arxiv:hep-ph/ v3 8 Jul 2005
|
|
- Mervyn Byrd
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 KEK-TH-9 SO() Group Theory for the Unified Model Building arxiv:hep-ph/4v 8 Jul Takeshi Fukuyama Amon Ilakovac Tatsuru Kikuchi Stjepan Meljanac 4 and Nobuchika Okada Department of Physics Ritsumeikan University Kusatsu Shiga -877 Japan Department of Physics University of Zagreb P.O. Box Bijenička cesta HR- Zagreb Croatia Institut Rudjer Bošković Bijenička cesta 4 P.O. Box 8 HR- Zagreb Croatia Theory Group KEK Oho - Tsukuba Ibaraki -8 Japan February 8 Abstract The complete tables of Clebsch-Gordan (CG) coefficients for a wide class of SO() SUSY grand unified theories (GUTs) are given. Explicit expressions of states of all corresponding multiplets under standard model gauge group G = SU() C SU() L U() Y necessary for evaluation of the CG coefficients are presented. The SUSY SO() GUT model considered here includes most of the Higgs irreducible representations usually used in the literature: 4 4 and. Mass matrices of all G multiplets are found for the most general superpotential. These results are indispensable for the precision calculations of the gauge couplings unification and proton decay etc. fukuyama@se.ritsumei.ac.jp ailakov@rosalind.phy.hr rp9979@se.ritsumei.ac.jp 4 meljanac@irb.hr nobuchika.okada@kek.jp
2 Introduction A particularly attractive idea for the physics beyond the standard model (SM) is the possible appearance of grand unified theories (GUTs) []. The idea of GUTs bears several profound features. Perhaps the most obvious one is that GUTs have the potential to unify the diverse set of particle representations and parameters found in the SM into a single comprehensive and hopefully predictive framework. For example through the GUT symmetry one might hope to explain the quantum numbers of the fermion spectrum or even the origins of fermion mass. Moreover by unifying all U() generators within a non- Abelian theory GUTs would also provide an explanation for the quantization of electric charge. By combining GUTs with supersymmetry (SUSY) we hope to unify the attractive features of GUTs simultaneously with those of SUSY into a single theory SUSY GUTs []. The apparent gauge couplings unification of the minimal supersymmetric standard model (MSSM) is strong circumstantial evidence in favor of the emergence of a SUSY GUT near M G GeV []. While there are a priori many choices for such possible groups the list can be narrowed down by requiring groups of rank 4 that have complex representations. The smallest groups satisfying these requirements are SU() SU() SO() and E. Amongst these choices SO() is particularly attractive [4] because SO() is the smallest simple Lie group for which a single anomaly-free irreducible representation (irrep) (namely the spinor representation) can accommodate the entire SM fermion content of each generation. Once we fix SO() as the gauge group we have also many choices of the Higgs fields though they are limited by the gauge symmetry. The Higgs fields play an essential role in the spontaneous symmetry breaking of the SO() gauge group and as a source of the observed fermion masses. The SO() gauge group must be broken down to the standard model gauge group G = SU() C SU() L U() Y gauge group and each SO() irrep has to be decomposed into G multiplets. In this paper we make an explicit construction of the states of these G multiplets. Using these states we calculate the CG coefficients appearing in the mass matrices for the states belonging to G irreps and corresponding mass matrices in a wide class of the SO() models. The purpose of the present paper is to give detailed structures of the SO() GUTs based on a general model as far as has been possible and to serve a wide range of unified model builders. The paper is organized as follows. In Sec. we give a class of SUSY SO() GUTs and give an explicit form of the most general superpotential. In such a superpotential we postulate a renormalizability in order to keep the predictability [ 7]. However the result developed here is also applicable to the non-renormalizable models [8 9 4]. The symmetry breakings are considered in Sec.. Sec. 4 is devoted to present explicit forms of the states in the G multiplets for all SO() irreps. This is the central part of the present paper. Using these tables we give in Sec. the mass matrices with the CG coefficients for a class of SUSY SO() GUTs together with suitable tests and consistency checks for them. In Sec. we consider the quark and lepton mass matrices in
3 general SUSY SO() models. Sec. 7 is devoted to conclusion. We list the decompositions of each SO() irreps under G subgroup in Appendix A. In Appendix B we present the complete list of the CG coefficients for the G multiplets for all SO() irreps. A Class of SUSY SO() GUTs In this section we consider a class of renormalizable SUSY SO() models. They include three families of matter fields Ψ i (i = ) transforming as dimensional fundamental spinor representation gauge fields contained in the adjoint representation and set of SO() multiplets of Higgs fields enabling most general Yukawa couplings. The most general Yukawa couplings follow from decomposition of = + + i.e. they include the Higgs fields in H = D = = irreps respectively. Furthermore to consider as general case of the symmetry breaking of SO() to the standard model gauge group G as possible we add several Higgs fields containing G singlets. They are A = 4 = Φ = and E = 4 irreps. Of course that is not the most general case. However this set of Higgs fields is quite rich and gives rise to several realistic SUSY SO() models. Our aim is to give a systematic method for treatment of models with complicated Higgs sectors. This is a generalization of the method proposed in Refs. [] [] and [7]. We shall assume that the SUSY is preserved so that we consider the breaking of SUSY SO() to the MSSM. Then the Yukawa couplings are W Y = Y ij Ψ i HΨ j + Y ij Ψ i DΨ j + Y ij Ψ i Ψ j () where i j = denote the generation indices. Note that H is a fundamental SO() irrep and A D Φ and + are antisymmetric tensors of rank 4 and respectively. E is a symmetric traceless tensor of rank. The most general Higgs superpotential is given by: W = m Φ + m + m H + m 4A + m E + m D + λ Φ + λ Φ + ( λ + λ 4 ) HΦ + λ A Φ iλ A + λ 7 εaφ + E ( λ 8 E + λ 9 A + λ Φ + λ + λ + λ H ) + D (λ 4 E + λ Φ) + D { λ HA + λ 7 HΦ + ( λ 8 + λ 9 ) A + ( λ + λ ) Φ } ()
4 where SO() invariants are defined in the fundamental SO() basis 9 and in the Y diagonal basis 9 (which we will define in the next section) as follows: Φ Φ a b c d Φ a b c d = Φ abcdφ abcd a b c d e a b c d e = abcde abcde H H a H a = H a H a A A a b A a b = A aba ab E E a b E a b = E abe ab D D a b c D a b c = D abcd abc Φ Φ a b c d Φ a b e f Φ c d e f = Φ abcd Φ abefφ cdef Φ Φ a b c d a b e f g c d e f g = Φ abcd abefg cdefg HΦ a b c d e H a Φ b c d e = abcde H aφ bcde HΦ a b c d e H a Φ b c d e = abcde H aφ bcde A Φ A a b A c d Φ a b c d = A ab A cdφ abcd ia ia a b a c d e f b c d e f = ia ab acdef bcdef εaφ ε a A a a a 4 a a a 7 a 8 a 9 a a Φ a a Φ a 4 a a a 7 a 8 a 9 a = ε a a a a 4 a a a 7 a 8 a 9 a A a a Φ a a 4 a a Φ a7 a 8 a 9 a E E a b E a c E b c = E ab E ace bc EA E a b A a c A b c = E ab A aca bc EΦ E a b Φ a c d e Φ b c d e = E ab Φ acdeφ bcde E E a b a c d e f b c d e f = E ab acdef bcdef E E a b a c d e f b c d e f = E ab acdef bcdef EH E a b H a H b = E ab H ah b ED E a b D a c d D b c d = E ab D acdd bcd D Φ D a b c D a d e Φ b c d e = D abc D adeφ bcde DHA D a b c H a A b c = D abc H aa bc DHΦ D a b c H d Φ a b c d = D abc H dφ abcd D A D a b c a b c d e A d e = D abc abcdea de D A D a b c a b c d e A d e = D abc abcdea de D Φ D a b c a b d e f Φ c d e f = D abc abdefφ cdef D Φ D a b c a b d e f Φ c d e f = D abc abdefφ cdef. () Here a b c (a b c ) run over all the SO() vector (Y diagonal) indices and ε is 4
5 a totally antisymmetric SO() invariant tensor with ε = iε 4789 =. (4) Symmetry Breaking Here we first introduce Y diagonal basis (see also Ref. [8]): = + i = i = +4 i 4 = 4 i = + i = i 7 = 7 +8 i 8 = 7 8 i 9 = 9 + i = 9 i up to the normalization factor. It is more convenient since ( 7 9) transforms as -plet and ( 4 8 ) transforms as -plet under SU() U() X (for that reason Y diagonal basis could also be called SU() basis). Consequently ( ) and ( 4) are SU() L doublets with definite hypercharges Y = and Y = respectively. Similarly ( 7 9) and ( 8 ) transform under SU() C as and with definite hypercharges Y = and Y = respectively. Note that under the complex conjugation (c.c.) = = 4 = 7 = 8 9 = and vice versa. The SO() invariants are build in such a way that an index a is contracted (summed) with the corresponding c.c. index a for example T a T a. The basis in A = 4 D = Φ = and + = + dimensional spaces are defined by totally antisymmetric (unit) tensors (a b ) (a b c ) (a b c d ) and (a b c d e ) respectively and similarly in a b c d e indices in Y diagonal basis. The states of the and have additional properties iεā ā ā ā 4 ā ā ā 7 ā 8 ā 9 ā a a 7 a 8 a 9 a = ā ā ā ā 4 ā iεā ā ā ā 4 ā ā ā 7 ā 8 ā 9 ā a a 7 a 8 a 9 a = ā ā ā ā 4 ā () that allow one to project out the and states respectively from the antisymmetric states (abcde). The explicit expressions for antisymmetric tensors are for example etc. Important relations are (ab) = ab ba (abc) = abc + cab + bca bac acb cba () () = i( ) (4) = i( 4 ) () = i( ) (78) = i(7 8 ) (9) = i(9 ) (7) Symmetric E = 4 dimensional space is spanned by traceless symmetric states {a b } a b + b a (a b = 9 ) and a c a {a a } with a c a. Also important
6 relations are {} = + {4} = {} = + {78} = {9} = (8) Now the Higgs fields A E and Φ contain 8 directions of singlets under the G subgroup (see Appendix A). The corresponding vacuum expectation values (VEVs) are defined by: A = A i Âi (9) i= E = E Ê () = v R v R () = v R v R () Φ = Φ Φ i i () where unit directions Âi (i = ) Ê v R v R and Φ i (i = ) in the Y diagonal basis are: i= Â = Â() () = i ( + 4) (4) Â = Â() () = i ( ) () Ê = v R = v R = Φ = Φ = Ê() () = { [ + 4] [ ]} () () () = () () = (48) (7) (79) (8) Φ () () = 4 (4) (9) Φ () () = 7 ( ) () () Φ = Φ () = ([ + 4][ ]). () Here and hereafter the upper and the lower indices indicate the SU() C SU() L U() Y SU(4) SU() L SU() R quantum numbers respectively in the case of double indices. A
7 word about notation: the square brackets are used for grouping of indices. This grouping of indices is used to emphasize the SU() L and SU() C structures within the state vectors. The square brackets satisfy usual distributive law with respect to summation of indices and tensor product of indices e.g. ([ + 4][ ]) = ( ) = () + (78) + (9) + (4) + (478) + (49) ([ ][[78 + 9] 7[ + 9] 9[ + 78]]) = ( ) = ( ) + ( ). () Further the numerical factors which could be misinterpreted as additional SO() indices are written in italics. The unit directions appearing in VEVs satisfy the following orthonormality relations  i Âj = δ ij (i j = ) Ê = v R v R = v R v R = v R v R = Φ i Φ j = δ ij (i j = ). () Due to the D-flatness condition the absolute values of the VEVs v R and v R are equal v R = v R. (4) The superpotential of Eq. () calculated at the VEVs in Eqs. (4) () is: W = m Φ + m + m 4 A + m E + λ Φ + λ Φ + λ A Φ iλ A + λ 7 ε A Φ + E [ λ 8 E + λ 9 A + λ Φ ]. () Inserting the VEVs from Eqs. (4) () one obtains W = m [ Φ + Φ + ] Φ + m v R v R 7
8 + m ( ) 4 A + A + m E + λ [Φ 9 + Φ Φ [ + λ Φ + Φ + λ [A Φ + A Φ [ ( + λ A ) ( + A ] + Φ Φ 9 ] + Φ v R v R ] + A A Φ )] v R v R [ + λ 7 A Φ Φ + A Φ ] + A Φ Φ [ ( + λ 8 E + λ 9E A + A )] [ ( + λ E Φ + Φ ) ] + Φ 4. () The VEVs are determined by the following equation: { Φ Φ Φ v R v R A A = m Φ + λ Φ + λ v R v R + λ A + λ 7 A Φ } W =. (7) E From Eq. (7) we obtain seven equations for Φ Φ Φ A A E and v R v R. They are: λ Φ E = m Φ + λ Φ + λ Φ + λ v R v R + + λ 7 A Φ = m Φ + λ Φ Φ λ 7 A Φ [ = v R v R λ Φ E λ Φ Φ + λ Φ E λ A + + λ v R v R + + λ7 Φ A λ A A + λ 7 A Φ m + λ Φ + λ Φ + λ Φ λ ] A λ A λ A Φ λ A = m 4 A + Φ + λ v R v R + λ 7 Φ Φ 8 + λ9 A E
9 λ A Φ = m 4 A + + λ A Φ λ v R v R + λ 7 Φ + λ 7 Φ Φ λ 9A E λ8 E = m E + + λ9 A λ 9A λ Φ + λ Φ + λ Φ 4. (8) If we assume v R v R we obtain five quadratic equations and one linear equation for Φ i A i and E. For that case there are solutions. Two of them correspond to SU() symmetry and remaining solutions to G standard gauge group symmetry solutions. If we set v R = we find six quadratic equations for Φ Φ Φ A A and E with 4 solutions with symmetry groups having rank. They are isomorphic to G SU() C SU() L U() R U() B L. However there are solutions with higher symmetries. They are G G 4 G 4 and G. For general coupling constants λ λ m m 8 the solutions with higher symmetries are specified by following relations. Solutions with higher symmetries are characterized by:. SU() U() X and (SU() U()) flipped symmetry solutions { E = vr = Φ = ε Φ Φ = ε Φ A = ε A (9) where ε = and ε = correspond to the SU() U() X symmetric vacua and (SU() U()) flipped symmetric vacua respectively.. SU() symmetry solutions { E = Φ = Φ Φ = Φ A = A v R. (). G 4 SU(4) SU() L SU() R symmetry solutions { Φ = Φ = A = A = v R = Φ E. () 4. G SU() C SU() L SU() R U() B L symmetry solutions { Φ = A = v R = Φ Φ A E. () For reader s convenience we list the decompositions of each representation in Appendix A. 9
10 . G 4 SU(4) SU() L U() symmetry solutions { Φ = Φ = A = v R = Φ A E. (). G SU() C SU() L U() R U() B L symmetry solutions { vr = Φ i (i = ) A i (i = ) E. (4) The higher symmetry solutions given in Eqs. (9)-(4) lead to the crucial consistency checks for all results in this paper. 4 The states and Clebsch-Gordan coefficients 4. The states in the G multiplets In order to obtain and study the mass matrices it is convenient to decompose the Higgs representations under the G gauge group. The explicit decompositions of 4 4 and representations in Y diagonal basis are presented according to the G multiplets with the same quantum numbers which generally mix among themselves. The 8 singlets ( ) are already given in Eqs. (4) (). There are 4 = would-be NG modes. They are in the following multiplets: ( ) [( ) + c.c.] [( )+c.c.] [( )+c.c.] and [( )+c.c.]. The corresponding orthonormal states are listed in Table in Y -diagonal basis. The physically important modes so called Higgs doublets [( ) + c.c.] and color triplets [( ) + c.c.] states are listed in Tables and respectively. The remaining G multiplets are listed in Tables 4 and. There are altogether 9 states accommodated in G multiplets (see Table ). There are mass matrices containing NG modes containing doublets containing color triplets 9 containing the other modes. There are multiplets ( states) with zero mass and 9 G multiplets with masses different from zero (containing 9 = 8 states). Hence the mass spectrum contains 7 different mass eigenvalues. For the SU() solutions there are only different masses and G multiplets are grouped into multiplets transforming under the SU() group. For the G 4 solutions there are 7 different mass eigenvalues and G multiplets are grouped into multiplets transforming under the G 4 group (see Appendix A). The higher symmetries serve as a strong consistency check of our mass matrices and CG coefficients. We point out that the main basic blocks in all 9 states are SU() L irreps and
11 and SU() irreps and 8: SU() L [ + 4] () (4) (4) [ [ ] [ ] ][ { 4] [ 4 ] 4 4 } { 44 } 4 SU() C [ ] (79) (8) ( ) [ 7 9] (8 8) ( ) ([ 8 ] (79 9 7) ( ) ) [9 78] 8[ 9] [78 ] { } ( [9 78] 8 7[ 9] { 88 {8} {} {8} } [ [87 ] ) ] ( ) () () All states can be constructed combining and antisymmetrizing or symmetrizing the basic blocks. The basic blocks () and () which appear only in antisymmetric tensors are embraced by parenthesis the basic blocks which appear only in the symmetric tensors are embraced by curly brackets ({aa}/ = aa) while the basic blocks that appear both in symmetric and antisymmetric tensors are embraced by square brackets.
12 Table : States in the would-be NG modes ( ) + c.c. Â() () D () () () () Φ () () ( ) + c.c. Â( ) () D ( ) () ( ) () Φ ( ) () Φ ( ) () ( ) + c.c. Â( ) () Ê ( ) () Φ ( ) () Φ ( ) () ( ) + c.c. Â( ) () Ê ( ) () D ( ) () ( ) () ( ) () Φ ( ) () Φ ( ) () i () + c.c. (8) + c.c. 4 ([ + 4] 8) + c.c. 7 ( [ ]) + c.c. i (8 8) + c.c. ( [ 7 9]) + c.c. 4 ( [ [78 + 9]7[ + 9]9[ + 78]]) + c.c. 4 ( ) + c.c. 48 ([ + 4] [8 8]) + c.c. i ([ 4][ 7 9]) + c.c. {[ 4][ 7 9]} + c.c. 4 ([4 4][ 7 9]) + c.c. 48 ([ 4][ [78 + 9]7[ + 9]9[ + 78]]) + c.c. i ([ ][ 7 9]) + c.c. {[ ][ 7 9]} + c.c. ([ 4 ][8 8]) + c.c. 4 [ ([ 4 4][8 8]) + ([ 4 ][ ]) ] + c.c. [ ] 4 ([ 4 4][8 8]) ([ 4 ] [ ]) + c.c. 4 ([4 ][ 7 9]) + c.c. 48 ([ ][ [78 + 9]7[ + 9]9[ + 78]]) + c.c.
13 Table : States in the doublets [( ) + c.c.] ( ) + c.c. Ĥ( ) () [ ] + c.c. D ( ) () D ( ) () ( ) () ( ) () Φ ( ) () (4 ) + c.c. 8 ([ ][ ]) + c.c. [ ] 7 ([4 ][ ]) ([ ][ ]) + c.c. 7 [ ([4 ][ ]) + ([ ][ ]) ] + c.c. 4 ([ 4 ]8) + c.c. Table : States in the color triplets [( ) + c.c.] ( ) + c.c. Ĥ( ) () [ 7 9] + c.c. D ( ) () D ( ) () ( ) () ( ) () ( ) () Φ ( ) () ([ + 4] [ 7 9]) + c.c. ( [78 + 9] 7 [ + 9] 9 [ + 78]) + c.c. [ ] 4 (4 [ 7 9]) ( ) + c.c. [ ] 4 (4 [ 7 9]) + ( ) + c.c. ([ + 4][ [78 + 9]7[ + 9]9[ + 78]]) + c.c. 4 (4 [8 8]) + c.c.
14 Table 4: States in the other G multiplets including or ( ) + c.c. () () ( ) + c.c. Ê() () () () ( 4) + c.c. D ( 4 ) () ( 4 ) () ( 7 ) + c.c. D ( 7 ) () ( 7 ) () ( 7 ) () ( ) + c.c. D ( ) () ( ) () ( ) + c.c. Ê( ) ( ) ( ) () ( ) + c.c. D ( ) () ( ) () ( 4) + c.c. ( 4 ) () ( ) + c.c. ( ) () (8 ) + c.c. D (8 ) () (8 ) () (8 ) () (8) + c.c. [ {} ] + c.c ([ 4 4 ] 8 ) + c.c. (4 [ 7 9]) + c.c. 4 (4 [ [78 + 9]7[ + 9] 9 [ + 78]]) + c.c. ([ ][8 8]) + c.c. 4 ([4 ][8 8] [ ][ ]) +c.c 4 ([4 ][8 8] + [ ][ ]) +c.c ([ ] ) 4 4 [ 7 9] + c.c. ([ ] [ [78 + 9]7[ + 9]9[ + 78]]) + c.c. [ ] {79} {9} {7} + c.c. ( [ ]) [9 78] 8[ 9] [78 ] + c.c. ( [9 78] 8[ 9] [78 ] ) + c.c. ( [ ]) 4 [ + 4] [9 78] 8[ 9] [78 ] + c.c. ( [ ]) [9 78] + c.c. 8[ 9] ] ([ 4 4 [78 ] [ ]) [9 78] 8[ 9] [78 ] + c.c. ( [ ]) [ ] [9] + c.c. ( [ 4 [4 ] [9] ] + [ ][ ]) [78] c.c. ( [ ] 4 [4 ] [9] [ ][ ]) c.c [78]
15 Table : States in the other G multiplets including Φ ( ) + c.c. Φ ( ) () ( ) Â() () Ê () () Φ () () ( ) + c.c. Φ ( ) () ( ) + c.c. Φ ( ) () ( ) + c.c. Φ ( ) () ( ) + c.c. Φ ( ) () (8 ) Â(8) () Ê (8) ( ) Φ (8) () Φ (8) () 4 ([ ]8) + c.c. ( ) i 4 4 { } 4 4 ([ ] ) [ ] 4 ( [8 8]) + c.c. 4 ([ 4 4 ]) [8 8] + c.c. ( [ 4 [ 4] (9 78) ( [ 4 [ ] (9 78) 8( 9) ( i [ 78] (78 ) ]) + c.c. ]) 8( 9) (78 ) + c.c. [ + 78 [9]] ) { [ 78] [ + 78 [9]] } ( [9 789] [[78] 9 789]] ) ( [ 48 [ + 4] [ 78] [ + 78 [9]] ]) (8 ) + c.c. (8 ) Φ (8) () Φ (8) () ( [ [ 78] [ + 78 [9]] ]) + c.c. 4 ([ 4 4 ] [ [ 78] [ + 78 [9]] ])
16 Table : Number of G multiplets 8 ( ) 4 [( ) + c.c.] [( ) + c.c.] [( ) + c.c.] [( ) + c.c.] ( ) [( ) + c.c.] [( 4 ) + c.c.] 7 [( ) + c.c.] [( ) + c.c.] [( ) + c.c.] 4 [( ) + c.c.] 7 [( ) + c.c.] [( 7) + c.c.] [( ) + c.c.] [( ) + c.c.] [( ) + c.c.] [( ) + c.c.] [( 4) + c.c.] [( ) + c.c.] [( ) + c.c.] [( ) + c.c.] 4 (8 ) [(8 ) + c.c.] [(8 ) + c.c.] (8 ) sum 74 multiplets NG multiplets 9 massive multiplets
17 4. H operators and Clebsch-Gordan coefficients Let us denote by R the sum of all representations 4 4 and R = I R I dim R = 9. (7) There are cubic invariants (see Eq. ()) I(R I R J R K ) I IJK R K R K (8) where R I R J = K R K. Let us denote H-operators (see Refs. [] and []) transforming as R K and H K (R I R J ) = H K (R J R I ) R K (9) H K (R I R J ) = N The normalization factor N is chosen so that For example in the Y -diagonal basis I IJK R K. (4) H K (R I R J ) R K = I IJK. (4) [H Φ (Φ Φ )] abcd = [ (Φ ) abef (Φ ) cdē f (Φ ) acef (Φ ) bdē f +(Φ ) adef (Φ ) bcē f + (Φ ) cdef (Φ ) abē f ] (Φ ) bdef (Φ ) acē f + (Φ ) bcef (Φ ) adē f (4) For invariants of the type I III there is only one H operator H I for invariants of the type I IIK there are two H operators H I and H K and for invariants of the type I IJK there are three H operators H I H J and H K. The H operators are symmetric in R I and R J H(R I R J ) = H(R J R I ). More generally I IJK = I JIK = I IKJ = I JKI = I KIJ = I KJI. (4) Specially we are interested in CG coefficients when at least one of the states transforms as a singlet under the G group. That requires the decomposition of each SO() irrep R I into G irreps R I = Ri I (44) i where indices i just enumerate the G irreps with fixed Y contained in a specific R I irrep. There are eight singlets denoted here shortly by S I i defined in Eqs. (4)-(). For 7
18 this choice of G -singlet states the action of H operators are reduced to the invariant subspaces of states with fixed G quantum numbers which are listed in Tables H K (ŜI i RJ j ) = k C IJK ijk RK k (4) where R J j and RK k transform as identical G irreps (have the same G quantum numbers). For example for the evaluation of the first column in the () mass matrix (see Eq. (74)) the following H operators have to be evaluated Note that H E (Ê Ê() () ) = H (v R Ê() () ) = Ê () () () (). (4) C IJK ijk = I(ŜI i ˆR J j ˆR K k ) ŜI i ˆR J j ˆR K k (47) (the second part of Eq. (47) defines shortand notation) where ˆR I i ˆR I i (48) is the complex conjugated irrep of ˆRI i. The CG coefficients are listed in tables in Appendix B. Note that the CG coefficients depend only on the indices i j that represent G multiplets and not on the specific states within the G multiplets. That can be used as a consistency check of the states belonging to the specific G multiplets. We choose all SO() invariants in Eq. () to be real except for invariants containing the or the field separately (for example HΦ or E ). In this last case the sum of the two invariants one containing field and the other having field in place of are real. Generally CG coefficients are complex (in our case they are either real or pure imaginary). Starting with cubic invariants in Eq. () our choice of phases of states in Tables is such that it leads to the minimal number of imaginary terms in the mass matrices. Symmetry relations imply C IJK ijk CG coefficients also satisfy hermiticity relations = C JIK jik. (49) C IJK ijk = C IKJ ikj. () Here the i represents the label assigned to the irrep complex conjugated to the irrep designated by i. 8
19 Furthermore following relations are valid j i i C IJJ ijj dim RJ j = j dim Rj J = dim R J () j C IJK ijk CIJK ijl dim R I i dim RJ j = C(I J K)δ kl dim R I i = dim R I where C(I J K) are constants depending on irreps R I R J and R K. dim Rj J = dim R J () j 9
20 Mass Matrices. Mass Matrices For the sum of all representations R (see Eq. (7)) we define fluctuations of the Higgs field around the VEVs as R = R + ri I. () Ii Then the matrix element of the mass matrix corresponding to G multiplets i j (R I i and R J j transform identically under G ) is: M IJ ij = M IJ ij W r I i r J j R= R (4) = m I δ IJ δ ij + λ IJK Si I CIJK ijk () Kk where λ III = λ p λ IIK = λ p and λ IJK = λ p for invariants containing three identical representations two identical representations (different from the third one) and three different representations respectively. Specifically {λ IJK } = {λ λ 8 λ λ 7 λ 9 λ λ λ λ λ 4 λ λ λ λ 4 λ λ λ 7 λ 8 λ 9 λ λ }. According to Eq. () the trace of the total mass matrix over all dim R states in R is Tr M = I m I dim R I. () The mass matrices are generally non-hermitian. So the squares of the physical masses are equal to the absolute values of eigenvalues of matrices M M and MM. (One can obtain hermitian matrices M M i.e. MM with the same spectra.) For a real superpotential that is for λ = λ 4 λ = λ λ 8 = λ 9 and λ = λ and all coupling constants and VEVs real the matrices are hermitian due to the hermiticity relation (). Now we are ready to present the explicit forms of the mass matrices calculated from the superpotential of Eq. (). Every matrix is designated with the corresponding G multiplet and appears dim Ri I times in the total mass matrix M. A mass matrix associated with a G multiplet and the mass matrix associated with the corresponding complex conjugated G multiplet are equal up to transposition and therefore for multiplets with Y we list only one of the two mass matrices. Of course when enumerating the total degrees of freedom one has to include all mass eigenvalues (9 in total). The basis designating the columns (c:) of the mass matrices listed below is given in the same way as shown in Tables 4 and while the rows are designated by the corresponding complex conjugated G multiplets (r:) :
21 ( ) c: Â() () Â() () Ê() () () () () () () () () Φ () Φ () Φ () r: Â() () Â() () Ê() () () () () () Φ () () () () Φ () Φ () where m () λ Φ λ 9A λ v R λ v R λ A λ 7 Φ m () 8 λ Φ m () λ 9A λ v R λ v R λ 7 Φ m () 7 m () 8 λ 9A λ 9A m () λ Φ λ Φ λ Φ λ v R λ v R m () 44 λ v R λ v R λ v R λ v R λ v R m () 44 λ v R λ v R λ v R λ A λ 7 Φ λ Φ λ v R λ v R m () λ 7 A λ Φ λ 7 Φ m () 7 λ Φ λ v R λ v R λ 7 A m () 77 m () 87 m () 8 m () 8 λ Φ λ v R λ v R λ Φ m () 87 m () 88 (7) m () m 4 + λ Φ + λ 9E m () m 4 + λ Φ m () m + λ 8E λ 9E m () 44 m + λ Φ + λ Φ + λ Φ m () m + λ E λ A λ A m () 7 λ A m () 77 m + m () 8 m () 8 + λ 7 Φ λ Φ λ E λ A + λ7 Φ λ A + 4 λ 7Φ m () 87 λ Φ + λ 7 A
22 [( ) + c.c.] m () 88 m + λ Φ λ Φ λ 7A + λ E. (8) c: Â() () () () D () () r: Â( ) () where m 4 + λ Φ ( ) ( ) D () () iλ 8 v R λ v R + λ 9 E λ A λ 7 Φ iλ 9v R m λ 4E + λ Φ iλ 9 A λ Φ λ v R m () m + λ Φ + λ Φ m () 44 m + λ Φ + λ Φ + 4 λ v R iλ 8A λ Φ m () λ v R λ A λ A λ 7 Φ λ v R λ v R m () 44 (9) λ 7A + λ E. () [ ( ) + c.c.] c: Â( ) () D ( ) ( () ) () Φ ( ) () Φ ( ) () r: Â( ) () D ( ) () ( ) Φ ( ) () () Φ ( ) () where m ( ) iλ 9 v R λ v R λ A λ 7 Φ λ A λ 7Φ iλ 8v R m ( ) m ( ) λ v R λ v R λ v R m ( ) m ( ) λ v R λ v R m ( ) λ Φ m 4 + m ( ) m + 4λ 4E + λ 9E m ( ) iλ 9A + λ Φ + λ Φ λ A λ 7 Φ λ v R λ v R m ( ) 44 m ( ) 4 λ Φ + λ Φ 9 λ A λ 7Φ λ v R λ v R m ( ) 4 m ( ) ()
23 m ( ) iλ 8A + λ Φ + λ Φ m ( ) m + λ Φ + λ Φ + λ Φ λ A λ A m ( ) 44 m + λ Φ λ E m ( ) 4 λ Φ + λ7 A m ( ) m + λ Φ + λ Φ + λ 7A + λ E. () [ ( ) + c.c.] c: Â( ) () Ê( ) () Φ ( ) () r: Â( ) () Ê( ) () Φ ( ) () Φ ( ) () Φ ( ) () where m 4 λ Φ + λ 9E λ 9A λ 9A λ A + λ A + λ 7Φ λ 7Φ λ 9A λ 9A m + λ 8E λ Φ + λ Φ 4 λ Φ + λ Φ λ A + λ 7Φ λ Φ + λ Φ 4 m λ Φ + 7λ E 4 λ Φ 4λ 7A λ 7Φ λ A + λ Φ + λ Φ λ Φ 4λ 7A m ( ) 44 () m ( ) 44 m + λ Φ λ Φ λ 7A 4 λ E. (4)
24 [ ( ) + c.c.] c: Â( ) () Ê( ) () D ( ) () ( ) ( () ) () Φ ( ) () Φ ( ) () r: Â( ) () Ê( ) where m ( ) λ 9 A λ 9A iλ 8 v R λ v R m ( ) m ( ) 7 () D ( ) () λ 9 A λ 9A m + λ 8E λ v R λ Φ 4 λ Φ λ Φ λ Φ ( ) () ( ) () Φ ( ) () Φ ( ) () iλ 9v R m ( ) m ( ) 4 m ( ) λ v R λ v R m ( ) m 4 + λ Φ m ( ) m λ 4E + λ v R m ( ) 4 m ( ) 44 λ E λ v R λ v R + λ 9E λ Φ 9 λ v R m ( ) λ E m ( ) + λ Φ 9 m ( ) λ Φ 4 λ Φ λ v R λ v R m ( ) λ Φ + 4λ 7A m ( ) 4 iλ 8A iλ 8A λ Φ 4 λ Φ λ Φ 4 m ( ) iλ 9A + iλ 9A λ Φ 4 + λ Φ λ Φ m ( ) 4 iλ 9A + iλ 9A λ Φ 4 λ Φ λ Φ 4 m ( ) 44 m + λ Φ + λ Φ λ A λ A m ( ) iλ 8A iλ 8A λ Φ 4 + λ Φ λ Φ m ( ) m + λ Φ + λ Φ + λ A m ( ) λ A m ( ) m + λ Φ m ( ) 7 λ A λ 7Φ + 7λ E 4 λ 7Φ 4 + λ A m ( ) 7 λ Φ λ Φ λ v R λ v R λ Φ + 4λ 7A m ( ) 77 ()
25 [ ( ) + c.c.] m ( ) 77 m + λ Φ + λ Φ + λ 7A 4 λ E () c: Ĥ( ) () D ( ) () D ( ) () ( ) ( () ) () Φ ( ) () r: Ĥ( ) () D ( ) () D ( ) () ( ) () ( ) () Φ ( ) () where m + λ E iλ A λ 7Φ iλ A λ 7Φ λ 4 Φ λ 4Φ λ Φ λ Φ λ v R iλ A λ 7Φ m + λ 4E λ Φ iλ 9 A iλ 8 A + λ Φ 4 + λ Φ 4 λ v R iλ A λ 7Φ λ Φ m ( ) m ( ) 4 m ( ) λ v R m ( ) m λ 4E + λ Φ 9 λ Φ λ Φ iλ 8A m ( ) 4 m ( ) 44 λ E + λ Φ 4 λ 4Φ λ 4Φ iλ 9A + λ Φ 4 m ( ) λ E m ( ) λ v R (7) λ 4v R λ v R λ v R λ v R m ( ) m ( ) 4 iλ 8A + iλ 8A + λ Φ 4 λ Φ m ( ) iλ 9A iλ 9A + λ Φ 4 + λ Φ m ( ) 4 iλ 9A iλ 9A + λ Φ 4 λ Φ m ( ) 44 m + λ Φ λ Φ + λ A m ( ) iλ 8A + iλ 8A + λ Φ 4 + λ Φ m ( ) m + λ Φ + λ Φ λ A m ( ) m + λ Φ + λ Φ + λ 7A 4 λ E. (8)
26 [ ( ) + c.c.] c: Ĥ( ) () D ( ) () D ( ) () ( ) () ( ) () ( ) () Φ ( ) () r: Ĥ( ) () D ( ) () D ( ) ( ) () () ( ) () ( ) Φ ( ) () () where m λ E m ( ) m ( ) m ( ) 4 m ( ) λ Φ λ v R m ( ) m ( ) λ Φ 9 m ( ) 4 m ( ) m ( ) λ v R m ( ) λ Φ 9 m ( ) m ( ) 4 m ( ) m ( ) λ v R m ( ) iλ A λ 7Φ m ( ) 4 m ( ) 4 m ( ) 4 m + λ A λ E m ( ) i λ A λ 7Φ m ( ) 4 λ Φ λ Φ m ( ) λ 4Φ λ 4Φ m ( ) iλ A λ 7Φ m ( ) m + 4λ 4E + m ( ) 4 iλ 8A + λ Φ m ( ) iλ 9A + λ Φ m ( ) iλ 9A + λ Φ m ( ) i λ A m ( ) m λ 4E + λ Φ λ 7Φ λ Φ 9 m ( ) m ( ) m ( ) λ E m λ A λ Φ λ v R λ 4Φ m ( ) m ( ) λ Φ m ( ) λ v R λ 4 v R λ v R λ v R λ v R λ v R m ( ) 77 (9)
27 [( ) + c.c.] m ( ) 4 iλ 8A λ Φ m ( ) iλ 9A + λ Φ m ( ) iλ 9A + λ Φ m ( ) 4 λ 4Φ λ 4Φ m ( ) 4 iλ 9A + λ Φ m ( ) 4 iλ 9A λ Φ m ( ) λ Φ λ Φ m ( ) iλ 8A + λ Φ m ( ) iλ 8A + λ Φ m ( ) iλ 8A + λ Φ m ( ) iλ 8A + λ Φ m ( ) m + λ Φ + λ Φ λ A m ( ) 77 m + λ Φ + λ Φ + λ Φ + λ 7A + λ E. (7) c: r: () () ( ) () m + λ Φ + λ Φ λ Φ + λ A λ A. (7) 7
28 [ ( ) + c.c.] c: Φ ( ) () r: Φ ( ) () ( ) c: Â() () Ê() () r: Â() () Ê() () Φ () () Φ () () m 4 λ Φ + λ 9E λ 9 A λ A + [( ) + c.c.] () c: Ê() () () r: Ê( ) () ( ) () [ ( 4 ) + c.c.] c: D ( 4 ) () 4 ( ) () r: D ( 4 ) () ( 4 ) () m + 4λ 4E m + λ Φ λ Φ λ 7A 4 λ E. (7) λ 9 A m + λ 8E λ7 Φ m + λ 8E λ v R + iλ 8 A + λ Φ λ Φ λ Φ λ Φ λ Φ 9 λ A + λ7 Φ λ Φ m λ Φ + λ Φ 4 λ v R m λ Φ + λ Φ + λ A λ 7A + λ E. (7). (74) iλ 9A + λ Φ λ Φ m + λ Φ + λ Φ λ Φ + λ A λ A. (7) 8
29 [ ( ) + c.c.] c: Φ ( ) () r: Φ ( ) () [ ( 7 ) + c.c.] c: D ( 7 ) () ( 7 ) 7 ( () ) () r: D ( 7 ) () where m + λ Φ + λ Φ λ Φ + λ 7A + λ E. (7) 7 ( ) () ( 7 ) () m ( 7 ) m ( 7 ) m ( 7 ) m ( 7 ) m ( 7 ) λ E m ( 7 ) m λ 4E + λ Φ 9 m ( 7 ) λ E m ( 7 ) λ Φ 9 m ( 7 ) iλ 8A + iλ 8A + λ Φ 4 + λ Φ λ Φ 4 (77) m ( 7 ) iλ 9A iλ 9A + λ Φ 4 λ Φ λ Φ m ( 7 ) iλ 9A iλ 9A + λ Φ 4 + λ Φ λ Φ 4 m ( 7 ) m + λ Φ λ Φ + λ A λ A m ( 7 ) iλ 8A + iλ 8A + λ Φ 4 λ Φ λ Φ m ( 7 ) m + λ Φ λ Φ λ A + λ A. (78) 9
30 [ ( ) + c.c.] c: D ( ) () ( ) () r: D ( ) () ( ) () [ ( ) + c.c.] c: Φ ( ) () r: Φ ( ) () λ Φ iλ 9 A + λ Φ m + 4λ 4E iλ 8A + λ Φ m λ Φ + λ Φ + λ A. (79) [ ( ) + c.c.] c: Ê( ) ( ) ( ) () r: Ê( ) ( ) ( ) () [ ( ) + c.c.] c: D ( ) ( () ) () r: D ( ) ( ) () () ( m λ 8E λ v R m λ Φ + λ Φ λ 7A + λ E. (8) m λ 4E λ Φ 9 iλ 8 A λ Φ λ v R m + λ Φ λ Φ + λ Φ + λ A + λ A iλ 9A λ Φ m + λ Φ λ Φ + λ A ). (8). (8)
31 [ ( 4 ) + c.c.] c: ( 4 ) () r: ( 4 ) () [ ( ) + c.c.] c: Φ ( ) () r: Φ ( ) () [ ( ) + c.c.] c: Φ ( ) () r: Φ ( ) () [ ( ) + c.c.] c: ( ) () r: ( ) () m + λ Φ λ Φ λ Φ λ A + λ A. (8) m λ Φ + λ Φ λ 7A 4 λ E. (84) m λ Φ λ Φ + λ 7A 4 λ E. (8) m λ Φ λ Φ λ A. (8)
32 (8 ) c: Â(8) () Ê(8) (8) (8) ( ) Φ () Φ () r: Â(8) () Ê(8) (8) (8) ( ) Φ () Φ () where m 4 λ Φ λ A λ 9E λ 9A + λ7 Φ λ A + λ 7Φ [(8 ) + c.c.] c: r: (8) Φ () (8 ) Φ () [ (8 ) + c.c.] c: D (8 ) () (8 ) (8 () ) () r: D (8 ) () λ 9A m λ 8E λ Φ λ Φ λ A + λ 7 Φ λ Φ m λ Φ λ E λ Φ λ7 A λ A + λ 7Φ λ Φ λ Φ λ7 A m (8) 44 (87) m (8) 44 m + λ Φ λ Φ λ 7A + λ E. (88) (8 ) () (8 ) () m + λ Φ λ Φ λ 7A + λ E. (89) where m (8 ) m (8 ) m (8 ) m (8 ) m λ 4E λ Φ 9 m (8 ) m (8 ) λ E m (8 ) λ E m (8 ) (9) m (8 ) iλ 8A iλ 8A + λ Φ 4 + λ Φ
33 m (8 ) iλ 9A + iλ 9A + λ Φ 4 λ Φ m (8 ) iλ 9A + iλ 9A + λ Φ 4 + λ Φ m (8 ) m λ Φ + λ Φ + λ A m (8 ) iλ 8A iλ 8A + λ Φ 4 λ Φ m (8 ) m λ Φ λ Φ λ A. (9) (8 ) c: r: (8) Φ () (8) Φ () m λ Φ λ Φ + λ 7A + λ E. (9). Tests and consistency checks of the total mass matrix The following consistency checks of the total mass matrix have been performed (see also Ref. ([7])):. The CG coefficients appearing in the total mass matrix have been found to satisfy the hermiticity relation ().. The trace of the total mass matrix has been evaluated and it has been found that it satisfies Eq. ().. For the G symmetric vacuum the number of the would-be NG modes have been found to be equal to the number of the broken generators i.e. massive gauge bosons 4 =. Here 4 represents the number of gauge bosons in the adjoint irrep of the SO() group and represents the number of the gauge bosons in the standard model (G group). The check has been performed numerically for several tens of randomly chosen sets of the parameters of the superpotential λ λ and m m constrained by VEV Eqs. (8). 4. For the SU() symmetric vacuum it has been found that the number of the different mass eigenvalues is. The number of independent SU() irreps contained in the total representation of the model R is (see Appendix A) and the would-be NG bosons are in two multiplets (()+( + )). Therefore there are in total mass
34 eigenvalues: different from zero and one equal to zero. All other states have to be accommodated in the SU() irreps. Further for the SU() symmetric vacuum all eigenvalues of the doublet Higgs matrix ( ) are contained in the spectrum of the triplet Higgs matrix ( ). The only mass eigenvalue of the triplet Higgs matrix spectrum not contained in the doublet mass spectrum belongs to the SU() multiplet leading to the following relation between determinants of these two matrices det(m ( ) λ ) = (m ( ) λ) det(m ( ) λ ). (9) The above relation gives a very strong test for these two matrices. All above checks have been performed numerically in the same way as explained in the previous item. Our mass matrices passed all checks. For the SU() symmetric vacuum all VEVs except E are different from zero and they are non trivially correlated through the VEV Eqs. (8) and SU() symmetry conditions (). Therefore these tests serve as a strong check of the total mass matrix up to terms which depend on E.. For the G 4 symmetric vacuum it has been found that the number of different mass eigenvalues is 7 what is just the number of the independent G 4 irreps (see Appendix A). The number of NG states contained in G 4 irrep () is 4 = 4. These checks have been performed numerically as explained above. All other states have been found to be accommodated in G 4 irreps. For the G 4 symmetric vacuum VEVs different from zero are Φ and E and therefore this serves as a check of the E-dependent parts of the total mass matrix.. Similar tests are satisfied for other higher symmetries G G 4 G and G. We stress that all mass matrices in Ref. [7] derived for minimal SO() model (R = ) satisfy all above consistency checks and are just a special case of the mass matrices in this paper. Further all results including CG coefficients and mass matrices were obtained analytically including checks. In the recent calculations in Refs. [9 ] that appeared after Ref. [7] the necessary condition (9) between doublets and triplets is not satisfied. The hermiticity condition () and the total trace relation () are also not satisfied in these references. Further none of the higher symmetry tests is satisfied. That is a consequence of different phase conventions in Ref. [7] and phase conventions in Refs. [9] and []. In this paper all results for the CG coefficients and mass matrices have been also obtained analytically. Checks have been performed numerically and it has been found that the mass matrices satisfy ALL consistency checks. 4
35 Mass Matrices of Quarks and Leptons After the symmetry breaking down to the G subgroup the electroweak symmetry breaking SU() L U() Y U() em can be achieved by the VEVs of doublets included in the fields H D and Φ. These fields are given by (see Table ) H u/d = H (± ) () D u/d = D (± ) () D u/d = D (± ) () u/d = (± ) () u/d = (± ) () Φ u/d = Φ (± ). () The Yukawa couplings of Eq. () including these doublets can be written as follows: ( W Y = Ui c Y ij H u + Y ij D u + Y ij D u + Y ij ) u Qj ( + Di c Y ij H d + Y ij D d + Y ij D d + Y ij ) d Qj ( + Ni c Y ij H u + Y ij D u Y ij D u Y ij ) u Lj ( + Ei c Y ij H d + Y ij D d Y ij D d Y ij ) d Lj. (94) where U c D c N c and E c are the right-handed SU() L singlet quark and lepton superfields Q and L are the left-handed SU() L doublet quark and lepton superfields respectively. This is a generalization of the renormalizable minimal SO() model [ 7] including. Note that the successful gauge-couplings unification is realized with only the MSSM particle contents. This means that only one pair of Higgs doublets remains light and others should be heavy ( M G ). Here we accept the simple picture that the low-energy superpotential is described by only one pair of light Higgs doublets (H u and H d ) in the MSSM. But in general these Higgs fields are admixtures of all Higgs doublets having the same quantum numbers in the original model such as: H u = α u H u + α u D u + α u D u + α 4 u u + α u u + α u Φ u H d = α d H d + α d D d + α d D d + α 4 d d + α d d + α d Φ d (9) where α ud i (i = ) denote elements of the unitary matrix which rotate the flavor basis in the original model into the (SUSY) mass eigenstates. As mentioned above the low-energy superpotential is described only by the light Higgs doublets H u and H d ( W Y = Ui c α u Y ij + αu Y ij + αu Y ij + αu 4 Y ) ij Hu Q j ( + Di c α d Y ij + αdy ij + αdy ij + αdy) 4 ij Hd Q j + N c i + E c i ( α u Y ij + αu Y ij αu Y ij αu 4 Y ) ij Hu L j ( α d Y ij + αd Y ij αd Y ij αd 4 Y ) ij Hd L j (9) where the formulae of the inverse unitary transformation of Eq. (9) H u = αu H u D u = αu H u D u = αu H u u = αu 4 H u H d = αd H d D d = αd H d D d = αd H d d = αd 4 H d (97)
36 have been used. Providing the Higgs VEVs H u = v sin β and H d = v cosβ with v 74. [GeV] the quark and lepton mass matrices can be read off as M u = c M + c M + c M + c M M d = M + M + M + M M D = c M + c M c M c M M e = M + M M M M R = c R M (98) where M u M d M D M e and M R denote the up-type quark down-type quark neutrino Dirac charged-lepton and right-handed neutrino Majorana mass matrices respectively. Note that the mass matrices at the right-hand side of Eq. (98) are defined as M = Y α d v cosβ M = Y α d v cos β M = Y α d v cosβ and M = Y α 4 d v cosβ respectively and the coefficients are defined as c = (α u /α d ) tanβ c = (α u /α d ) tanβ c = (α u/α d) tan β c = (α 4 u/α 4 d) tanβ and c R = v R /(α 4 dv cosβ). These mass matrices are directly connected with low-energy observations and are crucial to model judgement. 7 Conclusion We have presented a simple method for the calculation of CG coefficients. We have constructed all states for all antisymmetric and symmetric SO() tensor irreps. We list all tables for the CG coefficients for the SO() irreps 4 4 and for all possible cubic invariants. We have constructed all mass matrices for the corresponding Higgs-Higgsino sector is SUSY GUT SO() models. We have found a set of consistency checks for the CG coefficients and mass matrices which proved the correctness of all our results. The results obtained here are useful for a wide class of GUT models based on the SO() group. Acknowledgements The work of A.I. and S.M. is supported by the Ministry of the Science and Technology of the Republic of Croatia under contracts No. 9 and No. 98 respectively. The work of T.F. T.K. and N.O. is supported by the Grant in Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education Science and Culture. The work of T.K. is also supported by the Research Fellowship of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science for Young Scientists. T.F would like to thank G. Senjanović and A.Y. Smirnov for their hospitality at ICTP.
37 Appendix A Decomposition of Representations under G Here we list the decompositions of 4 4 and representations under the chain of subgroups G 4 G G G in Tables and where U() groups are related to SU(4) SU() C U() B L SU() L SU() R SU() L U() R. 7 Note also that we may consider another chain of subgroups SO() SU() U() X and SU() G. The relations between the generators of U() XY and U() B LR are: where T R denotes the U() R generator. ( X + 4 Y ) = B L Y = B L + TR (99) 7 We use the same notation as Slansky [] but with the proper U() normalizations. 7
38 Table 7: Decomposition of the representation (4 L R ) ( C L R B L ) ( C L R B L ) ( C L Y ) ( X ) ( ) ( ) ( ) () ; ; ; ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ; ; ; ( () (; ) ; ( ) ) ; ( ) ( ; ( ) ( ) ) ; Table 8: Decomposition of the representation (4 L R ) ( C L R B L ) ( C L R B L ) ( C L Y ) ( X ) ( ) ( ) ( ) (4) ; ; ; ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ; ; ; ( ) ( ) ( 4 ; ; ) ( ) ( ) ; ( ; ) ( ) ; ( ) ( ) ( ; ; ) (; ) ( ) ( ) ; (; ) ( ) 8
39 Table 9: Decomposition of the representation 4 (4 L R ) ( C L R B L ) ( C L R B L ) ( C L Y ) ( X ) () (; ) (; ) (; ) ( 4) (; ) (; ) ( ( ) ) (; ) (; ) 4 () (; ) (; ) (; ) (4 ) ( ) ( () ; ; ) ( ) ; ( 4) ( ; ) ( ) ; (4 ) ( ) ( ; ; ) ( ) ; (4 ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ; ; 4 () ( (; ) ) ( (; ) ) ( (; ) ) ( (4 ) ) ; ; ; 4 ( ) ( ) ( ) ; ; ; ( 4) (8; ) (8; ) (8; ) (4 ) Table : Decomposition of the representation 4 (4 L R ) ( C L R B L ) ( C L R B L ) ( C L Y ) ( X ) () (; ) (; ) (; ) (4 ) () (; ) (; ) (; ) ( 4) (; ) (; ) ((4 ) ) (; ) (; ) 4 ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ; ; ; 4 ( ) ( ) ( ) ; ; ; ( 4) (8; ) (8; ) (8; ) (4 ) ( ) ( () ; ; ) ( ) ; ( 4) ( ; ) ( ) ; (4 ) ( ) ( ; ; ) ( ) ; (4 ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ; ; 4 9
40 Table : Decomposition of the representation (4 L R ) ( C L R B L ) ( C L R B L ) ( C L Y ) ( X ) ( () (; ) ; ( ) ) ; ( ) ( ; ( ) ( ) ) ; ( ) () (; ) (; ) (; ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ; ; ; ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ; ; ; 4 ( ) (; ) (; ) (; ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ; ; ; ( ) ( ) ( ) ; ; ; (4 ) ( ) ( ) ( ) () ; ; ; (4 ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ; ; ; 4 ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) () ; ; ; ( ) ( ) ; ; (4 ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ; ; 4 4 ( ) ( ) ( ) ; ; ; 4 (4 ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ; ; 4 ( ) ( ) ; ; ( ) ( () (; ) ; ( ) ) ; (4 ) ( ; ( ) ( ) ) ; 4 ( ) ( ; ; ) ( ) ( ) ; 7 4 ( ; ) ( ) ; ( ) ( ) ( ; ; ) ( ) ; 7 (4 ) ( ; ) ( ) ( ) ; ( (8; ) 8; ( ) ) 8; (4 ) ( 8; ( ) ( ) ) 8; 4 4
41 Table : Decomposition of the representation (4 L R ) ( C L R B L ) ( C L R B L ) ( C L Y ) ( X ) ( ) ( ) ( ) () ; ; ; ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ; ; ; 4 ( ) (; ) (; ) (; ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ; ; ; 4 ( ) ( ) ( ) ; ; ; ( ) () (; ) (; ) (; ) ( ( ) ) (; ) (; ) ( ) (; ( ) ) (; ( ) ) ( ( ) ) ; ; ; ( ) ( ) ; ; ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ; ; 4 4 ( ) ( ) ( ) ; ; ; 4 ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ; ; 4 ( ) ( ) ; ; ( ) ( () (; ) ; ( ) ) ; ( ) ( ; ( ) ( ) ) ; 4 ( ) ( ; ; ) ( ) ( ) ; 7 4 ( ; ) ( ) ; ( ) ( ) ( ; ; ) ( ) ; 7 ( ) ( ; ) ( ) ( ) ; ( (8; ) 8; ( ) ) 8; ( ) ( 8; ( ) ( ) ) 8; 4 4
42 Table : Decomposition of the representation (4 L R ) ( C L R B L ) ( C L R B L ) ( C L Y ) ( X ) () (; ) (; ) (; ) ( ) () ((; ) ) ((; ) ) ((; ) ) ((4 ) ) ; ; ; 4 ( ) ( ) ( ) ; ; ; ( 4) (8; ) (8; ) (8; ) (4 ) ( ) ( () ; ; ) ( ) ; ( 4) ( ; ) ( ) ; (4 ) ( ) ( ; ; ) ( ) ; (4 ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ; ; 4 () ((; ) ) ((; ) ) ((; ) ) (4 ) ; ; ; (4 4) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ; ; ; 4 4 (8; ) (8; ) (8; ) (7 ) () (; ) (; ) (; ) ( 4) (; ) (; ) ( (7 ) ) (; ) (; ) 4 ( ) ( ) ( ) ; ; ; (7 ) ( ) ( ) ; ; (4 4) ( ) ( ) ; ; ( 8) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ; ; ; 8 ( ) ( ) ( ) ; ; 4 4 ( ) ( ) ; ; (7 ) ( ) (8; ) (8; ) (8; ) 4 4 (8; ) (8; ) (7 ) (8; ) (8; ) (4 4) 4
43 ( () (; ) ; ( ) ( ) ) ; 8 ( ; ( ) ( ) ) ; 4 4 ( ) ( ; ; ) ( ) ( ) ; 4 4 ( ; ) ( ) ; (7 ) ( ) ( ; ; ) ( ) ; (7 ) ( ; ) ( ) ; (4 4) ( ) ( (; ) ; ( ) ) ; (4 4) ( ; ( ) ) ; ( 8) ( ) ( ; ; ) ( ) ; (7 ) ( ; ) ( ) ; (4 4) ( ) ( ; ; ) ( ) ( ) ; 4 4 ( ) ( ) ; ; (7 ) B CG coefficients The CG coefficients for HH AA EE DD ΦΦ EA AΦ E E EΦ H H HΦ Φ Φ A A DH DA D D and DΦ combinations are listed in Tables and 8 respectively. Table 4: CG coefficients for the HH combination of fields H H ÊHH Ĥ ( ) () Ĥ ( ) () Ĥ ( ) () Ĥ ( ) () 4
44 Table : CG coefficients for the AA combination of fields A A ÊAA AAΦ AAΦ AAΦ Â () () Â () () Â () () Â () () Â () () Â ( ) () Â ( ) () Â ( ) () Â (8) () Â () () Â () () Â () () Â ( ) () Â () () Â ( ) () Â ( ) () Â ( ) () 4 4 Â (8) () Table : CG coefficients for the EE combination of fields E E ÊEE Ê () () Ê () () Ê () () Ê ( ) () Ê ( ) () Ê ( ) ( ) Ê (8) ( ) Ê () () Ê () () Ê ( ) () Ê ( ) () Ê ( ) () 4 4 Ê ( ) ( ) Ê (8) ( ) 44
45 Table 7: CG coefficients for the DD combination of fields D D ÊDD DD Φ DD Φ DD Φ D ( ) () D () () D ( ) () D ( ) () D ( ) () D ( ) () D ( 4 ) () D ( ) () D ( ) () D ( ) () D ( ) () D ( ) () D ( ) () D ( 7 ) () D ( ) () D ( ) () D (8 ) () D ( ) () 9 D ( ) () D ( ) () D ( ) () D ( 4 ) () D ( ) () D ( ) () 9 9 D ( ) () 9 D ( ) () D ( ) () D ( ) () D ( 7 ) () D ( ) () 9 9 D ( ) () 9 D (8 ) ()
46 Table 8: CG coefficients for the combination of fields Ê () () ( ) () ( ) () ( ) () ( ) () ( 7 ) () (8 ) () () ()) ( ) () ( ) () ( ) () ( ) () ( 7 ) () (8 ) () Table 9: CG coefficients for the combination of fields Ê () () ( ) () ( ) () ( ) () ( ) () ( 7 ) () (8 ) () () ()) ( ) () ( ) () ( ) () ( ) () ( 7 ) () (8 ) () 4
47 Table : CG coefficients for the combination of fields iâ iâ Φ Φ Φ () () ( ) () ( ) () ( ) () ( ) () () () ( 4 ) () ( ) () ( ) () ( ) () ( ) () ( ) () ( ) () ( ) () ( ) () ( 7 ) () ( 7 ) () ( ) () ( ) () ( ) () ( 4 ) () ( ) () (8 ) () (8 ) () () () () () () () ( ) () ( ) () ( ) () ( 4 ) () ( ) () ( ) () ( ) () ( ) () ( ) () ( ) () ( ) () ( ) () ( 7 ) () ( 7 ) () ( ) () ( ) () ( ) () ( 4 ) () ( ) () (8 ) () (8 ) () 47
48 Table : CG coefficients for the ΦΦ combination of fields Φ Φ εâφφ Φ () () Φ () () Φ () () Φ () () Φ () () Φ () () Φ () () Φ ( ) () Φ ( ) () Φ () () Φ ( ) () Φ ( ) () Φ ( ) () Φ ( ) () Φ ( ) () Φ ( ) () Φ ( ) () Φ ( ) () Φ ( ) () Φ ( ) () Φ ( ) () Φ ( ) () Φ ( ) () Φ ( ) () Φ ( ) () εâφφ ÊΦΦ Φ ΦΦ Φ ΦΦ Φ ΦΦ () Φ () Φ () () Φ () () Φ () () Φ () () 9 Φ () () Φ ( ) () Φ ( ) () Φ ( ) () Φ () () Φ ( ) () Φ ( ) () Φ ( ) () Φ ( ) () Φ ( ) () Φ ( ) () 4 4 Φ ( ) () 8 Φ ( ) () Φ ( ) () Φ ( ) () 7 Φ ( ) () Φ ( ) () Φ ( ) () Φ ( ) () 7 Φ ( ) ()
49 Φ Φ εâφφ Φ ( ) () Φ ( ) () Φ (8) () Φ (8) () Φ (8) () Φ (8) () Φ (8) () Φ ( ) () 8 Φ ( ) () εâφφ ÊΦΦ Φ ΦΦ Φ ΦΦ Φ ΦΦ Φ (8) () Φ (8) () Φ (8) () Φ (8 ) () Φ (8) () Table : CG coefficients for the EA combination of fields E A EAÂ EAÂ Ê () () Ê () () Ê () () Ê ( ) () Ê ( ) () Ê ( ) () Ê ( ) () Ê (8) ( ) Â () () Â () () Â () () Â ( ) () 4 Â ( ) () 4 Â ( ) () Â ( ) () 4 4 Â (8) () 49
50 Table : CG coefficients for the AΦ combination of fields A Φ ÂAΦ ÂAΦ εaφφ εaφφ Â () () Â () () Â () () Â () () Â () () Â () () Â () () Â ( ) () Â () () Â ( ) () Â ( ) () Â ( ) () Â ( ) () Â ( ) () Â ( ) () Â ( ) () Â ( ) () Â ( ) () Â ( ) () Â ( ) () Â ( ) () Â (8) () Â (8) () Φ () () Φ () εaφφ () Φ () () Φ () () Φ () () Φ () () Φ ( ) () Φ () () Φ () () Φ ( ) () Φ ( ) () Φ ( ) () Φ ( ) () Φ ( ) () Φ ( ) () Φ ( ) () Φ ( ) () Φ ( ) () Φ ( ) () Φ ( ) () Φ ( ) () Φ (8) () Φ (8) ()
51 Table 4: CG coefficients for the E combination of fields E E Ê () () Ê () () Ê ( ) () Ê ( ) () Ê ( ) ( ) () () ( ) () ( ) () ( ) () ( ) () Table : CG coefficients for the E combination of fields E E Ê () () Ê ( ) () Ê ( ) () Ê ( ) () Ê ( ) ( ) () () () () ( ) () ( ) () ( ) ()
52 Table : CG coefficients for the EΦ combination of fields E Φ EΦΦ EΦΦ EΦΦ Ê () () Ê () () Ê () () Ê () () Ê ( ) () Ê ( ) () Ê ( ) () Ê ( ) () Ê ( ) () Ê ( ) () Ê ( ) () Ê ( ) () Ê (8) ( ) Ê (8) ( ) Φ () () Φ () () Φ () () 4 Φ () () 4 Φ ( ) () 4 Φ ( ) () Φ ( ) () 4 Φ ( ) () 4 Φ ( ) () Φ ( ) () 4 Φ ( ) () 4 Φ ( ) () Φ (8) () Φ (8) () Table 7: CG coefficients for the H combination of fields H H Φ H Φ H Φ ( ) () ( ) () ( ) () ( ) () ( ) () Ĥ ( ) () Ĥ ( ) () Ĥ ( ) () Ĥ ( ) () Ĥ ( ) ()
53 Table 8: CG coefficients for the H combination of fields H H Φ H Φ H Φ ( ) () ( ) () ( ) () ( ) () ( ) () Ĥ ( ) () Ĥ ( ) () Ĥ ( ) () Ĥ ( ) () Ĥ ( ) () Table 9: CG coefficients for the HΦ combination of fields H Φ Ĥ ( ) () Ĥ ( ) () Ĥ ( ) () Ĥ ( ) () HΦ HΦ Φ ( ) () Φ ( ) () Φ ( ) () Φ ( ) ()
54 Table : CG coefficients for the Φ combination of fields Φ Φ Φ () () Φ () () Φ () () Φ ( ) () Φ ( ) () Φ ( ) () Φ ( ) () Φ ( ) () Φ ( ) () Φ ( ) () Φ ( ) () Φ ( ) () Φ ( ) () Φ ( ) () Φ ( ) () () () () () () () () () ( ) () ( ) () ( ) () ( ) () ( ) () ( ) () ( ) () ( ) () ( ) () ( ) () ( ) () 4
55 Table : CG coefficients for the Φ combination of fields Φ Φ Φ () () Φ () () Φ () () Φ () () Φ ( ) () Φ ( ) () Φ ( ) () Φ ( ) () Φ ( ) () Φ ( ) () Φ ( ) () Φ ( ) () Φ ( ) () Φ ( ) () Φ ( ) () () () () () () () ( ) () ( ) () ( ) () ( ) () ( ) () ( ) () ( ) () ( ) () ( ) () ( ) () ( ) () ( ) ()
56 Table : CG coefficients for the A combination of fields A ia  () ()  () ()  ( ) ()  ( ) ()  ( ) ()  ( ) () () () () () () () ( ) () ( ) () ( ) () Table : CG coefficients for the A combination of fields A ia  () ()  () ()  () ()  ( ) ()  ( ) ()  ( ) () () () () () ( ) () ( ) () ( ) () ( ) ()
57 Table 4: CG coefficients for the DH combination of fields D H DH DH DH Φ DH Φ DH Φ D ( ) () D ( ) () D ( ) () D ( ) () D ( ) () D ( ) () D ( ) () D ( ) () Ĥ ( ) () i Ĥ ( ) () i Ĥ ( ) () i Ĥ ( )) () i Ĥ ( ) () i Ĥ ( ) () i Ĥ ( ) () i Ĥ ( ) () i Table : CG coefficients for the DA combination of fields D A D A D A D () () D ( ) () D ( ) () D ( ) () D ( ) () D ( ) ()  ( ) () i  () ()  ( ) () i  ( ) () i i  ( ) () i  ( ) () i 7
58 Table : CG coefficients for the D combination of fields D D Â D Â D Φ D Φ D Φ () () i D ( ) () D ( ) () D ( ) () D ( ) () D ( ) () D ( 4 ) () D ( ) () D ( ) () D ( ) () D ( ) () D ( ) () D ( ) () D ( ) () D ( ) () D ( ) () D ( 7 ) () D ( 7 ) () D ( ) () D ( ) () D (8 ) () D (8 ) () ( ) () i ( ) () i ( ) () i ( ) () i i 4 i ( 4 ) () i ( ) () i ( ) () ( ) i ()) i ( ) () i ( ) () i ( ) () i ( ) () i ( ) () i ( ) () i ( 7 ) () i ( 7 ) () i i i i i ( ) () i ( ) () (8 ) () i (8 ) () 4 4 i i i i 4 4 8
59 Table 7: CG coefficients for the D combination of fields D D Â D Â D Φ D Φ D Φ ( ) () i D () () D ( ) () D ( ) () D ( ) () D ( ) () D ( 4 ) () D ( ) () D ( ) () D ( ) () D ( ) () D ( ) () D ( ) () D ( ) () D ( ) () D ( ) () D ( 7 ) () D ( 7 ) () D ( ) () D ( ) () D (8 ) () D (8 ) () ( ) () i ( ) () ( ) () i ( ) () i i ( 4 ) () i ( ) () i ( ) () i i 4 i ( ) () i ( ) () i ( ) () i ( ) () i ( ) () i ( ) () i ( ) () i ( 7 ) () i ( 7 ) () i i i i i ( ) i () 4 4 ( ) () i (8 ) () i (8 ) () i i i 4 4 9
60 Table 8: CG coefficients for the DΦ combination of fields D Φ D Φ D Φ Φ ( ) () D () () D ( ) () D ( ) () D ( ) () D ( ) () D ( ) () D ( ) () D ( ) () D ( ) () D ( ) () D ( ) () D ( ) () D ( ) () D ( ) () D ( ) () D ( ) () D ( ) () D ( ) () Φ () () Φ ( ) () Φ ( ) () Φ ( ) () Φ ( ) () Φ ( ) () Φ ( ) () Φ ( ) () Φ ( ) () Φ ( ) () Φ ( ) () Φ ( ) () Φ ( ) () Φ ( ) () Φ ( ) () Φ ( ) () Φ ( ) ()
arxiv:hep-ph/ v1 5 Oct 2005
Preprint typeset in JHEP style - HYPER VERSION RITS-PP-003 arxiv:hep-ph/0510054v1 5 Oct 2005 Constraint on the heavy sterile neutrino mixing angles in the SO10) model with double see-saw mechanism Takeshi
More informationSU(3)-Flavons and Pati-Salam-GUTs
SU(3)-Flavons and Pati-Salam-GUTs Florian Hartmann in collaboration with Wolfgang Kilian and Karsten Schnitter Universität Siegen Theoretische Physik I Dortmund, 03.07.2012 Outline 1 Running couplings
More informationSymmetries, Groups, and Conservation Laws
Chapter Symmetries, Groups, and Conservation Laws The dynamical properties and interactions of a system of particles and fields are derived from the principle of least action, where the action is a 4-dimensional
More informationTHE STANDARD MODEL AND THE GENERALIZED COVARIANT DERIVATIVE
THE STANDAD MODEL AND THE GENEALIZED COVAIANT DEIVATIVE arxiv:hep-ph/9907480v Jul 999 M. Chaves and H. Morales Escuela de Física, Universidad de Costa ica San José, Costa ica E-mails: mchaves@cariari.ucr.ac.cr,
More informationPati-Salam GUT-Flavour Models with Three Higgs Generations
Pati-Salam GUT-Flavour Models with Three Higgs Generations Florian Hartmann in collaboration with Wolfgang Kilian and Karsten Schnitter based on: JHEP 1405 (2014) 064 and arxiv:1405.1901 Universität Siegen
More informationIntroduction to Supersymmetry
Introduction to Supersymmetry I. Antoniadis Albert Einstein Center - ITP Lecture 5 Grand Unification I. Antoniadis (Supersymmetry) 1 / 22 Grand Unification Standard Model: remnant of a larger gauge symmetry
More informationFermion Mixing Angles and the Connection to Non-Trivially Broken Flavor Symmetries
Fermion Mixing ngles and the Connection to Non-Trivially Broken Flavor Symmetries C. Hagedorn hagedorn@mpi-hd.mpg.de Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik, Heidelberg, Germany. Blum, CH, M. Lindner numerics:.
More informationE 6 Spectra at the TeV Scale
E 6 Spectra at the TeV Scale Instituts-Seminar Kerne und Teilchen, TU Dresden Alexander Knochel Uni Freiburg 24.06.2010 Based on: F. Braam, AK, J. Reuter, arxiv:1001.4074 [hep-ph], JHEP06(2010)013 Outline
More informationGrand Unification. Strong, weak, electromagnetic unified at Q M X M Z Simple group SU(3) SU(2) U(1) Gravity not included
Pati-Salam, 73; Georgi-Glashow, 74 Grand Unification Strong, weak, electromagnetic unified at Q M X M Z Simple group G M X SU(3) SU() U(1) Gravity not included (perhaps not ambitious enough) α(q ) α 3
More informationLecture 6 The Super-Higgs Mechanism
Lecture 6 The Super-Higgs Mechanism Introduction: moduli space. Outline Explicit computation of moduli space for SUSY QCD with F < N and F N. The Higgs mechanism. The super-higgs mechanism. Reading: Terning
More informationProton Decay and Flavor Violating Thresholds in the SO(10) Models
Proton Decay and Flavor Violating Thresholds in the SO(10) Models Yukihiro Mimura (Texas A&M University) Based on Proton decay in Collaboration with B. Dutta and R.N. Mohapatra Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 091804
More informationThe Standard Model and beyond
The Standard Model and beyond In this chapter we overview the structure of the Standard Model (SM) of particle physics, its shortcomings, and different ideas for physics beyond the Standard Model (BSM)
More informationFlavour and Higgs in Pati-Salam Models
Flavour and Higgs in Pati-Salam Models Florian Hartmann Universität Siegen Theoretische Physik I Siegen, 16.11.2011 Florian Hartmann (Uni Siegen) Flavour and Higgs in Pati-Salam Models Siegen 16.11.2011
More informationHow does neutrino confine GUT and Cosmology? July T. Fukuyama Center of Quantum Universe, Okayama-U
How does neutrino confine GUT and Cosmology? July 11 08 T. Fukuyama (Rits) @ Center of Quantum Universe, Okayama-U 1. Introduction Neutrino oscillation breaks SM. Then is OK? does not predict 1. Gauge
More informationSM predicts massless neutrinos
MASSIVE NEUTRINOS SM predicts massless neutrinos What is the motivation for considering neutrino masses? Is the question of the existence of neutrino masses an isolated one, or is connected to other outstanding
More informationPhysics 662. Particle Physics Phenomenology. February 21, Physics 662, lecture 13 1
Physics 662 Particle Physics Phenomenology February 21, 2002 Physics 662, lecture 13 1 Physics Beyond the Standard Model Supersymmetry Grand Unified Theories: the SU(5) GUT Unification energy and weak
More informationU(1) Gauge Extensions of the Standard Model
U(1) Gauge Extensions of the Standard Model Ernest Ma Physics and Astronomy Department University of California Riverside, CA 92521, USA U(1) Gauge Extensions of the Standard Model (int08) back to start
More informationFor Review Only. General Structure of Democratic Mass Matrix of Lepton Sector in E 6 Model. Canadian Journal of Physics
General Structure of Democratic Mass Matrix of Lepton Sector in E 6 Model Journal: Canadian Journal of Physics Manuscript ID cjp-2017-0783.r1 Manuscript Type: Article Date Submitted by the Author: 08-Jan-2018
More information+ µ 2 ) H (m 2 H 2
I. THE HIGGS POTENTIAL AND THE LIGHT HIGGS BOSON In the previous chapter, it was demonstrated that a negative mass squared in the Higgs potential is generated radiatively for a large range of boundary
More informationLecture III: Higgs Mechanism
ecture III: Higgs Mechanism Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking The Higgs Mechanism Mass Generation for eptons Quark Masses & Mixing III.1 Symmetry Breaking One example is the infinite ferromagnet the nearest
More informationSteve King, DCPIHEP, Colima
!!! 1/6/11 Lecture I. The Flavour Problem in the Standard Model with Neutrino Mass Lecture II. Family Symmetry and SUSY Lecture III. SUSY GUTs of Flavour with Discrete Family Symmetry Steve King, DCPIHEP,
More informationFuzzy extra dimensions and particle physics models
Fuzzy extra dimensions and particle physics models Athanasios Chatzistavrakidis Joint work with H.Steinacker and G.Zoupanos arxiv:1002.2606 [hep-th] Corfu, September 2010 Overview Motivation N = 4 SYM
More informationarxiv: v1 [hep-ph] 12 Nov 2018
SISSA 47/2018/FISI IPMU18-0187 IPPP/18/98 Modular S 4 Models of Lepton Masses and Mixing P. P. Novichkov a,1, J. T. Penedo a,2, S. T. Petcov a,b,, A. V. Titov c,4 arxiv:1811.049v1 [hep-ph] 12 Nov 2018
More informationUnification without Doublet-Triplet Splitting SUSY Exotics at the LHC
Unification without Doublet-Triplet Splitting SUSY Exotics at the LHC Jürgen Reuter Carleton University, Ottawa University of Freiburg W. Kilian, J. Reuter, PLB B642 (2006), 81, and work in progress (with
More informationSpontaneous CP violation and Higgs spectra
PROCEEDINGS Spontaneous CP violation and Higgs spectra CERN-TH, CH-111 Geneva 3 E-mail: ulrich.nierste@cern.ch Abstract: A general theorem relating Higgs spectra to spontaneous CP phases is presented.
More informationTriplet Higgs Scenarios
Triplet Higgs Scenarios Jack Gunion U.C. Davis Grenoble Higgs Workshop, March 2, 203 Higgs-like LHC Signal Fits with MVA CMS suggest we are heading towards the SM, but it could simply be a decoupling limit
More informationA Classification of 3-Family Grand Unification in String Theory I. The SO(10) and E 6 Models. Abstract
CLNS 96/1433, HUTP-96/A048, NUB 3145 A Classification of 3-Family Grand Unification in String Theory I. The SO(10) and E 6 Models Zurab Kakushadze 1 and S.-H. Henry Tye 2 1 Lyman Laboratory of Physics,
More informationSymmetries of the Two-Higgs Doublet Model (2HDM) Eddie Santos Final Presentation, Physics 251 6/8/11
Symmetries of the Two-Higgs Doublet Model (2HDM) Eddie Santos Final Presentation, Physics 251 6/8/11 Outline Introduction to Higgs & Motivations for an Extended Higgs Sector Two-Higgs Doublet Model (2HDM)
More informationA model of the basic interactions between elementary particles is defined by the following three ingredients:
I. THE STANDARD MODEL A model of the basic interactions between elementary particles is defined by the following three ingredients:. The symmetries of the Lagrangian; 2. The representations of fermions
More informationDynamical supersymmetry breaking, with Flavor
Dynamical supersymmetry breaking, with Flavor Cornell University, November 2009 Based on arxiv: 0911.2467 [Craig, Essig, Franco, Kachru, GT] and arxiv: 0812.3213 [Essig, Fortin, Sinha, GT, Strassler] Flavor
More informationThe Higgs Boson and Electroweak Symmetry Breaking
The Higgs Boson and Electroweak Symmetry Breaking 1. Minimal Standard Model M. E. Peskin Chiemsee School September 2014 The Higgs boson has an odd position in the Standard Model of particle physics. On
More informationTheoretical Particle Physics Yonsei Univ.
Yang-Hwan Ahn (KIAS) Appear to arxiv : 1409.xxxxx sooooon Theoretical Particle Physics group @ Yonsei Univ. Introduction Now that the Higgs boson has been discovered at 126 GeV, assuming that it is indeed
More informationModels of Neutrino Masses
Models of Neutrino Masses Fernando Romero López 13.05.2016 1 Introduction and Motivation 3 2 Dirac and Majorana Spinors 4 3 SU(2) L U(1) Y Extensions 11 4 Neutrino masses in R-Parity Violating Supersymmetry
More informationLectures on Supersymmetry I
I Carlos E.M. Wagner HEP Division, Argonne National Laboratory Enrico Fermi Institute, University of Chicago Ecole de Physique de Les Houches, France, August 5, 005. PASI 006, Puerto Vallarta, Mexico,
More informationGrand Unification and Strings:
Grand Unification and Strings: the Geography of Extra Dimensions Hans Peter Nilles Physikalisches Institut, Universität Bonn Based on work with S. Förste, P. Vaudrevange and A. Wingerter hep-th/0406208,
More informationFlavor violating Z from
Flavor violating Z from SO(10) SUSY GUT model Yu Muramatsu( 村松祐 ) CCNU Junji Hisano(KMI, Nagoya U. & IPMU), Yuji Omura (KMI) & Yoshihiro Shigekami (Nagoya U.) Phys.Lett.B744 (2015) 395, and JHEP 1611 (2016)
More informationarxiv: v2 [hep-ph] 24 Dec 2018
SISSA 47/2018/FISI IPMU18-0187 IPPP/18/98 Modular S 4 Models of Lepton Masses and Mixing P. P. Novichkov a,1, J. T. Penedo a,2, S. T. Petcov a,b,, A. V. Titov c,4 arxiv:1811.049v2 [hep-ph] 24 Dec 2018
More informationPhysics 557 Lecture 5
Physics 557 Lecture 5 Group heory: Since symmetries and the use of group theory is so much a part of recent progress in particle physics we will take a small detour to introduce the basic structure (as
More informationSymmetry Groups conservation law quantum numbers Gauge symmetries local bosons mediate the interaction Group Abelian Product of Groups simple
Symmetry Groups Symmetry plays an essential role in particle theory. If a theory is invariant under transformations by a symmetry group one obtains a conservation law and quantum numbers. For example,
More informationGrand Unified Theories and Beyond
Grand Unified Theories and Beyond G. Zoupanos Department of Physics, NTUA Dubna, February 2014 G. Zoupanos (Department of Physics, NTUA ) Grand Unified Theories and Beyond Dubna, February 2014 1 / 36 Antonio
More informationLecture 7: N = 2 supersymmetric gauge theory
Lecture 7: N = 2 supersymmetric gauge theory José D. Edelstein University of Santiago de Compostela SUPERSYMMETRY Santiago de Compostela, November 22, 2012 José D. Edelstein (USC) Lecture 7: N = 2 supersymmetric
More information12.2 Problem Set 2 Solutions
78 CHAPTER. PROBLEM SET SOLUTIONS. Problem Set Solutions. I will use a basis m, which ψ C = iγ ψ = Cγ ψ (.47) We can define left (light) handed Majorana fields as, so that ω = ψ L + (ψ L ) C (.48) χ =
More informationNovember 24, Scalar Dark Matter from Grand Unified Theories. T. Daniel Brennan. Standard Model. Dark Matter. GUTs. Babu- Mohapatra Model
Scalar from November 24, 2014 1 2 3 4 5 What is the? Gauge theory that explains strong weak, and electromagnetic forces SU(3) C SU(2) W U(1) Y Each generation (3) has 2 quark flavors (each comes in one
More informationGROUP THEORY PRIMER. New terms: tensor, rank k tensor, Young tableau, Young diagram, hook, hook length, factors over hooks rule
GROUP THEORY PRIMER New terms: tensor, rank k tensor, Young tableau, Young diagram, hook, hook length, factors over hooks rule 1. Tensor methods for su(n) To study some aspects of representations of a
More informationBINARY TETRAHEDRAL GROUP (T )
Thank you for the invitation. BINARY TETRAHEDRAL GROUP (T ) AND THE CABIBBO ANGLE Paul H Frampton UNC-CHAPEL HILL OUTLINE 1. Introduction on renormalizability. 2. A 4 symmetry. 3. Minimal A 4 model. 4.
More informationGrand Unified Theory based on the SU(6) symmetry
Grand Unified Theory based on the SU(6) symmetry A. Hartanto a and L.T. Handoko a,b FISIKALIPI-04007 FIS-UI-TH-05-02 arxiv:hep-ph/0504280v1 29 Apr 2005 a) Department of Physics, University of Indonesia
More informationElectroweak and Higgs Physics
Electroweak and Higgs Physics Lecture 2 : Higgs Mechanism in the Standard and Supersymmetric Models Alexei Raspereza DESY Summer Student Program Hamburg August 2017 Standard Model (Summary) Building blocks
More informationReφ = 1 2. h ff λ. = λ f
I. THE FINE-TUNING PROBLEM A. Quadratic divergence We illustrate the problem of the quadratic divergence in the Higgs sector of the SM through an explicit calculation. The example studied is that of the
More informationTowards particle physics models from fuzzy extra dimensions
Towards particle physics models from fuzzy extra dimensions Athanasios Chatzistavrakidis National Technical University and NCSR Demokritos, Athens Joint work with H.Steinacker and G.Zoupanos Particles
More informationThe SU(3) Group SU(3) and Mesons Contents Quarks and Anti-quarks SU(3) and Baryons Masses and Symmetry Breaking Gell-Mann Okubo Mass Formulae Quark-Mo
Lecture 2 Quark Model The Eight Fold Way Adnan Bashir, IFM, UMSNH, Mexico August 2014 Culiacán Sinaloa The SU(3) Group SU(3) and Mesons Contents Quarks and Anti-quarks SU(3) and Baryons Masses and Symmetry
More informationSM, EWSB & Higgs. MITP Summer School 2017 Joint Challenges for Cosmology and Colliders. Homework & Exercises
SM, EWSB & Higgs MITP Summer School 017 Joint Challenges for Cosmology and Colliders Homework & Exercises Ch!"ophe Grojean Ch!"ophe Grojean DESY (Hamburg) Humboldt University (Berlin) ( christophe.grojean@desy.de
More informationUpdates in the Finite N=1 SU(5) Model
Updates in the Finite N=1 SU(5) Model Gregory Patellis Physics Department, NTUA Sven Heinemeyer, Myriam Mondragon, Nicholas Tracas, George Zoupanos arxiv:1802.04666 March 31, 2018 Updates in the Finite
More informationarxiv: v1 [hep-ph] 24 Feb 2015
LPT-Orsay-15-16 FTPI MINN 15/06 UMN TH 340/15 IPMU15-000 KCL-PH-TH/015-09 arxiv:150.0699v1 [hep-ph] 4 Feb 015 Dark Matter and Gauge Coupling Unification in Non-supersymmetric SO(10) Grand Unified Models
More informationNeutrino Models with Flavor Symmetry
Neutrino Models with Flavor Symmetry November 11, 2010 Mini Workshop on Neutrinos IPMU, Kashiwa, Japan Morimitsu Tanimoto (Niigata University) with H. Ishimori, Y. Shimizu, A. Watanabe 1 Plan of my talk
More informationAn extended standard model and its Higgs geometry from the matrix model
An extended standard model and its Higgs geometry from the matrix model Jochen Zahn Universität Wien based on arxiv:1401.2020 joint work with Harold Steinacker Bayrischzell, May 2014 Motivation The IKKT
More informationDark matter and IceCube neutrinos
IL NUOVO CIMENTO 38 C (2015) 31 DOI 10.1393/ncc/i2015-15031-4 Colloquia: IFAE 2014 Dark matter and IceCube neutrinos R. Biondi Dipartimento di Scienze Fisiche e Chimiche, Università degli Studi di L Aquila,
More informationF. Börkeroth, F. J. de Anda, I. de Medeiros Varzielas, S. F. King. arxiv:
F. Börkeroth, F. J. de Anda, I. de Medeiros Varzielas, S. F. King S FLASY 2015 arxiv:1503.03306 Standard Model Gauge theory SU(3)C X SU(2)L X U(1)Y Standard Model Gauge theory SU(3)C X SU(2)L X U(1)Y SM:
More informationParticles I, Tutorial notes Sessions I-III: Roots & Weights
Particles I, Tutorial notes Sessions I-III: Roots & Weights Kfir Blum June, 008 Comments/corrections regarding these notes will be appreciated. My Email address is: kf ir.blum@weizmann.ac.il Contents 1
More informationLittle Higgs Models Theory & Phenomenology
Little Higgs Models Theory Phenomenology Wolfgang Kilian (Karlsruhe) Karlsruhe January 2003 How to make a light Higgs (without SUSY) Minimal models The Littlest Higgs and the Minimal Moose Phenomenology
More informationSuccessful Leptogenesis in the Left-Right Symmetric Seesaw Mechanism
Successful Leptogenesis in the Left-Right Symmetric Seesaw Mechanism Pierre Hosteins Patras University 13th November 2007 Brussels P.H., S. Lavignac and C. Savoy, Nucl. Phys. B755, arxiv:hep-ph/0606078
More informationThe Anomalous Magnetic Moment of the Muon in the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model for tan β =
The Anomalous Magnetic Moment of the Muon in the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model for tan β = Markus Bach Institut für Kern- und Teilchenphysik Technische Universität Dresden IKTP Institute Seminar
More informationLecture 18 - Beyond the Standard Model
Lecture 18 - Beyond the Standard Model Why is the Standard Model incomplete? Grand Unification Baryon and Lepton Number Violation More Higgs Bosons? Supersymmetry (SUSY) Experimental signatures for SUSY
More informationSUSY QCD. Consider a SUSY SU(N) with F flavors of quarks and squarks
SUSY gauge theories SUSY QCD Consider a SUSY SU(N) with F flavors of quarks and squarks Q i = (φ i, Q i, F i ), i = 1,..., F, where φ is the squark and Q is the quark. Q i = (φ i, Q i, F i ), in the antifundamental
More informationSUPERSYMETRY FOR ASTROPHYSICISTS
Dark Matter: From the Cosmos to the Laboratory SUPERSYMETRY FOR ASTROPHYSICISTS Jonathan Feng University of California, Irvine 29 Jul 1 Aug 2007 SLAC Summer Institute 30 Jul 1 Aug 07 Feng 1 Graphic: N.
More informationMinimal Supersymmetric Standard Model (MSSM). Nausheen R. Shah
Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model (MSSM). Nausheen R. Shah June 8, 2003 1 Introduction Even though the Standard Model has had years of experimental success, it has been known for a long time that it
More informationNeutrino Masses SU(3) C U(1) EM, (1.2) φ(1, 2) +1/2. (1.3)
Neutrino Masses Contents I. The renormalizable Standard Model 1 II. The non-renormalizable Standard Model III. The See-Saw Mechanism 4 IV. Vacuum Oscillations 5 V. The MSW effect 7 VI. Experimental results
More informationEmbedding the Pentagon
Preprint typeset in JHEP style - PAPER VERSION hep-th07 scipp-07/13 Embedding the Pentagon arxiv:0708.0022v2 [hep-th] 26 Sep 2007 T. Banks Department of Physics University of California, Santa Cruz, CA
More informationNon-Abelian SU(2) H and Two-Higgs Doublets
Non-Abelian SU(2) H and Two-Higgs Doublets Technische Universität Dortmund Wei- Chih Huang 25 Sept 2015 Kavli IPMU arxiv:1510.xxxx(?) with Yue-Lin Sming Tsai, Tzu-Chiang Yuan Plea Please do not take any
More informationHidden two-higgs doublet model
Hidden two-higgs doublet model C, Uppsala and Lund University SUSY10, Bonn, 2010-08-26 1 Two Higgs doublet models () 2 3 4 Phenomenological consequences 5 Two Higgs doublet models () Work together with
More informationSupersymmetry, Dark Matter, and Neutrinos
Supersymmetry, Dark Matter, and Neutrinos The Standard Model and Supersymmetry Dark Matter Neutrino Physics and Astrophysics The Physics of Supersymmetry Gauge Theories Gauge symmetry requires existence
More informationYang-Hwan, Ahn (KIAS)
Yang-Hwan, Ahn (KIAS) Collaboration with Paolo Gondolo (Univ. of Utah) Appear to 1311.xxxxx The 3 rd KIAS workshop on Particle physics and Cosmology 1 The SM as an effective theory Several theoretical
More information125 GeV Higgs Boson and Gauge Higgs Unification
125 GeV Higgs Boson and Gauge Higgs Unification Nobuchika Okada The University of Alabama Miami 2013, Fort Lauderdale, Dec. 12 18, 2013 Discovery of Higgs boson at LHC! 7/04/2012 Standard Model Higgs boson
More informationNotes on SU(3) and the Quark Model
Notes on SU() and the Quark Model Contents. SU() and the Quark Model. Raising and Lowering Operators: The Weight Diagram 4.. Triangular Weight Diagrams (I) 6.. Triangular Weight Diagrams (II) 8.. Hexagonal
More informationSpectral Triples and Pati Salam GUT
Ma148b Spring 2016 Topics in Mathematical Physics References A.H. Chamseddine, A. Connes, W. van Suijlekom, Beyond the Spectral Standard Model: Emergence of Pati-Salam Unification, JHEP 1311 (2013) 132
More informationUnitary rotations. October 28, 2014
Unitary rotations October 8, 04 The special unitary group in dimensions It turns out that all orthogonal groups SO n), rotations in n real dimensions) may be written as special cases of rotations in a
More informationSpectral Triples and Supersymmetry
Ma148b Spring 2016 Topics in Mathematical Physics Reference: Wim Beenakker, Thijs van den Broek, Walter van Suijlekom, Supersymmetry and Noncommutative Geometry, Springer, 2015 (also all images in this
More informationHeterotic Brane World
Heterotic Brane World Hans Peter Nilles Physikalisches Institut Universität Bonn Germany Based on work with S. Förste, P. Vaudrevange and A. Wingerter hep-th/0406208, to appear in Physical Review D Heterotic
More informationLie Algebras in Particle Physics
Lie Algebras in Particle Physics Second Edition Howard Georgi S WieW Advanced Book Program A Member of the Perseus Books Group Contents Why Group Theory? 1 1 Finite Groups 2 1.1 Groups and representations
More informationUnified Dark Matter. SUSY2014 Stephen J. Lonsdale. The University of Melbourne. In collaboration with R.R. Volkas. arxiv:
arxiv:1407.4192 Unified Dark Matter SUSY2014 Stephen J. Lonsdale The University of Melbourne In collaboration with R.R. Volkas Unified Dark Matter Motivation: Asymmetric dark matter models Asymmetric symmetry
More informationThe Yang and Yin of Neutrinos
The Yang and Yin of Neutrinos Ernest Ma Physics and Astronomy Department University of California Riverside, CA 92521, USA The Yang and Yin of Neutrinos (2018) back to start 1 Contents Introduction The
More informationAspects of Symmetry Breaking in Grand Unified Theories
SISSA Scuola Internazionale Superiore di Studi Avanzati arxiv:1110.310v1 [hep-ph] 14 Oct 011 Aspects of Symmetry Breaking in Grand Unified Theories Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor Philosophiae
More informationGroup Theory - QMII 2017
Group Theory - QMII 017 Reminder Last time we said that a group element of a matrix lie group can be written as an exponent: U = e iαaxa, a = 1,..., N. We called X a the generators, we have N of them,
More informationAspects of Symmetry Breaking in Grand Unified Theories
SISSA Scuola Internazionale Superiore di Studi Avanzati Aspects of Symmetry Breaking in Grand Unified Theories Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor Philosophiæ Supervisor: Dr. Stefano Bertolini Candidate:
More informationUnification without Doublet-Triplet Splitting SUSY Exotics at the LHC
Unification without Doublet-Triplet Splitting SUSY Exotics at the LHC Jürgen Reuter Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg W. Kilian, JR, PLB B642 (2006), 81; and work in progress (with F. Deppisch, W. Kilian)
More informationS 3 Symmetry as the Origin of CKM Matrix
S 3 Symmetry as the Origin of CKM Matrix Ujjal Kumar Dey Physical Research Laboratory October 25, 2015 Based on: PRD 89, 095025 and arxiv:1507.06509 Collaborators: D. Das and P. B. Pal 1 / 25 Outline 1
More informationModels of Dynamical Supersymmetry Breaking from a SU(2k+3) Gauge Model* Abstract
SLAC-PUB-7174 hep-th/9605119 May 1996 Models of Dynamical Supersymmetry Breaking from a SU(2k+3) Gauge Model* Chih-Lung Chou Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Stanford University, Stanford, California
More informationThe Higgs discovery - a portal to new physics
The Higgs discovery - a portal to new physics Department of astronomy and theoretical physics, 2012-10-17 1 / 1 The Higgs discovery 2 / 1 July 4th 2012 - a historic day in many ways... 3 / 1 July 4th 2012
More informationMatter vs Anti-matter
Baryogenesis Matter vs Anti-matter Earth, Solar system made of baryons B Our Galaxy Anti-matter in cosmic rays p/p O(10 4 ) secondary Our Galaxy is made of baryons p galaxy p + p p + p + p + p galaxy γ
More information2T-physics and the Standard Model of Particles and Forces Itzhak Bars (USC)
2T-physics and the Standard Model of Particles and Forces Itzhak Bars (USC) hep-th/0606045 Success of 2T-physics for particles on worldlines. Field theory version of 2T-physics. Standard Model in 4+2 dimensions.
More informationarxiv:hep-ph/ v1 17 Dec 2002
OSU-HEP-02-17 hep-ph/0212245 December 2002 arxiv:hep-ph/0212245v1 17 Dec 2002 Natural R Parity, µ term, and Fermion Mass Hierarchy From Discrete Gauge Symmetries K.S. Babu 1, Ilia Gogoladze 2 and Kai Wang
More informationThe Strong Interaction and LHC phenomenology
The Strong Interaction and LHC phenomenology Juan Rojo STFC Rutherford Fellow University of Oxford Theoretical Physics Graduate School course Lecture 2: The QCD Lagrangian, Symmetries and Feynman Rules
More informationPhysics beyond the standard model with S 2 extra-space
Physics beyond the standard model with S 2 extra-space Programs in Science and Engineering Course in Material Science Student ID: 07DS008 Takaaki Nomura Doctoral Course Supervisor: Associate Professor
More informationGrand Unification and Proton Decay
Grand Unification and Proton Decay Borut Bajc J. Stefan Institute, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia 0 Reminder This is written for a series of 4 lectures at ICTP Summer School 2011. The choice of topics and the
More informationAutomatic CP Invariance and Flavor Symmetry
PRL-TH-95/21 Automatic CP Invariance and Flavor Symmetry arxiv:hep-ph/9602228v1 6 Feb 1996 Gautam Dutta and Anjan S. Joshipura Theory Group, Physical Research Laboratory Navrangpura, Ahmedabad 380 009,
More informationAlgebraic Theory of Entanglement
Algebraic Theory of (arxiv: 1205.2882) 1 (in collaboration with T.R. Govindarajan, A. Queiroz and A.F. Reyes-Lega) 1 Physics Department, Syracuse University, Syracuse, N.Y. and The Institute of Mathematical
More informationIntroduction to Group Theory
Chapter 10 Introduction to Group Theory Since symmetries described by groups play such an important role in modern physics, we will take a little time to introduce the basic structure (as seen by a physicist)
More informationLecture 10. September 28, 2017
Lecture 10 September 28, 2017 The Standard Model s QCD theory Comments on QED calculations Ø The general approach using Feynman diagrams Ø Example of a LO calculation Ø Higher order calculations and running
More informationarxiv: v1 [hep-ph] 11 Oct 2013
Challenging the minimal supersymmetric SU(5) model 1 Borut Bajc,, Stéphane Lavignac and Timon Mede J. Stefan Institute, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia Department of Physics, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana,
More informationExtra-d geometry might also explain flavor
Flavor and CP Solutions via~gim in Bulk RS LR with Liam Fitzpatrick, Gilad Perez -w/ Liam Fitzpatrick, Clifford Cheung Introduction Lots of attention devoted to weak scale Flavor and CP remain outstanding
More informationElements of Grand Unification
Elements of Grand Unification Problems with the Standard Model The Two Paths Grand Unification The Georgi-Glashow SU(5) Model Beyond SU(5) arger Groups Supersymmetry Extra Dimensions Additional Implications
More information