arxiv: v1 [physics.class-ph] 9 Apr 2014

Transcription

1 arxiv:144.65v1 [physics.class-ph] 9 Apr 14 About One-Dimensional Conservative Systems with Position Depending Mass G.V. López and C. Martínez-Prieto 1 1 Instituto Tecnológico y Estudios Superiores de Occidente, Periférico Sur 8585l, CP 4564, Tlaquepaque, Jalisco, Méico. Departamento de Física, Universidad de Guadalajara, Blvd. Marcelino García Barragán 141, esq. Calzada Olímpica, 444 Guadalajara, Jalisco, Méico. PACS: 45..D-, 45.dg, 45.dh, 45.Jj,45.4.+s, 3.3.+p April, 14 Abstract For a one-dimensional conservative systems with position depending mass, one deduces consistently a constant of motion, a Lagrangian, and a Hamiltonian for the non relativistic case. With these functions, one shows the trajectories on the spaces (,v) and (,p) for a linear position depending mass. For the relativistic case, the Lagrangian and Hamiltonian can not be given eplicitly in general. However, we study the particular system with constant force and mass linear dependence on the position where the Lagrangian can be found eplicitly, but the Hamiltonian remains implicit in the constant of motion. keywords: Mass variable systems, conservative system, position depending mass. gulopez@udgserv.cencar.udg.m CARLOSR@iteso.m 1

2 1 Introduction Position depending mass systems have been relevant since the foundation of the classical mechanics and modern physics [1-5] (see reference there in). Actually, the interest for these type of problems has grown in modern physics due to fabrication of ultra thin semiconductors [6,7], inhomogeneous crystals [8], quantum dots [9], quantum liquids [1], and neutrino mass oscillations [11,1]. We also need to mention that this topic is important due to its relation with the foundation of the classical mechanics [13], and its not invariance under Galileo or Poincar- Lorentz transformations[13,14]. Most of the approaches dealing with position depending mass problems use an intuitive way to write down a Lagrangian or Hamiltonian for the system, and then solve the corresponding equations [15,16]. In this paper, one obtains a constant of motion, a Lagrangian, and a Hamiltonian in a consistent way for conservative non relativistic systems and study the harmonic oscillator with position depending mass as an eample. For relativistic systems we point out the difficulty to get the same functions. Dynamical Functions A non relativistic conservative system with position depending mass is described by Newton s equation d ( ) m()ẋ = F(), (1) dt where ẋ denotes the velocity of the body with position depending mass m(), and with a force F() acting on it. This problem can be written as the dynamical system ẋ = v, v = F() m() m m v, () where m is the differentiation of the mass with respect the position. A constant of motion of this system is a function K = K(,v) [17,18] which satisfies the following first order partial differential equation v K + 1 [ ] K F() m v m() v =. (3) This equation can be solved by the characteristics method. The equations for its characteristics curves are d v = m() dv F() m v = dk. (4) From the last term, one knows that the solution of (3) must be of the form K(,v) = G ( C(,v) ), (5) where C(, v) is the characteristic curve obtained from the first two terms of (4), and being G and arbitrary function. This characteristic curve can be found arranging these two terms of the form m()v dv dt = F() m v, (6) and defining a new variable, ξ = v, to get the equation m() dξ d +m ξ = F() (7) which can readily be integrated to obtain the characteristic curve C(,v) = m () v m()f()d. (8)

3 Choosing the initial conditions () =, v(), and m() =, and selecting the functionality G(C(,v)) = C(,v)/, the constant of motion is K(,v) = m () v +V eff (), (9) where V eff is the effective potential due to the position depending mass, V eff () = 1 m()f() d, (1) and this constant of motion has the right epression when constant mass is considered. Using now the known epression [19,,1] to get the Lagrangian from a constant of motion, v K(,ξ) L(,v) = v ξ dξ, (11) The Lagrangian, generalized linear momentum and Hamiltonian are given by and L(,v) = m () v V eff (), (1) p(,v) = m () v, (13) H(,p) = m () p +V eff (). (14) The above epression for the dynamical functions show that there are two main modifications from the usual epression when position depending mass is considered. Firstly, an effective potential is created which depends on m() (1). Secondly, the kinetic energy like term is not of the form p /m() but it is of the form p /m (). These two modification are really important to deal correctly with an specific mass position depending conservative problem. 3 Harmonic Oscillator m() Consider the harmonic oscillator, F() = k, with a linear position depending mass, m() = +. Thus, the effective potential, constant of motion, and Hamiltonian are given by and V eff () = k + k 3 3, (15) K(,v) = ( + ) v + k + k 3, 3 (16) H(,p) = ( + ) p + k + k 3. 3 (17) Figures 1a and 1b show the trajectories on the spaces (,v) and (,p) generated by the constant of motion and the Hamiltonian above with = and for > ( = ; = (1), = 5 (), = 1 (3), = (4)). Figures a and b show also the trajectories on those spaces with = 1 and < ( = (1), = 1 (), = 1.5 (3), = (4)). From Figure a one notes a singular behaviorinthe velocitywhichcomesfrom(16) and does not appears in the Hamiltonian formulation (17). Note that due to relation (1), it is not possible to know the potential (effective) without the acknowledge of the position depending mass previously. 4 Relativistic case The relativistic motion [] of a body with position depending mass is not invariant under Poincaré- 3

4 v (5) (4) (3) () (1) p (5) (4) (3) () (1) v (a) (4) (1) () p () (1) (3) (b) (4) (3) Figure 1: Trajectories for >. Figure : Trajectories for <. Lorentz transformation [13], but it still can be described by the equation d (γm()ẋ) = F(), dt ẋ γ = (1 c ) 1/, (18) where c is the speed of light, and it can be written as a Newton s equation with a velocity depending force of the form [ m() d dt = ẋ ) 3/ m F() ](1 ẋ 1 (ẋ/c) c. (19) In turns, this equation defines the dynamical system ẋ = v, () v = 1 ] [F() γv m γ 3. (1) m() As before, a constant of motion of this autonomous system is a function K = K(,v) satisfying the equation v K + 1 ] [F() γv m γ 3 K m() v The equations for the characteristics are d v = =. () m()dv dk [ ]( ) F() γv m 1 v 3/ =. c (3) Thus, this constant of motion is an arbitrary function of the characteristic obtained from the firsttwotermofthisepression,k = G(C(,v)), and from the first two terms one gets the following equation in terms of the variable = v /c, m()c [ d d = F() m c ](1 ) 3/. 1 (4) 4

5 The constant of integration of this equation will represent the characteristic curve C(, ). Of course, in general the solution of this equation is notepressedincloseform. Thismeansthat the Lagrangian and the Hamiltonian of the system can not be found in general. However, there is a particular case where one can do something analytically, and this case consists of having a constant force with mass linearly dependence on the position. 4.1 Constant force with m() = +. In this particular case, one has that m = andf() = F = constant, andthevariablescan be separated for the integration in (??), bringing about the characteristic curve d C(,) = ( F )(1 ) 3/ 1 c ln( + ). (5) By selecting the constant of motion as K(,) = Fc that is, K(,) = c C(,)+ Fa ln c, (6) d ( ) 1 F (1 ) 1 3/ F ln( + )+ F ln c, one has the following limit lim K(,) = γc F c, (8) (7) which corresponds to the relativistic case of constant mass. Now, considering the condition F 1 1, (9) one can write the constant of motion as [3] or K(,) = γ c F c { F + + c } d (1 ) + c ( ) k 1 m1 F( d 1 (1 ) 3/ ( 1) k ( ) k F m1 +. (3) k K(,) = γ c F c { F + + c + c + [ ln(1 )+ 1 ]} 1 ( ) k 1 m1 F( d 1 (1 ) 3/ ( ) k m1, (31) ( 1) k F k where the summation represents terms of order two or higher in the parameter. The Lagrangian of the system (refla) in terms of the variable is K(,ρ)dρ L(,) = ρ. (3) ρ 5

6 So, using the above constant of motion in this epression, one gets L(,) = c 1 +F+ c { + F + c [ 3 ln ]} ln(1 ) 1 + c 4 d ( 1) k F k ( m1 ) k ( m1 ρ 1 ρ ) k 1dρ (1 ρ) 3/ (33) The generalized linear momentum in terms of the variable, is given by p = c ( ) L, (34) 5 Conclusion We have shown that mass position depending problems for non relativistic conservative systems bring about a modification to the potential and kinetic energy terms. The constant of motion and Hamiltonian of these system differs greatly since the generalized linear momentum depends on the position and the velocity of the body. This differences are shown with the trajectories on the spaces (,v) and (,p). For the relativistic conservative systems with mass position depending, the full integrability is not so simple in general, but we analyzed the particular case of constant force with mass linear dependence on position system. As we showed, even we can get the Lagrangian for the system, it is not possible to obtain the inverse relation v = v(, p), and therefore, the Hamiltonian of this system. p = γ c + m c { 1 c ln 1+ } 1+ + c(1 ) + c ( d m1 ρ (1 ρ) 3/ Now, as one can see from this epression, even a first order in it is not possible to obtain = (,p)inordertogetthehamiltonianofthe system. Therefore, one can not have eplicitly the Hamiltonian of the system but it remains implicit through the constant of motion (31). 1 ρ ) k 1dρ (35) 6

7 References [1] H. Goldstein, Classical Mechanics Addison- Wesley, (195). [] A. Sommerfeld, Lectures on Theoretical Physics, Vo. I Academic Press, Inc.,(1964). [3] H. Gylden, Astronomishe Nachrichten, [4] I.V. Meshcherskii, Astronomishe Nachrichten, 13 (1983) 93. [5] C. Prieto and J.A. Docobo, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 318 (1997) 657. [6] C. Tuiega, J. Jasiski, T. Iwamoto and V. Chikan, ACS Nano,, (8) [7] W. Selm, A. Higazy and M. Algradee, World Journal of Condensed Matter Physics, 1 (11) 4. [8] O. Takamobu, D. Kentaro, N. Koichi and T. Akitomo, Physica Status Solidi(b), 41, (4) 744. [9] L. Sierra and E. Lipparini, Europhys. Lett., 4 (1997) 667. [1] F.S.A. Cavalcate, R.N. Costa Filho, J. Ribeiro Filho, C.A.S. De Almeida and P.N. Freire, Phys. Rev. B, 55 (1997) 156. [13] G.V. López and E.M. Juárez J. Mod. Phys., 4 (13) [14] M. Spivak, Physics for Mathematicians, Mechanics I, Publish or Perish Inc., (1) [15] O.VonRoos, Phys.Rev.B,7(1983)7547. [16] T.L. Li and K.J. Kuhn, Phys. Rev. B, 47 (1993) 176. [17] G.V. López Partial Differential Equations of First Order and Their Application to Physics World Scientific, 1. [18] F. John, Partial Differential Equations, Springer-Verlag, New York, (1974). [19] J.A. Kobussen, Acta Phys. Austr., 51 (1979) 193. [] C. Leubner, Phys. Letter A, 86 (1981) 68. [1] G. López, Annals of Physics, 51 (1996) 37. [] C. Møller, Theory of Relativity Oford University Press (195), chapter III. [3] I.S. Gradsteyn and I.M. Ryzhik, Table of Integrals, Series, and Products, Academic Press, Inc., (1994) [11] H.A. Bethe, Phys. Rev. Lett., 56 (1986) 135. [1] E.D. Commins and P.A. Bucksbaum, Weak Interactions of Leptons and Quarks, Cambridge University Pres, Cambridge, (1983). 7