arxiv: v2 [hep-ph] 17 Oct 2008

Transcription

1 uclear scattering of dark matter coupled to a new ligt scalar Douglas P. Finkbeiner, 1, Tracy R. Slatyer,, and eal Weiner 3, 1 Harvard-Smitsonian Center for Astropysics, 60 Garden St., Cambridge, MA 0138 Pysics Department, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA Center for Cosmology and Particle Pysics, Department of Pysics, ew York University, ew York, Y Dated: August 0, 018 arxiv: v [ep-p] 17 Oct 008 We consider te nuclear scattering cross section for te exciting Dark Matter XDM model. In XDM, te Weakly Interacting Massive Particles WIMPs couple to te Standard Model only via an intermediate ligt scalar wic mixes wit te Higgs: tis leads to a suppression in te nuclear scattering cross section relative to models in wic te WIMPs couple to te Higgs directly. We estimate tis suppression factor to be of order Te elastic nuclear scattering cross section for XDM can also be computed directly: we perform tis computation for XDM coupled to te Higgs sector of te Standard Model and find a spin-independent cross section in te order of pb in te decoupling limit, wic is not witin te range of any near-term direct detection experiments. However, if te XDM dark sector is instead coupled to a two-higgs-doublet model, te spin-independent nuclear scattering cross section can be enanced by up to four orders of magnitude for large tan β, wic sould be observable in te upcoming SuperCDMS and ton-scale xenon experiments. PACS numbers: d I. ITRODUCTIO Motivated by te apparent excess of e + e anniilation in te Galacticcenter [1, ], Finkbeiner & Weiner [3] proposed a model of exciting Dark Matter XDM in wic Weakly Interacting Massive Particles WIMPs collisionally excite and subsequently de-excite via e + e emission. Tis model uses te kinetic energy of te WIMP dark matter to create e + e pairs, in contrast wit ligt dark matter models in wic te pairs result from te mass energy of WIMP anniilation [e.g., 4], were te WIMP mass must be less tan a few MeV [5, 6]. Because te XDM WIMP must ave a weak-scale mass 500 GeV it retains many of te desirable properties of weak-scale WIMPs suc as te termal relic freeze-out abundance. Collisional excitation of weak-scale WIMPs was also discussed by Pospelov & Ritz [7]. Te recentclaimbydama/libraofanannualmodulation signal [8] conflicts strongly wit oter direct detection experiments [CDMS, XEO-10, ZEPLI-II, CRESST], under te assumption of elastic nuclear scattering. Models in wic te WIMP scatters inelastically, exciting an internal state of order 100 kev, appear to accommodate all available data [9]. Te success of inelastic WIMP scattering in tese two casesalbeit wit different mass splittings raises te question of weter a nuclear scattering cross section of 10 4 pb required by Cang et al [9] could arise naturally in te XDM model. In XDM, WIMPs couple to te Standard Model via a new ligt scalar wic mixes wit te Higgs. Pre- Electronic address: dfinkbeiner@cfa.arvard.edu Electronic address: tslatyer@fas.arvard.edu Electronic address: neal.weiner@nyu.edu liminary results from ATIC [10] and PAMELA motivate te existence of just suc a ligt particle [11]. However, te mixing angle between te ligt scalar and te Higgs suppresses te nuclear scattering cross section relative to generic models of dark matter were te Higgs couples directly to te WIMPs. We first estimate tis suppression factor, ten calculate te nuclear scattering cross section for te XDM dark sector coupled to te Standard Model or a two-higgs-doublet model, and finally discuss te role of inelastic scattering and prospects for direct detection. II. SUMMARY OF THE XDM MODEL Te defining feature of te XDM model is tat te WIMP as an excited state wic can be collisionally excited, and subsequently decay to produce e + e pairs. Te excited state could exist due to compositeness of te dark matter, or arise from an approximate symmetry of te teory. Forte excited state to be accessiblein te Milky Way, and relevant for e + e production, only a narrow kinematical range must be considered for te mass splitting, δ. For te decay to te ground state to be energetically capable of producing e + e pairs, one must ave δ > 1.0 MeV. On te oter and, te kinetic energy available for a pair of 500 GeV WIMPs colliding eac wit velocities v 600 km/s rougly te escape velocity of te galaxy, is MeV, setting an upper bound on δ. To produce a sufficiently ig number of positrons to explain te ITEGRAL signal, a large cross section is required [3, 7], comparable to te geometric cross section set by te caracteristic momentum transfer. Tat is, σ M δ 1 is of te correct size. Suc a cross section can arise naturally [3], but requires te presence of a

2 new ligt scalar φ, wit m φ < M δ. Te can excite by emitting a φ wit amplitude λ or can scatter elastically wit amplitude λ +. We generally assume λ λ +, but tis need not necessarily be te case. Te XDM dark-sector Lagrangian takes te form [3], L XDM = 1 µφ µ φ+ i σ µ µ i m D 1 λ 1 φ 1 λ φ Vφ+α XDM φ.1 Te last term couples te dark sector to te Standard Model via te Higgs. Defining new basis states, = 1/ 1, and new couplings λ ± = λ 1 ± λ, te Lagrangian becomes L XDM = 1 µφ µ φ+ σ µ µ + σ µ µ 1 md +m D +λ + φ +λ + φ λ φ Vφ+α XDM φ. We write α XDM = m φ K/v, were K is te tuning parameter tat determines te correction to te φ VEV and v is te VEV of te Higgs v = 46 GeV in te Standard Model: naturalness demands tat K 100 corresponding to a 1% fine-tuning, and α XDM Te mass splitting δ is given by δ = λ + φ, were φ is te vacuum expectation value of te φ scalar. Wile XDM in its current form is an ad oc extension to te Standard Model and is not supersymmetric, we expect it to be possible to realize te XDM mecanism in supersymmetric models as well. III. EFFECT OF THE ITERMEDIATE LIGHT SCALAR O THE UCLEAR SCATTERIG CROSS SECTIO XDM WIMPs couple to te visible sector by te mixing of te Higgs wit te new ligt scalar φ, so at tree level, WIMP-nucleus scattering occurs only via t-cannel φ-higgs excange. A similar scenario as been explored in [1], were te dark matter is itself a scalar tat couples to te Higgs. In generic models of dark matter oter scattering cannels are available suc as t-cannel Z excange, and s and t-cannel squark excange in te Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model MSSM, but te t-cannel Higgs excange Fig. 1 generally provides te dominant contribution [13]. Consequently, te WIMPnucleus scattering cross section in XDM is suppressed mostly by te mixing angle between te new ligt scalar and te Higgs, and te suppression factor can be calculated in a straigtforward way. Te Feynman diagram for t-cannel Higgs-mediated WIMP-nucleus scattering in XDM Figure is identical to Figure 1 except tat te and WIMPs do not couple directly to te Higgs: teir interaction wit te Higgs is mediated by te relatively ligt scalar φ boson, wic ten mixes wit te Higgs. Integrating out te φ FIG. 1: t-cannel WIMP-nucleus scattering via Higgs transfer. FIG. : t-cannel WIMP-nucleus scattering via φ-mediated Higgs transfer XDM scenario. propagator gives rise to an effective WIMP-Higgs interaction wit amplitude λ +.4α XDM v φ /m φ t. Te analysis is identical for elastic scattering of particles; for te inelastic de-excitation A A were A denotes te nucleus te only cange is tat λ + is replaced wit λ. Te inelastic excitation A A is kinematically forbidden for virtually all te WIMPs in te Eart s neigborood. In te center-of-mass frame t = p 1 cosθ, were θ is te scattering angle and te incoming WIMP as 4-momentum p. For te energy range of interest, te momentum transfer is generally small compared to m φ, so te effective coupling becomes, φ g = 4λ + α XDM v φ /m φ = δk v. 3 If m φ is very small, of te same order as te momentum transfer, ten te φ excange can introduce a simple angular dependence to te cross section. Tis effective coupling is very small: allowing K to take values up to 100, we find, g K 100 δ 1MeV v GeV Suppose we compare XDM to a generic model wit g = 0.1 as a bencmark. Ten we see te XDM nuclear scattering cross section proportional to te square of te coupling is suppressed by at least five orders of magnitude.

3 3 IV. CALCULATIO OF THE XDM WIMP-UCLEUS ELASTIC SCATTERIG CROSS SECTIO We now calculate te XDM WIMP-nucleus cross section directly, for XDM coupled to te Higgs sector of te Standard Model. We will compute te effective spinindependent cross section for low-energy scattering between a WIMP and a pointlike nucleus. To determine te actual scattering cross section tis result must ten be integrated over te nuclear form factor. Evaluating te elastic scattering amplitude M in te low-energy t m φ m nonrelativistic regime, for a nucleus wit Z protons and A Z neutrons, we obtain, M = Mm g m Zg pp +A Zg nn, 5 were g pp and g nn are te couplings of te Higgs to te proton and neutron respectively, and M is te nuclear mass. Tus te cross section due to Higgs excange is given by, σ = µ A π Kδ Zgpp +A Zg nn, 6 v m were µ A is te reduced mass of te system. Te couplings of te Higgs to te proton and neutron are given by [13, 14], g = qq g qq 7 q=u,d,s,c,b,t qq = f Tq m /m q, 8 were = p,n, and te nucleon parameters f Tq are given by [15, 16, 17] f p Tu = 0.03, fp Td = 0.034, fp Ts = 0.14, f p Tc = fp Tb = fp Tt = , 9 f n Tu = 0.019, f n Td = 0.041, f n Ts = 0.14, f n Tc = f n Tb = f n Tt = ote tat fts is not well determined [15]: values in te literature also include 0.08 [18] and 0.46 [16, 19]. We adopt te value obtained by Gasser et al [17] and used in te DarkSUSY package [14]. Te nucleon parameters for te eavy quarks c, b, t are determined by tose for te ligtquarks[15, 0], soteuncertaintyinfts carriesover to tose parameters as well. However, coosing different values for fts modifies te final cross section by a factor 3 4 at most. In te Standard Model, te quark-higgs Yukawa couplings are given by g qq = m q /v, so te nuclear scattering cross section takes te form, σ = K µa δ π v A Zm n Zm p. m 11 To compare wit te current limits from direct detection experiments, we now take A = Z = 1 and compute te scattering cross section for a single proton. In tis case m p = M m so µ A m p. Te lab-frame lowenergy elastic scattering cross section is ten, σ m pb δ 1MeV 4 K 100GeV 100 v GeV Tis is a very small cross section, some five orders of magnitude below current experimental limits. V. TWO-HIGGS-DOUBLET MODELS If te XDM dark sector is instead coupled to a two- Higgs-doublet model HDM, te cross section can potentially be significantly enanced by interactions involving te eavy Higgs. Suc models constitute one of te simplest extensions of te Standard Model tat allow additional CP violation [1, ], and ave been discussed extensively in te literature see [3] for a review. We will concern ourselves ere wit type-ii HDMs, were one Higgs doublet couples purely to up-type fermions and te oter couples purely to down-type fermions [4]: te MSSM is oneexampleofsucamodel. Te effective coupling between and te eavy Higgs can be quite large forlargetanβ in sucmodels, aste smaller VEVresults in a weaker constraint on te φ-higgs mixing α XDM. Suc a model requires te Lagrangian Eq. to be modified to take couplings to te second Higgs into account. For example, let us replace te usual φ-higgs mixing term wit α XDM φ Hu 0H0 d +.c., were as usual te VEVs of te neutral Higgses are defined by, H 0 u = v u, H 0 d = v d, 13 and tanβ = v u /v d, v = v u + v d 46GeV. Te Hu-φ 0 and Hd 0 -φ mixing terms ten become, respectively, α XDM φ v d / φhu 0 +.c. and α XDM φ v u / φhd 0 +.c.. Te constraint on α XDM now comes from te term α XDM v u v d /φ, and can be written as, α XDM = K m φ v u v d, 14 were as previously K 100. Tus te Higgs-φ mixing terms in te Lagrangian can be written as, L mixing = 1 1 Km φ φ Hu Hd 0 φ+.c. 15 v u v d We are interested in scatterings mediated by te scalar uncarged pysical Higgs bosons. We now transform to

4 4 te basis of mass eigenstates, 0 and H 0, wic as usual are related to Hu 0 and H0 d by a mixing angle α, RH 0 u = 1 cosα 0 +sinαh 0, RH 0 d = 1 sinα 0 +cosαh Tus te mixing terms become, cosα L mixing = Km φ φ sinα v u v d sinα + + cosα v u v d 0 + H 0 φ. 17 Te effective Higgs-WIMP interactions can ten be written, g 0 = Kδ cosα sinα v u v d g H 0 = Kδ sinα + cosα. 18 v u v d Te quark-higgs Yukawa couplings g qq for te ligt CP-even Higgs are given by [15], g qq = m q v { cosα sinβ for q = u, c, t, sinα cosβ for q = d, s, b, 19 wereas tose for te eavy CP-even Higgs are, g Hqq = m { q sinα sinβ for q = u, c, t, v cosα cosβ for q = d, s, b. 0 Te Standard Model couplings are recovered in te decoupling limit were α β π/. Te effective WIMP-nucleon interaction for a proton tus becomes, g p = Kδm p 1 v m sinα + 1 m H 0 cosα sinβ sinα cosβ cosβ 0.14cosα sinβ sinα sinβ + cosα cosβ 0.14 sinα sinβ 0.335cosα cosβ + 1 Te nuclear scattering cross section normalized to a single nucleon is, as previously, σ = µ A π g p. At large tanβ, Eq. 1 can give rise to a muc greater cross section tan in te Standard Model case Eq. 1, via te contribution from te eavy Higgs. In te most general two-higgs-doublet model, te Higgs masses and Cross-section [pb] normalized to nucleon GeV 400 GeV 500 GeV tanβ FIG. 3: Variation of te cross section wit tanβ for XDM coupled to a two-higgs-doublet model, for m A = 300,400,500 GeV. Te tick lines correspond to cases were te ligt Higgs mass is eld constant at 100 GeV, wereas te tin lines use te tree-level MSSM values. mixing angles are all independent parameters: owever, allowing all tese parameters to vary freely can lead to conflicts wit experimental constraints, and problematic flavor canging neutral current processes. To estimate te effect of increasing tan β, we consider te tree-level MSSM relations between m H,m,α and β [15], m,h = 1 m A +MZ m A +M Z 4MZ m A cos β,3 sinα sinβ = m A +m Z m, H m cosα cosβ = m A m Z m. 4 H m ote tat tese relations are only approximately correct: te Higgs masses experience significant radiative corrections. Fig. 3 sows te variation of te spin-independent cross section as a function of tan β, for different pseudoscalar Higgs masses m A see [5] for a recent analysis of constraints on m A. We also sow te cross section were te ligt Higgs mass is eld constant at 100 GeV but te tree-level relations are used to obtain te mixing angle α, to facilitate comparison wit te Standard Model case discussed previously and to explore te effect on te nuclear scattering cross section of varying te ligt Higgs mass. At large tanβ we find tat varying te mass of te ligt Higgs as little impact, as te contribution from excange of te eavy Higgs dominates.

5 5 Cross-section [pb] normalised to nucleon x x x ttp://dmtools.brown.edu/ Gaitskell,Mandic,Filippini WIMP Mass [GeV/c ] DATA listed top to bottom on plot DAMA k kg-days ai Ann. Mod. 3sigma w/dama 1996 ZEPLI II Jan 007 result CRESST kg-day CaWO4 CDMS: reanalysis +008 Ge XEO et 136 kg-d SuperCDMS Projected 5kg 7-ST@Snolab Estimated cross-section for XDM coupled to a sample HDM XEO1T projected, 1 ton-year exposure Ellis et. al Teory region post-lep bencmark points Baltz and Gondolo 003 teory Estimated cross-section for XDM coupled to te Standard Model in units of c: for a mass splitting of δ = 1 MeV and any reasonable coice of nucleus, te tresold velocity is iger tan te velocity of all but a minute fraction of te WIMPs in te neigborood of te Eart. Wile te de-excitation process is not kinematically suppressed, te density of ambient particles is extremely low compared to tat of te particles [8], so te contribution to te detection rate is negligible even if te cross section is large. Clearly, XDM in its current form does not predict significant inelastic nucleus-wimp scattering, due to te relatively large mass splitting. However, a modified XDM model containing multiple excited states, wit some splittings of order 100 kev, migt permit a greater degree of inelastic scattering, and support te Tucker-Smit- Weiner mecanism suc models ave been discussed in [11, 9]. Te strong suppression of te elastic scattering cross section calculated in tis work may be useful in suc a model: if inelastic scattering effects are to reconcile DAMA wit oter direct detection experiments, te elastic scattering cross section must be very small relative to inelastic scattering contributions. FIG. 4: Current experimental limits and teoretical predictions for te spin-independent proton-wimp elastic scattering cross section. Te lower dased line is te estimated cross section for XDM coupled to te Standard Model, calculated in tis paper. Te upper dased line is te cross section for XDM coupled to a HDM wit tanβ = 50 and m A = 300 GeV, as sown in Fig. 3. VI. IELASTIC SCATTERIG Tucker-Smit and Weiner [9, 6, 7] ave investigated models of inelastically scattering dark matter in wic te modulation observed by DAMA/LIBRA [8] remains consistent wit te absence of signals in oter direct detection experiments, due to kinematic suppression of te scattering rate. XDM does not satisfy te requirements for tose models, as te mass splitting δ is too large by a factor of 10: noneteless, it is interesting to consider ow inelastic scattering processes migt contribute to te interaction cross section. Te coupling constant for inelastic scattering in XDM, λ, may be significantly larger tan λ + [8], so te low cross section calculated for elastic scattering does not necessarily limit te inelastic scattering cross section. Te cross section for dark matter inelastically scattering wit itself can be quite large in XDM: owever, tis is mostly due to enancement by ladder diagrams [3]. Suc an enancement does not apply to WIMP-nucleus scattering, as eac φ- excange is suppressed by a factor of α XDM. Te excitation process A A is suppressed by a kinematic factor 1 δ/µ A v, were v is te labframe velocity of te incident WIMP, and te cross section falls to zero at te tresold velocity v = δ/µ A VII. PROSPECTS FOR DIRECT DETECTIO Figure 4 [30] sows te current and projected upper limits on te elastic scattering cross section normalized to a single nucleon for an arrayofexperiments as a function of te WIMP mass, as well as te predicted values obtained by sampling te parameter spaces of teoretical models of dark matter. It is clear tat te prediction for XDM coupled to te Standard Model falls well below all current constraints, and also well below te projected lower limits of te SuperCDMS and ton-scale xenon experiments. However, if te XDM dark sector is instead coupled to a two-higgs-doublet model wit large tan β > 0 30, te cross section may be large enoug to permit direct detection in upcoming experiments. VIII. COCLUSIO Te XDM model, were te dark sector couples to te StandardModelonlyviateweakmixingofaligtscalar wit te Higgs, as a igly suppressed cross section for elastic nuclear scattering relative to models were te WIMP couples directly to te Higgs. We estimate tis suppression at five or more orders of magnitude. Computing te XDM nuclear scattering cross section directly, for XDM coupled to te Standard Model, leads to a WIMP-proton cross section for elastic scattering of, σ m pb δ 1MeV 4 K 100GeV 100 v 4, 5 46GeV

6 6 wic is beyond te reac of future proposed direct detection experiments. However, coupling te XDM dark sector to a two-higgs-doublet model can give rise to interesting cross sections, provided tan β is large. Models of dark matter incorporating inelastic scattering may be of interest in reconciling te results of DAMA/LIBRA wit oter direct detection experiments, but XDM in its current form is unsuitable, as te mass splitting is too large for te excited state to be kinematically accessible by WIMPs in te neigborood of te Eart. However, extensions of te model containing multiple nearly degenerate excited states migt allow inelastic scattering to play a greater role. [1] G. Weidenspointner et al., Astron. Astropys. 450, , astro-p/ [] G. Weidenspointner et al., arxiv:astro-p/07061v 007, astro-p/07061v1. [3] D. P. Finkbeiner and. Weiner, Pys. Rev. D76, , astro-p/ [4] C. Boem, D. Hooper, J. Silk, M. Cassé, and J. Paul, Pys. Rev. Lett. 9, , astro-p/ [5] J. F. Beacom,. F. Bell, and G. Bertone, Pys. Rev. Lett. 94, , astro-p/ [6] J. F. Beacom and H. Yuksel, Pys. Rev. Lett. 97, , astro-p/ [7] M. Pospelov and A. Ritz, Pys. Lett. B651, , ep-p/ [8] R. Bernabei, P. Belli, F. Cappella, R. Cerulli, C. J. Dai, A. d Angelo, H. L. He, A. Inciccitti, H. H. Kuang, J. M. Ma, et al., ArXiv e-prints , [9] S. Cang, G. D. Kribs, D. Tucker-Smit, and. Weiner, ArXiv e-prints , [10] J. Cang et al. ATIC 005, prepared for 9t International Cosmic Ray Conferences ICRC 005, Pune, India, 31 Aug [11]. Arkani-Hamed, D. Finkbeiner, T. Slatyer, and. Weiner 008, [1] V. Barger, P. Langacker, M. McCaskey, M. J. Ramsey-Musolf, and G. Saugnessy, Pys. Rev. D77, , [13] M. Drees and M. M. ojiri, Pys. Rev. D 48, , arxiv:ep-p/ [14] P. Gondolo, J. Edsjö, P. Ullio, L. Bergström, M. Scelke, and E. A. Baltz, Journal of Cosmology and Astro-Particle Pysics 7, 8 004, arxiv:astro-p/ [15] G. Jungman, M. Kamionkowski, and K. Griest, Pysics Reports 67, , arxiv:ep-p/ [16] H.-Y. Ceng, Pys. Lett. B19, [17] J. Gasser, H. Leutwyler, and M. E. Sainio, Pysics Letters B 53, [18] T. Hatsuda and T. Kuniiro, uclear Pysics B 387, [19] T. P. Ceng, Pys. Rev. D 38, [0] M. A. Sifman, A. I. Vainstein, and V. I. Zakarov, Pysics Letters B 78, [1] T. D. Lee, Pys. Rev. D 8, [] S. Weinberg, Pys. Rev. Lett. 37, [3] E. Accomando et al. 006, ep-p/ [4] J. F. Donogue and L.-F. Li, Pys. Rev. D 19, [5] D. Eriksson, F. Mamoudi, and O. Stal 008, [6] D. R. Smit and. Weiner, Pys. Rev. D64, , ep-p/ [7] D. Tucker-Smit and. Weiner, Pys. Rev. D7, , ep-p/ [8] D. P. Finkbeiner,. Padmanaban, and. Weiner, ArXiv e-prints , [9]. Arkani-Hamed and. Weiner 008, [30] R. Gaitskell and J. Filippini, ttp://dmtools.berkeley.edu/limitplots 008.