APPENDIX A Geotechnical Report, dated December 2009 PLANT CITY, FLORIDA SYDNEY ROAD RECLAIMED WATER PROJECT INVITATION TO BID ITB NO.

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "APPENDIX A Geotechnical Report, dated December 2009 PLANT CITY, FLORIDA SYDNEY ROAD RECLAIMED WATER PROJECT INVITATION TO BID ITB NO."

Transcription

1 APPENDIX A Geotechnical Report, dated December 29 PLANT CITY, FLORIDA SYDNEY ROAD RECLAIMED WATER INVITATION TO BID ITB NO ADVERTISED: November, 21 MANDATORY PRE-BID MEETING: November 29, 21 at 2: P.M. BID DUE DATE: December 1, 21 at 2: P.M. PREPARED BY: Jones Edmunds & Associates, Inc. 324 South Hyde Park Avenue, Suite 2 Tampa, FL 3366 For the City of Plant City, Florida 4-

2 CITY OF PLANT CITY, FLORIDA CITY OFFICIALS 21 Daniel D. Raulerson, Mayor William D. Dodson, Vice Mayor/City Commissioner Rick A. Lott, City Commissioner Michael S. Sparkman, City Commissioner Mary Yvette Thomas Mathis, City Commissioner Gregory S. Horwedel...City Manager Kerri J. Miller..City Clerk Kenneth W. Buchman City Attorney 4-1

3 Geotechnical Report Project Plant City, Florida Prepared for: Jones Edmunds & Associates, Inc. Prepared by: MADRID ENGINEERING GROUP, INC. 23 Hwy 6 E. Bartow, FL Project No. December 29

4

5 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION Site Location and Description Soil Survey Map Review GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION Hand Auger Borings Standard Penetration Test Borings Laboratory Testing SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Description of Soils Water Table Information CONCLUSIONS SITE PREPARATION AND EARTHWORK Clearing and Stripping Excavation and Shoring Dewatering Settlement Monitoring Program Pipe Bedding and Backfilling Unsuitable Materials TRENCHLESS CROSSINGS SLLOW SPREAD FOUNDATIONS BASIS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS... 1 FIGURES Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Site Location Map Soil Survey Maps Boring location Maps APPENDICES Appendix A Boring Logs Appendix B Laboratory Test Data

6 1. INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of a geotechnical investigation performed to provide soils information to the design engineers in support of the Sydney Road Reclaimed Water project. This project consists of new reclaimed water main that will roughly follow Sydney Road / Woodrow Wilson Street North and the surrounding areas in Plant City. The design engineer for this project, Jones Edmunds & Associates, Inc. (JEA), is designing the project for the owner (The City of Plant City). 1.1 Site Location and Description The Project includes the installation of a reclaimed water main along portions of Sydney Road, Old Sydney Road, Airport Road, Woodrow Wilson Street, and other surrounding local roads as Shown in Figure 1. We understand that the new pipeline will typically be constructed to invert depths of to 1 feet below existing grade. Greater depths may be required at some roadway and utility crossings due to conflicts with utilities and the requirements of special construction methods. However, since pipeline design has not yet been performed, depths of trenchless crossings are not currently available. 1.2 Soil Survey Map Review Soils data from the Soil Survey of Hillsborough County, Florida (USDA-SCS) were reviewed as part of the investigation. Portions of the map have been provided for each sub-project in Figure 2. Mapped soil groups in the vicinity of the project according to the Hillsborough County Soil Survey include: Basinger, Holopaw, and Samsula soils, depressional. The soils in this map unit are nearly level and very poorly drained. They are in swamps and depressions on the flatwoods. Generally, Basinger soil is along the exterior of swamps or in shallow depressions. Holopaw and Samsula soils are in the interior areas of the swamps or in deeper depressions. Undrained areas are frequently ponded for very long periods. The slope is to 2 percent. Typically, the surface layer of Basinger soil is black fine sand about 7 inches thick. The subsurface layer, to a depth of about 28 inches, is gray fine sand. The subsoil, to a depth of about 42 inches, is brown and grayish brown fine sand. The substratum to a depth of about 8 inches is light brownish gray fine sand. Similar soils included in mapping, in some areas, have a surface layer of mucky fine sand, and it is more than 7 inches thick. Typically, the surface layer of Holopaw soil is black mucky fine sand about 6 inches thick. The upper part of the subsurface layer, to a depth of about 12 inches, is dark gray fine sand. The middle part, to a depth of about 42 inches, is light gray fine sand. The lower part, to a depth of about 2 inches, is grayish brown fine sand. The upper part of the subsoil, to a depth of about 64 inches, is grayish brown fine sand. The lower part to a depth of about 8 inches is gray, mottled sandy loam. Similar soils included in mapping, in some areas, have a black surface layer more than

7 Madrid Engineering Group, Inc Project Project No. December 29 1 inches thick. Typically, the upper part of the surface tiers of Samsula soil is black muck about 1 inches thick. The lower part, to a depth of about 34 inches, is dark reddish brown muck. The layer below the organic material, to a depth of about 4 inches, is black fine sand. The underlying material to a depth of 8 inches is light brownish gray fine sand. Similar soils included in mapping, in some areas, have organic material that is more than 1 inches thick. In most years, the undrained areas in this map unit are ponded for about 6 months. Permeability is rapid in Basinger and Samsula soils. It is rapid in the surface and subsurface layer of Holopaw soil and moderately slow or moderate in the subsoil. The available water capacity is low in Basinger soil, low or moderate in Holopaw soil, and high in Samsula soil. 7 Candler fine sand, to percent slopes. This soil is nearly level to gently sloping and excessively drained. It is on the uplands. Typically, this soil has a surface layer of dark gray fine sand about 6 inches thick. The upper part of the subsurface layer, to a depth of about 3 inches, is light yellowish brown fine sand. The middle part, to a depth of about 72 inches, is very pale brown fine sand. The lower part to a depth of about 8 inches is a mixture of very pale brown fine sand and strong brown loamy sand lamellae that are about one-sixteenth to one-quarter of an inch thick and 2 to 6 inches long. In some places, similar soils included in the mapped areas do not have lamellae in the lower part of the subsurface layer. Other similar soils, in some areas, have a subsurface layer that consists of to 1 percent silt and clay; and some similar soils also included in mapping, in some of the lower parts of the landscape, are well drained. A seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 8 inches. Permeability is rapid. The available water capacity is very low. 2 Lake fine sand, to percent slopes. This soil is nearly level to gently sloping and excessively drained. It is on the uplands. Typically, this soil has a surface layer of dark grayish brown fine sand about 4 inches thick. The underlying material extends to a depth of about 8 inches. The upper 24 inches is strong brown fine sand. The next 4 inches is reddish yellow fine sand. The lower 12 inches is strong brown fine sand. Similar soils included in mapping, in some places, are gray or light gray in the lower part of the underlying material. Other similar soils, in some areas, consist of less than percent silt and clay in the underlying material. The included similar soils, in some of the lower parts of the landscape, are well drained. A seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 8 inches. Permeability is rapid. The available water capacity is very low or low. 2

8 Madrid Engineering Group, Inc Project Project No. December Myakka fine sand. This soil is nearly level and poorly drained. It is on broad plains on the flatwoods. The slope is to 2 percent. Typically, this soil has a surface layer of very dark gray fine sand about inches thick. The subsurface layer, to a depth of about 2 inches, is gray fine sand. The upper part of the subsoil, to a depth of about 2 inches, is black fine sand. The middle part, to a depth of 3 inches, is dark reddish brown fine sand. The lower part, to a depth of about 38 inches, is brownish yellow fine sand. The upper part of the substratum, to a depth of about inches, is very pale brown fine sand. The lower part to a depth of about 8 inches is dark grayish brown fine sand. Similar soils included in mapping, in some areas, have a surface layer that is more than 8 inches thick. Other similar soils, in some places, have a subsoil within 2 inches of the surface, and some included similar soils have a subsoil at a depth of more than 3 inches or have a brown or dark brown subsoil, or both. In most years, a seasonal high water table fluctuates from the soil surface to a depth of 1 inches for 1 to 4 months and recedes to a depth of 4 inches during prolonged dry periods. Permeability is rapid in the surface and subsurface layers, moderate or moderately rapid in the subsoil, and rapid in the substratum. The available water capacity is low. 33 Ona fine sand. This soil is nearly level and poorly drained. It is on broad plains on the flatwoods. The slope is to 2 percent. Typically, this soil has a surface layer of very dark gray fine sand about 4 inches thick. The upper part of the subsoil, to a depth of about 8 inches, is black fine sand. The lower part, to a depth of about 22 inches, is very dark brown fine sand. The substratum to a depth of about 8 inches is light gray fine sand. Similar soils included in mapping, in some areas, have a gray or dark gray subsurface layer. Other similar soils, in some places, have a subsoil at a depth of more than 1 inches. In most years, a seasonal high water table fluctuates from the soil surface to a depth of 1 inches for more than 2 months and recedes to a depth of 1 to 4 inches for 6 months or more. Permeability is rapid in the surface layer, moderate or moderately rapid in the surface layer, moderate or moderately rapid in the subsoil, and rapid in the substratum. The available water capacity is low or moderate. 41 Pomello fine sand, to percent slopes. This soil is nearly level to gently sloping and moderately well drained. It is on low ridges on the flatwoods. Typically, this soil has a surface layer of very dark gray fine sand about 3 inches thick. The subsurface layer, to a depth of about 43 inches, is light gray fine sand. The upper part of the subsoil, to a depth of about 46 inches, is dark brown fine sand. The lower part, to a depth of about inches, is brown fine sand. The substratum to a depth of about 8 inches is grayish brown fine sand. Similar soils included in mapping, in some places, have a subsoil within 3 inches of the surface. Other similar soils, in some areas, have 3

9 Madrid Engineering Group, Inc Project Project No. December 29 a subsoil at a depth of more than inches, and similar soils, in some of the lower parts of the landscape, are somewhat poorly drained. In most years, a seasonal high water table is at a depth of 24 to 4 inches for 1 to 4 months and recedes to a depth of 4 to 6 inches during dry periods. Permeability is very rapid in the surface and subsurface layers, moderately rapid in the subsoil, and rapid in the substratum. The available water capacity is very low. 46 St. Johns fine sand. This soil is nearly level and poorly drained. It is on low-lying plains on the flatwoods. The slope is to 2 percent. Typically, the upper part of the surface layer is black fine sand about 6 inches thick. The lower part, to a depth of about 12 inches, is very dark grayish brown fine sand. The subsurface layer, to a depth of about 29 inches, is light brownish gray fine sand. The upper part of the subsoil, to a depth of about 36 inches, is black fine sand. The middle part, to a depth of about 46 inches, is dark reddish brown fine sand. The lower part, to a depth of about inches, is dark yellowish brown fine sand. The substratum to a depth of about 8 inches is light brownish gray fine sand. Similar soils included in mapping, in some areas, have a surface layer that is less than 1 inches thick. Other similar soils, in some places, do not have a subsurface layer; and in some places these included soils have a subsoil that is brown or dark brown. In most years, a seasonal high water table fluctuates from the soil surface to a depth of 1 inches for 2 to 6 months and recedes to a depth of 1 to 3 inches during prolonged dry periods. Permeability is rapid in the surface and subsurface layers, moderately slow or moderate in the subsoil, and rapid in the substratum. The available water capacity is moderate. 47 Seffner fine sand. This soil is nearly level and somewhat poorly drained. It is on the rims of depressions and on broad, low ridges on the flatwoods. The slope is to 2 percent. Typically, this soil has a surface layer that is about 13 inches thick. The upper 9 inches is very dark gray fine sand, and the lower 4 inches is very dark gray, mottled fine sand. A transitional layer, to a depth of about 21 inches, is dark gray, mottled fine sand. The upper part of the underlying material, to a depth of about 3 inches, is very pale brown, mottled fine sand. The middle part, to a depth of about 63 inches, is light gray, mottled fine sand. The lower part to a depth of 8 inches is white, mottled fine sand. Similar soils included in mapping, in some areas, have a surface layer that is less than 1 inches thick. Other similar soils, in some places, have a surface layer that is more than 24 inches thick; and in some of the higher parts of the landscape, the included similar soils are moderately well drained. In most years, a seasonal high water table is at a depth of 2 to 4 inches for 2 to 6 months and recedes to a depth of less than 6 inches during prolonged dry periods. Permeability is rapid. The available water capacity is low or moderate. 4

10 Madrid Engineering Group, Inc Project Project No. December 29 6 Winder fine sand, frequently flooded. This soil is nearly level and poorly drained. It is on the flood plains. This soil is flooded for very long periods following prolonged intense rain. Many areas are isolated by stream channels and steep escarpments. The slope is to 2 percent. Typically, this soil has a surface layer of black fine sand about inches thick. The subsurface layer, to a depth of about 14 inches, is grayish brown fine sand. The upper part of the subsoil, to a depth of about 18 inches, is gray sandy clay loam and white fine sand. The lower part of the subsoil, to a depth of about 34 inches, is grayish brown, mottled sandy clay loam. The substratum, to a depth of about 8 inches, is light brownish gray fine sand. Similar soils included in mapping, in some areas, have a subsoil at a depth of more than 2 inches. Other similar soils, in some areas, have a surface layer that is more than 8 inches thick or is stratified, or both. In some places are similar soils that have a thin, discontinuous strata of fragmented limestone in the upper part of the subsoil. In most years, a seasonal high water table fluctuates from the soils surface to a depth of about 1 inches for 2 to 6 months. Permeability is rapid in the surface and subsurface layers, slow or very slow in the subsoil, and rapid in the substratum. The available water capacity is moderate. 61 Zolfo fine sand. This soil is nearly level and somewhat poorly drained. It is on broad, low ridges on the flatwoods. The slope is to 2 percent. Typically, this soil has a surface layer of very dark gray fine sand about 3 inches thick. The upper part of the subsurface layer, to a depth of about 1 inches, is grayish brown, mottled fine sand. The middle part, to a depth of about 1 inches, is light gray, mottled fine sand. The lower part, to a depth of about 6 inches, is grayish brown fine sand. The subsoil to a depth of about 8 inches. Other similar soils, in some of the higher parts of the landscape, are moderately well drained. In most years, a seasonal high water table is at a depth of 24 to 4 inches for more than 2 to 6 months and recedes to a depth of 6 inches during prolonged dry periods. Permeability is rapid in the surface and subsurface layers and moderate in the subsoil. The available water capacity is low. It is noted that some soil units such as and 6 have a greater chance of encountering unsuitable soils containing either high organic or clay content. It is expected that soils will vary with mapped units and actual soils encountered in the field should be evaluated for suitability during construction.

11 Madrid Engineering Group, Inc Project Project No. December GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION 2.1 Hand Auger Borings Fifty-four hand auger borings, labeled -1, -2, etc., were completed during site visits between May 4 and November 18, 29, at the locations shown on Figure 3. The borings were advanced to depths ranging from 2 to 7 feet below ground surface (bgs) using a bucket auger, and were completed in general accordance with ASTM D 142. Hand auger boring profiles are included in Appendix A. -3A through -3F were given alphabetical designations because they were added during the drilling portion of the investigation in order to delineate high organic content soils in that area. 2.2 Standard Penetration Test Borings Twelve standard penetration test (SPT) soil borings were completed during site visits on May 7, May 12, and May 1, 29. The borings were completed to a depth of 2 feet bgs along portions of the proposed alignment of the reclaimed water main at locations designated by JEA where trenchless crossings are expected at the locations shown in Figure 3. The borings were completed in accordance with ASTM Standard D-186 using the mud-rotary drilling method. Soil samples were collected from each borehole using a 1.4-inch I.D. split-spoon sampler driven with a 14-pound slide hammer falling a distance of 3 inches. An engineering technician familiar with soil classification and field evaluations logged the borings in the field and placed samples in sealed containers and returned them to MEG s laboratory for further classification. Upon completion, the boreholes were filled with cement grout and / or bentonite hole plug. Boring profiles are included in Appendix A. 2.3 Laboratory Testing Laboratory tests for natural water content (ASTM D2216) and organic content (ASTM D 2974) were performed on selected samples from the borings to verify the visual and tactile soil classifications. Laboratory test reports are included in Appendix B. The laboratory tests indicate variable organic contents in sediments at depths from 2 feet to 1 feet bgs in the samples tested. Percent organic for samples tested ranges from.6 to 6.1 percent. 6

12 Madrid Engineering Group, Inc Project Project No. December SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS 3.1 Description of Soils The soil strata encountered across this site generally consists of the following strata: Sand Stratum (USCS = SP) The surficial strata in all of the borings were generally loose to medium dense sand. This stratum made up the bulk of the soils encountered in this project. This strata consists of slightly organic topsoil (3 to 1 inches at the surface) and fine grained sand. The non-organic portion of this unit will be suitable for use as pipe bedding, structural backfill, and common backfill. This unit has a unified soil classification (USCS) of SP (poorly graded sand). Slightly Clayey Sand and Slightly Silty Sand Strata (USCS = SP-SC, SP-SM) Sporadic slightly clayey sand and slightly silty sand units were observed at varying depths in the borings. These lenses ranged from loose to dense with cementation in some cases and fines content less than 12%. These units will be slightly more difficult to use as backfill and will require a greater effort to excavate and compact. These units are not suitable for pipe bedding but are suitable for structural backfill and common backfill. These units have a USCS designation of SP-SC (slightly clayey sand) and SP-SM (slightly silty sand). Clayey Sand Stratum (USCS = SC) Clayey sand was encountered in some of the borings and was generally medium dense to dense. These units were generally found at depths greater than 12 to 17 feet bgs in some of the deep SPT borings and shallower in very few of the hand auger borings. This stratum consists of fine grained sand with less than % clay. These units will be significantly more difficult to use as backfill and will require a much greater effort to excavate and compact. This unit is not suitable for pipe bedding or structural fill in its natural state. If mixed with clean sands so that the fines content is reduced to below 12%, these soils may be used as structural backfill. If mixed with clean sand so that the fines content is reduced to 3%, these soils may be used as common fill. These units have a USCS designation of SC (clayey sand). Clay Stratum (USCS = CL) Clay was encountered in a limited number of the borings and was generally soft to firm. These units were generally found at depths greater than 17 feet bgs in some of the deep SPT borings. This stratum consists of cohesive clay with less than % sand. 7

13 Madrid Engineering Group, Inc Project Project No. December 29 This unit will require a greater effort to excavate and is not recommended for use as pipe bedding, structural backfill, or common backfill. These units have a USCS designation of CL (clay). Organic Soil Stratum (USCS = OL, and SP-SM or SM with organics notation) Silty soils with varying organic contents were observed in some of the borings. This unit can be expected to decay and consolidate excessively over time. This unit is unacceptable for use as pipe bedding, structural backfill, or common backfill. This unit has a USCS designation of OL (organic silt) or in some cases slightly silty sand (SP- SM) or silty sand (SM) with an organic content notation on the boring logs. In general, any soil type with an organic content in excess of 2 percent is not suitable for use as pipe bedding and greater than percent is not suitable for use as common fill or structural fill. 3.2 Water Table Information The surficial water table elevations recorded, at the time of the investigation, ranged from greater than 1 feet bgs to as shallow as feet bgs. Specific water table information is provided on the specific boring logs in Appendix A. 4. CONCLUSIONS The following conclusions and recommendations are based on our understanding of the proposed project, the data obtained from the soil borings, experience with similar conditions, and generally accepted principles and practices of geotechnical engineering. Borings were performed at generally -ft intervals and soil conditions between actual borings will also vary. Much of the proposed alignment falls along generally suitable soil conditions. Some organics were encountered at noted places along the alignment. Preliminary pipeline design calls for a reclaimed water main to be installed at approximately to 1 feet below existing grade. Assuming this invert depth, and based on the results of the boring program, the bases of trench excavations will typically expose loose to medium dense sand to slightly silty and slightly clayey sand. Due to the presence of shallow ground water in some portions of the alignment, shallow dewatering systems may be required to control ground water flow into trench excavations up to 1 feet deep. 8

14 Madrid Engineering Group, Inc Project Project No. December 29 Proposed crossings beneath roads, utilities, and railroads will require deeper excavations possibly up to 1 feet below the existing grade to support pipe installation utilizing trenchless methods such as either jack-and-bore (pipejacking) or directional drilling techniques. Minor appurtenant structures if required along the proposed pipeline alignment may generally be supported on shallow spread foundations. 4.1 SITE PREPARATION AND EARTHWORK Clearing and Stripping All construction areas should be cleared of any trees or scrub vegetation, pavements, and the topsoil stripped as necessary to remove roots and other deleterious material. Topsoil typically consists of fine sands with some silt and silty sands. Topsoil should be discarded or may be stockpiled for future reuse in landscape areas if desired Excavation and Shoring In general, the anticipated depth of trench excavations typically ranges from to 1 feet below existing grade. Localized excavations up to 1 feet below existing grade may be required at proposed crossings of drainage ditches, existing buried utilities, railroads, and roadways. The bases of trench excavations will expose soil conditions that are likely to vary along the route. Based on the results of our boring program, materials at the base of trench excavations along most of the route are likely to range from relatively clean sands to slightly clayey sands. If encountered, all soft clays, silts and organic soils encountered at the bases of the trench excavations should be excavated to at least two feet below the design trench depth and replaced with pipe bedding material, placed and compacted as described later in this report. All excavations and shoring should conform to the Occupational and Safety Health Act (OS) requirements for Type C soils as described in Federal Register 29 CFR Part 1926 subpart P. Design of a shoring system is the responsibility of the selected contractor. A number of variable factors, such as nature and strength of excavated soils, depth of excavation and groundwater, proximity of adjacent structures, and economics of construction method, etc., will affect the choice of support method. 9

15 Madrid Engineering Group, Inc Project Project No. December 29 All vertical shoring or prefabricated trench lining systems should be continuous and maintained in place to assure adequate temporary stability during backfilling of the pipe trench as recommended subsequently. Excavated soils should not be stockpiled within 1 feet of the shored excavations, unless specific provisions for surcharge loading have been included in the design of the shoring system. The final decision on appropriate excavation methods and design of shoring systems is the responsibility of the contractor Dewatering Based upon groundwater levels encountered during our field exploration and depending upon the depth of excavation and time of year when construction is scheduled, it appears that groundwater will be a factor along the alignments of much of the project. The variability in soil conditions encountered likely will result in varied performance of dewatering systems. We recommend that, where necessary, a dewatering system be designed and installed to draw the groundwater table down to a minimum depth of three feet below the final excavated grade. For excavations up to 1 feet depth, depending on the local soil profile present, a shallow well-point system may be adequate for trenches and small excavations up to approximately feet in plan dimension. Excavations in excess of 1 feet depth may require a multi-stage well-point system, deep wells or a single stage well-point installed from a reduced grade elevation to accomplish the recommended drawdown. The contractor should employ a registered professional engineer to design all shoring and dewatering systems Settlement Monitoring Program Some minor surface settlement may result from excavation and dewatering operations due to general soil deformation and the compression of loose or soft soils. These settlements and the risk of possible damage to adjacent structures could be minimized by using fully sheeted excavations and controlled recharge of groundwater outside the proposed excavation. Where necessary, a baseline survey and regular monitoring of roadway pavements, any settlement sensitive structures or utilities within feet of any excavation or dewatering operations should be completed prior to construction Pipe Bedding and Backfilling Clean fine sands (SP) containing less than two percent passing the U.S. standard No. 2 sieve and less than four percent organic matter (as determined by 1

16 Madrid Engineering Group, Inc Project Project No. December 29 ASTM D-2974) may be used as select sand pipe bedding material. Suitable pipe bedding should be free of stones, gravel, organics, vegetation and other deleterious material, placed in uniform loose lifts not exceeding six inches thick and compacted to at least 98 percent of its maximum dry density as determined by AASHTO T-18 (Modified Proctor). Pipe bedding material should be placed within one foot above and below the pipe. Particular care needs to be exercised during pipe bedding placement and compaction around pipe elbows and curves. Loose bedding materials may subsequently compact in-service, if subjected to dynamic or vibrational loading due to surge pressures, resulting in excessive pipe deflections and possibly failure. Structural backfill material in trenches above or below the pipe bedding should consist of clean or slightly silty fine sand (SP or SP-SM) with less than 12 percent passing the U.S. Standard No. 2 sieve. Common backfill above or below the pipe bedding should consist of clean, silty or clayey sands with less than 3 percent passing the U.S. Standard No. 2 sieve. All backfill should have less than percent organic matter and organic material should be well dispersed in the backfill. Common fill may be used in the trench outside of existing or proposed roadways, pavements or embankments. Structural fill should be used beneath roads, embankments or other structures. Structural and common fill placed above the pipe bedding should be graded and placed in loose lifts not exceeding 12-inches thick and compacted to at least 9 and 9 percent, respectively, of its maximum dry density as determined by AASHTO T-18. Prior to construction, a minimum of three bulk soil samples each, representative of anticipated bedding and backfill soils, should be obtained for gradation and compaction testing. Excavated spoil material intended for reuse as backfill will likely require moisture conditioning to permit adequate compaction. Shell or limerock base material under pavements should be compacted to 98 percent of the maximum dry density as per AASHTO T Unsuitable Materials Classification of soils as suitable for use as backfill should be monitored continuously during construction because the limited exploration performed will not have identified all areas with unsuitable soils. However, the investigation did identify some areas with unsuitable soils. Soils deemed unsuitable for use as backfill of any kind on this project as defined in this investigation were found in the following areas: N. Mobley Street across Highway 92 (Borings SPT-1 and SPT-2). The areas investigated as possible starting and ending points for a trenchless crossing (SPT-1 and SPT-2) encountered slightly clayey sand with organics and slightly silty 11

17 Madrid Engineering Group, Inc Project Project No. December 29 sand with organics from 2 to 6 feet bgs in both borings. The soils in this depth range of the proposed excavations in this area may not be suitable for all backfill uses on this project. Woodrow Wilson Street across Railroad Tracks (Borings SPT- and SPT-6) The areas investigated as possible starting and ending points for a trenchless crossing (SPT- and SPT-6) encountered slightly silty sand with organics from 8 to 12 feet bgs in boring SPT- and organic silt from 4 to 12 feet bgs in boring SPT-6. The soils in the depth ranges listed for each representative proposed excavation area likely will not be suitable for backfill on this project. Sydney Road across Railroad Tracks (Borings SPT-11 and SPT-12) The areas investigated as possible starting and ending points for a trenchless crossing (SPT-11 and SPT-12) encountered organic silt from 8 to 12 feet bgs in boring SPT-11 and from 2 to 6 feet bgs in boring SPT-12. Both borings encountered clay from 17 to 2 feet bgs. The soils in the depth ranges listed for each representative proposed excavation area likely will not be suitable for backfill on this project. -27 The soils encountered below 3 feet bgs in boring -27 encountered slightly silty sand with organics. This appears to be an isolated pocket of organics surrounding this boring as no organics were identified in either of the surrounding borings (-28 or SPT-8). 3A, -3B, and -3E The soils encountered below feet bgs in borings -3A and -3B as well as the soils encountered below 3 feet bgs in boring -3E consisted of organic silt and sand with buried plant and wood debris. This area is bound by boring -3C to the east and boring -3F to the west both of which do not indicate organic soils. The soils in the depth ranges listed for this area of proposed excavation likely will not be suitable for all backfill uses on this project. Other Considerations There are numerous other areas of the project where soils exist that will not be suitable for all applications of backfill. Layers of slightly silty sand, slightly clayey sand, and clayey sand will need to be used in appropriate depths or mixed appropriately as detailed above to be considered suitable for backfill applications. 12

18 Madrid Engineering Group, Inc Project Project No. December TRENCHLESS CROSSINGS Trenchless crossings are proposed for six areas as detailed below. Specific details on depth, length and size requirements for trenchless crossings have not yet been defined; however, soil conditions appear to be favorable for the use of trenchless methods for road crossings. Either mechanical excavation using rotary drilling equipment and mud stabilization (i.e. directional drilling or microtunneling) or mechanical excavation within a steel or concrete casing pipe installed by pipe jacking (auger boring) should be suitable construction methods. N. Mobley Street across Highway 92 This intersection was investigated with borings SPT-1 and SPT-2. Slightly clayey sand with organics and slightly silty sand with organics was encountered in both borings from approximately 2 to 6 feet bgs. The organic layer appears to be relatively uniform across this intersection at this depth with organic contents ranging from 2 to percent. The water table was encountered at approximately feet bgs at this location. N. Woodrow Wilson Street across W. Reynolds Street This intersection was investigated with borings SPT-3 and SPT-4. Loose to medium dense sand was encountered in the upper 12 feet bgs of both borings at this intersection. The water table was encountered at approximately 12 to 18 feet bgs at this location. A medium dense clayey sand layer was encountered below 12 feet bgs in both borings. Woodrow Wilson Street across Railroad Tracks This intersection was investigated with borings SPT- and SPT-6. Organic silt was encountered from 8 to 12 feet bgs in boring SPT- and slightly silty sand with organic were encountered from 4 to 12 feet bgs in boring SPT-6. The organic layers have organic contents ranging from 2 to 6 percent. The water table was encountered at approximately to 8 feet bgs at this location. Very dense slightly silty sand was encountered below 12 feet bgs in both borings. Woodrow Wilson Street across Sammonds Road This intersection was investigated with borings SPT-7 and SPT-8. Organic staining was observed in boring SPT-8 however the organic content was very low (Organic Content =.6%). The water table was encountered at approximately 9 feet bgs at this location. Very loose sands were encountered at 8 to 1 feet bgs in both borings however dense to very dense sands were encountered near 1 feet bgs also in both borings. 13

19 Madrid Engineering Group, Inc Project Project No. December 29 Airport Road and Old Sydney Road This area was investigated with borings SPT-9 and SPT-1. Loose to medium dense sand was encountered in the upper 1 to 12 feet bgs of the borings at this area. The water table was encountered at approximately 12 feet bgs at this location. Medium dense slightly clayey to clayey sand was encountered near 1 feet bgs in both borings but it is noted that the sands grade very loose to loose near 2 feet bgs. Sydney Road across Railroad Tracks This intersection was investigated with borings SPT-11 and SPT-12. Organic silt was encountered from 8 to 12 feet bgs in boring SPT-11 and from 2 to 6 feet bgs in boring SPT-12. The organic layers have organic contents ranging from 3 to percent. The water table was encountered at approximately to 6 feet bgs at this location. Very dense to dense sands were encountered at varying depths in each boring and soft to firm clay was encountered below 17 feet bgs in both borings. 4.3 SLLOW SPREAD FOUNDATIONS If minor appurtenant structures are required along the proposed pipeline length, we recommend that these be supported on shallow spread foundations. Shallow foundations up to 1 feet maximum depth may be constructed in densified native sands or compacted granular backfill after complete removal and replacement of all organic or locally soft subsoils. Where footings are to be constructed in natural granular soils, compaction operations should be carried out at the proposed foundation subgrade elevation. Granular subsoils within the upper 12 inches of the foundation subgrade should be compacted to at least 9 percent of the AASHTO T-18 (ASTM D- 17) maximum dry density. All below grade structures should be designed to resist uplift caused by buoyancy. We recommend a design water table at the ground surface be assumed for all uplift calculations. Uplift forces can be resisted by either adding dead weight to the structure or mobilizing the weight of the surrounding soil by extending the footing width further beyond the structure. 14

20 Madrid Engineering Group, Inc Project Project No. December 29. BASIS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS The recommendations provided are based in part on project information provided to us and only apply to the specific project and site discussed in this report. If the project information section in this report contains incorrect information, or if additional information is available, can be retained to review the corrected or additional information. We can modify our recommendations, if appropriate based on new information provided. The recommendations and findings herein are based on the exploratory borings drilled at the site and our professional judgment. The soil conditions indicated within this report are accurate with respect to the location and extent that the soil borings were completed. Because soils vary from place to place, and with depth, subsurface conditions different from those encountered in our exploration may exist. Variability is even more likely at this site because of its previous mining and reclamation land use. This investigation was completed in accordance with generally accepted standards of practice. No warranty regarding this investigation is intended, nor should any be inferred. We recommend that this complete report be provided to the various design team members (e.g., structural engineer), and the appropriate contractors. Potential contractors should be informed of this report in the Instructions to Bidders section of the bid documents. 1

21 B St Dort St S Gibbs St Waller St S Hunter St Oakbrook Ln Aston Ave Walter Dr Westside Dr Sugar Creek Dr Old Sydney Rd N Mobley St Oak Pointe Pl Joe Sanchez Rd Beauchamp Rd Plant City, Florida Cross Trl Fletcher Ln Boot Bay Rd! Enterprise St 4 4 Whitehurst Rd Gloria Ave Chipman St Bonnie Rd tu 92 Bennett Rd W Risk St W Risk St Plant St F St A St Victoria St W Garden St W Morse St W Cherry St 2, 4Feet W Calhoun St Whitehall St W Tever St Sylvan Ln Lantana Pl Hunts Ave Country Hills Blvd Ethan Way Liles Ln Pevetty Dr W Reynolds St Airport Rd UV 74 W Granfield Ave HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY N Ritter St Moody Ave Waver St W Oak Ave W Lowry Ave UV 66 UV 66 Midstate Dr Ruth St Elnor St Wood Ct Palmetto Ave W Ball St Bowman Ave W Washington St Nosleda St Stearns St W Ball St S Empire St Carey St W Grant St W Mahoney St NW Drane St S Tyler St Fern St Lykes Rd Plantation Cir Mendonsa Rd Walden Oaks Pl Reece Rd Business Ln Alumax Cir Central Dr Commerce St Sydney Rd Clubhouse Dr Walden Lake N Golfview Dr Country Club Ct S Golfview Dr Juniper Dr W Maki Rd Raider Pl Legend Pipe Alignment Foxglen Dr Barret Ave Pine Club Dr Hammock Dr Bridle Dr Paddock Dr Damascus Rd Horseshoe Dr Jesscott Dr Sources: GIS Information (SWFWMD) Notes: MADRID ENGINEERING GROUP, INC. GEOENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS 23 State Road 6 East Bartow, Florida Fax: EB-69 Drawn By: PCF Checked By: MWC Jones Edmunds & Associates, Inc. FIGURE 1 Location Map Plant City, Florida Date December 29 MEG Project Number

22 , 4Feet HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY Sources: GIS Information (SWFWMD/ESRI), Soil Type Information (NRCS) Legend Pipe Alignment Pipe Alignment SCS/USGS Soil Types 2, LAKE FINE SAND, TO PERCENT 33SLOPES 27, MALABAR FINE SAND 29, MYAKKA FINE SAND 3, ARCHBOLD FINE SAND 32, MYAKKA-URBAN LAND COMPLEX 33, ONA FINE SAND 3, ORLANDO FINE SAND, TO 47 PERCENT SLOPES 4, ARENTS, NEARLY LEVEL 41, POMELLO FINE SAND, TO PERCENT SLOPES 33 46, ST. JOHNS FINE SAND , SEFFNER FINE SAND, BASINGER, 29 HOLOPAW, AND SAMSULA SOILS, DEPRESSIONAL 2, SMYRNA FINE SAND 29 6, WINDER FINE SAND, FREQUENTLY FLOODED 61, ZOLFO FINE SAND 61 7, CANDLER FINE SAND, TO PERCENT SLOPES 99, WATER 61 Notes: MADRID ENGINEERING GROUP, INC. GEOENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS 23 State Road 6 East Bartow, Florida Fax: EB-69 Drawn By: PCF Checked By: MWC Jones Edmunds & Associates, Inc. FIGURE 2 Soils Map Plant City, Florida Date December 29 MEG Project Number

23

24

25 Loose, grayish brown (1YR-/2), sand. (SP) Loose, black (1YR-2/1), slightly clayey sand (SP-SC) with orgaincs Grades very dark gray (1YR-3/1), with traces of silt. Organic content = 4.7% Medium dense, dark grayish brown (1YR-4/2), sand. (SP) Grades to dark brown (1YR-3/3) Medium dense, pale brown (1YR-6/3), slightly silty sand. (SP-SM) Grades to slightly silty sand with cementation MEG WITH BLOW COUNTS SPT-LOGS.GPJ SAMPLE.GDT 12/31/9 NUMBER 2 SPT-1 /7/29 REMARKS: No loss of drilling fluid circulation occurred in this boring. Surficial water table encountered at feet bgs.

26 Medium dense, very dark gray (1YR-3/1), sand. (SP) Loose, black (1YR-2/1), slightly silty sand (SP-SM) with organics Grades very loose, very dark gray (1YR-3/1). Organic content = 2.3% Loose, brown (1YR-/3), sand. (SP) Grades to medium dense, dark gray (1YR-4/1) Dense, pale brown (1YR-6/3), slightly silty sand. (SP-SM) Grades to pale brown (1YR-6/3), with cementation MEG WITH BLOW COUNTS SPT-LOGS.GPJ SAMPLE.GDT 12/31/9 NUMBER 2 SPT-2 /7/29 REMARKS: No loss of drilling fluid circulation occurred in this boring. Surficial water table encountered at feet bgs.

27 Loose, very dark gray (1YR-3/1), sand. (SP) Grades to dark brown (1YR-3/3) Grades to brown (1YR-/3) Grades to pale brown (1YR-6/3) Grades to light brownish gray (1YR-6/2) Medium dense, light gray (1YR-7/2), clayey sand with traces of silt. (SC) Grades to white (GLEY1-8/N) MEG WITH BLOW COUNTS SPT-LOGS.GPJ SAMPLE.GDT 12/31/9 NUMBER 2 SPT-3 /7/29 REMARKS: No loss of drilling fluid circulation occurred in this boring. Surficial water table was encountered between 1 and 18 feet bgs.

28 Loose, brown (1YR-4/3), sand. (SP) Grades to brown (1YR-/3) Grades to light brownish gray (1YR-6/2) Grades to very loose Medium dense, light gray (1YR-7/2), clayey sand. (SC) Grades to light bluish gray (GLEY1-8/B), with traces of silt MEG WITH BLOW COUNTS SPT-LOGS.GPJ SAMPLE.GDT 12/31/9 NUMBER 2 SPT-4 /7/29 REMARKS: No loss of drilling fluid circulation occurred in this boring. Surficial water table was encountered at approximately 12 feet bgs.

29 Very loose, dark gray (1YR-4/1), sand. (SP) Grades to loose, sand with cemented sand Grades to dark grayish brown (1YR-4/2) Medium dense, very dark grayish brown (1YR-3/2), slightly silty sand. (SP-SM) Very dense, very dark grayish brown (1YR-3/2), organic silt. (OL) Organic content = 6.1% /3" R 1 12 Very dense, slightly silty sand (SP-SM) with organics. 32-/2" R 1 17 Dense, pale brown (1YR-7/3), clayey sand with cemented sand. (SC) MEG WITH BLOW COUNTS SPT-LOGS.GPJ SAMPLE.GDT 12/31/9 NUMBER 2 SPT- /1/29 REMARKS: No loss of drilling fluid circulation occurred in this boring. Surficial water table encountered at feet bgs.

30 Loose, dark gray (1YR-4/1), sand. (SP) Grades to grayish brown (1YR-/2) Loose, very dark grayish brown (1YR-3/2), slightly silty sand with trace organics. (SP-SM) Organic content = 1.6% Grades to very loose, slightly silty sand with organics Grades to loose very dark grayish brown (1YR-3/2), with organic constituent Very dense, very dark grayish brown (1YR-3/2), slightly silty sand. (SP-SM) /6" R 1 17 Very dense, pale brown (1YR-6/3), slightly clayey sand. (SP-SC) 32-/" R MEG WITH BLOW COUNTS SPT-LOGS.GPJ SAMPLE.GDT 12/31/9 NUMBER 2 SPT-6 /1/29 REMARKS: No loss of circulation occurred in this boring. A surficial water table was encountered at 8 ft. bgs.

31 Loose, dark gray (1YR-4/1), sand. (SP) Grades to medium dense, light brownish gray (1YR-6/2) Grades to loose, brown (1YR-4/3) Medium dense, light brownish gray (1YR-6/2), slightly silty sand. (SP-SM) Grades to very loose, very dark grayish brown (1YR-3/2) Grades to very dense, dark yellowish brown (1YR-3/4) Medium dense, pale brown (1YR-6/3), slightly clayey sand with cemented sand. (SP-SC) MEG WITH BLOW COUNTS SPT-LOGS.GPJ SAMPLE.GDT 12/31/9 NUMBER 2 SPT-7 /12/29 REMARKS: No loss of circulation occurred in this boring. A surficial water table was encountered at 9 ft. bgs.

32 Loose, gray (1YR-/1), sand. (SP) Grades to medium dense Grades to loose, brown (1YR-/3) Loose, very dark grayish brown (1YR-3/2), slightly silty sand. (SP-SM) Organic content =.6% Grades very loose Dense, dark yellowish brown (1YR-3/4), sand with cemented sand. (SP) Grades to medium dense, light yellowish brown (1YR-6/4), sand with cemented sand MEG WITH BLOW COUNTS SPT-LOGS.GPJ SAMPLE.GDT 12/31/9 NUMBER 2 SPT-8 /12/29 REMARKS: No loss of circulation occurred in this boring. A surficial water table was encountered at 9 ft. bgs.

33 Loose, very dark gray (1YR-3/1), sand with traces of organics. (SP) Grades to very loose, brown (1YR-4/3) Grades to loose, yellowish brown (1YR-/4) Grades to very pale brown (1YR-7/3) Medium dense, light gray (1YR-7/2), slightly clayey sand with traces of silt. (SP-SC) Grades to very loose, light gray (1YR-7/1) MEG WITH BLOW COUNTS SPT-LOGS.GPJ SAMPLE.GDT 12/31/9 NUMBER 2 SPT-9 /7/29 REMARKS: No loss of drilling fluid circulation occurred in this boring. Surficial water table was encountered at approximately 12 feet bgs.

34 Loose, brown (1YR-/3), sand. (SP) Grades to very loose Grades to loose, brownish yellow (1YR-6/6) Grades to very pale brown (1YR-7/3) Grades to medium dense, light gray (1YR-7/2) Medium dense, gray (1YR-6/1), clayey sand. (SC) Grades to loose, light gray (1YR-7/2), clayey sand with abundant cemented sand fragments MEG WITH BLOW COUNTS SPT-LOGS.GPJ SAMPLE.GDT 12/31/9 NUMBER 2 SPT-1 /7/29 REMARKS: No loss of drilling fluid circulation occurred in this boring. Surficial water table was encountered at approximately 12 feet bgs.

35 Loose, light brownish gray (1YR-6/2), sand. (SP) Grades to very loose Grades to dark grayish brown (1YR-4/2) Medium dense, very dark grayish brown (1YR-3/2), organic silt. (OL) Organic content = 2.9% Dense, dark yellowish brown (1YR-4/4), sand. (SP) Firm, white (GLEY1-8/N), slightly calcareous clay. (CL) MEG WITH BLOW COUNTS SPT-LOGS.GPJ SAMPLE.GDT 12/31/9 NUMBER 2 SPT-11 /12/29 REMARKS: No loss of circulation occurred in this boring. A surficial water table was encountered at 6 ft. bgs.

36 Loose, very dark gray (1YR-3/1), sand. (SP) Loose, very dark gray (1YR-3/1), organic silt (OL) Organic content =.% Grades to dense, dark yellowish brown (1YR-3/4) Very dense, dark yellowish brown (1YR-3/4), cemented sand. (SP) /6" R Grades to light yellowish brown (1YR-6/4) Grades to medium dense, very pale brown (1YR-8/3) Soft, white (GLEY1-8/N), sandy clay. (CL) MEG WITH BLOW COUNTS SPT-LOGS.GPJ SAMPLE.GDT 12/31/9 NUMBER 2 SPT-12 /12/29 REMARKS: No loss of circulation occurred in this boring. A surficial water table was encountered at 6 ft. bgs.

37 Gray slightly clayey sand with gravel. (SC) Grades to mottled light greenish gray. 2 Dark grayish brown sand. (SP) MEG WITH BLOW COUNTS LOGS.GPJ SAMPLE.GDT 12/31/9 NUMBER -1 /19/29 REMARKS: Surficial water table, exhibited by saturation of the soil, was estimated at 36" bgs.

38 Brown sand. (SP) Brown sand with abundant medium size gravel. (GP) Unable to continue due to abundant gravel material. MEG WITH BLOW COUNTS LOGS.GPJ SAMPLE.GDT 12/31/9 NUMBER -2 /6/29 REMARKS: A water table was not discrnable in the samples obtained within the surficial 7 ft. of the boring.

Civil Engineering, Surveying and Environmental Consulting WASP0059.ltr.JLS.Mich Ave Bridge Geotech.docx

Civil Engineering, Surveying and Environmental Consulting WASP0059.ltr.JLS.Mich Ave Bridge Geotech.docx 2365 Haggerty Road South * Canton, Michigan 48188 P: 734-397-3100 * F: 734-397-3131 * www.manniksmithgroup.com August 29, 2012 Mr. Richard Kent Washtenaw County Parks and Recreation Commission 2330 Platt

More information

CITY OF CAPE CORAL NORTH 2 UTILITIES EXTENSION PROJECT CONTRACT 3

CITY OF CAPE CORAL NORTH 2 UTILITIES EXTENSION PROJECT CONTRACT 3 GEOTECHNICAL REPORT CITY OF CAPE CORAL NORTH UTILITIES EXTENSION PROJECT CONTRACT City of Cape Coral Procurement Division Cultural Park Boulevard, nd Floor Cape Coral, FL ISSUED FOR BID VOLUME of GEOTECHNICAL

More information

INVITATION TO BID CITY OF CAPE CORAL SW 6&7 UTILITIES EXTENSION PROJECT CONTRACT VII CENTRAL AREA 6 AND CENTRAL AREA 8 ITB UT13-02/TM-G

INVITATION TO BID CITY OF CAPE CORAL SW 6&7 UTILITIES EXTENSION PROJECT CONTRACT VII CENTRAL AREA 6 AND CENTRAL AREA 8 ITB UT13-02/TM-G GEOTECHNICAL REPORT INVITATION TO BID CITY OF CAPE CORAL SW 6&7 UTILITIES EXTENSION PROJECT CONTRACT VII CENTRAL AREA 6 AND CENTRAL AREA 8 ITB UT13-02/TM-G City of Cape Coral Procurement Division 1015

More information

Report of Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation for Ponds

Report of Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation for Ponds Florida Department of TRANSPORTATION Report of Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation for Ponds Malabar Road (SR 514) PD&E Study From East of Babcock Street (SR 507) to US 1 Brevard County, Florida FPID:

More information

TIERRA. Florida License No Florida License No

TIERRA. Florida License No Florida License No March 9, 208 TIERRA AECOM 7650 West Courtney Campbell Cswy Tampa, FL 33607 Attn: RE: Mr. Edgar Figueroa, P.E. Geotechnical Engineering Services Report Purchase Order No.: 9532 AECOM Project Number: 6055499

More information

Ardaman & Associates, Inc. Geotechnical, Environmental and Materials Consultants

Ardaman & Associates, Inc. Geotechnical, Environmental and Materials Consultants SUBSURFACE SOIL EXPLORATION 42-INCH FORCE MAIN REPLACEMENT CHIQUITA BOULEVARD S AND SW 34 TH STREET CAPE CORAL, LEE COUNTY, FLORIDA Ardaman & Associates, Inc. Geotechnical, Environmental and Materials

More information

ATTACHMENT A PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL SUMMARY

ATTACHMENT A PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL SUMMARY ATTACHMENT A PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL SUMMARY Kevin M. Martin, P.E. KMM Geotechnical Consultants, LLC 7 Marshall Road Hampstead, NH 0384 603-489-6 (p)/ 603-489-8 (f)/78-78-4084(m) kevinmartinpe@aol.com

More information

APPENDIX C HYDROGEOLOGIC INVESTIGATION

APPENDIX C HYDROGEOLOGIC INVESTIGATION Figure B-5.7 Figure B-5.8 Preliminary Geotechnical and Environmental Report Appendix C Hydrogeologic Investigation APPENDIX C HYDROGEOLOGIC INVESTIGATION December 21, 2011 WESTSIDE SUBWAY EXTENSION PROJECT

More information

B-1 BORE LOCATION PLAN. EXHIBIT Drawn By: 115G BROOKS VETERINARY CLINIC CITY BASE LANDING AND GOLIAD ROAD SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS.

B-1 BORE LOCATION PLAN. EXHIBIT Drawn By: 115G BROOKS VETERINARY CLINIC CITY BASE LANDING AND GOLIAD ROAD SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS. N B-1 SYMBOLS: Exploratory Boring Location Project Mngr: BORE LOCATION PLAN Project No. GK EXHIBIT Drawn By: 115G1063.02 GK Scale: Checked By: 1045 Central Parkway North, Suite 103 San Antonio, Texas 78232

More information

Ardaman & Associates, Inc. Geotechnical, Environmental and Materials Consultants

Ardaman & Associates, Inc. Geotechnical, Environmental and Materials Consultants SUBSURFACE SOIL EXPLORATION DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS TO THE HENDRY COUNTY, FLORIDA Ardaman & Associates, Inc. Geotechnical, Environmental and Materials Consultants OFFICES Orlando, 88 S. Orange Avenue, Orlando,

More information

Geotechnical Engineering Study, Conifer Senior High School Football Field Improvements, Conifer, Colorado

Geotechnical Engineering Study, Conifer Senior High School Football Field Improvements, Conifer, Colorado 2390 South Lipan Street Denver, CO 80223 phone: (303) 742-9700 fax: (303) 742-9666 email: kadenver@kumarusa.com www.kumarusa.com Office Locations: Denver (HQ), Colorado Springs, Fort Collins, and Frisco,

More information

DATA REPORT GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION GALVESTON CRUISE TERMINAL 2 GALVESTON, TEXAS

DATA REPORT GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION GALVESTON CRUISE TERMINAL 2 GALVESTON, TEXAS DATA REPORT GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION GALVESTON CRUISE TERMINAL 2 GALVESTON, TEXAS SUBMITTED TO PORT OF GALVESTON 123 ROSENBERG AVENUE, 8TH FLOOR GALVESTON, TEXAS 77553 BY HVJ ASSOCIATES, INC. HOUSTON,

More information

June 9, R. D. Cook, P.Eng. Soils Engineer Special Services Western Region PUBLIC WORKS CANADA WESTERN REGION REPORT ON

June 9, R. D. Cook, P.Eng. Soils Engineer Special Services Western Region PUBLIC WORKS CANADA WESTERN REGION REPORT ON PUBLIC WORKS CANADA WESTERN REGION REPORT ON GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION PROPOSED MARTIN RIVER BRIDGE MILE 306.7 MACKENZIE HIGHWAY Submitted by : R. D. Cook, P.Eng. Soils Engineer Special Services Western

More information

Limited Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation Classroom Additions Albany County Campus Laramie, Wyoming

Limited Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation Classroom Additions Albany County Campus Laramie, Wyoming Limited Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation Classroom Additions Albany County Campus 2300 Missile Drive, Cheyenne, Wyoming 82001 Phone 307-635-0222 www.stratageotech.com Limited Geotechnical Engineering

More information

APPENDIX E SOILS TEST REPORTS

APPENDIX E SOILS TEST REPORTS Otsego County, NY Site Work Specifications APPENDIX E SOILS TEST REPORTS Blue Wing Services, Inc. July 1, 2010 Blue Wing Services May 20, 2010 Page 2 the site, was not made available to Empire at this

More information

Soil Map Polk County, Florida

Soil Map Polk County, Florida Soil Map Polk County, Florida 28 9' 21'' 28 8' 23'' 3113000 3113200 3113400 3113600 3113800 3114000 3114200 3114400 3114600 81 51' 19'' 81 51' 19'' 416000 416000 ± 416200 416200 68 416400 68 416400 7 13

More information

Project: ITHACA-TOMPKINS REGIONAL AIRPORT EXPANSION Project Location: ITHACA, NY Project Number: 218-34 Key to Soil Symbols and Terms TERMS DESCRIBING CONSISTENCY OR CONDITION COARSE-GRAINED SOILS (major

More information

M E M O R A N D U M. Mr. Jonathan K. Thrasher, P.E., Mr. Ian Kinnear, P.E. (FL) PSI

M E M O R A N D U M. Mr. Jonathan K. Thrasher, P.E., Mr. Ian Kinnear, P.E. (FL) PSI M E M O R A N D U M TO: FROM: Mr. Mark Schilling Gulf Interstate Engineering Mr. Jonathan K. Thrasher, P.E., Mr. Ian Kinnear, P.E. (FL) PSI DATE: November 11, 2014 RE: Summary of Findings Geotechnical

More information

Ardaman & Associates, Inc. Geotechnical, Environmental and Materials Consultants

Ardaman & Associates, Inc. Geotechnical, Environmental and Materials Consultants SUBSURFACE SOIL EXPLORATION ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATIONS LELY AREA STORMWATER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (LASIP) COUNTY BARN ROAD AND WING SOUTH CHANNELS NAPLES, COLLIER CO., FLORIDA Ardaman & Associates, Inc.

More information

IN SITU SPECIFIC GRAVITY VS GRAIN SIZE: A BETTER METHOD TO ESTIMATE NEW WORK DREDGING PRODUCTION

IN SITU SPECIFIC GRAVITY VS GRAIN SIZE: A BETTER METHOD TO ESTIMATE NEW WORK DREDGING PRODUCTION IN SITU SPECIFIC GRAVITY VS GRAIN SIZE: A BETTER METHOD TO ESTIMATE NEW WORK DREDGING PRODUCTION Nancy Case O Bourke, PE 1, Gregory L. Hartman, PE 2 and Paul Fuglevand, PE 3 ABSTRACT In-situ specific gravity

More information

Pierce County Department of Planning and Land Services Development Engineering Section

Pierce County Department of Planning and Land Services Development Engineering Section Page 1 of 7 Pierce County Department of Planning and Land Services Development Engineering Section PROJECT NAME: DATE: APPLICATION NO.: PCDE NO.: LANDSLIDE HAZARD AREA (LHA) GEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

More information

Report of Preliminary Geotechnical Exploration. CSO-012 Sewer Separation Cincinnati, Hamilton County, Ohio. February, 2011

Report of Preliminary Geotechnical Exploration. CSO-012 Sewer Separation Cincinnati, Hamilton County, Ohio. February, 2011 11242843_GeoTech_Preliminary - Feburary 2011_1/40 Report of Preliminary Geotechnical Exploration CSO-012 Sewer Separation Cincinnati, Hamilton County, Ohio February, 2011 11242843_GeoTech_Preliminary -

More information

Photo 1 - Southerly view across 2700 parking lot toward existing building. Multi-residential building borders western side of property in upper right of view. Photo 2 - Southerly view across 2750 parking

More information

ADDENDUM 1 FISHER SLOUGH RESTORATION PROJECT SKAGIT COUNTY, WASHINGTON

ADDENDUM 1 FISHER SLOUGH RESTORATION PROJECT SKAGIT COUNTY, WASHINGTON F I N A L A D D E N D U M 1 R E P O R T ADDENDUM 1 FISHER SLOUGH RESTORATION PROJECT SKAGIT COUNTY, WASHINGTON REPORT OF GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION URS JOB NO. 3376186 Prepared for Tetra Tech Inc. 142

More information

NAPLES MUNICIPAL AIRPORT

NAPLES MUNICIPAL AIRPORT NAPLES MUNICIPAL AIRPORT NAPLES MUNICIPAL AIRPORT (APF) TAXIWAY D REALIGNMENT AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS NORTH QUADRANT ADDENDUM NUMBER TWO March, The following Addendum is hereby made a part of the Plans

More information

Geotechnical Engineering Report

Geotechnical Engineering Report Geotechnical Engineering Report Turner Turnpike Widening Bridge B Bridge Crossing: South 257 th West Avenue Creek County, Oklahoma June 1, 2016 Terracon Project No. 04155197 Prepared for: Garver, LLC Tulsa,

More information

SOIL CLASSIFICATION CHART COARSE-GRAINED SOILS MORE THAN 50% RETAINED ON NO.200 SIEVE FINE-GRAINED SOILS 50% OR MORE PASSES THE NO.200 SIEVE PRIMARY DIVISIONS GRAVELS MORE THAN 50% OF COARSE FRACTION RETAINED

More information

Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation Gooseberry Point Pedestrian Improvements Whatcom County, Washington SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION

Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation Gooseberry Point Pedestrian Improvements Whatcom County, Washington SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION File No. 12-100 Geotechnical & Earthquake Engineering Consultants Mr. Kevin Brown, P.E. Gray & Osborne, Inc. 3710 168 th Street NE, Suite B210 Arlington, Washington 98223 Subject: Draft Report Preliminary

More information

GEOTECHNICAL REPORT. Matanuska-Susitna Borough. Parks Highway Connections Museum Drive. Matanuska-Susitna Borough, Alaska.

GEOTECHNICAL REPORT. Matanuska-Susitna Borough. Parks Highway Connections Museum Drive. Matanuska-Susitna Borough, Alaska. Matanuska-Susitna Borough GEOTECHNICAL REPORT Parks Highway Connections Museum Drive Matanuska-Susitna Borough, Alaska March 2, 20 Prepared By: John Thornley, PE Geotechnical Engineer 333 Arctic Blvd.,

More information

Depth (ft) USCS Soil Description TOPSOIL & FOREST DUFF

Depth (ft) USCS Soil Description TOPSOIL & FOREST DUFF Test Pit No. TP-6 Location: Latitude 47.543003, Longitude -121.980441 Approximate Ground Surface Elevation: 1,132 feet Depth (ft) USCS Soil Description 0 1.5 1.5 5.0 SM 5.0 8.0 SM Loose to medium dense,

More information

PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT. Proposed Re-Development 44 Old Worcester Road Charlton, Massachusetts. Prepared For:

PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT. Proposed Re-Development 44 Old Worcester Road Charlton, Massachusetts. Prepared For: PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT Proposed Re-Development 44 Old Worcester Road Charlton, Massachusetts Prepared For: Meridian Associates, Inc. 500 Cummings Center, Suite 5950 Beverly, Massachusetts

More information

REPORT OF PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL SITE INVESTIGATION KERSHAW COUNTY EXIT 87 OFFICE PARK. ELGIN, SOUTH CAROLINA S&ME Project No.

REPORT OF PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL SITE INVESTIGATION KERSHAW COUNTY EXIT 87 OFFICE PARK. ELGIN, SOUTH CAROLINA S&ME Project No. REPORT OF PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL SITE INVESTIGATION KERSHAW COUNTY EXIT 87 OFFICE PARK ELGIN, SOUTH CAROLINA S&ME Project No. 1611-04-450 Prepared For: KERSHAW COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OFFICE Post

More information

Northern Colorado Geotech

Northern Colorado Geotech PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT PROPOSED CECIL FARMS DEVELOPMENT WELD COUNTY ROAD 7, BETWEEN ROADS 7 AND 7 SEVERANCE, COLORADO NORTHERN COLORADO GEOTECH PROJECT NO. 0-6 APRIL 0, 06 Prepared

More information

Geotechnical Engineering Report

Geotechnical Engineering Report Geotechnical Engineering Report Turner Turnpike Widening Polecat Creek Bridge (Bridge A) June 1, 2016 Terracon Project No. 04155197 Prepared for: Garver, LLC Prepared by: Terracon Consultants, Inc. TABLE

More information

Geotechnical Data Report

Geotechnical Data Report Geotechnical Data Report Downtown Greenville Future Conveyance Study December 1, 2015 Terracon Project No. 86155032 Prepared for: Prepared by: Terracon Consultants, Inc. December 1, 2015 561 Mauldin Road

More information

B-1 SURFACE ELEVATION

B-1 SURFACE ELEVATION 5A 5B LOGGED BY El. S. Bhangoo DRILLING CONTRACTOR Pitcher Drilling DRILLING METHOD Rotary Wash BEGIN DATE 12-14-12 SAMPLER TYPE(S) AND SIZE(S) (ID) SPT, MC BOREHOLE BACKFILL AND COMPLETION COMPLETION

More information

Geotechnical Engineering Report

Geotechnical Engineering Report Geotechnical Engineering Report Turner Turnpike Widening Bridge D Bridge Crossing: South 209 th West Avenue Creek County, Oklahoma June 1, 2016 Terracon Project No. 04155197 Prepared for: Garver, LLC Tulsa,

More information

3.0 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS

3.0 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS AECOM 500 W Jefferson St. Suite 1600 Louisville, KY 40202 www.aecom.com 502-569-2301 tel 502-569-2304 fax October 17, 2018 Big Rivers Electric Corporation Sebree Generating Station 9000 Highway 2096 Robards,

More information

Chapter 12 Subsurface Exploration

Chapter 12 Subsurface Exploration Page 12 1 Chapter 12 Subsurface Exploration 1. The process of identifying the layers of deposits that underlie a proposed structure and their physical characteristics is generally referred to as (a) subsurface

More information

Log of Monitoring Well D58B

Log of Monitoring Well D58B Project: Motiva - Monitoring Well and Soil Boring Data Project Location: Delaware City Refinery Project Number: 20240412.W1000 Log of Monitoring Well D58B Sheet 1 of 7 Date(s) Drilled Drilling Method Drill

More information

ENCE 3610 Soil Mechanics. Site Exploration and Characterisation Field Exploration Methods

ENCE 3610 Soil Mechanics. Site Exploration and Characterisation Field Exploration Methods ENCE 3610 Soil Mechanics Site Exploration and Characterisation Field Exploration Methods Geotechnical Involvement in Project Phases Planning Design Alternatives Preparation of Detailed Plans Final Design

More information

IMAGING OF DEEP SINKHOLES USING THE MULTI-ELECTRODE RESISTIVITY IMPLANT TECHNIQUE (MERIT) CASE STUDIES IN FLORIDA

IMAGING OF DEEP SINKHOLES USING THE MULTI-ELECTRODE RESISTIVITY IMPLANT TECHNIQUE (MERIT) CASE STUDIES IN FLORIDA IMAGING OF DEEP SINKHOLES USING THE MULTI-ELECTRODE RESISTIVITY IMPLANT TECHNIQUE (MERIT) CASE STUDIES IN FLORIDA David Harro The G3 Group, 2509 Success Drive, Suite 1, Odessa, FL 33556, david.harro@geo3group.com

More information

Field Exploration. March 31, J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc. 115 Northstar Avenue Twin Falls, Idaho Attn: Mr. Tracy Ahrens, P. E. E:

Field Exploration. March 31, J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc. 115 Northstar Avenue Twin Falls, Idaho Attn: Mr. Tracy Ahrens, P. E. E: March 31, 201 11 Northstar Avenue 83301 Attn: Mr. Tracy Ahrens, P. E. E: taa@jub.com Re: Geotechnical Data Report Preliminary Phase 1 Field Exploration Revision No. 1 Proposed Rapid Infiltration Basin

More information

R-1 Conveyor Relocation Project Legend 0 500 1000 1500 ft. This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for general reference only. Data layers that appear on this map

More information

General. DATE December 10, 2013 PROJECT No TO Mary Jarvis Urbandale/Riverside South Development Corporation

General. DATE December 10, 2013 PROJECT No TO Mary Jarvis Urbandale/Riverside South Development Corporation DATE December 10, 201 PROJECT No. 10-1121-0260- TO Mary Jarvis Urbandale/Riverside South Development Corporation CC Justin Robitaille, Urbandale Jonathan Párraga, J.L. Richards & Associates Limited FROM

More information

Clay Robinson, PhD, CPSS, PG copyright 2009

Clay Robinson, PhD, CPSS, PG   copyright 2009 Engineering: What's soil got to do with it? Clay Robinson, PhD, CPSS, PG crobinson@wtamu.edu, http://www.wtamu.edu/~crobinson, copyright 2009 Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary soil, noun 1 : firm land

More information

Geotechnical Engineering Report

Geotechnical Engineering Report Geotechnical Engineering Report Richland Creek Trunk Sewer Greenville, South Carolina March 31, 2014 Terracon Project No. 86145008 Prepared for: Renewable Water Resources Greenville, South Carolina Prepared

More information

PREPARED FOR MR. JOE WOOD CARTER & SLOOPE, INC PEAKE ROAD MACON, GEORGIA PREPARED BY

PREPARED FOR MR. JOE WOOD CARTER & SLOOPE, INC PEAKE ROAD MACON, GEORGIA PREPARED BY SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION AND GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING EVALUATION MACON WATER AUTHORITY (MWA) SANITARY SEWER RELOCATION MACON, GEORGIA GEC PROJECT NO. 14077.2 PREPARED FOR MR. JOE WOOD CARTER & SLOOPE, INC.

More information

Eastgate Parking Lot Geotechnical Investigation

Eastgate Parking Lot Geotechnical Investigation Eastgate Parking Lot Geotechnical Investigation Cambium Reference No.: 336- March 4, 24 Prepared for: City of Peterborough Cambium Inc. P.O. Box 325 52 Hunter Street East, Peterborough Ontario, K9H G5

More information

REPORT OF PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION

REPORT OF PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION REPORT OF PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION ENKA INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL Sand Hill Road Candler, North Carolina Prepared For: BUNCOMBE COUNTY SCHOOLS Prepared By: AMEC ENVIRONMENT & INFRASTRUCTURE, INC.

More information

Cabarrus County, NC Construction and Demolition Debris Landfill Phase 1L Expansion Project Bidder's List CDM Project No.

Cabarrus County, NC Construction and Demolition Debris Landfill Phase 1L Expansion Project Bidder's List CDM Project No. Attachment No. 1 Cabarrus County, NC Construction and Demolition Debris Landfill Phase 1L Expansion Project Bidder's List CDM Project No. 1200 Contractor Contact Name Contractor Type? Cabarrus County Solid

More information

AN EMPLOYEE OWNED COMPANY

AN EMPLOYEE OWNED COMPANY CTL Engineering, Inc. 2860 Fisher Road, P.O. Box 4448, Columbus, Ohio 43204338 Phone: 614/2768123 Fax: 614/2766377 Email: ctl@ctleng.com AN EMPLOYEE OWNED COMPANY Consulting Engineers Testing Inspection

More information

10. GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION PROGRAM

10. GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION PROGRAM Geotechnical site investigations should be conducted in multiple phases to obtain data for use during the planning and design of the tunnel system. Geotechnical investigations typically are performed in

More information

SOIL INVESTIGATION REPORT. PROPOSED HOUSING DEVELOPMENT PROJECT Coral Spring, Trelawny, Jamaica.

SOIL INVESTIGATION REPORT. PROPOSED HOUSING DEVELOPMENT PROJECT Coral Spring, Trelawny, Jamaica. SOIL INVESTIGATION REPORT PROPOSED HOUSING DEVELOPMENT PROJECT Coral Spring, Trelawny, Jamaica. Prepared for: FCS Consultants 7a Barbados Avenue Kingston 5, Jamaica Prepared by: NHL Engineering Limited

More information

APPENDIX A GEOTECHNICAL REPORT

APPENDIX A GEOTECHNICAL REPORT The City of Winnipeg Bid Opportunity No. 529-2017 Template Version: C420170317 - RW APPENDIX A GEOTECHNICAL REPORT Quality Engineering Valued Relationships KGS Group 2017 Industrial Street Rehabilitation

More information

APPENDIX A. Borehole Logs Explanation of Terms and Symbols

APPENDIX A. Borehole Logs Explanation of Terms and Symbols APPENDIX A Borehole Logs Explanation of Terms and Symbols Page 153 of 168 EXPLANATION OF TERMS AND SYMBOLS The terms and symbols used on the borehole logs to summarize the results of field investigation

More information

Town of Amenia Dutchess County New York

Town of Amenia Dutchess County New York Appendix 9.14.2 Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation 2/2007 Preliminary Geotechnical Interpretive Report for Silo Ridge Golf Resort Community Town of Amenia Dutchess County New York February 16, 2007

More information

Hydro One (Sept 2014) Hydro One (Sept 2014) Hydro One (Sept 2014)

Hydro One (Sept 2014) Hydro One (Sept 2014) Hydro One (Sept 2014) TABLE 1 WELL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS MOE WWR No Well ID Location Installation Date Status Easting Coordinates Northing Source Elevation Screened Interval Screened Material Borehole Well Stick-up Ground Top

More information

Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Cadiz / Trigg County I-24 Business Park. Cadiz, Kentucky

Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Cadiz / Trigg County I-24 Business Park. Cadiz, Kentucky Environmental & Geoscience, LLC 834 Madisonville Road Hopkinsville, KY 440 70.44.000 FAX 70.44.8300 www.wedrill.com A member of Trinity Energy & Infrastructure Group, LLC Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation

More information

February 22, 2016 AG File No

February 22, 2016 AG File No Ainley Graham & Associates Limited 1-50 Grant Timmins Drive, Kingston, Ontario, K7M 8N2 Tel: (343) 266-0002 Fax: (343) 266-0028 E-mail Kingston@ainleygroup.com February 22, 2016 AG File No. 15062-1 Ministry

More information

Date: April 2, 2014 Project No.: Prepared For: Mr. Adam Kates CLASSIC COMMUNITIES 1068 E. Meadow Circle Palo Alto, California 94303

Date: April 2, 2014 Project No.: Prepared For: Mr. Adam Kates CLASSIC COMMUNITIES 1068 E. Meadow Circle Palo Alto, California 94303 City of Newark - 36120 Ruschin Drive Project Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Appendix C: Geologic Information FirstCarbon Solutions H:\Client (PN-JN)\4554\45540001\ISMND\45540001 36120

More information

Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report

Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Park 3 Barrow County, Georgia July, Terracon Project No. 4906 Prepared For: Winder Barrow Industrial Authority Prepared By: Terracon Consultants, Inc. Atlanta,

More information

TP-1 N61E 0 DARK BROWN SANDY SILT (ML) stiff, wet with roots (Disturbed Surficial Soil) DEPTH (FEET) 5 REDDISH BROWN SANDSTONE intensely fractured, weak to friable, deeply weathered, tight (Franciscan

More information

PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT

PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT TOWN OF ASHLAND TOWN HALL 101 THOMPSON STREET ASHLAND, VIRGINIA JOB NUMBER: 39016 PREPARED FOR: PMA PLANNERS & ARCHITECTS 10325 WARWICK BOULEVARD NEWPORT NEWS,

More information

Geotechnical Investigation Juneau Seawalk - Taku Fisheries to Miner s Wharf Juneau, Alaska DM&A Job No

Geotechnical Investigation Juneau Seawalk - Taku Fisheries to Miner s Wharf Juneau, Alaska DM&A Job No Duane Miller & Associates 5821 Arctic Boulevard, Suite A Anchorage, AK 99518-1654 (907) 644-3200 Fax 644-0507 Arctic & Geotechnical Engineering May 4, 2006 Tetra Tech/KCM, Inc. 1971 First Avenue Seattle,

More information

Redwood City Harbor, California, Navigation Improvement Feasibility Study. Appendix D. Geotechnical Engineering. DRAFT April 2015

Redwood City Harbor, California, Navigation Improvement Feasibility Study. Appendix D. Geotechnical Engineering. DRAFT April 2015 1 Redwood City Harbor, California, Navigation Improvement Feasibility Study Appendix D Geotechnical Engineering DRAFT April 2015 2 Contents 1 Purposes of Report... 3 2 Background... 3 3 References and

More information

Gotechnical Investigations and Sampling

Gotechnical Investigations and Sampling Gotechnical Investigations and Sampling Amit Prashant Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar Short Course on Geotechnical Investigations for Structural Engineering 12 14 October, 2017 1 Purpose of

More information

Geotechnical Recommendations for Proposed Additions to the Three Mile Creek Severe Weather Attenuation Tank Project

Geotechnical Recommendations for Proposed Additions to the Three Mile Creek Severe Weather Attenuation Tank Project TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM Geotechnical Recommendations for Proposed Additions to the Three Mile Creek Severe Weather Attenuation Tank Project PREPARED FOR: PREPARED BY: DATE: June 28, 218 PROJECT NUMBER: 697482

More information

PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION Additional MeadWestvaco Ridgeville Property 331 acres Dorchester County, South Carolina S&ME Project No. 1131-09-259A Prepared For: BP Barber & Associates Post Office

More information

ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES

ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES July 16, 211 Vista Design, Inc. 11634 Worcester Highway Showell, Maryland 21862 Attention: Reference: Dear Mr. Polk: Mr. Richard F. Polk, P.E. Geotechnical Engineering Report Charles County RFP No. 11-9

More information

GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING II. Subject Code : 06CV64 Internal Assessment Marks : 25 PART A UNIT 1

GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING II. Subject Code : 06CV64 Internal Assessment Marks : 25 PART A UNIT 1 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING II Subject Code : 06CV64 Internal Assessment Marks : 25 PART A UNIT 1 1. SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION 1.1 Importance, Exploration Program 1.2 Methods of exploration, Boring, Sounding

More information

Appendix A. Producer Statement Advisory Note

Appendix A. Producer Statement Advisory Note Appendix A Producer Statement Advisory Note Ref. No. 17095 26 May 2017 PRODUCER STATEMENT CONSTRUCTION REVIEW (PS4) IMPORTANT ADVISORY NOTE The Building Consent Authority (BCA) frequently requires Producer

More information

An Introduction to Field Explorations for Foundations

An Introduction to Field Explorations for Foundations An Introduction to Field Explorations for Foundations J. Paul Guyer, P.E., R.A. Paul Guyer is a registered mechanical engineer, civil engineer, fire protection engineer and architect with over 35 years

More information

Appendix 11-B Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation

Appendix 11-B Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Appendix 11-B Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation 11.0 Soil, Geology, and Seismology PRELIMINARY SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION AND CONCEPTUAL FOUNDATION ENGINEERING REPORT CPV VALLEY ENERGY CENTER Wawayanda,

More information

Geotechnical Subsurface Exploration, Engineering Evaluation and Dam Visual Observation Sun Valley Drive Extension Roswell, Fulton County, GA

Geotechnical Subsurface Exploration, Engineering Evaluation and Dam Visual Observation Sun Valley Drive Extension Roswell, Fulton County, GA Ranger Consulting, Inc. Geotechnical, Environmental, Drilling, Construction 3147 Martha Berry Highway, Rome, Georgia 165; Phone: 76-29-1782; Fax: 76-29-171 April 2, 215 Mr. Tommy Crochet, PE McGee Partners,

More information

Slope Stability Evaluation Ground Anchor Construction Area White Point Landslide San Pedro District Los Angeles, California.

Slope Stability Evaluation Ground Anchor Construction Area White Point Landslide San Pedro District Los Angeles, California. Slope Stability Evaluation Ground Anchor Construction Area White Point Landslide San Pedro District Los Angeles, California Submitted To: Mr. Gene Edwards City of Los Angeles Department of Public Works

More information

FIFTH STREET GRADE SEPARATION CARSON CITY, NEVADA

FIFTH STREET GRADE SEPARATION CARSON CITY, NEVADA GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FIFTH STREET GRADE SEPARATION CARSON CITY, NEVADA JULY 2005 MATERIALS DIVISION STATE OF NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION MATERIALS DIVISION GEOTECHNICAL SECTION GEOTECHNICAL REPORT

More information

REPORT OF SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION

REPORT OF SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION REPORT OF SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION GRAND RIVER DAM AUTHORITY HULBERT 69 KV SWITCHING STATION S. 440 Road Hulbert, Cherokee County, Oklahoma ENERCON PROJECT NO. GRDA006 MARCH 7, 2012 PREPARED FOR: C/O ENERCON

More information

UNIT DESCRIPTIONS: Artificial Fill, Undocumented (Afu): Locally derived sandy silt and silty sand, locally with clay and varying amounts of gravel and man-made debris. Abundant concrete rubble, in places

More information

APPENDIX B GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION

APPENDIX B GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION APPENDIX B GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION INTENTIONALL LEFT BLANK GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION 2016 SEWER AND WATER GROUP 1 CIP, WATER PROJECT 1 15 TH STREET AND AVENIDA PRIMAVERA DEL MAR, CALIFORNIA PREPARED

More information

SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION AND SUBGRADE EVALUATION. Proposed North Main Street Reconstruction (Contract 14-02) From New York Avenue and Murdoch Avenue

SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION AND SUBGRADE EVALUATION. Proposed North Main Street Reconstruction (Contract 14-02) From New York Avenue and Murdoch Avenue SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION AND SUBGRADE EVALUATION Proposed North Main Street Reconstruction (Contract 14-02) From New York Avenue and Murdoch Avenue Prepared for City of Oshkosh Department of Public Works

More information

December 5, Junction Gateway, LLC 7551 W. Sunset Boulevard #203 Los Angeles, CA Mr. James Frost P: Dear Mr.

December 5, Junction Gateway, LLC 7551 W. Sunset Boulevard #203 Los Angeles, CA Mr. James Frost P: Dear Mr. December 5, 2014 Junction Gateway, LLC 7551 W. Sunset Boulevard #203 90046 Attn: Re: Mr. James Frost P: 323.883.1800 Geotechnical Update Letter Sunset & Effie Mixed Use Development 4301 to 4311 Sunset

More information

14 Geotechnical Hazards

14 Geotechnical Hazards Volume 2: Assessment of Environmental Effects 296 14 Geotechnical Hazards Overview This Chapter provides an assessment of the underlying geotechnical conditions to identify: any potential liquefaction

More information

GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION REPORT INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD

GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION REPORT INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION REPORT Client : TAEIN CONSTRUCTION & INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD Office address : Flat No.104, A -Wing,1st floor,gloria Park, Paranjape Scheme, Bavdhan Khurd, Chandni Chowk, Pune

More information

Geotechnical Indications Of Eastern Bypass Area In Port Harcourt, Niger Delta

Geotechnical Indications Of Eastern Bypass Area In Port Harcourt, Niger Delta Geotechnical Indications Of Eastern Bypass Area In Port Harcourt, Niger Delta Warmate Tamunonengiyeofori Geostrat International Services Limited, Rivers State, Nigeria www.geostratinternational.com info@geostratinternational.com,

More information

Reference No S072 APRIL 2012

Reference No S072 APRIL 2012 A REPORT TO SOLMAR DEVELOPMENT CORP. A PRELIMINARY SOIL INVESTIGATION FOR PROPOSED SUBDIVISION DEVELOPMENT NORTHEAST OF SIDEROAD 5 AND 0 LINE TOWN OF ERIN Reference No. 202-S072 APRIL 202 DISTRIBUTION

More information

Geotechnical Data Report

Geotechnical Data Report Geotechnical Data Report Emergency Bridge Package 6 Richland County, South Carolina May 12, 2016 SCDOT Project ID.: P029942, P029943, P029944 Terracon Project No. 73100L (Rev. 1) Prepared for: South Carolina

More information

ROCK EXCAVATION (GRADING) OPSS 206 INDEX

ROCK EXCAVATION (GRADING) OPSS 206 INDEX 206-2 - OPSS 206 INDEX 206-2.1 GENERAL 206-2.1.1 Classification of Rock Materials 206-2.1.2 Tender Items 206-2.1.3 Other Excavation Tender Items 206-2.1.4 Specifications 206-2.1.5 Special Provisions 206-2.1.6

More information

New WW Hastings Hospital Geotechnical Investigation RFP Addendum #1

New WW Hastings Hospital Geotechnical Investigation RFP Addendum #1 88 E. Marshall Street, Suite 0 Tulsa, OK 76 98 8 9 Phone 98 8 798 FAX DATE: April 9, 0 ADDENDUM NO.: PROJECT: New WW Hastings Hospital BID PACKAGE NO: Geotechnical Investigation RFP SUBMITTED BY: CNCR

More information

APPENDICES. Appendix A City Standard Details Appendix B Engineering Geology Report

APPENDICES. Appendix A City Standard Details Appendix B Engineering Geology Report APPENDICES Appendix A City Standard Details Appendix B Engineering Geology Report APPENDIX A CITY STANDARDS DETAILS APPENDIX B ENGINEERING GEOLOGY REPORT ENGINEERING GEOLOGY REPORT WATER

More information

Liquefaction and Foundations

Liquefaction and Foundations Liquefaction and Foundations Amit Prashant Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar Short Course on Seismic Design of Reinforced Concrete Buildings 26 30 November, 2012 What is Liquefaction? Liquefaction

More information

Solution:Example 1. Example 2. Solution: Example 2. clay. Textural Soil Classification System (USDA) CE353 Soil Mechanics Dr.

Solution:Example 1. Example 2. Solution: Example 2. clay. Textural Soil Classification System (USDA) CE353 Soil Mechanics Dr. CE353 Soil Mechanics CE353 Lecture 5 Geotechnical Engineering Laboratory SOIL CLASSIFICATION Lecture 5 SOIL CLASSIFICATION Dr. Talat A Bader Dr. Talat Bader 2 Requirements of a soil Systems Why do we need

More information

M E M O R A N D U M. Mr. Jonathan K. Thrasher, P.E. and Mr. Ian Kinnear, P.E. PSI

M E M O R A N D U M. Mr. Jonathan K. Thrasher, P.E. and Mr. Ian Kinnear, P.E. PSI M E M O R A N D U M TO: FROM: Mr. Mark Schilling Gulf Interstate Engineering Mr. Jonathan K. Thrasher, P.E. and Mr. Ian Kinnear, P.E. PSI DATE: November 11, 2014 RE: Summary of Findings Geotechnical Study

More information

CENTRAL REGION GEOHAZARDS RISK ASSESSMENT SITE INSPECTION FORM

CENTRAL REGION GEOHAZARDS RISK ASSESSMENT SITE INSPECTION FORM SITE NUMBER AND NAME C55 H861:02 Slide LEGAL DESCRIPTION NW 14-40-14-W4 CENTRAL REGION GEOHAZARDS RISK ASSESSMENT SITE INSPECTION FORM HIGHWAY & KM NAD 83 COORDINATES N 5811217 E 437291 PREVIOUS INSPECTION

More information

CHEROKEE NATION BUSINESSES, LLC

CHEROKEE NATION BUSINESSES, LLC REPORT OF PRELIMINARY SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION AND GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION PROPOSED CHEROKEE SPRINGS PLAZA TAHLEQUAH, OKLAHOMA BUILDING & EARTH PROJECT NO. OK10004 PREPARED FOR: CHEROKEE NATION BUSINESSES,

More information

GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT

GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT 9 th Street and Magnolia Avenue Sidewalks Panama City, Bay County, Florida PREPARED FOR: CPH, Inc. 1031 West 23 rd Street Suite C Panama City, Florida 32405 NOVA Project

More information

APPENDIX C. Borehole Data

APPENDIX C. Borehole Data APPENDIX C Borehole Data MAJOR DIVISIONS SOIL CLASSIFICATION CHART SYMBOLS GRAPH LETTER TYPICAL DESCRIPTIONS ADDITIONAL MATERIAL

More information

Geotechnical Data Report

Geotechnical Data Report Geotechnical Data Report ReWa Solar Farm at Durbin Creek Fountain Inn, South Carolina September 1, 2017 Terracon Project No. 86165043 Prepared for: Renewable Water Resources Greenville, South Carolina

More information

KDOT Geotechnical Manual Edition. Table of Contents

KDOT Geotechnical Manual Edition. Table of Contents KDOT Geotechnical Manual 2007 Edition The KDOT Geotechnical Manual is available two volumes. Both volumes are very large electronic (pdf) files which may take several minutes to download. The table of

More information

DRILL HOLE # BH-BGC13-FN-01

DRILL HOLE # BH-BGC13-FN-01 DILL HOLE # BH-BGC3-FN-0 Drill Method: Mud otary/coring Depth To ock (m): N/A Page of 7 eviewed by: AJB 0 GAVEL (GW) Fine to coarse, sandy, well graded, dense, max particle size = 30 mm, angular to subrounded,

More information