The Southern Continental Shelf of Greenland
|
|
- Marvin Phillips
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Partial Submission of the Government of the Kingdom of Denmark together with the Government of Greenland to the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf The Southern Continental Shelf of Greenland 60 W 55 W 50 W D 40 W 35 W 30 W 25 W Greenland av is Baffin Island S tr Ic e ai Se 57 N a 54 N Se a e Gloria Drift r Spu ton Atlantic Ocean 50 W 45 W Executive Summary 60 N 57 N r 55 W il!! 54 N do m Ha R Rid er kja ra Canada i k ri g id nd nes ng Rey ab E 60 W mi Cape Farewell L 60 N Ir la ge t 63 N 45 W 63 N 65 W 40 W 35 W
2 The Southern Continental Shelf of Greenland g e r S e a Publisher: Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland (GEUS) Royal Danish Ministry of Climate, Energy and Building Øster Voldgade 10, DK-1350 Copenhagen K, Denmark Printers: Rosendahl/Schultz Grafisk, Albertslund, Denmark Printed: May 2012 ISBN: Langenæse, Graah Fjord, Skjoldungen, South East Greenland Photo: Jakob Lautrup
3
4 The Southern Continental Shelf of Greenland g e r S e a Contents 1. Introduction Maps and Coordinates Commission Members who Provided Advice during the Preparation of the Submission Provisions of Article 76 Invoked in Support of the Submission General Description of the Continental Margin The Southern Continental Shelf of Greenland Maritime Delimitations Appendix
5 Cape Farewell Executive Summary k R i d g e 1. Introduction The Kingdom of Denmark signed the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (hereafter the Convention ) on the day it was opened for signature and ratified it on 16 November It entered into force for the Kingdom of Denmark on 16 December This Partial Submission is the third step in fulfilling the Kingdom of Denmark s obligation under Article 76(8) and Article 4 of Annex II to the Convention to submit information on the outer limits of its continental shelf beyond 200 nautical miles (M) from the baselines from which the breadth of the territorial sea is measured. The Government of the Kingdom of Denmark made its first and second partial submissions together with the Government of the Faroes, regarding the northern and southern continental shelf of the Faroe Islands, on 29 April 2009 and 2 December 2010, respectively. This Partial Submission, which is the first one related to Greenland, covers only the Southern Continental Shelf of Greenland. Collection of scientific and technical data continues in the two remaining areas for which submissions are contemplated: - an area east of Greenland; and - an area north of Greenland. Information on the remaining two areas will be submitted to the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf (hereafter the Commission ) in accordance with Article 4 of Annex II to the Convention read in conjunction with the decision of the eighteenth Meeting of States Parties (SPLOS/183). The rights of the coastal State over the continental shelf exist ipso facto and ab initio as reflected in Article 77 of the Convention. By Royal Decree No. 259 of 7 June 1963, the Kingdom of Denmark proclaimed sovereign rights over the seabed and subsoil off the coast of the Kingdom of Denmark for exploration and exploitation of natural deposits beyond the territorial sea to a depth of 200 m or to such an extent as the depth of the sea permits the exploitation of such deposits. In accordance with the Convention, such sovereign rights are now being exercised up to a distance of 200 M from the baselines from which the breadth of the territorial sea is measured or to agreed boundaries between States with opposite or adjacent coasts. By Agreement between the Government of the Kingdom of Denmark and the Government of Greenland (Naalakkersuisut) (implemented by the Act on Greenland Self-Government, Danish Act No. 473 of 12 June 2009) Naalakkersuisut was vested with the authority of assuming new fields of responsibility. By Inatsisartut (Parliament of Greenland) Act No. 7 of 7 December 2009 (Act on Mineral Resources), the legislative and executive responsibility for mineral resource activities was assumed by Naalakkersuisut with effect from 1 January The Continental Shelf Project of the Kingdom of Denmark was established in 2002 under the auspices of the Royal Danish Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation in close conjunction with the Government of Greenland and the Government of the Faroes, and was tasked with acquiring the necessary data to delineate the outer limits of the continental shelf beyond 200 M. Acquisition of seismic data began the following year. The preparation of this Partial Submission began in Acquisition of seismic and bathymetric data, as well 5
6 The Southern Continental Shelf of Greenland g e r S e a as the processing, analysis and interpretation of data, continued until These preparations were carried out jointly by the Royal Danish Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the Premier s Office of Greenland, the Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland (GEUS), which is an agency of the Royal Danish Ministry of Climate, Energy and Building, and the Bureau of Minerals and Petroleum (BMP), which is an agency of the Government of Greenland. Both GEUS and BMP are national expert agencies for offshore geology and geophysics. Various other agencies and institutions, in particular the Danish National Survey and Cadastre, the Danish National Space Institute and the Danish Maritime Safety Administration, have also made scientific or other contributions to the submission. 6
7 Cape Farewell Executive Summary k R i d g e 2. Maps and Coordinates The data and information contained in this Partial Submission are intended to enable the establishment of the outer limits of the continental shelf where those limits extend beyond 200 M from the baselines from which the breadth of the territorial sea is measured. Two maps are included in this Executive Summary. The first map (Figure 1) shows the outer limits of the Southern Continental Shelf of Greenland beyond 200 M. Figure 1 indicates that the outer limits contained in the Partial submission consist of two parts a south-western part and an eastern part. The second map (Figure 2) depicts the regional bathymetry of the submission area and key geographical place names. Separate tables of geographical coordinates of the fixed points used to delineate the outer limits of the two parts of the Southern Continental Shelf of Greenland are contained in Appendix 1. The tables (Table 1 and 2) include the provision of Article 76 of the Convention invoked to determine each fixed point and the distance between adjacent points in nautical miles. Geographical coordinates presented in the tables and on the maps are given relative to the geodetic reference system ITRF2000 (Epoch ). 7
8 The Southern Continental Shelf of Greenland Atlantic Ocean Ic R r ra do av Canada 65 W Baffin Island 63 N 60 W L ab D 60 W is S S ea tr ai t 55 W 55 W Fylla Bank ns lto mi a H pur 50 W 50 W E i 45 W Gloria Drift ge id k ri 45 W Greenland Cape Farewell 40 W Ir mi 40 W ng er Se a 30 W 35 W 35 W la 54 N e kja ge nd 57 N Rey 25 W 60 N nes Rid 63 N 60 N 57 N 54 N Figure 1. The outer limits of the Southern Continental Shelf of Greenland showing the provisions of Article 76 invoked. 8
9 Executive Summary Bathymetry 250 m 500 m 750 m m m m m m m m m m m m m Index map Legend Gardiner Formula Point Hedberg Formula Point Point on the 200 M Line of Greenland Point on the 200 M Line of Canada Point on the 200 M Line of Iceland m Isobath Baselines of Greenland 200 M Line Agreed Maritime Boundary Outer Limits of the Continental Shelf Beyond 200 M M (nautical miles) Geodetic reference: ITRF 2000 (Epoch ) - Projection: UTM zone 22 9
10 The Southern Continental Shelf of Greenland g e r S e a 3. Commission Members who Provided Advice during the Preparation of the Submission The Kingdom of Denmark was assisted in the preparation of this Partial Submission by Mr. Harald Brekke, member of the Commission ( ) and Dr. Philip Alexander Symonds, member of the Commission ( ). No advice was provided by any other past or current member of the Commission. 10
11 Cape Farewell Executive Summary k R i d g e 4. Provisions of Article 76 Invoked in Support of the Submission The Kingdom of Denmark invokes the provisions of paragraphs 4 and 5 of Article 76 of the Convention in support of the establishment of the outer limits of the Southern Continental Shelf of Greenland, based on considerations outlined in Section 5 below. Both the Gardiner and the Hedberg formulae lines have been used in this Partial Submission. In accordance with Article 76(7) of the Convention, the outer limits of the continental shelf have been delineated by fixed points connected by straight lines not exceeding 60 M in length. The Partial Submission uses the terms Gardiner formula points and lines to refer to sediment thickness formula points determined through the application of Article 76(4)(a)(i) of the Convention, and the lines delineated in accordance with Article 76(7) that join such fixed points and establish the outer edge of the continental margin. The Partial Submission uses the terms Hedberg formula points and lines to refer to 60 M formula points determined through the application of Article 76(4)(a)(ii) of the Convention, and the lines delineated in accordance with Article 76(7) that join such fixed points and establish the outer edge of the continental margin. 11
12 The Southern Continental Shelf of Greenland g e r S e a 5. General Description of the Continental Margin The Southern Continental Margin of Greenland extends from the Greenland land mass in a continuous sweep from the Irminger Sea in the east, through the Eirik Ridge in the south, to the Labrador Sea in the west. The land mass of southern Greenland consists of an Archaean block and the Ketilidian fold belt that developed in the Proterozoic along the southern margin of the Archaean block. The crystalline basement is dominated by gneissic and granitic rocks. Greenland was part of the super-continent Pangaea and separated from Canada and North-West Europe during the rifting and seafloor spreading that resulted in the opening of the North Atlantic Ocean. The continental break-up took place along two distinct seafloor spreading axes. Off south-western Greenland, seafloor spreading developed no later than 61 million years ago (Ma) with the formation of oceanic crust in the Labrador Sea. Off south-eastern Greenland, break-up occurred at ~56 Ma when the North-East Atlantic Ocean began to form. From that time, until seafloor spreading in the Labrador Sea ceased at ~40 to 33 Ma, a ridge-ridge-ridge triple junction existed to the south of Greenland. The continental margin off south-western Greenland has a non-volcanic character with a ~100-km-wide continent-ocean transition zone that separates the thinned continental crust from the oceanic crust in the Labrador Sea. Partially serpentinized mantle occurs within this transition zone. In the northernmost part of the Labrador Sea, the margin becomes volcanic in response to the arrival of the Iceland mantle plume beneath central Greenland at 61 Ma. The associated magmatism formed the North Atlantic Igneous Province and affected the Davis Strait region and the continental margin off south-eastern Greenland. A classic, volcanic-style continental margin developed off south-eastern Greenland associated with extrusions onto and intrusions into the continental crust, and a thick initial oceanic crust. The volcanism related to the break-up of south-eastern Greenland extended south of Greenland and into the Labrador Sea. Here, thin preexisting crust associated with rifting and early seafloor spreading in the Labrador Sea was thickened and altered by the addition of magma that resulted in the formation of the basement high that underlies the present Eirik Ridge. The central part of the Ridge was formed by subaerially extruded basalts, and later the ridge subsided below sea level. Since the onset of the seafloor spreading, kilometre-thick sequences of Cenozoic sediments have been deposited on the continental margin off southern Greenland. During glaciation, vast amounts of material were transported down-slope and the shelf prograded seawards; however, during the interglacial periods alongslope processes dominated and re-deposited sediments on the lower slope and eroded the upper slope. From late Miocene to Recent times, the primary sedimentary processes shaping the margin have therefore been down- and along-slope processes forming sediment drifts along the lower slope, the most prominent of which is the Eirik Ridge drift. 12
13 Executive Summary 60 W 55 W 50 W 45 W 40 W 35 W 30 W 25 W 63 N Davis Strait Baffin Island Greenland Fylla Bank 54 N Canada m Ha 60 W 55 W ilto i 57 N Rey R e 54 N 57 N E k ri g id kja Cape Farewell Labrador Sea Rid nes 60 N Irminger Sea Gloria Drift pur ns 60 N ge 63 N 65 W Atlantic Ocean 50 W 45 W 40 W Bathymetry 250 m 500 m 750 m m m Legend m m m Isobath m m m m M (nautical miles) m m m Geodetic reference: ITRF2000 (Epoch ) - Projection: UTM zone m Figure 2. Bathymetric map of the region related to the Partial Submission for the Southern Continental Shelf of Greenland. 13
14 The Southern Continental Shelf of Greenland g e r S e a 6. The Southern Continental Shelf of Greenland In the Partial Submission there are two separate parts to the outer limits of the Southern Continental Shelf of Greenland beyond 200 M a south-western part in the Labrador Sea and an eastern part in the Irminger Sea (Figure 1). In the south-western part, the outer limits terminate at the 200 M line of Canada in the north and south, and then at the 200 M line of Greenland to the east. The outer limits between these points are delineated by straight lines connecting Gardiner and Hedberg formula fixed points in accordance with Article 76(7) of the Convention, as well as intervening points on the 200 M line of Canada. In the eastern part, the outer limits terminate at the 200 M line of Greenland in the south and the 200 M line of Iceland in the north. The outer limits between these points are delineated by straight lines connecting Hedberg formula fixed points in accordance with Article 76(7) of the Convention. 14
15 Cape Farewell Executive Summary k R i d g e 7. Maritime Delimitations Some unresolved questions remain in relation to the delimitation of the Southern Continental Shelf of Greenland. These questions are considered by reference to Article 76(10) and Article 9 of Annex II to the Convention. During the preparation of this Partial Submission, the Kingdom of Denmark has held regular consultations with Canada in order to coordinate their respective submissions for the same area. It was clear from these consultations that the outer limits of the continental shelf of Canada likely to be proposed in its forthcoming submission will overlap with the south-western part of the Southern Continental Shelf of Greenland. By Exchange of Notes dated 15 March 2012, the Government of the Kingdom of Denmark and the Government of Canada reached the understanding that when one State transmits its submission regarding the outer limits of the continental shelf in the Labrador Sea to the Commission, the other State will promptly transmit a diplomatic note to the Secretary-General of the United Nations advising that it does not object to the consideration of the submission by the Commission and indicating that the recommendations made by the Commission in respect of the submission are without prejudice both to the consideration by the Commission of its own submission and to matters relating to the delimitation of boundaries between the two States. Each State will refer to this Arrangement in its submission and request the Commission to make recommendations on this basis. The final delimitation will, as appropriate, be determined through a bilateral agreement. In accordance with the Exchange of Notes, the Kingdom of Denmark requests that the Commission consider this Partial Submission related to the south-western part of the Southern Continental Shelf of Greenland in the Labrador Sea and make recommendations accordingly on the basis of the data and other material submitted. The outer limits of Iceland proposed in its submission of 29 April 2009, overlap with the eastern part of the Southern Continental Shelf of Greenland. The matter is subject to consultations between the parties. It should be noted, that this Partial Submission is made without prejudice to any outstanding delimitations, consistent with Article 76(10) and Annex II, Article 9 of UNCLOS. 15
16 The Southern Continental Shelf of Greenland g e r S e a Appendix 1. Coordinates and Information on the Fixed Points Comprising the Outer Limits of the Continental Shelf Table 1. List of coordinates and the Article 76 provision invoked in the determination of each fixed point comprising the line of the outer limits of the south-western part of the Southern Continental Shelf of Greenland. Outer Limit Latitude Longitude Article 76 Provision invoked Distance to Fixed Point Next Point (M) SGM-FP N W Fixed point where the line delin eating the outer edge of the continental margin intersects the 200 M line of Canada SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(i): Gardiner formula 48.8 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(i): Gardiner formula 46.7 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(i): Gardiner formula 46.1 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(i): Gardiner formula 28.1 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(i): Gardiner formula 14.4 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(i): Gardiner formula 3.3 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(i): Gardiner formula 7.3 SGM-FP N W Fixed point where the line delineating the outer edge of the continental margin intersects the 200 M line of Canada SGM-FP N W Fixed point where the line delin eating the outer edge of the continental margin intersects the 200 M line of Canada SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(i): Gardiner formula 17.1 SGM-FP N W Fixed point where the line delineating the outer edge of the continental margin intersects the 200 M line of Canada SGM-FP N W Fixed point where the line delin eating the outer edge of the continental margin intersects the 200 M line of Canada SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(i): Gardiner formula 30.1 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(i): Gardiner formula
17 Cape Farewell Executive Summary k R i d g e Outer Limit Latitude Longitude Article 76 Provision invoked Distance to Fixed Point Next Point (M) SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(i): Gardiner formula 59.1 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.8 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 5.6 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 31.6 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.3 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 39.2 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(i): Gardiner formula 39.6 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(i): Gardiner formula
18 The Southern Continental Shelf of Greenland g e r S e a Outer Limit Latitude Longitude Article 76 Provision invoked Distance to Fixed Point Next Point (M) SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.8 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.6 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.1 SGM-FP N W Fixed point where the line delineating the outer edge of the continental margin intersects the 200 M line of Greenland Table 2. List of coordinates and the Article 76 provision invoked in the determination of each fixed point comprising the line of the outer limits of the eastern part of the Southern Continental Shelf of Greenland. Outer Limit Latitude Longitude Article 76 Provision invoked Distance to Fixed Point Next Point (M) SGM-FP N W Fixed point where the line delineating the outer edge of the continental margin intersects the 200 M line of Greenland 6.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.7 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula
19 Cape Farewell Executive Summary k R i d g e Outer Limit Latitude Longitude Article 76 Provision invoked Distance to Fixed Point Next Point (M) SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula
20 The Southern Continental Shelf of Greenland g e r S e a Outer Limit Latitude Longitude Article 76 Provision invoked Distance to Fixed Point Next Point (M) SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 5.4 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula
21 Cape Farewell Executive Summary k R i d g e Outer Limit Latitude Longitude Article 76 Provision invoked Distance to Fixed Point Next Point (M) SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 7.0 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 59.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula
22 The Southern Continental Shelf of Greenland g e r S e a Outer Limit Latitude Longitude Article 76 Provision invoked Distance to Fixed Point Next Point (M) SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula
23 Cape Farewell Executive Summary k R i d g e Outer Limit Latitude Longitude Article 76 Provision invoked Distance to Fixed Point Next Point (M) SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula
24 The Southern Continental Shelf of Greenland g e r S e a Outer Limit Latitude Longitude Article 76 Provision invoked Distance to Fixed Point Next Point (M) SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula
25 Cape Farewell Executive Summary k R i d g e Outer Limit Latitude Longitude Article 76 Provision invoked Distance to Fixed Point Next Point (M) SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 59.6 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.4 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 0.5 SGM-FP N W 76(4)(a)(ii): Hedberg formula 59.1 SGM-FP N W Fixed point where the line delineating the outer edge of the continental margin intersects the 200 M line of Iceland 25
26
27 Cape Farewell Executive Summary k R i d g e Skjoldungen Region, South East Greenland Photo: Jakob Lautrup 27
28
The Continental Shelf North of the Faroe Islands
Partial Submission of the Government of the Kingdom of Denmark together with the Government of the Faroes to the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf The Continental Shelf North of the Faroe
More informationMAPS AND COORDINATES...
Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION... 2 2 MAPS AND COORDINATES... 3 3 ADVISORY ASSISTANCE FROM COMMISSION MEMBERS... 3 4 PROVISIONS OF ARTICLE 76 INVOKED... 3 5 OUTSTANDING MARITIME DELIMITATIONS... 4 6
More informationEXECUTIVE SUMMARY A SUBMISSION OF DATA AND INFORMATION ON THE OUTER LIMITS OF THE CONTINENTAL SHELF OF THE REPUBLIC OF NIGERIA PURSUANT TO
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A SUBMISSION OF DATA AND INFORMATION ON THE OUTER LIMITS OF THE CONTINENTAL SHELF OF THE REPUBLIC OF NIGERIA PURSUANT TO PART VI OF AND ANNEX II TO THE UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION ON THE
More informationIRELAND. PART I Executive Summary
IRELAND Submission to the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf pursuant to Article 76, paragraph 8 of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982 in respect of the area abutting
More informationJOINT SUBMISSION TO THE COMMISSION ON THE LIMITS OF THE CONTINENTAL SHELF BY TUVALU, THE REPUBLIC OF FRANCE AND NEW ZEALAND (TOKELAU)
JOINT SUBMISSION TO THE COMMISSION ON THE LIMITS OF THE CONTINENTAL SHELF BY TUVALU, THE REPUBLIC OF FRANCE AND NEW ZEALAND (TOKELAU) TABLE OF CONTENTS i. PREFACE... iii ii. LIST OF FIGURES... iv iii.
More informationCONTINENTAL SHELF SUBMISSION OF ANGOLA - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY -
CONTINENTAL SHELF SUBMISSION OF ANGOLA - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY - INDEX List of Figures 2 List of Tables 3 1 Introduction 5 2 Provisions of Article 76 7 3 Angolan Institutions responsible for the Submission
More informationEXECUTIVE SUMMARY A PARTIAL SUBMISSION OF DATA AND INFORMATION ON THE OUTER LIMITS OF THE CONTINENTAL SHELF OF THE KINGDOM OF TONGA PURSUANT TO
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A PARTIAL SUBMISSION OF DATA AND INFORMATION ON THE OUTER LIMITS OF THE CONTINENTAL SHELF OF THE KINGDOM OF TONGA PURSUANT TO PART VI OF AND ANNEX II TO THE UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION
More informationPreliminary Information Indicative of the Outer Limits of the Continental Shelf Beyond 200 Nautical Miles of the People s Republic of China
(Translation) Preliminary Information Indicative of the Outer Limits of the Continental Shelf Beyond 200 Nautical Miles of the People s Republic of China 1. The People s Republic of China ratified the
More informationOUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF CLAIMS IN THE ARCTIC. Presentation given by Dr. Kamrul Hossain ASA University Bangladesh 15 March 2010
OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF CLAIMS IN THE ARCTIC Presentation given by Dr. Kamrul Hossain ASA University Bangladesh 15 March 2010 Contents Historical background of the continental shelf Concept of continental
More informationCONFERENCE OF PARLIAMENTARIANS OF THE ARCTIC REGION. UN LOS Convention and the extended continental shelf in the Arctic
CONFERENCE OF PARLIAMENTARIANS OF THE ARCTIC REGION UN LOS Convention and the extended continental shelf in the Arctic Presentation given by Dr. Kamrul Hossain Finnish Parliament 18 November 2009 Contents
More informationPreliminary Information Indicative of the outer limits of the continental shelf And Description of the status of preparation of making a submission
Preliminary Information Indicative of the outer limits of the continental shelf And Description of the status of preparation of making a submission To the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf
More informationArticle 76, variations in annotation and implementation seen in submission documents for the claim of Extended Continental Shelf
Article 76, variations in annotation and implementation seen in submission documents for the claim of Extended Continental Shelf Mr. Shin Tani Chairman, IHO/IAG Advisory Board on the Law of the Sea (ABLOS)
More informationFOOT OF THE CONTINENTAL SLOPE IN ARTICLE 76
FOOT OF THE CONTINENTAL SLOPE IN ARTICLE 76 Vaughan Stagpoole, Institute of Geological & Nuclear Sciences, Lower Hutt, New Zealand, v.stagpoole@gns.cri.nz Ray Wood, Institute of Geological & Nuclear Sciences,
More informationThis Book Belonged to
THE AMERICAN UNIVERSITY Washington College of Law Library This Book Belonged to The Private Collection of Judge Richard R, Baxter I THE AMERICAN UNIVERSITY Washington College of Law Law Library W-, D.C.
More informationUNCLOS Article 76- Formulae and constraint lines
UNCLOS Article 76- Formulae and constraint lines Dr Lindsay Parson (UNCLOS Group, National Oceanography Centre, UK) ABLOS TUTORIAL SESSION - Article 76 of UNCLOS 10th October 2005 IHO/IAG/IOC Advisory
More informationPRELIMINARY INFORMATION
PRELIMINARY INFORMATION INDICATIVE OF THE OUTER LIMITS OF THE CONTINENTAL SHELF AND DESCRIPTION OF THE STATUS OF PREPARATION OF MAKING A SUBMISSION TO THE COMMISSION ON THE LIMITS OF THE CONTINENTAL SHELF
More informationFinding the continental shelf integration of geology and geophysics
Finding the continental shelf integration of geology and geophysics R Wood Institute of Geological and Nuclear Sciences, PO Box 30-368, Lower Hutt, Telephone 64-4-570 4867, Fax 64-4-570 4803, Email r.wood@gns.cri.nz
More informationFEDERAL AUTHORITIES RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PREPARATION: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation
FEDERAL AUTHORITIES RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PREPARATION: Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment of the Russian Federation Federal Agency on Mineral Resources Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment
More informationThe Sea Floor. Chapter 2
The Sea Floor Chapter 2 Geography of the Ocean Basins World ocean is the predominant feature on the Earth in total area Northern Hemisphere = 61% of the total area is ocean. Southern Hemisphere = about
More informationChapter Two. Figure 02_02. Geography of the Ocean Basins. The Sea Floor
Chapter Two The Sea Floor Geography of the Ocean Basins Figure 02_02 The world ocean is the predominant feature on the Earth in total area. In the Northern Hemisphere, 61% of the total area is ocean. In
More informationThe french national programme for claiming continental shelf beyond 200 Miles
The french national programme for claiming continental shelf beyond 200 Miles Using global bathymetric models in the context of an Extended Continental Shelf submission EXTRAPLAC Using Global Bathymetric
More informationThe Continental Shelf Project: An overview of research activities in the Arctic Ocean on behalf of the Kingdom of Denmark
The Continental Shelf Project: An overview of research activities in the Arctic Ocean on behalf of the Kingdom of Denmark Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland Ministry of Climate and Energy John
More informationLaw of the Sea Symposium, February, 2016, TOKYO International Law for the Resources of the Sea
Law of the Sea Symposium, 16-17 February, 2016, TOKYO International Law for the Resources of the Sea Segment 2 Governance of Resources of the Continental Shelf (including extended continental shelf) Introduction
More informationBeneath our Feet: The 4 Layers of the Earty by Kelly Hashway
Beneath our Feet: The 4 Layers of the Earty by Kelly Hashway The Earth is more than a giant ball made up of dirt, rocks, and minerals. The Earth may look like a giant ball from when looking at it from
More informationSir Francis Bacon, 1620, noted that the continental coasts on opposites sides of the Atlantic fit together like puzzle pieces.
Plate Tectonics Sir Francis Bacon, 1620, noted that the continental coasts on opposites sides of the Atlantic fit together like puzzle pieces. Could North and South America once have been joined to Europe
More informationLimits in the Seas. No. 96 June 6, Greece Italy. Continental Shelf Boundary. (Country Codes: GR-IT)
Limits in the Seas No. 96 June 6, 1982 Greece Italy Continental Shelf Boundary (Country Codes: GR-IT) The Geographer Office of the Geographer Bureau of Intelligence and Research INTERNATIONAL BOUNDARY
More information2013 No MARINE MANAGEMENT. The Exclusive Economic Zone Order 2013
S T A T U T O R Y I N S T R U M E N T S 2013 No. 3161 MARINE MANAGEMENT The Exclusive Economic Zone Order 2013 Made - - - - 11th December 2013 Laid before Parliament 18th December 2013 Coming into force
More informationPart I. Executive Summary
Part I. Executive Summary Partial Submission of Data and Information on the Limits of the Continental Shelf of Spain to the West of the Canary Islands, pursuant to Part VI and Annex II of United Nations
More informationLecture #13 notes, Geology 3950 Spring 2006: CR Stern Magnetic reversals (text pages th edition and in the 5 th edition)
Lecture #13 notes, Geology 3950 Spring 2006: CR Stern Magnetic reversals (text pages 35-37 4 th edition and 53-55 in the 5 th edition) The earth has a magnetic field generated by circulation of charged
More informationDrifting Continents and Spreading Seas. The Road To Plate Tectonics
Drifting Continents and Spreading Seas The Road To Plate Tectonics Alfred Wegener and the Continental Drift hypothesis: Up until the early 1900s, long-held tradition in the earth sciences stated that continents
More informationChapter 02 The Sea Floor
Chapter 02 The Sea Floor Multiple Choice Questions 1. One of the following is not one of the world's major ocean basins: A. Atlantic Ocean B. Arctic Ocean C. Indian Ocean D. Antarctic Ocean E. Pacific
More information60% water. Big Bang: 14,000 millions years ago The Earth originated about 4,500 millions years ago its orbit allows water to exist in a liquid state!
Ch2. The Sea Floor #1 Why geology of the oceans? Marine habitats are directly shaped by geological processes The form of the coastlines The depth of the water Type of bottom (muddy, sandy, rocky) #2 Geological
More informationMarine Geospatial Software: Generating Economic Benefits from Hydrographic Data and Calculation of Maritime Boundaries
Marine Geospatial Software: Generating Economic Benefits from Hydrographic Data and Calculation of Serge LEVESQUE and Alexis CARDENAS, Canada Key words: marine geospatial data, hydrography, economic benefits,
More informationCopyright McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education
Copyright McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education Tibetan Plateau and Himalaya -southern Asia 11.00.a VE 10X
More informationChapter 2 Plate Tectonics and the Ocean Floor
Chapter 2 Plate Tectonics and the Ocean Floor Matching. Match the term or person with the appropriate phrase. You may use each answer once, more than once or not at all. 1. hydrothermal vents A. convergent
More informationEarth s Structure and Surface
Earth s Structure and Surface Structure of the Earth The earth is thought have originated about 4.5 billion years ago from a cloud or clouds of dust. The dust was the remains of a huge cosmic explosion
More informationTAKE HOME EXAM 8R - Geology
Name Period Date TAKE HOME EXAM 8R - Geology PART 1 - Multiple Choice 1. A volcanic cone made up of alternating layers of lava and rock particles is a cone. a. cinder b. lava c. shield d. composite 2.
More informationMindful of the interests which the Parties share as immediate neighbours, and in a spirit of cooperation, friendship and goodwill; and
page 1 Delimitation Treaties Infobase accessed on 13/03/2002 Treaty between the Government of Australia and the Government of the Republic of Indonesia establishing an exclusive economic zone boundary
More informationBefore Plate Tectonics: Theory of Continental Drift
Before Plate Tectonics: Theory of Continental Drift Predecessor to modern plate tectonics Shape and fit of the continents was the initial evidence Snider-Pelligrini (1858) Taylor (1908) Wegner (1915) Fig.
More informationScience 2015 Earth Science. Study Guide
Adult Basic Education Level II Science Science 2015 Earth Science Study Guide Resources: Discovering Science 7 Level II Science Courses Science 2011 Life Science Science 2012 Physical Science Science 2013
More informationMarine Science and Oceanography
Marine Science and Oceanography Marine geology- study of the ocean floor Physical oceanography- study of waves, currents, and tides Marine biology study of nature and distribution of marine organisms Chemical
More informationFig Available seismic reflection, refraction, and magnetic profiles from 107 the Offshore Indus Basin close to the representative profile GCDH,
List of Figures Page No. Fig. 1.1 Generalized physiography of the Indian Ocean along with 2 selected (200 m, 1000 m, 2000 m, and 3000 m) bathymetric contours. Fig. 1.2 Lithospheric plates in the Indian
More informationA) B) C) D) 4. Which diagram below best represents the pattern of magnetic orientation in the seafloor on the west (left) side of the ocean ridge?
1. Crustal formation, which may cause the widening of an ocean, is most likely occurring at the boundary between the A) African Plate and the Eurasian Plate B) Pacific Plate and the Philippine Plate C)
More information24. Ocean Basins p
24. Ocean Basins p. 350-372 Background The majority of the planet is covered by ocean- about %. So the majority of the Earth s crust is. This crust is hidden from view beneath the water so it is not as
More information12/3/2014. Plate Tectonics: A Scientific Revolution Unfolds Earth Science, 13e Chapter 7. Continental drift: an idea before its time
Plate Tectonics: A Scientific Revolution Unfolds Earth Science, 13e Chapter 7 Stanley C. Hatfield Southwestern Illinois College Continental drift: an idea before its time Alfred Wegener First proposed
More informationLaw No. 41 of 1 June 1979 concerning the Territorial Sea, the Economic Zone and the Continental Shelf. I The territorial sea
Page 1 Law No. 41 of 1 June 1979 concerning the Territorial Sea, the Economic Zone and the Continental Shelf I The territorial sea Article 1. The territorial sea of Iceland shall be delimited by a line
More informationsonar seismic wave basalt granite
geologist sonar crust geology seismic wave mantle constructive force basalt inner core destructive force granite outer core The solid, rocky, surface layer of the earth. an instrument that can find objects
More informationLegal Interpretation of Submarine Ridges & Submarine Elevations
Legal Interpretation of Ridges & Article 76, paragraph 6 New Knowledge and Changing Circumstances in the Law of the Sea Reykjavik, Iceland June 28, 2018 Kevin Baumert U.S. Department of State U.S. ECS
More informationITLOS s approach to the delimitation of the continental shelf beyond 200 M in Bangladesh/Myanmar: Theoretical and practical difficulties
ITLOS s approach to the delimitation of the continental shelf beyond 200 M in Bangladesh/Myanmar: Theoretical and practical difficulties London International Boundary Conference 18-19 April 2013 Panel
More informationReview participation point: The evidence for a fluid outer core is:
DDA1 Continental Drift to Plate Tectonics PS 100 Chapter 28 Review participation point: The evidence for a fluid outer core is: A. Average density of the earth is greater than the density of the crust.
More informationInternational Boundary Study
International Boundary Study Series A Limits in the Seas No. 1 January 21, 1970 Indonesia Malaysia Continental Shelf Boundary (Country Codes: ID-MY) The Geographer Office of the Geographer Bureau of Intelligence
More informationSOLVING THE RIDGES ENIGMA OF ARTICLE 76 OF THE UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION ON THE LAW OF THE SEA. Written by: George Taft Presented by: George Taft
SOLVING THE RIDGES ENIGMA OF ARTICLE 76 OF THE UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION ON THE LAW OF THE SEA Written by: George Taft Presented by: George Taft (The views contained herein are those of the author and
More informationFull file at
Essentials of Oceanography, 10e (Trujillo/Keller) Chapter 2 Plate Tectonics and the Ocean Floor Match the term with the appropriate phrase. You may use each answer once, more than once or not at all. A)
More informationModern geodynamic model of the Arctic Ocean
Modern geodynamic model of the Arctic Ocean O. Petrov, N. Sobolev, A. Morozov, G. Grikurov, S. Shokalsky, S. Kashubin, E. Petrov Vienna, April 2012 Atlas of Geological Maps of the Circumpolar Arctic Magnetic
More informationSocial Studies. Chapter 2 Canada s Physical Landscape
Social Studies Chapter 2 Canada s Physical Landscape Introduction Canada s geography its landforms and climate - has a great impact on Canadians sense of identity. Planet Earth The earth is divided into
More informationQuestions and Topics
Plate Tectonics and Continental Drift Questions and Topics 1. What are the theories of Plate Tectonics and Continental Drift? 2. What is the evidence that Continents move? 3. What are the forces that
More informationThe Structure of the Earth and Plate Tectonics
The Structure of the Earth and Plate Tectonics Structure of the Earth The Earth is made up of 4 main layers: Inner Core Outer Core Mantle Crust Crust Mantle Outer core Inner core The Crust This is where
More informationThe Building of the NYC Region
The Building of the NYC Region Definitions Fall Line marks the area where an upland region (continental bedrock) and a coastal plain meet Piedmont the plateau region of the eastern United States which
More informationChapter 2: Plate Tectonics: A Unifying Theory
Chapter 2: Plate Tectonics: A Unifying Theory Chapter Outline 2.1 Introduction 2.2 Early Ideas About Continental Drift 2.3 What Is the Evidence for Continental Drift? 2.4 Features of the Seafloor 2.5 Earth
More informationGlobal Tectonics. Kearey, Philip. Table of Contents ISBN-13: Historical perspective. 2. The interior of the Earth.
Global Tectonics Kearey, Philip ISBN-13: 9781405107778 Table of Contents Preface. Acknowledgments. 1. Historical perspective. 1.1 Continental drift. 1.2 Sea floor spreading and the birth of plate tectonics.
More informationLate 20 th Century Tests of the Continental Drift Hypothesis
Late 20 th Century Tests of the Continental Drift Hypothesis 5 Characteristics of the Ocean Trenches Unless otherwise noted the artwork and photographs in this slide show are original and by Burt Carter.
More informationBathymetric data acquisition in Arctic waters
Bathymetric data acquisition in Arctic waters within the Danish Continental Shelf Project Morten Sølvsten, Uni Bull, Richard Pedersen & Christian Marcussen Arctic-Antarctic Seafloor Mapping Meeting 2011
More informationChapter 8: The Dynamic Planet
Chapter 8: The Dynamic Planet I. The Pace of Change A. The Geologic Time Scale II. Earth s Structure and Internal Energy A. The Earth s Core B. The Earth s Mantle C. The Earth s Crust III. The Geologic
More informationThe Agreement Concerning the Boundary Line Dividing Parts of the Continental Shelf Between Iran and the United Arab Emirates states that:
2 The Imperial Government of Iran and the Government of the State of the United Arab Emirates (Dubai) signed an agreement on August 31, 1974, regarding the delimitation of their continental shelf boundary.
More informationEvidence for Continental Drift and The Theory of Plate Tectonics
Evidence for Continental Drift and The Theory of Plate Tectonics Did you know that the coal that is mined in Pennsylvania was actually formed from tropical plant life near the Equator? How did it travel
More informationPrentice Hall EARTH SCIENCE
Prentice Hall EARTH SCIENCE Tarbuck Lutgens Chapter 9 Plate Tectonics 9.1 Continental Drift An Idea Before Its Time Wegener s continental drift hypothesis stated that the continents had once been joined
More informationPrentice Hall EARTH SCIENCE
Prentice Hall EARTH SCIENCE Tarbuck Lutgens Chapter 9 Plate Tectonics 9.1 Continental Drift An Idea Before Its Time Wegener s continental drift hypothesis stated that the continents had once been joined
More informationThe Relevance of Hydrography to UNCLOS; an Indonesian Perspective By: Prof. Dr. Hasjim Djalal, MA*
The Relevance of Hydrography to UNCLOS; an Indonesian Perspective By: Prof. Dr. Hasjim Djalal, MA* As I understand it, the theme of this 6 th ABLOS Conference 2010 is Contentious Issues in UNCLOS- surely
More informationOrphan Basin, Offshore Newfoundland: New seismic data and hydrocarbon plays for a dormant Frontier Basin
Orphan Basin, Offshore Newfoundland: New seismic data and hydrocarbon plays for a dormant Frontier Basin Jerry Smee* G&G Exploration Consulting, 301 400-3rd Avenue SW, Calgary, AB, T2P 4H2 Sam Nader, Paul
More informationThe Theory of Continental Drift. Continental Drift Discovery
The Theory of Continental Drift Continental Drift Discovery The World ALFRED WEGENER THEORY OF CONTINENTAL DRIFT Found evidence for PANGAEA and proposed the theory of continental drift. Continental Drift
More informationOCEANOGRAPHY MEASURING THE DEPTHS OF THE OCEANS
Water 2 page 1 OCEANOGRAPHY Name If all the water was drained from the ocean basins, what kind of surface would be revealed? It would not be the quiet, subdued topography as was once thought, but a surface
More informationOperating conditions in the Arctic: Data acquisition in the Arctic Ocean by the Continental Shelf Project of the Kingdom of Denmark
Operating conditions in the Arctic: Data acquisition in the Arctic Ocean by the Continental Shelf Project of the Kingdom of Denmark By Christian Marcussen Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland Danish
More informationTerrain Units PALEOGEOGRAPHY: LANDFORM CREATION. Present Geology of NYS. Detailed Geologic Map of NYS
NYS TOPOGRAPHY Why so? PALEOGEOGRAPHY: LANDFORM CREATION Prof. Anthony Grande AFG 014 Present Geology of NYS Detailed Geologic Map of NYS Generalized Geology Detailed Geology Hot links to the fold out
More informationLooking at the world map, what do you notice about the shape of the continents? Jot down your ideas on your paper
Looking at the world map, what do you notice about the shape of the continents? Jot down your ideas on your paper The thing is the world didn t always look like this! It used to look like this: How is
More informationPlate Tectonics. Essentials of Geology, 11 th edition Chapter 15
1 Plate Tectonics Essentials of Geology, 11 th edition Chapter 15 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Plate Tectonics: summary in haiku form Alfred Wegener gave us Continental Drift. Fifty years later...
More informationPlate Tectonics Tutoiral. Questions. Teacher: Mrs. Zimmerman. Plate Tectonics and Mountains Practice Test
Teacher: Mrs. Zimmerman Print Close Plate Tectonics and Mountains Practice Test Plate Tectonics Tutoiral URL: http://www.hartrao.ac.za/geodesy/tectonics.html Questions 1. Fossils of organisms that lived
More informationLast Time. Submarine Canyons and Fans. Turbidites. MAS 603: Geological Oceanography. Lecture 16: Greenhouse vs. Icehouse Earths
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH ALABAMA Last Time MAS 603: Geological Oceanography Lecture 16: Greenhouse vs. Icehouse Earths Submarine Fans Definition and morphology Transport mechanisms (density currents) Submarine
More informationPlate Tectonics. Chapter 17. Great Idea: The entire Earth is still changing, due to the slow convection of soft, hot rocks deep within the planet.
Plate Tectonics Chapter 17 Great Idea: The entire Earth is still changing, due to the slow convection of soft, hot rocks deep within the planet. 1 Chapter Outline The Dynamic Earth Plate Tectonics: A Unifying
More informationThe Rock Cycle & Plate Tectonics
The Rock Cycle & Plate Tectonics I. The Rock Cycle 1. Rocks are the most common material on Earth. 2. They are made up of one or more minerals. A. The rock cycle explains how Earth processes change a rock
More informationUNIT 3 GEOLOGY VOCABULARY FLASHCARDS THESE KEY VOCABULARY WORDS AND PHRASES APPEAR ON THE UNIT 3 CBA
UNIT 3 GEOLOGY VOCABULARY FLASHCARDS THESE KEY VOCABULARY WORDS AND PHRASES APPEAR ON THE UNIT 3 CBA A map that shows Earth s Topographic Map surface topography, which is Earth s shape and features Contour
More informationOceanography, An Invitation to Marine Science 9e Tom Garrison. Ocean Basins Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
Oceanography, An Invitation to Marine Science 9e Tom Garrison 4 Ocean Basins Key Concepts Tectonic forces shape the seabed The ocean floor is divided into continental margins and deep ocean basins The
More informationThe surface of the ocean floor is as varied as the land. The five major oceans, from largest to smallest, are
11.1 Ocean Basins The surface of the ocean floor is as varied as the land. The five major oceans, from largest to smallest, are w the Pacific w the Atlantic w the Indian w the Southern w the Arctic The
More informationA Boundary Delineation System for the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management
A Boundary Delineation System for the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Doug Vandegraft Chief, Mapping and Boundary Branch BOEM Coastal Geotools - 2015 Outline Introduction BOEM Marine Cadastre Background
More informationPlate Tectonics: A Scientific Revolution Unfolds
Chapter 2 Lecture Earth: An Introduction to Physical Geology Eleventh Edition Plate Tectonics: A Scientific Revolution Unfolds Tarbuck and Lutgens From Continental Drift to Plate Tectonics Prior to the
More informationREADING QUESTIONS: Chapter 11, Plate Tectonics GEOL 131 Fall pts
READING QUESTIONS: Chapter 11, Plate Tectonics GEOL 131 Fall 2018 61 pts NAME DUE: Tuesday, November 20 Continental Drift: An Idea Before Its Time (p. 317-321) 1. Fill in the blanks in this sentence from
More informationGeography of the world s oceans and major current systems. Lecture 2
Geography of the world s oceans and major current systems Lecture 2 WHY is the GEOMORPHOLOGY OF THE OCEAN FLOOR important? (in the context of Oceanography) WHY is the GEOMORPHOLOGY OF THE OCEAN FLOOR important?
More informationPlate Tectonics. Structure of the Earth
Plate Tectonics Structure of the Earth The Earth can be considered as being made up of a series of concentric spheres, each made up of materials that differ in terms of composition and mechanical properties.
More informationPlate Tectonics. entirely rock both and rock
Plate Tectonics I. Tectonics A. Tectonic Forces are forces generated from within Earth causing rock to become. B. 1. The study of the origin and arrangement of Earth surface including mountain belts, continents,
More informationCh 9.1 Notes. Objective: Be able to explain the theory of plate tectonics and be able to explain evidence that supports it.
Ch 9.1 Notes Objective: Be able to explain the theory of plate tectonics and be able to explain evidence that supports it. Pangaea Alfred Wegener proposed that land on Earth formed a single, huge landmass.
More information1. I can describe evidence for continental drift theory (e.g., fossil evidence, mountain belts, paleoglaciation)
Science 10 Review Earth Science Vocabulary asthenosphere continental drift theory converging plates diverging plates earthquakes epicentre fault hot spot inner core lithosphere mantle mantle convection
More informationPotentials for Mineral and Hydrocarbon Development in the Northern part of Greenland
Potentials for Mineral and Hydrocarbon Development in the Northern part of Greenland WWF Seminar Iqaluit, 4-5 June 2013 Maja Sofie Burgaard Bureau of Minerals and Petroleum Agenda The Greenland Government
More informationContinental Drift and Plate Tectonics
Continental Drift and Plate Tectonics Continental Drift Wegener s continental drift hypothesis stated that the continents had once been joined to form a single supercontinent. Wegener proposed that the
More informationPacific Islands Regional Maritime Boundaries Project
Pacific Islands Regional Maritime Boundaries Project 31 st Star Conference, Nadi, FIJI 6-8 June 2016 Jens Kruger Head of Ocean & Coastal Geoscience Sector Andrick Lal Project Officer (Surveying) Emily
More informationMAR110 Lecture #3 Ocean Bathymetry / Plate Tectonics
1 MAR110 Lecture #3 Ocean Bathymetry / Plate Tectonics Ocean Basin Geographic Zones The geographic zones of the North Atlantic are identified in the bird s eye view of the sea floor above. Below is shown
More informationINTERNATIONAL BOUNDARY STUDY. Series A LIMITS IN THE SEAS. No. 15 MALAGASY REPUBLIC'STRAZGHT BASELINES. The Geographer
x, :hi,l54 tr45 no 15 This paper is one of a series issued by The Geographer, Bureau of Intelligence and Research of the Department of State. The aim is to set forth the basis for national arrangements
More informationPlate Tectonics 3. Where Does All the Extra Crust Go?
Plate Tectonics 3 Where Does All the Extra Crust Go? Unless otherwise noted the artwork and photographs in this slide show are original and by Burt Carter. Permission is granted to use them for non-commercial,
More informationGeomaticsWorld. Issue No 3 : Volume 21. Helping to unravel Easter Island s mysterious statues. DGI 2013: maritime security highlighted
GeomaticsWorld MARCH APRIL 2013 Issue No 3 : Volume 21 BIM: repeat the message even if you lose the will to live Helping to unravel Easter Island s mysterious statues DGI 2013: maritime security highlighted
More informationI. Earth s Layers a. Crust: Earth s outside layer. Made of mostly rock. i. Continental: er; made of mostly granite, forms the continents and shallow
I. Earth s Layers a. Crust: Earth s outside layer. Made of mostly rock. i. Continental: er; made of mostly granite, forms the continents and shallow sea beds, floats! ii. Oceanic: er; dense rock such as
More informationFigure 1. Examples of vector displacement diagrams for two and three-plate systems.
Figure 1. Examples of vector displacement diagrams for two and three-plate systems. Figure 2. Relationships between pole of rotation, great circles, ridge segments, small circles, transforms and fracture
More informationMUHAMMAD S TAMANNAI, DOUGLAS WINSTONE, IAN DEIGHTON & PETER CONN, TGS Nopec Geological Products and Services, London, United Kingdom
Geological and Geophysical Evaluation of Offshore Morondava Frontier Basin based on Satellite Gravity, Well and regional 2D Seismic Data Interpretation MUHAMMAD S TAMANNAI, DOUGLAS WINSTONE, IAN DEIGHTON
More information