arxiv: v3 [hep-ph] 3 Sep 2012

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "arxiv: v3 [hep-ph] 3 Sep 2012"

Maximilian York
5 years ago
Views:

1 Prepared for submission to JHEP arxiv: v3 [hep-ph] 3 Sep 01 sinθ 13 and neutrino mass matrix with an approximate flavor symmetry Riazuddin 1 1 National Centre for Physics, Quaid-i-Azam University Campus, Islamabad 4530, Pakistan riazuddin@ncp.edu.pk Abstract: For a neutrino mass matrix whose texture has an approximate flavor symmetry and where one has near degenerate neutrino mass, it is shown that the tribimaximal values for atmospheric angle sin θ 3 = 1 and solar angle sin θ 1 = 1 3 can be maintained even when the reactor angle θ The non zero sinθ 13 implies approximate ν µ ν τ symmetry instead of ν µ ν τ symmetry. Keywords: Neutrino-Physics, Flavor Symmetry, Nonzero reactor angle

2 Contents 1 Introduction 1 Approximate flavor symmetry and diagonalization of neutrino mass matrix 3 3 Summary and Conclusion 10 1 Introduction There is compelling evidence that neutrinos change flavor, have non zero masses and that neutrino mass eigenstates are different from weak eigenstates. As such they undergo oscillations. The flavor and mass eigenstates are related by the so called Pontecorvo-Maki- Nakagawa-Sakata (PMNS) mixing matrix [1], ν e ν µ ν τ = U ν 1 ν ν 3, (1.1) where the matrix U has been parameterized by the Particle Data Group (PDG) as [] c 1 c 13 s 1 c 13 s 13 e iδ s 1 c 3 c 1 s 3 s 13 e iδ c 1 c 3 s 1 s 3 s 13 e iδ s 3 c 13 s 1 s 3 c 1 c 3 s 13 e iδ c 1 s 3 s 1 c 3 s 13 e iδ c 3 c 13 P = U PMNS P. (1.) Here c ij = cosθ ij, s ij = sinθ ij and P is a diagonal matrix which contains (Majorana) CP violating phases in addition to the (Dirac) CP violating phase δ. θ 1, θ 3 and θ 13 are respectively known as solar, atmospheric and reactor angles. Current global fits allow the following ranges for the mass squared differences and mixing angles []: with the following best fit (BF) values ev m ev, 0.5 sin θ , ev m ev, 0.36 sin θ , (1.3) m 1 = ev, sin θ 1 = 0.304, m 31 = ev, sin θ 3 = 0.5. (1.4) 1

3 Recent results from TK collaboration [3] and MINOS indicate a relatively large θ 13 and when combined with the global fit gives [4] sin θ 13 = 0.05± (1.5) There is further evidence for nonzero reactor also θ 13 from DAYA BAY[5] and RENO[6] collaborations which respectively give θ 13 = ( ) o θ 13 = ( ) o 0.96 It is interesting on its own right to consider non-zero value for sin θ 13 in the above range. In fact it has been shown by the author[7] that nonzero value of sin θ 13 has important implications for the leptogenesis asymmetry parameter; its contribution to this parameter may even dominate. Before we proceed further it is instructive to summarize the theoretical framework needed. The effective Majorana neutrino mass matrix M ν constructed directly or in seesaw mechanism, can be symbolically written as [8] L = L l M l e R L l M D N R N T RM R N R (1.6) where L l = (e L,v L ) are lepton doublets, e R charged lepton SU L () singlets with nonvanishing hypercharge, N R are SU L () U(1) singlets. It is convenient to have a basis in which M l and M R are simultaneously diagonal M l ˆM l = U L M lu R, M R ˆ M R = V T M R V (1.7) Correspondingly L l U L L l,e R U R e R. We can select a basis in which U L is diagonal i.e. M l =diag(m e,m µ,m τ ). One may remark that the so called 3(µ τ) symmetry can not be simultaneously valid for lefthanded charged leptons and left-handed neutrinos. In the above basis it is obvious since m µ m τ but in fact it is independent of what basis one chooses [9]. Thus 3(µ τ) symmetry can only be regarded as an effective (approximate) symmetry in the neutrino sector and was inspired by maximal atmospheric angle and θ r = 0. If θ r 0, it has to be violated. Since the oscillation data are only sensitive to mass squared differences, they allow for three possible arrangements of different mass levels [8]. It is customary to order the mass eigenstates such that m 1 < m. We have two squared mass differences: m 1 = m m 1 = δm, m = m 3 m +m 1, where m > 0 for normal hierarchy (m 1 m m 3 ) and < 0 for inverted hierarchy (m 1 m m 3 ). For degenerate case (m 1 m m 3 ), one can write neutrino mass matrix as M ν = m 0 I +δm ν (1.8) where δm ν m 0 or M ν = m o δm ν (1.9) 0 1 0

4 in case of opposite CP-parity of ν and ν 3 (m and m 3 are of opposite sign). We have three mixing angles θ 1 = θ s (solar), θ 3 = θ a (atmospheric) and θ 13 = θ r (reactor). Some new ingredients are needed to describe correctly the three mixing angles. However it is well known that the best fit values given in Eq. (1.4) are consistent with the so called tribimaximal (TB) mixing [10] corresponding to sin θ 1 = 1 3, sin θ 3 = 1, sin θ 13 = 0. (1.10) For our discussion it is convenient to state various symmetries and/or conditions on M ν which lead to θ 13 = 0 and TB mixing. In an obvious notation if one has -3 symmetry i.e. (M ν ) = (M ν ) 33 and (M ν ) 1 = (M ν ) 13, then θ 13 = 0 and sin θ 3 = 1/. If further (M ν ) 11 +(M ν ) 1 = (M ν ) +(M ν ) 3, then we have TB mixing given in Eq. (1.1). Recently, a possibility has been discussed [11](named TBR) which allows the extension of TB mixing, so as to have a non-zero value of θ 13, preserving at the same time the predictions for the TB solar angle [sin θ 1 = 1 3 ] and the maximal atmospheric angle [sin θ 3 = 1 ]. To implement TBR, it is generally assumed that M TB ν M TBR ν = M TB ν +δm ν (1.11) satisfies the conditions mentioned above. The various recent attempts in this aspect differ in the treatment of δm ν. In general δm ν contains six parameters. In [1], the conditions on these parameters are put so as to give θ r 0 but θ , fixing θ s at the TB value. However these conditions are not unique. A simple form for δm ν for normal hierarchy is alsoinvented[1]. In[13, 14], δm ν is realized in specificflavor symmetrymodels based on S 4 and A 4 symmetries respectively. In this paper we attempt to realize TBR in degenerate mass spectrum given in Eq. (1.8) which as we shall see has some attractive features. Approximate flavor symmetry and diagonalization of neutrino mass matrix For degenerate case a particularly attractive Majorana neutrino mass matrix, which is a multiple of unit matrix supplemented by three far smaller off-diagonal entries, is given by [15, 16] M ν = m 0 1 ǫ 1 ǫ 13 ǫ 1 1 ǫ 3 ǫ 13 ǫ 3 1 = m 0 I +δm ν, (.1) with ǫ ij 1. This implies that in the limit of off-diagonals going to zero, M ν is flavor blind or preserves flavor symmetry. When they are switched on, but being at least an order of magnitude smaller than diagonal elements, they violate it as small perturbations A particularly attractive realization of δm ν given in Eq. (.1)is provided by Zee model [17] where diagonal elements are vanishing and off-diagonal elements arise from radiative corrections[18]. 3

5 Anotherrealization ofδm ν ineq.(.1)isprovidedbyasimpleextensionofthestandard electroweak group to [16] G SU L () U l (1) U µ (1) U τ (1) In addition to usual fermions there are three right-handed SU L () singlet neutrinos which carry appropriate U i (1) quantum numbers. Further in addition to SU L () Higgs doublets, there are three Higgs SU L () singlets Σ i with appropriate U i (1) quantum numbers. The fermions and Higgs bosons are assigned to the following representations of the group G: L (1) = L e = [ ν e e ] L : (, 1,0,0) : φ (1) e R : (1,,0,0), N e : (1, 1,1,0); Σ (1) : (1,1, 1,0) L () = L µ = [ ] ν µ : (,0, 1,0) : φ () µ L µ R : (1,0,,0), N µ : (1,1,0, 1); Σ () : (1, 1,0,1) L (3) = L τ = [ ] µ τ : (,0,0, 1) : φ (3) τ L τ R : (1,0,0, ), N τ : (1,0, 1,1); Σ (3) : (1,0,1, 1) (.) The Yukawa couplings of neutrinos with Higgs are given by L Y = g i ( L (i) φ(i) e (i) R +H.C.) i=e,µ,τ + i=d,s,b + i=u,c,t G i ( q (i) L φ (i) q (i) R +H.C.) G i ( q (i) L φ(i) q (i) R +H.C.) +(h 11 Le N e φ () +h 3 Lµ N τ φ (3) +h 3 Lτ N µ φ (1) +H.C.) [ + f 1 (Ne T cn µ +Nµ T cn e) Σ (3) +f 13 (Ne T CN τ +Nτ T CN e) Σ () ] +f 3 (Nµ T CN τ +Nτ T CN µ) Σ (1) +H.C. (.3) where φ = ( φ o φ ), φ = iτ φ = ( φ φ o ) 4

6 The symmetry is spontaneously broken by giving vacuum expectation values to Higgs bosons φ (i),σ (i) : φ (i) = v i, Σ (i) = Λ i where Λ i v i so that extra gauge bosons which break the e µ τ universality become superheavyandsodotherighthandedneutrinos. Forsimplicity weshalltake, v 1 = v = v 3 and Λ 1 = Λ = Λ 3 (any differences can be absorbed in the corresponding Yukawa coupling constants with the Higgs bosons). Then the charged lepton and Dirac neutrino mass matrices are while M R is M l = v m D = v M R = 1 g g g 3 h h 3 0 h 3 0 (.4) 0 f 1 Λ 1 f 13 Λ 1 f 1 Λ 1 0 f 3 Λ 1 f 13 Λ 1 f 3 Λ 1 0 Then the effective Majorana mass matrix for the light neutrinos is where ˆm D is the Dirac matrix in ( N 1 N N3 ) δm ν = v M 1 (.5) (.6) δm ν = ˆm ˆM 1 D R ˆmT D (.7) ν e ν µ ν τ basis giving h 11 h 11 h 3 h 11 h 3 h 3 h 11 h 3 h 3 h 3 h 3 h 11 h 3 h 3 h 3 Here M 1 = f 1 1 taking all Yukawa couplings in M R equal. (.8) In order to generate Mν 0, we introduce a right handed neutrino N and a corresponding Higgs boson Σ, both of which are SU L () and [U(1)] 3 singlets, with the Yukawa coupling L o Y = (h 1 Le φ (1) +h Lµ φ () +h 3 Lτ φ (3) )N +H.C.+fN T CNΣ (.9) Although a term M N N T CN is allowed in (.9) but it can be absorbed in fλ after the symmetry breaking. After spontaneous symmetry breaking Σ = Λ (so that M = fλ/ ) 5

7 and in the basis N ν e ν µ ν τ, the Dirac neutrino mass matrix, m o D is 3 1 matrix m o D = The effective neutrino mass matrix is then h 1 h h 3 M o ν = m o D(m o D) T 1 M = v M v (.10) h h h 3 (.11) Now Σ i carry flavor quantum numbers of U i but Σ does not, being [U(1)] 3 singlet, and we may take Σ i Σ so that M 1 M and then, as in clear from Eqs.(.8) and (.11), δm ν M 0 ν. This also justifies neglect of mixing of N with N (i). In a way it is nice since in fermions mass hierarchy, Yukawa couplings widely differ. Here it is due to M 1 M while Yukawa couplings are of same order. With h 1 h h 3, we have the required matrix given in Eq.(.1) or its variant to be considered later, [c.f. Eq.(.17)]. We may remark here that although the Lagrangian (.9) as it stands is not flavour blind, but if one takes h 1 = h = h 3 = h, then it is flavor singlet. This is easy to see as follows. In three dimensional flavor space, introduce two vectors L = (L 1,L,L 3 ) and Φ = (φ 1,φ,φ 3 ), then the Lagrangian (.9) takes the form L 0 Y = h[ L.ΦN +H.C.]+fN T CNΣ which is flavor single, just as ( Σ.π)Λ is singlet under isospin in hadron physics. When the symmetry is broken, M 0 ν is then a multiple of unit matrix (flavor blind) and since it dominates over δm ν, M ν has approximate flavor symmetry. It is in this limited sense that we talk about approximate falvor symmetry. We now explore the TBR possibility for the diagonalization of the neutrino mass matrix given in Eq. (.1). In spite of its attractiveness, its diagonalization is in conflict with the neutrino data. It is instructive to show it as it would provide us a guidance for possible modification of M ν in Eq. (.1) to obtain agreement with the experimental data. The diagonalization of M ν (we need to consider the diagonalization of δm ν as m 0 I commutes with any diagonalyzing matrix) give among others the following relation [9] where ǫ i are the eigenvalues of δm ν. Now ǫ = cos θ s tan θ r sin θ s tan θ r ǫ 1, ǫ 1 +ǫ +ǫ 3 = 0 (.1) m = m 0 (1+ǫ ), m 1 = m 0 (1+ǫ 1 ), m 3 = m 0 (1 ǫ 1 ǫ ) (.13) 6

8 The first of relations (.13) give while ǫ + (1 tan θ r ) = ǫ cosθ s (.14) m 1 = 4m 0ǫ m = 6m 0ǫ + (.15a) (.15b) where ǫ + = ǫ +ǫ 1, ǫ = ǫ ǫ 1 (.16) We require ǫ ǫ + and the relation (.14) then implies that tan θ r 1/, contrary to the experimental data. The relation (.1) is the consequence of det δm ν = 0. To avoid this, the simplest extension is that a ǫ 1 ǫ 13 δm ν = m o ǫ 1 0 ǫ 3 (.17) ǫ 13 ǫ 3 0 where a 1. Then the relations in Eq. (.1) are replaced by a = ǫ 1 (tan θ r cos θ s ) ǫ (tan θ r sin θ s ) = ǫ + (1 tan θ r ) ǫ cosθ s (.18) ǫ 1 +ǫ +ǫ 3 = a (.19) Further while the relation (.15a) remains the same but (.15b) is changed to m = m 0 [a 6ǫ +] = 4m 0 [ǫ +(1+ 1 tan θ r )+ 1 ǫ cosθ s )] (.0a) On using Eq. (.15a) Since m m 1, it follows that m = 4m 0ǫ + (1+tan θ r )+ 1 cosθ s m 1 m 4m 0 ǫ + (.0b) Thus from Eqs. (.15a), (.0b) and (1.4) ǫ = m 1 m = (.1) ǫ + 7

9 The other relations which diagonalization give are cosθ a ǫ + sinθ a sinθ s sinθ r ǫ = 0 (.) ǫ 1 +ǫ 13 = cosθ r sinθ s (cosθ a sinθ a )ǫ (cosθ a +sinθ a )tanθ r ǫ + (.3) ǫ 1 ǫ 13 = cosθ r sinθ s (cosθ a +sinθ a )ǫ +(cosθ a sinθ a )tanθ r ǫ + (.4) ǫ 3 = sinθ a (ǫ + +ǫ cosθ s ) ǫ cosθ a sinθ s sinθ r (.5) To proceed further it is convenient to use the expansion about the maximum atmospheric angle sin θ a = 1 sinθ a = 1 (1+t), cosθ a = 1 (1 t), sin θ a = 0.5+t (.6) Then the relations (.-.5) simplify to tǫ + +sinθ s sinθ r ǫ = 0 (.7) ǫ 1 ǫ 13 = tcosθ r sinθ s ǫ + tanθ r ǫ + (.8) ǫ 3 = ǫ + +ǫ cosθ s (.9) ǫ 1 +ǫ 13 = cosθ r sinθ s ǫ + ttanθ r ǫ + = sinθ s (1 3 sin θ r )ǫ (.30) where in the second step we have used Eq. (.7). Further from Eqs. (.18) and (.9) so that together with Eq. (.30) a ǫ 3 = ǫ + tan θ r ǫ cosθ s (.31) tanθ s = (ǫ 1 +ǫ 13 )(1+ 3 sin θ r ) a ǫ 3 +tan θ r ǫ + (.3) We note that if ν µ ν τ ( 3) symmetry is imposed so that ǫ 1 = ǫ 13, t 0, θ r 0, the relations (.7), (.8) are identically satisfied. Further if a ǫ 3 = ǫ 1, then Eq. (.3) gives tanθ s = i.e. the TB solar angle. However if sinθ r 0, Eq. (.7) implies that sinθ r = t sinθ s ǫ + ǫ ± 1 t 10, (.33) on usingeq. (.1) and the TB value of θ s. This can accommodate any finite value of sinθ r for extremely small deviation from the maximal atmospheric angle sin θ a = 1. Putting t 8

10 0 Θr Degree Θ a Degree 45 Figure 1. θ r as a function of θ a. The solid, dotted and dashed lines respectively correspond to the best fit values for DAYA BAY, RENO and TK collaborations. as given in the third relation of Eq.(.6) in Eq.(.33), we plot θ r as a function of θ a in Fig.1 which is if sign is taken negative in Eq.(.33). If the sign is positive, θ a is greater than 45 and for θ r = 10 it is It is clear that one can achieve θ r 7 to 10, keeping θ a around 45. Thus it covers recently measured values of θ r by TK, DAYA BAY[5] and RENO collaboration[6]. It follows from Eq. (.3) that TB solar angle is obtained i.e. tanθ s =, if a ǫ 3 +tan θ r ǫ + = 1 (ǫ 1 +ǫ 13 )(1+ 3 sin θ r ) (.34) It remains to determine the parameters in the δm ν given in Eq. (.17). It follows from Eqs. (.0b), (.9), (.30) and (.31) that ǫ 1 +ǫ 13 ǫ + ǫ 3 a ǫ + = 1 m 4 m 0 (.35) sinθ s ǫ ǫ (.36) On the other hand from Eqs. (1.5) and (.8) ǫ 1 ǫ 13 ǫ + tanθ r (.37) Thus it is possible to have TB solar angle sin θ s = 1 3 and almost maximal atmospheric angle sin θ a 1 and non zero sin θ r but at the cost of ν µ ν τ symmetry as the relations 9

11 (.36) and (.37) would imply. Finally the oscillation data give only a lower bound on the heaviest of the neutrino mass m h m > 0.05eV but cannot fix it. However m 0 is further constrained by WMAP data, m i < ( )eV. Taking m 0 0.1eV, we get from Eqs. (1.4), (.35), (.36) and (.37) that Then ǫ 3 a ǫ ǫ 1 +ǫ ǫ 1 ǫ ǫ 1 ǫ (.38) if the sign is chosen to be positive for ǫ ǫ+. If the sign is negative, ǫ 1 and ǫ 13 should be interchanged. This is meant for the rest of the manuscript. We may remark here that there are four parameters, apart from m o, in Eq.(.17). There are two mass differences and three mixing angles. Thus the prediction one gets is a relationship between θ r and θ a which is shown in Fig.1. All above parameters as well Fig.1 are obtained by using best fit values given in Eq.(1.4). All the values given in Eq.(.38)are consistent with small perturbations (at least an order of magnitude smaller) to M ν = m 0 I, I being the unit matrix. It is important to note that Eq. (.38) implies approximate ν µ ν τ symmetry (instead of ν µ ν τ symmetry,which would imply ǫ 1 ǫ 13 = 0). On the other hand the exact ν µ ν τ symmetry would imply ǫ 1 = ǫ 13 i.e. ǫ 1 +ǫ 13 = 0. In order to see how this happens for θ r 0, we note from Eqs. (.1), (.36) and (.37) that ǫ 13 = tan(θ r ) ǫ tan(θ r ) (.39) In Fig., we plot ǫ 13 /ǫ 1 as a function of θ r. We see how the transition from exact ν µ ν τ symmetry (ǫ 1 /ǫ 13 = 1) at θ r = 0 to approximate ν µ ν τ symmetry ( ǫ13 1,e.g. at θ r 10, ǫ ) takes place. ǫ 1 ǫ 1 3 Summary and Conclusion We have considered a model of approximate flavor symmetry which has near degenerate neutrino mass. It is shown that it is possible to have nonzero reactor angle while preserving the TB solar angle sin θ s = 1 3 and near maximal atmospheric angle sin θ a 0.5.The nonzero sinθ r implies approximate ν µ ν τ symmetry rather than that ν µ ν τ symmetry. Acknowledgments The author would like to thank Prof. Fernando Quevedo for hospitality at the Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics (AS-ICTP), Trieste, where the work was performed. 10

12 Ε 13 Ε Θ r Degree Figure. ǫ 13 /ǫ 1 as a function of θ r. References [1] B. Pontecorvo, Sov. Phys. JETP 6 (1957) 49 [Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 33 (1957) 549]; Z. Maki, M. Nakagawa and S. Sakata, Prog. theor. Phys. 8 (196) 870. [] K. Nakamura et al. (Particle Data Group), J. Phys. G 37 (010) [3] T. Schwertz, M. Tortala, and J. W. F Valle, [arxiv: ]; G. L. Fogli, E. Lisi, A. Marrone, A. Palazzo and A. M. Rotunno, [arxiv: ]. [4] K. Abe et al. (TK collaboration), arxiv: [5] F. P. An et al. (Daya Bay Collobation), arxiv: [hep-ex]. [6] J.K. Ahn et al (RENO colleboration): arxiv: [hep-ex]. [7] Riazuddin, Phys. Rev. D 81 (010) [8] For a review see, for example, R. N.Mohapatra and A.Y. Smirnov: arxiv: , Ann 11

13 Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci 59 (006) 569. [9] C.S. Lam, Phys. Lett. B 507 (001) 14 ; Phys. Rev. D 71 (003) [10] P.F. Harrison, D. H. Perkins and W. G. Scott, Phys. Lett. B 530 (00) 167 [11] S. F. King, arxiv: v5. [1] T. Araki, Phys. Rev. D 84 (011) , arxiv: [13] S. Morisi, K. M. Patel and E. Peinado, Phys. Rev. D 84 (011) 05300, arxiv: [14] S. F. King and C. Luhn, arxiv: [15] S. L. Glashow, arxiv: [16] Fayyazuddin and Riazuddin, Phys. Rev. D 35 (1987) 01; Riazuddin, JHEP 10 (003) 009; Riazuddin, Phys. Rev. D 63 (001) [17] A. Zee, Phys. Lett. B 93 (1980) 389. For a recent discussion of this model, see ref. [16]. [18] Xiao-Gang He and S.K.Majee, arxiv: v. [19] J.Matsuda, C.J.Jarlskog, S.Skadhauf and M.Tanimoto, hep-ph ; Riazuddin, 3rd reference in [13]. 1

A Novel and Simple Discrete Symmetry for Non-zero θ 13

A Novel and Simple Discrete Symmetry for Non-zero θ 13 Yang-Hwan, Ahn (KIAS) Collaboration with Seungwon Baek and Paolo Gondolo NRF workshop Yonsei Univ., Jun 7-8, 2012 Contents Introduction We propose