Welcome! Webinar Biostatistics: sample size & power. Thursday, April 26, 12:30 1:30 pm (NDT)

Transcription

1 . Welcome! Webinar Biostatistics: sample size & power Thursday, April 26, 12:30 1:30 pm (NDT) Get started now: Please check if your speakers are working and mute your audio. Please use the chat box to ask questions.

2 How to participate in this webinar Any issues? Technical Support Locally: or go to 2

3 Introduction Speaker Hensley H Mariathas Ph.D., Biostatistic Lead NL SUPPORT 3

4 Webinar # Biostatistics: sample size & power

5 Sample Size Calculation and Power Analysis Lead Biostatistician NL SUPPORT Faculty of Medicine Memorial University of Newfoundland Canada April 26, 2018

6 Why and What Why sample size calculation? Part of study design to determine the number of participants needed to detect clinically relevant treatment effect Number of patients in a study restricted because of ethical, cost and time consideration What we need? Requires prior estimation of study results May use data from other prior studies Will use investigator judgment and choice

7 Key Things to Decide Things You Have to Decide First Type of question: estimation, comparison etc. Study design: trial, cluster, case-control etc. Type of outcome measure: data level Likely analytic method Hypothesis test verses confidence interval approach Things You May Have to Decide Next Desired maximal type I & II error rates or Desired % ile and width of CI Likely outcome in controls Effect size you wish to detect (e.g. minimal difference in group outcome) Measure of variation expected (e.g. group SD for outcome)

8 Research Questions Example 1: Estimating a population proportion We want to estimate the true immunization coverage in a community of school children to be within 4% of the true value. Example 2: Trial to reduce blood pressure Suppose researcher wants to compare two treatments designed to reduce blood pressure. Researcher decide that a clinically important difference would be 10 mm Hg.

9 Two approaches to sample size calculations Precision-based With what precision do you want to estimate the quantum of one or more characteristics of the population, called parameter(s),(for example, mean hemoglobin level or prevalence of asthma ect.,)? To estimate the value of the parameter under study for a prefixed precision and level of confidence. Power-based How small a difference is it important to detect and with what degree of certain? To achieve a desired power for detecting a clinically or scientifically meaningful difference at a prefixed level of significance.

10 Precision-based sample size calculation Suppose you want be able to estimate your unknown parameter with a certain degree of precision. A 100(1 α)% confidence interval with certain width. The narrower the interval is, the more precise the inference is Consider the maximum half width of the 100(1 α)% confidence interval of the unknown parameter and usually referred to as the maximum error or margin of error In general a 100(1 α)% confidence interval of the unknown parameter is given by Estimate ± z α/2 SE, SE = σ n where z α/2 is the upper (α/2) th quartile of the standard normal distribution and σ is the population SD which is unknown The sample size required can be chosen as n = z2 α/2 σ2 E 2, E = maximum error

11 Precision-based sample size calculation-one sample Sample size for estimating a population mean ( zα/2 σ ) 2 n = (1) E

12 Precision-based sample size calculation-one sample Sample size for estimating a population mean ( zα/2 σ ) 2 n = (1) E Sample size for estimating a population proportion n = p(1 p) ( zα/2 ) 2 ( zα/2 ) 2 = pq (2) E E

13 Precision-based sample size calculation-one sample Sample size for estimating a population mean ( zα/2 σ ) 2 n = (1) E Sample size for estimating a population proportion n = p(1 p) The values of σ and p ( zα/2 E ) 2 ( zα/2 ) 2 = pq (2) E The values of σ and p can be taken from a similar published studies or based on a pilot studies.

14 Precision-based sample size calculation-two sample Sample size for estimating mean difference ( 2 unrelated group) n 1 = n 2 = n(per group) = z2 α/2 ( σ 2 E σ2 2 ) (3)

15 Precision-based sample size calculation-two sample Sample size for estimating mean difference ( 2 unrelated group) n 1 = n 2 = n(per group) = z2 α/2 ( σ 2 E σ2 2 ) (3) Sample size for estimating of difference in proportions n 1 = n 2 = n(per group) = z2 α/2 E 2 (p 1(1 p 1 ) + p 2 (1 p 2 )) (4)

16 Precision-based sample size calculation-two sample Sample size for estimating mean difference ( 2 unrelated group) n 1 = n 2 = n(per group) = z2 α/2 ( σ 2 E σ2 2 ) (3) Sample size for estimating of difference in proportions n 1 = n 2 = n(per group) = z2 α/2 E 2 (p 1(1 p 1 ) + p 2 (1 p 2 )) (4) About σ i and p i for i = 1, 2 are: Where, σ i is the standard deviation expected in group i, p i is the expected proportion with events in group i and E is the half the desired width of the CI.

17 Practical Problem Example 1 Suppose you wish to carry out a trial of a new treatment for hypertension (high blood pressure) among men aged between 50 and 60. You would like your 95% confidence interval to have width 10 mmhg (i.e. you want to be 95% sure that the true difference in means is within ±5 mmhg of your estimated difference in means). How many subjects will you need to include in your study?

18 Solution for the practical problem We know that the 95% confidence interval for a difference in means is given by σ1 2 ( x 1 x 2 ) ± 2 + σ2 2 (5) n 1 n 2 Hence, we want 2 σ 2 1 n 1 + σ2 2 n 2 to be equal to 5, that is for n 1 = n 2 = n and equal variance σ σ = 2 σ n 1 n 2 n = 5 σ n = 2.5 since we are aiming for groups of the same size

19 Solution for the practical problem cont... Need to know what σ is likely to be This is known from (a) previous experience (i.e. knowledge of the distribution of systolic blood pressure among men with hypertension in this age group), (b) using other published papers on blood pressure studies in a similar group of people or (c) carrying out a pilot study From option (b) assume σ = 20 mmhg. This gives 2 20 n = 2.5 n ( ) = n =

20 Power-based sample size calculation Relates to hypothesis testing Four possible outcomes of a test of hypothesis True State of Nature Clinical Decision H 0 True H a True Do not reject H 0 Correct Decision Type II error (β) Reject H 0 Type I error(α) Correct Decision Type I error (False positive): Rejecting H 0 when H 0 is true α: Type I error rate. Maximum p-value considered statistically significant Type II error (False negative): Failing to reject H 0 when H 0 is false β: Type II error rate. Power: The statistical power of a test is defined to be 1 β.

21 Power-based sample size calculation Power analysis Type I error is usually considered to be a more important and/or serious error which one would like to avoid Control α at an acceptable level and try to minimize β by choosing an appropriate sample size

22 Power-based sample size calculation Power analysis Type I error is usually considered to be a more important and/or serious error which one would like to avoid Control α at an acceptable level and try to minimize β by choosing an appropriate sample size Key steps of power analysis Select a significance level (type I error), which is willing to tolerate (i.e. typically α = 0.05) A choice of power is either 90% or 80% Specify a clinically meaningful difference( ). The knowledge regarding the standard deviation (i.e.,σ) of the primary endpoint considered in the study is also required for sample size determination

23 Comparing Means One-Sample Design The sample size need to achieve power 1 β can be obtained by solving the following equation, where, n = (z α/2 + z β ) 2 σ 2 2 (6) z p is the upper p th quartile of the standard normal distribution. = µ µ 0 is the difference between true mean (µ) and a reference value (µ 0 ). σ 2 is the population variance need to be replace by prior knowledge.

24 Comparing Means Two-Sample Design: Two independent groups The formula for estimating the sample size in each of the study group n 1 = n 2 = n is given by where, n = 2(z α/2 + z β ) 2 σ 2 2 or n = 2(z α/2 + z β ) 2 δ 2 (7) n is the minimum sample size required in each group (equal sample size and hence total size is 2n) = µ 1 µ 2 is the chosen difference in means to be detected with. σ 2 anticipated endpoint group variance ( You may assume σ 2 1 = σ 2 2 = σ2 ). δ = σ is the effect size, minimum difference we wish to detect relative to the endpoint group variance.

25 Comparing Means Two-Sample Design: Two dependent groups (Paired) These observations cannot be assumed to be independent of each other; the statistical test and the sample size estimation will have to take into account this dependency. Because of this we can use the sample size formula as given in (6) for one sample: n = (z α/2 + z β ) 2 σ 2 d 2 d (8) where, σ d is the unknown population SD of the differences between pairs of observations But σ d = σ 2(1 r), with σ is the SD of the observations at one time point and r is the correlation between observations within subjects over measurements

26 If two groups of unequal size Applies even if not using t-test Assuming n per group needed if groups equal n 1 as the size of the first unequal group (say, standard treatment group) kn 1 as the size of the second group ( say, new treatment group) (k + 1)n Then n 1 = 2k From (7), n = 2(z α/2 + z β ) 2 σ 2 2.

27 Comparison of Proportions between Two Groups Two independent groups, Binary The number of participants per group required to detect a difference p 1 p 2 in the proportions with significance level α and power 1 β is given by n = (z α/2 + z β ) 2 (p 1 (1 p 1 ) + p 2 (1 p 2 )) (p 1 p 2 ) 2 (9) where, p 1 is the expected proportion in Group 1 and p 2 is the expected proportion in Group 2.

28 Comparison of Proportions between Two Groups Two independent groups, Odds If the difference is specified as an odds ratio OR = p 1/(1 p 1 ) p 2 /(1 p 2 ) = p 1(1 p 2 ) p 2 (1 p 1 ) then an approximate formula is given by n = 2(z α/2 + z β ) 2 [ln(or)] 2 p(1 p) (10) where, p = p 1 + p 2 2 and OR is the odds ratio to be detected.

29 Comparison of Proportions between Two Groups Case Control Study, Odds In case-control study, data are usually summarized in odds ratio, rather than difference between two proportions when the outcome variables of interest were categorical If p 1 and p 2 are proportions of cases and controls respectively, exposed to a risk factor OR = p 1/(1 p 1 ) p 2 /(1 p 2 ) = p 1(1 p 2 ) p 2 (1 p 1 ) If we know the prevalence of exposure in the general population p, the total sample size N for estimating an OR is N = (1 + k)2 k (z α/2 + z β ) 2 [ln(or)] 2 p(1 p), k = n 1 (11) n 2

30 Comparison of Proportions between Two Groups Ordered categorical data n = 6(z α/2 + z β ) 2 [ln(or)] 2 (1 k i=1 p 3 i ) (12) where OR is the odds ratio of a patient being in category i or less for one treatment compared to the other k is the number of categories and p i is the mean proportion expected in category i, that is, p i = (p 1i + p 2i )/2 where p 1i and p 2i are the proportions expected in category i for the two groups 1 and 2 respectively.

31 Comparison of Proportions between Two Groups Example 3 Randomized trial of two treatments for HIV patients Primary outcome = proportion of patients with viral load (VL) less than the limit of detection at 48 weeks Expect that 60% of patients in the standard of care arm will have suppressed VL Interested in difference of 20% p 1 = 0.6, p 2 = 0.8, α = 0.05 and β = 0.2, The sample size per group is 81

32 Problems Problem 1 An investigator wish to estimate the sample size necessary to detect a 10 mg/dl difference in cholesterol level in a diet intervention group compared to the control group. The SD from the other data is estimated to be 50 mg/dl. For two sided 5% significance level, z α/2 = 1.96 and for 90% power z β = Thus the required sample size in each group is n = 2 ( ) = 526

33 Problems Problem 2 The Canadian Contraceptive Study 2002 is used as the best evidence for rates of oral contraceptive pills (OCP) use in the Canadian Population. It reported that 80% of women report ever use of OCP and 20% report use more than 10years. The average time duration of OCP use was 6.4 years. Meta-analysis reviewing the extent of relative risk reduction of endometrial cancer with OCP use report 0.44 at 4 years of use, 0.33 at 8years of use and 0.28 at 12 years of use. ( decreased rates of 56%, 67% and 72% respectively). Calculating that the probability of exposure to OCP for greater than 5 years at 60% and that women without the exposure have a risk of endometrial cancer that is 3 times higher. What sample size needed at α = 5% with power of 80%?

34 Problems Problem 2: Solution For two sided 5% significance level, z α/2 = 1.96 and for 80% power z β = 0.84 OR = 3 For k = 1 from (11), the total sample size N is N = (1 + 1)2 1 ( ) 2 [ln(3)] = 108 Since k = 1, then n 1 = n 2 = 54

35 Problems SAS output using proc power for problem 2

36 Problems From Example 3 Instead of 81, if we had only 60 samples in each group If we had 110 samples in each group

37 Questions?

38 Thank You!

39 Funding opportunity

40 Save the date: Upcoming sessions Webinar: Knowledge Translation beyond Publications. Thursday May 24, Time: 12:30 PM 1:30 PM (NDT) Webinar: Let's Talk Policy. Thursday June 21, Time: 12:30 PM 1:30 PM (NDT) Workshop: Writing in Plain Language. Thursday May 17, Time: 12:00 PM 2:00 PM (NDT) Go to to register Check out our past events, slides and recordings on our website.

41 Keep in touch Eva Vat, Training and Capacity lead / Patient Engagement lead eva.vat@med.mun.ca Sign up for our Newsletter