Chapter 30 Design and Analysis of


 Jason Harper
 1 years ago
 Views:
Transcription
1 Chapter 30 Design and Analysis of 2 k DOEs Introduction This chapter describes design alternatives and analysis techniques for conducting a DOE. Tables M1 to M5 in Appendix E can be used to create test trials. 1
2 level DOE Design Alternatives It was illustrated how a saturated fractional factorial design could be created from a full factorial design. However, there are other alternatives between full and saturated fractional factorial design. The concern is how to match the factors to the interaction columns so that there is minimal confounding. Tables M1 to M5 manages this issue by providing the column selections for the practitioner, while Tables N1 to N3 shows the confounding with 2factor interaction. Table 30.1 and Table M1 indicate test possibilities for 4, 8, 16, 32, and 64 2level factor designs with resolution V+, V, IV, and III level DOE Design Alternatives Table 30.1 (M1) Number of 2level Factor Considerations Possible for Various Full and Fractional Factorial Design Alternatives in Table M Number of Trials Experiment Resolution V+ V IV III ~ ~8 9~ ~16 17~ ~8 9~32 33~63 V+: Full 2level factorial V: All main effects and 2factor interactions are unconfounded with main effects or 2 factor interactions. IV: All main effects are unconfounded by 2factor interactions. 2factor interactions are confounded with each other. III: Main effects confounded with 2factor interactions. 2
3 30.2 Designing a 2level Fractional Experiment Using Tables M and N In Tables M1 to M5, the rows of the matrix define the trial configurations. The columns are used to define the 2level states of the factors for each trial, where the level designations are + or. Stepbystep descriptions for creating an experiment design using these tables are provided in Table M1. After the number of factors, resolution, and number of trials are chosen, a design can then be determined from the tables by choosing columns from left to right using those identified by an asterisk ( ) and the numbers sequentially in the header, until the number of columns equals the number of factors in the experiment Designing a 2level Fractional Experiment Using Tables M and N The contrast column numbers are then assigned sequential alphabetic characters from left to right. The numbers from the original matrix are noted and crossreferenced with Tables N1 to N3 if information is desired about 2factor interactions and 2factor interaction confounding. 3
4 30.3 Determining Statistically Significant Effects and Probability Plotting Procedure ANOVA techniques has traditionally been used to determine the significant effects in a factorial experiment. The ttest for assessing significance gives the same results as ANOVA techniques, but can be more appealing because the significance assessment is made against the magnitude of the effect. DOE techniques are often conducted with a small number of trials to save time and resources. Experimental trials are often not replicated, which leads to no knowledge about pure experimental error. One approach is to use nonsignificant interaction (or main effect) terms to estimate error for these significance tests Determining Statistically Significant Effects and Probability Plotting Procedure The formal significance test uses a probability plot of the contrast column. For 2level factorial designs, a contrast column effect,, can be determined as, = n high x highi n high i=1 n low x lowi n low i=1 where x highi and x lowi are the response values from n trials for high and low factorlevel conditions. 4
5 30.3 Determining Statistically Significant Effects and Probability Plotting Procedure Main effect or interaction effect is said to be statistically significant if its magnitude is large relative to other contrast column effects. When the plot position of an effect is beyond the bounds of a straight line through the nonsignificant contrast column effects, this effect is thought to be statistically significant. The contrast columns not found to be statistically significant can then be combined to give an estimate of experimental error for a significance test of the other factors Modeling Equation Format for a 2level DOE If the situation is the lower (higher) is always better, the choice of the statistically significant factor level to use either in a confirmation or followup experiment may be obvious. In some situations, a mathematical model is needed for the purpose of estimating the response as a function of the factorlevel considerations. For a 7factor 2level test, the modeling equation (without interaction terms) would initially take the form, y = b 0 + b 1 x 1 + b 2 x 2 + b 3 x 3 + b 4 x 4 + b 5 x 5 + b 6 x 6 + b 7 x 7 where y is the response and b 0 is the average of all trials, b 1 to b 7 are half of the calculated effects of factor x 1 to x 7, noting that x 1 to x 7 would take on values of 1 or +1. 5
6 30.4 Modeling Equation Format for a 2level DOE This equation form assumes that factor levels have a linear relationship with the response. Center points may have been included in the basic experiment design to check this assumption. The results from 2level experiments might lead a practitioner from considering many factors initially to considering a few factors that may need to be analyzed further using response surface techniques. Interaction terms in a model are added as the product of the factors, y = b 0 + b 1 x 1 + b 2 x 2 + b 12 x 1 x Modeling Equation Format for a 2level DOE Interaction terms in a model are added as the product of the factors, y = b 0 + b 1 x 1 + b 2 x 2 + b 12 x 1 x 2 If an interaction term is found statistically significant, the hierarchy rule states that all main factors and lower interaction terms that are part of the statistically significant interaction should be included in the model. 6
7 The settleout time of a stepper motor was a critical item in the design of a document printer. The product development group proposed a change to the stepping sequence algorithm that they believed would improve the settleout characteristics of the motor. Approach 1: To manufacture several motors and monitor their settleout time. Confidence interval on the average settleout time. Percent of population characteristics by probability plot. Approach 2: To perform a comparison test between the old design and the new design. Paired comparison. Approach 3: To conduct a fractional factorial experiment. Brainstorming session determined the factors to be considered: Factors ( ) Level (+) Level A: Motor temperature (mot_temp) Cold Hot B: Algorithm (algor) Current design Proposed design C: Motor adjustment (mot_adj) Low tolerance High tolerance D: External adjustment (ext_adj) Low tolerance High tolerance E: Supply voltage (sup_volt) Low tolerance High tolerance Team agreed to evaluate these five 2level factors in a resolution V design (also called halffraction) 7
8 Approach 3: (Fractional factorial experiment) Table M1 (or Table 30.1) shows that 16 test trials are needed. Number of Trials Experiment Resolution V+ V IV III ~ ~8 9~ ~16 17~ ~8 9~32 33~63 Table M3 (or Table 30.2) shows the design matrix V+ * * * 4 V * * * * 5 IV * * * * * III * * * * * * * *
9 Table 30.3 Test Design with Trial Responses A B C D E Output mot_temp algor mot_adj ext_adj sup_volt Timing Approach 3: To conduct a fractional factorial experiment. From Table N, all contrast columns contain either a main or 2factor interaction effect *A *B *C *D AB BC CD ABD AC BD ABC BCD ABCD ACD AD CE DE AE *E BE The factors highlighted with * and the higher order terms are also given. 9
10 Minitab: Stat DOE Factorial Analyze Factorial Design Graph Effects Plots: Normal Minitab: Stat DOE Factorial Analyze Factorial Design Graph Pareto 10
11 Analysis with all 5 factors Factorial Fit: Timing versus mot_temp, algor, mot_adj, ext_adj, sup_volt Estimated Effects and Coefficients for Timing (coded units) Term Effect Coef SE Coef T P Constant mot_temp algor mot_adj ext_adj sup_volt S = PRESS = RSq = 92.36% RSq(pred) = 80.44% RSq(adj) = 88.54% Analysis of Variance for Timing (coded units) Source DF Seq SS Adj SS Adj MS F P Main Effects Residual Error Total Unusual Observations for Timing Obs StdOrder Timing Fit SE Fit Residual St Resid R R denotes an observation with a large standardized residual. 11
12 Analysis with only 2 factors Factorial Fit: Timing versus algor, mot_adj Estimated Effects and Coefficients for Timing (coded units) Term Effect Coef SE Coef T P Constant algor mot_adj S = PRESS = RSq = 91.09% RSq(pred) = 86.50% RSq(adj) = 89.72% Analysis with only 2 factors Analysis of Variance for Timing (coded units) Source DF Seq SS Adj SS Adj MS F P Main Effects Residual Error Lack of Fit Pure Error Total Unusual Observations for Timing Obs StdOrder Timing Fit SE Fit Residual St Resid R R denotes an observation with a large standardized residual. 12
13 Analysis with only 2 factors Estimated Coefficients for Timing using data in uncoded units Term Coef Constant algor mot_adj Minitab: Stat DOE Factorial Factorial Plot Main Effects 13
14 Minitab: Stat DOE Factorial Analyze Factorial Graph Effects Plots: Residual vs fits Minitab: Stat DOE Factorial Analyze Factorial Graph Effects Plots: Normal 14
15 Analysis with only 2 factors with Observation #6 Removed Factorial Fit: Timing versus algor, mot_adj Estimated Effects and Coefficients for Timing (coded units) Term Effect Coef SE Coef T P Constant algor mot_adj S = PRESS = RSq = 97.70% RSq(pred) = 96.38% RSq(adj) = 97.31% Analysis with only 2 factors with Observation #6 Removed Analysis of Variance for Timing (coded units) Source DF Seq SS Adj SS Adj MS F P Main Effects Residual Error Lack of Fit Pure Error Total Estimated Coefficients for Timing using data in uncoded units Term Coef Constant algor mot_adj
16 Minitab: Stat DOE Factorial Analyze Factorial Graph Effects Plots: Normal Minitab: Stat DOE Factorial Analyze Factorial Graph Effects Plots: Residual vs fits 16
17 Probability Plot with all 16 Observations Probability Plot with all 16 Observations by 2 Factors 17
18 algor mot_adj DOE Alternatives This section provides 3 examples of DOE alternatives for 16 trial tests. Situation X: 5factor 16trial experiment Situation Y: 8factor 16trial experiment Situation Z: 15factor 16trial experiment 18
19 30.6 DOE Alternatives (Situation X 5 Factors) Table M V+ * * * 4 V * * * * 5 IV * * * * * III * * * * * * * * DOE Alternatives (Situation X 5 Factors) From Table N, all contrast columns contain either a main or 2factor interaction effect *A *B *C *D AB BC CD ABD AC BD ABC BCD ABCD ACD AD CE DE AE *E BE The factors highlighted with * and the higher order terms are also given. 19
20 30.6 DOE Alternatives (Situation Y 8 Factors) Table M V+ * * * 4 V * * * * 5 IV * * * * * III * * * * * * * * From Table N 30.6 DOE Alternatives (Situation Y 8 Factors) *A *B *C *D AB BC CD ABD AC BD ABC BCD ABCD ACD AD DE AF EF *E BF AE *F *G CE *H BE CF DG BG EG CG DF FG GH EH AH DH FH AG CH BH All contrast columns either have one main effect or 2 factor interactions. 20
21 30.6 DOE Alternatives (Situation Z 15 Factors) Table M3 (Situation Z) V+ * * * 4 V * * * * 5 IV * * * * * III * * * * * * * * From Table N 30.6 DOE Alternatives (Situation Z 15 Factors) *A *B *C *D AB BC CD ABD AC BD ABC BCD ABCD ACD AD BE AE BF CG *E *F *G DE EF FG CE DF EG AG BH CI CF DG EH DH EI FJ *H *I AH AF BG CH FH GI HJ DJ AI BJ FI GJ HK AJ BK *J GH HI IJ DI EJ FK IK EK FL CK AK BL GK HL CL BI CJ DK JK KL LM GL JL KM GM DL EM IL JM IM *K *L AL EL FM GN MN HM IN LN HN AN CM DN KN DM AM *M BM CN DO HO NO AO JO MO IO FN GO EO JN EN BN *N *O BO LO KO FO CO 21
22 30.7 Example 30.2: A DOE Development Test A computer manufacturer determines that no trouble found (NTF) is the largest category of returns from customers. Further investigation determines that there was a heat problem in the system. The problem was designrelated. The objective is to develop a strategy that identifies both the problem and risk of failure early in the product development.. The direction will be first to identify the worstcase configuration using DOE techniques, and then stress a sample of these configured machines to failure to determine the temperature guardband Example 30.2: A DOE Development Test Brainstorming session determined the factors to be considered: Factors ( 1) Level (+1) Level A: System type (sys_type) New Old B: Processor speed (procspd) Fast Slow C: Hard drive size (hd_size) Large Small D: Card (card) No card 1 card E: Memory module (m_mod) 2 extra 0 extra F: Test case (tst_case) Test case 1 Test case 2 G: Battery state (btry_st) Full charge Charging 22
23 30.7 Example 30.2: A DOE Development Test sys_type proc_spd hd_size card m_mod tst_case btry_st temp_proc temp_hd temp_vc Example 30.2: A DOE Development Test 23
24 30.7 Example 30.2: A DOE Development Test 30.7 Example 30.2: A DOE Development Test 24
25 30.7 Example 30.2: A DOE Development Test Factorial Fit: temp_proc versus sys_type, proc_spd,... Estimated Effects and Coefficients for temp_proc (coded units) Term Effect Coef SE Coef T P Constant sys_type proc_spd hd_size card m_mod tst_case btry_st S = PRESS = RSq = 98.06% RSq(pred) = 92.26% RSq(adj) = 96.37% 30.7 Example 30.2: A DOE Development Test Analysis of Variance for temp_proc (coded units) Source DF Seq SS Adj SS Adj MS F P Main Effects Residual Error Total Estimated Coefficients for temp_proc using data in uncoded units Term Coef Constant sys_type proc_spd hd_size card m_mod tst_case btry_st
26 30.7 Example 30.2: A DOE Development Test Factorial Fit: temp_proc versus sys_type, proc_spd, m_mod, tst_case Estimated Effects and Coefficients for temp_proc (coded units) Term Effect Coef SE Coef T P Constant sys_type proc_spd m_mod tst_case S = PRESS = RSq = 97.08% RSq(pred) = 93.83% RSq(adj) = 96.02% Analysis of Variance for temp_proc (coded units) Source DF Seq SS Adj SS Adj MS F P Main Effects Residual Error Total Example 30.2: A DOE Development Test Unusual Observations for temp_proc Obs StdOrder temp_proc Fit SE Fit Residual St Resid R R denotes an observation with a large standardized residual. Estimated Coefficients for temp_proc using data in uncoded units Term Coef Constant sys_type proc_spd m_mod tst_case
27 30.7 Example 30.2: A DOE Development Test The worstcase levels and temperatures are: Constant sys_type proc_spd m_mod tst_case Factors Level Contribution Constant A: System type (sys_type) 1 (Old) B: Processor speed (procspd) 1 (Fast) E: Memory module (m_mod) 1 (2 extra) F: Test case (tst_case) 1 (Test case 1)
NVLAP Proficiency Test Round 14 Results. Rolf Bergman CORM 16 May 2016
NVLAP Proficiency Test Round 14 Results Rolf Bergman CORM 16 May 2016 Outline PT 14 Structure Lamp Types Lab Participation Format for results PT 14 Analysis Average values of labs Average values of lamps
More informationParts Manual. EPIC II Critical Care Bed REF 2031
EPIC II Critical Care Bed REF 2031 Parts Manual For parts or technical assistance call: USA: 18003270770 2013/05 B.0 2031109006 REV B www.stryker.com Table of Contents English Product Labels... 4
More informationRedacted for Privacy
AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Terrence A. Smith for the degree of Master of Science in Industrial Engineering presented February 26, 1993. Title: An Experimental Investigation of Scheduling Non Identical
More informationInstitutionen för matematik och matematisk statistik Umeå universitet November 7, Inlämningsuppgift 3. Mariam Shirdel
Institutionen för matematik och matematisk statistik Umeå universitet November 7, 2011 Inlämningsuppgift 3 Mariam Shirdel (mash0007@student.umu.se) Kvalitetsteknik och försöksplanering, 7.5 hp 1 Uppgift
More informationCSCI 688 Homework 6. Megan Rose Bryant Department of Mathematics William and Mary
CSCI 688 Homework 6 Megan Rose Bryant Department of Mathematics William and Mary November 12, 2014 7.1 Consider the experiment described in Problem 6.1. Analyze this experiment assuming that each replicate
More informationAnswers Investigation 3
Answers Investigation Applications. a., b. s = n c. The numbers seem to be increasing b a greater amount each time. The square number increases b consecutive odd integers:,, 7,, c X X=. a.,,, b., X 7 X=
More informationa) Prepare a normal probability plot of the effects. Which effects seem active?
Problema 8.6: R.D. Snee ( Experimenting with a large number of variables, in experiments in Industry: Design, Analysis and Interpretation of Results, by R. D. Snee, L.B. Hare, and J. B. Trout, Editors,
More informationAPPENDIX 1. Binodal Curve calculations
APPENDIX 1 Binodal Curve calculations The weight of salt solution necessary for the mixture to cloud and the final concentrations of the phase components were calculated based on the method given by HattiKaul,
More informationChapter 13 Experiments with Random Factors Solutions
Solutions from Montgomery, D. C. (01) Design and Analysis of Experiments, Wiley, NY Chapter 13 Experiments with Random Factors Solutions 13.. An article by Hoof and Berman ( Statistical Analysis of Power
More informationSuppose we needed four batches of formaldehyde, and coulddoonly4runsperbatch. Thisisthena2 4 factorial in 2 2 blocks.
58 2. 2 factorials in 2 blocks Suppose we needed four batches of formaldehyde, and coulddoonly4runsperbatch. Thisisthena2 4 factorial in 2 2 blocks. Some more algebra: If two effects are confounded with
More information20g g g Analyze the residuals from this experiment and comment on the model adequacy.
3.4. A computer ANOVA output is shown below. Fill in the blanks. You may give bounds on the Pvalue. Oneway ANOVA Source DF SS MS F P Factor 3 36.15??? Error??? Total 19 196.04 3.11. A pharmaceutical
More informationAnswers. Investigation 3. ACE Assignment Choices. Applications. = = 210 (Note: students
Answers Investigation ACE Assignment Choices Problem. Core,,, Other Applications ; Connections, ; Etensions 7, ; unassigned choices from previous problems Problem. Core, Other Connections 7; Etensions
More informationpage 1 Total ( )
A B C D E F Costs budget of [Claimant / Defendant] dated [ ] Estimated page 1 Work done / to be done Preaction Disbs ( ) Time ( ) Disbs ( ) Time ( ) Total ( ) 1 Issue /statements of case 0.00 0.00 CMC
More information3.4. A computer ANOVA output is shown below. Fill in the blanks. You may give bounds on the Pvalue.
3.4. A computer ANOVA output is shown below. Fill in the blanks. You may give bounds on the Pvalue. Oneway ANOVA Source DF SS MS F P Factor 3 36.15??? Error??? Total 19 196.04 Completed table is: Oneway
More information23. Fractional factorials  introduction
173 3. Fractional factorials  introduction Consider a 5 factorial. Even without replicates, there are 5 = 3 obs ns required to estimate the effects  5 main effects, 10 two factor interactions, 10 three
More informationTHE TRANSLATION PLANES OF ORDER 49 AND THEIR AUTOMORPHISM GROUPS
MATHEMATICS OF COMPUTATION Volume 67, Number 223, July 1998, Pages 1207 1224 S 00255718(98)009612 THE TRANSLATION PLANES OF ORDER 49 AND THEIR AUTOMORPHISM GROUPS C. CHARNES AND U. DEMPWOLFF Abstract.
More information19. Blocking & confounding
146 19. Blocking & confounding Importance of blocking to control nuisance factors  day of week, batch of raw material, etc. Complete Blocks. This is the easy case. Suppose we run a 2 2 factorial experiment,
More informationLEARNING WITH MINITAB Chapter 12 SESSION FIVE: DESIGNING AN EXPERIMENT
LEARNING WITH MINITAB Chapter 12 SESSION FIVE: DESIGNING AN EXPERIMENT Laura M Williams, RN, CLNC, MSN MOREHEAD STATE UNIVERSITY IET603: STATISTICAL QUALITY ASSURANCE IN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY DR. AHMAD
More informationSolutions to Exercises
1 c Atkinson et al 2007, Optimum Experimental Designs, with SAS Solutions to Exercises 1. and 2. Certainly, the solutions to these questions will be different for every reader. Examples of the techniques
More informationAnswer Keys to Homework#10
Answer Keys to Homework#10 Problem 1 Use either restricted or unrestricted mixed models. Problem 2 (a) First, the respective means for the 8 level combinations are listed in the following table A B C Mean
More informationAssignment 9 Answer Keys
Assignment 9 Answer Keys Problem 1 (a) First, the respective means for the 8 level combinations are listed in the following table A B C Mean 26.00 + 34.67 + 39.67 + + 49.33 + 42.33 + + 37.67 + + 54.67
More informationConfidence Interval for the mean response
Week 3: Prediction and Confidence Intervals at specified x. Testing lack of fit with replicates at some x's. Inference for the correlation. Introduction to regression with several explanatory variables.
More informationChapter 6 The 2 k Factorial Design Solutions
Solutions from Montgomery, D. C. (004) Design and Analysis of Experiments, Wiley, NY Chapter 6 The k Factorial Design Solutions 6.. A router is used to cut locating notches on a printed circuit board.
More informationJ JUL  25JUL 2016 HOUSEHOLD FINANCES RESEARCH
J00 JUL JUL 0 Table XF0 In terms of your finances, how often if at all, do you and your household find yourselves without enough money to buy enough food? BASE: ALL ADULTS AGED + IN GREAT BRITAIN Page
More informationChapter 11: Factorial Designs
Chapter : Factorial Designs. Two factor factorial designs ( levels factors ) This situation is similar to the randomized block design from the previous chapter. However, in addition to the effects within
More informationGEOMETRY HW 8. 1 x z
GEOMETRY HW 8 CLAY SHONKWILER Consider the Heisenberg group x z 0 y which is a Lie group diffeomorphic to R 3 a: Find the left invariant vector fields X, Y, Z on R 3 whose value at the identity is the
More information2 k, 2 k r and 2 kp Factorial Designs
2 k, 2 k r and 2 kp Factorial Designs 1 Types of Experimental Designs! Full Factorial Design: " Uses all possible combinations of all levels of all factors. n=3*2*2=12 Too costly! 2 Types of Experimental
More informationCedar Millwork Products
1 BUILD SOME CHARACTER Edmund Allen s Cedar millwork products will set your design apart by adding the beauty, warmth, elegance of design, and functionality only natural Western Red Cedar can provide.
More information1. Determine the ZeroForce Members in the plane truss.
1. Determine the Zeroorce Members in the plane truss. 1 . Determine the force in each member of the loaded truss. Use the Method of Joints. 3. Determine the force in member GM by the Method of Section.
More informationContents. TAMS38  Lecture 8 2 k p fractional factorial design. Lecturer: Zhenxia Liu. Example 0  continued 4. Example 0  Glazing ceramic 3
Contents TAMS38  Lecture 8 2 k p fractional factorial design Lecturer: Zhenxia Liu Department of Mathematics  Mathematical Statistics Example 0 2 k factorial design with blocking Example 1 2 k p fractional
More informationMultiple Regression Examples
Multiple Regression Examples Example: Tree data. we have seen that a simple linear regression of usable volume on diameter at chest height is not suitable, but that a quadratic model y = β 0 + β 1 x +
More informationDIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY HW 7
DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY HW 7 CLAY SHONKWILER 1 Show that within a local coordinate system x 1,..., x n ) on M with coordinate vector fields X 1 / x 1,..., X n / x n, if we pick n 3 smooth realvalued functions
More informationChapter 26 Multiple Regression, Logistic Regression, and Indicator Variables
Chapter 26 Multiple Regression, Logistic Regression, and Indicator Variables 26.1 S 4 /IEE Application Examples: Multiple Regression An S 4 /IEE project was created to improve the 30,000footlevel metric
More informationST3232: Design and Analysis of Experiments
Department of Statistics & Applied Probability 2:004:00 pm, Monday, April 8, 2013 Lecture 21: Fractional 2 p factorial designs The general principles A full 2 p factorial experiment might not be efficient
More informationExecutive Committee and Officers ( )
Gifted and Talented International V o l u m e 2 4, N u m b e r 2, D e c e m b e r, 2 0 0 9. G i f t e d a n d T a l e n t e d I n t e r n a t i o n a2 l 4 ( 2), D e c e m b e r, 2 0 0 9. 1 T h e W o r
More informationIn this chapter trusses, frames and machines will be examines as engineering structures.
In the previous chapter we have employed the equations of equilibrium in order to determine the support / joint reactions acting on a single rigid body or a system of connected members treated as a single
More informationThe OneQuarter Fraction
The OneQuarter Fraction ST 516 Need two generating relations. E.g. a 2 6 2 design, with generating relations I = ABCE and I = BCDF. Product of these is ADEF. Complete defining relation is I = ABCE = BCDF
More informationChapter 5 Introduction to Factorial Designs Solutions
Solutions from Montgomery, D. C. (1) Design and Analysis of Experiments, Wiley, NY Chapter 5 Introduction to Factorial Designs Solutions 5.1. The following output was obtained from a computer program that
More informationUnreplicated 2 k Factorial Designs
Unreplicated 2 k Factorial Designs These are 2 k factorial designs with one observation at each corner of the cube An unreplicated 2 k factorial design is also sometimes called a single replicate of the
More informationDesign of Experiments SUTD  21/4/2015 1
Design of Experiments SUTD  21/4/2015 1 Outline 1. Introduction 2. 2 k Factorial Design Exercise 3. Choice of Sample Size Exercise 4. 2 k p Fractional Factorial Design Exercise 5. Followup experimentation
More informationFractional Factorial Designs
Fractional Factorial Designs ST 516 Each replicate of a 2 k design requires 2 k runs. E.g. 64 runs for k = 6, or 1024 runs for k = 10. When this is infeasible, we use a fraction of the runs. As a result,
More informationTWOLEVEL FACTORIAL EXPERIMENTS: IRREGULAR FRACTIONS
STAT 512 2Level Factorial Experiments: Irregular Fractions 1 TWOLEVEL FACTORIAL EXPERIMENTS: IRREGULAR FRACTIONS A major practical weakness of regular fractional factorial designs is that N must be a
More informationStatistical Design and Analysis of Experiments Part Two
0.1 Statistical Design and Analysis of Experiments Part Two Lecture notes Fall semester 2007 Henrik Spliid nformatics and Mathematical Modelling Technical University of Denmark List of contents, cont.
More informationCAT. NO /irtl,417~ S ~ I ';, A RIDER PUBLICATION BY H. A. MIDDLETON
CAT. NO. 1393 THIRD SUPPLEMENT I /irtl,417~ S ~ I ';,... 0 f? BY H. A. MIDDLETON.. A RIDER PUBLICATION B36 B65 B152 B309 B319 B329 B719 D63 D77 D152 DA90 DAC32 DAF96 DC70 DC80 DCC90 DD6 DD7 DF62 DF91
More informationChapter 6, Solution 1. Joint B: Joint C: Joint FBDs: F = 800 lb T. F = 1700 lb C lb lb F
\ COSMOS: Complete Online Solutions Manual Organization Sstem Chapter 6, Solution 1. Joint FBDs: Joint B: FAB 800 lb F = = 1 8 17 BC so F = 100 lb T AB F = 1700 lb C BC Joint C: FAC Cx 1700 lb = = 8 1
More information3. Factorial Experiments (Ch.5. Factorial Experiments)
3. Factorial Experiments (Ch.5. Factorial Experiments) HaeJin Choi School of Mechanical Engineering, ChungAng University DOE and Optimization 1 Introduction to Factorials Most experiments for process
More informationSix Sigma Black Belt Study Guides
Six Sigma Black Belt Study Guides 1 www.pmtutor.org Powered by POeT Solvers Limited. Analyze Correlation and Regression Analysis 2 www.pmtutor.org Powered by POeT Solvers Limited. Variables and relationships
More informationSTAT451/551 Homework#11 Due: April 22, 2014
STAT451/551 Homework#11 Due: April 22, 2014 1. Read Chapter 8.3 8.9. 2. 8.4. SAS code is provided. 3. 8.18. 4. 8.24. 5. 8.45. 376 Chapter 8 TwoLevel Fractional Factorial Designs more detail. Sequential
More informationReference: Chapter 6 of Montgomery(8e) Maghsoodloo
Reference: Chapter 6 of Montgomery(8e) Maghsoodloo 51 DOE (or DOX) FOR BASE BALANCED FACTORIALS The notation k is used to denote a factorial experiment involving k factors (A, B, C, D,..., K) each at levels.
More informationDesign of Experiments SUTD 06/04/2016 1
Design of Experiments SUTD 06/04/2016 1 Outline 1. Introduction 2. 2 k Factorial Design 3. Choice of Sample Size 4. 2 k p Fractional Factorial Design 5. Followup experimentation (folding over) with factorial
More informationnecessita d'interrogare il cielo
gigi nei necessia d'inegae i cie cic pe sax span s inuie a dispiegaa fma dea uce < affeandi ves i cen dea uce isnane " sienzi dei padi sie veic dei' anima 5 J i f H 5 f AL J) i ) L '3 J J "' U J J ö'
More informationThe 2 k Factorial Design. Dr. Mohammad Abuhaiba 1
The 2 k Factorial Design Dr. Mohammad Abuhaiba 1 HoweWork Assignment Due Tuesday 1/6/2010 6.1, 6.2, 6.17, 6.18, 6.19 Dr. Mohammad Abuhaiba 2 Design of Engineering Experiments The 2 k Factorial Design Special
More informationSchool of Mathematical Sciences. Question 1. Best Subsets Regression
School of Mathematical Sciences MTH5120 Statistical Modelling I Practical 9 and Assignment 8 Solutions Question 1 Best Subsets Regression Response is Crime I n W c e I P a n A E P U U l e Mallows g E P
More informationAnalysis of Covariance. The following example illustrates a case where the covariate is affected by the treatments.
Analysis of Covariance In some experiments, the experimental units (subjects) are nonhomogeneous or there is variation in the experimental conditions that are not due to the treatments. For example, a
More informationProcedure for Measuring Swing Bearing Movement on 300 A Series Hydraulic Excavators {7063}
Page 1 of 7 Procedure for Measuring Swing Bearing Movement on 300 A Series Hydraulic Excavators {7063} Excavator: 307 (S/N: 2PM1UP; 2WM1UP) 311 (S/N: 9LJ1UP; 5PK1UP; 2KM1UP) 312 (S/N: 6GK1UP; 7DK1UP;
More information1. Determine the ZeroForce Members in the plane truss.
1. Determine the Zeroorce Members in the plane truss. 1 . Determine the forces in members G, CG, BC, and E for the loaded crane truss. Use the Method of Joints. 3. Determine the forces in members CG and
More informationContents. 2 2 factorial design 4
Contents TAMS38  Lecture 10 Response surface methodology Lecturer: Zhenxia Liu Department of Mathematics  Mathematical Statistics 12 December, 2017 2 2 factorial design Polynomial Regression model First
More informationSMAM 314 Computer Assignment 5 due Nov 8,2012 Data Set 1. For each of the following data sets use Minitab to 1. Make a scatterplot.
SMAM 314 Computer Assignment 5 due Nov 8,2012 Data Set 1. For each of the following data sets use Minitab to 1. Make a scatterplot. 2. Fit the linear regression line. Regression Analysis: y versus x y
More informationSession 3 Fractional Factorial Designs 4
Session 3 Fractional Factorial Designs 3 a Modification of a Bearing Example 3. Fractional Factorial Designs Twolevel fractional factorial designs Confounding Blocking TwoLevel Eight Run Orthogonal Array
More informationPERFORMANCE SPECIFICATION SHEET
INCHPOUND MILPRF49464/1C 24 June 2009 SUPERSEDING MILPRF49464/1B 3 June 2004 PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATION SHEET CAPACITORS, CHIP, SINGLE LAYER, FIXED UNENCAPSULATED, CERAMIC DIELECTRIC, ESTABLISHED RELIABILITY,
More informationW I T H M i A. L I O E T O W A R D ISTOlNrE ^ I S T D C H A. n i T Y F O R  A L L. "
J/ H L D N D H Y F L L L N LLL KN NY H Y 2 95 HL N NG F L G NG F LNDD H H J F NH D K GN L _ L L :? H F K b H Y L DD Y N? N L L LD H LL LLL LNNG LL J K N 3 ND DL6 N Lb L F KF FH D LD3 D ND ND F ND LKKN
More informationSpring 2019 United Soccer Peoria Game Schedule
Please leave the following at home: Animals, drugs/alcohol, scooters/skateboards/bicycles. Please remember: 1. These are kids. 2. This is a game. 3. The coaches volunteer. 4. The referees are human. 5.
More informationST303C..L SERIES 515A. Features. Typical Applications. Major Ratings and Characteristics. Bulletin I25186 rev. A 05/94. case style TO200AC (BPUK)
ST303C..L SERIES INVERTER GRADE THYRISTORS Hockey Puk Version Features Metal case with ceramic insulator International standard case TOAC (BPUK) All diffused design Center amplifying gate Guaranteed
More informationDr. Shalabh Department of Mathematics and Statistics Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
Analysis of Variance and Design of ExperimentI MODULE IX LECTURE  38 EXERCISES Dr. Shalabh Department of Mathematics and Statistics Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur Example (Completely randomized
More informationUSE OF COMPUTER EXPERIMENTS TO STUDY THE QUALITATIVE BEHAVIOR OF SOLUTIONS OF SECOND ORDER NEUTRAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS
USE OF COMPUTER EXPERIMENTS TO STUDY THE QUALITATIVE BEHAVIOR OF SOLUTIONS OF SECOND ORDER NEUTRAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS Seshadev Padhi, Manish Trivedi and Soubhik Chakraborty* Department of Applied Mathematics
More information11 is the same as their sum, find the value of S.
Answers: (99899 HKMO Final Events) Created by: Mr. Francis Hung Last updated: July 08 Individual Events I P 4 I a 8 I a 6 I4 a I5 a IS a Q 8 b 0 b 7 b b spare b 770 R c c c c 0 c 57 S 0 d 000 d 990 d
More informationT h e C S E T I P r o j e c t
T h e P r o j e c t T H E P R O J E C T T A B L E O F C O N T E N T S A r t i c l e P a g e C o m p r e h e n s i v e A s s es s m e n t o f t h e U F O / E T I P h e n o m e n o n M a y 1 9 9 1 1 E T
More informationMATH602: APPLIED STATISTICS
MATH602: APPLIED STATISTICS Dr. Srinivas R. Chakravarthy Department of Science and Mathematics KETTERING UNIVERSITY Flint, MI 485044898 Lecture 10 1 FRACTIONAL FACTORIAL DESIGNS Complete factorial designs
More informationMultiple Linear Regression
Andrew Lonardelli December 20, 2013 Multiple Linear Regression 1 Table Of Contents Introduction: p.3 Multiple Linear Regression Model: p.3 Least Squares Estimation of the Parameters: p.45 The matrix approach
More informationINSTITIÚID TEICNEOLAÍOCHTA CHEATHARLACH INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY CARLOW MATRICES
1 CHAPTER 4 MATRICES 1 INSTITIÚID TEICNEOLAÍOCHTA CHEATHARLACH INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY CARLOW MATRICES 1 Matrices Matrices are of fundamental importance in 2dimensional and 3dimensional graphics programming
More informationHistogram of Residuals. Residual Normal Probability Plot. Reg. Analysis Check Model Utility. (con t) Check Model Utility. Inference.
Steps for Regression Simple Linear Regression Make a Scatter plot Does it make sense to plot a line? Check Residual Plot (Residuals vs. X) Are there any patterns? Check Histogram of Residuals Is it Normal?
More informationSimple Linear Regression. Steps for Regression. Example. Make a Scatter plot. Check Residual Plot (Residuals vs. X)
Simple Linear Regression 1 Steps for Regression Make a Scatter plot Does it make sense to plot a line? Check Residual Plot (Residuals vs. X) Are there any patterns? Check Histogram of Residuals Is it Normal?
More informationOrthogonal contrasts for a 2x2 factorial design Example p130
Week 9: Orthogonal comparisons for a 2x2 factorial design. The general twofactor factorial arrangement. Interaction and additivity. ANOVA summary table, tests, CIs. Planned/posthoc comparisons for the
More informationUnit 6: Fractional Factorial Experiments at Three Levels
Unit 6: Fractional Factorial Experiments at Three Levels Largerthebetter and smallerthebetter problems. Basic concepts for 3 k full factorial designs. Analysis of 3 k designs using orthogonal components
More informationFRACTIONAL FACTORIAL
FRACTIONAL FACTORIAL NURNABI MEHERUL ALAM M.Sc. (Agricultural Statistics), Roll No. 443 I.A.S.R.I, Library Avenue, New Delhi Chairperson: Dr. P.K. Batra Abstract: Fractional replication can be defined
More informationAalto University A!School of Engineering. Robust Design II. Prof. Kevin Otto Department of Mechanical Engineering
Robust Design II Prof. Kevin Otto Department of Mechanical Engineering Kevin.Otto@aalto.fi 1 Overview Fractional Factorial Designs Experimental Variability Assessment Taguchi s Method Robustness Improvement
More informationTWOLEVEL FACTORIAL EXPERIMENTS: BLOCKING. Uppercase letters are associated with factors, or regressors of factorial effects, e.g.
STAT 512 2Level Factorial Experiments: Blocking 1 TWOLEVEL FACTORIAL EXPERIMENTS: BLOCKING Some Traditional Notation: Uppercase letters are associated with factors, or regressors of factorial effects,
More informationINVERSION IN THE PLANE BERKELEY MATH CIRCLE
INVERSION IN THE PLANE BERKELEY MATH CIRCLE ZVEZDELINA STANKOVA MILLS COLLEGE/UC BERKELEY SEPTEMBER 26TH 2004 Contents 1. Definition of Inversion in the Plane 1 Properties of Inversion 2 Problems 2 2.
More informationQuintic Quasitopological Gravity
Quintic Quasitopological Gravity Luis Guajardo 1 in collaboration with Adolfo Cisterna 2 Mokthar Hassaïne 1 Julio Oliva 3 1 Universidad de Talca 2 Universidad Central de Chile 3 Universidad de Concepción
More informationChapter 6 The 2 k Factorial Design Solutions
Solutions from Montgomery, D. C. () Design and Analysis of Experiments, Wiley, NY Chapter 6 The k Factorial Design Solutions 6.. An engineer is interested in the effects of cutting speed (A), tool geometry
More informationSECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION FORM 10D. Filing Date: Period of Report: SEC Accession No
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION FORM 10D Periodic distribution reports by AssetBacked issuers pursuant to Rule 13a17 or 15d17 Filing Date: 20071206 Period of Report: 20071126 SEC Accession No.
More informationSouth Pacific Form Seven Certificate PHYSICS. QUESTION and ANSWER BOOKLET Time allowed: Two and a half hours
South Pacific Form Seven Certificate INSTRUCTIONS PHYSICS 2015 QUESTION and ANSWER BOOKLET Time allowed: Two and a half hours Write your Student Personal Identification Number (SPIN) in the space provided
More informationVisit: ImperialStudy.com For More Study Materials Class IX Chapter 12 Heron s Formula Maths
Exercise 1.1 1. Find the area of a triangle whose sides are respectively 150 cm, 10 cm and 00 cm. The triangle whose sides are a = 150 cm b = 10 cm c = 00 cm The area of a triangle = s(s a)(s b)(s c) Here
More informationContents. TAMS38  Lecture 6 Factorial design, Latin Square Design. Lecturer: Zhenxia Liu. Factorial design 3. Complete three factor design 4
Contents Factorial design TAMS38  Lecture 6 Factorial design, Latin Square Design Lecturer: Zhenxia Liu Department of Mathematics  Mathematical Statistics 28 November, 2017 Complete three factor design
More informationMath 3 Review Sheet Ch. 3 November 4, 2011
Math 3 Review Sheet Ch. 3 November 4, 2011 Review Sheet: Not all the problems need to be completed. However, you should look over all of them as they could be similar to test problems. Easy: 1, 3, 9, 10,
More informationGeometry Problem Solving Drill 08: Congruent Triangles
Geometry Problem Solving Drill 08: Congruent Triangles Question No. 1 of 10 Question 1. The following triangles are congruent. What is the value of x? Question #01 (A) 13.33 (B) 10 (C) 31 (D) 18 You set
More informationTMA4267 Linear Statistical Models V2017 (L19)
TMA4267 Linear Statistical Models V2017 (L19) Part 4: Design of Experiments Blocking Fractional factorial designs Mette Langaas Department of Mathematical Sciences, NTNU To be lectured: March 28, 2017
More informationFractional Replications
Chapter 11 Fractional Replications Consider the set up of complete factorial experiment, say k. If there are four factors, then the total number of plots needed to conduct the experiment is 4 = 1. When
More information$%! & (, 3 / 0 4, 5 6/ 6 +7, 6 8 9/ 5 :/ 5 A BDC EF G H I EJ KL N G H I. ] ^ _ ` _ ^ a b=c o e f p a q i h f i a j k e i l _ ^ m=c n ^
! #" $%! & ' ( ) ) (, . / ( 0 1#2 ' ( ) ) (, 3 / 0 4, 5 6/ 6 7, 6 8 9/ 5 :/ 5 ;=? @ A BDC EF G H I EJ KL M @C N G H I OPQ ;=R F L EI E G H A S T U S V@C N G H IDW G Q G XYU Z A [ H R C \ G ] ^ _ `
More informationStat 217 Final Exam. Name: May 1, 2002
Stat 217 Final Exam Name: May 1, 2002 Problem 1. Three brands of batteries are under study. It is suspected that the lives (in weeks) of the three brands are different. Five batteries of each brand are
More informationParts List, Wiring Diagrams
Parts List, Wiring Diagrams PAE180300 SERIES PACKAGE AIR CONDITIONER UNITS TABLE OF CONTENTS PARTS LIST 211 PARTS DRAWING 1234 WIRING DIAGRAMS 3548 Printed in U.S.A. 7/28/08 KEY
More informationBasic Business Statistics, 10/e
Chapter 4 4 Basic Business Statistics th Edition Chapter 4 Introduction to Multiple Regression Basic Business Statistics, e 9 PrenticeHall, Inc. Chap 4 Learning Objectives In this chapter, you learn:
More informationDemand Estimation Using Chinese Household Expenditures 1
Demand Estimation Using Chinese Household Expenditures 1 Shown on the following pages are demand estimates based on surveys of Chinese household expenditures. The data cover the period 1991 through 1995
More informationCharacteristic Numbers of Matrix Lie Algebras
Commun. Theor. Phys. (Beijing China) 49 (8) pp. 845 85 c Chinese Physical Society Vol. 49 No. 4 April 15 8 Characteristic Numbers of Matrix Lie Algebras ZHANG YuFeng 1 and FAN EnGui 1 Mathematical School
More informationSteps for Regression. Simple Linear Regression. Data. Example. Residuals vs. X. Scatterplot. Make a Scatter plot Does it make sense to plot a line?
Steps for Regression Simple Linear Regression Make a Scatter plot Does it make sense to plot a line? Check Residual Plot (Residuals vs. X) Are there any patterns? Check Histogram of Residuals Is it Normal?
More informationExperimental design (DOE)  Design
Experimental design (DOE)  Design Menu: QCExpert Experimental Design Design Full Factorial Fract Factorial This module designs a twolevel multifactorial orthogonal plan 2 n k and perform its analysis.
More informationSTRAIGHT LINES EXERCISE  3
STRAIGHT LINES EXERCISE  3 Q. D C (3,4) E A(, ) Mid point of A, C is B 3 E, Point D rotation of point C(3, 4) by angle 90 o about E. 3 o 3 3 i4 cis90 i 5i 3 i i 5 i 5 D, point E mid point of B & D. So
More information6. Fractional Factorial Designs (Ch.8. TwoLevel Fractional Factorial Designs)
6. Fractional Factorial Designs (Ch.8. TwoLevel Fractional Factorial Designs) HaeJin Choi School of Mechanical Engineering, ChungAng University 1 Introduction to The 2 kp Fractional Factorial Design
More information2.4.3 Estimatingσ Coefficient of Determination 2.4. ASSESSING THE MODEL 23
2.4. ASSESSING THE MODEL 23 2.4.3 Estimatingσ 2 Note that the sums of squares are functions of the conditional random variables Y i = (Y X = x i ). Hence, the sums of squares are random variables as well.
More information