILITY CURVE ESTIMATION USING SIGNALS GENERATED WITH GMPE - CASE STUDY ON THE KASHIWAZAKI-KARIWA POWER PLANT
Transactions, SMiRT-24 SEISMIC FRAGILITY CURVE ESTIMATION USING SIGNALS GENERATED WITH GMPE - CASE STUDY ON THE KASHIWAZAKI-KARIWA POWER PLANT Fan WANG 1, Cyril FEAU 1 1 Research Engineers, CEA, DEN, DANS,
More informationON NEAR-FIELD GROUND MOTIONS OF NORMAL AND REVERSE FAULTS FROM VIEWPOINT OF DYNAMIC RUPTURE MODEL
1 Best Practices in Physics-based Fault Rupture Models for Seismic Hazard Assessment of Nuclear ON NEAR-FIELD GROUND MOTIONS OF NORMAL AND REVERSE FAULTS FROM VIEWPOINT OF DYNAMIC RUPTURE MODEL Hideo AOCHI
More informationRECIPE FOR PREDICTING STRONG GROUND MOTIONS FROM FUTURE LARGE INTRASLAB EARTHQUAKES
RECIPE FOR PREDICTING STRONG GROUND MOTIONS FROM FUTURE LARGE INTRASLAB EARTHQUAKES T. Sasatani 1, S. Noguchi, T. Maeda 3, and N. Morikawa 4 1 Professor, Graduate School of Engineering, Hokkaido University,
More informationScientific Research on the Cascadia Subduction Zone that Will Help Improve Seismic Hazard Maps, Building Codes, and Other Risk-Mitigation Measures
Scientific Research on the Cascadia Subduction Zone that Will Help Improve Seismic Hazard Maps, Building Codes, and Other Risk-Mitigation Measures Art Frankel U.S. Geological Survey Seattle, WA GeoPrisms-Earthscope
More informationBuilding up Seismsic Models for Ground Motion Prediction of Taiwan: Problems and Challenges
Building up Seismsic Models for Ground Motion Prediction of Taiwan: Problems and Challenges Kuo-Fong Ma 馬國鳳 Institute of Geophysics National Central University What approaches we can make toward a reliable
More informationSeismic Issues for California's Nuclear Power Plants. Norman Abrahamson University of California, Berkeley
Seismic Issues for California's Nuclear Power Plants Norman Abrahamson University of California, Berkeley From UCERF 2 Seismic Setting for California s Nuclear Power Plants Major Offshore Strike-Slip Faults
More informationSynthetic Seismicity Models of Multiple Interacting Faults
Synthetic Seismicity Models of Multiple Interacting Faults Russell Robinson and Rafael Benites Institute of Geological & Nuclear Sciences, Box 30368, Lower Hutt, New Zealand (email: r.robinson@gns.cri.nz).
More informationWP2: Framework for Seismic Hazard Analysis of Spatially Distributed Systems
Systemic Seismic Vulnerability and Risk Analysis for Buildings, Lifeline Networks and Infrastructures Safety Gain WP2: Framework for Seismic Hazard Analysis of Spatially Distributed Systems Graeme Weatherill,
More informationChallenges of Applying Ground Motion Simulation to Earthquake Engineering
Challenges of Applying Ground Motion Simulation to Earthquake Engineering Methodology of simulating ground motions from crustal earthquake and mega-thrust subduction earthquakes: application to the 2016
More informationRepresentative ground-motion ensembles for several major earthquake scenarios in New Zealand
Representative ground-motion ensembles for several major earthquake scenarios in New Zealand K. Tarbali & B.A. Bradley Department of Civil and Natural Resources Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch.
More informationRevision of the AESJ Standard for Seismic Probabilistic Risk Assessment (2) Seismic Hazard Evaluation
Revision of the AESJ Standard for Seismic Probabilistic Risk Assessment (2) Seismic Hazard Evaluation Katsumi Ebisawa a, Katsuhiro Kamae b, Tadashi Annaka c, Hideaki Tsutsumi d And Atsushi Onouchi e a
More informationHazard Feedback using the. current GMPEs for DCPP. Nick Gregor. PG&E DCPP SSHAC Study. SWUS GMC Workshop 2 October 22, 2013
1 Hazard Feedback using the current GMPEs for DCPP Nick Gregor PG&E DCPP SSHAC Study SWUS GMC Workshop 2 October 22, 2013 PGA Hazard By Source 0.5 Hz 2 Deaggregation AEP = 10-4 PGA 0.5 Hz 3 4 Base Case
More informationUnderstanding Seismic Hazard Needs for Infrastructure Risk Analysis: Lessons from SYNER-G
Systemic Seismic Vulnerability and Risk Analysis for Buildings, Lifeline Networks and Infrastructures Safety Gain Understanding Seismic Hazard Needs for Infrastructure Risk Analysis: Lessons from SYNER-G
More informationEffects of Surface Geology on Seismic Motion
4 th IASPEI / IAEE International Symposium: Effects of Surface Geology on Seismic Motion August 23 26, 2011 University of California Santa Barbara SCALING OF SHORT-PERIOD SPECTRAL LEVEL OF ACCELERATION
More informationScientific Programme. 1. Opening Day
Scientific Programme International Training Course on Seismology, Seismic Data Analysis, Hazard Assessment and Risk Mitigation Potsdam, Germany, 12 August to 6 September, 2013 1. Opening Day Monday, Aug.
More informationProbabilistic Tsunami Hazard Assessment addressing the uncertainty of tsunami source
Probabilistic Tsunami Hazard Assessment addressing the uncertainty of tsunami source Pacific Rim Forum 2017 January 23, 2017 Yuta Abe, ITOCHU Techno-Solutions Corporation, Japan Copyright (c)2017 ITOCHU
More informationJapan Seismic Hazard Information Station
Japan Seismic Hazard Information Station (J-SHIS) Hiroyuki Fujiwara National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Prevention (NIED) Background of the Project Headquarters for Earthquake Research
More informationRELATIONSHIP OF SEISMIC RESPONSES AND STRENGTH INDEXES OF GROUND MOTIONS FOR NPP STRUCTURES
RELATIONSHIP OF SEISMIC RESPONSES AND STRENGTH INDEXES OF GROUND MOTIONS FOR NPP STRUCTURES Seckin Ozgur CITAK 1 Hiroshi KAWASE 2 and Shinya IKUTAMA 3 1 Research Engineer, Ohsaki Research Institute, Inc.,
More informationUniform Hazard Spectrum(UHS) for performance based seismic design
Uniform Hazard Spectrum(UHS) for performance based seismic design *Jun-Kyoung Kim 1), Soung-Hoon Wee 2) and Seong-Hwa Yoo 2) 1) Department of Fire Protection and Disaster Prevention, Semyoung University,
More informationGROUND MOTION TIME HISTORIES FOR THE VAN NUYS BUILDING
GROUND MOTION TIME HISTORIES FOR THE VAN NUYS BUILDING Prepared for the PEER Methodology Testbeds Project by Paul Somerville and Nancy Collins URS Corporation, Pasadena, CA. Preliminary Draft, Feb 11,
More informationEleventh U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering Integrating Science, Engineering & Policy June 25-29, 2018 Los Angeles, California
Eleventh U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering Integrating Science, Engineering & Policy June 25-29, 2018 Los Angeles, California Site-Specific MCE R Response Spectra for Los Angeles Region
More informationNew Prediction Formula of Fourier Spectra Based on Separation Method of Source, Path, and Site Effects Applied to the Observed Data in Japan
New Prediction Formula of Fourier Spectra Based on Separation Method of Source, Path, and Site Effects Applied to the Observed Data in Japan Kenichi Nakano Graduate School of Engineering, Kyoto University,
More informationGeotechnical Earthquake Engineering
Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering by Dr. Deepankar Choudhury Humboldt Fellow, JSPS Fellow, BOYSCAST Fellow Professor Department of Civil Engineering IIT Bombay, Powai, Mumbai 400 076, India. Email: dc@civil.iitb.ac.in
More informationEstimation of Strong Ground Motion: Aleatory Variability and Epistemic Uncertainty
Estimation of Strong Ground Motion: Aleatory Variability and Epistemic Uncertainty 5th National Conference on Earthquake Engineering 1st National Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology Bucharest,
More informationGround Motion Prediction Equation Hazard Sensitivity Results for Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station Site (PVNGS)
Ground Motion Prediction Equation Hazard Sensitivity Results for Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station Site (PVNGS) M.Walling SWUS GMC Workshop 3 March 11, 2013 Hazard ground motion prediction equation
More informationSeismology, Seismic Data Analysis, Hazard Assessment and Risk Mitigation
List of institutions and lecturers contributing to the International Training Course on "Seismology, Hazard Assessment and Risk Mitigation", September 10 to October 5, 2018 in Accra, Ghana International
More informationNGA-Subduction: Development of the Largest Ground Motion Database for Subduction Events
NGA-Subduction: Development of the Largest Ground Motion Database for Subduction Events Tadahiro Kishida. Ph.D., and Yousef Bozorgnia, Ph.D., P.E. University of California, Berkeley 1 Probabilistic Seismic
More informationIZMIT BAY BRIDGE SOUTH APPROACH VIADUCT: SEISMIC DESIGN NEXT TO THE NORTH ANATOLIAN FAULT
Istanbul Bridge Conference August 11-13, 2014 Istanbul, Turkey IZMIT BAY BRIDGE SOUTH APPROACH VIADUCT: SEISMIC DESIGN NEXT TO THE NORTH ANATOLIAN FAULT A. Giannakou 1, J. Chacko 2 and W. Chen 3 ABSTRACT
More informationGEM-PEER Global GMPEs Project Guidance for Including Near-Fault Effects in Ground Motion Prediction Models
GEM-PEER Global GMPEs Project Guidance for Including Near-Fault Effects in Ground Motion Prediction Models J.W. Baker Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA Y. Bozorgnia & C. Di Alessandro PEER Center,
More informationDIRECT HAZARD ANALYSIS OF INELASTIC RESPONSE SPECTRA
DIRECT HAZARD ANALYSIS OF INELASTIC RESPONSE SPECTRA ABSTRACT Y. Bozorgnia, M. Hachem, and K.W. Campbell Associate Director, PEER, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA Senior Associate,
More informationSynthesis of high frequency ground motion using Empirical Green s Functions. Yin-Tung Yen
Synthesis of high frequency ground motion using Empirical Green s Functions Yin-Tung Yen Disaster Prevention Technology Research Center, Sinotech Engineering Consultants, INC. Workshop on Seismic Hazard
More informationDisaster and Science. Post-Tohoku research actions in France. March 6, 2013
Disaster and Science Post-Tohoku research actions in France March 6, 2013 Question for the "Disaster and Science" session "HOW SCIENTIFIC COMMUNITY OF HIS/HER COUNTRY HAS REACTED AFTER MARCH 11, 2011 EARTHQUAKE"?
More informationCharacterizing Earthquake Rupture Models for the Prediction of Strong Ground Motion
Characterizing Earthquake Rupture Models for the Prediction of Strong Ground Motion Paul Somerville URS Corporation, 566 El Dorado Street, Pasadena, CA, 91101, USA Summary The uncertainty in estimates
More informationGeo-Marine Letters Volume 36, 2016, electronic supplementary material
1 Geo-Marine Letters Volume 36, 016, electronic supplementary material Submarine landslides offshore Vancouver Island along the northern Cascadia margin, British Columbia: why preconditioning is likely
More informationSeismology, Seismic Data Analysis, Hazard Assessment and Risk Mitigation
List of institutions and lecturers contributing to the International Training Course on "Seismology, Hazard Assessment and Risk Mitigation", September 26 to October 21, 2016 in Nay Pyi Taw, Myanmar International
More informationEffects of Surface Geology on Seismic Motion
4 th IASPEI / IAEE International Symposium: Effects of Surface Geology on Seismic Motion August 23 26, 2011 University of California Santa Barbara BROADBAND GROUND-MOTIONS FROM RUPTURE DYNAMICS P. Martin
More informationA Prototype of Strong Ground Motion Prediction Procedure for Intraslab Earthquake based on the Characterized Source Model
A Prototype of Strong Ground Motion Prediction Procedure for Intraslab Earthquake based on the Characterized Source Model T. Iwata, K. Asano & H. Sekiguchi Disaster Prevention Research Institute, Kyoto
More informationTakashi Kumamoto, Masatoshi Fujita, Hideaki Goto, and Takashi Nakata
Chapter 1 Examination of the Correlation Between Tectonic Landforms and Shallow Subsurface Structural Datasets for the Estimation of Seismic Source Faults Takashi Kumamoto, Masatoshi Fujita, Hideaki Goto,
More informationTHE RESPONSE SPECTRUM
(NBCC 25) Gail M. The Canadian Society for Civil Engineering, Vancouver Section THE RESPONSE SPECTRUM Seismic Hazard Analysis to obtain Uniform Hazard Response Spectrum (NBCC 25) Gail M. Department of
More informationSTUDYING THE IMPORTANT PARAMETERS IN EARTHQUAKE SIMULATION BASED ON STOCHASTIC FINITE FAULT MODELING
STUDYING THE IMPORTANT PARAMETERS IN EARTHQUAKE SIMULATION BASED ON STOCHASTIC FINITE FAULT MODELING H. Moghaddam 1, N. Fanaie 2* and H. Hamzehloo 1 Professor, Dept. of civil Engineering, Sharif University
More informationDeterministic Generation of Broadband Ground Motions! with Simulations of Dynamic Ruptures on Rough Faults! for Physics-Based Seismic Hazard Analysis
Deterministic Generation of Broadband Ground Motions! with Simulations of Dynamic Ruptures on Rough Faults! for Physics-Based Seismic Hazard Analysis Zheqiang Shi and Steven M. Day! Department of Geological
More informationEarthquake Source. Kazuki Koketsu. Special Session: Great East Japan (Tohoku) Earthquake. Earthquake Research Institute, University of Tokyo
2012/9/24 17:20-17:35 WCEE SS24.4 Special Session: Great East Japan (Tohoku) Earthquake Earthquake Source Kazuki Koketsu Earthquake Research Institute, University of Tokyo 1 Names and features of the earthquake
More informationStrong Ground Motion Prediction of Future Large Earthquake from Niavaran Fault in Tehran, Iran by Finite Fault Method
Strong Ground Motion Prediction of Future Large Earthquake from Niavaran Fault in Tehran, Iran by Finite Fault Method M. Samaei & M. Miyajima Kanazawa University, Japan M. Tsurugi Geo-Research Institute,
More informationCascadia megathrust earthquakes: reducing risk through science, engineering, and planning
Cascadia megathrust earthquakes: reducing risk through science, engineering, and planning NSF Hazards SEES EAR-1331412 Urban Science and Engineering Workshop 21 July 2014 Everything to do with M9 Cascadia
More informationBetween Seismology and Seismic Design
Between Seismology and Seismic Design Prof. Dipartimento di Ingegneria Civile e Ambientale, Politecnico di Milano Milano, 10 dicembre 2013 Outline 2 Seismic hazard analysis for critical facilities SIGMA
More informationComparisons of ground motions from the M 9 Tohoku earthquake with ground-motion prediction equations for subduction interface earthquakes
Comparisons of ground motions from the M 9 Tohoku earthquake with ground-motion prediction equations for subduction interface earthquakes David M. Boore 8 March 20 Revised: 3 March 20 I used data from
More informationWavelet Based Synthetic Earthquake Sources for Path and Soil Structure Interaction Modeling: Stress Testing of Nuclear Power Plants
Wavelet Based Synthetic Earthquake Sources for Path and Soil Structure Interaction Modeling: Stress Testing of Nuclear Power Plants Boris Jeremić, José Antonio Abell and Sumeet Kumar Sinha University of
More informationDCPP Seismic FAQ s Geosciences Department 08/04/2011 GM1) What magnitude earthquake is DCPP designed for?
GM1) What magnitude earthquake is DCPP designed for? The new design ground motions for DCPP were developed after the discovery of the Hosgri fault. In 1977, the largest magnitude of the Hosgri fault was
More informationFault Displacement Hazard Analysis Workshop in Menlo Park, USGS facility- Synthesis and Perspectives 8 and 9 December 2016
Fault Displacement Hazard Analysis Workshop in Menlo Park, USGS facility- Synthesis and Perspectives 8 and 9 December 2016 Stéphane Baize & Oona Scotti (IRSN), Timothy Dawson (CGS), David Schwartz (USGS)
More informationEFFECT OF RANDOM PARAMETERS IN SEMI-EMPIRICAL METHOD ON THE RESULTS OF GROUND MOTION PREDICTIONS
EFFECT OF RANDOM PARAMETERS IN SEMI-EMPIRICAL METHOD ON THE RESULTS OF GROUND MOTION PREDICTIONS J. Miyakoshi 1, K. Dan 1, A. Fukukita 1 and A. Okazaki 2 1 Shimizu Corporation, Tokyo, Japan 2 Kansai Electric
More informationThe quarter-wavelength average velocity: a review of some past and recent application developments
The quarter-wavelength average velocity: a review of some past and recent application developments V. Poggi, B. Edwards & D. Fäh Swiss Seismological Service, ETH Zürich, Switzerland SUMMARY: In recent
More informationStudy on Quantification Methodology of accident sequences for Tsunami Induced by Seismic Events.
Study on Quantification Methodology of accident sequences for Tsunami Induced by Seismic Events 1 Keisuke Usui, 2 Hitoshi Muta, 3 Ken Muramatsu 1 Graduate Student, Corporative Major in Nuclear Energy:
More informationInterpretive Map Series 24
Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries Interpretive Map Series 24 Geologic Hazards, Earthquake and Landslide Hazard Maps, and Future Earthquake Damage Estimates for Six Counties in the Mid/Southern
More informationPrediction of elastic displacement response spectra in Europe and the Middle East
EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING AND STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS Earthquake Engng Struct. Dyn. 2007; 36:1275 1301 Published online 27 February 2007 in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com)..679 Prediction of elastic
More informationReview of The Canterbury Earthquake Sequence and Implications. for Seismic Design Levels dated July 2011
SEI.ABR.0001.1 Review of The Canterbury Earthquake Sequence and Implications for Seismic Design Levels dated July 2011 Prepared by Norman Abrahamson* 152 Dracena Ave, Piedmont CA 94611 October 9, 2011
More informationSEISMIC HAZARD ANALYSIS. Instructional Material Complementing FEMA 451, Design Examples Seismic Hazard Analysis 5a - 1
SEISMIC HAZARD ANALYSIS Instructional Material Complementing FEMA 451, Design Examples Seismic Hazard Analysis 5a - 1 Seismic Hazard Analysis Deterministic procedures Probabilistic procedures USGS hazard
More informationDevelopment of U. S. National Seismic Hazard Maps and Implementation in the International Building Code
Development of U. S. National Seismic Hazard Maps and Implementation in the International Building Code Mark D. Petersen (U.S. Geological Survey) http://earthquake.usgs.gov/hazmaps/ Seismic hazard analysis
More informationI. Locations of Earthquakes. Announcements. Earthquakes Ch. 5. video Northridge, California earthquake, lecture on Chapter 5 Earthquakes!
51-100-21 Environmental Geology Summer 2006 Tuesday & Thursday 6-9:20 p.m. Dr. Beyer Earthquakes Ch. 5 I. Locations of Earthquakes II. Earthquake Processes III. Effects of Earthquakes IV. Earthquake Risk
More informationSeismic hazard analysis of Tianjin area based on strong ground motion prediction
Earthq Sci (2010)23: 369 375 369 Doi: 10.1007/s11589-010-0734-6 Seismic hazard analysis of Tianjin area based on strong ground motion prediction Zhao Boming School of Civil Engineering, Beijing Jiaotong
More informationRegional Workshop on Essential Knowledge of Site Evaluation Report for Nuclear Power Plants.
Regional Workshop on Essential Knowledge of Site Evaluation Report for Nuclear Power Plants. Development of seismotectonic models Ramon Secanell Kuala Lumpur, 26-30 August 2013 Overview of Presentation
More informationPROTECTING MONUMENTS AND HISTORICAL SETTINGS FROM THE NEXT EARTHQUAKE
PROTECTING MONUMENTS AND HISTORICAL SETTINGS FROM THE NEXT EARTHQUAKE R.PAPADHMHTRIOU, L.PELLI EUROPEAN CENTER OF PREVENTING & FORECASTING OF EARTHQUAKES Confronting the problem SEISMIC RISK R SEISMIC
More informationSimulation-based Seismic Hazard Analysis Using CyberShake
Simulation-based Seismic Hazard Analysis Using CyberShake SCEC CyberShake Collaboration: Robert Graves, Scott Callaghan, Feng Wang, Thomas H. Jordan, Philip Maechling, Kim Olsen, Kevin Milner, En-Jui Lee,
More informationPRELIMINARY AGENDA. President IRIS Consortium Introduction of the Speaker Dr. Olga Cabello
PRELIMINARY AGENDA Sunday October 24 18:00 Networking Reception 19:30 Dinner 20:30 Welcome and Opening Address Call to order Dr. Olga Cabello Welcome Dr. Marino Protti Opening Remarks Dr. David Simpson
More informationDi#erences in Earthquake Source and Ground Motion Characteristics between Surface and Buried Crustal Earthquakes
Bull. Earthq. Res. Inst. Univ. Tokyo Vol. 2+,**0 pp.,/3,00 Di#erences in Earthquake Source and Ground Motion Characteristics between Surface and Buried Crustal Earthquakes Paul Somerville* and Arben Pitarka
More informationKappa for Candidate GMPEs
SSHAC Level 3 Southwestern U.S. Ground Motion Characterization WS-1, March 21, 2013 Oakland, CA Kappa for Candidate GMPEs Linda Al Atik Resource Expert Overview Kappa controls the highfrequency spectral
More informationSimulation of Strong Ground Motions for a Shallow Crustal Earthquake in Japan Based on the Pseudo Point-Source Model
6 th International Conference on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering -4 November 25 Christchurch, New Zealand Simulation of Strong Ground Motions for a Shallow Crustal Earthquake in Japan Based on the
More informationUpdated Graizer-Kalkan GMPEs (GK13) Southwestern U.S. Ground Motion Characterization SSHAC Level 3 Workshop 2 Berkeley, CA October 23, 2013
Updated Graizer-Kalkan GMPEs (GK13) Southwestern U.S. Ground Motion Characterization SSHAC Level 3 Workshop 2 Berkeley, CA October 23, 2013 PGA Model Our model is based on representation of attenuation
More informationNon-Ergodic Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analyses
Non-Ergodic Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analyses M.A. Walling Lettis Consultants International, INC N.A. Abrahamson University of California, Berkeley SUMMARY A method is developed that relaxes the ergodic
More informationSHAKING TABLE TEST OF STEEL FRAME STRUCTURES SUBJECTED TO NEAR-FAULT GROUND MOTIONS
3 th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering Vancouver, B.C., Canada August -6, 24 Paper No. 354 SHAKING TABLE TEST OF STEEL FRAME STRUCTURES SUBJECTED TO NEAR-FAULT GROUND MOTIONS In-Kil Choi, Young-Sun
More informationCALIBRATING THE BACKBONE APPROACH FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF EARTHQUAKE GROUND MOTION MODELS
1 Best Practices in Physics-based Fault Rupture Models for Seismic Hazard Assessment of Nuclear CALIBRATING THE BACKBONE APPROACH FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF EARTHQUAKE GROUND MOTION MODELS J. DOUGLAS 1 1 University
More informationSelection of a Global Set of GMPEs for the GEM-PEER Global GMPEs Project
Selection of a Global Set of GMPEs for the GEM-PEER Global GMPEs Project J.P. Stewart University of California, Los Angeles, USA J. Douglas BRGM, Orleans, France C. Di Alessandro, Y. Bozorgnia, and N.A.
More informationNew developments in the evaluation of seismic hazard for Romania
New developments in the evaluation of seismic hazard for Romania Florin Pavel Seismic Risk Assessment Research Center CONTENTS Introduction Seismicity of Romania Ground motion models Evaluation of seismic
More informationModifications to Risk-Targeted Seismic Design Maps for Subduction and Near-Fault Hazards
Modifications to Risk-Targeted Seismic Design Maps for Subduction and Near-Fault Hazards Abbie B. Liel Assistant Prof., Dept. of Civil, Environ. and Arch. Eng., University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA
More informationCOMPARISON OF FREQUENCY AND TIME-DOMAIN OBJECTIVE FUNCTIONS FOR BOREHOLE STATION'S INVERSE PROBLEMS
Paper No. COFDE COMPARISON OF FREQUENCY AND TIME-DOMAIN OBJECTIVE FUNCTIONS FOR BOREHOLE STATION'S INVERSE PROBLEMS Florent DE MARTIN 1 ABSTRACT This paper compares the use of frequency and time-domain
More informationSM2.1/GD2.7/NH5.8/TS8.4, Large Earthquake and Tsunami Activity (co-organized), 13:30 17:00, Room B3
SM Seismology Orals and PICOs MO1, 08:30 10:00 MO2, 10:30 12:00 MOL, 12:15 13:15 MO3, 13:30 15:00 MO4, 15:30 17:00 TU1, 08:30 10:00 Monday, 08 April SM1.2/AS4.13, Research and Development in Nuclear Explosion
More informationWHAT SEISMIC HAZARD INFORMATION THE DAM ENGINEERS NEED FROM SEISMOLOGISTS AND GEOLOGISTS?
WHAT SEISMIC HAZARD INFORMATION THE DAM ENGINEERS NEED FROM SEISMOLOGISTS AND GEOLOGISTS? Martin WIELAND 1 ABSTRACT For large dam projects a site-specific seismic hazard analysis is usually recommended.
More informationThe Nonlinear Time-Domain Modeling of Earthquake Soil Structure Interaction for Nuclear Power Plants: Nonlinear Contact Between Foundation and Rock
The Nonlinear Time-Domain Modeling of Earthquake Soil Structure Interaction for Nuclear Power Plants: Nonlinear Contact Between Foundation and Rock B. Jeremić, A. Kammerer, N. Tafazzoli, B. Kamrani, University
More informationCHARACTERIZING SPATIAL CROSS-CORRELATION BETWEEN GROUND- MOTION SPECTRAL ACCELERATIONS AT MULTIPLE PERIODS. Nirmal Jayaram 1 and Jack W.
Proceedings of the 9th U.S. National and 10th Canadian Conference on Earthquake Engineering Compte Rendu de la 9ième Conférence Nationale Américaine et 10ième Conférence Canadienne de Génie Parasismique
More informationScenario Earthquakes for Korean Nuclear Power Plant Site Considering Active Faults
Transactions of the 7 th International Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology (SMiRT 7) Prague, Czech Republic, August 7 22, 2003 Paper # K03-2 Scenario Earthquakes for Korean Nuclear
More information2C09 Design for seismic and climate changes
2C09 Design for seismic and climate changes Lecture 10: Characterisation of seismic motion Aurel Stratan, Politehnica University of Timisoara 07/04/2017 European Erasmus Mundus Master Course Sustainable
More informationSpectra and Pgas for the Assessment and Reconstruction of Christchurch
Spectra and Pgas for the Assessment and Reconstruction of Christchurch G.H. McVerry, M.C. Gerstenberger, D.A. Rhoades & M.W. Stirling GNS Science, Lower Hutt, New Zealand. 2012 NZSEE Conference ABSTRACT:
More informationSan Andreas Movie Can It Happen?
San Andreas Movie Can It Happen? Learning Objectives (LO) Lecture 14: Faults and Quakes Read: Chapter 10 and 11 Homework #12 due Thursday 12pm What we ll learn today:! 1. Compare strike-slip to dip-slip
More informationSevere accident risk assessment for Nuclear. Power Plants
PSA 2017- September 2017 IRSN Severe accident risk assessment for Nuclear * Power Plants * Enhancing nuclear safety An original approach to derive seismic fragility curves - Application to a PWR main steam
More informationNext Generation Attenuation (NGA) Projects
Next Generation Attenuation (NGA) Projects Yousef Bozorgnia, Ph.D., P.E. Executive Director, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER), University of California, Berkeley NGA= Next Generation
More informationOverview of Seismic PHSA Approaches with Emphasis on the Management of Uncertainties
H4.SMR/1645-29 "2nd Workshop on Earthquake Engineering for Nuclear Facilities: Uncertainties in Seismic Hazard" 14-25 February 2005 Overview of Seismic PHSA Approaches with Emphasis on the Management of
More informationPart 2 - Engineering Characterization of Earthquakes and Seismic Hazard. Earthquake Environment
Part 2 - Engineering Characterization of Earthquakes and Seismic Hazard Ultimately what we want is a seismic intensity measure that will allow us to quantify effect of an earthquake on a structure. S a
More informationTsunami hazard risk and early warning projects at Global Geophysics Institute, Vietnam
Tsunami hazard risk and early warning projects at Global Geophysics Institute, Vietnam presented by Dr Kelvin Berryman, GNS Science, New Zealand k.berryman@gns.cri.nz on behalf of Prof. Bui C. Que,, Director
More informationCharacterization and modelling of seismic action
COST C26: Urban Habitat Constructions under Catastrophic Events Final Conference, 16-18 September 2010, Naples, Italy Characterization and modelling of seismic action Report of WG2: Earthquake resistance
More informationHazard and Vulnerability of Moderate Seismicity Regions
Hazard and Vulnerability of Moderate Seismicity Regions presented by Professor Tso-Chien PAN Dean, College of Engineering Director, 25 October 2010 DRM GDLN Session on Earthquake Vulnerability Reduction
More informationMeeting at a Glance May 2018
Meeting at a Glance 14 18 May 2018 Monday 14 May Tuesday 15 May Wednesday 16 May Thursday 17 May Friday 18 May 7:30 a.m. 3:30 p.m. Board of Directors Meeting Orchid C Noon 4 p.m. Workshop: Getting Published
More informationEARTHQUAKE HAZARD ASSESSMENT IN KAZAKHSTAN
EARTHQUAKE HAZARD ASSESSMENT IN KAZAKHSTAN Dr Ilaria Mosca 1 and Dr Natalya Silacheva 2 1 British Geological Survey, Edinburgh (UK) imosca@nerc.ac.uk 2 Institute of Seismology, Almaty (Kazakhstan) silacheva_nat@mail.ru
More information2 Approaches To Developing Design Ground Motions
2 Approaches To Developing Design Ground Motions There are two basic approaches to developing design ground motions that are commonly used in practice: deterministic and probabilistic. While both approaches
More information