City of Thornton Attn: Tim Semones Development Engineeering 9500 Civic Center Dr. Thornton, CO 80229
|
|
- Prosper Owens
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Development Engineering Land Surveying Construction Administration District Services October 20, 2017 City of Thornton Attn: Tim Semones Development Engineeering 9500 Civic Center Dr. Thornton, CO RE: DRAINAGE COMPLIANCE LETTER- AMBER CREEK RESIDENTIAL THORNTON, COLORADO Dear Mr. Semones: CWC Consulting Group (CWC) is submitting this letter on behalf of our client, Meritage Homes., to present the drainage analysis in support of the Conceptual Site Plan for Tallgrass Self Storage located within the Amber Creek Filing No. 1 subdivision. A Final Drainage Report will be submitted with the Final Plat. The purpose of this letter is to demonstrate that the proposed drainage for this project conforms with the City of Thornton Standards and Specifications Section 400 and the Master Drainage Study for Amber Creek Detention and Water Quality Pond in Tract B-A by MM&D Service, LLC dated 03/12/17. The project is located on approximately 12.9 acres located between E. 134 th Ave, Newport Street and the King Soopers site. The project is referred to as acres of Duplex Zoning in the master drainage report. This project is also part of a 2.33 acre Commercial area identified in the master drainage report. The Duplex area was designated as 45% and the Commercial area was designates as 87% for a total composite impervious coverage value of 13.3 acres at 52.4 %. The existing site generally slopes form southwest to northeast and has had soil stockpiles placed on-site from adjacent development. Newport Street and E. 134 th Ave. have been constructed. And residential homes are currently being constructed to the south. The King Soopers site is going through the CSP process slightly ahead of this project. Coordination between both projects is ongoing and the King Soopers site will construct storm sewer infrastructure that receives runoff from this project. There is also a portion of this project that drains directly to the King Soopers site that will need to be analyzed by the King Soopers project. A 30 storm sewer stub designed as part of the Amber Creek Phase 4 and 5 project located to the northwest will be extended through this project to the King Soopers site. The proposed on-site drainage basins for this project total acres at 51.9% impervious. There is an additional 1.09 acres at 11.7% impervious that drains directly off-site to King Soopers. This brings the overall project to acres at a composite impervious value of 48.6% which is less than the master drainage plan value of 13.3 acres at 52.4%. The combined Runoff coefficients are 0.43 for the 5-yr event and 0.69 for the 100-yr event. The on-site basins are developed to represent the drainage area being conveyed to key infrastructure. Basins A, B, C and D all drain to the King Soopers storm sewer system. Basins E and F drain directly to the detention/wq pond located in Tract B-A which is designed in the master drainage report but not yet constructed. Basin OS are basins either draining from off-site areas or to off-site areas. CWC Consulting Group 9360 Teddy Lane, Suite 203 Lone Tree Colorado
2 Basin A is 0.86 acres in size and has an impervious coverage value of 62.5%. When combined with Basin OS-1, this area is 7.93 acres. The basin discharges 9.5 cfs during the 5-yr storm and 29.9 cfs during the 100-yr storm including flows from Basin OS-1. Basin B is 1.30 acres in size and has an impervious coverage value of 63.6%. The basin discharges 2.6 cfs during the 5-yr storm and 6.9 cfs during the 100-yr storm. Basin C is 2.60 acres in size and has an impervious coverage value of 56.4%. The basin discharges 4.8 cfs during the 5-yr storm and 13.3 cfs during the 100-yr storm. Basin D is 3.15 acres in size and has an impervious coverage value of 45.9%. The basin discharges 4.5 cfs during the 5-yr storm and 14.3 cfs during the 100-yr storm. Basin E is 2.55 acres in size and has an impervious coverage value of 51.2%. The basin discharges 4.2 cfs during the 5-yr storm and 12.5 cfs during the 100-yr storm. Basin F is 1.57 acres in size and has an impervious coverage value of 41.8%. The basin discharges 2.1 cfs during the 5-yr storm and 7.8 cfs during the 100-yr storm. The combined Basins E and F discharge 6.1 cfs in the 5-yr event and 19.7 cfs in the 100-yr event directly to the pond. Basin OS-1 is 7.07 acres in size and has an impervious coverage value of 45.0% as obtained from the master drainage report. The basin discharges 8.2 cfs during the 5-yr storm and 26.6 cfs during the 100-yr storm. Basin OS-2 is 1.09 acres in size and has an impervious coverage value of 11.7%. Runoff is not analyzed for this basin since it flows directly to the King Soopers site. Runoff coefficients are obtained from the latest Urban Drainage criteria (March 2017) with the exception of Basin OS-1 which utilized the master drainage plan values. The private street capacities were determined using the City standard Local Attached curb and gutter per DWG The streets are 26 wide flowline to flowline and the 5- yr allowable street depth is 4 to the top of curb and the allowable 100-yr street depth is 5 to the back of walk. Inlets are placed prior to the streets exceeding allowable capacity and bypass flows for runoff in excess of inlet capacity is placed at the downstream inlet. I affirm that the proposed drainage design for the Amber Creek Residential project is in substantial conformance with the Master Drainage Study for Amber Creek Detention and Water Quality Pond in Tract B-A by MM&D Service, LLC dated 03/12/17. Respectfully, Bryan Clerico, P.E. SIGNATURE: Registered Professional Engineer State of Colorado No (Affix Seal)
3 Table 6-5. Runoff coefficients, c (continued) Total or Effective NRCS Hydrologic Soil Group C % Impervious 2-Year 5-Year 10-Year 25-Year 50-Year 100-Year 500-Year 2% % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % Figure 6-1. Runoff coefficient vs. watershed imperviousness NRCS HSG A March 2017 Urban Drainage and Flood Control District 6-11 Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual Volume 1
4 Parcel Data Table Fully-Developed Conditions 10/19/17 Job No.: Date: 10/19/2017 Calculated By: Checked By: Parcel Data Table ONSITE AREAS: Area Land Use Density C2 C5 C10 C100 I (%) Category DU/acre Street/Pond Paved/Pond Trail/Sidewalks Concrete Multi Unit Detached Residential Single Family Residential Roof Roof Open Space Tree Lawn, Open Space Imperviousness values and Runoff Coefficients are from the UDFCD Manual Volume 1 Table 6-5 Imperviousness values and Runoff Coefficients are from MM&D Engineering Services Master Plan T:\JOBS\Meritage\Amber Creek\Engineering\Drainage\CSP\Hydrology\[.xlsx]Parcel Data
5 Composite Imperviousness Fully Developed Conditions 10/19/2017 Job No.: Date: Calculated By: Checked By: /19/17 ELS BEC Parcel Imperviousness Basin Sub-Basin Area Street/Pond Trail/Sidewalks Multi Unit Detached Single Family Roof Open Space Composite Imperviousness A (acres) A Sum B B B B Sum C C C C C Sum D D D D D D Sum E E E E Sum F F F F Sum On-Site Sum OS OS Sum OS OS Sum T:\JOBS\Meritage\Amber Creek\Engineering\Drainage\CSP\FIRST\Hydrology\[.xlsx]Summary
6 Composite Runoff Coeffient 10/19/2017 Job No.: Date: Calculated By: Checked By: /19/ Year Calculation 5 Year Calculation 10 Year Calculation 100 Year Calculation Area Type Area Type Area Type Area Type Basin Sub-Basin Area Street/Pond Trail/Sidewalks Multi Unit Detached Single Family Roof Open Space Street/Pond Trail/Sidewalks Multi Unit Detached Single Family Roof Open Space C2 C5 C10 Street/Pond Trail/Sidewalks Multi Unit Detached Single Family Roof Open Space Street/Pond Trail/Sidewalks Multi Unit Detached Single Family Roof Open Space (ac) A A B B B B C C C C C D D D D D D E E E E F F F F COMPOSITE OS OS OS OS T:\JOBS\Meritage\Amber Creek\Engineering\Drainage\CSP\FIRST\Hydrology\[.xlsx]Summary C100
7 TIME OF CONCENTRATION Developed Conditions 10/19/2017 Job No.: Date: 10/19/17 Calculated By: Checked By: BEC BEC SUB-BASIN DATA INITIAL/OVERLAND TRAVEL TIME Rational Tc Check for Urban Catchments FINAL Tc TIME (Ti) (Tt) Tc CONVEYANCE DESIG: AREA C5 LENGTH SLOPE Ti LENGTH AVG. SLOPE Conv. VEL Tt COMP TOTAL Tc=(L/180)+10 REMARKS (acres) (ft) (ft/ft) (min) (ft) Y (%) Type* (fps) (min) Tc (min) LENGTH (ft) (min) (min) A Paved Gutter B Paved Gutter B Paved Gutter B Paved Gutter C Paved Gutter C Paved Gutter C Paved Gutter C Paved Gutter D Paved Gutter D Paved Gutter D Grass Swale D D Paved Gutter E E Paved Gutter E Paved Gutter F Grass Swale F Paved Gutter F Paved Gutter OS MM&D Master Plan value Derived from MM&D Master Plan area, flow and impervious value to back into time of concentration * Note: Conveyance Coefficients - Type 1-Heavy Meadow, Type 2-Tillage/field, Type 3-Short Pasture & Lawn, Type 4-Nearly Bare Ground, Type 5-Grassed Waterway, Type 6-Paved Areas & Shallow Paved Swales. Ti= 0.395(1.1-C 5 )L 0.5 S 0.33 T:\JOBS\Meritage\Amber Creek\Engineering\Drainage\CSP\Hydrology\[.xlsx]Parcel Data
8 Rainfall Intensities STANDARD FORM SF-2 STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM DESIGN I=28.5*P1/(10+Tc).0786 (RATIONAL METHOD PROCEDURE) DESIGN STORM: 5 -YEAR (minor storm) 5-year P1 = 1.38 CALCULATED BY: BEC PROJECT: JOB NO: CHECKED BY: BEC MAJOR BASIN: LOCATION: Thornton DIRECT RUNOFF TOTAL RUNOFF STREET PIPE TRAVEL TIME LOCATION DESIGN POINT AREA DESIG. AREA (Acres) RUNOFF COEFF Tc (min) C A (Acres) I (in/hour) Q (cfs) Tc (min) (C A) (Acres) I (in/hour) Q (cfs) SLOPE (%) STREET FLOW (cfs) DESIGN FLOW (cfs) SLOPE (%) PIPE SIZE LENGTH (ft) VELOCITY (fps) Tt (min) REMARKS OS OS OS Flow from MM&D Engineering Master Plan A A1 A Pipe flow to JP 1 Surface flow to inlet at DP A1 inc. upstream bypass B B1 B Surface flow to inlet at DP B1 ~ Bypass street flow to DP A1, Pipe flow to JP 2 B B2 B Surface flow to inlet at DP B2 ~ 0.00 Bypass street flow to DP B3 B B3 B Surface flow to inlet at DP B3 inc. upstream bypass C C1 C Surface flow to inlet at DP C1 ~ Bypass street flow to DP D1, Pipe flow to JP 4 C C2 C Surface flow to inlet at DP C2 C C3 C Surface flow to inlet at DP C3 ~ 0.00 Bypass street flow to DP C4 C C4 C Surface flow to inlet at DP C4 inc. upstream bypass Pipe flow to JP 6 D D1 D Surface flow to inlet at DP D1 inc. upstream bypass Pipe flow to JP 7 D D2 D Surface flow to inlet at DP D2 ~ 0.00 Bypass street flow to DP E2 D D3 D Surface flow to inlet at DP D3 D D4 D Surface flow to inlet at DP D4 D D5 D Surface flow to inlet at DP D5 E E1 E Surface flow to inlet at DP E1 inc. upstream bypass ~ 0.00 Bypass street flow to DP F2 E E2 E Surface flow to inlet at DP E2 ~ Bypass street flow to DP E1,Pipe flow to JP 11 E E3 E Surface flow to inlet at DP E3 ~ 0.07 Bypass street flow to DP F2 F F1 F Surface flow to inlet at DP F Pipe flow to JP 12 F F2 F Surface flow to inlet at DP F2 inc. upstream bypass F F3 F Surface flow to inlet at DP F3 jp 1 A1, OS jp 2 B1,B jp 3 B1,B2, B jp 4 C1,C jp 5 C1, C2, C Pipe flow to JP KS Pipe flow to JP 3 inc. downstream bypass Pipe flow to JP KS Pipe flow to JP 5 inc. downstream bypass Pipe flow to JP 5 inc. downstream bypass
9 Rainfall Intensities STANDARD FORM SF-2 STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM DESIGN I=28.5*P1/(10+Tc).0786 (RATIONAL METHOD PROCEDURE) DESIGN STORM: 5 -YEAR (minor storm) 5-year P1 = 1.38 CALCULATED BY: BEC PROJECT: JOB NO: CHECKED BY: BEC MAJOR BASIN: LOCATION: Thornton DIRECT RUNOFF TOTAL RUNOFF STREET PIPE TRAVEL TIME LOCATION DESIGN POINT AREA DESIG. AREA (Acres) RUNOFF COEFF Tc (min) C A (Acres) I (in/hour) Q (cfs) Tc (min) (C A) (Acres) I (in/hour) Q (cfs) SLOPE (%) STREET FLOW (cfs) DESIGN FLOW (cfs) SLOPE (%) PIPE SIZE LENGTH (ft) VELOCITY (fps) Tt (min) REMARKS jp 6 C1, C2, C3, C jp 7 D1, D jp 8 D1, D2, D jp 9 D1, D2, D3, D jp 10 D1, D2, D3, D4, D jp 11 E1, E jp 12 E1, E2, E jp 13 F1, F jp 14 F1, F2, F jp 15 E1, E2, E3, F1, F2, F Pipe flow to JP KS Pipe flow to JP 8 inc. downstream bypass Pipe flow to JP Pipe flow to JP Pipe flow to JP KS Pipe flow to JP 15 inc. downstream bypass Pipe flow to JP 13 inc. downstream bypass Pipe flow to JP Pipe flow to JP Pipe flow to Pond T:\JOBS\Meritage\Amber Creek\Engineering\Drainage\CSP\Hydrology\[.xlsx]R5 Intensity -Duration Curve for Rational Method per equation RA-3 (Urban Drainage) 7.07 Acres from MM&D Engineering Services Master Plan 26.6 CFS from MM&D Engineering Services Master Plan ~ Indicates street flow
10 Rainfall Intensities STANDARD FORM SF-2 STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM DESIGN I=28.5*P1/(10+Tc).0786 (RATIONAL METHOD PROCEDURE) DESIGN STORM: 100 -YEAR (major storm) 100-year P1 = 2.69 CALCULATED BY: BEC PROJECT: JOB NO: CHECKED BY: BEC MAJOR BASIN: LOCATION: Thornton DIRECT RUNOFF TOTAL RUNOFF STREET PIPE TRAVEL TIME LOCATION DESIGN POINT AREA DESIG. AREA (Acres) RUNOFF COEFF Tc (min) C A (Acres) I (in/hour) Q (cfs) Tc (min) (C A) (Acres) I (in/hour) Q (cfs) SLOPE (%) STREET FLOW (cfs) DESIGN FLOW (cfs) SLOPE (%) PIPE SIZE LENGTH (ft) VELOCITY (fps) Tt (min) REMARKS OS OS OS Flow from MM&D Engineering Master Plan A A1 A Pipe flow to JP 1 Surface flow to inlet at DP A1 inc. upstream bypass B B1 B Surface flow to inlet at DP B1 ~ Bypass street flow to DP A1, Pipe flow to JP 2 B B2 B Surface flow to inlet at DP B2 ~ 0.14 Bypass street flow to DP B3 B B3 B Surface flow to inlet at DP B3 inc. upstream bypass C C1 C Surface flow to inlet at DP C1 ~ Bypass street flow to DP D1, Pipe flow to JP 4 C C2 C Surface flow to inlet at DP C2 C C3 C Surface flow to inlet at DP C3 ~ 0.58 Bypass street flow to DP C4 C C4 C Surface flow to inlet at DP C4 inc. upstream bypass Pipe flow to JP 6 D D1 D Surface flow to inlet at DP D1 inc. upstream bypass D D2 D Pipe flow to JP 7 Surface flow to inlet at DP D2 ~ 0.20 Bypass street flow to DP E2 D D3 D Surface flow to inlet at DP D3 D D4 D Surface flow to inlet at DP D4 D D5 D Surface flow to inlet at DP D5 E E1 E Surface flow to inlet at DP E1 inc. upstream bypass ~ 0.08 Bypass street flow to DP F2 E E2 E Surface flow to inlet at DP E2 ~ Bypass street flow to DP E1,Pipe flow to JP 11 E E3 E Surface flow to inlet at DP E3 ~ 1.75 Bypass street flow to DP F2 F F1 F Surface flow to inlet at DP F Pipe flow to JP 12 F F2 F Surface flow to inlet at DP F2 inc. upstream bypass F F3 F Surface flow to inlet at DP F3 jp 1 A1, OS jp 2 B1,B jp 3 B1,B2, B jp 4 C1,C jp 5 C1, C2, C Pipe flow to JP KS Pipe flow to JP 3 inc. downstream bypass Pipe flow to JP KS Pipe flow to JP 5 inc. downstream bypass Pipe flow to JP 5 inc. downstream bypass
11 Rainfall Intensities STANDARD FORM SF-2 STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM DESIGN I=28.5*P1/(10+Tc).0786 (RATIONAL METHOD PROCEDURE) DESIGN STORM: 100 -YEAR (major storm) 100-year P1 = 2.69 CALCULATED BY: BEC PROJECT: JOB NO: CHECKED BY: BEC MAJOR BASIN: LOCATION: Thornton DIRECT RUNOFF TOTAL RUNOFF STREET PIPE TRAVEL TIME LOCATION DESIGN POINT AREA DESIG. AREA (Acres) RUNOFF COEFF Tc (min) C A (Acres) I (in/hour) Q (cfs) Tc (min) (C A) (Acres) I (in/hour) Q (cfs) SLOPE (%) STREET FLOW (cfs) DESIGN FLOW (cfs) SLOPE (%) PIPE SIZE LENGTH (ft) VELOCITY (fps) Tt (min) REMARKS jp 6 C1, C2, C3, C jp 7 D1, D jp 8 D1, D2, D jp 9 D1, D2, D3, D jp 10 D1, D2, D3, D4, D jp 11 E1, E jp 12 E1, E2, E jp 13 F1, F jp 14 F1, F2, F jp 15 E1, E2, E3, F1, F2, F Pipe flow to JP KS Pipe flow to JP 8 inc. downstream bypass Pipe flow to JP Pipe flow to JP Pipe flow to JP KS Pipe flow to JP 15 inc. downstream bypass Pipe flow to JP 13 inc. downstream bypass Pipe flow to JP Pipe flow to JP Pipe flow to Pond T:\JOBS\Meritage\Amber Creek\Engineering\Drainage\CSP\Hydrology\[.xlsx]R5 Intensity -Duration Curve for Rational Method per equation RA-3 (Urban Drainage) 7.07 Acres from MM&D Engineering Services Master Plan 26.6 CFS from MM&D Engineering Services Master Plan ~ Indicates street flow
12
13 DESIGN PEAK FLOW FOR ONE-HALF OF STREET OR GRASS-LINED CHANNEL BY THE RATIONAL METHOD Worksheet Protected Project: Inlet A1 Show Details Design Flow: ONLY if already determined through other methods: Minor Storm Major Storm (local peak flow for 1/2 of street OR grass-lined channel): *Q Known = cfs * If you enter values in Row 14, skip the rest of this sheet and proceed to sheet Q-Allow or Area Inlet. Geographic Information: (Enter data in the blue cells): Site Type: Site is Urban Site is Non-Urban Flows Developed For: Street Inlets Area Inlets in a Median Subcatchment Area = Acres Percent Imperviousness = % NRCS Soil Type = A, B, C, or D Overland Flow = Channel Flow = Slope (ft/ft) Length (ft) FILL IN THIS SECTION OR FILL IN THE SECTIONS BELOW. Rainfall Information: Intensity I (inch/hr) = C 1 * P 1 / ( C 2 + T c ) ^ C 3 Minor Storm Major Storm Design Storm Return Period, T r = Return Period One-Hour Precipitation, P 1 = C 1 = C 2 = C 3 = User-Defined Storm Runoff Coefficient (leave this blank to accept a calculated value), C = User-Defined 5-yr. Runoff Coefficient (leave this blank to accept a calculated value), C 5 = Bypass (Carry-Over) Flow from upstream Subcatchments, Q b = cfs years inches Total Design Peak Flow, Q = cfs inlet A1.xlsm, Q-Peak 10/19/2017, 2:41 PM
14 Project: ALLOWABLE CAPACITY FOR ONE-HALF OF STREET (Minor & Major Storm) (Based on Regulated Criteria for Maximum Allowable Flow Depth and Spread) Inlet A1 Gutter Geometry (Enter data in the blue cells) Maximum Allowable Width for Spread Behind Curb T BACK = 5.0 ft Side Slope Behind Curb (leave blank for no conveyance credit behind curb) S BACK = ft/ft Manning's Roughness Behind Curb (typically between and 0.020) n BACK = Height of Curb at Gutter Flow Line H CURB = 4.00 inches Distance from Curb Face to Street Crown T CROWN = 13.0 ft Gutter Width W = 2.00 ft Street Transverse Slope S X = ft/ft Gutter Cross Slope (typically 2 inches over 24 inches or ft/ft) S W = ft/ft Street Longitudinal Slope - Enter 0 for sump condition S O = ft/ft Manning's Roughness for Street Section (typically between and 0.020) n STREET = Minor Storm Major Storm Max. Allowable Spread for Minor & Major Storm T MAX = ft Max. Allowable Depth at Gutter Flowline for Minor & Major Storm d MAX = inches Allow Flow Depth at Street Crown (leave blank for no) check = yes MINOR STORM Allowable Capacity is based on Depth Criterion Minor Storm Major Storm MAJOR STORM Allowable Capacity is based on Spread Criterion Q allow = cfs Minor storm max. allowable capacity GOOD - greater than flow given on sheet 'Q-Peak' Major storm max. allowable capacity GOOD - greater than flow given on sheet 'Q-Peak' inlet A1.xlsm, Q-Allow 10/19/2017, 2:42 PM
15 INLET ON A CONTINUOUS GRADE Project: Inlet A1 Design Information (Input) MINOR MAJOR Type of Inlet Type = CDOT Type R Curb Opening Local Depression (additional to continuous gutter depression 'a' from 'Q-Allow') a LOCAL = inches Total Number of Units in the Inlet (Grate or Curb Opening) No = 2 2 Length of a Single Unit Inlet (Grate or Curb Opening) L o = ft Width of a Unit Grate (cannot be greater than W from Q-Allow) W o = N/A N/A ft Clogging Factor for a Single Unit Grate (typical min. value = 0.5) C f-g = N/A N/A Clogging Factor for a Single Unit Curb Opening (typical min. value = 0.1) C f-c = Street Hydraulics: OK - Q < maximum allowable from sheet 'Q-Allow' MINOR MAJOR Total Inlet Interception Capacity Q = cfs Total Inlet Carry-Over Flow (flow bypassing inlet) Q b = cfs Capture Percentage = Q a/q o = C% = % inlet A1.xlsm, Inlet On Grade 10/19/2017, 2:42 PM
16 DESIGN PEAK FLOW FOR ONE-HALF OF STREET OR GRASS-LINED CHANNEL BY THE RATIONAL METHOD Worksheet Protected Project: Inlet B1 Show Details Design Flow: ONLY if already determined through other methods: Minor Storm Major Storm (local peak flow for 1/2 of street OR grass-lined channel): *Q Known = cfs * If you enter values in Row 14, skip the rest of this sheet and proceed to sheet Q-Allow or Area Inlet. Geographic Information: (Enter data in the blue cells): Site Type: Site is Urban Site is Non-Urban Flows Developed For: Street Inlets Area Inlets in a Median Subcatchment Area = Acres Percent Imperviousness = % NRCS Soil Type = A, B, C, or D Overland Flow = Channel Flow = Slope (ft/ft) Length (ft) FILL IN THIS SECTION OR FILL IN THE SECTIONS BELOW. Rainfall Information: Intensity I (inch/hr) = C 1 * P 1 / ( C 2 + T c ) ^ C 3 Minor Storm Major Storm Design Storm Return Period, T r = Return Period One-Hour Precipitation, P 1 = C 1 = C 2 = C 3 = User-Defined Storm Runoff Coefficient (leave this blank to accept a calculated value), C = User-Defined 5-yr. Runoff Coefficient (leave this blank to accept a calculated value), C 5 = Bypass (Carry-Over) Flow from upstream Subcatchments, Q b = years inches cfs Total Design Peak Flow, Q = cfs inlet B1.xlsm, Q-Peak 10/19/2017, 2:29 PM
17 Project: ALLOWABLE CAPACITY FOR ONE-HALF OF STREET (Minor & Major Storm) (Based on Regulated Criteria for Maximum Allowable Flow Depth and Spread) Inlet B1 Gutter Geometry (Enter data in the blue cells) Maximum Allowable Width for Spread Behind Curb T BACK = 5.0 ft Side Slope Behind Curb (leave blank for no conveyance credit behind curb) S BACK = ft/ft Manning's Roughness Behind Curb (typically between and 0.020) n BACK = Height of Curb at Gutter Flow Line H CURB = 4.00 inches Distance from Curb Face to Street Crown T CROWN = 13.0 ft Gutter Width W = 2.00 ft Street Transverse Slope S X = ft/ft Gutter Cross Slope (typically 2 inches over 24 inches or ft/ft) S W = ft/ft Street Longitudinal Slope - Enter 0 for sump condition S O = ft/ft Manning's Roughness for Street Section (typically between and 0.020) n STREET = Minor Storm Major Storm Max. Allowable Spread for Minor & Major Storm T MAX = ft Max. Allowable Depth at Gutter Flowline for Minor & Major Storm d MAX = inches Allow Flow Depth at Street Crown (leave blank for no) check = yes MINOR STORM Allowable Capacity is based on Depth Criterion Minor Storm Major Storm MAJOR STORM Allowable Capacity is based on Spread Criterion Q allow = cfs Minor storm max. allowable capacity GOOD - greater than flow given on sheet 'Q-Peak' Major storm max. allowable capacity GOOD - greater than flow given on sheet 'Q-Peak' inlet B1.xlsm, Q-Allow 10/19/2017, 2:30 PM
18 INLET ON A CONTINUOUS GRADE Project: Inlet B1 Design Information (Input) MINOR MAJOR Type of Inlet Type = CDOT Type R Curb Opening Local Depression (additional to continuous gutter depression 'a' from 'Q-Allow') a LOCAL = inches Total Number of Units in the Inlet (Grate or Curb Opening) No = 2 2 Length of a Single Unit Inlet (Grate or Curb Opening) L o = ft Width of a Unit Grate (cannot be greater than W from Q-Allow) W o = N/A N/A ft Clogging Factor for a Single Unit Grate (typical min. value = 0.5) C f-g = N/A N/A Clogging Factor for a Single Unit Curb Opening (typical min. value = 0.1) C f-c = Street Hydraulics: OK - Q < maximum allowable from sheet 'Q-Allow' MINOR MAJOR Total Inlet Interception Capacity Q = cfs Total Inlet Carry-Over Flow (flow bypassing inlet) Q b = cfs Capture Percentage = Q a/q o = C% = % inlet B1.xlsm, Inlet On Grade 10/19/2017, 2:31 PM
19 DESIGN PEAK FLOW FOR ONE-HALF OF STREET OR GRASS-LINED CHANNEL BY THE RATIONAL METHOD Worksheet Protected Project: Inlet B2 Show Details Design Flow: ONLY if already determined through other methods: Minor Storm Major Storm (local peak flow for 1/2 of street OR grass-lined channel): *Q Known = cfs * If you enter values in Row 14, skip the rest of this sheet and proceed to sheet Q-Allow or Area Inlet. Geographic Information: (Enter data in the blue cells): Site Type: Site is Urban Site is Non-Urban Flows Developed For: Street Inlets Area Inlets in a Median Subcatchment Area = Acres Percent Imperviousness = % NRCS Soil Type = A, B, C, or D Overland Flow = Channel Flow = Slope (ft/ft) Length (ft) FILL IN THIS SECTION OR FILL IN THE SECTIONS BELOW. Rainfall Information: Intensity I (inch/hr) = C 1 * P 1 / ( C 2 + T c ) ^ C 3 Minor Storm Major Storm Design Storm Return Period, T r = Return Period One-Hour Precipitation, P 1 = C 1 = C 2 = C 3 = User-Defined Storm Runoff Coefficient (leave this blank to accept a calculated value), C = User-Defined 5-yr. Runoff Coefficient (leave this blank to accept a calculated value), C 5 = Bypass (Carry-Over) Flow from upstream Subcatchments, Q b = years inches cfs Total Design Peak Flow, Q = cfs inlet B2.xlsm, Q-Peak 10/19/2017, 2:34 PM
20 Project: ALLOWABLE CAPACITY FOR ONE-HALF OF STREET (Minor & Major Storm) (Based on Regulated Criteria for Maximum Allowable Flow Depth and Spread) Inlet B2 Gutter Geometry (Enter data in the blue cells) Maximum Allowable Width for Spread Behind Curb T BACK = 5.0 ft Side Slope Behind Curb (leave blank for no conveyance credit behind curb) S BACK = ft/ft Manning's Roughness Behind Curb (typically between and 0.020) n BACK = Height of Curb at Gutter Flow Line H CURB = 4.00 inches Distance from Curb Face to Street Crown T CROWN = 13.0 ft Gutter Width W = 2.00 ft Street Transverse Slope S X = ft/ft Gutter Cross Slope (typically 2 inches over 24 inches or ft/ft) S W = ft/ft Street Longitudinal Slope - Enter 0 for sump condition S O = ft/ft Manning's Roughness for Street Section (typically between and 0.020) n STREET = Minor Storm Major Storm Max. Allowable Spread for Minor & Major Storm T MAX = ft Max. Allowable Depth at Gutter Flowline for Minor & Major Storm d MAX = inches Allow Flow Depth at Street Crown (leave blank for no) check = yes MINOR STORM Allowable Capacity is based on Depth Criterion Minor Storm Major Storm MAJOR STORM Allowable Capacity is based on Spread Criterion Q allow = cfs Minor storm max. allowable capacity GOOD - greater than flow given on sheet 'Q-Peak' Major storm max. allowable capacity GOOD - greater than flow given on sheet 'Q-Peak' inlet B2.xlsm, Q-Allow 10/19/2017, 2:35 PM
21 INLET ON A CONTINUOUS GRADE Project: Inlet B2 Design Information (Input) MINOR MAJOR Type of Inlet Type = CDOT Type R Curb Opening Local Depression (additional to continuous gutter depression 'a' from 'Q-Allow') a LOCAL = inches Total Number of Units in the Inlet (Grate or Curb Opening) No = 1 1 Length of a Single Unit Inlet (Grate or Curb Opening) L o = ft Width of a Unit Grate (cannot be greater than W from Q-Allow) W o = N/A N/A ft Clogging Factor for a Single Unit Grate (typical min. value = 0.5) C f-g = N/A N/A Clogging Factor for a Single Unit Curb Opening (typical min. value = 0.1) C f-c = Street Hydraulics: OK - Q < maximum allowable from sheet 'Q-Allow' MINOR MAJOR Total Inlet Interception Capacity Q = cfs Total Inlet Carry-Over Flow (flow bypassing inlet) Q b = cfs Capture Percentage = Q a/q o = C% = % inlet B2.xlsm, Inlet On Grade 10/19/2017, 2:35 PM
22 DESIGN PEAK FLOW FOR ONE-HALF OF STREET OR GRASS-LINED CHANNEL BY THE RATIONAL METHOD Worksheet Protected Project: Inlet B3 Show Details Design Flow: ONLY if already determined through other methods: Minor Storm Major Storm (local peak flow for 1/2 of street OR grass-lined channel): *Q Known = cfs * If you enter values in Row 14, skip the rest of this sheet and proceed to sheet Q-Allow or Area Inlet. Geographic Information: (Enter data in the blue cells): Site Type: Site is Urban Site is Non-Urban Flows Developed For: Street Inlets Area Inlets in a Median Subcatchment Area = Acres Percent Imperviousness = % NRCS Soil Type = A, B, C, or D Overland Flow = Channel Flow = Slope (ft/ft) Length (ft) FILL IN THIS SECTION OR FILL IN THE SECTIONS BELOW. Rainfall Information: Intensity I (inch/hr) = C 1 * P 1 / ( C 2 + T c ) ^ C 3 Minor Storm Major Storm Design Storm Return Period, T r = Return Period One-Hour Precipitation, P 1 = C 1 = C 2 = C 3 = User-Defined Storm Runoff Coefficient (leave this blank to accept a calculated value), C = User-Defined 5-yr. Runoff Coefficient (leave this blank to accept a calculated value), C 5 = Bypass (Carry-Over) Flow from upstream Subcatchments, Q b = cfs years inches Total Design Peak Flow, Q = cfs inlet B3.xlsm, Q-Peak 10/19/2017, 2:36 PM
23 Project: ALLOWABLE CAPACITY FOR ONE-HALF OF STREET (Minor & Major Storm) (Based on Regulated Criteria for Maximum Allowable Flow Depth and Spread) Inlet B3 Gutter Geometry (Enter data in the blue cells) Maximum Allowable Width for Spread Behind Curb T BACK = 5.0 ft Side Slope Behind Curb (leave blank for no conveyance credit behind curb) S BACK = ft/ft Manning's Roughness Behind Curb (typically between and 0.020) n BACK = Height of Curb at Gutter Flow Line H CURB = 4.00 inches Distance from Curb Face to Street Crown T CROWN = 13.0 ft Gutter Width W = 2.00 ft Street Transverse Slope S X = ft/ft Gutter Cross Slope (typically 2 inches over 24 inches or ft/ft) S W = ft/ft Street Longitudinal Slope - Enter 0 for sump condition S O = ft/ft Manning's Roughness for Street Section (typically between and 0.020) n STREET = Minor Storm Major Storm Max. Allowable Spread for Minor & Major Storm T MAX = ft Max. Allowable Depth at Gutter Flowline for Minor & Major Storm d MAX = inches Allow Flow Depth at Street Crown (leave blank for no) check = yes MINOR STORM Allowable Capacity is based on Depth Criterion Minor Storm Major Storm MAJOR STORM Allowable Capacity is based on Spread Criterion Q allow = cfs Minor storm max. allowable capacity GOOD - greater than flow given on sheet 'Q-Peak' Major storm max. allowable capacity GOOD - greater than flow given on sheet 'Q-Peak' inlet B3.xlsm, Q-Allow 10/19/2017, 2:37 PM
24 INLET ON A CONTINUOUS GRADE Project: Inlet B3 Design Information (Input) MINOR MAJOR Type of Inlet Type = CDOT Type R Curb Opening Local Depression (additional to continuous gutter depression 'a' from 'Q-Allow') a LOCAL = inches Total Number of Units in the Inlet (Grate or Curb Opening) No = 1 1 Length of a Single Unit Inlet (Grate or Curb Opening) L o = ft Width of a Unit Grate (cannot be greater than W from Q-Allow) W o = N/A N/A ft Clogging Factor for a Single Unit Grate (typical min. value = 0.5) C f-g = N/A N/A Clogging Factor for a Single Unit Curb Opening (typical min. value = 0.1) C f-c = Street Hydraulics: OK - Q < maximum allowable from sheet 'Q-Allow' MINOR MAJOR Total Inlet Interception Capacity Q = cfs Total Inlet Carry-Over Flow (flow bypassing inlet) Q b = cfs Capture Percentage = Q a/q o = C% = % inlet B3.xlsm, Inlet On Grade 10/19/2017, 2:38 PM
25 DESIGN PEAK FLOW FOR ONE-HALF OF STREET OR GRASS-LINED CHANNEL BY THE RATIONAL METHOD Worksheet Protected Project: Inlet C1 Show Details Design Flow: ONLY if already determined through other methods: Minor Storm Major Storm (local peak flow for 1/2 of street OR grass-lined channel): *Q Known = cfs * If you enter values in Row 14, skip the rest of this sheet and proceed to sheet Q-Allow or Area Inlet. Geographic Information: (Enter data in the blue cells): Site Type: Site is Urban Site is Non-Urban Flows Developed For: Street Inlets Area Inlets in a Median Subcatchment Area = Acres Percent Imperviousness = % NRCS Soil Type = A, B, C, or D Overland Flow = Channel Flow = Slope (ft/ft) Length (ft) FILL IN THIS SECTION OR FILL IN THE SECTIONS BELOW. Rainfall Information: Intensity I (inch/hr) = C 1 * P 1 / ( C 2 + T c ) ^ C 3 Minor Storm Major Storm Design Storm Return Period, T r = Return Period One-Hour Precipitation, P 1 = C 1 = C 2 = C 3 = User-Defined Storm Runoff Coefficient (leave this blank to accept a calculated value), C = User-Defined 5-yr. Runoff Coefficient (leave this blank to accept a calculated value), C 5 = Bypass (Carry-Over) Flow from upstream Subcatchments, Q b = years inches cfs Total Design Peak Flow, Q = cfs inlet C1.xlsm, Q-Peak 10/19/2017, 2:47 PM
26 Project: ALLOWABLE CAPACITY FOR ONE-HALF OF STREET (Minor & Major Storm) (Based on Regulated Criteria for Maximum Allowable Flow Depth and Spread) Inlet C1 Gutter Geometry (Enter data in the blue cells) Maximum Allowable Width for Spread Behind Curb T BACK = 5.0 ft Side Slope Behind Curb (leave blank for no conveyance credit behind curb) S BACK = ft/ft Manning's Roughness Behind Curb (typically between and 0.020) n BACK = Height of Curb at Gutter Flow Line H CURB = 4.00 inches Distance from Curb Face to Street Crown T CROWN = 13.0 ft Gutter Width W = 2.00 ft Street Transverse Slope S X = ft/ft Gutter Cross Slope (typically 2 inches over 24 inches or ft/ft) S W = ft/ft Street Longitudinal Slope - Enter 0 for sump condition S O = ft/ft Manning's Roughness for Street Section (typically between and 0.020) n STREET = Minor Storm Major Storm Max. Allowable Spread for Minor & Major Storm T MAX = ft Max. Allowable Depth at Gutter Flowline for Minor & Major Storm d MAX = inches Allow Flow Depth at Street Crown (leave blank for no) check = yes MINOR STORM Allowable Capacity is based on Depth Criterion Minor Storm Major Storm MAJOR STORM Allowable Capacity is based on Spread Criterion Q allow = cfs Minor storm max. allowable capacity GOOD - greater than flow given on sheet 'Q-Peak' Major storm max. allowable capacity GOOD - greater than flow given on sheet 'Q-Peak' inlet C1.xlsm, Q-Allow 10/19/2017, 2:47 PM
27 INLET ON A CONTINUOUS GRADE Project: Inlet C1 Design Information (Input) MINOR MAJOR Type of Inlet Type = CDOT Type R Curb Opening Local Depression (additional to continuous gutter depression 'a' from 'Q-Allow') a LOCAL = inches Total Number of Units in the Inlet (Grate or Curb Opening) No = 2 2 Length of a Single Unit Inlet (Grate or Curb Opening) L o = ft Width of a Unit Grate (cannot be greater than W from Q-Allow) W o = N/A N/A ft Clogging Factor for a Single Unit Grate (typical min. value = 0.5) C f-g = N/A N/A Clogging Factor for a Single Unit Curb Opening (typical min. value = 0.1) C f-c = Street Hydraulics: OK - Q < maximum allowable from sheet 'Q-Allow' MINOR MAJOR Total Inlet Interception Capacity Q = cfs Total Inlet Carry-Over Flow (flow bypassing inlet) Q b = cfs Capture Percentage = Q a/q o = C% = % inlet C1.xlsm, Inlet On Grade 10/19/2017, 2:48 PM
28 DESIGN PEAK FLOW FOR ONE-HALF OF STREET OR GRASS-LINED CHANNEL BY THE RATIONAL METHOD Worksheet Protected Project: Inlet C2 Show Details Design Flow: ONLY if already determined through other methods: Minor Storm Major Storm (local peak flow for 1/2 of street OR grass-lined channel): *Q Known = cfs * If you enter values in Row 14, skip the rest of this sheet and proceed to sheet Q-Allow or Area Inlet. Geographic Information: (Enter data in the blue cells): Site Type: Site is Urban Site is Non-Urban Flows Developed For: Street Inlets Area Inlets in a Median Subcatchment Area = Acres Percent Imperviousness = % NRCS Soil Type = A, B, C, or D Overland Flow = Channel Flow = Slope (ft/ft) Length (ft) FILL IN THIS SECTION OR FILL IN THE SECTIONS BELOW. Rainfall Information: Intensity I (inch/hr) = C 1 * P 1 / ( C 2 + T c ) ^ C 3 Minor Storm Major Storm Design Storm Return Period, T r = Return Period One-Hour Precipitation, P 1 = C 1 = C 2 = C 3 = User-Defined Storm Runoff Coefficient (leave this blank to accept a calculated value), C = User-Defined 5-yr. Runoff Coefficient (leave this blank to accept a calculated value), C 5 = Bypass (Carry-Over) Flow from upstream Subcatchments, Q b = years inches cfs Total Design Peak Flow, Q = cfs inlet C2.xlsm, Q-Peak 10/19/2017, 2:49 PM
29 Project: ALLOWABLE CAPACITY FOR ONE-HALF OF STREET (Minor & Major Storm) (Based on Regulated Criteria for Maximum Allowable Flow Depth and Spread) Inlet C2 Gutter Geometry (Enter data in the blue cells) Maximum Allowable Width for Spread Behind Curb T BACK = 5.0 ft Side Slope Behind Curb (leave blank for no conveyance credit behind curb) S BACK = ft/ft Manning's Roughness Behind Curb (typically between and 0.020) n BACK = Height of Curb at Gutter Flow Line H CURB = 4.00 inches Distance from Curb Face to Street Crown T CROWN = 13.0 ft Gutter Width W = 2.00 ft Street Transverse Slope S X = ft/ft Gutter Cross Slope (typically 2 inches over 24 inches or ft/ft) S W = ft/ft Street Longitudinal Slope - Enter 0 for sump condition S O = ft/ft Manning's Roughness for Street Section (typically between and 0.020) n STREET = Minor Storm Major Storm Max. Allowable Spread for Minor & Major Storm T MAX = ft Max. Allowable Depth at Gutter Flowline for Minor & Major Storm d MAX = inches Allow Flow Depth at Street Crown (leave blank for no) check = yes MINOR STORM Allowable Capacity is based on Depth Criterion Minor Storm Major Storm MAJOR STORM Allowable Capacity is based on Spread Criterion Q allow = cfs Minor storm max. allowable capacity GOOD - greater than flow given on sheet 'Q-Peak' Major storm max. allowable capacity GOOD - greater than flow given on sheet 'Q-Peak' inlet C2.xlsm, Q-Allow 10/19/2017, 2:50 PM
30 INLET ON A CONTINUOUS GRADE Project: Inlet C2 Design Information (Input) MINOR MAJOR Type of Inlet Type = CDOT Type R Curb Opening Local Depression (additional to continuous gutter depression 'a' from 'Q-Allow') a LOCAL = inches Total Number of Units in the Inlet (Grate or Curb Opening) No = 1 1 Length of a Single Unit Inlet (Grate or Curb Opening) L o = ft Width of a Unit Grate (cannot be greater than W from Q-Allow) W o = N/A N/A ft Clogging Factor for a Single Unit Grate (typical min. value = 0.5) C f-g = N/A N/A Clogging Factor for a Single Unit Curb Opening (typical min. value = 0.1) C f-c = Street Hydraulics: OK - Q < maximum allowable from sheet 'Q-Allow' MINOR MAJOR Total Inlet Interception Capacity Q = cfs Total Inlet Carry-Over Flow (flow bypassing inlet) Q b = cfs Capture Percentage = Q a/q o = C% = % inlet C2.xlsm, Inlet On Grade 10/19/2017, 2:52 PM
31 DESIGN PEAK FLOW FOR ONE-HALF OF STREET OR GRASS-LINED CHANNEL BY THE RATIONAL METHOD Worksheet Protected Project: Inlet C3 Show Details Design Flow: ONLY if already determined through other methods: Minor Storm Major Storm (local peak flow for 1/2 of street OR grass-lined channel): *Q Known = cfs * If you enter values in Row 14, skip the rest of this sheet and proceed to sheet Q-Allow or Area Inlet. Geographic Information: (Enter data in the blue cells): Site Type: Site is Urban Site is Non-Urban Flows Developed For: Street Inlets Area Inlets in a Median Subcatchment Area = Acres Percent Imperviousness = % NRCS Soil Type = A, B, C, or D Overland Flow = Channel Flow = Slope (ft/ft) Length (ft) FILL IN THIS SECTION OR FILL IN THE SECTIONS BELOW. Rainfall Information: Intensity I (inch/hr) = C 1 * P 1 / ( C 2 + T c ) ^ C 3 Minor Storm Major Storm Design Storm Return Period, T r = Return Period One-Hour Precipitation, P 1 = C 1 = C 2 = C 3 = User-Defined Storm Runoff Coefficient (leave this blank to accept a calculated value), C = User-Defined 5-yr. Runoff Coefficient (leave this blank to accept a calculated value), C 5 = Bypass (Carry-Over) Flow from upstream Subcatchments, Q b = years inches cfs Total Design Peak Flow, Q = cfs inlet C3.xlsm, Q-Peak 10/19/2017, 2:53 PM
32 Project: ALLOWABLE CAPACITY FOR ONE-HALF OF STREET (Minor & Major Storm) (Based on Regulated Criteria for Maximum Allowable Flow Depth and Spread) Inlet C3 Gutter Geometry (Enter data in the blue cells) Maximum Allowable Width for Spread Behind Curb T BACK = 5.0 ft Side Slope Behind Curb (leave blank for no conveyance credit behind curb) S BACK = ft/ft Manning's Roughness Behind Curb (typically between and 0.020) n BACK = Height of Curb at Gutter Flow Line H CURB = 4.00 inches Distance from Curb Face to Street Crown T CROWN = 13.0 ft Gutter Width W = 2.00 ft Street Transverse Slope S X = ft/ft Gutter Cross Slope (typically 2 inches over 24 inches or ft/ft) S W = ft/ft Street Longitudinal Slope - Enter 0 for sump condition S O = ft/ft Manning's Roughness for Street Section (typically between and 0.020) n STREET = Minor Storm Major Storm Max. Allowable Spread for Minor & Major Storm T MAX = ft Max. Allowable Depth at Gutter Flowline for Minor & Major Storm d MAX = inches Allow Flow Depth at Street Crown (leave blank for no) check = yes MINOR STORM Allowable Capacity is based on Depth Criterion Minor Storm Major Storm MAJOR STORM Allowable Capacity is based on Spread Criterion Q allow = cfs Minor storm max. allowable capacity GOOD - greater than flow given on sheet 'Q-Peak' Major storm max. allowable capacity GOOD - greater than flow given on sheet 'Q-Peak' inlet C3.xlsm, Q-Allow 10/19/2017, 2:53 PM
September 6, City of Thornton 9500 Civic Center Drive Thornton, CO (303) RE: Maverik Thornton, CO - Drainage Report
September 6, 2016 City of Thornton 9500 Civic Center Drive Thornton, CO 80229 (303) 538-7295 RE: Maverik Thornton, CO - Drainage Report As per your request, we are submitting to you the drainage report
More informationDRAINAGE REPORT FOR THORNTON SELF STORAGE THORNTON, COLORADO
DRAINAGE REPORT FOR THORNTON SELF STORAGE THORNTON, COLORADO Prepared by: Bowman Consulting 603 Park Point Dr. Suite 100 Golden, CO 80401 (303)-801-2900 June 29, 2015 Revised August 14, 2015 CERTIFICATE
More informationSTREUVER FIDELCO CAPPELLI, LLC YONKERS DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT PHASE 1. DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT For: PALISADES POINT
STREUVER FIDELCO CAPPELLI, LLC YONKERS DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT PHASE 1 DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT For: PALISADES POINT Prepared by: PAULUS, SOKOLOWSKI & SARTOR STORMWATER MANAGEMENT 1. Methodology
More informationStormwater Guidelines and Case Studies. CAHILL ASSOCIATES Environmental Consultants West Chester, PA (610)
Stormwater Guidelines and Case Studies CAHILL ASSOCIATES Environmental Consultants West Chester, PA (610) 696-4150 www.thcahill.com Goals and Challenges for Manual State Stormwater Policy More Widespread
More information******************* Project Description ******************* File Name... NAAF Stormwater Improvement Project 11_21_2014.SPF
Autodesk Storm and Sanitary Analysis 2014 - Version 8.1.62 (Build 1) ----------------- *** Project Description *** File Name... NAAF Stormwater Improvement Project 11_21_2014.SPF Analysis Options Flow
More informationFHWA - HIGHWAY HYDROLOGY
The unit peak discharge is computed with Equation 5.6 by interpolating c 0, c, and c Table 5.5 using a type II distribution. The peak discharge is also calculated as follows. from Variable SI Unit U Unit.5444
More informationEROSION CONTROL NARRATIVE
EROSION CONTROL NARRATIVE Erosion and sediment control has been designed for the Willow Bend Phase I Subdivision according to UDFCD and the City of Thornton criteria, in order to minimize erosion and sediment
More informationChapter 10 - Sacramento Method Examples
Chapter 10 Sacramento Method Examples Introduction Overview This chapter presents two example problems to demonstrate the use of the Sacramento method. These example problems use the SACPRE and HEC-1 computer
More informationSection 4: Model Development and Application
Section 4: Model Development and Application The hydrologic model for the Wissahickon Act 167 study was built using GIS layers of land use, hydrologic soil groups, terrain and orthophotography. Within
More informationAppendix B Equations and Examples
Equations and Examples Purpose The purpose of this appendix is to provide background equations and example problems for clarity of calculations used throughout the manual. This appendix is divided into
More informationSTORMWATER REPORT FRITO LAY SUBDIVISION NO. 3
STORMWATER REPORT FRITO LAY SUBDIVISION NO. 3 May 2018 STORMWATER REPORT I. Subdivision Data a. The parcel is adjacent to the existing Frito Lay property in Topeka; and the subject plat application encompasses
More informationFINAL DRAINAGE REPORT Villages at Riverdale Carriage Homes Thornton, CO
FINAL DRAINAGE REPORT Villages at Riverdale Carriage Homes Thornton, CO October 14, 2016 Revised: March 30, 2017 JN: 15096 Prepared for: PCS Group, Inc. 1001 16 th Street #3 B-180 Denver, CO 80265 P: 303.561.4905
More informationVillages at Riverdale Thornton, CO
FINAL UTILITY REPORT Villages at Riverdale Thornton, CO October 14, 216 Revised: March 29, 217 JN: 1539 Prepared for: PCS Group, Inc. 11 16 th Street #3 B-18 Denver, CO 8265 P: 33.531.495 Prepared by:
More informationContinuing Education Course #101 Drainage Design with WinTR-55
1 of 5 Continuing Education Course #101 Drainage Design with WinTR-55 1. WinTR-55 uses the Kinematic Wave method for calculating storm runoff rates and volumes. 2. According to the Velocity Method, the
More informationUTILITY REPORT FOR THORNTON SELF STORAGE THORNTON, COLORADO
UTILITY REPORT FOR THORNTON SELF STORAGE THORNTON, COLORADO Prepared by: Bowman Consulting 63 Park Point Dr. Suite 1 Golden, CO 841 (33)-81-29 June 29, 215 Revised August 14, 215 Revised September 3, 215
More informationCITY OF CAPE CORAL STORMWATER MASTER PLAN PHASE II - PART 1 BASINS 4, 10, & 14 SUB-BASIN DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS SUMMARY
CITY OF CAPE CORAL STORMWATER MASTER PLAN PHASE II - PART 1 BASINS 4, 10, & 14 SUB-BASIN DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS SUMMARY Cape Coral, FL Prepared for: The City of Cape Coral Public Works
More information3301 East 120 th Avenue Assited Living & Memory Care
UTILITY REPORT FOR 3301 East 120 th Avenue Assited Living & Memory Care 1 st Submittal January 23, 2016 2 nd Submittal March 04, 2016 Prepared for: 3301 E. 120 th Ave, LLC. 8200 E. Maplewood Ave., Suite
More informationSTORMWATER MANAGEMENT COMPUTATIONS. Mount Prospect
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT COMPUTATIONS Mount Prospect MHG PROJECT No. 2011.173.11 November 6, 2014 Prepared for: Piney Meetinghouse Investments c/o Mr. Dennis Fling 14801 Clopper Road Boyds, MD 20841 (301)
More informationARTICLE 5 (PART 2) DETENTION VOLUME EXAMPLE PROBLEMS
ARTICLE 5 (PART 2) DETENTION VOLUME EXAMPLE PROBLEMS Example 5.7 Simple (Detention Nomograph) Example 5.8 Offsite and Unrestricted Areas (HEC-HMS) Example 5.9 Ponds in Series w/ Tailwater (HEC-HMS) Example
More informationEastlake Assited Living & Memory Care
UTILITY REPORT FOR Eastlake Assited Living & Memory Care 1 st Submittal January 23, 2016 2 nd Submittal March 04, 2016 June 7, 2016 Final Submittal August 08, 2016 Prepared for: 3301 E. 120 th Ave, LLC.
More informationBROADSTONE VANTAGE POINT APARTMENTS NE corner of S. Parker Road, and E. Cottonwood Drive Parker, Colorado
BROADSTONE VANTAGE POINT APARTMENTS NE corner of S. Parker Road, and E. Cottonwood Drive Parker, Colorado PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE REPORT Strategic Land Solutions, Inc. JN: 16-002-15 Report Date/History: July
More informationVolume 1, Chapter 4 Rainfall
Volume 1, Chapter 4 Rainfall Users Guidance: If a UDFCD Section number in this chapter is skipped: It was adopted as is; please refer to that Section in the corresponding UDFCD Manual, Volume, Chapter
More informationWellsgate Terrace SPECIFICATIONS.
GRADING NOTES: 1. LOT GRADING SHALL BE COMPLETED TO PROVE SUFFICIENT DIRT ON EACH PAD TO ACHIEVE THE CRITICAL PAD GRADES AND SPOT GRADES ON EACH LOT. AFTER ACHIEVING CRITICAL PAD GRADES INDICATED ON THIS
More informationFINAL UTILITY REPORT Creekside Thornton, CO
FINAL UTILITY REPORT Creekside Thornton, CO March 4, 216 Revised: June 27, 216 JN: 1539 Prepared for: HW Sodbusters, LLC 2733 E. Parleys Way, Suite 3 Salt Lake City, UT 8419 P: 81.485.777 Prepared by:
More informationStormwater Drainage Design Report. Reeve & Associates, Inc. Maverik, Inc. 88th Avenue and Pecos Street. Thornton, CO
88th Avenue and Pecos Street Stormwater Drainage Design Report Reeve & Associates, Inc. Solutions You Can Build On for Maverik, Inc. 88th Avenue and Pecos Street Thornton, CO submitted to Reeve & Associates,
More informationHYDROLOGY REPORT Tentative Tract No. 5978
ATTACHMENT 5 October 2016 HYDROLOGY REPORT Tentative Tract No. 5978 City of Simi Valley County of Ventura Prepared For: Landsea Holdings Corporation 7525 Irvine Center Drive Suite 200 Irvine, CA 92618
More informationPARADIGM ODP FORT COLLINS, CO 80525
DRAINAGE REPORT PARADIGM ODP FORT COLLINS, CO 80525 Prepared For: Paradigm Properties, LLC 2186 Knoll Drive Ventura, CA 93003 Prepared By Coffey Engineering & Surveying 4045 St. Cloud Drive, Suite 180
More informationSubmitted to: St. Johns River Power Park New Berlin Road Jacksonville, FL 32226
RUN-ON/RUN-OFF CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN RUN-ON AND RUN-OFF CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN St. Johns River Power Park Byproduct Storage Area B Phase I Development Submitted to: St. Johns River Power Park 11201 New Berlin
More informationHydrology Study Report
Hafeez Consulting www.hafeezconsulting.com Civil/ Structural Engineering, Design & Construction 1451 S. Hacienda St. Anaheim CA 92804 (714) 225-4565 Fax (714)917-2977 engineer@hafeezconsulting.com Hydrology
More informationAPPENDIX B DRAINAGE REPORT
APPENDIX B DRAINAGE REPORT B-1 South Lamar Blvd. Transportation Corridor Study Drainage Report Prepared for: City of Austin and HDR, Inc. Prepared by: and Services, Inc. Final 07-09-2015 Michael C. Meriwether,
More informationINFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART PLANT YATES ASH POND 2 (AP-2) GEORGIA POWER COMPANY
INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART 257.82 PLANT YATES ASH POND 2 (AP-2) GEORGIA POWER COMPANY EPA s Disposal of Coal Combustion Residuals from Electric Utilities Final Rule (40 C.F.R.
More informationA HYDROLOGIC STUDY OF THE EFFECTS OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT ON STORM RUNOFF: A CASE STUDY IN QUEENS, NY ABSTRACT
154 A HYDROLOGC STUDY OF THE EFFECTS OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT ON STORM RUNOFF: A CASE STUDY N QUEENS, NY Monica Tsang-Rakovan, Kevin J. Phillips, Khalid Bajwa, John Ferrelli, Fanning, Phillips and Molnar Fanning,
More informationBRANDON LAKES AVENUE PRE AND POST CONDITIONS DRAINAGE REPORT
BRANDON LAKES AVENUE PRE AND POST CONDITIONS DRAINAGE REPORT Hillsborough County Public Works County Center, 22nd Floor 601 E. Kennedy Blvd. Tampa, FL 33602 BRANDON LAKES AVENUE DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS Capital
More informationUrban Hydrology for Small Watersheds
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service Conservation Engineering Division Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds TR-55 Technical Release 55 June 1986 To show bookmarks
More informationObjectives: After completing this assignment, you should be able to:
Data Analysis Assignment #1 Evaluating the effects of watershed land use on storm runoff Assignment due: 21 February 2013, 5 pm Objectives: After completing this assignment, you should be able to: 1) Calculate
More informationHydrology and Hydraulics Design Report. Background Summary
To: National Park Services Montezuma Castle National Monument Richard Goepfrich, Facility Manager From: Multicultural Technical Engineers Date: Tuesday - February 13, 2018 Subject: 30% Hydrology and Hydraulics
More informationSTORMWATER DESIGN CALCULATIONS
STORMWATER DESIGN CALCULATIONS REF : C7011-2390 AT 19a-23 MEMORIAL AVENUE BLACKWALL FOR MR KERR Contents 1.0 Detention System Requirements 1.1 Storage-Area calcs. 1.2 Data Files for Pre & Post Developed
More informationWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT FOR PAGE ESTATES
WATER MANAGEMENT REPORT FOR PAGE ESTATES SLB Consulting of SW Florida, LLC PO Box 2826 Bonita Springs, FL. 34133 Phone: 239-948-9566 sandra@slbconsult.com C.O.A. # 25395 September 1, 2014 Sandra L. Bottcher
More informationDrainage Analysis. Appendix F
Drainage Analysis Appendix F Golden View Drive Elizabeth Street LMORE CREEK Ricky Road Rabbit Creek Road LITTLE RABBIT CREEK East 156th Avenue MOA Project #10-026 Golden View Drive Intersection
More informationWATERVIEW EAST PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE REPORT EL PASO COUNTY, COLORADO
WATERVIEW EAST PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE REPORT EL PASO COUNTY, COLORADO PROJECT NO. 181710214 Prepared for: CPR ENTITLEMENTS 31 N. TEJON, SUITE 500 COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 80903 719.377.0244 Prepared by: STANTEC
More informationCoal Combustion Residuals Unit Inflow Design Flood Control System Plan
Coal Combustion Residuals Unit Inflow Design Flood Control System Plan Virginia Electric and Power Company Chesterfield Power Station Upper (East) Pond Chesterfield County, Virginia GAI Project Number:
More informationLOCATED IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PREPARED FOR S.J.R.W.M.D. AND F.W.C.D. DECEMBER, 2003 Updated 2007 Updated May 2014 PREPARED BY
FELLSMERE WATER CONTROL DISTRICT EAST MASTER DRAINAGE PLAN AND STORMWATER HYDROLOGIC ANALYSIS OF THE GRAVITY DRAINAGE SYSTEM LOCATED BETWEEN THE EAST BOUNDARY, LATERAL U, THE MAIN CANAL, AND DITCH 24 LOCATED
More informationThe effectiveness of the Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) and Huff rainfall distribution methods for use in detention basin design
Scholars' Mine Masters Theses Student Theses and Dissertations Spring 2010 The effectiveness of the Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) and Huff rainfall distribution methods for use in detention
More informationPreliminary Hydraulic Report
Tarrant County, Texas Preliminary Hydraulic Report Prepared for: Texas Department of Transportation Fort Worth District Prepared by: AECOM Corporation Scott C. Williams, P.E. No. 101334, Date 2009 This
More informationThe Effect of Stormwater Controls on Sediment Transport in Urban Streams
Hydrology Days 2004 The Effect of Stormwater Controls on Sediment Transport in Urban Streams Christine A. Rohrer, P.E. 1 Master s Candidate, Department of Civil Engineering, Colorado State University,
More informationPONDNET.WK1 - Flow and Phosphorus Routing in Pond Networks
PONDNET.WK1 - Flow and Phosphorus Routing in Pond Networks Version 2.1 - March 1989 William W. Walker, Jr. Ph.D., Environmental Engineer 1127 Lowell Road, Concord, Massachusetts 01742 508-369-8061 PONDNET.WK1
More informationAPPENDIX B HYDROLOGY
APPENDIX B HYDROLOGY TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION... 1 2.0 PROBABLE MAXIMUM PRECIPITATION (PMP)... 1 3.0 DESIGN FLOW CALCULATION... 1 4.0 DIVERSION CHANNEL SIZING... 2 5.0 REFERENCES... 4 LIST OF
More informationDrainage Study for Civic Center Way
Drainage Study for 23401 Civic Center Way P.C.C.E. INC. CIVIL ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Drainage Study for 23401 Civic Center Way WHOLE FOODS AT THE PARK Prepared by: P.C.C.E. INC STEPHEN R. SMITH, P.E. 23801
More informationChapter 5 CALIBRATION AND VERIFICATION
Chapter 5 CALIBRATION AND VERIFICATION This chapter contains the calibration procedure and data used for the LSC existing conditions model. The goal of the calibration effort was to develop a hydraulic
More informationBasic Hydraulics June 2007
Basic Hydraulics www.concrete-pipe.org June 2007 2007 Overview Open Channel Flow Manning Equation Basic Culvert Design Sanitary Sewer Design Flow, Velocity Stormwater Sewer Design Flow, Velocity 2 Open
More informationDetermination of Urban Runoff Using ILLUDAS and GIS
Texas A&M University Department of Civil Engineering Instructor: Dr. Francisco Olivera CVEN689 Applications of GIS to Civil Engineering Determination of Urban Runoff Using ILLUDAS and GIS Tae Jin Kim 03.
More informationContinuing Education Associated with Maintaining CPESC and CESSWI Certification
Continuing Education Associated with Maintaining CPESC and CESSWI Certification Module 2: Stormwater Management Principles for Earth Disturbing Activities Sponsors: ODOTs Local Technical Assistance Program
More informationCity of Columbia BMP Manual. Detailed Unified Sizing Criteria Example Wet Pond Design
City of Columbia BMP Manual Detailed Unified Sizing Criteria Example Wet Pond Design April 17, 2013 Wet Pond Example: Unified Sizing Criteria Methodology Base Data Location: Rome, GA Site Drainage Area
More informationHYDRAULIC EFFICIENCY OF GRATE AND CURB INLETS FOR URBAN STORM DRAINAGE
HYDRAULIC EFFICIENCY OF GRATE AND CURB INLETS FOR URBAN STORM DRAINAGE Prepared for The Urban Drainage and Flood Control District Prepared by Brendan C. Comport Christopher I. Thornton Amanda L. Cox December
More informationDRAINAGE CALCULATIONS
DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS NW 8 th Street and NW 8 th Terrace Roadway and Drainage Improvements City of Miami Project B-30745 And NW 14 th Court Roadway and Drainage Improvements City of Miami Project B-30746
More informationPHASE III DRAINAGE STUDY FOR CRYSTAL VALLEY RANCH FILING 11. Castle Rock, Colorado PREPARED FOR CRYSTAL VALLEY RANCH DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC
PHASE III DRAINAGE STUDY FOR CRYSTAL VALLEY RANCH FILING 11 Castle Rock, Colorado February 18, 2013 (Revised Friday, August 16, 2013) PREPARED FOR CRYSTAL VALLEY RANCH DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 1175 East
More informationCASE STUDIES. Introduction
Introduction The City of Winston-Salem faces the challenge of maintaining public infrastructure (e.g., water and sewer lines, storm drains, roads, culverts and bridges) while minimizing the potential impacts
More informationAPPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM U.S. Army Corps of Engineers This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section IV of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook. SECTION
More informationChapter 13. Editing Intermediate Files. Overview
Chapter 13 Editing Intermediate Files Overview The SACPRE intermediate file is an ASCII file that contains records or lines of information. In SACPRE and HEC-1 each record represents a command for the
More informationProject Description. Project Options. End Analysis On... Apr 26, :00:00. Rainfall Details
Project Description File Name... 323 - Att Pond 3 East PIPES ONLY.SPF Project Options Flow Units... Elevation Type... Hydrology Method... EPA SWMM Infiltration Method... Link Routing Method... Enable Overflow
More informationENGINEERING HYDROLOGY
ENGINEERING HYDROLOGY Prof. Rajesh Bhagat Asst. Professor Civil Engineering Department Yeshwantrao Chavan College Of Engineering Nagpur B. E. (Civil Engg.) M. Tech. (Enviro. Engg.) GCOE, Amravati VNIT,
More informationPRELIMINARY CULVERT ANALYSIS REPORT FOR CULVERT NO. 008-C OREGON AVENUE OVER PINEHURST CREEK
PRELIMINARY CULVERT ANALYSIS REPORT FOR CULVERT NO. 008-C OREGON AVENUE OVER PINEHURST CREEK Prepared for The District of Columbia Department of Transportation Washington, D.C. Prepared by Parsons Transportation
More informationD.M. Wills Associates Limited PARTNERS IN ENGINEERING. Stormwater Management Report. City of Peterborough
Stormwater Management Report City of Peterborough P-20-12 Parkway Corridor Class Environmental Assessment Jackson Park Parkhill Road West to Chemong Road D.M. Wills Project No. 12-5061 D.M. Wills Associates
More informationDAVID NOEL KELLY CIVIL. David Noel Kelly :24:14-04'00'
DAVID NOEL KELLY CIVIL David Noel Kelly 2014.07.22 10:24:14-04'00' TABLE OF CONTENTS Stormwater Management Summary Checklist for Stormwater Report Illicit Discharge Statement Runoff Summary Existing Conditions
More informationSTORMWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT THE FAIRWAYS AT EDGEWOOD LOTS 5 & 6, BLOCK 1201 TOWNSHIP OF RIVER VALE BERGEN COUNTY, NEW JERSEY PREPARED BY: DAPHNE A. GALVIN PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER LICENSE NO. 24GE03434900
More informationThis site will utilize an infiltration berm to manage the two-year/24-hour volume increase.
High Street TETRA TECH, INC. By: RH Date: 1/30/2017 Subject: High Street Checked By: JB Date: 2/1/2017 PCSM Design and Evaluation PURPOSE: The purpose of these calculations is to design a Post-Construction
More informationLas Colonias Subdivision September 2010 Flood Study
Las Colonias Subdivision September 2010 Flood Study Curtis Beitel, P.E., CFM Scott Muchard, P.E. Project Engineer William Badini, CFM Senior Meteorologist Location Map Background Los Colonias Subdivision
More informationStormwater Capacity Analysis for Westover Branch Watershed
Stormwater Capacity Analysis for Westover Branch Watershed Pimmit Run Little Pimmit Run, Mainstem Stohman's Run Gulf Branch Pimmit Run Tributary Little Pimmit Run, W. Branch Little Pimmit Run, E. Branch
More informationSection 3.0 Existing Systems Hydrology and Hydraulics
Section 3.0 Existing Systems Hydrology and Hydraulics This chapter summarizes the results and methodology of MACTEC s evaluation of the existing drainage systems and lakes for the City of Maitland, Florida.
More informationB805 TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES - OPSS 805
B805 MEASURES - OPSS 805 805.1 GENERAL Construction activities frequently remove protective cover and expose soil to accelerated rates of erosion. Sediments generated thereby can be conveyed via runoff
More informationFOR PROJECTS INITIATED AFTER NOVEMBER 1, 2008 ITEM 716 EMBANKMENT EARTH OUTLET SEDIMENT TRAP
AFTER NOVEMBER 1, 2008 ITEM 716 EMBANKMENT EARTH OUTLET SEDIMENT TRAP 716.1 Description. This work shall consist of furnishing, installing, maintaining, and removing temporary erosion protection and sediment
More information12 SWAT USER S MANUAL, VERSION 98.1
12 SWAT USER S MANUAL, VERSION 98.1 CANOPY STORAGE. Canopy storage is the water intercepted by vegetative surfaces (the canopy) where it is held and made available for evaporation. When using the curve
More informationStone Outlet Sediment Trap
3.12 Sediment Control Description: A stone outlet sediment trap is a small detention area formed by placing a stone embankment with an integral stone filter outlet across a drainage swale for the purpose
More informationPressure Head: Pressure head is the height of a column of water that would exert a unit pressure equal to the pressure of the water.
Design Manual Chapter - Stormwater D - Storm Sewer Design D- Storm Sewer Sizing A. Introduction The purpose of this section is to outline the basic hydraulic principles in order to determine the storm
More informationThis site will utilize an infiltration berm to manage the two-year/24-hour volume increase.
Gates TETRA TECH, INC. By: RH Date: 1/30/2017 Subject: Gates Road Checked By: JB Date: 2/1/2017 PCSM Design and Evaluation PURPOSE: The purpose of these calculations is to design a Post-Construction Stormwater
More informationEROSION CONTROL NARRATIVE
EROSION CONTROL NARRATIVE Erosion and sediment control has been designed for the Willow Bend Phase I Subdivision according to UDFCD and the City of Thornton criteria, in order to minimize erosion and sediment
More informationDRAINAGE REPORT. Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure. Highway 7 Four Laning Silverdale Avenue to Nelson Street 100% Detailed Design
DRAINAGE REPORT Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure Highway 7 Four Laning Silverdale Avenue to Nelson Street 100% Detailed Design December 14, 2017 Reviewed by: Amanda Rust, P. Eng. Senior Drainage
More informationGISHydro2000: A Tool for Automated Hydrologic Analysis in Maryland. G. E. Moglen 1
GISHydro2000: A Tool for Automated Hydrologic Analysis in Maryland G. E. Moglen 1 1 Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742; PH (301) 405-1964;
More informationNotes: Space for as many as two segments per flow type can be used for each worksheet. Include a map, schematic, or description of flow segments.
Worksheet 3: Time of Concentration (Tc) or travel time (Tt) Project By Date Location Checked Date Check one: Present Developed Check one: Tc Tt through subarea Notes: Space for as many as two segments
More informationThis site will utilize an infiltration berm to manage the two-year/24-hour volume increase.
Gates TETRA TECH, INC. By: RH Date: 11/11/2016 Subject: Gates Road Checked By: JB Date: 11/13/2016 PCSM Design and Evaluation PURPOSE: The purpose of these calculations is to design a Post-Construction
More informationTechnical Memorandum. City of Salem, Stormwater Management Design Standards. Project No:
Technical Memorandum 6500 SW Macadam Avenue, Suite 200 Portland, Oregon, 97239 Tel: 503-244-7005 Fax: 503-244-9095 Prepared for: Project Title: City of Salem, Oregon City of Salem, Stormwater Management
More informationSERVICING BRIEF & STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT Colonial Road Sarsfield (Ottawa), Ontario. Report No June 15, 2017
SERVICING BRIEF & STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT 2980 Colonial Road Sarsfield (Ottawa), Ontario Report No. 16033 June 15, 2017 D. B. G R A Y E N G I N E E R I N G I N C. Stormwater Management - Grading &
More informationChapter 7 Mudflow Analysis
Chapter 7 Mudflow Analysis 7.0 Introduction This chapter provides information on the potential and magnitude of mud floods and mudflows that may develop in Aspen due to rainfall events, snowmelt, or rain
More informationStandards for Soil Erosion and Sediment Control in New Jersey May 2012
STANDARD FOR SEDIMENT BASIN Definition A barrier, dam, excavated pit, or dugout constructed across a waterway or at other suitable locations to intercept and retain sediment. Basins created by construction
More informationTitle: ArcMap: Calculating Soil Areas for Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plans Authors: Brandy Woodcock, Benjamin Byars
Title: ArcMap: Calculating Soil Areas for Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plans Authors: Brandy Woodcock, Benjamin Byars Introduction Abstract: The use of ArcMap to calculate soil areas for storm water
More informationUrban Mapping and Providing Partner Services Utilizing GIS Presenter: Josh Garver. GISP, Assistant Director;
Urban Mapping and Providing Partner Services Utilizing GIS Presenter: Josh Garver. GISP, Assistant Director; jgarver@franklinswcd.org What I d Like You to do: Think Spatially Look for Shapes Look for Patterns
More informationWMS 9.0 Tutorial GSSHA Modeling Basics Infiltration Learn how to add infiltration to your GSSHA model
v. 9.0 WMS 9.0 Tutorial GSSHA Modeling Basics Infiltration Learn how to add infiltration to your GSSHA model Objectives This workshop builds on the model developed in the previous workshop and shows you
More informationOLD TOWN DRAINAGE STUDY AND FLOODPLAIN MASTERPLAN
OLD TOWN DRAINAGE STUDY AND FLOODPLAIN MASTERPLAN FOR SODA, BUTCHERKNIFE AND SPRING CREEKS PRELIMINARY DESIGN REPORT PREPARED FOR: PREPARED BY: Engineering Consultants Your project, our pride. 3151 SOUTH
More informationSuitable Applications Sediment traps should be considered for use:
Categories EC Erosion Control SE Sediment Control TC Tracking Control WE Wind Erosion Control Non-Stormwater NS Management Control Waste Management and WM Materials Pollution Control Legend: Primary Objective
More informationAPPENDIX B DESIGN CRITERIA FOR TEMPORARY WATER QUALITY BMPS USED DURING CONSTRUCTION
APPENDIX B DESIGN CRITERIA FOR TEMPORARY WATER QUALITY BMPS USED DURING CONSTRUCTION This Appendix presents design criteria and example calculations for the following temporary water quality BMPs for use
More informationChapter 7 Mudflow Analysis
Chapter 7 Mudflow Analysis 7.0 Introduction This chapter provides information on the potential and magnitude of mud floods and mudflows that may develop in Aspen due to rainfall events, snowmelt, or rain
More informationA GIS-based Approach to Watershed Analysis in Texas Author: Allison Guettner
Texas A&M University Zachry Department of Civil Engineering CVEN 658 Civil Engineering Applications of GIS Instructor: Dr. Francisco Olivera A GIS-based Approach to Watershed Analysis in Texas Author:
More informationTemplate for Sediment and Erosion Control Plan General Instructions. Section Instructions
Template for Sediment and Erosion Control Plan General Instructions Introduction: Soil erosion and sediment deposition from farmlands can contribute to degraded surface water quality. Sediment delivery
More informationModule 5: Channel and Slope Protection Example Assignments
Module 5: Channel and Slope Protection Example Assignments A) Example Project Assignment on Slope and Swale Design North America Green Software Example (Erosion Control Materials Design Software) The following
More informationUrban Erosion Potential Risk Mapping with GIS
Urban Erosion Potential Risk Mapping with GIS ESRI Water Conference San Diego, CA Jan 29-Feb 1, 2018 Dr. Randy Dymond, PE, F.ASCE, D.WRE Co-investigators: Amanda Weikmann, MS Student Dr. Clay Hodges, PE
More informationTable of Contents Project Description... 1 Summary of Existing Conditions... 1 Summary of Proposed Conditions... 1 Stormwater Compliance... 2 Collecti
Table of Contents Project Description... 1 Summary of Existing Conditions... 1 Summary of Proposed Conditions... 1 Stormwater Compliance... 2 Collection... 2 Treatment... 3 Storage... 3 Disposal... 4 Soils...
More informationTable 1 - Infiltration Rates
Stantec Consulting Ltd. 100-300 Hagey Boulevard, Waterloo ON N2L 0A4 November 14, 2017 File: 161413228/10 Attention: Mr. Michael Witmer, BES, MPA, MCIP, RPP City of Guelph 1 Carden Street Guelph ON N1H
More informationSediment Trap. At multiple locations within the project site where sediment control is needed.
Sediment Trap SE-3 Objectives EC Erosion Control SE Sediment Control TR Tracking Control WE Wind Erosion Control Non-Stormwater NS Management Control Waste Management and WM Materials Pollution Control
More informationSWAMP GIS: A spatial decision support system for predicting and treating stormwater runoff. Michael G. Wing 1 * and Derek Godwin
Journal of Spatial Hydrology Vol. 11, No. 2 Fall 2011 SWAMP GIS: A spatial decision support system for predicting and treating stormwater runoff Michael G. Wing 1 * and Derek Godwin Abstract SWAMP GIS
More informationGIS Enabled Automated Culvert Design
GIS Enabled Automated Culvert Design ASHTON GREER PH.D. STUDENT, THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA DR. ANDREW GRAETTINGER, LEAH CLIFTON, ZACHARY WILBANKS, BRADFORD WILSON Outline Culvert Background Project Objectives
More information