arxiv: v1 [math.ho] 4 Jul 2007

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "arxiv: v1 [math.ho] 4 Jul 2007"

William Bradford
5 years ago
Views:

1 arxiv: v [math.ho] 4 Jul 2007 A double demonstration of a theorem of Newton, which gives a relation between the coefficient of an algebraic equation and the sums of the powers of its roots Leonhard Euler. After an algebraic equation has been given, either from fractions or by irrationals, and reduced to this form x n Ax n +Bx n 2 Cx n 3 +Dx n 4 Ex n 5 + ±N = 0, one demonstrates in analysis that the equation always has as many roots, either real or imaginary, as unities are contained in the exponent n of the highest power. Then indeed it is no less certain that if all the roots of this equation are α,β,γ,δ,ǫ,...,ν, the coefficients of the terms of the equation A,B,C,D,E are comprised thus from them A = sum of all the roots = α+β +γ +δ + +ν, B = sum of the products of two = αβ +αγ +αδ +βγ +, C = sum of the products of three = αβγ +, D = sum of the products of four = αβγδ +, E = sum of the products of five = αβγδǫ+, and finally the last term N is the product of all the roots αβγδ ν. 2. Now it will help me to simply and briefly explain this theorem, whose demonstration I give in this paper, if I first introduce some notation. Let α designate the sum of all the roots, α 2 the sum of the squares of the roots, α 3 the sum of the cubes of the roots, α 4 the sum of the biquadrates of the roots, Presented to the Berlin Academy on January 2, 747. Originally published as Demonstratio gemina theorematis Neutoniani, quo traditur relatio inter coefficientes cuiusvis aequationis algebraicae et summas potestatum radicum eiusdem, Opuscula varii argumenti 2 (750), E53 in the Eneström index. Translated from the Latin by Jordan Bell, School of Mathematics and Statistics, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada. jbell3@connect.carleton.ca

2 and so on, so that it will be α = α +β +γ +δ +ǫ + +ν, α 2 = α 2 +β 2 +γ 2 +δ 2 +ǫ 2 + +ν 2, α 3 = α 3 +β 3 +γ 3 +δ 3 +ǫ 3 + +ν 3, α 4 = α 4 +β 4 +γ 4 +δ 4 +ǫ 4 + +ν 4, α 5 = α 5 +β 5 +γ 5 +δ 5 +ǫ 5 + +ν 5 3. With the rule for this sign explained, Newton affirms that these sums of powers, which are formed from all the roots, can thus be defined by the coefficients of the equation A,B,C,D,E α = A, α 2 = A α 3 = A α 4 = A α 5 = A α 6 = A α 2B, α 2 B α 3 B α 4 B α 5 B α+3c, α 2 +C α 3 +C α 4 +C α 4D, α 2 D α 3 D α+5e, α 2 +E α 6F Newton does not give any demonstration of this theorem, but rather seems to conclude its truth by continued examples. First, as no demonstration is required that α = A, and since A 2 = α 2 +β 2 +γ 2 +δ 2 +ǫ 2 ++2αβ +2αγ +2αδ +2βγ +2βδ +, it will be A 2 = α 2 +2B and hence α 2 = A 2 2B = Aα 2B; inasimilarwaythe truthofthe followingformulaecanbeshown, but continuing will take more work. 4. Though many have already shown the truth of this most useful theorem, their demonstrations are often based on rules of combinations, which, though 2

3 true, depend however on induction. I will thus offer here a double demonstration, the first of which completely avoids induction. Indeed the one from the analysis of the infinite is small, and though it may seem quite remote, everything comes together perfectly; however since it can reasonably be objected that the truth of this theorem should be obtained before the analysis of the infinite is come to, I add another demonstration, in which nothing is assumed beyond that which follows immediately from the nature of equations. Demonstration. 5. Let us put x n Ax n +Bx n 2 Cx n 3 + ±N =, and if the roots of the equation = 0, or values of x, are α,β,γ,δ,...,ν, whose number is = n, it will be from the nature of equations = (x α)(x β)(x γ)(x δ) (x ν) and by taking the logarithm we will obtain l = l(x α)+l(x β)+l(x γ)+l(x δ)+ +l(x ν). But if the differential of these formulae are now taken, it will be d = dx x α + dx x β + dx x γ + dx dx + + x δ x ν and so by dividing by dx it will become d dx = x α + x β + x γ + x δ + + x ν. Now let each of these fractions be converted into infinite geometric series in the usual way, as x α = x + α x 2 + α2 x 3 + α3 x 4 + α4 x 5 + α5 x 6 +, = x β x + β x 2 + β2 x 3 + β3 x 4 + β4 x 5 + β5 x 6 +, x γ x ν = x + γ x 2 + γ2 x 3 + γ3 x 4 + γ4 x 5 + γ5 x 6 + = x + ν x 2 + ν2 x 3 + ν3 x 4 + ν4 x 5 + ν5 x 6 + 3

4 Therefore by collecting these series together, using the signs explained above α, α 2, α 3, because the number of these series is = n, d dx = n x + x 2 α+ x 3 α 2 + x 4 α 3 + x 5 α On the other hand, since we have put = x n Ax n +Bx n 2 Cx n 3 +Dx n 4 ±N, it will similarly be, by taking differentials, d dx = nxn (n )Ax n 2 +(n 2)Bx n 3 (n 3)Cx n 4 +(n 4)Dx n 5 and then let the above formula be put in the same form as d dx, so that it would be d dx = nxn (n )Ax n 2 +(n 2)Bx n 3 (n 3)Cx n 4 +(n 4)Dx n 5, x n Ax n +Bx n 2 Cx n 3 +Dx n 4 and this fraction will therefore be equal to the series found previously n x + x 2 α+ x 3 α 2 + x 4 α 3 + x 5 α 4 + Now if each expression found for d dx is multiplied by the one denominator this equation will result x n Ax n +Bx n 2 Cx n 3 +Dx n 4, nx n (n )Ax n 2 +(n 2)Bx n 3 (n 3)Cx n 4 +(n 4)Dx n 5 = nx n +x n 2 α +x n 3 α 2 +x n 4 α 3 +x n 5 α 4 + nax n 2 Ax n 3 α Ax n 4 α 2 Ax n 5 α 3 +nbx n 3 +Bx n 4 α +Bx n 5 α 2 + ncx n 4 Cx n 5 α +ndx n Now just as much as both the first terms nx n are equal, it is also necessary that the second, third, fourth are equal to each other; thus the following equations arise (n )A = α na, +(n 2)B = α 2 A α+nb, (n 3)C = α 3 A α 2 +B α nc, +(n 4)D = α 4 A α 3 +B α 2 C α+nd 4

5 and the law by which these equations progress is at immediately clear. Further, from these, the formulae can be obtained which comprise the theorem of Newton, namely α = A, α 2 = A α 2B, α 3 = A α 2 B α+3c, α 4 = A α 3 B α 2 +C α 4D, α 5 = A α 4 B α 3 +C α 2 D α+5e This is the first demonstration of the proposed theorem. Demonstration So this demonstration can be clearly understood, I will fix an equation of a determinate degree, but one can see that this extends equally well to any degree. Thus let the given equation be of the fifth degree x 5 Ax 4 +Bx 3 Cx 2 E = 0, all of whose roots are α,β,γ,δ,ǫ. Then because any root substituted in place of x satisfies the equation, it will be α 5 Aα 4 +Bα 3 Cα 2 +Dα E = 0, β 5 Aβ 4 +Bβ 3 Cβ 2 +Dβ E = 0, γ 5 Aγ 4 +Bγ 3 Cγ 2 +Dγ E = 0, δ 5 Aδ 4 +Bδ 3 Cδ 2 +Dδ E = 0, ǫ 5 Aǫ 4 +Bǫ 3 Cǫ 2 +Dǫ E = 0. These equations can be collected into one sum, and using the above sign ( 2) one will have α 5 A α 4 +B α 3 C α 2 +D α 5E = 0 or α 5 = A α 4 B α 3 +C α 2 D α+5e. 9. It is clear then that if the given equation were of any degree x n Ax n +Bx n 2 Cx n 3 +Dx n 4 ±Mx N = 0, 5

6 where in the last term, the top of the ambiguous signs occurs if the exponent n is an odd number, and the bottom if even, it will likewise be α n = A α n B α n 2 +C α n 3 M α±nn, where α indicates any root of this equation. Thus the truth of the Theorem of Newton is now shown for this one case. It therefore remains for us to demonstrate the truth of it for both the higher and for the lower powers of the roots. 0. Indeed for the higher powers the same argument applies; for if the values α,β,γ,δ,ǫ satisfy the equation x 5 Ax 4 +Bx 3 Cx 2 +Dx E = 0, then they also will satisfy the following equations x 6 Ax 5 +Bx 4 Cx 3 +Dx 2 Ex = 0, x 7 Ax 6 +Bx 5 Cx 4 +Dx 3 Ex 2 = 0, x 8 Ax 7 +Bx 6 Cx 5 +Dx 4 Ex 3 = 0, Therefore also if in each equation all the values α,β,γ,δ,ǫ are substituted for x and the aggregate collected, it will be α 6 = A α 5 B α 4 +C α 3 D α 2 +E α, α 7 = A α 6 B α 5 +C α 4 D α 3 +E α 2, α 8 = A α 7 +C α 5 D α 4 +E α 3. Thus if α denotes any root of this equation x n Ax n +Bx n 2 Cx n 3 +Dx n 4 ±Mx N = 0, it will not only be, as we have already found, α n = A α n B α n 2 +C α n 3 D α n 4 + M α±nn, but by proceeding to higher powers it will also be α n+ = A α n B α n +C α n 2 D α n 3 + M α n+2 = A α n+ B α n +C α n D α n 2 + M α n+3 = A α n+2 B α n+ +C α n D α n + M α 2 ±N α 3 ±N α 4 ±N α, α 2, α 3, 6

7 and indeed in general, if any number m is added to n, it will be α n+m = A α n+m B α n+m 2 +C α n+m 3 M α m+ ±N α m. It should be noted here that if m = 0, because all the powers α 0 =,β 0 =,γ 0 = and the number of these letters = n, then α 0 = n, and in this case the first formula that was found is included in this expression. 2. This expression could also be used if a negative number is taken for m, and then for the assumed equation of the fifth degree x 5 Ax 4 +Bx 3 Cx 2 +Dx E = 0 the following formulae would respectively occur α 4 = A α 3 B α 2 +C α D α 0 +E α, α 3 = A α 2 B α +C α 0 D α +E α 2, α 2 = A α B α 0 +C α D α 2 +E, but these formulae are different from those which the theorem contains. For it needs to be demonstrated that α 4 = A α 3 B α 2 +C α 4D, α 3 = A α 2 B α+3c, α 2 = A α 2B, α = A. I will therefore show the truth of these formulae in the following way. 3. Namely, given an equation of the fifth degree x 5 Ax 4 +Bx 3 Cx 2 +Dx E = 0 α 3 let us form the following equations of lower degrees by using its coefficients I. x A = 0. Let p be its root. II. x 2 Ax+B = 0. Let q be any root. III. x 3 Ax 2 +Bx C = 0. Let r be any root. IV. x 4 Ax 3 +Bx 2 Cx+D = 0. Let s be any root. 7

8 The roots of these equations, even though they are different from each other, constitute however for all these equations the same sum = A. Next, with the first removed, the sum of the products from two roots will everywhere be the same = B. Then the sum of the products from three roots will everywhere = C, besides of course equations I and II, where C does not occur. Similarly in the given equation IV the sum of the products from four roots will be the same = D. 4. Therefore in the equations of lower degrees, whose roots are denoted respectively by the letters p,q,r,s, if the letter α denotes an arbitrary root of the given equation, it will be α = s = r = q = p, α 2 = s 2 = r 2 = q 2, α 3 = s 3 = r 3, α 4 = s 4. But on the other hand, it follows, from what we demonstrated above in 9, that p = A, q 2 = A q 2B, r 3 = A r 2 B r+3c, s 4 = A s 3 B s 2 +C s 4D. Now therefore for the given equation of the fifth degree x 5 Ax 4 +Bx 3 Cx 2 +Dx E = 0 these formulae arise α = A, = A = A = A α 2 α 3 α 4 α 2B, α 2 B α 3 B α+3c, α 2 +C α 4D. 8

9 6. Therefore in a given equation of any degree x n Ax n +Bx n 2 Cx n 3 +Dx n 4 ±N = 0 if the letter α indicates an arbitrary root, it will be α = A, α 2 = A α 2B, α 3 = A α 2 B α+3c, α 4 = A α 3 B α 2 +C α 4D, α 5 = A α 4 B α 3 +C α 2 D α+5e In this way the truth of the Theorem of Newton is also demonstrated. 9

How Euler Did It. by Ed Sandifer. A theorem of Newton %! 3 =! 3 + " 3 + # 3 +!+ $ 3, %! =! + " + # +!+ $, ! 2 =! 2 + " 2 + # 2 +!

How Euler Did It. by Ed Sandifer. A theorem of Newton %! 3 =! 3 + 3 + # 3 +!+ $ 3, %! =! + + # +!+ $, ! 2 =! 2 + 2 + # 2 +! How Euler Did It A theorem of Newton April 2008 by Ed Sandifer Early in our algebra careers we learn the basic relationship between the coefficients of a monic quadratic polynomial and the roots of that