arxiv: v1 [gr-qc] 17 Nov 2017

Transcription

1 Tsallis and Kaniadakis statistics from a point of view of the holographic equipartition law arxiv: v1 [gr-qc] 17 Nov 2017 Everton M. C. Abreu, 1,2, Jorge Ananias Neto, 2, Albert C. R. Mendes, 3, and Alexander Bonilla 3, 1 Grupo de Física Teórica e Matemática Física, Departamento de Física, Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, , Seropédica, RJ, Brazil 2 Departamento de Física, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, , Juiz de Fora, MG, Brazil 3 Departamento de Física, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, , Juiz de Fora - MG, Brazil (Dated: November 20, 2017) Abstract In this work, we have illustrated the difference between both Tsallis and Kaniadakis entropies through cosmological models obtained from the formalism proposed by Padmanabhan, which is called holographic equipartition law. Similar to the formalism proposed by Komatsu, we have obtained an extra driving constant term in the Friedmann equation if we deform the Tsallis entropy by Kaniadakis formalism. We have considered initially Tsallis entropy as the Black Hole (BH) area entropy. This constant term may lead the universe to be in an accelerated mode. On the other hand, if we start with the Kaniadakis entropy as the BH area entropy and then by modifying the Kappa expression by Tsallis formalism, the same constant, which shows that the universe have an acceleration was obtained. In an opposite limit, no driving inflation term of the early universe was derived from both deformations. PACS numbers: y, y, Cw Keywords: Tsallis statistics, Kaniadakis statistics, holographic equipartition law Electronic address: evertonabreu@ufrrj.br Electronic address: jorge@fisica.ufjf.br Electronic address: albert@fisica.ufjf.br Electronic address: abonillafisica.ufjf.br 1

2 Tsallis statistics [1], which is an extension of Boltzman-Gibbs s(bg) statistical theory, defines a nonextensive (NE), i.e., nonadditive entropy as S q = k B 1 W i=1 pq i q 1 ( W i=1 ) p i = 1, (1) where p i is the probability of a system to exist within a microstate, W is the total number of configurations (microstates) and q, known in the current literature as being the Tsallis parameter or NE parameter, is a real parameter which measures the degree of nonextensivity. The definition of entropy in Tsallis statistics carries the standard properties of positivity, equiprobability, concavity and irreversibility. This approach has been successfully used in many different physical system. For instance, we can mention the Levy-type anomalous diffusion [2], turbulence in a pure-electron plasma [3] and gravitational systems [4, 5]. It is noteworthy to affirm that Tsallis thermostatistics formalism has the BG statistics as a particular case in the limit q 1 where the standard additivity of entropy can be recovered. In the microcanonical ensemble, where all the states have the same probability, Tsallis entropy reduces to [6] W 1 q 1 S q = k B, (2) 1 q where in the limit q 1 we recover the usual Boltzmann entropy formula, S = k B lnw. On the other hand, the well known Kaniadakis statistics[7], also refereed as κ-statistics, analogously to Tsallis thermostatistics model, generalizes the usual BG statistics initially by introducing both the κ-exponential and κ-logarithm defined respectively by exp κ (f) = ( 1+κ2 f 2 +κf ) 1 κ, (3) ln κ (f) = fκ f κ, (4) 2κ and the following property can be satisfied, namely, ) ( ) ln κ (exp κ (f) = exp κ ln κ (f) f. (5) From Eqs. (3) and (4) we can notice that the κ-parameter twists the standard definitions of the exponential and logarithm functions. The κ-entropy, connected to this κ-framework, can be written as S κ = k B W i p 1+κ i p 1 κ i 2κ, (6) which recovers the BG entropy in the limit κ 0. It is relevant to comment here that the κ-entropy satisfies the properties concerning concavity, additivity and extensivity. The 2

3 κ-statistics has thrived when applied in many experimental scenarios. As an example we can cite cosmic rays [8] and cosmic effects [9], quark-gluon plasma [10], kinetic models describing a gas of interacting atoms and photons [11] and financial models [12]. Using the microcanonical ensemble definition, where all the states have the same probability, Kaniadakis entropy reduces to [6] W κ W κ S κ = k B, (7) 2κ where in the limit κ 0 we recover the usual Boltzmann entropy formula, S = k B lnw. In order to illustrate the main difference between the Tsallis and Kaniadakis formalism we begin our formalism by considering the Tsallis microcanonical entropy formula, Eq.(2), as the BH entropy t Wλ 1 λ, (8) where we have that S t k B A 4L 2 p and λ 1 q. Writing Kaniadakis s entropy formula, Eq.(7), as a function of the Tsallis entropy, Eq.(8), we have S κ = k [ B 1+λt 1 ] = k B 2λ 1+λt 2 [ 2t+λt 2 We can expand (10) in a power series of t where we obtain S κ = k B [t 1 2 λt2 + 1 ] 2 λ2 t λt (9) ]. (10). (11) Considering now the Kaniadakis microcanonical entropy formula, Eq.(7), as the BH entropy y Wλ W λ 2λ, (12) and writing Tsallis s entropy formula, Eq.(2), as a function of the Kaniadakis entropy, Eq.(7), we have, analogously to (9), that S κ = k B A 4L 2 p (13) 3

4 and that S t = k B [ y + (1+λ2 y 2 ) 1 2 λ 1 λ ], (14) where the plus sign before the square root guarantees us a positive entropy. We can expand (14) in a power series of κ where we obtain S t = k B [y λy2 1 ] 8 λ3 y (15) Following the same line of Komatsu [14], the holographic equipartition law proposed by Padmanabhan [13] considers the time s rate of change of the cosmic volume as dv dt = L2 p c(n sur ǫn bulk ), (16) where L p is the Planck length, c is the velocity of light, N sur is the number of degrees of freedom on the spherical surface of Hubble radius r H and N bulk is the number of degrees of freedom in the bulk. Using the Hubble horizon radius as the Hubble volume V is written as r H = c H, (17) V = 4π 3 r3 H = 4π 3 ( c H ) 3. (18) The equipartition theorem determines the number of degrees of freedom in the bulk which can be written as N bulk = E 1 2 k BT, (19) where E is the positive value o Komar energy inside the Hubble volume V which is given by E = ǫ(ρc 2 +3p)V. (20) The accelerated universe (dark energy) corresponding (ρc 2 +3p) < 0 which implies that ǫ = +1. The temperature T on the horizon is written as 4

5 T = H 2πk B. (21) The number of degrees of freedom on the spherical surface is given by N sur = 4S H k B, (22) where S H is the entropy on the Hubble horizon. When S H = S BH = k B A H /4L 2 p then N sur is the usual number of degrees of freedom on the surface that is N sur = A/L 2 p. S BH can be written as S BH = k BA H 4L 2 p = πk Bc 2 L 2 p H2 = k H2, (23) where A H = 4πr 2 H, being r H the Hubble horizon (radius), and k πk B c 2 /L 2 p. In order to derive the Friedmann equation by the holographic equipartition law, we will start by calculating the left-hand side of Eq. (16). Substituting Eq. (18) into (16) we obtain ( ) dv Ḣ dt = 4πc3. (24) H 4 Then, using Eqs. (19), (20), (21) and (24) into Eq. (16) we have where we have used ( ä a = 4πG ρ+ 3p ( )+H 2 1 S ) H, (25) 3 c 2 S BH ä a = Ḣ +H2, (26) and ǫ = 1 which corresponds to an accelerated universe. From Eq. (25) we can observe that the driven term that indicates an accelerated universe is given by ( f(h) = H 2 1 S ) H. (27) S BH Considering S H = S κ, Eq.(10), and S BH = S t, Eq. (9), we have f(h) = k λ 2k B (1+λt). (28) 5

6 Expanding Eq.(28) in a power series of λ and taking only the linear term in λ we obtain f(h) = k λ 2k B (1+λt) = k λ (1+λt) 1 k λ. (29) 2k B 2k B Hence, we can mention that when we deform Tsallis by Kaniadakis entropy, Eq.(10), a cosmological type constant term appears, Eq.(29). This result illustrates a difference between Tsallis and Kaniadakis formalism. Moreover, this result is the same obtained by Komatsu[14] when Rényi entropy is deformed by Tsallis expression. Considering now S H = S t, Eq.(14), and S BH = S κ, Eq.(13), we have f(h) = k (1+λ 2 y 2 1 ) 2 1. (30) k B λy 2 Expanding Eq.(30) in a power series λ and taking only the linear term in λ we obtain f(h) = k (1+λ 2 y 2 ) k B λy 2 k λ 2k B. (31) So, when we deform Kaniadakis by Tsallis entropy, Eq.(14), a cosmological constant term also appears, Eq.(31). This fact can again illustrate a difference between Kaniadakis and Tsallis entropy. We can analyze Eq.(28) in the limit λt >> 1 where we obtain f(h) = k λ 2k B (1+λt) = k 2k b t(1+ 1 λt ) = k 2k B t (1+ 1 λt ) 1 k 2k B t H2 2. (32) From Eq.(32) we can observe that a H 2 like term is obtained. This result is similar to obtained by Komatsu[14] and we can mention that this driving term does not produce inflation of the early universe where a H 4 like term should be required. From the driving term, Eq.(30), we can also perform the limit λy >> 1 and the result is f(h) = k (1+λ 2 y 2 1 ) 2 1 = k (1+ 1 ) 1 λ 2 y k B λy 2 k B y k 0. (33) 2k B λ 2 y3 From Eq.(33) we can observe that in the limit λt >> 1, we have f(h) 0. Then, the null drive term obtained when we consider Tsallis entropy deformed by Kaniadakis approach does not also produce inflation of the early universe where a H 4 like term should be needed. To conclude, in this paper we have studied differences between the Tsallis and Kaniadakis entropy from the point of view of the holographic equipartition formalism. Initially, in the limits λt << 1 and λk << 1, the Tsallis and Kaniadakis entropy both differ by a 6

7 cosmological term that are Eqs.(29) and (31). Then, when we deform the Tsallis entropy by the Kaniadakis approach, in the limit λt >> 1, the resulting difference term, Eq.(32), does not correspond to a inflation term of the early universe. In an inverse procedure, when we deform the Kaniadakis entropy by the Tsallis approach, in the limit λk >> 1, also no inflation term in a early universe, that is Eq.(33), is obtained. 1. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS E.M.C.A. thanks CNPq(Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico), Brazilian scientific support federal agency, for partial financial support, Grants numbers / and / and the hospitality of Theoretical Physics Department at Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), where part of this work was carried out. [1] C. Tsallis, J. Stat. Phys. 52 (1988) 479; C. Tsallis, Introduction to Nonextensive Statistical Mechanics: Approaching a Complex World, Springer (2009); C. Tsallis, Braz. J. Phys. vol.29 (1999) 1. [2] P. A. Alemany and D. H. Zanette, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75 (1995) 366. [3] C. Anteneodo and C. Tsallis, J. Mol. Liq. 71 (1997) 255. [4] C. Tsallis, Chaos, Soliton and Fractals 13 (2002) 371. R. Silva and J. S. Alcaniz, Physica A 341 (2004) 208; [5] J Ananias Neto, Physica A 391 (2012) [6] C. Tsallis, Chaos, Soliton and Fractals 6 (1995) 539. [7] G. Kaniadakis, Physica A 296 (2001) 405; Phys. Rev. E 66 (2002) ; Phys. Rev. E 72 (2005) [8] G. Kaniadakis and A. M. Scarfone, Physica A 305 (2002) 69; G. Kaniadakis, P. Quarati and A. M. Scarfone, Physica A 305 (2002) 76. [9] E. M.C. Abreu, J. Ananias Neto, E. M. Barboza, R. C. Nunes, Physica A 441 (2016) 141. [10] A. M. Teweldeberhan, H. G. Miller and R. Tegen, Int. J. Mod. Phys E 12 (2003) 669. [11] A. Rossani and A. M. Scarfone, J. Phys. A: Math Gen. 37 (2004) [12] D. Rajaonarison, D. Bolduc and H. Jayet, Econ. Lett. 86 (2005) 13. [13] T. Padmanabhan, arxiv: [hep-th] [14] N. Komatsu, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017)