Client RSK Environment Ltd Job No. J387 Date 19/11/2016. Project: Environmental Survey Location: Otranto Vessel: RV Atlante
|
|
- Dustin Watkins
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 FUGRO OCEANSISMICA S.p.A. GEODETIC PARAMETERS Client RSK Environment Ltd Job No. J387 Date 19/11/216 Project: Environmental Survey Location: Otranto Vessel: RV Atlante WGS-84 Geodetic Parameters Datum WGS 84 Spheroid WGS 84 Semi-major axis m Semi-minor axis First eccentricity squared Inverse flattening Transformation Parameters from WGS 84 to Local System Bursa Wolf convention YES NO Translation X. Rotation X. Translation Y. Rotation Y. Translation Z. Rotation Z. Scale factor Scale in ppm Local Datum Geodetic Parameters Datum WGS 84 Spheroid WGS 84 Semi-major axis m Semi-minor axis First eccentricity squared Inverse flattening Local Projection Parameters Projection name Universal Transverse Mercator, Northern Hemisphere Projection type UTM UTM zone 34 N Central meridian (CM) 21 E Latitude of origin Equator False easting 5m False northing m False height Scale factor on CM.9996 Northern standard parallel Southern standard parallel Azimuth of central line projection Ellip. height of projection centre Units Metres Edition: 3 29 Oct 29 Page 1 of 3 Form 9.31 geodetic parameters
2 FUGRO OCEANSISMICA S.p.A. GEODETIC PARAMETERS Local Datum Geodetic Parameters Datum WGS 84 Spheroid WGS 84 Semi-major axis m Semi-minor axis First eccentricity squared Inverse flattening Transformation Parameters from WGS 84 to Local System Bursa Wolf convention YES NO Translation X. Rotation X. Translation Y. Rotation Y. Translation Z. Rotation Z. Scale factor Scale in ppm Geographical Co-ordinates of Point of Check in WGS-84 Latitude N Longitude E Ellipsoidal height Height of geoid above ellipsoid Geoidal model used Geographical Co-ordinates of Point of Check in Local Datum Latitude N Longitude E Ellipsoidal height Height of geoid above ellipsoid Geoidal model used Projection Co-ordinates of Point of Check in Local Datum Easting Northing Elevation Approval Project manager Client Party chief in the field Client representative in the field Edition: 3 29 Oct 29 Page 2 of 3 Form 9.31 geodetic parameters
3 FUGRO OCEANSISMICA S.p.A. GEODETIC PARAMETERS Co-ordinates of check in WGS-84 Latitude N Longitude E Easting Northing Ellipsoidal height Height of geoid above ellipsoid Geoidal model used Co-ordinates of check in Local Datum Latitude N Longitude E Easting Northing Ellipsoidal height Height of geoid above ellipsoid Geoidal model used Co-ordinates of check in WGS-84 Latitude N Longitude E Easting Northing Ellipsoidal height Height of geoid above ellipsoid Geoidal model used Co-ordinates of check in Local Datum Latitude N Longitude E Easting Northing Ellipsoidal height Height of geoid above ellipsoid Geoidal model used Approval Project manager Client Party chief in the field Client representative in the field Edition: 3 29 Oct 29 Page 3 of 3 Form 9.31 geodetic parameters
4 OSD-FO POSITIONING SYSTEM VERIFICATION Vessel : Atlante CT 253 Project no : 16-J387 Location : Otranto Date : Positioning System : WGS 84 - UTM 34 From DGPS Logging Control Co-ordinate Fix Time Easting Northing Easting Northing de dn No. hh:mm:ss m m m m m m 1 11:2: :21: :22: :22: :23: :23: :24: :25: :25: :26: :26: :27: :28: :28: :4: :4: :41: :41: :42: :43: :43: :44: :44: :45: :46: S.D..2.2 Mean Notes: Datum WGS84 Projection UTM CM 21 Hemisphere North For Fugro OSD For Client Revision: Aug 212 Page 1 of 1 FSD-FO R1.2-PositioningSystemVerification.xls
5 GYRO CALIBRATION WITH TOTAL STATION Project: 16-J387 Location: Otranto Datum: WGS84 Vessel: Atlante CT 253 Date: Hemisphere: North Client: RSK Gyro Name: Meridian Projection: UTM Central Meridian: 21 E Station 1: Station 2: False Easting: 5 Easting: Easting: Convergence: Northing: Northing: Co-ordinates Observed Calculated Calculated Difference Difference Fix No. UTC time Bow Stern vessel bearing vessel heading vessel heading from mean Easting Northing Easting Northing Raw Gyro grid true (C-O) C-O (hh:mm:ss) (deg) (deg) (deg) (deg) (deg) 1 1:45: :45: :46: :46: :47: :48: :48: :49: :49: :5: :51: :51: :52: :52: :53: :54: :54: :55: :55: :56: Average: -.1 St. dev..7 For Fugro OSD For Client Gyro is reading:. to high. Revision: Dec 29 Page 1 of 1 Fugro OSD Version 1.3 FSD-FO-3-R1.3-Gyrocompass Calibrations.xls
6 Job 16 J387/27/11/216 18:21:21 Page: 1 TAP USBL CALIBRATION Project Details Project: Vessel Name: Client: Surveyors: Project Description: Calibration Descrption: Method / Units: Job 16 J387 ATLANTE TAP Davide P. Eduard T. TAP Pre construction Survey USBL Check Average Error / metres BEFORE (Initial Settings) Beacon (estimate): ~SD: Easting: 297, m Northing: 4,481, m Depth: m AFTER (Results of Calibration) Beacon (mean): SD: Easting: 297, m ( 2.57 m) Northing: 4,481, m ( 2.35 m) Depth: 34.8 m ( 1.9 m) X: Y: Depth: Transducer Offset: m -8. m 4.39 m X: Y: Depth: Transducer Offset: m -8. m 4.39 m USBL: Sound Velocity: 1,53. m/s Sound Velocity: USBL: 1, m/s ScaleFactor: Attitude Corrections: Attitude Corrections: Starfix: Pitch: Roll: Orientation: Starfix: Pitch: Roll: Orientation: Sonardyne: Pitch: Roll: Heading: Sonardyne: Pitch: 1.14 Roll: Heading: APOS: Pitch: Roll: Gear: APOS: Pitch: Roll: Gear: (Sonardyne and APOS corrections listed for convention) Iterations: Obs Accepted: Obs Rejected: Scatter Before: Scatter After:
7 TAP USBL CALIBRATION Vessel Track: Position Spread After Spread Percentage Position Spread Before 1 8 Spread Percentage Range Residual Z Residual X Residual Y Residual Job 16 J387/27/11/216 18:21:21 Page: 2
8 Job 16 J387/27/11/216 15:55:26 Page: 1 TAP USBL CALIBRATION Project Details Project: Vessel Name: Client: Surveyors: Project Description: Calibration Descrption: Method / Units: Job 16 J387 ATLANTE TAP Davide P. Eduard T. TAP Pre construction Survey USBL Calibration Average Error / metres BEFORE (Initial Settings) Beacon (estimate): ~SD: Easting: 297,196. m Northing: 4,481,561. m Depth: 296. m AFTER (Results of Calibration) Beacon (mean): SD: Easting: 297, m ( m) Northing: 4,481, m ( m) Depth: m ( 5.27 m) X: Y: Depth: Transducer Offset: m -8. m 4.39 m X: Y: Depth: Transducer Offset: m -8. m 4.39 m USBL: Sound Velocity: 1,53. m/s Sound Velocity: USBL: 1,53. m/s ScaleFactor: 1. Attitude Corrections: Attitude Corrections: Starfix: Pitch: Roll: Orientation: Starfix: Pitch: Roll: Orientation: Sonardyne: Pitch: Roll: Heading: Sonardyne: Pitch: 1.72 Roll: Heading: APOS: Pitch: Roll: Gear: APOS: Pitch: Roll: Gear: (Sonardyne and APOS corrections listed for convention) Iterations: Obs Accepted: Obs Rejected: Scatter Before: Scatter After:
9 TAP USBL CALIBRATION Vessel Track: Position Spread After Spread Percentage Position Spread Before Spread Percentage Range Residual Z Residual X Residual Y Residual Job 16 J387/27/11/216 15:55:26 Page: 2
10 Job 16 J387/27/11/216 17:37:34 Page: 1 TAP USBL CALIBRATION Project Details Project: Vessel Name: Client: Surveyors: Project Description: Calibration Descrption: Method / Units: Job 16 J387 ATLANTE TAP Davide P. Eduard T. TAP Pre construction Survey USBL Calibration Pitch Average Error / metres BEFORE (Initial Settings) Beacon (estimate): ~SD: Easting: 297, m Northing: 4,481, m Depth: m AFTER (Results of Calibration) Beacon (mean): SD: Easting: 297, m ( m) Northing: 4,481, m ( m) Depth: m ( 5.13 m) X: Y: Depth: Transducer Offset: m -8. m 4.39 m X: Y: Depth: Transducer Offset: m -8. m 4.39 m USBL: Sound Velocity: 1,53. m/s Sound Velocity: USBL: 1,53. m/s ScaleFactor: 1. Attitude Corrections: Attitude Corrections: Starfix: Pitch: Roll: Orientation: Starfix: Pitch: Roll: Orientation: Sonardyne: Pitch: Roll: Heading: Sonardyne: Pitch: Roll: Heading: APOS: Pitch: Roll: Gear: APOS: Pitch: Roll: Gear: (Sonardyne and APOS corrections listed for convention) Iterations: Obs Accepted: Obs Rejected: 253 Scatter Before: Scatter After:
11 TAP USBL CALIBRATION Vessel Track: Position Spread After Spread Percentage Position Spread Before Spread Percentage Range Residual Z Residual X Residual Y Residual Job 16 J387/27/11/216 17:37:34 Page: 2
12 MRU5 CALIBRATION Project: Nord Stream 2 Station 1: P1 Datum: WGS84 Time zone: UTC+1 Roll Base (Lr): 4.8 m Vessel: Easting: Hemisphere: North Pitch Base (Lp): 11.7 m Location: Otranto Northing: Projection: UTM zone 34 Date: Station 2: P2 Central Meridian: 21º Unit: DMS3-5 Easting: False Easting: 5 Serial No: Northing: No. Time observations of Roll TRUE ROLL RTK DGNSS Time True Pitch RTK DGNSS H, m observations of H, m ΔH, m Δ Roll, ΔH, m Δ Pitch, STBD PORT Pitch STERN BOW C-Or, C-Op, 1 1:29: :35: :29: :35: :3: :35: :3: :35: :3: :35: :3: :36: :3: :36: :3: :36: :3: :36: :3: :36: :31: :36: :31: :36: :31: :36: :31: :36: :31: :37: :31: :37: Average: St. dev Observed Roll, Observed Pitch,
13 FUGRO TAP Pre-construction Survey-Installation of Monitoring Station, Environmental and Geophysical Survey Adriatic Sea MBES calibration Report Reson Seabat 711 Trans Adriatic Pipeline AG RSK Environment Ltd. Fugro Document No. XXXXXX Page 1 of Error! Bookmark not defined.
14 RSK ENVIRONMENT LTD TRANS ADRIATIC PIPELINE PRE-CONSTRUCTION SURVEY FUGRO TAP Pre-construction Survey-Installation of Monitoring Station, Environmental and Geophysical Survey Adriatic Sea MBES calibration Report Reson Seabat 711 Prepared for: RSK Environment Ltd t Spring Lodge 172 Chester Road Helsby U.K. Phone no.: Mobile no.: dwatson@rsk.co.uk Multibeam Calibration Report Paolo Cosmo Santoro Rev Descrizione Prepared MBES Calibration Report
15 RSK ENVIRONMENT LTD TRANS ADRIATIC PIPELINE PRE-CONSTRUCTION SURVEY CONTENTS Page 1. INTRODUCTION General Background Pre Calibration Settings Calibration Method Results 5 TABLES Table 1.1: Loaded Calibration Lines (P= pitch R=roll Y=Yaw ) 3 Table 1.2: Calibrations results 5 FIGURES Figure 1.1: MBES data example (pre calibration) 6 Figure 1.2: MBES data example (after calibration) 7 FOSPA MBES Report Page 1
16 RSK ENVIRONMENT LTD TRANS ADRIATIC PIPELINE PRE-CONSTRUCTION SURVEY 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 General The Reson Seabat 711 multibeam echo sounder on board the MN ATLANTE was calibrated on 2 December 216. The calibration was undertaken over an area with several targets inside the survey area. The purpose of calibrating the system was to determine the angular difference between the pitch, roll and heading sensors with the multibeam head installation. 1.2 Background When the multibeam transducer, motion sensor and gyro are installed on a vessel, there is always going to be some residual misalignment between the sensors. During survey operations the multibeam data, with appropriate offset corrections, needs to be derived relative to true vertical. Any deviations in roll will translate to depth measurement errors in the outer beams, increasing with beam angle. Deviations in pitch will result in along track position errors. Similarly, heading (or yaw) offsets between the planes of the multibeam transmit beam and the alignment of the vessel reported by the gyro will result in position errors on the soundings from the outer beams. These errors will increase both with beam angle off nadir and water depth. It is also necessary to determine any latency within the positioning system to ensure that the data collection system is synchronized to GPS time. The difference in time from the moment when a position is valid until the position message is sent to the data collection system must be determined. Commonly used DGPS receivers have latencies ranging from 2 milliseconds to over one second. If the data collection system does not correct for this latency, the result is a speed dependent position error in the data. The positioning system used in the current survey has no latency, so the lines have not been run. 1.3 Pre Calibration The following operations were carried out prior to calibration: Location of appropriate calibration feature Draft measurement of echo sounders Gyro calibration Sound velocity Profile Check time offset of positioning system, motion sensors and echo sounders Check operation of motion sensors FOSPA MBES Report Page 2
17 RSK ENVIRONMENT LTD TRANS ADRIATIC PIPELINE PRE-CONSTRUCTION SURVEY 1.4 Settings Local Geodetic Parameters Datum WGS84 Spheroid WGS84 Semi-Major Axis a= m Inverse Flattening 1/f= Projection parameters: Projection Universal Transverse Mercator, Northern Hemisphere Zone 34 N Central Meridian 21 E False Easting 5 m False Northing. m Scale Factor.9996 on Central Meridian Units Meters Multibeam Echo Sounder MBE Device Type HULL MOUNTED Cast Reference SVP 2/12/216 Transducer SV 1514 m/s MBE Device Reson SEABAT 711 Position Device Starfix STAR PACK Heading Device Teledyne Meridian gyro Heave Device Teledyne DMS 55 Pitch Roll Device Teledyne DMS 55 Pos Offset from CRP MBES (installation position) Calibration Location Centred about the following coordinates: Easting m Northing m Depth -12 m Table 1.1: Loaded Calibration Lines (P= pitch R=roll Y=Yaw ) RESON 8111 MULTIBEAM CALIBRATION LINE SUMMARY Calibration Line used For Logging Session Average Heading (deg) Average Speed m/s(knots) PRH H knots 4 knots FOSPA MBES Report Page 3
18 RSK ENVIRONMENT LTD TRANS ADRIATIC PIPELINE PRE-CONSTRUCTION SURVEY Calibration Conditions Weather: Good Sea: Calm 1.5 Calibration Method 4 lines were run, 2 over the same location, two for yaw and two in opposite direction for roll, pitch, yaw and latency calibration. Calibration lines were processed using the Multibeam calibration software program within Fugro s Starfix suite to find correction values in the following order: 1. Roll 2. Pitch 3. Heading (or Yaw) 4. Latency Pitch Calibration A latency correction s was applied before deriving the Pitch offset error. Pitch offset error was measured from reciprocal lines that were run over the established point at a speed of 4 knots. The pitch offset correction of -2 was derived by iteratively reducing the differences in vertical angle through nadir along the track calibration line until the two data sets aligned. Roll Calibration A pitch correction of -2 was applied before deriving the Roll offset error. The roll offset error was measured by running reciprocal survey lines over a flat area of seabed then comparing the across track profiles against one another. The roll offset correction of 1.26 was derived by iteratively reducing the differences in horizontal angle along an across track calibration line until the two data sets aligned. FOSPA MBES Report Page 4
19 RSK ENVIRONMENT LTD TRANS ADRIATIC PIPELINE PRE-CONSTRUCTION SURVEY Heading (or Yaw) Calibration A Roll offset correction of 1.26 was applied before deriving the Orientation offset error. The heading offset error was derived by iteratively reducing the difference in orientation angle to a target resolved in 2 lines run in the same direction and apart. A heading offset correction of.6 was derived by iteratively reducing the differences in orientation angle of each swathe until the target aligned within the overlapping central region. 1.6 Results A summary of calibration results is given below: Table 1.2: Calibrations results Motion Sensor Calibration Date Latency (s) Pitch Error ( ) Roll Error ( ) Heading Error ( ) Teledyne DMS 55 2/12/ A good correlation of features was observed on overlapping lines after the application of calibration corrections. The following data examples show screen dumps after the application of calibration corrections and an image showing the final corrected data set. FOSPA MBES Report Page 5
20 RSK ENVIRONMENT LTD TRANS ADRIATIC PIPELINE PRE-CONSTRUCTION SURVEY MULTIBEAM CALIBRATION DATA EXAMPLE Image Description Screen dump from Fugro Reson SEABAT 711 Pre Calibration Starfix WorkBench Module Echo Sounder GENERAL INFORMATION Date of Survey: 2/12/216 Vessel: MN ATLANTE Survey Equipment: Reson SEABAT 711 Recording Medium: Scaling: Frequency: Starfix Logging Image is taken by screen dump. Example is not to scale 24 khz Figure 1.1: MBES data example (pre calibration) FOSPA MBES Report Page 6
21 RSK ENVIRONMENT LTD TRANS ADRIATIC PIPELINE PRE-CONSTRUCTION SURVEY MULTIBEAM CALIBRATION DATA EXAMPLE Image Description Calibrated Sensor Screen dump from Fugro Reson SEABAT 711 After Calibration Starfix WorkBench Module Echo Sounder GENERAL INFORMATION Date of Survey: 2/12/216 Vessel: MN ATLANTE Survey Equipment: Reson SEABAT 711 Recording Medium: Scaling: Frequency: Starfix Logging Image is taken by screen dump. Example is not to scale 24 khz Figure 1.2: MBES data example (after calibration) FOSPA MBES Report Page 7
22 FUGRO TAP Pre-construction Survey-Installation of Monitoring Station, Environmental and Geophysical Survey Adriatic Sea MBES calibration Report Reson Seabat 716 Trans Adriatic Pipeline AG RSK Environment Ltd. Fugro Document No. XXXXXX Page 1 of Error! Bookmark not defined.
23 RSK ENVIRONMENT LTD TRANS ADRIATIC PIPELINE PRE-CONSTRUCTION SURVEY FUGRO TAP Pre-construction Survey-Installation of Monitoring Station, Environmental and Geophysical Survey Adriatic Sea MBES calibration Report Reson Seabat 716 Prepared for: RSK Environment Ltd t Spring Lodge 172 Chester Road Helsby U.K. Phone no.: Mobile no.: dwatson@rsk.co.uk Multibeam Calibration Report Paolo Cosmo Santoro Rev Descrizione Prepared MBES Calibration Report
24 RSK ENVIRONMENT LTD TRANS ADRIATIC PIPELINE PRE-CONSTRUCTION SURVEY CONTENTS Page 1. INTRODUCTION General Background Pre Calibration Settings Calibration Method Results 5 TABLES Table 1.1: Loaded Calibration Lines (P= pitch R=roll Y=Yaw ) 3 Table 1.2: Calibrations results 5 FIGURES Figure 1.1: MBES data example (pre calibration) 6 Figure 1.2: MBES data example (after calibration) 7 FOSPA MBES Report Page 1
25 RSK ENVIRONMENT LTD TRANS ADRIATIC PIPELINE PRE-CONSTRUCTION SURVEY 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 General The Reson Seabat 716 multibeam echo sounder on board the MN ATLANTE was calibrated on 7 December 216. The calibration was undertaken over an area with several targets inside the survey area. The purpose of calibrating the system was to determine the angular difference between the pitch, roll and heading sensors with the multibeam head installation. 1.2 Background When the multibeam transducer, motion sensor and gyro are installed on a vessel, there is always going to be some residual misalignment between the sensors. During survey operations the multibeam data, with appropriate offset corrections, needs to be derived relative to true vertical. Any deviations in roll will translate to depth measurement errors in the outer beams, increasing with beam angle. Deviations in pitch will result in along track position errors. Similarly, heading (or yaw) offsets between the planes of the multibeam transmit beam and the alignment of the vessel reported by the gyro will result in position errors on the soundings from the outer beams. These errors will increase both with beam angle off nadir and water depth. It is also necessary to determine any latency within the positioning system to ensure that the data collection system is synchronized to GPS time. The difference in time from the moment when a position is valid until the position message is sent to the data collection system must be determined. Commonly used DGPS receivers have latencies ranging from 2 milliseconds to over one second. If the data collection system does not correct for this latency, the result is a speed dependent position error in the data. The positioning system used in the current survey has no latency, so the lines have not been run. 1.3 Pre Calibration The following operations were carried out prior to calibration: Location of appropriate calibration feature Draft measurement of echo sounders Gyro calibration Sound velocity Profile Check time offset of positioning system, motion sensors and echo sounders Check operation of motion sensors FOSPA MBES Report Page 2
26 RSK ENVIRONMENT LTD TRANS ADRIATIC PIPELINE PRE-CONSTRUCTION SURVEY 1.4 Settings Local Geodetic Parameters Datum WGS84 Spheroid WGS84 Semi-Major Axis a= m Inverse Flattening 1/f= Projection parameters: Projection Universal Transverse Mercator, Northern Hemisphere Zone 34 N Central Meridian 21 E False Easting 5 m False Northing. m Scale Factor.9996 on Central Meridian Units Meters Multibeam Echo Sounder MBE Device Type HULL MOUNTED Cast Reference SVP 7/12/216 Transducer SV 1514 m/s MBE Device Reson SEABAT 716 Position Device Starfix STAR PACK Heading Device Teledyne Meridian gyro Heave Device Teledyne DMS 55 Pitch Roll Device Teledyne DMS 55 Pos Offset from CRP MBES (installation position) Calibration Location Centred about the following coordinates: Easting Northing Depth m m -591 m Table 1.1: Loaded Calibration Lines (P= pitch R=roll Y=Yaw ) RESON 716 MULTIBEAM CALIBRATION LINE SUMMARY Calibration Line used For Logging Session Average Heading (deg) Average Speed m/s(knots) PRH H knots 4 knots FOSPA MBES Report Page 3
27 RSK ENVIRONMENT LTD TRANS ADRIATIC PIPELINE PRE-CONSTRUCTION SURVEY Calibration Conditions Weather: Good Sea: Calm 1.5 Calibration Method 4 lines were run, 2 over the same location, two for yaw and two in opposite direction for roll, pitch, yaw and latency calibration. Calibration lines were processed using the Multibeam calibration software program within Fugro s Starfix suite to find correction values in the following order: 1. Roll 2. Pitch 3. Heading (or Yaw) 4. Latency Pitch Calibration A latency correction s was applied before deriving the Pitch offset error. Pitch offset error was measured from reciprocal lines that were run over the established point at a speed of 4 knots. The pitch offset correction of -.8 was derived by iteratively reducing the differences in vertical angle through nadir along the track calibration line until the two data sets aligned. Roll Calibration A pitch correction of -.8 was applied before deriving the Roll offset error. The roll offset error was measured by running reciprocal survey lines over a flat area of seabed then comparing the across track profiles against one another. The roll offset correction of 1.6 was derived by iteratively reducing the differences in horizontal angle along an across track calibration line until the two data sets aligned. FOSPA MBES Report Page 4
28 RSK ENVIRONMENT LTD TRANS ADRIATIC PIPELINE PRE-CONSTRUCTION SURVEY Heading (or Yaw) Calibration A Roll offset correction of 1.6 was applied before deriving the Orientation offset error. The heading offset error was derived by iteratively reducing the difference in orientation angle to a target resolved in 2 lines run in the same direction and apart. A heading offset correction of -.25 was derived by iteratively reducing the differences in orientation angle of each swathe until the target aligned within the overlapping central region. 1.6 Results A summary of calibration results is given below: Table 1.2: Calibrations results Motion Sensor Calibration Date Latency (s) Pitch Error ( ) Roll Error ( ) Heading Error ( ) Teledyne DMS 55 7/12/ A good correlation of features was observed on overlapping lines after the application of calibration corrections. The following data examples show screen dumps after the application of calibration corrections and an image showing the final corrected data set. FOSPA MBES Report Page 5
29 RSK ENVIRONMENT LTD TRANS ADRIATIC PIPELINE PRE-CONSTRUCTION SURVEY MULTIBEAM CALIBRATION DATA EXAMPLE Image Description Screen dump from Fugro Reson SEABAT 716 Pre Calibration Starfix WorkBench Module Echo Sounder GENERAL INFORMATION Date of Survey: 7/12/216 Vessel: MN ATLANTE Survey Equipment: Reson SEABAT 716 Recording Medium: Starfix Logging Scaling: Frequency: Image is taken by screen dump. Example is not to scale 44 khz Figure 1.1: MBES data example (pre calibration) FOSPA MBES Report Page 6
30 RSK ENVIRONMENT LTD TRANS ADRIATIC PIPELINE PRE-CONSTRUCTION SURVEY MULTIBEAM CALIBRATION DATA EXAMPLE Image Description Calibrated Sensor Screen dump from Fugro Reson SEABAT 716 After Calibration Starfix WorkBench Module Echo Sounder GENERAL INFORMATION Date of Survey: 7/12/216 Vessel: MN ATLANTE Survey Equipment: Reson SEABAT 716 Recording Medium: Scaling: Frequency: Starfix Logging Image is taken by screen dump. Example is not to scale 44 khz Figure 1.2: MBES data example (after calibration) FOSPA MBES Report Page 7
31 FUGRO OCEANSISMICA S.p.A. S.V.P. GRAPHIC PLOT UP/DOWN Date:2/12/216 Project: Trans Adriatic Pipeline - Geophysical survey Time: 6.5 (UTC +1) Client: RSK Project No: 16-J387 Wather Depth: 37 Area: San Foca- Adriatic Sea Mean Value: 1514,23 m/s UP and DOWN Speed of Sound Depths (m) Datum: Local Datum Latitude: 4 27' 15.88" Northing: Longitude: 18 36' 57.66" Easting: Ed Oct 29 Page 1 of 1 Form 9.48 SVP
32 FUGRO OCEANSISMICA S.p.A. S.V.P. GRAPHIC PLOT UP/DOWN Date:2/12/216 Project: Trans Adriatic Pipeline - Geophysical survey Time: 8.3 (UTC +1) Client: RSK Project No: 16-J387 Wather Depth: 122 Area: San Foca- Adriatic Sea Mean Value: 1515,55 m/s UP and DOWN Speed of Sound Depths (m) Datum: Local Datum Latitude: 4 26' 56.78" Northing: Longitude: 18 32' 48.49" Easting: Ed Oct 29 Page 1 of 1 Form 9.48 SVP
33 FUGRO OCEANSISMICA S.p.A. S.V.P. GRAPHIC PLOT UP/DOWN Date:2/12/216 Project: Trans Adriatic Pipeline - Geophysical survey Time:19,58 (UTC +1) Client: RSK Project No: 16-J387 Wather Depth: 84 Area: San Foca- Adriatic Sea Mean Value: 1516,67 m/s UP and DOWN Speed of Sound Depths (m) Datum: Local Datum Latitude: 4 19' 35.4" Northing: Longitude: 18 25' 3.7" Easting: Ed Oct 29 Page 1 of 1 Form 9.48 SVP
34 FUGRO OCEANSISMICA S.p.A. S.V.P. GRAPHIC PLOT UP/DOWN Date:3/12/216 Project: Trans Adriatic Pipeline - Geophysical survey Time:8,2 (UTC +1) Client: RSK Project No: 16-J387 Wather Depth: 34,5 Area: San Foca- Adriatic Sea Mean Value: 1515,91 m/s UP and DOWN Speed of Sound Depths (m) 2 4 Datum: Local Datum Latitude: 4 19' 3.63" Northing: Longitude: 18 24' 17.91" Easting: Ed Oct 29 Page 1 of 1 Form 9.48 SVP
35 FUGRO OCEANSISMICA S.p.A. S.V.P. GRAPHIC PLOT UP/DOWN Date:3/12/216 Project: Trans Adriatic Pipeline - Geophysical survey Time:18, (UTC +1) Client: RSK Project No: 16-J387 Wather Depth: 75,5 Area: San Foca- Adriatic Sea Mean Value: 1516,1 m/s UP and DOWN Speed of Sound Depths (m) 2 4 Datum: Local Datum Latitude: 4 19' 8.48" Northing: ,5 Longitude: 18 25' 6.351" Easting: 28654,7 Ed Oct 29 Page 1 of 1 Form 9.48 SVP
36 FUGRO OCEANSISMICA S.p.A. S.V.P. GRAPHIC PLOT UP/DOWN Date:4/12/216 Project: Trans Adriatic Pipeline - Geophysical survey Time: 15, (UTC +1) Client: RSK Project No: 16-J387 Wather Depth: 122 Area: San Foca- Adriatic Sea Mean Value: 1515,85 m/s UP and DOWN Speed of Sound Depths (m) Datum: Local Datum Latitude: 4 27' " Northing: Longitude: 18 32' 59.48" Easting: Ed Oct 29 Page 1 of 1 Form 9.48 SVP
37 FUGRO OCEANSISMICA S.p.A. S.V.P. GRAPHIC PLOT UP/DOWN Date:4/12/216 Project: Trans Adriatic Pipeline - Geophysical survey Time: 22,15 (UTC +1) Client: RSK Project No: 16-J387 Wather Depth: 9 Area: San Foca- Adriatic Sea Mean Value: 1515,93 m/s UP and DOWN Speed of Sound Depths (m) Datum: Local Datum Latitude: 4 18' 56.47" Northing: Longitude: 18 26' 27.56" Easting: Ed Oct 29 Page 1 of 1 Form 9.48 SVP
38 FUGRO OCEANSISMICA S.p.A. S.V.P. GRAPHIC PLOT UP/DOWN Date:6/12/216 Project: Trans Adriatic Pipeline - Geophysical survey Time: 17,3 (UTC +1) Client: RSK Project No: 16-J387 Wather Depth: 225,69 Area: San Foca- Adriatic Sea Mean Value: 1514,58 m/s UP and DOWN Speed of Sound Depths (m) Datum: Local Datum Latitude: 4 25' 24.6" Northing: Longitude: 18 31' 4.59" Easting: Ed Oct 29 Page 1 of 1 Form 9.48 SVP
39 FUGRO OCEANSISMICA S.p.A. S.V.P. GRAPHIC PLOT UP/DOWN Date:7/12/216 Project: Trans Adriatic Pipeline - Geophysical survey Time: 1.55 (UTC +1) Client: RSK Project No: 16-J387 Wather Depth: 591 Area: San Foca- Adriatic Sea Mean Value: 1515,1 m/s Depths (m) UP and DOWN Speed of Sound Datum: Local Datum Latitude: 4 27' 26.53" Northing: Longitude: 18 38' 38.29" Easting: 3229 Ed Oct 29 Page 1 of 1 Form 9.48 SVP
40 FUGRO OCEANSISMICA S.p.A. S.V.P. GRAPHIC PLOT UP/DOWN Date:8/12/216 Project: Trans Adriatic Pipeline - Geophysical survey Time: 14.2 (UTC +1) Client: RSK Project No: 16-J387 Wather Depth: 785,5 Area: San Foca- Adriatic Sea Mean Value: 1516,1 m/s Depths (m) UP and DOWN Speed of Sound Datum: Local Datum Latitude: 4 31' 29.9" Northing: ,4 Longitude: 18 47' 1." Easting: ,4 Ed Oct 29 Page 1 of 1 Form 9.48 SVP
41 FUGRO OCEANSISMICA S.p.A. S.V.P. GRAPHIC PLOT UP/DOWN Date:9/12/216 Project: Trans Adriatic Pipeline - Geophysical survey Time: 15.5 (UTC +1) Client: RSK Project No: 16-J387 Wather Depth: 49 Area: San Foca- Adriatic Sea Mean Value: 1514,1 m/s Depths (m) UP and DOWN Speed of Sound Datum: Local Datum Latitude: 4 27' 4.5" Northing: Longitude: 18 37' 26.73" Easting: ,4 Ed Oct 29 Page 1 of 1 Form 9.48 SVP
42 FUGRO OCEANSISMICA S.p.A. S.V.P. GRAPHIC PLOT UP/DOWN Date:11/12/216 Project: Trans Adriatic Pipeline - Geophysical survey Time: 8,1 (UTC +1) Client: RSK Project No: 16-J387 Wather Depth: 123 Area: San Foca- Adriatic Sea Mean Value: 1516,1 m/s UP and DOWN Speed of Sound Depths (m) Datum: Local Datum Latitude: 4 26' 51.5" Northing: ,3 Longitude: 18 32' 7.34" Easting: 29989,6 Ed Oct 29 Page 1 of 1 Form 9.48 SVP
43 FUGRO OCEANSISMICA S.p.A. S.V.P. GRAPHIC PLOT UP/DOWN Date:14/12/216 Project: Trans Adriatic Pipeline - Geophysical survey Time: 7.15 (UTC +1) Client: RSK Project No: 16-J387 Wather Depth: 589 Area: San Foca- Adriatic Sea Mean Value: 1515,7 m/s Depths (m) UP and DOWN Speed of Sound Datum: Local Datum Latitude: 4 27' 35.5" Northing: ,9 Longitude: 18 38' 23.55" Easting: ,1 Ed Oct 29 Page 1 of 1 Form 9.48 SVP
44 FUGRO OCEANSISMICA S.p.A. S.V.P. GRAPHIC PLOT UP/DOWN Date:15/12/216 Project: Trans Adriatic Pipeline - Geophysical survey Time: 12.2 (UTC +1) Client: RSK Project No: 16-J387 Wather Depth: 644,3 Area: San Foca- Adriatic Sea Mean Value: 1515,8 m/s Depths (m) UP and DOWN Speed of Sound Datum: Local Datum Latitude: 4 27' 37." Northing: Longitude: 18 39' 6.36" Easting: 3899 Ed Oct 29 Page 1 of 1 Form 9.48 SVP
45 FUGRO OCEANSISMICA S.p.A. S.V.P. GRAPHIC PLOT UP/DOWN Date:27/11/216 Project: Trans Adriatic Pipeline - Geophysical survey Time: 7,34 (UTC +1) Client: RSK Project No: 16-J387 Wather Depth: 125 Area: San Foca- Adriatic Sea Mean Value: 1516,36 m/s UP and DOWN Speed of Sound Depths (m) Datum: Local Datum Latitude: 4 27' 4.35" Northing: Longitude: 18 32' 32.1" Easting: Ed Oct 29 Page 1 of 1 Form 9.48 SVP
H.A.R.S. PRA #1 (Historic Area Remediation Site)
H.A.R.S. PRA #1 (Historic Area Remediation Site) 2009 Multibeam Bathymetry TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF TABLES 2 LIST OF FIGURES 3 1.0 INTRODUCTION 4 2.0 OBJECTIVE 4 3.0 PROCEDURE 4 3.1 DATA ACQUISITION
More information12/26/2012. Geographic Information Systems * * * * GIS (... yrezaei
( - Geographic Information Systems ( ( 1 2 3 Information System Data base DB IS IS DB (Knowledge ( ( (System (Information System - (Georefrence Analysis Data + Knowledge ======== Information 4 5 ( < 10%
More informationOffshore Operations and Project Execution Geophysical Site Surveys
Offshore Operations and Project Execution Geophysical Site Surveys Chris Almond Senior Geophysicist Fugro Survey Limited 22/04/2015 Presentation Summary: Office-based Personnel Project Awarded Pre Offshore
More informationCoordinate Systems. Location on earth is defined by coordinates
Coordinate Systems We think of the earth as a sphere It is actually a spheroid (ellipsoid), slightly larger in radius at the equator than at the poles Shape of the Earth Location on earth is defined by
More informationShape of the Earth. Data Output by the Receiver
It is quite common for confusion to arise about the process used during a hydrographic survey when GPS-derived water surface elevation is incorporated into the data as an RTK Tide correction. This article
More informationWHERE ARE YOU? Maps & Geospatial Concepts Fall 2015
WHERE ARE YOU? Maps & Geospatial Concepts Fall 2015 Where are you? Relative location I m at school Absolute Location 45 26 18.07 122 43 50.78 Where is Boston? Introducing Geodesy, Ellipsoids & Geoids Geodesy
More informationMap Projections. Displaying the earth on 2 dimensional maps
Map Projections Displaying the earth on 2 dimensional maps Map projections Define the spatial relationship between locations on earth and their relative locations on a flat map Are mathematical expressions
More informationGRAVITY SURVEY TEELS MARSH PROSPECT
GRAVITY SURVEY over the TEELS MARSH PROSPECT MINERAL COUNTY, NV for Dajin Resources (US) Corp. March 2015 SUBMITTED BY Magee Geophysical Services LLC 465 Leventina Canyon Road Reno, Nevada 89523 USA TEL
More informationIntroduction to Geographic Information Science. Updates/News. Last Lecture. Geography 4103 / Map Projections and Coordinate Systems
Geography 4103 / 5103 Introduction to Geographic Information Science Map Projections and Coordinate Systems Updates/News Thursday s lecture Reading discussion 1 find the readings online open questions,
More informationNR402 GIS Applications in Natural Resources Lesson 4 Map Projections
NR402 GIS Applications in Natural Resources Lesson 4 Map Projections From http://www.or.blm.gov/gis/ 1 Geographic coordinates Coordinates are expressed as Latitude and Longitude in Degrees, Minutes, Seconds
More information2. GETTING STARTED WITH GIS
2. GETTING STARTED WITH GIS What are geographic information systems and what are they used for? ArcGIS: ArcMap, ArcCatalog and ArcToolbox Vector data vs. raster data vs. attribute tables Polygons, polylines,
More informationGEOGRAPHIC COORDINATE SYSTEMS
GEOGRAPHIC COORDINATE SYSTEMS Introduction to GIS Winter 2015 What is Georeferencing? Used to establish a location on the Earth s surface 1 st order polynomial transformation Georeferencing toolbar What
More informationWHERE ARE YOU? Maps & Geospatial Concepts Fall 2012
WHERE ARE YOU? Maps & Geospatial Concepts Fall 2012 Where are you? Relative location I m at school Absolute Location 45 26 18.07 122 43 50.78 Datums Datums A reference surface of the Earth Used as the
More informationOutline. Shape of the Earth. Geographic Coordinates (φ, λ, z) Ellipsoid or Spheroid Rotate an ellipse around an axis. Ellipse.
Map Projections Outline Geodesy and map projections Prof. D. Nagesh Kumar Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Science Bangalore 560 012, India http://www.civil.iisc.ernet.in/~nagesh Shape
More informationMap projections. Rüdiger Gens
Rüdiger Gens Coordinate systems Geographic coordinates f a: semi-major axis b: semi-minor axis Geographic latitude b Geodetic latitude a f: flattening = (a-b)/a Expresses as a fraction 1/f = about 300
More informationGeographic coordinate systems
1 Geographic coordinate systems In this chapter you ll learn about longitude and latitude. You ll also learn about the parts that comprise a geographic coordinate system including Spheres and spheroids
More information1/28/16. EGM101 Skills Toolbox. Oblate spheroid. The shape of the earth Co-ordinate systems Map projections. Geoid
EGM101 Skills Toolbox Oblate spheroid The shape of the earth Co-ordinate systems Map projections The geoid is the shape that the surface of the oceans would take under the influence of Earth's gravitation
More information1. Geospatial technology rarely links geospatial data to nonspatial data. a. True *b. False
Chapter 2 Where in the Geospatial World Are You? 1. Geospatial technology rarely links geospatial data to nonspatial data. 2. For geospatial technology to work, every location on Earth must be: a. inhabited
More informationch02.pdf chap2.pdf chap02.pdf
Introduction to Geographic Information Systems 8th Edition Karl Solutions Manual Full Download: http://testbanklive.com/download/introduction-to-geographic-information-systems-8th-edition-karl-solutions-manu
More informationMLLW and the NAD83 Ellipsoid: An Investigation of Local Offsets and Trends Using PPK and Gauge Derived Water Surfaces.
MLLW and the NAD83 Ellipsoid: An Investigation of Local Offsets and Trends Using PPK and Gauge Derived Water Surfaces. Abstract: Authors Doug Lockhart, Fugro Pelagos, Inc. Andy Orthmann, Fugro Pelagos,
More informationChoosing the wrong spheroid
Reality Check The E&P industry has experienced avoidable costs in its encounters with the science and methodology of geodesy and cartography. The following are explicit case histories of real problems
More informationHow does an ellipsoid differ from a sphere in approximating the shape and size of the Earth?
Chapter 02 Test Bank Worksheet Questions 1. What is a map projection? Topic: Map Projection 2. How does an ellipsoid differ from a sphere in approximating the shape and size of the Earth? Topic: Ellipsoid
More informationLecture 4. Coordinate Systems & Projections
Lecture 4 Coordinate Systems & Projections Outline Geodesy Geoids Ellipsoids Geographic Coordinate Systems Magnetic North vs. True North Datums Projections Applying Coordinate Systems and Projections Why
More informationWhen the Earth Was Flat. Measurements were made using a plumb bob, a spirit level, and a stick. Also, the Stars.
ABSTRACT Defining the shape of the Earth geoid. Mathematical models spheroid or ellipsoid Mathematical projection of geodetic systems GIS/GPS technology The need for a unified projection systems World
More informationTopic: Bathymetric Survey Techniques. (a) Single-beam echo-sounders (SBES) (b) Multi-beam echo-sounders (MBES)
Topic: Bathymetric Survey Techniques (a) Single-beam echo-sounders (SBES) (b) Multi-beam echo-sounders (MBES) Bathymetry is the measurement of water depths - bathymetry is the underwater equivalent of
More informationGPS Remote Sensing. GIS Photogrammetry. GEODESY Equipment (total station) CARTOGRAPHY Survey Software. Map Projection Coordinate Systems
GPS Remote Sensing GIS Photogrammetry GEODESY Equipment (total station) CARTOGRAPHY Survey Software Map Projection Coordinate Systems 1 Coordinate Systems, Datum and Map Projection Dr. Maher A. El-Hallaq
More informationFLUVIA NAUTIC DATASET (16 March 2007) Description of the sensor logs
FLUVIA NAUTIC DATASET (16 March 2007) Description of the sensor logs David Ribas, PhD Student. Underwater Robotics Lab, Computer Vision and Robotics Group, University of Girona Doppler Velocity Log (Argonaut
More informationThe Elements of GIS. Organizing Data and Information. The GIS Database. MAP and ATRIBUTE INFORMATION
GIS s Roots in Cartography Getting Started With GIS Chapter 2 Dursun Z. Seker MAP and ATRIBUTE INFORMATION Data (numbers and text) store as files refer to them collectively as a database gather inform.
More informationThe Gauss Conform Coordinate
Surveying The South African Coordinate Reference System (Part 2) by Aslam Parker, Chief Directorate: National Geo-spatial Information Part 1 of this article (see PositionIT Nov/Dec 2011) focused on the
More informationGIST 3300 / Geographic Information Systems. Last Time. Today
GIST 3300 / 5300 Last Time Ellipsoids and Datums Today Map Projections Map Projections Today we will build on the concepts of Geographic Coordinate Systems, Ellipsoids and Datums and add the concepts of
More informationNEW SEAFLOOR INSTALLATIONS REQUIRE ULTRA-HIGH RESOLUTION SURVEYS
NEW SEAFLOOR INSTALLATIONS REQUIRE ULTRA-HIGH RESOLUTION SURVEYS Donald Hussong (Fugro Seafloor Surveys, Inc.) dhussong@fugro.com Fugro Seafloor Surveys, Inc., 1100 Dexter Avenue North (Suite 100), Seattle,
More informationWhat is a Map Projection?
What is a Map Projection? It is how we represent a three dimensional Earth on a flat piece of paper However The process of transferring information from the Earth to a map causes every projection to distort
More informationApplied Cartography and Introduction to GIS GEOG 2017 EL. Lecture-1 Chapters 1 and 2
Applied Cartography and Introduction to GIS GEOG 2017 EL Lecture-1 Chapters 1 and 2 What is GIS? A Geographic Information System (GIS) is a computer system for capturing, storing, querying, analyzing and
More informationThe Wildlife Society Meet and Greet. Come learn about what the UNBC Student Chapter of TWS is all about!
Georeferencing I GEOG 300, Lecture 4 Dr. Anthony Jjumba 1 The Wildlife Society Meet and Greet Quiz Come learn about what the UNBC Student Chapter of TWS is all about! 5:30 7:30 PM, Wednesday September
More informationWelcome to Lesson 4. It is important for a GIS analyst to have a thorough understanding of map projections and coordinate systems.
Welcome to Lesson 4. It is important for a GIS analyst to have a thorough understanding of map projections and coordinate systems. A GIS without coordinates would simply be a database like Microsoft Excel
More informationLecture 2. Map Projections and GIS Coordinate Systems. Tomislav Sapic GIS Technologist Faculty of Natural Resources Management Lakehead University
Lecture 2 Map Projections and GIS Coordinate Systems Tomislav Sapic GIS Technologist Faculty of Natural Resources Management Lakehead University Map Projections Map projections are mathematical formulas
More informationProjections and Coordinate Systems
Projections and Coordinate Systems Overview Projections Examples of different projections Coordinate systems Datums Projections Overview Projections and Coordinate Systems GIS must accurately represent
More informationEnvSci360 Computer and Analytical Cartography
EnvSci360 Computer and Analytical Cartography Lecture 3 Geodesy Map Projections, Datums, and Coordinate Systems 1 Geodesy The science of measuring and representing the shape and size of the earth, and
More informationChapter 3: Configuring Geodetics & Units
Chapter 3: Configuring Geodetics & Units WinFrog provides you with the ability to configure the Working Geodetics to suit survey requirements for almost any location worldwide. The configuration of the
More informationFri. Jan. 26, Demonstration of QGIS with GPS tracks. Types of data, simple vector (shapefile) formats
Fri. Jan. 26, 2018 Demonstration of QGIS with GPS tracks Types of data, simple vector (shapefile) formats Map projections, Coordinate Reference Systems Demonstration of QGIS with geologic map 1 Raster
More informationHORIZONTAL PROJECTION PARAMETERS: DANE COUNTY COORDINATES
Recommended RTK GPS Configuration Parameters for the City of Madison, WI Base Station Compiled by: Dan Rodman RLS, City of Madison (608)266-6674 drodman@cityofmadison.com For base station information see
More informationLesson 5: Map Scale and Projections
Organizing Data and Information Lesson 5: Map Scale and Projections Map Scales Projections Information can be organized as lists, numbers, tables, text, pictures, maps, or indexes. Clusters of information
More informationProjections & GIS Data Collection: An Overview
Projections & GIS Data Collection: An Overview Projections Primary data capture Secondary data capture Data transfer Capturing attribute data Managing a data capture project Geodesy Basics for Geospatial
More informationControl Surveys and Coordinate Systems
Control Surveys and Coordinate Systems The Earth is Round Basic Shape of the Earth: Oblate Spheroid of Revolution The length of the equatorial axis is approximately 27 miles greater than the polar axis.
More informationOrbit and Transmit Characteristics of the CloudSat Cloud Profiling Radar (CPR) JPL Document No. D-29695
Orbit and Transmit Characteristics of the CloudSat Cloud Profiling Radar (CPR) JPL Document No. D-29695 Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, CA 91109 26 July 2004 Revised
More informationGeoreferencing. Where on earth are we? Critical for importing and combining layers for mapping
Georeferencing Where on earth are we? Critical for importing and combining layers for mapping 1. The Geoid Earth is not a perfect sphere, it is ellipsoidal.. earth is the 'Geoid'. The difference between
More informationBuilding a Local Transverse Mercator (LTM) Grid aligned with MGA94 for use in GNSS and GIS Richard Stanaway
Building a Local Transverse Mercator (LTM) Grid aligned with MGA94 for use in GNSS and GIS Richard Stanaway Quickclose What is an LTM? An LTM (Local Transverse Mercator) is a working Plane Grid Used for
More informationstart of Swedish national maps.
1809 - start of Swedish national maps. Corps of military field measurement Triangulation network Spheroid: Bessel 1841 Semimajor axis: : 6377397.155 Semiminor axis: : 6356078.963 Inverse flattening: :
More information12/11/2013& egm502 seafloor mapping
egm502 seafloor mapping lecture 13 multi-beam echo-sounders The majority of the current charts of the ocean floors have been produced from single beam echo-sounder data. Even though these data have been
More informationEvaluation of GPS in Orthometric Heights Determination in Khartoum State (Sudan)
Evaluation of GPS in Orthometric Heights Determination in Khartoum State (Sudan) Dr. Nagi Zomrawi Mohammed 1, Dr. Abd Elrahim Elgizouli Mohammed 2 and Engineer Osman Bakry 3 1 Sudan University of Science
More informationGeog Lecture 29 Mapping and GIS Continued
Geog 1000 - Lecture 29 Mapping and GIS Continued http://scholar.ulethbridge.ca/chasmer/classes/ Today s Lecture (Pgs 13-25, 28-29) 1. Hand back Assignment 3 2. Review of Dr. Peddle s lecture last week
More informationUnderstanding Projections for GIS
Presented by John Schaeffer Juniper GIS Services, Inc. This PowerPoint is available at JuniperGIS.com Presentation Objectives To understand basic concepts on projections and coordinate systems for the
More informationIntro to GIS Fall 2010 Georeferencing & Map Projections
Intro to GIS Fall 2010 Georeferencing & Map Projections SHAPE OF THE EARTH Earth's Shape Geoid: shape of earth minus topographic features (irregular due to local variations in gravity) Ellipsoid: elongated
More informationGeo Referencing & Map projections CGI-GIRS 0910
Geo Referencing & Map projections CGI-GIRS 0910 Where are you? 31UFT8361 174,7 441,2 51 58' NB 5 40' OL 2/60 Who are they? 3/60 Do geo data describe Earth s phenomena perfectly? Georeference systems ellipsoid
More informationMapping coordinate systems
Mapping coordinate systems 1. The Earth's Graticule Latitude and Longitude The graticule is the imaginary grid of lines running east-west (lines of latitude = parallels) and north-south lines of longitude
More informationCoordinate systems, measured surveys for BIM, total station for BIM, as-built surveys, setting-out
Coordinate systems, measured surveys for BIM, total station for BIM, as-built surveys, setting-out What is a BIM What does a BIM do Why use a BIM BIM Software BIM and the Surveyor How do they relate to
More informationREFERENCING COORDINATE SYSTEMS MAP PROJECTIONS GEOREFERENCING
GIS in Ecology SPATIAL REFERENCING COORDINATE SYSTEMS MAP PROJECTIONS GEOREFERENCING : :1 Where on earth? Early mapmakers recognized the need for a system that could locate features on the earth's surface.
More informationWhat is Geodesy? Types of Geodesy terrestrial or classical geodesy space geodesy theoretical geodesy
What is Geodesy? Geodesy is the study of: The size, shape and motion of the earth The measurement of the position and motion of points on the earth's surface, and The study of the earth's gravity field
More informationOn an Advanced Shipboard Information and Decision-making System for Safe and Efficient Passage Planning
International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation Volume 2 Number 1 March 28 On an Advanced Shipboard Information and Decision-making System for Safe and Efficient Passage Planning
More informationDRAFT MARINE ARTILLERY SURVEY
MARINE ARTILLERY SURVEY Table of Contents Chapter 1: Mission, Organization, and Duties Section I: Mission PARA TITLE PAGE 1-1 Common Grid 1-1 1-2 Components of a Common Grid 1-1 1-3 Fundamentals of Survey
More informationGeo Referencing & Map projections CGI-GIRS 0910
Geo Referencing & Map projections CGI-GIRS 0910 Where are you? 31UFT8361 174,7 441,2 51 58' NB 5 40' OL 2/60 Who are they? 3/60 Do geo data describe Earth s phenomena perfectly? Georeference systems ellipsoid
More informationSolving the "Grid to Ground Problem" with Custom Coordinate Systems CV327-6 About the Speaker:
Solving the "Grid to Ground Problem" with Custom Coordinate Systems Richard Sincovec, LSI Director of Technology, Edward James Surveying President, Quux Software CV327-6 Grid projections such as the State
More informationCONTINENTAL SHELF SUBMISSION OF ANGOLA - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY -
CONTINENTAL SHELF SUBMISSION OF ANGOLA - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY - INDEX List of Figures 2 List of Tables 3 1 Introduction 5 2 Provisions of Article 76 7 3 Angolan Institutions responsible for the Submission
More informationCONTROL MONUMENT REPORT
CONTROL MONUMENT REPORT This document was prepared by Altus Geomatics for use by City of Yorkton staff and contractors working in and for the City of Yorkton. This document is meant to inform readers about
More informationCoordinate Systems and Datum Transformation in ArcGIS. Brittney White and Melita Kennedy
Coordinate Systems and Datum Transformation in ArcGIS Brittney White and Melita Kennedy Where is my data? Problem Horizontal Vertical Projections Transformations Horizontal coordinate systems Geographic
More informationANNEX 23 RESOLUTION MSC.231(82) ADOPTION OF AMENDMENTS TO THE EXISTING MANDATORY SHIP REPORTING SYSTEM IN THE GULF OF FINLAND
RESOLUTION MSC.231(82) (adopted on 5 December 2006) ADOPTION OF AMENDMENTS TO THE EXISTING MANDATORY SHIP REPORTING SYSTEM IN THE GULF OF FINLAND THE MARITIME SAFETY COMMITTEE, RECALLING Article 28(b)
More informationGeoreferencing. Place names Postal addresses Postal codes Coordinate systems (lat/long, UTM, etc.)
Georeferencing Georeferencing Used to describe the act of assigning locations to data or information Certain requirements include that they are: unique, have shared meaning, and are persistent through
More informationReferencing map features: Coordinate systems and map projections
Referencing map features: Coordinate systems and map projections Coordinate systems and map projections if we want to integrate geographic data from many different sources, we need to use a consistent
More informationGeographers Perspectives on the World
What is Geography? Geography is not just about city and country names Geography is not just about population and growth Geography is not just about rivers and mountains Geography is a broad field that
More informationA PRIMER ON COORDINATE SYSTEMS Commonly Used in Michigan
A PRIMER ON COORDINATE SYSTEMS Commonly Used in Michigan David P. Lusch, Ph.D., GISP Department of Geography Remote Sensing & GIS Research and Outreach Services Group Michigan State University September,
More informationShape e o f f the e Earth
1 Coordinate Systems & Projections Coordinate Systems Two map layers are not going to register spatially unless they are based on the same coordinate system. 2 Contents Shape of the earth Datum Projections
More informationHP-33S Calculator Program TM 2
Convert Latitude and Longitude to Transverse Mercator Co-ordinates (UTM, SPCS, etc.) Programmer: Dr. Bill Hazelton Date: April, 2008. Version: 1.0 Mnemonic: T for Transverse Mercator Line Instruction Display
More informationHP-35s Calculator Program TM 1
Convert Latitude and Longitude to Transverse Mercator Co-ordinates (UTM, SPCS, etc.) Programmer: Dr. Bill Hazelton Date: April, 2008. Version: 1.0 Mnemonic: T for Transverse Mercator Line Instruction Display
More informationResults of the RV Simon Stevin EM2040 Sea Acceptance Test and comparison with EM3002D data from the HS Ter Streep and RV Belgica.
Results of the RV Simon Stevin EM2040 Sea Acceptance Test and comparison with EM3002D data from the HS Ter Streep and RV Belgica. Cattrijsse Andre, Degrendele Koen, De Mol Lies, Naudts Lieven, Roche Marc,
More informationLab 1: Importing Data, Rectification, Datums, Projections, and Coordinate Systems
Lab 1: Importing Data, Rectification, Datums, Projections, and Coordinate Systems Topics covered in this lab: i. Importing spatial data to TAS ii. Rectification iii. Conversion from latitude/longitude
More informationInternational Journal of Computer Science and Telecommunications [Volume 3, Issue 7, July 2012] 109. Levelling with GPS. Dr. Nagi Zomrawi Mohammed
International Journal of Computer Science and Telecommunications [Volume 3, Issue 7, July 2012] 109 ling with ISSN 2047-3338 Dr. Nagi Zomrawi Mohammed Associate Professor, College of Engineering, Sudan
More informationNAVIGATION THEORY QUESTIONS Basics of Navigation
NAVIGATION THEORY QUESTIONS Basics of Navigation Q610065 look at it The angle between the plane of the ecliptic and the plane of equator is approx? 23.5 degrees In which two months of the year is the difference
More information3GPP TS V ( )
TS 23.032 V11.0.0 (2012-09) Technical Specification 3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects; Universal Geographical Area Description (GAD) (Release
More informationGeocentric Datum of Australia - GDA
Geocentric Datum of Australia - GDA Supporting GDA94 ARC/INFO 7.2.1 ArcView 3.1 An ESRI Australia White Paper September 1999 White Paper Series OVERVIEW... 1 INTRODUCTION... 1 PART 1 ESRI SOLUTION... 2
More informationThis week s topics. Week 6. FE 257. GIS and Forest Engineering Applications. Week 6
FE 257. GIS and Forest Engineering Applications Week 6 Week 6 Last week Chapter 8 Combining and splitting landscape features and merging GIS databases Chapter 11 Overlay processes Questions? Next week
More informationMap Projections. What does the world look like? AITOFF AZIMUTHAL EQUIDISTANT BEHRMANN EQUAL AREA CYLINDRICAL
Map Projections What does the world look like? AITOFF AZIMUTHAL EQUIDISTANT BEHRMANN EQUAL AREA CYLINDRICAL 1 CYLINDRICAL EQUAL AREA BONNE CRASTER PARABOLIC 2 ECKERT I ECKERT III ECKERT V There are many
More informationMap Projections & Coordinate Systems
Map Projections & Coordinate Systems 9/7/2017 1 Why? Laying the Earth Flat Need convenient means of measuring and comparing distances, directions, areas, shapes. Traditional surveying instruments measure
More informationGeoreferencing, Map Projections, Cartographic Concepts. -Coordinate Systems -Datum
Georeferencing, Map Projections, Cartographic Concepts -Map Projections -Coordinate Systems -Datum Map projection is "the process of systematically transforming positions on the Earth's spherical surface
More informationAnalytical and Computer Cartography Lecture 3: Review: Coordinate Systems
Analytical and Computer Cartography Lecture 3: Review: Coordinate Systems Geographic Coordinates NAD83 NAD27 remained in use until the earthcentered international GRS80 was complete (Geodetic Reference
More informationINSPIRATION RESULTS AND BENEFITS ALBANIA
INSPIRATION RESULTS AND BENEFITS ALBANIA By Eng. Besnik Çomo Paper prepared for E&I Workshop: Support to INSPIRE Implementation in enlargement and EWP Countries JRC ISPRA Central Office of Immovable Property
More informationChapter 5. Presenting Data
Chapter 5. Presenting Data Copyright McGraw-Hill Education. Permission required for reproduction or display. 5-1 Basic principles of map design 5-2 1 Map Design Process 5-3 The map objective The first
More informationDetermining rock quantities using swathe techniques on Maasvlakte 2
Determining rock quantities using swathe techniques on Maasvlakte 2 Marnix KOL 1, Huibert-Jan LEKKERKERK 2, Eric PEETERS 1, René ROELS 1, Tjebbe WESTERBEEK 2 1: PUMA, the Netherlands; 2: Port of Rotterdam,
More informationDr. ABOLGHASEM AKBARI Faculty of Civil Engineering & Earth Resources, University Malaysia Pahang (UMP)
Workshop on : Dr. ABOLGHASEM AKBARI Faculty of Civil Engineering & Earth Resources, University Malaysia Pahang (UMP) 14-15 April 2016 Venue: Tehran, Iran GIS definitions GIS: A simplified view of the real
More informationMultibeam Hydrographic Survey Use for Construction Control of Filling and Ground Improvement Activities
Multibeam Hydrographic Survey Use for Construction Control of Filling and Ground Improvement Activities WEDA Cincinnati April 10, 2014 Ray Wood C.Eng Executive Vice President Fugro Consultants Inc Advantages
More informationGPS Surveying Dr. Jayanta Kumar Ghosh Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee. Lecture 06 GPS Position
GPS Surveying Dr. Jayanta Kumar Ghosh Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee Lecture 06 GPS Position Friends! Welcome you to sixth class on GPS surveying. Today, I am going
More informationRESULTS OF THE 2007 MULTIBEAM BATHYMETRIC AND BACKSCATTER SURVEYS AT THE HISTORIC AREA REMEDIATION SITE
RESULTS OF THE 2007 MULTIBEAM BATHYMETRIC AND BACKSCATTER SURVEYS AT THE HISTORIC AREA REMEDIATION SITE FINAL DRAFT December 2007 Contract No. SAIC Project No. 01-0236-08-6326-400 SAIC Report No. 724 Prepared
More informationMap Projections. Chapter 4 MAP PROJECTION
Map Projections Chapter 4 Map Projections What is map projection? Why are map projections drawn? What are the different types of projections? Which projection is most suitably used for which area? In this
More informationApproaches to GNSS & Geodesy
Approaches to GNSS & Geodesy Ray Hintz Univ. of Maine Ray.hintz@.maine.edu The biggest complaint about state plane coordinates The concept that scale and elevation factor need to be applied to the pythagoreum
More informationPreventing Coordinate- System Confusion (maybe?)
Preventing Coordinate- System Confusion (maybe?) Montana Association of Registered Land Surveyors 2008 Convention Bozeman, Montana 07 & 08 February 2008 Glenn Borkenhagen Inland GPS Inc. - Cody, Wyoming
More informationLecture 10-14: Map Projections and Coordinate System
URP 1281 Surveying and Cartography Lecture 10-14: Map Projections and Coordinate System December 27, 2015 Course Teacher: Md. Esraz-Ul-Zannat Assistant Professor Department of Urban and Regional Planning
More informationVT State Plane. Daniel J. Martin National Geodetic Survey VT Geodetic Advisor. VSLS Conference Rutland VT April 11, 2008
VT State Plane Daniel J. Martin National Geodetic Survey VT Geodetic Advisor VSLS Conference Rutland VT April 11, 2008 Today s Outline Define the problem Review of VT State Plane System Relationship
More informationCE 316 GEOMATICS COURSE NOTES DR. MOIR D HAUG, C.L.S., P. ENG. JANUARY 2012
CE 316 GEOMATICS COURSE NOTES DR. MOIR D HAUG, C.L.S., P. ENG. JANUARY 2012 0 COURSE INFORMATION Dr Moir D Haug, P. Eng University Office 2B25 Engineering 966 5355 moir.haug@usask.ca MDH Engineered Solutions
More informationTerje Pedersen Product Manager Software / Hydrography Hydroacoustics Division
Terje Pedersen Product Manager Software / Hydrography Hydroacoustics Division WORLD CLASS through people, technology and dedication WORLD CLASS through people, technology and dedication 1 2 HYDROFEST 2005
More informationHeight systems. Rudi Gens Alaska Satellite Facility
Rudi Gens Alaska Satellite Facility Outline Why bother about height systems? Relevant terms Coordinate systems Reference surfaces Geopotential number 2 Why bother about height systems? give a meaning to
More informationDistance Determination between the MINOS Detectors for TOF Measurements. Dr. Virgil Bocean Alignment & Metrology Department Fermilab
Distance Determination between the MINOS Detectors for TOF Measurements Dr. Virgil Bocean Alignment & Metrology Department Fermilab 1 1 Introduction Part of the neutrino research program at Fermilab is
More information