International ejournals
|
|
- Allan Simon
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Available online at International ejournals ISSN DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OF A METHODOLOGY FOR MEASUREMENT-UNCERTAINTY-ESTIMATION THROUGH DOE & ANOVA Koilakuntla Maddulety; National Institute of Industrial Engineering; Vihar Lake post; Mumbai E. Mail: koila@rediffmail.com Mobile: Abstract In this paper the author developed a methodology with the applications of DoE & ANOVA for estimating standard components uncertainties and combined uncertainty with minimum number of trails and minimum experimental efforts. The methodology had been validated with practical experimentation in which all the Type B uncertainty components are replaced with Type A uncertainty methods, which is more accurate and scientific. In classical method of uncertainty estimation requires separate efforts for estimating type A uncertainty and Type B uncertainty. The accuracy level of Type B uncertainty is very low as it is estimated indirectly, unlike Type-A uncertainty estimation which is direct experimentation and statistical analysis. The suggested methodology in this paper is highly scientific, accurate, needs minimum experimentation effort. Based on classical methodology separate measurement-uncertainty analyses are carried-out for each product range, in most of the laboratories and NABL approved laboratories. But as per this methodology, for all the ranges of the products or a group of ranges of products a single design, uncertainty experimentation & analysis produce highly reliable uncertainty-measurement results. Hence it is highly recommended to the laboratories where the ranges of product are measured with same laboratory setup. Key Words Measurement-Uncertainty; Combined-Uncertainty; Expanded Uncertainty; Experimental Design (DoE); Analysis of Variance (ANOVA); Factors; Factor Levels
2 938 Introduction Measurement Uncertainty In metrology, measurement uncertainty describes a region about an observed value of a physical quantity, also called a measured quantity, which is likely to vary slightly from true value but enclose the true value of that quantity. Measurement Error, Accuracy, Precision Statistics in Metrology ISO Guide to Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement. This is a brief summary of the method of evaluating and expressing uncertainty in measurement adopted widely by U.S. industry, companies in other countries, NIST, its sister national metrology institutes throughout the world, and many organizations worldwide. These "essentials" are adapted from NIST Technical Note 1297 Measurement equation The case of interest is where the quantity Y being measured, called the measured, is not measured directly, but is determined from N other quantities X1, X2,..., XN through a functional relation f, often called the measurement equation: Y = f(x1, X2,..., XN).. (1) Included among the quantities X i are corrections (or correction factors), as well as quantities that are accounts to other sources of variability, such as different observers, instruments, samples, laboratories, and times at which observations are made (e.g., different days). Thus, the function f of equation (1) should express not only a physical law but also a measurement process, and in particular, it should contain all quantities that can contribute a significant uncertainty to the measurement result. An estimate of the measured or output quantity Y, denoted by y, is obtained from equation (1) using input estimates x 1, x 2,..., x N for the values of the N input quantities X 1, X 2,..., X N. Thus, the output estimate y, which is the result of the measurement, is given by y = f(x 1, x 2,..., x N ) (2) For example, as pointed-out in the ISO Guide, if a potential difference V is applied to the terminals of a temperature-dependent resistor that has a resistance R 0 at the defined temperature t 0 and a linear temperature coefficient of resistance b, the power P (the measurement) dissipated by the resistor at the temperature t depends on V, R 0, b, and t according to P = f(v, R 0, b, t) = V 2 /R 0 [1 + b(t - t 0 )].. (3) Classification of Uncertainty Components The uncertainty of the measurement result y arises from the uncertainties u (x i ) (or u i for brevity) of the input estimates x i that enter equation (2). Thus, in the example of equation (3), the uncertainty of the estimated value of the power P arises from the uncertainties of the estimated values of the potential difference V, resistance R 0, temperature coefficient of resistance b, and temperature t. In general, components of uncertainty may be categorized according to the method used to evaluate them. Type A evaluation: method of evaluation of uncertainty by the statistical analysis of series
3 939 of observations, Type B evaluation: method of evaluation of uncertainty by means other than the statistical analysis of series of observations. Representation of uncertainty components Standard Uncertainty Each component of uncertainty, however evaluated, is represented by an estimated standard deviation, termed standard uncertainty with suggested symbol u i, and equal to the positive square root of the estimated variance Standard uncertainty: Type A An uncertainty component obtained by a Type A evaluation is represented by a statistically estimated standard deviation s i, equal to the positive square root of the statistically estimated variance s i 2, and the associated number of degrees of freedom vi. For such a component the standard uncertainty is ui = Sx1-bar =. x1-bar Standard uncertainty: Type B In a similar manner, an uncertainty component obtained by a Type B evaluation is represented by a quantity u j, which may be considered an approximation to the corresponding standard deviation; it is equal to the positive square root of u j 2, which may be considered an approximation to the corresponding variance and which is obtained from an assumed probability distribution based on all the available information. Since the quantity u j 2 is treated like a variance and u j like a standard deviation, for such a component the standard uncertainty is simply u j. Evaluating uncertainty components: Type A A Type A evaluation of standard uncertainty may be based on any valid statistical method for treating data. Examples are calculating the standard deviation of the mean of a series of independent observations; using the method of least squares to fit a curve to data in order to estimate the parameters of the curve and their standard deviations; and carrying out an analysis of variance (ANOVA) in order to identify and quantify random effects in certain kinds of measurements. Mean and standard deviation As an example of a Type A evaluation, consider an input quantity X i whose value is estimated from n independent observations X i,k of X i obtained under the same conditions of measurement. In this case the input estimate x i is usually the sample mean µ = X i-bar = (4) and the standard uncertainty u(x i ) to be associated with x i is the estimated standard deviation of the mean Standard Uncertainty of i th Variable/Factor = = u(xi) xi-bar= S xi-bar = (5)
4 940 Combining uncertainty Calculation of combined standard uncertainty The combined standard uncertainty of the measurement result y, designated by u c (y) and taken to represent the estimated standard deviation of the results, is the positive square root of the estimated variance u c 2 (y) obtained for factor 1 to m u c (y) = = cu = ( x1-bar^2 + x2-bar^2 + x3-bar^2 + xm-bar^2 ) = S cu = (S x1-bar 2 +S x2-bar 2 +S x3-bar 2 +.S xm-bar 2 ). (6) Expanded Uncertainty and Coverage Factor Expanded Uncertainty: Although the combined standard uncertainty uc is used to express the uncertainty of many measurement results, for some commercial, industrial, and regulatory applications (e.g., when health and safety are concerned), what is often required is a measure of uncertainty that defines an interval about the measurement result y within which the value of the measured Y can be confidently asserted to lie. The measure of uncertainty intended to meet this requirement is termed expanded uncertainty, suggested symbol U, and is obtained by multiplying uc(y) by a coverage factor, suggested symbol k. Thus U = kuc(y) and it is confidently believed that Y is greater than or equal to y - U, and is less than or equal to y + U, which is commonly written as Y = y ± U. Coverage factor In general, the value of the coverage factor k is chosen on the basis of the desired level of confidence to be associated with the interval defined by U = kuc. Typically, k is in the range 2 to 3. When the normal distribution applies and uc is a reliable estimate of the standard deviation of y, U = 2 uc (i.e., k = 2) defines an interval having a level of confidence of approximately 95 %, and U = 3 uc (i.e., k = 3) defines an interval having a level of confidence approximately 99.7 %. U = uc (i.e., k=2.575) defines an interval having a level of confidence approximately 99 % In General, U =5.15 uc (i.e k = *2 ) it covers total width (either side) of uncertainty interval at 99% confidence, it should not exceed the 25% of Specification width i.e 0.25*(USL LSL) to accept a measurement System. Objectives of the Research Project: 1. To Understand the meaning and Importance of DoE & ANOVA and Applications of DoE & ANOVA in Measurement-Uncertainty 2. To identify all the factors that influence the Measurement Uncertainty through Brainstorming 3. To identify the levels for each factor identified above through Brainstorming 4. To identify the significant first-order interactions to be considered in design 5. To develop Experimental Designs through Minitab Software 6. To Conducting Analysis (Analytical experiments) as per Designs 7. Analyzing the output of experimental analysis Through ANOVA 8. Estimating Component-wise Uncertainty ; Combined Uncertainty and Expanded Uncertainty 9. Grading the measurement System with the help of Table 1 (with proper Interpretation). 10. Action recommended in the case of C, B, and B+ grading of Measurement System
5 941 Methodology used in the Project: Brainstorming technique used for identifying Critical input Factors/Components and their levels that causes Measurement-Uncertainty, and to identify 1st order interaction effect that effect/causes Measurement-Uncertainty. Minitab16 Software is used for developing fractional factorial design by considering the factors and levels identified. Conduced the experiments as per random run-order generated by the Minitab software Analyzed the data after feeding the output of the experiments against each run in Minitab design through Minitab Interpretations and meaningful conclusions are made based on Analysis of Minitab Software output. DoE and ANOVA Importance, Meaning and Application in Measurement-Uncertainty Why is DoE Important? DoE is important as a formal way of maximizing information gained while resources required. It has more to offer than 'one change at a time' experimental methods, because it allows a judgment on the significance to the output of input variables acting alone, as well input variables acting in combination with one another. 'One change at a time' testing always carries the risk that the experimenter may find one input variable to have a significant effect on the response (output) while failing to discover that changing another variable may alter the effect of the first (i.e. some kind of dependency or interaction). This is because the temptation is to stop the test when this first significant effect has been found. In order to reveal an interaction or dependency, 'one change at a time' testing relies on the experimenter carrying the tests in the appropriate direction. However, DoE plans for all possible dependencies in the first place, and then prescribes exactly what data are needed to assess them i.e. whether input variables change the response on their own, when combined, or not at all. In terms of resource the exact length and size of the experiment are set by the design and outcome analysis guarantee the accuracy of estimating effect of each input variable on output. Hence it has a great advantage over classical experiments that are conducted for assessing measurement uncertainty. Experimental Designs / Design of Experiments (DoE) DoE is a systematic approach to investigation of a system or process which includes measurement system or measuring process. A series of structured tests are designed in which planned minor changes that covers a ranges of random variation generally occurring in the input variables of a measuring process or measurement system. The total effects of these changes on measured value are assessed as combined uncertainty through ANOVA, and also effect of individual input variable (Testers, Gauges, Temperature, Balances, Methods of Testing, etc.) measured as components of combined uncertainty or components of Type A & Type B uncertainties through ANOVA. Then one can estimate the expanded uncertainty as explained above by multiplying with coverage factor. Generally the ratio of expanded uncertainty to specification width is estimated and compared for grading the measurement system and taking appropriate corrective action as and when needed with the help of following table:
6 942 Table 1: Verification of Status of Measurement System: Sl. Percentage (%) No. Ratio *100 Ratio of Expanded Uncertainty to the Specification width = R Measurement System Grade is.. 1 R < 0.10 R < 10% A+ Grade (Excellent) < R < % < R < 15% A Grade (Very Good) < R < % < R < 20% B+ Grade (Good) < R < % < R < 25% B (Satisfactory) 5 R > 0.25 R > 25% C Grade (Not Acceptable) Ratio R = (Expanded-Uncertainty/Specification-Width) Remark Ensure the Same Use the System without any correction Scope for Improvement Large Scope for Improvement Do not use the measurement system until correction How to use DoE? The order of tasks for using this tool starts with identifying the input variables and the response (output) that is to be measured. For each input variable, a number of levels are defined that represent the range for which the effect of that variable is desired to be known. An experimental plan is produced which tells the experimenter where to set each test parameter for each run of the test. The response is then measured for each run. The method of analysis is to look for differences between response (output) readings for different groups of the input changes. These differences are then attributed to the input variables acting alone (called a single effect) or in combination with another input variable (called an interaction). Experimentation for Validating above Procedure As per above methodology we have conducted brainstorming with QA Lab executives of ABC Company under the coordination of author and developed experimental design for estimating detailed Measurement Uncertainty ( Combined Uncertainty and each Component Uncertainty ), by identifying the following factors and levels through brainstorming. Based on the Brainstorming we have titled the Project; identified all the Input variable/factors; identified the levels for each factor and developed the experimental designs through Minitab16 (See the Minitab generated design in Table 2) Output of Brainstorming session: Table2: The Input Factors (Variables) and Levels with significant 1st order Interactions Identified through Brainstorming are:
7 943 Sl. Factors No. Levels Remark Nos Levels Low High 1 Product 2 Pro1 Pro2 Pro1: Product 1 is required by a customer whose Min Assay requirement is least Pro2: Product 2 is required by a customer whose Min Assay requirement is highest among all the customer 2 Operator 2 Ope1 Ope2 Ope1: operator 1 whose experience is least Ope1: operator 2 whose experience is maximum 3 Titrator 2 Tit1 Tit2 Tit1: Old Titrater Tit2: New Titrater 4 Balance 2 Bal1 Bal2 Bal1: Old Balance Bal2: New Balance 5 Lab Temperature : Least Temp. in the lab 25 0 C 29: Hight Temp. in the lab 29 0 C: 6 Method 2 Met1 Met2 Met1: IPM Met2: USPM 7 Two Significance Interactions are indentified: 1. Temperature and Balance 2. Temperature and Method It has been decided to conduct a study to estimate standard measurement uncertainty for eight components, five main factors effects components measurement-uncertainty, two 1st order interactions effects measurement-uncertainty, one error component measurement-uncertainty and finally estimating combined-uncertainty then estimating expanded-uncertainty. The ratio has been calculated and compared as per table1 for grading the measurement system of a selected laboratory. Minitab-Design had been developed by considering five factors that are Operator, Titrator, Balance, Temp, and Method each at two levels as above and used for first Product 1 Sample Analysis then product 2 Sample Analysis. Fractional Factorial Design Factors: 5; Base Design: 5-Factors, 8-Runs; Resolution: III Runs: 16; Replicates: 2; Fraction: 1/4 The following Design is Generated by Minitab and verified that each column is Orthogonal to all other column:
8 944 Table3: Design is as per Std. Order Sequence: StdOrder RunOrder Operator Titrator Balance Lab Temperature Method Assay % 1 13 Ope1 Tit1 Bal1 29 Met Ope2 Tit1 Bal1 25 Met1 3 4 Ope1 Tit2 Bal1 25 Met2 4 3 Ope2 Tit2 Bal1 29 Met1 5 8 Ope1 Tit1 Bal2 29 Met Ope2 Tit1 Bal2 25 Met2 7 6 Ope1 Tit2 Bal2 25 Met1 8 5 Ope2 Tit2 Bal2 29 Met Ope1 Tit1 Bal1 29 Met Ope2 Tit1 Bal1 25 Met Ope1 Tit2 Bal1 25 Met Ope2 Tit2 Bal1 29 Met Ope1 Tit1 Bal2 29 Met Ope2 Tit1 Bal2 25 Met Ope1 Tit2 Bal2 25 Met Ope2 Tit2 Bal2 29 Met2 Table4: Design is arranged as per Run-order Sequence and conducted experiments as per runorder and shown experimental results i.e Assay% value for each run: StdOrd er RunOrd er Operat or Titrato r Balan ce Lab Temperature Metho d Assay % 10 1 Ope2 Tit1 Bal1 25 Met Ope1 Tit2 Bal2 25 Met Ope2 Tit2 Bal1 29 Met Ope1 Tit2 Bal1 25 Met Ope2 Tit2 Bal2 29 Met Ope1 Tit2 Bal2 25 Met Ope1 Tit2 Bal1 25 Met Ope1 Tit1 Bal2 29 Met Ope1 Tit1 Bal2 29 Met Ope1 Tit1 Bal1 29 Met Ope2 Tit2 Bal2 29 Met Ope2 Tit1 Bal2 25 Met Ope1 Tit1 Bal1 29 Met Ope2 Tit2 Bal1 29 Met Ope2 Tit1 Bal2 25 Met Ope2 Tit1 Bal1 25 Met Analysis and Interpretations of Experimental output with the help of Minitab:
9 945 Minitab output of ANOVA: Assay% versus Operator, Titrator, Balance, Lab Temperature, Method Source DF Seq SS Adj SS Adj MS F P Main Effects Operator Titrator Balance Lab Temperature Method Way Interactions Titrator*Balance Titrator*Method Residual Error Pure Error Total R-Sq = 30.69%; R-Sq(pred) = 0.00%; R-Sq(adj) = 0.00% The R-sq value indicates that entire variation occurring in measurement system is random; there is no variable acting as cause for measurement-uncertainty (variation). Same is supported by individual component P Value i.e No identified factor can contribute to measurement-uncertainty (variation) significantly. Table5: Adj. Mean Squares (Variance 2)); Standard Deviations ( i); each Component Uncertainty (Standard Error = SE = xi-bar ) Component (Source of Adj Mean Squares Standard Deviation = Component-Uncertainty Variation) (Variance 2) Sqrt of Variance ( (Standard Error (SE)) Operator 2 = xop-bar Titrator xop-bar Balance xtit-bar Lab Temp xtemp-bar Method = xmet-bar Temp&Bal xtemp&bal-bar Temp&Method xtemp&met-bar Error xerror-bar Total xtotal-bar Combined uncertainty has been estimated by using the formula 6, which is shown below: u c (y) = = cu = xtotal-bar ( x1-bar^2 + x2-bar^2 + x3-bar^2 + xm-bar^2 ) = S cu = (S x1-bar 2 +S x2-bar 2 +S x3-bar 2 +.S xm-bar 2 ) Combined uncertainty: uc(y) = = cu = xtotal-bar
10 946 99% confidence either side Expanded Uncertainty = EU = 5.15* cu 5.15 * = Assay% Specification width for customer-a = USL LSL = = 1 Ratio in % = (Expanded-Uncertainty / Specification-Width) * 100 = ( /1) * 100 = 3.24% Conclusion: The ratio is 3.24% which is less than 10% hence the measurement system is excellent Ref. Table1 for grading Measurement System) In case if the ratio is more than 25%, the measurement system is not acceptable for most of the laboratories, under this situation one has to check each component-uncertainty that are estimated and posted in last column of Table 6 above, along with some special Minitab analysis for finding the maximum contributing components and necessary analysis and corrective action. The author has explained in detail in his next paper titled as A case-study on application of DoE & ANOVA for Measurement Uncertainty, for taking corrective action whenever the Measurement Uncertainty cross the limits i.e ratio is more than 25%. References: 1. Angela and Daniel Voss; Design and Analysis of Experiments; Springer 2. Barry N. Taylor and Chris E. Kuyatt; Guidelines for Evaluating and Expressing the Uncertainty of NIST Measurement Results; NIST Technical Note 1297, 1994 Edition 3. C. Croarkin, Measurement Assurance Programs, Part II: Development and Implementation, NBS SpecialPublication 676-II (U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 1985). 4. CIPM, BIPM Proc.-Verb. Com. Int. Poids et Mesures 54, 14, 35 (1986) (in French); P. Giacomo, News from the BIPM, Metrologia 24, (1987). 5. C. F. Dietrich, Uncertainty, Calibration and Probability, second edition (Adam Hilger, Bristol, U.K., 1991), chapter Douglas C. Montgomery, Design and Analysis of Experiments; John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York, Singapore. 7. D.R. COX, The Theory of the Design of Experiments 8. Eisenhart. C, Realistic Evaluation of the Precision and Accuracy of Instrument Calibration Systems, 9. G. E. P. Box, W. G. Hunter, and J. S. Hunter, Statistics for Experimenters (John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, 1978). 10. Jiju Antony, Design of Experiments for Engineers & Scientists; Elsevier Science and Technology Books 11. Klaus Hinkelmann and Oscar Kempthorne; Design and Analysis of Experiments (Volume 2, Advanced Experimental Designs); wiley 12. Mandel. J, The Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data (Interscience-Wiley Publishers, New York, NY, 13. M. G. Natrella, Experimental Statistics, NBS Handbook 91 (U.S. Government Printing Office,Washington, DC, 1963; reprinted October 1966 with corrections). 14. Ranjit. K. Roy, Design of Experiments using the Taguchi Approach; John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York, Singapore. 15. W ISO, Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland, 1993 Websites: etc.
Essentials of expressing measurement uncertainty
Essentials of expressing measurement uncertainty This is a brief summary of the method of evaluating and expressing uncertainty in measurement adopted widely by U.S. industry, companies in other countries,
More informationGuidelines for Evaluating and Expressing the Uncertainty of NIST Measurement Results
United States Department of Commerce National Institute of Standards and Technology NIST Technical Note 1297 1994 Edition Guidelines for Evaluating and Expressing the Uncertainty of NIST Measurement Results
More informationA guide to expression of uncertainty of measurements QA4EO-QAEO-GEN-DQK-006
A guide to expression of uncertainty of measurements QA4EO-QAEO-GEN-DQK-006 A guide to expression of uncertainty of measurements Author: E-mail: Nigel Fox Nigel.Fox@npl.co.uk Editor: E-mail: Marie-Claire
More informationIntroduction to the evaluation of uncertainty
Manual of Codes of Practice for the Determination of Uncertainties in Mechanical Tests on Metallic Materials SECTION 1 Introduction to the evaluation of uncertainty F A Kandil National Physical Laboratory
More informationR SANAS Page 1 of 7
ESTIMATION OF THE UNCERTAINTY OF MEASUREMENT BY CALIBRATION LABORATORIES AND SPECIFICATION OF CALIBRATION AND MEASUREMENT CAPABILITY ON SCHEDULES OF ACCREDITATION Approved By: Chief Executive Officer:
More informationLEARNING WITH MINITAB Chapter 12 SESSION FIVE: DESIGNING AN EXPERIMENT
LEARNING WITH MINITAB Chapter 12 SESSION FIVE: DESIGNING AN EXPERIMENT Laura M Williams, RN, CLNC, MSN MOREHEAD STATE UNIVERSITY IET603: STATISTICAL QUALITY ASSURANCE IN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY DR. AHMAD
More informationContents. 2 2 factorial design 4
Contents TAMS38 - Lecture 10 Response surface methodology Lecturer: Zhenxia Liu Department of Mathematics - Mathematical Statistics 12 December, 2017 2 2 factorial design Polynomial Regression model First
More informationUNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS FOR LABORATORY ACCREDITATION. Peter B. Crisp. Fluke Precision Measurement Ltd, 52 Hurricane Way, Norwich, UK
UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS FOR LABORATORY ACCREDITATION Peter B. Crisp Fluke Precision Measurement Ltd, 5 Hurricane Way, Norwich, UK Introduction NAMAS Accredited laboratories are required to follow recommended
More informationDocument No: TR 12 Issue No: 1
ESTIMATION OF THE UNCERTAINTY OF MEASUREMENT BY CALIBRATION LABORATORIES AND SPECIFICATION OF CALIBRATION AND MEASUREMENT CAPABILITY ON SCHEDULES OF ACCREDITATION Prepared by: SADCAS Technical Manage Approved
More informationStandard Guide for Determination of the Thermal Resistance of Low-Density Blanket-Type Mineral Fiber Insulation 1
Designation: C 653 97 Standard Guide for Determination of the Thermal Resistance of Low-Density Blanket-Type Mineral Fiber Insulation 1 This standard is issued under the fixed designation C 653; the number
More informationCSCI 688 Homework 6. Megan Rose Bryant Department of Mathematics William and Mary
CSCI 688 Homework 6 Megan Rose Bryant Department of Mathematics William and Mary November 12, 2014 7.1 Consider the experiment described in Problem 6.1. Analyze this experiment assuming that each replicate
More informationPart 5: Total stations
Provläsningsexemplar / Preview INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ISO 17123-5 Third edition 2018-02 Optics and optical instruments Field procedures for testing geodetic and surveying instruments Part 5: Total stations
More informationy, x k estimates of Y, X k.
The uncertainty of a measurement is a parameter associated with the result of the measurement, that characterises the dispersion of the values that could reasonably be attributed to the quantity being
More informationSensor Characteristics
Lecture (3) Sensor Characteristics (Part Two) Prof. Kasim M. Al-Aubidy Philadelphia University-Jordan AMSS-MSc Prof. Kasim Al-Aubidy 1 3. Computation of Stimulus: The main objective of sensing is to determine
More informationGUIDE TO THE EXPRESSION OF UNCERTAINTY IN MEASUREMENT
KINGDOM OF SAUDI ARABIA SASO.../006 SAUDI STANDARD DRAFT NO. 13/000 GUIDE TO THE EXPRESSION OF UNCERTAINTY IN MEASUREMENT SAUDI ARABIAN STANDARDS ORGANIZATION -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
More informationInstitutionen för matematik och matematisk statistik Umeå universitet November 7, Inlämningsuppgift 3. Mariam Shirdel
Institutionen för matematik och matematisk statistik Umeå universitet November 7, 2011 Inlämningsuppgift 3 Mariam Shirdel (mash0007@student.umu.se) Kvalitetsteknik och försöksplanering, 7.5 hp 1 Uppgift
More informationSix Sigma Black Belt Study Guides
Six Sigma Black Belt Study Guides 1 www.pmtutor.org Powered by POeT Solvers Limited. Analyze Correlation and Regression Analysis 2 www.pmtutor.org Powered by POeT Solvers Limited. Variables and relationships
More informationAnalysis of Covariance. The following example illustrates a case where the covariate is affected by the treatments.
Analysis of Covariance In some experiments, the experimental units (subjects) are nonhomogeneous or there is variation in the experimental conditions that are not due to the treatments. For example, a
More informationOptimization of Radial Force in Turning Process Using Taguchi s Approach
5 th International & 6 th All India Manufacturing Technology, Design and Research Conference (AIMTDR 04) December th 4 th, 04, IIT Optimization of Radial Force in Turning Process Using Taguchi s Approach
More informationAFRIMETS. Supplementary Comparison Programme. Calibration of Gauge Blocks. by Mechanical Comparison Method AFRIMETS.L S3.
AFRIMETS Secretariat Private Bag X34 Lynnwood Ridge 0040 AFRIMETS Supplementary Comparison Programme Calibration of Gauge Blocks by Mechanical Comparison Method AFRIMETS.L S3 Final Report Giza, Egypt,
More informationUncertainty due to Finite Resolution Measurements
Uncertainty due to Finite Resolution Measurements S.D. Phillips, B. Tolman, T.W. Estler National Institute of Standards and Technology Gaithersburg, MD 899 Steven.Phillips@NIST.gov Abstract We investigate
More informationMETHODS FOR CERTIFYING MEASUREMENT EQUIPMENT. Scott Crone
METHODS FOR CERTIFYING MEASUREMENT EQUIPMENT Scott Crone North American Sales Manager AMETEK Calibration Instruments 8600 Somerset Drive Largo, Florida 33773 USA INTRODUCTION Like any other piece of equipment,
More informationABSTRACT. Page 1 of 9
Gage R. & R. vs. ANOVA Dilip A. Shah E = mc 3 Solutions 197 Great Oaks Trail # 130 Wadsworth, Ohio 44281-8215 Tel: 330-328-4400 Fax: 330-336-3974 E-mail: emc3solu@aol.com ABSTRACT Quality and metrology
More informationA Unified Approach to Uncertainty for Quality Improvement
A Unified Approach to Uncertainty for Quality Improvement J E Muelaner 1, M Chappell 2, P S Keogh 1 1 Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Bath, UK 2 MCS, Cam, Gloucester, UK Abstract To
More informationEA 4/02. Expression of the Uncertainty of Measurement in Calibration. Publication Reference
EAEA Publication Reference EA 4/0 Expression of the Uncertainty of Measurement in Calibration PURPOSE The purpose of this document is to harmonise evaluation of uncertainty of measurement within EA, to
More informationHow To: Analyze a Split-Plot Design Using STATGRAPHICS Centurion
How To: Analyze a SplitPlot Design Using STATGRAPHICS Centurion by Dr. Neil W. Polhemus August 13, 2005 Introduction When performing an experiment involving several factors, it is best to randomize the
More informationProvläsningsexemplar / Preview INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ISO Second edition
INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ISO 17123-4 Second edition 2012-06-01 Optics and optical instruments Field procedures for testing geodetic and surveying instruments Part 4: Electro-optical distance meters (EDM
More informationUncertainty of Measurement A Concept
Uncertainty of Measurement A Concept Shweta V. Matey 1, Dr. Nitin K. Mandavgade 2, and Dr. R.R. Lakhe 3 1 (Asst. Professor, Dept. of Mechanical Engg, Lokmanya Tilak College of Engineering, Mumbai University,
More informationINTERNATIONAL STANDARD
INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ISO 80000-5 First edition 2007-05-01 Quantities and units Part 5: Thermodynamics Grandeurs et unités Partie 5: Thermodynamique Reference number ISO 2007 PDF disclaimer This PDF file
More informationChapter 30 Design and Analysis of
Chapter 30 Design and Analysis of 2 k DOEs Introduction This chapter describes design alternatives and analysis techniques for conducting a DOE. Tables M1 to M5 in Appendix E can be used to create test
More informationValidation and Standardization of (Bio)Analytical Methods
Validation and Standardization of (Bio)Analytical Methods Prof.dr.eng. Gabriel-Lucian RADU 21 March, Bucharest Why method validation is important? The purpose of analytical measurement is to get consistent,
More informationProvläsningsexemplar / Preview INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ISO Second edition
INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ISO 6974-1 Second edition 2012-05-15 Natural gas Determination of composition and associated uncertainty by gas chromatography Part 1: General guidelines and calculation of composition
More informationApplication of Full Factorial Design for Optimization of Feed Rate of Stationary Hook Hopper
Application of Full Factorial Design for Optimization of Feed Rate of Stationary Hook Hopper Astha Kukreja, Pankaj Chopra, Akshay Aggarwal, and Pradeep Khanna Abstract the work aims at the optimization
More informationUncertainty of Measurement
Uncertainty of Measurement Contents Uncertainty of Measurement.... 3 Uncertainty of Measurement and Measurement Error.... 4 Measuring Uncertainty.... 5 Coverage factor k...6 Factors Affecting Uncertainty....
More informationTemperatures: Measure Thrice
Temperatures: Measure Thrice At Least Before Reporting Once G. Raymond Peacock Temperatures.com, Inc. Southampton, PA 18966 Ph: 215-436-9730 Web: www.temperatures.com Email: grp@mrpyro.com Abstract A measurement
More informationCharacterization and Uncertainty Analysis of a Reference Pressure Measurement System for Wind Tunnels
Characterization and Uncertainty Analysis of a Reference Pressure Measurement System for Wind Tunnels Tahani Amer, John Tripp, Ping Tcheng, Cecil Burkett, and Bradley Sealey NASA Langley Research Center
More informationON REPLICATION IN DESIGN OF EXPERIMENTS
ON REPLICATION IN DESIGN OF EXPERIMENTS Bianca FAGARAS 1), Ingrid KOVACS 1), Anamaria OROS 1), Monica RAFAILA 2), Marina Dana TOPA 1), Manuel HARRANT 2) 1) Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, Str. Baritiu
More informationANALYSIS OF PARAMETRIC INFLUENCE ON DRILLING USING CAD BASED SIMULATION AND DESIGN OF EXPERIMENTS
5 th International Conference on Advances in Mechanical Engineering and Mechanics ICAMEM2010 18-20 December, 2010, Hammamet, Tunisia ANALYSIS OF PARAMETRIC INFLUENCE ON DRILLING USING CAD BASED SIMULATION
More informationOA03 UNCERTAINTY OF MEASUREMENT IN CHEMICAL TESTING IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE STANDARD SIST EN ISO/IEC Table of contents
UNCERTAINTY OF MEASUREMENT IN CHEMICAL TESTING IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE STANDARD SIST EN ISO/IEC 17025 Table of contents 1 GENERAL... 2 2 THE STANDARD SIST EN ISO/IEC 17025... 2 3 SA'S POLICY IN IMPLEMENTING
More informationGUIDE Uncertainty of measurement Part 3: Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (GUM:1995)
GUIDE 98-3 Uncertainty of measurement Part 3: Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (GUM:1995) Incertitude de mesure Partie 3: Guide pour l'expression de l'incertitude de mesure (GUM:1995)
More informationSince the publication of the ISO Guide to the Expression
DE SILVA: JOURNAL OF AOAC INTERNATIONAL VOL. 86, NO. 5, 003 1077 SPECIAL GUEST EDITOR SECTION Uncertainty of Analytical Determinations GALAPPATTI M.S. DE SILVA 4, PB Alwis Perera Mawatha, Katubedda, Sri
More informationDesign of Experiments SUTD - 21/4/2015 1
Design of Experiments SUTD - 21/4/2015 1 Outline 1. Introduction 2. 2 k Factorial Design Exercise 3. Choice of Sample Size Exercise 4. 2 k p Fractional Factorial Design Exercise 5. Follow-up experimentation
More informationA hybrid Measurement Systems Analysis and Uncertainty of Measurement Approach for Industrial Measurement in the Light Controlled Factory
A hybrid Measurement Systems Analysis and Uncertainty of Measurement Approach for Industrial Measurement in the Light Controlled Factory J E Muelaner, A Francis, M Chappell, P G Maropoulos Laboratory for
More informationParameters Optimization of Rotary Ultrasonic Machining of Glass Lens for Surface Roughness Using Statistical Taguchi s Experimental Design
Parameters Optimization of Rotary Ultrasonic Machining of Glass Lens for Surface Roughness Using Statistical Taguchi s Experimental Design MUHAMMAD HISYAM LEE Universiti Teknologi Malaysia Department of
More informationPLS205 Lab 6 February 13, Laboratory Topic 9
PLS205 Lab 6 February 13, 2014 Laboratory Topic 9 A word about factorials Specifying interactions among factorial effects in SAS The relationship between factors and treatment Interpreting results of an
More informationAPPENDIX G EVALUATION OF MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY
APPENDIX G EVALUATION OF MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY Table of Contents 1. SCOPE... 2 2. REFERENCES... 2 3. TERMS AND DEFINITIONS... 2 4. BACKGROUND... 4 5. EVALUATION OF MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY POLICY... 5
More information1 Mathematics and Statistics in Science
1 Mathematics and Statistics in Science Overview Science students encounter mathematics and statistics in three main areas: Understanding and using theory. Carrying out experiments and analysing results.
More informationThe Uncertainty Principle
1 The Uncertainty Principle Uncertainty versus Error in High Voltage Measurements Presented by the High Voltage Testing Techniques Subcommittee (HVTT) -of the - IEEE PES Power Systems Instrumentation and
More informationChapter 6 The 2 k Factorial Design Solutions
Solutions from Montgomery, D. C. (004) Design and Analysis of Experiments, Wiley, NY Chapter 6 The k Factorial Design Solutions 6.. A router is used to cut locating notches on a printed circuit board.
More informationStatistical Analysis of Engineering Data The Bare Bones Edition. Precision, Bias, Accuracy, Measures of Precision, Propagation of Error
Statistical Analysis of Engineering Data The Bare Bones Edition (I) Precision, Bias, Accuracy, Measures of Precision, Propagation of Error PRIOR TO DATA ACQUISITION ONE SHOULD CONSIDER: 1. The accuracy
More informationINTERNATIONAL STANDARD
INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ISO 80000-8 First edition 2007-06-01 Corrected version 2007-08-15 Quantities and units Part 8: Acoustics Grandeurs et unités Partie 8: Acoustique Reference number ISO 80000-8:2007(E)
More informationAPPENDIX G ESTIMATION OF UNCERTAINTY OF MEASUREMENT
APPENDIX G ESTIMATION OF UNCERTAINTY OF MEASUREMENT Table of Contents 1. SCOPE... 2 2. REFERENCES... 2 3. TERMS AND DEFINITIONS... 2 4. BACKGROUND... 4 5. ESTIMATION OF UNCERTAINTY OF MEASUREMENT POLICY...
More informationERROR LIMITS AND MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY IN LEGAL METROLOGY
ERROR LIMITS AND MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY IN LEGAL METROLOGY K.-D. Sommer 1, M. Kochsiek and W. Schulz 1 Landesamt fuer Mess- und Eichwesen Thueringen, German Phsikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt, German
More informationMeasurement Uncertainty Principles and Implementation in QC
Measurement Uncertainty Principles and Implementation in QC Dr. Michael Haustein CURRENTA GmbH & Co. OHG Analytics 41538 Dormagen, Germany www.analytik.currenta.de A company of Bayer and LANXESS About
More informationINTERNATIONAL STANDARD. This is a preview of "ISO :2009". Click here to purchase the full version from the ANSI store.
INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ISO 80000-1 First edition 2009-11-15 Quantities and units Part 1: General Grandeurs et unités Partie 1: Généralités Reference number ISO 80000-1:2009(E) ISO 2009 PDF disclaimer This
More informationOIML D 28 DOCUMENT. Edition 2004 (E) ORGANISATION INTERNATIONALE INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION. Conventional value of the result of weighing in air
INTERNATIONAL DOCUMENT OIML D 28 Edition 2004 (E) Conventional value of the result of weighing in air Valeur conventionnelle du résultat des pesées dans l'air OIML D 28 Edition 2004 (E) ORGANISATION INTERNATIONALE
More informationAPPENDIX 1. Binodal Curve calculations
APPENDIX 1 Binodal Curve calculations The weight of salt solution necessary for the mixture to cloud and the final concentrations of the phase components were calculated based on the method given by Hatti-Kaul,
More informationSTUDYING RADIOCARBON PAPERS MAY SOLVE THE ENIGMA OF THE RADIOCARBON DATING OF THE SHROUD OF TURIN.
STUDYING RADIOCARBON PAPERS MAY SOLVE THE ENIGMA OF THE RADIOCARBON DATING OF THE SHROUD OF TURIN. Remi Van Haelst r.vanhaelst@scarlet.be Note: Most data used in this paper are taken from peer reviewed
More informationMeasuring System Analysis in Six Sigma methodology application Case Study
Measuring System Analysis in Six Sigma methodology application Case Study M.Sc Sibalija Tatjana 1, Prof.Dr Majstorovic Vidosav 1 1 Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Belgrade, Kraljice Marije
More informationMeasurement And Uncertainty
Measurement And Uncertainty Based on Guidelines for Evaluating and Expressing the Uncertainty of NIST Measurement Results, NIST Technical Note 1297, 1994 Edition PHYS 407 1 Measurement approximates or
More informationDesign of Engineering Experiments Part 2 Basic Statistical Concepts Simple comparative experiments
Design of Engineering Experiments Part 2 Basic Statistical Concepts Simple comparative experiments The hypothesis testing framework The two-sample t-test Checking assumptions, validity Comparing more that
More informationCHAPTER 6 A STUDY ON DISC BRAKE SQUEAL USING DESIGN OF EXPERIMENTS
134 CHAPTER 6 A STUDY ON DISC BRAKE SQUEAL USING DESIGN OF EXPERIMENTS 6.1 INTRODUCTION In spite of the large amount of research work that has been carried out to solve the squeal problem during the last
More informationTaguchi Design of Experiments
Taguchi Design of Experiments Many factors/inputs/variables must be taken into consideration when making a product especially a brand new one The Taguchi method is a structured approach for determining
More informationDESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF EXPERIMENTS Third Edition
DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF EXPERIMENTS Third Edition Douglas C. Montgomery ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY JOHN WILEY & SONS New York Chichester Brisbane Toronto Singapore Contents Chapter 1. Introduction 1-1 What
More informationStandard Test Method for Field Measurement of Sound Power Level by the Two- Surface Method 1
Designation: E 1124 97 AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TESTING AND MATERIALS 100 Barr Harbor Dr., West Conshohocken, PA 19428 Reprinted from the Annual Book of ASTM Standards. Copyright ASTM Standard Test Method
More informationMeasurement and Calibration of a High-Sensitivity Microwave Power Sensor with an Attenuator
RADIOENGINEERING, VOL. 3, NO. 4, DECEMBER 014 1055 Measurement and Calibration of a High-Sensitivity Microwave Power Sensor with an Attenuator Yu Song MENG, Yueyan SHAN National Metrology Centre, Agency
More informationPractical and Valid Guidelines for Realistic Estimation of Measurement Uncertainty in Pesticide Multi-Residue Analysis*
Practical and Valid Guidelines for Realistic Estimation of Measurement Uncertainty in Pesticide Multi-Residue Analysis* Antonio Valverde Pesticide Residue Research Group University of Almería * This presentation
More information1 Introduction to Minitab
1 Introduction to Minitab Minitab is a statistical analysis software package. The software is freely available to all students and is downloadable through the Technology Tab at my.calpoly.edu. When you
More informationDoubt-Free Uncertainty In Measurement
Doubt-Free Uncertainty In Measurement Colin Ratcliffe Bridget Ratcliffe Doubt-Free Uncertainty In Measurement An Introduction for Engineers and Students Colin Ratcliffe United States Naval Academy Annapolis
More informationA case study on how to maintain confidence of thermal properties test: Thermal conductivity of building insulation materials
Thermochimica Acta 455 (2007) 90 94 A case study on how to maintain confidence of thermal properties test: Thermal conductivity of building insulation materials Young-Sun Jeong a,b,, Gyoung-Soek Choi a,
More informationOptimization of Machining Process Parameters in Drilling of
Optimization of Machining Process Parameters in Drilling of CFRP Using Multi-Objective Taguchi Technique, TOPSIS and RSA Optimization of Machining Process Parameters in Drilling of CFRP Using Multi-Objective
More informationUsing validation data for ISO measurement uncertainty estimation Part 1. Principles of an approach using cause and effect analysis
Analyst, June 1998, Vol. 123 (1387 1392) 1387 Using validation data for ISO measurement uncertainty estimation Part 1. Principles of an approach using cause and effect analysis Stephen L. R. Ellison *,
More informationA combinatorial technique for weighbridge verification
VERIFICATION/WEIGHING A combinatorial technique for weighbridge verification MARK T. CLARKSON Measurement Standards Laboratory of New Zealand Industrial Research Ltd. P O Box 31-310, Lower Hutt, New Zealand
More informationEXAMINATIONS OF THE HONG KONG STATISTICAL SOCIETY HIGHER CERTIFICATE IN STATISTICS, Paper III : Statistical Applications and Practice
EXAMINATIONS OF THE HONG KONG STATISTICAL SOCIETY HIGHER CERTIFICATE IN STATISTICS, 2002 Paper III Statistical Applications and Practice Time Allowed Three Hours Candidates should answer FIVE questions.
More informationResidual Analysis for two-way ANOVA The twoway model with K replicates, including interaction,
Residual Analysis for two-way ANOVA The twoway model with K replicates, including interaction, is Y ijk = µ ij + ɛ ijk = µ + α i + β j + γ ij + ɛ ijk with i = 1,..., I, j = 1,..., J, k = 1,..., K. In carrying
More informationJAB NOTE4. ESTIMATION OF MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY (Electrical Testing / High Power Testing) Japan Accreditation Board (JAB)
JAB NOTE4 ESTIMATION OF MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY (Electrical Testing / High Power Testing) nd edition: January 5 01 1 st edition: March 5 00 Japan Accreditation Board (JAB) Initial edition: 00-0-5 1/ nd
More informationDesign of Engineering Experiments Part 5 The 2 k Factorial Design
Design of Engineering Experiments Part 5 The 2 k Factorial Design Text reference, Special case of the general factorial design; k factors, all at two levels The two levels are usually called low and high
More informationContents. TAMS38 - Lecture 10 Response surface. Lecturer: Jolanta Pielaszkiewicz. Response surface 3. Response surface, cont. 4
Contents TAMS38 - Lecture 10 Response surface Lecturer: Jolanta Pielaszkiewicz Matematisk statistik - Matematiska institutionen Linköpings universitet Look beneath the surface; let not the several quality
More informationReference: Chapter 6 of Montgomery(8e) Maghsoodloo
Reference: Chapter 6 of Montgomery(8e) Maghsoodloo 51 DOE (or DOX) FOR BASE BALANCED FACTORIALS The notation k is used to denote a factorial experiment involving k factors (A, B, C, D,..., K) each at levels.
More informationContents. TAMS38 - Lecture 6 Factorial design, Latin Square Design. Lecturer: Zhenxia Liu. Factorial design 3. Complete three factor design 4
Contents Factorial design TAMS38 - Lecture 6 Factorial design, Latin Square Design Lecturer: Zhenxia Liu Department of Mathematics - Mathematical Statistics 28 November, 2017 Complete three factor design
More informationStandard Practice for Heat Aging of Plastics Without Load 1
Designation: D 3045 92 (Reapproved 2003) Standard Practice for Heat Aging of Plastics Without Load 1 This standard is issued under the fixed designation D 3045; the number immediately following the designation
More informationCh 13 & 14 - Regression Analysis
Ch 3 & 4 - Regression Analysis Simple Regression Model I. Multiple Choice:. A simple regression is a regression model that contains a. only one independent variable b. only one dependent variable c. more
More informationA Case for Periodic Calibration or Verification of RTDs
A Case for Periodic Calibration or Verification of RTDs If you are experiencing audio problems please call the teleconference number below Phone 650-479-3208 Access code 668 676 434 Your Host and Presenter
More informationINTERNATIONAL STANDARD
INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ISO 80000-9 First edition 2009-04-01 Quantities and units Part 9: Physical chemistry and molecular physics Grandeurs et unités Partie 9: Chimie physique et physique moléculaire Reference
More information3.4. A computer ANOVA output is shown below. Fill in the blanks. You may give bounds on the P-value.
3.4. A computer ANOVA output is shown below. Fill in the blanks. You may give bounds on the P-value. One-way ANOVA Source DF SS MS F P Factor 3 36.15??? Error??? Total 19 196.04 Completed table is: One-way
More informationChapter 5 EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN AND ANALYSIS
Chapter 5 EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN AND ANALYSIS This chapter contains description of the Taguchi experimental design and analysis procedure with an introduction to Taguchi OA experimentation and the data analysis
More informationStatistical and regression analysis of Material Removal Rate for wire cut Electro Discharge Machining of SS 304L using design of experiments
Vol. 2(5), 200, 02028 Statistical and regression analysis of Material Removal Rate for wire cut Electro Discharge Machining of SS 304L using design of experiments Vishal Parashar a*, A.Rehman b, J.L.Bhagoria
More informationEstimation of non-statistical uncertainty using fuzzy-set theory
Meas. Sci. Technol. 11 (2000) 430 435. Printed in the UK PII: S0957-0233(00)09015-9 Estimation of non-statistical uncertainty using fuzzy-set theory Xintao Xia, Zhongyu Wang and Yongsheng Gao Luoyang Institute
More informationMeasurement uncertainty and legal limits in analytical measurements
UNCERTAINTY Measurement uncertainty and legal limits in analytical measurements MIRELLA BUZOIANU, Reference Materials Laboratory, National Institute of Metrology (INM), Bucharest, Romania 1 Introduction
More informationSupplementary Comparison EURAMET.EM-S19 EURAMET Project No. 688
Supplementary Comparison EURAMET.EMS19 EURAMET Project No. 688 Bilateral Comparison of Measurements of Current Transformers (CTs) Between and Final Report Hüseyin Çaycı (, Pilot Laboratory) January 211
More informationGlossary. Appendix G AAG-SAM APP G
Appendix G Glossary Glossary 159 G.1 This glossary summarizes definitions of the terms related to audit sampling used in this guide. It does not contain definitions of common audit terms. Related terms
More informationModeling Common Cause Failures in Diverse Components with Fault Tree Applications
Modeling Common Cause Failures in Diverse s with Fault Tree Applications Joseph R. Belland, Isograph Inc. Key Words: Common Cause Failures, Fault Trees, Beta Factor SUMMARY & CONCLUSIONS A common cause
More informationQuality Improvement in Hot Dip Galvanizing Process Using Robust Design tools
Quality Improvement in Hot Dip Galvanizing Process Using Robust Design tools Abdosalam R. Dalef 1 and Mohammed E. Alaalem 2 1 Faculty of Marine Resources, Al-Asmarya Islamic University, Zliten, Libya,
More informationA discussion on multiple regression models
A discussion on multiple regression models In our previous discussion of simple linear regression, we focused on a model in which one independent or explanatory variable X was used to predict the value
More informationRevision of the Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement impact on national metrology institutes and industry
Revision of the Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement impact on national metrology institutes and industry Maurice Cox/Peter Harris National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, UK CCRI BIPM,
More informationISO/TR TECHNICAL REPORT. Determination of uncertainty for volume measurements made using the gravimetric method
TECHNICAL REPORT ISO/TR 20461 First edition 2000-11-01 Determination of uncertainty for volume measurements made using the gravimetric method Détermination de l'incertitude de mesure pour les mesurages
More informationMethod Validation Characteristics through Statistical Analysis Approaches. Jane Weitzel
Method Validation Characteristics through Statistical Analysis Approaches Jane Weitzel mljweitzel@msn.com 1:00 to 2:30 Wednesday, Dec. 9 SESSION 6 ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES AND METHOD VALIDATION mljweitzel@msn.com
More informationFinal Report 06 July 2006 Frank Wilkinson, Gan Xu, and Yuanjie Liu
Bilateral Comparison of between NMIA (Australia) and SPRING (Singapore) (KCDB reference No. CCPR-K1.a.1) Final Report 06 July 2006 Frank Wilkinson, Gan Xu, and Yuanjie Liu Contents 1. Introduction..2 2.
More informationIndependence and Dependence in Calibration: A Discussion FDA and EMA Guidelines
ENGINEERING RESEARCH CENTER FOR STRUCTURED ORGANIC PARTICULATE SYSTEMS Independence and Dependence in Calibration: A Discussion FDA and EMA Guidelines Rodolfo J. Romañach, Ph.D. ERC-SOPS Puerto Rico Site
More informationW&M CSCI 688: Design of Experiments Homework 2. Megan Rose Bryant
W&M CSCI 688: Design of Experiments Homework 2 Megan Rose Bryant September 25, 201 3.5 The tensile strength of Portland cement is being studied. Four different mixing techniques can be used economically.
More information