Mobility and attractive townlife through co-creation Group 1, Ystad november 2018

Transcription

1 Mobility and attractive townlife through co-creation Group 1, Ystad november 2018

2 Lund: / Vaasa: / Lund, S Hamar, N Vaasa, F Viborg, DK Hamar: / Viborg: /40.000

3 Common challenges and opportunities Growing towns of medium size All have historic town centers considered the engine of growth for their respective region Ambitious environmental goals related to energy use, emissions and carbon footprint Scarcity of land available for development environmentally friendly mobility and transport linking center, subsenters and surroundings a challenge easy accessible town scale and grid with key town functions centrally located, challenge to keep city life vibrant Strong citizen involvement Relatively short distances to decision makers Access to capital for city development

4 Two projects in group 1: Mobility-hub Aim is to develop a model in order to 1. Reduce private cars in the town-centre 2. Increase use of green transportation Liveability & attractive townlife through co-creation 1. explore how cities attractiveness and image can be improved through co-creation - with citizens, business communities, Co-creation for real 2. to be familiar with more methods to map and test how we measure attractive citylifee

5 Mobility-hub Talking points 1. Background & goals 2. Experiences so far 3. How are we moving forward? 4. Project-outputs

6 Livability & attactive townlife

7

8 Project Lund Hamar Vaasa Viborg Veberöd Longterm plan Smaller city inhabitants Östre Torg, Hamar Renewal of central square New station, Hamar Selecting location of a new trainstation Ristinummi Subcenter renewal inhabitants Bjerringbro Masterplan for citycentre Second biggest city inhabitants Challeng e mismatch between inhabitant-wishes for public service and possibilities lack of business opportunities lack of meeting places how can renewal improve city-life? / how does the location of a new station affect city life? segregated social challenges unemployment mix of culture. How to involve people? former municipal city loss of services stagnant population declining jobs great protential Methods Soft-GIS-data? Interactive response to plans Temporary use Co-creation into what level

9 Veberöd, Lund Bjerringbro, Viborg

10 Hamar, centrumsplan Suburb, Vaasa Ristinummi

11 Process to 2019

12 Digital tool Maptionnaire - Easier involvement - more immediate & quick dialogue - Better preparation vision-level! - Strength: questions on maps - Ownership to plan realization!

13 Possibilities - maptionnaire - Point out on maps - Places you like (positive dialogque) - Draw - Upload plan /photos

14 Possibilities - maptionnaire - Multible choise / make priority!

15 Results - heatmaps overall picture - Other language - Quick proces & results - Sum/focus discussion Viborg Kommune

16 Results 158 svar på 1 uge Ingen useriøse Flere kvinder end mænd En del unge 30%!

17 Indicators - make citylife measurable

18 Indicators - VAASA Missing: o Housing prices and property investments o Activated first floor metres in citycentres o Maintainance and use of urban spaces and green or blue areas o Safety and health o Partaker/identity Numbers of associations in the city / memberships in local associations. Potential in gathering forces. o Work-possibilities within 30 min. acces to public transport o Happiness index o Initiatives aimed at children and youth o Efforts for integration in urban space and inner city o Analysis of how often critical words and topics are mentioned over time in municipal goals and plans o Number of positive articles in local and national media o Buildings with heritage value

19 Expected impact: More attractive towns for citizens Exchange of knowledge Better understanding of indicators of city life soft qualities Test of methods and method development Measurement

20 .public servants addressing global challenges in a Nordic way.