arxiv: v1 [hep-ph] 2 May 2017

Transcription

1 Scotogenic model with B L symmetry and exotic neutrinos A. C. B. Machado Laboratorio de Física Teórica e Computacional Universidade Cruzeiro do Sul Rua Galvão Bueno 868 São Paulo, SP, Brazil, arxiv: v1 [hep-ph] May 017 J. Montaño and V. Pleitez Instituto de Física Teórica Universidade Estadual Paulista R. Dr. Bento Teobaldo Ferraz 71, Barra Funda São Paulo - SP, , Brazil M. C. Rodriguez Grupo de Física Teórica e Matemática Física Departamento de Física Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro - UFRRJ BR 465 Km 7, Seropédica, RJ, Brazil (Dated: 09//16) Abstract We consider a model with three Higgs doublet in a discrete B L Z 3 discrete symmetries. Two of the scalar doublets are inert due to the Z 3 symmetry. We calculated all the mass spectra in the scalar and lepton sectors and accommodate the leptonic mixing matrix as well. PACS numbers: 1.60.Fr, Pq St Electronic address: ana@ift.unesp.br Electronic address: montano@ift.unesp.br Electronic address: vicente@ift.unesp.br Electronic address: marcoscrodriguez@ufrrj.br 1

2 The existence of inert scalar fields comes from very long ago, in particular the inert doublet [1]. Here we consider a model in which the scotogenic mechanism [] is at work generating neutrino masses and the Pontecorvo-Maki-Nakagawa-Sakata (PMNS) matrix. The model has three doublets with the same quantum number as the standard model Higgs doublet: H S, D 1, D, being the latter two doublets inert because of an unbroken (at the tree level) Z 3 symmetry. We also include three right-handed neutrinos but with nosstandard assignment of B L. See the Table II for the transformation under B L and Z 3 of the lepton and scalar fields. Although neutrinos with this B L assignment make this symmetry free of anomalies [3, 4], we will consider it a global symmetry. The Yukawa interactions are given by where i, j = e, µ, τ and k, l =, 3. L leptons Y ukawa = Gl ij L i l jr S + G ν 1i L i N 1R D1 + G ν ik L il N kr D (1) + M 1 N c 1R N 1R + M kl N c k N l + H.c., The more general SU() L U(1) Y U(1) B L invariant scalar potential for the three doublets, is given by: V (S, D 1, D ) = µ SM S + µ d1 D 1 + µ d D + λ 1 S S + λ D 1D 1 + λ 3 D D + λ 4 S D 1 + λ 5 S D + λ 6 D 1 D + λ 7 S D 1 + λ 8 S D + [µ 1D 1D + λ 9 (S D 1 ) + λ 10 (S D ) + H.c.] () Notice that the term µ 1 and λ 9,10 break B L softly and hard, respectively. We will assume these parameters are real. If µ 1 0 and λ 9,10 = 0 the doublets are not inert anymore and we have a mechanism as in Ref. [5] in which the smallness of the neutrino masses is due to the smallness of the VEV of the doublet(s) D 1 (D ). On the other hand, if µ 1 = 0 and λ 9,10 0 we have the scotogenic mechanism with two inert doublet as in Ref. [fortes]. Here we will consider only the latter case. Doing as usual the shifted as S 0 = 1 (v SM + h + ig) with v SM D 0 1, = 1 (R 1, + ii 1, ), so that the constraint equations are given by: = 46 GeV, and v SM (µ s + v SMλ 1 ) = 0 (3) The masses matrices are all diagonal and the eigenvalues are:

3 For CP even scalars: m R1 m R m R3 = λ 1 v SM = µ d1 + v SM (λ 10 + λ 5 + λ 8 ) = µ d + v SM (λ 9 + λ 5 + λ 8 ) (4) For CP odd scalars: m I1 = 0 m I m I3 = µ d1 + v SM ( λ 10 + λ 5 + λ 8 ) = µ d + v SM ( λ 9 + λ 5 + λ 8 ) (5) For charged scalars: m c1 = 0 m c = 1 4 (µ d1 + λ 4 v SM) m c3 = 1 4 (µ d + λ 5 v SM) (6) The charged leptons has the following Yukawas: G l 11 = , G l 1 = G l 1 = , G l = , G l 13 = G l 31 = , G l 3 = G l 3 = , G l 33 = , and we obatian m e = MeV, m µ = MeV and m τ = MeV and the matrix V l L defined as l l = V l L l L (primed fields are symmetry eigenstates and unprimed ones mass eigenstates): VL l = Defining the lepton mixing matrix as V P MNS = VL νv l L, it means that this matrix appears in the charged currents coupled to W. Notice that neutrinos are still massless at tree level as in SM. However, in the scalar potential there are the interactions like λ 4 and λ 5 in the scalar potential in (), that induce the sort of diagrams as those in Fig. 1. With these interactions, it is possible to implement the mechanism of Ref. [] for the radiative generation of neutrinos masses. (7) 3

4 In fact, the diagram in Fig. 1 are exactly calculable from the exchange of ReD 0 1, and Imφ 0 1, [] (M ν ) ij = a,k Y ik Y jk M k 3π [ m Ra m Ra M k ln m Ra M k m Ia m Ia M k ] ln m Ia Mk where m Ra and m Ia with a = 1, are the masses of ReD 0 1, and ImD 0 1,, respectively. In the present model the Y ij corresponds to G ν ij when the coupling is with the N,3R and Y ij corresponds to G ν 1i when the coupling is with the N 1R. We can define = m Ra m Ia = λ 9v SM, and m 0a = (m Ra + m Ia )/, a = 1,. If λ 9 1, we can write (M ν ) ij = v SM 8π [ λ 10 G ν 1iG ν 1jM 1 m R1 M 1 ( 1 M 1 m R1 M 1 where we have omitted a sum in k =, 3. ) G ν ik +λ Gν jk M ( k 9 m R M 1 k M k m R M k (8) )], (9) In order to obtain the active neutrinos masses we assume a normal hierarchy and, without loss of generality, that M 1 M,3 and will be represented from now on by M R. M ν is diagonalized with a unitary matrix V ν L i.e., ˆM ν = V νt L M ν V ν L, where ˆM ν = diag(m 1, m, m 3 ). In the charged lepton sector we assume their masses at the central values in PDG ˆM l = (0.510, , ) GeV. It is important to note from these considerations, that there exist a multitude of other possibilities which satisfy also the masses squared differences and the astrophysical limits in the active neutrino sector. parametrization of the unitary matrices V l L,R, V ν L. Each one corresponds to different We will obtain the neutrinos masses from Eq. (9), we have as free parameters λ, M R, M D +, M 1 D + and the Yukawas. In the Fig. we show the dependence of λ respect the main Yukawas G ν τd in (a) and Gν es in (b) for fixed M R values. Notice that G e1 are essentially of the same order of magnitude, while the rest are suppressed by four orders of magnitude when comparing with any specific value of those G ν e1. The mass matrices in the charged sector M l are diagonalized by a bi-unitary transformation ˆM l = V l L M l V l R and ˆM l = diag(m e, m µ, m τ ). The relation between symmetry eigenstates (primed) and mass (unprimed) fields are l L,R = V l L,R l L,R and ν L = V ν L ν L, where l L,R = (e, µ, τ ) T L,R, l L,R = (e, µ, τ) T L,R and ν L = (ν e, ν µ, ν τ ) T L and ν L = (ν 1, ν, ν 3 ) L. Defining the lepton mixing matrix as V P MNS = V l L V L ν, it means that this matrix appears in the charged currents coupled to W + µ. obtain Eq.(10). From Eq.(A1) and Eq.(A5) to Eq.(??) to Eq.(??) we 4

5 Sol. Masses in TeV G l 11 G l 1 G l 13 G l G l 3 G l 33 P1 M R = 0.5, M 0 = P M R = 1.5, M 0 = P3 M R =.5, M 0 = P4 M R = 3, M 0 = TABLE I: Masses of the scalars in Scotogenic model (in GeV) V P MNS (10) which is in agreement within the experimental error data at 3σ given by [7] V P MNS (11) and we see that it is possible to accommodate all lepton masses and the PMNS matrix. Here we do not consider CP violation. I. THE BOUNDEDNESS OF THE POTENTIAL The boundedness of the potential from below has to be a criteria defined allowing the greatest number of the parameter space. In the earlier work in Ref.[10] was computed some set of vacuum stability conditions following the Copositive Criteria for the Boundedness of the Scalar Potential, in short the basic idea is construct the quartic couplings as a pure square of the combinations of bilinear scalar fields and set their coefficients could be nonnegative, with this we can certainly makes the vacuum stable. However, for scalar potential more complicated certain amount of ambiguities may arise, for more details see Ref.[10]. So in the base S, D 1, D, we have: 5

6 The values for r i λ 1 λ 4 λ 5 + λ 9 r1 A = λ 4 λ λ 6 + λ 10 r. (1) λ 5 + λ 9 r1 λ 6 + λ 10 r λ 3 are those to minimize the entries of the matrix. We have two relevant cases for the off-diagonal elements with sums, : if both coupling constants are positive/negative, the minimum comes from choosing r i signs, the minimum comes from r i = 1. = 0 ; if the constants have opposite For a symmetric matrix A of order 3 the copositivity criteria are summarized as follows: a ii > 0 and v ij = a ij + a ii a jj > 0 and a 11 a a 33 + a 1 a33 + a 13 a + a 3 a11 + v1 v 13 v 3 > 0. Explicitly we obtain: λ 1 > 0, λ > 0, λ 3 > 0, λ 4 + λ 1 λ > 0, λ 5 λ 9 + λ 1 λ 3 > 0 or λ 5 + λ 1 λ 3 > 0, λ 6 λ 10 + λ λ 3 > 0 or λ 6 + λ λ 3 > 0 (13) and (λ1 λ λ 3 ) + λ 4 λ3 + (λ 5 + λ 9 ) λ + (λ 6 + λ 10 ) λ 3 > 0, (14) It is easy to verify that if the conditions in Eqs. (13) are satisfied the conditions in Eq. (14) are automatically satisfied. Hence, the positivity of the scalar potential is guarantee just by the conditions in Eq. (13). II. CONCLUSIONS The scotogenic mechanism is based on the existence of inert doublets (they do not couple with charged leptons and do not contribute to the masses of the vector bosons) and this character is due the existence of a discrete symmetry, usually Z or S 3 [6]. However, It 6

7 has been noted in Refs. [8, 9] that the running of the parameters in model may induce a spontaneously breakdown of this symmetry and the doublets lose its inert character. This occurs also in the present model in which the discrete symmetry is Z 3. The renomalizaton group equation of the µ d > 0 parameter is 16π d dt µ d = H(µ x, {a}, T, T ν, g i ) 4M 1 Tr(G ν 1G ν 1 ) 4 3 k= M k (G ν G ν ) kk, (15) with t = ln µ where µ is the energy scale at which µ d are calculated, µ x = µ s, µ d, T and T ν involve the Yukawa matrices in the charged leptons and neutrinos, respectively; g i = g 1, are the gauge couplings, and {a} denotes the dimensionless couplings in the scalar potential. µ SM and the Yukawa couplings have a similar expression but without the last term. The important point is that H is positive. We see from (??) that if M 1 and/or M k are large enough, the scalars D 0 1, lose its inert character, µ d < 0, in a given scale t [8, 9]. For small neutrino Yukawa couplings and a 1, the positive term is dominated by µ d [8] 16π d dt µ d µ d 4 3 k= M k (G ν G ν ) kk, (16) Acknowledgments ACBM thanks CAPES for financial support and VP thanks to CNPq for partial financial support. Appendix A: V l L parameterizations The five VL l parameterizations: VL(P l 1) = VL(P l ) = (A1) (A) 7

8 VL(P l 3) = VL(P l 4) = The five VL ν parameterizations: VL ν (P 1) = VL ν (P ) = VL ν (P 3) = VL ν (P 4) = (A3) (A4) (A5) (A6) (A7) (A8) [1] N. G. Deshpande and E. Ma, Pattern of Symmetry Breaking with Two Higgs Doublets, Phys. Rev. D 18, 574 (1978). [] E. Ma, Verifiable radiative seesaw mechanism of neutrino mass and dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 73, (006); [hep-ph/06015]. [3] J. C. Montero and V. Pleitez, Gauging U(1) symmetries and the number of right-handed neutrinos, Phys. Lett. B 675, 64 (009); [arxiv: [hep-ph]]. [4] E. Ma and R. Srivastava, Dirac or inverse seesaw neutrino masses with B L gauge symmetry and S 3 flavor symmetry, Phys. Lett. B 741, 17 (015); [arxiv: [hep-ph]]. 8

9 [5] E. Ma, Naturally small seesaw neutrino mass with no new physics beyond the TeV scale, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 50 (001); [hep-ph/001111]. [6]... [7] M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni, J. Salvado and T. Schwetz, Global fit to three neutrino mixing: critical look at present precision, JHEP 11, 13 (01); [arxiv: [hep-ph]]. [8] A. Merle and M. Platscher, Parity Problem of the Scotogenic Neutrino Model, Phys. Rev. D 9, no. 9, (015); [arxiv: [hep-ph]]. [9] M. Lindner, A. Merle, M. Platscher and C. E. Yaguna, Fermionic WIMPs and Vacuum Stability in the Scotogenic Model, arxiv: [hep-ph]. [10] J. Chakrabortty, P. Konar and T. Mondal, Phys. Rev. D 89, no. 9, (014) doi: /physrevd [arxiv: [hep-ph]]. 9

10 L i l jr N 1R N,3R S D 1 D (B L) Z 3 w 1 1 w w w w TABLE II: Transformation properties of the fermion and scalar fields under (B L). We do not include quarks because they are singlet under Z 3 and B L = +1/3 as usual. 10

11 (a) (b) FIG. 1: one-loop for neutrinos masses. The vertices A, B, C and D are given in Eq.(??) 11

12 λ λ Ge1-sol1 Ge1-sol Ge1-sol3 Ge1-sol Ge Gμ1 Gμ Gτ Ge Ge,Gμ1,Gμ,Gτ (a) (b) FIG. : Dependence of λ respect the main Yukawa G e1 (a) for fixed Values de M R. In (b) the other Yukawas provide the same value for any M R ) 1