SPACE WEATHER, VOL. 1, NO. 3, 1016, doi: /2003sw000009, 2003
|
|
- Dominic Palmer
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 SPACE WEATHER, VOL. 1, NO. 3, 1016, doi: /2003sw000009, 2003 Storm sudden commencement events and the associated geomagnetically induced current risks to ground-based systems at low-latitude and midlatitude locations John G. Kappenman Applied Power Solutions, Metatech Corporation, Duluth, Minnesota, USA Received 23 July 2003; revised 23 July 2003; accepted 9 October 2003; published 30 December [1] Large impulsive geomagnetic field disturbances from auroral current systems have always been well understood as a concern for power grids in close proximity to these disturbance regions, predominantly at high-latitude locations. Magnetospheric shocks (SSCs) due to largescale interplanetary pressure pulses are familiar from a geomagnetic disturbance perspective but have not been understood in the context as a potential driver for large geomagnetically induced currents (GICs). Observational evidence and analysis contained in this paper illustrate such events are capable of producing large geoelectric fields and associated GIC risks at any latitude, even equatorial locations. A large SSC disturbance on 24 March 1991 produced some of the largest GICs ever measured in the United States at midlatitude locations. The analysis methods and understanding of electromagnetic coupling processes at that time were unable to fully explain these observations. Electrojet-driven disturbances common at high-latitude locations during geomagnetic substorms cause large amplitude variations in locally observed B field, while SSC events are characterized as low-amplitude B field disturbance events. Disturbance amplitude only accounts for part of the electromagnetic coupling process. The attribute of spectral content of the disturbance is equally important and heretofore had not been well understood and was not well measured unless high-cadence observations were conducted. The deep-earth ground conductivity also provides an important enabling role at higher frequencies. Deep-earth ground response to geomagnetic field disturbances is highly frequencydependent. Therefore for nearly all ground conditions the higher the spectral content of the incident magnetic field disturbance, the higher the relative geoelectric field response. INDEX TERMS: 1530 Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism: Rapid time variations; 1515 Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism: Geomagnetic induction; 2784 Magnetospheric Physics: Solar wind/magnetosphere interactions; 7851 Space Plasma Physics: Shock waves; KEYWORDS: storm sudden commencement (SSC), geomagnetically induced current (GIC), interplanetary shock, electric power grids Citation: Kappenman, J. G., Storm sudden commencement events and the associated geomagnetically induced current risks to ground-based systems at low-latitude and midlatitude locations, Space Weather, 1(3), 1016, doi: /2003sw000009, Introduction [2] It is well known that large magnitude geomagnetic field disturbances can be generated at high-latitude locations due to the intensification of ionospheric electrojet currents during substorms associated with major geomagnetic storms. These large magnitude disturbances which are usually accompanied with a large rate-of-change in the local geomagnetic field will also produce large geoelectric fields and the flow of geomagnetically induced currents (GIC) in exposed technology systems like electric power grids and metallic-conductor portions communication lines and cables. However, this conventional wisdom does not explain the occurrence of large GICs and power system impacts that have been occasionally observed at low-latitude locations or at other midlatitude locations where no electrojet current intensification has occurred. In looking at the time specifics of these noted events, it was apparent that the magnetospheric shock associated with a sudden impulse or storm sudden commencement (SSC) was the disturbance source of these unexpected GIC events. These SSC or shock events are quite small in magnitude at low and midlatitude locations, especially in comparison to electrojet-driven disturbances at high latitudes. SSC events are generally less than 200 nt in total delta B change [Araki, 1994; Araki et al., 1997; Tsunomura, 1998]. Therefore using the perspective of larger geomagnetic field disturbances (>2000 nt) driven by electrojet intensifications, the observation of important GIC impacts is surprising. 2. An Overview of Large GIC Observations and Impacts due to Magnetospheric Shock (SSC) Events [3] Due to the large number and serious nature of power system impacts that were observed during the March 1989 superstorm, several electric utility companies across the United States began or reinstituted continuous Copyright 2003 by the American Geophysical Union. 1of16
2 Figure 1. Paper chart recording of GIC and AC current in the neutral of the Limerick 1 transformer during the SSC Event on 24 March observations of neutral GIC flows in transformers. While these measurements never constituted more than a handful of the many thousand possible locations on the U. S. power grid that GIC could flow and were usually carried out in the more northerly locations, this effort provided some important observations. During a SSC event on 24 March 1991 (23 March 1991 LT in North America), some of the largest GICs ever observed in the United States were recorded. In one of the transformers at the Limerick 500 kv Nuclear Plant near Philadelphia, a paper chart recording (Figure 1) measured both a large DC current (the GIC) and a correspondingly large AC current in the transformer neutral (D. Fagnan, plot, Philadelphia Electric, 1991). These paper chart recorders are usually set at 100 amps full scale, and as noted by the arrows, the GIC went to full scale briefly and then rapidly decayed. The corresponding AC measurement at this site also reacted in the same manner. The AC current measurement is caused by half-cycle saturation in the transformer due to the GIC and therefore provides a high-quality measure of the degree of power system impact that was being observed. In western Virginia at the same time, two measurements of GIC were made at the Meadowbrook 500 kv substation on transformers T2 and T4; these measurements (Figure 2) taken at a average cadence of 20 seconds indicated GIC peaks of 47 and 66 amps each at time 0343:03 UT. If there had been only one transformer, the GIC flow would have been approximately 110 amps, as the two transformers were providing parallel paths for the GIC flow [Gattens, 1992]. At the same time, at the Pleasant Valley 345 kv substation in the lower Hudson River valley in New York, an even larger GIC was observed [Electric Research and Management Inc., 1995]. As shown in Figure 3, both the neutral GIC and a neutral AC third harmonic current were recorded. As in the case of the observations at Limerick, both the GIC and the AC current reached large values and then rapidly 2of16
3 Figure 2. Observed GIC in the neutral of the two Meadowbrook transformers during the SSC Event on 24 March decayed. The GIC measurement reached a peak of 130 amps, while the third harmonic (due to transformer saturation) had a peak just short of 350 amps. [4] More contemporary observations of GIC and GICrelated power system impacts indicate that even smaller intensity SSC events have the capacity to disrupt power system operations over wide geographic areas. For example, a SSC at the start of the 15 July 2000 storm caused simultaneous tripping of capacitor banks at time 1439:01 UT at two substations in the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) power grid, one at the Madison station in northern Alabama (geographic latitude of ) and the other at the New Albany station in northern Mississippi (geographic latitude of ) (F. Elmendorf, personal com- Figure 3. Observation of GIC and AC third harmonic current in the neutral of the Pleasant Valley transformer during the SSC Event on 24 March of16
4 Figure 4. Observed GIC at Fukumitsu and Sunen stations in central Japan associated with the SSC and ring current intensification of 6 November munication, 2000). On 31 March 2001 the NY-ISO reported the tripping of the East Fishkill capacitor bank at time 0000:54 UT due to GIC affects, a timestamp coincident with the SSC onset for that storm [Ingleson, 2001]. Meanwhile, observations at even lower latitudes confirm the presence of large GIC flows in power grids due to SSC events. For example at the Fukumitsu substation in central Japan (geographic latitude 34, geomagnetic latitude 26 ), a peak GIC of over 40 amps was observed at one station due to a moderate SSC event on 6 November 2001, and GIC was also simultaneously observed at another station as shown in Figure 4 [Erinmez et al., 2002]. For this event, nearly equally large GICs, as shown, were due to equatorial ring current intensifications over the region in the several hours period after the SSC onset. Also, during this same 6 November 2001 SSC event, the power grid in New Zealand reported observing GIC, operational problems, and the failure of a large power transformer coincident with the SSC event [Small, 2003]. [5] These observations clearly provide a compelling case that a new class of GIC risk is plausible and that these risks can occur on power grids at very low-latitude locations that are typically not concerned about or seldom in the proximity of large electrojet intensifications. The SSC disturbance conditions can extend to low-latitude and midlatitude locations, while most large electrojet disturbances are generally confined to high-latitude locations. It is also evident that the magnitude of the delta B geomagnetic field disturbance, in isolation, does not provide a good predictor of the relative severity of the resulting GIC flow in technology systems such as power grids. Therefore a detailed assessment was undertaken to consider the relative risk factors leading to GIC. These risk factors considered all attributes of the geomagnetic disturbance environments, caused by both an SSC event in contrast to the more commonly considered geomagnetic disturbance threat due to electrojet intensifications. To further examine the factors that contribute to GIC risks, it was also necessary to evaluate the electromagnetic coupling behavior between the geomagnetic disturbance and the deep-earth ground conductivity that creates the geoelectric field. The spectral content attributes of the impulsive disturbances associated with a SSC event along with the role of the deep-earth ground conductivity conditions provides the enabling conditions to produce large geoelectric field responses and large GIC flows in exposed infrastructures. 3. Example Ground Models for Geoelectric Field Response Evaluations [6] While the focus of this paper regards the nature of geoelectric fields due to SSC events at low-latitude and midlatitude locations, a complimentary understanding of the role of deep-earth conductivity in determination of the geoelectric field is also needed. Considerable prior work has been done to model the geomagnetic induction effects in ground-based systems, however these approaches have primarily been focused upon the induction due to auroral current sources [Albertson and Van Baalen, 1970; Lanzerotti, 1983; Pirjola, 1984]. As an extension to this fundamental work, numerical modeling of ground conductivity conditions have been demonstrated to provide accurate replication of observed geoelectric field conditions over a very broad frequency spectrum [Kappenman et al., 1997]. Recent reviews of space weather events have briefly noted the effects due to SSC onsets of geomagnetic storms [Lanzerotti et al., 2001]. [7] Ground conductivity models need to accurately reproduce geoelectric field variations that are caused by the extensive range of frequency or spectral content of 4of16
5 Table 1. Depths to Which Conductivity Information is Needed a Ground Conductivity, S/m Frequency, Hz a a Skin depths in kilometers. geomagnetic disturbance events from the large magnitude/low frequency content disturbances to the low amplitude but relatively high frequency content impulsive disturbances commonly associated with SSC events. This variation of electromagnetic disturbances therefore require models accurate over a frequency range from 0.3 Hz to as low as Hz. Over this range of frequencies of the disturbance environments, diffusion aspects of ground conductivities must be considered to appropriate depths. Therefore skin depth theory can be used in the frequency domain to illustrate the range of depths that are of importance. Ground conductivity measurements have routinely been made at 50 or 60 Hz frequencies and also at much higher frequencies; however, these measurements are not of great use since they only characterize the upper portion of the ground conductivity profile. Table 1 shows the depths to which conductivity information is needed for geomagnetic storms relative to 50 Hz measurements. Using these frequencies as a range, a comparison can also be made of the effective skin depths that high-frequency measurements cover versus the depth range that needs to be considered for various ground conductivities. It is clear that for constant Earth conductivities, the depths required are more than several hundred kilometers, although the exact depth is a function of the layers of conductivities present at a specific location of interest. [8] It is generally understood that the Earth s mantle conductivity increases with depth. In most locations, ground conductivity laterally varies substantially at the surface over mesoscale distances, these conductivity variations with depth can range 3 to 5 orders of magnitude. While surface conductivity can exhibit considerable lateral heterogeneity, conductivity at depth is more uniform. Conductivities range from values of 1 to 10 S/m at depths from 600 to 1000 km [Campbell, 1987; Masse, 1987]. If sufficient low-frequency measurements are available to characterize ground conductivity profiles, models of ground conductivity can be successfully applied over mesoscale distances and can be accurately represented by use of layered conductivity profiles or models. [9] For illustration of the importance of ground models on the response of geoelectric fields, a set of four example ground models have been developed that illustrate the probable lower to upper quartile response characteristics of most known ground conditions, considering there is a high degree of uncertainty in the plausible diversity of upper layer conductivities. Figure 5 provides a plot of the layered ground conductivity conditions for these four ground models to depths of 700 km. As shown, there can be as much a four orders of magnitude variation in ground resistivity at various depths in the upper layers. Models A and B have very thin surface layers of relatively low resistivity. Models A and C are characterized by levels of relatively high resistivity until reaching depths exceeding 400 km, while models B and D have high variability of resistivity in only the upper 50 to 200 km of depth [Campbell and Zimmerman, 1980; Rasmussen et al., 1987; Rasmussen, 1988]. [10] Figure 6 provides the frequency response characteristics for these same four layered earth ground models of Figure 5. Each line plot represents the geoelectric field response for a corresponding incident magnetic field disturbance at each frequency. While each ground model has unique response characteristics at each frequency, in general, all ground models produce higher geoelectric field responses as the frequency of the incident disturbance increases. Also shown on this plot are the relative differences in geoelectric field response for the lowest and highest responding ground model at each decade of frequency. This illustrates that the response between the Figure 5. Ground resistivity versus depth for four example ground models. 5of16
6 Figure 6. Geoelectric field response of four example ground models of Figure 9. Also shown are differences in min/max response of geoelectric fields at each decade of frequency range. lowest and highest responding ground model can be as much as a factor of 13 different. Also because the frequency content of an SSC event can have higher frequency content, the disturbance is acting upon the more responsive portion of the frequency range of the ground models. Therefore, the same disturbance energy input at these higher frequencies produces a proportionately larger response in geoelectric field. For example, in most of the ground models the geoelectric field response is a factor of 50 higher at 0.1 Hz compared to the response at Hz. This frequency response characteristic explains why the SSC events though smaller in magnitude have been responsible for producing large GICs. 4. Parametric Analysis of Ground Model Response to SSC Events [11] As previously noted, prior work on geoelectric field response has traditionally been focused upon the disturbance environments associated with high-latitude impulsive disturbances driven by electrojet intensifications. Variations in ground models have been shown to produce large differences in geoelectric field response for these disturbances. In one such study, a factor of 5 difference in peak geoelectric field response was established due to ground model differences alone, given the same impulsive geomagnetic field disturbance [Kappenman, 2001]. In order to assess the potential for large geoelectric fields and GICs in power grids posed by SSC shock events, it is necessary to assess the possible range of geoelectric field response differences that are due to natural variations from the differing ground models that have been presented. [12] As with any other aspect of space weather, there can be a wide variation in the nature of ground-level impulsive magnetic field disturbances due to SSC events. Figure 7 provides a comparison of two extremes of observed Bx during SSC events at the MSR observatory on the 210 Longitude Chain of magnetic field observatories. While both these disturbances have similar magnitudes of delta Bx disturbance intensity, they have significantly different rates of rise to peak. The slower rise disturbance occurred during the SSC from the 15 July 2000 SSC event at around time 1538 UT, the MSR observatory was near local midnight. The faster rise disturbance was observed during the 24 March 1991 SSC event at around time 0341 UT. During this event, the MSR observatory was near local noon. Figure 8 provides a comparison of the rate of change of the disturbance field or dbx/dt and demonstrates the broad range of variation that is possible, given nearly identical peak amplitudes of Bx. The 15 July 2000 SSC had a peak dbx/dt of 4 nt/s while the 24 March 1991 SSC had a peak dbx/dt over 10 times larger at 40 nt/s. These differences in spectral content of the impulsive disturbances are important and are intimately coupled with the variations in ground conductivity conditions in determining the resulting geoelectric field response. [13] Because SSC events can present at times complex impulsive disturbance waveforms that vary both in amplitude and spectral content, a parametric analysis using a uniform series of impulsive geomagnetic disturbances has been performed to more clearly illustrate the role of the ground model in the resulting geoelectric fields that can occur. In Figure 9 a parameterized SSC waveform is shown (blue time plot) compared to an actual Bx waveform from 6of16
7 Figure 7. Comparison of extremes of impulsive geomagnetic disturbances observed during a SSC. Measurements of Bx at MSR for SSC on 15 July 2000 and 24 March the 15 July 2000 SSC as measured at the MSR observatory. The parameterized waveform replicates closely both the peak delta B magnitude as well as the slope of the rise in delta B. While the MSR B field decays more slowly than the profile waveform, the high rate of change at the event onset will be the important driver in the formation of the geoelectric field. Figure 10 provides a comparison of the rate of change of the two B fields from Figure 9, and this comparison indicates that both B fields reach peak db/dt of 4 nt/s. [14] As will be demonstrated in a series of parametric simulations, the rate of change of the B field is one of the most important factors in determining the expected geoelectric field response. In general, the larger the db/dt, the larger the resulting geoelectric field response will be for most ground conductivity conditions. SSC events can produce large delta B variations (>1000 nt) at auroral latitudes. However, at low and midlatitude locations, SSC events typically have much less variation in the peak magnitude of delta B. Therefore when an increase is db/dt occurs at these locations, the increase in db/dt primarily is generally due to enhancing the spectral content of the disturbance. To illustrate this principle, a set of four parameterized waveforms has been developed as shown in Figure 11. Each of these B fields represents plausible B Figure 8. Comparison of rate-of-change of Bx (db/dt) for two SSC disturbance events measured at MSR as shown in Figure 11. 7of16
8 Figure 9. Observed Bx field due to SSC from interplanetary shock at the MSR observatory and a parameterized B profile waveform. fields from SSC events and have been constrained such that the peak delta B only increases to 100 nt, yet the db/dt intensity differs, with values at 2, 8, 15, and 30 nt/s, respectively. Figure 12 illustrates the db/dt characteristics of each of these four profile B field disturbances. Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) methods can be used to approximately estimate the spectral content of each of the profile B field disturbances. As shown in Figure 13, at low frequencies (below 0.05 Hz) the magnitude of the four B fields are similar; however, at higher frequencies the higher db/dt disturbance conditions have more content of high frequency disturbance signal. [15] These profile B field disturbances will be simulated with the four example ground models that have been previously discussed. From the frequency response plots of the ground models as provided in Figure 6, some of the expected geoelectric field response due to these profile B field characteristics can be inferred. For example, ground C provides the highest geoelectric field response across the entire spectral range; therefore it would be expected that the time domain response of the geoelectric field would be the highest for nearly all B field disturbances. At low frequencies, ground B has the lowest geoelectric field response while at frequen- Figure 10. Comparison of the rate of change of the B fields from Figure 13. 8of16
9 Figure 11. Set of three SSC profile B field disturbances with db/dt of 2, 8, 15 and 30 nt/sec. cies above 0.02 Hz, ground A produces the lowest geoelectric field response. Because each of these ground models have both frequency-dependent and nonlinear variations in response, the resulting form of the geoelectric field waveforms would be expected to differ in form for the same B field input disturbance. In all cases each of the ground models produces higher relative increasing geoelectric field response as the frequency of the incident B field disturbance increases. Therefore it should be expected that a higher peak geoelectric field should result for a higher db/dt disturbance condition, due to the higher frequency spectral content as db/dt increases. [16] Figures 14 and 15 provide the geoelectric field responses for each of the four ground models for the 2 nt/s and 15 nt/s B field disturbances. In Figure 14, the geoelectric fields are compared for the 2 nt/s uniform geomagnetic field disturbance. As expected, the ground C model produces the largest geoelectric field, while ground A is next largest and the ground B model produces the smallest geoelectric field response. For this disturbance scenario the ground C geoelectric field peak is more than six times larger than the peak geoelectric field for the ground B model. It is also evident that significant differences result in the shape and form of the geoelectric field response. For example in the 2 nt/s disturbance, the peak Figure 12. Plot of rate-of-change for the three SSC B field profiles of Figure 15. 9of16
10 Figure 13. Plot comparing spectral content for the three SSC B Field disturbance profile waveforms of Figure 15, the red box indicates frequency range with >90% of signal content. geoelectric field for the ground A model occurs 15 s later than the time of the peak geoelectric field for the ground B model. In addition to the differences in the time of peak, the waveforms also exhibit differences in decay rates. For the higher impulsive disturbances (8, 15, and 30 nt/s), similar variations in the times of peak and decay rates of the geoelectric field also occur. In addition, there is considerable variation in the order of severity of the geoelectric field amongst the models. For example, while ground A had the second largest peak geoelectric field at 2 nt/s, at 15 nt/s (Figure 15), the ground A model had the lowest peak geoelectric field as both ground B and D models responded more readily to the higher spectral content of the B field disturbance. The ground C model produces the largest geoelectric field in all impulse disturbance scenarios, which was an expected outcome. [17] For all the ground models, the larger db/dt disturbance scenarios resulted in larger peak geoelectric fields as well. However, the rate of increase in peak geoelectric field was not uniform, hence the reason that the ground A model slipped from second highest geoelectric field at 2 nt/s disturbance conditions to lowest geoelectric field at 15 nt/s. Figure 16 provides a comparison of the peak geoelectric fields for each of the four ground models for all four of the B field disturbance scenarios. In the case of ground B, the geoelectric field increased by a factor of 5.5 between the 2 nt/s disturbance and the 30 nt/s disturbance, while for ground A the increase was much lower with only a increase of 1.6 times in peak geoelectric field. There are also important differences in the peak response between the ground models. As previously noted, the difference between the highest responding ground (ground C) and the lowest responding ground (ground B) was a factor of 6 for the 2 nt/s disturbance. For the 30 nt/s disturbance the ratio of max response (ground C) to min response (ground A) has increased to nearly a factor of 10 difference. Figures 17 and 18 provide a comparison of the spectral content of the geoelectric field respectively for the ground C and ground B ground models for the 2, 8, and 15 nt/s disturbances. In relative terms, the ground B spectral content is lower than the ground C model spectral content due to the much lower geoelectric field response of the ground B model. More importantly as shown in these two figures, the spectral content below frequencies of 0.05 Hz are essentially equal for the 2, 8, and 15 nt/s disturbances. However, at higher db/dt disturbance levels, the geoelectric field content at frequencies above 0.05 Hz increases with increased db/dt Figure 14. Calculated Geoelectric field for the four example ground models due to the 2 nt/sec B Field disturbance. 10 of 16
11 Figure 15. Calculated Geoelectric field for the four example ground models due to the 15 nt/sec B Field disturbance. intensity. This higher geoelectric field spectral content is sufficient to cause the previously demonstrated increases in peak geoelectric field levels. 5. An Analysis of Peak Geoelectric Fields at Low Latitudes and Midlatitudes for the 24 March 1991 SSC Event [18] The SSC disturbance scenario B field waveforms developed in Figure 11 have provided a set of simulations to undertake a parametric analysis of the importance of ground model response and the spectral content of the B field disturbance in the determination of the resultant geoelectric field response. These profile disturbances do not represent worst-case scenarios, in that the peak of the delta B disturbance was limited to only 100 nt, while large SSC events even at low latitude locations can exceed 200 nt. The 24 March 1991 SSC was one such large and known event that produced widespread impacts to systems at mid and low latitude locations as described in section 2. Figure 16. Comparison of peak geoelectric fields for each of the four ground models due to the four profile B field disturbance scenarios of Figure of 16
12 Figure 17. Comparison of spectral content of geoelectric fields for the ground C model for the 2, 8, and 15 nt/sec B field disturbance scenarios. Only a limited number of high-cadence observatories were in operation at the time of this disturbance, but they are sufficient to provide a generally broad description of the B field disturbance intensities and propagation characteristics at low and midlatitudes. By extension and with the use of the example ground models it is also possible to estimate geoelectric field intensities that could have been possible in these locations. Key observatories with high cadence data for this event are along the 210 Chain of observatories (CBI, KAK, and MSR) in Japan, the AT and T observatories at Point Arena (PTA) in California and Tuckerton (TUK) in New Jersey. Also available are data from the VIC and OTT observatories in southern Canada. [19] The onset time for this SSC event occurred at 0341 UT on 24 March Therefore local noon is located west of Japan, while local midnight was located in the mid-atlantic region off the eastern coast of North America. Figures 19 and 20 provide time plots of the observed delta Bx and delta By for observatories running east to west from KAK (central Japan), PTA (central California), and TUK (New Jersey). As the plots of delta Bx and By suggest, a large coherent disturbance propagated across the low and midlatitude regions. At times across North America, the disturbance would have presented as a largescale coherent plane wave. An example of the geographic scale of the disturbance can best be shown by a plot of the coherent horizontal geomagnetic field disturbance vectors over midlatitude portions of North America as shown in Figure 21 at time 0342:22 UT. The disturbance conditions observed at the KAK observatory produced a dbx/dt of 15 nt/s. Figure 22 provides a summary of the estimated geoelectric fields using the four ground models. Since the Kakioka Bx component is being used in this calculation, the resulting geoelectric field will have an east-west orientation. As with the prior set of example B field simulations, the results of the geoelectric field waveforms and peak geoelectric fields show a wide variation of results that are heavily influenced by the nature of the ground model. In this case, the peak geoelectric field again occurs for the ground C model, reaching a peak of about 3.4 V/km (for this calculation an eastward field is positive polarity, the polarity of the peak of this geoelectric field is westward oriented). The lowest geoelectric fields occur for both the ground A and ground B models reaching levels of only about 0.7 V/km, which provides a factor 5 difference between the peak geoelectric field for the example ground models considered. These levels are nearly twice as large as the peak geoelectric field magnitudes from the earlier profile B field disturbances. [20] Because of the sparsity of observatories, a crosssectional analysis both north to south and east to west in the low and mid latitude regions provides a broad perspective of the possible range of geoelectric fields that could have resulted from the SSC event. Figure 23 provides a cross-sectional summary of the geoelectric field peaks for the four example ground models from the MSR location to the CBI location, which spans north-to-south in the local noon dayside region of the SSC event. In the worst-case ground model, the peak geoelectric fields range from 5.5 V/km at the northern point on the chain and decrease to 3 V/km at the lower latitude CBI observatory. Since the geomagnetic disturbances in the Southern Hemisphere have a symmetrical behavior of the northern hemisphere, it would be expected that a similar variation of geoelectric field intensity would also occur for the Southern Hemisphere regions. [21] This SSC event also produced a consistently large geoelectric field levels from the dayside to the nightside as illustrated by the summary of peak geoelectric field observations in Figure 24. The observations range from the MSR (37.6 geomagnetic latitude) observatory (dayside) to the PTA (44.6 geomagnetic latitude) and TUK (51.4 geomagnetic latitude) observatories at midlatitude locations in North America (nightside). While these three observatory locations are at differing geomagnetic latitude locations, they indicate a trend that relatively high levels of geo- Figure 18. Comparison of spectral content of geoelectric fields for the ground B model for the 2, 8 and 15 nt/sec B Field disturbance scenarios. 12 of 16
13 Figure 19. Plot of delta Bx disturbance conditions at KAK, PTA, and TUK observatories east-towest during the 24 March 1991 SSC event. electric field are being observed globally at low and midlatitude locations and not strictly limited to dayside regions. The geoelectric fields estimated to occur at MSR (midlatitude near local noon) are approximately equivalent to those estimated at TUK in eastern North America (midlatitude near local midnight). The large geoelectric fields estimated based upon the TUK observations would provide an explanation for the large GIC flows in these regions as noted earlier in the paper. [22] In all cases and locations, the larger variation in geoelectric field levels is due to the nature of the ground model that is being considered and not as much due to local B field environment differences. For example the peak geoelectric field for the ground C example ground model varies from 4 to 5.5 V/km at midlatitude locations from dayside to nightside. For the other three less responsive ground models, the peak geoelectric fields vary between 0.75 to 2 V/km across this same broad geographic region. 6. Conclusion [23] The implications of these findings on the role of SSCs and related GIC risks at low latitudes are potentially far reaching and could ultimately and dramatically transform the investigations of GIC and GIC risks to infrastruc- Figure 20. Plot of delta By disturbance conditions at KAK, PTA, and TUK observatories east-towest during the March 24, 1991 SSC event. 13 of 16
14 Figure 21. Vector depiction of horizontal magnetic field disturbances over North America due to SSC event on 24 March 1991 at time 0342:22 LT. Figure 22. Calculated east component of geoelectric field due to SSC on 24 March 1991 at the Kakioka observatory for the four example ground models. 14 of 16
15 Figure 23. Peak geoelectric fields from north-to-south in Asia (dayside region of SSC event). Figure 24. Peak geoelectric fields from high latitude Asia (MSR) to North America (east-to-west or dayside-to-nightside regions of SSC event). 15 of 16
16 ture operators. New facets of space weather risks have been established in that large geoelectric fields and associated GICs can and have been observed due to SSC events and at various latitude locations. [24] Implications of GIC hazard also extend to power grids that have never considered the risk of GIC previously because they were not at high latitude locations. In contrast to prior assumptions that GIC hazards were only limited to infrastructures at high latitude locations, it is now apparent that low magnitude/high spectral content disturbances can provide large geoelectric fields that can trigger power system upsets comparable to those more commonly observed at high latitudes. [25] Acknowledgments. This research was made possible by a grant from the National Science Foundation (award ATM ). The author also appreciates the considerable assistance and inputs from Metatech coworkers William A. Radasky, James L. Gilbert, and Jeffrey Patrick, Jason Rauner and Khaled Ejaz. The author would also like to thank the numerous suppliers of observed magnetometer data, data providers include Lou Lanzerotti and Carol Maclennan at Lucent Technologies, David Boteler at the Geological Survey of Canada, the 210 Longitude Chain of magnetic field observatories, the World Data Center for Geomagnetism in Kyoto, Japan. References Albertson, V. D., and J. A. Van Baalen, Electric and magnetic fields at the Earth s surface due to auroral currents, IEEE Trans. Power Apparatus Syst., PAS-89, , Araki, T., A physical model of the geomagnetic sudden commencement, Solar Wind Sources of Magnetospheric Ultra-low-Frequency Waves, Geophys. Monogr. Ser., vol. 81, pp , AGU, Washington, D. C., Araki, T., et al., Anomalous sudden commencement of March 24, 1991, J. Geophys. Res., 102(A7), 14, ,086, Campbell, W. H., Introduction to the electrical properties of the Earth s mantle, Pure Appl. Geophys., 125(2/3), , Campbell, W. H., and J. E. Zimmerman, Induced electric currents in the Alaska oil pipeline measured by gradient fluxgate and SQUID magnetometers, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., GE-18(3), , Electric Research and Management Inc. (ERM), SUNBURST GIC network, Phase II Progr. Rep., Pittsburgh, Pa., Erinmez, I. A., S. Majithia, C. Rogers, T. Yasuhiro, S. Ogawa, H. Swahn, and J. G. Kappenman, Application of modeling techniques to assess geomagnetically induced current risks on the NGC transmission system, paper presented at CIGRE, Council Int. Des Grands Res. Elect., Paris, Gattens, P., The effects of solar magnetic disturbances on the Allegheny power system, Rep. to EEI, Edison Elect. Inst., Washington, D. C., Ingleson, J. W., Impact of GIC on electric power systems, New York Independent System Operator, Inc., paper presented at NOAA-SEC Space Weather Week 2001 Conference, Natl. Ocean and Atmos. Assoc., Boulder, Colo., 3 May Kappenman, J. G., An Introduction to Power Grid Impacts and Vulnerabilities from Space Weather, NATO-ASI Book on Space Storms and Space Weather Hazards, NATO Sci. Ser., vol. 38, chap. 13, edited by I. A. Daglis, pp , Kluwer Acad., Norwell, Mass., Kappenman, J. G., L. J. Zanetti, and W. A. Radasky, Space weather from a user s perspective: Geomagnetic storm forecasts and the power industry, Eos Trans. AGU, 78(4), , Lanzerotti, L. J., Geomagnetic induction effects in ground-based systems, Space Sci. Rev., 34, , Lanzerotti, L. J., L. V. Medford, C. G. MacLennan, J. S. Kraus, J. G. Kappenman, and W. Radasky, Transatlantic Geopotentials during the July 2000 Solar Event and Geomagnetic Storm, Sol. Phys., 204, , Masse, R. P., Crustal and upper mantle structure of stable continental regions in North America and northern Europe, Pure Appl. Geophys., 125(2/3), , Pirjola, R., Estimation of the electric field on the Earth s surface during a geomagnetic storm, Geophysica, 20(2), , Rasmussen, T. M., Magnetotellurics in southwestern Sweden: Evidence for electrical anisotropy in the lower crust?, J. Geophys. Res., 93(B7), , Rasmussen, T. M., R. G. Roberts, and L. B. Pedersen, Magnetotellurics along the Fennoscandian long range profile, Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc., 89, , Small, K., Electric power system event in New Zealand caused by geomagnetically induced currents on November 6, 2001, paper presented at NATO-ESPRIT Conference, NATO-ESPRIT, Rhodes, Greece, March Tsunomura, S., Characteristics of geomagnetic sudden commencement observed in middle and low latitudes, Earth Planets Space, 50, , J. G. Kappenman, Applied Power Solutions, Metatech Corporation, 5 West 1st Street, Suite 301, Duluth, MN 55802, USA. (john@ metatechcorp.com) 16 of 16
Space Weather effects observed on the ground geomagnetic effects
Space Weather effects observed on the ground geomagnetic effects J. Watermann Danish Meteorological Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark my thanks to 1 Ground-based systems affected by space weather ( physics
More informationStatistics on Geomagnetically-Induced Currents in the Finnish 400 kv Power System Based on Recordings of Geomagnetic Variations
J. Geomag. Geoelectr., 41, 411-420,1989 Statistics on Geomagnetically-Induced Currents in the Finnish 400 kv Power System Based on Recordings of Geomagnetic Variations Ari VILJANEN and Risto PIRJOLA Finnish
More informationMitsubishi Electric Power Products Inc. and Duquesne Light Co.
Mitsubishi Electric Power Products Inc. and Duquesne Light Co. Overview on Geomagnetically Induced Current Revision #00 March 2017 Presented by: Elizabeth Cook (DLC) and Wesley Terek (MEPPI) Overview on
More informationDo Countries Under the Equatorial Electrojet Belt Worry About GIC?
Do Countries Under the Equatorial Electrojet Belt Worry About GIC? Endawoke Yizengaw 1 and Brett Carter 2 1 Institute for Scientific Research, Boston College 2 RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia Content
More informationMeasurements of geomagnetically induced current in a power grid in Hokkaido, Japan
SPACE WEATHER, VOL. 7,, doi:10.1029/2008sw000417, 2009 Measurements of geomagnetically induced current in a power grid in Hokkaido, Japan S. Watari, 1 M. Kunitake, 1 K. Kitamura, 2 T. Hori, 3 T. Kikuchi,
More informationSTUDY ON RELATIONSHIP OF MAGNETOSPHERIC SUBSTORM AND MAGNETIC STORM
Prosiding Seminar Nasional Penelitian, Pendidikan dan Penerapan MIPA Fakultas MIPA, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, 16 Mei 2009 STUDY ON RELATIONSHIP OF MAGNETOSPHERIC SUBSTORM AND MAGNETIC STORM L. Muhammad
More informationGEOMAGNETICALLY INDUCED CURRENTS IN A BRAZILIAN POWER NETWORK OVER THE SOLAR CYCLES 23 AND 24
GEOMAGNETICALLY INDUCED CURRENTS IN A BRAZILIAN POWER NETWORK OVER THE SOLAR CYCLES 23 AND 24 Cleiton Barbosa 1,2 *, Gelvam A. Hartmann 1, Livia Alves 3, Ramon Caraballo 4, Andrés Papa 1, R.Pirjola 5,6
More informationCalculation of induced geoelectric field distribution in wide area geomagnetic storms based on time harmonic fitting
IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering PAPER OPEN ACCESS Calculation of induced geoelectric field distribution in wide area geomagnetic storms based on time harmonic fitting To cite this
More informationExamination of NERC GMD Standards and Validation of Ground Models and Geo-Electric Fields. by John G. Kappenman and William A.
Examination of NERC GMD Standards and Validation of Ground Models and Geo-Electric Fields by John G. Kappenman and William A. Radasky July 2017 REPORT TO THE COMMISSION TO ASSESS THE THREAT TO THE UNITED
More informationGeomagnetic Disturbances (GMDs) History and Prediction
Geomagnetic Disturbances (GMDs) History and Prediction J. Patrick Donohoe, Ph.D., P.E. Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering Mississippi State University Box 9571 Miss. State, MS 39762 donohoe@ece.msstate.edu
More informationEffects of neutral point reactors and series capacitors on geomagnetically induced currents in a high voltage electric power transmission system
SPACE WEATHER, VOL. 9,, doi:10.1029/2011sw000715, 2011 Effects of neutral point reactors and series capacitors on geomagnetically induced currents in a high voltage electric power transmission system Esko
More informationModeling magnetospheric current response to solar wind dynamic pressure enhancements during magnetic storms: 2. Application to different storm phases
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 113,, doi:10.1029/2008ja013420, 2008 Modeling magnetospheric current response to solar wind dynamic pressure enhancements during magnetic storms: 2. Application to
More informationThe Dynamic Magnetosphere. Ioannis A. Daglis. National Observatory of Athens, Greece
310/1749-42 ICTP-COST-USNSWP-CAWSES-INAF-INFN International Advanced School on Space Weather 2-19 May 2006 The Dynamic Magnetosphere: Reaction to and Consequences of Solar Wind Variations Yannis DAGLIS
More information[2] Observatorio Geofísico de Aiguá. Ruta 39 km 60 Maldonado Uruguay
in : The : The [1] Laboratorio de Geofísica-Geotectónica, Instituto de Ciencias Geológicas Universidad de la República, Facultad de Ciencias Iguá 4225 CP 11400 Montevideo, Uruguay [2] Observatorio Geofísico
More informationBill Murtagh. Overview 7/30/2014. Wed_GS_Murtagh_Solar Storms 1
SOLAR STORMS AND WHAT THEY MEAN FOR UTILITIES Bill Murtagh Program Coordinator NOAA Space Weather Prediction Center (SWPC) National Weather Service Overview Growing concerns Solar cycles Extreme events
More informationV r : A new index to represent the variation rate of geomagnetic activity
Earthq Sci (2010)23: 343 348 343 Doi: 10.1007/s11589-010-0731-9 V r : A new index to represent the variation rate of geomagnetic activity Dongmei Yang 1, Yufei He 1 Chuanhua Chen 2 and Jiadong Qian 3 1
More informationSolar and Interplanetary Disturbances causing Moderate Geomagnetic Storms
J. Astrophys. Astr. (2008) 29, 263 267 Solar and Interplanetary Disturbances causing Moderate Geomagnetic Storms Santosh Kumar, M. P. Yadav & Amita Raizada Department of P.G. Studies and Research in Physics
More informationBenchmark GMD Event. Project (GMD Mitigation) Standard Drafting Team. GMD Task Force In-person meeting March 18-19, 2014
Benchmark GMD Event Project 2013-03 (GMD Mitigation) Standard Drafting Team GMD Task Force In-person meeting March 18-19, 2014 Topics General Description Luis Marti, Hydro One Statistical Considerations
More informationPlanned talk schedule. Substorm models. Reading: Chapter 9 - SW-Magnetospheric Coupling from Russell book (posted)
Reading: Chapter 9 - SW-Magnetospheric Coupling from Russell book (posted) Today: Example of dynamics/time variation Review of intro to auroral substorms Substorm models How do we know a substorm is occurring?
More informationGeomagnetic Storms and Power Systems
Geomagnetic Storms and Power Systems Don Watkins Bonneville Power Administration Page 1 November 8, 2012 University of Washington 1 Sources This presentation is derived from the 2012 NERC Special Reliability
More informationG. Balasis (1), I. A. Daglis (1,2), M. Georgiou (1,2), C. Papadimitriou (1,2), E. Zesta (3), I. Mann (4) and R. Haagmans (5)
G. Balasis (1), I. A. Daglis (1,2), M. Georgiou (1,2), C. Papadimitriou (1,2), E. Zesta (3), I. Mann (4) and R. Haagmans (5) (1) IAASARS-National Observatory of Athens; (2) University of Athens; (3) NASA;
More informationComment on Effects of fast and slow solar wind on the correlation between interplanetary medium and geomagnetic activity by P.
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 108, NO. A10, 1386, doi:10.1029/2002ja009746, 2003 Correction published 20 January 2004 Comment on Effects of fast and slow solar wind on the correlation between interplanetary
More informationTime Series of Images of the Auroral Substorm
ESS 7 Lecture 13 October 27, 2010 Substorms Time Series of Images of the Auroral Substorm This set of images in the ultra-violet from the Polar satellite shows changes that occur during an auroral substorm.
More informationGeomagnetic sudden commencement at the dawn-time dip equator
Earth Planets Space, 6, 67 612, 2 Geomagnetic sudden commencement at the dawn-time dip equator De-Sheng Han 1 and Qi Li 2 1 SOA Key Laboratory for Polar Science, Polar Research Institute of China, Shanghai,
More informationShinichi Watari. Watari Earth, Planets and Space (2015) 67:77 DOI /s
Watari Earth, Planets and Space (2015) 67:77 DOI 10.1186/s40623-015-0253-8 FULL PAPER Estimation of geomagnetically induced currents based on the measurement data of a transformer in a Japanese power network
More informationVariations of time derivatives of the horizontal geomagnetic field and horizontal geomagnetic field along 96-degree magnetic meridian
Covenant Journal of Physical and Life Sciences (CJPL) Vol. 4 No 1 June, 216 Variations of time derivatives of the horizontal geomagnetic field and horizontal geomagnetic field along 96-degree magnetic
More informationGeomagnetic storms. Measurement and forecasting
Geomagnetic storms. Measurement and forecasting Anna Gustavsson 17 October 2006 Project of the Space Physics Course 2006 Umeå University 1 Introduction Effects of magnetic storms on technology Geomagnetic
More informationGeomagnetic Disturbance Report Reeve Observatory
Event type: Various geomagnetic disturbances including coronal hole high-speed stream, coronal mass ejection, sudden impulse and reverse shock effects Background: This background section defines the various
More informationGeneration of 100-year geomagnetically induced current scenarios
SPACE WEATHER, VOL. 10,, doi:10.1029/2011sw000750, 2012 Generation of 100-year geomagnetically induced current scenarios A. Pulkkinen, 1,2 E. Bernabeu, 3 J. Eichner, 4 C. Beggan, 5 and A. W. P. Thomson
More informationImpact of Severe Solar Flares, Nuclear EMP and Intentional EMI on Electric Grids. John G. Kappenman
Impact of Severe Solar Flares, Nuclear EMP and Intentional EMI on Electric Grids John G. Kappenman A Quick Definition of Solar Activity & Space Weather Space Weather due to Solar Activity can impact many
More informationarxiv: v1 [physics.space-ph] 20 Apr 2017
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL.???, XXXX, DOI:10.1029/, Spectral Scaling Technique to Determine Extreme Carrington-level Geomagnetically Induced Currents Effects Lisa M. Winter 1, Jennifer Gannon
More information12. Low Latitude A.urorae on October 21, I
No. 3] Proc. Japan Acad., 66, Ser. B (199) 47 12. Low Latitude A.urorae on October 21, 1989. I By Hiroshi MIYAOKA, *) Takeo HIRASAWA, *) Kiyohumi and Yoshihito TANAKA**> (Communicated by Takesi NAGATA,
More informationGMD Impacts on Power System Voltage Stability. Komal S. Shetye Research Engineer University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
1 GMD Impacts on Power System Voltage Stability Komal S. Shetye Research Engineer University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign shetye1@illinois.edu 2 Overview of GMDs and GICs GMD: Geomagnetic Disturbances
More informationThe NGDC/USGS Real-time Magnetospheric Disturbance Field Calculator
The NGDC/USGS Real-time Magnetospheric Disturbance Field Calculator Contributions to the geomagnetic disturbance field Description of the magnetospheric model Validation against observatory measurements
More informationCanadian Journal of Physics
Geomagnetic field H, Z and electromagnetic induction features of coronal mass ejections in association with geomagnetic storm at African longitudes Journal: Canadian Journal of Physics Manuscript ID cjp176.r2
More informationINVESTIGATIONS OF THE STRUCTURE OF THE DIURNAL VARIATIONS OF GEOMAGNETIC FIELD
Geologica Macedonica, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 37 51 (2012) GEOME 2 ISSN 0352 1206 Manuscript received: May 6, 2012 UDC: 556.385 Accepted: October 10, 2012 Original scientific paper INVESTIGATIONS OF THE STRUCTURE
More informationRecordings of geomagnetically induced currents and a nowcasting service of the Finnish natural gas pipeline system
SPACE WEATHER, VOL. 4,, doi:10.1029/2006sw000234, 2006 Recordings of geomagnetically induced currents and a nowcasting service of the Finnish natural gas pipeline system A. Viljanen, 1 A. Pulkkinen, 2,3
More informationJoule heating and nitric oxide in the thermosphere, 2
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 115,, doi:10.1029/2010ja015565, 2010 Joule heating and nitric oxide in the thermosphere, 2 Charles A. Barth 1 Received 14 April 2010; revised 24 June 2010; accepted
More informationRisto Pirjola. Finnish Meteorological Institute, P. O. Box 503, FI Helsinki, Finland
Earth Planets Space, 63, 999 1008, 2011 Eigenvalues and eigenvectors of the transfer matrix involved in the calculation of geomagnetically induced currents in an electric power transmission network Risto
More informationSolar wind drivers of large geomagnetically induced currents during the solar cycle 23
Click Here for Full Article SPACE WEATHER, VOL. 6,, doi:10.1029/2007sw000374, 2008 Solar wind drivers of large geomagnetically induced currents during the solar cycle 23 K. E. J. Huttunen, 1 S. P. Kilpua,
More informationMagnetic field nomenclature
Magnetic field nomenclature Declination trend angle between horizontal projection of F and true North Inclination plunge angle between horizontal and F Magnetic equator location on surface where field
More informationBenchmark Geomagnetic Disturbance Event Description
Benchmark Geomagnetic Disturbance Event Description Project 2013-03 GMD Mitigation Standard Drafting Team Draft: June 10, 2014 NERC Report Title Report Date 1 of 26 Table of Contents Preface...3 Introduction...4
More informationGE SPACE. Geomagnetic Earth Observation from SPAce
GE SPACE Geomagnetic Earth Observation from SPAce Fit to NERC s Science Priorities Understanding the complex interactions and feedbacks within the Earth system over a range of space and time scales Fit
More informationGeomagnetically Induced Currents in Austria. Rachel Bailey, ZAMG Georg Achleitner, APG Thomas Halbedl, TU Graz Roman Leonhardt, ZAMG
Geomagnetically Induced Currents in Austria Rachel Bailey, ZAMG Georg Achleitner, APG Thomas Halbedl, TU Graz Roman Leonhardt, ZAMG Geomagnetically Induced Currents (GIC) Enhanced electrojet and rapid
More informationGeosynchronous magnetic field response to solar wind dynamic pressure pulse
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 109,, doi:10.1029/2003ja010076, 2004 Geosynchronous magnetic field response to solar wind dynamic pressure pulse D.-Y. Lee Department of Astronomy and Space Science,
More informationSubstorms: Externally Driven Transition to Unstable State a few Minutes Before Onset
Substorms: Externally Driven Transition to Unstable State a few Minutes Before Onset L. R. Lyons 1, I. O Voronkov 2, J. M. Ruohoniemi 3, E. F. Donovan 4 1 Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University
More informationSubstorm studies with magnetic field measurements from ground-based networks
Substorm studies with magnetic field measurements from ground-based networks Eija I. Tanskanen University of Bergen,Institute of Physics and Technology, Bergen, Norway Finnish Meteorological Institute,
More informationCase studies of space weather events from their launching on the Sun to their impacts on power systems on the Earth
Annales Geophysicae (22) 2: 173 179 c European Geophysical Society 22 Annales Geophysicae Case studies of space weather events from their launching on the Sun to their impacts on power systems on the Earth
More informationEffect of solar flare on the equatorial electrojet in eastern Brazil region
J. Earth Syst. Sci. (2017) 126:51 c Indian Academy of Sciences DOI 10.1007/s12040-017-0837-8 Effect of solar flare on the equatorial electrojet in eastern Brazil region R G Rastogi 1, P Janardhan 1, H
More informationEquatorial Electrojet Strengths in the Indian and American Sectors Part I. During Low Solar Activity
J. Geomag. Geoelectr., 42, 801-811,1990 Equatorial Electrojet Strengths in the Indian and American Sectors Part I. During Low Solar Activity A. R. PATIL, D. R. K. RAO, and R. G. RASTOGI Indian Institute
More informationINTERPLANETARY ASPECTS OF SPACE WEATHER
INTERPLANETARY ASPECTS OF SPACE WEATHER Richard G. Marsden Research & Scientific Support Dept. of ESA, ESTEC, P.O. Box 299, 2200 AG Noordwijk, NL, Email: Richard.Marsden@esa.int ABSTRACT/RESUME Interplanetary
More informationRisto Pirjola. Finnish Meteorological Institute, P.O. Box 503, Helsinki, Finland
Earth Planets Space, 61, 263 272, 2009 Properties of matrices included in the calculation of geomagnetically induced currents (GICs) in power systems and introduction of a test model for GIC computation
More informationObservatories in India
J. Geomag. Geoelectr., 26, 529-537, 1974 On the Occurrence of SSC(-+) Observatories in India at Geomagnetic R.G. RASTOGI* and N.S. SASTRI** Physical Research Laboratory, Ahmedabad, India* and Indian Institute
More informationCalculating Electric Fields that drive Geomagnetically Induced Currents
Calculating Electric Fields that drive Geomagnetically Induced Currents David Boteler, Ph.D. Natural Resources Canada EPRI NERC GIC and System Analysis Workshop April 18-20, 2012 The Overall Process Magnetic
More informationConvection dynamics and driving mechanism of a small substorm during dominantly IMF By+, Bz+ conditions
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, VOL. 31, L08803, doi:10.1029/2003gl018878, 2004 Convection dynamics and driving mechanism of a small substorm during dominantly IMF By+, Bz+ conditions Jun Liang, 1 G. J.
More informationThe North Atlantic Oscillation: Climatic Significance and Environmental Impact
1 The North Atlantic Oscillation: Climatic Significance and Environmental Impact James W. Hurrell National Center for Atmospheric Research Climate and Global Dynamics Division, Climate Analysis Section
More informationThe geomagnetic field variations and earthquake activity
The geomagnetic field variations and earthquake activity Yu. Ya. Ruzhin 1), V. A. Novikov 2) 1) Pushkov Institute of Terrestrial Magnetism, Ionosphere and Radio Wave Propagation (IZMIRAN), Russian Academy
More informationEQUATORIAL ELECTROJET STRENGTH IN THE AFRICAN SECTOR DURING HIGH AND LOW SOLAR ACTIVITY YEARS
SINET: ETHIOP. J. SCI., 26(1):77 81, 2003 Faculty of Science, Addis Ababa University, 2003 ISSN: 0379 2897 Short communication EQUATORIAL ELECTROJET STRENGTH IN THE AFRICAN SECTOR DURING HIGH AND LOW SOLAR
More informationCHAPTER 2 DATA. 2.1 Data Used
CHAPTER DATA For the analysis, it is required to use geomagnetic indices, which are representatives of geomagnetic activity, and Interplanetary Magnetic Field (IMF) data in addition to f F,which is used
More informationStudy of Geomagnetic Field Variations at Low Latitude of African Equatorial Region
Study of Geomagnetic Field Variations at Low Latitude of African Equatorial Region Agbo G. A 1 ; Azi A. O. 2, Okoro N. O. 3 Industrial Physics Department, Ebonyi State University, P.M.B 053 Abakaliki Abstract:
More informationIonospheric Scintillation Impact Report: South African SKA Site
NW RA NorthWest Research Associates, Inc. University of Arizona Science and Technology Park : South African SKA Site Prepared for the University of Manchester, Jodrell Bank Centre for Astrophysics NWRA
More informationGIC at mid-latitudes under extreme Dst scenarios
GIC at mid-latitudes under extreme Dst scenarios Gemma Kelly 1, Ari Viljanen 2, Ciaran Beggan 1, Alan Thomson 1, Alexis Ruffenach 3 1 2 3 Introduction Study of GIC in Europe Higher profile of Space Weather
More informationEXTREMELY QUIET 2009 STATE OF GEOMAGNETIC FIELD AS A REFERENCE LEVEL FOR AMPLITUDE OF THE LOCAL GEOMAGNETIC DISTURBANCES
EXTREMELY QUIET 2009 STATE OF GEOMAGNETIC FIELD AS A REFERENCE LEVEL FOR AMPLITUDE OF THE LOCAL GEOMAGNETIC DISTURBANCES A.E. Levitin, L.I. Gromova, S.V. Gromov, L.A. Dremukhina Pushkov Institute of Terrestrial
More informationCTU Presents. The Fitful Rise of Solar Cycle 24 What it Means in the Coming Year. Frank Donovan W3LPL
CTU Presents The Fitful Rise of Solar Cycle 24 What it Means in the Coming Year Frank Donovan W3LPL Introduction This presentation focuses on: The four major fall and winter DX contests: CQ WW SSB and
More informationLongitudinal Dependence of Equatorial Irregularities and Electrodynamics!
Longitudinal Dependence of Equatorial Irregularities and Electrodynamics! Endawoke Yizengaw Institute for Scientific Research, Boston College Special Thanks: M. Magoun, M. Moldwin, E. Zesta, F. Anad, A.
More information2 Preliminary Results Achieved by the Meridian Project
Space Science Activities in China cycle peak year ( ), magnetic storm activities increased significantly, the Meridian Project has repeatedly observed the responses of the space environment to solar storms
More informationChapter 8 Geospace 1
Chapter 8 Geospace 1 Previously Sources of the Earth's magnetic field. 2 Content Basic concepts The Sun and solar wind Near-Earth space About other planets 3 Basic concepts 4 Plasma The molecules of an
More informationComparing the Impact of HEMP Electric Field Waveforms on a Synthetic Grid
Comparing the Impact of HEMP Electric Field Waveforms on a Synthetic Grid Raymund Lee and Thomas J. Overbye Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Texas A&M University College Station, TX, USA
More information1 Introduction. Cambridge University Press Physics of Space Plasma Activity Karl Schindler Excerpt More information
1 Introduction Space plasma phenomena have attracted particular interest since the beginning of the exploration of space about half a century ago. Already a first set of pioneering observations (e.g.,
More informationNICT SPACE WEATHER ACTIVITIES
Prepared by NICT Agenda Item: 3 Discussed in Ad-Hoc Meeting on Space Weather NICT SPACE WEATHER ACTIVITIES Tsutomu Nagatsuma Space Weather and Environment Informatics Laboratory, Applied Electromagnetic
More informationGeomagnetically induced currents during intense storms driven by coronal mass ejections and corotating interacting regions
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 113,, doi:10.1029/2007ja012487, 2008 Geomagnetically induced currents during intense storms driven by coronal mass ejections and corotating interacting regions Ryuho
More informationTwo types of geomagnetic storms and relationship between Dst and AE indexes
Two types of geomagnetic storms and relationship between Dst and AE indexes Lyudmila P. Shadrina 1, * 1 Academy of sciences of Sakha (Yakutia) Republic, Yakutsk, Russia Abstract. The study of the relationship
More informationРС INDEX AS INDICATOR OF THE SOLAR WIND ENERGY ENTERED INTO THE MAGNETOSPHERE: RELATION TO INTERPLANETARY ELECTRIC FIELD AND MAGNETIC DISTURBANCES
РС INDEX AS INDICATOR OF THE SOLAR WIND ENERGY ENTERED INTO THE MAGNETOSPHERE: RELATION TO INTERPLANETARY ELECTRIC FIELD AND MAGNETIC DISTURBANCES О. A.Troshichev Arctic and Antarcrtic Research Institute,
More informationReceived 30 October 2006; received in revised form 1 June 2007; accepted 1 June 2007
Advances in Space Research 40 (07) 15 1111 www.elsevier.com/locate/asr New indices of geomagnetic activity at test: Comparing the correlation of the analogue ak index with the digital A h and IHV indices
More informationGlobal Models of the Magnetic Field in Historical Times: Augmenting Declination Observations with Archeo- and Paleo- Magnetic Data D.
J. Geomag. Geoelectr., 38, 715-720, 1986 Global Models of the Magnetic Field in Historical Times: Augmenting Declination Observations with Archeo- and Paleo- Magnetic Data D. GUBBINS Bullard Laboratories,
More informationTransmission and Dispatching Operations Manual
MANUAL 12 Transmission and Dispatching Operations Manual October 2012 4.2.10 Adverse Operating Conditions NYISO Actions The NYISO may perform the following actions under adverse operating conditions: 1.
More informationCharacteristics of the storm-induced big bubbles (SIBBs)
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 111,, doi:10.1029/2006ja011743, 2006 Characteristics of the storm-induced big bubbles (SIBBs) Hyosub Kil, 1 Larry J. Paxton, 1 Shin-Yi Su, 2 Yongliang Zhang, 1 and
More informationPresent Day Challenges in Understanding the Geomagnetic Hazard to National Power Grids
Present Day Challenges in Understanding the Geomagnetic Hazard to National Power Grids A. W. P. Thomson, C. T. Gaunt 2, P. Cilliers 3, J. A. Wild 4, B. Opperman 3, L.-A. McKinnell 3,5, P. Kotze 3, C. M.
More informationResponse of morning auroras and cosmic noise absorption to the negative solar wind pressure pulse: A case study
ÓPTICA PURA Y APLICADA. www.sedoptica.es Sección Especial: 37 th AMASON / Special Section: 37 th AMASON Aurora Response of morning auroras and cosmic noise absorption to the negative solar wind pressure
More informationForecasting, Modelling and Monitoring GICs and other Ground Effects: Future Needs
Forecasting, Modelling and Monitoring GICs and other Ground Effects: Future Needs Henrik Lundstedt Swedish Institute of Space Physics Lund, Sweden www.lund.irf.se Outline of my talk On Future Needs From
More informationMAGNETIC STORM EFFECTS IN THE ATMOSPHERIC ELECTRIC FIELD VARIATIONS
MAGNETIC STORM EFFECTS IN THE ATMOSPHERIC ELECTRIC FIELD VARIATIONS N.G. Kleimenova 1, O.V. Kozyreva 1, S. Michnowski 2, M. Kubicki 2, N.N. Nikiforova 1 1 Institute of the Earth Physics RAS, Moscow, Russia,
More informationSeasonal and longitudinal dependence of equatorialdisturbance vertical plasma drifts
Utah State University From the SelectedWorks of Bela G. Fejer October 1, 2008 Seasonal and longitudinal dependence of equatorialdisturbance vertical plasma drifts Bela G. Fejer, Utah State University J.
More informationGeomagnetically induced currents in an electric power transmission system at low latitudes in Brazil: A case study
SPACE WEATHER, VOL. 5,, doi:10.1029/2006sw000282, 2007 Geomagnetically induced currents in an electric power transmission system at low latitudes in Brazil: A case study Nalin B. Trivedi, 1 Ícaro Vitorello,
More informationSmall-Scale Structure of Ionospheric Absorption of Cosmic Noise During Pre-Onset and Sharp Onset Phases of an Auroral Absorption Substorm
Geophysica (1999), 35(1-2), 45-57 Small-Scale Structure of Ionospheric Absorption of Cosmic Noise During Pre-Onset and Sharp Onset Phases of an Auroral Absorption Substorm Hilkka Ranta 1, Aarne Ranta 1
More informationChanges in Southern Hemisphere rainfall, circulation and weather systems
19th International Congress on Modelling and Simulation, Perth, Australia, 12 16 December 2011 http://mssanz.org.au/modsim2011 Changes in Southern Hemisphere rainfall, circulation and weather systems Frederiksen,
More informationGeomagnetically induced pipe-to-soil voltages in the Czech oil pipelines during October November 2003
Annales Geophysicae, 3, 389 393, 5 SRef-ID: 43-576/ag/53-389 European Geosciences Union 5 Annales Geophysicae Geomagnetically induced pipe-to-soil voltages in the Czech oil pipelines during October November
More informationPlanetary Magnetospheres
1 Planetary Magnetospheres Vytenis M. Vasyliūnas Max-Planck-Institut für Sonnensystemforschung Heliophysics Summer School: Year 4 July 28 August 4, 2010 Boulder, Colorado July 23, 2010 Figure 1: Schematic
More informationSpace Weather and Satellite System Interaction
Space Engineering International Course, Kyutech, 4 th Quarter Semester 2017 Space Weather and Satellite System Interaction Lecture 2: Space Weather Concept, Reporting and Forecasting Assoc. Prof. Ir. Dr.
More informationECEN 615 Methods of Electric Power Systems Analysis Lecture 23: Geomagnetic Disturbances, Optimal Power Flow
ECEN 615 Methods of Electric Power Systems Analysis Lecture 23: Geomagnetic Disturbances, Optimal Power Flow Prof. Tom Overbye Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering Texas A&M University overbye@tamu.edu
More informationThe Effects of Magnetic Storm Phases on F-Layer Irregularities from Auroral to Equatorial Latitudes
The Effects of Magnetic Storm Phases on F-Layer Irregularities from Auroral to Equatorial Latitudes Jules Aarons Center for Space Physics Boston University Boston, MA 02215 phone: (617) 353-2639 fax: (617)
More informationPractical Model Applicable to Investigating the Coast. Effect on the Geoelectric Field in Connection with. Studies of Geomagnetically Induced Currents
Advances in Applied Physics, Vol. 1, 2013, no. 1, 9-28 HIKARI Ltd, www.m-hikari.com Practical Model Applicable to Investigating the Coast Effect on the Geoelectric Field in Connection with Studies of Geomagnetically
More informationTransmission and Dispatching Operations Manual
MANUAL 12 Transmission and Dispatching Operations Manual April 2016 4.2.9 Adverse Operating Conditions NYISO Actions The NYISO may perform the following actions under adverse operating conditions: 1. Notify
More information4/29/2011. Mid-latitude cyclones form along a
Chapter 10: Cyclones: East of the Rocky Mountain Extratropical Cyclones Environment prior to the development of the Cyclone Initial Development of the Extratropical Cyclone Early Weather Along the Fronts
More informationCHAPTER IV THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN OCEANOGRAPHY AND METEOROLOGY
CHAPTER IV THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN OCEANOGRAPHY AND METEOROLOGY THE relationship between oceanography and meteorology is of an order different from that between it and geology or biology, because meteorologic
More informationAndrew Keen, Inari, Finland 18 Feb º C spaceweather.com
ESS 7 Lecture 17 May 14, 2010 The Aurora Aurora Amazing Light Show Andrew Keen, Inari, Finland 18 Feb 2010-31º C spaceweather.com Athabasca Aurora Oct 3 2003 Courtesy Mikko Syrjäsuo There is a Long Record
More informationComparative study of solar and geomagnetic indices for the solar cycle 22 and 23 C. M Tiwari Dept. of Physics, APS University, Rewa (M. P.
International Association of Scientific Innovation and Research (IASIR) (An Association Unifying the Sciences, Engineering, and Applied Research) International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Computational
More informationSimultaneous Observations of E-Region Coherent Backscatter and Electric Field Amplitude at F-Region Heights with the Millstone Hill UHF Radar
Simultaneous Observations of E-Region Coherent Backscatter and Electric Field Amplitude at F-Region Heights with the Millstone Hill UHF Radar J. C. Foster and P. J. Erickson MIT Haystack Observatory Abstract
More informationActivities of the Japanese Space Weather Forecast Center at Communications Research Laboratory
J. RADIAT. RES., 43: SUPPL., S53 S57 (2002) Activities of the Japanese Space Weather Forecast Center at Communications Research Laboratory SHINICHI WATARI 1 * and FUMIHIKO TOMITA 1 Space weather / ISES/SEP
More informationEvaluating the applicability of the finite element method for modelling of geoelectric fields
Ann. Geophys.,, 89 98, 0 www.ann-geophys.net//89/0/ doi:0.9/angeo--89-0 Author(s) 0. CC Attribution.0 License. Annales Geophysicae Open Access Evaluating the applicability of the finite element method
More informationSpectral Studies of Ionospheric and Solar Wind Electric Fields: Case Studies and Long-Duration Analysis Using Magnetometer Data
Spectral Studies of Ionospheric and Solar Wind Electric Fields: Case Studies and Long-Duration Analysis Using Magnetometer Data M. C. Kelley, M. J. Nicolls, and G. Sachdeva Cornell University, Ithaca,
More information